Abstract
Exosomes are extracellular vesicles with diameters ranging from 30 to 150 nm, which contain several donor cell‐associated proteins as well as mRNA, miRNA, and lipids and coordinate multiple physiological and pathological functions through horizontal communication between cells. Almost all types of liver cells, such as hepatocytes and Kupffer cells, are exosome‐releasing and/or exosome‐targeted cells. Exosomes secreted by liver cells play an important role in regulating general physiological functions and also participate in the onset and development of liver diseases, including liver cancer, liver injury, liver fibrosis and viral hepatitis. Liver cell‐derived exosomes carry liver cell‐specific proteins and miRNAs, which can be used as diagnostic biomarkers and treatment targets of liver disease. This review discusses the functions of exosomes derived from different liver cells and provides novel insights based on the latest developments regarding the roles of exosomes in the diagnosis and treatment of liver diseases.
Keywords: biomarker, exosome, hepatocyte, liver disease
1. INTRODUCTION
Exosomes are primarily derived from multi‐vesicular bodies, which fuse with the plasma membrane and subsequently release internal vesicles in the form of exosomes. 1 Exosomes are naturally closed vesicles with lipid bilayers. Electron microscopy has shown them to have disc‐ or cup‐shaped structures with, diameters ranging from 30 to 150 nm. Almost all types of cells in the human body can release exosomes, including reticulocytes, tumour cells and mesenchymal stem cells. 2 As a substance carrier, exosomes contain a variety of biologically active molecules, including lipids, proteins and nucleic acids, such as mRNA, microRNA (miRNA) and long non‐coding RNA (lncRNA). Established exosome markers include CD63, syntenin‐1, TSG101 and integrin among others. Recent studies have shown that exosomes can serve as potential tools for diagnosis and treatment owing to their ability to carry functional RNA or small molecules. In addition, the contents of exosomes can be selectively manipulated using various methods, which can further help develop treatment strategies.
2. PHYSIOLOGICAL FUNCTIONS OF EXOSOMES
Among the extensive physiological functions of exosomes, the most important is its role in information exchange and intercellular material transfer. 3 Exosomes communicate with cells using three major mechanisms: binding to receptors on target cells, fusing directly with target cell membranes and entering target cells by endocytosis. Endocytosis can occur by clathrin‐dependent and clathrin‐independent mechanisms. 4 , 5 Exosomes contain several types of bioactive molecules. Lipids are essential for maintaining the morphological stability of exosomes in extracellular fluids, protecting exosomes from enzymatic degradation 6 and participating in multiple biological processes as signal molecules. Proteins present in exosomes can be divided into two categories. Non‐specific proteins, such as cytoskeletal proteins, four‐transmembrane proteins (CD9, CD63) and heat‐shock proteins (such as HSP90), are present in all exosomes, 7 whereas specific proteins are those associated with the source cells of exosomes specifically. For example, exosomes derived from tumour cells carry large quantities of tumour antigens, which may be related to cellular signal transduction. 8 , 9 In addition, exosomes contain different nucleic acids, such as mRNA, miRNA and lncRNA, which are considered potential markers for the diagnosis of disease. 10
3. EXOSOMES DERIVED FROM LIVER CELLS
The liver contains hepatocytes, hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) and Kupffer cells, which are exosome‐releasing/‐targeted cells. Exosomes contain tissue‐specific proteins and miRNAs derived from source cells, and the number and content of exosomes may fluctuate based on the specific disease state. Liver cell‐derived exosomes carry liver‐specific proteins and miRNAs, such as carboxylesterase‐1 (CES1), alcohol dehydrogenase‐1 (ADH1), glutathione S‐transferase, apolipoprotein A‐1 (APOA1), albumin (ALB), haptoglobin (HP) and miRNA‐122, 11 which can be used as potential biomarkers and targets in liver disease. ALB and ASGPR1 are encapsulated in exosomes secreted by hepatocytes 12 , 13 and participate in liver injury as well as liver regeneration. Exosomes derived from liver cancer cells containing alpha fetoprotein (AFP) mRNA and glypican‐3 mRNA are used for the diagnosis and treatment of liver cancer. 14 Exosomes derived from HSCs carrying connective tissue growth factor (CCN2) participate in the induction of liver fibrosis. 15 Cytokeratin 18 (CK18) is present in exosomes derived from bile duct cells and is used to diagnose biliary diseases, alcoholic hepatitis (AH) and cirrhosis 16 , 17 (Figure 1).
Figure 1.
Exosomes derived from liver cells are involved in the pathogenesis of liver diseases and may serve as diagnostic markers and therapeutic targets. Liver cell‐derived exosomes carry liver‐specific proteins and miRNAs, which can be used as potential biomarkers and targets in liver disease. For example, albumin is encapsulated by exosomes secreted by hepatocytes and contributes to liver injury as well as to liver regeneration
3.1. Hepatocyte‐derived exosomes
Studies have shown that hepatocyte‐derived exosomes carrying hepatocyte‐specific contents can easily pass through the sinusoidal endothelium. 18 , 19 They stimulate various non‐parenchymal cells (Figure 2), including monocytes, 20 lymphocytes, 21 HSCs 22 , 23 and endothelial cells, 24 and play an important role in signalling transmission.
Figure 2.
Functions of exosomes derived from hepatocytes. The figure shows the bioactivities of hepatocyte‐derived exosomes, including homoeostasis, angiogenesis, tissue repair and regeneration, inflammation, and fibrosis
To date, a large number of studies have shown that hepatocyte‐derived exosomes are involved in the pathogenesis of liver diseases. Momen‐Heravi et al showed that, in a model of AH, miRNA‐122 was present in exosomes released by alcohol‐treated hepatocytes. Exosomes were absorbed by the human monocytic cell line THP‐1 and were observed to transfer miRNA‐122 into THP‐1 cells. miR‐122 enhances the inflammatory response in monocytes and affects their immune function. 20 In alcoholic liver disease, alcohol‐exposed human monocytes can release exosomes, which can subsequently stimulate the polarization of naive monocytes, which then form M2 macrophages. 25 Alcohol stimulates the expression of miR‐155 in hepatocytes. This miR‐155 targets mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), Ras homolog enriched in brain (Rheb), lysosomal‐associated membrane protein 1 (LAMP1) and lysosomal‐associated membrane protein 2 (LAMP2); it also disrupts autophagy at the lysosomal level and increases exosome release. 26 In a hepatitis C virus (HCV)‐induced fibrosis model, exosomes released by HCV‐infected hepatocytes carry miR‐19a, which can be internalized by HSCs. miR‐19 was observed to target suppressor of cytokine signalling 3 (SOCS3) in HSCs and activate the STAT3/TGFβ‐1/Smad3 signalling pathway to convert resting HSCs to activated HSCs. 27
Exosomes play an important role in liver injury and regeneration. Holman et al used hepatocyte‐derived exosomes to treat THP‐1 cells for 24 hours and followed this by stimulation of the cells with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) for 6 hours; they observed that the levels of interleukin (IL)‐1β and IL‐8 produced in response to stimulation by LPS reduced and that genes encoding proteins associated with the innate immune response were significantly down‐regulated. Hepatocyte‐derived exosomes could transfer functional miRNAs and multiple immune‐mediated transcripts to monocytes to inhibit the release of cytokine stimulated by LPS. 28 , 29 In addition, hepatocyte‐derived exosomes were observed to promote the proliferation of hepatocytes in vitro and liver regeneration in vivo by mediating the transfer of sphingosine kinase 2 (SK2) to target cells and inducing up‐regulation of intracellular sphingosine‐1‐phosphate (S1P). 30 , 31
3.2. HSC‐derived exosomes
Under normal conditions, HSCs remain in the resting state, and their activation is closely related to liver fibrosis. Studies have shown that HSC‐derived exosomes promote fibrosis. When HSCs are activated, they can release exosomes containing CCN2, which is transmitted between HSCs. Exosomal CCN2, along with other fibrosis‐related molecules, may amplify fibrogenic signalling to promote hepatic fibrosis. 15 Wan et al showed that exosomes derived from activated HSCs contain glycolysis‐related molecules, such as glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1) and pyruvate kinase M2 (PKM2). These exosomes are internalized by resting HSCs, macrophages and liver sinusoidal endothelial cells. The increase in the intracellular levels of GLUT1 and PKM2 induced non‐parenchymal cell activation and metabolic conversion in the liver. 32 Other experiments also supported the observation that exosomes produced by HSCs promote fibrosis by acting on HSCs or other non‐parenchymal cells. Platelet‐derived growth factor (PDGF)‐BB is a key molecule in the process leading to liver fibrosis. Kostallari et al reported that PDGF‐BB–treated HSCs release PDGF receptor‐alpha (PDGFRα)‐enriched exosomes using an Src homology 2 domain tyrosine phosphatase 2‐dependent mechanism. These exosomes promote HSC migration and liver fibrosis. Interference with PDGFRα in exosomes was shown to suppress carbon tetrachloride (CCl4)‐induced liver fibrosis in mice. 33
In addition, exosomes derived from HSCs contribute to the pathology of liver cancer. Researchers showed that exosomes derived from HSCs deliver miR‐335‐5p to recipient hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cells, inhibiting the proliferation and in vitro invasion of HCC cells and inducing the shrinkage of HCC tumours in vivo. 34 Moreover, researchers observed that the expression of miR‐30a was down‐regulated in exosomes derived from activated HSCs, which may prevent HSC activation by suppressing autophagy. 35
3.3. Cholangiocyte‐derived exosomes
Cholangiocyte‐derived exosomes are closely associated with the onset of cholestatic liver injury, and exosomes containing lncRNA‐H19 are key contributors. Researchers found that, in multidrug resistance‐associated protein 2 knockout mice, exosomes secreted by cholangiocytes can transfer lncRNA‐H19 to hepatocytes; this subsequently inhibits the expression of hepatic small heterodimer partner, interferes with bile acid homoeostasis and promotes cholestatic liver injury. 36 Research showed that exosomes containing lncRNA‐H19 are also major contributors to liver fibrosis. HSCs are the primary target cells of cholangiocyte‐derived exosomes. Particularly in cholestasis, HSCs preferentially take up exosomes secreted by cholangiocytes. lncRNA‐H19 promotes the proliferation and activation of HSCs by increasing G1/S cell cycle transition and up‐regulates fibrotic gene expression in fibroblasts derived from HSCs to promote liver fibrosis. 37
Certain studies have also shown that exosomes accumulate in the lumen of the intrahepatic bile duct and bile exosomes interact with cholangiocyte cilia; these phenomena affect intracellular and extracellular regulated protein kinase signalling, up‐regulate miR‐15A expression and inhibit cholangiocyte proliferation. Thus, the interaction of bile exosomes with cholangiocyte cilia could be a novel mechanism underlying intercellular communication in the liver. 38
3.4. HCC cell‐derived exosomes
Liver cancer‐derived exosomes are involved in several pathological processes (Table 1). Exosomes can be transferred horizontally between different liver cancer cells and change the original biological functions of the cells. For example, Huh7 cell‐derived exosomes can transfer miR‐122 to HepG2 cells to inhibit the growth and accelerate the ageing process in HepG2 cells. 39 HCC cell‐derived exosomes also affect tumour angiogenesis. miR‐210‐containing exosomes released by HCC cells can be transferred to endothelial cells, preventing angiogenesis by inhibiting the expression of mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 4 (SMAD4) and signal transducer and activator of transcription 6 (STAT6). 40 HCC cell‐derived exosomes also participate in metastasis in HCC. Hepatoma cell‐derived exosomal miRNA‐103 was observed to target junction proteins, which attenuated the integrity of the endothelial junction and promoted tumour metastasis. 41 Fang et al 42 reported that highly metastatic HCC cells secrete exosomal miR‐1247‐3p, which activates β1‐integrin‐NF‐κB signalling in fibroblasts, and cancer‐associated fibroblasts promote lung metastasis of liver cancer by secreting pro‐inflammatory cytokines. In addition, exosomes also contribute to liver cancer progression. Cheng et al 43 reported that p120‐catenin (p120ctn) present in exosomes secreted by liver cancer cells inhibited the growth of liver cancer stem cells and the proliferation and metastasis of HCC cells through the STAT3 pathway.
Table 1.
Components of exosomes derived from hepatocellular carcinoma cells and their roles
Component | Role | Reference | Year of publication | Reference no. |
---|---|---|---|---|
miR‐1247‐3p | Induces cancer‐associated fibroblast activation | Fang et al | 2018 | 42 |
miR‐18a | Increased level/diagnostic marker | Sohn et al | 2015 | 44 |
miR‐103 | Metastasis | Fang et al | 2018 | 41 |
miR‐221 | Increased level/diagnostic marker | Sohn et al | 2015 | 44 |
miR‐222 | Increased level/diagnostic marker | Sohn et al | 2015 | 44 |
miR‐224 | Increased level/diagnostic marker | Sohn et al | 2015 | 44 |
miR‐210 | Promotes angiogenesis | Lin et al | 2018 | 40 |
miR‐122 | Improve treatment effects | Lou et al | 2015 | 52 |
miR‐638 | Predict the prognosis of HCC | Shi et al | 2018 | 46 |
miR‐335 | Novel therapeutic agent | Wang et al | 2018 | 34 |
circPTGR1 | Increased level/ prognosis marker | Wang et al | 2019 | 49 |
LINC00635 | Diagnosis and Prognosis of HCC | Xu et al | 2018 | 48 |
LINC00161 | Increased level/ prognosis marker | Sun et al | 2018 | 50 |
Abbreviation: HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma.
4. EXOSOMES AS DIAGNOSTIC AND TREATMENT TOOLS FOR LIVER DISEASE
Findings from certain studies suggest that there are differences in the number and content of exosomes released at different stages of liver disease. Exosomes are advantageous for diagnosis, as they offer the specificity of liver biopsy samples and the non‐invasiveness of peripheral blood samples, which are potential biomarkers of liver disease (Table 2). Recently, researchers have selectively manipulated the contents of exosomes to develop novel strategies for disease treatment. Exosomes are important non‐toxic carriers and elicit low immunogenicity and toxicity. They can be used as drug delivery tools in the treatment of certain liver diseases (Table 3) (Figure 3).
Table 2.
Exosomes are potential biomarkers of liver disease
Disease | Maker | Reference no. |
---|---|---|
Primary hepatic carcinoma |
miR‐18a, miR‐221, miR‐222, miR‐224, miR‐101, miR‐106b, miR‐122, miR‐195, miR‐30d, miR‐140, miR‐29b, miR‐638, lncRNAXist, circPTGR1 LNCRNAs ENSG00000258332.1 and LINC00635 |
44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 50 |
NAFLD and ALD | miR‐192‐5P, ceramide and S1P, CD40L, miRNA‐192 and miRNA‐30a | 59, 60, 61, 62 |
Acute liver injury and liver failure | miRNA‐122, miRNA‐155, miRNA‐192, albumin, fibrinogen B, Gnb2l, haptoglobin, Rbp4 | 11, 70, 71 |
Liver fibrosis | CCN2, GLUT1, PKM2, PDGFRα, miR‐30a | 15, 32, 33, 35 |
Abbreviations: ALD, alcoholic liver disease; CCN2, connective tissue growth factor; GLUT1, glucose transporter 1; Gnb2l, G protein β‐polypeptide 2‐like 1; NAFLD, non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease; PDGFRα, PDGF receptor‐alpha;PKM2, pyruvate kinase M2; Rbp4, retinol‐binding protein 4; S1P, sphingosine‐1‐phosphate.
Table 3.
Roles of exosomes in the treatment of liver disease
Disease | Donor cells | Recipient cells | Mediators | Implications | Reference no. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Primary hepatic carcinoma | Macrophage | HCC |
miR‐142 miR‐223 |
Inhibit tumour cell proliferation and growth | 51 |
AMSC | HCC | miR‐122 | Increase sensitivity to chemotherapy drugs | 52 | |
293T cell | Liver cancer cell | miR‐26a | Inhibits the cell cycle and cell proliferation | 53 | |
HCC | Dendritic cell | HCC antigens | Trigger DC‐mediated immune response | 54 | |
HSC | HCC | miR‐335‐5p | Induce the shrinkage of HCC tumours | 34 | |
Liver fibrosis | AMSC | HSC | miR‐122 | Ameliorate liver fibrosis | 52 |
Amnion‐MSC | KC/HSC | Not mentioned | Reduce HSC and KC activation/ liver fibrosis | 55 | |
HUC‐MSC | Mice with liver fibrosis | Not mentioned | Ameliorate CCl4‐induced liver fibrosis | 56 | |
BM‐MSC | Mice with liver fibrosis | Not mentioned | Inhibit HSC activation | 57 | |
Hepatocyte | HSC | miRNA‐192 | Induce HSC transdifferentiation into myofibroblasts | 58 | |
Hepatocyte | HSC | Not mentioned | Activate TLR3 in HSCs and exacerbate fibrosis | 22 | |
NAFLD and ALD | Hepatocyte | Macrophage | Apoptosis‐inducing ligand | Activate inflammatory phenotype in macrophage | 64 |
Hepatocyte | Macrophage | CXCL10 | Induce macrophage chemotaxis | 65 | |
Obese mice | Lean mice | miRNA27a‐3pmiRNA‐192 miRNA‐122 | Modulate glucose and lipid metabolism in mice | 66 | |
Hepatocyte | KC | mtdsRNA | Trigger the production of IL‐1β from KCs | 68 | |
Acute liver injury and liver failure | BM‐MSC | Murine model of hepatic IRI | Not mentioned | Reduce liver damage by regulating inflammatory responses | 72 |
BM‐MSC | Hepatocyte | Not mentioned | Improve survival in hepatic failure mice | 73 | |
MSC | Hepatocyte | Not mentioned | Promote hepatic regeneration | 74 | |
AMSC | Macrophage | miR‐17 | Alleviate LPS/GalN induced liver failure | 75 | |
CP‐MSC | HSC | miR‐125b | Ameliorate liver fibrosis | 76 | |
Viral hepatitis | Macrophage | Hepatocyte | IFN‐α‐induced antiviral substances | Exosomes exploit virus entry machinery for access to hepatocyte | 84 |
Monocyte | Healthy mice | Not mentioned | Promote inflammatory response | 86 | |
Not mentioned | Hepatoma cell/ Hepatocyte | Viral envelope glycoprotein E2 | Make HCV less sensitive to antibody neutralization | 77 | |
Not mentioned | Antigen‐presenting cell | Nefmut‐based DNA vectors exosomes | Induce CTL immunization against full‐length antigens | 87 |
Abbreviations: ALD, alcoholic liver disease; AMSC, adipose‐derived mesenchymal stem cell; AMSC, amnion‐derived MSC; AMSCs, adipose tissue‐derived mesenchymal stem cells. CP‐MSC, chorionic plate‐derived mesenchymal stem cell; BM‐MSC, bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell; CTL, cytotoxic T lymphocyte; CXCL10, CXC motif chemokine ligand‐10; HCCs, hepato‐carcinoma cells; HCV, hepatitis C virus; HUC‐MSC, human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell; KC, Kupffer cells; LNPCs, liver non‐parenchymal cells; MSC, mesenchymal stem cell; mtdsRNA, mitochondrial double‐stranded RNA; NAFLD, non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease.
Figure 3.
Exosomes as novel tools for the treatment and diagnosis of diseases. Exosomes are present in a variety of body fluids, such as blood, urine and cerebrospinal fluid, and can be used as potential diagnostic biomarkers. Genetically engineered exosomes may serve as novel vaccines. In addition, exosomes are important non‐toxic carriers and can be used as drug delivery tools
4.1. Primary hepatic carcinoma
4.1.1. Biomarkers
Several studies have revealed that certain differentially expressed exosomal miRNAs can be used as potential biomarkers for diagnosing HCC. Sohn et al showed that the serum levels of exosomal miR‐18a, miR‐221, miR‐222, and miR‐224 in patients with HCC are significantly higher than those in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infection, while the serum levels of miR‐101, miR‐106b, miR‐122 and miR‐195 are lower than those in CHB patients. These exosomal miRNAs may serve as novel serum markers for the diagnosis of HCC. 44 Exosomal miRNA can also be used as prognostic markers of liver cancer. miR‐30d, miR‐140 and miR‐29b are significantly associated with survival in patients with HCC and may be used as biomarkers for predicting the migration of HCC cells and HCC prognosis and may guide the treatment of advanced HCC. 45 In addition, certain miRNAs can be used as indicators for predicting the risk of relapse clinical conditions. The level of exosomal miR‐638 is inversely related to tumour size, vascular infiltration and tumour node metastasis stage. The serum levels of exosomal miR‐638 were reduced in patients with HCC, and these patients exhibited lower overall survival than patients with higher levels of exosomal miR‐638. 46 In addition to miRNA, non‐coding exosomal RNAs can also be used as potential markers. Ma et al 47 demonstrated that exosomes mediate the regulation of lncRNA X inactivation‐specific transcript (Xist) expression in blood cells, which indicates that Xist expressed by monocytes and granulocytes may serve as a valuable biomarker for the diagnosis of liver cancer in women. Xu et al 48 reported that the measurement of the levels of serum exosomal lncRNA ENSG00000258332.1, serum exosomal RNA LINC00635 and serum AFP might be a promising method for the diagnosis and prognosis of HCC. Other studies have revealed that, compared to normal patients, patients with HCC exhibit significant up‐regulation of LINC00161 and circPTGR1 (a type of circRNA), which indicates that these can be used for clinical staging and prognosis. 49 , 50
4.1.2. Therapy
There exists mutual communication between exosomes and their targeted tumour cells. The delivery of exosomal miRNA and lncRNA significantly inhibits cancer development and leads to antitumour effects. For example, miR‐142 and miR‐223 can be transferred from human macrophages to hepatocytes via exosomes to inhibit tumour cell proliferation and growth. 51 Lou et al showed that miR‐122 can negatively regulate the expression of target genes, such as cyclin B1 and insulin‐like growth factor 1 receptor genes. Adipose tissue‐derived mesenchymal stem cells transfected with miR‐122 can transport miR‐122 to HCC cells via exosomes to promote apoptosis and cell cycle arrest and reduce liver fibrosis, as well as to increase the sensitivity of HCC cells to chemotherapy drugs. 52 Engineered exosomes have been studied extensively in recent years. Liang et al 53 reported that modified 293T cells were observed to release ApoA1‐CD63‐expressing exosomes loaded with miR‐26a by electroporation and that the exosomes were internalized by HepG2 cells via scavenger receptor class B type 1 receptor‐mediated endocytosis, which up‐regulated the expression of miR‐26a, a key molecule that inhibits the cell cycle and cell proliferation. In addition, exosomes can be used as cancer vaccines. Dendritic cells (DCs) bind HCC tumour cell‐derived exosomes by increasing the number of activated T cells and interferon (IFN)‐γ levels as well as by reducing the expression of the anti‐inflammatory cytokines IL‐10 and TGF‐β to induce cellular immune response. This process promotes tumour suppression and can be used as a new strategy for the development of cancer vaccines. 23 , 54
4.2. Liver fibrosis
4.2.1. Biomarkers
Hepatic fibrosis occurs owing to the suppression of liver cell regeneration. It is a process for scar repair induced by the accumulation and precipitation of components, such as type I collagen fibres. Exosomal elements play an important role in liver fibrosis (Table 2).
4.2.2. Therapy
At present, most treatments for liver fibrosis that involve the use of exosomes require hepatocytes and progenitor cells. There are several potential treatment modalities based on this. Researchers have demonstrated that miRNA‐122 loaded in exosomes derived from mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) can inhibit the activation and proliferation of primary HSCs, and continued treatment for 4 weeks using this method can improve CCl4‐induced liver fibrosis in mice. 52 Ohara et al 55 demonstrated that amniotic mesenchymal stem cell‐derived extracellular vesicles in primary cell culture can suppress the activation of Kupffer cells and HSCs and can improve CCl4‐induced liver fibrosis. Exosomes derived from human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (HUC‐MSCs) also reduce fibrosis by inhibiting the expression of collagen and TGF‐β1 in vivo. 56 In addition, MSC‐derived exosomes suppress liver fibrosis by improving liver function and inhibiting inflammation and HSC activation. 57 In addition to the use of stem cells and progenitor cells, in a model of CCl4‐induced liver injury, hepatocyte‐derived exosomes were observed to activate Toll‐like receptor 3 (TLR3) in HSCs and promote fibrosis by enhancing IL‐17A secretion from T cells, suggesting that TLR3 may serve as a novel therapeutic target for liver fibrosis. 22 In HCV‐induced fibrosis, HCV‐replicating hepatocytes transfer miRNA‐192 to HSCs through exosomes, activating HSCs and inducing their transdifferentiation into myofibroblasts. This suggests that exosomal miR‐192 is a major regulator and potential therapeutic target in liver fibrosis induced by HCV. 58
4.3. Non‐alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and alcoholic liver disease
4.3.1. Biomarkers
Liu et al reported that, during NAFLD progression, the number of exosomes containing miR‐192‐5P in plasma was higher in patients with NAFLD and in rat models than in controls, and exosomal miR‐192‐5P derived from hepatocytes with lipotoxicity induced the activation of M1 macrophages and increased the expression of M1‐specific cytokines, such as inducible nitric oxide synthases, IL‐6 and tumour necrosis factor (TNF)‐β. This suggested that miR‐192‐5P may serve as a potential non‐invasive marker for NAFLD. 59 In patients with non‐alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), the ceramide levels in peripheral blood exosomes were observed to increase significantly. The ceramide metabolite sphingosine‐1‐phosphate (S1P) activates macrophage chemotaxis. The ceramide and S1P levels in exosomes may be used as a biomarker for NASH. 60 Alcohol exposure induces the release of CD40L‐enriched exosomes from hepatocytes, which leads to the activation of macrophages and induces inflammation in alcoholic liver disease. High levels of CD40L‐enriched exosomes have also been detected in the sera of patients with AH, which suggests that CD40L‐enriched exosomes may act as biomarkers for liver damage caused by inflammation. 61 Researchers have shown that the number of circulating exosomes increased in alcohol‐fed mice, a model of AH. In patients with AH, the number of exosomes and the levels of miRNA‐192 and miRNA‐30a increased significantly; these are useful parameters for identifying alcohol‐induced liver damage. In particular, miRNA‐192 is a promising diagnostic marker for AH. 62
4.3.2. Therapy
Alcohol and lipotoxicity stimulate the release of exosomes from hepatocytes through different mechanisms. It has been reported, using experimental models of NASH and AH, that exosomes released by damaged or stressed hepatocytes promote disease progression by activating liver endothelial cells, HSCs and liver macrophages. 63 , 64 , 65 Moreover, Castano et al 66 demonstrated that mice fed a high‐fat diet produce circulating exosomes containing miRNAs (miRNA27a‐3p, miRNA 192, miRNA 122), which, when transfected into healthy mice, interfered with the expression of genes encoding proteins related to hepatic steatosis and inflammation. Other studies have shown that the fatty acid palmitate stimulates the release of exosomes by death receptor 5 (present on the surface of hepatocytes) that contain TNF‐related apoptosis‐inducing ligand, CXC motif chemokine ligand (CXCL)‐10, S1P and other molecules associated with macrophage activation. This is an essential step in the development of NASH. The use of Rho‐associated coiled‐coil‐containing protein kinase 1 inhibitors for suppressing the release of extracellular vesicles from hepatocytes may be a suitable treatment strategy for NASH. 67 Lee et al reported that, in the treatment of ALD, ethanol induces the release of exosomes loaded with mitochondrial double‐stranded RNA (mtdsRNA) from hepatocytes, and the activation of TLR3 induced by mtdsRNA triggers the production of IL‐1β by the neighbouring Kupffer cells. This increases IL‐17A expression in the early stage of ALD. Therefore, TLR3 and mtdsRNA could be considered important targets for improvements in ALD treatment. 68
4.4. Acute liver injury and liver failure
4.4.1. Biomarkers
Acute liver injury can be categorized into physical liver injury and toxic liver injury. A different perspective for diagnosis involves monitoring the changes in exosome contents during liver injury. For example, studies have shown that miRNA‐122, miRNA‐155 and miRNA‐192 may serve as biomarkers of acute toxic liver injury. 11 , 69 , 70 , 71 In APAP‐ or galactosamine‐induced caries animal liver injury models, the number of circulating exosomes containing albumin, β‐actin, fibrinogen B, G protein β‐polypeptide 2‐like 1, haptoglobin and retinol‐binding protein 4 increased, and these were considered markers of acute liver injury. 11 , 18
4.4.2. Therapy
In recent times, studies have shown that the injection of exosomes derived from specific types of cells can alleviate liver damage (Table 3). For example, Haga et al 72 found that, in a mouse model of ischaemia‐reperfusion injury, exosomes derived from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BM‐MSCs) reduced liver damage by regulating inflammatory responses. In a mouse model of liver failure induced by d‐galactosamine/TNF‐α, liver injury and mortality rates were reduced upon treatment with mouse and human BM‐MSC‐derived exosomes, an effect that was related to decreased inflammation. 73 In a mouse model of liver injury induced by CCl4, MSC‐derived exosomes could resist toxin‐induced liver damage by activating proliferative and regenerative responses. 74 In addition, exosomes released by chorionic plate‐derived mesenchymal stem cells (CP‐MSCs) and adipose‐derived mesenchymal stem cells (AMSCs) can be potentially used in the treatment of liver injury. 75 , 76
4.5. Viral hepatitis
4.5.1. Biomarkers
Studies have shown that exosomes are associated with the spread of hepatitis virus. Exosomes secreted by infected cells contain viral nucleic acids and proteins. Viruses can spread to surrounding cells and cause infections through hepatocyte‐derived exosomes. 77 , 78 , 79 Li et al showed that, in patients with CHB infection, who have normal alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels, 18 types of exosomal miRNAs were up‐regulated, including hsa‐miR‐221‐3p and hsa‐miR‐25‐3p. In addition, six types of exosomal miRNAs were down‐regulated, including hsa‐miR‐372‐3p and hsa‐miR‐10a‐5p, and these exosomal miRNAs were more sensitive indicators of liver inflammation than ALT. 80 In certain studies on HCV infection, researchers have compared the miRNA expression in serum exosomes between patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) and normal controls, and found that the miRNA expression patterns are related to liver fibrosis stage and inflammation grade in patients with CHC infection. Exosomal miRNAs may serve as biomarkers for staging liver disease. 81 Bukong et al isolated exosomes from the serum samples of patients with CHC, which contain replicating components of viral RNA associated with miR‐122, Argonaute 2, and HSP90. These exosomes can infect human primary hepatocytes as well as human liver cancer Huh7 cells and can therefore be used as potential biomarkers. 82
4.5.2. Treatment
During hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, exosomes affect cytokine‐mediated signalling pathways by suppressing immune responses and promoting infection. In contrast, they also play an anti‐infective role by enhancing the functions of macrophages and NK cells and transmitting antiviral molecules 83 (Figure 4). For example, IFN‐α stimulates the release of exosomes from non‐parenchymal liver cells (resistant to viral infection), which can be internalized by hepatocytes, which subsequently exhibit antiviral properties against HBV. 84 , 85 This provides the theoretical basis for exosome‐mediated immunotherapy of HBV infection. In addition, exosomes activate immune responses and serve as an attractive adjuvant. For example, exosomes isolated from LPS/endotoxin‐stimulated human monocytes were observed to promote inflammatory responses in healthy mice by inducing cytokine production. When these exosomes were used as adjuvants of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), they were observed to induce a cellular immune response in mice. 86 Genetically engineered exosomes play a more significant role in resisting HBV infection. Researchers have constructed a DNA vector expressing the mutant form of the exosome anchoring protein Nef and specific antigens and injected it into animals to produce engineered exosomes, which induced specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte‐mediated immunity against HBV. Activated HBV‐specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes were observed to exert important therapeutic effects in HBV infection; such genetically engineered exosomes may serve as novel HBV vaccines. 87
Figure 4.
Exosomes and hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. During chronic HBV infection, infected hepatocytes can release exosomes that can exhibit contrasting actions. Exosomes contain HBV proteins and nucleic acids, which can promote as well as suppress HBV infection. IFN‐γ, interferon‐γ; TNF‐α, tumour necrosis factor‐α; RIG‐1, retinoic acid‐inducible gene I; NF‐κB, nuclear factor κB
Exosomes are also used for the treatment of HCV infection. Deng et al showed that syntenin is a protein involved in the secretory pathway of exosomes. In vitro, syntenin overexpression was observed to induce the release of exosomes containing the HCV protein E2. These exosomes may act as antibody baits during HCV infection. 77
5. SUMMARY
Exosomes are important tools in cell‐to‐cell communication. Compared with current diagnostic agents, exosomes can be used a non‐invasive agents that do not cause major side effects. Despite their limitations, exosomes are considered promising screening and treatment tools in liver diseases. This review aimed to describe the functions of exosomes derived from different liver cells and their role in different liver diseases. At present, with the increase in research on exosomes, the gradual increase in their demand as biological carriers has been observed. Further research on the role of exosomes in liver diseases will improve the diagnosis and treatment of liver diseases.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Yan Jiao: Writing‐original draft (equal). Xu Ping: Software (equal). Shi Honglin: Project administration (equal). Dexi Chen: Writing‐review & editing (equal). Hongbo Shi: Writing‐review & editing (equal).
Jiao Y, Ping X, Honglin S, Chen D, Shi H. Advances on liver cell‐derived exosomes in liver diseases. J Cell Mol Med.2021;25:15–26. 10.1111/jcmm.16123
Funding informationThis study received financial support from The Chinese Foundation for Hepatitis Prevention and Control (TQGB20190050), Beijing Municipal Medical Research Institute Public Welfare Development and Reform Pilot Project (jingyiyan 2019‐6) and The National Natural Science Foundation of China (81672026)
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
Data sharing not applicable—no new data generated, or the article describes entirely theoretical research.
REFERENCES
- 1. Sato K, Meng F, Glaser S, Alpini G. Exosomes in liver pathology. J Hepatol. 2016;65:213‐221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Lai RC, Yeo RW, Tan KH, Lim SK. Exosomes for drug delivery ‐ a novel application for the mesenchymal stem cell. Biotechnol Adv. 2013;31:543‐551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Hood JL, San RS, Wickline SA. Exosomes released by melanoma cells prepare sentinel lymph nodes for tumor metastasis. Cancer Res. 2011;71:3792‐3801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Banizs AB, Huang T, Nakamoto RK, Shi W, He J. Endocytosis pathways of endothelial cell derived exosomes. Mol Pharm. 2018;15:5585‐5590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Mulcahy LA, Pink RC, Carter DR. Routes and mechanisms of extracellular vesicle uptake. J Extracell Vesicles. 2014;3:24641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Silverman JM, Clos J, De'Oliveira CC, et al. An exosome‐based secretion pathway is responsible for protein export from Leishmania and communication with macrophages. J Cell Sci. 2010;123:842‐852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Xiao W, Dong W, Zhang C, et al. Effects of the epigenetic drug MS‐275 on the release and function of exosome‐related immune molecules in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Eur J Med Res. 2013;18:61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Ji H, Greening DW, Barnes TW, et al. Proteome profiling of exosomes derived from human primary and metastatic colorectal cancer cells reveal differential expression of key metastatic factors and signal transduction components. Proteomics. 2013;13:1672‐1686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Demory BM, Higginbotham JN, Franklin JL, et al. Proteomic analysis of exosomes from mutant KRAS colon cancer cells identifies intercellular transfer of mutant KRAS. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2013;12:343‐355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Zhang YC, Xu Z, Zhang TF, Wang YL. Circulating microRNAs as diagnostic and prognostic tools for hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:9853‐9862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Cho YE, Im EJ, Moon PG, Mezey E, Song BJ, Baek MC. Increased liver‐specific proteins in circulating extracellular vesicles as potential biomarkers for drug‐ and alcohol‐induced liver injury. PLoS One. 2017;12:e172463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Sancho‐Bru P, Altamirano J, Rodrigo‐Torres D, et al. Liver progenitor cell markers correlate with liver damage and predict short‐term mortality in patients with alcoholic hepatitis. Hepatology. 2012;55:1931‐1941. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Malato Y, Naqvi S, Schurmann N, et al. Fate tracing of mature hepatocytes in mouse liver homoeostasis and regeneration. J Clin Invest. 2011;121:4850‐4860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Wang X, Kwak KJ, Yang Z, et al. Extracellular mRNA detected by molecular beacons in tethered lipoplex nanoparticles for diagnosis of human hepatocellular carcinoma. PLoS One. 2018;13:e198552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Charrier A, Chen R, Chen L, et al. Exosomes mediate intercellular transfer of pro‐fibrogenic connective tissue growth factor (CCN2) between hepatic stellate cells, the principal fibrotic cells in the liver. Surgery. 2014;156:548‐555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Bissonnette J, Altamirano J, Devue C, et al. A prospective study of the utility of plasma biomarkers to diagnose alcoholic hepatitis. Hepatology. 2017;66:555‐563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Lambrecht J, Verhulst S, Mannaerts I, Reynaert H, van Grunsven LA. Prospects in non‐invasive assessment of liver fibrosis: Liquid biopsy as the future gold standard? Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. 2018;1864:1024‐1036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Wetmore BA, Brees DJ, Singh R, et al. Quantitative analyses and transcriptomic profiling of circulating messenger RNAs as biomarkers of rat liver injury. Hepatology. 2010;51:2127‐2139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Conde‐Vancells J, Rodriguez‐Suarez E, Embade N, et al. Characterization and comprehensive proteome profiling of exosomes secreted by hepatocytes. J Proteome Res. 2008;7:5157‐5166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Momen‐Heravi F, Bala S, Kodys K, Szabo G. Exosomes derived from alcohol‐treated hepatocytes horizontally transfer liver specific miRNA‐122 and sensitize monocytes to LPS. Sci Rep. 2015;5:9991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Cobb DA, Kim OK, Golden‐Mason L, Rosen HR, Hahn YS. Hepatocyte‐derived exosomes promote T follicular regulatory cell expansion during hepatitis C virus infection. Hepatology. 2018;67:71‐85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Seo W, Eun HS, Kim SY, et al. Exosome‐mediated activation of toll‐like receptor 3 in stellate cells stimulates interleukin‐17 production by gammadelta T cells in liver fibrosis. Hepatology. 2016;64:616‐631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Chen L, Chen R, Kemper S, Charrier A, Brigstock DR. Suppression of fibrogenic signaling in hepatic stellate cells by Twist1‐dependent microRNA‐214 expression: role of exosomes in horizontal transfer of Twist1. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2015;309:G491‐G499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Giugliano S, Kriss M, Golden‐Mason L, et al. Hepatitis C virus infection induces autocrine interferon signaling by human liver endothelial cells and release of exosomes, which inhibits viral replication. Gastroenterology. 2015;148:392‐402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Saha B, Momen‐Heravi F, Kodys K, Szabo G. MicroRNA cargo of extracellular vesicles from alcohol‐exposed monocytes signals naive monocytes to differentiate into M2 macrophages. J Biol Chem. 2016;291:149‐159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Babuta M, Furi I, Bala S, et al. Dysregulated autophagy and lysosome function are linked to exosome production by micro‐RNA 155 in alcoholic liver disease. Hepatology. 2019;70:2123‐2141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Devhare PB, Sasaki R, Shrivastava S, Di Bisceglie AM, Ray R, Ray RB. Exosome‐mediated intercellular communication between hepatitis C virus‐infected hepatocytes and hepatic stellate cells. J Virol. 2017;91:e02225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Holman NS, Church RJ, Nautiyal M, et al. Hepatocyte‐derived exosomes promote liver immune tolerance: possible implications for idiosyncratic drug‐induced liver injury. Toxicol Sci. 2019;170:499‐508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Tiegs G, Lohse AW. Immune tolerance: what is unique about the liver. J Autoimmun. 2010;34:1‐6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Nong K, Wang W, Niu X, et al. Hepatoprotective effect of exosomes from human‐induced pluripotent stem cell‐derived mesenchymal stromal cells against hepatic ischemia‐reperfusion injury in rats. Cytotherapy. 2016;18:1548‐1559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Nojima H, Freeman CM, Schuster RM, et al. Hepatocyte exosomes mediate liver repair and regeneration via sphingosine‐1‐phosphate. J Hepatol. 2016;64:60‐68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Wan L, Xia T, Du Y, et al. Exosomes from activated hepatic stellate cells contain GLUT1 and PKM2: a role for exosomes in metabolic switch of liver nonparenchymal cells. FASEB J. 2019;33:8530‐8542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Kostallari E, Hirsova P, Prasnicka A, et al. Hepatic stellate cell‐derived platelet‐derived growth factor receptor‐alpha‐enriched extracellular vesicles promote liver fibrosis in mice through SHP2. Hepatology. 2018;68:333‐348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Wang F, Li L, Piontek K, Sakaguchi M, Selaru FM. Exosome miR‐335 as a novel therapeutic strategy in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2018;67:940‐954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Chen J, Yu Y, Li S, et al. MicroRNA‐30a ameliorates hepatic fibrosis by inhibiting Beclin1‐mediated autophagy. J Cell Mol Med. 2017;21:3679‐3692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Li X, Liu R, Huang Z, et al. Cholangiocyte‐derived exosomal long noncoding RNA H19 promotes cholestatic liver injury in mouse and humans. Hepatology. 2018;68:599‐615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Liu R, Li X, Zhu W, et al. Cholangiocyte‐derived exosomal long noncoding RNA H19 promotes hepatic stellate cell activation and cholestatic liver fibrosis. Hepatology. 2019;70:1317‐1335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Masyuk AI, Huang BQ, Ward CJ, et al. Biliary exosomes influence cholangiocyte regulatory mechanisms and proliferation through interaction with primary cilia. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2010;299:G990‐G999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Basu S, Bhattacharyya SN. Insulin‐like growth factor‐1 prevents miR‐122 production in neighbouring cells to curtail its intercellular transfer to ensure proliferation of human hepatoma cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:7170‐7185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Lin XJ, Fang JH, Yang XJ, et al. Hepatocellular Carcinoma cell‐secreted exosomal MicroRNA‐210 promotes angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2018;11:243‐252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Fang JH, Zhang ZJ, Shang LR, et al. Hepatoma cell‐secreted exosomal microRNA‐103 increases vascular permeability and promotes metastasis by targeting junction proteins. Hepatology. 2018;68:1459‐1475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Fang T, Lv H, Lv G, et al. Tumor‐derived exosomal miR‐1247‐3p induces cancer‐associated fibroblast activation to foster lung metastasis of liver cancer. Nat Commun. 2018;9:191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Cheng Z, Lei Z, Yang P, et al. Exosome‐transmitted p120‐catenin suppresses hepatocellular carcinoma progression via STAT3 pathways. Mol Carcinog. 2019;58:1389‐1399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Sohn W, Kim J, Kang SH, et al. Serum exosomal microRNAs as novel biomarkers for hepatocellular carcinoma. Exp Mol Med. 2015;47:e184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Yu LX, Zhang BL, Yang Y, et al. Exosomal microRNAs as potential biomarkers for cancer cell migration and prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma patient‐derived cell models. Oncol Rep. 2019;41:257‐269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Shi M, Jiang Y, Yang L, Yan S, Wang YG, Lu XJ. Decreased levels of serum exosomal miR‐638 predict poor prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Cell Biochem. 2018;119:4711‐4716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Ma X, Yuan T, Yang C, et al. X‐inactive‐specific transcript of peripheral blood cells is regulated by exosomal Jpx and acts as a biomarker for female patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2017;9:665‐677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Xu H, Chen Y, Dong X, Wang X. Serum exosomal long noncoding RNAs ENSG00000258332.1 and LINC00635 for the diagnosis and prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2018;27:710‐716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Wang G, Liu W, Zou Y, et al. Three isoforms of exosomal circPTGR1 promote hepatocellular carcinoma metastasis via the miR449a‐MET pathway. EBioMedicine. 2019;40:432‐445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Sun L, Su Y, Liu X, et al. Serum and exosome long non coding RNAs as potential biomarkers for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Cancer. 2018;9:2631‐2639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Aucher A, Rudnicka D, Davis DM. MicroRNAs transfer from human macrophages to hepato‐carcinoma cells and inhibit proliferation. J Immunol. 2013;191:6250‐6260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Lou G, Yang Y, Liu F, et al. MiR‐122 modification enhances the therapeutic efficacy of adipose tissue‐derived mesenchymal stem cells against liver fibrosis. J Cell Mol Med. 2017;21:2963‐2973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Liang G, Kan S, Zhu Y, Feng S, Feng W, Gao S. Engineered exosome‐mediated delivery of functionally active miR‐26a and its enhanced suppression effect in HepG2 cells. Int J Nanomedicine. 2018;13:585‐599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Rao Q, Zuo B, Lu Z, et al. Tumor‐derived exosomes elicit tumor suppression in murine hepatocellular carcinoma models and humans in vitro. Hepatology. 2016;64:456‐472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Ohara M, Ohnishi S, Hosono H, et al. Extracellular vesicles from amnion‐derived mesenchymal stem cells ameliorate hepatic inflammation and fibrosis in rats. Stem Cells Int. 2018;2018:3212643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Li T, Yan Y, Wang B, et al. Exosomes derived from human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells alleviate liver fibrosis. Stem Cells Dev. 2013;22:845‐854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Rong X, Liu J, Yao X, Jiang T, Wang Y, Xie F. Human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells‐derived exosomes alleviate liver fibrosis through the Wnt/beta‐catenin pathway. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2019;10:98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Kim JH, Lee CH, Lee SW. Exosomal transmission of MicroRNA from HCV replicating cells stimulates transdifferentiation in hepatic stellate cells. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2019;14:483‐497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Liu XL, Pan Q, Cao HX, et al. Lipotoxic hepatocyte‐derived exosomal miR‐192‐5p activates macrophages via Rictor/Akt/FoxO1 signaling in NAFLD. Hepatology. 2020;72(2):454–469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Kakazu E, Mauer AS, Yin M, Malhi H. Hepatocytes release ceramide‐enriched pro‐inflammatory extracellular vesicles in an IRE1alpha‐dependent manner. J Lipid Res. 2016;57:233‐245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Verma VK, Li H, Wang R, et al. Alcohol stimulates macrophage activation through caspase‐dependent hepatocyte derived release of CD40L containing extracellular vesicles. J Hepatol. 2016;64:651‐660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Momen‐Heravi F, Saha B, Kodys K, Catalano D, Satishchandran A, Szabo G. Increased number of circulating exosomes and their microRNA cargos are potential novel biomarkers in alcoholic hepatitis. J Transl Med. 2015;13:261. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Tamura R, Uemoto S, Tabata Y. Immunosuppressive effect of mesenchymal stem cell‐derived exosomes on a concanavalin A‐induced liver injury model. Inflamm Regen. 2016;36:26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Hirsova P, Ibrahim SH, Krishnan A, et al. Lipid‐induced signaling causes release of inflammatory extracellular vesicles from hepatocytes. Gastroenterology. 2016;150:956‐967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Ibrahim SH, Hirsova P, Tomita K, et al. Mixed lineage kinase 3 mediates release of C‐X‐C motif ligand 10‐bearing chemotactic extracellular vesicles from lipotoxic hepatocytes. Hepatology. 2016;63:731‐744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Castano C, Kalko S, Novials A, Parrizas M. Obesity‐associated exosomal miRNAs modulate glucose and lipid metabolism in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115:12158‐12163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Schattenberg JM, Lee MS. Extracellular vesicles as messengers between hepatocytes and macrophages in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Gastroenterology. 2016;150:815‐818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Lee JH, Shim YR, Seo W, et al. Mitochondrial double‐stranded RNA in exosome promotes interleukin‐17 production through toll‐like receptor 3 in alcoholic liver injury. Hepatology. 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Thulin P, Hornby RJ, Auli M, et al. A longitudinal assessment of miR‐122 and GLDH as biomarkers of drug‐induced liver injury in the rat. Biomarkers. 2017;22:461‐469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Holman NS, Mosedale M, Wolf KK, LeCluyse EL, Watkins PB. Subtoxic alterations in hepatocyte‐derived exosomes: an early step in drug‐induced liver injury? Toxicol Sci. 2016;151:365‐375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Bala S, Petrasek J, Mundkur S, et al. Circulating microRNAs in exosomes indicate hepatocyte injury and inflammation in alcoholic, drug‐induced, and inflammatory liver diseases. Hepatology. 2012;56:1946‐1957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Haga H, Yan IK, Borrelli DA, et al. Extracellular vesicles from bone marrow‐derived mesenchymal stem cells protect against murine hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury. Liver Transpl. 2017;23:791‐803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Haga H, Yan IK, Takahashi K, Matsuda A, Patel T. Extracellular vesicles from bone marrow‐derived mesenchymal stem cells improve survival from lethal hepatic failure in mice. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2017;6:1262‐1272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Tan CY, Lai RC, Wong W, Dan YY, Lim SK, Ho HK. Mesenchymal stem cell‐derived exosomes promote hepatic regeneration in drug‐induced liver injury models. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2014;5:76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Liu Y, Lou G, Li A, et al. AMSC‐derived exosomes alleviate lipopolysaccharide/d‐galactosamine‐induced acute liver failure by miR‐17‐mediated reduction of TXNIP/NLRP3 inflammasome activation in macrophages. EBioMedicine. 2018;36:140‐150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Hyun J, Wang S, Kim J, Kim GJ, Jung Y. MicroRNA125b‐mediated Hedgehog signaling influences liver regeneration by chorionic plate‐derived mesenchymal stem cells. Sci Rep. 2015;5:14135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Deng L, Jiang W, Wang X, et al. Syntenin regulates hepatitis C virus sensitivity to neutralizing antibody by promoting E2 secretion through exosomes. J Hepatol. 2019;71:52‐61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Nagashima S, Jirintai S, Takahashi M, et al. Hepatitis E virus egress depends on the exosomal pathway, with secretory exosomes derived from multivesicular bodies. J Gen Virol. 2014;95:2166‐2175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Lambert C, Doring T, Prange R. Hepatitis B virus maturation is sensitive to functional inhibition of ESCRT‐III, Vps4, and gamma 2‐adaptin. J Virol. 2007;81:9050‐9060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Li R, Fu X, Tang Y, Fu L, Tan D, Ouyang Y, Peng S. [Expression profiles of the exosomal miRNAs in the chronic hepatitis B patients with persistently normal ALT]. Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2018;43:475‐480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Murakami Y, Toyoda H, Tanahashi T, et al. Comprehensive miRNA expression analysis in peripheral blood can diagnose liver disease. PLoS One. 2012;7:e48366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Bukong TN, Momen‐Heravi F, Kodys K, Bala S, Szabo G. Exosomes from hepatitis C infected patients transmit HCV infection and contain replication competent viral RNA in complex with Ago2‐miR122‐HSP90. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10:e1004424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Yang Y, Han Q, Hou Z, Zhang C, Tian Z, Zhang J. Exosomes mediate hepatitis B virus (HBV) transmission and NK‐cell dysfunction. Cell Mol Immunol. 2017;14:465‐475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Yao Z, Qiao Y, Li X, et al. Exosomes exploit the virus entry machinery and pathway to transmit alpha interferon‐induced antiviral activity. J Virol. 2018;92:e01578‐18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Li J, Liu K, Liu Y, et al. Exosomes mediate the cell‐to‐cell transmission of IFN‐alpha‐induced antiviral activity. Nat Immunol. 2013;14:793‐803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Jesus S, Soares E, Cruz MT, Borges O. Exosomes as adjuvants for the recombinant hepatitis B antigen: First report. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2018;133:1‐11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Ferrantelli F, Manfredi F, Chiozzini C, et al. DNA vectors generating engineered exosomes potential CTL vaccine candidates against AIDS, hepatitis B, and tumors. Mol Biotechnol. 2018;60:773‐782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data sharing not applicable—no new data generated, or the article describes entirely theoretical research.