Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2021 Jan 14;11:1301. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-80634-1

Response of Lactobacillus plantarum VAL6 to challenges of pH and sodium chloride stresses

Phu-Tho Nguyen 1,2, Thi-Tho Nguyen 3, Thi-Ngoc-Tuyen Vo 4, Thi-Thanh-Xuan Nguyen 2, Quoc-Khanh Hoang 5, Huu-Thanh Nguyen 2,✉
PMCID: PMC7809271  PMID: 33446763

Abstract

To investigate the effect of environmental stresses on the exopolysaccharide biosynthesis, after 24 h of culture at 37 °C with pH 6.8 and without sodium chloride, Lactobacillus plantarum VAL6 was exposed to different stress conditions, including pH (pHs of 3 and 8) and high sodium chloride concentration treatments. The results found that Lactobacillus plantarum VAL6 exposed to stress at pH 3 for 3 h gives the highest exopolysaccharide yield (50.44 g/L) which is 6.4 fold higher than non-stress. Under pH and sodium chloride stresses, the mannose content in exopolysaccharides decreased while the glucose increased in comparison with non-stress condition. The galactose content was highest under stress condition of pH 8 meantime rhamnose content increased sharply when Lactobacillus plantarum VAL6 was stressed at pH 3. The arabinose content in exopolysaccharides was not detected under non-stress condition but it was recorded in great amounts after 3 h of stress at pH 3. In addition, stress of pH 8 triggered the mRNA expression of epsF gene resulting in galactose-rich EPS synthesis. According to our results, the stresses of pH and sodium chloride enhance the production and change the mRNA expression of epsF gene, leading to differences in the monosaccharide composition of exopolysaccharides.

Subject terms: Cell biology, Microbiology

Introduction

Exopolysaccharides (EPS) are high molecular weight biological polymers synthesized extracellularly by various microorganisms (archaea, bacteria, fungi or algae) and applied in the variety of industries such as food, pharmaceuticals, etc.1. Especially, Lactic acid bacterial (LAB) are the most remarkable group of EPS producing bacteria because of their strong production of EPS2 and they are GRAS (Generally Recognized As Safe)3. Dextran, levan, oligosaccharides, etc. are polysaccharides produced by LAB and widely used in the food industry to improve the rheological, structural and sensory properties of fermented products2. In addition, LAB's EPS can also possess biological functions such as immune stimulation, antitumour effects, prebiotic activities and antioxidants4.

The function of EPS for bacteria is to protect cells from the negative effects of environment as dehydration, antibiotics, phagocytosis and phage attacks because of their role in forming biofilms5–7. Changes in environmental conditions may alter the EPS production8 and result in the biosynthesis of new types of EPS in bacteria9. The final EPS yield and the characteristics of EPS are strongly influenced by environmental conditions10,11. Fedorová et al.12 have found a positive correlation between EPS production and L. reuteri resistance to low pH stress. Seesuriyachan et al.13 also reported that EPS production increased when L. confusus was stressed under high salinity. Moreover, the effect of various environmental conditions can trigger the expression of genes involved in the biosynthesis of EPS in LAB. For example, when the pH of the culture medium decreased from pH 6.5 to pH 5.5, the eps gene cluster expression increased in S. thermophilus ASCC 127514.

The EPS biological properties are determined by its monosacharide composition. The differences in the ratio and composition of monosaccharides cause the alteration of biological activity and therapeutic effect15. For instance, the anti-inflammatory activity of EPS is related to the sugar ratio of galactose, rhamnose and glucose. Galactose-rich EPS enhances their anti-inflammatory activity16. Rare sugar-rich EPS have a higher biological activity than EPS consisting of common sugars. Some of rare sugars as L-fucose, L-rhamnose, and uronic acid contain valuable properties which maybe attractive to a large number of applications for various fields including antioxidant, anti-inflammatory substances, etc.; particularly, such rare sugars can be used to synthesize the nucleoside substances which have antiviral effects17. Rhamnose-rich EPS secreted by L. paracasei have ability to boost the immune system18. Bacteria can produce EPS containing rare sugars under certain conditions19. The EPS synthesized by LAB can contain both common and rare sugars, depending highly on environmental conditions20. The monosaccharide composition of EPS also involve LAB’s resistance to stress. According to the study result of London et al.21, the stress resistance of L. mucosae DPC 6426 depended on the monosaccharide ratio of EPS produced by themself. Furthermore, the proportions of individual monosaccharides in EPS differed when L. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus CNRZ 1187 and L. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus CNRZ 416 were cultured under various pH conditions22.

Environmental stresses can alter biosynthesis and metabolism in microorganisms23. Although there are many reports on the relationship between changed environmental conditions and EPS biosynthesis, studies on the effects of environmental stress on EPS synthesis in Lactobacilli are still limited. L. plantarum has been known to be a producer of EPS with distinct biological properties and activities for different applications, including health and food industry24. Thus, this study focuses on assessing the impact of stress conditions such as pH (low and high) and high sodium chloride concentration on EPS synthesis in L. plantarum VAL6. The purpose of this work is to improve the yield and monosaccharide composition of EPS for highly bioactive EPS production.

Results

Effect of pH and sodium chloride stresses on EPS production

The harsh environmental conditions stimulate microorganisms to develop various adaptive strategies, allowing them to cope with the adverse effects of extreme conditions. Among these strategies, EPS biosynthesis is one of the most common protection mechanisms11. We wonder if it is true during L. plantarum VAL6′s EPS production under pH and sodium chloride stresses. Therefore, L. plantarum VAL6 was treated with stress conditions of pH 3, pH 8 and high concentration of sodium chloride. As results of our data, EPS yield increases considerably under stress treatments of pH 3 and pH 8 compared to non-stressed condition (Fig. 1a).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

The EPS yield (a) and cell density (b) of L. plantarum VAL6 under pH and sodium chloride stresses. The non-stress control was maintained at 37 °C, pH 6.8 and without sodium chloride for the entire time. Standard deviation is displayed and account for three independent experiments.

The amount of EPS produced by L. plantarum VAL6 under stress of pH 3 was higher than that under other stress conditions. The highest EPS yield produced by ones was over 50 g/L after exposure to stress at pH 3 for 3 h and 6.4 fold higher than the control (only 7.8 g/L). While under stress at pH 8, the yield of EPS was about 16 g/L and 2.1 fold higher. These results indicated that L. plantarum VAL6 enhances EPS synthesis under stress conditions of pH 3 and pH 8.

The production of EPS was influenced by not only pH stress but also sodium chloride stress. The effect of sodium chloride stress on EPS production in L. plantarum VAL6 was determined in the presence of sodium chloride (10%). It is observed that there is a slight increase in the production of EPS compared to non-stress (Fig. 1a). Under sodium chloride stress, the yield of EPS fluctuated approxymately 10 g/L. However, there was still a significant difference (P < 0.05) in EPS yield between sodium chloride stress and non-stress.

In addition to the evaluation of EPS production, the growth capacity of L. plantarum VAL6 under stress conditions was also examined. The results showed that L. plantarum VAL6 is able to survive during the time of tested stresses (Fig. 1b). Under the stress conditions of NaCl and pH 8, the density of L. plantarum VAL6 was found an insignificant difference (P > 0.05) compared to non-stress. However, the density of L. plantarum VAL6 decreased strongly under stress condition of pH 3.

The changes in the monosaccharide compositions of EPS

Environmental conditions greatly affect the yield, monosaccharide composition as well as functional properties of EPS synthesized by bacteria10,11. To better clarify the effect of environmental conditions on EPS biosynthesis, we have evaluated the impact of pH and sodium chloride stress conditions on changes in the monosaccharide composition of EPS. The results were shown in Fig. 2.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Proportions of monosaccharides in the EPS produced by L. plantarum VAL6 under pH and sodium chloride stresses: (a) mannose; (b) glucose; (c) galactose; (d) arabinose; (e) rhamnose; (f) xylose. The non-stress control was maintained at 37 °C, pH 6.8 and without sodium chloride for the entire time.

The ratio of monosaccharides in EPS differently fluctuated between non-stress and stress conditions. Stress conditions decreased the ratio of mannose in EPS (Fig. 2a). Under stress of sodium chloride, the percentage of mannose fluctuated around 81% during the time of stress and was lower than non-stress samples (84.33%). For stress of pH 3, the percentage of mannose was 83.46% after 1 h of stress but then dropped to 75–76% when extending the stress period. For stress of pH 8, the proportion of mannose in EPS was only 73–74%.

In contrast, stress conditions increased glucose levels (Fig. 2b). Under stress of pH 3, the glucose content in EPS increased from 12.55% after 1 h of stress to a maximum ratio of 15.77% after 3 h and then it steadily decreased to 14.21% after 7 h of stress. Whereas under stress of pH 8, the glucose ratio fluctuated between 17.15 and 18.59%. The glucose content in EPS under sodium chloride stress increased slightly from 13.88% after 1 h of stress to a approximate maximum of 14.7% at 3 h and then it steadily decreased according to the time of stress. These compared with about 13% under non-stress condition.

The galactose ratio in EPS produced by L. plantarum VAL6 in exposure to stress at pH 8 sharply increased (Fig. 2c). Under stress of pH 8, the galactose ratio ranged 6.20–6.49% compared to 1.21% of the control. This value was only about 0.62–1.75% under stress of pH 3. It was also observed that galactose ratio in EPS slightly increased when L. plantarum VAL6 was exposed to sodium chloride stress and ranged 2.7–3%.

Research results also indicated that there was a difference in the rhamnose content of EPS when L. plantarum VAL6 was exposed to pH stress conditions (Fig. 2e). Especially, the rhamnose content of EPS from L. plantarum VAL6 stressed at pH 3 was highest and increased gradually following to the time of stress. It was approximately 5% after 7 h of stress, 6.6 times higher than non-stress. Under stress of pH 8, the ratio of rhamnose fluctuated approximately 2% and it was did not detected during stress periods over 3 h. For sodium chloride stress, the ratio of rhamnose was about 1%.

Arabinose was not detected in EPS composition under non-stress condition, but it was found under tested stress conditions (Fig. 2d). Under stress of pH 3, the arabinose content in EPS was considerably higher than that under stress conditions of pH 8 and sodium chloride. The arabinose ratio was highest when L. plantarum VAL6 exposed to stress at pH 3 for 3 h. It peaked at 4.25% compared to just about 1% under stress conditions of pH 8 and sodium chloride. In contrast, xylose was found in the EPS composition of the controls although it was quite small. However, it was not detected in EPS produced by L. plantarum VAL6 under tested stress conditions (Fig. 2f).

Expression of EPS genes

Changes in expression of genes involved in EPS biosynthesis under different environmental conditions have been previously reported25,26. Assuming that alterations in the monosaccharide composition of EPS produced by L. plantarum VAL6 under pH and sodium chloride stresses could be also related to the expression of eps genes, we analyzed the expression of the two genes including epsD (encoding a putative protein tyrosine phosphatase) and epsF (encoding a putative glycosyltransferase)27 (see “Materials and methods” section for the primers used to amlify cDNA, Table 2). Results showed that epsD was expressed both stress and non-stress conditions (Fig. 3). Meanwhile, epsF was only expressed under stress of pH 8 (Fig. 3).

Table 2.

The primers used for the amplification55.

Gene Primer Sequence (5′ → 3′) Tm (°C) Product size (bp)
epsD DF2 sense TATTCTGGAGGCGTTTTTGG 60.1 205
DR2 antisense AAACTCACGGGCCATTTTT 59.4
epsF FF2 sense TCAAGCGGGTATTTGACTTCTT 60.1 238
FR2 antisense AACATTGGGCCATCAACATC 60.6
Open in a new tab

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

The expression of epsF and epsD gene under stress conditions of pH 3, pH 8, NaCl and non-stress. The non-stress control was maintained at 37 °C, pH 6.8 and without sodium chloride for the entire time. Full-length gels are presented in Supplementary Fig. S3.

Discussion

The results showed that stress of pH 3 stimulates L. plantarum VAL6 to strongly synthesize EPS. It is explained that EPS affect cell's sensitivity to acid pH. Anions linked to EPS can limit acid’s access to bacterial cells28. Moreover, cultures were stressed at low pH by addition of H3PO4. Therefore, having been synthesized, EPS may be attached to phosphate groups from H3PO4 by phosphorylation in order to form phosphate polysaccharide leading to increase the weight of obtained EPS. The presence of phosphate groups in EPS has been also recorded in some studies. EPS-b and EPS-r produced by L. plantarum EP56 contained phosphate groups which contribute to their negative charge29. Phosphate groups may provide important properties to EPS because they are required for the activation of lymphocytes30. The negative charge on EPS surface plays an important role in isolating positively charged toxic compounds such as nisin and metal ions31. In this study, phosphate rich EPS may be synthesized by L. plantarum VAL6 under stress condition of pH 3. Several studies also demonstrated that there is a correlation between low pH and EPS production. The contemporary pH decrease and the presence of sugar (osmotic stress) stimulated EPS production in LAB32. The EPS producing L. mucosae DPC 6426 exhibited a fivefold increasing survival during a 60-min exposure to HCl compared to EPS non-producing L. mucosae DPC 642021. The strains of L. reuteri producing more EPS showed a considerably higher tolerance at low pH. The resistance of L. reuteri to the stress conditions of gastrointestinal tract was related to EPS production12. For treatment of pH 8, although EPS yield was lower compared to treatment pH 3, it was still higher than the control sample. This result indicated that L. plantarum VAL6 also enhances EPS synthesis to cope with the effects of high pH. There are few studies reporting on relationships between alkaline pH and EPS production. However, it was found that EPS related to flocs formation, composed of a complex mixture of EPS, provide microorganism protection against alkaline pH33.

The high concentration of sodium chloride affected positively EPS production in L. plantarum VAL6. The increase in EPS production was related to sodium chloride tolerance34. The extracellular polysaccharide layer with high water retention helps microorganisms for better resistance to osmosis35. Another study has also demonstrated that L. confusus TISTR 1498 overproduced EPS under high salinity stress13. The effect of sodium chloride on the biosynthesis of EPS in LAB has been little reported. However, many studies on cyanobacteria demonstrated that high sodium chloride concentration positively affects EPS production. There was a considerable increase in EPS production of Synechocystis sp. exposed to sodium chloride34. The production of extracellular carbohydrates by Microcoleus vaginatus also considerably increased under higher salt concentrations36.

The results of growth kinetics demonstrated that L. plantarum VAL6 is able to survive during tested stresses. Despite a sharp decrease, the density of L. plantarum VAL6 was still higher than 5 log CFU/mL after 7 h of stress at pH 3. Many studies have also demonstrated that L. plantarum can outlive under extremely low pH condition. According to the study of Lee et al.37, some L. plantarum strains isolated from Korean kimchi could survive at pH 2.5 for 2 h. The density of L. plantarum ZDY 2013 altered inconsiderably at pH 3 and could survive for 6 h at pH 2 at over 7 log CFU/mL38.

This research characterised monosaccharides making of EPS produced by L. plantarum VAL6 with and without exposure to pH and sodium chloride stresses, then quantified the monosaccharide compositions by GC-FID. Overall, monosaccharide composition of EPS produced by L. plantarum VAL6 was composed of different monomers. The presence of mannose, glucose and galactose was common in both non-stress and stress conditions. The EPS of L. plantarum VAL6 from non-stress samples was found to be comprised of five identifiable monosachharides. In descending order, mannose, glucose, galactose were three major monosaccharides present in these samples. This result was not the same as other L. plantarum species studied previously such as L. plantarum EP5629, L. plantarum C8839, L. plantarum YW1140, where glucose was main component sugar. However, the monosaccharide ratio of EPS produced by L. plantarum VAL6 was similar to the monosaccharide ratio of EPS produced by L. plantarum 70810 (18.21 Glc: 3.03 Gal: 78.76 Man)41. Likewise, mannose, glucose and galactose (in a molar ratio of 12.94:7.26:3.31) were the main composition of EPS produced by L. plantarum KX04115.

The monosaccharide composition of EPS from L. plantarum VAL6 exposed to tested stress treatments changed both monosaccharide type and the ratio of sugars. This result suggested that stresses of pH and sodium chloride can trigger the reprogramming of cellular mechanism for EPS biosynthesis resulting in changes in monosacchride composition of EPS with the accumulation of certain common and rare sugar ratios (Table 1). Remarkably, the result found a substantial increase in rhamnose content under stress condition of pH 3. Rhamnose-rich EPS show interesting biological activities which make them likely to be used for many applications such as pharmaceuticals, cosmetics and functional foods42,43. For instance, rhamnose and fucose have gotten more attention when oligo and polysaccharides rich in rhamnose and fucose were found to be associated with anti-aging skin mechanisms44. Also according to this study, galactose content in EPS increased sharply when L. plantarum VAL6 was exposed to stress of pH 8. As reported by previous studies, galatose-rich EPS could enhance anti-inflammatory activity16. Galactose-rich EPS also increased the adhesion and capacity of biofilm formation in LAB45. Another interesting result found in our study was the presence of arabinose in EPS under tested stresses but it was not detected under non-stress condition. This result suggested that arabinose component in EPS may be involved in bacterial stress resistance. A prior study has also demonstrated that the arabinose component in EPS plays an important role in cell aggregation to deal with hostile environmental conditions46. These results elicit the using potential of pH stress for the production of carbohydrate bioactive compounds.

Table 1.

Summary of the changes in the monosacharide composition of EPS produced by L. plantarum VAL6 under pH and sodium chloride stresses.

Monosaccharides The changes in composition of monosacharides
Non-stress Stress
Mannose + ↓
Glucose + ↑
Galactose + ↑
Arabinose − +
Rhamnose + ↑
Xylose + −
Open in a new tab

(−) Not detected; (+) Detected; (↓) Decreased; (↑) Increased.

The changes in the monosaccharide composition of EPS were related to the expression of tested eps genes. epsD gene takes part in the functional group which encodes enzymes involved in phosphoregulatory system, it controls polysaccharide assembly20. This may explain why epsD is always expressed in EPS synthesis. The results of this study also showed that epsD was expressed under non-stress and tested stress conditions (Fig. 3). However, epsF gene was only expressed under stress condition of pH 8 (Fig. 3). Furthermore, the result of study also demonstrated that stress of pH 8 strongly increased galactose content in EPS (Fig. 2c). In S. thermophilus Sfi6, epsF has been shown to encode a galactosyltransferase47, a transport enzyme which adds galactose to the repeating unit of EPS structure, leading to increase galactose proportion in the monosaccharide composition of EPS. Similarly, the results of this study suggested that the expression of epsF gene is related to the synthesis of galactose-rich EPS in L. plantarum VAL6.

Conclusion

L. plantarum VAL6 was able to survive and enhance EPS production under pH and sodium chloride stresses. The highest yield of EPS reached to 50.44 g/L when L. plantarum VAL6 was exposed to stress of pH 3. The results also demonstrated that the stresses of pH 8 and sodium chloride positively affect the EPS producing ability of L. plantarum VAL6. Futhermore, the monosaccharide compositions in EPS synthesized by L. plantarum VAL6 differently changed under the impact of these stresses. Under tested stress conditions, the content of mannose decreased while glucose content increased compared to non-stress circumstance. Galactose content dramatically increased when L. plantarum VAL6 was exposed to stress of pH 8. There was an increase in the proportion of rare sugars (rhamnose and arabinose) when L. plantarum VAL6 was exposed to stress treatments. Rhamnose content in EPS was highest when L. plantarum VAL6 was stressed at pH 3 for 7 h. A large amount of arabinose was found in EPS when L. plantarum VAL6 was exposed to stress at pH 3 for 3 to 7 h. There was a relationship between epsF gene expression and high galactose content in EPS synthesized under stress of pH 8. These results elicit the biosynthesis of EPS in order to enrich rare sugars by using environmental stresses. The EPS with higher proportion of rare monosaccharides which is capable of increasing their biological properties can be used for different applications.

Materials and methods

Microbial strain, cultivation medium and stress conditions

Lactobacillus plantarum VAL6 (or Lactiplantibacillus plantarum VAL6, according to the taxonomy of the new genus Lactobacillus described by Zheng et al.48) was isolated from pickled vegetables. The strain was identified by molecular method using 16S rRNA sequence analysis and amplification to check the recA gene fragment. The primers used for amplifying the 16S rRNA region were 27f. (5′-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3′) and 1492r (5′-GGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3′) as forward and reverse primers, respectively49. The primers used for recA gene fragment amplification were planF (5′-CCG TTT ATGCGGAACACCTA-3′), and pREV (5′-TCGGGATTACCAAACATCAC-3′)50. The amplification of recA gene region Cultures were performed on Man–Rogosa–Sharpe medium (MRS)51. All the cultures have been carried out in a 5 L bioreactor (BIOSTAT, Sartorius Stedim Biotech GmbH, Germany). Briefly, 5 L of MRS medium was inoculated with 100 mL of overnight bacterial culture (OD595 = 1.5). pH was maintained to 6.8 (regulation by addition of NaOH 10 M), temperature was kept at 37 °C, agitation rate was set up to 250 rpm under aerobic facultative condition.

For pH stress, after 24 h of culture at 37 °C and pH 6.8, the culture was treated with pH conditions either pH 3 or pH 8 for 7 h. The time was calculated when the bioreactor reached the required pH. For sodium chloride stress, after 24 h of culture at 37 °C and pH 6.8, the culture was treated by adding NaCl to reach a concentration of 10% for 7 h. The non-stress control was simultaneously carried out in another bioreactor with pH 6.8 for the entire time. Under both stress and non-stress conditions, temperature was maintained at 37 °C and agitation rate was set up to 250 rpm. A volume of 500 mL of culture was sampled in every hour during the stress treatment for EPS quantification and characterization.

EPS extraction and quantification

EPS was extracted from cell suspensions collected at the given time point according to the method described by Salazar et al.52 and Nguyen et al.53. Crude EPS total produced by L. plantarum VAL6 was harvested after 24 h by mixing 100 mL of supernatant with an equal amount of NaOH 2 M and was gently stirred overnight at room temperature. Supernatants were then recovered by centrifugation at 8400 g for 20 min and crude EPS was precipitated from the supernatants by adding twice the volume of 96% (v/v) cold ethanol. The precipitation was carried out at 4 °C for 48 h. After the second centrifugation step at 8400 g and 4 °C for 30 min, EPS was dried at 55 °C until constant weight. Consequently, the total EPS yield was determined gravimetrically by calculating the total weight of EPS per liter of culture medium.

Compositional analysis of EPS by GC-FID

Monosaccharide composition of EPS was analyzed by GC-FID according to the method described by Yuan et al.54 with some modify54. 0.1 g of EPS was hydrolyzed with 3 mL of 2 M trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) at 105 °C for 4 h. The hydrolysed sugars were derivatised by the addition of hydroxylamine, pyridine and were subjected to acetylation using acetic anhydride (CH3CO)2O. The derivative products were used for determination of the monosaccharide composition by Gas Chromatography (GC). Sample of 1 μL was injected into the GC-FID using autosampler. GC was performed on Agilent 6890 N (USA) and HP-5MS UI column (30 m length 0.25 mm inner diameter 0.25 μm film thickness). Nitrogen was used as the carrier gas with 1 mL/min flow rate. The chromatographic conditions used are as follows: the initial column temperature was held at 120 °C for 2 min, increased at a rate of 20 °C/min to 200 °C for 4 min, and then subsequently increased at 25 °C/min to 280 °C, where it was held at 290 °C for 5 min. The comparison was made with standard mannose, glucose, galactose, rhamnose, arabinose, xylose and fucose for sugar identification.

Examine the expression of eps genes

Total RNA was extracted from 500 μL cell suspension of L. plantarum VAL6 using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, UK) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. RNA was treated with RQ1 RNase-free DNase (Promega, Madison, USA) to remove contamination of chromosomal DNA. Qualitative test of RNA at 260 and 280 nm was found to be.

more than 1.8. One-Step RT-PCR was performed to synthesize cDNA from 1 μg of the DNase-treated RNA using HiSenScript RH(-) cDNA Synthesis Kit (iNtRON, Korea). Conventional PCR was done to amplify complementary DNA (cDNA). The reaction mixture (48 µL of master mix: 5 µL of 10X buffer, 0.5 µL of 10 mM dNTP mixture, 2 µL of 5 μM primers, 0.5 µL of Taq and 40 µL of distilled water) was mixed with 2 µL of template cDNA. The primers were shown in Table 2. The cycle conditions were as follows: 95 °C for 3 min; 30 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 58 °C for 30 s and 72 °C for 30 s; 72 °C for 5 min; and then maintenance at 25 °C for 1 min. The PCR products were checked the expression of eps genes by electrophoresis in 2% agarose gel.

Statistical analysis

The experiments were done three times. All the data were expressed as means ± standard deviations. Significance of difference was evaluated with one way ANOVA, followed by Tukey's HSD procedure to identify statistically significant differences at the 95.0% confidence interval. One-way analysis of variance was performed. Tukey's HSD multiple-range tests were applied to the individual variables to compare means and to assess if there was a significant difference.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figure S3. (426KB, docx)

Acknowledgements

P.-T.N is a graduate student researcher of Graduate University of Sciences and Technology, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, Vietnam. The authors would like to acknowledge the Science and Technology Program for the Southwestern Sustainable Development, Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City for the financial support. This publication’s contents and interpretations are the sole responsibility of the authors.

Author contributions

Conceptualization, P.-T.N., T.-T.N., H.-T.N.; methodology, P.-T.N., T.-T.N.; validation; P.-T.N., T.-T.N.; formal analysis, P.-T.N., T-.T.N., T.-N.-T.V., T.-T.-X.N., Q.-K.H., H.-T.N.; investigation, P.-T.N., T.-T.N.; resources, Q.-K.H., H.-T.N.; data curation, P.-T.N., T.-T.N., T.-N.-T.V., T.-T.-X.N., Q.-K.H., H.-T.N.; writing—original draft preparation, P.-T.N., H.-T.N.; writing—review and editing, P.-T.N., T.-N.-T.V., T.-T.-X.N., H.-T.N.; visualization, P.-T.N., T.-N.-T.V., T.-T.-X.N., H.-T.N.; supervision, H.-T.N.; funding acquisition, H.-T.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Science and Technology Program for the Southwestern Sustainable Development, Vietnam National University Ho Chi Minh City (Project/Grant Number KHCN-TNB/14–19/C32), Vietnam.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-020-80634-1.

References

  • 1.Singha, T. Microbial Extracellular Polymeric Substances: Production, Isolation and Applications. IOSR Journal of Pharmacy (IOSRPHR)2, doi:10.9790/3013-0220276281 (2012)
  • 2.Patel A, Prajapati J. Food and health applications of exopolysaccharides produced by lactic acid bacteria. Adv. Dairy Res. 2013;1:1–7. doi: 10.4172/2329-888X.1000107. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Ismail B, Nampoothiri KM. Production, purification and structural characterization of an exopolysaccharide produced by a probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum MTCC 9510. Arch. Microbiol. 2010;192:1049–1057. doi: 10.1007/s00203-010-0636-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Baruah R, Das D, Goyal A. Heteropolysaccharides from lactic acid bacteria: current trends and applications. J. Probiotics Health. 2016;4:2. doi: 10.4172/2329-8901.1000141. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Badel-Berchoux S, Bernardi T, Michaud P. New perspective for Lactobacilli exopolysaccharides. Biotechnol. Adv. 2011;29:54–66. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2010.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lebeer S, Vanderleyden J, De Keersmaecker SCJ. Genes and molecules of Lactobacilli supporting probiotic action. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2008;72:728. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00017-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gauri DS, Mandal SM, Mondal K, Dey S, Pati B. Enhanced production and partial characterization of an extracellular polysaccharide from newly isolated Azotobacter sp. SSB81. Bioresour. Technol. 2009;100:4240–4243. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.03.064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lloret J, et al. Exopolysaccharide II production is regulated by salt in the Halotolerant strain Rhizobium meliloti EFB1. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1998;64:1024–1028. doi: 10.1128/AEM.64.3.1024-1028.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Nandal K, Sehrawat AR, Yadav AS, Vashishat RK, Boora KS. High temperature-induced changes in exopolysaccharides, lipopolysaccharides and protein profile of heat-resistant mutants of Rhizobium sp. (Cajanus) Microbiol. Res. 2005;160:367–373. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2005.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Nicolaus B, Kambourova M, Oner ET. Exopolysaccharides from extremophiles: from fundamentals to biotechnology. Environ. Technol. 2010;31:1145–1158. doi: 10.1080/09593330903552094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Poli A, Di Donato P, Abbamondi GR, Nicolaus B. Synthesis, production, and biotechnological applications of exopolysaccharides and polyhydroxyalkanoates by archaea. Archaea (Vancouver, B.C.) 2011 doi: 10.1155/2011/693253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Fedorová M, et al. Exopolysaccharides may increase gastrointestinal stress tolerance of Lactobacillus reuteri. Folia Veterinaria. 2018;62:24–32. doi: 10.2478/fv-2018-0034. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Seesuriyachan P. Statistical modeling and optimization for exopolysaccharide production by Lactobacillus confusus in submerged fermentation under high salinity stress. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2012 doi: 10.1007/s10068-012-0219-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wu Q, Shah NP. Comparative mRNA-Seq analysis reveals the improved EPS production machinery in Streptococcus thermophilus ASCC 1275 during optimized milk fermentation. Front. Microbiol. 2018;9:445. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wang X, et al. Optimization, partial characterization and antioxidant activity of an exopolysaccharide from Lactobacillus plantarum KX041. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017;103:1173–1184. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.05.118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chen YC, Wu YJ, Hu CY. Monosaccharide composition influence and immunomodulatory effects of probiotic exopolysaccharides. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019;133:575–582. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.04.109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kumar A, Mody K, Jha B. Bacterial exopolysaccharides—a perception. J. Basic Microbiol. 2007;47:103–117. doi: 10.1002/jobm.200610203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Balzaretti S, et al. A novel rhamnose-rich hetero-exopolysaccharide isolated from Lactobacillus paracasei DG activates THP-1 human monocytic cells. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2016 doi: 10.1128/AEM.02702-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Rehm, B. Microbial production of biopolymers and polymer precursors: applications and perspectives (2009).
  • 20.Zeidan AA, et al. Polysaccharide production by lactic acid bacteria: from genes to industrial applications. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2017;41:S168–S200. doi: 10.1093/femsre/fux017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.London L, et al. Characterization of a bovine isolate Lactobacillus mucosae DPC 6426 which produces an exopolysaccharide composed predominantly of mannose residues. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2014 doi: 10.1111/jam.12542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Petry S, Furlan S, Crepeau MJ, Cerning J, Desmazeaud M. Factors affecting exocellular polysaccharide production by Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus grown in a chemically defined medium. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000;66:3427–3431. doi: 10.1128/aem.66.8.3427-3431.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Guan N, et al. Microbial response to environmental stresses: from fundamental mechanisms to practical applications. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017;101:3991–4008. doi: 10.1007/s00253-017-8264-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Silva LA, Lopes Neto JHP, Cardarelli HR. Exopolysaccharides produced by Lactobacillus plantarum: technological properties, biological activity, and potential application in the food industry. Ann. Microbiol. 2019;69:321–328. doi: 10.1007/s13213-019-01456-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Amund D, Ouoba L, Sutherland J, Ghoddusi H. Assessing the effects of exposure to environmental stress on some functional properties of Bifidobacterium animalis ssp. lactis. Benef. Microbes. 2014;5:1–9. doi: 10.3920/BM2013.0099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ruas-Madiedo P, Gueimonde M, Arigoni F, De los Reyes-Gavilán C, Margolles A. Bile Affects the synthesis of exopolysaccharides by Bifidobacterium animalis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009;75:1204–1207. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00908-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Dan T, et al. Characterization and expression analysis of the Exopolysaccharide gene cluster in lactobacillus fermentum TDS030603. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2009;73:2656–2664. doi: 10.1271/bbb.90502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Donoghue HD, Newman HN. Effect of glucose and sucrose on survival in batch culture of Streptococcus mutans C67–1 and a noncariogenic mutant, C67–25. Infect. Immun. 1976;13:16–21. doi: 10.1128/iai.13.1.16-21.1976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Tallon R, Bressollier P, Urdaci MC. Isolation and characterization of two exopolysaccharides produced by Lactobacillus plantarum EP56. Res. Microbiol. 2003;154:705–712. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2003.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kitazawa H, et al. Phosphate group requirement for mitogenic activation of lymphocytes by an extracellular phosphopolysaccharide from Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1998;40:169–175. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1605(98)00030-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Looijesteijn PJ, Trapet L, Vries ED, Abee T, Hugenholtz J. Physiological function of exopolysaccharides produced by Lactococcus lactis. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2001;64:71–80. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1605(00)00437-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Schwab, C. Ecology of exopolysaccharide formation by lactic acid bacteria: sucrose utilization, stress tolerance and biofilm formation. Bact. Polysacch. Curr. Innov. Future Trends, 263–278 (2005).
  • 33.Charles CJ, et al. Floc formation reduces the ph stress experienced by microorganisms living in alkaline environments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2017;83:e02985–e12916. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02985-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ozturk S, Aslim B. Modification of exopolysaccharide composition and production by three cyanobacterial isolates under salt stress. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2010;17:595–602. doi: 10.1007/s11356-009-0233-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Donot F, Fontana A, Baccou JC, Schorr-Galindo S. Microbial exopolysaccharides: main examples of synthesis, excretion, genetics and extraction. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012;87:951–962. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.08.083. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Chen L, et al. Effects of salt stress on carbohydrate metabolism in desert soil alga Microcoleus vaginatus Gom. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2006;48:914–919. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7909.2006.00291.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Lee J, et al. Evaluation of probiotic characteristics of newly isolated Lactobacillus spp.: immune modulation and longevity. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2011;148:80–86. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Huang R, et al. In vitro probiotic characteristics of Lactobacillus plantarum ZDY 2013 and its modulatory effect on gut microbiota of mice. J. Dairy Sci. 2015;98:5850–5861. doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-9153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Wang J, Zhao X, Tian Z, Yang Y, Yang Z. Characterization of an exopolysaccharide produced by Lactobacillus plantarum YW11 isolated from Tibet Kefir. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015;125:16–25. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Zhang L, et al. Antioxidant activity of an exopolysaccharide isolated from Lactobacillus plantarum C88. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2013;54:270–275. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2012.12.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Wang K, et al. Structural characterization and bioactivity of released exopolysaccharides from Lactobacillus plantarum 70810. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2014 doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.02.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Péterszegi G, Fodil-Bourahla I, Robert AM, Robert L. Pharmacological properties of fucose. Applications in age-related modifications of connective tissues. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2003;57:240–245. doi: 10.1016/s0753-3322(03)00028-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ravelojaona V, Robert AM, Robert L. Expression of senescence-associated β-galactosidase (SA-β-Gal) by human skin fibroblasts, effect of advanced glycation end-products and fucose or rhamnose-rich polysaccharides. Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 2008;48:151–154. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2007.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Robert L, Labat-Robert J, Robert AM. Physiology of skin aging. Pathol. Biol. (Paris) 2009;57:336–341. doi: 10.1016/j.patbio.2008.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Lebeer S, et al. Identification of a gene cluster for the biosynthesis of a long, galactose-rich exopolysaccharide in Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG and functional analysis of the priming glycosyltransferase. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009;75:3554–3563. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02919-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Bahat-Samet E, Castro-Sowinski S, Okon Y. Arabinose content of extracellular polysaccharide plays a role in cell aggregation of Azospirillum brasilense. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2004;237:195–203. doi: 10.1016/j.femsle.2004.06.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Stingele FNJ, Mollet B. Identification and characterization of the eps (Exopolysaccharide) gene cluster from Streptococcus thermophilus Sfi6. J. Bacteriol. 1996;178:1680–1690. doi: 10.1128/JB.178.6.1680-1690.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Zheng J, et al. A taxonomic note on the genus Lactobacillus: description of 23 novel genera, emended description of the genus Lactobacillus Beijerinck 1901, and union of Lactobacillaceae and Leuconostocaceae. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2020;70:2782–2858. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Masumizu Y, et al. Isolation and immunocharacterization of Lactobacillus salivarius from the intestine of wakame-fed pigs to develop novel "immunosynbiotics". Microorganisms. 2019 doi: 10.3390/microorganisms7060167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Torriani S, Felis GE, Dellaglio F. Differentiation of Lactobacillus plantarum, L. pentosus, and L. paraplantarum by recA gene sequence analysis and multiplex PCR assay with recA gene-derived primers. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2001;67:3450–3454. doi: 10.1128/AEM.67.8.3450-3454.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.De Man JC, Rogosa M, Sharpe ME. A medium for the cultivation of Lactobacilli. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 1960;23:130–135. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1960.tb00188.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Salazar N, et al. Exopolysaccharides produced by Bifidobacterium longum IPLA E44 and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis IPLA R1 modify the composition and metabolic activity of human faecal microbiota in pH-controlled batch cultures. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2009;135:260–267. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2009.08.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Nguyen HT, et al. Stochastic exposure to sub-lethal high temperature enhances exopolysaccharides (EPS) excretion and improves Bifidobacterium bifidum cell survival to freeze–drying. Biochem. Eng. J. 2014;88:85–94. doi: 10.1016/j.bej.2014.04.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Yuan Y, et al. Structure identification of a polysaccharide purified from Lycium barbarium fruit. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016;82:696–701. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.10.069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Shi T, Desy N, Uchida K, Urashima T, Fukuda K. Enhancement of exopolysaccharide production of Lactobacillus fermentum TDS030603 by modifying culture conditions. Biosci. Microbiota Food Health. 2014;33:85–90. doi: 10.12938/bmfh.33.85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Figure S3. (426KB, docx)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES