Abstract
The K. marxianus has emerged as a potential yeast strain for various biotechnological applications. However, the limited number of available genetic tools has hindered the widespread usage of this yeast. In the current study we have expanded the molecular tool box by identifying novel sets of promoters and terminators for increased recombinant protein expression in K. marxianus. The previously available transcriptomic data were analyzed to identify top 10 promoters of highest gene expression activity. We further characterized and compared strength of these identified promoters using eGFP as a reporter protein, at different temperatures and carbon sources. To examine the regulatory region driving protein expression, serially truncated shorter versions of two selected strong promoters were designed, and examined for their ability to drive eGFP protein expression. The activities of these two promoters were further enhanced using different combinations of native transcription terminators of K. marxianus. We further utilized the identified DNA cassette encoding strong promoter in metabolic engineering of K. marxianus for enhanced β-galactosidase activity. The present study thus provides novel sets of promoters and terminators as well as engineered K. marxianus strain for its wider utility in applications requiring lactose degradation such as in cheese whey and milk.
Keywords: Kluyveromyces marxianus, Protein expression, Metabolic engineering, Promoter, Terminator, β-Galactosidase
Highlights
-
•
Novel promoters and terminators for constitutive gene expression in K. marxianus.
-
•
The promoters show constitutive expression at varying temperature and carbon source.
-
•
K. marxianus strain with improved production of β-galactosidase.
1. Introduction
The use of microorganisms for various biotechnological applications has been greatly expanded from producing beverages to food, enzymes, biofuels, flavors and pharmaceuticals. The increased use of these organisms is primarily due to the advancement of various genetics and molecular biology tools, which has facilitated metabolic engineering of biochemical pathways for desired applications (Lian et al., 2018; Nielsen and Jewett, 2008). The yeast-based system has gained more potential as it is amenable to genetic manipulations and also possesses various biochemical pathways found in higher eukaryotes such as mammalian or plant cells (Chakraborty et al., 2016; Mohammadi et al., 2015). Some of the commonly employed yeasts for research as well as industrial processes are Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Pichia pastoris, Hansenula polymorpha, Kluyveromyces lactis and Yarrowia lipolytica. Recently another yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus, a sister species of K. lactis, has also emerged as a valuable strain for biotechnological applications (Karim et al., 2020; Lane and Morrissey, 2010).
The K. marxianus is a non-conventional, non-pathogenic and GRAS (generally regarded as safe) organism. K. marxianus possesses various desirable properties which is absent in many other commonly used yeast, and thus the strain is a potential substitute for biotechnological needs. It’s a fastest growing organism as compared to any of the other known eukaryotes (Groeneveld et al., 2009). It’s a thermotolerant yeast that could grow up to 52 °C (Banat et al., 1992). K. marxianus can assimilate various sugars such as glucose, lactose, mannose, galactose and xylose (Fonseca et al., 2013) (Rodrussamee et al., 2011). The availability of its whole genome sequence could be used for desired genetic manipulations.
In contrast to extensively studied S. cerevisiae, not much is established in K. marxianus. The lack of efficient genetic tools, limited number of auxotrophic markers, limited choice of constitutive or inducible promoters is the major drawback for its metabolic engineering, and usage for biotechnological applications. The presence of dominant nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) over homologous recombination in K. marxianus is another limitation for construction of specific gene knock-out strain (Abdel-Banat et al., 2010). The limitation has been partially overcome by the development of CRISPR-Cas9 system that has improved the efficiency to construct specific gene knockout strain (Löbs et al., 2017). Similarly, a CRISPR interference (CRISPRi) method based upon inactive Cas9, has been successfully used for simultaneous suppression of multiple genes for improved ethyl acetate production in K. marxianus (Löbs et al., 2018). The K. marxianus has shown its potential usage in production of various biomolecules including proteins, ethanol, oligosaccharides and oligopeptides (Belem et al., 1999; Cheng et al., 2006; Yanase et al., 2010). Various enzymes, such as Inulinase, aminopeptidases, β-galactosidase have been successfully produced in their active state from K. marxianus (Bansal et al., 2008; Ramírez-Zavala et al., 2004; Zhou et al., 2014). To fully exploit the unique properties of K. marxianus, it is desirable to expand the tool-box for carrying out genetic manipulations. The ability to modulate a biochemical pathway by varying the expression level of its enzymes and proteins is required for the development of yeast strain for desired application. Thus the identification of novel promoters that could be used in the presence of various sugars and different temperatures would further enhance the potential of K. marxianus as a substitute for P. pastoris or other yeasts.
Various approaches such as optimization of signal sequences and exploration of strong promoters are currently underway for metabolic engineering applications in K. marxianus. Both types of promoters, native as well as those derived from budding yeast S. cerevisiae have been examined in K. marxianus. Promoters of S. cerevisiae origin used for expression in K. marxianus are of galactokinase (PScGAL1) (Almeida et al., 2003), glyceraldehyde-3-dehydrogenase (PScTDH3) (Nonklang et al., 2009), 3-phosphoglycerate kinase (PScPGK1) (Ball et al., 1999; Pecota et al., 2007) and alcohol dehydrogenase (PScADH1) (Lee et al., 2013). Among these promoters, the PScGAL1 promoter is galactose regulatable, and other such as PScTDH3, PScPGK1 and PScADH1 are constitutively expressed. Similarly, native promoters of K. marxianus origin such as PKmINU1 (promoter of inulinase enzyme), PKmGAL1, PKmTDH3, PKmPGK1 and PKmADH1 have been employed to express recombinant proteins (Akada et al., 2014; Bergkamp et al., 1993; Yang et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2015). The expression from PKmINU1 and PKmGAL1 is carbon source dependent. Furthermore, attempts have been made to improve strength of native promoters such as of PKmINU1 (Zhou et al., 2018). Studies show that under growth conditions where glucose is used as carbon source, the native promoters of K. marxianus show higher strength than homologous promoter derived from S. cerevisiae paving way for further exploration of native promoters of K. marxianus (Yang et al., 2015).
In addition to promoters, terminators are known to play critical role in protein expression by modulating the stability of mRNA. Only limited number of terminators sequences have been examined in K. marxianus. The different gene-terminators of K. marxianus and S. cerevisiae origin have been used to modulate promoter strength (Rajkumar et al., 2019). These studies suggest that further expansion of number of terminators sequences would provide additional control for gene expression for metabolic engineering applications in K. marxianus.
Overall there are only limited number of promoters as well as terminator sequences available for protein production and metabolic engineering applications in K. marxianus, and thus there is a need to identify novel promoters and terminators for modulation of desirable biochemical pathways. Thus in the current study, we carried out analysis of available transcriptomic profile of K. marxianus, and identified novel promoters for high expression of proteins, enzymes and metabolic engineering applications. Also, using different sets of terminator sequences, we further enhanced promoter strength. Using the identified combination of these promoters and terminators, we expressed HA antigen of influenza virus. We further used the promoter cassette to engineer K. marxianus with improved β-galactosidase production. The study thus provides novel sets of promoters and terminators for high level production of heterologous proteins and thus contributes to novel genetic tools for use of K. marxianus for metabolic engineering and biotechnological applications. The genetic tools developed in the present study would aid to further understanding of cellular biology of K. marxianus.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Plasmid, strains and growth media
The K. marxianus NBRC1777 was obtained from Biological Resource Centre, NITE (NBRC), Japan. The S. cerevisiae strain BY4741 (MATa his3Δ1, leu2Δ0, met15Δ0, ura3Δ0) was used. The plasmid used in the study are listed in Table 3. SD (Synthetic-defined) media was composed of yeast nitrogen base (YNB) with ammonium sulfate (6.7 g/l) and 2% dextrose (w/v). SX media composition is similar to SD media except that 2% (w/v) xylose instead of dextrose provided carbon source. Amino acids were supplemented as required. YPD media is composed of 1% yeast extract, 2% peptone and 2% dextrose (w/v). YPX and YPL media is same as YPD except that 2% xylose or lactose was used instead of dextrose.
Table 3.
Plasmids constructed in the present study.
| S. No. | Plasmid | Marker |
|---|---|---|
| 1. | pPKM316-PKmIMTCP1-eGFP-TScCYC1 | URA3 |
| 2. | pPKM316-PKmIMTCP2-eGFP-TScCYC1 | URA3 |
| 3. | pPKM316-PKmIMTCP3-eGFP-TScCYC1 | URA3 |
| 4. | pPKM316-PKmIMTCP4-eGFP-TScCYC1 | URA3 |
| 5. | pPKM316-PKmIMTCP5-eGFP-TScCYC1 | URA3 |
| 6. | pPKM316-PKmIMTCP6-eGFP-TScCYC1 | URA3 |
| 7. | pPKM316-PKmIMTCP7-eGFP-TScCYC1 | URA3 |
| 8. | pPKM316-PKmIMTCP8-eGFP-TScCYC1 | URA3 |
| 9. | pPKM316-PKmIMTCP9-eGFP-TScCYC1 | URA3 |
| 10. | pPKM316-PKmIMTCP10-eGFP-TScCYC1 | URA3 |
| 11. | pPKM316-PKmTDH3-eGFP-TScCYC1 | URA3 |
| 12. | pPKM316-PKmPGK1-eGFP-TScCYC1 | URA3 |
| 13. | pPKM316-PKmIMTCP1-787-eGFP-TScCYC1 | URA3 |
| 14. | pPKM316-PKmIMTCP1-612-eGFP-TScCYC1 | URA3 |
| 15. | pPKM316-PKmIMTCP1-400-eGFP-TScCYC1 | URA3 |
| 16. | pPKM316-PKmIMTCP1-194-eGFP-TScCYC1 | URA3 |
| 17. | pPKM316-PKmIMTCP2-699-eGFP-TScCYC1 | URA3 |
| 18. | pPKM316-PKmIMTCP2-499-eGFP-TScCYC1 | URA3 |
| 19. | pPKM316-PKmIMTCP2-408-eGFP-TScCYC1 | URA3 |
| 20 | pPKM316-PKmIMTCP2-299-eGFP-TScCYC1 | URA3 |
| 21. | pPKM316-PKmIMTCP2-199-eGFP-TScCYC1 | URA3 |
| 22. | pPKM316-PKmIMTCP2-111-eGFP-TScCYC1 | URA3 |
| 23. | pPKM316-PKmIMTCP2-eGFP-TKmIMTT1 | URA3 |
| 24. | pPKM316-PKmIMTCP2-eGFP-TKmIMTT2 | URA3 |
| 25. | pPKM316-PKmIMTCP1-FLuc-TKmIMTT1 | URA3 |
| 26. | pPKM316-PKmIMTCP1-FLuc-TKmIMTT2 | URA3 |
| 27. | pPKM316-PKmIMTCP2-FLuc-TKmIMTT1 | URA3 |
| 28. | pPKM316-PKmIMTCP2-FLuc-TKmIMTT2 | URA3 |
| 29. | pPKM316-PKmIMTCP1-FLuc-TScCYC1 | URA3 |
| 30. | pPKM316-PKmIMTCP2-FLuc-TScCYC1 | URA3 |
| 31. | pPKM316-PKmTDH3-FLuc-TScCYC1 | URA3 |
| 32. | pPKM316-PKmPGK1-FLuc-TScCYC1 | URA3 |
| 33. | pPKM316-PKmIMTCP2-ssInu1Km-eGFP-TKmIMTT1 | URA3 |
| 34. | pPKM316-PKmIMTCP2-ssPho1Pp-eGFP-TKmIMTT1 | URA3 |
| 35. | pPKM316-PKmIMTCP2-ssαMFSc-eGFP-TKmIMTT1 | URA3 |
| 36. | pPKM316-PKmIMTCP2-ssαMFKm-eGFP-TKmIMTT1 | URA3 |
| 37. | pPKM316-PKmIMTCP2-HA-TKmIMTT1 | URA3 |
| 38. | pPKM316-PKmPGK1-β-Gal-TScCYC1 | URA3 |
| 39. | pPKM316-PKmTDH3- β-Gal-TScCYC1 | URA3 |
| 40. | pPKM316-PKmIMTCP2- β-Gal-TKmIMTT1 | URA3 |
| 41. | pRS316-PScGPD-FLuc-TScCYC1 | URA3 |
| 42. | pRS316-PKmIMTCP1-FLuc-TScCYC1 | URA3 |
| 43. | pRS316-PKmIMTCP2-FLuc-TScCYC1 | URA3 |
| 44. | pRS316-PScGPD-FLuc-TKmIMTT1 | URA3 |
| 45. | pRS316-PScGPD-FLuc-TKmIMTT2 | URA3 |
| 46. | pRS316-PKmIMTCP1-FLuc-TKmIMTT1 | URA3 |
| 47. | pRS316-PKmIMTCP1-FLuc-TKmIMTT2 | URA3 |
| 48. | pRS316-PKmIMTCP2-FLuc-TKmIMTT1 | URA3 |
| 49. | pRS316-PKmIMTCP2-FLuc-TKmIMTT2 | URA3 |
| 50. | pRS316-PScGPD-HA-TScCYC1 | URA3 |
2.2. Development of K. marxianus expression vectors
The integrating shuttle vector pRS306 was used as a backbone for construction of recombinant yeast expression vector. First, 1265 bp comprising of ARS/CEN sequence was PCR amplified from the genomic DNA of K. marxianus strain NBRC1777. Amplified product was inserted into the vector pRS306 by Transfer-PCR method (Erijman et al., 2011). The resultant expression vector is referred to as pPKM316. Subsequently, the DNA encoding eGFP and TScCYC1 terminator (of S. cerevisiae) was subcloned into pPKM316 using restriction sites BamHI and KpnI to construct pPKM316-eGFP-TScCYC1. The DNA encoding desired promoter (Table S2) was PCR amplified from genomic DNA of K. marxianus strain NBRC1777 using promoter specific forward and reverse primers (Table S1). The amplified DNA sequences were digested with restriction enzymes SacI and XbaI. The digested product was ligated into pPKM316-eGFP-TScCYC1 to develop expression vector encoding eGFP under the control of desired promoter. The plasmid encodes in 5′ to 3’ direction, the desired promoter, eGFP and TScCYC1 terminator.
For studying the role of different terminators, the TScCYC1 terminator was later replaced by desired terminator sequences. The desired terminator sequences (TKmIMTT1 or TKmIMTT2) were PCR amplified from K. marxianus genome, and subcloned into pPKM316-PKmIMTCP2-eGFP plasmid using XhoI and KpnI restriction sites.
Four different signal sequences (signal sequence of Inulinase with P10L substitution (ssInu1Km) (Zhou et al., 2018) and mating α-factor of K. marxianus (ssαMFKm), Pho1 signal sequence of P. pastoris (ssPho1Pp), mating α-factor signal sequence with D83E of S. cerevisiae (ssαMFSc)) were examined in the present study. The DNA encoding ssαMFSc was PCR amplified from P. pastoris plasmid pPic9 (Invitrogen #K1710-01). The DNA encoding ssαMFKm was PCR amplified from the K. marxianus genomic DNA. The DNA encoding ssInu1Km and ssPho1Pp signal sequence were constructed using overlap PCR. The DNA cassette encoding from 5′ to 3′, PKmIMTCP2 promoter and desired signal sequences were constructed using overlap PCR and further subcloned using restriction sites SacI and XbaI into expression plasmid at 5’ end of gene encoding eGFP.
For β-galactosidase expression, the β-galactosidase gene sequence was PCR amplified from the genomic DNA of K. marxianus strain NBRC1777 and subcloned at SpeI and XhoI restriction sites under desired promoter and terminator.
For PCR amplification, the initial denaturation was carried out for 5 min at 98 °C, followed by additional 30 cycles of denaturation for 30 s at 98 °C, primer annealing for 30 s at 55–60 °C and extension at 72 °C. Then one final extension time of 10 min at 72 °C was carried out.
2.3. Construction of K. marxianus strain with uracil auxotrophy
The uracil auxotrophy of K. marxianus was constructed using homologous recombination of DNA cassette lacking Ura3 encoding gene at Ura3 locus. The DNA cassette lacking URA3 and having homology of 250 base pair (bp) upstream and 250bp downstream sequence of URA3 gene was synthesized from GenScript USA, Inc. The cassette was transformed into K. marxianus strain. The transformants with uracil auxotropy was identified by their inability to grow on solid media lacking uracil as well as growth onto 5-fluoroorotic acid (5-FOA) containing growth media.
2.4. Immunoblot analysis
NBRC1777 ura3Δ cells (10 ml culture volume in 50 ml flasks) harboring desired plasmid were grown until mid-log phase. The cells were harvested by centrifugation and washed with PBS buffer. The cells were lysed, and cell-debris was removed by centrifugation at 3000g for 2 min. The lysate supernatant was used for immunoblotting. About 10–15 μg of total protein from cell lysate was subjected to electrophoresis onto a 12% SDS–polyacrylamide gel. The proteins were then transferred onto PVDF membrane. A 1:5000 dilution of an anti-GFP (cat. No. MA5-15256; thermo fisher scientific) or anti-Pgk1 (Life Technologies, USA-459250) or anti- His6 (Pierce, USA-MA1-21315) antibody was used for detection.
To detect eGFP in culture growth media, the cells were separated from growth media by centrifugation at 12000g for 30 min. The supernatant was collected, and 20 μl of supernatant was used for immunoblotting.
2.5. In vivo luciferase assay
The gene encoding luciferase (FLuc) was PCR amplified and subcloned into plasmid downstream of desired promoter cassette using restriction sites BamHI and XhoI. The designed plasmids encoding luciferase were transformed into yeast K. marxianus or S. cerevisiae. The 3–4 transformants were pooled and grown overnight into SD liquid growth media lacking uracil. The overnight grown primary culture was diluted to 0.05 O.D.600 using 20 ml of sterile growth media (in 100 ml flask) with dextrose or xylose as carbon source. Cells were grown at either 30 °C or 45 °C at 200 rpm until cell O.D.600 reached 0.8–1.0. The cells were harvested by centrifugation and re-suspended into 1 ml of YNB media. For measuring luciferase activity, 200 μl of 0.3 O.D.600 cells were added with 50 μl of 1 mg/ml D-Luciferin (Sigma-Aldrich Cat #L9504), and the luminescence was measured in Multimode Plate Readers (TECAN Infinite M200 PRO, Switzerland).
2.6. Quantitative real-time PCR
Cells, grown in selective SD media (20 ml in 100 ml flasks) at 30 °C and 200 rpm until mid-log phase, were harvested and total RNA was isolated using HiPurA Yeast RNA Purification Kit (HiMedia, India-MB611). The 100 ng of isolated RNA was used to prepare cDNA using a cDNA synthesis kit (BIO-RED Cat#170–8891). For quantitative Real-Time PCR (qRT-PCR), cDNA (1 μl) was amplified using iTaq™ Universal SYBR® Green Supermix qPCR kit (BIO-RED, CAT#172–5124) by using eGFP specific primer (Table S1) and following manufacturer’s protocol. The reaction was subjected to an initial denaturation at 95 °C for 2 min and 40 repetitive cycles of 15 s at 95 °C, 30 s at 60 °C in CFX96 Touch Real-Time PCR System (BIO-RED). The 18 S rRNA was selected as a reference gene.
2.7. β-Galactosidase activity assay
The K. marxianus cells harboring plasmid encoding β-galactosidase were grown until mid-log phase as 10 ml culture in 50 ml flasks (shaking speed 200 rpm). 1 O.D.600nm cells were treated with 3 rounds of freeze thaw cycle for permeabilization. Cells were further incubated with 0.2 ml of ortho-Nitrophenyl-β-galactoside (ONPG 4 mg/ml) for 15 min. The reaction was stopped with 0.3 ml of 1 M Na2CO3. Cells were centrifuged at 12000g for 10 min and the enzyme activity was monitored in supernatant by measuring absorbance at 420 nm.
3. Results
3.1. The transcriptomic analysis of gene expression reveals the promoters of higher strength
As promoter act as a regulatory region for gene transcription, the relatively higher number of a gene transcript is likely to be expressed from a stronger promoter. Thus, to identify strong promoters in K. marxianus, we analyzed the transcription profile of cellular genes as a reporter of the relative strength of promoters. A previous study has reported transcriptomic data of K. marxianus cells grown at 30 °C in liquid YPD media under shaking condition (Lertwattanasakul et al., 2015). To understand the relative increase in the number of transcripts, we normalized the available gene expression data of each gene by dividing its number of transcripts by the lowest positive transcript number (0.03 ppm at 30 °C).
Table 1 provides fold increase of the top 10 highly expressed gene transcripts. Interestingly the top 2 highly expressed genes, IMTCP1 and IMTCP2, encode for yet uncharacterized proteins. One of the gene, IMTCP3 codes for a subunit of 40 S ribosomal protein. The ribosomal proteins are known to be abundantly present in the cell (Ho et al., 2018). The gene products driven by previously used strong promoters such as glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase 1, inulinase, enolase were also found to be among top 10 identified transcripts suggesting that these identified promoters are likely to be strong promoters for use in K. marxianus.
Table 1.
Fold change in mRNA level of 10 most abundant transcripts. The fold change was calculated by dividing the transcript value of the gene by the lowest non-zero transcript value (0.03) reported in (Lertwattanasakul et al., 2015).
| Promoter/Gene notation | Name | CDS product | 30 °C (Fold change) | 45 °C (Fold change) | Length of Promoter (bp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PKmIMTCP1/IMTCP1 | KLMA_10040 | Uncharacterized protein YDR524C–B | 17169530 | 7149637 | 1000 |
| PKmIMTCP2/IMTCP2 | KLMA_40174 | Uncharacterized cell wall protein YDR134C | 1362106 | 1221608 | 999 |
| PKmIMTCP3/IMTCP3 | KLMA_40094 | 40 S ribosomal protein S13 | 213216.4 | 438075.7 | 438 |
| PKmIMTCP4/IMTCP4 | KLMA_10830 | Ribosyldihydronicotinamide dehydrogenase [quinone] | 101348.9 | 451185.9 | 594 |
| PKmIMTCP5/IMTCP5 | KLMA_20547 | Protein BTN2 | 131705.2 | 602783.1 | 479 |
| PKmIMTCP6/IMTCP6 | KLMA_10518 | Inulinase | 431333.3 | 20887.56 | 930 |
| PKmIMTCP7/IMTCP7 | KLMA_40218 | Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase 1 | 420417 | 79451.56 | 1008 |
| PKmIMTCP8/IMTCP8 | KLMA_70281 | Asparagine synthetase [glutamine-hydrolyzing] 1 | 23655.22 | 353828.3 | 1000 |
| PKmIMTCP9/IMTCP9 | KLMA_10179 | Glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase [NAD+] 1 | 76492.56 | 40412 | 1000 |
| PKmIMTCP10/IMTCP10 | KLMA_10462 | Enolase | 143882.2 | 26598.33 | 977 |
| PKmTDH3/TDH3 | KLMA_80059 | Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase 3 | 489093.7 | 81713.78 | 1060 |
| PKmPGK1/PGK1 | KLMA_10540 | Phosphoglycerate kinase | 15041.11 | 3238.889 | 1035 |
3.2. Promoter driving IMTCP1 or IMTCP2 shows the highest expression of reporter protein eGFP
To examine the relative strength of the above-identified promoters, we constructed an expression plasmid compatible for use in K. marxianus. The plasmid was further used to express eGFP encoded under the identified promoters.
For the construction of the recombinant yeast expression vector, the ARS/CEN sequence of K. marxianus strain NBRC1777 was inserted into integrating shuttle vector pRS306 (ATCC 77141) to generate plasmid pPKM316 (Fig. 1) (Ball et al., 1999). To examine the strength of individual promoter, the gene encoding reporter protein eGFP was subcloned into pPKM316. The DNA encoding each of the identified promoters was further subcloned into the plasmid at region 5’ to gene encoding eGFP. Previous studies show that 500–700 bp upstream region is sufficient to drive gene expression (Lang et al., 2020; Lee et al., 2015; Ohler and Niemann, 2001). Thus a minimum length of 500bp was selected as promoter region. We selected either intergenic or 1000 bp upstream region (except for PKmIMTCP4) if intergenic region is more than 1000bp, as the promoter length. For PKmIMTCP4, instead of 1000bp only 594 bp were selected (due to the presence of a desired restriction site just upstream of 594bp) as the promoter region.
Fig. 1.
Schematics showing the methodology used for development of K. marxianus expression plasmid. The CEN/ARS origin sequence of K. marxianus was inserted into the vector pRS306 to generate pPKM316. The pPKM316 was further used for insertion of cassette encoding desired promoters and terminators.
The plasmids encoding eGFP under desired promoters were transformed into K. marxianus cells. The transformants were grown into liquid SD media lacking uracil at 30 °C. The cellular lysate prepared from equal O.D.600nm cells was probed with anti-GFP antibodies. The Pgk1 expressed from chromosomal PGK1 encoded under its native promoter was used as an internal control. As seen in Fig. 2, though Pgk1 is expressed at a similar level, the cellular abundance of eGFP varied with different promoters. We observed that as compared to previously known strong constitutive promoter PKmTDH3, the eGFP expression from PKmIMTCP2 was about 2 fold higher. The PKmIMTCP1 showed second highest expression as compared to other promoters selected from transcriptomic analysis. The other chosen promoters showed much lower expression than PKmIMTCP2.
Fig. 2.
PKmIMTCP1and PKmIMTCP2show relatively higher expression of reporter protein eGFP. (A) Immunoblot analysis to compare the strength of different promoters using eGFP as a reporter protein and TScCYC1 terminator. The cells were transformed with plasmid encoding indicated promoters. Transformants were grown in liquid growth media containing dextrose (SD) at 30 °C or 45 °C. The cellular lysate was immunoblotted with anti-GFP or anti-PGK1 antibody. Previously known PKmTDH3 and PKmPGK1 promoters of K. marxianus origin were also examined for comparison. (B) The promoter strength was analyzed similar to as descrived in Panel “A” except that xylose was used as carbon source instead of dextrose. (C) The eGFP expression from indicated promoters. Cells were grown at 30 °C in media containing dextrose or xylose as carbon source. The endogenous Pgk1 showed lower expression when cells were grown in xylose containing media.
To examine whether the relative strength of identified promoters varies with temperature, we examined eGFP level from cells grown under shaking conditions in SD media at 45 °C. The cellular lysate was prepared similarly to the method described above, and the eGFP level was measured on immunoblot using anti-GFP antibodies. Similar to as seen above for cell growth at 30 °C, among all promoters that were examined, PKmIMTCP2 was found to be the strongest promoter followed by PKmIMTCP1 whose strength was found be similar to as of previously used PKmTDH3. The strong activity of PKmIMTCP2 is in agreement with a recent study that identified NC1 (smaller fragment of PKmIMTCP2) as one of the strong promoters in K. marxianus (Lang et al., 2020).
3.3. PKmIMTCP1 and PKmIMTCP2 show the strongest eGFP expression in growth media containing xylose as carbon source
The type of carbon source varies depending upon the biotechnological applications which influences microbial growth. For example, xylose is one of the primary sources of carbon when lignocellulose hydrolysates is used for biofuel production. We thus examined the relative strength of our identified promoter in media containing xylose instead of dextrose as carbon source, and compared with that of previously used strong promoters PKmTDH3 and PKmPGK1. The cells harboring plasmid encoding eGFP under various promoters were grown into liquid growth media with xylose (SX) as the carbon source and the cellular lysate was examined for eGFP expression. We observed that in xylose containing media, the expression of eGFP was higher from promoters PKmIMTCP1, PKmIMTCP2, PKmIMTCP6, and PKmIMTCP9 as compared to that from previously used strong promoters, PKmTDH3 and PKmPGK1 (Fig. 2B). The results from SD and SX media showed that Inulinase promoter (PKmIMTCP6) has relatively higher activity in the presence of xylose than dextrose. Among the newly identified promoters, the eGFP expression was highest from PKmIMTCP2 followed by from PKmIMTCP1. We further compared the ability of two strongest promoters (PKmIMTCP1 and PKmIMTCP2) to drive eGFP expression in dextrose or xylose containing growth media. As seen in Fig. 2C, though the strength of PKmTDH3 varied with the carbon source, the identified strong promoters showed similar eGFP expression in both media suggesting that the strength of these newly identified promoters is independent of dextrose or xylose as carbon source. Overall above data suggest that the identified PKmIMTCP1 and PKmIMTCP2 promoters are more efficient at different temperatures and carbon sources than the previously known promoters in K. marxianus (Fig. S1).
3.4. The 388 bp at 5’ end of PKmIMTCP1 are indispensable for its activity
We further focused on PKmIMTCP1 and PKmIMTCP2 promoters that showed relatively higher eGFP expression as compared to the other promoters. Promoter region binds to RNA polymerase as well as with other regulatory factors required for the polymerase recruitment. To determine the regulatory region in PKmIMTCP1 and PKmIMTCP2, we constructed various derivatives of these promoters by sequentially truncating stretch of DNA bases from the 5′ region of the promoter as shown in Fig. 3A and 3B. For PKmIMTCP1, 4 truncated derivatives of different lengths were PCR amplified, and subcloned 5′ to gene encoding eGFP in plasmid pPKM316-eGFP-TScCYC1. The capability of truncated promoters to drive eGFP expression was monitored in K. marxianus as described above for full-length promoter at 30 °C in media containing dextrose as a carbon source. The varying level of eGFP expression was observed with promoters of different length (Fig. 3C and 3D). The results show that PKmIMTCP1-1000, PKmIMTCP1-787 and PKmIMTCP1-612 have relatively similar strength. Further truncation of promoter length led to a progressive decrease in eGFP cellular abundance with PKmIMTCP1-194 showing least expression of the protein. Overall, the data suggest that the extreme 388 bp at 5’ region of the PKmIMTCP1 does not contribute much to its ability to drive gene expression.
Fig. 3.
eGFP expression varies with the promoter length. (A and B) Schematics of designed derivatives of PKmIMTCP1 and PKmIMTCP2. (C) Cells were transformed with plasmid encoding varying length of PKmIMTCP1 promoter. Transformants were grown in SD liquid media, and cellular lysate was immunoblotted with anti-GFP antibody. Pgk1 was probed as loading control. (D) Cells were examined for eGFP expression using method similar to as mentioned above in Panel “C”. The eGFP was expressed under indicated derivatives of PKmIMTCP2.
Similarly, six truncated promoters of varying lengths based upon the parent PKmIMTCP2 promoter were constructed and examined for their strength using eGFP as reporter protein. The expression of eGFP decreased with an increase in truncation of 5’ region of PKmIMTCP2 suggesting the full-length promoter was required for the maximal protein expression.
3.5. The terminators TKmIMTT1 and TKmIMTT2 enhance promoter activity by stabilizing mRNA
The cellular abundance of a protein not only depends upon the strength of promoter but also on the terminator sequence that follows 3′ to the encoding gene. The terminator sequence affects gene expression by modulating mRNA stability (Curran et al., 2013; Rajkumar et al., 2019). Thus the relatively higher transcript level of the chromosomally encoded native gene under PKmIMTCP1 or PkmIMTCP2 could be dependent upon its native terminators. To examine the effect of native terminators of PkmIMTCP1 (TKmIMTT1) and PkmIMTCP2 (TKmIMTT2) on PkmIMTCP2 strength, we replaced TScCYC1 terminator from 3’ end of gene encoding eGFP with that of TKmIMTT1 and TKmIMTT2. It is reported that terminator sequences generally contains characteristic elements such as AT-rich efficiency elements and A-rich positioning elements (AAG/TAA), and about 200bp downstream sequence from stop codon is sufficient for termination (Helden et al., 2000). To include such characteristic features, we used minimum of 250bp downstream of stop codon (269bp and 290bp for TKmIMTT1 and TKmIMTT2 respectively) as the terminator sequence.
The plasmid encoding from 5′ to 3’ direction PkmIMTCP2, eGFP, TKmIMTT1/TKmIMTT2 was transformed into K. marxianus strain. The transformants were grown in liquid SD media at 30 °C, and examined for eGFP expression using immunoblot as described above. Interestingly, the expression of eGFP from PkmIMTCP2 was enhanced when TKmIMTT1 was used as terminator instead of TScCYC1 (Fig. 4A). Similar increase of eGFP expression was observed with TKmIMTT2 terminator as compared to TScCYC1. To examine whether increase in eGFP level is because of enhanced mRNA stability, we carried out qRT-PCR to examine the transcript level (Fig. 4B). Similar to as seen for increase in eGFP protein abundance, about 4 fold increase of mRNA level was observed when TScCYC1 was replaced with either TKmIMTT1/TKmIMTT2. Further the eGFP expression from PKmIMTCP2-TKmIMTT1 was found to similar at different temperatures (18 °C, 30 °C and 37 °C) used for K. marxianus growth (Fig. 4C). We also examined the effect of the protein overexpression on cells growth, and seen in Fig. S2, no significant growth defect was observed upon eGFP overexpression from PkmIMTCP2-TKmIMTT1 cassette. Overall, the designed sets of promoters and terminators showed significantly higher expression than any of the other native promoters used for protein expression in K. marxianus.
Fig. 4.
The eGFP expression improves when PKmIMTCP2is used in combination with TKmIMTT1or TKmIMTT2(A) Cells were transformed with plasmids encoding indicated combinations of promoters and terminators. Transformants were grown in SD liquid media at 30 °C, and examined for eGFP expression in cellular lysate using anti-GFP antibodies. Pgk1 level was examined as loading control. (B) Cells were grown as in Panel A. The mRNA was isolated, and eGFP transcript level was examined using qRT-PCR with primers specific for the genes encoding eGFP or 18 S (internal control). (C) The strength of indicated DNA cassette was examined by monitoring eGFP level expressed at 18 °C, 30 °C or 37 °C in K. marxianus.
3.6. The cassette PKmIMTCP2-TKmIMTT1 shows relatively higher expression of luciferase gene
We further examined the effect of TKmIMTT1/TKmIMTT2 terminator sequences on the expression of gene encoding firefly luciferase driven by PKmIMTCP1 and PKmIMTCP2 promoters. The luciferase encoding gene was subcloned in-between 5′ and 3′ region of desired promoter and terminator respectively. The plasmid encoding from 5′ to 3’ direction, the desired promoter, gene encoding firefly luciferase, and desired terminator was transformed into K. marxianus strain. The transformants were examined for in vivo luciferase activity by monitoring increase in luminescence as a measure of luciferase expression. As seen in Fig. 5, when cells were grown at 30 °C (Fig. 5A) or 45 °C (Fig. 5B) in dextrose containing liquid growth media, varying level of luciferase activity was observed from different combinations of promoters and terminators. The strongest luminescence signal was obtained when luciferase was expressed from PKmIMTCP2 promoter in combination with TKmIMTT1 or TKmIMTT2 terminator sequences, suggesting that among the different combinations, PKmIMTCP2-TKmIMTT1 or PKmIMTCP2-TKmIMTT2 drive the strongest expression of the protein. Similarly, there was ~1.7 fold increase in luminescence when the luciferase was expressed from PKmIMTCP1-TKmIMTT1 or PKmIMTCP2-TKmIMTT1 as compared to PKmIMTCP1-TScCYC1 or PKmIMTCP2-TScCYC1. The data shows that the order of promoter-terminator combination strength with regard to their ability to drive luciferase expression is PKmIMTCP2-TKmIMTT1 ~ PKmIMTCP2-TKmIMTT2 > PKmIMTCP1-TKmIMTT1 ~ PKmIMTCP1-TKmIMTT2 > PKmIMTCP2-TScCYC1 ~ PKmIMTCP1-TScCYC1 > PKmTDH3-TScCYC1 >PKmPGK1-TScCYC1.
Fig. 5.
The TKmIMTT1enhances luciferase expression. Cells were transformed with plasmid encoding luciferase under the control of different combinations of indicated promoters and terminators. Transformants were grown until OD600nm of 0.8 in liquid synthetic media containing dextrose or xylose as carbon source. About 200 μl of 0.3 O.D.600nm cells were added with D-Luciferin as luciferase substrate, and increase in luminescence was monitored. Shown is the luciferase activity from cells grown (A) at 30 °C with dextrose or (B) 45 °C with dextrose as carbon source or (C) at 30 °C with xylose as carbon source.
In order to explore whether the relative strength of above DNA cassette with identified promoters and terminators is affected by a different carbon source, we grew cells harbouring plasmid encoding these cassettes in media containing xylose instead of dextrose as source of carbon. The luciferase activity was measured as described above. Similar to as observed for dextrose containing media, when cells were grown in media containing xylose, PKmIMTCP2-TKmIMTT1 ~ PKmIMTCP2-TKmIMTT2 showed highest luciferase activity followed by that shown by PKmIMTCP1-TKmIMTT1 ~ PKmIMTCP1-TKmIMTT2 (Fig. 5C). Further, the identified promoters, PKmIMTCP1 and PKmIMTCP2 with any of the three terminators TScCYC1, TKmIMTT1 or TKmIMTT2 showed relatively higher luciferase expression than PKmPGK1-TScCYC1 or PKmTDH3-TScCYC1.
3.7. The terminators TKmIMTT1 and TKmIMTT2 further improved promoter strength in S. cerevisiae
The promoters of S. cerevisiae origin have been successfully used to express proteins in K. marxianus suggesting that promoters from one yeast species could also be active in others. We thus examined the ability of identified K. marxianus promoter to drive protein expression in S. cerevisiae. Further as terminators provide an additional regulation for protein expression, we examined whether the above identified terminators affect PScGPD in S. cerevisiae. Various combinations of promoters and terminators (Fig. 6), were constructed as described in Table 2. Overall, we used three promoters, PScGPD from S. cerevisiae, PKmIMTCP1 and PKmIMTCP2 from K. marxianus; and three terminator sequences, TScCYC1 from S. cerevisiae, TKmIMTT1 and TKmIMTT2 from K. marxianus. The firefly luciferase was used as reporter protein to examine the strength of these expression cassettes.
Fig. 6.
Comparison of the activity of luciferase expressed using indicated combination of promoter and terminator in S. cerevisiae. Cells harboring plasmid encoding luciferase under different promoter and terminator combinations were grown in liquid SD media at 30 °C. The luciferase activity was monitored as described in Materials and Methods. The luciferase substrate D-luciferin was added into 200 μl of culture volume (O.D.600nm = 0.3) and increase in luminescence was monitored.
Table 2.
Promoter and terminator combinations used in this study.
| S. No. | Combination |
|---|---|
| 1. | PKmIMTCP1-TScCYC1 |
| 2. | PKmIMTCP2-TScCYC1 |
| 3. | PKmIMTCP3-TScCYC1 |
| 4. | PKmIMTCP4-TScCYC1 |
| 5. | PKmIMTCP5-TScCYC1 |
| 6. | PKmIMTCP6-TScCYC1 |
| 7. | PKmIMTCP7-TScCYC1 |
| 8. | PKmIMTCP8-TScCYC1 |
| 9. | PKmIMTCP9-TScCYC1 |
| 10. | PKmIMTCP10-TScCYC1 |
| 11. | PKmTDH3-TScCYC1 |
| 12. | PKmPGK1-TScCYC1 |
| 13. | PKmIMTCP1-TKmIMTT1 |
| 14. | PKmIMTCP1-TKmIMTT2 |
| 15. | PKmIMTCP2-TKmIMTT1 |
| 16. | PKmIMTCP2-TKmIMTT2 |
| 17. | PScGPD-TScCYC1 |
| 18. | PScGPD-TKmIMTT1 |
| 19. | PScGPD-TKmIMTT2 |
The pRS316 either alone or encoding any of above expression cassettes was transformed into S. cerevisiae strain BY4741, and transformants were examined for the luciferase activity using method similar to as used above for K. marxianus strain. Both PKmIMTCP1-TScCYC1 and PKmIMTCP2-TScCYC1 showed activity in S. cerevisiae as seen by enhanced luciferase activity as compared to cells harboring vector alone however the luciferase activity was slightly lower than when luciferase was expressed from native promoter and terminator of S. cerevisiae (PScGPD-TScCYC1). The substitution of TScCYC1 in PScGPD-TScCYC1 with TKmIMTT1 or TKmIMTT2 improved the promoter ability to drive luciferase expression as seen by further increase in luminescence by 1.6 and 1.8 fold respectively. Similar increase in luciferase activity was detected when TScCYC1 was substituted with TKmIMTT1 or TKmIMTT2 in PKmIMTCP1-TScCYC1 and PKmIMTCP2-TScCYC1. The cells encoding designed PScGPD-TKmIMTT1 or PScGPD-TKmIMTT2 showed marginally higher luminescence than those encoding PKmIMTCP2-TKmIMTT1 or PKmIMTCP2-TKmIMTT2.
3.8. The cassette PKmIMTCP2-TKmIMTT1 showed higher strength than PscGPD-TScCYC1 for influenza HA antigen expression
We further examined the application of above designed expression cassette from K. marxianus for its ability to drive expression of influenza protein Hemagglutinin (HA). The HA antigen is a potential candidate for the design of influenza vaccine. We examined HA expression driven by the designed DNA cassette PKmIMTCP2-TKmIMTT1 in K. marxianus, and compared with that produced from widely used strong constitutive promoter cassette PScGPD-TScCYC1 in S. cerevisiae. The gene encoding His10-HA was subcloned with desired combination of promoters and terminators in centromeric plasmid for expression in K. marxianus or S. cerevisiae. The cells harboring expression plasmid were grown until mid log phase, and cellular lysate was probed with anti-His tag antibodies on an immunoblot. As seen in Fig. 7, the HA expression from K. marxianus was found to be 2.5 fold higher than that from PScGPD promoter in S. cerevisiae, further suggesting that the identified promoter cassette could not only drive stronger expression of reporter proteins such as eGFP or firefly luciferase but also of other heterologous proteins.
Fig. 7.
Comparative expression of HA protein in different yeast strains. Immunoblot analysis of expression level of His tagged HA protein in S. cerevisiae and K. marxianus. The His10-HA was expressed from strong GPD promoter in S. cerevisiae. The PKmIMTCP2-TKmIMTT1 was used to express His10-HA in K. marxianus. Yeast cells were grown at 30 °C with dextrose as carbon source. The cells were harvested and cellular lysate was probed with anti-His6 or anti-Pgk1 (loading control) antibody.
3.9. S. cerevisiae α-factor signal sequence efficiently secretes eGFP in K. marxianus
We further examined the ability of the identified PKmIMTCP2-TKmIMTT1 cassette on expression of eGFP secreted out into extracellular growth media. The secretion of a protein into extracellular space requires the presence of secretory signal sequence that traffics the protein into media supernatant through endoplasmic reticulum (ER).
To examine the secretion of eGFP in extracellular growth media, the protein was expressed in fusion with various signal sequences under PKmIMTCP2. The various signal sequence that are compared in the present study are; Inulinase signal sequence (ssInu1Km) with P10L substitution of K. marxianus, Pho1 signal sequence (ssPho1Pp) of P. pastoris, mating α-factor signal sequence (ssαMFSc) containing D83E substitution of S. cerevisiae and mating α-factor signal sequence (ssαMFKm) of K. marxianus. The plasmid encoding eGFP in fusion with desired signal sequence was transformed in K. marxianus. The media supernatant was collected and examined for eGFP expression. As seen in Fig. 8A, among the various signal sequences examined, eGFP in media supernatant was significantly higher when expressed in fusion with signal sequence from mating α factor of S. cerevisiae.
Fig. 8.
Comparison of secretory capacity of various signal sequences in K. marxianus. (A) Cells harboring plasmid encoding eGFP fused with indicated signal sequences under PKmIMTCP2-TKmIMTT1 cassette was grown for 24 h and 48 h. The culture was spun at 12000g for 15 min, and media supernatant was collected, and further probed with anti-GFP antibody. The signal sequences examined are: Inulinase signal sequence (ssInu1Km) with P10L substitution of K. marxianus, ssPho1Pp signal sequence of P. pastoris, mating α-factor signal sequence (ssαMFSc) with D83E of S. cerevisiae and mating α-factor signal sequence (ssαMFKm) of K. marxianus(B) expression of extracellular eGFP expressed in fusion with ssαMFSc encoded under the control of PKmIMTCP2-TKmIMTT1. The DNA PKmIMTCP2-ssαMFSc-eGFP-TKmIMTT1 cassette was genome integrated at HIS3 locus in K. marxianus genome. Cells were grown in media containing dextrose (YPD), xylose (YPX) and lactose (YPL). The eGFP expression was examined as above in Panel (A).
We further examined the effect of changes in carbon source on promoter strength as well as ability of αMFSc for extracellular secretion of proteins. The DNA cassette PKmIMTCP2-ssαMFSc-eGFP-TKmIMTT1 encoding fusion of eGFP with ssαMFSc expressed under the control of PKmIMTCP2 promoter was genomically integrated in K. marxianus at HIS3 locus. The genomically integrated strain was grown in liquid growth media containing dextrose, xylose or lactose as carbon source. The eGFP expression was confirmed in extracellular growth media using immnoublot analysis. As seen in Fig. 8B, the eGFP was expressed similarly in all the three types of growth media suggesting the strength of promoter as well as the secretion signal sequence is independent of the type of carbon source used for culturing cells.
3.10. The cassette PKmIMTCP2-TKmIMTT1 showed higher β-galactosidase expression
The K. marxianus has potential usage for the enzymatic mitigation of lactose in products such as cheese whey and milk, due to its ability to produce β-galactosidase. To further improve the utility of K. marxianus for lactose utilization, we engineered the strain for enhanced production of β-galactosidase.
Above data show that the ability of designed PKmIMTCP2-TKmIMTT1 for protein production is independent of carbon sources such as dextrose, xylose or lactose. We subcloned gene encoding K. marxianus β-galactosidase under the PKmIMTCP2-TKmIMTT1 in Ura3 based plasmid. The β-galactosidase encoding plasmid was transformed into K. marxianus, and examined for β-galactosidase activity as mentioned in Materials and Methods. As seen in Fig. 9, wt K. marxianus with empty vector showed lower β-galactosidase activity of 10 miller units. The enzyme activity of the β-galactosidase produced from PKmIMTCP2-TKmIMTT1 showed ~1800 miller units higher activity as compared to that produced chromosomal borne gene. Further the PKmIMTCP2-TKmIMTT1 produced 1.6 and 24 fold higher activity than previously identified PKmTHD3 and PKmPGK1 promoters. Overall our data suggest that the K. marxianus engineered to produce β-galactosidase from PKmIMTCP2-TKmIMTT1 produces significantly higher β-galactosidase then the wt organism.
Fig. 9.
The engineered K. marxianus with β-galactosidase encoded gene under PKmIMTCP2-TKmIMTT1shows significantly higher enzyme activity. Cells were transformed with plasmid encoding β-Galactosidase under the control of different combinations of indicated promoters and terminators. The β-galactosidase activity was measured as described in Materials and Methods. As seen, the engineered K. marxianus cells that express β-galactosidase from combination of PKmIMTCPP2-TKmIMTT1 show significantly higher enzyme activity than those that express from chromosomally encoded enzyme.
4. Discussion
For wider utilization of K. marxianus, there is a need to expand the genetic toolbox required for various applications such as to improve the production of heterologous proteins, engineering of its glycosylation pathways and secretory capacity. Many of such synthetic biology approaches require genetic tools for genomic integration as well as expression of desired proteins in different carbon sources and temperatures. The present study provides novel sets of promoters and terminators, and further used it for metabolic engineering of K. marxianus for higher β-galactosidase activity.
The analysis of available transcriptomic data revealed relative strength of various promoters in K. marxianus. The transcript level of previously used strong promoter PKmPGK1 in K. marxianus was found to be lower than the most abundant transcripts at 30 °C. In agreement, the relative eGFP expression driven from identified top 2 promoters was found to be higher than from PKmPGK1 suggesting that transcriptomics could potentially provide novel strong promoters with varying level of protein expression. This is also in agreement with previous studies focused to identify novel promoters based upon level of various transcripts (Yuan et al., 2020).
The eGFP or luciferase expression from identified strong promoters PKmIMTCP1 and PKmIMTCP2 at 30 °C and 45 °C showed consistent higher expression than previously known PKmTDH3 or PKmPGK1 promoter suggesting that their ability to drive relatively higher protein expression is independent of alteration of growth temperature. The constitutive expression from PKmIMTCP1 and PKmIMTCP2 is also consistent with the reported transcriptomic data obtained under various conditions (Table S3) (Lertwattanasakul et al., 2015). As evident from Table S3, IMTCP1 and IMTCP2 have highest transcript value than the rest of the genes (IMTCP3-IMTCP10) under all four conditions (Lertwattanasakul et al., 2015). The promoter strength at higher temperature is particularly crucial in processes where cell growth is required at higher temperature such as during alcohol fermentation.
The substitution of dextrose with xylose for carbon source showed alteration of eGFP expression level suggesting that strength of some of the identified promoters are dependent upon the nature of the carbon source. The effect of change in carbon source to xylose was more pronounced for PKmIMTCP6 and PKmIMTCP9 than PKmIMTCP1 or PKmIMTCP2. It is possible that the effect of xylose on promoter strength is due to cellular adaptation of metabolic pathways for better utilization of the pentose sugars. This is in agreement with the known influence of change in carbon source on metabolic perturbation and reprograming of gene transcription (Diniz et al., 2017; Paulo et al., 2015). Interestingly, the strength of the best two identified promoters, PKmIMTCP1 and PKmIMTCP2 remain independent of change in the carbon source whereas the previously used PKmTDH3 show relatively lower expression in xylose containing media.
It is known that various regulatory elements interact with the promoter region and govern its ability to drive gene expression. The study examining DNA fragments of PKmIMTCP1 or PKmIMTCP2 that are still capable to drive protein expression showed that though PKmIMTCP1 could be truncated by 388 bp without affecting its ability to regulate protein expression, full length PKmIMTCP2 is required for maximal activity. The smaller fragment of PKmIMTCP1 having 612 bp showing similar activity as of full length 1000bp promoter is in agreement with previous studies showing that in general 500-700bp upstream sequence is sufficient to drive protein expression (Lang et al., 2020; Lee et al., 2015; Ohler and Niemann, 2001). However since full-length PKmIMTCP2 is required, it is possible that different regulatory factors such as transcription factors binds to the extreme 5′ end of the promoter PKmIMTCP2 and allosterically influences RNA polymerase binding to the 3’ region of the promoter. Similar upstream enhancer/regulatory sequences has been observed before for promoters such POX2 in Y. lipolytica (Shabbir Hussain et al., 2016).
The PKmIMTCP1 or PKmIMTCP2 were found to be strongest among the selected 10 promoters. Promoters generally consist of conserved functional elements such as a core promoter region (consisting of TATA box and the transcriptional start site) and upstream regulatory sequences. In general, these regions lie within first 200bp upstream sequence (Basehoar et al., 2004). We looked into the presence of TATA boxes in all 10 promoters and found TATA boxes in less than 250bp upstream of translation start site of all the promoters. The upstream regulatory elements of these promoters are still not defined. Thus we did not find any apparent correlation between amplified promoter regions of the remaining 8 promoters and their low activities. A detailed study to identify the upstream regulatory elements and their role in promoter strengths would be required to further understand the underlying basis of varying activities of these identified promoters.
The further increase in the ability of PKmIMTCP1 and PKmIMTCP2 to drive protein expression upon substitution of TScCYC1 with TKmIMTT1 or TKmIMTT2 indicates that the protein abundance not only depends upon the promoter but also upon terminator which is in agreement with previous studies. The increase in protein expression with identified terminators is not only specific for PKmIMTCP1 or PKmIMTCP2 but more general as they also enhanced promoter strength of other promoter such as PScGPD. The enhanced expression is not specific to eGFP but is more general for other proteins such as luciferase. As the effect is not specific to a particular promoter or substrate, it is possible that the ability of the identified terminators to enhance protein expression could be related to enhanced mRNA stability. This is in agreement with increase in transcript level of eGFP when TKmIMTT1 or TKmIMTT2 were used as terminator sequence.
Our data show that the identified promoter cassette PKmIMTCP2-TKmIMTT1 functions efficiently at wide range of sugars as carbon source such as dextrose, xylose and lactose. The metabolically engineered K. marxianus harboring this cassette showing more than 181 fold higher β-galactosidase activity as compared to the strain expressing from chromosomally encoded enzyme, further enhances the wider utility of the strain in applications requiring lactose degradation such as from cheese whey and milk.
The ability to metabolically engineer microorganism has greatly enhanced their potential for diverse applications. K. marxianus provides a unique opportunity in various biotechnological applications and thus number of ongoing studies are focused to develop novel genetic tools and to understand more about its biology such as its glycosylation pathway and metabolomics. The present study has now provided various DNA cassettes consisting of novel strong promoters and terminators and further showed the application of these tools in metabolic engineering of K. marxianus for enhanced β-galactosidase activity. We also show that these tools could be efficiently used for the production of potential therapeutic agents such as influenza antigen HA. The promoters and terminators as well as the engineered K. marxianus strain identified in the present study has enhanced the potential of K. marxianus for various research, industrial and biotherapeutic applications.
5. Conclusions
In the present study, we have identified novel strong native promoters of K. marxianus. The ability of identified promoters for protein production was further enhanced by novel sets of terminators. The identified promoters showed similar strength at wider range of temperatures and different carbon sugars. The identified promoters and terminators were also found to be active in S. cerevisiae. Further, we used the identified promoter and terminator DNA cassette to engineer K. marxianus for increased production of β-galactosidase. The engineered strain would have wider applications requiring mitigation of lactose such as in cheese whey and milk. Thus, the designed DNA cassettes of novel promoters and terminators has increased the genetic tool box for basic research, protein production and metabolic engineering applications in K. marxianus.
Author contributions
P.K., D.K.S. and D.S. designed research. P.K. performed research. D.S., and D.K.S., arranged for reagents and tools. P.K., D.K.S. and D.S.analyzed results. P.K., D.K.S. and D.S. wrote manuscript.
Financial disclosure
The work is supported by the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), India, and the Ramalingaswami Re-entry Fellowship (BT/RLF/RE-entry/33/2010) from the Department of Biotechnology (DBT), India to Deepak Sharma. The current study was also supported by funds received from BIRAC, Department of Biotechnology, India.
Additional information
A patent on part of this study has been filed: “VECTOR FOR HIGH-EXPRESSION OF PROTEINS IN YEAST” Application No. PCT/IN 2020/050640.
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgement
We thank Prof. Raghavan Varadarajan, IISc, Bangalore, India for kind gift of plasmid encoding HA. We thank Ms. Laxmi Swami for help in standardization of transformation protocol and Dr. Anubhav for help in plasmid design. Deepak Sharma acknowledges funding support from Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), India, Biotechnology Industry Research Assistance Council, India and the Ramalingaswami Re-entry Fellowship from Department of Biotechnology (DBT) India.
Footnotes
Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mec.2020.e00160.
Appendix A. Supplementary data
The following is/are the supplementary data to this article:
Figure S1. The relative strength of four strong promoters, identified in the current study. Immunoblot analysis to compare the strength of four selected promoters using eGFP as a reporter protein and TScCYC1 terminator. The cells were transformed with plasmid encoding indicated promoters. Transformants were grown in liquid SD media at 30 °C or 45 °C and SX at 30 °C. The cellular lysate was immunoblotted with anti-GFP or anti-PGK1 antibody. Previously known promoters of K. marxianus origin, PKmTDH3 and PKmPGK1, were also examined for comparison.
Figure S2. Effect of eGFP overexpression on cell growth. Cells were transformed with empty vector (EV) and vector having eGFP under the control of PKmIMTCP2 -TKmIMTT1. The cell growth was monitored by measuring OD600 at indicated time intervals.
References
- Abdel-Banat B.M., Nonklang S., Hoshida H., Akada R. Random and targeted gene integrations through the control of non-homologous end joining in the yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus. Yeast. 2010;27:29–39. doi: 10.1002/yea.1729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Akada R., Hoshida H., Ide M. 2014. High-expression Promoter Derived from Kluyveromyces Marxianus (Google Patents) [Google Scholar]
- Almeida C., Queirós O., Wheals A., Teixeira J., Moradas-Ferreira P. Acquisition of flocculation phenotype by Kluyveromyces marxianus when overexpressing GAP1 gene encoding an isoform of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase. J. Microbiol. Methods. 2003;55:433–440. doi: 10.1016/s0167-7012(03)00189-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ball M.M., Raynal A., Guérineau M., Iborra F. Construction of efficient centromeric, multicopy and expression vectors for the yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus using homologous elements and the promoter of a purine-cytosine-like permease. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1999;1:347–353. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Banat I.M., Nigam P., Marchant R. Isolation of thermotolerant, fermentative yeasts growing at 52 C and producing ethanol at 45 C and 50 C. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1992;8:259–263. doi: 10.1007/BF01201874. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bansal S., Oberoi H.S., Dhillon G.S., Patil R. Production of β-galactosidase by Kluyveromyces marxianus MTCC 1388 using whey and effect of four different methods of enzyme extraction on β-galactosidase activity. Indian J. Microbiol. 2008;48:337–341. doi: 10.1007/s12088-008-0019-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Basehoar A.D., Zanton S.J., Pugh B.F. Identification and distinct regulation of yeast TATA box-containing genes. Cell. 2004;116:699–709. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00205-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Belem M., Gibbs B., Lee B. Proposing sequences for peptides derived from whey fermentation with potential bioactive sites. J. Dairy Sci. 1999;82:486–493. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75258-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bergkamp R.J., Bootsman T.C., Toschka H.Y., Mooren A.T., Kox L., Verbakel J.M., Geerse R.H., Planta R.J. Expression of an α-galactosidase gene under control of the homologous inulinase promoter in Kluyveromyces marxianus. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1993;40:309–317. doi: 10.1007/BF00170386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chakraborty R., Baek J.H., Bae E.Y., Kim W.-Y., Lee S.Y., Kim M.G. Comparison and contrast of plant, yeast, and mammalian ER stress and UPR. Applied Biological Chemistry. 2016;59:337–347. [Google Scholar]
- Cheng C.-C., Yu M.-C., Cheng T.-C., Sheu D.-C., Duan K.-J., Tai W.-L. Production of high-content galacto-oligosaccharide by enzyme catalysis and fermentation with Kluyveromyces marxianus. Biotechnol. Lett. 2006;28:793–797. doi: 10.1007/s10529-006-9002-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Curran K.A., Karim A.S., Gupta A., Alper H.S. Use of expression-enhancing terminators in Saccharomyces cerevisiae to increase mRNA half-life and improve gene expression control for metabolic engineering applications. Metab. Eng. 2013;19:88–97. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2013.07.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Diniz R.H.S., Villada J.C., Alvim M.C.T., Vidigal P.M.P., Vieira N.M., Lamas-Maceiras M., Cerdán M.E., González-Siso M.-I., Lahtvee P.-J., da Silveira W.B. Transcriptome analysis of the thermotolerant yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus CCT 7735 under ethanol stress. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017;101:6969–6980. doi: 10.1007/s00253-017-8432-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Erijman A., Dantes A., Bernheim R., Shifman J.M., Peleg Y. Transfer-PCR (TPCR): a highway for DNA cloning and protein engineering. J. Struct. Biol. 2011;175:171–177. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2011.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fonseca G.G., de Carvalho N.M.B., Gombert A.K. Growth of the yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus CBS 6556 on different sugar combinations as sole carbon and energy source. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013;97:5055–5067. doi: 10.1007/s00253-013-4748-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Groeneveld P., Stouthamer A.H., Westerhoff H.V. Super life–how and why ‘cell selection’leads to the fastest-growing eukaryote. FEBS J. 2009;276:254–270. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2008.06778.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Helden J.v., Olmo M.l.d., Pérez-Ortín J.E. Statistical analysis of yeast genomic downstream sequences reveals putative polyadenylation signals. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28:1000–1010. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.4.1000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ho B., Baryshnikova A., Brown G.W. Unification of protein abundance datasets yields a quantitative Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteome. Cell systems. 2018;6:192–205. doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2017.12.004. e193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Karim A., Gerliani N., Aïder M. Kluyveromyces marxianus: an emerging yeast cell factory for applications in food and biotechnology. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2020:108818. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2020.108818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lane M.M., Morrissey J.P. Kluyveromyces marxianus: a yeast emerging from its sister’s shadow. Fungal Biology Reviews. 2010;24:17–26. [Google Scholar]
- Lang X., Besada-Lombana P.B., Li M., Da Silva N.A., Wheeldon I. Developing a broad-range promoter set for metabolic engineering in the thermotolerant yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus. Metabolic engineering communications. 2020;11 doi: 10.1016/j.mec.2020.e00145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee K.-S., Kim J.-S., Heo P., Yang T.-J., Sung Y.-J., Cheon Y., Koo H.M., Yu B.J., Seo J.-H., Jin Y.-S. Characterization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae promoters for heterologous gene expression in Kluyveromyces marxianus. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013;97:2029–2041. doi: 10.1007/s00253-012-4306-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee M.E., DeLoache W.C., Cervantes B., Dueber J.E. A highly characterized yeast toolkit for modular, multipart assembly. ACS Synth. Biol. 2015;4:975–986. doi: 10.1021/sb500366v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lertwattanasakul N., Kosaka T., Hosoyama A., Suzuki Y., Rodrussamee N., Matsutani M., Murata M., Fujimoto N., Tsuchikane K., Limtong S. Genetic basis of the highly efficient yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus: complete genome sequence and transcriptome analyses. Biotechnol. Biofuels. 2015;8:47. doi: 10.1186/s13068-015-0227-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lian J., Mishra S., Zhao H. Recent advances in metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: new tools and their applications. Metab. Eng. 2018;50:85–108. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2018.04.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Löbs A.-K., Engel R., Schwartz C., Flores A., Wheeldon I. CRISPR–Cas9-enabled genetic disruptions for understanding ethanol and ethyl acetate biosynthesis in Kluyveromyces marxianus. Biotechnol. Biofuels. 2017;10:164. doi: 10.1186/s13068-017-0854-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Löbs A.-K., Schwartz C., Thorwall S., Wheeldon I. Highly multiplexed CRISPRi repression of respiratory functions enhances mitochondrial localized ethyl acetate biosynthesis in Kluyveromyces marxianus. ACS Synth. Biol. 2018;7:2647–2655. doi: 10.1021/acssynbio.8b00331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mohammadi S., Saberidokht B., Subramaniam S., Grama A. Scope and limitations of yeast as a model organism for studying human tissue-specific pathways. BMC Syst. Biol. 2015;9:1–22. doi: 10.1186/s12918-015-0253-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nielsen J., Jewett M.C. Impact of systems biology on metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res. 2008;8:122–131. doi: 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2007.00302.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nonklang S., Ano A., Abdel-Banat B.M., Saito Y., Hoshida H., Akada R. Construction of flocculent Kluyveromyces marxianus strains suitable for high-temperature ethanol fermentation. Biosc. Biotech. Biochem. 2009 doi: 10.1271/bbb.80853. 0904101433-0904101433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ohler U., Niemann H. Identification and analysis of eukaryotic promoters: recent computational approaches. Trends Genet. 2001;17:56–60. doi: 10.1016/s0168-9525(00)02174-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Paulo J.A., O’Connell J.D., Gaun A., Gygi S.P. Proteome-wide quantitative multiplexed profiling of protein expression: carbon-source dependency in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2015;26:4063–4074. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E15-07-0499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pecota D.C., Rajgarhia V., Da Silva N.A. Sequential gene integration for the engineering of Kluyveromyces marxianus. J. Biotechnol. 2007;127:408–416. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2006.07.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rajkumar A.S., Varela J.A., Juergens H., Daran J.-M.G., Morrissey J.P. Biological parts for Kluyveromyces marxianus synthetic biology. Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology. 2019;7:97. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ramírez-Zavala B., Mercado-Flores Y., Hernández-Rodríguez C., Villa-Tanaca L. Purification and characterization of a lysine aminopeptidase from Kluyveromyces marxianus. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2004;235:369–375. doi: 10.1016/j.femsle.2004.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rodrussamee N., Lertwattanasakul N., Hirata K., Limtong S., Kosaka T., Yamada M. Growth and ethanol fermentation ability on hexose and pentose sugars and glucose effect under various conditions in thermotolerant yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011;90:1573. doi: 10.1007/s00253-011-3218-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shabbir Hussain M., Gambill L., Smith S., Blenner M.A. Engineering promoter architecture in oleaginous yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. ACS Synth. Biol. 2016;5:213–223. doi: 10.1021/acssynbio.5b00100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yanase S., Hasunuma T., Yamada R., Tanaka T., Ogino C., Fukuda H., Kondo A. Direct ethanol production from cellulosic materials at high temperature using the thermotolerant yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus displaying cellulolytic enzymes. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010;88:381–388. doi: 10.1007/s00253-010-2784-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang C., Hu S., Zhu S., Wang D., Gao X., Hong J. Characterizing yeast promoters used in Kluyveromyces marxianus. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015;31:1641–1646. doi: 10.1007/s11274-015-1899-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yuan F., Li K., Zhou C., Zhou H., Liu H., Chai H., Lu F., Zhang H. Identification of two novel highly inducible promoters from Bacillus licheniformis by screening transcriptomic data. Genomics. 2020;112:1866–1871. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2019.10.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang J., Zhang B., Wang D., Gao X., Sun L., Hong J. Rapid ethanol production at elevated temperatures by engineered thermotolerant Kluyveromyces marxianus via the NADP (H)-preferring xylose reductase-xylitol dehydrogenase pathway. Metab. Eng. 2015;31:140–152. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2015.07.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhou H.-X., Xin F.-H., Chi Z., Liu G.-L., Chi Z.-M. Inulinase production by the yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus with the disrupted MIG1 gene and the over-expressed inulinase gene. Process Biochem. 2014;49:1867–1874. [Google Scholar]
- Zhou J., Zhu P., Hu X., Lu H., Yu Y. Improved secretory expression of lignocellulolytic enzymes in Kluyveromyces marxianus by promoter and signal sequence engineering. Biotechnol. Biofuels. 2018;11:235. doi: 10.1186/s13068-018-1232-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.









