Skip to main content
Medicine logoLink to Medicine
. 2021 Jan 15;100(2):e23977. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023977

The risk factors for cognitive dysfunction in elderly patients after laparoscopic surgery

A retrospective analysis

Yan Fan 1, Xinru Liu 1, Shanshan Wu 1, Yan Liu 1,
Editor: Goran Augustin1
PMCID: PMC7808459  PMID: 33466139

Abstract

Postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) is very common in clinical settings, it is necessary to analyze the risk factors for POCD in elderly patients after laparoscopic surgery to provide insights into clinical surgery management.

Elderly patients undergone laparoscopy between September 1, 2018 and March 31, 2020 were included. The mini-mental state examination (MMSE) scale was used to evaluate the POCD, and the characteristics and clinical data of patients with and without POCD were collected and compared. Logistic regression was used to analyze the potential influencing factors.

A total of 572 patients with laparoscopic surgery were included. The incidence of POCD was 11.89%. There were significant differences in the history of cerebral infarction, preemptive analgesia, preoperative use of dexmedetomidine, general anesthesia combined with continuous epidural block, duration of surgery, low SpO2 during anesthesia induction, PaCO2 after pneumoperitoneum, postoperative PCEA and VAS score at the third day after operation (all P < .05). Logistic regression analysis revealed that history of cerebral infarction (OR3.12, 1.02∼5.13), low SpO2 during anesthesia induction (OR2.03, 1.19∼4.47), Longer duration of surgery (OR1.82, 1.01∼3.16) were risk factors for POCD in elderly patients with laparoscopic surgery, while postoperative PCEA (OR0.43, 0.01∼0.91), General anesthesia combined with continuous epidural block (OR0.59, 0.04∼0.87), preoperative use of dexmedetomidine (OR0.70, 0.08∼0.94) and preemptive analgesia (OR0.75, 0.13–0.90) were the protective factors for POCD in elderly patients with laparoscopic surgery.

For the elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery, the health care providers should be fully alert to the POCD based on those relevant factors.

Keywords: cognitive dysfunction, elderly, laparoscopic, management, nursing, surgery

1. Introduction

Postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) refers to post-operative mental disorder, anxiety, personality changes, and memory impairment in patients without mental abnormalities before surgery, which is a central nervous system complication after surgery.[1] It is been found that patients with cardiovascular surgery had a higher incidence of postoperative cognitive impairment.[2,3] With the deepening of the research, it has found that POCD also has a certain incidence in patients with non-cardiovascular surgery. Several studies[4,5] have found that the incidence of POCD in non-cardiac surgery under general anesthesia vary from 3.5% to 25.8%. With the aging of the population becoming more and more serious, the proportion of elderly patients undergoing surgery is gradually increasing, and POCD is also gradually becoming a hot spot in recent years. The current research on POCD mainly involves various fields such as etiology, influencing factors and treatment. However, the pathogenesis of POCD is not yet fully understood.[6] A series of factors such as perioperative anesthesia medication, anesthesia method selection and management, and postoperative analgesia may affect the occurrence of POCD.[7,8] Therefore, further investigations on those issues are needed.

Laparoscopic surgery is a newly developed minimally invasive approach for surgery. With regards to its small incision and trauma, less patient's postoperative pain, shortened duration of the hospital stay, and equal therapeutic effect compared to open surgery, laparoscopic surgery is very popular in current clinical settings.[9,10] With the advancement of laparoscopic technology, in recent years, laparoscopy has been widely carried out in patients of all ages, and its impact on POCD has gradually been paid attention to. Previous studies[11,12] have raised some potential factors that have an impact on POCD in the perioperative period. Especially for the elderly patients with surgery, they often have more basic diseases, the organ function gradually declines, the tolerance to surgery and anesthesia decrease accordingly, thus they are more sensitive to the factors that may affect the cognitive function.[13,14] Based on literature review, we have found that most previous reports[15,16] were focused on the POCD in patients undergone cardiovascular surgery, but very few on the patients with laparoscopic surgery. Therefore, we aimed to analyze the risk factors for POCD in elderly patients after laparoscopic surgery, to provide evidence for clinical management of laparoscopic surgery.

2. Methods

2.1. Ethical issues

This study complied with the “Helsinki Declaration” and the relevant regulations of China clinical trial research, and has been approved by the hospital ethical committee (No2018110977-a). All included patients had signed the written informed consent.

2.2. Patients

Elderly patients undergone laparoscopy in our hospital between September 1, 2018 and March 31, 2020 were identified as potential participants. The inclusion criteria for included patients were: elderly patients ≥60 years old; The patients were evaluated by the Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) scale[17] before operation, and it was confirmed that the preoperative cognitive function was normal; well-informed and agreed to participate in this study. Exclusion criteria in this present study were: patients who took long-term medications that may affect mental state; patients with mental disorders; patients with language and visual impairments that cannot communicate normally and cannot cooperate with the examination; Patients who refuse to participate in this study.

2.3. Diagnostic criteria

The diagnosis of POCD complied with the “Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Dementia and Cognitive Disorders” developed by the Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Group of the Chinese Academy of Neurology. Clinicians with relevant experience and rigorous training were responsible for the assessment, and the assessment personnel were relatively fixed. The MMSE scale was evaluated once every 2 days before surgery and 3 days after surgery. If the postoperative score decreased by more than 2 points compared with the preoperative score, it was regarded as a decrease in postoperative cognitive function. The MMSE scale included 19 items, which was divided into 5 parts: memory, orientation, attention, calculation, and language ability. If the answer is correct, the score was 1, and if the answer is incorrect or unknown, it was scored as 0. The total score ranged from 0 to 30. The higher the score, the better the patients cognitive ability.

2.4. Data collection

The general information of patients was collected and analyzed, including gender, age, education level, surgery history, body mass index (BMI), diagnosis of diseases. Furthermore, the related perioperative data were collected, including basic diseases such as hypertension, diabetes, surgical grade, whether they were preemptive analgesia or used dexmedetomidine before surgery, the anesthesia method, duration of surgery, the SpO2 during anesthesia induction, intraoperative hypotension, estimated blood loss during surgery, the PaCO2 after pneumoperitoneum, postoperative patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA), postoperative patient controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA), visual analogue scale (VAS) score at the first and third day after operation. Two investigators collected and double-check the collected data, and any disagreement was solved by further discussion.

2.5. Statistical analysis

We use SPSS 23.0 software to analyze the related data. The binary data in this study were expressed as ratio, and the corresponding comparison between 2 groups was tested by Chi-Squared test. The continuous data was expressed as mean ± standard deviation (x± s), and the corresponding comparison between groups was tested by t test. Logistic regression was used to analyze the potential influencing factors. P < .05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. The characteristics of included patients

A total of 572 patients with laparoscopic surgery were included. Among then, 68 patients were diagnosed with POCD, the incidence of POCD was 11.89%. As Table 1 presented, there were no significant differences in the gender, age, BMI, operation history, education level and disease diagnosis among patients with and without POCD (all P > .05).

Table 1.

The characteristics of included patients.

Items POCD patients (n = 68) No- POCD patients (n = 504) t/χ2 P
Male 45 (66.18%) 318 (63.10%) 1.129 .085
Age (y) 67.03 ± 6.22 66.86 ± 7.03 8.170 .102
BMI 26.27 ± 3.01 26.09 ± 2.79 5.114 .137
First operation 59 (86.76%) 452 (89.68%) 1.131 .096
Education level
Junior school 20 (29.41%) 150 (29.76%) 1.155 .081
Senior school 29 (42.65%) 212 (42.06%)
Bachelor 11 (16.18%) 85 (16.87%)
Graduate 8 (11.76%) 57 (11.31%)
Disease diagnosis
Gallstone 19 (27.94%) 149 (29.56%) 1.027 .057
Appendicitis 17 (25%) 120 (23.81%)
bile duct stones 13 (19.12%) 94 (18.65%)
Digestive tract perforation 9 (13.24%) 62 (12.30%)
Gastrointestinal cancer 6 (8.82%) 45 (8.93%)
others 4 (5.88%) 34 (6.75%)

3.2. The clinical information of POCD and no- POCD patients

As Table 2 showed, there were significant differences in the history of cerebral infarction, preemptive analgesia, preoperative use of dexmedetomidine, general anesthesia combined with continuous epidural block, duration of surgery, low SpO2 during anesthesia induction, PaCO2 after pneumoperitoneum, postoperative PCEA and VAS score at the third day after operation (all P < .05), and no statistical differences on the anemia, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, surgical grading, intraoperative hypotension, postoperative PCIA and VAS score at the first day after operation were found (all P > .05).

Table 2.

The comparison on the clinical information of POCD and no- POCD patients.

Variables POCD patients (n = 68) No-POCD patients (n = 504) χ2 P
Anemia 15 (22.06%) 96 (19.05%) 1.038 .101
hypertension 12 (17.65%) 90 (17.86%) 2.630 .095
Hyperlipidemia 19 (27.94%) 132 (26.19%) 1.287 .171
Diabetes 8 (11.76%) 61 (12.10%) 1.022 .304
History of cerebral infarction 11 (16.18%) 28 (5.56%) 1.174 .007
Surgical grading
ASA I-II 62 (91.18%) 465 (92.26%) 1.205 .098
ASA III 6 (8.82%) 39 (7.74%)
Preemptive analgesia 3 (4.41%) 162 (32.14%) 3.190 .022
Preoperative use of dexmedetomidine 16 (23.53%) 313 (62.10%) 2.773 .009
General anesthesia combined with continuous epidural block 3 (4.41%) 127 (25.20%) 1.135 .047
Duration of surgery
<2 hours 12 (17.65%) 223 (44.25%) 3.284 .015
2–3 hours 36 (52.94%) 201 (39.88%)
>3 hours 20 (29.41%) 80 (15.87%)
Low SpO2 during anesthesia induction
>80% 8 (11.76%) 278 (55.16%) 2.285 .041
60%–80% 52 (76.48%) 192 (38.10%)
<60% 8 (11.76%) 34 (6.74%)
Intraoperative hypotension 14 (20.59%) 101 (20.04%) 1.148 .085
Estimated blood loss during surgery (mL)
<200 35 (51.47%) 260 (51.59%) 3.081 .113
200–500 24 (35.29%) 177 (35.12%)
>500 9 (13.24%) 67 (13.29%)
PaCO2 (mm Hg) after pneumoperitoneum
<40 11 (16.18%) 126 (25%) 2.845 .038
40–50 31 (45.59%) 342 (67.86%)
>50 26 (38.23%) 36 (7.14%)
Postoperative PCEA 16 (23.53%) 261 (51.79%) 5.169 .025
Postoperative PCIA 25 (36.76%) 187 (37.10%) 1.193 .171
VAS score at the first day after operation
<3 27 (39.71%) 194 (38.49%) 2.194 .183
3–5 21 (30.88%) 151 (29.96%)
>5 20 (29.41%) 159 (31.55%)
VAS score at the third day after operation
<3 36 (54.94%) 412 (81.75%) 3.166 .017
3–5 17 (25%) 54 (10.71%)
>5 15 (22.06%) 38 (7.54%)

3.3. Logistic regression analysis

The statistically different factors among 2 groups in Table 2 were used as independent variables, which were substituted into the multi-factor logistic regression analysis model. The conditional method was used to gradually establish the regression model based on the results of conditional parameter likelihood ratios. Logistic regression analysis revealed that history of cerebral infarction (OR3.12, 1.02∼5.13), low SpO2 during anesthesia induction (OR2.03, 1.19∼4.47), Longer duration of surgery (OR1.82, 1.01∼3.16) were risk factors for POCD in elderly patients with laparoscopic surgery, while postoperative PCEA (OR0.43, 0.01∼0.91), General anesthesia combined with continuous epidural block (OR0.59, 0.04∼0.87), preoperative use of dexmedetomidine (OR0.70, 0.08∼0.94) and preemptive analgesia (OR0.75, 0.13∼0.90) were the protective factors for POCD in elderly patients with laparoscopic surgery (Table 3).

Table 3.

Logistic regression analysis on the influencing factors for POCD in elderly patients with laparoscopic surgery.

Variables β SE OR 95%CI P Rank
History of cerebral infarction 0.85 0.24 3.12 1.02–5.13 .024 1
Low SpO2 during anesthesia induction 0.91 0.36 2.03 1.19–4.47 .030 2
Postoperative PCEA 1.12 0.41 0.43 0.01–0.91 .042 3
General anesthesia combined with continuous epidural block 0.93 0.30 0.59 0.04–0.87 .033 4
Preoperative use of dexmedetomidine 1.04 0.24 0.70 0.08–0.94 .044 5
Duration of surgery 0.95 0.15 1.82 1.01–3.16 .037 6
Preemptive analgesia 0.74 0.18 0.75 0.13–0.90 .023 7

4. Discussion

Due to the influence of various factors during the perioperative period, the patients with POCD may show a decline in memory, attention and social adaptability within a few days after surgery.[18,19] The typical clinical manifestations of POCD are anxiety, personality changes, memory impairment, orientation and perception disorders.[20] POCD can increase the occurrence of postoperative complications and cost of medical resources, and affect the long-term quality of life of patients.[21] If the disease does not receive timely and effective interventions, it is easy to progress to Alzheimers disease or vascular dementia.[22] The results of this present study have found that patients with history of cerebral infarction, low SpO2 during anesthesia induction, longer duration of surgery have higher risks for POCD after laparoscopic surgery, while patients with postoperative PCEA, general anesthesia combined with continuous epidural block, preoperative use of dexmedetomidine and preemptive analgesia may have lower risks for POCD. It is necessary to take corresponding treatment measures for these influencing factors in clinical settings.

The pathogenesis of cognitive dysfunction involves the central nervous system, endocrine and immune system.[23] The current research on the pathogenesis of this disease mainly focuses on the functional degradation of the central nervous system.[24] It has been found that changes in the central cholinergic system, neurotransmitters, stress, inflammatory mediators, genes and other factors can cause central neurotransmitter disorders.[25] Among them, the combination of surgical stimulation, trauma, and anesthesia induction can lead to neurological dysfunction and can induce POCD.[26] Especially in elderly patients, the functions of tissues and organs of elderly patients gradually decline, their tolerance to surgery and anesthesia decreases accordingly.[27] Previous study[28] has reported that the incidence of POCD in elderly patients after receiving general anesthesia can be as high as 20%. With the improvement of peoples living standards and the advancement of endoscopy technology, the attention to the physical and mental recovery of patients after surgery has gradually increased among the health care providers.[29] Therefore, early clinical intervention in elderly patients with high risk of POCD has become the most effective and economical treatment strategy to prevent the pathological and physiological development of POCD.

Several protective factors should be considered. Dexmedetomidine can effectively reduce the perioperative stress response, inflammatory irritation and the dose of analgesic drugs. Besides, it has less interference with the central cholinergic system, which helps the recovery of patients postoperative cognitive function.[30] Furthermore, it has little effect on circulatory function and no respiratory depression.[31] Previous study[32] has showed that sedation with dexmedetomidine can significantly reduce the incidence of delirium after surgery. Postoperative PCEA can effectively slow the conduction of low-level sympathetic nerves, and block the transmission of noxious stimuli to the central nervous system, significantly reduce the release of inflammatory factors, and reduce the damage of inflammatory factors to the central nervous system.[33] Severe postoperative pain affects the recovery of the patient's physiological function, and effective postoperative analgesia can significantly reduce the occurrence of complications.[34] Preoperative analgesia before surgery is used to inhibit peripheral nerve and central nerve sensitization and maintain a smooth transition during the recovery period of anesthesia.[35] The use of general anesthesia combined with epidural block anesthesia, through epidural block of spinal nerve roots, can well control the transmission of stimulation signals to the central nervous system.[36]

Shortening the operation time as much as possible is important for reducing the incidence of POCD. Shortening the operation time not only reduces the trauma and the release of inflammatory mediators, but also effectively reduces the intake of sedative and analgesic drugs.[37] Factors such as laparoscopic CO2 pneumoperitoneum should also be concerned. The acidosis caused by CO2 pneumoperitoneum can affect synaptic nerve function, relax cerebral blood vessels, increase intracranial pressure, then promote the release of vascular factors and actuate-venous short circuit opening, and eventually cause cognitive dysfunction.[21,38] For example, through reasonable adjustment of breathing parameters, balancing the proportion of lung shunt and ventilation blood flow, and promoting the emission of CO2, which may effectively improve POCD.

Several limitations in this study should be considered. Firstly, this is a single institution, retrospective analysis of POCD following laparoscopic surgery in China, there may be some biases since our study is a retrospective analysis. Secondly, the small sample size may be not power enough to detect the differences, future studies with larger sample size are needed. Besides, it is necessary to conduct more studies with longer follow-up period to identify the potentially influencing factors in the future.

5. Conclusions

In conclusions, for patients with the influencing factors analyzed in this study, clinicians should be fully vigilant and carry out relevant screening for POCD in time, therefore finding and intervening as soon as possible to improve the quality of life of elderly patients after laparoscopic surgery. However, the selection of different diagnostic scales on cognition dysfunction may also bias the results. Additionally, limited to medical insurance policies, current serological indicators related to cognitive dysfunction, such as serum S-100β, cannot be implemented among the groups in this study. Therefore, this study may lack an objective basis and is bound to have certain limitations, future studies to explore more sensitive indicators on the POCD are warranted.

Author contributions

Y F, Y L designed research; Y F, X L conducted research; Y F, S W analyzed data; Y F, Y L wrote the first draft of manuscript; Y L had primary responsibility for final content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conceptualization: Yan Fan, Xinru Liu.

Data curation: Yan Fan, Yan Liu.

Formal analysis: Yan Fan, Xinru Liu.

Investigation: Yan Fan, Xinru Liu, Shanshan Wu, Yan Liu.

Methodology: Yan Fan.

Project administration: Shanshan Wu.

Resources: Yan Fan, Xinru Liu, Yan Liu.

Supervision: Shanshan Wu, Yan Liu.

Writing – original draft: Yan Fan, Yan Liu.

Glossary

Abbreviations: BMI = body mass index, MMSE = Mini-mental State Examination, PCEA = patient controlled epidural analgesia, PCIA = patient controlled intravenous analgesia, POCD = Postoperative cognitive dysfunction, VAS = visual analogue scale.

References

  • [1].Xiao QX, Liu Q, Deng R, et al. Postoperative cognitive dysfunction in elderly patients undergoing hip arthroplasty. Psychogeriatrics 2020;33:1–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Maleva OV, Trubnikova OA, Syrova ID, et al. Incidence of postoperative cognitive dysfunction after simultaneous carotid surgery and coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with asymptomatic cerebral atherosclerosis. Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova 2020;120(3):5–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Bukauskiene R, Sirvinskas E, Lenkutis T, et al. The influence of blood flow velocity changes to postoperative cognitive dysfunction development in patients undergoing heart surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Perfusion 2020;14:10–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Chen YC, Sun WZ. Postoperative cognitive dysfunction in premenopausal versus postmenopausal women. Climacteric 2020;23:165–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Liu C, Wang Y, Chen L, et al. Risk factors and prognostic models of cognitive dysfunction in elderly patients after gynecological laparoscopic surgery. Chin J Geriatrics 2019;38:269–73. [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Kapoor I, Prabhakar H, Mahajan C. Postoperative cognitive dysfunction. Indian J Crit Care Med 2019;23: (Suppl 2): S162–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Daiello LA, Racine AM, Yun Gou R, et al. Postoperative delirium and postoperative cognitive dysfunction: overlap and divergence. Anesthesiology 2019;131:477–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Kotekar N, Shenkar A, Nagaraj R. Postoperative cognitive dysfunction - current preventive strategies. Clin Interv Aging 2018;13:2267–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Huang L, Li TJ. Laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer: where are we now and where are we going? Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2018;18:1145–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Cullinan DR, Schill MR, DeClue A, et al. Fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery: not only for senior residents. J Surg Educ 2017;74:e51–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Evered LA, Silbert BS. Postoperative cognitive dysfunction and noncardiac surgery. Anesth Analg 2018;127:496–505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].Needham MJ, Webb CE, Bryden DC. Postoperative cognitive dysfunction and dementia: what we need to know and do. Br J Anaesth 2017;119: (suppl_1): i115–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].Rundshagen I. Postoperative cognitive dysfunction. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2014;111:119–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Berger M, Nadler JW, Browndyke J, et al. Postoperative cognitive dysfunction: minding the gaps in our knowledge of a common postoperative complication in the elderly. Anesthesiol Clin 2015;33:517–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Holmgaard F, Vedel AG, Rasmussen LS, et al. The association between postoperative cognitive dysfunction and cerebral oximetry during cardiac surgery: a secondary analysis of a randomised trial. Br J Anaesth 2019;123:196–205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Duan X, Zhu T, Chen C, et al. Serum glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor levels and postoperative cognitive dysfunction after surgery for rheumatic heart disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2018;155:958–65. e951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Norris D, Clark MS, Shipley S. The mental status examination. Am Fam Physician 2016;94:635–41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Wan J, Luo P, Du X, et al. Preoperative red cell distribution width predicts postoperative cognitive dysfunction after coronary artery bypass grafting. Biosci Rep 2020;40:7–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Austin CA, O’Gorman T, Stern E, et al. Association between postoperative delirium and long-term cognitive function after major nonemergent surgery. JAMA Surg 2019;154:328–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Corrigan FE, 3rd, Gleason PT, Condado JF, et al. Imaging for predicting, detecting, and managing complications after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2019;12:904–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Li Y, Huang D, Su D, et al. Postoperative cognitive dysfunction after robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with cerebral oxygen monitoring an observational prospective cohort pilot study. BMC Anesthesiol 2019;19:202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Gerlach RM, Chaney MA. Postoperative cognitive dysfunction related to Alzheimer disease? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2018;155:968–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Punjasawadwong Y, Chau-In W, Laopaiboon M, et al. Processed electroencephalogram and evoked potential techniques for amelioration of postoperative delirium and cognitive dysfunction following non-cardiac and non-neurosurgical procedures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018;5:CD011283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Isik B. Postoperative cognitive dysfunction and Alzheimer disease. Turk J Med Sci 2015;45:1015–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Fodale V, Santamaria LB, Schifilliti D, et al. Anaesthetics and postoperative cognitive dysfunction: a pathological mechanism mimicking Alzheimer's disease. Anaesthesia 2010;65:388–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Evered L, Silbert B, Knopman DS, et al. Recommendations for the nomenclature of cognitive change associated with anaesthesia and surgery-2018. Br J Anaesth 2018;121:1005–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Lin X, Chen Y, Zhang P, et al. The potential mechanism of postoperative cognitive dysfunction in older people. Exp Gerontol 2020;130:110791. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Belrose JC, Noppens RR. Anesthesiology and cognitive impairment: a narrative review of current clinical literature. BMC Anesthesiol 2019;19:241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Mafrica F, Fodale V. Thyroid function, Alzheimer's disease and postoperative cognitive dysfunction: a tale of dangerous liaisons? J Alzheimers Dis 2008;14:95–105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Halpin E, Inch H, O’Neill M. Dexmedetomidine's relationship to delirium in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a systematic review. Crit Care Nurs Q 2020;43:28–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Tervonen M, Pokka T, Kallio M, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis found that intranasal dexmedetomidine was a safe and effective sedative drug during paediatric procedural sedation. Acta Paediatr 2020;18:44–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [32].FitzSimons J, Bonanno LS, Pierce S, et al. Effectiveness of preoperative intranasal dexmedetomidine, compared with oral midazolam, for the prevention of emergence delirium in the pediatric patient undergoing general anesthesia: a systematic review. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep 2017;15:1934–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Mann C, Pouzeratte Y, Eledjam JJ. Postoperative patient-controlled analgesia in the elderly: risks and benefits of epidural versus intravenous administration. Drugs Aging 2003;20:337–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [34].Aubrun F, Marmion F. The elderly patient and postoperative pain treatment. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2007;21:109–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [35].Wang Y, Liu X, Li H. [Incidence of the post-operative cognitive dysfunction in elderly patients with general anesthesia combined with epidural anesthesia and patient-controlled epidural analgesia]. Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban 2016;41:846–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [36].Li Y, Dong H, Tan S, et al. Effects of thoracic epidural anesthesia/analgesia on the stress response, pain relief, hospital stay, and treatment costs of patients with esophageal carcinoma undergoing thoracic surgery: a single-center, randomized controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019;98:e14362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [37].Olotu C. Postoperative neurocognitive disorders. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2020;33:101–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [38].Liu LL, Bao N, Lu HW. Effects of CO2 pneumoperitoneum on the cognitive function of patients undergoing gynecologic laparoscopy. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2016;81:90–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Medicine are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES