Abstract
Background and Aim:
There is a large amount of information on intestinal parasites in stray dogs and golden jackals (Canis aureus) in Mazandaran Province, Iran. However, there is little information about foxes and wolves, which have a potential role in the spread of dangerous parasitic diseases, such as echinococcosis and toxocariasis. The aim of the present study was to identify the genus or species of parasitic worms in stool samples obtained from carnivores in Mazandaran Province, Iran, from August 2017 to April 2018.
Materials and Methods:
A total of 274 fecal samples were collected from carnivores, including dog, fox, wolf, and C. aureus in three areas of Mazandaran Province, Iran. All specimens were examined by centrifugal fecal flotation using a solution of Sheather’s sugar to detect helminths eggs. Then, all samples were assessed using a light microscope. Data analysis was performed by SPSS version 18 (Chicago, IL, USA).
Results:
In this study, seven genera of helminths were observed, including Ancylostoma, Uncinaria, Toxocara, Dipylidium, Toxascaris, Taenia, and Spirocerca. The prevalence of helminth infections was 97.7% (127 out of 130), 56.7% (51 out of 90), 51.4% (18 out of 35), and 52.6% (10 out of 19), among dogs, C. aureus, foxes, and wolves, respectively. The highest prevalence of Ancylostoma and Toxocara infections occurred in the eastern and central areas of the province (42.1% and 35.7%, respectively).
Conclusion:
Based on the results of this study, the infection with intestinal zoonotic helminths in carnivores was an important public health factor in Mazandaran. Therefore, these infections can be potentially harmful to humans and other animals.
Keywords: carnivores, environmental contamination, helminth, intestinal parasites, Iran
Introduction
Zoonoses are defined as diseases or infections that are transmitted naturally between animals and humans [1]. According to the World Health Organization, these diseases represent an important part of all newly identified infectious diseases, as well as existing ones [2]. They threaten human health because many pathogens responsible for diseases in humans are shared with other animals [3]. In fact, the emergence of these diseases among the human population is the result of increased contact between humans and animals. Therefore, several species of domestic animals, including cats, pigs, goats, and dogs, can be the reservoirs for many parasitic zoonoses.
Accordingly, the mode of transmission, namely, the direct and indirect pathways, are important for many protozoa and parasitic helminths. In addition, domestic and wild carnivores, especially stray dogs, can play a crucial role in the transmission of zoonotic helminth diseases to humans and animals in different areas of the world [4]. Canine intestinal parasites are a major concern for humans due to their presence in the marginal areas of cities and villages, especially in the cold seasons. Dogs accommodate several species of dangerous parasites responsible for various diseases, such as echinococcosis, ancylostomiasis, and toxocariasis. These diseases are major public health problems among the human population, especially in developing countries [5]. Although wild carnivores have an important role in natural or biological equivalence, these species are potential reservoirs of many parasites, including those that are shared between pets and humans [6]. The exchange of parasites between animals and humans can happen through the ingestion of eggs and cysts (with contaminated food, vegetables, or drinking water) or by the penetration of larvae through the skin [7,8]. The previous studies in Mazandaran and other areas of the world, including Nigeria, Australia, Belgium, and Hawaii, have shown a high rate of helminthic infections in carnivores [9-11].
The Province of Mazandaran is a region in North of Iran with suitable ecological and geographical conditions for the transmission and distribution of gastrointestinal parasites, and its change of host which may constitute a human public health problem in Mazandaran, but relatively little information on the environmental contamination by helminth eggs is currently available. Therefore, it is timely to conduct this study to investigate the possible role of wolves, dogs, foxes, and golden jackals through epidemiological screening in the transmission of parasitic helminths to other animals and humans. Furthermore, it is to explore the current trend on the epidemiology of parasitic infections by helminths of the Canidae family. This will further minimize exposure risk among people living in the affected areas.
Materials and Methods
Ethical approval
This study was approved by the Animal Ethics and Institutional Research Committee of the Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences (Ref. No: 2929).
Study period and area
This study was conducted in Province of Mazandaran, Iran, from August 2017 to April 2018. Mazandaran is located in North of Iran and on the southeast coast of the Caspian Sea. This zone covers an area of 23,842 km2 with a population of about 2,922,432 individuals who live in rural and urban areas. This province has a special temperate climate and weather conditions with relative humidity of 70-100%, average temperature of 10-35°C, and annual precipitation of 800-1200 mm. This province is geographically separated into coastal plains and mountainous areas in the Alborz Mountains Range. It has various ecosystems, including grasslands, sea, and forests [5].
Sampling
Fecal samples were collected from animals in three livestock farming zones of Mazandaran Province. A total of 274 fecal samples were obtained from Canis familiaris, Vulpes vulpes, Canis lupus, and Canis aureus. All samples were collected with the help of hunters and environmental guards. The criteria for morphological identification were the presence of parasites (shape, size, and internal structures) and confirmed with the reference standard [12], while environmental parameters were screened and confirmed by the presence of fecal matter (i.e., size, shape, and appearance), the footprints of wild carnivores and direct observation to identify the different appearances of these samples obtained from different animal species [12,13]. Approximately 6 g of each sample was placed in a small plastic bag. All the collected materials were transferred to the Parasitology Laboratory of the School of Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Fecal examination
Briefly, approximately 3 g of feces were mixed with 10 mL of premade Sheather’s solution, with the specific gravity of 1.13, and transferred to a 15 mL conical tube. Furthermore, Sheather’s solution was added to fill in the volume to 15 mL, if required. The solution was centrifuged at 1200 rpm (280× g) for 5 min, then a coverslip (20 mm×20 mm) was added to the tube for 10 mins. The coverslip was removed, placed on a glass slide, and examined with a light microscope (Olympus BX 41TF, Tokyo, Japan) using a 10× objective and six fields were checked with a 40× objective. The morphological features and measurement methods were used to differentiate eggs from one to another [14].
Results
According to the results of the current study, different genera of helminths in carnivores were distributed in different areas in Mazandaran Province, Iran. The overall prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites was 75.2%. However, the prevalence of helminthic infections was 84.4%, 82.8%, and 58.9% in the western, central, and eastern areas of the province, respectively (Figure-1).
Figure-1.

Prevalence of parasitic species found in 274 carnivorous fecal samples from three different groups.
Furthermore, the prevalence of helminthic infections was 97.7% (127 out of 130), 56.7% (51 out of 90), 51.4% (18 out of 35), and 52.6% (10 out of 19), among dogs, golden jackal, foxes, and wolves, respectively. The prevalence of parasites among carnivores in North of Iran is presented in Figure-2. In this study, there were seven genera of helminths, including Ancylostoma spp., Uncinaria spp., Toxocara spp., Dipylidium spp., Toxascaris spp., Taenia spp., and Spirocerca spp., which were examined in fecal samples from these selected animals (Figure-3).
Figure-2.

Parasites found in dogs, foxes, golden jackals, and wolf in North of Iran.
Figure-3.

Egg of species found in carnivores in North of Iran. (a) Spirocerca spp., (b) immature Toxocara spp., (c) Uncinaria spp., (d) Ancylostoma spp., (e) Toxocara spp., (f) Taenia spp.; 400×.
Among these helminthic parasites, the infection rate of Ancylostoma spp. was found to be more prevalent in dogs (65.8%) and foxes (22.8%), while the prevalence of Uncinaria spp. infection was more prevalent among C. aureus (28.8%) and dogs (28.6%). The prevalence of Toxocara spp. infection was between 2.8% and 37.9%. However, dogs with an infection rate of 37.9% were the most infected animals. A higher rate of Dipylidium caninum infection (25.5%) was found among dogs compared to the golden jackals (11.1%). The prevalence of Toxascaris spp., Taenia spp., and Spirocerca spp. infections was detected between 0.7% and 13.1%. Remarkably, the highest prevalence of these parasitic infections was found among dogs with the infection rate of 13.1% with a similar spatial distribution in the province. The wolves were more infected with Taenia spp. (5.2%) in comparison to the dogs and golden jackals. Single and double infections were observed in 172 (62.8%) and 31 (11.3%) of carnivores, whereas poly (mixed) infections were found in 3 (1.1%) of these animals (Table-1).
Table-1.
Mono, double, and poly (mixed) infections in examined fecal of different carnivores in North of Iran.
| Number of different helminthes | Dog (n=130) | Fox (n=35) | Golden jackal (n=90) | Wolf (n=19) | Total animals | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | No. | % | |
| Mono infection | 100 | 76.9 | 18 | 51.4 | 44 | 48.9 | 10 | 52.6 | 172 | 62.8 |
| Double infections | 24 | 18.5 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7.8 | 0 | 0 | 31 | 11.3 |
| Poly infections | 3 | 2.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1.1 |
| Total | 127 | 97.7 | 17 | 51.4 | 51 | 56.7 | 10 | 52.6 | 206 | 75.2 |
Discussion
This study attempts to demonstrate the prevalence of helminthic infections of both genus and/or genus and species of parasite worms in fecal samples from carnivores in Mazandaran Province, Iran. The overall prevalence of helminthic infections was 75.2% detected from animals in the current study. The highest prevalence of these zoonotic parasites was observed in dogs’ feces. This finding is imperative for human and domestic animals in urban and rural areas of the province. However, the zoonotic transmission of parasites from other carnivores is also crucial for humans, especially in rural areas. Our results were consistent with a previous study in Iran that reported significant infection rates of helminths in these animals. In fact, the variety in the presence of carnivore feces with different groups of helminthic parasites showed the potential contamination to all public places at any time [15,16].
In this study, two genera of Ancylostomatidae family were identified, including Ancylostoma and Uncinaria, which are the hookworm species that infect canines worldwide [7]. Infection with these parasites is important due to their severity and zoonotic potential [17]. Ancylostoma spp. and Uncinaria spp. cause cutaneous migration of larvae and sensitization of the gastrointestinal tract in humans, mainly in low socioeconomic conditions [18,19]. In this study, the highest prevalence rates of Ancylostoma spp. and Uncinaria spp. infections were seen in canines. However, the infection rate of Uncinaria spp. in dogs was almost similar to the golden jackals. The results of the present study were in accordance with a previous study in North of Iran, which found the prevalence of hookworm infections ranging from 12% to 46% [5].
Toxocara spp. was the second most frequent intestinal nematode, with a prevalence of 37.9% in canines. Toxocara spp. can spread many eggs that are resistant to environmental stresses because they have an outer shell and can remain infectious for 5 years. Therefore, their abundance in the environment can be a real health problem for the human population [7,20]. Herein, Taenia spp. eggs was found 5.2% of fecal samples. This finding is in accordance with the results of earlier studies in Iran [5,21]. This prevalence rate may appear low; indeed, fecal examination might underestimate the number of helminths eggs, especially those of cestode and proglottids compared to necropsy [22,23].
The overall prevalence rates of Toxascaris spp. in dogs, wolves, and golden jackals were 13.1%, 5.2%, and 1.1%, respectively. Surprisingly, this parasite was not detected in foxes. The presence of this parasite could be explained by the fact that dog is the natural host of this parasite. Although humans are not usually infected with this parasite, it is a cause of visceral larva migrants in children [24]. Accordingly, Toxascaris spp. could endanger human public health.
D. caninum is generally considered as a common intestinal cestode in carnivores [25]. In the present study, the prevalence of this parasitic infection was 16.7% and the highest prevalence in carnivores was observed in dogs and golden jackals, respectively. These results were inconsistent with the findings of the previous studies that reported a high prevalence of D. caninum in Iran (33% to 52.5%) [11] and Nigeria (75%) [26]. As a result, a high rate of this parasitic infection in dogs is not surprising. Indeed, it is a common parasite in dogs that are frequently transmitted through flea infestations [27]. However, most infected animals that are in contact with humans are asymptomatic.
Spirocerca lupi is the etiological agent of spirocercosis, a potentially fatal disease in carnivores, especially canids and C. lupus families [28]. This parasite is located within esophageal nodules and sheds eggs in the gastrointestinal tract and in the host’s feces. The prevalence of this parasitic infection has been reported to be 25% in Iran [29]. In our study, we found this parasite in only one dog in the central part of Mazandaran. In addition, our results were consistent with the results obtained in Latin America (Brazil and Venezuela), which reported prevalence values between 0.2% and 19% [30,31]. The presence of this parasite in dogs can be explained by the probable consumption of a paratenic host such as a lizard, hedgehog, rodent, or frog.
Conclusion
The high prevalence rate of helminthic infections among selected carnivores in North of Iran has revealed potentially harmful effects to humans and other animals. Indeed, helminthic infections can be a plausible risk factor for public and environmental health issues. Therefore, suitable operational interventions (i.e., vaccination, neutering, and regular medical check-up) must be adopted to regulate the carnivore populations, to prevent zoonotic transmission, and to further eliminate the infection rates and disease burden. Moreover, epidemiological studies are recommended to be conducted regularly and seasonally across the country, especially in high-risk areas of Iran.
Authors’ Contributions
AS, RN, and SG designed the study. ASP, AD, SS, SAH, LB, and FT collected the samples and analyzed the data. AS and RN drafted the manuscript. MLP and VN edited the manuscript. All authors revised and approved the final manuscript.
Acknowledgments
The authors are thankful to the Head and staff of the Department of Environment of Mazandaran province, Iran, who helped in identifying carnivorous places and sample collection. This research was supported by Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran (Grant number: 96-2929) and Project CICECO – Aveiro Institute of Materials, Portugal, (UIDB/50011/2020 and UIDP/50011/2020).
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’s Note
Veterinary World remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published institutional affiliation.
References
- 1.Hundal J.S, Singh S.S, Gupta A, Singh J, Chahal U.S. Awareness, knowledge, and risks of zoonotic diseases among livestock farmers in Punjab. Vet. World. 2016;9(2):186–191. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2015.186-191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.WHO. Report of a Joint WHO/DFID-AHP Meeting, 20-21 September 2005, WHO Headquarters Geneva, with the participation of FAO and OIE. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2006. The control of neglected zoonotic diseases:A route to poverty alleviation; p. 62. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Dantas-Torres F, Otranto D. Best practices for preventing vector-borne diseases in dogs and humans. Trends. Parasitol. 2016;32(1):43–55. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2015.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Deplazes P, Van Knapen F, Schweiger A, Overgaauw P.A. Role of pet dogs and cats in the transmission of helminthic zoonoses in Europe, with a focus on echinococcosis and toxocarosis. Vet. Parasitol. 2011;182(1):41–53. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.07.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gholami I, Daryani A, Sharif M, Amouei A, Mobedi I. Seroepidemiological survey of helminthic parasites of stray dogs in Sari city, Northern Iran. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 2011;14(2):133–137. doi: 10.3923/pjbs.2011.133.137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Duscher G.G, Leschnik M, Fuehrer H.P, Joachim A. Wildlife reservoirs for vector-borne canine, feline and zoonotic infections in Austria. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites. Wildl. 2015;4(1):88–96. doi: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2014.12.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Emameh R.Z, Purmonen S, Sukura A, Parkkila S. Surveillance and diagnosis of zoonotic foodborne parasites. Food Sci. Nutr. 2017;6(1):3–17. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Anvari D, Saadati D, Nabavi R, Eskandani M.A. Epidemiology and molecular prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in cattle slaughtered in Zahedan and Zabol districts, South East of Iran. Iran. J. Parasitol. 2018;13(1):114–119. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Sarvi S, Daryani A, Sharif M, Rahimi M.T, Kohansal M.H, Mirshafiee S, Siyadatpanah A, Hosseini S.A, Gholami S. Zoonotic intestinal parasites of carnivores:A systematic review in Iran. Vet. World. 2018;11(1):58–65. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2018.58-65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ekong P.S, Juryit R, Dika N.M, Nguku P, Musenero M. Prevalence and risk factors for zoonotic helminth infection among humans and animals-Jos, Nigeria, 2005-2009. Pan. Afr. Med. J. 2012;12(2):6. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Eslahi A.V, Kia E.B, Mobedi I, Sharifdini M, Badri M, Mowlavi G. Carnivores illustrate the status of zoonotic helminthes in Caspian Sea Littoral of Iran. Iran. J. Parasitol. 2017;12(2):230–235. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Oudni-M'rad M, Chaâbane-Banaoues R, M'rad S, Trifa F, Mezhoud H, Babba H. Gastrointestinal parasites of canids, a latent risk to human health in Tunisia. Parasite Vector. 2017;10(1):280. doi: 10.1186/s13071-017-2208-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gompper M.E, Goodman R.M, Kays R.W, Ray J.C, Fiorello C.V, Wade S.E. A survey of the parasites of coyotes (Canislatrans) in New York based on fecal analysis. J. Wildl. Dis. 2003;39(3):712–717. doi: 10.7589/0090-3558-39.3.712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Dryden M.W, Payne P.A, Ridley R, Smith V. Comparison of common fecal flotation techniques for the recovery of parasite eggs and oocysts. Vet. Ther. 2005;6(1):15–28. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Boundenga L, Moussadji C, Mombo I.M, Ngoubangoye B, Lekana-Douki J.B, Hugot J.P. Diversity and prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites in two wild Galago species in Gabon. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2018;63(7):249–256. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2018.04.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Penakalapati G, Swarthout J, Delahoy M.J, McAliley L, Wodnik B, Levy K, Freeman M.C. Exposure to animal feces and human health:A systematic review and proposed research priorities. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017;51(20):11537–11552. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.7b02811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Otranto D, Deplazes P. Zoonotic nematodes of wild carnivores. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites. Wildl. 2019;9(2):370–383. doi: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2018.12.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Symeonidou I, Gelasakis A.?, Arsenopoulos K.V, Schaper R, Papadopoulos E. Regression models to assess the risk factors of canine gastrointestinal parasitism. Vet. Parasitol. 2017;248(17):54–61. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2017.10.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Canto G.J, Garcia M.P, Garcia A, Guerrero M.J, Mosqueda J. The prevalence and abundance of helminth parasites in stray dogs from the city of Queretaro in central Mexico. J. Helminthol. 2011;85(3):263–269. doi: 10.1017/S0022149X10000544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Otranto D, Cantacessi C, Dantas-Torres F, Brianti E, Pfeffer M, Genchi C, Guberti V, Capelli G, Deplazes P. The role of wild canids and felids in spreading parasites to dogs and cats in Europe. Part II:Helminths and arthropods. Vet. Parasitol. 2015;213(1-2):24–37. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2015.04.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kohansal M.H, Nourian A, Haniloo A, Fazaeli A. Molecular detection of Taenia spp. In dogs'feces in Zanjan Province, Northwest of Iran. Vet. World. 2017;10(4):445–449. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2017.445-449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Gillespie S, Bradbury R.S. A survey of intestinal parasites of domestic dogs in Central Queensland. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2017;2(4):60. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed2040060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sardarian K, Maghsood A.H, Ghiasian S.A, Zahirnia A.H. Prevalence of zoonotic intestinal parasites in household and stray dogs in rural areas of Hamadan, Western Iran. Trop. Biomed. 2015;32(2):240–246. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Carvalho E.A, Rocha R.L. Toxocariasis:Visceral larva migrans in children. J. Pediatr. (Rio J) 2011;87(2):100–110. doi: 10.2223/JPED.2074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Martinez-Moreno F, Hernández S, López-Cobos E, Becerra C, Acosta I, Martinez-Moreno A. Estimation of canine intestinal parasites in Cordoba (Spain) and their risk to public health. Vet. Parasitol. 2007;143(1):7–13. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Umar Y. Intestinal helminthoses in dogs in Kaduna metropolis, Kaduna state, Nigeria. Iran. J. Parasitol. 2009;4(1):34–39. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Xhaxhiu D, Kusi I, Rapti D, Kondi E, Postoli R, Rinaldi L, Dimitrova Z.M, Visser M, Knaus M, Rehbein S. Principal intestinal parasites of dogs in Tirana, Albania. Parasitol. Res. 2011;108(2):341–353. doi: 10.1007/s00436-010-2067-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Rojas A, Sanchis-Monsonis G, Alic A, Hodzic A, Otranto D, Yasur-Landau D, Martínez-Carrasco C, Baneth G. Spirocercavulpis sp. nov. (Spiruridae:Spirocercidae):Description of a new nematodespecies of the red fox, Vulpesvulpes (Carnivora:Canidae) Parasitol. 2018;145(14):1917–1928. doi: 10.1017/S0031182018000707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Gholi-Toluei M, Amniattalab A, Rasouli S. Oesophageal spirocercosis in stray dogs of Urmia. Res. Opin. Anim. Vet. Sci. 2015;5(9):388–391. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Oliveira-Sequeira T.C, Amarante A.F, Ferrari T.B, Nunes L.C. Prevalence of intestinal parasites in dogs from Sao Paulo state, Brazil. Vet. Parasitol. 2002;103(1-2):19–27. doi: 10.1016/s0304-4017(01)00575-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ramirez-Barrios R.A, Barboza-Mena G, Munoz J, Angulo-Cubillan F, Hernandez E, Gonzalez F, Escalona F. Prevalence of intestinal parasites in dogs under veterinary care in Maracaibo, Venezuela. Vet. Parasitol. 2004;121(1-2):11–20. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2004.02.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
