Abstract
Purpose of Review:
Cognitive impairments are a devastating long-term consequence following traumatic brain injury (TBI). This review provides an update on the quantitative muti-modal neuroimaging studies that attempt to elucidate the mechanism(s) underlying cognitive impairments and their recovery following TBI.
Recent Findings:
Recent studies have linked individual specific behavioral impairments and their changes over time to physiological activity and structural changes using EEG, PET and MRI. Multimodal studies that combine measures of physiological activity with knowledge of neuroanatomical and connectivity damage have also illuminated the multifactorial function-structure relationships that underlie impairment and recovery following TBI.
Summary:
The combined use of multiple neuroimaging modalities, with focus on individual longitudinal studies, has the potential to accurately classify impairments, enhance sensitivity of prognoses, inform targets for interventions, and precisely track spontaneous and intervention-driven recovery.
Keywords: Cognitive impairments, Traumatic Brain Injury, brain damage, attention impairments, neuroimaging, EEG, PET, MRI, diffusion MRI, functional MRI, connectome
Introduction:
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of death and long-term disability in the United States and worldwide[1]. In addition to 50,000 TBI-related civilian deaths in the US each year, there are over 1 million Americans treated in emergency departments and 235,000 hospital admissions annually[2]. Cognitive impairment is a central determinant of vocational, social and emotional functioning, and approximately 70% of TBI survivors experience chronic cognitive impairments (TBI Model Systems National Data and Statistical Center). Currently, there are more than 5.3 million persons in the US alone with chronic cognitive dysfunction as a result of TBI[3].
Despite this high disease burden, mechanisms underlying impaired cognitive function have not been characterized fully, limiting clinicians’ ability to accurately diagnose, prognose, track, and identify mechanisms of impairment. Current prognostic models rely heavily on injury severity, lack sensitivity[4] and account for only a moderate portion of variance in clinical outcomes[5]. Unsurprisingly, to date, there are no effective therapeutic interventions for cognitive impairment following TBI[6]. The failure of most TBI clinical trials has been attributed to insufficient knowledge of the pathophysiology of deficits which precludes development of targeted therapies for an inherently heterogeneous disease[7]. Here, we discuss and summarize efforts to overcome these barriers using quantitative multimodal neuroimaging techniques.
Electroencephalography (EEG)
The electrophysiological monitoring of voltage fluctuations resulting from neuronal activity has long been used to objectively study cognitive functioning following TBI because of its excellent time resolution[8–10]. Specifically, the amplitude and latency of Event Related Potentials (ERPs), which is recorded during cognitive behavioral tasks and represents stimulus detection and evaluation, have been extensively used to diagnose [11,12], understand, and predict cognitive impairment[8]. Early perceptual discrimination of stimulus (N100, a negative peak ~ 100 msecs post stimulus[13]) has been shown to be mostly preserved following TBI[14,15]. Conversely, the classic P300, a positive peak ~300 msecs post-stimuli associated with attentional and working memory resources[16], has reliably been shown to have smaller amplitudes and longer latencies in response to high-conflict stimuli in individuals with TBI compared to healthy controls (HCs) [14,15,17–19] and individual amplitudes have been associated with attention, executive functioning, and processing speed[18,19]. In one study, P3A and P3b, both components of the P300, were found to be associated with executive function impairment, with the former relating to sub-acute impairments and the latter with chronic impairments[20**]. In another recent study, individual longitudinal changes in P300 amplitude and latency following TBI were related to changes in psychological outcomes, suggesting the utility of P300 as an objective biomarker for tracking of recovery[21**]. A neural component of the failure to evaluate and regulate (conflict processing), the N450, in HCs reveals higher amplitude for incongruent trials but shows no discrimination between incongruent and congruent processing in individuals with TBI[22,23].
In contrast to ERP analyses, spectral analyses of oscillatory activity offer a plethora of possible variables (power, frequency, coherence, etc.) during both resting and during-task EEG that can be related to cognitive behavior. Decreased alpha power, increased theta power and decreased beta synchronization during resting EEG have been reported in individuals with TBI but were not associated with global cognition[24,25]; however, delta and theta coherence were positively correlated with working memory and resting beta synchronization was related to language processing and executive functioning[26]. Resting delta/alpha power ratio, which was significantly associated with confusion and attention symptoms in individuals remaining in post-traumatic confusional state also successfully predicted cognitive recovery at 1, 2, and 5 years post-injury[27*] and theta synchronization in acute stages successfully predicted recovery of executive functioning 2 months later[28**]. Analyses of spectral power during cognitive tasks have showed reduced theta synchronization and phase coherence and no change in alpha synchronization preceding high-conflict stimuli in individuals with TBI compared to HCs[19,29]. An increase in midline theta power during conflict processing (and not during rest) was positively correlated with performance on an executive attention task in individuals with TBI[30*, see Figure 1] and lower peak alpha power during an attention task was related to better performance on cognitive assessments of attention and executive function[31*]. In clinical trials of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) which demonstrated improved cognition, spectral EEG was successfully used as an outcome assessment: 1) a concomitant increase in coherence of alpha and theta bands correlated with improvement in minimally conscious patients[32**] and 2) a decrease in theta power correlated with improvements in processing speed, attention, and memory in individuals with acute to subacute TBI[33].
Figure 1:
Multimodal imaging derivations demonstrate associations with cognitive impairment following TBI: A. Event Related Potentials (ERPs) and spectral power derived from EEG recorded during performance of Attention Network Test [108,109]. The spectral power significantly associates with executive attention behavior [30]. Structural and functional connectome measures, and measures of the relationship between the two correlates with B) longitudinal cognitive recovery in mild TBI [71] and C) cross-sectional measures of consciousness in severe brain injury [70] (anatomical brain injury (ABI). D. Flumazenil PET shows differential activations in TBI (compared to age-matched HC). Activity within the anterior forebrain mesocircuit [110] predict executive attention. Unpublished data courtesy of Shah & Kuceyeski.
While EEG offers a clinically feasible, inexpensive, task-specific activity report of cognitive behavior, able to dissociate when/where cognitive processing fails, the signal to noise ratio (neuronal activity filtered through the scalp) is low, and spatial resolution and sources can be difficult to decipher. However, by relating EEG to individual behavior and tracking its changes as cognitive function recovers, EEG has the potential to provide valuable insight into the pathophysiology that can be exploited for biomarkers and treatment planning.
Positron Emission Tomography (PET)
PET imaging is a powerful emerging technique that allows for non-invasive insight into cellular or subcellular brain mechanisms associated with cognition, depending on the ligand used[34].
Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET, used to measure tissue glucose metabolism, illustrates the chronic effects of TBI both globally[35] and within specific brain regions[36–38]. Following TBI, reduced metabolism in several regions has been related to cognition: 1) decreased FDG signal in temporal and frontal lobes[37] correlates with worse memory and executive functioning[35,39], 2) glucose metabolism in cingulate gyrus and medial frontal gyrus[36,37] is negatively associated with IQ[37], and 3) reduced middle orbitofrontal cortex metabolism negatively associates with episodic memory[38]. FDG-PET has also proven to be sensitive to recovery of consciousness in TBI, with thalamic metabolism grading with level of recovery: lowest in individuals in a minimally conscious state (MCS) [38], increasing in those in Post-traumatic Amnesia (PTA), and even more in those who have emerged from PTA. An increase in glucose metabolism in the left prefrontal and medial temporal regions accounted for more than 80% of variance in improvement of executive functioning following pharmacological intervention of Amantadine in individuals with TBI[40].
More recently, other PET ligands have been used to study cognition in TBI. Amyloid and Flortaucipir PET have offered evidence of increased amyloid deposition and tau accumulation, respectively, in individuals with TBI compared to HCs, but no associations were found between amyloid and tau pathology and cognitive functioning[41,42]. Flumazenil (FMZ), which binds to the GABA inhibitory neurons and can serve as a proxy for cellular integrity, is a potentially sensitive marker of cognitive impairment[38,43, see Figure 1]. Differential patterns of FMZ binding, reflecting altered integrity, have been found in individuals with TBI compared to HCs[38,43]. Decreased FMZ binding in the right thalamus has been associated with worse full-scale and performance IQ, decreased FMZ binding in the left medial frontal gyrus with worse full-scale, performance, and verbal IQ[43], and decreased FMZ binding in the left angular gyrus with poorer episodic memory[38]. Lastly, functional PET collected during a memory retrieval task showed a different pattern of regional blood flow compared to HCs, despite similar task performance between groups, suggesting functional reorganization in TBI[44].
PET is expensive and not as widely available as other imaging modalities. However, PET provides a unique insight into the subcellular and cellular process which can potentially serve as tools for appropriate stratification and studies of mechanism[45,46].
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
The noninvasive, non-contrast, and versatile nature of MRI makes it especially suited for studies of pathology-related changes in brain anatomy, white matter connectivity, and physiological activation patterns that may contribute to cognitive impairment after TBI[47].
Hemorrhage, petechiae, and diffuse axonal injury (DAI) associated with TBI can be identified easily on anatomical MRI (T2, T2-FLAIR)[48,49**], along with neurodegenerative effects of injury[50–53]. A recent study showed that MRI-based evidence of DAI following acute TBI, particularly in the corpus callosum and brainstem, was related to worse global cognitive functioning at 12 months post-injury[49]. Whole brain and regional (frontal and tempo-parietal) volumes have also been shown to be correlated with global cognitive impairment in TBI[48]. Regional reductions in and increased rates of atrophy of grey and white matter have been found in individuals with TBI compared to HCs. From the acute to chronic phase of TBI, total brain volume and white matter volume reductions have been related to measures of attention, processing speed, and executive functioning[51], whereas the rate of atrophy has been correlated to memory performance[54].
DAI, a common pathological mechanism in TBI, results in damage of white matter connections via a shearing effect, which can impact the transmission of neuronal signals and lead to cognitive impairments. DAI is most sensitively detected via diffusion MRI (dMRI), which uses the shape of diffusion of water molecules in the brain to reconstruct underlying white matter fiber architectures, and can lead to decreased fractional anisotropy (FA) or increased mean diffusivity (MD). Numerous studies have found relationships between dMRI-derived measures of axonal injury and cognitive functioning[55–64]. Of note, one study found reduced FA in individuals with TBI compared to HCs, and showed a relationship between abnormal FA in at least one white matter region on acute imaging and executive functioning 6 months later[58]. Additional studies have provided further evidence of decreased FA in the white matter of individuals with TBI compared to HCs, which was associated with poorer processing speed and verbal fluency[65,66]. A meta-analysis of dMRI in 9 mild TBI studies reported that higher FA in particular tracts, including the longitudinal fasciculus, sagittal striatum, cerebellum, and internal capsule, was related to better global cognitive functioning[64]. Interestingly, in this study higher FA in the cerebellar peduncles correlated with worse global cognitive functioning and higher FA in the anterior corona radiata correlated with worse attention, working memory and processing speed. In another meta-analysis of 20 studies, Wallace et al, (2018) found that increased FA and reduced MD associated with better cognitive outcomes, with attention and memory having the strongest relationships with dMRI metrics, particularly in the corpus callosum, fornix, internal capsule, arcuate and uncinate fasciculi[67**].
Tractography, a process by which the diffusion MRI signal is used to reconstruct likely white matter pathways in the brain, allows for graph-based representation of the white matter connectivity network, or structural connectome (SC). Connectomics has been applied to various neurological disorders, including TBI [57,68,69,70*,71*]. Small-worldness is a common property of biological networks, and represents a balance of numerous short-range and few long-range connections, enabling efficient transfer of information with a relatively low wiring cost[72]. A recent meta-analysis of 15 studies found that TBI populations may be shifted away from small-worldness, with longer characteristic path length and increased clustering coefficient, toward a regular lattice[73*]. Limited studies have investigated relationships between SC metrics and cognitive functioning in TBI. Kuceyeski et al., (2016) showed increased SC modularity, degree, and efficiency in individuals in disorders of consciousness (DOC) compared to HCs, but did not find correlations between SC metrics and Coma Recovery Scale-Revised scores, CRS-R[70]. Two studies in mild TBI found a correlation between reduced SC network efficiency and assessments of executive functioning and verbal learning[74], while another study showed an association between increased SC betweenness centrality values in language areas and poorer verbal memory[75*].
Measurement of the blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) signal in the brain via functional MRI (fMRI) allows for noninvasive, whole brain monitoring of activation patterns over time. The BOLD signal has been shown to be tightly coupled to neuronal activation[76]. The temporal resolution of fMRI is coarse compared to EEG, but allows for higher resolution spatial sampling. fMRI data can be analyzed using i) Independent Component Analysis (ICA), which allows for identification of networks associated with various functions, ii) seed-based correlations which allow investigations of spatial relationships to areas of interest or iii) functional connectomes (FCs), which represent similarity of activation patterns of regions over time and allow the application of graph theoretical approaches as described above. Numerous studies have shown changes in the task-free (resting-state) fMRI patterns in TBI patients, most indicating increases of default-mode network (DMN) activation compared to HCs. Bernier et al., 2017 found DMN hyperconnectivity during rest and task in individuals with TBI compared to HCs, which was positively correlated with working memory. FC hyperconnectivity in the frontal and middle temporal gyrus at rest was positively correlated with attention, processing speed, and executive functioning[77]. Increased FC within the sensory-motor regions at rest have been found to be correlated with better attention in individuals with TBI, a relationship absent in HCs[78]. Similar findings were reported by Grossner et al., 2019, which found that FC was positively correlated with better monitoring and error-awareness in individuals with TBI, but negatively correlated in HCs[79]. Correlations have also been shown between FC measures and recovery of consciousness post-injury[80–84]. These observations have lent further support to the “less wiring, more firing” hypothesis that has been suggested in multiple studies of neurological disorders[77,82,85–89]. However, increased FC in the precuneus has recently been related to worse global cognitive functioning in individuals with TBI[89]. Degree centrality, a graph theory metric that represents the number of connections between a node of interest and its neighboring nodes, in the left middle frontal gyrus was found to be positively correlated with global cognitive functioning and attention in individuals with mild TBI[90]. Until recently, static FC, or FC calculated using the entire fMRI time series, has predominated the literature. To capture how the brain’s FC can change over the duration of a scan, Van der Horn et., al 2019 utilized dynamic, or sliding-window, FC. They demonstrated that individuals with TBI who had poor recovery, characterized by sensorimotor and higher level cognitive deficits, spent less time in segregated dynamic FC and exhibited fewer transitions between states at 3 months post-injury[91].
Multimodal Imaging
To date, limited studies utilizing multimodal neuroimaging to identify and predict post-TBI cognitive impairment have been conducted. Multimodal MRI studies investigating the SC and FC networks jointly are most prevalent in the literature[92,93,94**]. One multimodal connectomic study showed that individuals with TBI with more SC injury exhibited less FC in the DMN, and higher DMN FC was associated with better processing speed[82]. In addition, Palacios et al., (2013) found that increased FC with the DMN in the frontal lobes was associated with worse SC in the cingulum[86]. A more recent study showed that SC between regions active during working memory and reasoning tasks on fMRI were dissociable and correlated with the respective cognitive domain in individuals with TBI[94]. A study using dynamic, sliding-window FC showed that patients with disorders of consciousness had less transitions between dynamic FC states and spent significantly more time in dynamic FC states that were closely coupled with SC, a finding they replicated in anaesthesia[95**]. Recent work has focused on implementing mathematical models to better codify the relationship between SC and FC in both healthy and pathological populations[96–103]. Hellyer et al., (2015) used a neural mass model to show that TBI-related decreases in SC were related to reduced metastability of FC, the latter being correlated with poorer cognitive flexibility, processing speed, and memory[104]. Network Diffusion (ND) modeling has also been adopted to study the relationship between SC and FC[105]. Increased ND model propagation time, a measure reflecting the “amount” of SC used to reconstruct observed FC, was significantly related to i) better CRS-R scores in a cross-sectional sample of individuals in DOC and ii) greater improvements in attention and memory from subacute to chronic mild TBI[70,71, see Figure 1].
Data obtained from EEG and PET have also been related to MRI to understand the relationship between function and structure post-TBI. EEG coherence, which has been associated with cognitive functioning, was related to greater T2 relaxation time in white and grey matter in individuals with TBI[26]. Decreased theta band synchrony in the first week of TBI predicted executive functioning 2 months later, and voxels within the theta band activity on MRI had less FA[20]. FA in the corpus callosum was also found to be correlated with beta coherence[24]. Alpha power and thalamic atrophy projecting to the temporo-occipital areas predicted functional recovery from acute to chronic status in severe TBI[106]. Reduced FA in the corpus callosum on MRI and reduced FDG metabolism in the cingulate gyrus on PET was found in individuals with TBI and cognitive impairments and not in HCs[107].
Conclusion:
The plethora of non-invasive imaging techniques and analyses presented here allow for increased insight into the biological substrate underlying heterogeneous cognitive impairments following structural brain injury. However, to date, validated, sensitive biomarkers remain unidentified. This is unsurprising given the advantages and disadvantages of each imaging modality and the previous focus on cross-sectional group level analyses.
More recent studies have related functional and structural changes to individual specific behavior, allowing for tracking of natural and intervened recovery and insight into the biological mechanisms. Furthermore, the few studies that have utilized multimodal imaging have a clear advantage over any single modality because they provide a more comprehensive quantification of the relationship between function and structure. Future studies focused on deriving biomarkers that are sensitive at the individual level with validation via studies of longitudinal change are key to converting on the promise of improving diagnosis of impairments, refining prognostic models, informing interventions, and precisely tracking spontaneous and intervention-driven recovery.
Key Points:
Neuroimaging studies that associate with behavior at the individual level are useful for biomarker studies.
Very few biomarkers are currently validated in studies of longitudinal change or intervention.
Multimodal studies are valuable to disentangle complex interactions between function and structure following heterogeneous brain injury.
Acknowledgements:
The authors thank Karen Wen for assistance with the figure creation.
Financial Support and sponsorship: None
Footnotes
Conflicts of interest: None
References
- 1.Murray CJ, Lopez AD. Global mortality, disability, and the contribution of risk factors: Global Burden of Disease Study Lancet Lond Engl 1997; 349:1436–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Corrigan JD, Selassie AW, Orman JAL. The epidemiology of traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2010; 25:72–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Stierwalt JAG, Murray LL. Attention impairment following traumatic brain injury. Semin Speech Lang 2002; 23:129–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Silverberg ND, Gardner AJ, Brubacher JR, et al. Systematic review of multivariable prognostic models for mild traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2015; 32:517–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hanks RA, Millis SR, Ricker JH, et al. The predictive validity of a brief inpatient neuropsychologic battery for persons with traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008; 89:950–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Stein DG. Embracing failure: What the Phase III progesterone studies can teach about TBI clinical trials. Brain Inj 2015; 29:1259–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Saatman KE, Duhaime A-C, Bullock R, et al. Classification of traumatic brain injury for targeted therapies. J Neurotrauma 2008; 25:719–38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Dockree PM, Robertson IH. Electrophysiological markers of cognitive deficits in traumatic brain injury: A review. Int J Psychophysiol 2011; 82:53–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rapp PE, Keyser DO, Albano A, et al. Traumatic brain injury detection using electrophysiological methods. Front Hum Neurosci 2015; 9:11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ianof JN, Anghinah R, Ianof JN, Anghinah R. Traumatic brain injury: An EEG point of view. Dement Amp Neuropsychol 2017; 11:3–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Davis TM, Hill BD, Evans KJ, et al. P300 event-related potentials differentiate better performing individuals with traumatic brain injury: a preliminary study of semantic processing. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2017; 32:E27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Washnik NJ, Anjum J, Lundgren K, Phillips S. A review of the role of auditory evoked potentials in mild traumatic brain injury assessment. Trends Hear 2019; 23:2331216519840094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Näätänen R, Picton T. The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology 1987; 24:375–425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lachapelle J, Bolduc-Teasdale J, Ptito A, McKerral M. Deficits in complex visual information processing after mild TBI: Electrophysiological markers and vocational outcome prognosis. Brain Inj 2008; 22:265–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Gosselin N, Bottari C, Chen J-K, et al. Evaluating the cognitive consequences of mild traumatic brain injury and concussion by using electrophysiology. Neurosurg Focus 2012; 33:E7: 1–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Picton T The P300 wave of the human event-related potential. J Clin Neurophysiol Off Publ Am Electroencephalogr Soc 1992; 9:456–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Reinvang I, Nordby H, Nielsen CS. Information processing deficits in head injury assessed with ERPs reflecting early and late processing stages. Neuropsychologia 2000; 38:995–1005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Elting JW, Maurits N, van Weerden T, et al. P300 analysis techniques in cognitive impairment after brain injury: comparison with neuropsychological and imaging data. Brain Inj 2008; 22:870–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Dautricourt S, Violante I, Mallas E-J, et al. Reduced information processing speed and event-related EEG synchronization in traumatic brain injury. Neurology 2017; 88:6 149. [Google Scholar]
- 20**.Cavanagh JF, Wilson JK, Rieger RE, et al. ERPs predict symptomatic distress and recovery in sub-acute mild traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychologia 2019; 132:107125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This study found that P3a amplitude, a subcomponent of the P300 ERP measured during conflict processing tasks using EEG, was negatively correlated with executive functioning in individuals with subacute TBI, but P3b amplitude, another P300 subcomponent, was negatively correlated with executive functioning in individuals with chronic TBI and HCs. These results suggest P3a may be a biomarker for short-term executive dysfunction following TBI and P3b may reflect general cognitive dysfunction.
- 21**.Wang C, Rapp P, Darmon D, et al. Utility of P300 ERP in monitoring post-trauma mental health: A longitudinal study in military personnel returning from combat deployment. J Psychiatr Res 2018; 101:5–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This study demonstrated the potential utility of the P300 ERP measured during conflict processing tasks using EEG as a biomarker of recovery following TBI, as the authors found that increased P300 amplitude and decreased latency was related to improved psychological functioning following brain injury in military services members.
- 22.Perlstein WM, Larson MJ, Dotson VM, Kelly KG. Temporal dissociation of components of cognitive control dysfunction in severe TBI: ERPs and the cued-Stroop task. Neuropsychologia 2006; 44:260–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Larson MJ, Clayson PE, Clawson A. Making sense of all the conflict: A theoretical review and critique of conflict-related ERPs. Int J Psychophysiol 2014; 93:283–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lewine JD, Plis S, Ulloa A, et al. Quantitative EEG Biomarkers for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. J Clin Neurophysiol Off Publ Am Electroencephalogr Soc 2019; 36:298–305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Urakami Y Electrophysiologic evaluation of diffuse axonal injury after traumatic brain injury. J Neurol Neurophysiol 2013; 04:1000157. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Thatcher RW, Biver C, McAlaster R, Salazar A. Biophysical linkage between MRI and EEG coherence in closed head injury. NeuroImage 1998; 8:307–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27*.Shah SA, Mohamadpour M, Askin G, et al. Focal electroencephalographic changes index post-traumatic confusion and outcome. J Neurotrauma 2017; 34:2691–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This study demonstrated that the delta-to-alpha power ratio measured during resting EEG associated with post-traumatic confusional symptoms and predicted recovery of general cognitive functioning at 1, 2, and 5 years following TBI.
- 28**.Cavanagh JF, Rieger RE, Wilson JK et al. Joint analysis of frontal theta synchrony and white matter following mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Imaging Behav [Preprint] 2019. Available from: 10.1007/s11682-019-00171-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]; This study reported that frontal theta synchrony during a cognitive control task using EEG following subacute TBI predicted recovery of executive functioning at 2 months post-injury. Moreover, the authors used MRI to demonstrate that voxels with reduced theta synchrony had lower FA values.
- 29.Dockree PM, Kelly SP, Roche RAP, et al. Behavioural and physiological impairments of sustained attention after traumatic brain injury. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 2004; 20:403–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30*.Shah SA, Goldin Y, Conte MM, et al. Executive attention deficits after traumatic brain injury reflect impaired recruitment of resources. NeuroImage Clin 2017; 14:233–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This study used principal component analysis to identify a spectral EEG pattern of increased midline theta power and decreased frontal beta power in individuals with TBI that were associated with executive attention impairment.
- 31*.Kaltiainen H, Liljeström M, Helle L, et al. Mild traumatic brain injury affects cognitive processing and modifies oscillatory brain activity during attentional tasks. J Neurotrauma 2019; 36:2222–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This study found that alpha attenuation measured using magnetoencephalography during an attention task was stronger in individuals with mild TBI compared to HCs, and peak alpha power during the attention task was negatively correlated with attention, processing speed, and executive functioning in individuals with mild TBI.
- 32**.Cavinato M, Genna C, Formaggio E, et al. Behavioural and electrophysiological effects of tDCS to prefrontal cortex in patients with disorders of consciousness. Clin Neurophysiol 2019; 130:231–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This study showed that repeated tDCS in individuals in MCS resulted in an increase of alpha power and coherence and beta frequency measured using EEG and improved cognition.
- 33.Ulam F, Shelton C, Richards L, et al. Cumulative effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on EEG oscillations and attention/working memory during subacute neurorehabilitation of traumatic brain injury. Clin Neurophysiol Off J Int Fed Clin Neurophysiol 2015; 126:486–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Bookheimer SY. Positron emission tomography studies of cognition. In: Bigler ED, editor. Neuroimaging Basic Sci. Boston, MA: Springer US; 1996. p. 97–117. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Fontaine A, Azouvi P, Remy P, et al. Functional anatomy of neuropsychological deficits after severe traumatic brain injury. Neurology 1999; 53:1963–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Nakashima T, Nakayama N, Miwa K, et al. Focal brain glucose hypometabolism in patients with neuropsychologic deficits after diffuse axonal injury. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007; 28:236–42. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kato T, Nakayama N, Yasokawa Y, et al. Statistical image analysis of cerebral glucose metabolism in patients with cognitive impairment following diffuse traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2007; 24:919–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Bang SA, Song YS, Moon BS, et al. Neuropsychological, metabolic, and GABAA receptor studies in subjects with repetitive traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2016; 33:1005–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Gross H, Kling A, Henry G, et al. Local cerebral glucose metabolism in patients with long-term behavioral and cognitive deficits following mild traumatic brain injury. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 1996; 8:324–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kraus MF, Smith GS, Butters M, et al. Effects of the dopaminergic agent and NMDA receptor antagonist amantadine on cognitive function, cerebral glucose metabolism and D2 receptor availability in chronic traumatic brain injury: a study using positron emission tomography (PET). Brain Inj 2005; 19:471–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kawai N, Kawanishi M, Kudomi N, et al. Detection of brain amyloid β deposition in patients with neuropsychological impairment after traumatic brain injury: PET evaluation using Pittsburgh Compound-B. Brain Inj 2013; 27:1026–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Gorgoraptis N, Li LM, Whittington A, et al. In vivo detection of cerebral tau pathology in long-term survivors of traumatic brain injury. Sci Transl Med 2019; 11:eaaw1993. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kawai N, Maeda Y, Kudomi N, et al. Focal neuronal damage in patients with neuropsychological impairment after diffuse traumatic brain injury: evaluation using 11C-flumazenil positron emission tomography with statistical image analysis. J Neurotrauma 2010; 27:2131–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Levine B, Cabeza R, McIntosh A, et al. Functional reorganisation of memory after traumatic brain injury: a study with H2150 positron emission tomography. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002; 73:173–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Klunk WE, Engler H, Nordberg A, et al. Imaging brain amyloid in Alzheimer’s disease with Pittsburgh Compound-B. Ann Neurol 2004; 55:306–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Morris JC, Roe CM, Grant EA, et al. Pittsburgh compound B imaging and prediction of progression from cognitive normality to symptomatic Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol 2009; 66:1469–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Wang M-L, Li W-B. Cognitive impairment after traumatic brain injury: The role of MRI and possible pathological basis. J Neurol Sci 2016; 370:244–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Meysami S, Raji CA, Merrill DA, et al. MRI volumetric quantification in persons with a history of traumatic brain injury and cognitive impairment. J Alzheimers Dis JAD 2019; 72:293–300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49**.Aldossary NM, Kotb MA, Kamal AM. Predictive value of early MRI findings on neurocognitive and psychiatric outcomes in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. J Affect Disord 2019; 243:1–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This study showed that individuals with TBI and DAI on subacute MRI had worse general cognitive functioning, depression, personality changes, and depression at 1 year post-injury compared to individuals with TBI and no DAI. Individuals with TBI with isolated cerebral hemispheric lesions also had better outcomes than individuals with TBI that also had lesions in the brain stem or corpus callosum.
- 50.Bendlin BB, Ries ML, Lazar M, et al. Longitudinal changes in patients with traumatic brain injury assessed with diffusion-tensor and volumetric imaging. NeuroImage 2008; 42:503–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Stewan Feltrin F, Zaninotto AL, Guirado VMP, et al. Longitudinal changes in brain volumetry and cognitive functions after moderate and severe diffuse axonal injury. Brain Inj 2018; 32:1208–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Poudel GR, D JFD, Verhelst H, et al. Network diffusion modeling predicts neurodegeneration in traumatic brain injury. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 2020; 7:270–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Harris TC, de Rooij R, Kuhl E. The shrinking brain: cerebral atrophy following traumatic brain injury. Ann Biomed Eng 2019; 47:1941–59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Cole JH, Jolly A, de Simoni S, et al. Spatial patterns of progressive brain volume loss after moderate-severe traumatic brain injury. Brain 2018; 141:822–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Kuceyeski A, Maruta J, Niogi SN, et al. The generation and validation of white matter connectivity importance maps. NeuroImage 2011; 58:109–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Niogi SN, Mukherjee P, Ghajar J, et al. Extent of microstructural white matter injury in postconcussive syndrome correlates with impaired cognitive reaction time: a 3T diffusion tensor imaging study of mild traumatic brain injury. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008; 29:967–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Sharp DJ, Scott G, Leech R. Network dysfunction after traumatic brain injury. Nat Rev Neurol 2014; 10:156–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Yuh EL, Cooper SR, Mukherjee P, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging for outcome prediction in mild traumatic brain injury: a TRACK-TBI study. J Neurotrauma 2014; 31:1457–77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Munivenkatappa A, Devi BI, Shukla DP, Rajeswaran J. Role of the thalamus in natural recovery of cognitive impairment in patients with mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj 2016; 30:388–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Newcombe VFJ, Correia MM, Ledig C, et al. Dynamic changes in white matter abnormalities correlate with late improvement and deterioration following TBI: a diffusion tensor imaging study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2016; 30:49–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Wallace EJ, Mathias JL, Ward L. Diffusion tensor imaging changes following mild, moderate and severe adult traumatic brain injury: a meta-analysis. Brain Imaging Behav 2018; 12:1607–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Yiannakkaras C, Konstantinou N, Constantinidou F, et al. Whole brain and corpus callosum diffusion tensor metrics: How do they correlate with visual and verbal memory performance in chronic traumatic brain injury. J Integr Neurosci 2019; 18:95–105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Rajagopalan V, Das A, Zhang L, et al. Fractal dimension brain morphometry: a novel approach to quantify white matter in traumatic brain injury. Brain Imaging Behav 2019; 13:914–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Zhu J, Ling J, Ding N. Association between diffusion tensor imaging findings and cognitive outcomes following mild traumatic brain injury: a PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis. ACS Chem Neurosci 2019; 10:4864–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Hanks R, Millis S, Scott S, et al. The relation between cognitive dysfunction and diffusion tensor imaging parameters in traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj 2019; 33:355–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Yamagata B, Ueda R, Tasato K, et al. Widespread white matter aberrations are associated with phonemic verbal fluency impairment in chronic traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2020; 37:975–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67**.Wallace E, Mathias JL, Ward L The relationship between diffusion tensor imaging findings and cognitive outcomes following adult traumatic brain injury: A meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2018; 92:93–103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This meta-analysis of DTI metrics found that lower FA and higher MD was related to better cognitive functioning in individuals with TBI, with memory and attention being more strongly related to DTI metrics than general cognition, executive functioning, verbal/language skills, and reasoning.
- 68.Irimia A, Wang B, Aylward SR, et al. Neuroimaging of structural pathology and connectomics in traumatic brain injury: Toward personalized outcome prediction. NeuroImage Clin 2012; 1:1–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Spielberg JM, Miller GA, Heller W, Banich MT. Flexible brain network reconfiguration supporting inhibitory control. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2015; 112:10020–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70*.Kuceyeski A, Shah S, Dyke JP, et al. The application of a mathematical model linking structural and functional connectomes in severe brain injury. NeuroImage Clin 2016; 11:635–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This study associated the change in network diffusion model propagation time, a measure that accounts for the relationship between MRI-based measures of SC and FC, and level of consciousness in individuals with severe brain injury. This suggests a rerouting of functional activity to avoid damaged white matter structures following brain injury, resulting in inefficient pathways and increased network diffusion model propagation time.
- 71*.Kuceyeski AF, Jamison KW, Owen JP, et al. Longitudinal increases in structural connectome segregation and functional connectome integration are associated with better recovery after mild TBI. Hum Brain Mapp 2019; 40:4441–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This study found longitudinal associations between an increase in network diffusion model propagation time, a measure that accounts for the relationship between MRI-based SC and FC, and better cognitive recovery in attention and verbal learning/memory from subacute to chronic status in individuals with mild TBI.
- 72.Bassett DS, Bullmore ET. Small-world brain networks revisited. The Neuroscientist 2017; 23:499–516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73*.Imms P, Clemente A, Cook M, et al. The structural connectome in traumatic brain injury: A meta-analysis of graph metrics. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2019; 99:128–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This meta-analysis of graph theory metrics in studies of global SC using MRI in TBI found larger normalized clustering coefficients and longer characteristic path lengths in individuals with TBI compared to HCs. These findings suggest that restructuring of the SC following TBI results in less small-worldness.
- 74.Kim J, Parker D, Whyte J, et al. Disrupted structural connectome is associated with both psychometric and real-world neuropsychological impairment in diffuse traumatic brain injury. J Int Neuropsychol Soc JINS 2014; 20:887–96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.van der Horn HJ, Kok JG, de Koning ME, et al. Altered wiring of the human structural connectome in adults with mild traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2016; 34:1035–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Logothetis NK. What we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI. Nature 2008; 453:869–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Bernier RA, Roy A, Venkatesan UM, et al. Dedifferentiation does not account for hyperconnectivity after traumatic brain injury. Front Neurol 2017; 8:297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78*.Shumskaya E, van Gerven MAJ, Norris DG, et al. Abnormal connectivity in the sensorimotor network predicts attention deficits in traumatic brain injury. Exp Brain Res 2017; 235:799–807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This study found hyperconnectivity in various functional networks of individuals with TBI on rsfMRI. Increased FC in the sensorimotor resting state network was positively correlated with attention in individuals with TBI, but negatively correlated with attention in HCs.
- 79.Grossner EC, Bernier RA, Brenner EK, et al. Enhanced default mode connectivity predicts metacognitive accuracy in traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychology 2019; 33:922–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Demertzi A, Gómez F, Crone JS, et al. Multiple fMRI system-level baseline connectivity is disrupted in patients with consciousness alterations. Cortex J Devoted Study Nerv Syst Behav 2014; 52:35–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Laureys S, Schiff ND. Coma and consciousness: paradigms (re)framed by neuroimaging. NeuroImage 2012; 61:478–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Sharp DJ, Ham TE. Investigating white matter injury after mild traumatic brain injury. Curr Opin Neurol 2011; 24:558–563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Soddu A, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Demertzi A, et al. Resting state activity in patients with disorders of consciousness. Funct Neurol 2011; 26:37–43. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Vanhaudenhuyse A, Noirhomme Q, Tshibanda LJ-F, et al. Default network connectivity reflects the level of consciousness in non-communicative brain-damaged patients. Brain 2010; 133:161–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Bonnelle V, Leech R, Kinnunen KM, et al. Default mode network connectivity predicts sustained attention deficits after traumatic brain injury. J Neurosci Off J Soc Neurosci 2011; 31:13442–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Palacios EM, Sala-Llonch R, Junque C, et al. Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging activity and connectivity and cognitive outcome in traumatic brain injury. JAMA Neurol 2013; 70:845–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Hillary FG, Rajtmajer SM, Roman CA, et al. The rich get richer: brain injury elicits hyperconnectivity in core subnetworks. PLOS ONE 2014; 9:e104021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Roy A, Bernier RA, Wang J, et al. The evolution of cost-efficiency in neural networks during recovery from traumatic brain injury. PLoS ONE 2017; 12:e0170541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Lu L, Li F, Ma Y, et al. Functional connectivity disruption of the substantia nigra associated with cognitive impairment in acute mild traumatic brain injury. Eur J Radiol 2019; 114:69–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Li N, Zhang W, Cheng S, Liu Y. Structured sparse representation in resting-state fMRI image processing for mild traumatic brain injury analysis 2019 Int Conf Commun Inf Syst Comput Eng CISCE, Haikou, China. 2019, pp.445–450. [Google Scholar]
- 91.Horn HJ van der, Vergara VM, Espinoza FA, et al. Functional outcome is tied to dynamic brain states after mild to moderate traumatic brain injury. Hum Brain Mapp 2020; 41:617–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Caeyenberghs K, Leemans A, Leunissen I, et al. Topological correlations of structural and functional networks in patients with traumatic brain injury. Front Hum Neurosci 2013; 7:726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Caeyenberghs K, Verhelst H, Clemente A, Wilson PH. Mapping the functional connectome in traumatic brain injury: What can graph metrics tell us? NeuroImage 2017; 160:113–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94**.Jolly AE, Scott GT, Sharp DJ, Hampshire AH Distinct patterns of structural damage underlie working memory and reasoning deficits after traumatic brain injury. Brain 2020; 143:1158–76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This study demonstrated that the SC of brain regions active on fMRI during working memory and reasoning tasks were dissociable in individuals with TBI, suggesting that damage to either network would have different cognitive consequences.
- 95**.Demertzi A, Tagliazucchi E, Dehaene S, et al. Human consciousness is supported by dynamic complex patterns of brain signal coordination. Sci Adv American Association for the Advancement of Science; 2019; 5:eaat7603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This study, replicated across multiple large datasets and sites, showed that people with disorders of consciousness spend more time in dynamic FC states that are similar to SC, a finding which was replicated in anaesthesia.
- 96.Cabral J, Hugues E, Sporns O, Deco G. Role of local network oscillations in resting-state functional connectivity. NeuroImage 2011; 57:130–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Chu S-H, Parhi KK, Lenglet C. Function-specific and enhanced brain structural connectivity mapping via joint modeling of diffusion and functional MRI. Sci Rep 2018; 8:4741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Das T, Abeyasinghe P, Crone J, et al. Highlighting the structure-function relationship of the brain with the Ising model and graph theory. BioMed Res Int 2014; 2014:237898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Deco G, Senden M, Jirsa V. How anatomy shapes dynamics: a semi-analytical study of the brain at rest by a simple spin model. Front Comput Neurosci 2012; 6:68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Fernández-Espejo D, Bekinschtein T, Monti MM, et al. Diffusion weighted imaging distinguishes the vegetative state from the minimally conscious state. NeuroImage 2011; 54:103–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Honey CJ, Sporns O, Cammoun L, et al. Predicting human resting-state functional connectivity from structural connectivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2009; 106:2035–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Messé A, Rudrauf D, Giron A, Marrelec G. Predicting functional connectivity from structural connectivity via computational models using MRI: An extensive comparison study. NeuroImage 2015; 111:65–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Woolrich MW, Stephan KE. Biophysical network models and the human connectome. NeuroImage 2013; 80:330–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Hellyer PJ, Scott G, Shanahan M, et al. Cognitive flexibility through metastable neural dynamics is disrupted by damage to the structural connectome. J Neurosci 2015; 35:9050–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Abdelnour F, Voss HU, Raj A. Network diffusion accurately models the relationship between structural and functional brain connectivity networks. NeuroImage 2014; 90:335–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Schnakers C, Lutkenhoff ES, Bio BJ, et al. Acute EEG spectra characteristics predict thalamic atrophy after severe TBI. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2019; 90:617–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Okumura A, Yasokawa Y, Nakayama N, et al. The clinical utility of MR diffusion tensor imaging and spatially normalized PET to evaluate traumatic brain injury patients with memory and cognitive impairments. No To Shinkei 2005; 57:115–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Fan J, McCandliss BD, Fossella J, Flombaum JI, Posner MI. The activation of attentional networks. NeuroImage 2005;26:471–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Fan J, McCandliss BD, Sommer T, Raz A, Posner MI. Testing the efficiency and independence of attentional networks. J Cogn Neurosci. 2002;14:340–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Schiff ND. Recovery of consciousness after brain injury: a mesocircuit hypothesis. Trends Neurosci. 2010;33:1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]