Skip to main content
Elsevier Sponsored Documents logoLink to Elsevier Sponsored Documents
. 2021 Jan;134:104689. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104689

Single-step RT-PCR assay for dual genotyping of GI and GII norovirus strains

Preeti Chhabra a,*, Hannah Browne b, Thalia Huynh c, Marta Diez-Valcarce d, Leslie Barclay a, Margaret N Kosek e, Tahmeed Ahmed f, Maria Renee Lopez g, Chao-Yang Pan c, Jan Vinjé a
PMCID: PMC7816162  PMID: 33260046

Highlights

  • We validated genogroup-specific one-step conventional RT-PCR assays (PC assays) for sequence-based dual typing of GI and GII norovirus strains.

  • The PC assays use a combination of oligonucleotide primers that target a genomic region spanning the 3’-end of ORF1 and 5’end of ORF2 of GI and GII noroviruses.

  • The PC assays are sensitive (5 to 50 copies/rx) and detect all currently identified norovirus P-types and capsid genotypes from different geographic regions.

  • The PC assays have been successfully implemented by CaliciNet USA and CaliciNet China.

Keywords: Norovirus, Gastroenteritis, RT-PCR

Abstract

Background

Noroviruses are the major cause of acute gastroenteritis (AGE) in people of all ages globally. Standardized genotyping is key for outbreak investigations and surveillance networks.

Objective

Here we describe the validation of a one-step conventional RT-PCR assay for sequence-based dual typing of GI and GII noroviruses.

This polymerase (P) and capsid (C) dual typing assay uses a combination of previously published oligonucleotide primers amplifying a genomic region spanning the 3'-end of ORF1 and 5'end of ORF2 resulting in a 579 bp product for GI and 570 bp product for GII viruses.

Results

The limit of detection of the assay ranged from 5 to 50 copies of viral RNA per reaction for GI and GII. To validate the assay, we tested 2,663 noroviruspositive stool samples from outbreaks and sporadic cases of AGE in Bangladesh, Guatemala, Peru, and USA collected between 2010–2019, of which 2,392 (90 %) were genotyped successfully. Most of the known genotypes infecting humans (GI (n = 9) and GII (n = 23)) and P types (GI (n = 15), GII, (n = 20)) could be detected. The remaining 270 samples had low viral load (Ct > 30) by real-time RT-PCR. A panel of 166 samples positive for other enteric viruses (rotavirus, astrovirus, sapovirus, adenovirus type 40/41) tested negative.

Conclusion

The use of broadly reactive genotyping assays greatly strengthens exchange of standardized genotype data globally to monitor trends in genotype diversity which is important for both the development of vaccines and to measure their impact.

1. Introduction

Human noroviruses are a leading cause of acute gastroenteritis in all age groups, globally [1]. Vaccines are under development which, if effective, offer promise to prevent hundreds of millions of gastroenteritis cases annually [2]. The viral genome is divided into three open reading frames (ORFs) with ORF1 encoding the nonstructural viral proteins including the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp), ORF2 and ORF3 encoding the major (VP1) and minor (VP2) capsid proteins, respectively.

Genetically, norovirus can be divided into 10 genogroups (G) of which viruses from GI and GII cause almost all infections in humans. They can be further segregated into 35 genotypes based on amino acid diversity of VP1 [3]. In addition, the RdRp region of GI and GII noroviruses can be divided into 51 P-types based on nucleotide diversity [3]. Since the recognition that noroviruses frequently recombine at ORF1-ORF2 junction [4,5], dual typing of norovirus strains improves the ability to correctly identify strains [6].

Many laboratories perform norovirus typing by sequencing partial polymerase and capsid regions using two separate RT-PCR methods [[7], [8], [9], [10]]. To simplify the protocol, we combined existing oligonucleotide primers targeting the 3’-end of ORF1 and 5’-end of ORF2 [11] and validated the GI and GII specific conventional RT-PCR assays using a large panel of norovirus-positive stool samples.

2. Materials and methods

The genogroup-specific polymerase – capsid typing (PC) assays were developed using a combination of previously published oligonucleotide primers [12,13] including MON432 (TGG ACI CGY GGI CCY AAY CA) targeting a small region at the 3’-end of ORF1 (polymerase), and G1SKR (CCA ACC CAR CCA TTR TAC A), targeting a region of the 5’-end of ORF2 for GI viruses and oligonucleotide primers MON431 (TGG ACI AGR GGI CCY AAY CA) and G2SKR (CCR CCN GCA TRH CCR TTR TAC AT) for GII viruses resulting in a 579 bp product for GI and 570 for GII viruses (Fig. 1) [14]. The limit of detection (LOD) of the assays were determined by analyzing 5 μl of 10-fold serial dilutions of quantified RNA transcripts of norovirus GI.1 and GII.4 Sydney ranging from 10−1 to 108 copies/μl. We used a panel of 166 stool samples positive for other viruses including rotavirus (n = 48), sapovirus (n = 41), astrovirus (n = 39) and adenovirus 40/41 (n = 38) to determine the specificity of the assays [14]. To validate PC assays, we tested 2,663 norovirus-positive stool samples from different outbreaks and sporadic cases of acute gastroenteritis from Bangladesh (n = 91), Guatemala (n = 61), Peru (n = 1,288), and USA (n = 1,223) collected between 2010 and 2019 [[15], [16], [17]]. CDC Human Research Protection Office determined the study as public health non-research therefore human subject regulations did not apply. Viral nucleic acid was extracted from 10 % clarified fecal suspensions prepared in phosphate buffered saline using MagMax-96 Viral RNA Isolation Kit (Ambion, Foster City, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions on an automated KingFisher extractor (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA, USA). After each sample was mixed with lysis buffer, coliphage MS2 virus was added as an RNA extraction control [14]. Viral RNA was detected using a multiplex real-time RT-PCR assay [11,18] with the AgPath-ID One Step RT PCR kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA, USA).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Genomic region amplified by one-step RT-PCR dual typing assays. The location of open reading frames corresponds to the genome organization of Norwalk virus (M87661) for GI and MD145 virus (AY032605) for GII viruses. This figure was created with BioRender.com.

PC assays was performed using Qiagen One-Step RT-PCR (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA) kit with 20 U of RNase inhibitor (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Cycling conditions included reverse transcription at 42 °C for 30 min, activation of Taq polymerase at 95 °C for 15 min, and 40 cycles of PCR amplification at 95 °C, 50 °C, and 72 °C for 1 min each, followed by 10 min at 72 °C and cooling down to 4 °C. PCR products were visualized on a 1x TAE 2% agarose gel (Seakem-ME, Lonza, Allendale, NJ, USA) containing 10 μl of Gel Red (Biotium, Fremont, CA, USA), purified by ExoSAP-IT (Affymetrix, USB, Cleveland, OH, USA) or by a QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen) followed by sequencing of the purified PCR products Eurofins MWG Operon, Louisville, KY, USA). Genotypes were assigned using an online human calicivirus typing tool (https://norovirus.ng.philab.cdc.gov/) [3].

3. Results

The LOD of the PC assays were 5 RNA copies/rx for GI and 50 copies/rx for GII (Fig. 2). All 166 stool samples positive for other gastroenteritis viruses tested negative (data not shown). A total of 2,392 (90 %) of the 2,663 norovirus-positive stool samples were successfully genotyped. The typed samples included all but one of the known GI and GII genotypes infecting humans (GI (n = 9) and GII (n = 23)) and P types (GI (n = 15), GII (n = 20)) (Fig. 3) (Table S1, S2 and S3). The 270 samples that could not be typed had a low viral load (Ct > 30) by real-time RT-PCR.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Ten-fold serial dilution of: (A) GI.1 RNA transcripts and (B) GII.4 Sydney RNA transcripts. PCR products were visualized on a 1 × TAE 2 % agarose gel containing Gel Red.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Norovirus polymerase and capsid dual type combinations of (A) genogroup I (n = 502) and (B) genogroup II (n = 1,890). The number of sequences available for each combination were grouped into quartiles separately for GI and GII. Quartiles with each dual type combination were marked blue for GI and green for GII. The raw data for this figure are listed in Table S1.

4. Conclusions

To harmonize genotyping of noroviruses globally, it is important that laboratories use robust and easily implementable genotyping protocols that amplify the same regions of the genome. Recently, we reported genogroup-specific one-step conventional RT-PCR assays for sequence-based dual typing of GI and GII noroviruses that amplify a small region at the 3’-end of ORF1 and a small region at the 5’-end of ORF2 [11]. In the current study, we evaluated the performance of these assays with a norovirus-positive stool panel including samples from Bangladesh, Guatemala, Peru, and the USA and demonstrated that all norovirus genotypes and P-types included in the panel could be detected.

Genotyping of norovirus strains for routine surveillance is based on conventional RT-PCR followed by Sanger sequencing. Since the mid-1990s, when detection and typing of noroviruses was primarily targeting a small region in the center of the polymerase gene [19,20], genotyping has evolved from a region at the 3’-end of ORF1 [12] to a region at the 5’-end of ORF2 [13], which in the last decade has become the typing assay used by many laboratories globally [7,[21], [22], [23], [24], [25]].

Protocols for typing both the polymerase and the capsid gene include the use of two different RT-PCR assays or amplification of a longer region of the genome which often includes a nested amplification step to increase sensitivity [[7], [8], [9], [10],26].

We recently successfully implemented these dual typing assays in several CaliciNet laboratories and after pilot data showed robust performance, the assays were officially adopted by the entire CaliciNet USA network [11] and by CaliciNet China [24]. A similar approach for genotyping of GI and GII norovirus strains has been reported by the Australian and New Zealand norovirus surveillance network [22,27].

The genogroup-specific PC assays have several limitations. First, the reverse GI and GII oligonucleotide primer sequences are quite similar and therefore the assays are not 100 % genogroup-specific. Consequently, samples should be first tested by GI/GII real-time RT-PCR to identify the genogroup of a strain prior to select if a GI or a GII PC assay should be employed for typing. Finally, samples with a low viral load (Ct values >30) are not robustly amplified and therefore the success rate of typing these strains is often low.

In summary, the norovirus PC assays are sensitive and detect all currently identified norovirus P-types and capsid genotypes from different geographic regions. The use of broadly reactive genotyping assays greatly strengthens exchange of standardized genotype data globally to monitor trends in genotype diversity which is important for both the development of vaccines and to measure their impact.

Funding

This study was partly supported by a grant from the intramural food safety program of CDC (PC, HB, LB, JV) and in part by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP1066146) and 47075 to the Fogarty International Center (MNK). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Ethical approval

CDC Human Research Protection Office determined the study as public health non-research therefore human subject regulations did not apply.

Disclaimer

The findings and conclusions in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Preeti Chhabra: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing - original draft. Hannah Browne: Investigation, Data curation. Thalia Huynh: Investigation, Data curation. Marta Diez-Valcarce: Visualization, Investigation, Writing - review & editing. Leslie Barclay: Data curation, Writing - review & editing. Margaret N. Kosek: Writing - review & editing. Tahmeed Ahmed: Writing - review & editing. Maria Renee Lopez: Investigation, Writing - review & editing. Chao-Yang Pan: Writing - review & editing. Jan Vinjé: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing - review & editing.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors report no declarations of interest.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Chi Wai (Martin) Chan (The Chinese University of Hong Kong), Joseph Bonifacio (Research Institute for Tropical Medicine, Philippines) and Miao Jin (CDC China) for their feedback which helped confirm the robustness of the assays for typing strains from different countries, and Mery Siguas Salas and Maribel Paredes Olortegui (AB PRISMA, Iquitos, Peru) for help with collecting the samples in Peru.

Footnotes

Appendix A

Supplementary material related to this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104689.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

The following are Supplementary data to this article:

mmc1.xlsx (13.5KB, xlsx)
mmc2.xlsx (15.4KB, xlsx)
mmc3.xlsx (12.9KB, xlsx)

References

  • 1.Ahmed S.M., Hall A.J., Robinson A.E., Verhoef L., Premkumar P., Parashar U.D. Global prevalence of norovirus in cases of gastroenteritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2014;14:725–730. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(14)70767-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mattison C.P., Cardemil C.V., Hall A.J. Progress on norovirus vaccine research: public health considerations and future directions. Expert Rev. Vaccines. 2018;17:773–784. doi: 10.1080/14760584.2018.1510327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Chhabra P., de Graaf M., Parra G.I., Chan M.C., Green K., Martella V. Updated classification of norovirus genogroups and genotypes. J. Gen. Virol. 2019;100:1393–1406. doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.001318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bull R.A., Hansman G.S., Clancy L.E., Tanaka M.M., Rawlinson W.D., White P.A. Norovirus recombination in ORF1/ORF2 overlap. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2005;11:1079–1085. doi: 10.3201/eid1107.041273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bull R.A., Tanaka M.M., White P.A. Norovirus recombination. J. Gen. Virol. 2007;88:3347–3359. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.83321-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kroneman A., Vega E., Vennema H., Vinje J., White P.A., Hansman G. Proposal for a unified norovirus nomenclature and genotyping. Arch. Virol. 2013;158:2059–2068. doi: 10.1007/s00705-013-1708-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kroneman A., Harris J., Vennema H., Duizer E., van Duynhoven Y., Gray J. Data quality of 5 years of central norovirus outbreak reporting in the European Network for food-borne viruses. J. Public Health (Oxf.) 2008;30:82–90. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdm080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Verhoef L., Hewitt J., Barclay L., Ahmed S.M., Lake R., Hall A.J. Norovirus genotype profiles associated with foodborne transmission, 1999–2012. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2015;21:592–599. doi: 10.3201/eid2104.141073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.van Beek J., de Graaf M., Al-Hello H., Allen D.J., Ambert-Balay K., Botteldoorn N. Molecular surveillance of norovirus, 2005–16: an epidemiological analysis of data collected from the NoroNet network. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2018;18:545–553. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30059-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.van Beek J., van der Eijk A.A., Fraaij P.L., Caliskan K., Cransberg K., Dalinghaus M. Chronic norovirus infection among solid organ recipients in a tertiary care hospital, the Netherlands, 2006–2014. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2017;23(265):e9–e13. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2016.12.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Cannon J.L., Barclay L., Collins N.R., Wikswo M.E., Castro C.J., Magana L.C. Genetic and epidemiologic trends of norovirus outbreaks in the United States from 2013 to 2016 demonstrated emergence of novel GII.4 recombinant viruses. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2017;55:2208–2221. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00455-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Anderson A.D., Garrett V.D., Sobel J., Monroe S.S., Fankhauser R.L., Schwab K.J. Multistate outbreak of Norwalk-like virus gastroenteritis associated with a common caterer. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2001;154:1013–1019. doi: 10.1093/aje/154.11.1013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kojima S., Kageyama T., Fukushi S., Hoshino F.B., Shinohara M., Uchida K. Genogroup-specific PCR primers for detection of Norwalk-like viruses. J. Virol. Methods. 2002;100:107–114. doi: 10.1016/s0166-0934(01)00404-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Chhabra P., Gregoricus N., Weinberg G.A., Halasa N., Chappell J., Hassan F. Comparison of three multiplex gastrointestinal platforms for the detection of gastroenteritis viruses. J. Clin. Virol. 2017;95:66–71. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2017.08.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chhabra P., Rouhani S., Browne H., Yori P.P., Salas M.S., Olortegui M.P. Homotypic and heterotypic protection and risk of re-infection following natural norovirus infection in a highly endemic setting. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020 doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Nelson M.I., Mahfuz M., Chhabra P., Haque R., Seidman J.C., Hossain I. Genetic diversity of noroviruses circulating in a pediatric cohort in Bangladesh. J. Infect. Dis. 2018;218:1937–1942. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiy454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Diez-Valcarce M., Lopez M.R., Lopez B., Morales O., Sagastume M., Cadena L. Prevalence and genetic diversity of viral gastroenteritis viruses in children younger than 5 years of age in Guatemala, 2014–2015. J. Clin. Virol. 2019;114:6–11. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2019.03.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Park G.W., Chhabra P., Vinje J. Swab sampling method for the detection of human norovirus on surfaces. J. Vis. Exp. 2017;120:55205. doi: 10.3791/55205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Vinje J., Koopmans M.P. Molecular detection and epidemiology of small round-structured viruses in outbreaks of gastroenteritis in the Netherlands. J. Infect. Dis. 1996;174:610–615. doi: 10.1093/infdis/174.3.610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Vennema H., de Bruin E., Koopmans M. Rational optimization of generic primers used for Norwalk-like virus detection by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. J. Clin. Virol. 2002;25:233–235. doi: 10.1016/s1386-6532(02)00126-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Degiuseppe J.I., Gomes K.A., Hadad M.F., Parra G.I., Stupka J.A. Detection of novel GII.17 norovirus in Argentina, 2015. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2017;47:121–124. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2016.11.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Eden J.S., Hewitt J., Lim K.L., Boni M.F., Merif J., Greening G. The emergence and evolution of the novel epidemic norovirus GII.4 variant Sydney 2012. Virology. 2014;450–451:106–113. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2013.12.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ferreira M.S., Xavier Mda P., Tinga A.C., Rose T.L., Fumian T.M., Fialho A.M. Assessment of gastroenteric viruses frequency in a children’s day care center in Rio De Janeiro, Brazil: a fifteen year study (1994–2008) PLoS One. 2012;7 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Jin M., Wu S., Kong X., Xie H., Fu J., He Y. Norovirus outbreak surveillance, China, 201–2018. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2020;26:437–445. doi: 10.3201/eid2603.191183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Vega E., Barclay L., Gregoricus N., Williams K., Lee D., Vinje J. Novel surveillance network for norovirus gastroenteritis outbreaks, United States. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2011;17:1389–1395. doi: 10.3201/eid1708.101837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kroneman A., Vennema H., Deforche K., v d Avoort H., Penaranda S., Oberste M.S. An automated genotyping tool for enteroviruses and noroviruses. J. Clin. Virol. 2011;51:121–125. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2011.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Lim K.L., Hewitt J., Sitabkhan A., Eden J.S., Lun J., Levy A. A multi-site study of norovirus molecular epidemiology in Australia and New Zealand, 2013–2014. PLoS One. 2016;11 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

mmc1.xlsx (13.5KB, xlsx)
mmc2.xlsx (15.4KB, xlsx)
mmc3.xlsx (12.9KB, xlsx)

RESOURCES