Skip to main content
ACS Omega logoLink to ACS Omega
. 2020 Dec 18;6(1):492–504. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.0c04940

Ameliorative Efficacy of the Cassia auriculata Root Against High-Fat-Diet + STZ-Induced Type-2 Diabetes in C57BL/6 Mice

Babu Salma , Prakash Janhavi ‡,, Saravanan Muthaiah ‡,§,, Pattar Veeresh , Manjula Santhepete Nanjundaiah , Sheshadri Divyashree ‡,*, Muthukumar Serva Peddha ‡,⊥,*
PMCID: PMC7807783  PMID: 33458501

Abstract

graphic file with name ao0c04940_0010.jpg

Diabetes mellitus is a major metabolic disorder worldwide. Several herbs are being tested for the management of diabetes. Cassia auriculata is one of those herbs known for its nutritional value and health benefits. However, limited scientific evidence has been shown on the elucidation of its root bioactives as well as biological activity. This study attempted to identify and characterize phenolic compounds from the potent root extract and to evaluate its antioxidant as well as antidiabetic properties in both in vitro and in vivo models. The results revealed that the total polyphenol and flavonoid contents were highest in the methanolic extract. The methanolic extract of the C. auriculata root showed the highest antioxidant and antidiabetic activities in vitro than other extracts. These biological activities may be because the extract is rich in coumaric acid and −OH groups as revealed by high-performance liquid chromatography and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy analyses, respectively. Further, the antidiabetic activity of the methanolic extract was studied in a diet-induced type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) C57BL/6 mouse model. A significant increase in fasting blood glucose and decreased plasma insulin levels in T2DM mice confirmed the development of the diabetic condition. In addition, the T2DM mice showed oxidative stress in the plasma as well as muscle tissue and significant alterations in the plasma biochemistry, viz., lipid profile, liver, and renal function tests. However, the administration of the ethanolic extract of the C. auriculata root (150 mg/kg body weight) to T2DM mice normalized the condition comparable to that of control mice. Thus, the extract can be used as a potent antioxidant and antidiabetic agent in pharmaceutical companies.

1. Introduction

The naturally available herbs are being used as an alternative for allopathic drugs since ancient times in the ayurvedic system of medicine. The natural herbs gain importance over allopathy since the former have less or no side effects. The natural herbs viz., Curcuma longa, Withania somnifera, Acorus calamus, Tinospora cordifolia, Zingiber officinale, Asparagus racemosus, Garcinia cambogia, Moringa oliefera, Piper longa, Terminalia chebula, etc., have been proven to act effectively against various deadly diseased conditions.1Cassia auriculata is one such herb known for its potency against various ailments. It is an evergreen shrub with attractive yellow flowers, belonging to the family Caesalpiniaceae. This shrub grows in different parts of Asia including India.2 Various studies reported medicinal properties of different parts of the plant C. auriculata. For instance, tea from the leaves is used against chronic fever and as an anthelminthic,3 the methanolic extract of leaves and the aqueous extract of whole plant powder have antibacterial properties,4 the leaf extract also has anticancer properties,5 the ethanolic extract of roots shows hepatoprotective properties,6 and the aqueous extract of leaves reduces glucose and oxidative stress markers in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats.7 The aqueous extract of the flowers has antioxidant properties as it decreased oxidative stress in diabetic rats.8 The ethanolic extract of buds and flowers showed antidiabetic properties both in vitro and in vivo,9 the water extract of buds and flowers reduced blood sugar levels,2 and the ethanolic extract of leaves and flowers managed the diabetic condition by acting as an insulin secretagogue agent.10 Further, it has been reported that the chloroform extract of aerial parts of the herb showed the antimicrobial activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and fungi.11 A comparative study among the different parts of the herb as reported by Uma Devi et al.12 revealed that the flower and leaf extract has a potent antidiabetic property by reducing the serum glucose level and increasing plasma insulin levels. These biological properties of the herb C. auriculata may be because of the presence of bioactives. Hence, understanding the phytochemical constituents of the herb or its parts provides the knowledge of its biological properties. However, there are no studies on the quantification of different bioactives in the root of C. auriculata and its potential antidiabetic properties. Hence, this study aimed to investigate the presence of different phytochemical constituents in the root of C. auriculata both qualitatively and quantitatively and also to determine its biological properties such as antioxidant and antidiabetic activities in both in vitro and in vivo models.

2. Results

2.1. Color and Yield of the Extracts of the Root of C. auriculata with Different Solvents

The different solvent extracts of the C. auriculata root showed different colors, i.e., chloroform, ethanol, methanol, and aqueous extracts showed yellow, dark brown, light green, and light brown colors, respectively (Table 1). The methanolic extract showed the highest yield of 13.8% (w/w), followed by the ethanolic extract with a yield of 11.65%, the aqueous extract with a yield of 10.4%, and the chloroform extract with a yield of 5% (Table 1).

Table 1. Color and Yield of the Extracts of Roots of C. auriculata with Different Solvents.

solvent color % yield (g/100 g)
chloroform yellow 5
ethanol dark brown 11.6
methanol light green 13.8
aqueous light brown 10.4

2.2. Estimation of Total Polyphenols and Flavonoids

The methanol extract of the root of C. auriculata has the highest total polyphenols, followed by aqueous, ethanol, and chloroform extracts (Table 2). Similarly, the methanol extract of the root of C. auriculata possessed the highest amount of flavonoids, followed by ethanol, aqueous and chloroform extracts. This shows that methanol is a more potent solvent to extract the maximum amount of total polyphenols and flavonoids. The least amount of polyphenols and flavonoids was extracted from the chloroform extract among all of the other extracts.

Table 2. Total Polyphenols and Flavonoid Content of Different Solvent Extracts of C. auriculata RootA,B.

solvents total polyphenols (mg/100 g of the sample) flavonoid (mg/100 g of the sample)
chloroform 1454.33 ± 19.52a 832.53 ± 17.04a
ethanol 6531.69 ± 196.83b 1340.79 ± 1.14c
methanol 8979.04 ± 495.59c 1647.12 ± 20.71d
aqueous 8301.26 ± 269.29c 1111.14 ± 10.52b
significance P < 0.001 P < 0.001
A

Note: All of the values are mean ± SEM.

B

Mean values with the same superscript letters in the given column are not significantly different, whereas those with different superscript letters are significantly different as judged by Duncan’s multiple range test.

2.3. High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) Analysis

To know the different phenolic acids in the different solvent extracts of the C. auriculata root, the retention times of the extracts in the chromatogram were compared with those of the accurate standards. The results of HPLC analysis of different extracts are represented in Table 3. The chloroform extract showed peaks for epicatechin, chlorogenic acid, and gallic acid. The ethanolic extract showed peaks similar to those of epicatechin, gallic acid, ferulic acid, syringic acid, whereas the methanolic extract of the C. auriculata root showed peaks matching with those of epicatechin, chlorogenic acid, gallic acid, ferulic acid, syringic acid, and coumaric acid standards. Further, in the aqueous extract, epicatechin, ferulic acid, and coumaric acid were absent and chlorogenic acid, gallic acid, syringic acid, tannic acid, resveratrol, caffeic acid, and protocatechuic acid were present (Figure 1). The highest amounts of gallic acid, syringic acid, and coumaric acid were found in chloroform, ethanol, and aqueous and methanolic extracts, respectively.

Table 3. Polyphenolic Profile of Different Solvent Extracts of the C. auriculata RootA,B.

  chloroform ethanol methanol aqueous
epicatechin (mg/100 g) 13.07 ± 0.39c 3.15 ± 0.03b 46.69 ± 0.27d ND
chlorogenic acid (mg/100 g) 0.60 ± 0.01b ND 44.24 ± 0.24d 3.12 ± 0.04c
gallic acid (mg/100 g) 27.68 ± 0.44b 20.88 ± 0.39a 39.85 ± 0.54c 27.68 ± 0.44b
ferulic acid (mg/100 g) ND 46.22 ± 0.29c 22.68 ± 0.04b ND
syringic acid (mg/100 g) ND 70.98 ± 0.38c 18.24 ± 0.28b 79.57 ± 0.26d
coumaric acid (mg/100 g) ND ND 189.47 ± 0.30b ND
tannic acid (mg/100 g) ND ND ND 2.24 ± 0.01b
resveratrol (mg/100 g) ND ND ND 1.64 ± 0.04b
caffeic acid (mg/100 g) ND ND ND 18.05 ± 0.38b
protocatechuic acid (mg/100 g) ND ND ND 51.59 ± 0.40b
A

Note: All of the values are mean ± SEM.

B

Mean values with the same superscript letters in the given row are not significantly different, whereas those with different superscript letters are significantly different as judged by Duncan’s multiple range test.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

HPLC chromatograms of different solvent extracts of the C. auriculata root showing the polyphenols present. (A) Gallic acid; (B) epicatechin; (C) chlorogenic acid; (D) ferulic acid; (E) tannic acid; (F) synergic acid; (G) resveratrol; (H) coumaric acid; (I) caffeic acid; (J) protocatechuic acid.

2.4. Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) Analysis of Different Solvent Extracts of the C. auriculata Root

The different functional groups in different solvent extracts of the C. auriculata root were determined by FTIR analysis. The FTIR spectra revealed that the four extracts studied showed a strong, broad stretching band at 3300 cm–1, with methanolic and aqueous extracts showing broader bands than those of other extracts (chloroform extract, 3332 cm–1; ethanol extract, 3423; aqueous extract 3242; methanolic extract 3251 cm–1). A broad stretching band at 3300 cm–1 indicates the presence of intermolecular −OH groups (Figure 2). In addition, bands at 2924, 2906, 2949 and 2837, and 2879 cm–1 in chloroform, ethanol, methanol, and aqueous extracts, respectively, indicate the presence of a C–H stretching alkane. Further, bands at 1614 cm–1 (C=C stretching conjugated alkene), 1455 cm–1 (C–H bending alkane methylene group), 1214 cm–1 (C–N stretching amine), and 754 cm–1 (C–Cl stretching halo compound) for the chloroform extract; 3195 cm–1 (broad O–H stretching alcohol intramolecularly bonded) and 1035 cm–1 (C–O stretching primary alcohol) for the ethanol extract; 1652, 1565, 1480 cm–1 (C=N stretching imine/oxime), 1411 cm–1 (O–H bending carboxylic acid), and 606 cm–1 (C–I stretching halo compound) for the methanolic extract; and 1550 cm–1 (N–O stretching nitro compound), 1413 cm–1 (C–H bending alkane methyl group), and 603 cm–1 (C–I stretching halo compound) for the aqueous extract were observed.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

FTIR spectra of (a) chloroform, (b) ethanol, (c) methanol and (d) aqueous extracts of the C. auriculata root showing bands of different functional groups. Note the band between 3600 and 3000 cm–1, suggesting the presence of −OH groups in all of the four extracts, and significantly broader in the spectra of the methanolic extract.

2.5. Antioxidant Activity

2.5.1. 2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) Assay

The antioxidant ability of the different solvent extracts of C. auriculata was determined by calculating the IC50 values, wherein the samples with the least IC50 value show the robust scavenging activity against DPPH free radicals. Among the different solvent extracts from the C. auriculata root, the methanolic extract showed the maximum DPPH scavenging activity with the lowest IC50 value (42.87 ± 1.5 μg/mL), followed by ethanol (46.24 ± 1.78 μg/mL), aqueous (57.04 ± 2.75 μg/mL), and chloroform extracts (60.55 ± 5.29 μg/mL) (Table 4).

Table 4. IC50 Values of DPPH and FRAP Assays of Different Solvent Extracts of the C. auriculata RootA,B.
solvents DPPH (μg/mL) FRAP (μg/mL)
chloroform 60.55 ± 5.29b 67.59 ± 0.75c
ethanol 46.24 ± 1.78a 52.44 ± 0.46b
methanol 42.87 ± 1.51a 47.13 ± 0.37a
aqueous 57.04 ± 2.75b 95.68 ± 1.50d
standard 43.29 ± 1.17a 50.76 ± 0.43b
significance P < 0.05 P < 0.001
A

Note: All of the values are mean ± SEM.

B

Mean values with the same superscript letters in the given column are not significantly different, whereas those with different superscript letters are significantly different as judged by Duncan’s multiple range test.

2.5.2. Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP)

In this study, the methanolic extract of C. auriculata showed the highest ferric reducing antioxidant power, followed by ethanol, chloroform, and aqueous extracts as shown in Table 4, and the inhibitory concentrations were found to be close to those of standards. The IC50 values of methanolic, ethanol, chloroform, and aqueous extracts were 47.13 ± 0.37, 52.44 ± 0.46, 67.59 ± 0.75, and 95.68 ± 1.50 μg/mL, respectively, indicating that the methanol extract has more antioxidant potency than the other extracts of the root studied.

As the methanolic extract of the root showed the highest content of polyphenols and exhibited the highest antioxidant potential, it was selected for further in vitro and in vivo studies.

2.6. Antidiabetic Activity

2.6.1. α-Amylase and α-Glucosidase Inhibition Assay

The methanolic extract inhibited α-amylase activity in a dose-dependent manner. The IC50 value of the extract for inhibiting the α-amylase activity is represented in Figure 3, wherein the IC50 value is 44.75 ± 1.31 μg/mL compared to that of the standard (81.19 ± 1.34 μg/mL). Similarly, the methanolic extract inhibited the α-glucosidase activity, and the result is represented in Figure 3. The IC50 value of the extract for inhibiting α-glucosidase activity is 66.86 ± 1.72 μg/mL compared to that of its standard 94.83 ± 9.83 μg/mL.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Vertical bar graphs showing the inhibitory potency of the methanolic extract of the C. auriculata root for the activities of α-amylase and α-glucosidase. Note: All of the values are mean ± SEM. * Indicates that groups are significantly different as judged by Duncan’s multiple range test.

2.7. Effect of the C. auriculata Root Extract on Body Weight

In this present study, diabetes was induced with a combination of high fat diet and a low dose of streptozotocin (STZ) and the effect of the C. auriculata root extracts was evaluated. The change in the body weight of mice of different groups is presented in Figure 4. The mice were fed with the high-fat diet for 11 weeks; thus, a considerable increase in body weight was observed among the high-fat-diet-fed mice as compared to the control group. After the induction of diabetes, the weight of mice in the diabetic group significantly reduced, whereas the treatment with the C. auriculata root extract could help in regaining the weight much better than the metformin-treated group.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Line graph showing the change in the weight of the body of different experimental group mice throughout the experiment. Note a significant increase in the weight of the body till 11th week in the high-fat-diet-fed mice and a gradual decrease in those treated with metformin and the methanolic extract but not in diabetic mice compared to control mice.

2.8. Effect of the Methanolic Extract the C. auriculata Root on Fasting Blood Glucose Levels

After 5 days of diabetes induction by STZ, all mice were tested for the blood glucose level, and the levels above 200 mg/dL confirmed the induction of diabetes in the mice. The blood glucose levels of all the four groups were monitored on a weekly basis. The control group showed normal blood glucose levels throughout the experiment in contrast to the diabetic group, which showed a gradual increase in the blood glucose level every week, a sign of uncontrolled diabetes (Figure 5). The treatment with metformin for 4 weeks could effectively reduce blood glucose in diabetic rats, and almost equal to the level of control mice at the end of the experiment (8th week). Similarly, the treatment with the methanolic extract of the C. auriculata root also showed a significant reduction in the blood glucose level gradually, reduced to half when compared to the initial level after 3 weeks of treatment and further decreased to the level of metformin toward the end of the experiment.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Line graph showing the fasting blood glucose level in different experimental group mice during the treatment period. Note a significantly elevated level of fasting blood glucose levels in the diabetic mice compared to control and the mice treated with the methanolic extract of C. auriculata and metformin treated diabetic mice.

2.9. Effect of Methanolic Extract of the C. auriculata Root on the Antioxidant Status in the Plasma and Muscles

The antioxidant enzymes such as superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) were significantly decreased in diabetic mice compared with those of control animals in both the plasma and muscles (Table 5). However, the activities of SOD and CAT were increased even above the control level in the methanolic extract of the C. auriculata root- and metformin-treated mice.

Table 5. Effect of the Methanolic Extract of the C. auriculata Root on the Activities of Antioxidant Enzymes in the Serum and Muscle of Experimental GroupsA,B.

  SOD (U/mg protein)
CAT (nmol/mg/min)
plasma muscle plasma muscle
control 1875.24 ± 197.12b 10.38 ± 0.62b 0.25 ± 0.03b 1.13 ± 0.12a
diabetes 549.58 ± 69.39a 6.21 ± 0.87a 0.12 ± 0.01a 0.48 ± 0.11b
diabetes + metformin 2268.68 ± 77.31b,c 8.78 ± 1.12b 0.4 ± 0.08c 2.4 ± 0.19c
diabetes + methanolic extract (150 mg/kg bw) 2469.17 ± 252.67c 11.17 ± 0.44b 0.28 ± 0.03b,c 1.62 ± 0.29a
significance P < 0.001 P < 0.05 P < 0.05 P < 0.003
A

Note: All of the values are mean ± SEM.

B

Mean values with the same superscript letters in the given column are not significantly different, whereas those with different superscript letters are significantly different as judged by Duncan’s multiple range test.

2.10. Effect of Methanolic Extract of C. auriculata Root on Oxidative Stress Markers in Plasma and Muscle

There was a significantly higher level of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and nitric oxide (NO) in both the plasma and muscles in the diabetic rats compared to those of control mice (Table 6). However, the treatment of diabetic mice with metformin could effectively lower the ROS and NO levels to the levels of controls and the methanolic extract of the C. auriculata root reduced these levels better than metformin. Further, the metformin and the C. auriculata root extract reduced the ROS and NO levels and showed similarity with the control mice.

Table 6. Effect of the Methanolic Extract of the C. auriculata Root on the Concentration of Oxidative Stress Markers in the Serum and Muscle of Experimental GroupsA,B.

  ROS (μmol of DCF formed/min/mg protein)
NO (ng/mg protein)
plasma muscle plasma muscle
control 2601.77 ± 182.88b 2595.56 ± 95.98a 3.86 ± 0.17b 2.59 ± 0.25a
diabetes 3347.69 ± 15.77c 3230.25 ± 44.56c 6.52 ± 0.56c 5.19 ± 0.47b
diabetes + metformin 2783.77 ± 106.92b 2842.57 ± 51.11b 3.85 ± 106.92b 1.98 ± 0.32a
diabetes + methanolic extract (150 mg/kg bw) 1496.69 ± 54.55a 2726.95 ± 42.97a,b 2.88 ± 54.55a 2.73 ± 0.23a
significance P < 0.001 P < 0.001 P < 0.001 P < 0.001
A

Note: All of the values are mean ± SEM.

B

Mean values with the same superscript letters in the given column are not significantly different, whereas those with different superscript letters are significantly different as judged by Duncan’s multiple range test.

2.11. Effect of the C. auriculata Root Extract on Plasma Insulin Levels

The plasma insulin levels of the different mice groups are represented in Table 7. There was a significantly lower level of plasma insulin in diabetic mice compared to that of the control group (P < 0.001), whereas the levels were similar to those of control mice in the C. auriculata root extract and metformin-treated mice.

Table 7. Effect of the Methanolic Extract of the C. auriculata Root on the Serum Concentration of Insulin of Experimental GroupsA,B.

  insulin (μL U/mL)
control 0.65 ± 0.02a
diabetes 0.22 ± 0.01b
diabetes + metformin 0.68 ± 0.03a
diabetes + methanolic extract 0.71 ± 0.02a
significance P < 0.001
A

Note: All of the values are mean ± SEM.

B

Mean values with the same superscript letters in the given column are not significantly different, whereas those with different superscript letters are significantly different as judged by Duncan’s multiple range test.

2.12. Effect of the Methanolic Extract of the C. auriculata Root on the Lipid Profile

There was a significant increase in the plasma levels of triglycerides (TG), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), total cholesterol (TC), and very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) with a concomitant decrease in the plasma levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) in diabetic mice, whereas these were normalized to the level of control mice in the C. auriculata root extract and metformin-treated mice. In addition, the atherogenic index, a new index to determine the alteration in the lipid profile, was also found to be higher in diabetic mice compared to the mice of other groups studied (Table 8).

Table 8. Effect of the Methanolic Extract of the C. auriculata Root on the Lipid Profile of Experimental GroupsA,B.

  total cholesterol (mg/dL) triglycerides (mg/dL) HDL (mg/dL) LDL (mg/dL) VLDL (mg/dL) AI
control 170.46 ± 8.22a 92.75 ± 2.28a 49.79 ± 2.15b 78.17 ± 2.86a 18.55 ± 0.46a 0.28 ± 0.03a
diabetes 276.11 ± 8.99c 219.56 ± 17.94b 30.67 ± 5.81a 153.80 ± 4.32c 43.91 ± 3.59b 0.87 ± 0.13b
diabetes + metformin 199.79 ± 5.36b 96.84 ± 1.79a 45.07 ± 4.67b 95.05 ± 2.46b 19.97 ± 0.66a 0.31 ± 0.05a
diabetes + methanolic extract 169.49 ± 5.39a 90.30 ± 7.62a 44.75 ± 2.48b 82.54 ± 3.59a 17.89 ± 1.19a 0.29 ± 0.04a
significance P < 0.001 P < 0.001 P < 0.05 P < 0.001 P < 0.001 P < 0.001
A

Note: All of the values are mean ± SEM.

B

Mean values with the same superscript letters in the given column are not significantly different, whereas those with different superscript letters are significantly different as judged by Duncan’s multiple range test.

2.13. Effect of the Methanolic Extract of the C. auriculata Root on Plasma Markers of Hepatic Damage

The treatment with the C. auriculata root extract maintained the normal hepatic condition as there was a significant decrease in the activities of plasma markers of hepatic damage, i.e., aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) in extract-treated diabetic mice compared to diabetic mice (Figure 6). The diabetic group mice showed a significant rise in the activities of plasma ALP, AST, and ALT, indicating liver damage.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Vertical bar graphs showing the activities of AST, ALT, and ALP in different experimental group mice. AST: aspartate aminotransferase, ALT: alanine aminotransferase, ALP: alkaline phosphatase. Note: All of the values are mean ± SEM. Mean values with the same superscript letters in the given parameter are not significantly different, whereas those with different superscript letters are significantly different as judged by Duncan’s multiple range test.

2.14. Effect of the Methanolic Extract of the C. auriculata Root on Plasma Markers of Renal Damage

The diabetic group mice showed a significant upsurge (P < 0.05) of urea, BUN, uric acid, and creatinine levels in the plasma compared to the control groups (Figure 7a,b). However, diabetic mice treated with the C. auriculata root extract and metformin showed significantly lower plasma urea, BUN, uric acid, and creatinine levels, indicating the attenuation of alteration in the plasma levels of renal markers caused by diabetes.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

(a and b) Vertical bar graphs showing the plasma concentration of urea and BUN (a) and uric acid and creatinine (b) in different experimental group mice. Note: All of the values are mean ± SEM. Mean values with the same superscript letters are not significantly different, whereas those with different superscript letters are significantly different as judged by Duncan’s multiple range test.

2.15. Effect of the Methanolic Extract of the C. auriculata Root on the Histomorphology of Muscles

The histological architecture in the diabetic group mice was altered compared to that of the normal architecture in the control mice. The diabetic mice muscle histomorphology showed the presence of mononucleated inflammatory cells and muscles replaced by the adipose tissue with nonhomogeneous fiber size distribution against homogeneous fiber size distribution in the control mice (Figure 8a,b). In addition, in mice treated with metformin and the methanolic extract of the C. auriculata root, homogenous fiber distribution similar to that of control mice was observed (Figure 8c,d). This suggests that the ameliorative efficacy of the methanolic extract against high-fat-diet plus STZ-induced diabetic alterations in muscle histomorphology.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Photomicrographs of muscle tissues of (a) control, (b) diabetic, (c) diabetic + metformin, (d) diabetic + the methanolic-extract-treated mice. Note the presence of mononucleated inflammatory cells (up-pointing bullet) and muscles replaced by the adipose tissue with (down-pointing arrow) with nonhomogenous fiber size distribution against homogeneous fiber size distribution in control mice and metformin- as well as the methanolic extract of C. auriculata- treated diabetic mice muscle section.

3. Discussion

The herbs are used for medicinal purposes because of their less or no side effects. The bioactives present in the herbs may be the reason for their health-benefiting properties. However, the phytocomponents of the C. auriculata root are not well known/understood. Hence, this study investigated the total polyphenols as well as flavonoids present in different solvent extracts and the antidiabetic activity of the methanolic extract of the root both in in vitro and in vivo models. The methanolic extract of the C. auriculata root showed the highest amount of total polyphenols, followed by aqueous, ethanol, and chloroform extracts in the order mentioned. The HPLC profile of polyphenols showed that coumaric acid in the methanolic extract, gallic acid in the chloroform extract, and syringic acid in ethanolic and aqueous extracts are present in the highest concentrations compared to other polyphenols present in respective solvent extracts. Further, the flavonoid content was also found to be highest in the methanolic extract compared to other extracts studied. The methanolic extract was followed by ethanolic, aqueous, and chloroform extracts. Furthermore, the results of this study revealed that the antioxidant potency of the methanolic extract was high, with the least IC50 value (42.87 ± 1.51 μg/mL), followed by ethanol, aqueous, and chloroform extracts compared to the standard. The potent methanolic extract, among four extracts studied, showed antidiabetic properties both in vitro and in vivo.

The methanolic extract reduced the hyperglycemia in the high-fat-diet-fed + STZ-injected type-2 diabetic C57BL/6 mice (T2D mice), suggesting the hypoglycemic/antidiabetic property. The administration of a high-fat diet + STZ injection resulted in a decrease in the body weight, an increase in the fasting blood glucose level, the concentration of ROS and NO in the plasma and muscles, with a concomitant decrease in the plasma insulin and activities of antioxidant enzymes. The above results are further authenticated by the alteration in the normal architecture of the muscle tissue in the diabetic mice compared to other control mice. Further, there was a significant increase in the activities of plasma AST, ALT, and ALP as well as the plasma concentration of urea, uric acid, and BUN in the high-fat-diet-fed diabetic mice compared to control mice. The levels of plasma TC, TG, LDL, VLDL, and the atherogenic index were found to be elevated significantly, with a significant decrease in the HDL level in T2D mice compared to control. However, the administration of 150 mg/kg body weight of the methanolic extract of the C. auriculata root for 8 weeks could normalize the condition to the level of control. This indicates that the C. auriculata root extract act as an antidiabetic agent.

Several studies have reported that the health-promoting properties of medicinal herbs are due to the presence of different bioactives.13 Hence, the identification and characterization of bioactives or phytoconstituents of herbs have become a major topic of various studies. In this investigation, the root of C. auriculata was subjected to different solvent extractions in the order of increasing polarity and it was found that the methanolic extract could extract the highest amount of total polyphenols compared to other solvents. Indeed, studies have shown that polar solvents could extract the maximum amount of polyphenols.14 Further, the flavonoids were also found to be highest in the methanolic extract. In addition to the estimation of total polyphenols from different solvent extracts, the different polyphenols present were also determined in this study. The different solvent extracts were subjected to HPLC analysis, and it was found that methanolic, chloroform, and ethanol and aqueous extracts were rich in coumaric acid, gallic acid, and syringic acid, respectively. In addition, researchers are reporting alternate natural sources of polyphenols with high bioavailability;15 indeed, the results of our study showed that the C. auriculata root is also an alternate source for polyphenols.

The imbalance between the antioxidant and pro-oxidant levels results in oxidative stress, and antioxidants scavenge the free radicals to reduce the oxidative stress. In this study, to determine the antioxidant potential of different solvent extracts of the root, DPPH and FRAP assays were performed. The results of the DPPH assay revealed that the methanolic extract showed better antioxidant activity compared to other extracts and standard. This was further confirmed by the FRAP assay, which showed a similar pattern of the result. The earlier studies had shown that C. auriculata leaves10 and flowers2,8 have antioxidant properties. However, the methanolic extract in this study showed the least IC50 value of about 42.87 ± 1.51 μg/mL for the DPPH assay and 47.13 ± 0.37 μg/mL for the FRAP assay. This may be because of the highest polyphenol content, as polyphenols are known for their antioxidant potential.16,17 It is further confirmed by FTIR analyses, the results of which revealed that the methanolic extract has a broader peak at 3300 cm–1, range which indicates the presence of −OH groups.

Hyperglycemia is the hallmark of the diabetic condition.18 Hyperglycemia for prolonged periods results in diabetes and its associated secondary complications like diabetic nephropathy, neuropathy, retinopathy, cardiovascular disease, etc. Hence, maintaining the near-normoglycemic condition is a dire need in a diabetic patient. The blood glucose level increases soon after the digestion of food and the absorption of monomers; hence, the inhibition of oligo/polysaccharide-hydrolyzing enzymes, viz., α-amylase and α-glucosidase, could delay the hydrolysis of polysaccharides. In this study, the methanolic extract of the C. auriculata root, the potent extracts among all the extracts studied, suppressed the activities of hydrolyzing enzymes, suggesting potency in reducing the hyperglycemic condition.

Based on the results of in vitro antioxidant and in vitro antidiabetic properties of the methanolic extract of the C. auriculata root, a study was designed to evaluate the same in vivo in a diabetic mice model. In this study, a high-fat diet was fed with a small single dose of streptozotocin to induce type-2 diabetes in C57BL/6 mice. A high-fat diet for 11 weeks induces insulin resistance and a small dose of streptozotocin decreases the plasma insulin levels and, in turn, increases blood glucose, providing a diabetic model to study the efficacy of herbs. The T2D mice showed a significant increase in fasting blood glucose and decreased plasma insulin levels which indicates that the mice were diabetic and developed insulin resistance. The decrease in the plasma insulin despite a high-fat diet maybe because of the fact that in a diabetic condition, the prolonged insulin resistance with compensatory hyperinsulinaemia sends negative signals to the pancreatic β-cell to stop insulin production as there are increased levels of plasma insulin. A similar mechanism is mimicked in this animal model where a high-fat diet for 11 weeks induces insulin resistance and a small dose of STZ injection decreases the insulin level immediately but maintains the insulin resistance to develop a type-2 diabetic model. These results are in agreement with earlier results.19 However, the diabetic mice treated with metformin and the methanolic extract of the C. auriculata root showed the above parameters similar to those of control mice, indicating the amelioration or management of the diabetic condition.

The body weight of all the T2D mice was increased over control mice in this study. After STZ induction, the body weight of diabetic mice decreased compared to other group mice. This may be because in the diabetic condition, the muscle protein is degraded to provide amino acids as substrates for gluconeogenesis20 as the decreased level of insulin due to STZ-induced diabetes cannot transfer glucose into the cells and utilize the same. However, it has been mentioned earlier that insulin and glucose levels were normalized to the level of control mice in metformin and extract-treated mice and hence the body weight is not reduced as there may be increased glucose uptake and thereby reduced gluconeogenesis in treated diabetic mice.

The plasma lipid profile of T2D mice was altered in this study compared to other groups mice. These results are similar to those of earlier studies where Holmes et al.21 reported that high-fat-diet-fed rats showed increased plasma TG and TC levels. Studies reported that diabetes increases hepatic TG.22 The increased amount of TG leads to the accumulation of fats and causes nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.23 Increased levels of LDL-C and TG have been proven to contribute to the development of hypertension and cardiovascular diseases.24,25 Indeed, in this study, there is a significant increase in the plasma levels of TG and LDL, which might lead to cardiovascular diseases. In recent years, the lipid profile alteration has been determined by the atherogenic index. The atherogenic index of plasma is a logarithmically transformed ratio of TG and HDL-C. It is considered as an indicator of dyslipidemia and associated diseases.26 The atherogenic index of diabetic mice in this study is significantly high compared to control, metformin, and extract-treated mice, indicating a significant damage/alteration in the diabetic mice, which may lead to cardiovascular diseases. This is because the atherogenic index is linked with cardiovascular diseases.27

It is well established that as a secondary complication, diabetes is associated with dysfunction or damage in other organs. In this study, the activities of plasma AST, ALT, and ALP were elevated in the T2D mice than in control group mice. The elevated AST, ALT, and ALP activities indicate liver dysfunction. Earlier studies have reported that in the diabetic condition the liver function biomarkers such as ALT, AST, and ALP elevate,9 with which our study is also in line. However, the diabetic mice administered with metformin and the methanolic extract of the C. auriculata root showed the plasma AST, ALT, and ALP activities comparable to those of control mice.

Similarly, kidney dysfunction was also observed only in diabetic mice in this study as reported by previous studies. For instance, Nambirajan et al.9 showed significantly increased levels of urea and creatinine, indicating kidney damage in diabetic rats. The prolonged hyperglycemia in the diabetic condition is known to damage the kidney and leads to diabetic nephropathy. As an indication of kidney dysfunction, there was a significant increase in the plasma concentration of urea, BUN, uric acid, and creatinine in diabetic mice compared to control and metformin- and extract-treated diabetic mice.

In addition to the elevated fasting blood glucose levels, decreased plasma insulin levels, and alterations in the lipid profile as characteristic features of diabetes, oxidative stress is also associated with diabetes. Hyperglycemia is known to generate reactive oxygen species, which in turn cause oxidative stress.28 In the present study, there was a significant increase in the levels of oxidative stress markers, i.e., ROS and NO, in both the plasma and muscles with a concomitant decrease in the activities of antioxidant enzymes SOD and CAT in the T2D mice compared to control mice. However, mice treated with metformin and the methanolic extract of the C. auriculata root showed an increase in the activities of SOD and CAT in the plasma and muscles, confirming the antioxidant property of the methanolic extract of the C. auriculata root. The oxidative stress in the muscle tissue is further supported by the deleterious alteration in the histological architecture of the muscle in diabetic mice as there was a deposition of fat and infiltration of leukocytes, indicating inflammation or damage to the tissue.

Based on the results obtained, a possible mechanism of action is derived as follows. It is well established that feeding with a high-fat diet develops insulin resistance,29 a model for the type-2-diabetic studies. However, recently, an alternate model wherein a high-fat diet fed for 2–3 months with a single dose (60 mg/kg body weight) of STZ would develop a suitable type-2 diabetic model.10 The high-fat diet alters lipid metabolism and develops insulin resistance. The intraperitoneal injection of STZ further alters the insulin level and glucose absorption, resulting in a suitable condition for type-2 diabetes. In this study, a significant increase in fasting blood glucose and a decrease in plasma insulin indicate the induction of insulin resistance after a high-fat diet + STZ injection. This further resulted in the development of the diabetic condition. As a secondary complication of diabetes, there was a significant damage/disruption in the liver and kidney function. Insulin plays a vital role in glucose absorption through glucose transporter (Glut). Glut 4 is an insulin-dependent glut transporters present in the muscle and adipose tissue. Because of insulin resistance and decreased plasma insulin levels, the glut transporters present in muscle cannot function normally, hence altering the function or physiology of the muscle. Altered physiology in muscle further resulted in oxidative stress as evident by increased concentration of ROS and NO with a significant decrease in the activities of SOD and CAT in the muscle. Further, the polyphenol-rich methanolic extract of the C. auriculata root could manage the alterations due to high-fat diet + STZ-induced diabetes similar to that of metformin. This may be because of its rich −OH groups and an efficacy to increase the insulin sensitization as the plasma insulin levels were similar to the levels of control mice in extract-treated mice.

To conclude, the methanolic extract of the C. auriculata root had the highest amount of polyphenols and flavonoids and was rich in −OH groups with potent antioxidant and antidiabetic properties in vitro. The methanolic extract also managed the type-2 diabetic condition to the level of controls. The mechanism of action of the extract may be by increasing the insulin secretion as well as sensitivity in extract-treated diabetic mice.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Chemicals

All the analytical and laboratory-grade chemicals were supplied by Rankem (Bangalore, India), whereas HPLC-grade chemicals, standards, and the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit for insulin were procured from Sigma-Aldrich Chemicals Private Limited (Bangalore, India). Kits for biochemical analyses of plasma were procured from Agappe Diagnostic Limited (Bangalore, India).

4.2. Procurement and Processing of the C. auriculata Root

The root of the C. auriculata plant was collected from Chandravana botanical garden, maintained by Mysore Medical College, Mysuru. After the collection of the plant, it was authenticated by a botany expert, and the voucher number of the herbarium submitted is UOMBOT20CA17. The root was rinsed thoroughly in distilled water and alcohol, shade-dried, coarsely powdered in a hammer mill, and stored in a sealed container at −20 °C until further use.

4.3. Defatting of the Samples

The processed C. auriculata root was defatted by the cold extraction method. Briefly, 10 g of the coarsely powdered C. auriculata root sample was taken in a conical flask with a stopper and extracted with 100 mL of hexane at room temperature for 8 h. Then, the extract was filtered using Whatman No. 1 filter paper, and the residual defatted powder was evaporated and then stored in airtight container at −20 °C.

4.4. Solvent Extraction of Total Polyphenols

The total polyphenols were extracted using different solvents with increasing polarity, viz., chloroform, ethanol, methanol, and water. Briefly, 10 g of defatted root sample was taken in a stopper conical flask along with 100 mL of respective solvents. The conical flasks were kept at room temperature in a rotary shaker for 8 h. Later, the extracts were filtered using Whatman No. 1 filter paper, evaporated using a rotary evaporator, and stored at −20 °C until further analyses.

4.5. Estimation of Total Polyphenols and Flavonoids

The estimation of total polyphenols, and flavonoids was performed according to the methods of McDonald et al.30 and Chang et al.31 respectively, for different solvent extracts of the C. auriculata root.

4.6. HPLC Analysis of Polyphenols in Different Solvent Extracts of the C. auriculata Root

The polyphenol extracts of defatted samples of the C. auriculata root were subjected to HPLC analysis using the protocol of Govardhan Singh et al.32 in a Shimadzu LC-10AVp (Gradient System PDA, RID, UV) system on a reversed-phase C18 column (250 × 4.6 mm2, Phenomenex). Different polyphenols in the different extracts of the C. auriculata root were identified and quantified by comparing with those of the standard peaks.

4.7. FTIR Analysis of Polyphenolic Extracts of the C. auriculata Root

The different solvent extracts of the C. auriculata root were subjected to FTIR analysis to determine the functional groups present. Briefly, FTIR spectra were recorded at a resolution of 2 cm–1 in the range of 400–4000 cm–1.

4.8. Biological Activities of Polyphenol-Rich Extracts of the C. auriculata Root

4.8.1. In Vitro Antioxidant Activities

4.8.1.1. DPPH Free Radical Scavenging Activity

Free radical scavenging activity was investigated using DPPH assay as described by Rakholiya et al.33 In brief, 150 μL of different concentrations of ascorbic acid (standard) and solvent extracts was taken in different test tubes; 2 mL of 0.1 mM DPPH in methanol was added; the total volume was made up to 3 mL with methanol, and the solution was mixed thoroughly and incubated for 30 min in dark; and the absorbance was recorded at 517 nm against the blank. The percentage of radical scavenging activity was calculated using the following formula: DPPH radical scavenging ability (%) = [{(Absref – Abssam)/Absref} × 100], and the samples were compared by calculating IC50 values.

4.8.1.2. FRAP

Ferric reducing antioxidant power was measured following the method of Jeong et al.34 About 8.5 mL of the reaction mixture consisting of 1 mL of different concentrations of the standard (ascorbic acid) and solvent extracts was mixed with 2.5 mL of 0.2 M phosphate buffer (pH 6.6), and 2.5 mL of 1% of potassium ferricyanide [K3Fe(CN)6] was thoroughly mixed and incubated for 30 min at 50 °C. About 2.5 mL of 10% (v/v) trichloroacetic acid was added, and the solution was centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min. Last, 2.5 mL of the supernatant was taken and diluted with the same amount of distilled water and 0.5 mL of 0.1% (w/v) ferric chloride. The absorbance was measured at 700 nm, and an increase in the absorbance of the reaction mixture indicates increasing reducing power.

4.8.2. In Vitro Antidiabetic Activities

4.8.2.1. α-Amylase Inhibitory Assay

The α-amylase inhibitory effect of different solvent extracts of the C. auriculata root was analysed by the method described by Hemalatha et al.35 with slight changes. Briefly, 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 6.9) containing 6.7 mM sodium chloride was prepared, and porcine pancreatic α-amylase and 1% (w/v) starch solution was prepared using the above buffer. Different concentrations of extracts were taken, to which 500 μL of starch was added and the mixture was incubated at 37 °C for 10 min. About 50 μL of porcine pancreatic amylase (0.15 unit/mL) was added to initiate the reaction and was incubated for 30 min at 37 °C. Then, 1 mL of dinitro salicylic acid reagent (1 g of DNSA, 30 g of Rochelle salt was dissolved in 20 mL of 2 N sodium hydroxide and made up to 100 mL with distilled water) was added to all test tubes and incubated for 5 min in boiling water to terminate the reaction. Test tubes were cooled to room temperature and diluted with 5 mL of water, and the absorbance was measured at 540 nm. Acarbose (1 mg/mL) was used as a positive control. The α-amylase inhibitory activity of the extract was calculated using the following formula:

4.8.2.1.

Based on the percentage of inhibition of the enzyme activity, IC50 values were calculated and the inhibitory effect of the extract was compared with that of the standard.

4.8.2.2. α-Glucosidase Inhibition Assay

The methanolic extract of the C. auriculata root was tested for its inhibitory activity against rat intestinal α-glucosidase using 4-nitrophenyl-α-d-glucopyranoside as a substrate according to the method reported by Hemalatha et al.35 The reaction mixture containing 0.6 mL of 0.05 M phosphate buffer (pH 6.8), 0.25 mL of 3 mM 4-nitrophenyl-α-d-glucopyranoside, and 0.1 mL of the sample at various concentrations was prepared and incubated for 5 min at 37 °C. About 0.25 mL of the α-glucosidase solution (0.15 U/mL) was added to initiate the reaction; it was incubated at 37 °C for 40 min. Then, 0.25 mL of 0.67 M sodium carbonate solution was added to terminate the reaction. The absorbance was recorded at 405 nm. Acarbose was used as a positive control. The percentage of α-glucosidase inhibition was calculated by the following formula:

4.8.2.2.

Based on the percentage of inhibition of the enzyme activity, the IC50 value of the methanolic extract was calculated, and the inhibitory effect of the extract was compared with that of the standard.

4.9. Animal Maintenance

Six week-old male C57BL/6 mice were used in this experiment and maintained at 22 ± 2 °C temperature, 55 ± 5% humidity, and 12-h light/dark cycle. The animals were given food and water ad libitum. The animals were maintained at the Animal House Facility, Vipragen Biosciences Private Limited, Mysore, and acclimatized for 1 week before the commencement of the experiment. All the protocols and procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Ethical Committee (VIP-IAEC-206-2020), and CPCSEA guidelines were followed throughout the experiment.

4.10. Experimental Design

After acclimatization, animals were divided into two sets: the first set (n = 5) is control (group 1) with AIN 93 diet (Table 9) and the second set (n = 15) received a high-fat diet (Table 9) for 8 weeks, followed by a single small dose of streptozotocin (60 mg/kg body weight) dissolved in 50 mM citrate buffer (pH 4.5) and 5% of sucrose solution for 24 h. After 5 days, fasting blood glucose (FBG) levels were measured and it was confirmed that second group mice were with FBG levels ≥200 mg/dL (11.1 mmol/L). Then, the second set of mice were divided into three groups, viz., group 2: diabetic (positive control), group 3: diabetic + metformin (102.74 mg/kg bw) (standard group) (the human dose: 500 mg is converted into mouse dose using “DoseCal” calculator of Janhavi et al.36), and group 4: diabetic + the methanolic extract of the C. auriculata root (150 mg/kg bw) (treatment group). The treatment of metformin and the methanolic extract of root of C. auriculata was given for 8 weeks, and the mice were maintained with the AIN 93 diet. After the last treatment, mice were fasted overnight, euthanized and blood and muscle samples were collected. The blood was centrifuged at 3500 rpm for 10 min, and the plasma obtained as the supernatant was separated. The muscle sample was stored in 10% formalin for the histological study. The remaining muscle and plasma were stored at −20 °C until further use.

Table 9. Composition and Energy of AIN 93M and High-Fat Diets.

ingredients AIN 93M diet (g) energy (kcal) high-fat diet (g) energy (kcal)
casein 180 690.66 180 690.66
sucrose 100 389.5 100 389.5
corn starch 550 141.21 270 69.48
oil 70 18.01 0 0
cellulose 50 0 50 0
minerals 35 0 35 0
vitamins 10 0 10 0
choline 2 0 2 0
l-cystine 3 0 3 0
lard 0 0 350 3150
total 1000 1239.38 1000 4299.64

4.11. Biochemical Analyses

All the plasma biochemical analyses (lipid profiling, liver, and renal function tests) were performed using kits of Agappe Diagnostic Limited, Kerala, India.

4.12. Oxidative Stress Marker in the Plasma and Muscles

The ROS and NO in the plasma and muscles were estimated according to Black and Brandt37 and Green et al.,38 respectively, with slight modifications, i.e., the muscle tissue was homogenized in 0.32 M sucrose.

The ROS generation was measured by incubating the reaction aliquot consisting of 0.1 M Tris–HCl buffer, the sample, and DCF-DA for 1 h at room temperature in the dark. The reaction was read with an excitation wavelength of 488 nm and an emission wavelength of 525 nm. The values are expressed as μmol DCF formed/min/mg protein.

For the measurement of NO generation, the sample was incubated with the Griess reagent for 10 min at room temperature in dark and read at 540 nm. The values are expressed as ng of NO generated/mg protein.

4.13. Activities of Antioxidant Enzymes in the Plasma and Muscles

The activities of antioxidant enzymes, SOD39 and CAT,40 in the plasma and muscles were determined according to the standard protocols with slight modifications, i.e., the muscle tissue was homogenized in 0.32 M sucrose.

For the determination of the activity of SOD, to 0.1 M Tris–HCl buffer of pH 8.2, the enzyme sample and 0.2 mM pyrogallol were added and monitored at 420 nm for 2 min for the autoxidation of pyrogallol with and without the presence of sample in the reaction mixture. The quantity of enzyme used to inhibit 50% of autoxidation of pyrogallol is considered as 1 unit. The specific activity was expressed as U/mg protein.

The activity of catalase was determined. Briefly, to the 1 mL reaction mixture, 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), the enzyme sample, and 8.8 mM H2O2 were added. The reaction was monitored at 240 nm for 3 min, and the change in absorbance was recorded for every 30 s. The activity of catalase was expressed as nmol/min/mg protein.

4.14. Histopathology

The muscle tissue was removed from the animals and fixed in buffered formaldehyde (10% v/v). After dehydrating with a graded ethanol solution, the tissue was embedded in paraffin wax. Sections of 5 μm thickness were taken in a microtome, mounted on glass slides, deparaffinized in xylene and stained for hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). The slides were observed under a light microscope (Olympus Optical Co., Ltd., Germany) and analyzed for the recovery of damages caused due to high blood glucose by the treatment of metformin and the methanolic extract of root of C. auriculata.

4.15. Statistical Analysis

All results are expressed as mean ± standard error (SE). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was employed, followed by the posthoc Duncan test to identify significant differences (P < 0.05) using the SPSS software 17.0. The significant difference (P < 0.05) between the standard and the methanolic extract of the C. auriculata root in in vitro anti-diabetic assay was determined by Student’s t-test.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Director, CSIR-CFTRI, Mysuru, for providing the required facilities for this study.

Glossary

Abbreviations

ALP

alkaline phosphatase

ALT

alanine transferase

AST

aspartate transferase

BUN

blood urea nitrogen

CAT

catalase

CPCSEA

Committee for the Purpose of Control and Supervision of Experiments on Animals

DPPH

2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl

FRAP

ferrous reducing antioxidant power

FTIR

Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy

HDL

high-density lipoprotein

HPLC

high-pressure liquid chromatography

LDL

low-density lipoprotein

NO

nitric oxide

ROS

reactive oxygen species

SOD

superoxide dismutase

STZ

streptozotocin

TC

total cholesterol

TG

triglyceride

T2DM

type-2 diabetic mice

VLDL

very low density lipoprotein

Author Contributions

# B.S., P.J., and S.M. contributed equally to the manuscript. S.D. and M.S.P.: conceptualized the concept and proposed the project; B.S., P.J., S.M., and P.V.: executed the experiments; S.D. and P.J.: compiled and interpreted the results; S.D. and P.J.: prepared the manuscript; and M.S.P., S.D., and M.S.N.: did a critical revision of the manuscript and finalized it.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  1. Pandey M. M.; Rastogi S.; Rawat A. K. S. Indian traditional ayurvedic system of medicine and nutritional supplementation. Evidence-Based Complementary Altern. Med. 2013, 2013, 376327 10.1155/2013/376327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Pari L.; Latha M. Effect of Cassia auriculata flowers on blood sugar levels, serum and tissue lipids in streptozotocin diabetic rats. Singapore Med. J. 2002, 43, 617–621. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Joshi S. G.Cesalpinaceae-Cassia auriculata. Textbook of Medicinal Plants, 3rd ed.; India Book House: Bangalore, India, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  4. Perumal Samy R.; Ignacimithu S. Antibacterial activity of some folklore medicinal plants used by tribals in Western Ghats of India. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2000, 69, 63–71. 10.1016/S0378-8741(98)00156-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Padmalochana K. Anti-cancer (liver cancer cell lines) and antioxidant activity of Cassia auriculata flower extract from acetone and methanol solvents. J. Drug Discovery Ther. 2018, 8, 274–278. 10.22270/jddt.v8i6-s.2130. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Jaydeokar A. V.; Bandawane D. D.; et al. Hepatoprotective potential of Cassia auriculata roots on ethanol and antitubercular drug-induced hepatotoxicity in experimental models. Pharm. Biol. 2014, 52, 344–355. 10.3109/13880209.2013.837075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gupta S.; Sharma S. B.; Bansal S. K.; Prabhu K. M. Antihyperglycemic and hypolipidemic activity extract of Cassia auriculata L. leaves in experimental diabetes. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2009, 123, 499–503. 10.1016/j.jep.2009.02.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Latha M.; Pari L. Antihyperglycaemic effect of Cassia auriculata in experimental diabetes and its effects on key metabolic enzymes involved in carbohydrate metabolism. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 2003, 30, 38–43. 10.1046/j.1440-1681.2003.03785.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Nambirajan G.; Karunanidhi K.; Ganesan A.; Rajendran R.; Kandasamy R.; Elangovan A.; Thilagar S. Evaluation of antidiabetic activity of bud and flower of Avaram senna (Cassia auriculata L.) in high fat diet and streptozotocin induced diabetic rats. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018, 108, 1495–1506. 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kalavani A.; Umamaheswari A.; Vinayagam A.; Kalavani K. Anti-hyperglycemic and antioxidant properties of Cassia auriculata leaves and flowers on alloxan induced diabetic rats. Pharmacologyonline 2008, 1, 204–217. [Google Scholar]
  11. Raja D. K.; Jeganathan N. S.; Manavalan R. In vitro antimicrobial activity and phytochemical analysis of Cassia auriculata Linn.. Int. Curr. Pharm. J. 2013, 2, 105–108. 10.3329/icpj.v2i6.14869. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Uma Devi P.; Selvi P. S.; Suja S.; Selvam K.; Chinnaswamy P. Antidiabetic and hypolipidemic effect of Cassia auriculata in alloxan induced diabetic rats. Int. J. Pharmacol. 2006, 2, 601–607. 10.3923/ijp.2006.601.607. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Craig W. J. Health-promoting properties of common herbs. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1999, 70, 491S–499S. 10.1093/ajcn/70.3.491s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Mohsen S. M.; Ammar A. S. M. Total phenolic contents and antioxidant activity of corn tassel extracts. Food Chem. 2009, 112, 595–598. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.06.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Janhavi P.; Sindhoora S.; Muthukumar S. P. Bioaccessibility and bioavailability of polyphenols from sour mangosteen (Garcinia xanthochymus) fruit. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2020, 14, 2414–2423. 10.1007/s11694-020-00488-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Pandey K. B.; Rizvi S. I. Plant polyphenols as dietary antioxidants in human health and disease. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longevity 2009, 2, 270–278. 10.4161/oxim.2.5.9498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Swallah M. S.; Sun H.; Affoh R.; Fu H.; Yu H. Antioxidant potential overviews of secondary metabolites (polyphenols) in fruits. Int. J. Food Sci. 2020, 2020, 9081686 10.1155/2020/9081686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Chait A.; Bornfeldt K. E. Diabetes and atherosclerosis: is there a role for hyperglycemia?. J. Lipid Res. 2009, 50, S335–S339. 10.1194/jlr.R800059-JLR200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Vatandoust N.; Rami F.; Salehi A. R.; Khosravi S.; Dashti G.; Eslami G.; Momenzadeh A.; Salehi R. Novel high-fat diet formulation and streptozotocin treatment for induction of prediabetes and type 2 diabetes in rats. Adv. Biomed. Res. 2018, 7, 107 10.4103/abr.abr_8_17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hatting M.; Tavares C. D. J.; Sharabi K.; Rines A. K.; Puigserver P. Insulin regulation of gluconeogenesis. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2018, 1411, 21–35. 10.1111/nyas.13435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Holmes A.; Coppey L. J.; Davidson E. P.; Yorek M. A. Rat models of diet-induced obesity and high fat/low dose streptozotocin type 2 diabetes: effect of reversal of high fat diet compared to treatment with enalapril or menhaden oil on glucose utilization and neuropathic endpoints. J. Diabetes Res. 2015, 2015, 307285 10.1155/2015/307285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Cho S. Y.; Park J. Y.; Park E. M.; Choi M. S.; Lee M. K.; Jeon S. M.; Jang M. K.; Kim M. J.; Park Y. B. Alternation of hepatic antioxidant enzyme activities and lipid profile in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats by supplementation of dandelion water extract. Clin. Chim. Acta 2002, 317, 109–117. 10.1016/S0009-8981(01)00762-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Friedman S. L.; Neuschwander-Tetri B. A.; Rinella M.; Sanyal A. J. Mechanisms of NAFLD development and therapeutic strategies. Nat. Med. 2018, 24, 908–922. 10.1038/s41591-018-0104-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Halperin R. O.; Sesso H. D.; Ma J.; Buring J. E.; Stampfer M. J.; Gaziano J. M. Dyslipidemia and the risk of incident hypertension in men. Hypertension 2006, 47, 45–50. 10.1161/01.HYP.0000196306.42418.0e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Harchaoui K. E. L.; Visser M. E.; Kastelein J. J. P.; Stroes E. S.; Dallinga-Thie G. M. Triglycerides and cardiovascular risk. Curr. Cardiol. Rev. 2009, 5, 216–222. 10.2174/157340309788970315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Yang S. H.; Du Y.; Li X. L.; Zhang Y.; Li S.; Xu R. X.; Zhu C. G.; Guo Y. L.; Wu N. Q.; Qing P.; Gao Y.; Cui C. J.; Dong Q.; Sun J.; Li J. J. Triglyceride to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio and cardiovascular events in diabetics with coronary artery disease. Am. J. Med. Sci. 2017, 354, 117–124. 10.1016/j.amjms.2017.03.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Niroumand S.; Khajedaluee M.; Khadem-Rezaiyan M.; Abrishami M.; Juya M.; Khodaee G.; Dadgarmoghaddam M. Atherogenic index of plasma (AIP): a marker of cardiovascular disease. Med. J. Islam. Repub. Iran 2015, 29, 240. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Baynes J. W. Role of oxidative stress in development of complications in diabetes. Diabetes 1991, 40, 405–412. 10.2337/diab.40.4.405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Riant E.; Waget A.; Cogo H.; Arnal J. F.; Burcelin R.; Gourdy P. Estrogens protect against high-fat diet-induced insulin resistance and glucose intolerance in mice. Endrocrinology 2009, 150, 2109–2117. 10.1210/en.2008-0971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. McDonald S.; Prenzler P. D.; Antolovich M.; Robards K. Phenolic content and antioxidant activity of olive extracts. Food Chem. 2001, 73 (1), 73–84. 10.1016/S0308-8146(00)00288-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Chang C. C.; Yang M. H.; Wen H. M.; Chern J. C. Estimation of total flavonoid content in propolis by two complementary colorimetric methods. J. Food Drug Anal. 2002, 10, 178–182. 10.38212/2224-6614.2748. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Govardhan Singh R. S.; Negi P. S.; Radha C. Phenolic composition, antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of free and bound phenolic extracts of Moringa oleifera seed flour. J. Funct. Foods 2013, 5, 1883–1891. 10.1016/j.jff.2013.09.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Rakholiya K. D.; Kaneria M.; Sumitra C. Vegetable and fruit peels as a novel source of antioxidants. J. Med. Plant Res. 2011, 5, 63. [Google Scholar]
  34. Jeong C. H.; Choi G. N.; Kim J. H.; Kwak J. H.; Kim D. O.; Kim Y. J.; Heo H. J. Antioxidant activities from the aerial parts of Platycodon grandiflorum. Food Chem. 2010, 118, 278–282. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.04.134. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Hemalatha P.; Bomzan D. P.; Rao B. S.; Sreerama Y. N. Distribution of phenolic antioxidants in whole and milled fractions of quinoa and their inhibitory effects on α-amylase and α-glucosidase activities. Food Chem. 2016, 199, 330–338. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.12.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Janhavi P.; Divyashree S.; Sanjailal K. P.; Muthukumar S. DoseCal: a virtual calculator for dosage conversion between human and different animal species. Arch. Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 20, 1–5. 10.1080/13813455.2019.1687523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Black M. J.; Brandt R. B. Spectrofluorometric analysis of hydrogen peroxide. Anal. Biochem. 1974, 58, 246–254. 10.1016/0003-2697(74)90464-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Green L. C.; Wagner D. A.; Glogowski J.; Skipper P. L.; Wishnok J. S.; Tannenbaum S. R. Analysis of nitrate and 15N in biological fluids. Anal. Biochem. 1982, 126, 131–138. 10.1016/0003-2697(82)90118-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Marklund S.; Marklund G. Involvement of the superoxide anion radical in the autoxidation of pyrogallol and a convenient assay for SOD. Eur. J. Biochem. 1974, 47, 469–473. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1974.tb03714.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Aebi H. Catalase in vitro methods. Methods Enzymol. 1984, 105, 121–126. 10.1016/s0076-6879(84)05016-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from ACS Omega are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES