Skip to main content
STAR Protocols logoLink to STAR Protocols
. 2021 Jan 13;2(1):100265. doi: 10.1016/j.xpro.2020.100265

Quantitative in vivo assessment of amyloid-beta phagocytic capacity in an Alzheimer’s disease mouse model

Shun-Fat Lau 1,2,4, Wei Wu 1,2, Heukjin Seo 1,2, Amy KY Fu 1,2,3, Nancy Y Ip 1,2,3,5,
PMCID: PMC7811161  PMID: 33490981

Summary

Alzheimer’s disease is characterized by the deposition of extracellular amyloid-beta (Aβ) plaques. While microglial phagocytosis is a major mechanism through which Aβ is cleared, there is no method for quantitatively assessing Aβ phagocytic capacity of microglia in vivo. Here, we present a flow cytometry-based method for investigating the Aβ phagocytic capacity of microglia in vivo. This method enables the direct comparison of Aβ phagocytic capacity between different microglial subpopulations as well as the direct isolation of Aβ phagocytic microglia for downstream applications.

For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Lau et al. (2020).

Subject areas: Cell isolation, Flow cytometry/mass cytometry, Model organisms, Neuroscience

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name fx1.jpg

Highlights

  • Detailed protocol for quantitative assessment of Aβ phagocytosis in vivo

  • Optimized sample preparation for isolating abundant and highly viable microglia

  • High-throughput analysis of microglial phagocytic capacity within 1 day

  • Compatible with downstream transcriptomic and proteomic analyses


Alzheimer’s disease is characterized by the deposition of extracellular amyloid-beta (Aβ) plaques. While microglial phagocytosis is a major mechanism through which Aβ is cleared, there is no method for quantitatively assessing Aβ phagocytic capacity of microglia in vivo. Here, we present a flow cytometry-based method for investigating the Aβ phagocytic capacity of microglia in vivo. This method enables the direct comparison of Aβ phagocytic capacity between different microglial subpopulations as well as the direct isolation of Aβ phagocytic microglia for downstream applications.

Before you begin

Inline graphicTiming: 1–1.5 h

This section lists the stock and working solutions needed for the experiment. It is strongly recommended to prepare the working solution immediately before the experiments.

  • 1.
    Prepare methoxy-X04 (MeX04) solution
    • a.
      Stock solution (10 mg/mL): Prepare MeX04 stock solution (10 mg/mL) by dissolving in DMSO and storing in aliquots (200 μL) at −80°C for at least 1 year.
    • b.
      Working solution (2 mg/mL): Dilute 2 parts MeX04 stock in 3 parts DMSO and 5 parts 0.9% saline (pH 12.0). Refer to “Materials and equipment” for detailed recipe for dilution.
  • 2.
    Prepare artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF) for brain dissociation
  • 3.
    Enzyme dissociation solution (20 mL per reaction, freshly prepared)
  • 4.
    Isotonic Percoll (stock at 4°C)

Key resources table

REAGENT or RESOURCE SOURCE IDENTIFIER
Antibodies

Rat anti-CD11b (M1/70) APC eBioscience Cat. #17-0112-83
Rat anti-CD45 (30-F11) FITC eBioscience Cat. #11-0451-85

Chemicals, peptides, and recombinant proteins

Methoxy-X04 Tocris Bioscience Cat. #4920
Papain Worthington Biochemical Cat. #LS003126
DNaseI Worthington Biochemical Cat. #LS002140
l-Cysteine Sigma-Aldrich Cat. #168149
Percoll Sigma-Aldrich Cat. #P1644
HBSS (10×), no calcium, no magnesium, no phenol red Thermo Fisher Cat. #14185052
DMEM/F-12, no phenol red Thermo Fisher Cat. #21041025
Fetal bovine serum Corning Cat. #35-079-CV
Dimethyl sulfoxide Sigma-Aldrich Cat. #472301

Experimental models: organisms/strains

APP/PS1 mice (non-transgenic mice as WT mice control) The Jackson Laboratory Cat. #34829-JAX

Software and algorithms

FlowJo TreeStar https://www.flowjo.com

Other

Hemocytometer Sigma Cat. #Z359629
BD Influx Cell Sorter BD Biosciences n/a

Materials and equipment

MeX04 working solution (for 3 injections, freshly prepared)

Reagent Final concentration Volume
MeX04 stock (10 mg/mL) 2 mg/mL 200 μL
DMSO n/a 300 μL
0.9% saline, pH 12.0 n/a 500 μL
Total n/a 1,000 μL

Inline graphicCRITICAL: Protect from light. Avoid repeated freeze-thaw of MeX04 stock. The resultant MeX04 working solution (2 mg/mL) should be yellow.

aCSF stock solution (10×, stock at 4°C for at least 1 month)

Reagent Final concentration Amount or volume
NaCl 1190 mM 34.77 g
KCl 25 mM 0.93 g
CaCl2⋅2H2O 25 mM 1.84 g
NaH2PO4⋅2H2O 10 mM 0.78 g
MgCl2⋅6H2O 13 mM 1.32 g
Autoclaved deionized H2O n/a To 500 mL
Total n/a 500 mL

aCSF working solution (1×, freshly prepared)

Reagent Final concentration Amount or volume
aCSF stock solution 50 mL
NaHCO3 26.2 mM 1.1 g
d-Glucose 11.0 mM 0.991 g
Autoclaved deionized H2O n/a To 500 mL
Total n/a 500 mL

Enzyme dissociation solution (20 mL per reaction, freshly prepared)

Reagent Final concentration Volume
aCSF working solution 19.8 mL
Papain (1,000 U/mL) 5 U/mL 100 μL
DNaseI (7,000 U/mL) 35 U/mL 100 μL
l-Cysteine 1.65 mM 0.004 g
Total N/A 20 mL

Isotonic Percoll (stock at 4°C for at least 3 months)

Reagent Final concentration Volume
10× HBSS 5 mL
Percoll n/a 45 mL
Total n/a 50 mL

Step-by-step method details

In vivo labeling of amyloid plaques

Inline graphicTiming: 3 h

This section describes how to label amyloid plaques with methoxy-X04 (MeX04), a blood–brain barrier-penetrating amyloid-beta (Aβ) dye. After MeX04 is intraperitoneally injected into Alzheimer’s disease (AD) transgenic mice, it enters the brain and binds to the surface of Aβ plaques. If microglia are actively phagocytosing amyloid plaques, MeX04 will be internalized together with Aβ. Thus, subsequent flow cytometry analysis enables the quantification of the capacity of microglia to phagocytose Aβ within the 3 h interval between MeX04 injection and sacrifice.

  • 1.
    Intraperitoneal injection of MeX04 into 6–18-month-old AD transgenic mice
    • a.
      Warm the MeX04 working solution (2 mg/mL) in a 37°C water bath for 5 min before injection.
    • b.
      Weigh the AD transgenic mice and intraperitoneally inject MeX04 working solution at 10 mg/kg.

Note: Also include non-transgenic wild-type (WT) mice (i.e., without amyloid plaques) to control for MeX04 signal baseline in flow cytometry analysis.

Brain dissociation and microglia isolation

Inline graphicTiming: 3–4 h

This section describes a modified protocol to maximize the number of microglia isolated.

Inline graphicCRITICAL: To achieve a high yield of viable microglia, freshly prepared aCSF with pH 7.2–7.4 and gentle mechanical dissociation are essential. It is also recommended that each experimenter handle fewer than 3 samples to minimize differences in digestion time.

  • 2.
    Brain dissection
    • a.
      Euthanize mice using isoflurane 3 h after MeX04 injection and perfuse mice with 20 mL ice-cold PBS.
    • b.
      Dissect the region(s) of interest in ice-cold PBS.
  • 3.
    Brain dissociation by papain
    • a.
      Prepare enzyme dissociation solution by adding 0.004 g l-cysteine, 100 U papain, and 700 U DNaseI into 20 mL working aCSF solution (refer to “Materials and equipment” for detailed recipe).
    • b.
      Prewarm the enzyme dissociation solution in a 37°C water bath for 5 min.
    • c.
      Mince the brain tissue into small pieces on a petri dish and transfer to a 50-mL falcon tube with 20 mL enzyme dissociation solution.
    • d.
      Incubate in a 37°C water bath with constant shaking for 10 min.
    • e.
      Remove the tube from the water bath and let the undigested tissue sink to the bottom.
    • f.
      Very gently pass the tissue through a 20-gauge needles 3 times and return the tubes to the 37°C water bath for an additional 30 min of digestion.
    • g.
      Pellet the cells by centrifugation at 800 × g at 4°C for 5 min.
    • h.
      Aspirate the supernatant and subject it to a Percoll gradient.
  • 4.
    Percoll gradient
    • a.
      Prepare isotonic Percoll by adding 9 parts Percoll into 1 part 10× HBSS.
    • b.
      Resuspend the cell pellet in 7 mL working aCSF solution.
    • c.
      Add 3 mL isotonic Percoll and mix well by inverting 10 times; the resultant solution contains 30% Percoll.
    • d.
      Gently add 2 mL working aCSF on top.
    • e.
      Centrifuge at 800 × g at 4°C for 15 min with the slowest acceleration and zero deceleration.
    • f.
      Use a P1000 pipette to gently remove the myelin debris layer trapped between the aCSF and 30% Percoll, and subsequently aspirate all supernatant (Figure 1).
    • g.
      Resuspend the cell pellet in 200 μL of ice-cold DMEM/F12 with 10% heat-inactivated FBS.
  • 5.
    Cell staining
    • a.
      Before cell staining, aliquot 5 μL cell suspension and inspect cell viability, number, and singlet by hemocytometer.
      Note: Number of viable cell number ranges from 1.5–3.0 × 106 per forebrain depending on age of AD transgenic mice.
    • b.
      To label microglia, stain the cell suspension (200 μL) with CD11b-APC (1:200) and CD45-FITC (1:200) for 45 min at 4°C with rotation. In addition, prepare unstained controls using AD transgenic model mice and non-transgenic wild-type mice to serve as fluorescence-minus-one controls.
      Note: The emission spectrum of MeX04 overlaps with that of DAPI/Pacific blue.
    • c.
      After 45 min, wash the cells with 1 mL DMEM/F12 + 10% FBS and centrifuge at 800 × g at 4°C for 5 min.
    • d.
      Resuspend the cells in 500 μL DMEM/F12 + 10% FBS.
  • 6.
    Flow cytometry
    • a.
      Switch on the flow cytometer and perform machine start-up.
    • b.
      Create the following plots in the template (Figures 2A and 2B)
      • i.
        Side-scattered (SSC) versus forward-scattered (FSC) (to identify cell populations)
      • ii.
        Pulse width trigger versus FSC (to identify singlets)
      • iii.
        PB488 versus FSC-A (to identify CD45 signal)
      • iv.
        PB660 versus FSC-A (to identify CD11b signal)
      • v.
        PB450 versus PB660 (to identify MeX04 signal)
    • c.
      Use a non-transgenic mice brain sample to set a negative signal for MeX04 and an unstained control sample to set a negative signal for CD11b and CD45.
    • d.
      Proceed with the samples and record the MeX04 signals of 10,000 microglia.
    • e.
      Analyze the data using FlowJo to obtain the following:
      • i.
        Proportion of MeX04+ microglia = proportion of Aβ phagocytic microglia (Figure 2B)
      • ii.
        Mean fluorescence intensity of MeX04 = Aβ phagocytic capacity (Figure 2C)

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Photograph of the myelin layer and cell pellet after Percoll gradient centrifugation

The myelin layer is trapped between the 30% Percoll layer and artificial cerebrospinal fluid layer.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Gating strategy and analysis of Aβ phagocytic microglia in APP/PS1 transgenic mice

(A) Gating strategy to identify CD11b+ CD45lo microglia. SSC, side-scattered.

(B) Contour plots showing the proportion of Aβ phagocytic microglia in 16-month-old APP/PS1 mice (an Alzheimer’s disease transgenic mouse model). Age-matched non-transgenic wild-type (WT) mice, which lack MeX04 signal, are used as control.

(C) Histogram showing the MeX04 signal intensity of Aβ phagocytic microglia (i.e., MeX04+ microglia) and non-Aβ phagocytic microglia (i.e., MeX04 microglia). MFI, mean fluorescence intensity.

Expected outcomes

This section describes some of the quality control steps during the protocol and the anticipated results. These steps are recommended to ensure good-quality results and minimize artifacts due to sample preparation.

Cell number and viability after papain dissociation

When starting with the whole forebrain, 2–3 million viable cells are routinely obtained after sample preparation. More importantly, the cell suspension should be mostly viable (>95%) and singlet. After FACS isolation, approximately 150,000 microglia per 12-month-old APP/PS1 mouse are usually obtained; more if a younger mouse is used.

Proportion of Aβ phagocytic microglia

The proportion of Aβ phagocytic microglia varies among AD transgenic mouse models (e.g., APP/PS1 and 5xFAD mice) and with respect to mouse age. For APP/PS1 mice, the proportion of Aβ phagocytic microglia should be ∼10% and ∼20% at 12 and 16 months of age, respectively (Figure 2B) (Fu et al., 2016; Lau et al., 2020). This result has been further validated by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in the same APP/PS1 mice. Flow cytometry analysis showed that in 16-month-old APP/PS1 mice, 20.4 ± 2.8% of microglia are MeX04+ (n = 4; Figure 2B), whereas IHC analysis showed that 27.9 ± 4.0% of microglia are Aβ+ (n = 4; Figure 3). These results demonstrate the consistency of our method for examining the proportion of Aβ phagocytic microglia. Also, the intracellular localization of MeX04 in Aβ phagocytic microglia can be confirmed by confocal imaging (Figure 4).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Representative images showing the proportions of Aβ+ microglia in 16-month-old APP/PS1 mice

Scale bar, 20 μm.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Intracellular MeX04 in FACS-isolated MeX04+ microglia

Scale bar, 5 μm.

Limitations

This protocol only measures the phagocytic capacity of microglia within 1–2 h of MeX04 injection. It is inappropriate for long-term measurement (i.e., more than 4 h), because MeX04 can nonspecifically bind to nuclei or other non-Aβ materials.

Although this protocol is compatible with mechanical dissociation, there will be substantially more dead cells as a result of mechanical dissociation. The advantages and disadvantages of enzymatic dissociation versus mechanical dissociation are summarized below (Table 1).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Representative contour plots showing the proportions of Aβ phagocytic microglia after enzymatic or mechanical digestion

WT, non-transgenic wild-type.

Table 1.

Advantages and disadvantages of using enzymatic and mechanical dissociation in this protocol

Characteristic Enzymatic dissociation Mechanical dissociation
Cell viability Higher Lower
Proportion of Aβ phagocytic microglia Higher (due to better cell viability; Figure 5) Lower (due to poor cell viability; Figure 5)
Preservation of transcriptome Potential induction of immediate early genes Better

Troubleshooting

Problem 1

The MeX04 working solution appears cloudy (step 1a).

Potential solutions

Ensure that the 0.9% saline has the correct pH of 12.0.

Use new anhydrous DMSO.

Use a new MeX04 stock solution.

Problem 2

MeX04 cross-reacts with non-Aβ materials (step 1b).

Potential solutions

Titrate MeX04 for intraperitoneal injection and examine the specificity of the Aβ staining pattern by co-staining with Aβ antibody on brain sections.

Problem 3

There are few cells and/or poor viability after sample preparation (step 5a).

Potential solutions

Freshly prepare all buffers and bubble 5% CO2 in O2 through them for at least 10 min immediately before the experiment.

Gently mechanically dissociate with a 20-gauge needle; to avoid foaming, eject toward the tube wall.

Resource availability

Lead contact

Further information and requests for resources and reagents should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the Lead Contact, Nancy Y. Ip (e-mail: boip@ust.hk).

Materials availability

This study did not generate new unique reagents.

Data and code availability

This study did not generate any unique datasets or code.

Acknowledgments

We thank all members of the Ip Laboratory for their many helpful discussions. This study was supported in part by the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong (the Collaborative Research Fund [C6027-19GF], the Theme-Based Research Scheme [T13-607/12R], and the General Research Fund [HKUST16149616, HKUST16103017, HKUST16100418, and HKUST16102019]), the National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFE0190000 and 2018YFE0203600), the Areas of Excellence Scheme of the University Grants Committee (AoE/M-604/16), the Innovation and Technology Commission (ITCPD/17-9), the Guangdong Provincial Key S&T Program (2018B030336001), and the Shenzhen Knowledge Innovation Program (JCYJ20180507183642005 and JCYJ20170413173717055). S.-F.L., W.W., and H.S. are recipients of the Hong Kong PhD Fellowship Award.

Author contributions

S.-F.L., A.K.Y.F., and N.Y.I. conceived of the project; S.-F.L., W.W., and H.S. optimized and conducted the experiments; and S.-F.L., A.K.Y.F., and N.Y.I. wrote the manuscript.

Declaration of interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

References

  1. Fu A.K.Y., Hung K.W., Yuen M.Y.F., Zhou X., Mak D.S.Y., Chan I.C.W., Cheung T.H., Zhang B., Fu W.Y., Liew F.Y. IL-33 ameliorates Alzheimer’s disease-like pathology and cognitive decline. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 2016;113:E2705–E2713. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1604032113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Lau S.F., Chen C., Fu W.Y., Qu J.Y., Cheung T.H., Fu A.K.Y., Ip N.Y. IL-33-PU.1 transcriptome reprogramming drives functional state transition and clearance activity of microglia in Alzheimer’s disease. Cell Rep. 2020;31:107530. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

This study did not generate any unique datasets or code.


Articles from STAR Protocols are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES