Table 4.
Consistently classed as + ve responder | Consistently classed as non-responder | Consistently classed as –ve responder | Inconsistent responder classification | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Study 1 (n = 45) | 13 (29%) | 3 (7%) | 1 (2%) | 28 (62%) |
Study 2 (n = 36) | 7 (19%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 29 (81%) |
Study 3 (n = 30) | 6 (20%) | 4 (13%) | 0 (0%) | 20 (67%) |
Across studies (n = 111) | 26 (23%) | 7 (6%) | 1 (1%) | 77 (69%) |
‘Consistently classed’ indicates participant was a +ve, non or –ve responder across all 3 portion size reduction contrasts (i.e. large-normal vs. smaller than normal, large-normal vs. small-normal, small-normal vs. smaller than normal). Inconsistent classification indicates number of participants whose responder classification was not the same across all 3 portion size reduction contrasts.