Skip to main content
Oncology Letters logoLink to Oncology Letters
. 2021 Jan 6;21(3):188. doi: 10.3892/ol.2021.12449

Comprehensive evaluation of risk factors for lymph node metastasis in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma

Yan Dong 1,2,*, Dan Wang 3,*, Yisheng Luo 1,*, Ling Chen 4,*, Huili Bai 1, Yifan Shen 1, Yangli Zhang 1, Xueping Chen 1, Xinliang Su 5, Jinqiu Zhao 6, Huandong Liu 7, Jungao Lu 8, Zuoyi Yao 9, Yajing Zhao 10, Changlong He 4, Xiaosong Li 1,
PMCID: PMC7816409  PMID: 33574927

Abstract

With the increasing incidence of papillary thyroid cancer (PTC), it is important to risk-stratify patients who may have a more aggressive tumor biology. The present study aimed to evaluate the risk factors for lymph node metastasis (LNM) in patients with PTC, which may provide a significant reference for clinical diagnosis and treatment. In total, 1,045 patients with PTC [313 with PT microcarcinoma (PTMC) and 732 with non-PTMC] between August 2016 and August 2019 were investigated. The B-type Raf kinase (BRAF) V600E mutation was tested in all samples. The clinical data (sex, age, tumor location, sample type and pathological features) were retrospectively analyzed. Logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate independent risk factors for LNM. A total of 181/313 (57.8%) PTMC cases and 145/732 (19.8%) non-PTMC cases had a BRAF V600E mutation. In the PTMC cases, significant differences in sex and sample type were identified (BRAF V600E mutation vs. wild-type). In the non-PTMC cases, significant differences in sex and age were identified (BRAF V600E mutation vs. wild-type). Female sex and tumor diameter ≤1 cm were significant independent predictors of LNM in PTC. In PTMC, female sex was a significant independent predictor of LNM. A bilateral tumor was an independent protective factor for LNM in PTC, PTMC and non-PTMC. The BRAF V600E mutation rate of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology was higher compared with FFPE in PTMC (P=0.018). In contrast to previous studies, the results of the present study suggested that being female and having a tumor of diameter ≤1 cm were risk factors for LNM, and that the BRAF wild-type of PTMC may be more aggressive than other types. Notably, the position of the tumor in the bilateral thyroid was also an independent protective factor for LNM. Therefore, ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration should be recommended for gene analysis (BRAF V600E) in PTMC. In addition, clinicians should consider an individualized treatment according to gene mutations, sex, age, tumor size and the location of the tumor, in order to achieve an improved therapeutic efficacy.

Keywords: genetic testing, papillary thyroid carcinoma, papillary thyroid microcarcinoma, non-papillary thyroid microcarcinoma, BRAF mutation

Introduction

Papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC), is the most common histological subtype of thyroid cancer, which accounts for >90% of all thyroid malignancies, and its incidence rate has increased rapidly in recent years (14). This recent marked change is primarily attributable to the increased use of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) or ultrasonography-guided biopsy as the early diagnosis methods in patients without palpable thyroid nodes (5,6). Although the mortality rate of PTC is relatively low, 20–50% of patients have a risk of poor clinical outcomes, including distant metastases (7), a high rate of long-term persistence of the disease and the possibility of recurrence (8). Papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC) with a tumor diameter ≤1 cm occurs in >50% of all new-onset thyroid cancer types, and its incidence has been increasing rapidly over the last several decades worldwide (9,10). Clinically, numerous studies have reported that PTMC had a favorable prognosis in the majority of cases following surgical interventions (1113). However, PTMC tumor growth is usually slow and certain patients developed clinically problematic tumor growth after multiple years of observation (14,15). In addition, the majority of PTMC cases have an indolent nature and excellent outcomes, and the expert consensus recommended that PTMC should be identified and managed separately (2,12).

The B-type Raf kinase (BRAF) mutation has been the subject of intensive research to investigate its tumorigenic role and clinical implications in thyroid cancer types, particularly PTC. It has been revealed that ~90% of BRAF mutations are T1799A transverse point mutations, resulting in a valine to glutamic acid switch at codon 600 (V600E) (16,17). The kinase activity of BRAF V600E is 460-fold higher compared with the wild-type BRAF, and this active conformation may constitutively activate its downstream effects to transform healthy cells or induce cancer proliferation without the need of RAS for activation (18). These results suggested that the mutation is an early event in PTC development, and there is a complex process that may affect tumorigenesis and tumor aggressiveness.

As with PTC in general, lymph node metastasis (LNM) has been reported to be a risk factor for increased tumor recurrence rates and is also associated with a decreased survival rate (19). Lutz et al (20) revealed that an imbalance in DNA repair gene expression was associated with aggressive clinicopathological features in PTC. Therefore, the aim of the present retrospective observational study was to investigate the associations between BRAF V600E mutations and clinicopathological features and to identify the risk factors for LNM in patients with PTC.

Materials and methods

Patient population

Clinical data of 1,045 patients with PTC were collected for analysis between August 2016 and August 2019 from The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (Yuzhong, China). Based on tumor diameter, patients were diagnosed with PTMC (n=313) or non-PTMC (n=732). All participants in the study were Chinese, without a blood relationship with each other, and all provided written informed consent.

All patients met the inclusion criteria, which were as follows: i) underwent either a resection or a diagnostic procedure (biopsy or cytological specimen); ii) confirmed to have PTC via intraoperative rapid pathology or postoperative pathology detection; and iii) presence of gene mutation. Different locations of thyroid tumor were divided into seven regions: Left lobe, right lobe, bilaterality, isthmus, left lobe and isthmus, right lobe and isthmus, bilateral lobes and isthmus according to ultrasound imaging results. The information of sex, age, diagnosis date and sample type are available for the 1,045 patients in the hospital information system of The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (Table I).

Table I.

Patient characteristics.

Characteristics Total (n=1,045) PTMC (n=313) Non-PTMC (n=732) P-value
Sex 0.524
  Male 298 85 213
  Female 747 228 519
Age (7–85), years 41.97±12.94 42.57±11.40 41.60±13.78 0.009a
  <55 889 280 (89.5%) 609 (83.2%)
  ≥55 156 33 (10.5%) 123 (16.8%)
Lymph node metastasis 326 181 (57.8%) 145 (19.8%) 0.000a
BRAF V600E mutation 839 273 (87.2%) 566 (77.3%) 0.000a
Different locations of thyroid tumor 0.254b
  Left lobe 382 104 (33.2%) 278 (38.0%)
  Right lobe 480 147 (47.0%) 333 (45.5%)
  Isthmus 6 3 (1.0%) 3 (0.4%)
  Bilateral lobes 150 52 (16.6%) 98 (13.4%)
  Left lobe and isthmus 7 1 (0.3%) 6 (0.8%)
  Right lobe and isthmus 15 6 (1.9%) 9 (1.2%)
  Bilateral lobes and isthmus 5 0 (0.0%) 5 (0.7%)
Sample type 0.058
  FNAC 303 78 (24.9%) 225 (30.7%)
  FFPE 742 235 (75.1%) 507 (69.3%)

Quantitative data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation or n (%).

a

P<0.05

b

Fisher exact test. PTMC, papillary thyroid microcarcinoma; FNAC, fine-needle aspiration cytology; FFPE, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded.

Pathological examination

PTC tissues were embedded in paraffin and were sectioned into 4-µm thick sections according to standard procedures. The sections were processed for hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining. For this purpose the sections were fixed with 95% ethanol for 20 min at room temperature, and washed twice with PBS for 1 min each time. The 60% neutral balsam was used as a blocking reagent for 3–5 sec at room temperature. The hematoxylin staining was performed for 12–15 min and eosin for 5 min at room temperature. Slides were used for observed under a light microscope (magnification, ×400). Different types of PTC and the presence of LNM were reviewed independently by two blinded pathologists; any inconsistent diagnostic cases were discussed with a third pathologist. The color ultrasound diagnosis was routinely used before and after the surgical resection of thyroid tumor or used before the fine needle aspiration, the ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (US-FNA) was routinely used before the surgical resection of thyroid tumor or conservative treatment and the H&E staining was used for morphological detection.

Sample collection, DNA extraction and mutation screening

DNA was extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) or fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) samples using TRIzol® reagent (cat. no. 15596-026; Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), according to the manufacturer's protocols. DNA concentrations of all samples were determined using a NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer at 280 nm (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Gene mutations were detected via amplification refractory mutation system-polymerase chain reaction (ARMS-PCR) and the sequences used were as follows: BRAF, forward, 5′-GCTTGCTCTGATAGGAAAATGAG-3′; and reverse, 5′-GGGCCAAAAATTTAATCAGTGG-3′. The thermocycling conditions of PCR were as follows 1 cycle of 94°C for 5 min; followed by 15 cycles of 95°C for 25 sec, 64°C for 20 sec, 72°C for 20 sec and 93°C for 25 sec; and then finally 31 cycles of 60°C for 35 sec and 72°C for 20 sec. The ARMS-PCR reagents were provided by AmoyDx Diagnostics Co., Ltd. (cat. no. 20143401824).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 22.0 software (IBM Corp.). Quantitative data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation, while qualitative data are represented as a percentage or frequency. χ2 or Fisher's exact tests were used to evaluate the difference in clinical features between two different groups. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to assess independent risk factors for the presence of LNM in PTC, and the results are reported as odds ratios (OR) with a 95% CI. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

SPSS univariate analysis is helpful for selecting variables that will be in the final logistic regression model. Following testing for all possible interactions among independent variables, the best fitted logistic regression model was established to determine the possible risk factors for LNM in PTC. Next, adjusted ORs and 95% CIs were calculated for all significant variables.

The two stepwise multiple logistic regression was used in the multivariate analysis to compare parameters with LNM or without in PTC as the dependent variable, and sex, age, mutation, tumor type, sample type and different location of thyroid tumor as the independent variables.

Results

Clinicopathological characteristics of 1,045 patients with or without PTMC

A retrospective study of 732 patients with non-PTMC and 313 patients with PTMC between August 2016 and August 2019 was performed to assess the clinicopathological characteristics at diagnosis, including sex, age, sample type (FFPE tissues or FNAC), LNM, different locations of thyroid tumor (left lobe, right lobe, bilaterality, isthmus, left lobe and isthmus, right lobe and isthmus, or bilateral lobes and isthmus) and BRAF V600E mutation status (Table I). In total, 298 male and 747 female patients have been analyzed in the present study. The mean age was 41.97±12.94 years. The patients were divided into two subgroups according to age: Young subgroup (<55 years; n=889) and old subgroup (≥55 years; n=156). The sample type consisted of FFPE (n=742) and FNAC (n=303). LNM was present in 181 cases (57.8%) of PTMC and in 145 cases (19.8%) of non-PTMC. Collectively, LNM was present in 31.2% of patients.

With regards to the location of the thyroid tumor, it was present in 382 patients with PTC in the left lobe, in 480 cases in the right lobe, in six cases in the isthmus, in 150 cases in the left and right lobes, in seven cases in the left lobe and isthmus, in 15 patients in the right lobe and isthmus, and in five cases in the bilateral lobes and isthmus. The BRAF V600E mutation occurred in 273 (87.2%) of PTMC cases and 566 (77.3%) of non-PTMC cases. The total mutation rate of BRAF V600E was 80.3%.

The clinicopathological characteristics and sample types were compared between PTMC and non-PTMC in the present study (Table I). The BRAF V600E mutation rate in the PTMC group was significantly higher than that in the non-PTMC group (P=0.00). The frequency of LNM in the PTMC group was also significantly increased compared with that in the non-PTMC group (P=0.00). The age cut-off value of 55 years between the PTMC group and the non-PTMC group was significantly different (P=0.009). Other clinical parameters exhibited no significant differences between the two groups.

BRAF V600E mutational status and clinical characteristics in patients with PTMC or non-PTMC

The association between BRAF mutation status and clinical characteristics of 313 patients with PTMC was analyzed. The BRAF V600E mutation demonstrated a significant association with the male sex (P=0.026) and sample type from FFPE tissues (P=0.018) compared with the BRAF wild-type in patients with PTMC. However, there was no difference in LNM, age and location of thyroid tumor between the BRAF V600E mutation and the BRAF wild-type (Table II).

Table II.

Association between clinicopathological characteristics and BRAF V600E mutation.

PTMC Non-PTMC


Characteristics BRAF V600E mutation BRAF wild-type P-value BRAF V600E mutation BRAF wild-type P-value
Sex 0.026a 0.003a
  Male   80   5 180   33
  Female 193 35 386 133
Age, years 42.02±11.31 43.07±11.48 0.505 43.32±14.06 36.83±11.74 0.017a
  <55 242 34 464 149
  ≥55   31   6 102   17
Lymph node metastasis 0.964 0.280
  Yes (+) 158 23 449 138
  No (−) 115 17 117   28
Different locations of thyroid tumor 0.475b 0.448b
  Left lobe   88 16 211   67
  Right lobe 127 20 259   74
  Isthmus     3   0     3     0
  Bilateral lobes   49   3   79   19
  Left lobe and isthmus     1   0     3     3
  Right lobe and isthmus     5   1     8     1
  Bilateral lobes and isthmus     0   0     3     2
Sample type 0.018a 0.699
  FNAC   75   4 176   49
  FFPE 198 36 390 117
a

P<0.05

b

Fisher exact test. PTMC, papillary thyroid microcarcinoma; FNAC, fine-needle aspiration cytology; FFPE, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded.

The BRAF V600E mutation had a significant association with the male sex (P=0.003) compared with the BRAF wild-type in patients without PTMC. In addition, significant differences were identified in the age cut-off value of 55 years between BRAF V600E mutation and BRAF wild-type in patients without PTMC (P=0.017). However, there was no difference in other clinical features between the BRAF V600E mutation and the BRAF wild-type (Table II).

The clinicopathological characteristics and sample type in all patients with the BRAF V600E mutation were compared (Table III). A lower rate of LNM (P=0.00; χ2=42.369) was present in PTMC cases compared with that in non-PTMC cases. The age cut-off value of 55 years was significantly different (P=0.013) between PTMC and non-PTMC groups. However, there was no difference in other clinical features between PTMC and non-PTMC groups.

Table III.

Comparison of progression between PTMC and non-PTMC with BRAF V600E mutation.

BRAF V600E mutation

Characteristics PTMC non-PTMC χ2 P-value
Sex   0.537 0.464
  Male   80 180
  Female 193 386
Age, years 42.02±11.31 43.32±14.06   6.135 0.013a
  <55 242 464
  ≥55   31 102
Lymph node metastasis 42.369 0.000a
  Yes (+) 158 449
  No (−) 115 117
Different locations of thyroid tumor   5.644 0.445b
  Left lobe   88 211
  Right lobe 127 259
  Isthmus     3     3
  Bilateral lobes   49   79
  Left lobe and isthmus     1     3
  Right lobe and isthmus     5     8
  Bilateral lobes and isthmus     0     3
Sample type   1.153 0.283
  FNAC   75 176
  FFPE 198 390
a

P<0.05

b

Fisher exact test. PTMC, papillary thyroid microcarcinoma; FNAC, fine-needle aspiration cytology; FFPE, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded.

Univariate and multivariate analysis of risk factors for LNM in PTC, PTMC and non-PTMC

In PTC (Table IV), the female sex (OR=1.834; 95% CI=1.297–2.592; P=0.001) and PTMC (OR=3.267; 95% CI=2.418–4.413; P<0.001) were characterized as independent risk factors for LNM. Furthermore, a bilateral tumor (OR=0.29; 95% CI=0.1676–0.497; P=0.000) and sample type FFPE (OR=0.643; 95% CI=0.470–0.879; P=0.006) were characterized as protective factors for LNM. However, there was no difference between BRAF V600E mutation and LNM (P>0.05).

Table IV.

Univariate and multivariate analysis of risk factors for lymph node metastasis in papillary thyroid carcinoma.

Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis


Variables OR (95% CI) P-value OR (95% CI) P-value
Sex (male as reference)
  Female 1.868 (1.340–2.604) 0.000a 1.834 (1.297–2.592) 0.001a
Age (<55 as reference)
  ≥55 1.106 (0.757–1.616) 0.603
BRAF V600E (yes as reference)
  No (−)   0.72 (0.505–1.043) 0.084
Tumor type (non-PTMC as reference)
  PTMC   2.93 (2.198–3.910) 0.000a 3.267 (2.418–4.413) 0.000a
Sample type (FNAC as reference)
  FFPE 0.712 (0.530–0.955) 0.024a 0.643 (0.470–0.879) 0.006a
Different locations of thyroid tumor (left lobe as reference)
  Right lobe   0.82 (0.611–1.103) 0.191   0.76 (0.556–1.034) 0.080
  Bilateral lobes   0.32 (0.189–0.543) 0.000a   0.29 (0.1676–0.497) 0.000a
  Isthmus   1.11 (0.200–6.117) 0.909   0.89 (0.158–5.089) 0.901
  Bilateral lobes and isthmus   0.55 (0.061–4.996) 0.597   0.43 (0.044–4.138) 0.461
  Right lobe and isthmus   1.11 (0.370–3.304) 0.858   0.93 (0.292–2.926) 0.894
  Left lobe and isthmus   0.37 (0.044–3.094) 0.358 0.441 (0.052–3.743) 0.453
a

P<0.05. OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; PTMC, papillary thyroid microcarcinoma; FNAC, fine-needle aspiration cytology; FFPE, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded.

In PTMC (Table V), the female sex (OR=2.66; 95% CI=1.490–4.760; P=0.001) was characterized as an independent risk factor, while a bilateral tumor (OR=0.18; 95% CI=0.075–0.418; P=0.00) was characterized as a protective factor. Age, BRAF V600E mutation and sample type did not demonstrate any statistical differences with LNM (P>0.05).

Table V.

Univariate and multivariate analysis of risk factors for lymph node biopsy in papillary thyroid microcarcinoma.

Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis


Variables OR (95% CI) P-value OR (95% CI) P-value
Sex (male as reference)
  Female 2.91 (1.671–5.077) 0.000a 2.66 (1.490–4.760) 0.001a
Age (<55 as reference)
  ≥55 1.54 (0.773–3.056) 0.220
BRAF V600E (yes as reference)
  No (−) 0.93 (0.481–1.805) 0.835
Sample type (FNAC as reference)
  FFPE 0.80 (0.476–1.333) 0.387a
Different locations of thyroid tumor (left lobe as reference)
  Right lobe 0.70 (0.427–1.169) 0.176 0.71 (0.423–1.184) 0.188
  Bilateral lobes 0.15 (0.068–0.369) 0.000a 0.18 (0.075–0.418) 0.000a
  Isthmus 1.78 (0.157–20.263) 0.641 2.87 (0.236–35.051) 0.408
  Bilateral lobes and isthmus 0.44 (0.039–5.066) 0.514 0.48 (0.040–5.732) 0.561
  Right lobe and isthmus 0.44 (0.078–2.539) 0.362 0.48 (0.081–2.833) 0.417
  Left lobe and isthmus 0.00 1.000 0.00 1.00
a

P<0.05. OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; FNAC, fine-needle aspiration cytology; FFPE, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded.

In non-PTMC cases (Table VI), the sample type FFPE (OR=0.568; 95% CI=0.389–0.8291; P=0.003) was characterized as a protective factor for LNM. The sex, age, BRAF V600E mutation and different locations of thyroid tumor did not show statistical differences with LNM (P>0.05).

Table VI.

Univariate and multivariate analysis of risk factors for lymph node metastasis in non-papillary thyroid microcarcinoma.

Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis


Variables OR (95% CI) P-value OR (95% CI) P-value
Sex (male as reference)
  Female 1.42 (0.929–2.165) 0.105 1.44 (0.940–2.202) 0.094
Age (<55 as reference)
  ≥55 1.095 (0.675–1.778) 0.713
BRAF V600E (yes as reference)
  No (−) 0.79 (0.500–1.241) 0.304
Sample type (FNAC as reference)
  FFPE 0.572 (0.392–0.835) 0.004a 0.568 (0.389–0.8291) 0.003a
Different locations of thyroid tumor (left lobe as reference)
  Right lobe 0.81 (0.550–1.197) 0.291
  Bilateral lobes 0.43 (0.215–0.850) 0.015a
  Isthmus 0.0 0.999
  Bilateral lobes and isthmus 0.0 0.999
  Right lobe and isthmus 1.67 (0.407–6.874) 0.476
  Left lobe and isthmus 0.67 (0.077–5.829) 0.716
*

P<0.05. OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; FNAC, fine-needle aspiration cytology; FFPE, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded.

Discussion

With the increasing incidences of non-PTMC and PTMC, it is important to risk-stratify patients who may have a more aggressive tumor biology in what was traditionally considered to be an indolent disease. This stratification will have management implications, including whether or not to observe the patient outcomes, the extent of surgical resection, the use of radioiodine ablation therapy (the β rays emitted during 131 iodine decay could selectively destroy thyroid acinar epithelium without affecting the adjacent tissues) and the frequency of follow-up (21). Li et al (22) reported that PTMC had an indolent course and excellent prognosis, while the results of the present study demonstrated that the incidence of LNM was more frequent in PTMC than in non-PTMC. The correlation analysis indicated that the incidence of the BRAF V600E mutation in male patients with PTMC was significantly higher than that in female patients. Lee et al (23) recommended that the male sex may be an independent prognostic factor for recurrence in non-PTMC, but it was not a prognostic factor in PTMC. In the present study, the incidence of the BRAF V600E mutation in FNAC was significantly increased compared with that in FFPE, which was consistent with previous studies (24,25). However, LNM was associated with BRAF wild-type in PTMC cases, which was inconsistent with a previous study (26). Therefore, the results of the present study demonstrated that the BRAF V600E mutation may be more prevalent among male patients and is more easily detected in FNAC of PTMC.

To further analyze the difference between PTMC and non-PTMC with regard to the biological features, the clinicopathological characteristics and sample type of patients with BRAF V600E mutations were compared. While several studies have reported that BRAF V600E mutation in PTC is associated with aggressive pathological features, including a negative influence on 131I-avidity, decreased thyroperoxidase, an increased risk of lymph node metastasis and recurrence following treatment (2729), the clinical implications and precise mechanisms in PTMC and non-PTMC are contradictory. For example, Zheng et al (30) reported that tumor diameter (>0.5 cm) was an independent risk factor correlated with LNM in PTC. Notably, the results of the present study demonstrated that the LNM rate was significantly increased and was correlated with BRAF wild-type in PTMC, which indicated that the BRAF V600E mutation in PTMC was less aggressive; this result differs to that from a previous meta-analysis (22). A previous study revealed that the majority of PTMC cases with a BRAF V600E mutation do not express BRAF V600E protein (31).

Correct preoperative diagnosis is highly important, and it is generally agreed that improved knowledge regarding predictive risk factors for LNM may guide clinical decisions, but the greater risk of LNM remains debatable. Following adjusting for other significant preoperative clinical factors, univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to identify the risk factors for LNM in the present study. Sex was a prominent patient background parameter for PTC. In recent years, the association between sex and recurrence or survival of PTC has been debated. A previous study reported that the male sex was an independent clinical prognostic factor of poor outcome in PTC (32), but not in PTMC (23). Recently, Roh et al (33) reported that there was no association between sex and LNM. In the present study, although the female sex had a lower BRAF V600E mutation presence than the male sex, multivariate analysis demonstrated that the female sex was a risk factor for LNM in PTMC and non-PTMC, which was different from the results of the aforementioned studies. A previous study revealed that the female sex was an independent predictive risk factor of central lymph node metastasis in PTC (34). Controversies in the results of these studies may be associated with different sample types, sample sizes and detection techniques. It has been reported that the disease in the female sex has an earlier age of onset, while male patients have a higher rate of mortality (35,36). Therefore, it is recommended that the molecular mechanisms between LNM and sex in patients with PTC are investigated in future studies.

The results of the present study have suggested that the location of the tumor in the bilateral thyroid was a protective factor for LNM in PTMC and non-PTMC, which was inconsistent with a retrospective cohort study (37).

In conclusion, the results of the present study have demonstrated that the female sex and PTMC were independently associated with LNM in PTC, while the tumor in the bilateral thyroid was a protective factor in LNM. Furthermore, a negative association was identified between the BRAF V600E mutation and LNM. FNAC from tumor samples had a higher rate of BRAF V600E mutation compared with FFPE in PTMC, which suggested that FNAC may be a reliable intervention to detect the BRAF V600E mutation. Therefore, the results of the present study indicated that clinicians should comprehensively consider the following clinical features: Sample type, BRAF mutation, tumor size, patient sex and location of the thyroid tumor. Furthermore, multilevel gene sequencing technologies and therapeutic schedule should be utilized in order to achieve a relatively favorable prognosis.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Glossary

Abbreviations

PTC

papillary thyroid carcinoma

PTMC

papillary thyroid microcarcinoma

US-FNA

ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration

FFPE

formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded

FNAC

fine-needle aspiration cytology

H&E

hematoxylin-eosin staining

LNM

lymph node metastasis

OR

odds ratio

Funding

The present study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 81871653), the Chongqing Medical Science Project (grant no. 2018MSXM065) and the Science and Technology Research Project of Chongqing Education Commission (grant no. KJQN201900449).

Availability of data and materials

All data generated and/or analyzed during the present study are included in this published article.

Authors' contributions

YD, DW and XL conceived and designed the study. HB, YS, YLZ, XC, YJZ developed the methodology. XS, JZ, HL, JL, ZY, CH and YJZ acquired the data (acquired and managed patients and provided facilities). LC, DW and YL analyzed and interpreted the data (statistical analysis, biostatistics and computational analysis). YD, DW and XL wrote, reviewed and revised the manuscript. LC, DW and XL provided administrative, technical or material support (i.e., reporting or organizing data and constructing databases). XL supervised the study. CH performed English language editing All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University Ethics Review Board (approval no. 2020-173). All patients provided written informed consent.

Patient consent for publication

All patients provided written patient consent for publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  • 1.Lewiński A, Adamczewski Z, Zygmunt A, Markuszewski L, Karbownik-Lewińska M, Stasiak M. Correlations between molecular landscape and sonographic image of different variants of papillary thyroid carcinoma. J Clin Med. 2019;8:1916. doi: 10.3390/jcm8111916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ahn HS, Kim HJ, Welch HG. Korea's thyroid-cancer ‘epidemic’-screening and overdiagnosis. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:1765–1767. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1409841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kim TY, Kim WG, Kim WB, Shong YK. Current status and future perspectives in differentiated thyroid cancer. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul) 2014;29:217–225. doi: 10.3803/EnM.2014.29.3.217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Jung CK, Little MP, Lubin JH, Brenner AV, Wells SAJ, Sigurdson AJ, Nikiforov YE. The increase in thyroid cancer incidence during the last four decades is accompanied by a high frequency of BRAF mutations and a sharp increase in RAS mutations. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99:E276–E285. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-2503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Pusztaszeri M, Auger M. Update on the cytologic features of papillary thyroid carcinoma variants. Diagn Cytopathol. 2017;45:714–730. doi: 10.1002/dc.23703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Liang J, Cai W, Feng D, Teng H, Mao F, Jiang Y, Hu S, Li X, Zhang Y, Liu B, Sun ZS. Genetic landscape of papillary thyroid carcinoma in the Chinese population: Somatic mutational profile of PTC in China. J Pathol. 2017;244 doi: 10.1002/path.5005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Larsen PR. New guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab. 2006;2:297. doi: 10.1038/ncpendmet0198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tang KT, Lee CH. BRAF mutation in papillary thyroid carcinoma: Pathogenic role and clinical implications. J Chin Med Assoc. 2010;73:113–128. doi: 10.1016/S1726-4901(10)70025-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sobin LH. Histological typing of thyroid tumours. Histopathology. 1990;16:513. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.1990.tb01559.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.McGuire S. World Cancer Report 2014. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer, WHO Press, 2015. Adv Nutr. 2016;7:418–419. doi: 10.3945/an.116.012211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ito Y, Higashiyama T, Takamura Y, Miya A, Kobayashi K, Matsuzuka F, Kuma K, Miyauchi A. Prognosis of patients with benign thyroid diseases accompanied by incidental papillary carcinoma undetectable on preoperative imaging tests. World J Surg. 2007;31:1672–1676. doi: 10.1007/s00268-007-9131-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Haugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC, Doherty GM, Mandel SJ, Nikiforov UE, Pacini F, Randolph GW, Sawka AM, Schlumberger M, et al. 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: The American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. Thyroid. 2016;26:1–133. doi: 10.1089/thy.2015.0020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Chen JF, Cao J, Qiu FQ, Huang PT. The efficacy and the safety of ultrasound-guided ablation therapy for treating papillary thyroid microcarcinoma. J Cancer. 2019;10:5272–5282. doi: 10.7150/jca.36289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zheng X, Peng C, Gao M, Zhi J, Hou X, Zhao J, Wei X, Chi J, Li D, Qian BK. Risk factors for cervical lymph node metastasis in papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: A study of 1,587 patients. Cancer Biol Med. 2019;16:121–130. doi: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2018.0125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Jeon MJ, Kim WG, Chung K, Baek JH, Kim WB, Shong YK. Active surveillance of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: Where do we stand? Eur Thyroid J. 2019;8:298–306. doi: 10.1159/000503064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Robb R, Yang L, Shen C, Wolfe AR, Webb A, Zhang X, Vedaie M, Saji M, Jhiang S, Ringel MD, Williams TM, et al. Inhibiting BRAF oncogene-mediated radioresistance effectively radiosensitizes BRAFV600E-mutant thyroid cancer cells by constraining DNA double-strand break repair. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25:4749–4760. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-3625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Qiu T, Lu H, Guo L, Huang W, Ling Y, Shan L, Li W, Ying J, Lv N. Detection of BRAF mutation in Chinese tumor patients using a highly sensitive antibody immunohistochemistry assay. Sci Rep. 2015;5:9211. doi: 10.1038/srep09211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Landa I, Pozdeyev N, Korch C, Marlow LA, Smallridge RC, Copland JA, Henderson YC, Lai SY, Clayman GL, Onoda N, et al. Comprehensive genetic characterization of human thyroid cancer cell lines: A validated panel for preclinical studies. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25:3141–3151. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-2531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kim ES, Lee Y, Seo H, Son GS, Kwon SY, Kim YS, Seo J, Kim NH, Suh S, Ryoo I, You SH. Clinical features of recently diagnosed papillary thyroid carcinoma in elderly patients aged 65 and older based on 10 years of sonographic experience at a single institution in Korea. Ultrasonography. 2017;36:355–362. doi: 10.14366/usg.17010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lutz BS, Leguisamo NM, Cabral NK, Gloria HC, Reiter KC, Agnes G, Zanella V, Meyer ELS, Saffi J. Imbalance in DNA repair machinery is associated with BRAF(V600E) mutation and tumor aggressiveness in papillary thyroid carcinoma. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2018;472:140–148. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2017.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Chen Y, Sadow PM, Suh H, Lee KE, Choi JY, Suh YJ, Wang TS, Lubitz CC. BRAF(V600E) is correlated with recurrence of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: A systematic review, multi-institutional primary data analysis, and meta-analysis. Thyroid. 2016;26:248–255. doi: 10.1089/thy.2015.0391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Li F, Chen G, Sheng C, Gusdon AM, Huang Y, Lv Z, Xu H, Xing M, Qu S. BRAFV600E mutation in papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: A meta-analysis. Endocr-Relat Cancer. 2015;22:159–168. doi: 10.1530/ERC-14-0531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Lee YH, Lee YM, Sung TY, Yoon JH, Song DE, Kim TY, Baek JH, Ryu JS, Chung KW, Hong SJ. Is male gender a prognostic factor for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma? Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24:1958–1964. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-5788-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kim TY, Kim WB, Song JY, Rhee YS, Gong G, Cho YM, Kim SY, Kim SC, Hong SJ, Shong YK. The BRAF mutation is not associated with poor prognostic factors in Korean patients with conventional papillary thyroid microcarcinoma. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2005;63:588–593. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2005.02389.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kwak JY, Kim EK, Chung WY, Moon HJ, Kim MJ, Choi JR. Association of BRAFV600E mutation with poor clinical prognostic factors and US features in Korean patients with papillary thyroid microcarcinoma. Radiologe. 2009;253:854–860. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2533090471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chen B, Zhang Z, Wang K, Shang M, Zhao S, Ding W, Du R, Yu Z, Xu X. Association of BRAFV600E mutation with ultrasonographic features and clinicopathologic characteristics of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: A retrospective study of 116 cases. Clin Hemorheol Micro. 2019;73:545–552. doi: 10.3233/CH-190568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Choi SY, Park H, Kang MK, Lee DK, Lee KD, Lee HS, Kim SW, Lee EN, Hong JC. The relationship between the BRAF(V600E) mutation in papillary thyroid microcarcinoma and clinicopathologic factors. World J Surg Oncol. 2013;11:291. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-11-291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Rothenberg SM, Mcfadden DG, Palmer EL, Daniels GH, Wirth LJ. Redifferentiation of iodine-refractory BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic papillary thyroid cancer with dabrafenib. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21:1028–1035. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-2915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mingzhao X. Molecular pathogenesis and mechanisms of thyroid cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2013;13:184–199. doi: 10.1038/nrc3431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zheng X, Wei S, Han Y, Li Y, Yu Y, Yun X, Ren X, Gao M. Papillary microcarcinoma of the thyroid: Clinical characteristics and BRAF(V600E) mutational status of 977 cases. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:2266–2273. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2851-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Koelsch B, Theurer S, Staniszewska M, Heupel J, Koch A, Mergener S, Walk F, Fischer C, Kutritz A, Schmid KW, Kindler-Röhrborn A. An animal model further uncovers the role of mutant BrafV600E during papillary thyroid cancer development. Am J Pathol. 2020;190:702–710. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2019.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Lang HH, Chai YJ, Cowling BJ, Min HS, Lee KE, Youn YK. Is BRAFV600E mutation a marker for central nodal metastasis in small papillary thyroid carcinoma? Endocr Relat Cancer. 2014;21:285–295. doi: 10.1530/ERC-13-0291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Roh JL, Kim J, Park CI. Central cervical nodal metastasis from papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: Pattern and factors predictive of nodal metastasis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:2482–2486. doi: 10.1245/s10434-008-9813-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Sun Y, Hongjun L, Shaoqiang Z, Yanxia B, Bingyin S. Gender-specific risk of central compartment lymph node metastasis in papillary thyroid carcinoma. Int J Endocrinol. 2018;2018:6710326. doi: 10.1155/2018/6710326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kilfoy BA, Devesa SS, Ward MH, Zhang Y, Rosenberg PS, Holford TR, Anderson WF. Gender is an age-specific effect modifier for papillary cancers of the thyroid gland. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009;18:1092–1100. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Rahbari R, Zhang L, Kebebew E. Thyroid cancer gender disparity. Future Oncol. 2010;6:1771–1779. doi: 10.2217/fon.10.127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Li M, Zhu X, Lv J, Lu K, Shen M, Xu Z, Wu Z. Risk factors for predicting central lymph node metastasis in papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (CN0): A study of 273 resections. Eur Rev Med Pharmaco. 2017;21:3801–3807. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated and/or analyzed during the present study are included in this published article.


Articles from Oncology Letters are provided here courtesy of Spandidos Publications

RESOURCES