Abstract
Background
Exportin 1 (XPO1/CRM1) is a key mediator of nuclear export with relevance to multiple cancers, including chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Whole exome sequencing has identified hot-spot somatic XPO1 point mutations which we found to disrupt highly conserved biophysical interactions in the NES-binding groove, conferring novel cargo-binding abilities and forcing cellular mis-localization of critical regulators. However, the pathogenic role played by change-in-function XPO1 mutations in CLL is not fully understood.
Methods
We performed a large, multi-center retrospective analysis of CLL cases (N = 1286) to correlate nonsynonymous mutations in XPO1 (predominantly E571K or E571G; n = 72) with genetic and epigenetic features contributing to the overall outcomes in these patients. We then established a mouse model with over-expression of wildtype (wt) or mutant (E571K or E571G) XPO1 restricted to the B cell compartment (Eµ-XPO1). Eµ-XPO1 mice were then crossed with the Eµ-TCL1 CLL mouse model. Lastly, we determined crystal structures of XPO1 (wt or E571K) bound to several selective inhibitors of nuclear export (SINE) molecules (KPT-185, KPT-330/Selinexor, and KPT-8602/Eltanexor).
Results
We report that nonsynonymous mutations in XPO1 associate with high risk genetic and epigenetic features and accelerated CLL progression. Using the newly-generated Eµ-XPO1 mouse model, we found that constitutive B-cell over-expression of wt or mutant XPO1 could affect development of a CLL-like disease in aged mice. Furthermore, concurrent B-cell expression of XPO1 with E571K or E571G mutations and TCL1 accelerated the rate of leukemogenesis relative to that of Eµ-TCL1 mice. Lastly, crystal structures of E571 or E571K-XPO1 bound to SINEs, including Selinexor, are highly similar, suggesting that the activity of this class of compounds will not be affected by XPO1 mutations at E571 in patients with CLL.
Conclusions
These findings indicate that mutations in XPO1 at E571 can drive leukemogenesis by priming the pre-neoplastic lymphocytes for acquisition of additional genetic and epigenetic abnormalities that collectively result in neoplastic transformation.
Keywords: XPO1, Chronic lymphocytic leukemia, Mouse model, Selinexor, Sines, Expression profiling, Mutation analysis
Introduction
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is the most prevalent adult leukemia in Western societies, characterized by clonal expansion of mature CD5+/CD19+ expressing B lymphocytes with significant genetic and clinical heterogeneity [1]. The majority of CLL patients are diagnosed at an early stage with low tumor volume and moderate disease activity [2]. While a small percentage of CLL cases will never progress from this indolent disease phase, most patients will maintain a watchful waiting period until worsening cytopenias or disease symptoms emerge, upon which treatment begins. Recent advances in treatment of patients with CLL have dramatically improved patient outcomes, prompted by innovations in drugs targeting B-cell receptor (BCR) signaling pathways including Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) [3–8] or phosphoinositide 3-kinases (PI3K) [9–13], or disruption of the B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2) [14–17] inhibitor of apoptosis, among others [18]. Each class of drug yields extended remissions with variable time periods of treatment ranging from intermittent to continuous. Sequential treatment with these agents is also effective. However, a subset of patients develop resistance to inhibitors of BCR pathways and BCL2 and have a relatively poor prognosis, spotlighting the need for further investigation of novel therapies [19]. Preventing this from occurring in high risk patients is also important for which new therapies are needed. Moreover, approximately 2–10% of CLL cases will progress to develop a highly aggressive lymphoma morphologically resembling a diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) termed Richter’s Transformation (RT). Patients who develop RT have a poor prognosis with short survival due to the lack of effective therapies [20, 21].
Investigating mechanisms behind the genetic and clinical heterogeneity of CLL, genomic studies have identified a number of recurrent somatic mutations affecting several critical regulatory proteins, including, among others, those affecting the nuclear export protein Exportin-1 (XPO1; also known as Chromosome Region Maintenance 1, CRM1) [22–24]. Those affecting XPO1 are primarily observed as single point mutations to a residue within the NES-binding groove (most frequently E571K or E571G), altering the charge and structural basis of the amino acid in this critical location [25]. These recurrent hot-spot point mutations have been reported in ~ 5% of CLL cases and between ~ 25 and 35% of CLL cases progressing to RT, suggesting either a pathogenic role for this genetic aberration or association with other high risk features [24, 26–28].
Nuclear vs cytoplasmic compartmentalization is a defining trait of eukaryotic cells, and remains critical for proper cell maintenance and function. Selective permeability of the nuclear envelope and the nuclear pore complex (NPC) allows for passive diffusion of small ions and metabolites while facilitating active transport of large macromolecules (> 40 kDa) with energy-dependent nuclear transporters. The karyopherin-β superfamily of importins and exportins mediates the transport of large macromolecules containing either nuclear localization signals (NLSs) or nuclear export signals (NESs), respectively [29]. The major nuclear export receptor, XPO1, exports hundreds of functionally diverse proteins, binding to highly diverse 10–15 amino acid NES motifs in cargos that contain 4–5 hydrophobic residues that interact with the hydrophobic XPO1 NES-binding groove (Fig. 1a) [30–33]. XPO1 is expressed in all human cells and has been cited as a core essential gene, where loss of XPO1 is a lethal event due to the ablation of proper nuclear and cytosolic organization [34, 35].
While maintaining proper homeostatic balance in eukaryotic cells, XPO1 sustains relevance to cancer through several proposed mechanisms; most widely cited is its ability to shuttle tumor-suppressor proteins out of the nucleus (e.g. p53, IkB, BRCA1) thereby preventing their anti-apoptotic function [36]. In addition, XPO1 is a transporter for > 1000 putative protein cargos [37–39], influences the localization and metabolism of oncoprotein-encoding mRNAs and various RNA species (miRNA, rRNA, snRNA, tRNA) [40], and plays an essential role in regulating mitosis and chromosome structure [41], suggesting many contributing oncogenic mechanisms may involve XPO1. Moreover, alterations to NESs of recurrently mutated genes in cancer have been shown to drive mis-localization of the NES-containing protein and enhance downstream tumorigenic effects [42]. In this regard, XPO1 is frequently overexpressed and/or present with recurrent mutations in many cancer types. Surprisingly, these abnormalities have remarkable specificity for hematologic malignancies including Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL), DLBCL, primary mediastinal B cell lymphoma (PMBCL), and CLL [24, 43]. Notably, the XPO1 gene is located on chromosome 2p15, suggesting XPO1 overexpression may be a critical leukemogenic mechanism in the subset of CLL patients with gain of the short arm of chromosome 2 (+ 2p) [44].
Due to the over-expression of XPO1 in many cancer cells and its role in exporting tumor suppressor genes such as TP53, development of selective inhibitors of nuclear export (SINEs) that inhibit the nuclear export activity of XPO1 in malignant cells has garnered increased attention [43, 45]. The SINE molecules selinexor (KPT-330/XPOVIO™) [46] or Eltanexor (KPT-8602) [47] have each demonstrated anti-leukemia activity in pre-clinical studies and have advanced to clinical trials in patients with CLL and other types of cancer. Moreover, Selinexor has received accelerated approval from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treatment of patients with relapsed and/or refractory (R/R) multiple myeloma or R/R DLBCL [48, 49].
A previous report described studies indicating that germline insertion of the E571K XPO1 mutation could accelerate development of lymphoma in mice made to express high-level c-Myc and BCL-2, suggesting such XPO1 mutations could contribute to oncogenic transformation [24]. Additionally, we previously showed that the E571K mutation affects the binding of a small subset of NESs that have highly charged β-strands located close enough to make strong interactions with residue 571 [50], suggesting a select group of cargos are affected by this mutation. One of these cargos is the RNA regulator eIF4E-Transporter (4E-T), which forms a weaker association with E571K XPO1, resulting in inappropriate 4E-T localization in cells carrying the mutation. However, these previous studies employed mouse models used to study lymphomagenesis or models primarily for general in vitro tumor cell investigation. Although the E571K mutation in XPO1 has been observed in CLL, the role they play driving leukemogenesis remains unclear.
Herein, we present a retrospective analysis of CLL cases in which we have identified a subset of patients harboring an E571 XPO1 mutation. This analysis reveals the E571K/E571G XPO1 mutation associated with high-risk genetic and epigenetic co-factors and at the time of diagnosis. To elucidate whether such mutations in XPO1 could play a causal role in CLL leukemogenesis, we developed Eµ-XPO1 transgenic mice harboring human XPO1 under control of µ heavy chain enhancer (Eµ) elements driving constitutive expression of XPO1. We found that overexpression of XPO1 (wt, E571K or E571G) was sufficient to initiate development of a CLL-like disease in a subset of aged mice, but lacked the ability to drive a spontaneous leukemic expansion in young mice. However, when crossed with the established Eµ-TCL1 CLL-mouse model (Eµ-XPO1/TCL1), concurrent presence of E571K or E571G XPO1 mutations with overexpression of the TCL1 oncogene sufficiently enhanced the rate in which these mice developed their CLL-like phenotype. Lastly, crystal structures of XPO1 (wt or E571K) bound to several SINE molecules (KPT-185, KPT-330/Selinexor, and KPT-8602/Eltanexor) show the compounds binding similarly in each case, which was further confirmed by a similar cytotoxicity profile from this class of compounds in patients’ cells with or without an XPO1 mutation. This suggests XPO1 inhibitors are likely to remain effective pharmaceutic candidates for cancer patients with E571 XPO1 mutations.
Methods
CLL patient cohort selection
CLL patient information was collected from 4 independent cohorts as previously described [51]. In brief, a total of 1286 samples were collected, those from The Mayo Clinic (Mayo; n = 248) contributing treatment-naïve patients at diagnosis; samples collected from MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC; n = 367) were from treatment-naïve patients who subsequently required treatment; samples collected from The Ohio State University (OSU; n = 232) were from relapsed/refractory (R/R) patients (median 3 prior therapies) receiving single-agent ibrutinib in clinical trials conducted at OSU; and samples collected from the CLL Research Consortium (CRC; n = 439) were samples collected from treatment-naïve patients. All blood samples were obtained after patients provided written informed consent in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and established Institutional Review Board guidelines.
CLL sample acquisition
Human de-identified CLL and normal B cells were isolated and cultured as previously described. Blood from newly diagnosed untreated CLL patients were obtained from the Ohio State University Leukemia Tissue Bank after obtaining informed consent approved by the cancer institution review board according to the Declaration of Helsinki. IgVH mutation status and epigenetic maturation status of patient CLL cells was determined via protocols previously described [52]. Proliferation of CLL cells was determined via MTS assay. Cells in all MTS assays were seeded at 5e5 cells/well in a 96-well plate for 48hrs with or without SINE treatment.
Library construction and RNA-seq
Library preparation and RNA-sequencing was performed and analyzed under protocols developed and approved by the Genomic Services Laboratory at Nationwide Children’s Hospital. Downstream pathway analysis of differentially expressed genes was determined via publically available Ingenuity pathway analysis software as previously described [53]. Paired-end 150 bp reads were aligned to the human reference genome GRCh38 using HISAT2 [54] and gene counts were generated with featureCounts [55] as described in [56]. Gene expression was quantified as log2 counts per million and differential expression analysis was performed using R limma voom function [57]. Heatmaps were generated using R pheatmap package.
Mouse IGH gene usage was determined from RNA-sequencing. Cell pellets were collected and washed in PBS on ice prior to resuspension in TRIzol reagent and stored at − 80°. B-cells were isolated via EasySep Mouse Pan-B Cell Isolation Kit (Stemcell Technologies) from spleen suspensions. RNA was extracted using the Monarch Total RNA Miniprep Kit (New England Biolabs) according to manufacturer instructions. Total RNA was quantified using the Nanodrop 2000 Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The Clontech SMARTer v4 kit (Takara Bio USA, Inc.) was used for global preamplification. Illumina sequencing libraries were derived from the resultant cDNA using the Illumina Nextera XT DNA Library Prep Kit following manufacturer's instructions. Libraries were sequenced using an Illumina HiSeq 4000 sequencer paired-end 150 bp protocol to approximately 12 million passed filter clusters per sample. Data processing was performed according to the CLEAR workflow [58], which identifies reliably quantifiable transcripts in low-input RNA-seq for differentially expressed gene (DEG) transcripts using gene coverage profiles. BCR reads were binned by specific heavy (H) and light-chain V genes. First, we quantified the percentage of reads with heavy, kappa, and lambda chains compared to the number of total sequencing reads. MiXCR [59] (v3.0.5) was used with default parameters to identify preprocessed reads containing CDR3 regions from B-cell heavy, kappa, and lambda chains, generating a list of unique CDR3 sequences associated with their relative abundances and specific V(D)J gene usage.
Animal studies
All animals were housed at The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center (OSUCCC). All animal experiments were carried out under protocols approved by the Ohio State University Institutional Laboratory Animal Care and Use Committee. Homozygous Eµ-TCL1 transgenic mice (background strain b6) have been previously described [60]. Eµ-XPO1 mice (E571WT, E571G, E571K; background strain C57BL/6) were generated via pronuclear injection of the pBH plasmid containing full-length hXPO1 cDNA into mouse embryos at the single-cell stage in collaboration with the Ohio State University Genetically Engineered Mouse Modeling Core (GEMMC). Embryos were implanted into pseudo pregnant females. Detection of hXPO1 mRNA in Eµ-XPO1 progeny was confirmed via RT-qPCR with human-specific probes (ThermoFisher, #Hs01034172_m1) and overexpression of XPO1 protein in Eµ-XPO1 progeny was confirmed via western blot (Santa Cruz, #sc-5595). Eµ-XPO1 mice and Eµ-TCL1 mice were crossed to produce Eµ-XPO1/Eµ-TCL1 progeny (abbreviated Eµ-XPO1/TCL1). Genotypes of the resulting progeny were confirmed via PCR. Whole blood from all transgenic mice was collected via submandibular vein (cheek punch) and assessed for leukemic development via flow cytometry. Pre-defined euthanasia criteria for mice in all transgenic colonies and murine transplant models included lethargy, impaired motility, splenomegaly, enlarged lymph nodes, and decrease in body weight (> 20%). Organs from select mice were collected at time of euthanasia and preserved in 10% formalin for histopathologic analysis. Complete blood count (CBC) analysis of whole blood was performed and analyzed under protocols developed and approved by The Ohio State University Comparative Pathology & Mouse Phenotyping Shared Resource.
Flow cytometry
Fresh cells were isolated from spleen, thymus, bone marrow, or whole blood from mice at ages indicated. T and B cells were enriched using EasySep kit (Stem Cell Technologies, Vancouver, BC, Canada). Flow optimizations and protocols were used as previously described [61]. Gating strategy and graphs from representative C57BL/6 and Eµ-TCL1 whole blood are shown in the supplementary materials. All gates were set using fluorescent antibody controls prepared for each individual experiment. Flow cytometry antibodies used in this study include: anti-mouse CD45 (BD #559,864), anti-mouse CD5 (BD #553,023), anti-mouse CD19 (BD #562,701), anti-mouse CD45R/B220 (BD #553,088), anti-human CD3 (BD #555,335), anti-human CD19 (BD #562,440), anti-human CD2 (BD #555,326), anti-human CD28 (BD #555,729), anti-human Granzyme B (BD #561,142), anti-human IFN-gamma (BD #554,551). All data were analyzed using Kaluza v2.0 software (Becton Dickinson).
Histopathology
Organs were harvested from colony mice at indicated ages or upon meeting euthanasia criteria. Tissues were fixed, processed and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) (Leica) as previously described [61]. Photographs were taken using an Olympus SC30 camera with an Olympus BX53 microscope. Peripheral blood smears were fixed and stained according to Wright-Giemsa stain standard procedures (Fisherbrand Hema3), and imaged with a Revolve R4 brightfield microscope, Echo Laboratories (model: RVL-100-G).
Structure determination of XPO1-KPT complexes
E571K XPO1 (represented by ScXPO1 E582K) was cloned by quick-change mutagenesis of the E582 codon. The previously published pGexTev-ScCRM1* (contains residues 1–1058, Δ377–413, 537-DLTVK-541 to GLCEQ) crystallization construct for wildtype (WT) XPO1 was used as the PCR template for the E571K XPO1 mutant protein [33]. For structure determination of WT XPO1 bound to KPT-330, a construct of pGexTev-ScCRM1* was used where residues 537-DLTVK-541 were not mutated. The XPO1 proteins were expressed in E. coli (DE3) cells with 0.5 mM IPTG at 25 °C for 12 h. XPO1 was purified from lysates in GF buffer (20 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgOAc, and 2 mM DTT, and protease inhibitors) by affinity chromatography using Glutathione Sepharose 4B beads (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, PA), cleaved with TEV protease, and further purified using size exclusion chromatography (HiLoad 16/600 Superdex 200 pg, GE Healthcare Life Sciences). Yrb1 (Sc RanBP1(62–201)) was expressed from a pGEX-TEV construct, in E. coli (DE3) cells (0.5 mM IPTG for 12 h at 25 °C) and purified from lysates using the same purification scheme as for XPO1. A pET-15b-human Ran was used to express Ran (same expression condition as for Yrb1), lysed in in buffer containing 50 mM HEPES (pH 8.0), 2 mM magnesium acetate, 200 mM NaCl, 10% (vol/vol) glycerol, 5 mM imidazole (pH 7.8), 2 mM DTT, purified using Ni–NTA Agarose (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), loaded with GMPPNP as previously described [33], and then further purified by anion exchange and size exclusion chromatography in TB buffer (20 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 110 mM KOAc, 2 mM MgOAc, 10% glycerol, and 2 mM DTT).
KPT-185, -330 (Selinexor), and -8602 (Eltanexor) were supplied by Karyopharm Therapeutics, LLC. The structure of wildtype XPO1 construct used for structure determination bound to KPT-330 does not contain the 537-DLTVK-541 to GLCEQ mutations present in the other XPO1 constructs. All the other wildtype XPO1 constructs contain the 537-DLTVK-541 to GLCEQ mutations that served to mimic the human XPO1 NES-binding groove. KPT-CRM1-Ran-RanBP1 complexes were assembled in a 3:1:3:3 molar ratio and purified by gel filtration using Superdex 75 10/300 GL (GE Healthcare Life Sciences), concentrated to 10 mg/ml, crystallized at 20 °C in 17% (weight/vol) PEG3350, 100 mM Bis–Tris (pH 6.4), 200 mM ammonium nitrate, and 10 mM Spermine HCl and crystals cryoprotected with the same crystallization condition supplemented with up to 23% PEG3350 and 12% glycerol followed by flash freezing in liquid nitrogen. X-ray diffraction datasets were collected at the APS 19ID beamline at the Argonne National Laboratory and processed using HKL-3000 [62]. Structures were determined by molecular replacement using the unliganded CRM1-Ran-RanBP1 structure (PDB 4HB2) as search model in PHENIX. Reiterative modeling in Coot and refinement were performed using Phenix until satisfactory MolProbity statistical measures were achieved [63, 64].
Statistical analyses
Analyses were performed using previously described models [43]. For all in vivo survival experiments, Kaplan–Meier estimates of the survival function were calculated for each group and differences assessed using the log-rank test. In Fig. 3c, multiple founder lines (n = 5) were generated within each transgenic mouse genotype and were combined for analysis. Therefore, a shared frailty model was applied to the data in order to account for correlations among mice from the same founder; models included sex as a covariate. All survival analysis were performed using SAS/STAT software (SAS v9.4 for Windows, SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC); data were plotted using GraphPad Prism 8.4.2.
Results
Recurrent XPO1 mutations E571K and E571G in CLL associate with poor prognosis
Human XPO1 is a ~ 120 kDa protein comprised of 21 repetitive anti-parallel α-helical segments forming tertiary protein structures termed ‘HEAT domains’ (H1-H21) [65–67]. The α-helices of H11 and H12 form a groove with hydrophobic pockets that serves as a binding site for prospective cargo proteins with an exposed hydrophobic NES (Fig. 1a). The E571 residue is located within this NES-binding pocket in a position close to the bound NES, where chemical and physical changes associated with mutations at this site (most often E571K or E571G) alter how XPO1 binds select NESs on these cargos [50] (Fig. 1a). While these mutations appear to be enriched in B cell malignancies, most notably in HL, DLBCL, PMBCL, or CLL [22–24], the effects that such mutations may have on the development or progression of these diseases are not understood.
To address this gap in understanding in CLL and to characterize the clinical significance of recurrent E571 XPO1 mutations, we conducted a multi-center retrospective analysis on a large number of CLL cases (N = 1286), and identified 72 leukemia-cell samples (~ 6%) harboring a nonsynonymous mutation in XPO1 at E571, resulting in an amino acid substitution of E→K in 59 (82%), E→G in 12 (17%), or E→A in 1 (1%) of the cases with XPO1 mutations. The observed prevalence of each of these mutations at E571 was consistent with previous reports [22, 25, 68], and we define such mutations throughout the text as ‘mutated XPO1.’
In line with previous reports [35], the E571 variant allele frequency (VAF) present in XPO1 mutated samples from the patient samples examined in this study had a high allelic frequency (median VAF = 0.47, 25% percentile = 0.39, 75% percentile = 0.50; Fig. 1b). Only four patient samples had mutated XPO1 with a VAF < 0.2. One patient sample with biclonal disease had an E571K XPO1 mutation with a VAF of 0.39 in the dominant CLL clone and an E571G XPO1 mutation with a VAF of 0.10 in a smaller clonal population.
We interrogated the annotated clinical data to assess the relationship between XPO1 mutations and patient outcome (Table 1). In addition to demographic (gender, age, Rai stage) and blood count information, (beta-2 microglobulin (B2M), hemoglobin (HGM), Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), platelet count (PLT), and blood lymphocyte count (WBC)) routinely collected from CLL patients, we also obtained results from a genetic screening probing for significant cytogenetic abnormalities determined via fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) (del(11q22.3), del(13q14), del(17p13), trisomy 12 (+ 12), or cytogenetically normal (CN)) and gene mutation signatures with known leukemogenic potential (NOTCH1, SF3B1, TP53, XPO1, EGR2, MYD88). These characteristics were then stratified by IgHV mutation status or by epigenetic maturation status, which previous studies defined as major prognostic factors in CLL [51, 69, 70].
Table 1.
All CLL patients† (% or 95% CI) | XPO1-mut (IgHV-U)† (% or 95% CI) | XPO1-wt (IgHV-U)† (% or 95% CI) | XPO1-wt (IgHV-M)† (% or 95% CI) | p value‡ | test | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Demographics | Gender (n, Male) | 649 (69.3%) | 41 (75.9%) | 349 (71.8%) | 258 (65.2%) | 0.630 | χ2 | |
Rai (n, II–IV) | 167 (27.4%) | 21 (53.8%) | 86 (27.6%) | 60 (23.3%) | 0.199 | χ2 | ||
Age (median, year) | 57.2 (56.4–58.0) | 52.3 (49.9–55.0) | 57.1 (56.0–58.2) | 58.7 (57.4–59.9) | 0.031 | t-test | ||
Blood Counts | B2M (median) | 3 (2.8–3.2) | 3.4 (2.6–4.2) | 3.15 (2.9–3.4) | 2.7 (2.5–2.9) | 0.814 | t-test | |
HGB (median) | 13.1 (12.9–13.3) | 12.5 (11.7–13.3) | 13.1 (12.8–13.4) | 13.4 (13.1–13.7) | 0.562 | t-test | ||
LDH (median) | 493 (463–523) | 528 (446–610) | 499.5 (453–546) | 473 (438–508) | 0.809 | t-test | ||
PLT (median) | 167 (159.7–174.3) | 140.5 (113.5–167.5) | 177 (188–166) | 164.5 (154.7–174.3) | 0.149 | t-test | ||
WBC (median) | 65.35 (57.67–73.03) | 122.95 (82.28–163.62) | 72.3 (61.83–83.60) | 44.8 (35.59–54.01) | 0.041 | t-test | ||
FISH | del(11q) | 74 (15%) | 3 (11%) | 63 (25%) | 8 (4%) | 0.081 | χ2 | |
del(13q) | 276 (55%) | 20 (74%) | 116 (45%) | 140 (66%) | 0.003 | χ2 | ||
del(17p) | 51 (8%) | 1 (3%) | 40 (12%) | 10 (3%) | 0.079 | χ2 | ||
12 + | 64 (13%) | 0 (0%) | 42 (16%) | 22 (10%) | 0.011 | χ2 | ||
CN | 134 (27%) | 7 (26%) | 71 (28%) | 56 (27%) | 0.51 | χ2 | ||
Mutation Panel | NOTCH1 | 99 (9%) | 9 (13%) | 79 (13%) | 11 (3%) | 0.52 | χ2 | |
SF3B1 | 52 (15%) | 8 (30%) | 29 (14%) | 15 (12%) | 0.045 | χ2 | ||
TP53 | 97 (19%) | 5 (16%) | 71 (26%) | 21 (10%) | 0.141 | χ2 | ||
XPO1 | 72 (6%) | 72 (100%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | - | - | ||
EGR2 | 46 (4%) | 4 (6%) | 32 (5%) | 10 (2%) | 0.51 | χ2 | ||
MYD88 | 26 (2%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (0.3%) | 24 (6%) | 0.81 | χ2 |
All CLL patients† (% or 95% CI) | XPO1-mut (LP-CLL)† (% or 95% CI) | XPO1-wt (LP-CLL)† (% or 95% CI) | XPO1-wt (IP-CLL)† (% or 95% CI) | XPO1-wt (HP-CLL)† (% or 95% CI) | p value$ | Test | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Multi-Cohort CLL patient characteristics by epigenetic maturation status* | ||||||||
Demographics | Gender (count, M) | 659 (69%) | 41 (78.8%) | 310 (70.9%) | 120 (72.7%) | 188 (62.5%) | 0.130 | χ2 |
Rai (count, > 1) | 167 (27.5%) | 21 (56.8%) | 76 (27%) | 36 (35.3%) | 34 (18.2%) | 0.036 | χ2 | |
Age (median, year) | 57.2 (56.4–58.0) | 52.3 (49.6–55.0) | 57.0 (55.8–58.1) | 57.1 (55.2–59.1) | 59.1 (57.7–60.6) | 0.020 | t-test | |
Blood Counts | B2M (median) | 3 (2.8–3.2) | 3.4 (2.6–4.2) | 3.3 (3.0–3.6) | 2.9 (2.5–3.3) | 2.65 (2.4–2.9) | 0.826 | t-test |
HGB (median) | 13.1 (12.9–13.3) | 12.1 (11.3–12.9) | 13 (12.7–13.3) | 13.3 (12.8–13.8) | 13.4 (13.1–13.7) | 0.440 | t-test | |
LDH (median) | 494 (464–524) | 545 (459–631) | 524 (475–573) | 476 (415–537) | 459 (422–496) | 0.936 | t-test | |
PLT (median) | 167 (160–174) | 132 (105–159) | 176 (165–187) | 160 (145–175) | 167 (155–179) | 0.110 | t-test | |
WBC (median) | 65.35 (57.67–73.03) | 124 (81.34–166.66) | 77.3 (65.49–89.11) | 42.45 (26.59–58.31) | 43.65 (33.02–54.28) | 0.056 | t-test | |
FISH | del(11q) | 74 (14%) | 2 (8%) | 62 (26%) | 9 (10%) | 1 (1%) | 0.064 | χ2 |
del(13q) | 288 (56%) | 18 (69%) | 101 (42%) | 64 (72%) | 105 (64%) | 0.0043 | χ2 | |
del(17p) | 52 (7%) | 1 (3%) | 39 (13%) | 5 (4%) | 7 (3%) | 0.196 | χ2 | |
12 + | 66 (13%) | 0 (0%) | 43 (18%) | 10 (11%) | 13 (8%) | 0.006 | χ2 | |
CN | 140 (27%) | 8 (31%) | 67 (29%) | 18 (20%) | 47 (29%) | 0.54 | χ2 | |
Mutation Panel | NOTCH1 | 105 (9%) | 11 (17%) | 75 (13%) | 11 (6%) | 8 (3%) | 0.289 | χ2 |
SF3B1 | 57 (15%) | 7 (25%) | 28 (15%) | 18 (32%) | 4 (4%) | 0.131 | χ2 | |
TP53 | 101 (19%) | 5 (16%) | 68 (28%) | 13 (14%) | 15 (9%) | 0.214 | χ2 | |
XPO1 | 71 (6%) | 69 (97%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | – | – | |
EGR2 | 48 (4%) | 5 (7%) | 29 (5%) | 9 (5%) | 5 (2%) | 0.32 | χ2 | |
MYD88 | 27 (2%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 14 (7%) | 13 (4) | – | – |
*Characteristics at time of diagnosis
†Represents the total count of eligible patients with available data for each annotation
‡p value determined by: XPO1-mut (IgVH-U) vs XPO1-wt (IgVH-U)
$p value determined by: XPO1-mut (LP-CLL) vs XPO1-wt (LP-CLL)
As has been previously reported, CLL samples with mutated XPO1 invariably were found to use unmutated IgHV (72/72 cases, 100%; IgHV-U) in contrast to samples with wt XPO1, for which only 633 of the 1,068 evaluable cases (59%) used unmutated IgHV (Additional file 1: Fig. S1A). Cases with XPO1 mutations also had a skewed epigenetic maturation status. Sixty-nine of the 71 evaluated leukemia-cell samples (97%) had a low-programmed (LP-CLL) epigenetic signature [51]; in contrast, only 578 of the 1100 cases (53%) without detectable XPO1 mutations had such an epigenetic signature. These data confirm previous reports that associated E571 XPO1 mutations in CLL with these adverse prognostic markers [71].
As virtually all samples harboring mutated XPO1 had either unmutated IgHV or LP-CLL, we next examined this data for clinical features associated with mutated XPO1 that could distinguish such patients from patients with CLL cells that did not have XPO1 mutations but using unmutated IgHV or present an LP-CLL epigenetic signature (Table 1). We found that patients with CLL cells harboring mutated XPO1 were diagnosed at a significantly younger median age, and more often presented with an advanced Rai stage than patients with CLL that expressed unmutated IgHV or had LP-CLL signatures but had wt XPO1. Patients with CLL cells that had mutated XPO1 also had higher absolute blood lymphocyte counts (WBC) at time of diagnosis than comparable patients with CLL cells that had wt XPO1.
Deletions in the long arm of chromosome 13 at q14 (del(13q14)) are observed in approximately 50% of all CLL cases by FISH analysis, but only in 45% or 42% of cases with unmutated IgHV or LP-CLL epigenetic signatures, respectively, as observed in our cohort of CLL samples (Table 1). However, cases with mutated XPO1 for which we had cytogenetic data were more commonly associated with del(13q14) than were wt XPO1 samples with unmutated IgHV (74% vs 45%; p = 0.003) or LP-CLL (69% vs 42%; p = 0.004). Furthermore, cases with mutated XPO1 more commonly had nonsynonymous mutations in SF3B1 than samples with wt XPO1 and unmutated IgHV (30% vs 14%, p = 0.045) (Table 1). On the other hand, whereas nearly 16–18% of samples with wt XPO1 and unmutated IgHV or LP-CLL had trisomy 12 (+ 12) at diagnosis, none of the samples with mutated XPO1 had this chromosomal abnormality (p = 0.011, p = 0.006, respectively).
Despite having an advanced stage and younger age at diagnosis, patients with CLL cells harboring XPO1 mutations did not display a strong difference in median survival than CLL patients that had wt XPO1 and unmutated IgHV or LP-CLL (Additional file 1: figure S1B). Likewise, the difference in time to first treatment (TTFT) for patients with mutated XPO1 relative to that of patients with wt XPO1 and unmutated IgHV or LP-CLL also did not reach statistical significance (Additional file 1: figure S1C).
CLL patients with the E571K mutation exhibit differential expression of genes important in the pathogenesis of CLL
We hypothesized that CLL cells containing an E571 XPO1 mutation may become reliant upon alternative growth and proliferation signals stemming from disrupted nuclear transport of intracellular cargos, priming the B lymphocytes for enhanced oncogenic potential. Thus, we aimed to identify disrupted cellular pathways in response to the E571K XPO1 mutation, the mutation most frequently cited in CLL patients. To do this, we performed unbiased RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) in CLL patient B-CLL cells containing an E571K XPO1 mutation and compared this with XPO1-wt IgVH-U patient CLL cells. Multidimensional scaling (MDS) analysis of the top 1000 most variable genes demonstrated distinctly unique clustering along the first dimension for XPO1-E571K patient and XPO1-wt patient samples (Fig. 1c). This clustering pattern was driven by a number of genes that were either over- or under-expressed in XPO1-E571K patient cells (Fig. 1d), contributing to a unique gene expression pattern in patients with this mutation signature (Fig. 1e).
In particular, CLL cells with XPO1-E571K had enriched expression of several genes known to potentially contribute to lymphocyte activation (i.e. IFNG, GZMB, CCR1, FCN1, and VCAN). Significant downregulation of a select few genes were noted in CLL cells with XPO1-E571K compared to those with wt XPO1, including KLK2, BEND3, and WNT3. Interestingly, CLL cells with XPO1-E571K displayed significant upregulation of several genes expressed in activated T lymphocytes, including ITK, CCL5, CCR5, CD2, CD28, CD96, CD226, and TRBC1, among others. Enrichment in activation genes CD2, CD28, GZMB, and IFNG in XPO1-E571K CLL cells were also seen at the protein level as detected by flow cytometry (Additional file 1: Figure S1D). Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) of these differentially expressed genes in XPO1-E571K CLL cells confirmed an enrichment for T cell-specific signaling pathways, including T cell activation and regulation, autoimmunity, NFAT signaling, NF-κB activation, and Tec kinase signaling (Fig. 1f).
XPO1 overexpression induces leukemogenesis in XPO1-transgenic mice
Despite implications as an independent oncogenic event in CLL patients, until recently, there have been no reports on whether XPO1 mutations could induce a CLL-like disease. Taylor and colleagues have recently described a novel knock-in mouse model with heterozygous expression of XPO1-E571K in the murine B lymphocytes. Such mice did not develop a B cell malignancy without alloantigen stimulation, but when crossed with two lymphoma models (c-MYC and BCL2), the E571K mutation enhanced the lymphomagenic potential of c-MYC and BCL2, suggesting additional molecular abnormalities must be present for the E571K XPO1 mutation to incite an aggressive tumor progression [24].
In an alternate strategy, we developed transgenic mice harboring wt XPO1 or mutant XPO1 under the control of the VH-promoter-IgH-Eμ-enhancer elements to generate Eµ-XPO1WT, Eµ-XPO1E571K, Eµ-XPO1E571G transgenic mice, which had high level expression of the XPO1 transgene in mature B cells (Fig. 2a, Additional file 2: Figure S2A-C) [60]. Five unique founder lines were generated for each Eµ-XPO1WT, Eµ-XPO1E571K, Eµ-XPO1E571G transgenic strain. No outstanding phenotypic differences were observed between founder lines of mice expressing XPO1-wt, XPO1-E571K, or XPO1-E571G, respectively (data not shown), and founder lines were combined for comparative analysis.
Immunophenotypic evaluation of mice in Eμ-XPO1 colonies by flow cytometry revealed no overt change in B and T cell subsets in the spleen or blood of mice between 3 and 12 months of age (Additional file 2: Fig. S2D–G). This included no change in transitional B cells in the spleen or circulating B cells in the blood, and no changes in B cells populating the follicular (FOL) or marginal zones (MZ/MZP) of the spleen in 12 month old animals. In 3 month old animals, no marked changes were observed in CD4 + or CD8 + T cell subpopulations between Eμ-XPO1 and C56BL/6 non-transgenic mice. Within T cell subsets, no strong differences in naïve, memory, or effector compartments were observed. And further, both CD4 + and CD8 + T cell subsets displayed comparable percentages of Ctla4, Pd-1, Cd25, or Tim3 expressing cells. Large scale longitudinal evaluation of Eμ-XPO1 transgenic colonies resulted in similar overall survival between Eμ-XPO1 and C57BL/6 non-transgenic colonies, with both Eμ-XPO1 colony and C57BL/6 non-transgenic survival times extending significantly past the median survival observed in Eμ-TCL1 CLL model (Fig. 2b).
Long term follow-up of mice advancing to 24–33 months of age, however, revealed Eμ-XPO1WT, Eμ-XPO1E571K and Eμ-XPO1E571G mice variably developed lymphocytosis and a CLL-like disease. Elevated circulating blood cell counts, including white blood cells (WBC), lymphocytes (LY), neutrophils (NE), and monocytes (MO), could be found moderately- or far-exceeding ranges found in C57BL/6 animals, most notably in the Eμ-XPO1WT group (Fig. 2c). Blood counts in Eμ-TCL1 mice variably exceeding those found in C57BL/6 mice are shown as reference. Furthermore, analysis of CD45 + cells circulating in the blood (Additional file 2: Figure S2H) demonstrated that a small subset (5/15 analyzed mice) of aged Eμ-XPO1WT, Eμ-XPO1E571G, and Eμ-XPO1E571K mice spontaneously developed a circulating leukemia characterized by expansion of CD5+/CD19+ and CD19+/B220dim B lymphocytes (Fig. 2d). These neoplastic cells resembled the CLL-like disease observed in Eμ-TCL1 transgenic animals. Evaluation of blood mononuclear cells collected from one Eμ-XPO1E571G animal revealed significant accumulation of well-differentiated lymphocytes in ratios resembling the blood smear of a CLL patient with a WBC count of 196,000/µL (Fig. 2e).
Using RNA-sequencing methods previously described by our group [72], we identified IgHV transcript use in aged Eμ-XPO1 mice (range 19–28 months). BCR reads from the variable (V) regions of each heavy- (H) and light-chain genes were binned and normalized by the total number of reads corresponding to each respective chain. Percent IgHV gene usage in Eμ-XPO1 and C57BL/6 non-transgenic mice are visualized in Fig. 2f, with each color bar representing the 10 individual IGHV genes with the highest usage, and the dark green bar representing the collection of all other IGHV genes found in that animal. We found that Eμ-XPO1E571G or Eμ-XPO1E571K mice that did not have overt CLL-like lymphocytosis had splenic B cells expressing a restricted IgHV repertoire, suggesting nascent leukemogenesis (Additional file 4: Table S1). This trend was not observed in the non-transgenic animals, where a high degree of IGH gene diversity was observed. Of note, a less restrictive use of IgHV genes in aged Eμ-XPO1WT mice relative to that of age-matched Eμ-XPO1E571G or Eμ-XPO1E571K mice.
To assess the disease burden accumulated throughout all tissues, aged Eμ-XPO1WT, Eμ-XPO1E571G, and Eμ-XPO1E571K mice were sacrificed and detailed necropsy was performed. Microscopic examination of tissue architecture revealed development of a systemic hematopoietic neoplasia most commonly affecting the liver and lymph nodes in 75% (3/4 mice per group) of the analyzed Eμ-XPO1 transgenic mice (Fig. 2g, Additional file 2: Figure S2I). Livers and lymph nodes from Eµ-XPO1WT, Eµ-XPO1E571G and Eµ-XPO1E571K mice were significantly enlarged due to infiltration of neoplastic cells composed (in varying ratios) of large lymphocytes and histiocytoid cells. Accumulation of neoplastic infiltrates was also observed in the bone marrow of a Eµ-XPO1E571G mouse. This neoplasm was most consistent with histiocyte associated lymphoma, a variant of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and homologue of histiocyte and T-cell rich DLBCL in humans [73]. The spleen, kidney, and lungs were also affected in analyzed mice although at a lesser frequency. Additional lesions were noted in these very old mice without obvious differences between groups, including glomerulopathies, chronic kidney injury, aggregates of mixed lymphocytes in various tissues, extramedullary hematopoiesis, lymphoid atrophy, and occasional neoplasms of non-lymphoid tissue. In comparison, the aged-matched C57BL/6 non-transgenic group showed some evidence of hematopoietic neoplasia in 25% (1/4 mice) of the analyzed animals.
E571 XPO1 mutations accelerate leukemogenesis in Eµ-TCL1 transgenic mice
We crossed mice from each respective Eµ-XPO1 transgenic line with Eµ-TCL1 mice, a model known to develop an overt B cell leukemia between 7 and 12 months of age [60, 74, 75] (Eµ-XPO1xTCL1; Fig. 3a). Eµ-XPO1xTCL1 double transgenic mice were monitored monthly for onset of leukemia by flow cytometry analysis of blood mononuclear cells. Immunophenotypic profiling demonstrated a similar expansion of detectable CD5+/CD19+ and CD19+/B220dim cells in the blood of Eµ-TCL1 and all Eµ-XPO1xTCL1 mice over time (Fig. 3c). However, by monitoring the time to disease onset (determined as > 20% CD5+/CD19+ and CD19+/B220dim populations), we observed accelerated leukemic development in Eµ-XPO1E571GxTCL1 and Eµ-XPO1E571KxTCL1 mice when compared to Eµ-TCL1 mice (median time to disease onset = 185 vs 212 days, p = 0.001; 186 vs 212 days, p = 0.093, respectively; Fig. 3c). Alternatively, overexpression of WT-XPO1 in Eµ-TCL1 B lymphocytes did not enhance the rate of leukemia onset when compared to Eµ-TCL1 mice (median time to disease onset = 214 vs 212 days, p = 0.713).
Despite accelerated time to disease onset, we observed no marked changes in overall survival between Eµ-XPO1E571GxTCL1 or Eµ-XPO1E571KxTCL1 mice and Eµ-TCL1 transgenic mice (Median survival = 396 vs 424 days, p = 0.254; 423 vs 424 days, p = 0.360, respectively; Fig. 3c).
Histopathologic examination between age-matched (7–16 months) Eµ-XPO1xTCL1 transgenic mice (n = 6, respectively) revealed that mice in all groups demonstrated a histologic disease phenotype similar to the Eµ-TCL1 mouse (Fig. 3d). Mice developed lymphoid neoplasia affecting multiple organ systems, including thymus, spleen, lymph node, bone marrow, liver, kidney, and gastrointestinal tract, consisting of small to large lymphocytes mixed with varying proportions of histiocytes. This type of murine neoplasm has been previously identified in the Eµ-TCL1 mouse [76], warranting a diagnosis of histiocyte-associated lymphoma.
Again assessing the BCR repertoire in transgenic animals by evaluating IGH transcripts of splenic B cells by RNA-sequencing, we observed distinct usage of select few IGHV gene transcripts in all Eµ-XPO1xTCL1 groups and in all Eµ-TCL1 mice, suggesting these spleens are comprised of malignant B lymphocytes with remarkably low clonal diversity (Fig. 3e, Additional file 4: Table 1).
E571K XPO1 mutation does not alter SINE therapeutic potential
Recent advances in therapeutic strategies for management of hematologic malignancies have identified SINE molecules having potential anti-cancer activity. First generation (KPT-185, KPT-330, KPT-335) and second generation SINE therapeutics (KPT-8602) (Additional file 3: Figure S3A) have demonstrated selective cytotoxicity for solid and liquid tumor types in pre-clinical and clinical studies. Such activity is due to slowly-reversible covalent binding with the C528 residue within the XPO1 NES-binding groove, effectively inhibiting nuclear transport of essential proteins and RNAs [43, 77–79]. One SINE compound, Selinexor (KPT-330/XPOVIO™), was recently approved by the FDA for use in therapy of patients with in penta-refractory multiple myeloma or R/R DLBCL [45, 49, 80].
Glutamate 571 is located in the XPO1 NES-binding groove, and the E571K mutation changes both the shape and electrostatics of this exposed region [50] (Fig. 1a). The considerable change in size and charge resulting from this amino acid change may also affect SINE molecule binding within this groove. Reports exploring the relationship between SINE efficacy and tumor models with E571K XPO1 have been discussed previously, suggesting a slight reduction in SINE efficacy in PMBCL cell lines (MedB1) [25] and an increase in SINE efficacy in CLL cell lines (NALM-6) [24]. However, as there has been no mechanistic study of the relationship between the E571K mutations and binding of the SINE compounds to XPO1, we solved the crystal structures for E571 (wt) and E571K XPO1 bound to SINE compounds KPT-185, KPT-330 or KPT-8602 (Table 2, Fig. 4a, b and Additional file 3: Figure S3B).
Table 2.
Crystals of XPO1•RanGTP•RanBP1 bound to KPT-SINEs | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Data collection | ||||||
XPO1 | wildtype | wildtype | wildtype | E571K | E571K | E571K |
KPT-SINE | KPT-185 | KPT-330 | KPT-8602 | KPT-185 | KPT-330 | KPT-8602 |
Space group | P43212 | |||||
Cell dimensions a = b, c (Å) | 105.9, 305.5 | 105.4, 305.1 | 106.7, 306.1 | 106.0, 306.0 | 106.0, 305.6 | 106.0, 305.4 |
Resolution range (Å) | 50.00–2.80 (2.85–2.80) | 50.00–2.04 (2.10–2.04) | 50.00–2.40 (2.44–2.40) | 40.00–1.94 (1.97–1.94) | 40.00–1.94 (1.97–1.94) | 40.00–2.20 (2.24–2.20) |
Multiplicity | 15.1 (13.8) | 4.4 (3.1) | 16.6 (16.4) | 17.6 (17.9) | 17.2 (16.3) | 15.8 (15.9) |
Data completeness (%) | 100 (100) | 99.9 (99.2) | 100 (100) | 95.5 (91.1) | 100 (100) | 100 (100) |
Rmeas /Rpim (%) | 18.5/5.6 (0.0/60.8) | 11.5/6.3 (0.0/81.1) | 14.0/5.6 (0.0/93.9) | 9.2/2.1 (300.0/66.0) | 10.6/2.5 (337.5/80.9) | 15.7/4.0 (766.8/190.5) |
I/σ(I) | 12.7 (1.3) | 10.4 (0.6) | 19.7 (1.9) | 38.2 (1.4) | 35.6 (1.3) | 25.5 (1.4) |
CC1/2 (last resolution shell)a | 0.656 | 0.096 | 0.576 | 0.486 | 0.477 | 0.709 |
Refinement statistics | ||||||
Resolution range (Å) | 46.99–2.80 (2.87–2.80) | 47.55–2.04 (2.09–2.04) | 45.54–2.41 (2.46–2.40) | 38.25–1.94 (1.99–1.94) | 38.20–1.94 (1.97–1.94) | 38.17–2.19 (2.23–2.19) |
No. of reflections Rwork/Rfree | 3181/185 (798/47) | 6191/350 (5532/276) | 5191/159 (3579/109) | 9650/169 (3610/63) | 12,080/206 (2704/46) | 7562/176 (2595/61) |
Data completeness (%) | 83.1 (28) | 98.3 (80.15) | 97.2 (76) | 89.9 (40) | 67.7 (22) | 79.7 (35) |
Atoms (non-H protein and ligand/solvent) | 10,807/0 | 11,851/616 | 11,102/0 | 11,093/1147 | 11,103/511 | 11,102/444 |
Rwork/Rfree (%) | 20.8/26.1 (28.0/35.8) | 17.5/23.2 (38.1/43.0) | 19.6/24.6 (24.2/31.4) | 19.4/22.6 (26.6/26.0) | 20.1/24.1 (30.4/34.9) | 20.4/23.6 (33.3/31.9) |
R.m.s.d. Bond length (Å)/angle (°) | 0.009/1.039 | 0.004/0.872 | 0.014/1.214 | 0.003/0.550 | 0.004/0.144 | 0.003/0.521 |
Mean B-value (Å [2]) | 41.6 | 51.8 | 35.1 | 18.8 | 19.5 | 37 |
Ramachandran plot favored /disallowed (%)b | 95.63/0.23 | 98.16/0.15 | 96.17/0.53 | 96.40/0.75 | 97.07/0.38 | 97.15/0.38 |
ML coordinate error | 0.32 | 0.17 | 0.32 | 0.19 | 0.20 | 0.30 |
PDB code | 6XJP | 7L5E | 6XJT | 6XJR | 6XJS | 6XJU |
Data for the outermost shell are given in parentheses
aKarplus PA & Diederichs K (2012) Linking crystallographic model and data quality. Science 336(6084):1030–1033
bAs defined by MolProbity in PHENIX
The structures of KPT-bound E571 and E571K XPO1 were very similar. Comparison of wildtype and E571K XPO1 with all three sets of KPT compounds gave pairwise Cα r.m.s.d. values less than 0.18 Å and XPO1 side chains were in similar conformations, implying that both wt and E571K-XPO1 will confer similar XPO1-drug interactions (Fig. 4b). In all structures, there was no density for the side chain of Glu571 in wildtype XPO1 or for the lysine side chain of E571K XPO1, suggesting they are flexible and mobile in the crystal structure and unlikely to make any persistent contacts with the SINE compounds bound in this groove (Fig. 4b and Additional file 3: Figure S3B). Furthermore, while the variable side chains of the SINE compounds are likely flexible (weak to no density), the trifluoromethyl phenyl triazole scaffolds are well-defined and bind similarly to both wildtype and E571K XPO1 (Fig. 4 and Additional file 3: Figure S3A, B). All structural observations suggest the E571K mutation is unlikely to change how KPT-185, KPT-330 (Selinexor) or KPT-8602 bind to XPO1, and will have little to no effect on inhibition efficacy.
Furthermore, we evaluated the ability for these SINE molecules to impact cell proliferation using in vitro models expressing wildtype or E571K-mutated XPO1. First, employing a HEK293 tumor cell model we have previously designed for heterozygous expression of XPO1-E571K in the endogenous locus via CRISPR-based gene editing techniques [50], we observed a similar, dose-dependent, inhibitory response upon 48 h of exposure to SINE molecules KPT-185, KPT-330 or KPT-8602 between both wt and XPO1-E571K expressing cells (Fig. 4c). XPO1-E571K mutant HEK293 cells appeared to display an increase in sensitivity to treatment with KPT-330 (Selinexor) at 0.01 μM (p < 0.001) and 0.1 μM (p = 0.027) doses, however. A similar trend was observed when treating wt or XPO1-E571K expressing human CLL samples ex-vivo with clinically relevant SINE molecules KPT-330 and KPT-8602, observing no significant change in reduction of proliferative potential in XPO1-E571K expressing cells (Fig. 4d). While no level of significance was reached at these dosing schedules, however, a modest increase in sensitivity to SINE inhibition was again observed in XPO1-E571K expressing CLL cells. Collectively, these results suggest KPT-330 and KPT-8602 are likely to remain effective as a therapeutic strategy for CLL patients possessing an E571 XPO1 mutation.
Discussion
Wide scale genomic analysis across a range of cancer types have discovered the recurrent E571 XPO1 mutations to be particularly enriched in hematologic malignancies. In CLL, presence of an E571 XPO1 mutation also suggests association with other high-risk CLL prognostic indicators, but to date, a complete understanding of their impact on the genesis and progression of these hematologic malignancies remains unresolved. We have herein provided an extensive evaluation of the leukemogenic potential of E571 XPO1 mutations in both human and murine CLL. Thanks to collaboration between a diverse set of clinical CLL research groups, we retrospectively analyzed a total of 1286 CLL cases, identifying 72 of which having presented with an E571 XPO1 mutation at their time of diagnosis. The overall distribution of XPO1-mutated patients in this cohort and their association with other high-risk CLL co-factors falls in line with previous reports for this mutation, providing further evidence for the E571 XPO1 mutation as a cancer-associated genetic abnormality. The high VAF seen among all patients suggests XPO1 is likely part of the early initiating event of CLL and is most likely not acquired as a later sub-clone with treatment. Collectively, this suggests a dominant role for XPO1 in CLL leukemia initiation. Despite these associations, the results of our study also confirm that the E571 XPO1 mutation does not impact survival outcomes in these patients, measured either in surrogate by TTFT or from time from diagnosis to death.
Our study does highlight a handful of CLL patient characteristics found in those with an E571 XPO1 mutation that may provide an insight to mechanisms of pathogenesis, however.
With regards to cytogenetic evaluation, poor survival outcomes paired with a significant association with del(13q14) and an abrupt dissociation with trisomy 12 (+ 12) in XPO1-mutated CLL patients offer potential pathways to explain the consequences of these mutations. Deletion of the q14 region of chromosome 13 in CLL cases is often met with a favorable prognosis, citing the loss of miR-15/16, DLEU7, or RB1 as major contributors to disease pathogenesis [81–83]. Roughly 70% of evaluable XPO1-mutated patients presented del(13q14) as a co-occurring genetic abnormality, a significant increase from the ~ 50% reported in the general CLL population and the ~ 42–45% reported in CLL cells with wt XPO1. Despite a historically fair prognosis, the survival outcomes of these patients were among the shortest reported in this study, suggesting some combination of dysfunctional molecular signaling stemming from these genetic aberrations are acutely advantageous for proliferation of the CLL cells. Moreover, the alternative activation of survival pathways in XPO1-mutated CLL cells suggests the XPO1 mutation may be skewing the molecular dependence of specific survival pathways for continued proliferation of neoplastic B cells and encourages the emergence of additional factors to contribute to leukemogenesis. Enrichment in factors such as CD2, CD28, GZMB, and INFG also suggests the disrupted signaling in XPO1-E571K CLL cells may influence surrounding immune cells, contributing to the immune dysfunction attributed to CLL patients. The role for complications stemming from E571 XPO1 mutations in modulating the immune system of CLL patients, or increasing susceptibility to opportunistic infections [84], remain unresolved. Further genetic evaluation will be necessary to completely describe these mechanisms.
Of the most striking results from cytogenetic evaluation in these patients was the exclusivity of the E571 XPO1 mutation and the gain in copy number for chromosome 12. This suggests a divergent biology of trisomy 12 and XPO1-initiated CLL. Copy number gains in entire chromosomes remain particularly challenging events to study in cancer pathogenesis due to the immensity of information stored in each chromosome. Regarding chromosome 12, however, a recent report suggests hyperactive NFAT signaling in + 12 CLL cases may act as a driving mechanism in these neoplastic cells [85]. Interestingly, RNA-sequencing of CLL cells with E571K XPO1 mutations in our study revealed an upregulation of genes converging on NFAT and NFAT-related signaling pathways. This relationship may reveal a scenario in which convergence of the disrupted molecular pathways from both genetic aberrations is a lethal event in CLL cells. Thus, development of an E571 XPO1 mutation would push towards an aggressive CLL phenotype with worse overall CLL prognosis, and conversely, development of a trisomy 12 leading to an intermediate CLL course.
It is important to note that the CLL patient data described in our study were collected from tertiary care centers and are likely selecting for advanced disease cases that are referred to these institutions. This remains a limitation to most large-scale investigations determining trends in cancer data, highlighting the need for widespread access to affordable, high-throughput evaluation of tumor samples in primary care centers.
Previous reports have noted that E571 XPO1 mutations are exclusively found as heterozygous missense mutations, never appearing in the homozygous or hemizygous state [24, 86]. This finding reinforces the notion that XPO1 contributes critical homeostatic functions to the eukaryotic cell. As CLL is most often defined as a clonal expansion of malignant B lymphocytes, identifying a median E571 VAF in XPO1-mutated CLL patients to be 0.47 suggests the E571 XPO1 mutation is in the dominant clone of the total disease burden. This finding proposes the E571 XPO1 mutation as an early transformative event in progression of CLL, from which these clones progress to populate the majority of the leukemic tumor burden. This same explanation, however, implies the E571 XPO1 mutation in B lymphocytes alone is not sufficient to spur development of an overt leukemia, as very few CLL patients presented with a low VAF at the time of diagnosis. This idea is reaffirmed by data generated from our novel Eμ-XPO1 transgenic mouse model, where E571K-XPO1 and E571G-XPO1 overexpressing mice displayed the same rates of disease development as mice overexpressing the WT-XPO1 transgene. However, splenic populations from Eμ-XPO1E571K and Eμ-XPO1E571G mice, but not Eμ-XPO1WT mice, were largely comprised of clonally related B cells, suggesting these mutations are advantageous for proliferation and survival, and would be primed for leukemic transformation with the addition of another genetic abnormality.
When paired with another CLL-driving oncogene, like has been recently shown by Taylor and colleagues in mouse models combining the E571K XPO1 mutation with c-Myc or Bcl-2 alterations [24], recurrent mutations to this site stimulate a more aggressive disease phenotype. In our study, crossing Eμ-XPO1 mice with the Eμ-TCL1 mouse, which is the most common murine model of CLL, Eμ-XPO1xTCL1 mice expressing E571K- or E571G-XPO1 displayed a more rapid onset of their CLL-like disease. This accelerated disease phenotype was not produced in Eμ-XPO1xTCL1 mice expressing WT-XPO1. Interestingly, however, no significant impact on survival was observed between each Eμ-XPO1xTCL1 transgenic cross and Eμ-TCL1 mice. Moreover, the histologic disease phenotype in all Eμ-XPO1xTCL1 transgenic crosses retained similarity to that observed in the Eμ-TCL1 model, suggesting the overall phenotype resulting from this double transgenic cross is dominated by the TCL1 oncogene. Observations with this Eμ-XPO1xTCL1 mouse fall in line with survival data collected from human CLL patients, suggesting that once leukemogenic transformation is complete, other high risk factors may provide a more significant contribution to the overall mortality of this disease.
As the presence of an E571 XPO1 mutation in CLL almost exclusively coincides with a negative overall prognosis, development of an effective therapeutic regimen is of critical importance. Recently, small molecule inhibitors of XPO1 termed SINEs have gained increasing attention as anti-cancer molecules, with specific emphasis toward hematologic malignancies. The covalent binding site of all SINE compounds, C528, resides in the XPO1 NES-binding groove within proximity of the E571 locus, the latter of which potentially contributing to the biochemical environment uniquely conducive for SINE binding. However, by solving crystal structures of SINE-bound XPO1, we determined the E571K mutation is unlikely to impact the inhibitory potential of this class of drugs. These data support the use of SINE molecules in cancer patients possessing an E571 XPO1 mutation without suspicion of alternative drug-target interactions altering the therapeutic potential. Our data using a human tumor cell model and CLL patient cells with heterozygous XPO1-E571K expression support this claim, as we observed no change in proliferation potential between wt and E571K mutant cells upon treatment with these molecules. In both mutant models, interestingly, a modest increase in sensitivity to SINE inhibition was observed at select doses, suggesting manipulation of molecular signaling pathways stemming from the E571 XPO1 mutation may make these cells more susceptible to this form of anti-cancer treatment. Further characterization of these interactions will be necessary to fully describe the altered molecular pathways stemming from E571 XPO1 mutations that may influence the sensitivity and cytotoxic efficacy of tumor cells to inhibition by SINE molecules.
Conclusion
The similar disease course in human and murine CLL observed in our study suggests the mislocalization of intracellular machinery stemming from E571-XPO1 mutations may be priming pre-neoplastic B cells for complete leukemogenic transformation with the addition of oncogenic molecular defects converging on similar critical regulatory or signaling pathways. However, a complete understanding of the leukemogenic consequences stemming from the E571 XPO1 mutation are not yet fully understood and will require further investigation to provide a complete description of this unique genetic abnormality.
Supplementary Information
Acknowledgements
We thank Ho Yee Joyce Fung for advice on structure determination and for previous structures and the UTSW Structural Biology Laboratory for their assistance with crystallographic data collection. The above-mentioned studies were presented in part in abstract form at the 24th Congress of the European Hematology Association. Amsterdam, Netherlands, 15 June, 2019.
Abbreviations
- XPO1
Exportin 1
- CRM1
Chromosome region maintenance 1
- CLL
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia
- BTK
Bruton’s tyrosine kinase
- PI3K
Phosphoinositide 3-kinase
- BCL2
B-cell lymphoma 2
- DLBCL
Diffuse large B cell lymphoma
- RT
Richter’s transformation
- NPC
Nuclear pore complex
- NES
Nuclear export signal
- HL
Hodgkin’s Lymphoma
- PMBCL
Primary mediastinal B cell lymphoma
- R/R
Relapsed and refractory
- MM
Multiple myeloma
- 4E-T
EIF4E-transporter
- VAF
Variant allele frequency
- B2M
Beta-2 microglobulin
- HGM
Hemoglobin
- LDH
Lactate dehydrogenase
- PLT
Platelet
- WBC
White blood cell
- FISH
Florescence in Situ Hybridization
- + 12
Trisomy 12
- CN
Cytogenetically normal
- IgHV-U/M
IgHV-Unmuated/Mutated
- LP-CLL
Low programmed epigenetic signature
- IP-CLL
Intermediate programmed epigenetic signature
- HP-CLL
High programmed epigenetic signature
- TTFT
Time to first treatment
- OS
Overall survival
- MDS
Multidimensional scaling
- FOL
Follicular zone
- MZ/MZP
Marginal zone
- LY
Lymphocytes
- NE
Neutrophils
- MO
Monocytes
- BCR
B cell receptor
Author’s contributions
JSW and ZAH designed and conducted experiments, generated data and figures, analyzed data, interpreted results, and wrote the manuscript. LVA, TJK, SP, NEK, KR, and JAW collected, organized, and provided CLL patient data. JB, QS, SS, BG, KW, JNS, CBC, BRS, and MKS conducted experiments, analyzed data and contributed to generating figures. BH prepared and interpreted histopathology data. LPB performed animal experiments. HGO analyzed RNA-seq data and generated figures. AL conducted statistical analysis. VC generated the Eµ-XPO1 transgenic mouse within the OSU GEMM core. YMC, CO, JAW, JCB and RL obtained funding, planned the project, supervised the study, interpreted results, and reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Funding
Research support for J.S.W. was provided in part by The Ohio State University College of Medicine’s Systems and Integrative Biology T32 fellowship program (NIGMS T32 GM068412). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the College of Medicine at The Ohio State University. The authors thank the CLL Research Consortium (supported by National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute [NIH/NCI] grant P01 5P01CA081534) and the CLL Global Research Foundation (supported by NIH/NCI grant R01 CA182905-01) and R35 CA198183. The authors are grateful for the assistance in the generation of the XPO1 transgenic mouse lines to the personnel Genetically Engineered Mouse Modeling Core, a Shared Resource of the Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center supported by the P30 CA016058. Crystallographic results are derived from work performed at Argonne National Laboratory, Structural Biology Center at the Advanced Photon Source. Argonne is operated by U Chicago Argonne, LLC, for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Biological and Environmental Research (BER) under contract DE-AC02-06CH11357. This work is funded by the Cancer Prevention Research Institute of Texas (CPRIT) Grants RP180410 and RP170170 (Y.M.C.), Welch Foundation Grant I-1532 (Y.M.C) and the Mabel and Alfred Gilman Chair for Molecular Pharmacology. This research was funded by THE NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH, grant number 5P30 CA016058, 5R01 CA223165 (R.L.), and R35 CA197734 (J.C.B.). Funding bodies played no role in the design of the study, collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.
Availability of data and materials
RNA-sequencing data for human CLL subjects can be found here: GSE163370. Crystallography data can be found here: PDB codes 6XJP, 7L5E, 6XJT, 6XJR, 6XJS, 6XJU. Other raw datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The authors are grateful to the patients who generously provided blood for the above-mentioned studies. All CLL patient data was obtained after patients provided informed consent and approved by the institutional review board (IRB) from each respective institution. Blood from newly diagnosed untreated CLL patients were obtained from the Ohio State University Leukemia Tissue Bank after obtaining informed consent approved by the cancer institution review board. All mouse protocols were reviewed and approved by The Ohio State University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC).
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
SS is employed by and is a stockholder of Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc. SS holds Patents (8999996, 9079865, 9714226, PCT/US12/048319, and I574957) on hydrazide containing nuclear transport modulators and uses, and pending Patents (PCT/US12/048319, 499/2012, PI20102724, and 2012000928) on hydrazide-containing nuclear transport modulators and uses. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Janek S. Walker and Zachary A. Hing have contributed equally to this work.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13045-021-01032-2.
References
- 1.Hallek M, Shanafelt TD, Eichhorst B. Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Lancet. 2018;391(10129):1524–1537. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30422-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hoechstetter MA, Busch R, Eichhorst B, et al. Prognostic model for newly diagnosed CLL patients in Binet stage A: results of the multicenter, prospective CLL1 trial of the German CLL study group. Leukemia. 2020;34(4):1038–1051. doi: 10.1038/s41375-020-0727-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Woyach JA, Bojnik E, Ruppert AS, et al. Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) function is important to the development and expansion of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) Blood. 2014;123(8):1207–1213. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-07-515361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Byrd JC, Brown JR, O'Brien S, et al. Ibrutinib versus ofatumumab in previously treated chronic lymphoid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(3):213–223. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1400376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Burger JA, Tedeschi A, Barr PM, et al. Ibrutinib as initial therapy for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(25):2425–2437. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1509388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Byrd JC, Harrington B, O'Brien S, et al. Acalabrutinib (ACP-196) in relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(4):323–332. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1509981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Reiff SD, Mantel R, Smith LL, et al. The BTK Inhibitor ARQ 531 Targets Ibrutinib-Resistant CLL and Richter Transformation. Cancer Discov. 2018;8(10):1300–1315. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-17-1409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Woyach JA, Blachly JS, Rogers KA, et al. Acalabrutinib plus obinutuzumab in treatment-naïve and relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Cancer Discov. 2020;10(3):394–405. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-19-1130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Herman SE, Lapalombella R, Gordon AL, et al. The role of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-δ in the immunomodulatory effects of lenalidomide in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood. 2011;117(16):4323–4327. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-11-315705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lannutti BJ, Meadows SA, Herman SE, et al. CAL-101, a p110delta selective phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase inhibitor for the treatment of B-cell malignancies, inhibits PI3K signaling and cellular viability. Blood. 2011;117(2):591–594. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-03-275305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Winkler DG, Faia KL, DiNitto JP, et al. PI3K-δ and PI3K-γ inhibition by IPI-145 abrogates immune responses and suppresses activity in autoimmune and inflammatory disease models. Chem Biol. 2013;20(11):1364–1374. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2013.09.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Furman RR, Sharman JP, Coutre SE, et al. Idelalisib and rituximab in relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(11):997–1007. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1315226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Flinn IW, O'Brien S, Kahl B, et al. Duvelisib, a novel oral dual inhibitor of PI3K-δ, γ, is clinically active in advanced hematologic malignancies. Blood. 2018;131(8):877–887. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-05-786566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Cimmino A, Calin GA, Fabbri M, et al. miR-15 and miR-16 induce apoptosis by targeting BCL2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(39):13944–13949. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0506654102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Del Gaizo MV, Brown JR, Certo M, Love TM, Novina CD, Letai A. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia requires BCL2 to sequester prodeath BIM, explaining sensitivity to BCL2 antagonist ABT-737. J Clin Invest. 2007;117(1):112–121. doi: 10.1172/JCI28281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Roberts AW, Davids MS, Pagel JM, et al. Targeting BCL2 with Venetoclax in Relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(4):311–322. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1513257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Fischer K, Al-Sawaf O, Bahlo J, et al. Venetoclax and obinutuzumab in patients with CLL and coexisting conditions. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(23):2225–2236. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1815281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Milne K, Sturrock B, Chevassut T. Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in 2020: the future has arrived. Curr Oncol Rep. 2020;22(4):36. doi: 10.1007/s11912-020-0893-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Scheffold A, Stilgenbauer S. Revolution of chronic lymphocytic leukemia therapy: the chemo-free treatment paradigm. Curr Oncol Rep. 2020;22(2):16. doi: 10.1007/s11912-020-0881-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Rossi D, Spina V, Deambrogi C, et al. The genetics of Richter syndrome reveals disease heterogeneity and predicts survival after transformation. Blood. 2011;117(12):3391–3401. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-09-302174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Rossi D, Spina V, Gaidano G. Biology and treatment of Richter syndrome. Blood. 2018;131(25):2761–2772. doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-01-791376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Puente XS, Pinyol M, Quesada V, et al. Whole-genome sequencing identifies recurrent mutations in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Nature. 2011;475(7354):101–105. doi: 10.1038/nature10113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Landau DA, Carter SL, Stojanov P, et al. Evolution and impact of subclonal mutations in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Cell. 2013;152(4):714–726. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.01.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Taylor J, Sendino M, Gorelick AN, et al. Altered nuclear export signal recognition as a driver of oncogenesis. Cancer Discov. 2019;9(10):1452–1467. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-19-0298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Jardin F, Pujals A, Pelletier L, et al. Recurrent mutations of the exportin 1 gene (XPO1) and their impact on selective inhibitor of nuclear export compounds sensitivity in primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma. Am J Hematol. 2016;91(9):923–930. doi: 10.1002/ajh.24451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Jeromin S, Weissmann S, Haferlach C, et al. SF3B1 mutations correlated to cytogenetics and mutations in NOTCH1, FBXW7, MYD88, XPO1 and TP53 in 1160 untreated CLL patients. Leukemia. 2014;28(1):108–117. doi: 10.1038/leu.2013.263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Stamatopoulos, Basile, Antoniou, et al. Characterization of Recurrent Mutations in Patient with a Richter Syndrome By Targeted Next Generation Sequencing. American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting. San Diego, CA: Blood; 2016:3200.
- 28.Klintman J, Stamatopoulos B, Ridout K, et al. Differential genomic and transcriptomic events associated with high-grade transformation of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. In: 24th Congress of the European Hematology Association. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: European Hematology Association; 2019.
- 29.Weis K. Regulating access to the genome: nucleocytoplasmic transport throughout the cell cycle. Cell. 2003;112(4):441–451. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00082-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Fornerod M, Ohno M. Exportin-mediated nuclear export of proteins and ribonucleoproteins. Results Probl Cell Differ. 2002;35:67–91. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-44603-3_4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.la Cour T, Kiemer L, Mølgaard A, Gupta R, Skriver K, Brunak S. Analysis and prediction of leucine-rich nuclear export signals. Protein Eng Des Sel. 2004;17(6):527–536. doi: 10.1093/protein/gzh062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Dong X, Biswas A, Chook YM. Structural basis for assembly and disassembly of the CRM1 nuclear export complex. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2009;16(5):558–560. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Fung HY, Fu SC, Brautigam CA, Chook YM. Structural determinants of nuclear export signal orientation in binding to exportin CRM1. Elife. 2015;4:e10024. doi: 10.7554/eLife.10024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Schmidt J, Braggio E, Kortuem KM, et al. Genome-wide studies in multiple myeloma identify XPO1/CRM1 as a critical target validated using the selective nuclear export inhibitor KPT-276. Leukemia. 2013;27(12):2357–2365. doi: 10.1038/leu.2013.172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hart T, Chandrashekhar M, Aregger M, et al. High-resolution CRISPR screens reveal fitness genes and genotype-specific cancer liabilities. Cell. 2015;163(6):1515–1526. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.11.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Turner JG, Dawson J, Sullivan DM. Nuclear export of proteins and drug resistance in cancer. Biochem Pharmacol. 2012;83(8):1021–1032. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2011.12.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Xu D, Farmer A, Collett G, Grishin NV, Chook YM. Sequence and structural analyses of nuclear export signals in the NESdb database. Mol Biol Cell. 2012;23(18):3677–3693. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e12-01-0046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Xu D, Marquis K, Pei J, et al. LocNES: a computational tool for locating classical NESs in CRM1 cargo proteins. Bioinformatics. 2015;31(9):1357–1365. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kırlı K, Karaca S, Dehne HJ, et al. A deep proteomics perspective on CRM1-mediated nuclear export and nucleocytoplasmic partitioning. Elife. 2015;4:E11466. doi: 10.7554/eLife.11466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Okamura M, Inose H, Masuda S. RNA Export through the NPC in Eukaryotes. Genes (Basel) 2015;6(1):124–149. doi: 10.3390/genes6010124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Forbes DJ, Travesa A, Nord MS, Bernis C. Nuclear transport factors: global regulation of mitosis. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2015;35:78–90. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2015.04.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Prieto G, Fullaondo A, Rodríguez JA. Proteome-wide search for functional motifs altered in tumors: Prediction of nuclear export signals inactivated by cancer-related mutations. Sci Rep. 2016;6:25869. doi: 10.1038/srep25869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Lapalombella R, Sun Q, Williams K, et al. Selective inhibitors of nuclear export show that CRM1/XPO1 is a target in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood. 2012;120(23):4621–4634. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-05-429506. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Cosson A, Chapiro E, Bougacha N, et al. Gain in the short arm of chromosome 2 (2p+) induces gene overexpression and drug resistance in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: analysis of the central role of XPO1. Leukemia. 2017;31(7):1625–1629. doi: 10.1038/leu.2017.100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Walker JS, Garzon R, Lapalombella R. Selinexor for advanced hematologic malignancies. Leuk Lymphoma. 2020;61:2335. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2020.1775210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Hing ZA, Mantel R, Beckwith KA, et al. Selinexor is effective in acquired resistance to ibrutinib and synergizes with ibrutinib in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood. 2015;125(20):3128–3132. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-01-621391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Hing ZA, Fung HY, Ranganathan P, et al. Next-generation XPO1 inhibitor shows improved efficacy and in vivo tolerability in hematological malignancies. Leukemia. 2016;30(12):2364–2372. doi: 10.1038/leu.2016.136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Newton MKTI. XPOVIOTM (selinexor) tablets, for oral use [Package Insert].
- 49.Kalakonda N, Maerevoet M, Cavallo F, et al. Selinexor in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (SADAL): a single-arm, multinational, multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Haematol. 2020;7(7):e511–e522. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(20)30120-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Baumhardt JM, Walker JS, Lee Y, et al. Recognition of nuclear export signals by CRM1 carrying the oncogenic E571K mutation. Mol Biol Cell. 2020:mbcE20040233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 51.Giacopelli B, Zhao Q, Ruppert AS, et al. Developmental subtypes assessed by DNA methylation-iPLEX forecast the natural history of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood. 2019;134(8):688–698. doi: 10.1182/blood.2019000490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Oakes CC, Seifert M, Assenov Y, et al. DNA methylation dynamics during B cell maturation underlie a continuum of disease phenotypes in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Nat Genet. 2016;48(3):253–264. doi: 10.1038/ng.3488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Krämer A, Green J, Pollard J, Tugendreich S. Causal analysis approaches in Ingenuity Pathway Analysis. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(4):523–530. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Kim D, Paggi JM, Park C, Bennett C, Salzberg SL. Graph-based genome alignment and genotyping with HISAT2 and HISAT-genotype. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37(8):907–915. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0201-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Liao Y, Smyth GK, Shi W. featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(7):923–930. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Gadepalli VS, Ozer HG, Yilmaz AS, Pietrzak M, Webb A. BISR-RNAseq: an efficient and scalable RNAseq analysis workflow with interactive report generation. BMC Bioinf. 2019;20(Suppl 24):670. doi: 10.1186/s12859-019-3251-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Ritchie ME, Phipson B, Wu D, et al. limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(7):e47. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Walker LA, Sovic MG, Chiang CL, et al. CLEAR: coverage-based limiting-cell experiment analysis for RNA-seq. J Transl Med. 2020;18(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12967-020-02247-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Bolotin DA, Poslavsky S, Mitrophanov I, et al. MiXCR: software for comprehensive adaptive immunity profiling. Nat Methods. 2015;12(5):380–381. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Bichi R, Shinton SA, Martin ES, et al. Human chronic lymphocytic leukemia modeled in mouse by targeted TCL1 expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99(10):6955–6960. doi: 10.1073/pnas.102181599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Lucas F, Rogers KA, Harrington BK, et al. Eμ-TCL1xMyc: A Novel Mouse Model for Concurrent CLL and B-Cell Lymphoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25(20):6260–6273. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-0273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Minor W, Cymborowski M, Otwinowski Z, Chruszcz M. HKL-3000: the integration of data reduction and structure solution–from diffraction images to an initial model in minutes. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2006;62(Pt 8):859–866. doi: 10.1107/S0907444906019949. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Emsley P, Lohkamp B, Scott WG, Cowtan K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2010;66(Pt 4):486–501. doi: 10.1107/S0907444910007493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Chen VB, Arendall WB, Headd JJ, et al. MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2010;66(Pt 1):12–21. doi: 10.1107/S0907444909042073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Dong X, Biswas A, Süel KE, et al. Structural basis for leucine-rich nuclear export signal recognition by CRM1. Nature. 2009;458(7242):1136–1141. doi: 10.1038/nature07975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Monecke T, Güttler T, Neumann P, Dickmanns A, Görlich D, Ficner R. Crystal structure of the nuclear export receptor CRM1 in complex with Snurportin1 and RanGTP. Science. 2009;324(5930):1087–1091. doi: 10.1126/science.1173388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Camus V, Miloudi H, Taly A, Sola B, Jardin F. XPO1 in B cell hematological malignancies: from recurrent somatic mutations to targeted therapy. J Hematol Oncol. 2017;10(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s13045-017-0412-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Sutton LA, Ljungström V, Mansouri L, et al. Targeted next-generation sequencing in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a high-throughput yet tailored approach will facilitate implementation in a clinical setting. Haematologica. 2015;100(3):370–376. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2014.109777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Damle RN, Wasil T, Fais F, et al. Ig V gene mutation status and CD38 expression as novel prognostic indicators in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood. 1999;94(6):1840–1847. doi: 10.1182/blood.V94.6.1840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Hamblin TJ, Davis Z, Gardiner A, Oscier DG, Stevenson FK. Unmutated Ig V(H) genes are associated with a more aggressive form of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood. 1999;94(6):1848–1854. doi: 10.1182/blood.V94.6.1848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Hu B, Patel KP, Chen HC, et al. Routine sequencing in CLL has prognostic implications and provides new insight into pathogenesis and targeted treatments. Br J Haematol. 2019;185(5):852–864. doi: 10.1111/bjh.15877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Blachly JS, Ruppert AS, Zhao W, et al. Immunoglobulin transcript sequence and somatic hypermutation computation from unselected RNA-seq reads in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(14):4322–4327. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1503587112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Morse HC, Anver MR, Fredrickson TN, et al. Bethesda proposals for classification of lymphoid neoplasms in mice. Blood. 2002;100(1):246–258. doi: 10.1182/blood.V100.1.246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Yan XJ, Albesiano E, Zanesi N, et al. B cell receptors in TCL1 transgenic mice resemble those of aggressive, treatment-resistant human chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(31):11713–11718. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0604564103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Efanov A, Zanesi N, Nazaryan N, et al. CD5+CD23+ leukemic cell populations in TCL1 transgenic mice show significantly increased proliferation and Akt phosphorylation. Leukemia. 2010;24(5):970–975. doi: 10.1038/leu.2010.46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Hao X, Fredrickson TN, Chattopadhyay SK, et al. The histopathologic and molecular basis for the diagnosis of histiocytic sarcoma and histiocyte-associated lymphoma of mice. Vet Pathol. 2010;47(3):434–445. doi: 10.1177/0300985810363705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Van Neck T, Pannecouque C, Vanstreels E, Stevens M, Dehaen W, Daelemans D. Inhibition of the CRM1-mediated nucleocytoplasmic transport by N-azolylacrylates: structure-activity relationship and mechanism of action. Bioorg Med Chem. 2008;16(21):9487–9497. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2008.09.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Etchin J, Sun Q, Kentsis A, et al. Antileukemic activity of nuclear export inhibitors that spare normal hematopoietic cells. Leukemia. 2013;27(1):66–74. doi: 10.1038/leu.2012.219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Neggers JE, Vercruysse T, Jacquemyn M, et al. Identifying drug-target selectivity of small-molecule CRM1/XPO1 inhibitors by CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing. Chem Biol. 2015;22(1):107–116. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2014.11.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Chari A, Vogl DT, Gavriatopoulou M, et al. Oral Selinexor-Dexamethasone for Triple-Class Refractory Multiple Myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(8):727–738. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1903455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Calin GA, Dumitru CD, Shimizu M, et al. Frequent deletions and down-regulation of micro- RNA genes miR15 and miR16 at 13q14 in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99(24):15524–15529. doi: 10.1073/pnas.242606799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Klein U, Lia M, Crespo M, et al. The DLEU2/miR-15a/16-1 cluster controls B cell proliferation and its deletion leads to chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Cancer Cell. 2010;17(1):28–40. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.11.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Ouillette P, Erba H, Kujawski L, Kaminski M, Shedden K, Malek SN. Integrated genomic profiling of chronic lymphocytic leukemia identifies subtypes of deletion 13q14. Cancer Res. 2008;68(4):1012–1021. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-3105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Else M, Blakemore SJ, Strefford JC, Catovsky D. The Association between Deaths Due to Infection and Mutations of the BRAF, FBXW7, NRAS and XPO1 genes: A Report from the LRF CLL4 Trial [ABSTRACT]. American Society of Hematology. ASH Publications, 641.CLL: Biology and pathophysiology, excluding therapy. All-Virtual: Blood; 2020.
- 85.Abruzzo LV, Herling CD, Calin GA, et al. Trisomy 12 chronic lymphocytic leukemia expresses a unique set of activated and targetable pathways. Haematologica. 2018;103(12):2069–2078. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2018.190132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Jain P, Kanagal-Shamanna R, Wierda W, et al. Clinical and molecular characteristics of XPO1 mutations in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Am J Hematol. 2016;91(11):E478–E479. doi: 10.1002/ajh.24496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
RNA-sequencing data for human CLL subjects can be found here: GSE163370. Crystallography data can be found here: PDB codes 6XJP, 7L5E, 6XJT, 6XJR, 6XJS, 6XJU. Other raw datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.