Skip to main content
Elsevier Sponsored Documents logoLink to Elsevier Sponsored Documents
. 2021 Jan;193:111402. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2020.111402

Molecular and neural adaptations to neuromuscular electrical stimulation; Implications for ageing muscle

Yuxiao Guo 1, Bethan E Phillips 1, Philip J Atherton 1, Mathew Piasecki 1,*
PMCID: PMC7816160  PMID: 33189759

Highlights

  • Muscle atrophy and functional declines observed with advancing age can be minimized via various NMES protocols.

  • Animal models have shown that NMES induces motor axon regeneration and promotes axonal outgrowth and fibre reinnervation.

  • The activation of BDNF-trkB contributes to promotion of nerve growth and survival and mediates neuroplasticity.

  • NMES is able to regulate muscle protein homeostasis and elevate oxidative enzyme activity.

Keywords: Neuromuscular electrical stimulation, Ageing, Muscle, Atrophy, Denervation, Motor unit remodelling

Abstract

One of the most notable effects of ageing is an accelerated decline of skeletal muscle mass and function, resulting in various undesirable outcomes such as falls, frailty, and all-cause mortality. The loss of muscle mass directly leads to functional deficits and can be explained by the combined effects of individual fibre atrophy and fibre loss. The gradual degradation of fibre atrophy is attributed to impaired muscle protein homeostasis, while muscle fibre loss is a result of denervation and motor unit (MU) remodelling. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES), a substitute for voluntary contractions, has been applied to reduce muscle mass and functional declines. However, the measurement of the effectiveness of NMES in terms of its mechanism of action on the peripheral motor nervous system and neuromuscular junction, and multiple molecular adaptations at the single fibre level is not well described. NMES mediates neuroplasticity and upregulates a number of neurotropic factors, manifested by increased axonal sprouting and newly formed neuromuscular junctions. Repeated involuntary contractions increase the activity levels of oxidative enzymes, increase fibre capillarisation and can influence fibre type conversion. Additionally, following NMES muscle protein synthesis is increased as well as functional capacity. This review will detail the neural, molecular, metabolic and functional adaptations to NMES in human and animal studies.

1. Introduction

An accelerated loss of skeletal muscle mass and function is a predictable accompaniment of ageing (Convertino, 1990; Cruz-Jentoft and Sayer, 2019; Vandenborne et al., 1998). This physiological process of muscle atrophy, weaker strength and a slower gait speed is collectively defined as sarcopenia (Rosenberg, 1997). Its functional associations and consequences include a high incidence of falls and fractures (Chalhoub et al., 2015; Hida et al., 2016; Landi et al., 2012; Yeung et al., 2019), mobility disorders (Marcus et al., 2012), frailty (Cesari et al., 2014; Wilson et al., 2017), all-cause mortality (Cruz-Jentoft et al., 2019), and substantial individual and social financial burden (Beaudart et al., 2014; Bruyère et al., 2019).

The contraction of skeletal muscles depends on the regulation and coordination of its neural input, which also undergoes significant adaptations in response to ageing. The final motor nervous system associated with muscle contraction is the motor unit (MU), which consists of an efferent motor neuron and all of the muscle fibres it innervates (Liddell and Sherrington, 1925). A decreased number of MUs has been identified in a number of aged muscles in humans, leaving some muscle fibres denervated (Piasecki et al., 2016) and resulting in the loss of muscle mass and functional decrement (Luff, 1998). The denervation of muscle fibres not only occurs in the process of ageing, but also occurs in some neuropathological disorders, such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (Gonzalez Calzada et al., 2016) and autosomal recessive spinal muscular atrophy in children (Kolb and Kissel, 2015).

Resistance exercise has proven to be an effective countermeasure to neuromuscular decrements, including in the elderly (Binder et al., 2005; Frontera et al., 1988; Leenders et al., 2013; Suetta et al., 2008; Tsuzuku et al., 2018; Verdijk et al., 2009). However, certain situations such as injury and/or prolonged bed rest render resistance exercise intervention an unachievable option, particularly in elderly populations, and neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) has been applied as a surrogate to mitigate or treat muscle mass and strength decreases (Kern et al., 2014). The contraction of skeletal muscle triggered by electrical stimulator devices is a result of the depolarisation of motor neuron axons and their branches. This can be achieved in several ways, including stimuli on the superficial muscle belly via self-adhesive surface electrodes, and directly over a motor nerve (Enoka et al., 2019; Mortimer and Bhadra, 2004a). Depending on the goals of the intervention, NMES, composed of stimulation-rest cycles, is provided within a range of frequencies to generate muscle tetany and muscle contraction, over periods of weeks or months (Doucet et al., 2012).

According to the Henneman size principle, the recruitment of MUs in voluntary contractions presents a temporally asynchronous, spatially diffused pattern from slow twitch muscle fibres to fast twitch fibres, from small MUs to larger ones (Henneman et al., 1965), whereas the recruitment pattern via NMES is temporally synchronized, spatially fixed, and non-selective (Gregory and Bickel, 2005; Semmler, 2002), evidenced by early recruitment of a large number of fatigable fast twitch muscle fibres. Unlike motor nerve stimulation activating all muscle fibres within a MU, direct muscle stimulation non-selectively activates fibres in close proximity to the stimulating electrodes, which may not include complete MUs (Fig. 1). The excitation of muscle or nerve is largely dependent on proximity to stimulating electrodes, with axon depolarisation also dependent on membrane resistance (Kiernan and Bostock, 2000; Mortimer and Bhadra, 2004b). Put simply, NMES induces a poorly defined and non-physiological order of MU recruitment.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Motor unit recruitment following neuromuscular electrical stimulation. A) Motor nerve stimulation activates superficial motor neurons, and all fibres within that motor unit; B) Direct muscle stimulation non-selectively activates the muscle fibres in close proximity to the stimulating electrodes, which may not include complete motor units.

Although NMES has been applied as a clinical treatment to maintain or enhance muscle strength and relieve muscle tension, the assessment of the effectiveness is mostly based on a small number of parameters, has been applied largely in younger cohorts, and fails to account for multiple adaptations i.e. molecular responses at the muscle fibre and those that are deemed clinically relevant such as motor control and balance. Importantly, its mechanisms on the peripheral motor nervous system and adaptive changes it produces at the neuromuscular junction (NMJ) remain largely unexplored in humans.

As such, the purpose of this review is to explore the physiology of NMES in terms of both neural and muscular adaptations in animal and human studies, with the intention of providing a more informed foundation for future studies of ageing.

2. Neural plasticity and NMES

Electromyography (EMG), the recording of electrical activity from muscle (Mills, 2005), is widely accepted and used to study MU structure and function (Heckman and Enoka, 2012; Piasecki et al., 2018a; Piasecki et al., 2020). These methods range in complexity but largely involve surface based and/or intramuscular measures, able to generate representations of the ionic exchange across the muscle fibre membrane. The summated action potential of a single MU is referred to as a MU potential (MUP) and represents the summation of depolarization from fibres innervated by the same axon, within the recording range of the electrode. Features of the MUP, such as amplitude, duration, phases, etc., reflect aspects of the MU, such as size, fibre density and complexity, which are routinely used in clinical applications (Dhand, 2014; Katirji, 2007). The compound muscle action potential (CMAP), elicited via maximal electrical stimulation, has also been used as an estimate of muscle excitability from involuntary contractions (Araújo et al., 2015) and is associated with physical frailty in elderly populations (Swiecicka et al., 2020, 2019). Calculating motor unit number estimates (MUNE) has largely been applied to track the motor unit loss in different pathologies (Gooch et al., 2014) or compare across populations i.e. young and old (Piasecki et al., 2016, 2018b; Power et al., 2013).

Involuntary muscle contractions generated by NMES have been considered as a potential strategy to limit the denervation-induced muscle fibre loss and maintain muscle function (Kern et al., 2017), with involvement of efferent and afferent pathways (Gondin et al., 2006, 2005). The NMES-elicited depolarisation of the motor axons transmits descending signals to the motor endplate directly (Maffiuletti et al., 2018) and in parallel the sensory neurons depolarise and transmit ascending signals obtained from direct depolarisation, muscle spindles, Golgi tendon organs and cutaneous receptors (Burke et al., 1983) to the spinal cord (Bergquist et al., 2011; Collins, 2007). The repetitive activation of the afferents generates a somatosensory input, resulting in both central and peripheral involvement (Blickenstorfer et al., 2009; Han et al., 2003; Smith et al., 2003).

The exploration of NMES-induced plasticity of the peripheral nervous system lacks convincing evidence from human experimental data, and most results are derived from animal models (Al-Majed et al., 2000b; Brushart et al., 2002; Johnson and Connor, 2011). For example, electrical stimulation was applied to the thigh muscles of rats following sciatic nerve sectioning, and to a large extent induced reinnervation of the dennervated muscle fibre (Eken and Gundersen, 1988; Vivó et al., 2008). Similarly, a greater MUP size was observed in rabbits following high-intensity NMES, suggesting that NMES improved the regenerative capacity of motor neurons (Nix and Hopf, 1983).

Successful nerve regeneration and muscle reinnervation following NMES ultimately depends on the homeostatic plasticity of the NMJ (Fukazawa et al., 2013). MU expansion requires axonal sprouting, including terminal and nodal sprouting (Hoffman, 1950), and the ability of the original intact axons to form additional neuromuscular connections at synapses (Brown et al., 1981; Slater, 2017; Tomori et al., 2010). A continual supply of neurotrophic factors, such as brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), glial-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) and nerve growth factor (NGF) (Gordon, 2010; Höke et al., 2006), contributes to the axonal regeneration process following NMES. Of all neurotrophic factors, BDNF is the most predominant molecule involved in axonal regeneration (Zhang et al., 2000) and its expression has been proven to be elevated following NMES (Al-Majed et al., 2000a; Wenjin et al., 2011; Willand et al., 2016). Increased BDNF expression can promote axonal sprouting via the trkB signalling pathway (Greising et al., 2015; Mantilla et al., 2014) (Fig. 2), followed by the initiation of downstream signalling pathways (Hurtado et al., 2017; Pradhan et al., 2019), including BDNF-PLC/Ras-PI3K/MEX pathways, and once the axonal sprout reaches the muscle fibre and completes the formation of the intact NMJ, the role of BDNF adapts, now binding to the p75 receptors on the nerve terminal to inhibit continued axonal growth and re-establish the functional connections at the NMJ (Gordon et al., 2003).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Nerve regeneration and muscle reinnervation. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) accelerates axonal outgrowth and the reinnervation process at the neuromuscular junction (NMJ), mediated by brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) through the tropomyosin-related kinase receptor B (trkB), and its downstream pathways.

A certain intensity and duration of voluntary exercise contributes to the enhancement of BDNF levels, and the upregulation of BDNF has a positive correlation with blood lactate content (Boyne et al., 2019; Dinoff et al., 2017; Ferris et al., 2007; Müller et al., 2020; Schiffer et al., 2011), known to increase during exercise. NMES has been reported to elevate the levels of BDNF and lactate in both animal and human studies (Dalise et al., 2017; Hamada et al., 2004), with circulating BDNF levels reaching a similar level or even a higher level as in voluntary exercise (Kimura et al., 2019; Miyamoto et al., 2018), and the increase of lactate was positively correlated with the increase of BDNF (Kimura et al., 2019). The upregulation of BDNF levels and the lactate concentration following low-intensity muscle involuntary contractions is likely due to the non-selective motor unit recruitment pattern, with NMES activating additional fast-twitch MUs (Watanabe et al., 2014). Even if the electrical stimulation may not have the reversed recruitment order, its non-selective principle has the potential to activate a larger proportion of high-threshold motor units.

Given the mounting evidence highlighting adaptations to the peripheral motor system as a major contributor to loss of muscle mass and function in humans (Filippo et al., 2017; Gonzalez-Freire et al., 2014; Hepple and Rice, 2016; Piasecki et al., 2018b), data derived from animal experiments has provided a mechanistic foundation for exploring the benefits of NMES as a pre/rehabilitation strategy to promote neural adaptations in human studies.

3. Morphological effects of NMES

Muscle atrophy and the inability to produce efficient force are the main consequences of neuromuscular deficiencies. Muscle architecture is evaluated from physiological or anatomical cross-sectional area (CSA), muscle fibre length and pennation angle (Lieber and Fridén, 2000). Although data are equivocal because of the different populations studied, various characteristics of NMES protocols and the inclusion of resistance exercise and/or nutrition, collectively it is probable that NMES positively influences total muscle size in humans (Karlsen et al., 2020; Sillen et al., 2013). Eight weeks high-frequency NMES (75 Hz) applied to both vastus lateralis and vastus medialis muscles in healthy elderly resulted in a significant increase of CSA (Filippo et al., 2017). NMES over 4 months also induced an increase in knee extensors CSA, and a greater increase was observed when combined with voluntary exercise (Benavent-Caballer et al., 2014). At the level of individual muscle fibres, histochemical and morphological results following nine weeks NMES revealed that an increase of diameter and percentage was observed in fast-type muscle fibres, while the diameter of slow fibres was decreased (Kern et al., 2014; Zampieri et al., 2015).

The distribution and classification of muscle fibres in humans is based on the content of three predominantly identified myosin heavy chain (MHC) isoforms, consisting of type 1, 2A and 2X (Schiaffino and Reggiani, 2011). An upregulation of MHC-2A and a downregulation of MHC-I expression have been reported in the elderly received eight weeks NMES (Mancinelli et al., 2019). The variability of the plasticity of MHC following NMES may be attributed to variations in stimulation levels (Minetto et al., 2013) and/or variability in the non-selective order of MU recruitment (Gregory and Bickel, 2005). Notwithstanding neural input and the range of applied protocols, there are also several factors that contribute to the conversion of MHC phenotype, including an individual’s habitual physical activity levels (sedentary or active) which could influence baseline MHC isoforms distribution (Gondin et al., 2011).

Combined with the adaptive changes in muscle architecture, the adaptations of muscle fibre capillaries following NMES is of interest due to their role in substrate delivery, for instance, oxygen, which is directly related to the muscle fibre size (Bosutti et al., 2015). Evidence showed that the capillary proliferation and muscle fibre growth followed a similar time course in the skeletal muscles in humans (Verdijk et al., 2016), suggesting a positive relationship between capillarisation and muscle fibre hypertrophy. Although the data exploring the adaptations of capillary supply is scant in healthy elderly, it’s found that high-frequency NMES improved the capillarisation of the muscles and preceded the conversion of muscle fibre phenotype (Perez et al., 2002), highlighting the importance of angiogenesis and muscle fibre capillarisation, particularly in older muscle (Prior et al., 2016).

4. Molecular effects of NMES

4.1. Muscle protein synthesis

An imbalance between muscle protein synthesis (MPS) and muscle protein breakdown (MPB) leads directly to individual fibre atrophy, and total muscle atrophy (Wilkinson et al., 2018). Protein nutrition and exercise are regarded as the main countermeasures to attenuate or prevent muscle atrophy (Brooks et al., 2008; Jordan et al., 2014; Wall et al., 2015). Regardless of nutritional intake, even some low volume physical exercise is able to maintain skeletal muscle mass (Ferrando et al., 1997; Oates et al., 2010), further highlighting the potential of NMES as an interventional therapy.

In healthy older individuals, five days of bed rest with NMES and protein supplementation resulted in no significant decrease in muscle mass (Reidy et al., 2017), which would be expected to occur without intervention (Snijders et al., 2019). Similarly Dirks et al., identified the effectiveness of NMES combined with pre-sleep protein intake on MPS in older adults. Prior to 20 g protein feeding, a 70-min single bout of NMES was conducted unilaterally on the lower limb, and muscle biopsies after 4 h showed no difference in myofibrillar MPS between the stimulated and control leg (Dirks et al., 2016). However, the same NMES protocol including 40 g rather than 20 g protein intake, showed an increase in muscle protein synthesis 8 h post feeding, suggesting that metabolic responses to NMES are sensitive to nutritional intervention and are time dependent (Dirks et al., 2017). Further to this, a single session of NMES was performed in elderly individuals with type 2 diabetes, who are known to be more susceptible to muscle loss and functional decline (Park et al., 2006), and was shown to elicit a large increase (27 %) in MPS (Wall et al., 2012). Four weeks of home-based daily NMES in patients with knee osteoarthritis resulted in increased muscle fibre size, which was matched with a heightened rate of MPS (Gibson et al., 1989).

According to the limited available data on NMES and MPS, NMES used directly as an isolated strategy or as an adjuvant to nutritional (protein-based) interventions can increase MPS and as such, help mitigate the anabolic resistance commonly observed in ageing muscle (Breen and Phillips, 2011).

4.2. Metabolic adaptations

The term exercise commonly refers to two modalities; aerobic endurance training and anaerobic resistance training, or a combination of these two. Each of these modalities is associated with distinct physiological adaptations including intramuscular metabolic changes (Bell et al., 2000), such as alterations of active oxidative enzymes with endurance training (Carter et al., 2001) and active glycolytic enzymes with resistance training (Tesch et al., 1989).

The most common enzymatic reaction in human body is the tricarboxylic acid cycle (Krebs cycle), in which citrate synthase (CS) is paramount. Findings from four studies which applied low-frequency NMES for 4–10 weeks demonstrated an increase in the activity levels of CS by 9 %–31 % (Gauthier et al., 1992; Nuhr et al., 2003; Thériault et al., 1996; Theriault et al., 1994), with greater increases in women when compared to men (Gauthier et al., 1992). Moreover, Theriault and colleagues examined the response of metabolic enzymes to different lengths of NMES intervention and showed that the activity level of CS increased after four weeks, with no further change after an additional four weeks (Theriault et al., 1994). Similarly, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH), another enzyme involved in Krebs cycle, was also increased following eight-weeks of high-frequency NMES (Gondin et al., 2011). The premise of achieving energy production from the Krebs cycle is the beta oxidation of fatty acids (Rasmussen and Wolfe, 1999), and the levels of 3-Hydroxylacyl-CoA dehydrogenase (HADH) increased by up to 30 % following low-frequency NMES (Gauthier et al., 1992; Theriault et al., 1994). However, this outcome was reversed when applying high-frequency NMES, showing a decreasing trend (Gondin et al., 2011). Findings from the same study did however report an increase in the second step of beta oxidation; a greater level of Enoyl CoA hydratase (Gondin et al., 2011). With regards to other oxidative enzymes, succinate dehydrogenase, cytochrome c oxidase and pyruvate dehydrogenase all increased following several weeks NMES stimulation (Gauthier et al., 1992; Perez et al., 2002; Theriault et al., 1994).

Unlike the significantly increased levels of oxidative enzymes shown in most experiments, glycolytic enzymes reportedly remained unchanged or decreased after NMES. For example, although there was a decrease in the activity level of glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) following ten weeks NMES intervention (Nuhr et al., 2003), a separate study showed that it did not change after six weeks low-frequency NMES (Gauthier et al., 1992). However, another glycolytic enzyme, phosphofructokinase (PFK) showed a mild decrease in activity with the six-week intervention, specifically decreasing in men by 10 %, with little change in women (Gauthier et al., 1992). High-frequency NMES in active individuals and sedentary young individuals revealed differing outcomes for beta-enolase, a glycolytic enzyme involved in the process of glycolysis of 2-phosphoglycerate to phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP), with an increase in the active young individuals, but no change in sedentary group (Gondin et al., 2011).

However, the majority of studies looking at metabolic enzyme activity have focused on low-frequency NMES, with limited available data following high-frequency NMES. Additionally, although some studies applying chronic low-frequency NMES have shown some benefits on oxidative capacity, the severity and duration of some protocols may render them impractical for elderly populations.

5. Functional effects of NMES

NMES has proven to play an important role in minimising functional declines caused by ageing (Amiridis et al., 2005; Bax et al., 2005). Muscle torque in the elderly increased over several weeks NMES intervention as determined by maximal isometric voluntary contractions (MVC) (Caggiano et al., 1994; Kern et al., 2014; Mignardot et al., 2015; Paillard et al., 2004). In addition to measuring muscle force directly, a number of functional tests are commonly recommended and applied in clinical practice or research, such as the timed up and go test (TUG) (Podsiadlo and Richardson, 1991), the Berg balance scale (BBS) (Berg et al., 1992) and the short physical performance battery (SPPB) (Guralnik et al., 1994), among others. NMES-based interventions have proven to shorten the time for completing activities of daily living, for example climbing stairs, potentially indicating a higher level of muscle strength and power of the lower extremities in older adults (Kern et al., 2014; Langeard et al., 2020; Zampieri et al., 2015). Using a similar stimulation frequency and doubling the number of training sessions, NMES improved balance gait speed, but TUG performance improved only when NMES was combined with voluntary exercise (Benavent-Caballer et al., 2014).

Although the pathologies of muscle ageing and disuse differ, they are often strongly associated. Immobilisation often occurs in the elderly as the decline in their functional capacity increases propensity for falls and fracture (Dirks et al., 2014; Marks, 2011). NMES applied to support the functional recovery of elderly women after hip fracture surgery resulted in a faster recovery of indoor mobility (Lamb et al., 2002). Moreover, the follow-up assessment after an additional six weeks found that NMES induced a longer-term effect on functional rehabilitation, showing an improvement in walking speed, as well as postural stability and muscle power.

Numerous studies have demonstrated that NMES induces a significant attenuation of muscle atrophy during or after immobilisation, however, owing to the high variability of procedures and protocols, direct comparisons cannot be reliably performed. Collectively, the available data demonstrates that NMES exerts positive effects on functional rehabilitation.

6. Conclusions

This review details the adaptations to NMES at the individual muscle fibre level and within the peripheral motor nervous system. Although this review is not exhaustive with regards to the multiple pathologies to which NMES has been applied, the majority of findings indicate that NMES exerts positive effects on both neural and muscular remodelling in terms of morphological, molecular and functional aspects in the elderly. The mechanistic knowledge obtained thus far is largely derived from animal studies, with little human data available, indicating the potential direction of future research.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Yuxiao Guo: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing, Visualization. Bethan E Phillips: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing - review & editing, Visualization. Philip J Atherton: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing - review & editing, Visualization, Supervision. Mathew Piasecki: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing - review & editing, Visualization, Supervision.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Medical Research Council [grant number MR/P021220/1] as part of the MRC-Versus Arthritis Centre for Musculoskeletal Ageing Research awarded to the Universities of Nottingham and Birmingham and was supported by the NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.

Contributor Information

Yuxiao Guo, Email: yuxiao.guo@nottingham.ac.uk.

Bethan E Phillips, Email: beth.phillips@nottingham.ac.uk.

Philip J Atherton, Email: philip.atherton@nottingham.ac.uk.

Mathew Piasecki, Email: mathew.piasecki@nottingham.ac.uk.

References

  1. Al-Majed A.A., Brushart T.M., Gordon T. Electrical stimulation accelerates and increases expression of BDNF and trkB mRNA in regenerating rat femoral motoneurons. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2000;12:4381–4390. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Al-Majed A.A., Neumann C.M., Brushart T.M., Gordon T. Brief electrical stimulation promotes the speed and accuracy of motor axonal regeneration. J. Neurosci. 2000;20:2602–2608. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-07-02602.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Amiridis I., Arabatzi F., Violaris P., Stavropoulos E., Hatzitaki V. Static balance improvement in elderly after dorsiflexors electrostimulation training. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2005;94:424–433. doi: 10.1007/s00421-005-1326-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Araújo T., Candeias R., Nunes N., Gamboa H. Evaluation of motor neuron excitability by CMAP scanning with electric modulated current. Neurosci. J. 2015;2015:360648. doi: 10.1155/2015/360648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bax L., Staes F., Verhagen A. Does neuromuscular electrical stimulation strengthen the quadriceps femoris? A systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Sports Med. 2005;35:191–212. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200535030-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Beaudart C., Rizzoli R., Bruyère O., Reginster J.-Y., Biver E. Sarcopenia: burden and challenges for public health. Arch. Public Health. 2014;72:45. doi: 10.1186/2049-3258-72-45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bell G.J., Syrotuik D., Martin T.P., Burnham R., Quinney H.A. Effect of concurrent strength and endurance training on skeletal muscle properties and hormone concentrations in humans. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2000;81:418–427. doi: 10.1007/s004210050063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Benavent-Caballer V., Rosado-Calatayud P., Segura-Orti E., Amer-Cuenca J.J., Lison J.F. Effects of three different low-intensity exercise interventions on physical performance, muscle CSA and activities of daily living: a randomized controlled trial. Exp. Gerontol. 2014;58:159–165. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2014.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Berg K.O., Wood-Dauphinee S.L., Williams J.I., Maki B. Measuring balance in the elderly: validation of an instrument. Can. J. Public Health. 1992;83(Suppl 2):S7–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bergquist A.J., Clair J.M., Lagerquist O., Mang C.S., Okuma Y., Collins D.F. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation: implications of the electrically evoked sensory volley. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2011;111:2409. doi: 10.1007/s00421-011-2087-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Binder E.F., Yarasheski K.E., Steger-May K., Sinacore D.R., Brown M., Schechtman K.B., Holloszy J.O. Effects of progressive resistance training on body composition in frail older adults: results of a randomized, controlled trial. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2005;60:1425–1431. doi: 10.1093/gerona/60.11.1425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Blickenstorfer A., Kleiser R., Keller T., Keisker B., Meyer M., Riener R., Kollias S. Cortical and subcortical correlates of functional electrical stimulation of wrist extensor and flexor muscles revealed by fMRI. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2009;30:963–975. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bosutti A., Egginton S., Barnouin Y., Ganse B., Rittweger J., Degens H. Local capillary supply in muscle is not determined by local oxidative capacity. J. Exp. Biol. 2015;218:3377–3380. doi: 10.1242/jeb.126664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Boyne P., Meyrose C., Westover J., Whitesel D., Hatter K., Reisman D.S., Cunningham D., Carl D., Jansen C., Khoury J.C., Gerson M., Kissela B., Dunning K. Exercise intensity affects acute neurotrophic and neurophysiological responses poststroke. J. Appl. Physiol. 2019;126:431–443. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00594.2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Breen L., Phillips S.M. Skeletal muscle protein metabolism in the elderly: interventions to counteract the’ anabolic resistance’ of ageing. Nutr. Metab. (Lond) 2011;8:68. doi: 10.1186/1743-7075-8-68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Brooks N., Cloutier G.J., Cadena S.M., Layne J.E., Nelsen C.A., Freed A.M., Roubenoff R., Castaneda-Sceppa C. Resistance training and timed essential amino acids protect against the loss of muscle mass and strength during 28 days of bed rest and energy deficit. J. Appl. Physiol. 2008;105(1985):241–248. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01346.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Brown M.C., Holland R.L., Hopkins W.G. Motor nerve sprouting. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 1981;4:17–42. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ne.04.030181.000313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Brushart T.M., Hoffman P.N., Royall R.M., Murinson B.B., Witzel C., Gordon T. Electrical stimulation promotes motoneuron regeneration without increasing its speed or conditioning the neuron. J. Neurosci. 2002;22:6631–6638. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-15-06631.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Bruyère O., Beaudart C., Ethgen O., Reginster J.-Y., Locquet M. The health economics burden of sarcopenia: a systematic review. Maturitas. 2019;119:61–69. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Burke D., Gandevia S.C., McKeon B. The afferent volleys responsible for spinal proprioceptive reflexes in man. J. Physiol. 1983;339:535–552. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Caggiano E., Emrey T., Shirley S., Craik R.L. Effects of electrical stimulation or voluntary contraction for strengthening the quadriceps femoris muscles in an aged male population. J. Orthop. Sports Phys. Ther. 1994;20:22–28. doi: 10.2519/jospt.1994.20.1.22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Carter S.L., Rennie C.D., Hamilton S.J., Tarnopolsky Changes in skeletal muscle in males and females following endurance training. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2001;79:386–392. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Cesari M., Landi F., Vellas B., Bernabei R., Marzetti E. Sarcopenia and physical frailty: two sides of the same coin. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2014;6:192. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Chalhoub D., Cawthon P.M., Ensrud K.E., Stefanick M.L., Kado D.M., Boudreau R., Greenspan S., Newman A.B., Zmuda J., Orwoll E.S., Cauley J.A. Risk of nonspine fractures in older adults with Sarcopenia, low bone mass, or both. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2015;63:1733–1740. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Collins D.F. Central contributions to contractions evoked by tetanic neuromuscular electrical stimulation. Exerc. Sport Sci. Rev. 2007;35:102–109. doi: 10.1097/jes.0b013e3180a0321b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Convertino V.A. Physiological adaptations to weightlessness: effects on exercise and work performance. Exerc. Sport Sci. Rev. 1990;18:119–166. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Cruz-Jentoft A.J., Sayer A.A. Sarcopenia. Lancet. 2019;393:2636–2646. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31138-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Cruz-Jentoft A.J., Bahat G., Bauer J., Boirie Y., Bruyere O., Cederholm T., Cooper C., Landi F., Rolland Y., Sayer A.A., Schneider S.M., Sieber C.C., Topinkova E., Vandewoude M., Visser M., Zamboni M. Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing. 2019;48:16–31. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afy169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Dalise S., Cavalli L., Ghuman H., Wahlberg B., Gerwig M., Chisari C., Ambrosio F., Modo M. Biological effects of dosing aerobic exercise and neuromuscular electrical stimulation in rats. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:10830. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-11260-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Dhand U.K. Motor unit potential. In: Aminoff M.J., Daroff R.B., editors. Encyclopedia of the Neurological Sciences (Second Edition). Academic Press; Oxford: 2014. pp. 117–119. [Google Scholar]
  31. Dinoff A., Herrmann N., Swardfager W., Lanctôt K.L. The effect of acute exercise on blood concentrations of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in healthy adults: a meta-analysis. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2017;46:1635–1646. doi: 10.1111/ejn.13603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Dirks M.L., Wall B.T., Snijders T., Ottenbros C.L., Verdijk L.B., van Loon L.J. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation prevents muscle disuse atrophy during leg immobilization in humans. Acta Physiol. (Oxf.) 2014;210:628–641. doi: 10.1111/apha.12200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Dirks M.L., Wall B.T., Kramer I.F., Zorenc A.H., Goessens J.P., Gijsen A.P., van Loon L.J. A single session of neuromuscular electrical stimulation does not augment postprandial muscle protein accretion. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2016;311:E278–285. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00085.2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Dirks M.L., Groen B.B., Franssen R., van Kranenburg J., van Loon L.J. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation prior to presleep protein feeding stimulates the use of protein-derived amino acids for overnight muscle protein synthesis. J. Appl. Physiol. 2017;122(1985):20–27. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00331.2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Doucet B.M., Lam A., Griffin L. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation for skeletal muscle function. Yale J. Biol. Med. 2012;85:201–215. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Eken T., Gundersen K. Electrical stimulation resembling normal motor-unit activity: effects on denervated fast and slow rat muscles. J. Physiol. 1988;402:651–669. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1988.sp017227. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Enoka R.M., Amiridis I.G., Duchateau J. Electrical stimulation of muscle: electrophysiology and rehabilitation. Physiology. 2019;35:40–56. doi: 10.1152/physiol.00015.2019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Ferrando A.A., Tipton K.D., Bamman M.M., Wolfe R.R. Resistance exercise maintains skeletal muscle protein synthesis during bed rest. J. Appl. Physiol. 1997;82(1985):807–810. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1997.82.3.807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Ferris L.T., Williams J.S., Shen C.L. The effect of acute exercise on serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels and cognitive function. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2007;39:728–734. doi: 10.1249/mss.0b013e31802f04c7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Filippo E.S.D., Mancinelli R., Marrone M., Doria C., Verratti V., Toniolo L., Dantas J.L., Fulle S., Pietrangelo T. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation improves skeletal muscle regeneration through satellite cell fusion with myofibers in healthy elderly subjects. J. Appl. Physiol. 2017;123:501–512. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00855.2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Frontera W.R., Meredith C.N., O’Reilly K.P., Knuttgen H.G., Evans W.J. Strength conditioning in older men: skeletal muscle hypertrophy and improved function. J. Appl. Physiol. 1988;64(1985):1038–1044. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1988.64.3.1038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Fukazawa T., Matsumoto M., Imura T., Khalesi E., Kajiume T., Kawahara Y., Tanimoto K., Yuge L. Electrical stimulation accelerates neuromuscular junction formation through ADAM19/neuregulin/ErbB signaling in vitro. Neurosci. Lett. 2013;545:29–34. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2013.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Gauthier J.M., Theriault R., Theriault G., Gelinas Y., Simoneau J.A. Electrical stimulation-induced changes in skeletal muscle enzymes of men and women. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 1992;24:1252–1256. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Gibson J.N., Morrison W.L., Scrimgeour C.M., Smith K., Stoward P.J., Rennie M.J. Effects of therapeutic percutaneous electrical stimulation of atrophic human quadriceps on muscle composition, protein synthesis and contractile properties. Eur. J. Clin. Invest. 1989;19:206–212. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.1989.tb00219.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Gondin J., Guette M., Ballay Y., Martin A. Electromyostimulation training effects on neural drive and muscle architecture. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2005;37:1291–1299. doi: 10.1249/01.mss.0000175090.49048.41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Gondin J., Duclay J., Martin A. Soleus- and gastrocnemii-evoked V-wave responses increase after neuromuscular electrical stimulation training. J. Neurophysiol. 2006;95:3328–3335. doi: 10.1152/jn.01002.2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Gondin J., Brocca L., Bellinzona E., D’Antona G., Maffiuletti N.A., Miotti D., Pellegrino M.A., Bottinelli R. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation training induces atypical adaptations of the human skeletal muscle phenotype: a functional and proteomic analysis. J. Appl. Physiol. 2011;110(1985):433–450. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00914.2010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Gonzalez Calzada N., Prats Soro E., Mateu Gomez L., Giro Bulta E., Cordoba Izquierdo A., Povedano Panades M., Dorca Sargatal J., Farrero Muñoz E. Factors predicting survival in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients on non-invasive ventilation. Amyotroph. Lateral Scler. Frontotemporal Degener. 2016;17:337–342. doi: 10.3109/21678421.2016.1165256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Gonzalez-Freire M., de Cabo R., Studenski S.A., Ferrucci L. The neuromuscular junction: aging at the crossroad between nerves and muscle. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2014:6. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Gooch C.L., Doherty T.J., Chan K.M., Bromberg M.B., Lewis R.A., Stashuk D.W., Berger M.J., Andary M.T., Daube J.R. Motor unit number estimation: a technology and literature review. Muscle Nerve. 2014;50:884–893. doi: 10.1002/mus.24442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Gordon T. The physiology of neural injury and regeneration: the role of neurotrophic factors. J. Commun. Disord. 2010;43:265–273. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2010.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Gordon T., Sulaiman O., Boyd J.G. Experimental strategies to promote functional recovery after peripheral nerve injuries. J. Peripher. Nerv. Syst. 2003;8:236–250. doi: 10.1111/j.1085-9489.2003.03029.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Gregory C.M., Bickel C.S. Recruitment patterns in human skeletal muscle during electrical stimulation. Phys. Ther. 2005;85:358–364. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Greising S.M., Stowe J.M., Sieck G.C., Mantilla C.B. Role of TrkB kinase activity in aging diaphragm neuromuscular junctions. Exp. Gerontol. 2015;72:184–191. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2015.10.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Guralnik J.M., Simonsick E.M., Ferrucci L., Glynn R.J., Berkman L.F., Blazer D.G., Scherr P.A., Wallace R.B. A short physical performance battery assessing lower extremity function: association with self-reported disability and prediction of mortality and nursing home admission. J. Gerontol. 1994;49:M85–94. doi: 10.1093/geronj/49.2.m85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Hamada T., Hayashi T., Kimura T., Nakao K., Moritani T. Electrical stimulation of human lower extremities enhances energy consumption, carbohydrate oxidation, and whole body glucose uptake. J. Appl. Physiol. 2004;96(1985):911–916. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00664.2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Han B.S., Jang S.H., Chang Y., Byun W.M., Lim S.K., Kang D.S. Functional Magnetic Resonance Image Finding of Cortical Activation by Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on Wrist Extensor Muscles. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2003;82:17–20. doi: 10.1097/00002060-200301000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Heckman C.J., Enoka R.M. Motor unit. Compr. Physiol. 2012;2:2629–2682. doi: 10.1002/cphy.c100087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Henneman E., Somjen G., Carpenter D.O. Functional significance of cell size in spinal motoneurons. J. Neurophysiol. 1965;28:560–580. doi: 10.1152/jn.1965.28.3.560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Hepple R.T., Rice C.L. Innervation and neuromuscular control in ageing skeletal muscle. J. Physiol. 2016;594:1965–1978. doi: 10.1113/JP270561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Hida T., Shimokata H., Sakai Y., Ito S., Matsui Y., Takemura M., Kasai T., Ishiguro N., Harada A. Sarcopenia and sarcopenic leg as potential risk factors for acute osteoporotic vertebral fracture among older women. Eur. Spine J. 2016;25:3424–3431. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-3805-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Hoffman H. Local re-innervation in partially denervated muscle: a histo-physiological study. Aust. J. Exp. Biol. Med. Sci. 1950;28:383–398. doi: 10.1038/icb.1950.39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Höke A., Redett R., Hameed H., Jari R., Zhou C., Li Z.B., Griffin J.W., Brushart T.M. Schwann cells express motor and sensory phenotypes that regulate axon regeneration. J. Neurosci. 2006;26:9646–9655. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1620-06.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Hurtado E., Cilleros V., Nadal L., Simó A., Obis T., Garcia N., Santafé M.M., Tomàs M., Halievski K., Jordan C.L., Lanuza M.A., Tomàs J. Muscle contraction regulates BDNF/TrkB signaling to modulate synaptic function through presynaptic cPKCα and cPKCβI. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2017;10:147. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2017.00147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Johnson A.M., Connor N.P. Effects of electrical stimulation on neuromuscular junction morphology in the aging rat tongue. Muscle Nerve. 2011;43:203–211. doi: 10.1002/mus.21819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Jordan M., Paulo B., Darren J.B., Zafar I., James P.M. Case study: muscle atrophy and hypertrophy in a premier league soccer player during rehabilitation from ACL injury. Int. J. Sport Nutr. Exerc. Metab. 2014;24:543–552. doi: 10.1123/ijsnem.2013-0209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Karlsen A., Cullum C.K., Norheim K.L., Scheel F.U., Zinglersen A.H., Vahlgren J., Schjerling P., Kjaer M., Mackey A.L. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation preserves leg lean mass in geriatric patients. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2020;52:773–784. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Katirji B. Chapter 2 - routine clinical electromyography. In: Katirji B., editor. Electromyography in Clinical Practice. second edition. Mosby; Philadelphia: 2007. pp. 13–36. [Google Scholar]
  69. Kern H., Barberi L., Löfler S., Sbardella S., Burggraf S., Fruhmann H., Carraro U., Mosole S., Sarabon N., Vogelauer M., Mayr W., Krenn M., Cvecka J., Romanello V., Pietrangelo L., Protasi F., Sandri M., Zampieri S., Musaro A. Electrical stimulation counteracts muscle decline in seniors. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2014;6:189. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2014.00189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Kern H., Hofer C., Loefler S., Zampieri S., Gargiulo P., Baba A., Marcante A., Piccione F., Pond A., Carraro U. Atrophy, ultra-structural disorders, severe atrophy and degeneration of denervated human muscle in SCI and Aging. Implications for their recovery by Functional Electrical Stimulation, updated 2017. Neurol. Res. 2017;39:660–666. doi: 10.1080/01616412.2017.1314906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Kiernan M.C., Bostock H. Effects of membrane polarization and ischaemia on the excitability properties of human motor axons. Brain. 2000;123:2542–2551. doi: 10.1093/brain/123.12.2542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Kimura T., Kaneko F., Iwamoto E., Saitoh S., Yamada T. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation increases serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor in humans. Exp. Brain Res. 2019;237:47–56. doi: 10.1007/s00221-018-5396-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Kolb S.J., Kissel J.T. Spinal muscular atrophy. Neurol. Clin. 2015;33:831–846. doi: 10.1016/j.ncl.2015.07.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Lamb S.E., Oldham J.A., Morse R.E., Evans J.G. Neuromuscular stimulation of the quadriceps muscle after hip fracture: a randomized controlled trial. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2002;83:1087–1092. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2002.33645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Landi F., Liperoti R., Russo A., Giovannini S., Tosato M., Capoluongo E., Bernabei R., Onder G. Sarcopenia as a risk factor for falls in elderly individuals: results from the ilSIRENTE study. Clin. Nutr. 2012;31:652–658. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2012.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Langeard A., Bigot L., Loggia G., Chastan N., Quarck G., Gauthier A. Plantar flexor strength training with home-based neuromuscular electrical stimulation improves limits of postural stability in older adults. J. Phys. Act. Health. 2020;17:657–661. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2019-0501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Leenders M., Verdijk L.B., Van der Hoeven L., Van Kranenburg J., Nilwik R., Wodzig W.K., Senden J.M., Keizer H.A., Van Loon L.J. Protein supplementation during resistance-type exercise training in the elderly. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2013;45:542–552. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e318272fcdb. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Liddell E.G.T., Sherrington C.S. Recruitment and some other features of reflex inhibition. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Series B. 1925;97:488. [Google Scholar]
  79. Lieber R.L., Fridén J. Functional and clinical significance of skeletal muscle architecture. Muscle Nerve. 2000;23:1647–1666. doi: 10.1002/1097-4598(200011)23:11<1647::aid-mus1>3.0.co;2-m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Luff A.R. Age-associated changes in the innervation of muscle fibers and changes in the mechanical properties of motor units. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1998;854:92–101. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1998.tb09895.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Maffiuletti N.A., Gondin J., Place N., Stevens-Lapsley J., Vivodtzev I., Minetto M.A. Clinical Use of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation for Neuromuscular Rehabilitation: What Are We Overlooking? Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2018;99:806–812. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.10.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Mancinelli R., Toniolo L., Di Filippo E.S., Doria C., Marrone M., Maroni C.R., Verratti V., Bondi D., Maccatrozzo L., Pietrangelo T., Fulle S. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation induces skeletal muscle Fiber remodeling and specific gene expression profile in healthy elderly. Front. Physiol. 2019;10:1459. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.01459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Mantilla C.B., Stowe J.M., Sieck D.C., Ermilov L.G., Greising S.M., Zhang C., Shokat K.M., Sieck G.C. TrkB kinase activity maintains synaptic function and structural integrity at adult neuromuscular junctions. J. Appl. Physiol. 2014;117:910–920. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01386.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Marcus R.L., Addison O., Dibble L.E., Foreman K.B., Morrell G., Lastayo P. Intramuscular adipose tissue, sarcopenia, and mobility function in older individuals. J. Aging Res. 2012;2012:629637. doi: 10.1155/2012/629637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Marks R. Physical activity and hip fracture disability: a review. J. Aging Res. 2011;2011 doi: 10.4061/2011/741918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Mignardot J.B., Deschamps T., Le Goff C.G., Roumier F.X., Duclay J., Martin A., Sixt M., Pousson M., Cornu C. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation leads to physiological gains enhancing postural balance in the pre-frail elderly. Physiol. Rep. 2015:3. doi: 10.14814/phy2.12471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Mills K.R. The basics of electromyography. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 2005;76 doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2005.069211. ii32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Minetto M.A., Botter A., Bottinelli O., Miotti D., Bottinelli R., D’Antona G. Variability in muscle adaptation to electrical stimulation. Int. J. Sports Med. 2013;34:544–553. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1321799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Miyamoto T., Kou K., Yanamoto H., Hashimoto S., Ikawa M., Sekiyama T., Nakano Y., Kashiwamura S.I., Takeda C., Fujioka H. Effect of neuromuscular electrical stimulation on brain-derived neurotrophic factor. Int. J. Sports Med. 2018;39:5–11. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-120343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Mortimer J.T., Bhadra N. Peripheral nerve and muscle stimulation, Neuroprosthetics. World Sci. 2004:638–682. [Google Scholar]
  91. Mortimer J.T., Bhadra N. Peripheral nerve and muscle stimulation. Neuroprosthetics. 2004:638–682. [Google Scholar]
  92. Müller P., Duderstadt Y., Lessmann V., Müller N.G. Lactate and BDNF: Key Mediators of Exercise Induced Neuroplasticity? J. Clin. Med. 2020;9:1136. doi: 10.3390/jcm9041136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Nix W.A., Hopf H.C. Electrical stimulation of regenerating nerve and its effect on motor recovery. Brain Res. 1983;272:21–25. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(83)90360-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Nuhr M., Crevenna R., Gohlsch B., Bittner C., Pleiner J., Wiesinger G., Fialka-Moser V., Quittan M., Pette D. Functional and biochemical properties of chronically stimulated human skeletal muscle. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2003;89:202–208. doi: 10.1007/s00421-003-0792-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Oates B.R., Glover E.I., West D.W., Fry J.L., Tarnopolsky M.A., Phillips S.M. Low-volume resistance exercise attenuates the decline in strength and muscle mass associated with immobilization. Muscle Nerve. 2010;42:539–546. doi: 10.1002/mus.21721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Paillard T., Lafont C., Soulat J.M., Costes-Salon M.C., Mario B., Montoya R., Dupui P. Neuromuscular effects of three training methods in ageing women. J. Sports Med. Phys. Fitness. 2004;44:87–91. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Park S.W., Goodpaster B.H., Strotmeyer E.S., de Rekeneire N., Harris T.B., Schwartz A.V., Tylavsky F.A., Newman A.B. Decreased muscle strength and quality in older adults with type 2 diabetes: the health, aging, and body composition study. Diabetes. 2006;55:1813–1818. doi: 10.2337/db05-1183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Perez M., Lucia A., Rivero J.L., Serrano A.L., Calbet J.A., Delgado M.A., Chicharro J.L. Effects of transcutaneous short-term electrical stimulation on M. vastus lateralis characteristics of healthy young men. Pflugers Arch. 2002;443:866–874. doi: 10.1007/s00424-001-0769-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Piasecki M., Ireland A., Jones D.A., McPhee J.S. Age-dependent motor unit remodelling in human limb muscles. Biogerontology. 2016;17:485–496. doi: 10.1007/s10522-015-9627-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Piasecki M., Ireland A., Piasecki J., Stashuk D.W., McPhee J.S., Jones D.A. The reliability of methods to estimate the number and size of human motor units and their use with large limb muscles. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2018;118:767–775. doi: 10.1007/s00421-018-3811-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Piasecki M., Ireland A., Piasecki J., Stashuk D.W., Swiecicka A., Rutter M.K., Jones D.A., McPhee J.S. Failure to expand the motor unit size to compensate for declining motor unit numbers distinguishes sarcopenic from non-sarcopenic older men. J. Physiol. 2018;596:1627–1637. doi: 10.1113/JP275520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Piasecki J., Inns T.B., Bass J.J., Scott R., Stashuk D.W., Phillips B.E., Atherton P.J., Piasecki M. Influence of sex on the age-related adaptations of neuromuscular function and motor unit properties in elite masters athletes. J. Physiol. 2020 doi: 10.1113/JP280679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Podsiadlo D., Richardson S. The timed "Up & Go": a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 1991;39:142–148. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb01616.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Power G.A., Dalton B.H., Rice C.L. Human neuromuscular structure and function in old age: a brief review. J. Sport Health Sci. 2013;2:215–226. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2013.07.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Pradhan J., Noakes P.G., Bellingham M.C. The role of altered BDNF/TrkB signaling in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2019;13:368. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2019.00368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Prior S.J., Ryan A.S., Blumenthal J.B., Watson J.M., Katzel L.I., Goldberg A.P. Sarcopenia is associated with lower skeletal muscle capillarization and exercise capacity in older adults. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2016;71:1096–1101. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glw017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Rasmussen B.B., Wolfe R.R. Regulation of fatty acid oxidation in skeletal muscle. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 1999;19:463–484. doi: 10.1146/annurev.nutr.19.1.463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Reidy P.T., McKenzie A.I., Brunker P., Nelson D.S., Barrows K.M., Supiano M., LaStayo P.C., Drummond M.J. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation combined with protein ingestion preserves thigh muscle mass but not muscle function in healthy older adults during 5 days of bed rest. Rejuvenation Res. 2017;20:449–461. doi: 10.1089/rej.2017.1942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Rosenberg I.H. Sarcopenia: origins and clinical relevance. J. Nutr. 1997;127:990s–991s. doi: 10.1093/jn/127.5.990S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Schiaffino S., Reggiani C. Fiber types in mammalian skeletal muscles. Physiol. Rev. 2011;91:1447–1531. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00031.2010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Schiffer T., Schulte S., Sperlich B., Achtzehn S., Fricke H., Strüder H.K. Lactate infusion at rest increases BDNF blood concentration in humans. Neurosci. Lett. 2011;488:234–237. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.11.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Semmler J.G. Motor unit synchronization and neuromuscular performance. Exerc. Sport Sci. Rev. 2002;30:8–14. doi: 10.1097/00003677-200201000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Sillen M.J., Franssen F.M., Gosker H.R., Wouters E.F., Spruit M.A. Metabolic and structural changes in lower-limb skeletal muscle following neuromuscular electrical stimulation: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2013;8 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Slater R.C. The structure of human neuromuscular junctions: some unanswered molecular questions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017:18. doi: 10.3390/ijms18102183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Smith G.V., Alon G., Roys S.R., Gullapalli R.P. Functional MRI determination of a dose-response relationship to lower extremity neuromuscular electrical stimulation in healthy subjects. Exp. Brain Res. 2003;150:33–39. doi: 10.1007/s00221-003-1405-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Snijders T., Trommelen J., Kouw I.W.K., Holwerda A.M., Verdijk L.B., van Loon L.J.C. The impact of pre-sleep protein ingestion on the skeletal muscle adaptive response to exercise in humans: an update. Front. Nutr. 2019;6:17. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2019.00017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Suetta C., Andersen J.L., Dalgas U., Berget J., Koskinen S., Aagaard P., Magnusson S.P., Kjaer M. Resistance training induces qualitative changes in muscle morphology, muscle architecture, and muscle function in elderly postoperative patients. J. Appl. Physiol. 2008;105:180–186. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01354.2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Swiecicka A., Piasecki M., Stashuk D.W., Ireland A., Jones D.A., Rutter M.K., McPhee J.S. Frailty phenotype and frailty index are associated with distinct neuromuscular electrophysiological characteristics in men. Exp. Physiol. 2019;104:1154–1161. doi: 10.1113/EP087579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Swiecicka A., Piasecki M., Stashuk D., Jones D., Wu F., McPhee J.S., Rutter M.K. Relationship of anabolic hormones with motor unit characteristics in quadriceps muscle in healthy and frail aging men. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2020;105:e2358–e2368. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Tesch P.A., Thorsson A., Essen-Gustavsson B. Enzyme activities of FT and ST muscle fibers in heavy-resistance trained athletes. J. Appl. Physiol. 1989;67:83–87. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1989.67.1.83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Theriault R., Theriault G., Simoneau J.A. Human skeletal muscle adaptation in response to chronic low-frequency electrical stimulation. J. Appl. Physiol. 1994;77:1885–1889. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1994.77.4.1885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Thériault R., Boulay M.R., Thériault G., Simoneau J.-A. Electrical stimulation-induced changes in performance and fiber type proportion of human knee extensor muscles. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. Occup. Physiol. 1996;74:311–317. doi: 10.1007/BF02226926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Tomori K., Ohta Y., Nishizawa T., Tamaki H., Takekura H. Low-intensity electrical stimulation ameliorates disruption of transverse tubules and neuromuscular junctional architecture in denervated rat skeletal muscle fibers. J. Muscle Res. Cell. Motil. 2010;31:195–205. doi: 10.1007/s10974-010-9223-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Tsuzuku S., Kajioka T., Sakakibara H., Shimaoka K. Slow movement resistance training using body weight improves muscle mass in the elderly: a randomized controlled trial. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports. 2018;28:1339–1344. doi: 10.1111/sms.13039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Vandenborne K., Elliott M.A., Walter G.A., Abdus S., Okereke E., Shaffer M., Tahernia D., Esterhai J.L. Longitudinal study of skeletal muscle adaptations during immobilization and rehabilitation. Muscle Nerve. 1998;21:1006–1012. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4598(199808)21:8<1006::aid-mus4>3.0.co;2-c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Verdijk L.B., Gleeson B.G., Jonkers R.A., Meijer K., Savelberg H.H., Dendale P., van Loon L.J. Skeletal muscle hypertrophy following resistance training is accompanied by a fiber type-specific increase in satellite cell content in elderly men. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2009;64:332–339. doi: 10.1093/gerona/gln050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Verdijk L.B., Snijders T., Holloway T.M., V.A.N.K J., LJ, V.A.N.L Resistance training increases skeletal muscle capillarization in healthy older men. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2016;48:2157–2164. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  128. Vivó M., Puigdemasa A., Casals L., Asensio E., Udina E., Navarro X. Immediate electrical stimulation enhances regeneration and reinnervation and modulates spinal plastic changes after sciatic nerve injury and repair. Exp. Neurol. 2008;211:180–193. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2008.01.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Wall B.T., Dirks M.L., Verdijk L.B., Snijders T., Hansen D., Vranckx P., Burd N.A., Dendale P., van Loon L.J. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation increases muscle protein synthesis in elderly type 2 diabetic men. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2012;303:E614–623. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00138.2012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  130. Wall B.T., Morton J.P., van Loon L.J. Strategies to maintain skeletal muscle mass in the injured athlete: nutritional considerations and exercise mimetics. Eur. J. Sport Sci. 2015;15:53–62. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2014.936326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  131. Watanabe K., Taniguchi Y., Moritani T. Metabolic and cardiovascular responses during voluntary pedaling exercise with electrical muscle stimulation. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2014;114:1801–1807. doi: 10.1007/s00421-014-2906-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  132. Wenjin W., Wenchao L., Hao Z., Feng L., Yan W., Wodong S., Xianqun F., Wenlong D. Electrical stimulation promotes BDNF expression in spinal cord neurons through Ca(2+)- and Erk-dependent signaling pathways. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 2011;31:459–467. doi: 10.1007/s10571-010-9639-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  133. Wilkinson D.J., Piasecki M., Atherton P.J. The age-related loss of skeletal muscle mass and function: measurement and physiology of muscle fibre atrophy and muscle fibre loss in humans. Ageing Res. Rev. 2018;47:123–132. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2018.07.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  134. Willand M.P., Rosa E., Michalski B., Zhang J.J., Gordon T., Fahnestock M., Borschel G.H. Electrical muscle stimulation elevates intramuscular BDNF and GDNF mRNA following peripheral nerve injury and repair in rats. Neuroscience. 2016;334:93–104. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.07.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  135. Wilson D., Jackson T., Sapey E., Lord J.M. Frailty and sarcopenia: the potential role of an aged immune system. Ageing Res. Rev. 2017;36:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2017.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  136. Yeung S.S.Y., Reijnierse E.M., Pham V.K., Trappenburg M.C., Lim W.K., Meskers C.G.M., Maier A.B. Sarcopenia and its association with falls and fractures in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2019;10:485–500. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  137. Zampieri S., Mosole S., Löfler S., Fruhmann H., Burggraf S., Cvečka J., Hamar D., Sedliak M., Tirptakova V., Šarabon N., Mayr W., Kern H. Physical exercise in aging: nine weeks of leg press or electrical stimulation training in 70 years old sedentary elderly people. Eur. J. Transl. Myol. 2015;25:237–242. doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2015.5374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  138. Zhang J.-Y., Luo X.-G., Xian C.J., Liu Z.-H., Zhou X.-F. Endogenous BDNF is required for myelination and regeneration of injured sciatic nerve in rodents. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2000;12:4171–4180. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES