Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2021 Jan 15;16(1):e0244694. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244694

Population dynamics of sugarcane borers, Diatraea spp., under different climatic scenarios in Colombia

Julián Andrés Valencia Arbeláez 1,*, Alberto Soto Giraldo 2,, Gabriel Jaime Castaño Villa 3,, Luis Fernando Vallejo Espinosa 2,, Melba Ruth Salazar Gutierrez 4,, Germán Vargas 5
Editor: Shamsuddin Shahid6
PMCID: PMC7810321  PMID: 33449921

Abstract

Seasonal temperature and precipitation patterns on a global scale are main factors to which insects and plants adapt through natural selection, although periodic outbreaks in insect populations may occur in areas where they had not been previously reported, a phenomenon considered as a consequence of global warming. In this study, we estimate the distribution of sugarcane borers, Diatraea spp., under different climate scenarios (rcp26, rcp45, rcp60 and rcp85.) Insects were collected weekly in four sugarcane fields from four different towns in the department of Caldas (Colombia) during 2017, and also in several sugarcane fields in the Cauca River Valley (CRV) between 2010 and 2017. The influence of climatic variables on different agro-ecological zones of the CRV sugarcane fields was defined by climatic data between 2010 and 2017 (maximum and minimum daily temperatures, and accumulated precipitation). The estimate of an optimal niche for Diatraea spp. includes temperatures between 20°C and 23°C, accumulated annual rainfall between 1200 and 1500 mm, dry months with precipitations below 50 mm, slopes of less than 0.05 degrees, crop heterogeneity with an index of 0.2 and primary production values of 1.0. Data suggests Diatraea population is considerably influenced by adverse climate change effects, under the premise of an increase in local and global temperatures, reducing its population niches as well as the number of individuals.

Introduction

The Earth's temperature has increased 1.8°C over the past 35 years and the last two decades have been among the warmest since temperatures began to be recorded. Since the early 80’s, tons of different crops have been lost annually due to global warming [1, 2]. In some cases, however, losses were compensated by higher yields achieved through genetically improved crops and other technological advances [3]. High seasonal temperatures may become widespread in some areas of Central and South America during the remainder of the century [4], and temperatures are estimated to increase by 0.4°C to 1.8°C by 2020, being more pronounced in tropical areas. High temperatures (especially when increases exceed 3°C) may significantly affect agricultural productivity, representing serious impact to commodity crops for food-insecure populations, with very negative scenarios for some crops more than for others [1, 5].

Increases in pest incidence have been observed in agricultural systems, associated with climate change events, such as prolonged droughts, hurricanes, heavy and out-of-season rains, among others. Changes in pest dynamics often pass unnoticed, overshadowed by human disasters caused by such climatic events. And yet, pest outbreaks contribute to incremental losses, forcing the use of pesticides that usually fail to solve the problem [6, 7].

Seasonal patterns of temperature and precipitation are known to be the main factors determining organisms distribution at a global scale [8, 9]. Insects and plants adapt to combinations of these factors through natural selection, although periodic outbreaks of insects have been documented to occur especially in physically stressed areas as a consequence of global warming [7]. Due to the response of insect populations to changes in local climate conditions, fluctuations in these populations may serve as indicators of local or global climate change [9]. Temperature may thus be regarded as the most important variable in insect response, considering its role on biochemical processes and the insect’s dependence on environmental temperature to thermoregulate, thereby affecting infestation dynamics [6, 911]. Infestation dynamics are more notorious with pronounced climate variability events such as El Niño and La Niña [4, 12, 13]. Consequently, the combination of these factors enables the development of agrometeorological indices to identify areas of greater and lower risk of climate variability, and the provision of regional recommendations for future climate variation events [14].

Monitoring studies with a bio-indicator of climate change can play a role in at least two main fronts: data collected can be used to predict climate change effects and long-term monitoring can detect changes in abundance and distribution, an important input in redirecting management strategies to establish appropriate control measures in advance. Additionally, data collection and monitoring constitute valuable sources of information on the effects of climate change in tropical latitudes, where information is insufficient.

The effects on biomass production and sucrose content [15] cause by species belonging to the Diatraea genus (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) are considered of great economic importance to sugarcane in the Americas. The damage caused by these sugarcane borers include destruction of buds in planting material; injury to seedlings, resulting in the so-called ‘dead heart’; and perforations to fully developed stalks, reducing internode growth and allowing the propagation of microorganisms that decrease sucrose content [16]. Even though a great number of studies on biology and integrated pest management are available, information is lacking on insect’s ecology and population dynamics, particularly in relation to climate change effects. To understand how climate change can affect sugarcane borers distribution, predictive inter- and intra-annual scale models were applied at the global, national and local scales, aiming to develop a framework to guide pest management decisions, thus reducing levels of uncertainty in the face of different climate scenarios.

Materials and methods

Insects were collected in western Colombia in the departments of Caldas, Risaralda and Valle del Cauca. In Caldas, insects were collected during 2017 from fields in four municipalities (Riosucio, Supía, Filadelfia, Neira and Manzanares); whereas in the departments of Risaralda and Valle del Cauca, samples were collected from 2010 to 2017 from different municipalities in what it is known as the Cauca River Valley (CRV), a region that extends from northern Cauca to southern Risaralda (Fig 1). Larvae were collected in each sugarcane plot by a uniform 2 man-hour sampling effort, following the linear distribution of crop rows. Larvae were then taken to the laboratory and identified following taxonomic keys [17]. In addition, this information was used in combination with the CABI—Invasive Species Compendium (www.cabi.org)–to increase data on distribution of Diatraea spp. and increasing modeling accuracy.

Fig 1. Cenicaña’s weather stations in the Cauca River Valley (CRV), Colombia.

Fig 1

Climate data (daily precipitation; maximum, minimum and daily temperatures) between 2010 and 2017 were obtained from the 37 weather stations of the Colombian Sugarcane Research Center (Centro de Investigación de la Caña de Azúcar de Colombia, Cenicaña) located across the CRV (Fig 1). The distribution map of the weather stations was generated by QGIS 3.6.1, according to coordinates of the different stations.

Missing weather data was generated using Marksim®, which provided daily scale weather data files (http://gismap.ciat.cgiar.org/MarkSimGCM/). At the same time, open-access weather portals were consulted such as WorldClim, from which 19 bioclimatic variables were collected on monthly rainfall and temperature [18]. The variance inflation factor (VIF) was calculated to analyze correlations between variables [19, 20], providing an index that measures the extent to which the variance (the square of the estimated standard deviation) increases due to the collinearity, which allows for discarding climatic variables that could generate noise through redundancy (Eq (1)).

VIFi=11Ri2 (1)

Where Ri2 is the determination coefficient of the regression equation

Following the VIF analysis, only 6 of the 19 variables provided by WorldClim were used, plus slope (topographic slope in degrees), slope-aspect (which is defined as the compass direction to which a slope faces measured in degrees), altitude (meters), vegetation index (VI), terrestrial primary production (TPP, gCm2 d1), and TH24 (topographic heterogeneity calculated for the 24 surrounding cells) [21, 22], and used along with those supplied within the ModestR® software (http://www.ipezes/ModestR) [23] (Table 1).

Table 1. WorldClim bioclimatic variables.

Code Variable
BIO1 Annual Mean Temperature
BIO8 Mean Temperature of Wettest Quarter
BIO12 Annual Precipitation
BIO13 Precipitation of Wettest Month
BIO14 Precipitation of Driest Month
BIO19 Precipitation of Coldest Quarter.
VI Normalized Vegetation Index
Slope Topographic slope (°)
Altitude Altitude (masl)
TH24 Topographical heterogeneity, 24 surrounding cells with A 5' x 5
PP Primary Production

The global climate model (GCM) BCC_CSM1 from the Beijing Climate Centre was used to test the climatic variables. The GCM is a fully coupled global climate and carbon model that includes the interactive vegetation and global carbon cycle, the oceanic component, the terrestrial component, and the sea-ice component. In addition, according to the Colombian Institute of Hydrology, Meteorology and Environmental Studies (Instituto de Hidrología, Meteorología y Estudios Ambientales, IDEAM) this model fits well Colombian meteorological conditions [24]. The exchange of atmospheric carbon with the terrestrial biosphere was calculated at each stage of the model (20 min) and representative concentration pathways (RCP) were used. These four paths of greenhouse gas concentration (not emissions), adopted by the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), are used to model climate by describing four possible future climate scenarios, based on the amount of greenhouse gas emissions projected for the coming years. These representative concentration pathways were referenced as rcp26, rcp45, rcp60 and rcp85 [25].

ModestR® was used to generate distribution maps and analyze the effect of climate variables on Diatraea spp. distribution. ModestR® is an R-based program that integrates a combination of statistics, maximum entropy and Bayesian methods to estimate probable distributions, subject to restrictions imposed by the environment [26, 27]. The model requires only presence-absence data, and uses continuous and categorical variables, incorporating interactions between different variables, allowing assessing the role of each environmental variable, while over-adjustment is avoided using regularizations. The output variable enables making distinctions among areas (only discrete distinctions however) and can be used in multiple applications and at all scales [28].

RWizard® was used to calculate the variable effects of richness, niche, and construction. The packages used were FactorsR, to identify factors affecting species richness; EnvNicheR, to estimate the niche of multiple species and environmental conditions favoring greater species richness; and SPEDInstabR, to obtain the relative importance of the factors that affect species distribution based on the concept of stability.

Results

Environmental layer

A global environmental layer was generated with each of the variables, using information from WorldClim (Fig 2) and a local layer with data from weather stations and Marksim®, to enhance the distribution model (Fig 3). The local layer contains variables BIO1, BIO8, BIO12, BIO13, BIO14, VI, Slope, Altitude, TH24 (with 5x5 cells and in current conditions) and PP. Presence maps for Diatraea spp. were generated at global, national and local scales (Fig 4).

Fig 2. Global-scale environmental layer using WorldClim.

Fig 2

Colors indicate the mixture of BIO1, BIO8, BIO12, BIO13, BIO14, VI, Slope, Altitude, TH24, PP for each zone in a range of 5'x5' cell resolution. Green indicates areas of potential presence of Diatraea spp. and blue indicates areas whose environmental conditions do not guarantee insect´s life cycle.

Fig 3. Environmental layer for Caldas department, Colombia.

Fig 3

Range of 5'x5' cell resolution. Dots indicate records of Diatraea spp. Areas in green, red or yellow have a high probability of having presence of Diatraea spp. Other colors indicate areas where the insect could be present, but with smaller populations.

Fig 4. Presence points of Diatraea spp. at different scales.

Fig 4

a) Western Hemisphere, b) Colombia and c) Department of Caldas. Dots indicate records of presence.

Variable contribution

The effect of environmental variables on Diatraea spp. distribution shows direct incidence of BIO12, VI, BIO19, PP, Slope and BIO1. Although temperature is considered a main factor affecting insect physiology, precipitation and its association with cloudy conditions can alter navigation in the nocturnal adult stage, thus becoming a determining factor in movement and distribution in a given range. Food availability throughout the year and the type of topography are also definite limiting factors. In this analysis altitude did not show up as a limiting factor for pest distribution (Fig 5).

Fig 5. Percentage contribution of environmental variables to Diatraea spp. distribution.

Fig 5

Optimum niche

The analysis of optimal niche estimates indicated that Diatraea spp. may express their maximum adaptive potential under temperatures between 20°C and 23°C, accumulated annual rainfall between 1200 and 1500 mm, dry months with precipitations below 50 mm, slopes below 0.05 degrees, crop heterogeneity with an index of 0.2 and primary production values of 1.0. These conditions are similar to those present throughout the year in the CRV and the areas sampled in the department of Caldas. It is noteworthy that the ranges obtained here may have a greater or lesser amplitude for each environmental variable, facilitating the mobilization of pest populations towards areas different from those originally occupied (Fig 6).

Fig 6. Estimate of an optimum niche for the establishment of Diatraea spp.

Fig 6

In the model, quartiles indicate areas with environmental conditions favorable for development of Diatraea spp., with those under 50% representing optimum conditions.

Diatraea spp. richness

The most notable differences among sites, determining flora and fauna distribution, were related to soil conditions, topography, altitude, ambient temperature and rainfall. The matrix analyzed here identified factors and their relative contribution to species richness. The negative effect of anthropogenic factors such as primary production (PP) and vegetation index (VI)—even without taking into account effects associated with pest management that were not considered here—reduced species richness in several potential areas (Fig 7). Polar Coordinates (Eq 2) suggest high probability of Diatraea spp. dispersion associated to precipitation and slope as the determinant environmental factors in the movement of adults to colonize new areas (Fig 7).

Fig 7. Polar coordinates to evaluate the importance of environmental variables in the distribution of Diatraea spp.

Fig 7

BIO1, BIO8, BIO10, BIO12, BIO12, VI, PP, BIO13 and TH24.

xn+1=xn+sin(anglexdistance)yn+1=yn+cos(anglexdistance) (2)

Distribution maps

Indications of a possible reduction in the number of niches and therefore in the population of Diatraea spp. are given by the BCC-CSM1-1 climate change model, projected for a period of 50 years, under the premise of an increase in CO2 and greenhouse gas concentrations, at the same time that Earth temperatures increase, impacting life cycles and dispersion due to meteorological alterations and changes in the ecosystems (Fig 8). The impact is greater when effects are projected over 70 years, and where CO2 and greenhouse gas concentrations are projected to increase global temperature by as much as 1°C. The estimate is that under these conditions, Diatraea spp. populations would be reduced by 50% in their current and potential niches (Fig 9).

Fig 8. Distribution of Diatraea spp. in the Western Hemisphere under different climate change (BCC-CSM1-1) and carbon concentration projections over 50 years.

Fig 8

a) current condition, b) rcp26, c) rcp45, d) rcp60, e) rcp85. Color indicates maximum or minimum presence in a likely niche and under favorable conditions.

Fig 9. Distribution of Diatraea spp. in the Western Hemisphere under different climate change (BCC-CSM1-1) and carbon concentration projections over 70 years.

Fig 9

a) current condition, b) rcp26, c) rcp45, d) rcp60, e) rcp85. Color indicates maximum or minimum presence in a likely niche and under favorable conditions.

In Colombia, climate change is expected to affect the dispersion of Diatraea spp. populations, forcing populations to concentrate in western Colombia and the Caribbean, and changing pest distribution (currently predominant in southern, central and western parts of the country). Niche decrease may be greater than 50%, when the climate change model is projected over a 50-year period (Fig 10). It is important to note that even though the Diatraea pest complex is a well-recognized sugarcane pest, it is also found in corn, rice, sorghum and some forage grasses [17]. In addition, models of maximum entropy and climate change show reductions of more than 70% in pest populations as a result of changes in water regimes and winds, radically changing climate dynamics at different scales (macro, meso and micro) (Fig 11). The three departments analyzed (Caldas, Risaralda and Valle del Cauca) in western Colombia exhibit a notorious reduction of niches and consequently of populations, but sustain current presence of the insect’s populations in some areas. The highest concentration and production of sugarcane in the country is located in the CRV. Therefore, it is very likely that this region will sustain resources (i.e., plants to feed upon) for Diatraea busckella populations to prosper during and beyond the next 50 years (Fig 12).

Fig 10. Distribution of Diatraea spp. in Colombia under different climate change (BCC-CSM1-1) and carbon concentration projections over 50 years.

Fig 10

a) current condition, b) rcp26, c) rcp45, d) rcp60, e) rcp85. Color indicates maximum or minimum presence in a likely niche and under favorable conditions.

Fig 11. Distribution of Diatraea spp. in Colombia under different climate change (BCC-CSM1-1) and carbon concentration projections over 70 years.

Fig 11

a) current condition, b) rcp26, c) rcp45, d) rcp60, e) rcp85. The color chart indicates maximum or minimum presence in a likely niche under favorable conditions.

Fig 12. Distribution of Diatraea busckella under different climate change projections (BCC-CSM1-1) over 50 years in the departments of Caldas (top), Risaralda (middle) and Valle del Cauca (bottom) in southwestern Colombia.

Fig 12

a) current condition, b) rcp26, c) rcp45, d) rcp60, e) rcp85. Color indicates maximum or minimum presence in a likely niche and under favorable conditions.

Discussion

Climate data is widely used to model potential geographic species distribution [29, 30] as it allows the use of a greater number of historical records on the target species and does not present inconsistencies between records and shapes used to model. In this way, temporal shapes—such as vegetation, whose correspondence with target species would require updated information on the temporal availability of that shape—can be substituted.

The broadening of Geographic Information Systems and the growth of applied statistical techniques have allowed the expansion of tools for spatial analysis and species distribution studies [3136]. Species distribution models are not only useful to evaluate possible effects of environmental factors on natural ecosystems, but also on agricultural ones, as well as to highlight possible population changes on different species commonly associated to these areas, anticipating pest outbreaks and/or new colonizers.

Initial models described the relationship between climatic phenomena, insect distribution and behavior through linear relationships [3744], assuming the area under the curve as a good representation of the relation between developmental rate and temperature, as in the case of asymmetric, exponential and logistic models [4547]. In studies on Diatraea saccharalis F. spatial distribution, in order to propose changes in scouting [48], data was adjusted by Poisson distribution, assuming that all individuals have the same probability of occupying a place in any given space [12], but also using negative binomial distribution, in which occurrence of individuals limits the presence of others [49]. In our case linear and maximum entropy models were used [5056] to improve estimates on minimum developmental threshold.

Descriptions of current exotic flora and fauna of Great Britain reflect a small subset of resident species in climatologically comparable regions for which important links were established [57, 58]. Therefore, the way in which climate change can influence future pathways for possible exotic species needs to be understood, considering that natural dynamics can also be affected by global warming due to alterations in the accumulation of day-grades for each physiological process.

Given its tropical location, Colombia is affected by patterns of either bimodal (Andean region) or unimodal rainfall patterns (eastern Colombia), when El Niño or La Niña conditions are not present [59]. These patterns determine insect distribution and environmentally-optimal zones for population development. Invertebrates are particularly sensitive to climatic conditions, and parameters such as temperature, precipitation, relative humidity and soil moisture are useful in predicting important events in the growth of pest populations [13, 60].

Our analysis suggests that Diatraea species can colonize new areas, specifically during the drier months, when precipitation is not a limiting factor for adult distribution, and when threshold temperatures (ranging from 18 to 26°C) guarantee full development and determine successful establishment as food availability is assured (i.e., sugarcane grown all year round). In this regard and associated with climate change, changes have been determined in pest profiles in South Australia [61], changes in the distribution of aphid flights have been noted across Europe [62], and a destabilization of the tea moth Adoxophyes honmai Yasuda (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) outbreak cycles in Japan has been highlighted [63]; demonstrating that due to their rapid development arthropods are essential to underscore climate changes environmental impacts at a global scale.

The main expectation concerning recent and projected global climate variability scenarios will influence the likelihood of species improving the use of available thermal energy for growth and reproduction. Our analysis of Diatraea species distribution shows a possible reduction in the number of niches and therefore in the populations of Diatraea spp. at a global, national and regional scales, with greater impacts when effects are projected over 70 years. In agreement to what we found in the Diatraea case, the distribution of the three Penthaleus species (Acari: Penthaleidae) in Australia is correlated with different climate variables and suitable climatic conditions are likely to decrease in the future [64]; but in general positive associations between climate change and pests increases have been reported; such as the expectation of generalized increases in fungal, plant and arthropod communities in Great Britain [65]; the expansion of the suitable habitat area for the Colorado potato beetle Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) and the European corn borer Ostrinia nubilalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) in central Europe [66]; risks of additional generations of the apple moth Cydia pomonella (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in Switzerland [67]; and invasive populations of the African fig fly Zaprionus indianus (Diptera: Drosophilidae) colonizing India, after latitudinal clones of rapid adaptation [68]. In general, changes in phenology and voltinism will require a change in plant protection strategies but, as illustrated in our work, this will depend on the system under study and the conditions, which may benefit some species but be deleterious for others.

Concluding remarks

Species distribution models, based on statistical and cartographic procedures plus real presence data, have become a tool for analysis of organisms spatial patterns, making it possible to infer potentially suitable areas based on favorable environmental conditions. In this sense, data from natural history collections acquires a new use. Information about species distribution is increasingly important for a wide range of aspects of decision support and management tactics, such as biodiversity studies, species protection, species reintroduction, exotic species, prediction of potential effects of ecosystem loss or global climate change, etc. Such information is crucial in constructing species distribution models, as deficiencies in data quality lead to uncertainty in such models.

Diatraea spp. is strongly influenced by the effects of climate change, not only at a global and regional scale, but also at the local scale. Under the environmental models evaluated for the next 50 to 70 years, climate change will reduce the species’ population niches as well as the number of individuals, with reductions that may exceed 70% in comparison to current records. An optimal niche for the Diatraea species is estimated to require temperatures between 20°C and 23°C, accumulated annual rainfall between 1200 and 1500 mm, dry months with precipitations below 50 mm, slopes below 0.05 degrees, crop heterogeneity with an index of 0.2 and primary production values of 1.0. These conditions are similar to those present throughout the year in the CRV and the municipalities sampled in the Caldas department.

The present research allows us to give a future approximation on the incidence of a pest complex that is a mayor limiting factor for sugarcane production, but that also uses alternate hosts such as rice, corn and other gramineous plants. The species may be present during global warming scenarios, with reduced populations, but remaining in currently inhabited spaces and colonizing new places, where conditions are optimal for development. The development of these models is intended to feed support systems for decision-making and reduce the levels of uncertainty when looking for new management and pest control practices and for establishing new sugarcane projects in the country.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their appreciation to the Colombian Sugarcane Research Center (CENICAÑA) for its valuable contribution and collaboration in the supply, development, and analysis of information; to the BEKDAU Center for Research, Innovation and Technology of the sugarcane sector in the Caldas Department for contributing significantly to the development and execution of the project; and to Washington State University (WSU) for its guidance in the development and analysis of each of the parameters evaluated. We also thank Alexandra Walter for valuable editorial assistance.

Data Availability

All files are available from the OSF database (https://osf.io/ms39c/).

Funding Statement

The Colombian Institute for the Development of Science and Technology (COLCIENCIAS) provided funding for this study through grant program number 647. The Colombian Sugarcane Research Center (Centro de Investigación de la Caña de Azúcar de Colombia, Cenicaña) provided support for this study in the form of use of infrastructure and laboratories.

References

  • 1.Peng S, Huan J, Sheehy JE, Laza RC, Visperas RM, Zhong X, et al. Rice yields decline with higher night temperature from global warming. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004; 101:9971–9975. 10.1073/pnas.0403720101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lobell DB, Field CB. Global scale climate–crop yield relationships and the impacts of recent warming. Environ Res Lett. 2:1 2007; 10.1088/1748-9326/2/1/014002 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Foley JA, Ramankutty N, Brauman KA, Cassidy ES, Gerber JS, Johnston M, et al. Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature. 2011; 478:337–42. 10.1038/nature10452 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Battisti DS, Naylor RL. Historical warnings of future food insecurity with unprecedented seasonal heat. Science. 2009; 323:240–44. 10.1126/science.1164363 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Nelson G, Rosegrant M, Palazzo A, Gray I, Ingersoll C, Robertson R, et al. Climate change: Impact on Agriculture and Costs of Adaptation and Food Security, Farming, and Climate Change to 2050 Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute; 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Estay P. Uso de grados día, eficaz herramienta en la prevención de plagas Chile: INIA; 2009. p. 14. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Vázquez L. Cambio climático, incidencia de plagas y prácticas agroecológicas resilientes. Instituto de investigaciones de sanidad vegetal, la Habana In: Ríos H, Vargas D, F Funes-Monzote, compilers; Innovación agroecológica, adaptación y mitigación del cambio climático. La Habana: Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Agrícolas (INCA); 2011. p. 242. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Birch LC. The intrinsic rate of natural increase of an insect population. J Anim Ecol. 1948; 17:15–26. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Marco V. Modelación de la tasa de desarrollo de insectos en función de la temperatura. Aplicación al manejo integrado de plagas mediante el método de grados-días. Aracnet (Bol. S.E.A.). 2001; 7(28):147–150. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jaramillo A, Arcila J. Avances técnicos. No. 390: Variabilidad climática en la zona cafetera colombiana asociada al evento de El Niño y su efecto en la caficultura Chinchiná: Cenicafé; 2009. p. 8. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wagner T, Hsin-I W, Sharpe P, Schoolfield R, Coulson R. Modeling insect development rates: A Literature Review and Application of a Biophysical Model. Ann Entomol Soc Am. 29 February 1984, 77(2):208–225. 10.1093/aesa/77.2.208208-220 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Barbosa JC, Perecin D. Modelos probabilísticos para distribuições de lagartas de Spodoptera frugiperda (Smith, 1797) na cultura do milho. Científica, São Paulo. 1982; v.10, n. 2, p. 181–191. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Chen C, Xia QW, Fu S, Wu XF, Xue FS. Effect of photoperiod and temperature on the intensity of pupal diapause in the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Bull. Entomol. Res. 2014; 104, 12–18. 10.1017/S0007485313000266 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Muñoz LG. Caficultura climáticamente inteligente. LXXVI. Congreso Nacional de Cafeteros. Informe del gerente general Bogotá: FNC; 2012. p. 148 [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lange C, Scott K, Graham M, Sallam M, Allsopp P. Sugarcane moth borers (Lepidoptera; Noctuidae and Pyraloidea): phylogenetics constructed using COII and 16S mitochondrial partial gene sequences. Bull Entomol Res, 2004; 94:5 Available from: pp. 457–464 10.1079/ber2004320 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Vargas G, Gómez L, Michaud J. Sugarcane stem borers of the Colombian Cauca River Valley: pest status, biology and control. Fla Entomol. 2015; 98:728–735. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Solis M, Metz M. An illustrated guide to the identification of the known species of Diatraea guilding (Lepidoptera: Crambidae: Crambinae) based on genitalia. ZooKeys. 2016; 565, 73–121. 10.3897/zookeys.565.6797 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hijmans R, Cameron S, Parra J, Jones P, Jarvis A. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol. 2005; 25:1965–1978. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Estrada-Peña A, Estrada-Sánchez A, Estrada-Sánchez D, de la Fuente J. Assessing the effects of variables and background selection on the capture of the tick climate niche. Int J Health Geogr. 2013; 12:43 10.1186/1476-072X-12-43 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Pradhan P. Strengthening MaxEnt modelling through screening of redundant explanatory bioclimatic variables with variance inflation factor analysis. Researcher. 2016; 8(5). [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Larkin D, Smith G, Zedler J. Topographic heterogeneity theory and ecological restoration In: Falk DA, Palmer MA, Zedler JB, editors. Foundations of restoration ecology. Washington DC: Society for Ecological Restoration International; 2006. pp. 142–164. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zhang C, Quan Q, Wu Y, Chen Y, He P, Qu Y, et al. Topographic heterogeneity and temperature amplitude explain species richness patterns of birds in the Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau. Curr Zool. 2017; 63:2:131–137. 10.1093/cz/zow024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Pelayo P, Guisande C, Vari R, Manjarrés A, García E, González J, et al. Global diversity patterns of freshwater fishes: potential victims of their own success. Divers Distrib. 2015; 21:345–356. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Rodríguez A. Evaluación de los modelos globales del clima utilizandos para la generación de escenarios de cambio climático con el clima presente en Colombia Nota Técnica, Bogotá: IDEAM–METEO/147-2012; 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wu T, Li W, Ji J, Xin X. The 20th century global carbon cycle from the Beijing Climate Center Climate System Model (BCC_CSM). Submitted to J. Climate; 2012 [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Elith J, Phillips S, Hastie T, Dudik M, Chee Y, Yates C. A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists. Diversity and Distributions. 2011; 17, 43–57 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00725.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Phillips S, Dudik M. Modeling of species distributions with MaxEnt: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography. 2008; 31: 161–175. 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2008.5203.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Edelstein JD, Bartó CA, Trumper EV. ARTROPOB: sistema de simulación de dinámica poblacional y manejo de artrópodos plaga Córdoba: Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), EEA Manfredi; 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Rojas O, Sosa V, Ornelas J. Forecasting cloud forest in eastern and southern Mexico: conservation insights under future climate change scenarios. Biodiversity and Conservation. 2012; 21(10):2671–2690. 10.1007/s10531-012-0327-x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mateo G, Vanderpoorten A, Muñoz J, Laenen B, Désamoré A. Modeling species distributions from heterogeneous data for the biogeographic regionalization of the European bryophyte flora. PLoS One. 2013; 8:1–11. 10.1371/journal.pone.0055648 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Franklin J. Predictive vegetation mapping: Geographic modelling of biospatial patterns in relation to enviromental gradients. Prog Phys Geogr. 1995; 19:474–499. 10.1177/030913339501900403 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Guisan A, Zimmermann N. Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecol Modell. 5 December 2000; 135:2–3:147–186. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Rushton S, Ormerod S, Kerby G. New paradigms for modelling species distributions? J Appl Ecol. 2004; 41:193–200. 10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00903.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Foody GM. GIS: Biodiversity applications. Prog Phys Geogr. 2008; 32:223–235. 10.1177/0309133308094656 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Swenson N. The past and future influence of geographic information systems on hybrid zone, phylogeographic and speciation research. Int J Evol Biol. 2008; 21(2):421–434. 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01487.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Mateo R, Felicísimo A, Jesús Muñoz J. Modelos de distribución de especies: Una revisión sintética. Rev Chil Hist Nat. 2011; 84:217–240. 10.4067/S0716-078X2011000200008 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Candolle AP. Géographie botanique raisonnée; ou, Exposition des faits principaux et des lois concernant la distribution géographique des plantes de l'epoque actuelle Paris: V. Masson; 1855. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Reibisch J. Über den Einfluss der temperatur auf die Entwicklung von fischeiern. Wiss Meeresuntersuch. 1902; 2:213–231. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Sanderson ED, Peairs LM. The relation of temperature to insect life. N.H. Coll. Agric. Exp. Stn. Tech. Bull. 1913;7. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Arnold CY. Maximum-minimum temperatures as a basis for computing heat units. Proc Am Soc Hort Sci. 1960; 76:682–692. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Baskerville GL, Emin P. Rapid estimation of heat acumulation from maximum and minimum temperatures. Ecology. 1969; 50:514–517. Available from: 10.2307/1933912 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Abrami G. Optimum mean temperature for a plant growth calculated by a new method of summation. Ecology. 1972;53:893–900. 10.2307/1934305 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Allen PM. Evolution, population dynamics, and stability. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. March 1, 1976; 73 (3):665–668. 10.1073/pnas.73.3.665 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Sevacherian V, Stern VM, Mueller AJ. Heat accumulation for timing Lygus control measures on a safflower-cotton complex. J Econ Entomol. 1977; 70(4):399–402. 10.1093/jee/70.4.399 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Belehradek J. Temperature and living matter Protoplasma Monogr. 8 Berlín: Verlag Gebrüder Brontraeger; 1935. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Davidson J. On the relationship between temperature and rate of development of insect at constant temperatures. J Anim Ecol. 1944; 64:26–38. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Janisch E. Über die Temperaturabhängigkeit biologischer Vorgange und ihre Kurvenmassige Analyse. Pfluger's Archiv. Ges. Physiol. 1925; 209:414–436. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Carvalho J. Distribuição espacial e amostragem sequencial de Diatraea saccharalis (Fabricius, 1794) (Lepidoptera: Crambidae), na cultura de cana-de-açúcar xv, 61 f. Tese (doutorado)—Universidade Estadual Paulista, Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias; 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Perecin D, Barbosa JC. Amostragem e análise estatística de dados de distribuição de contágio. Revista de Matemática e Estatística, Jaboticabal. 1992; 10:207–216. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Sharpe P, DeMichele D. Reaction kinetics of poikilotherm development. J Theor Biol. 1977. February 21;64(4):649–70. 10.1016/0022-5193(77)90265-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Hilbert D, Logan J. Empirical model of nymphal development for the migratory grasshopper, Melanopus sanguinipes (Orthoptera, Acrididae). Environ Entomol. 1 February 1983; 12:1–5. 10.1093/ee/12.1.1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Lactin DJ, Holliday NJ, Johnson DL, Craigen R. An improved rate model of temperature-dependent development by arthropods. Environ Entomol. 1995; 24(1):68–75. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Briere JF, Pracros P, Le Roux AY, Pierre, JS. A novel rate model of temperature-dependent development for arthropods. Environ Entomol. 1999; 28(1):22–29. 10.1093/ee/28.1.22 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol Modell. 2006; 190(3–4):231–259. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ar. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Romo H, Sanabria P, García E. Predicción de los impactos del cambio climático en la distribución sobre las especies de Lepidoptera. El caso del género Boloria Moore, 1900 en la Península Ibérica (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). SHILAP Soc Hispano Luso Am Lepid. 2013; 41(162):267–286. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Pérez B, Liria J. Modelos de nicho ecológico fundamental para especies del género Thraulodes (Ephemeroptera: Leptophlebiidae: Atalophlebiinae). Rev Mex Biodivers. 2013; 84(2):600–611. 10.7550/rmb.32234. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Hulme P, Bacher S, Kenis M, Klotz S, Kuhn I, Minchin D, et al. Grasping at the routes of biological invasions: a framework for integrating pathways into policy. J Appl Ecol. 2008; 45:403–414. 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01442.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Roy H, Bacon J, Beckmann B, Harrower C, Hill M, Isaac N, et al. Non-native species in Great Britain: establishment, detection and reporting to inform effective decision making London: Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs; 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Jaramillo A, Ramírez V, Arcila J. Patrones de distribución de la lluvia en la zona cafetera Avance técnico Cenicafé; 2011; 411 12p. ISNN-0120-0178 [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Klapwijk M, Ayres M; Battisti A; Larsson S. Assessing the impact of climate change on outbreak potential In: Barbosa P, Letourneau DK, Agrawal AA, editors. Insect outbreaks revisited. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2012. pp. 429–450. [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Hullé M, Coeur d’Acier AC, Bankhead-Dromet S, Harrington RA. Aphids in the face of global changes. Compt Rend Biol. 2010; 333:497–503. 10.1016/j.crvi.2010.03.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Hoffmann A, Weeks A, Nash M, Mangano G, Umina P. The changing status of invertebrate pests and the future of pest management in the Australian grains industry. Aust J Exp Agric. 2008; 48(12):1481–1493. 10.1071/ea08185 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Nelson W, Bjørnstad O, Yamanaka T. Recurrent insect outbreaks caused by temperature-driven changes in system stability. Science. 2013. August 16;341(6147):796–9. 10.1126/science.1238477 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Hill MP, Hoffmann AA, McColl SA, Umina PA. Distribution of cryptic blue oat mite species in Australia: current and future climate conditions. Agric For Entomol. 2011; 14:127–137. 10.1111/j.1461-9563.2011.00544.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Hulme P. Climate change and biological invasions: evidence, expectations, and response options. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2016; 1 10.1111/brv.12156 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Kocmankova E, Trnka M, Eitzinger J, Dubrovsky M, Stepanek P, Semeradova D, et al. Estimating the impact of climate change on the occurrence of selected pests at a high spatial resolution: a novel approach. J Agric Sci. 2011; 149(2):185–195. 10.1017/S002185961000114 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Stoeckli S, Hirschi M, Spirig C, Calanca P, Rotach M, Samietz J. Impact of climate change on voltinism and prospective diapause induction of a global pest insect-Cydia pomonella (L.). PLoS One. 2012; 7, e35723 10.1371/journal.pone.0035723 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Gibert P, Hill M, Pascual M, Plantamp C, Terblanche JS, Yassin A, et al. Drosophila as models to understand the adaptive process during invasion. Biol Invasions. 2016; 18:1089–1103. 10.1007/s10530-016-1087-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Shamsuddin Shahid

13 Aug 2020

PONE-D-20-18805

POPULATION DYNAMICS OF Diatraea spp. UNDER DIFFERENT CLIMATE OFFER CONDITIONS IN COLOMBIA.

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Valencia Arbeláez,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Sep 27 2020 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Shamsuddin Shahid

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments:

Both the reviewers think the paper is interesting. But both of them asked for more description of methods and justification of the data and methods used in the study. I also believe that significant improvement in description of methods is required.

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We suggest you thoroughly copyedit your manuscript for language usage, spelling, and grammar. If you do not know anyone who can help you do this, you may wish to consider employing a professional scientific editing service.  

Whilst you may use any professional scientific editing service of your choice, PLOS has partnered with both American Journal Experts (AJE) and Editage to provide discounted services to PLOS authors. Both organizations have experience helping authors meet PLOS guidelines and can provide language editing, translation, manuscript formatting, and figure formatting to ensure your manuscript meets our submission guidelines. To take advantage of our partnership with AJE, visit the AJE website (http://learn.aje.com/plos/) for a 15% discount off AJE services. To take advantage of our partnership with Editage, visit the Editage website (www.editage.com) and enter referral code PLOSEDIT for a 15% discount off Editage services.  If the PLOS editorial team finds any language issues in text that either AJE or Editage has edited, the service provider will re-edit the text for free.

Upon resubmission, please provide the following:

  • The name of the colleague or the details of the professional service that edited your manuscript

  • A copy of your manuscript showing your changes by either highlighting them or using track changes (uploaded as a *supporting information* file)

  • A clean copy of the edited manuscript (uploaded as the new *manuscript* file)

3. During your revisions, please note that a simple title correction is required: to follow correct English language usage, the title should read"Population dynamics of Diatraea spp. under different climate scenarios in Colombia". Please ensure this is updated in the manuscript file and the online submission information.

4. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure:

"Unfunded studies"

At this time, please address the following queries:

  1. Please clarify the sources of funding (financial or material support) for your study. List the grants or organizations that supported your study, including funding received from your institution.

  2. State what role the funders took in the study. If the funders had no role in your study, please state: “The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.”

  3. If any authors received a salary from any of your funders, please state which authors and which funders.

  4. If you did not receive any funding for this study, please state: “The authors received no specific funding for this work.”

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

5. We note that you have stated that you will provide repository information for your data at acceptance. Should your manuscript be accepted for publication, we will hold it until you provide the relevant accession numbers or DOIs necessary to access your data. If you wish to make changes to your Data Availability statement, please describe these changes in your cover letter and we will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide.

6. We note that Figures in your submission contain map images which may be copyrighted. All PLOS content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and Supporting Information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution. For these reasons, we cannot publish previously copyrighted maps or satellite images created using proprietary data, such as Google software (Google Maps, Street View, and Earth). For more information, see our copyright guidelines: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses-and-copyright.

We require you to either (1) present written permission from the copyright holder to publish these figures specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license, or (2) remove the figures from your submission:

6.1.    You may seek permission from the original copyright holder of Figures to publish the content specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license. 

We recommend that you contact the original copyright holder with the Content Permission Form (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=7c09/content-permission-form.pdf) and the following text:

“I request permission for the open-access journal PLOS ONE to publish XXX under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Please be aware that this license allows unrestricted use and distribution, even commercially, by third parties. Please reply and provide explicit written permission to publish XXX under a CC BY license and complete the attached form.”

Please upload the completed Content Permission Form or other proof of granted permissions as an "Other" file with your submission.

In the figure caption of the copyrighted figure, please include the following text: “Reprinted from [ref] under a CC BY license, with permission from [name of publisher], original copyright [original copyright year].”

6.2.    If you are unable to obtain permission from the original copyright holder to publish these figures under the CC BY 4.0 license or if the copyright holder’s requirements are incompatible with the CC BY 4.0 license, please either i) remove the figure or ii) supply a replacement figure that complies with the CC BY 4.0 license. Please check copyright information on all replacement figures and update the figure caption with source information. If applicable, please specify in the figure caption text when a figure is similar but not identical to the original image and is therefore for illustrative purposes only.

The following resources for replacing copyrighted map figures may be helpful:

USGS National Map Viewer (public domain): http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/

The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth (public domain): http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/sseop/clickmap/

Maps at the CIA (public domain): https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html and https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/cia-maps-publications/index.html

NASA Earth Observatory (public domain): http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/

Landsat: http://landsat.visibleearth.nasa.gov/

USGS EROS (Earth Resources Observatory and Science (EROS) Center) (public domain): http://eros.usgs.gov/#

Natural Earth (public domain): http://www.naturalearthdata.com/

7. Please upload copies of Figures 7-12, to which you refer in your text. If the figures are no longer to be included as part of the submission please remove all reference to them within the text.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Comments for Authors

The manuscript “population dynamics of Diatraea spp. under different climate offer

conditions in Colombia” present an interesting study on how climate change is expected to affect the distribution of sugar cane stem borers, Diatraea spp. The manuscript is well structured and nicely presented. However, I have some observations and comments for the authors as follows.

Abstract

Authors should mention for which scenarios the study was conducted for.

Authors should include more key findings from the study in the abstract.

Introduction

1. The Earth's temperature increased between 0. 7°C from 1900, 1. 3°C from 1950 and 1. 8°C

over the past 35 years. This sentence should be rephrased for better understanding for readers.

2. Many of the sentences in this section are too long; authors should make them shorter or split them.

Materials and Methods

1. Change ‘The climate change model’ to ‘The global climate model (GCM)’

2. Why was this BCC_CSM1 chosen?

3. Change (CPR) to (RCP)

4. Change ‘depending on the number’ to ‘depending on the amount’

5. Remove ‘it’ in the sentence: MODESTR®, like MAXENT®, (Elith et al., 2011, Phillips and Dudik, 2008) it

6. Authors should split the paragraph that started with: To generate the distribution maps and to see the effect for each variable in the distribution of Diatraea spp., MODESTR® (http://www.ipezes/ModestR)..........

Results

1. Why are legends not given in the Figures in the results?

2. Authors should label the axis of Figure 5.

3. Label axis of Figure 6.

4. The authors mentioned anthropogenic factors affecting the Diatraea spp. Under the section: Factors affecting Diatraea spp. Richness. Are there other anthropogenic factors aside from the primary production (PP) and vegetation index e.g. does factors such as pest control affect them?

5. Under section distribution maps: Change this word ‘affection’ to ‘impaction’

6. From section 3.4 authors should check the figure numberings and correct them.

Other comments

Authors should include lines numbering in manuscript the next times

There are grammatical and typographical errors in the manuscript. Authors should check and correct for these.

Reviewer #2: POPULATION DYNAMICS OF Diatraea spp. UNDER DIFFERENT CLIMATE OFFER CONDITIONS IN COLOMBIA.

The authors applied for the first time a species distribution modelling approach to study Diatraea species. They estimated potential distributions and niche overlap using modelling software. Results suggests

that these species could be affected by climate change and that they have distinct ecological niches. They propose SDMs as a cost-effective tool to explore ecological and biological limits of non-model species and inform management decisions on environmental issues like climate change.

The study is overall interesting and extends our understanding of ecology and biology of insect populations. The proposed approach could be useful for other studies focusing on the impact of climate change on species distribution and their conservation/management. However, some conceptual and methodological details are not fully clear, and several

points need to be elucidated. Please find additional details in the specific comments below.

Abstract: Describe more generally your results and conclusion.

figures could benefit from a shorter title.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Saeed Mohammadi

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Comments for Authors.docx

Attachment

Submitted filename: PONE-D-20-18805_reviewer-1.pdf

PLoS One. 2021 Jan 15;16(1):e0244694. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244694.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


25 Nov 2020

PlosOne

Response to Reviewers

Journal Requirements

Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming.

PLOS ONES´s style requirements have been included

We suggest you thoroughly copyedit your manuscript for language usage, spelling, and grammar. If you do not know anyone who can help you do this, you may wish to consider employing a professional scientific editing service.

We hired Alexandra Walter, a professional Spanish-English translator with 30 years of experience with scientific publications at the International Center for Tropical Agriculture in Colombia - CIAT. Alexandra retired from CIAT in 2008 and works as a freelance editor.

We note that Figures in your submission contain map images which may be copyrighted. All PLOS content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and Supporting Information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution. For these reasons, we cannot publish previously copyrighted maps or satellite images created using proprietary data, such as Google software (Google Maps, Street View, and Earth). For more information, see our copyright guidelines: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses-and-copyright.

We used ModestR to design the maps, so they are original and not previously copyrighted. Fig 1 is a free available figure from the Cenicaña´s webpage whose source is accordingly cited.

Please provide a direct link to the source of the replacement map in Figure 1.

The distribution map of the weather stations was generated by QGIS 3.6.1, according to coordinates of the different stations. As the map was made using free software, there is no direct link to share.

We note that your Financial Disclosure statement is currently as follows: "Unfunded studies".

The Project was funded through resources from by the Colombian Institute for the Development of Science and Technology (COLCIENCIAS) by grant program number 647, in addition to support through the use of infrastructure and laboratories of the Colombian Sugarcane Research Center (Centro de Investigación de la Caña de Azúcar de Colombia, Cenicaña)

Comments for Authors

The manuscript “population dynamics of Diatraea spp. under different climate offer

conditions in Colombia” present an interesting study on how climate change is expected to affect the distribution of sugar cane stem borers, Diatraea spp. The manuscript is well structured and nicely presented. However, I have some observations and comments for the authors as follows.

Abstract

Authors should mention for which scenarios the study was conducted for.

Done

Authors should include more key findings from the study in the abstract.

More key findings have been included in the abstract

Introduction

The Earth's temperature increased between 0. 7°C from 1900, 1. 3°C from 1950 and 1. 8°C

over the past 35 years. This sentence should be rephrased for better understanding for readers.

Sentence has been rephrased for better understanding

Many of the sentences in this section are too long; authors should make them shorter or split them.

Sentences have been edited and organized for better understanding

Materials and Methods

Change ‘The climate change model’ to ‘The global climate model (GCM)’

Done

Why was this BCC_CSM1 chosen?

Lines 138 – 141: “… according to the Colombian Institute of Hydrology, Meteorology and Environmental Studies (Instituto de Hidrología, Meteorología y Estudios Ambientales, IDEAM) this model fits well Colombian meteorological conditions.”

Change (CPR) to (RCP)

Done

Change ‘depending on the number’ to ‘depending on the amount’

Done

Remove ‘it’ in the sentence: MODESTR®, like MAXENT®, (Elith et al., 2011, Phillips and Dudik, 2008) it

Done

Authors should split the paragraph that started with: To generate the distribution maps and to see the effect for each variable in the distribution of Diatraea spp., MODESTR® (http://www.ipezes/ModestR)..........

Done

Results

Why are legends not given in the Figures in the results?

Legends have been added to figs

Authors should label the axis of Figure 5.

Done

Label axis of Figure 6.

Done

The authors mentioned anthropogenic factors affecting the Diatraea spp. Under the section: Factors affecting Diatraea spp. Richness. Are there other anthropogenic factors aside from the primary production (PP) and vegetation index e.g. does factors such as pest control affect them?

Pest control tactics have the potential to affect directly insect populations. However, no detailed information is available on control programs in the areas under study, being the case that in some of those no control is executed, so we did no considered this factor and rather focus on making a first distribution approach in relation to environmental, topographical and agricultural factors.

Under section distribution maps: Change this word ‘affection’ to ‘impaction’

Done

From section 3.4 authors should check the figure numberings and correct them.

Done

Other comments

Authors should include lines numbering in manuscript the next times

Done

There are grammatical and typographical errors in the manuscript. Authors should check and correct for these.

We hired a professional scientific editing service

PDF Comments

Abstract

Does not need to say this here in the abstract

Done

Introduction

Is true it effects on just these areas??

Lines 90-93 “To understand how climate change can affect sugarcane borers distribution, predictive inter- and intra-annual scale models were applied at the global, national and local scales, aiming to develop a framework to guide pest management decisions, thus reducing levels of uncertainty in the face of different climate scenarios. “

Materials and methods

you need to sort a new section regarding the study genus and introduce it including the number of species...

Lines 98 – 106 “whereas in the departments of Risaralda and Valle del Cauca, samples were collected from 2010 to 2017 from different municipalities in what it is known as the Cauca River Valley (CRV), a region that extends from northern Cauca to southern Risaralda (Fig 1). Larvae were collected in each sugarcane plot by a uniform 2 man-hour sampling effort, following the linear distribution of crop rows. Larvae were then taken to the laboratory and identified following taxonomic keys [17]. In addition, this information was used in combination with the CABI - Invasive Species Compendium (www.cabi.org) – to increase data on distribution of Diatraea spp. and increasing modeling accuracy”.

you need to explain how measure these and their source?

Lines 116-131 “/). At the same time, open-access weather portals were consulted such as WorldClim, from which 19 bioclimatic variables were collected on monthly rainfall and temperature [18]. The variance inflation factor (VIF) was calculated to analyze correlations between variables [19,20], providing an index that measures the extent to which the variance (the square of the estimated standard deviation) increases due to the collinearity, which allows for discarding climatic variables that could generate noise through redundancy.

Following the VIF analysis, only 6 of the 19 variables provided by WorldClim were used, plus slope (topographic slope in degrees), slope-aspect (which is defined as the compass direction to which a slope faces measured in degrees), altitude (meters), vegetation index (VI), terrestrial primary production (TPP, gCm2 d1), and TH24 (topographic heterogeneity calculated for the 24 surrounding cells) [21,22], and used along with those supplied within the ModestR® software

change the title of figure 3.

Done

seems you explained before these abbreviations in the table 1. Do not need to repeat again.

Done

please say more details in Methods for this approach, polar coordinates

To find that, we use the following ecuation

x_(n+1)=x_n+sin⁡(angle x distance) y_(n+1)=y_n+cos⁡(angle x distance)

where? which country?

Colombia

Conclusions

does not make sense when you did not compare different softwares! you applied just this, so delete this part.

Done

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Shamsuddin Shahid

15 Dec 2020

Population dynamics of sugarcane borers, Diatraea spp., under different climatic scenarios in Colombia

PONE-D-20-18805R1

Dear Dr. Valencia Arbeláez,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Shamsuddin Shahid

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Authors have appropraitely addressed all comments. Manuscript is technically sound and presents an interesting research on the study topic.

Reviewer #2: You did not mention anything about the biodiversity values of studied species? It would be very good to add more details.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Saeed Mohammadi- Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Zabol, Zabol, Iran

Acceptance letter

Shamsuddin Shahid

2 Jan 2021

PONE-D-20-18805R1

Population dynamics of sugarcane borers, Diatraea spp., under different climatic scenarios in Colombia

Dear Dr. Valencia Arbeláez:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Shamsuddin Shahid

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Comments for Authors.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PONE-D-20-18805_reviewer-1.pdf

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All files are available from the OSF database (https://osf.io/ms39c/).


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES