Abstract
The vagus nerve is the largest autonomic nerve, innervating nearly every organ in the body. “Vagal tone” is a clinical measure believed to indicate overall levels of vagal activity, but is measured indirectly through the heart rate variability (HRV). Abnormal HRV has been associated with many severe conditions such as diabetes, heart failure, and hypertension. However, vagal tone has never been directly measured, leading to disagreements in its interpretation and influencing the effectiveness of vagal therapies. Using custom carbon nanotube yarn electrodes, we were able to chronically record neural activity from the left cervical vagus in both anesthetized and non-anesthetized rats. Here we show that tonic vagal activity does not correlate with common HRV metrics with or without anesthesia. Although we found that average vagal activity is increased during inspiration compared to expiration, this respiratory-linked signal was not correlated with HRV either. These results represent a clear advance in neural recording technology but also point to the need for a re-interpretation of the link between HRV and “vagal tone”.
Subject terms: Autonomic nervous system, Biomedical engineering
Introduction
The autonomic nervous system governs subconscious control and sensing of visceral organ activity. It has recently become a focus for novel therapeutic technologies, such as “bioelectronic medicine”1. The vagus nerve is the largest autonomic nerve, innervating nearly every organ in the body2. Its widespread innervation has made the vagus nerve a target for therapeutic interventions, with vagus nerve stimulation therapies being used to treat many diseases, from epilepsy to rheumatoid arthritis to depression3–7.
While vagus nerve activity has not been directly measured in these diseases, heart rate variability (HRV) is a clinical measure presumed to assess vagal activity, often termed “vagal tone”8. Abnormal vagal tone has been associated with many severe conditions such as diabetes, heart failure, and hypertension9–15, and with worse patient outcomes16–18. Yet, vagal tone has only been measured indirectly until now19. Additionally, the physiological mechanism underlying HRV has been debated in literature: some believe HRV to be representative of overall vagal activity18–21, while others claim HRV is only driven by cardiac vagal activity, or a combination of cardiac vagal efferents and baroreceptor afferents22–24. HRV, whether representative of overall vagal activity or only a small subset of vagal fibers, may also be driven by phasic vagal activity related to respiration, rather than the tonic level22,25,26. Additionally, there are a large number of metrics that can be used to measure HRV, including time-based, frequency-based, and non-linear measures19,27. Unfortunately, there is not a clear consensus on the best HRV metric, leading to a lack of clarity when it comes to interpreting results. This is further complicated by the fact that many of these metrics are highly correlated with each other19. Here, direct, simultaneous measurement of vagal activity and heart rate are used to determine if any of these HRV metrics are actually related to tonic or phasic vagal activity.
Despite the importance of the vagus nerve, very little is understood about the role it plays in normal and pathological function, and how vagal stimulation can improve outcomes in some patients28. Previous physiological studies of the vagus nerve have been limited, due to difficulties recording chronic signals in the vagus (and other small autonomic nerves)29–32. Extraneural cuff electrodes, while useful for stimulation, suffer from small signal-to-noise ratio, and can be difficult to implement in small autonomic nerves such as the rat vagus nerve (diameter ~ 250 to 500 µm). Intraneural electrodes can provide higher signal-to-noise ratios, but many suffer from poor chronic stability and low durability due to the large size and low flexibility of the electrodes relative to the neural tissue. As a result, recordings from the vagus nerve have been largely limited to non-survival experiments, including both whole nerve recordings (using hook or cuff electrodes), or recordings from single fibers. We previously reported on the development of a novel recording technique for chronic intrafascicular recording using carbon nanotube yarn (CNTY) electrodes, resulting in high-quality signals in the rat vagus nerve for up to 10 weeks after implantation33. CNTY electrodes are small (10 µm diameter), and highly flexible with low-impedance, creating an axon-like interface that allows high-SNR recordings in small autonomic nerves.
In this study, we further refined the CNTY chronic recording method, improving electrode manufacture, surgical technique, vagal signal processing, and developing a technique for chronic recording in awake, behaving animals. We report here the first direct chronic recordings of natural vagal activity in rats, and results which elucidate the relationship between HRV, true vagal tone, and respiratory vagal activity.
Results
Chronic recording in the vagus nerve
Chronic recording in the rat vagus nerve has proven challenging, with the majority of vagus nerve studies being conducted under acute or semi-chronic conditions. Signals have been recorded acutely from the vagus nerve using extraneural cuff electrodes; however, these electrodes tend to have low SNR due to the insulating perineurium attenuating the neural signals, and restricting recordings to the outer layers of axons. Additionally, vagal recordings have only been carried out under the influence of anesthesia, which is known to alter autonomic activity. Thus, we aimed to record intraneural vagal signals chronically in the rat using CNTY electrodes, both with and without anesthesia. We have previously described implantation of these electrodes by winding the CNTY around a tungsten microneurography needle for anesthetized recording; here, we describe a novel method which simplifies electrode preparation and implantation while increasing successful surgical implants. The stability of these electrodes paired with an improved recording setup also allow for the first ever recordings of vagal activity from awake, behaving rats. Figure 1 shows implantation of the electrodes using this novel suture method, and Fig. 2a shows the chronic awake recording system.
Figure 1.
Implantation of CNTY electrodes using the suture insertion method. In all images, the CNT is on the left, while the suture is on the right. (a) Not-to-scale schematic showing the entire electrode assembly. (b) Detailed schematic of the de-insulated CNTY and the fisherman’s knot which secures the electrode to the suture. (c) CNTY, suture, and de-insulated portion of the electrode. Scale bar represents 100 µm. A small section of parylene-C is removed by laser. Arrow shows the fisherman’s knot which secures the CNTY to the suture, and helps to keep the electrode in place after implantation. (d) Inset image shows the removal of ~ 200 µm parylene-C insulation. (e) Implanted CNTY. Scale bar represents 500 µm. Arrow shows the fisherman’s knot. After implantation of two electrodes, the electrodes and nerve are covered with fibrin glue to secure the electrodes in place.
Figure 2.
Awake recording setup and sample data. Red bars show electrode noise levels (calculated from electrode impedance and input amplifier noise). (a) Chronic non-anesthetized recording setup. The rat has a connector mounted to the skull headcap, where a custom amplifier board (inset image) is connected. The cable is routed to a commutator which allows the rat to move around without the cable becoming tangled or twisted. A metal spring is used to protect the cable from being chewed on. This setup can be used for 24/7 continuous recording (purple glow is glare from an infrared-equipped camera). (b) Quiet baseline, where there are few/no spikes significantly above the baseline. This is the most common type of activity observed, especially under anesthesia. (c) Intermittent spiking, where spikes are observed but appear and disappear quickly. (d) Spike bursting, where long bursts of spikes (of varying amplitude and firing rate) occur for periods of 30 s or longer. (e) Large intermittent spiking, where very large spikes (> 100 µV pk-pk) are observed in short bursts. This is most common without anesthesia but occurs with anesthesia as well. (f) Simultaneously recorded ECG. (g). Heart rate calculated from ECG.
Vagal activity was recorded in anesthetized and awake, behaving rats for up to 11 weeks using custom-ultra-low noise electronics and connector headcap (see Fig. 2a). The recorded activity varied in both awake and anesthetized rats, and included large spontaneous spiking activity (individual spikes as well as bursting). Figure 2b shows an example of baseline activity; the red box represents estimated peak-to-peak noise based on electrode impedance and input amplifier noise34. Spiking activity occurred both with and without anesthesia, but was more common in awake animals. Figure 2c,d show examples of short and long spike bursts, while Fig. 2e shows large spiking activity, including individual spikes and short bursts with > 100 µV peak-to-peak voltage. Spikes were detected via thresholding (6 times the baseline RMS), and peak-to-peak spike amplitude was compared to baseline RMS to calculate SNR. Average spike SNR was found to be 16.9 ± 5.4. Figure 2f shows an example of the simultaneously recorded ECG, with Fig. 2g showing the associated heart rate. All of these activity types were observed both with and without anesthesia, though spiking, spike bursting, and large spikes were more common without anesthesia, while quiet baseline was more common with anesthesia. Due to the many organs innervated by the vagus nerve, decoding the function of individual spikes or groups of spikes is a significant challenge. However, average vagal activity can be calculated to directly compare measured vagal tone to HRV.
Tonic vagal activity is not correlated with HRV
While there is some controversy surrounding the physiological significance of HRV measurements, they are accepted by many as a viable clinical method to estimate parasympathetic (or vagal) and/or sympathetic tone. However, there is very little understanding about how well HRV actually represents overall vagal activity. Using intraneural CNTY electrodes, we measured tonic vagal activity in the left cervical vagus chronically. Vagal ENG and ECG were recorded simultaneously for 10 min while animals were maintained at 2% isoflurane. Electrode noise was estimated for each recording from electrode impedance (Johnson noise) and input amplifier noise. This electrode noise was subtracted from the average RMS for each 10-min recording to obtain a measurement of vagal tone. Across all animals, vagal tone under isoflurane anesthesia was 1.03 ± 0.48 µV RMS (63 recordings from 6 animals). Commonly used HRV metrics were calculated from the ECG recording using ADInstruments’ Labchart HRV module. HRV metrics used were standard deviation of the R–R interval (SDRR), standard deviation of the heart rate (SD Rate), the root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD), high frequency (HF) power, HF power as a percentage of total power (HF%), and low frequency to high frequency power ratio (LF/HF). The high frequency range was defined as 0.5–2 Hz, while the low frequency range was 0.2–0.5 Hz. These 6 metrics were chosen as they are the most common measures in both time and frequency domains. Other candidate metrics (such as nonlinear metrics) were not used due to their high correlation with one of the 6 measures used. Measurements were taken from 1–11 weeks after implantation in 6 rats, and the Pearson correlation and significance between tonic neural RMS and the HRV metrics was calculated for each animal; p values and average correlation coefficients for all animals are shown in Table 1. Supplemental Table 1 shows correlation coefficients and correlation p values for each animal separately, and Supplemental Fig. 1 shows a scatterplot of the tonic vagal activity with each HRV metric investigated for one animal. None of the HRV metrics were found to have a correlation significantly different from zero across all 6 animals.
Table 1.
Correlations of anesthetized baseline vagal activity with HRV.
| Correlation between anesthetized baseline vagal activity and HRV | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SDRR | CVRR | RMSSD | HF | HF% | LF/HF | |
| Correlation Coefficients | − 0.13 ± 0.35 | − 0.12 ± 0.34 | − 0.19 ± 0.37 | − 0.044 ± 0.38 | − 0.0026 ± 0.50 | 0.072 ± 0.27 |
| p value | 0.40 | 0.42 | 0.90 | 0.79 | 0.98 | 0.54 |
Data shown are the averages for six animals (63 total recordings). None of the six HRV metrics have correlations significantly different from zero (Bonferroni corrected significant level of p = 0.0083). Supplemental Table 1 shows individual correlations and p values for each animal.
Anesthesia is known to significantly change HRV, with isoflurane generally causing a decrease in HRV metrics associated with vagal activity. Previous studies have shown that generalized vagal activity is decreased by anesthesia; at the same time, individual fiber types display varied behavior, with both increases and decreases in firing. Due to the ambiguity of the relationship between vagal activity, HRV, and isoflurane anesthesia, we investigated the correlation between HRV and tonic vagal activity without anesthesia. Non-anesthetized recordings were collected from 4 animals, repeating the measurements described above to determine if tonic vagal activity was correlated with HRV under these conditions. In this case, vagal RMS was averaged over 3–10 min periods, with recordings conducted for 1–4 h. Across all animals, vagal tone without anesthesia was 2.38 ± 2.081 µV RMS (358 recordings from 4 animals) – a significant increase over anesthetized vagal tone (two-sample t-test, p = 5.3E−7). Hedge’s g was used to measure the effect size of increased vagal tone without isoflurane, yielding a medium effect size with g = 0.70. P values and average correlation coefficients between vagal tone and HRV for are shown in Table 2. Supplemental Table 2 shows correlation coefficients and correlation p values for each animal separately, and Supplemental Fig. 2 shows a scatterplot of the tonic vagal activity with each HRV metric investigated for one animal. Once again, none of the HRV metrics were found to have a correlation significantly different from zero across all 4 animals, though rat #6 did have significant correlations for several HRV measures (SDRR, CVRR, and LH/HF—positive correlation, HF%—negative correlation). From these measurements, we conclude that tonic vagal activity in both awake and in anesthetized animals has no consistent correlation with any HRV metrics, suggesting that HRV is not a valid estimate of cervical vagal tone, with or without anesthesia.
Table 2.
Correlations of non-anesthetized baseline vagal activity with HRV.
| Correlation between non-anesthetized baseline vagal activity and HRV | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SDRR | CVRR | RMSSD | HF | HF% | LF/HF | |
| Correlation Coefficients | 0.19 ± 0.23 | 0.26 ± 0.24 | 0.088 ± 0.10 | 0.028 ± 0.070 | − 0.077 ± 0.17 | 0.069 ± 0.22 |
| p value | 0.20 | 0.12 | 0.19 | 0.49 | 0.44 | 0.58 |
Data shown are the averages for four animals (358 total recordings). None of the six HRV metrics have correlations significantly different from zero (Bonferroni corrected significant level of p = 0.0083). Supplemental Table 2 shows individual correlations and p values for each animal.
Average vagal activity is increased during inspiration compared to expiration
The vagal/parasympathetic components of HRV are thought to arise from respiratory sinus arrhythmia, whereby inspiration and expiration cause natural changes in heart rate (heart rate typically increases during inspiration and decreases during expiration). Thus, HRV may not be a measure of tonic vagal activity, but rather phasic activity of the vagus nerve that is modulated with respiration. Coherent averaging is a technique which can be applied to increase SNR of a periodic signal by averaging the recording power based on a specific control trigger. Here, we use a trigger based on respiration to detect changes in vagal activity during different phases of respiration. An accelerometer attached to the torso of the animal was used to measure respiration under anesthesia while simultaneously recording ENG and ECG. Figure 3a shows an example of average vagal RMS (50 ms bin size) alongside the average respiratory trace recorded by the accelerometer for a 10-min recording period (497 breaths). Under isoflurane anesthesia, we observed a reversal of normal RSA. This effect is shown in Fig. 3b, where heart rate decreases during inspiration and increases during expiration. Additionally, we found that average vagal RMS was significantly increased during inspiration compared to expiration (Fig. 3c), with paired t-test of 61 recordings from 4 animals yielding a p value of 8.4E−7, with a medium effect size of Cohen’s d = 0.67. The average RMS during expiration was subtracted from the average during inspiration to obtain a quantitative measure of the phasic respiratory signal. This respiratory vagal difference (RVD), is consistent with predicted and measured vagal activity for lung afferents, and may also include the effect of respiration on other vagal fiber types.
Figure 3.

Average vagal activity measured during respiration, under anesthesia. (a) Sample dataset obtained from a 10-min recording showing the average accelerometer trace (red, used to measure inspiration and expiration phases), as well as average vagal RMS (blue, with shaded area representing the 95% confidence interval). (b) Sample dataset obtained from another 10-min recording showing the average accelerometer trace as well as the average heart rate (black). (c) Average values for the total anesthetized RMS (left) and the RMS difference between inspiration and expiration phases (right) using accelerometer to signal respiration (61 recordings total from 4 animals). The respiratory difference is 0.10 ± 0.15 µV RMS, which is significantly different from zero (p = 8.4E−7).
Respiratory vagal difference can be estimated from the ECG
Due to the presence of respiratory sinus arrythmia, it is possible to obtain a measure of respiration from the ECG. We investigated whether RVD could be measured using only the ECG and vagal ENG. Under normal conditions, HR decreases during expiration and increases during inspiration; this is reversed with isoflurane anesthesia. Figure 4 shows how heart rate changes were used to average ENG signal during respiration and estimate RVD both with and without anesthesia. Vagal RMS was calculated in 50 ms bins, and the bins were averaged during periods of heart rate increase (at least 0.25 s long) and heart rate decrease (at least 0.25 s long). Sample data are shown in Fig. 4g,h, while Fig. 5 shows that during inspiration there was an overall increase in vagal activity compared to expiration both with and without anesthesia (paired t-tests, p = 1.8E−5, 63 recordings in 6 animals with anesthesia, p = 5.4E−6, 358 recordings in 4 animals without anesthesia). Paired sample effect size, Cohen’s d, was measured for RVD with and without anesthesia. Under isoflurane anesthesia, RVD has a medium effect size, with d = 0.59, while without anesthesia, there is only a small effect size, with d = 0.24. RVD measured with both the accelerometer and heart rate methods (4 animals, 46 total recordings) showed high correlation between the accelerometer and heart rate methods (R = 0.96, p = 2.3E−26; see Supplementary Fig. 3). Thus, RVD can be estimated from the heart rate.
Figure 4.
Calculation of respiratory vagal difference (RVD) using heart rate to signal respiration. (a,b) Simultaneous recording of ECG (a) and vagal ENG (b). (c) Anesthetized ECG is used to calculate heart rate. Periods of increasing (green—expiration) and decreasing (purple—inspiration) heart rate are identified. (d) Filtered vagal ENG is divided into increasing/decreasing heart rate periods. (e,f) Steps described in panels (c) and (d) are repeated for non-anesthetized recordings, but inverted due to RSA reversal under anesthesia. (g) Average heart rate and vagal ENG during inspiration and expiration under anesthesia (sample data shown for a single 10-min recording). (h) Average heart rate and vagal ENG during inspiration and expiration without anesthesia (sample data shown for a single 10-min recording). RVD is calculated as the difference in vagal RMS between expiration and inspiration over a 10-min period.
Figure 5.

Average tonic RMS and respiratory vagal difference (RVD) using HR to signal respiration. (a) With anesthesia: Average RMS and 95% confidence interval in blue, RVD and 95% confidence interval in grey. Average RVD, calculated for 63 total recordings from 6 animals, was 0.0828 ± 0.14 µV RMS, which is significantly different from zero (p = 1.8E−5). (b) Without anesthesia: Average RMS and 95% confidence interval in blue, RVD and 95% confidence interval in grey. Average RVD, calculated for 63 total recordings from 6 animals, was 0.15 ± 0.60 µV RMS, which is significantly different from zero (p = 5.4E−6).
Respiratory vagal difference does not correlate with HRV
Variability in heart rate is closely related to respiration, with certain HRV metrics specifically measuring respiratory variations. The high frequency components (HF and HF%) specifically measure the power of HRV at respiratory frequencies and are thought to be an accurate representation of vagal tone. Due to this connection between the respiratory cycle and HRV, we hypothesized that the magnitude of RVD (which measures the changes in vagal activity during respiration) could be a better predictor of “vagal tone” (HRV), as compared to tonic activity. RVD, both with and without anesthesia, was compared to average HRV metrics. Tables 3 and 4 show p values and average correlations for all animals. Supplemental Tables 3 and 4 show correlations and correlation p values for each animal separately, and Supplemental Figs. 4 and 5 show sample scatterplots of the RVD with each HRV metric investigated with and without anesthesia. There are only two animals which show a significant correlation with an individual metric under anesthesia—rat #3, which is negatively correlated with RMSSD, and rat #4, which is positively correlated with HF%. No animals showed a significant correlation with any HRV measures without anesthesia. These data show that there is a clear change in vagal activity during respiration, as indicated by the RVD measurements. However, RVD is not correlated with any HRV metrics, suggesting that HRV is not a valid measure of overall phasic respiratory activity in the vagus.
Table 3.
Correlations of anesthetized respiratory vagal difference with HRV.
| Correlation between anesthetized respiratory vagal activity and HRV | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SDRR | CVRR | RMSSD | HF | HF% | LF/HF | |
| Correlation Coefficients | 0.041 ± 0.49 | 0.11 ± 0.53 | 0.042 ± 0.49 | − 0.035 ± 0.26 | 0.011 ± 0.64 | − 0.16 ± 0.52 |
| p value | 0.84 | 0.62 | 0.84 | 0.76 | 0.70 | 0.49 |
Data shown are the averages for six animals (63 total recordings). None of the six HRV metrics have correlations significantly different from zero (Bonferroni corrected significant level of p = 0.0083). Supplemental Table 3 shows individual correlations and p values for each animal.
Table 4.
Correlations of non-anesthetized respiratory vagal difference with HRV.
| Correlation between non-anesthetized respiratory vagal activity and HRV | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SDRR | CVRR | RMSSD | HF | HF% | LF/HF | |
| Correlation coefficients | 0.10 ± 0.092 | 0.11 ± 0.10 | 0.069 ± 0.095 | 0.0029 ± 0.086 | − 0.081 ± 0.15 | − 0.084 ± 0.12 |
| p value | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.24 | 0.95 | 0.36 | 0.26 |
Data shown are the averages for four animals (358 total recordings). None of the six HRV metrics have correlations significantly different from zero (Bonferroni corrected significant level of p = 0.0083). Supplemental Table 4 shows individual correlations and p values for each animal.
Discussion
Bioelectronic medicine and autonomic therapy are rapidly growing fields, and technologies to interface with small autonomic nerves will be crucial to further the research in these disciplines. While previous approaches have had limited success with long-term recording, CNTY electrodes provide a stable, high-SNR interface for chronic peripheral nerve interfacing33. With novel techniques for electrode manufacture and preparation described here, CNTYs are now easier to use and more reliable to implant. Anesthesia is also known to alter HRV and individual fiber dynamics35–43; yet, vagal recordings have not been obtained under chronic conditions without anesthesia. For the first time, we have shown that vagal tone can be recorded using CNTY electrodes in awake, behaving rats, greatly expanding the scope of possible autonomic studies. Of particular interest to physiologists is the relationship between vagal activity, respiratory sinus arrhythmia and HRV.
Respiratory sinus arrhythmia is a well-known phenomenon present in mammals and other animals that links HRV to respiration44. The firing rate of cardiac vagal efferents has been shown to be inversely correlated with heart rate in acute experiments, and can be used to predict changes in heart rate associated with respiratory sinus arrhythmia45,46. Vagal activity is also linked to HRV by a correlation between the parasympathetic control of heart rate (measured by the degree of HR increase occurring after vagal blockade) and the peak-to-peak variations in heart rate caused by respiration25,47. Initially, studies focused on the cardiac component of the vagus nerve, but since, the measurements of HRV have been used to represent overall vagal or parasympathetic activity. This concept was likely strengthened by studies linking altered HRV and non-cardiac diseases. For example, patients with diabetes have lowered high-frequency HRV48. Another study showed decreases in SDRR and normalized high frequency HRV for patients with COPD20 and concluded that an increase in vagal activity and lack of sympathetic response to stimulus may contribute to airway obstruction. Multiple studies have reported decreased HRV in patients in critical care, and the recovery of normal HRV is associated with survival and general improvement in children and adults21. On the other hand, epileptic patients show an increase in respiratory HRV during interictal periods12, demonstrating a potential link to hyperactivity in the brain. As a result, HRV is thought to be representative of overall vagal activity19. While it is possible that changes in cardiac vagal activity correspond to changes in the activity of other fibers, our data show that HRV is not representative of total vagal activity, even when averaging across the respiratory cycle.
Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is an electronic stimulation therapy used for a variety of diseases, most famously for treatment of drug-resistant (refractory) epilepsy49. Despite the assorted successes of VNS, the mechanisms of action are largely unknown. One concept is that stimulating the vagus nerve could increase vagal tone, thus offsetting some negative effects seen in patients. However, conflicting results on the efficacy of VNS in both the right and left vagus to increase HRV have emerged9,50. Recently, three major clinical trials were completed with the goal of utilizing VNS to correct autonomic imbalance and improve patient outcomes in heart failure. NECTAR-HF (Boston Scientific), INOVATE-HF (BioControl Medical), and ANTHEM-HF (Cyberonics) all discussed the importance of altered HRV in the study rationale51–53, and ANTHEM-HF and NECTAR-HF both measured the effect of VNS on HRV. While both of these studies observed an increase in some of the HRV metrics examined, all three of the clinical trials failed to show clear benefits to patients with VNS treatment50,54,55, despite previously promising results in dogs, rats, and humans56–58. The ANTHEM-HF trial is the only study which yielded overall positive results, such as improvements in left ventricular ejection fraction. Even so, the authors concede that the placebo effect may have affected their results, and further investigation is necessary. There is a great unmet need to increase our knowledge of the vagus nerve signals, and to answer questions such as: “What is vagal tone?”, “How does vagal activity, or true vagal tone, relate to the clinical measures of HRV?”, and “How can VNS be used to restore autonomic function?”. Direct recording of vagal tone is therefore crucial to improving our ability to study autonomic therapies and evaluating their effectiveness.
The vagus contains a variety of fiber types, targets, and sources, with most being afferent fibers2. Thus, tonic vagal activity is likely to contain both afferent and efferent firing which would vary greatly depending on physiological status. We have shown that direct measurement of vagal tone is not correlated with common measures of HRV in rats with and without anesthesia. HRV is used as a predictor for vagal tone in both rodents and humans59, therefore this result could be extended to humans and suggests that clinical measures of HRV are not representative of overall vagal activity, and/or that the term “vagal tone” is misleading. Since the effects on vagal blockade and vagotomy on HRV are well-established, it is likely that HRV is associated with the activity of a subset of vagal fibers which modulate their activity in response to physiological changes. Variations in HRV could also occur due to changes in downstream receptors or neurotransmitters, independent of changes in neural activity. Recording signals from the cardiac branches of the vagus would allow for a more thorough investigation of the relationship between cardiac vagal activity and HRV. However, the cardiac branches in the rat are prohibitively small and difficult to access, and the study would likely need to utilize a larger mammalian model. These results do provide a potential explanation for the relative lack of success and consistency of VNS stimulation for heart failure, since stimulation in these studies was a fixed on/off cycle, based on the assumption that changing overall vagal activity was equivalent to increasing HRV. Our results do not explain why VNS has been effective in treating a wide array of other chronic conditions, but they do suggest that these actions are likely taking place through the activation of afferent fibers in the vagus nerve.
Single-unit recordings show that cardiac vagal efferents are highly correlated with respiratory sinus arrhythmia45–47. Additionally, pulmonary vagal afferents are correlated with respiration60. However, such experiments inherently capture only a small subset of vagal activity, whereas the data presented in this study come from many different locations within the nerve. Acute whole-nerve recordings in the mouse vagus have also shown phasic activity synchronized with respiration61–63, a trend which is clearly replicated in these data from the rat vagus. Using coherence averaging to increase the SNR revealed that vagal activity is increased during inspiration relative to expiration. This technique has previously been used with R-peak triggered averaging (based on ECG) to detect changes in vagal activity occurring before acutely-induced seizures64. The respiratory vagal difference, RVD, is the average activity of many fibers and indicated a strong correlation between vagal firing and respiration. However, RVD did not significantly correlate with HRV, which further demonstrates that HRV is not an accurate measure of vagal tone. RVD signals originate from many types of vagal fibers, such as cardiac vagal efferents, lung afferents (which may be part of the HRV reflex), and fibers that detect changes in blood pressure. Thus, while phasic activity is the likely driver of HRV, it contains other fibers which are unrelated to cardiac control, explaining why RVD does not correlate directly with HRV.
As the first direct study of vagal tone, this work is somewhat limited in its scope. First, HRV is often measured under non-normal physiological conditions, such as chronic illness. The experiments described here could be repeated using models of chronic disease, such as heart failure, high blood pressure, or diabetes, to determine if vagal tone is altered under those conditions. Physiological interventions, such as exercise, could also be used to illicit known changes in HRV that could be compared to vagal recordings. Pharmacological and electrical stimulation-based therapies should also be investigated, providing new information on how these treatments effect vagal activity acutely and long-term. Although many drugs known to alter vagal tone, such as atropine, primarily work on the receptors rather than the vagal fibers themselves, they may have secondary effects on vagal activity. Furthermore, heart rate is controlled not only by the vagus nerve, but by the sympathetic nervous system as well. There is some evidence that the sympathetic tone can be measured by low frequency HRV, and the sympathovagal balance measured by the LF/HF ratio65, though this is a controversial topic66,67. The application of chronic recording with CNTY electrodes for both sympathetic and vagal tone could be used to greatly improve our understanding of how the sympathetic and vagal systems interact to control HRV, and how these systems are affected by pathophysiological conditions and stimuli.
Overall, our results indicate that it now possible to study the vagus activity in a chronic animal model and to ask new questions about autonomic physiology. By directly measuring vagal activity, we investigated two measures of “true vagal tone”: (1) average vagal activity, which is the most fitting measure of “tone”, and (2) phasic respiratory activity, which is more closely related to the variations in heart rate. Since neither measure showed significant correlation with HRV metrics, regardless of the presence of isoflurane, we conclude that HRV is not an accurate measure of vagal tone in rats. These results can pave the way for future studies on the exact nature of HRV, and can be used as a basis for investigations of novel autonomic therapy paradigms. Additionally, improvements to the CNTY electrodes and recording setup greatly broadens the research that can be conducted in the peripheral nervous system and can lead to new breakthroughs in the study of the vagus nerve.
Methods
Electrode manufacture
CNT yarns were manufactured at Case Western Reserve University as described previously33. CNTYs were then mated to stainless steel 35NLT-DFT wire (Fort Wayne Metals) with conductive epoxy resin (H20E, EPO-TEK). Dacron mesh and silicone elastomer (MED-4211/MED-4011, NuSil Silicone Technology) were added to further secure and insulate the CNT-DFT junction. The free end of the CNTY was tied to the end of an 11–0 nylon suture (S&T 5V33) using a fisherman’s knot. The DFT-CNTY-suture assembly was coated with 5 µm parylene C (vapor deposition coating, SMART Microsystems), and then a small section (~ 200 µm long) of insulation was removed using a laser welder (Kelanc Laser). Laser settings were set to 1A current, 0.3 ms pulse width, and 300 µm diameter. Parylene-C removal was confirmed by measuring impedance of the recording site in saline before and after de-insulation (typically ~ 10MΩ before de-insulation, and ~ 10kΩ after). Figure 1a,b show a schematic of the electrode assembly and the de-insulated recording site. Figure 1c,d show close-ups of the CNTY-suture knot and the de-insulated recording site, and Fig. 1e shows an electrode implanted in the rat vagus nerve.
Surgery
All surgical and experimental procedures were done with the approval and oversight of the Case Western Reserve University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (protocol number 2016–0328) to ensure compliance with all federal, state and local animal welfare laws and regulations. Electrodes were implanted in male Sprague–Dawley rats between 7–12 weeks of age.
The left cervical vagus nerve was exposed through a midline incision along the neck. Muscles on the left side of the neck were separated to expose the vagus nerve and carotid artery, which are normally mated together. The vagus nerve was separated from the artery and held in slight tension on a glass hook. Two CNTY electrodes were implanted in the nerve by sewing the suture-CNTY electrode through ~ 1 to 2 mm of the nerve, as shown in Fig. 1e. Electrodes were implanted approximately 2 mm apart. The knot was pulled through the nerve, and then pulled back such that the knot rested against the epineurium and the recording site remained inside the nerve. After implantation, the nerve and surrounding tissue were covered with ~ 1 mL of fibrin glue (Tisseel, Baxter International Inc.) to secure the electrodes in place. The DFT ends of the electrode were tunneled to the top of the skull, and then soldered to a connector (Omnetics Connector Corporation MCP-5-SS) which was fixed to the top of the skull using dental cement. The amplifier ground was connected to a screw placed in the skull. Electrodes were implanted for chronic recording in 8 animals, with implant duration varying from two to eleven weeks. Early termination of the experiment sometimes occurred as a result of skin erosion exposing tunneled leads, or from damage to the headcap connector causing pain or discomfort to the animal.
Implantation of the ECG telemeters was performed as described by Kaha Sciences68. Telemeters were implanted in the abdomen and fixed to the abdominal muscle, and ECG leads were tunneled to the chest, with one lead placed on the xyphoid process, and the other placed near the bottom of the sternohyoid muscle. Vagus nerve CNTY implants and ECG telemeter implants were performed during a single surgery to minimize impact on the animal.
Recording
Recordings were carried out in awake, behaving animals, and in animals anesthetized with isoflurane gas. Four animals underwent recordings under anesthesia only, two animals were recorded without anesthesia only, and two animals were recorded both with and without anesthesia (total of 6 animals with anesthesia and 4 without). For anesthetized recording, animals were anesthetized with 4% isoflurane and maintained at 2% isoflurane with 100% oxygen. A quarter-sized mini-board (shown inset in Fig. 2a) was connected to the headcap. This board amplifies and digitizes the signal (via Intan RHD2216 recording chip) before sending the signal to be displayed and saved on a laptop computer. 8-channel hardware averaging was utilized to further increase SNR34. Neural recordings were sampled at 20 kHz with a 5 kHz low pass filter. ECG was simultaneously recorded with a 1 kHz sampling rate using a TR50B Biopotential telemeter (Kaha Sciences) via ADInstruments Powerlab and LabChart software. In some cases, an accelerometer (Adafruit ADXL335) was fixed to the animals’ torso to detect movement that occurred during respiration. For awake recordings, the amplifier board was secured to the headcap connector using a custom-made 3D printed pin-locked mechanism (Supplemental Fig. 6a), and attached to a PlasticsOne commutator which allowed the rat to move freely around the cage, as shown in Fig. 2a. This recording setup is also robust against motion of the animal and the board, as shown in Supplemental Fig. 6b. During recordings, the telemeter charging field was turned off as much as possible due to significant interference with the ENG signal. Periods where the telemeter charging field was active, or where ECG signal was poor (due to packet loss from the telemetry, or EMG contamination), were excluded from the analysis.
Signal processing
ENG, ECG, and accelerometer data were imported into MATLAB, where they were further processed. ENG was band pass filtered from 800–5000 Hz to minimize interference from EMG, ECG, or other possible sources; ECG was low-pass filtered at 300 Hz. Electrode noise was estimated for each recording from electrode impedance (Johnson noise) and input amplifier noise, as described previously34, and this noise estimate was subtracted from average recorded RMS to estimate the vagal tone RMS. ECG data was low-pass filtered with a cutoff of 300 Hz. Instantaneous heart rate was calculated by taking the inverse of successive R–R intervals, and was interpolated to generate a signal with a fixed sampling rate of 1 kHz. HRV metrics were calculated using the Labchart HRV module. Beat detection typically including beats with 150–250 ms RR interval and 0–1.8 complexity (though these values were adjusted slightly between animals and recording days as needed). Ectopic beats were excluded from analysis, and recordings with more than 10% ectopic beats or artifacts were excluded, with artifacts and high noise (present only in non-anesthetized recordings) being the most common reasons for exclusion. Data were analyzed in continuous sections between 3 and 10 min long, or approximately 1000–3000 RR intervals.
Statistical methods
Results in text are reported as mean ± standard deviation, while error bars and shaded areas represent the 95% confidence interval (mean ± 1.96*SEM). T-tests were used to measure significance of correlations, with a Bonferroni corrected significance level of 0.0083; paired t-tests were used to measure significance of respiratory vagal difference (comparing inspiration to expiration), and a two-sample t-test was used to compare the average vagal tone for anesthetized to non-anesthetized recording. All reported p values are two-tailed.
Supplementary Information
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by the Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs (Autonomic nervous system activity and the implications on breast cancer metastasis, W81XWH-18-1-058), and the National Institutes of Health, (Nerve reshaping for improved selectivity, 5R01NS032845-22). Special thanks to William Marcus, who helped monitor animals during surgery and recovery, and assisted with recording. Experiments and analysis was performed by Joseph T. Marmerstein, with oversight from Dr. Grant A. McCallum and Dr. Dominique M. Durand.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Some custom analysis code was created to calculate and measure RVD and is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
The original online version of this Article was revised: The original version of this Article contained errors.
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Change history
5/7/2021
A Correction to this paper has been published: 10.1038/s41598-021-88882-5
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-020-79808-8.
References
- 1.Birmingham K, et al. Bioelectronic medicines: a research roadmap. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery. 2014 doi: 10.1038/nrd4351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Berthoud HR, Neuhuber WL. Functional and chemical anatomy of the afferent vagal system. Auton. Neurosci. Basic Clin. 2000;85:1–17. doi: 10.1016/S1566-0702(00)00215-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Groves DA, Brown VJ. Vagal nerve stimulation: a review of its applications and potential mechanisms that mediate its clinical effects. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2005;29:493–500. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Nahas Z, et al. Two-year outcome of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) for treatment of major depressive episodes. J. Clin. Psychiatry. 2005 doi: 10.4088/JCP.v66n0902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Pardo JV, et al. Weight loss during chronic, cervical vagus nerve stimulation in depressed patients with obesity: An observation. Int. J. Obes. 2007 doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Koopman FA, et al. Vagus nerve stimulation inhibits cytokine production and attenuates disease severity in Rheumatoid arthritis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2016 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1605635113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Johnson RL, Wilson CG. A review of vagus nerve stimulation as a therapeutic intervention. J. Inflamm. Res. 2018 doi: 10.2147/JIR.S163248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Pomeranz B, et al. Assessment of autonomic function in humans by heart rate spectral analysis. Am. J. Physiol. 1985 doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1985.248.1.H151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ronkainen E, et al. Cardiac autonomic control in patients with refractory epilepsy before and during vagus nerve stimulation treatment: a one-year follow-up study. Epilepsia. 2006;47:556–562. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2006.00467.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Crow RS, et al. Low heart rate variability in a 2-minute rhythm strip predicts risk of coronary heart disease and mortality from several causes. Circulation. 2012;102:1239–1244. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.102.11.1239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Grassi G. Assessment of sympathetic cardiovascular drive in human hypertension: achievements and perspectives. Hypertension. 2009;54:690–697. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.108.119883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Namath AG, Galán RF, Tuxhorn IE, Lewis SJ, Sivakumar SS. Decreased heart rate and enhanced sinus arrhythmia during interictal sleep demonstrate autonomic imbalance in generalized epilepsy. J. Neurophysiol. 2016;115:1988–1999. doi: 10.1152/jn.01120.2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Curtis BM, O’Keefe J. Autonomic tone as a cardiovascular risk factor: the dangers of chronic fight or flight. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2002;77:45–54. doi: 10.4065/77.1.45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Porges SW. Cardiac vagal tone: a physiological index of stress. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 1995;19(2):225–233. doi: 10.1016/0149-7634(94)00066-A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.MäkikallioTH, et al. Fractal analysis of heart rate dynamics as a predictor of mortality in patients after acute myocardial infarction. Am. J. Cardiol. 1999;83:836–839. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9149(98)01076-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Goldstein B, et al. Decomplexification in critical illness and injury: relationship between heart rate variability, severity of illness, and outcome. Crit. Care Med. 1998 doi: 10.1097/00003246-199802000-00040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Adamson PB, et al. Continuous autonomic assessment in patients with symptomatic heart failure: prognostic value of heart rate variability measured by an implanted cardiac resynchronization device. Circulation. 2004 doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000139841.42454.78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Winchell RJ, Hoyt DB. Analysis of heart-rate variability: a noninvasive predictor of death and poor outcome in patients with severe head injury. J. Trauma Inj. Infect. Crit. Care. 1997 doi: 10.1097/00005373-199712000-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Shaffer F, Ginsberg JP. An overview of heart rate variability metrics and norms. Front. Public Heal. 2017 doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Volterrani M, et al. Decreased heart rate variability in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chest. 1994 doi: 10.1378/chest.106.5.1432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Buchman TG, Stein PK, Goldstein B. Heart rate variability in critical illness and critical care. Curr. Opin. Critic. Care. 2002 doi: 10.1097/00075198-200208000-00007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hedman AE, Hartikainen JEK, Tahvanainen KUO, Hakumäki MOK. The high frequency component of heart rate variability reflects cardiac parasympathetic modulation rather than parasympathetic ‘tone’. Acta Physiol. Scand. 1995 doi: 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1995.tb09973.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Grossman P, Taylor EW. Toward understanding respiratory sinus arrhythmia: relations to cardiac vagal tone, evolution and biobehavioral functions. Biol. Psychol. 2007;74:263–285. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2005.11.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Eckberg DL. Human sinus arrhythmia as an index of vagal cardiac outflow. J. Appl. Physiol. Respir. Environ. Exerc. Physiol. 1983 doi: 10.1152/jappl.1983.54.4.961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Katona PG, Jih F. Respiratory sinus arrhythmia: noninvasive measure of parasympathetic cardiac control. J. Appl. Physiol. 1975 doi: 10.1152/jappl.1975.39.5.801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kollai M, Mizsei G. Respiratory sinus arrhythmia is a limited measure of cardiac parasympathetic control in man. J. Physiol. 1990 doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1990.sp018070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ori Z, Monir G, Weiss J, Sayhouni X, Singer DH. Heart rate variability: Frequency domain analysis. Cardiol. Clin. 1992 doi: 10.1016/S0733-8651(18)30231-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Jing‐Jing Fan, Wei Shan, Jian‐Ping Wu, Q. W. Research progress of vagus nerve stimulation in the treatment of epilepsy. CNS Neurosci. Ther. (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 29.Ozaki N, Sengupta JN, Gebhart GF. Mechanosensitive properties of gastric vagal afferent fibers in the rat. J. Neurophysiol. 2017;82:2210–2220. doi: 10.1152/jn.1999.82.5.2210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Schwartz GJ, McHugh PR, Moran TH. Gastric loads and cholecystokinin synergistically stimulate rat gastric vagal afferents. Am. J. Physiol. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2017;265:R872–R876. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.1993.265.4.R872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Liu CY, Mueller MH, Grundy D, Kreis ME. Vagal modulation of intestinal afferent sensitivity to systemic LPS in the rat. Am. J. Physiol. Liver Physiol. 2007;292:G1213–G1220. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00267.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Zanos TP. Recording and decoding of vagal neural signals related to changes in physiological parameters and biomarkers of disease. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2019 doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a034157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.McCallum GA, et al. Chronic interfacing with the autonomic nervous system using carbon nanotube (CNT) yarn electrodes. Sci. Rep. 2017 doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-10639-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Dweiri YM, Eggers T, McCallum G, Durand DM. Ultra-low noise miniaturized neural amplifier with hardware averaging. J. Neural Eng. 2015 doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/12/4/046024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kato M, et al. Spectral analysis of heart rate variability during isoflurane anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 1992 doi: 10.1097/00000542-199210000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Nishiyama T. Changes in heart rate variability during anaesthesia induction using sevoflurane or isoflurane with nitrous oxide. Anaesthesiol. Intensive Ther. 2016 doi: 10.5603/AIT.a2016.0041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Keyl C, Lemberger P, Frey AW, Dambacher M, Hobbhahn J. Perioperative changes in cardiac autonomic control in patients receiving either general or local anesthesia for ophthalmic surgery. Anesth. Analg. 1996 doi: 10.1097/00000539-199601000-00020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Halliwill JR, Billman GE. Effect of general anesthesia on cardiac vagal tone. Am. J. Physiol. Circ. Physiol. 2017;262:H1719–H1724. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1992.262.6.H1719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Picker O, Scheeren TWL, Arndt JO. Inhalation anaesthetics increase heart rate by decreasing cardiac vagal activity in dogs. Br. J. Anaesth. 2001 doi: 10.1093/bja/87.5.748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Ishiguro Y, et al. Effect of xenon on autonomic cardiovascular control - Comparison with isoflurane and nitrous oxide. J. Clin. Anesth. 2000 doi: 10.1016/S0952-8180(00)00139-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Skovsted P, Sapthavichaikul S. The effects of isoflurane on arterial pressure, pulse rate, autonomic nervous activity, and barostatic reflexes. Can. Anaesth. Soc. J. 1977 doi: 10.1007/BF03005103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Mutoh T, Tsubone H, Nishimura R, Sasaki N. Effects of volatile anesthetics on vagal C-fiber activities and their reflexes in anesthetized dogs. Respir. Physiol. 1998;112:253–264. doi: 10.1016/S0034-5687(98)00028-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Mutoh T, Tsubone H, Nishimura R, Sasaki N. Effects of halothane, enflurane, isoflurane, and sevoflurane on slowly adapting pulmonary stretch receptor activity in anesthetized dogs. Lung. 1998 doi: 10.1007/PL00007601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Tzeng YC, Galletly DC, Larsen PD. Paradoxical respiratory sinus arrhythmia in the anesthetized rat. Auton. Neurosci. Basic Clin. 2005 doi: 10.1016/j.autneu.2004.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Jewett DL. Activity of single efferent fibres in the cervical vagus nerve of the dog, with special reference to possible cardio-inhibitory fibres. J. Physiol. 1964;175:321–357. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1964.sp007520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Katona PG, Poitras JW, Barnett GO, Terry BS. Cardiac vagal efferent activity and heart period in the carotid sinus reflex. Am. J. Physiol. 1970 doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1970.218.4.1030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Sammon MP, Bruce EN. Vagal afferent activity increases dynamical dimension of respiration in rats. J. Appl. Physiol. 1991 doi: 10.1152/jappl.1991.70.4.1748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Liao D, et al. Association of vagal tone with serum insulin, glucose, and diabetes mellitus—the ARIC study. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 1995 doi: 10.1016/0168-8227(95)01190-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Englot DJ, Chang EF, Auguste KI. Efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation for epilepsy by patient age, epilepsy duration, and seizure type. Neurosurg. Clin. N. Am. 2011 doi: 10.1016/j.nec.2011.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Premchand RK, et al. Autonomic regulation therapy via left or right cervical vagus nerve stimulation in patients with chronic heart failure: Results of the ANTHEM-HF trial. J. Card. Fail. 2014 doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2014.08.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Dicarlo L, Libbus I, Amurthur B, Kenknight BH, Anand IS. Autonomic regulation therapy for the improvement of left ventricular function and heart failure symptoms: The anthem-HF study. J. Card. Fail. 2013 doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2013.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.De Ferrari GM, et al. Rationale and study design of the neurocardiac therapy for heart failure study: NECTAR-HF. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2014 doi: 10.1002/ejhf.80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Hauptman PJ, et al. Rationale and study design of the INcrease of Vagal TonE in heart failure study: INOVATE-HF. Am. Heart J. 2012 doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.03.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Gold MR, et al. Vagus nerve stimulation for the treatment of heart failure: the INOVATE-HF trial. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2016 doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.03.525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Zannad F, et al. Chronic vagal stimulation for the treatment of low ejection fraction heart failure: results of the NEural Cardiac TherApy for heart failure (NECTAR-HF) randomized controlled trial. Eur. Heart J. 2015 doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Vanoli E, et al. Vagal stimulation and prevention of sudden death in conscious dogs with a healed myocardial infarction. Circ. Res. 1991 doi: 10.1161/01.RES.68.5.1471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Li M, et al. Vagal nerve stimulation markedly improves long-term survival after chronic heart failure in rats. Circulation. 2004 doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000105721.71640.DA. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Schwartz PJ, et al. Long term vagal stimulation in patients with advanced heart failure. First experience in man. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2008 doi: 10.1016/j.ejheart.2008.07.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Kuwahara M, et al. Power spectral analysis of heart rate variability as a new method for assessing autonomic activity in the rat. J. Electrocardiol. 1994 doi: 10.1016/S0022-0736(05)80272-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Kubin L, Alheid GF, Zuperku EJ, McCrimmon DR. Central pathways of pulmonary and lower airway vagal afferents. J. Appl. Physiol. 2006 doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00252.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Zanos TP, et al. Identification of cytokine-specific sensory neural signals by decoding murine vagus nerve activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2018;115:E4843–E4852. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1719083115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Caravaca AS, et al. A novel flexible cuff-like microelectrode for dual purpose, acute and chronic electrical interfacing with the mouse cervical vagus nerve. J. Neural Eng. 2017;14:066005. doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/aa7a42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Sevcencu C, Nielsen TN, Kjærgaard B, Struijk JJ. A respiratory marker derived from left vagus nerve signals recorded with implantable cuff electrodes. Neuromodulation. 2018 doi: 10.1111/ner.12630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Harreby KR, Sevcencu C, Struijk JJ. Early seizure detection in rats based on vagus nerve activity. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 2011;49:143–151. doi: 10.1007/s11517-010-0683-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Pagani M, et al. Power spectral analysis of heart rate and arterial pressure variabilities as a marker of sympatho-vagal interaction in man and conscious dog. Circ. Res. 1986 doi: 10.1161/01.RES.59.2.178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Heathers JAJ. Sympathovagal balance from heart rate variability: an obituary. Exp. Physiol. 2012 doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.2011.063867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Prakash ES. ‘Sympathovagal balance from heart rate variability: an obituary’, but what is sympathovagal balance? Exp. Physiol. 2012 doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.2012.067322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Rat ECG electrode placement. (2018). https://www.kahasciences.com/knowledge-centre/rat-ecg-electrode-placement/.
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Some custom analysis code was created to calculate and measure RVD and is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.



