Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 29;143(12):3763–3775. doi: 10.1093/brain/awaa334

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Comparison of chronological age with DNA methylation age derived using four DNA methylation age clocks. Shown are comparisons of chronological age with predicted age in (A) the testing dataset (n = 350 cortical samples) and (B) the independent test dataset (n = 1221 cortical samples). DNAm age was predicted using four DNA methylation age clocks: (i) our novel DNAmClockCortical; (ii) Horvath’s DNAmClockMulti; (iii) Zhang’s DNAmClockBlood and (iv) Levine’s DNAmClockPheno. The x-axis represents chronological age (years) and the y-axis represents predicted age (years). Each point on the plot represents an individual sample. Our cortical clock out-performed the three alternative DNAm clocks across all accuracy statistics. DNA methylation age estimates derived using the DNAmClockMulti [A(ii) testing and B(ii) independent test] and the DNAmClockBlood [A(iii) testing and B(iii) independent test] appear to have a non-linear relationship with chronological age.