Abstract
Because of physiology of coleoids, their fossils preserve soft-tissue-remains more often than other cephalopods. Sometimes, the phosphatized soft-tissues, particularly parts of the muscular mantle, display dark circular patterns. Here, we showcase that these patterns, here documented for fossil coleoids from the Jurassic of Germany and the Cretaceous of Lebanon, superficially resemble chromatophores (which enable living coleoids to alter their coloration). We examined and chemically analyzed the circular structures in these specimens, describe them, and discuss their genesis. Based on their structure and color, we visually differentiate between three types of circles. By comparison with similar structures, we suggest that these structures are not biogenic but Liesegang rings, which formed due to reaction-diffusion processes very soon after death.
Keywords: Coleoidea, Vampyropoda, Jurassic, Cretaceous, Diagenesis, Exceptional preservation, Conservation deposits
Introduction
Coleoids (octopus, squid and their ancestors) have a surprising record of soft-tissue fossils despite their limited biomineralised tissues. There are known biases that prevent some coleoid tissues from fossilizing (Clements et al., 2016), however, conservation deposits (Konservatlagerstätten sensu Seilacher, 1970) of Carboniferous to Cretaceous age (Naef, 1923; Klinghardt, 1932; Johnson & Richardson, 1968; Rieber, 1970; Kluessendorf & Doyle, 2000; Doguzhaeva, Mapes & Mutvei, 2002; Fuchs, 2006a, 2006b; Schweigert & Dietl, 2010; Donovan, Fuchs & Part, 2016; Klug et al., 2019; Jenny et al., 2019) yield many specimens with phosphatized remains. For example, there are good records of fossilized organs such as the buccal mass, digestive tract, gills, fins, spermatophores, mantle muscles, cephalic cartilage, arm nerve bundles etc. (Keupp et al., 2010; Klug et al., 2015, 2016, 2019; Jenny et al., 2019). The scarcity of soft-tissue preservation in crown group decabrachians is linked with the higher amount of ammonia in their bodies (Clements et al., 2016). Despite this, the anatomy of fossil coleoids is better known than that of ectocochleate cephalopods such as ammonoids (with external shell and presumably low amounts of or no ammonia; Klug, Riegraf & Lehmann, 2012).
Recently, three coleoid specimens and one coprolite were discovered, displaying concentric circular structures. They were found in platy limestones (Plattenkalks) of the German Late Jurassic and the Lebanese Late Cretaceous. Both occurrences are world-renowned conservation deposits, which contain, among many other fossils, reasonably abundant coleoid remains often retaining some remnants of soft-tissue (Allison, 1988; Wilby et al., 2004; Fuchs, 2006a, 2006b; Fuchs & Larson, 2011; Donovan, Fuchs & Part, 2016; Klug et al., 2015, 2016). These soft-tissue remains are usually phosphatized except for jaws and ink, which may be carbonized (Klug et al., 2015).
The specimens under consideration here display more or less circular structures with concentric rings or spirals inside. At first sight, we thought of a first case of fossilized chromatophores, that is, the cells enabling many modern coleoids to rapidly change their colors (Sereni, 1930; Cloney & Florey, 1968; Florey, 1969; Cloney & Brocco, 1983; Dubas et al., 1986; Hanlon, 2007; Kingston et al., 2015; Ramirez & Oakley, 2015). This interpretation was falsified based on the broad size-range of the structures between less than a millimeter and over one centimeter and the absence of characteristic anatomical features, which should be preserved but are not. Additionally, the internal patterns are concentric or spiral, which does not coincide with those of cephalopod chromatophores.
From this falsification, the question for the origin of these patterns arose. Are they comparable to silicification rings (Kazanci & Varol, 1993), Liesegang rings (Keller & Rubinow, 1981; Zhang et al., 2014) or other peculiar mineralization processes (Chernov, 1961; Martins & Rocha, 2007; Cartwright et al., 2009; Seiss, Ouissen & Chaussende, 2013; Shtukenberg et al., 2013)? The structures found in the phosphatized mantle of the Mesozoic coleoids share patterns with all three phenomena.
The aims of this study are to (1) describe all available specimens displaying these phosphatized circular and spiral patterns with a focus on these structures, (2) to document their chemistry and organization, and (3) to discuss their genesis, that is, whether these are biological structures or not and how they formed.
Material
The specimens are kept in the Paläontologisches Institut und Museum of the Universität Zürich, Switzerland (PIMUZ numbers), as well as at the Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde in Stuttgart, Germany (SMNS numbers). Three coleoids and one coprolite were included here.
The oldest specimens (PIMUZ 51761; SMNS 70496) are from the Beckeri Zone, Ulmense Subzone, rebouletianum Horizon (Kimmeridgian) of the Rygol quarry near Painten (Bavaria, Germany). Both belong to Trachyteuthis, possibly T. hastiformis (Rüppell, 1829), which is one of the more common coleoids of the Solnhofen Archipelago. This assignment is based on the shape of the gladius with a characteristic granulated median field (Fuchs, 2006a, 2006b). The locality has become famous for its exceptionally preserved vertebrates and also for its organic preservation in coleoids (Klug et al., 2015). While chitinous cephalopod mandibles are not preserved in the Solnhofen region, these are commonly present in Painten (Klug et al., 2015).
Like Painten, the Plattenkalk-locality Nusplingen in Baden-Württemberg (Germany) also preserves carbonaceous matter well (slightly older than the fossiliferous strata in Painten). From there, we include the coprolite Medusites (Schweigert, 2001), which also shows these circular structures (SMNS P1856).
The last specimen is a complete specimen of Dorateuthis syriaca (Woodward, 1883) from the Cenomanian of the Haqel conservation deposit in Lebanon (Fuchs, 2006b; Fuchs & Larson, 2011; Jattiot et al., 2014). This species was identified based on its characteristic elongate gladius and its body proportions. It is also the most common coleoid in this locality. These platy limestones are famous for their articulated fish remains but also for soft-tissue preservation in ammonoids (Wippich & Lehmann, 2004) as well as stomach contents of both ammonoids and nautiloids (Keupp, Saad & Schweigert, 2016).
Methods
SEM imaging and EDX analyses of thee uncoated samples were done with a Jeol 6010 VP scanning electron microscope primarily at low vacuum conditions and 10 keV. Equipped with a Bruker EDX system we mapped the elements: C, O, Ca, Si, P, F and S with Esprit 2.1 software. In addition, we used Raman spectroscopy with three different laser excitation systems (red, blue, green); however, fluorescence was always too high to obtain useful analytical results.
X-ray diffraction (XRD) was collected on unpreprared millimetric samples extracted from the fossils using a conventional Cu-Kα (λ = 1.5418 Å) diffractometer (ARL X’TRA; Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA) at the Institute of Earth Sciences, University of Lausanne, using the following experimental conditions: 2θ range: 5–65°; 0.02° angular step, 1 s counting time. Phase identification was carried out using references from the RRUFF database (https://rruff.info/).
Raman microspectroscopy was performed at the Institute of Earth Sciences, University of Lausanne, using a Horiba Jobin Yvon LabRAM 800 HR spectrometer in a confocal configuration, equipped with an Ar+ laser (532 nm) excitation source and an electron multiplying charge-coupled device (EMCCD). Measurements were performed at constant room temperature, directly on the sample surface, by focusing the laser beam with a 300 μm confocal hole using a long working distance ×50 objective (NA = 0.70). This configuration provided a ≈2 μm spot size for a laser power delivered at the sample surface below 1 mW. Light was dispersed using a 1,800 gr/mm diffraction grating.
Most photos were taken with a normal camera (Nikon D6) under white light. One photo was taken using a simple UV-light and a UV-filter on the camera’s lens.
Description
Visual classification of circular structures
This study focuses on circular structures in phosphatic fossils from the Mesozoic. These structures have different appearances. Accordingly, we classified three different forms, here exemplified using specimen SMNS 70496 (types I to III). In the following, we describe these types (overview in Fig. 1):
Type I (Fig. 1A): This is the most common type. The circles of Type I have an outer field of a lighter gray and a central field in brownish darker gray, although the color contrast between the two is low (Figs. 2C, 2E, 2H and 3B). The central brownish circle appears to contain slightly more of some dark matter. The outer ring appears to be composed of more or less homogeneous phosphate, but sometimes, faint concentric circles are visible. This suggests that the concentric structures are omnipresent but only become visible in the presence of a black substance we interpret as ink: all examined coleoids had ink sacs, which are discernible in two of the specimens. The visual comparison of the black substance with ink in ink sac of other fossil coleoids supports the interpretation as ink (cf. Doguzhaeva, Mapes & Mutvei, 2002; Glass et al., 2012; Lindgren et al., 2012; Košťák et al., 2018).
Type II (Figs. 1B and 1C): The second form is richer in organic matter (former ink) and displays fine black concentric circles in the more deeply weathered gray phosphate (Figs. 2D, 2F, 3A and 3E). Usually, there is a darker spot in the center, surrounded by concentric or eccentric rings (i.e., the center of concentric rings either coincides with the outline of the circle or not), partial rings or spirals. In the largest Type II-circles, small Type I or even Type II-circles are present (Fig. 2F).
Type III (Fig. 1D): The third form appears to be composed of almost exclusively black organic matter (Figs. 2E and 2G), that is, former ink, but it shows similarly sized concentric circles as the Type II-circles. This type was found only in this specimen and only in a few spots. We assume that, although they appear nearly entirely black, they still contain quite some phosphate. This is supported by the presence of the slightly brighter rings in Fig. 2G.
These three types reflect an increase in organic matter, that is former ink and thus melanin. Especially around and posterior to the aptychi (=calcified lower jaw of an ammonoid that was eaten by the coleoid), spaces between circles are filled with black amorphous matter, which fractures like gagate (=fossil wood remains, bituminous coal, fossil hydrocarbon, also known as jet or black amber) but lacks internal circles.
Trachyteuthis sp. from the Kimmeridgian of Painten (SMNS 70496; Figs. 2 and 3)
Like many specimens from Painten, it broke when the plate was split. The fossil is about 140 mm long. Like the other specimens, much of it is phosphatized. In the middle, a lanceolate field is covered by irregularly distributed black organic matter. This field might correspond to the gladius or its median field, although no ornament is discernible. Within this field, the circular structures occur (Fig. 2A). An elongate structure filled with organic matter turns upwards and to the left and might represent the ink duct. The posterior end of the supposed ink sac is accompanied by two elongate brownish fields, which show an oblique striation. Possibly, these are gill remains. Posterior to the ink duct, a lamellaptychus is embedded in the phosphate. Its surrounding suggests that this lower jaw of an ammonite was indeed inside the digestive tract of the coleoid (Fig. 2B). The circular structures are described in detail in the methods section since it is used as an example for the classification of circles.
Trachyteuthis sp. from the Kimmeridgian of Painten (SMNS 70496, PIMUZ 51761; Fig. 4)
This is another fragmentary specimen of Trachyteuthis, which shows much of the gladius and non-mineralized remains. It is 133 mm long, preserves parts of the characteristic gladius (partially as imprint showing the granular ornament), phosphatized soft-tissues (mantle and gill remains), as well as the ink sac and ink. It is accompanied by ammonite aptychi (not as stomach contents). Like the other specimen, a lot of ink has leaked into the body of the coleoid during necrolysis or following an injury (no evidence available to determine, which process was involved).
This specimen shows the circles in a broad size range from less than 1 mm to about 10 mm (Figs. 4B–4D). The circles are visible, where the fossil remains were darkened by ink that seeped out of the ink sac. The circles are mostly concentric, often slightly eccentric with alternating broader grayish to brownish fields separated by finer dark brown to black lines. In the largest Type II-circles, the outer bands contain much smaller Type I-circles themselves (Fig. 4D, arrows). This self-similarity corroborates the self-organisation of these patterns. Additionally, the single circular fields vary in width both compared to their inner and outer neighboring rings and within a single field, which occasionally wedge out. The smaller-scale circles of less than 1 mm diameter tend to be of Type I while all larger ones belong to Type II.
Dorateuthis syriaca from the Cenomanian of Haqel (PIMUZ 51762; Fig. 5)
This species represents the most common coleoid from Lebanon (Fuchs & Larson, 2011). The specimen described here (PIMUZ 51762) is 200 mm long and complete including most soft parts. Both slab and counterslab are available. Some arms, the eyes, mantle remains, ink sac and duct as well as the pen are well discernible. Like in the two Trachyteuthis described above, the circles are visible where the phosphatized mantle (characteristic transverse striations) remains show a brown staining from leaked ink. This area corresponds to a surface, where parts of the mantle musculature broke off when the slab was split.
Here, the circles are visible in and around the imprint of the ink sac as well as in and around the ink duct. This arrangement corroborates the genetic link between the circles and leaked ink. Here, the circles also occur in a certain range of sizes, although the largest ones are smaller than the largest ones in the Jurassic Trachyteuthis. In this Dorateuthis, most circles measure less than 1 mm and only a few circles reach about 5 mm (Figs. 5B and 5C). Posterior to the ink sac, most circles belong to Type I and are light gray with a darker brownish center. At the border between the two parts, finer lines occur forming either a couple of fine concentric circles or thin spiral lines completing a few turns (Fig. 5F), thus representing rather Type II-circles. Type III-circles were not seen in this specimen.
Behind the ink sac, the circles are grouped (Figs. 5B, 5C and 5E). Towards the margins of some of these fields, circle size gradually decreases as visible in Fig. 3E towards the top. Possibly, this reflects a link between a change in thickness of the tissue, in which the circles formed.
In the ink duct, Type II-circles are arranged in longitudinal fields, which are delimited by fine and distinct dark lines. In some of these fields, circles are surrounded by segments of surrounding circles covering up to about five mm in diameter (Fig. 5G). Similar longitudinal arrangements of the circles in fields delimited by bright lines are visible in Figs. 5B–5F. The surrounding overlying mantle (top third of the specimen in Fig. 5A) displays its transverse muscular striation but partially lacks the circles where it is whitish (no ink had penetrated this tissue). Further dorsally, the mantle is stained with ink, displaying more Type I-circles.
Under ultraviolet illumination, the dark parts of the circles stay dark, confirming the assumption that these parts are rich in organic carbon and contain less phosphate (Fig. 5C). For details of the composition, see the chapter “Chemical Analyses”.
Medusites capillaris from the Kimmeridgian of Nusplingen (Fig. 6)
This specimen differs from the others in not being a coleoid and the possible absence of ink. According to Schweigert (2001), Medusites is a fish coprolite. Nevertheless, its name reflects its earlier interpretation as a fossil jellyfish (Germar, 1827). The specimen depicted here measures 32 mm across and consists of an aggregate of elongate threads, which are between 0.2 and 2 mm thick. Especially the thickest parts display the Type II-circles, which were described in the coleoid fossils above. Here, the circles are much less well discernible and range between 0.1 and 1 mm in diameter. In this specimen, the circles are dark brown with an almost black center and fine black concentric lines in varying number (Fig. 6B). The number of concentric circles appears to depend on the size of the respective structure.
We did not carry out chemical analyses on this fossil. Since it is considered a fish coprolite, it is possible that the fish fed on coleoids. Consequently, the black matter might indeed be digested ink, but we cannot rule out that it is other organic matter or melanin of a different origin such as visual systems (Schäfer, 2013), liver (Scalia et al., 1990) or others (Wakamatsu & Ito, 2002), which complicates the recognition of original coleoid ink remains. The main mass of vertebrate coprolites is usually rich in phosphate and thus also probable for this specimen (corroborated by the color).
Chemical Analyses
The question for the formation of the circular structures is linked with its composition. Visual clues such as color and breakage as well as occurrence in distinct organs pointed at calcium phosphates in the case of light gray and light brownish substances. Correspondingly, the spatial proximity of darker parts to the ink sac and ink duct imply that it is former ink staining these areas. Localities with Mesozoic conservation deposits such as Nusplingen and Painten in Germany as well as Sahel Alma, Hajula and Haqel in Lebanon are known to have the potential of preserving eumelanin (for analyses of eumelanin from the United Kingdom see Glass et al., 2012).
We analyzed a sample from the Lebanese Dorateuthis (PIMUZ 51762; Fig. 5). Two of the circles were examined by EDX and Raman spectroscopy using various wave-lengths. The latter did provide only little results due to strong fluorescence, which is typical of, for example, fluorapatite. Elemental mapping by EDX was carried out on the original sample surface in two of the circles, and revealed a slight increase in carbon in the dark parts of Type I-circles. Figure 7 shows the EDX elemental maps with the somewhat higher C-content in the brown centers, while O and possibly F appears to be slightly elevated in the lighter gray parts. Two EDX-spectra of the same sample are shown in Fig. 8. As far as the weight percentages are concerned, the differences in Ca and C are confirmed by the values in Table 1. These analyses revealed that calcium phosphate is predominant in the light gray circles behind the ink sac. In the dark center, C appears to be slightly enriched (Fig. 7), while Ca is a bit more abundant in the light gray parts (Table 1). Raman spectroscopy confirms, despite a strong fluorescence associated to a quasi-periodic ripple-artefact (Alleon et al. (2020) and references therein), the presence of C in the circles evidenced by the so-called graphite (G) and defect (D) bands typical of fossil organic materials (Fig. 9C). However, no carbon signal was obtained in the light gray parts at the margin of the Type I-circles. By contrast, X-ray diffraction carried out over a millimetric sample extracted from the fossil confirms the phosphatic nature (apatite) of these structures (Fig. 9D). Quartz and calcite from the sedimentary matrix are found in association with apatite in the German Trachyteuthis (Fig. 9D).
Table 1. Results of EDX-analyses in some Type I-circles in Dorateuthis syriaca, Cenomanian, Haqel (Lebanon), PIMUZ 51762.
Sample nr. | 24 | 38 | 41 | 62 | 66 | Ø brown |
Ø gray |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
O | 46.16 | 37.60 | 40.82 | 41.71 | 47.10 | 42.90 | 42.35 |
C | 22.17 | 11.16 | 13.97 | 18.73 | 14.70 | 18.29 | 12.93 |
Ca | 21.98 | 34.14 | 28.39 | 24.61 | 28.31 | 24.99 | 31.23 |
P | 5.73 | 11.84 | 10.42 | 8.7 | 5.21 | 8.28 | 8.53 |
F | 2.11 | 3.03 | 3.74 | 2.99 | 1.86 | 2.95 | 2.45 |
S | 1.03 | 1.42 | 1.43 | 1.54 | 0.71 | 1.33 | 1.07 |
Na | 0.50 | 0.69 | 0.93 | 0.70 | 0.52 | 0.71 | 0.61 |
Si | 0.81 | 1.12 |
Note:
The values in bold highlight the average values of C and Ca, which differ between the dark and the gray parts of the circles.
Discussion
It is interesting to note that none of the previous authors dealing with phosphatized soft-tissue preservation of cephalopods or other marine animals, preserved ink sacs, or the process of phosphatization mentioned these peculiar circles and spiral structures (Allison, 1988; Wilby et al., 2004; Fuchs, 2006a, 2006b; Fuchs & Larson, 2011; Dornbos, 2011; Donovan, Fuchs & Part, 2016; Klug et al., 2015, 2016). In order to understand their formation, it is appropriate to compare the structures with at least superficially similar structures such as silicification rings as well as Liesegang rings.
Silicification rings
The concentric structures described here from fossil tissues of Mesozoic coleoids and one coprolite superficially resemble silicification rings or beekite rings as widely known from fossils with originally calcitic shell material (Fig. 10) and were first described by Von Buch (1828). Our chemical analyses as well as the optical appearance suggest that no or very low amounts of silica (around 1 weight percent; Table 1) are present in the fossils under consideration here.
Nevertheless, as we will discuss below, the concentric and circular shapes seen in our specimens are highly reminiscent of beekite rings (Butts & Briggs, 2011; Butts, 2014). For these structures, it has been suggested that episodically changing silica availability or varying calcite dissolution account for the formation of Liesegang-like concentric siliceous rings (Hodges, 1932; Holdaway & Clayton, 1982). This similarity hints at genetic parallels, that is, reaction-diffusion processes (Dietrich, 2019), which are likely linked with a gel-like state during early diagenesis.
Liesegang rings
Liesegang rings are concentric structures that form by chemical precipitation, often depending on the concentration of solutions of poorly soluble salts and commonly occur in gel-like environments (Hodges, 1932; Keller & Rubinow, 1981; Zhang et al., 2014). There is quite a considerable number of papers discussing the processes in the experimental formation of Liesegang rings with various salts including carbonates, chromates, metal hydroxides, sulfides but also sulfates (Swami & Kant, 1966; Zhang et al., 2014). The formation of Liesegang rings is, however, also widely known from biological systems (Islam Ou et al., 2012) and geological systems (Seilacher, 2001) as shown in Fig. 11.
Some phenomenona have been observed repeatedly in different experimental systems. For example, the ring width tends to depend on the distance to the gel-liquid interface and the rings apparently do not move. The findings by Zhang et al. (2014) are of special relevance for the system discussed here, because they obtained CaHPO4 by applying CaCl2 and Na2HPO4 to a gelatin ball, that is, there is some chemical similarity. Their main discoveries were the important role of the inner electrolyte Ca2+, which increased gelatin viscosity and allowed the formation of Liesegang rings. Remarkably, Ca is more abundant outside the circles found in the fossil coleoids. Zhang et al. (2014: p. 604) also found that “the interaction of Ca2+ and –COO− of gelatin chains […] dominated the formation of CaHPO4 LRs in gelatin” and “the time law, spacing law and width law observed in 1D/2D gel systems were obeyed in this 3D gelatin system. The interaction of Ca2+ and HPO42− with gelatin matrix played a key role to the formation of LRs due to the existence of carboxylic groups on the gelatin chains”.
How can this knowledge be transferred to the fossils described here? We cannot reconstruct all chemical details of the diagenetic processes that occurred during the formation of Liesegang rings of these fossil coleoids. In the following, we propose a diagenetic pathway that generated these pseudo-chromatophores.
In the course of necrolysis, soft parts begin to fall apart (disarticulate). In the decay experiments of Clements et al. (2016), the mantle tissue started to fracture into blocks quite early. This process began already after a few days, while large pieces of mantle remained intact for weeks. After 7–9 days, the ink sac disintegrated. This is relevant because it informs us about the earliest onset of the formation of Liesegang rings. Only then, ink seeped into the surrounding tissues (for chemical analyses of fossil coleoid ink see Glass et al. (2012)). Remarkably, it was after slightly more than 6 days that the pH in the decaying octopus reached the phosphatization window (Clements et al., 2016: p. 7; Briggs & Wilby, 1996). This suggests that, under normal conditions where there is no environmental factor to retard decay (i.e., low temperature—Briggs & Kear (1993) for variables that effect decay rates), Liesegang rings must have started to form very early during decay—possibly a week after the coleoids’ death and burial.
For the Liesegang rings to form, a gelatinous matrix is needed. Muscle mass loses ultrastructure within days (Kear, Briggs & Donovan, 1995) and becomes “gellified” rapidly during decay (T. Clements, 2016, personal observation). Calcium phosphate was available in the sea water in supersaturation. However, Ca2+ and HPO42−-ions were also available in the soft-tissues of the coleoids (Clements et al., 2016). Likely, there was a favorable gradient in these ions, allowing the Liesegang rings to form. The rhythmic secretion allowed then ink to settle according to the gradients within the Liesegang rings and ink availability as well as space between the tissue parts that were being phosphatized.
Conclusion
We describe two Jurassic and one Cretaceous octobrachian coleoid as well as a Jurassic coprolite, which display subcircular structures with concentric ring patterns. Superficially, they resemble chromatophores, but their fine structure and proportions falsify this interpretation. According to their internal patterns, we differentiate between three types of circles. Type I displays a light gray circle with a brownish center, in Type II, dark, more or less concentric rings and spirals surround the center, while in Type III, the abundance of ink colored the circles more or less completely in black.
These patterns suggest that they are Liesegang rings, which are diagenetic structures well-known from chemical experiments with a broad range of molecules, from biological systems and geological structures. Published results of experiments with calcium phosphates in gelatin revealed that phosphates can form such rings as well. The fossils documented here were all rich in calcium and phosphates as well as organic matter. During decay, we speculate that the matrix, where the Liesegang rings formed, reached a gel-like state. Apparently, the concentrations of dissolved Ca2+ and HPO42−-ions were such that Liesegang rings formed. Depending on the space between adjacent mantle blocks that became phosphatized, squid ink (or other organic matter in the case of the coprolite) could enter and visually enhanced the Liesegang rings to varying degrees, causing the formation of the three types of circles. This study shows how some putative biological structures seen in fossils have formed by taphonomic processes and thus great care has to be taken in the interpretation of unknown fossil structures.
Acknowledgments
Martin Kapitzke (Stuttgart) collected one of the Trachyteuthis in Painten in 2012 and generously donated it to the Stuttgart museum in 2013. Andres Kaech (Zürich) kindly carried out the EDX-analyses and mapping. Teresa Colangelo (Zürich) tried several analytical methods for us including FTIR. Some photographs were taken by DB (Bochum). Thierry Adatte and Brahimsamba Bomou (both Lausanne) performed XRD, and Julien Alleon (Lausanne) Raman microspectroscopy. We thank Johan Lindgren (Lund) and an anonymous reviewer for their thorough work and constructive comments.
Funding Statement
This research was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation SNF (grant 200021_169627). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Additional Information and Declarations
Competing Interests
Gianpaolo Di Silvestro is employed by Trilobite Design Italia.
Author Contributions
Christian Klug conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.
Gianpaolo Di Silvestro conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.
Rene Hoffmann conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.
Guenter Schweigert analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.
Dirk Fuchs analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.
Thomas Clements conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.
Pierre Gueriau conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, and approved the final draft.
Data Availability
The following information was supplied regarding data availability:
All measurements and data are included in the article.
Specimens are stored in the following museums: NMSG-Naturmuseum Sankt Gallen, Switzerland; PIMUZ-Paläontologisches Institut und Museum, Universität Zürich, Switzerland; SMNS-Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde, Stuttgart, Germany. Specimen accession numbers are available in the Material section: PIMUZ 51761; SMNS 70496; SMNS P1856.
References
- Alleon et al. (2020).Alleon J, Montagnac G, Reynard B, Brule T, Thoury M, Gueriau P. Pushing Raman spectroscopy over the edge: purported signatures of organic molecules in fossils are instrumental artefacts. BioRxiv. 2020;3(1):1. doi: 10.1101/2020.11.09.375212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Allison (1988).Allison PA. Phosphatized soft-bodied squids from the Jurassic Oxford Clay. Lethaia. 1988;21(4):403–410. doi: 10.1111/j.1502-3931.1988.tb01769.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Briggs & Kear (1993).Briggs DEG, Kear AJ. Decay and preservation of polychaetes: taphonomic thresholds in soft-bodied organisms. Paleobiology. 1993;19(1):107–135. doi: 10.1017/S0094837300012343. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Briggs & Wilby (1996).Briggs DEG, Wilby PR. The role of the calcium carbonate-calcium phosphate switch in the mineralization of soft-bodied fossils. Journal of the Geological Society. 1996;153(5):665–668. doi: 10.1144/gsjgs.153.5.0665. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Butts (2014).Butts SH. Silicification. In: reading and writing of the fossil record: preservational pathways to exceptional fossilization. Paleontological Society Papers. 2014;20:15–33. doi: 10.1017/S1089332600002783. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Butts & Briggs (2011).Butts SH, Briggs DEG. Silicification through time. In: Allison PA, Bottjer DJ, editors. Taphonomy. 2nd ed. Topics in Geobiology. Vol. 32. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2011. pp. 411–434. [Google Scholar]
- Cartwright et al. (2009).Cartwright JHE, Checa AG, Escribano B, Ignacio Sainz-Díaz C. Spiral and target patterns in bivalve nacre manifest a natural excitable medium from layer growth of a biological liquid crystal. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2009;106(26):10499–10504. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0900867106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chernov (1961).Chernov AA. The spiral growth of crystals. Soviet Physics Uspekhi. 1961;4(1):116–148. doi: 10.1070/PU1961v004n01ABEH003328. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Clements et al. (2016).Clements T, Colleary C, De Baets K, Vinther J. Buoyancy mechanisms limit preservation of coleoid cephalopod soft tissues in Mesozoic lagerstätten. Palaeontology. 2016;60(1):1–14. doi: 10.1111/pala.12267. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Cloney & Brocco (1983).Cloney R, Brocco S. Chromatophore organs, reflector cells, iridocytes, and leucophores. American Zoologist. 1983;23(3):581–592. doi: 10.1093/icb/23.3.581. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Cloney & Florey (1968).Cloney RA, Florey E. Ultrastructure of cephalopod chromatophore organs. Zellforschung. 1968;89(2):250–280. doi: 10.1007/BF00347297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dietrich (2019).Dietrich S. Liesegang rings, spirals and helices. In: Tsuji K, Müller SC, editors. Spirals and Vortices. The Frontiers Collection. New York: Springer International Publishing; 2019. pp. 129–140. [Google Scholar]
- Doguzhaeva, Mapes & Mutvei (2002).Doguzhaeva LA, Mapes RH, Mutvei H. The coleoid with an ink sac and a living chamber from the Upper Pennsylvanian of Oklahoma, USA. Berliner Paläobiologische Abhandlungen. 2002;1:34–38. [Google Scholar]
- Donovan, Fuchs & Part (2016).Donovan DT, Fuchs D, Part M. Chapter 10: fossilized soft tissues in Coleoidea. Treatise Online. 2016;73:1–30. [Google Scholar]
- Dornbos (2011).Dornbos SQ. Chapter 12—phosphatization through the Phanerozoic. In: Allison PA, Bottjer DJ, editors. Taphonomy: Process and Bias through time. Topics in Geobiology. Vol. 32. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2011. pp. 435–455. [Google Scholar]
- Dubas et al. (1986).Dubas F, Hanlon RT, Ferguson JP, Pinsker HM. Localization and stimulation of chromatophore motoneurones in the brain of the squid, Lolliguncula brevis. Journal of Experimental Biology. 1986;121:1–25. doi: 10.1242/jeb.121.1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Florey (1969).Florey E. Ultrastructure and function of cephalopod chromatophores. American Zoologist. 1969;9(2):429–442. doi: 10.1093/icb/9.2.429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fuchs (2006a).Fuchs D. Fossil erhaltungsfähige Merkmalskomplexe der Coleoidea (Cephalopoda) und ihre phylogenetische Bedeutung. Berliner Paläobiologische Abhandlungen. 2006a;8:1–122. [Google Scholar]
- Fuchs (2006b).Fuchs D. Taxonomy and morphology of vampyropod Coleoids (Cephalopoda) from the Upper Cretaceous of Lebanon. Memorie della Società Italiana di Scienze Naturali et del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Milano. 2006b;34:1–28. [Google Scholar]
- Fuchs & Larson (2011).Fuchs D, Larson NL. Diversity, morphology, and phylogeny of coleoid cephalopods from the Upper Cretaceous plattenkalks of Lebanon—Part I: Prototeuthidina. Journal of Paleontology. 2011;85(2):234–249. doi: 10.1666/10-089.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Germar (1827).Germar EF. Ueber die Versteinerungen von Solenhofen. In: Keferstein C, editor. Teutschland geognostisch-geologisch dargestellt und mit Charten und Zeichnungen erläutert. Vol. 4. Weimar: Verlag des Landes-Industrie-Comptoirs; 1827. pp. 89–110. [Google Scholar]
- Glass et al. (2012).Glass K, Ito S, Wilby PR, Sota T, Nakamura A, Bowers CR, Vinther J, Dutta S, Summons R, Briggs DEG, Wakamatsu K, Simon JD. Direct chemical evidence for eumelanin pigment from the Jurassic period. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2012;109(26):10218–10223. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1118448109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hanlon (2007).Hanlon R. Cephalopod dynamic camouflage. Current Biology. 2007;17(11):400–404. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.03.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hodges (1932).Hodges ES. Liesegang rings and other periodic structures. London: Chapman & Hall; 1932. p. 122. [Google Scholar]
- Holdaway & Clayton (1982).Holdaway HK, Clayton C. Preservation of shell microstructure in silicified brachiopods from the Upper Cretaceous Wilmington Sands of Devon. Geological Magazine. 1982;119(4):371–382. doi: 10.1017/S0016756800026285. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Islam Ou et al. (2012).Islam Ou JJ, Hansen K, Simon RA, Quddus MR. Liesegang-like rings in lactational changes in the breast. Case Reports in Pathology. 2012;268903(8):1–4. doi: 10.1155/2012/268903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jattiot et al. (2014).Jattiot J, Brayard A, Fara E, Charbonnier S. Gladius-bearing coleoids from the Upper Cretaceous Lebanese Lagerstätten: diversity, morphology, and phylogenetic implications. Journal of Paleontology. 2014;89(1):148–167. doi: 10.1017/jpa.2014.13. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Jenny et al. (2019).Jenny D, Fuchs D, Arkhipkin AI, Hauff RB, Fritschi B, Klug C. Predatory behavior and taphonomy of a Jurassic belemnoid coleoid (Diplobelida, Cephalopoda) Scientific Reports. 2019;9(1):7944. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-44260-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Johnson & Richardson (1968).Johnson RG, Richardson ES. Ten-armed fossil cephalopod from the Pennsylvanian in Illinois. Science. 1968;159(3814):526–528. doi: 10.1126/science.159.3814.526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kazanci & Varol (1993).Kazanci N, Varol B. The occurrence and significance of beekite in Paleocene alluvial-fan deposits in central Anatolia, Turkey. Terra Nova. 1993;5(1):36–39. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3121.1993.tb00224.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kear, Briggs & Donovan (1995).Kear A, Briggs DEG, Donovan DT. Decay and fossilization of non-mineralized tissue in coleoid cephalopods. Palaeontology. 1995;38:105–131. [Google Scholar]
- Keller & Rubinow (1981).Keller JB, Rubinow SI. Recurrent precipitation and Liesegang rings. Journal of Chemical Physics. 1981;74(9):5000–5007. doi: 10.1063/1.441752. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Keupp et al. (2010).Keupp H, Engeser T, Fuchs D, Haeckel W. Ein Trachyteuthis hastiformis (Cephalopoda, Coleoidea) mit Spermatophoren aus dem Ober-Kimmeridgium von Painten (Ostbayern) Archaeopteryx. 2010;28:23–30. [Google Scholar]
- Keupp, Saad & Schweigert (2016).Keupp H, Saad PA, Schweigert G. Nautiliden mit Kiefern und Mageninhalt. Fossilien. 2016;2016(2):38–43. [Google Scholar]
- Kingston et al. (2015).Kingston ACN, Kuzirian AM, Hanlon RT, Cronin TW. Visual phototransduction components in cephalopod chromatophores suggest dermal photoreception. Journal of Experimental Biology. 2015;218(10):1596–1602. doi: 10.1242/jeb.117945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Klinghardt (1932).Klinghardt F. Über den methodischen Nachweis der Eingeweide bei fossilen Tintenfischen. Paläontologische Zeitschrift. 1932;14:160–164. [Google Scholar]
- Kluessendorf & Doyle (2000).Kluessendorf J, Doyle P. Pohlsepia mazonensis, an early octopus from the Carboniferous of Illinois, USA. Palaeontology. 2000;43(5):919–926. doi: 10.1111/1475-4983.00155. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Klug et al. (2016).Klug C, Fuchs D, Schweigert G, Kruta I, Tischlinger H. Adaptations to squid-style high-speed swimming in Jurassic belemnitids. Biology Letters. 2016;12(1):1–5. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2015.0877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Klug et al. (2015).Klug C, Fuchs D, Schweigert G, Röper M, Tischlinger H. New anatomical information on arms and fins from exceptionally preserved Plesioteuthis (Coleoidea) from the Late Jurassic of Germany. Swiss Journal of Palaeontology. 2015;134(2):245–255. doi: 10.1007/s13358-015-0093-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Klug, Riegraf & Lehmann (2012).Klug C, Riegraf W, Lehmann J. Soft-part preservation in heteromorph ammonites from the Cenomanian-Turonian Boundary Event (OAE 2) in the Teutoburger Wald (Germany) Palaeontology. 2012;55(6):1307–1331. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4983.2012.01196.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Klug et al. (2019).Klug C, Landman NH, Fuchs D, Mapes RH, Pohle A, Guériau P, Reguer S, Hoffmann R. Anatomy and evolution of the first Coleoidea in the Carboniferous. Communications Biology. 2019;2(1):280. doi: 10.1038/s42003-019-0523-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Košťák et al. (2018).Košťák M, Schlögl J, Culka A, Tomašových A, Mazuch M, Hudáčková N. The unique preservation of Sepia soft tissues in the Miocene deposits (Serravalian, Vienna Basin): implications for the origin of microbodies in the fossil record. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 2018;493:111–118. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2018.01.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Lindgren et al. (2012).Lindgren J, Uvdal P, Sjövall P, Nilsson DE, Engdahl A, Schultz BP, Thiel V. Molecular preservation of the pigment melanin in fossil melanosomes. Nature Communications. 2012;3(1):824. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martins & Rocha (2007).Martins PM, Rocha F. Characterization of crystal growth using a spiral nucleation model. Surface Science. 2007;601(16):3400–3408. doi: 10.1016/j.susc.2007.06.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Naef (1923).Naef A. Die fossilen Tintenfische [The fossil squids] Jena: Gustav Fischer; 1923. p. 322. [In German] [Google Scholar]
- Ramirez & Oakley (2015).Ramirez MD, Oakley TH. Eye independent, light-activated chromatophore expansion (LACE) and expression of phototransduction genes in the skin of Octopus bimaculoides. Journal of Experimental Biology. 2015;218(10):1513–1520. doi: 10.1242/jeb.110908. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rieber (1970).Rieber H. Phragmoteuthis? ticinensis n. sp., ein Coleoidea-Rest aus der Grenzbitumenzone (Mittlere Trias) des Monte San Giorgio (Kt. Tessin, Schweiz) Paläontologische Zeitschrift. 1970;44:32–40. [Google Scholar]
- Rüppell (1829).Rüppell E. Abbildung und Beschreibung einiger neuer oder wenig bekannten Versteinerungen aus der Kalkschieferformation von Soln—hofen. Frankfurt/M.: Brönner Verlag; 1829. [Google Scholar]
- Scalia et al. (1990).Scalia M, Geremia E, Corsaro C, Santoro C, Baratta D, Sichel G. Lipid peroxidation in pigmented and unpigmented liver tissues: protective role of melanin. Pigment Cell Research. 1990;3(2):115–119. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0749.1990.tb00330.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schäfer (2013).Schäfer N. Raman spectroscopy in geobiology—advances in detection and interpretation of organic signatures in rocks and minerals. 2013. Phd thesis Georg-August University School of Science, Göttingen, Germany.
- Schweigert (2001).Schweigert G. On Medusites Germar (Coprolite) and true algae from Upper Jurassic lithographic limestones of Germany. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie Monatshefte. 2001;2001(4):237–249. doi: 10.1127/njgpm/2001/2001/237. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Schweigert & Dietl (2010).Schweigert G, Dietl G. The Coleoidea of the Upper Kimmeridgian Nusplingen Lithographic Limestone (Upper Jurassic, SW Germany)—diversity, preservation and palaeoecology. Ferrantia. 2010;59:165–175. [Google Scholar]
- Seilacher (1970).Seilacher A. Begriff und Bedeutung der Fossil-Lagerstätten. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie Monatshefte. 1970;1970(1):34–39. [Google Scholar]
- Seilacher (2001).Seilacher A. Concretion morphologies reflecting diagenetic and epigenetic pathways. Sedimentary Geology. 2001;143(1–2):41–57. doi: 10.1016/S0037-0738(01)00092-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sereni (1930).Sereni E. The chromatophores of the cephalopods. Biological Bulletin. 1930;59(3):247–268. doi: 10.2307/1536813. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Seiss, Ouissen & Chaussende (2013).Seiss M, Ouissen T, Chaussende D. Comparison of the spiral growth modes of silicon-face and carbon-face silicon carbide crystals. Journal of Crystal Growth. 2013;384:129–134. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2013.09.022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Shtukenberg et al. (2013).Shtukenberg AG, Zhu Z, An Z, Bhandari M, Song P, Kahr B, Ward MD. Illusory spirals and loops in crystal growth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2013;110(43):17195–17198. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1311637110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Swami & Kant (1966).Swami SN, Kant K. Liesegang rings of copper chromate in gelatin gel. Colloid and Polymer Science. 1966;209(1):56–57. doi: 10.1007/BF01500047. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Von Buch (1828).Von Buch L. Über die Silicification organischer Körper nebst einigen anderen Bemerkungen über wenig bekannte Versteinerungen. Berlin: Abhandlungen der physikalischen Klasse der Königlich-Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften; 1828. pp. 43–59. [Google Scholar]
- Wakamatsu & Ito (2002).Wakamatsu K, Ito S. Advanced chemical methods in melanin determination. Pigment Cell Research. 2002;15(3):174–183. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0749.2002.02017.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wilby et al. (2004).Wilby PR, Hudson JD, Clements RG, Hollingworth NTJ. Taphonomy and origin of an accumulate of soft-bodied cephalopods in the Oxford clay formation (Jurassic, England) Palaeontology. 2004;47(5):1159–1180. doi: 10.1111/j.0031-0239.2004.00405.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wippich & Lehmann (2004).Wippich MGE, Lehmann J. Allocrioceras from the Cenomanian (mid-Cretaceous) of the Lebanon and its bearing on the palaeobiological interpretation of heteromorphic ammonites. Palaeontology. 2004;47(5):1093–1107. doi: 10.1111/j.0031-0239.2004.00408.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Woodward (1883).Woodward On a new genus of fossil “calamary” from the Cretaceous formation of Sahel Alma, near Beirut, Lebanon, Syria. Geological Magazine, N.S. 1883;10:1–5. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang et al. (2014).Zhang H, Zhan K, Chen Y, Chen G, Zhou X, Liu J, Wu M, Ni H. Three dimension Liesegang rings of calcium hydrophosphate in gelatin. Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology. 2014;71(3):597–605. doi: 10.1007/s10971-014-3411-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The following information was supplied regarding data availability:
All measurements and data are included in the article.
Specimens are stored in the following museums: NMSG-Naturmuseum Sankt Gallen, Switzerland; PIMUZ-Paläontologisches Institut und Museum, Universität Zürich, Switzerland; SMNS-Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde, Stuttgart, Germany. Specimen accession numbers are available in the Material section: PIMUZ 51761; SMNS 70496; SMNS P1856.