Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2021 Jan 14;11:1468. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-80882-1

HIF-1α promotes cellular growth in lymphatic endothelial cells exposed to chronically elevated pulmonary lymph flow

Jason T Boehme 1,#, Catherine J Morris 1,#, Samuel R Chiacchia 1, Wenhui Gong 1, Katherine Y Wu 1, Rebecca J Kameny 1, Gary W Raff 3, Jeffrey R Fineman 1,2, Emin Maltepe 1,, Sanjeev A Datar 1,
PMCID: PMC7809484  PMID: 33446832

Abstract

Normal growth and development of lymphatic structures depends on mechanical forces created by accumulating interstitial fluid. However, prolonged exposure to pathologic mechanical stimuli generated by chronically elevated lymph flow results in lymphatic dysfunction. The mechanisms that transduce these mechanical forces are not fully understood. Our objective was to investigate molecular mechanisms that alter the growth and metabolism of isolated lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs) exposed to prolonged pathologically elevated lymph flow in vivo within the anatomic and physiologic context of a large animal model of congenital heart disease with increased pulmonary blood flow using in vitro approaches. To this end, late gestation fetal lambs underwent in utero placement of an aortopulmonary graft (shunt). Four weeks after birth, LECs were isolated and cultured from control and shunt lambs. Redox status and proliferation were quantified, and transcriptional profiling and metabolomic analyses were performed. Shunt LECs exhibited hyperproliferative growth driven by increased levels of Hypoxia Inducible Factor 1α (HIF-1α), along with upregulated expression of known HIF-1α target genes in response to mechanical stimuli and shear stress. Compared to control LECs, shunt LECs exhibited abnormal metabolism including abnormalities of glycolysis, the TCA cycle and aerobic respiration. In conclusion, LECs from lambs exposed in vivo to chronically increased pulmonary lymph flow are hyperproliferative, have enhanced expression of HIF-1α and its target genes, and demonstrate altered central carbon metabolism in vitro. Importantly, these findings suggest provocative therapeutic targets for patients with lymphatic abnormalities.

Subject terms: Congenital heart defects, Cell growth, Transcriptomics

Introduction

The accumulation and flow of interstitial fluid is essential for proper development of the lymphatic vasculature1. Mechanical forces at the physical interface of the lymph and the vessel initiate cellular transcriptional programs vital to the normal growth and maturation of lymphatic valves, collecting vessels, and mesenteric lymphatics27. However, exposure of the lymphatic system to abnormal flow and mechanical stimulation can lead to aberrant cellular responses811 and pathology of the lymph vessels12.

The association between abnormal lymphatic function and congenital heart disease (CHD) is well established but the contributing mechanisms are poorly understood13,14. Using a clinically relevant ovine model of CHD with markedly elevated pulmonary blood flow (PBF)15, we have previously demonstrated that chronic elevation in PBF results in supraphysiologic pulmonary lymph flow that provokes lymphatic dysfunction, including increased baseline tone, augmented contraction, and attenuated endothelium-dependent relaxation of the thoracic duct, and delayed transit kinetics of lymph through the pulmonary lymphatic vasculature. These physiologic abnormalities arise predominantly from lymphatic endothelial dysfunction, as manifest by impaired nitric oxide (NO) signaling both in vitro and in vivo1619. Specifically, lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs) from these (shunt) animals exhibit abnormal induction of the shear-responsive transcriptional regulator Krüppel-like Factor 2 (KLF2), which causes increased cellular production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), disrupting NO signaling19. This is accompanied by parallel disturbances of NO production in these cells stemming from the disordered homeostasis of nitric oxide synthase (NOS) isoforms18.

We believe that these previously characterized changes represent a subset of widespread LEC signaling and transcriptional alterations induced by sustained exposure to pathologically elevated lymph flow. Other groups have performed elegant work beginning to describe mechanotransductive pathways in the lymphatic endothelium that influence growth, development and pathology1,2,4,5,711,2022. However, as they have noted, these cellular responses are highly dependent on context such as the nature, magnitude, and duration of the mechanical stimuli investigated8,9. Our animal model presents a unique opportunity to study the evolution of LEC responses to prolonged pathologic lymph flow within a relevant anatomic and physiologic context.

Primary LECs isolated from the efferent vessel of the caudal mediastinal lymph node of both shunt and normal control lambs were submitted for next generation sequencing in order to broadly characterize the resulting biologic alterations. This analysis revealed varied cellular responses to environmental stimuli in the shunt LECs, but paradoxically demonstrated activation of pathways associated with hypoxic exposure. While our shunt model results in double the normal levels of pulmonary capillary pressure and pulmonary lymph flow, the lymphatic vascular endothelium is not subjected to abnormalities in environmental O2 tension16. Cellular adaptations to hypoxia are often diverse and complex, but many aspects of this response flow, either directly or indirectly, from activation of the wide-reaching transcriptional regulator Hypoxia Inducible Factor-1α (HIF-1α)23. Although named for its well-characterized induction by environmental hypoxia, HIF-1α has subsequently been shown to respond to a variety of environmental stimuli including shear and stretch24,25. We therefore hypothesize that continuous exposure of the lymphatic endothelium to pathologic mechanical forces directly activates HIF-1α via mechanotransductive signaling, leading to widespread alterations in mitochondrial function and cellular growth. To this effect, we assessed changes to cellular transcription and metabolism, redox status, and proliferation in LECs from shunt animals.

Results

LECs from shunt animals exhibit broad transcriptional changes

Primary LEC lines were derived and purified from the efferent vessel of the caudal mediastinal lymph node of shunt and control lambs. RNA seq analysis was performed on primary shunt and control LECs. 4645 differentially expressed transcripts were identified based on a false discovery threshold of < 0.05. In order to optimize pathway enrichment analysis, this pool of differential transcripts was restricted by selecting only those transcripts with an absolute fold change > 2, resulting in ~ 1000 transcripts, of which 834 were mapped onto known human orthologs. 373 of these orthologs were up regulated in shunt LECs, while 461 were down regulated with respect to control cells. Principle component analysis of these 834 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) demonstrated clustering by group, suggesting that the two groups maintain distinct transcriptional profiles (Fig. 1A). This was further supported by unsupervised Euclidean clustering, which demonstrated clear separation between the shunt and control LEC transcriptomes (Fig. 1B). In an effort to further characterize these transcriptional differences, as well as to place them within the context of LEC biology, significantly up-regulated DEGs were submitted to the Gene Ontology (GO) Database for pathway enrichment analysis of biological processes26,27. 186 terms were significantly enriched with Fold Enrichment > 3 and FDR < 0.05. Many of these terms referenced redundant or overlapping biological processes, including distal and progressively more proximal categorizations within the same overarching pathway (i.e. serine biosynthesis, serine family amino acid biosynthesis, alpha-amino acid metabolic process, and cellular amino acid biosynthesis). In order to reduce the redundancy of these 186 terms in an unbiased manner, and provide a high-level overview of the pathways impacted, each distal-to-proximal pathway cluster was condensed and reported by only the most proximal term (greatest number of pathway reference genes) that retained pathway fold enrichment > 3. This resulted in 24 distinct terms that are grouped into broad biologic categories and reported in Table 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Transcriptional profiling of cultured lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs) isolated from control and shunt lambs. (A) Principal component (PC) analysis and (B) heat map of RNA-sequencing data demonstrate clustering of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) by model, N = 3 control, 3 shunt.

Table 1.

Pathway enrichment analysis of biologic processes in gene ontology (GO) database.

Go biological process complete Reference genes in pathway DEGs matched to pathway Expected pathway matches Fold enrichment  + /− Raw p value FDR
Cellular response to environmental stimuli
Response to fluid shear stress 34 5 0.61 8.17  +  5.92E−04 4.31E−02
Response to osmotic stress 76 8 1.37 5.85  +  1.20E−04 1.38E−02
Cellular response to oxygen levels 216 13 3.89 3.34  +  2.35E−04 2.34E−02
Response to mechanical stimulus 212 13 3.82 3.41  +  1.98E−04 2.02E−02
Metabolism and molecular transport
Amino acid activation 50 6 0.9 6.67  +  4.53E−04 3.64E−02
Glycosaminoglycan metabolic process 151 10 2.72 3.68  +  6.07E−04 4.38E−02
Cellular amino acid metabolic process 323 21 5.82 3.61  +  9.74E−07 3.28E−04
Small molecule biosynthetic process 578 35 10.41 3.36  +  1.26E−09 1.99E−06
Regulation of lipid metabolic process 397 22 7.15 3.08  +  6.31E−06 1.26E−03
Organic hydroxy compound metabolic process 445 25 8.01 3.12  +  1.16E−06 3.83E−04
Neutral amino acid transport 36 6 0.65 9.26  +  9.01E−05 1.08E−02
L-amino acid transport 58 9 1.04 8.62  +  2.66E−06 7.14E−04
organic acid transport 286 16 5.15 3.11  +  1.04E−04 1.22E−02
Cellular differentiation and development
Regulation of fat cell differentiation 121 11 2.18 5.05  +  2.34E−05 3.50E−03
Regulation of epithelial cell differentiation 138 12 2.48 4.83  +  1.52E−05 2.45E−03
Mesenchymal cell differentiation 151 10 2.72 3.68  +  6.07E−04 4.40E−02
Regulation of muscle cell differentiation 152 10 2.74 3.65  +  6.36E−04 4.51E−02
mammary gland development 132 10 2.38 4.21  +  2.23E−04 2.23E−02
Placenta development 151 11 2.72 4.05  +  1.51E−04 1.63E−02
Proliferation and apoptosis
Negative regulation of vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation 18 4 0.32 12.34  +  5.47E−04 4.08E−02
Negative regulation of apoptotic signaling pathway 226 16 4.07 3.93  +  7.08E−06 1.37E−03
Response to signalling molecules
Response to vitamin D 31 6 0.56 10.75  +  4.30E−05 5.71E−03
Response to purine-containing compound 155 12 2.79 4.3  +  4.41E−05 5.82E−03
Response to steroid hormone 333 22 6 3.67  +  4.16E−07 1.73E−04

Transcriptional profiles of shunt LECs corroborate widespread activation of hypoxic and mechanotransductive cellular signaling pathways

Transcriptional profiling demonstrated that shunt LECs exhibit significant activation of pathways related to environmental stimuli as seen in the GO terms listed in Table 1, including response to fluid shear stress and response to mechanical stimulus (Fig. 2A,B). Additionally, the transcriptional profile of these LECs indicated activation of cellular responses to oxygen levels. Examining the more specific branch terms within this GO pathway, the great majority of genes enriching this pathway were specifically related to the cellular hypoxic response (Fig. 2C). To better correlate these DEGs with more specific upstream regulators, both the entire set of 4645 differentially expressed transcripts, and the more restricted set consisting of DEGs with FC > 2, were evaluated using IPA (QIAGEN Inc.) core analysis algorithm. In addition to standard pathway enrichment algorithms based on the Ingenuity Knowledge Base, IPA upstream regulator analysis predicts likely upstream regulatory elements to explain directional variations in the experimental data set28. This analysis corroborated broad transcriptional activation of cellular hypoxic responses and strongly predicted (activation z-score of 3.566, overlap p value 3.11 × 10−8) the transcription factor hypoxia inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) as an upstream activating factor in shunt LECs (Fig. 2D).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

RNA-sequencing analysis. Supervised clustering heat maps demonstrate that upregulated DEGs mapped to processes activated in (A) the response to mechanical stimulus, (B) the cellular response to fluid shear stress, and (C) the cellular response to hypoxia. (D) DEGs targeted by HIF-1α in shunt LECs, as predicted by Ingenuity Pathway Analysis upstream regulator modeling. N = 3 control, 3 shunt.

Increased rate of proliferation and HIF-1α stabilization in primary LECs from shunt animals

Based on results from the RNAseq analyses, the role of HIF-1α in shunt LEC growth and biology was investigated further. Under standard cell culture conditions, primary LECs derived from the shunted animals grew at a significantly increased rate compared to controls (Fig. 3A). Under these same culture conditions, consisting of atmospheric (21%) O2 tension, the shunt LECs exhibited greater than ten-fold increased stabilization of HIF-1α compared to controls (Fig. 3B). As proof of principle, control LECs were then cultured under hypoxic conditions (2% O2) to induce HIF-1α, resulting in significantly increased HIF-1α stabilization in these cells (Fig. 3E), and also promoting a significantly increased cellular proliferation rate compared to controls cultured under standard conditions (Fig. 3D).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Stabilization of HIF-1α is associated with faster LEC growth and accumulation of mitochondrially-derived reactive oxygen species (ROS). (A) shunt LECs proliferate with doubling time 15.2% faster than control LECs, *, P < 0.05, N = 3 control, 3 shunt, and (B) have 13.1-fold higher expression of HIF-1α, P < 0.05, N = 3 control, 3 shunt. NB, bar graph represents HIF-1α protein normalized to β-actin. (C) Mitochondrially-derived ROS were increased 1.3-fold in shunt LECs compared to controls, P < 0.05. N = 5 control, 5 shunt. NB, bars represent MitoSOX signal normalized to control. (D) control LECs cultured in 2% O2 proliferate significantly faster than control LECs cultured in 21% O2, *, P < 0.05; N = 3 control + 21% O2, 3 control + 2% O2. (E) HIF-1α is stabilized in control LECs cultured in 2% O2. (FH) In control LECs exposed to 0.9 N/m2 of shear for 24hrs using a parallel plate flow chamber (ibidi Pump System), (F) expression of HIF-1α mRNA is significantly increased compared to levels in non-sheared control LECs, *, P < 0.05, N = 3 control no shear, 3 control + shear, 3 shunt; (G) similarly, HIF-1α protein is significantly stabilized in sheared (s) control LECs compared with non-sheared (ns) controls, *, P < 0.05; N = 3 control no shear, 3 control + shear; and, (H) 51% ± 8% sheared control LECs stained positive with MitoSOX compared with 8% ± 2% in non-sheared control LECs, *, P < 0.05; N = 3 control no shear, 3 control + shear. In panel F, blank lanes marked by ‘b’. In panels A, B, D, F, G, and H, error bars represent standard deviation. For panels B, E, and G, full-length blots/gels are presented in Supplemental Fig. 6.

Mechanical forces promote stabilization of HIF-1α in primary LECs

To validate the principle that mechanical forces can promote stabilization of HIF-1α in the lymphatic endothelium, control LECs were plated on fibronectin-coated slides and exposed for 24hrs to laminar flow at 5 ml/min that generated shear stress of 0.9 N/m2, using a parallel plate flow chamber. Compared to the same LEC lines simultaneously plated and incubated on fibronectin-coated slides without corresponding shear, HIF-1α mRNA (Fig. 3F) and protein levels (Fig. 3G) were significantly increased in the shear exposed LECs.

Increased generation of mitochondrial ROS promotes HIF-1α stabilization and rapid cellular proliferation in shunt LECs

LECs from shunt animals have previously been shown to exhibit abnormal cellular redox signaling18, 19. Mitochondrial ROS are important regulators of HIF-1α, though increased and decreased ROS have both been variably reported as stabilizing HIF-1α in differing experimental preparations2931. Investigation of the mitochondria as a source of ROS in the LECs was performed using the targeted mitochondrial superoxide indicator MitoSOX, revealing a 27% increase in mitochondrial ROS production in the shunt LECs compared to controls (Fig. 3C). Similarly, in control LECs exposed to 24 h of laminar flow-mediated shear stress of 0.9 N/m2, significantly more cells stained positive for mitochondrial ROS (Fig. 3H, SUP FIG 4). Importantly, treatment of these control LECs with the targeted mitochondrial antioxidant mitoquinone (MQ) during shear exposure abrogated HIF-1α stabilization in these cells (Fig. 4A). Treatment of shunt LECs with MQ also significantly impaired HIF-1α stabilization under atmospheric O2 conditions (Fig. 4B). Furthermore, inhibition of HIF-1α with either MQ (Fig. 4C), or by selective knockdown of HIF-1α through siRNA targeted transcriptional silencing (Fig. 4D), significantly slowed the growth of shunt LECs to rates comparable to control LECs.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Mitochondrial ROS stabilize HIF-1α and drive HIF-1α-dependent proliferation in shunt LECs. (A) HIF-1α protein is significantly stabilized in sheared (s) control LECs compared with non-sheared (ns) controls; treatment of sheared control LECs with a mitochondrially targeted antioxidant mitoquinone (s + MQ) abrogates HIF-1α protein stabilization, *, P < 0.05, N = 3 control no shear compared with 3 control + shear; †, P < 0.05, N = 3 control + shear compared with 3 control + shear + MQ; (B) Treatment of shunt LECs with MQ abrogates HIF-1α expression but does not with triphenylphosphonium (TPP), a lipophilic cationic control; NB, each lane is a pooled sample of 3 distinct shunt LEC lines. (C) At 72hrs, treatment of shunt LECs with MQ (angled line bar) slows proliferation to the level observed in control LECs, P > 0.05, whether untreated, + MQ, or + TPP (white, speckled, and inverted caret bars, respectively); *, P < 0.05 compared to untreated shunt LECs (black bar). Treatment of shunt LECs with TPP (solid gray bar) does not change proliferation compared to untreated shunt LECs (black bar), and remains significantly faster than control LECs or shunt LECs treated with MQ, #, P < 0.05. N = 3 control, 3 shunt, for each condition: untreated, + TPP, and + MQ. NB, cell counts normalized to baseline 24 hr timepoint. (D) Knockdown of HIF-1α in shunt LECs (angled line bars) slows proliferation to levels observed in scramble treated controls (white bars), *, P < 0.05 comparing scramble treated control and shunt LECs, or scramble treated shunt LECs and siHIF-1α treated shunt LECs; N = 3 control + scr, 3 shunt + scr, 3 shunt + siHIF-1α. In panels A, C and D, error bars represent standard deviation. For panels A and B, full-length blots/gels are presented in Supplemental Fig. 6.

HIF-1α is a proximal regulator of biological alterations in LECs from shunted animals

Important distinct biological alterations of the LECs derived from this ovine shunt model have previously been described, including decreased levels of eNOS and bioavailable NO18, increased activity of the transcription regulator Krüppel-like Factor 2 (KLF2)19, and increased cellular ROS stemming from both uncoupling of NOS as well as up-regulation of NADPH oxidase (NOX) complexes18, 19. To evaluate the impact of HIF-1α stabilization on these previously described biological alterations, HIF-1α was knocked down in shunt LECs using siRNA targeted transcriptional silencing (Fig. 5A). This normalized the expression of canonical HIF-1α target genes, like prolyl hydroxylase (PHD2), to levels comparable to those measured in control LECs (Fig. 5F). Furthermore, knockdown of HIF-1α resulted in a significant increase in the expression of eNOS (Fig. 5B), a significant decrease in the level of KLF2 (Fig. 5C), and decreased expression of NOX enzymes and co-factors (Fig. 5D,E). These results indicate that HIF-1α-dependent signaling can act upstream of KLF2 to regulate LEC biology.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

HIF-1α knockdown in shunt LECs. In all panels values are normalized to scramble treated control LECs. (A) Treatment with HIF-1α siRNA decreases detectable HIF-1α protein in shunt LECs from 92-fold to 11-fold scramble treated controls. (B) In scramble treated shunt LECs, eNOS protein is 0.45-fold scramble treated controls; treatment with HIF-1α siRNA increases eNOS protein in shunt LECs to 1.9-fold scramble treated controls. (C) Treatment with HIF-1α siRNA decreases KLF2 protein in shunt LECs from 7.9-fold to 0.14-fold scramble treated controls. (D) Treatment with HIF-1α siRNA decreases NOX4 protein in shunt LECs from 3.1-fold to 1.5-fold scramble treated controls, and (E) decreases p47phox protein in shunt LECs from 2.6-fold to 1.4-fold scramble treated controls. (F) Scramble treated shunt LECs express threefold increased levels of the canonical HIF-1α target PHD2 compared to scramble treated controls, while treatment with HIF-1α siRNA decreases PHD2 protein in shunt LECs to 1.3-fold scramble treated controls. For each panel, *, P < 0.05; n = 5 control + scr, 5 shunt + scr, 5 shunt + siHIF-1α, and error bars represent standard deviation.

Shunt LECs exhibit significant alterations in cellular metabolism

The analyses performed by GO and IPA both indicated widespread changes in transcription related to cellular metabolic pathways. Furthermore, HIF-1α is a well-established and prolific regulator of cellular metabolism and it’s activation in varied biological contexts is often associated with metabolic alterations32. We performed untargeted metabolomic evaluation of shunt and control LECs using gas chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry to obtain an unbiased overview focused on central carbohydrate and small molecule metabolism. Principal component analysis of all identified metabolites indicated clustering by group, suggesting distinct metabolic profiles (Fig. 6A), and unsupervised Euclidean clustering demonstrated clear separation between the identified shunt and control LEC metabolomes (Fig. 6B). By univariate analysis, 118 identified metabolites were significantly different in the shunt LECs compared to controls using a false discovery rate threshold of < 0.05. Many of these differential metabolites were clustered in identifiable metabolic pathways and classes.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Untargeted metabolomic analysis of cultured LECs isolated from control and shunt lambs, N = 3 control, 3 shunt. (A) Principal component analysis and (B) heat map of metabolites identified by tandem gas chromatography–mass spectrometry identify differential cellular metabolite concentrations.

As seen in Fig. 7A, the intermediate metabolites of glycolysis and the Tricarboxylic Acid (TCA) cycle showed extensive differences in shunt LECs. Almost all identified glycolytic intermediates were significantly reduced in the shunt LECs with the notable exception of phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP), the penultimate metabolite of the pathway, which was significantly elevated. Shunt LECs also exhibited significantly decreased levels of all identified intermediates of the TCA cycle. While this static snapshot indicates significant differences in these pathways, it is not possible to truly assess the pathway rates and activities with this methodology. Low individual metabolite levels for example, may result from either suppression of the pathway upstream, or rapid metabolism downstream.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Untargeted metabolomic and extracellular flux analyses demonstrate metabolic abnormalities in shunt LECs. (A) Significantly differing metabolites of glycolysis and the TCA cycle in shunt and control LECs by untargeted metabolomic analysis. N = 3 control, 3 shunt. Values expressed as peak intensities with modified vector normalization to the sum of peak heights for all identified metabolites (mTIC) per sample. Data are presented side-by-side as individual data points mapped over notched box and whisker plots with waist at the 50th percentile and edges at the 25th and 75th percentiles respectively. Notch width displays a confidence interval around the median based on the median + / − 1.57 × IQR/sqrt of n. All displayed metabolites exhibit significant differences based on student’s t test with P < 0.05 adjusted for multiple comparisons using a Bonferroni correction. (B) Oxygen consumption rate (OCR, pmol O2/min/100,000 cells) and (C) Extracellular acidification rate (ECAR mpH/min/100,000 cells) comparisons of shunt (orange squares) and control (blue circles) LECs with N = 2 for each of these representative experiments. For each, repeated measurements are shown for the basal condition and following sequential addition of the metabolites and drugs noted on the x-axis, and separated by dotted vertical lines. For each condition, * denotes a significant difference between pooled values for shunt and control LECs with P < 0.05. Also shown is the change in OCR (B) and ECAR (C) between conditions (basal and following addition of exogenous bioavailable oleic acid) for control and shunt LECs. Pooled values for each condition are presented as box and whisker plots, with * denoting a significant within group difference across conditions with P < 0.05.

To better characterize the rate and activity of these pathways, extracellular flux analyses was performed using the Seahorse XF-24 (Agilent)33. Given that fatty acids have been strongly implicated as an important energy source for LECs34, the standard mitochondrial stress kit was utilized with a modification to include a basal condition without exogenous fatty acid, and a subsequent condition with addition of conjugated oleic acid to the media prior to sequential addition of mitochondrial inhibitors and membrane uncouplers. As seen in Fig. 7B, shunt LECs showed significant repression of oxygen consumption and aerobic metabolism compared to controls. Additionally, shunt LECs did not show the same increase in O2 consumption exhibited by control LECs with addition of exogenous fatty acids. The control response matches well with what might be predicted by the Randle cycle, demonstrating increased aerobic metabolism of fatty acids and apparent decrease in glycolysis as the fatty acids become abundant. Interestingly, shunt LECs exhibited significantly lower ECAR than controls, indicating decreased glycolytic lactate production. This result is surprising given the well-established role of HIF-1α as a positive regulator of glycolytic enzymes and activity35. Interestingly, addition of exogenous fatty acid demonstrated opposing effects on the ECAR; increasing it in the shunt LECs and decreasing it in the control LECs (Fig. 7C). To assess the role of HIF-1α in these functional metabolic alterations, HIF-1α was suppressed in shunt LECs via siRNA knockdown for 48 h and compared to scramble treated shunt and control LECs in a glucose-only condition using a standard Seahorse mitochondrial stress assay. Shunt LECs treated with HIF-1α siRNA exhibited a partial, but incomplete reversion towards the control LEC phenotype in regard to both oxygen consumption and glycolytic lactate production (SUP FIG 5).

Based on the RNA seq analysis, shunt LECs show broad transcriptional changes impacting amino acid transport and metabolism, and this is corroborated by the metabolic data, which demonstrate significant differences in amino acid levels across a wide range of biosynthetic groups and families (SUP FIG 2). Of particular note is the specific distinctions related to serine and glycine metabolism. Serine is derived from the glycolytic intermediate 3-phosphoglycerate, and is a vital component of biosynthetic pathways via its contributions to one carbon metabolism36. The transcriptional data indicated significant upregulation of every enzyme of serine biosynthesis as well as SHMT2, the mitochondrial isoform of the enzyme that converts serine to glycine and mediates the methylation of tetrahydrofolate (SUP Fig. 1A & B) 36. Correspondingly the levels of both serine and glycine were significantly lower in shunt compared to control LECs (SUP FIG 1B), in notable contrast to the elevated levels of most other amino acids in these cells (SUP FIG 2).

Discussion

Vascular endothelial cells are situated at the physical interface of the vessel and its circulating fluid contents. As such, they are at the biologic forefront of vascular responses to fluid dynamics. Mechanoreceptors within the endothelium respond to differential flow patterns and forces to trigger complex cellular and extracellular responses throughout the vessel. These include immediate physiologic changes, along with alterations of cellular growth and biology that may be persistent and lead to eventual vascular remodeling37,38. Such mechanotransductive pathways are vital to the growth and differentiation of distinct vascular beds12, but may be co-opted by aberrant flow patterns, leading to vascular pathologies such as atherosclerosis39 and pulmonary arterial hypertension40.

In our ovine model of congenital heart disease with increased pulmonary blood flow and pressure, we have shown that pathologic alterations to pulmonary blood flow result in significantly elevated pulmonary lymph flow and physiologic pulmonary lymphatic dysfunction1517. In this paper we describe wide-reaching biologic alterations in the pulmonary lymphatic endothelial cells (LECs) of this model15. In vivo, the pulmonary lymphatic vessels of these animals are subjected to significantly elevated lymph flow on a chronic basis16. These changes in flow alter the biomechanical forces to which the lymphatic endothelium is exposed9. LECs are extremely attuned to such changes, and have been shown previously to be particularly sensitive to shear, functioning at an optimal biologic homeostasis around a narrowly defined shear-stress “set point” that approximates baseline physiologic exposure8. Even small gradations in shear outside this range can provoke widespread cellular responses8, 9. In our model of CHD, the LECs are exposed to an increased lymph flow which necessitates increased shear forces, but other mechanical stimuli, such as circumferential or axial stretch41, may also be relevant within the lymph vessels in vivo.

In order to broadly characterize the nature of these responses to long-standing elevations in pulmonary lymph flow, cultured LECs from the shunt animals were evaluated by RNAseq, and they revealed a distinct phenotype stemming from the in vivo physiologic alterations. Cellular cascades associated with external environmental stimuli, including mechanical and shear stress, were up-regulated in the shunt LECs, consistent with the known underlying physiology. More surprising was the prominent alteration in pathways related to the cellular hypoxia response, particularly suggesting increased activity of the transcription factor HIF-1α.

HIF-1α was initially recognized as part of the cellular reaction to hypoxic stress, with canonical regulation at the post-translational level mediated via a stabilizing signal arising from the mitochondria in response to hypoxia. There is general agreement that mitochondria modulate HIF-1α stabilization via ROS second messengers, though the exact nature (increased vs decreased) and source of these ROS is subject to continued debate in the literature30, 31. It is now recognized that HIF-1α stabilization and activity are mediated through diverse mechanisms, and in response to varied cellular environments and stresses42. Indeed, here we have presented evidence that HIF-1α is stabilized in control LECs exposed in vitro to flow-mediated shear (Figs. 3G, 4A). There is precedent in the literature that mechanical forces are included within this group of HIF-1α stabilizing factors. In studies of cultured arterial endothelial cells, separate investigations have demonstrated direct induction of endothelial HIF-1α activity through variations in exposure to shear stress, flow directionality, and stretch24,25,43. It is interesting that the nature and magnitude of the provoking forces in these experiments is inconsistent. Though this could be due simply to differences in experimental design and analysis, these results may suggest a response that is variable and dependent on the unique physiologic conditions of distinctive vascular beds. Such context specificity is already described in the fields of both vascular endothelial biology, and HIF-1α biology respectively12,23.

HIF-1α is a prolific transcriptional regulator, with over 1000 recognized target genes, but it does not invariably affect these targets in a uniform pattern. Rather, specific subsets of genes are activated according to particular environments and cell types23. HIF-1α has long been recognized as an important signal in vascular biology, with essential roles in angiogenesis, vascular growth and development, and cardiovascular disease44. The role of HIF-1α in the lymphatic vasculature is less clear, but it has been associated with lymphangiogenesis in the settings of malignancy45,46, inflammatory conditions including wound healing47,48, and as part of pulmonary lymphatic development49. HIF-1α has also been observed to have prominent interactions with canonical regulators of lymphatic identity and development. This includes cooperative binding with the transcription factor GATA2 to activate transcriptional hypoxic response elements50, and upstream regulation of VEGFR-3, the receptor for the lymphatic growth factor VEGF-C. The clearest established relationship comes from the work of Han et al. examining the biology of lymphatic malformations, in which they show that HIF-1α activation promotes abnormal LEC growth and migration phenotypes via its effect on VEGFR-3 expression51.

In this study we demonstrate significantly increased HIF-1α activity in LECs in response to persistent elevations in lymph flow. Though these cells are not exposed to hypoxic environments in vivo or in vitro, mitochondrial ROS are shown to be a central upstream signal promoting HIF-1α stabilization in response to mechanical forces. While the relationship of mitochondrial ROS and HIF-1α remains contested, our findings of increased mitochondrial ROS in this regard are supported by findings from other experimental models30, and the importance of mitochondrial signaling in HIF-1α biology is widely accepted. In line with the work of Han et al., we show that HIF-1α fosters hyperproliferative cellular growth in the shunt LECs, and further demonstrate that interruption of the mitochondrial ROS/HIF-1α signaling cascade can restore a more typical cellular proliferation phenotype. Additionally, our data suggests that HIF-1α may play a proximal role in the mechanotransductive pathways underlying many of the previously described cellular anomalies in LECs chronically exposed to increased flow.

Knocking down HIF-1α in shunt LECs increases the level of eNOS, which has been shown to be pathologically depressed in these cells18. eNOS and NO play a vital role in the physiologic functions of vascular endothelium52. In the lymphatic vessels, endothelial release of NO is an important regulator of lymphatic pumping and lymph flow5355. We have previously shown that chronic exposure to elevated lymph flow in this model of CHD leads to significantly impaired lymphatic function in vivo due to decreased eNOS expression and deficiency of bioavailable NO17,18. Additionally, HIF-1α knockdown suppresses the abnormally elevated levels of KLF2 in the shunt LECs19. KLF2 is itself a widely-acting mechanosensitive transcription factor that is induced in vascular endothelial cells by laminar flow-mediated mechanisms11,47. In shunt LECs chronically exposed to supraphysiologic shear, KLF2 is abnormally elevated, leading to disruption of PPAR-γ signaling, increased production of ROS by NADPH Oxidase (NOX) complexes, and a further decrease in bioavailable NO19. Interestingly, KLF2 has been previously characterized as antagonizing the effects of HIF-1α and promoting its degradation56, 57. However, the knockdown effect of HIF-1α on KLF2 seen here suggests a more complex interaction between the two transcription factors.

These results demonstrate a previously unrecognized role of HIF-1α in the lymphatic endothelial response to elevations in lymph flow and mechanical forces. That role includes proximal regulatory control over cellular functions as central as proliferation, redox balance, and NO production. This speaks to a remarkable depth and breadth of the cellular responses mediated by HIF-1α induction. Correspondingly, the IPA analysis of shunt LECs identified greater than 90 differentially expressed genes that vary in accordance with predicted regulation by HIF-1α, many of which are transcription factors, second messengers, or signaling molecules with their own multifaceted downstream effects. Perhaps unsurprisingly given the phenotypic changes relating to cellular proliferation and redox control, the RNA seq analysis also indicates extensive alterations to the cellular metabolic machinery. Metabolism is increasingly recognized as an important governing mechanism in vascular development, growth, and function58, with HIF-1α often serving in a prominent regulatory role in these processes23,44. HIF-1α has numerous metabolic targets59, but is classically characterized by its effects on central carbohydrate metabolism, including up-regulation of glucose transporters and glycolysis, and suppression of mitochondrial oxidation of pyruvate35,60.

These canonical hallmarks of HIF-1α are present in the transcriptional profile of shunt LECs, with increased transcription of glucose transporters GLUT1 and GLUT3, the glycolytic enzymes Hexokinase-2 (HK2), Phosphofructokinase (PFK) and Pyruvate Kinase (PK), and the regulatory kinase Pyruvate Dehydrogenase Kinase 1 (PDK1), which restricts the entry of pyruvate into the TCA cycle (SUP FIG 3). Correspondingly, metabolomic analysis of the cells shows striking differences of glycolytic and TCA cycle intermediates, and functional assessments of glycolytic flux and respiration by extracellular flux analysis show significant differences between shunt and control LECs that are at least partially mediated by HIF-1α (Fig. 7 & SUP FIG 5). Interestingly, the physiologic phenotype we find diverges from the classical HIF-1α mediated pattern of aerobic glycolysis. While shunt LECs do exhibit decreased aerobic respiration by extracellular flux analysis, they do not demonstrate the corresponding increase in glycolytic lactate production61. This could be explained by specific metabolic adaptations of the LECs, which are known to exhibit greater reliance on fatty acid β-oxidation than other vascular endothelial cells34. Indeed, shunt LECs do show a distinctive pattern of alterations to central carbohydrate metabolism with supplementation of exogenous fatty acid. Another possibility suggested by paired findings from the metabolomic and RNAseq data sets indicates potential diversion of the glycolytic metabolite 3-phosphoglycerate (3-PG) through an alternative biosynthetic pathway (detailed in SUP FIG 3). At a regulatory level, transcriptional modifiers in addition to HIF-1α may be having significant interacting effects on cellular metabolism in this model of mechanical stress, as suggested by the broad changes in the transcriptional profile presented. To this effect, the scope of metabolic alterations observed by metabolomic analysis in the shunt LECs extends beyond just the central carbohydrate pathways, implicating diffuse effects on other pathways and cellular programs, such as the widespread increases in amino acid levels across varied synthetic pathway “families” in these cells (SUP FIG 2).

In our efforts to characterize the effects of chronically elevated lymph flow on the lymphatic endothelium, we have uncovered far-reaching alterations of LEC biology that intersect fundamental cellular and vascular phenotypes. HIF-1α is shown to be a novel and pivotal mediator of abnormal proliferation, and is extensively implicated in aberrations of redox control, metabolism, and NO production in these cells. While the immediate signal potentiating HIF-1α stability and activity originates from the mitochondria, the ultimate stimulus is mechanical in nature. Cellular studies have previously shown that the mitochondria of vascular endothelial cells respond to mechanical forces with acute modulation of respiratory activity and ROS production62,63, but our findings reveal a comprehensive and sustained response to pathologic hemodynamic conditions that is directly mediated through mitochondrial signaling mechanisms. It remains unclear from this work exactly how mechanical stimuli from the luminal/lymph interface are transmitted to the mitochondria. However, mechanoresponsive ion channels such as Piezo1 and Orai1, along with the VEGFR2/VEGFR3/VE-Cadherin endothelial mechanosensory complex, have all been shown to play important roles in lymphatic growth and development, suggesting any or all of these as potential signal mediators11,22,64. Understanding the role of the mitochondria and HIF-1α in the mechanotransductive pathways driving chronic lymphatic vascular abnormalities could lead to innovative therapeutic strategies for children with congenital heart disease and other disorders of lymphatic function.

Materials and methods

Detailed methods presented in the Online Supplement.

Chronic model of increased PBF and pulmonary lymph flow

As described15, an 8.0 mm vascular graft was anastomosed between the ascending aorta and left pulmonary artery in late gestation fetuses from mixed-breed Western ewes. Four-weeks after spontaneous delivery, hemodynamics were measured and tissue harvested. At the end of each protocol, all lambs were euthanized with a lethal injection of sodium pentobarbital followed by bilateral thoracotomy as described in the NIH Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. The Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees (IACUC) of the University of California, San Francisco and the University of California, Davis approved all protocols and procedures.

Isolation and culture of LECs

Primary LEC lines were derived, as described, from an explanted segment of the efferent vessel of the caudal mediastinal lymph node18.

RNAseq

Tissue disruption, mRNA isolation, library synthesis, sequencing, and bioinformatic analysis were conducted by Amaryllis Nucleics (Oakland, CA).

Baseline and conditional hypoxia proliferation assays

For proliferation studies, three distinct control and shunt LEC lines were plated in triplicate and counted at baseline, 24 h, and 48 h. For hypoxia proliferation assay, LEC lines were counted in triplicate at baseline and 24 h.

Mitoquinone (MQ) and HIF-1α knockdown proliferation assays

Three distinct LEC lines per group were plated at uniform cell number in triplicate. 24 h after plating, shunt LECs were cultured for the remainder of the experiment in standard culture media with 10umol/L triphenylphosphonium (TPP) or MQ. Post-transcriptional knockdown of gene expression in shunt LECs was performed using custom dicer-substrate siRNA (IDT, IA) per manufacturer’s instructions. Three distinct LEC lines per treatment group were plated in triplicate and counted at baseline, 24 h, and 48 h.

Untargeted metabolomics analysis

Three distinct shunt and control LEC lines were grown in triplicate (n = 9) and harvested. Extraction and quantification were performed by the UC Davis NIH West Coast Metabolomics Center as described65.

Extracellular flux analysis

Extracellular flux was performed as described33 using the Seahorse XF-24 Extracellular Flux Analyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) per manufacturer recommendations.

Applied shear stress on LECs

Three distinct cell lines of confluent control LECs were exposed to 24hrs 0.9 N/m2 shear stress using a parallel plate flow chamber (ibidi Pump System, ibidi)2. As control, these LEC lines were plated and incubated on fibronectin-coated slides but were not exposed to shear. Cells were either fixed and stained with MitoSOX Red for imaging or were harvested and processed for qPCR and protein determinations as described previously19. A slide of each control LEC line that was exposed to shear was co-incubated with 10umol/L MQ; these cells were then processed for protein determination as below.

Preparation of LEC protein extracts and western blot analysis

Preparation and analysis of protein from LECs was performed as described previously66.

Determination of mitochondrial ROS

Control and shunt LECs were incubated with MitoSOX Red added at a final concentration of 5 mmol/L. Stained LECs were analyzed on a BD LSRFortessa flow cytometer and using FlowJo V10.3.0 software.

Statistical analysis

As previously described18,19, for all experiments not otherwise specified, comparisons in cases of more than two conditions were made using a one-way analysis of variance with a post-hoc Tukey’s multiple comparisons test using GraphPad Prism (version 7.0, GraphPad Software, La Jolla, California). Comparisons between control and shunt conditions were made with the unpaired t test. Comparisons between cells in a given line, with or without treatment were made with the paired t test. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Supplementary Information

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Michael Johengen and Youping He for their outstanding surgical and technical support, and to Linda Talken for her expert care of our animals. This research was supported in part by grants from the National Institutes of Health: K08HL116763 (SAD), R01HL133034 (SAD), and R01HL61284 (JRF).

Author contributions

J.T.B., J.R.F., E.M., and S.A.D. designed the study; J.T.B., C.J.M., W.G., K.Y.W., R.J.K., G.W.R., and S.A.D. performed the experiments, J.T.B., C.J.M., S.R.C., W.G., J.R.F., E.M., and S.A.D. analyzed data and J.T.B. and S.A.D. wrote the paper. All authors have approved submission of the final version of the manuscript. All authors agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work. All authors who qualify for authorship are listed.

Data availability

The datasets analyzed in the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These authors contributed equally: Jason T. Boehme and Catherine J. Morris.

Contributor Information

Emin Maltepe, Email: emin.maltepe@ucsf.edu.

Sanjeev A. Datar, Email: sanjeev.datar@ucsf.edu

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material availlable at 10.1038/s41598-020-80882-1.

References

  • 1.Planas-Paz L, et al. Mechanoinduction of lymph vessel expansion. EMBO J. 2012;31:788–804. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2011.456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sabine A, et al. Mechanotransduction, PROX1, and FOXC2 cooperate to control Connexin37 and calcineurin during lymphatic-valve formation. Dev. Cell. 2012;22:430–445. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2011.12.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Planas-Paz L, Lammert E. Mechanical forces in lymphatic vascular development and disease. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2013;70:4341–4354. doi: 10.1007/s00018-013-1358-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kazenwadel J, et al. GATA2 is required for lymphatic vessel valve development and maintenance. J. Clin. Investig. 2015;125:2979–2994. doi: 10.1172/JCI78888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sweet DT, et al. Lymph flow regulates collecting lymphatic vessel maturation in vivo. J. Clin. Investig. 2015;125:2995–3007. doi: 10.1172/JCI79386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Djonov V, et al. FOXC2 and fluid shear stress stabilize postnatal lymphatic vasculature. J. Clin. Investig. 2015;125:3861–3877. doi: 10.1172/JCI80454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Choi, D. et al. Piezo1 incorporates mechanical force signals into the genetic program that governs lymphatic valve development and maintenance. JCI Insight4 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 8.Baeyens N, et al. Vascular remodeling is governed by a VEGFR3-dependent fluid shear stress set point. Elife. 2015;4:1–16. doi: 10.7554/eLife.04645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sabine A, SaygiliDemir C, Petrova TV. Endothelial cell responses to biomechanical forces in lymphatic vessels. Antioxidants Redox Signaling. 2016;25:451–465. doi: 10.1089/ars.2016.6685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hong Y-K, et al. Laminar flow downregulates Notch activity to promote lymphatic sprouting. J. Clin. Investig. 2017;127:1225–1240. doi: 10.1172/JCI87442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Choi D, et al. ORAI1 activates proliferation of lymphatic endothelial cells in response to laminar flow through Krüppel-like factors 2 and 4. Circ. Res. 2017;120:1426–1439. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.309548. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.García-Cardeña G, Slegtenhorst BR. Hemodynamic control of endothelial cell fates in development. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2016;32:633–648. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100814-125610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Corbett CR, Dale RF, Coltart DJ, Kinmonth JB. Congenital heart disease in patients with primary lymphedemas. Lymphology. 1982;15:85–90. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wert S. Fetal and Neonatal Physiology. Amsterdam: Elsevier/Saunders; 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Reddy VM, et al. In utero placement of aortopulmonary shunts: A model of postnatal pulmonary hypertension with increased pulmonary blood flow in lambs. Circulation. 1995;92:606–613. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.92.3.606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Datar SA, et al. Altered lymphatics in an ovine model of congenital heart disease with increased pulmonary blood flow. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2011;302:L530–L540. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00324.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Datar SA, et al. Altered reactivity and nitric oxide signaling in the isolated thoracic duct from an ovine model of congenital heart disease with increased pulmonary blood flow. Am. J. Physiol Heart Circ. Physiol. 2014;306:H954–H962. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00841.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Datar SA, et al. Disrupted NOS signaling in lymphatic endothelial cells exposed to chronically increased pulmonary lymph flow. Am. J. Physiol. Circ. Physiol. 2016;311:H137–H145. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00649.2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Morris CJ, et al. KLF2-mediated disruption of PPAR-γ signaling in lymphatic endothelial cells exposed to chronically increased pulmonary lymph flow. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circul. Physiol. 2018;315:H173–H181. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00635.2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Nonomura K, et al. Mechanically activated ion channel PIEZO1 is required for lymphatic valve formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2018;115:12817–12822. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1817070115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Jain RK, et al. Mechanics of interstitial-lymphatic fluid transport: theoretical foundation and experimental validation. J. Biomech. 1999;32:1297–1307. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9290(99)00125-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Boardman KC, Swartz MA. Interstitial flow as a guide for lymphangiogenesis. Circ. Res. 2003;92:801–808. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000065621.69843.49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Semenza GL. Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1 and Cardiovascular Disease. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2013;76:39–56. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-021113-170322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Feng S, et al. Mechanical activation of hypoxia-inducible factor 1a drives endothelial dysfunction at atheroprone sites. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2017;37:2087–2101. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.117.309249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Milkiewicz M, et al. HIF-1α and HIF-2α play a central role in stretch-induced but not shear-stress-induced angiogenesis in rat skeletal muscle. J. Physiol. 2007;583:753–766. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.136325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.The Gene Ontology Consortium et al. Gene Ontology : tool for the unification of biology. Nat. Genet.25, 25–29 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 27.Mi H, et al. PANTHER version 11: Expanded annotation data from gene ontology and reactome pathways, and data analysis tool enhancements. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:D183–D189. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw1138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Krämer A, Green J, Pollard J, Tugendreich S. Causal analysis approaches in ingenuity pathway analysis. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:523–530. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Pouysségur J, Mechta-Grigoriou F. Redox regulation of the hypoxia-inducible factor. Biol. Chem. 2006;387:1337–1346. doi: 10.1515/BC.2006.167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.McElroy GS, Chandel NS. Mitochondria control acute and chronic responses to hypoxia. Exp. Cell Res. 2017;356:217–222. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2017.03.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Dasgupta A, et al. Mitochondria in the pulmonary vasculature in health and disease: Oxygen-sensing, metabolism, and dynamics. Compr. Physiol. 2020;10:713–765. doi: 10.1002/cphy.c190027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Greer SN, Metcalf JL, Wang Y, Ohh M. The updated biology of hypoxia-inducible factor. EMBO J. 2012;31:2448–2460. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2012.125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ferrick DA, Neilson A, Beeson C. Advances in measuring cellular bioenergetics using extracellular flux. Drug Discov. Today. 2008;13:268–274. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2007.12.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Wong BW, et al. The role of fatty acid β-oxidation in lymphangiogenesis. Nature. 2017;542:49–54. doi: 10.1038/nature21028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kim JW, Tchernyshyov I, Semenza GL, Dang CV. HIF-1-mediated expression of pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase: A metabolic switch required for cellular adaptation to hypoxia. Cell Metab. 2006;3:177–185. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2006.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Mattaini KR, Sullivan MR, Vander Heiden MG. The importance of serine metabolism in cancer. J. Cell Biol. 2016;214:249–257. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201604085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Baratchi S, et al. Molecular sensors of blood flow in endothelial cells. Trends Mol. Med. 2017 doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2017.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Nakajima H, Mochizuki N. Flow pattern-dependent endothelial cell responses through transcriptional regulation. Cell Cycle. 2017;16:1893–1901. doi: 10.1080/15384101.2017.1364324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Chiu J-J, Chien S. Effects of disturbed flow on vascular endothelium: Pathophysiological basis and clinical perspectives. Physiol. Rev. 2011;91:327–387. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00047.2009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Dickinson MG, Bartelds B, Borgdorff MAJ, Berger RMF. The role of disturbed blood flow in the development of pulmonary arterial hypertension: Lessons from preclinical animal models. Am. J. Physiol. Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2013;305:L1–L14. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00031.2013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Razavi MS, Leonard-Duke J, Hardie B, Dixon JB, Gleason RL. Axial stretch regulates rat tail collecting lymphatic vessel contractions. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:1–11. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-62799-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Koyasu S, Kobayashi M, Goto Y, Hiraoka M, Harada H. Regulatory mechanisms of hypoxia-inducible factor 1 activity: Two decades of knowledge. Cancer Sci. 2018;109:560–571. doi: 10.1111/cas.13483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Wu D, et al. HIF-1α is required for disturbed flow-induced metabolic reprogramming in human and porcine vascular endothelium. Elife. 2017;6:1–26. doi: 10.7554/eLife.25217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Zimna A, Kurpisz M. Hypoxia-inducible factor-1 in physiological and pathophysiological angiogenesis: Applications and therapies. Biomed Res. Int. 2015;2015:1–13. doi: 10.1155/2015/549412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Liang X, et al. Hypoxia inducible factor-1alpha expression correlates with vascular endothelial growth factor-C expression and lymphangiogenesis/angiogenesis in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Anticancer Res. 2008;28:1659–1666. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Schoppmann SF, et al. Hypoxia inducible factor-1α correlates with VEGF-C expression and lymphangiogenesis in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2006;99:135–141. doi: 10.1007/s10549-006-9190-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Min JH, et al. Activation of Dll4/notch signaling and hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha facilitates lymphangiogenesis in lacrimal glands in dry eye. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:1–15. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Zampell JC, et al. HIF-1α coordinates lymphangiogenesis during wound healing and in response to inflammation. FASEB J. 2011;26:1027–1039. doi: 10.1096/fj.11-195321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Bridges JP, Lin S, Ikegami M, Shannon JM. Conditional hypoxia inducible factor-1α induction in embryonic pulmonary epithelium impairs maturation and augments lymphangiogenesis. Dev. Biol. 2012;362:24–41. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2011.10.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Yamashita K, Discher DJ, Hu J, Bishopric NH, Webster KA. Molecular regulation of the endothelin-1 Gene by hypoxia. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;276:12645–12653. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M011344200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Han T, et al. HIF-1α contributes to tube malformation of human lymphatic endothelial cells by upregulating VEGFR-3. Int. J. Oncol. 2019;54:139–151. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2018.4623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Förstermann U, Sessa WC. Nitric oxide synthases: Regulation and function. Eur. Heart J. 2012;33:829–837. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Gashev AA, Davis MJ, Zawieja DC. Inhibition of the active lymph pump by flow in rat mesenteric lymphatics and thoracic duct. J. Physiol. 2002;540:1023–1037. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2001.016642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Hagendoorn J, et al. Endothelial nitric oxide synthase regulates microlymphatic flow via collecting lymphatics. Circ. Res. 2004;95:204–209. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000135549.72828.24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Tsunemoto H, Ikomi F, Ohhashi T. Flow-mediated release of nitric oxide from lymphatic endothelial cells of pressurized canine thoracic duct. Jpn. J. Physiol. 2003;53:157–163. doi: 10.2170/jjphysiol.53.157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Nayak L, Lin Z, Jain MK. ‘Go with the flow’: How Kruppel-Like factor 2 regulates the vasoprotective effects of shear stress. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2011;15:1449–1461. doi: 10.1089/ars.2010.3647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Kawanami D, et al. Kruppel-like factor 2 inhibits hypoxia-inducible factor 1α expression and function in the endothelium. J. Biol. Chem. 2009;284:20522–20530. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.025346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Teuwen LA, Geldhof V, Carmeliet P. How glucose, glutamine and fatty acid metabolism shape blood and lymph vessel development. Dev. Biol. 2019;447:90–102. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2017.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Samanta D, Semenza GL. Maintenance of redox homeostasis by hypoxia-inducible factors. Redox Biol. 2017;13:331–335. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2017.05.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Jung-whan K, Irina T, Gregg LS, Chi VD. HIF-1-mediated expression of pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase: A metabolic switch required for cellular adaptation to hypoxia. Cell Metab. 2005;3:177–185. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2006.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Fijalkowska I, et al. Hypoxia inducible-factor1α regulates the metabolic shift of pulmonary hypertensive endothelial cells. Am. J. Pathol. 2010;176:1130–1138. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.090832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Caja S, Enríquez JA. Mitochondria in endothelial cells: Sensors and integrators of environmental cues. Redox Biol. 2017;12:821–827. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2017.04.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Scheitlin CG, Nair DM, Crestanello JA, Zweier JL, Alevriadou BR. Fluid mechanical forces and endothelial mitochondria: A bioengineering perspective. Cell. Mol. Bioeng. 2014;7:483–496. doi: 10.1007/s12195-014-0357-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Yang Y, Cha B, Motawe ZY, Srinivasan RS, Scallan JP. VE-Cadherin is required for lymphatic valve formation and maintenance. Cell Rep. 2019;28:2397–2412.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.07.072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Fiehn O, et al. Quality control for plant metabolomics: Reporting MSI-compliant studies. Plant J. 2008;53:691–704. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03387.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Black SM, et al. Altered regulation of the ET-1 cascade in lambs with increased pulmonary blood flow and pulmonary hypertension. Pediatr. Res. 2000;47:97–97. doi: 10.1203/00006450-200001000-00018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

The datasets analyzed in the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES