Summary
TNF signalling through TNFRp55 and TNFRp75, and receptor shedding is important for immune activation and regulation. TNFRp75 deficiency leads to improved control of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis) infection, but the effects of early innate immune events in this process are unclear. We investigated the role of TNFRp75 on cell activation and apoptosis of alveolar macrophages and neutrophils during M. tuberculosis and M. bovis BCG infection. We found increased microbicidal activity against M. tuberculosis occurred independently of IFNy and NO generation, and displayed an inverse correlation with alveolar macrophages (AMs) apoptosis. Both M. tuberculosis and M. bovis BCG induced higher expression of MHC‐II in TNFRp75−/− AMs; however, M bovis BCG infection did not alter AM apoptosis in the absence of TNFRp75. Pulmonary concentrations of CCL2, CCL3 and IL‐1β were increased in TNFRp75−/− mice during M, bovis BCG infection, but had no effect on neutrophil responses. Thus, TNFRp75‐dependent regulation of mycobacterial replication is virulence dependent and occurs independently of early alveolar macrophage apoptosis and neutrophil responses.
Keywords: TNF, macrophage, neutrophil, TNF receptor, apoptosis, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, BCG
In the WT macrophages, TNF is expressed as a transmembrane molecule (tmTNF) and released to a soluble protein (sTNF). Both TNF forms are biologically active that can bind to either TNFRp55 or TNFRp75 leading to the NFκB pathway or the apoptotic pathway. In the TNFRp75−/− macrophages, there is no TNFRp75 to either modulate TNF activity or to deplete the cytosolic pool of adaptor protein TRAF2. It is therefore possible that exclusive stimulation of TNFRp55 mediated by TRAF2 aggregation consequently increases NFκB activation.

Abbreviations
- AM
alveolar macrophage
- BALF
bronchoalveolar lavage fluid
- BCG
Bacillus Calmette‐Guerin
- BMDM
bone marrow‐derived macrophage
- CCL
CC chemokine ligand
- CFU
colony‐forming unit
- DC
dendritic cell
- GFP
green fluorescent protein
- IL
interleukin
- MCP
monocyte chemotactic protein
- MIP
macrophage inflammatory protein
- MHC
major histocompatibility complex
- MOI
multiplicity of infection
- M. bovis
Mycobacterium bovis
- M. tuberculosis
Mycobacterium tuberculosis
- NFκB
nuclear factor kappa B
- OADC
oleic acid‐albumin‐dextrose‐catalase
- RIPK
receptor interacting protein kinase
- TB
tuberculosis
- TNF
tumour necrosis factor
- TRADD
TNF receptor‐associated protein with death domain
- TRAF
TNF receptor‐associating factor
- WT
wild type
INTRODUCTION
Tuberculosis (TB) is the leading cause of mortality worldwide from a single infectious agent, Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis), and is primarily spread by the aerosol route of infection. 1 Upon inhalation, M. tuberculosis can infect different subsets of mononuclear phagocytes in the lung, such as macrophages, neutrophils and dendritic cells (DCs). Although host macrophages are predominantly the cells targeted for initial infection, studies suggest that macrophages of different lineages, for example alveolar macrophages (AMs), interstitial and infiltrating macrophages, contribute differently to immune function and disease control. 2 , 3 , 4 Following bacilli uptake, these macrophages are capable of producing reactive nitrogen species and reactive oxygen species (ROS), which generate a hostile environment to kill intracellular pathogens. 5 , 6 , 7 In addition, apoptosis of infected macrophages plays an important role in host defence, by preventing M. tuberculosis dissemination. 8 , 9 , 10 However, intracellular mycobacteria have developed the ability to subvert macrophage protective responses by producing antioxidants, interrupting phagosome maturation and reducing major histocompatibility complex class II (MHC‐II) antigen presentation. 11 , 12 , 13 , 14
Tumour necrosis factor (TNF) is a well‐characterized cytokine known to have pleiotropic functions in cellular communication, immunity and different modes of cell death. 15 , 16 TNF is expressed as a transmembrane protein that can be cleaved into a soluble form. Both molecular forms can bind to either TNFRp55 (TNFR1, CD120a) or TNFRp75 (TNFR2, CD120b) through which it elicits different receptor signalling outcomes. TNFRp55 is expressed on all cell types and has a cytoplasmic ‘death domain’, which recruits receptor‐interacting protein kinase (RIPK) and TNF receptor‐associated protein with death domain (TRADD) that activate downstream pro‐inflammatory signalling pathways or alternatively, facilitate signalling leading to cell death via apoptosis and necroptosis. In contrast, TNFRp75 lacks the cytoplasmic death domain and mainly exerts pro‐survival effects. However, both TNFRs bind TNF receptor associating factors (TRAFs) and cellular inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (cIAP1 and cIAP2) that ultimately activate the transcription factor nuclear factor of kappa B (NFκB), 16 , 17 , 18 suggesting crosstalk between TNFRp55 and TNFRp75 in tightly regulated signalling cascades. In many cases, immune cells express both TNFRp55 and TNFRp75 that makes it difficult to dissect the TNF‐mediated signalling cascades and to understand how both receptors are regulated.
Importantly, TNF signalling mediates inflammatory responses and contributes to host protection as well as immune‐mediated pathology during M. tuberculosis infection. 19 In humans, primates and mice, TNF plays a critical role in containment of chronic and latent M. tuberculosis infection. 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 While TNF contributes to adaptive Th1 immunity to control chronic infection, TNF synthesis by macrophages and neutrophils is critical for early protection against M. tuberculosis demonstrated in the MLys‐Cre TNF murine model. 20 In addition, macrophage and neutrophil expression of TNFRp55 is similarly important as MLys‐Cre TNFRp55‐deficient mice rapidly succumb to M. tuberculosis infection. 25
Unlike the constitutive expression of TNFRp55, TNFRp75 expression is limited to endothelial cells, immune cells and certain central nervous system cell types. 26 , 27 Most of the previous studies investigating TNFRp75 functions focus on non‐communicable diseases and autoimmunity that demonstrated therapeutic benefits in diseases such as cancer and rheumatoid arthritis. 28 , 29 Early in vitro studies have found that M. tuberculosis exploits TNFRp75 shedding to reduce TNF‐mediated apoptosis for self‐preservation 8 , 10 . In mice, we have identified the regulatory role of TNFRp75 in host protection against M. tuberculosis through shedding and binding to TNF. We have also shown that TNFRp75 deficiency improves mouse survival and is associated with increased control of bacterial growth during acute and chronic stages of infection. 30 It is known that rapid initiation of effective localized pulmonary immune responses can ultimately improve disease outcome 31 , 32 , 33 ; therefore, in the present study we sought to define TNFRp75‐dependent immune regulation as part of the host defence during the earliest events of M. tuberculosis infection. As the initial responder cells to mycobacterial insult that may be functionally important in early TNFRp75‐mediated immune responses, AMs and neutrophils were of particular interest to our study. Through aerosol transmission, we infected TNFRp75−/− mice with fluorescent M. tuberculosis and used multi‐parametric flow cytometry to characterize localized AM activation and apoptosis in the alveolar space of the lung. Considering TNF‐mediated apoptosis of infected AMs is dependent on mycobacteria virulence, 8 , 9 , 10 we also assessed the contribution of TNFRp75 to regulate innate immune responses at the onset of M. bovis BCG infection. Therefore, our study reveals the effects of TNFRp75 deficiency on host macrophages and neutrophils during early innate responses against mycobacteria.
METHODS
Mice
Mice used in this study were housed at the Research Animal Facility of the University of Cape Town under specific pathogen‐free conditions. Both male and female mice between 6 to 12 weeks of age were used. C57BL/6 mice were used as wild‐type (WT) control mice, and TNFRp75−/− (Tnfrsf1b −/−) mice were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory. All experiments were approved by the Research Animal Ethics Committee of the University of Cape Town (Reference Number: AEC 015/016) in accordance with the South African National Standard 10386 – The care and use of animals for scientific purposes.
Mycobacteria
Mycobacterium Bovis Bacillus Calmette‐Guerin‐expressing green fluorescent protein (BCG‐GFP) and M. tuberculosis (H37Rv‐GFP and H37Rv) were cultured for 21 days in Millbrook 7H9 broth (Difco™, Becton, Dickinson and Company) containing 0.5% glycerol, 10% oleic acid‐albumin‐dextrose‐catalase (OADC) (Becton, Dickinson and Company) and incubated at 37°C. An additional 50 μg/ml of hygromycin B (Roche Diagnostics) and kanamycin was added to the BCG‐GFP and H37Rv‐GFP broths, respectively. Aliquots were made and stored at −80°C. To determine the concentrations of the frozen stocks, 10‐fold serial dilutions were made after passaging 30 x through a 29.5 G needle to eliminate clumping. Serial dilutions were plated on Middlebrook 7H10 agar (Difco™, Becton, Dickinson and Company) containing 10% OADC and antibiotics (50 μg/ml of hygromycin B or kanamycin), and incubated at 37°C for 21 days after which colony‐forming units (CFUs) were enumerated.
In vivo infection
For intranasal infection, anaesthetized mice were administrated with 25 μl of inoculum into each nostril to give each mouse a total of 1 × 104 CFU of mycobacteria. Aerosol infection was performed using a Glas‐Col Inhalation Exposure System (Model A4224). The infection dose was verified by determining the bacterial burden of five mice 24 h post‐infection. To determine pulmonary bacterial burdens, whole lungs were removed, homogenized in sterile PBS/0.04% Tween‐80 and plated in 10‐fold serial dilution on Middlebrook 7H10 agar with 10% OADC. Plates were incubated at 37°C for 19–21 days before CFUs were enumerated.
Cells and infection
Primary bone marrow‐derived macrophages (BMDMs) were cultivated from adult mouse femurs and maintained in RPMI medium (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) supplemented with 20% foetal calf serum (Gibco, Germany), 30% L929‐conditioned medium, 10 mM l‐glutamine (Gibco, Germany), 100 μg/ml Streptomycin and 100 U/ml Penicillin (Gibco, Germany) at 37°C with 5% CO2. After 8‐10 days, confluent cells were seeded at a concentration of 1 × 105 cells per well in a 96‐well plate, and M. tuberculosis H37Rv were added at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 5:1 (bacillus to cell). To determine the ability of macrophages to control bacterial growth in vitro, BMDMs were pre‐stimulated with or without 100 U/ml recombinant IFNγ for 24 h, then infected with H37Rv‐GFP at 2:1 MOI for 4 h to 72 h. The amount of intracellular bacilli from the lysate of macrophages was determined by means of relative fluorescent unit (RFU) using a Modulus microplate fluorometer (Turner Biosystems Inc.). Culture supernatants were assayed for nitrite (NO2 –) concentrations using Griess reagent, and absorbance was recorded at 540 nm on SoftMax Pro (Molecular Devices Corporation).
For ex vivo experiments, the AMs were harvested from the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) using fluorescently activated cell sorting (FACS, Becton Dickson Aria flow cytometer). Neutrophils were isolated from the blood of naïve mice using magnetic cell sorting (Miltenyi Biotec). The cytospin slides of sorted AMs and neutrophils were Giemsa stained and analysed using a Nikon 90i Eclipse microscope. The sorted cells were then seeded at 5 × 104 cells per well and incubated with BCG‐GFP or H37Rv‐GFP at a MOI of 5:1. Neutrophils were stimulated for 4 h, whereas AMs were stimulated for 24 h and analysed using flow cytometry.
Flow cytometric analysis
The flow cytometry antibodies were purchased from BD Pharmingen unless otherwise stated. Non‐specific binding to cells was blocked through incubation with αFcγRIII (1 mg/ml of rat α‐mouse CD32/16c). BMDMs were stained with FITC‐conjugated anti‐TNFRp55 (clone 55R‐170, Santa Cruz) and PE‐conjugated anti‐TNFRp75 (clone TR75‐89, Santa Cruz). BAL cells ex vivo and in vivo were labelled with fluorochrome‐conjugated antibodies: anti‐CD11b (clone M1/70), anti‐CD11c (clone HL3), anti‐Ly6G (clone 1A8), anti‐SiglecF (E50‐2440), BV711‐conjugated anti‐I‐A/I‐E‐PE (M5/14.15.2) and PE‐conjugated anti‐Annexin V. The antibodies were used at 2 µg/ml per 106 cells. After washing with PBS, the cells were fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde and then analysed on a FACS Calibur (BD) using Cell Quest software (BD) or a FACS LSRII (BD) flow cytometer using FACS Diva version 6.0 (BD). Further analysis was performed on FlowJo software.
ELISA
Supernatants of BMDM cultures were used for ELISA to assess the soluble TNFRp55 and TNFRp75 concentrations. BALF from the in vivo experiments was used to assess the CCL2, CCL3, IL‐β, TNF and TNFRp55 cytokine concentrations. All ELISA reagents were purchased from R&D Systems and used according to the manufacturer's instructions. The absorbance was read at 405 nm using a VERSAmax Microplate Reader (Molecular Devices Corporation), and data were analysed using SoftMax Pro (Molecular Devices Corporation).
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed by the Student's t‐test or one‐way ANOVA test with multiple comparisons using GraphPad Prism software. The data are presented as the standard error mean (SEM). For all tests, a P‐value of ≤0.05 was considered significant.
RESULTS
TNFRp75 deficiency reduces TNFRp55 shedding in Mycobacterium tuberculosis‐infected BMDM
Macrophages are considered the primary target cells of M. tuberculosis, which express and release both soluble TNFRp55 and TNFRp75 that regulate TNF‐mediated activities including macrophage activation and survival in an autocrine fashion. 8 , 16 , 34 To study the effect of TNFRp75 in regulating macrophage functions, our initial experimental approach incorporated a bone marrow‐derived macrophages (BMDM) culture system, which we and others have used extensively to study macrophage responses to M. tuberculosis. 34 , 35 We first confirmed constitutive expression of TNFRp75 in unstimulated WT BMDM (Figure 1A). Following 24 h of in vitro infection with H37Rv (MOI 5:1), TNFRp75 was subsequently released in WT BMDM cultures during M. tuberculosis infection (Figure 1A,C). As expected, no detectable soluble TNFRp75 was present in TNFRp75−/− BMDM cultures (Figure 1C).
Figure 1.

Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection induces TNFR shedding in BMDM. BMDMs were cultured from WT (black bar) and TNFRp75−/− mice (grey bar). Following 24 h of M. tuberculosis H37Rv (MOI 5:1) in vitro infection, flow cytometry analysis of surface expression of (A) TNFRp75 and (B) TNFRp55 in WT and TNFRp75−/− BMDM, and culture supernatants were analysed by ELISA for (C) TNFRp75 and (D) TNFRp55. Experiments were performed twice. The data shown as representative data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01). (ND = not detectable)
Release of soluble TNFRp55 has been described to regulate macrophage activation and apoptosis during mycobacterial infection. 34 , 36 We have previously found that TNFRp75 deficiency is associated with the release of less TNFRp55 from DCs during M. tuberculosis infection. 30 To gain insight into the regulatory relationship between TNFRp75 and TNFRp55 in macrophages during M. tuberculosis infection, we analysed TNFRp55 expression in TNFRp75−/− macrophages subsequent to M. tuberculosis exposure. Flow cytometric analysis revealed the upregulation of TNFRp55 surface expression on both M. tuberculosis‐infected WT and TNFRp75−/− BMDMs (Figure 1B). Consistent with our previous observation in DCs, the release of soluble TNFRp55 was significantly less in TNFRp75−/− BMDM cultures compared to WT BMDM from 4 to 72 h post‐infection (Figure 1D). The data therefore support a regulatory relationship between TNFRp55 and TNFRp75 expressed on macrophages in response to M. tuberculosis infection.
TNFRp75 deficiency enhances microbicidal activity of BMDM independent of IFNγ and NO
Next, to evaluate the effects of TNFRp75 on the efficiency of macrophages to phagocytose and control bacterial growth, WT and TNFRp75−/− BMDM were infected with H37Rv‐GFP (MOI 2:1) for 4 –72 h. The number of H37Rv‐GFP bacilli was significantly higher in the TNFRp75−/− BMDM compared to WT BMDM at 4 h post‐infection (Figure 2A) indicating a higher potential for rapid phagocytosis in the absence of TNFRp75. Notably, TNFRp75−/− BMDM displayed a higher rate of mycobacterial killing over the first 24 h with a 60% reduction in bacilli levels compared to WT BMDM that reduced bacilli levels by 49% over the same period. The amount of intracellular bacilli was comparable in both strains from 24 h to 72 h post‐infection (Figure 2A).
Figure 2.

TNFRp75 deficiency increases control of Mycobacterium tuberculosis growth in BMDM. WT (black bar) and TNFRp75−/− BMDM (grey bar) cultures were infected with M. tuberculosis H37Rv‐GFP at MOI of 2:1. The intracellular bacillary load was determined by GFP‐microplate assay. (A) Relative fluorescent unit (RFU) was measured from 4 to 72 h. Dash line (‐‐) represents bacilli reduction over 24 h. (B) RFU was also measured in BMDM cultures treated with recombinant IFNγ for 24 h prior to H37Rv‐GFP infection. (C) The levels of nitrite were determined over 72 h in culture supernatants from both IFNγ pre‐treated and untreated BMDM cultures after M. tuberculosis infection. No nitrite was detectable in medium control. Experiments were performed twice. The data shown as representative data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance (*P < 0.05)
Studies have shown that IFNγ contributes to the activation of macrophages and their microbicidal functions, and synergizes with TNF for optimal M. tuberculosis growth control. 37 , 38 We treated WT and TNFRp75−/− BMDM with IFNγ 24 h prior to infection and as a result found similar uptake of H37Rv‐GFP by both strains at 4 h post‐infection. Moreover, IFNγ pre‐stimulation increased the rate of microbicidal activity of WT BMDM equivalent to that observed for TNFRp75−/− BMDM with the percentage of H37Rv‐GFP reduction increasing from 49% (Figure 2A) to 62% (Figure 2B). In contrast, IFNγ stimulation did not further increase the initial uptake of bacilli by TNFRp75−/− BMDM or the rate of bacilli killing measured by bacilli reduction (Figure 2A,B). As part of the microbicidal activity induced by IFNγ and TNF, activated macrophages release nitric oxide (NO) to kill intracellular bacilli within phagosomes. 38 To evaluate the functional impact of TNFRp75 on activated macrophages, we measured the levels of NO in the supernatant of WT and TNFRp75−/− BMDM cultures infected with H37Rv‐GFP. Interestingly, TNFRp75−/− BMDM responded to M. tuberculosis with lower NO production when compared to WT BMDM over 72 h in vitro infection (Figure 2C). Interestingly, TNFRp75 deficiency dysregulated NO production in infected macrophages but did not impair its ability to control bacterial growth (Figure 2A). Although increased NO production was seen with IFNγ pre‐stimulation, the levels of NO production were consistently lower in TNFRp75−/− BMDM compared to WT BMDM over the experimental period (Figure 2C). Interestingly, this impaired capability of NO production in TNFRp75−/− BMDM is in agreement with the described observations of reduced NO production in TNFRp75‐deficient myeloid‐derived suppressor cells. 39 This suggests an independent role of TNFRp75 in inflammatory and immune regulatory responses. Overall, exogenous IFNγ pre‐stimulation enhanced macrophage function in the presence of TNFRp75 expression but was redundant for TNFRp75‐deficient macrophage‐mediated functions to control M. tuberculosis infection.
Enhanced microbicidal effects of TNFRp75−/− mice occurs independent of alveolar macrophage apoptosis during Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection
Macrophages of diverse lineages contribute differently to early immune responses, 3 , 31 , 35 particularly TNFRp75‐mediated AM apoptosis which is considered beneficial to host defence. 8 , 36 In this study, we identified AMs as CD11bloCD11c+SiglecF+ cells, 2 , 3 which was confirmed microscopically by Giemsa staining (Figure 3A). TNFRp75−/− AMs and WT AMs from BALF of naïve mouse were sorted and infected ex vivo with H37Rv‐GFP at a MOI of 5:1 for 24 h. We observed equivalent numbers of GFP+ WT and TNFRp75−/− AMs in culture (Figure 3B), while the percentages of Annexin V+ apoptotic AMs were also similar in both WT and TNFRp75−/− cultures (Figure 3C). Although the primary functions of AMs are not antigen presentation and activation of CD4+ T cells, resident AMs express MHC‐II molecules that can be interfered with by mycobacteria as an immune evasion strategy. 12 , 40 We analysed the surface expression of MHC‐II in both WT and TNFRp75−/− AMs and flow cytometry analysis revealed similar expression levels in both strains (Figure 3D).
Figure 3.

TNFRp75 deficiency protects early Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection and enhances alveolar macrophage response in vivo. (A) fluorescence‐activated cell sorting of CD11bloCD11c+SiglecF+ cells from BALF of WT and TNFRp75−/− mouse. The sorted AMs were Giemsa stained. Ex vivo experiments were performed with M. tuberculosis H37Rv‐GFP infection at a MOI of 5:1 and then analysed the composition of (B) GFP+, (C) Annexin V+ and (D) MHC‐II+ AM by flow cytometry at 24 h post‐infection. WT mice (black bar) and TNFRp75−/− mice (grey bar) were challenged by aerosol inhalation with 1 × 103 CFU with M. tuberculosis H37Rv‐GFP. (E) Bacilli burdens were enumerated in the lungs after 24‐ and 48‐h infection. Flow cytometry analysis was performed to analyse the percentages of (F) CD11bloCD11c+SiglecF+ cells, as well as (G) GFP+, (H) Annexin V+ and (I) MHC‐II+ AMs in the BALF of infected mice. The data shown are pooled from two experiments with six mice per group and are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ns, not significant)
To determine whether our observations in culture had physiological relevance, we infected WT and TNFRp75−/− mice with 1 × 103 CFU of M. tuberculosis H37Rv‐GFP by aerosol inhalation and assessed the pulmonary bacterial burden at 24 h and 48 h post‐infection. Enumeration of CFU revealed comparable mycobacterial uptake by WT and TNFRp75−/− mice after 24 h. A significantly lower bacterial burden was measured in TNFRp75−/− lungs (P < 0.05; Figure 3E) following a 30% reduction after 48 h compared to 6% observed in WT mice. This suggested that TNFRp75 did not affect initial phagocytic events in the lung but may regulate intracellular bacterial replication. To explore the significance of TNFRp75 in AMs at the site of infection, BAL cells were collected from the H37Rv‐GFP‐infected mice and analysed by flow cytometry at 24 h post‐infection. Measurement of the total number of AMs was similar between WT and TNFRp75−/− mice (Figure 3F). Since AMs are the primary phagocytes during initial events of M. tuberculosis infection, 4 the number of AMs containing GFP‐positive bacilli was also analysed and found to be comparable in WT and TNFRp75−/− mice (Figure 3G). Shedding of TNFRp75 regulates TNF‐dependent AM apoptosis, 8 and analysis of the number of apoptotic AMs showed it was significantly reduced in TNFRp75−/− mice (P < 0.01; Figure 3H). We further observed that overall AM functionality was improved, as evident by the significantly higher number of MHC‐II+ AMs present in TNFRp75−/− mice (P < 0.05; Figure 3I).
Thus, in accordance with our previous study, 30 the results show that TNFRp75 deficiency enhances early host protection during onset of M. tuberculosis infection. Deletion of TNFRp75 increases AM function but displayed an inverse correlation between microbicidal efficacy and apoptosis. Furthermore, the difference in observations from this in vivo challenge study (Figure 3C&D) compared to our ex vivo study findings (Figure 3H,I) indicates that the cellular environment contributes to the regulation of TNFRp75‐facilitated apoptosis.
Alveolar macrophage apoptosis is unaltered in the absence of TNFRp75 during M. bovis BCG infection
Mycobacteria can induce shedding of TNFRp75 and induce apoptosis of alveolar macrophages in a virulence‐dependent manner. 8 , 36 We have previously found that M. bovis BCG, unlike M. tuberculosis, is ineffective at inducing soluble TNFRp75 shedding that limits availability of bioactive TNF. 30 Here, we replicated experiments to investigate the effects of TNFRp75 deficiency in AMs using avirulent M. bovis BCG as the challenge agent. We wanted to determine whether there was a correlation between mycobacterial virulence and AM apoptosis in the absence of TNFRp75 expression. AM was sorted from the BALF of naïve WT and TNFRp75−/− mice and subsequently infected ex vivo with BCG‐GFP at a MOI of 5:1 for 24 h. We measured a significantly higher percentage of GFP‐positive TNFRp75−/− AMs compared to infected WT AMs (P < 0.001; Figure 4A), indicating a permissiveness towards infection in the absence of TNFRp75, while similar percentages of Annexin V+ and MHC‐II+ AMs were detected in the two strains (Figure 4B,C).
Figure 4.

TNFRp75 deficiency enhances AM activation in vivo but does not affect disease progress. In ex vivo experiments, the AMs were sorted from BALF of WT (black bar) and TNFRp75−/− mouse (grey bar), and then infected with M. bovis BCG‐GFP at a MOI of 5:1. The percentages of (A) GFP+ (B) Annexin V+ and (C) MHC‐II+ AMs were analysed by flow cytometry at 24 h post‐infection. For in vivo studies, WT mice and TNFRp75−/− mice were challenged intranasally with 1 × 104 CFU of M. bovis BCG‐GFP. (D) Bacilli burdens were enumerated in the lungs after 24‐ and 48‐h infection. Flow cytometry analysis was performed to analyse the percentages of (E) CD11bloCD11c+SiglecF+ cells, as well as (F) GFP+, (G) Annexin V+ and (H) MHC‐II+ AMs in the BALF of infected mice. The data shown are pooled from at least two experiments with six mice per group and are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ns, not significant)
To establish physiological relevance for outcomes observed in an avirulent challenge setting, WT and TNFRp75−/− mice were infected via intranasal inoculation with M. bovis BCG‐GFP. We observed no difference in bacterial pulmonary burdens between WT and TNFRp75−/− mice after 24 h (Figure 4D), despite a tendency towards higher numbers of BCG‐GFP+ AMs recovered from the BALF of TNFRp75−/− mice (Figure 4F). Interestingly, we observed an increase of MHC‐II+ AMs present in TNFRp75−/− mice (P < 0.01; Figure 4H), while comparable numbers of CD11bloCD11c+SiglecF+ cells and apoptotic AMs in WT and TNFRp75−/− mice were measured (Figure 4E,G).
Thus, in line with our previous study, 41 the results show that TNFRp75 is redundant to control M. bovis BCG infection. We found that AM responses including apoptosis are not altered during M. bovis BCG infection and highlight the influence of mycobacterial virulence on the effects of TNFRp75 to regulate AM responses.
TNFRp75 deficiency enhances neutrophil recruiting chemokines in response to Mycobacterium bovis BCG infection
While AMs phagocytose mycobacteria and limit intracellular bacterial growth, AMs also recruit other effector leucocytes and initiate inflammation by producing immune effector molecules, 42 such as monocyte chemo‐attractant protein‐1 (MCP‐1, CCL2) and macrophage inflammatory protein‐1α (MIP‐1α, CCL3) known to recruit neutrophil and other leucocytes. 43 , 44 Pro‐inflammatory cytokines, such as IL‐1β and TNF, are not only known to control mycobacterial infection, 19 , 45 but also stimulate chemokine production by macrophages. 46 , 47 Therefore, to determine the effect of TNFRp75 to regulate inflammatory responses during avirulent challenge, we measured the concentrations of CCL2 and CCL3, as well as IL‐1β, TNF and TNFRp55 in the BALF collected from BCG‐GFP infected WT and TNFRp75−/− mice. We detected significantly increased (P < 0.05) levels of CCL2 (Figure 5A) and CCL3 (Figure 5B) in the BALF of TNFRp75−/− lungs compared to WT mice following 24 h of infection. Further, significantly higher concentrations of pulmonary IL‐1β were also measured in TNFRp75−/− mice (P < 0.05; Figure 5C), whereas TNF concentrations (Figure 5D) were comparable. The regulation of TNF signalling between TNFRp75 and TNFRp55 is interdependent. 16 To determine whether TNFRp55 influences differences in chemokines expression observed between WT and TNFRp75‐deficient strains, we measured soluble TNFRp55 concentrations in BALF of infected mice. Equivalent BALF concentrations (Figure 5E) indicated that increased chemokine expression occurred independently of soluble TNFRp55 regulation.
Figure 5.

BCG infection increases chemokine production in TNFRp75‐deficient mice. BALF from BCG‐GFP‐infected WT (closed bar) and TNFRp75−/− (grey bar) mice were analysed by ELISA for CCL2, CCL3, IL‐1β, TNF and TNFRp55 at 24 h post‐infection. The data are pool of two experiments with six mice per group. The data shown are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance (*P < 0.05) was determined by Student's t‐test
These data indicate that, in response to M. bovis BCG infection, TNFRp75 deficiency in the airways of BCG‐infected lungs enhances the potential for preferential neutrophil recruitment through the upregulation of CCL2 and CCL3, as well as IL‐1β, but not the production of TNF and TNFRp55.
TNFRp75 deficiency does not alter neutrophil responses to mycobacterial infection in vivo
Neutrophils are usually the first immune cell type to be recruited to the site of infection. 48 Since our data show TNFRp75 deficiency induced upregulation of neutrophil recruitment chemokines, we next examined the neutrophil influx following 24 h of intranasal BCG‐GFP infection in WT and TNFRp75−/− mice. Neutrophils from BAL were identified as CD11b+Ly6G+ via flow cytometric analysis and demonstrated with typical polysegmented nuclei by microscopic analysis (Figure 6A). We observed a tendency towards higher neutrophil recruitment in M. bovis BCG‐GFP‐infected TNFRp75−/− lungs compared to the WT strain (Figure 6B). Neutrophils can internalize, process and present antigen to T cells. 49 Measurement of the number of GFP+ neutrophils (Figure 6C), the Annexin V+ apoptotic neutrophils (Figure 6D) and MHC‐II+ neutrophils (Figure 6E) revealed it to be similar between the two strains. To consolidate what we observed in vivo, we sorted CD11b+Ly6G+ cells from naïve mouse blood infected with BCG‐GFP at a MOI of 5:1. The neutrophils are short‐lived cells 50 ; therefore, we performed flow cytometry analysis at 4 h post‐infection and observed no difference in percentages of bacilli uptake (Figure 6F), apoptosis (Figure 6G) and MHC‐II expression (Figure 6H) between WT and TNFRp75−/− neutrophils. Together, the data show that TNFRp75 deficiency does not alter the recruitment and functionality of neutrophils to the lungs during early M. bovis BCG infection.
Figure 6.

Neutrophil activity is not affected by mycobacterial virulence and TNFRp75 deficiency. (A) flow cytometry gating of CD11bloCD11c+SiglecF+ cells and microscopic examination of Giemsa stained neutrophils. For in vivo studies, WT mice (closed bar) and TNFRp75−/− mice (grey bar) were challenged intranasally with 1 × 104 CFU of M. bovis BCG‐GFP. After 24‐h infection, flow cytometry analysis was performed to analyse the percentages of (B) CD11b+Ly6G+ cells, as well as (C) GFP+, (D) Annexin V+ and (E) MHC‐II+ neutrophils in the BALF of infected mice. In the ex vivo experiments, CD11b+Ly6G+ neutrophils were sorted from naïve WT and TNFRp75−/− mouse blood, and infected with M. bovis BCG‐GFP at a MOI of 5:1. The percentages of (F) GFP+, (G) Annexin V+ and (H) MHC‐II+ AMs neutrophils were analysed by flow cytometry at 4 h post‐infection. The data shown are pooled from at least two experiments with six mice per group and are expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by Student's t‐test
DISCUSSION
The establishment of early protection in M. tuberculosis infection, provided by innate immune cells, including resident alveolar and recruited macrophages, neutrophils and dendritic cells (DCs), 2 has beneficial effects on the eventual outcome of the disease. 31 Following infection, macrophages are the major cellular sources of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines to either enhance bacterial killing or activate inflammatory responses leading to granuloma formation. Among these, TNF‐mediated host immunity to M. tuberculosis infection is well documented, 19 particularly its importance in granuloma formation and maintenance. 20 , 22 As the dominant receptor for TNF signalling, TNFRp55 is critical for host protection to M. tuberculosis infection. 25 , 47 Given the therapeutic potential of TNFRp75 in cancer and autoimmunity, 27 , 29 , 51 the study on the immunological role of this receptor in infectious diseases is warranted. Previously, we have challenged TNFRp75−/− mice with M. tuberculosis and demonstrated better host survival associated with enhanced IL‐12p40‐dependent DC activation and overall Th1 immune responses. 30 The findings reported here demonstrates improved AM potential at initial onset of infection that leads to better host protection in TNFRp75−/− mice during M. tuberculosis challenge.
When M. tuberculosis enters the alveolar space, AMs act as host cells and initiate the first defence responses to combat intracellular bacilli. However, specific depletion of AMs improves bacterial clearance and subsequent protection from pulmonary tuberculosis. 3 , 32 This suggests that AM may provide a permissive niche for bacterial growth. AM apoptosis is considered a key mechanism to control mycobacterial replication and contributes significantly to host defence mechanisms. Previous in vitro studies have demonstrated that AM apoptosis is mediated by bioactive TNF, which can be attenuated by soluble TNFRp75 through M. tuberculosis‐induced shedding. 8 In our earlier studies, we have also measured the levels of bioactive TNF in the BALF and shown that TNFRp75 shedding reduces bioavailability of TNF in M. tuberculosis‐infected mice, 34 whereas deficiency of TNFRp75 increases bioavailability of TNF. 30 Therefore, we postulated that increased AM apoptosis to be a plausible mechanism to contribute to enhanced pulmonary immune protection in TNFRp75−/− mice. Whereas annexin V staining revealed equivalent number of apoptotic AMs after ex vivo infection, on the contrary, in vivo animal infection studies showed less apoptotic AMs in the airway of M. tuberculosis‐infected TNFRp75−/− mice, despite similar numbers of AMs recovered from both WT and TNFRp75−/− strains. This suggests that the effects of TNFRp75 on AMs in response to M. tuberculosis is dependent on the lung microenvironment rather than cell‐intrinsic factors.
Alveolar macrophages reside in the alveolar space, a site of constant exposure to both harmless antigens and pathogenic micro‐organisms; therefore, AM must have the plasticity to perform phagocytic functions without mounting excessive immune responses while rapidly reacting to pathogens in a pro‐inflammatory manner. AMs in health express low level of MHC‐II with a poor ability of antigen presentation and exhibit an anti‐inflammatory phenotype to prevent undesirable inflammation in the lung. 52 However, AMs express high levels of integrin CD11c, 40 a phenotype similar to DC and serves as immune sentinels. Adoptive transfer studies have demonstrated the influence of the lung environment in upregulating CD11c expression and promoting DC‐like features in macrophages. 40 Local immunoregulatory mechanisms are essential to tightly control AM activation when necessary, and studies with TNF have shown it as a key regulator in several transcription factor pathways that underlie immune responses to M. tuberculosis. In macrophages, TNF‐mediated NFκB signalling induces cellular activation, inflammation and apoptosis, 53 whereas TNF‐induced nuclear factor (erythroid‐derived 2)‐like 2 (Nrf2) signalling has antioxidative and anti‐inflammatory response in TNFRp55‐dependent manner. 54 Noteworthy, M. tuberculosis infection in cell‐specific Nrf2 knockout mice has shown an increase of MHC‐II expression in Nrf2‐deficient AMs. 35 Since TNFRp55 and TNFRp75 compete for cytosolic components in signal transduction, 16 , 17 , 18 it is therefore plausible to infer from our findings that an upregulation of MHC‐II expression in TNFRp75−/− AMs is attributed, in part, to the dysregulation of Nrf2 signalling (Figure 7). However, in contrary to the increased AM death in Nrf2‐deficient mice, 35 we observed a reduction of apoptotic TNFRp75−/− AMs in M. tuberculosis‐infected mice, similar to the effects of NFκB activation to sustain macrophage viability. 55 Increasing evidence has demonstrated induction of Nrf2 to modulate TNF‐mediated NFκB activation 54 that suggests a complex interplay and the possible balance of NFκB and Nrf2 pathways in the coordination of macrophage responses. 56 Therefore, future studies on the regulation of TNFR activity and intracellular molecular mechanisms controlling the TNF‐induced NFκB and Nrf2 signalling in immune responses to M. tuberculosis infection are warranted.
Figure 7.

Schematic diagram of proposed mechanisms affected by TNFR75 deficiency in alveolar macrophages during early Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. (A) In the WT macrophages, TNF is expressed as a transmembrane molecule (tmTNF) and released to a soluble protein (sTNF). Both TNF forms are biologically active that can bind to either TNFRp55 or TNFRp75 leading to the canonical NFκB pathway or the apoptotic pathway. (B) In the TNFRp75−/− macrophages, there is no TNFRp75 to either modulate TNF activity or to deplete the cytosolic pool of adaptor protein TRAF2. It is therefore possible that exclusive stimulation of TNFRp55 mediated by TRAF2 aggregation consequently increases NFκB activation
Not all macrophages respond equally to M. tuberculosis infection. Following phagocytosis of M. tuberculosis by AMs, the initiation of inflammatory responses is associated with recruitment of macrophages. Selective depletion of macrophage subsets by clodronate liposomes demonstrates the differential significance of interstitial and recruited macrophages from AMs in response to M. tuberculosis. 3 , 32 , 57 Further transcriptional profiling revealed distinct gene expression, which confirms their functional differences. 3 In our study, in vitro infection of BMDMs has demonstrated that the effects of TNFRp75 on macrophages in response to M. tuberculosis can be cell intrinsic, such that TNFRp75‐deficient BMDM is more efficient independent of extrinsic IFNγ activation. Also, the finding of reduced TNFRp55 shedding in TNFRp75−/− macrophages alludes to the complexity of TNF‐TNFRs signalling mechanisms within macrophages. At the molecular level, the complex interplay between TNFRp55 and TNFRp75 signalling mechanisms has been identified. 16 Generally, TNF induces NFκb activation mainly through the TNFRp55 signalling complex consisting of TRADD, TRAF2 and cIAP, whereas the molecular mechanism of TNFRp55‐induced caspase‐mediated apoptosis is acting through FADD, which is indirectly linked to TRADD, and therefore, TRAF2‐mediated recruitment of cIAP to TNFRp55 is a regulated process to selectively induce apoptosis. Although the formation of the TNFRp75 signalling complex lacks TRADD, it also recruits TRAF2 that reveals TNF receptors crosstalk and overlapping functions. TNFRp75 competes for the cytoplasmic TRAF2‐cIAP complex and subsequently modulates TNFRp55‐induced activation of the canonical NFκB pathway or the apoptotic pathway 16 , 18 , 58 ; hence, the affinity of TRAF2 binding to either TNFR signalling complexes regulates the balance between cell survival and cell death. Although it is unclear from our study how TNFRp75 deficiency affects these cytoplasmic adaptor proteins and the downstream signalling events in M. tuberculosis infected mice, others have shown an inhibition of TRAF2 degradation in the TNFRp75−/− macrophage following TNF stimulation. 59 Therefore, we speculated in our TNFRp75−/− mouse model that the potential increase of cytosolic TRAF2 enhances TNFRp55 signalling and its subsequent NFκB‐mediated anti‐apoptotic function during M. tuberculosis infection (Figure 7).
Previous studies have found that mycobacterial virulence is an important factor for AM apoptosis; virulent strains reduce AM apoptosis compared to the less virulent strains. 9 , 10 One of the mechanisms driving these differences stemmed from bioactive TNF levels determined by TNF receptor shedding. 8 Our data further demonstrate that TNFRp75 does not affect AM apoptosis during low virulence BCG infection. This is in line with our previous reports where we demonstrated similar bioactive TNF levels in cultured WT and TNFRp75−/− dendritic cells due to low levels of TNF receptor shedding in response to low virulence BCG infection of DCs. 30 Further, in vivo BCG‐GFP infection observations in TNFRp75−/− mice from this study are supported by our earlier work, which demonstrated that TNFRp75 is dispensable for protection against BCG infection with similar control of bacilli replication, granuloma formation and survival as WT mice. 41
Increasing evidence suggests that inflammasomes, a group of multimeric protein complexes containing NLRP3 that activate IL‐1β proteolytically in the caspase‐1‐dependent manner, play important roles in host immunity against mycobacteria. 60 Similar to TNF, IL‐1 is a potent inflammatory cytokine implicated in host protection to M. tuberculosis infection; mice deficient in IL‐1β or its receptor IL‐1RI develop high bacterial burdens and mortality. 61 , 62 By using TNFRp55−/− and TNFRp75−/− peritoneal macrophages, others have shown that IL‐1β‐mediated antimicrobial effects involve caspase‐3‐induced apoptosis, which depends on TNFRp55 and, in part, TNFRp75. Interestingly, this antimicrobial effect of IL‐1β is not due to apoptosis but rather mediated through efferocytosis 63 ; engulfment of M. tuberculosis‐infected apoptotic cells by uninfected neighbouring cells restricts bacterial replication. 64 Studies showed that BCG was able to hinder inflammasome activation 65 , 66 that reduced the secretion of mature IL‐1β. It was therefore interesting to observe elevated level of IL‐1β in the BALF of BCG‐infected TNFRp75−/− mice in this study. Another factor that has been implicated in IL‑1β processing is caspase‐8, which can be activated by cIAP1/2 depletion and subsequent RIPK1 kinase activation as a result of TNFRp55 and TNFRp75 stimulation. 16 , 58
During bacterial infection, chemokine expression is of importance for recruiting cells from the periphery to the infected macrophages to form granulomas. Clinical studies have detected increased CCL2 and CCL5 (RANTES) in the BALF of active TB patients compared to healthy controls. 43 While CCL3 and CCL5 are capable of inhibiting intracellular bacterial growth in human AMs, 67 CCL2 participates in granuloma formation during M. tuberculosis infection despite its redundancy in overall protection. 68 , 69 In TNF‐deficient mice, M. tuberculosis infection leads to a defective granulomatous response together with increased mRNA expression of CCL2 and CCL3. 70 Higher CCL2 and CCL3 secretion in TNFRp75−/− lung is believed to be one of the driving factors for the cellular recruitment to the lungs. However, disruption of the TNFRp75 gene did not alter AM or neutrophil accumulation in the lungs during initial events of infection. Interestingly, others have shown exacerbated pulmonary neutrophil influx in TNFRp75−/− mice challenged with Micropolyspora faeni antigens. 71 In BALF of CCL2‐overexpressing mice, the numbers of AM are constitutively higher than the WT but did not increase in response to BCG infection. Although overexpression of CCL2 showed earlier neutrophil recruitment to the bronchoalveolar space, the overall neutrophil influx was only observed in the later phase of BCG infection. 72
Therefore, our work provides evidence that TNFRp75 regulates early host protection during onset of infection. Although TNFRp75 is redundant in macrophage and neutrophil recruitment, we found TNFRp75 deficiency had differential effects on the activation and cell death of alveolar macrophages during early M. tuberculosis and M. bovis BCG infection.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank Faried Abbass for technical support. We thank the staff of the Animal Research Facility at the University of Cape Town for their contribution to animal care. The study was supported by the University of Cape Town, the South African Medical Research Council, National Research Foundation (South Africa) and the National Health Laboratory Service (South Africa).
Contributor Information
Nai‐Jen Hsu, Email: nai-jen.hsu@uct.ac.za.
Muazzam Jacobs, Email: muazzam.jacobs@uct.ac.za.
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
The corresponding authors can provide raw data of results on reasonable request.
REFERENCES
- 1. Furin J, Cox H, Pai M. Tuberculosis. Lancet. 2019;393(10181):1642‐56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Srivastava S, Ernst JD, Desvignes L. Beyond macrophages: the diversity of mononuclear cells in tuberculosis. Immunol Rev. 2014;262(1):179‐92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Huang L, Nazarova EV, Tan S, Liu Y, Russell DG. Growth of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in vivo segregates with host macrophage metabolism and ontogeny. J Exp Med. 2018;215(4):1135‐52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Cohen SB, Gern BH, Delahaye JL, Adams KN, Plumlee CR, Winkler JK, et al. Alveolar macrophages provide an early Mycobacterium tuberculosis niche and initiate dissemination. Cell Host Microbe. 2018;24(3):439‐46e4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Chan J, Tanaka K, Carroll D, Flynn J, Bloom BR. Effects of nitric oxide synthase inhibitors on murine infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Infect Immun. 1995;63(2):736‐40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. MacMicking JD, North RJ, LaCourse R, Mudgett JS, Shah SK, Nathan CF. Identification of nitric oxide synthase as a protective locus against tuberculosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94(10):5243‐8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Zhang Y, Choksi S, Chen K, Pobezinskaya Y, Linnoila I, Liu ZG. ROS play a critical role in the differentiation of alternatively activated macrophages and the occurrence of tumor‐associated macrophages. Cell Res. 2013;23(7):898‐914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Balcewicz‐Sablinska MK, Keane J, Kornfeld H, Remold HG. Pathogenic Mycobacterium tuberculosis evades apoptosis of host macrophages by release of TNF‐R2, resulting in inactivation of TNF‐alpha. J Immunol. 1998;161(5):2636‐41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Keane J, Balcewicz‐Sablinska MK, Remold HG, Chupp GL, Meek BB, Fenton MJ, et al. Infection by Mycobacterium tuberculosis promotes human alveolar macrophage apoptosis. Infect Immun. 1997;65(1):298‐304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Keane J, Remold HG, Kornfeld H. Virulent Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains evade apoptosis of infected alveolar macrophages. J Immunol. 2000;164(4):2016‐20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Pecora ND, Fulton SA, Reba SM, Drage MG, Simmons DP, Urankar‐Nagy NJ, et al. Mycobacterium bovis BCG decreases MHC‐II expression in vivo on murine lung macrophages and dendritic cells during aerosol infection. Cell Immunol. 2009;254(2):94‐104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Fulton SA, Reba SM, Pai RK, Pennini M, Torres M, Harding CV, et al. Inhibition of major histocompatibility complex II expression and antigen processing in murine alveolar macrophages by Mycobacterium bovis BCG and the 19‐kilodalton mycobacterial lipoprotein. Infect Immun. 2004;72(4):2101‐10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Ufimtseva E, Eremeeva N, Bayborodin S, Umpeleva T, Vakhrusheva D, Skornyakov S. Mycobacterium tuberculosis with different virulence reside within intact phagosomes and inhibit phagolysosomal biogenesis in alveolar macrophages of patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. Tuberculosis. 2019;114:77‐90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Flynn JL, Chan J. Immune evasion by Mycobacterium tuberculosis: living with the enemy. Curr Opin Immunol. 2003;15(4):450‐5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Aggarwal BB. Signalling pathways of the TNF superfamily: a double‐edged sword. Nat Rev Immunol. 2003;3(9):745‐56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Wajant H, Siegmund D. TNFR1 and TNFR2 in the control of the life and death balance of macrophages. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2019;7:91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Cabal‐Hierro L, Artime N, Iglesias J, Prado MA, Ugarte‐Gil L, Casado P, et al. A TRAF2 binding independent region of TNFR2 is responsible for TRAF2 depletion and enhancement of cytotoxicity driven by TNFR1. Oncotarget. 2014;5(1):224‐36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Fotin‐Mleczek M, Henkler F, Samel D, Reichwein M, Hausser A, Parmryd I, et al. Apoptotic crosstalk of TNF receptors: TNF‐R2‐induces depletion of TRAF2 and IAP proteins and accelerates TNF‐R1‐dependent activation of caspase‐8. J Cell Sci. 2002;115(Pt 13):2757‐70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Quesniaux VF, Jacobs M, Allie N, Grivennikov S, Nedospasov SA, Garcia I, et al. TNF in host resistance to tuberculosis infection. Curr Dir Autoimmun. 2010;11:157‐79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Allie N, Grivennikov SI, Keeton R, Hsu NJ, Bourigault ML, Court N, et al. Prominent role for T cell‐derived tumour necrosis factor for sustained control of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Sci Rep 2013;3:1809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Benmerzoug S, Marinho FV, Rose S, Mackowiak C, Gosset D, Sedda D, et al. GM‐CSF targeted immunomodulation affects host response to M. tuberculosis infection. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):8652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Dambuza I, Keeton R, Allie N, Hsu NJ, Randall P, Sebesho B, et al. Reactivation of M. tuberculosis infection in trans‐membrane tumour necrosis factor mice. PLoS One 2011;6(11):e25121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Lin PL, Myers A, Smith L, Bigbee C, Bigbee M, Fuhrman C, et al. Tumor necrosis factor neutralization results in disseminated disease in acute and latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection with normal granuloma structure in a cynomolgus macaque model. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62(2):340‐50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Marino S, Sud D, Plessner H, Lin PL, Chan J, Flynn JL, et al. Differences in reactivation of tuberculosis induced from anti‐TNF treatments are based on bioavailability in granulomatous tissue. PLoS Comput Biol. 2007;3(10):1909‐24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Segueni N, Benmerzoug S, Rose S, Gauthier A, Bourigault ML, Reverchon F, et al. Innate myeloid cell TNFR1 mediates first line defence against primary Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Sci Rep 2016;6:22454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Faustman D, Davis M. TNF receptor 2 pathway: drug target for autoimmune diseases. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2010;9(6):482‐93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Chen X, Oppenheim JJ. Targeting TNFR2, an immune checkpoint stimulator and oncoprotein, is a promising treatment for cancer. Sci Signal. 2017;10(462). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Chen X, Wu X, Zhou Q, Howard OM, Netea MG, Oppenheim JJ. TNFR2 is critical for the stabilization of the CD4+Foxp3+ regulatory T. cell phenotype in the inflammatory environment. J Immunol. 2013;190(3):1076‐84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Atretkhany KN, Mufazalov IA, Dunst J, Kuchmiy A, Gogoleva VS, Andruszewski D, et al. Intrinsic TNFR2 signaling in T regulatory cells provides protection in CNS autoimmunity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115(51):13051‐6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Keeton R, Allie N, Dambuza I, Abel B, Hsu NJ, Sebesho B, et al. Soluble TNFRp75 regulates host protective immunity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis . J Clin Investig. 2014;124(4):1537‐51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Cadena AM, Flynn JL, Fortune SM. The importance of first impressions: early events in Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection influence outcome. MBio. 2016;7(2):e00342‐e416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Leemans JC, Juffermans NP, Florquin S, van Rooijen N, Vervoordeldonk MJ, Verbon A, et al. Depletion of alveolar macrophages exerts protective effects in pulmonary tuberculosis in mice. J Immunol. 2001;166(7):4604‐11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Ryder BM, Sandford SK, Manners KM, Dalton JP, Wiles S, Kirman JR. Gr1(int/high) cells dominate the early phagocyte response to mycobacterial lung infection in mice. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Dambuza IM, Keeton R, Hsu NJ, Allie N, Quesniaux VF, Ryffel B, et al. Persistent p55TNFR expression impairs T cell responses during chronic tuberculosis and promotes reactivation. Sci Rep. 2016;6:39499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Rothchild AC, Olson GS, Nemeth J, Amon LM, Mai D, Gold ES, et al. Alveolar macrophages generate a noncanonical NRF2‐driven transcriptional response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis in vivo. Sci Immunol. 2019;4(37). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Rodrigues MF, Alves CC, Figueiredo BB, Rezende AB, Wohlres‐Viana S, Silva VL, et al. Tumour necrosis factor receptors and apoptosis of alveolar macrophages during early infection with attenuated and virulent Mycobacterium bovis . Immunology 2013;139(4):503‐12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Khan TA, Mazhar H, Saleha S, Tipu HN, Muhammad N, Abbas MN. Interferon‐gamma improves macrophages function against M. tuberculosis in multidrug‐resistant tuberculosis patients. Chemother Res Pract. 2016;2016:7295390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Mendoza‐Coronel E, Castanon‐Arreola M. Comparative evaluation of in vitro human macrophage models for mycobacterial infection study. Pathog Dis. 2016;74(6). 10.1093/femspd/ftw052 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Polz J, Remke A, Weber S, Schmidt D, Weber‐Steffens D, Pietryga‐Krieger A, et al. Myeloid suppressor cells require membrane TNFR2 expression for suppressive activity. Immun Inflamm Dis. 2014;2(2):121‐30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Guth AM, Janssen WJ, Bosio CM, Crouch EC, Henson PM, Dow SW. Lung environment determines unique phenotype of alveolar macrophages. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2009;296(6):L936‐L946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Jacobs M, Brown N, Allie N, Chetty K, Ryffel B. Tumor necrosis factor receptor 2 plays a minor role for mycobacterial immunity. Pathobiology 2000;68(2):68‐75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Silver RF, Walrath J, Lee H, Jacobson BA, Horton H, Bowman MR, et al. Human alveolar macrophage gene responses to Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains H37Ra and H37Rv. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2009;40(4):491‐504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Sadek MI, Sada E, Toossi Z, Schwander SK, Rich EA. Chemokines induced by infection of mononuclear phagocytes with mycobacteria and present in lung alveoli during active pulmonary tuberculosis. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 1998;19(3):513‐21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Ferrero E, Biswas P, Vettoretto K, Ferrarini M, Uguccioni M, Piali L, et al. Macrophages exposed to Mycobacterium tuberculosis release chemokines able to recruit selected leucocyte subpopulations: focus on gammadelta cells. Immunology 2003;108(3):365‐74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Bourigault ML, Segueni N, Rose S, Court N, Vacher R, Vasseur V, et al. Relative contribution of IL‐1alpha, IL‐1beta and TNF to the host response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis and attenuated M. bovis BCG. Immun Inflamm Dis. 2013;1(1):47‐62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Zhang Y, Broser M, Cohen H, Bodkin M, Law K, Reibman J, et al. Enhanced interleukin‐8 release and gene expression in macrophages after exposure to Mycobacterium tuberculosis and its components. J Clin Investig. 1995;95(2):586‐92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Algood HM, Lin PL, Yankura D, Jones A, Chan J, Flynn JL. TNF influences chemokine expression of macrophages in vitro and that of CD11b+ cells in vivo during Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Journal of immunology. 2004;172(11):6846‐57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Charmoy M, Auderset F, Allenbach C, Tacchini‐Cottier F. The prominent role of neutrophils during the initial phase of infection by Leishmania parasites. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2010;2010:719361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Abi Abdallah DS, Egan CE, Butcher BA, Denkers EY. Mouse neutrophils are professional antigen‐presenting cells programmed to instruct Th1 and Th17 T‐cell differentiation. Int Immunol. 2011;23(5):317‐26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Liles WC, Kiener PA, Ledbetter JA, Aruffo A, Klebanoff SJ. Differential expression of Fas (CD95) and Fas ligand on normal human phagocytes: implications for the regulation of apoptosis in neutrophils. J Exp Med. 1996;184(2):429‐40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Faustman DL, Davis M. TNF receptor 2 and disease: autoimmunity and regenerative medicine. Front Immunol. 2013;4:478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Hussell T, Bell TJ. Alveolar macrophages: plasticity in a tissue‐specific context. Nat Rev Immunol. 2014;14(2):81‐93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Fallahi‐Sichani M, Kirschner DE, Linderman JJ. NF‐kappaB signaling dynamics play a key role in infection control in tuberculosis. Front Physiol. 2012;3:170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Rushworth SA, Shah S, MacEwan DJ. TNF mediates the sustained activation of Nrf2 in human monocytes. J Immunol. 2011;187(2):702‐7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Bai X, Feldman NE, Chmura K, Ovrutsky AR, Su WL, Griffin L, et al. Inhibition of nuclear factor‐kappa B activation decreases survival of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in human macrophages. PLoS One 2013;8(4):e61925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Wardyn JD, Ponsford AH, Sanderson CM. Dissecting molecular cross‐talk between Nrf2 and NF‐kappaB response pathways. Biochem Soc Trans. 2015;43(4):621‐6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Leemans JC, Thepen T, Weijer S, Florquin S, van Rooijen N, van de Winkel JG, et al. Macrophages play a dual role during pulmonary tuberculosis in mice. J Infect Dis. 2005;191(1):65‐74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Siegmund D, Kums J, Ehrenschwender M, Wajant H. Activation of TNFR2 sensitizes macrophages for TNFR1‐mediated necroptosis. Cell Death Dis. 2016;7(9):e2375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Ruspi G, Schmidt EM, McCann F, Feldmann M, Williams RO, Stoop AA, et al. TNFR2 increases the sensitivity of ligand‐induced activation of the p38 MAPK and NF‐kappaB pathways and signals TRAF2 protein degradation in macrophages. Cell Signal. 2014;26(4):683‐90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Latz E, Xiao TS, Stutz A. Activation and regulation of the inflammasomes. Nat Rev Immunol. 2013;13(6):397‐411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Fremond CM, Togbe D, Doz E, Rose S, Vasseur V, Maillet I, et al. IL‐1 receptor‐mediated signal is an essential component of MyD88‐dependent innate response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. J Immunol. 2007;179(2):1178‐89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Di Paolo NC, Shafiani S, Day T, Papayannopoulou T, Russell DW, Iwakura Y, et al. Interdependence between interleukin‐1 and tumor necrosis factor regulates TNF‐dependent control of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Immunity 2015;43(6):1125‐36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Jayaraman P, Sada‐Ovalle I, Nishimura T, Anderson AC, Kuchroo VK, Remold HG, et al. IL‐1beta promotes antimicrobial immunity in macrophages by regulating TNFR signaling and caspase‐3 activation. J Immunol. 2013;190(8):4196‐204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Martin CJ, Booty MG, Rosebrock TR, Nunes‐Alves C, Desjardins DM, Keren I, et al. Efferocytosis is an innate antibacterial mechanism. Cell Host Microbe. 2012;12(3):289‐300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Master SS, Rampini SK, Davis AS, Keller C, Ehlers S, Springer B, et al. Mycobacterium tuberculosis prevents inflammasome activation. Cell Host Microbe. 2008;3(4):224‐32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Dorhoi A, Nouailles G, Jorg S, Hagens K, Heinemann E, Pradl L, et al. Activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome by Mycobacterium tuberculosis is uncoupled from susceptibility to active tuberculosis. Eur J Immunol. 2012;42(2):374‐84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Saukkonen JJ, Bazydlo B, Thomas M, Strieter RM, Keane J, Kornfeld H. Beta‐chemokines are induced by Mycobacterium tuberculosis and inhibit its growth. Infect Immun. 2002;70(4):1684‐93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Kipnis A, Basaraba RJ, Orme IM, Cooper AM. Role of chemokine ligand 2 in the protective response to early murine pulmonary tuberculosis. Immunology 2003;109(4):547‐51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Lu B, Rutledge BJ, Gu L, Fiorillo J, Lukacs NW, Kunkel SL, et al. Abnormalities in monocyte recruitment and cytokine expression in monocyte chemoattractant protein 1‐deficient mice. J Exp Med. 1998;187(4):601‐8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Roach DR, Bean AG, Demangel C, France MP, Briscoe H, Britton WJ. TNF regulates chemokine induction essential for cell recruitment, granuloma formation, and clearance of mycobacterial infection. J immunol. 2002;168(9):4620‐7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Peschon JJ, Torrance DS, Stocking KL, Glaccum MB, Otten C, Willis CR, et al. TNF receptor‐deficient mice reveal divergent roles for p55 and p75 in several models of inflammation. J Immunol. 1998;160(2):943‐52. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Schreiber O, Steinwede K, Ding N, Srivastava M, Maus R, Langer F, et al. Mice that overexpress CC chemokine ligand 2 in their lungs show increased protective immunity to infection with Mycobacterium bovis bacille Calmette‐Guerin. J Infect Dis. 2008;198(7):1044‐54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The corresponding authors can provide raw data of results on reasonable request.
