Skip to main content
BMC Biotechnology logoLink to BMC Biotechnology
. 2021 Jan 20;21:8. doi: 10.1186/s12896-020-00658-3

Comparing various protocols of human and bovine ovarian tissue decellularization to prepare extracellular matrix-alginate scaffold for better follicle development in vitro

Hossein Nikniaz 1, Zahra Zandieh 1,, Mohammad Nouri 2, Neda Daei-farshbaf 1, Reza Aflatoonian 3, Mazaher Gholipourmalekabadi 4,5, Seyed Behnamedin Jameie 6,
PMCID: PMC7816475  PMID: 33472624

Abstract

Background

Nowadays, the number of cancer survivors is significantly increasing as a result of efficient chemo/radio therapeutic treatments. Female cancer survivors may suffer from decreased fertility. In this regard, different fertility preservation techniques were developed. Artificial ovary is one of these methods suggested by several scientific groups. Decellularized ovarian cortex has been introduced as a scaffold in the field of human fertility preservation. This study was carried out to compare decellularization of the ovarian scaffold by various protocols and evaluate the follicle survival in extracellular matrix (ECM)-alginate scaffold.

Results

The micrographs of H&E and DAPI staining confirmed successful decellularization of the ovarian cortex in all experimental groups, but residual DNA content in SDS-Triton group was significantly higher than other groups (P < 0.05). SEM images demonstrated that complex fiber network and porosity structure were maintained in all groups. Furthermore, elastin and collagen fibers were observed in all groups after decellularization process. MTT test revealed higher cytobiocompatibility of the SDS-Triton-Ammonium and SDS-Triton decellularized scaffolds compared with SDS groups. Compared to the transferred follicles into the sodium alginate (81%), 85.9% of the transferred follicles into the decellularized scaffold were viable after 7 days of cultivation (P = 0.04).

Conclusion

Although all the decellularization procedures was effective in removal of cells from ovarian cortex, SDS-Triton-Ammonium group showed less residual DNA content with higher cytobiocompatibility for follicles when compared with other groups. In addition, the scaffold made from ovarian tissues decellularized using SDS-Triton-Ammonium and sodium alginate is suggested as a potential 3D substrate for in vitro culture of follicles for fertility preservation.

Keywords: Decellularization, Scaffold, Ovary, Fertility preservation

Background

Nowadays, the number of cancer survivors is significantly increasing as a result of efficient chemo/radio therapeutic treatments [1]. But female cancer survivors may suffer from decreased fertility. Thus, fertility preservation is one of the most important issues in these patients. In this regard, different fertility preservation techniques, such as ovarian shielding or transposition, embryo and oocyte cryopreservation, ovarian tissue cryopreservation, and artificial ovary were developed [2, 3]. However, due to the risk of transmission of cancer cells by transplanting cryopreserved ovarian tissue, artificial ovary and in vitro maturation were suggested by several scientific groups [46]. In recent techniques, ovarian follicles were isolated from the surrounding tissue and transferred into the scaffold to maintain mechanical support [7]. Studies demonstrated that follicle growth and the survival rate depend on type, structure, and rigidity of the scaffold and its ability to enhance vascularization after transplantation [8, 9]. So, scientific groups attempt to find ideal scaffold to support follicle development [10]. To reach this aim, different kinds of natural and synthetic matrixes were examined. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) was the only synthetic scaffold ever used but varieties of natural scaffolds were examined. Alginate, collagen, and fibrin hydrogels transmit nutrients to the follicle rapidly. In recent years, extracellular matrix (ECM) was used as a scaffold in the field of reproductive medicine [9, 1113]. ECM scaffold is obtained by decellularizing the tissue. Decellularization is performed by physical, chemical, or combinative methods [12]. The type of decellularization agents and duration of exposure have effect on structure and biocompatibility of the ECM scaffold [11, 14]. Therefore, different techniques of decellularization were tested to obtain optimized ovarian ECM scaffolds [9, 12, 13]. Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) human and bovine ovarian tissue has been decellularized by SDS, SDS-Triton, and sodium lauryl ester sulfate (SLE). Although SDS is the ionic surfactant and a prevalent agent used in the decellularization process and successfully eliminates cells’ nuclear materials, it can be harmful to the structural of ECM and signaling proteins [15]. Furthermore, it is a cytotoxic agent and irremovable due to its ionic nature [11]. Therefore, researchers are attempting to reduce the exposure time and concentration of the SDS and increase the biocompatibility of the scaffold through combining it with other decellularization materials. Triton X-100 is a nonionic surfactant commonly used as a decellularizing material [16]. Liu et al. decreased SDS exposure time and decellularized ovarian tissue by SDS-Triton protocol [12]. But elimination of residual DNA was lower than SDS alone. Ammonium hydroxide is a decellularizing agent commonly used in combination with SDS [11]. Ammonium retains glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) and viscoelasticity of the decellularized tissue by counteracting the negative charge of collagen [17].

In addition to decellularization materials, the type of tissue used as a scaffold is important in the growth and differentiation of cells. Recently, ovarian cortical decellularized tissue has been used as a scaffold in regenerative medicine. Laronda et al. demonstrated that by culturing ovarian cells on to the decellularized scaffold, ovarian cells can produce estrogen after transplantation and can initiate puberty in ovariectomized mice [9]. Hassanpoure et al. cultured primary ovarian cells on the decellularized ovarian scaffolds and reconstructed follicle-like structures after transplantation [13]. However, the viability of follicles into the decellularized scaffold was not assessed. So, for the first time, in the present study, the isolated ovarian follicles were 3D cultured into the SDS-Triton-Ammonium decellularized ovarian scaffold using alginate hydrogel and the viability of follicles was tested.

So, in the present study, various decellularization protocols were compared to find optimized ovarian tissue decellularization method in terms of biocompatibility and residiual DNA. Furthermore, for the first time, isolated preantral follicles were cultured into the decellularized ovarian scaffold and the viability of follicles was tested.

Results

Decellularization of bovine ovarian cortex

The H&E staining results showed that ovarian tissues were completely decellularized in all groups (Fig. 1a-e). Furthermore, no residual nuclei were observed by DAPI staining (Fig. 1f-j). The results of data quantification with DNA content kit showed that the residual DNA in SDS-Triton group was significantly higher than SDS-18 h, SDS-24 h, and SDS-T-A groups (P < 0.05) (Table 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Extracellular matrix structure and composition preservation. Decellularization of the ovarian cortex confirmed by DAPI staining (a-d). Preservation of scaffold microarchitecture presented by SEM (U-Y). Orcein staining (K-O) and Masson’s Trichrome staining (P-T) demonstrate the presence of elastic and collagen fibers, respectively. Scale bars: 100 μm

Table 1.

Comparison of decellularization and cytotoxicity of decellularization methods

Decellularization methods SDS 18 Mean ± SD SDS24 Mean ± SD SDS-T Mean ± SD SDS-T-A Mean ± SD
Residual DNA (%) 10.4 ± 2.35 a 9.13 ± 0.85 b 15.2 ± 1.9 c 7.16 ± 1.6 d
MTT test assay (%) 24 Hours 87.33% ± 28.57 68% ± 20.51 80% ± 9.84 96.33% ± 12.74
7 days 43.33 ± 10.50 e 14% ± 8.32 f 77.66% ± 14.64 g 75% ± 15.71 h

Significant difference between a and c (P < 0.028), b and c (P < 0.054), c and d (P < 0.011), e and f (P < 0.03), e and g (P < 0.014), e and h (P < 0.021), f and g (P < 0.001), and f and h (P < 0.001). The experiments where performed in three replication and results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation

Staining of elastic fibers and collagen proteins with orcein (Fig. K-O) and trichrome (Fig. P-T, respectively, revealed that the ECM components remained intact after decellularization process. A complex fiber network with porous and uniform microstructure was clearly seen in all the decellularized samples under SEM (Fig. U-Y). Along with light microscopy results, no visible cells were found in the decellularized groups. Furthermore, after the cells removal, the vessels, follicles, empty spaces and pores were preserved. In higher magnification, intact collagen networks were observed with no damage during the decellularization process.

Decellularized human ovarian cortex analysis

The human ovarian cortex was decellularized with SDS-Triton-Ammonium. The results of H&E and DAPI staining demonstrated that the human ovarian cortex was decellularized completely but DNA content analysis showed that it contained 24.1% ± 3.7% of the DNA matched with intact samples. Fiber structure and porosity were preserved as the bovine ovarian cortex. However, in the human ovarian cortex, the pore size was smaller and the collagen fibers were denser than the bovine ovary (Fig. 1Y).

MTT assay

To compare the cytotoxicity effect of decellularization methods, the viability of fibroblast cells was assessed with and without scaffolds after one and 7 days. The results showed that the viability of cells was not significantly different between groups after 1 day, but the percentage of cell viability in SDS groups (18 and 24 h) was significantly lower than SDS-T and SDS-T-A groups after 7 days. Moreover, there was no significant difference between SDS-T and SDS-T-A groups (Table 1). Cells viability of human decellularized scaffold was 81.1%. There was no significant difference between cell viability of human and bovine decellularized tissue treated with SDS-Triton-Ammonium.

Viability of follicles after 7 days of cultivation in decellularized ovarian tissue using hydrogel

To assess viability of follicles after isolation, follicles were stained by Trypan blue. Out of 50 isolated preantral follicles, 89% had a high quality and 11% had a low quality. Also, no dead follicles were found. After transferring the follicles into the decellularized scaffolds, their histology was assessed by H&E staining (Fig. 2). Based on the results, no significant difference was observed in the recovery rate of preantral follicle cultured into the SDS-Triton-Ammonium decellularized scaffold [85.9% (220/256)] and alginate alone [81% (166/205)] after 7 days (P = 0.04).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Mice follicles encapsulated in the decellularized matrix after 7 days of cultivation. Histologically, normal (black arro) and degenerated follicles (red arrow) were found after histological analysis

Discussion

Currently, the application of decellularized tissue in regenerative medicine has been considered because of its biological activity, three-dimensional structure, and capacity for providing the suitable conditions for cell adhesion, migration, differentiation, and proliferation [18]. In this regard, in the present study we used ECM scaffold matrix and showed that although there was no significant difference in the structure of decellularized scaffold, the elimination of residual DNA was different and cell viability could be affected by different decellularization methods. Besides, this study demonstrated that similar to alginate alone, the composition of the decellularized scaffold with alginate could preserve follicles viability in vitro.

The ECM is an organized network of proteins and GAGs. It is a dynamic structure which can remodel throughout follicle development, ovulation, and atresia [19]. ECM compartment affects estrogen and progesterone production and plays a role in the viability of GCs [19]. Studies demonstrated that GCs cultured on ECM proliferate more rapidly than cells cultured on plastic culture dish due to connection with ECM ligands and the presence of cellular growth factors stored in the ECM [18]. Furthermore, the rates of oocyte maturation in alginate with ECM compartments were higher than alginate alone [20]. Decellularized tissue can improve follicles viability and growth by providing natural ECM composition, growth factors, and porous structure [21]. Due to the features of the decellularized tissue, it can be used as a scaffold for follicle culture.

Decellularization methods can affect the structure of the ECM, maintenance of growth factors, amount of residual DNA, and the cellular bioactivity in the scaffold [12]. The results of the present study showed that decellularization with SDS-T and SDS-T-A had the highest and lowest residual DNA, respectively. Triton eliminates residual DNA better than SDS, especially when combined with ammonium [11, 22]. Also, Triton led to less damage to ECM structure and better cell viability when compared with SDS [11]. In line with previous results, in the present study, cell viability was higher on scaffolds with a shorter exposure to SDS [15].

The GCs environment can affect gene expression. GCs cultured on ECM protein-coated culture dish produce a higher level of estrogen and have better proliferation and differentiation rates but follicle 3D culture system is crucial to inhibit GCs detachment from the oocyte and improve follicle survival and development [23, 24]. Alginate is one of the most commonly used scaffolds for follicles 3D culture. Alginate is non-toxic, biocompatible hydrogel, and easy to prepare [25]. In order to use ECM proteins in the follicle three-dimensional culture system, ECM molecules were combined with alginate to create synthetic ECM hydrogel. The results of follicle culture in alginate-ECM protein hydrogel showed that it had a positive effect on estrogen production, follicle development, and oocyte maturation [21, 26].

In Intact decellular tissue matrix, porosity and protein composition was not changed so in vivo and in vitro biological activity was remained. Therefore, in the present study, we attempted not only to preserve the overall structure of the ovarian cortex, but also maintain 3D conditions for the follicles. To this aim, we made a hole inside the scaffold with an insulin needle and inserted the follicles with the alginate into the hole. This type of scaffold can be suitable for in vitro culture because porous structure is permeable for culture media. Furthermore, intact ECM could imitate follicle native tissue microenvironment by providing growth factors. On the other hand, alginate is a well-known non-toxic hydrogel for three-dimensional follicle culture. It’s permeable for large molecules ranging from 5 nm to 200 nm; so, hormones such as follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) can diffuse easily into the hydrogel within 15 min [1]. The results of this study showed that the viability of the follicles in decellularized ovarian scaffold was not decreased when compared with control group. In the study group, follicles were surrounded by a thin layer of alginate. As follicles cultured in the 3D environment can easily access the culture media and benefit from decellularized tissue, the viability of follicles was not decreased compared with alginate alone. Due to the effect of decellularized scaffold on gene expression in follicles, it can be better choice for follicle culture in vitro [23, 24].

The results of the present study should be interpreted considering the following limitation. The study was performed in vitro just for 7 days. Thus, long-term culture and extra analysis such as maturation of oocyte and grafting in ovariectomized mice are needed.

In conclusion, decellularization of ovarian cortex by SDS-Triton-Ammonium protocol not only has less residual DNA compared with other methods, but also is biocompatible for follicle culture; in addition, it is effective in human ovarian cortex decellularization.

Murine isolated preantral follicles survive and develop when composed with the alginate-ECM scaffold. Due to the characteristics of the decellularized scaffold, seeding, vascularization, and consequently follicle viability in vivo would be better than hydrogel scaffolds and they could be used as a suitable scaffold in the artificial ovary. Application of other natural hydrogels such as ECM hydrogels instead of alginate is suggested for further studies.

Materials and methods

Animal husbandry and care

The present study was approved by the Ethics Committee on Human and Animal Research, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (ir.iums.fmd.rec.1398.031). In this study, the Naval Medical Research Institute (NMRI) female mice were maintained in a temperature-controlled room with a 12-h light/12-h dark cycle.

Bovine ovarian tissue acquisition and decellularization

Bovine ovaries were collected from a local slaughterhouse and transported to the lab. Upon arrival, the connective tissue and fat were isolated and ovaries were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and then were frozen at − 80 °C for further treatments.

After thawing, each ovary was butterflied along the hilus, and then medulla was removed with a sharp blade. The remaining cortex was cut into equal parts with a two-millimeter biopsy punch (Fig. 3a). For decellularization process, the pieces were frozen and thawed three times at − 80 °C and 37 °C, respectively. Then, ovarian pieces were decellularized with four different methods.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Ovarian cortex was cut to 2 mm pieces and then decellularized with SDS-T-A and freeze-dried. Scaffolds were pierced with insulin needle and alginate with preamtral follicles were injected into the scaffold

In the first method, ovarian pieces were treated with 0.1% SDS for 24 h (SDS-24 h group); in the second method, the pieces were treated with 0.1% SDS for 18 h (SDS-18 h group); in the third method, the pieces were decellularized with 0.5% SDS for 3 h and 1% Triton for 9 h (SDS-T group); and in the last method, the pieces were decellularized with 0.5% SDS for 2 h and then treated with composition of 1% Triton and 0.1% Ammonium hydroxide for 22 h (SDS-T-A group). After the decellularization process, all samples were washed in deionized water for 24 h and dried with freezing and lyophilizing process (Fig. 3b).

Human ovarian tissue acquisition and transport

Four Human ovarian tissue was obtained from females (age range: 34–45 years) undergoing ovarian tissue removal. A written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

The ovaries were transported to the laboratory at 4 °C within 1 h. Human ovarian pieces were prepared in the same way as the bovine ovary. They were decellularized with the same method of SDS-T-A group, which had the best results in the bovine ovary.

Tissue fixation and histological analysis

The ovarian cortex and decellularized pieces were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde overnight. All fixed tissues and scaffolds were processed by an automated tissue processor (Leica) and embedded in paraffin. Five-micrometer sections were prepared and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Decellularized scaffolds were stained by DAPI (Sigma, USA) to confirm the decellularization process.

DNA content analysis

DNA count assay was performed to investigate residual nuclear material of decellularized scaffold by QIAamp® DNA Blood and Tissue Mini Kit (QiagenGmbH, Hilden, Germany) according to the instructions. The extracted DNA materials (ng/μL) were analyzed by spectrophotometer (the optical density (OD) at γ = 260 nm) using the NanoDrop® ND-1000 (Nanodrop Technologies Inc., Wilmington, DE, USA).

Extracellular matrix (ECM) analysis

The presence of elastin and collagen fibers was evaluated by Orcein staining and Masson’s trichrome staining, respectively.

Scanning electron microscope (SEM)

To examine the structure of decellularized scaffolds, all lyophilized ovarian pieces were prepared for SEM. Firstly, ovarian pieces were put into the liquid nitrogen and cut with a sharp blade for exposing the inner region. Then, they were mounted with gold-palladium using a Humen VII sputter coater (Anatech Ltd., Alexandria, VA, US).

MTT assay

To determine cytocompatibility of decellularized ovarian samples in vitro, 5 × 106 mice fibroblast cells were cultured in DMEM/F12 medium (Shell Max; A2930) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco, Paisley UK), 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin (Gibco) in 96-well dish for 24 h at 5% CO2 and 37 °C. After 24 h, decellularized scaffolds of each group were put into the wells. For the 2D control group, fibroblast cells were cultured without scaffold. After 1 and 7 days of cultivation, 20 μl of media was removed and 20 μl of the MTT solution (1 mg/mL of MTT in PBS) was added and the cultures were incubated for 4 h. After 4 h, culturing media was completely removed and Formazan crystals were dissolved by 300 μL dimethyl sulfoxide (Sigma-Aldrich) for 15 min. The optical density (OD) was measured by spectrophotometer (DANA-DA3200, Iran) at a wavelength of 560 nm to define the metabolic activity level of the cells.

Isolation of preantral follicles from mouse ovaries

Eleven 14-day-old female NMRI mice were provided from the Center of Experimental and Comparative Study, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Mice were killed by cervical dislocation. Ovaries were removed aseptically and placed in 40 μl isolation media (Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS)) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Sigma-Aldrich), 100 mIU/ml penicillin, and 100 mg/ml streptomycin (Sigma Aldrich) in 4°C and separated from the connective tissue. Then, ovaries were placed in 30 μl isolation media and prenatal follicles were dissected mechanically with a 29-gauge needle. Two hundred fifty six morphologically healthy follicles were picked up with 130-μm micropipette (Flexipet; Cook) [27]. Follicles were picked up within 45 min under a stereomicroscope (Leica; Van Hopplynus Instruments). The follicular population was characterized after isolation.

Follicle viability test

After follicle isolation, the viability of isolated preantral follicles was assessed by trypan blue dye. To this aim, 15 μl of 0.4% trypan blue was added to 300 μl of isolated media containing 50 preantral follicles and incubated for 10 min at room temperature. Afterward, follicles were classified as high viable, low viable, or dead based on oocyte and granulosa cell (GC) viability. High viable follicles had less than 10% dead GCs, low viable follicles had 10–50% dead GCs, and dead follicles had a dead oocyte.

Alginate hydrogel preparation

Sodium alginate (Sigma; MO; USA) was diluted in deionized water to a final concentration of 5% (w/v). Organic impurities were removed with activated charcoal (0.5 g charcoal/ g alginate). Following charcoal treatment, the alginate solution was filtered through 0.22 μM filters under sterile conditions after 24 h. Finally, 5% alginate was diluted to 1% (w/v) alginate with sterile 1% PBS.

Transferring follicle into the decellularized ovarian scaffold and alginate

In the study group, SDS-Triton-Ammonium decellularized ovarian cortex was used as a scaffold to 3D culture in vitro. Ten scaffolds were pierced with a 27-gage insulin needle under sterile conditions and put into the culture media (Fig. 3c). Isolated preantral follicles (24–30/ scaffold) were transferred into the 20 μl 1% alginate (final concentration = 0.7%) (Fig. 3d). Alginate with preantral follicles injected into the decellularized scaffold with a 130-μm micropipette (Flexipet; Cook) and then scaffolds suspended into the encapsulation solution (140 mM NaCl / 50 mM CaCl2) for 3 min (Fig. 3e).

In the control group, a droplet of culture media containing isolated preantral follicle was transferred to droplets (40 μl) of alginate solution (final concentration = 0.7%). To form the beads, the droplets were slowly released into the crosslinking bath consisting of calcium solution at 37 °C. Then, the beads were removed and washed in PBS and transferred to the culture media.

In vitro culture

Scaffolds with follicles were cultured in a 24-well plate containing 500 μl αMEM supplemented with 10 mIU ml− 1 recombinant follicle stimulating hormone (Merck; Darmstadt, Germany) 3 mg ml− 1 bovine serum albumin (BSA; Sigma-Aldrich), 5 mg ml− 1 insulin, 5 mg ml− 1 transferrin, and 5 mg ml− 1 selenium (Gibco, UK) for 7 days.

Post-culture analysis

After fixation and paraffin embed of the scaffold, five-micrometer serial sections were prepared and H&E staining was performed. Follicles were counted in all slides.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS version 22 software (SPSS, Chicago, IL) and included means and SDs. Differences among group means for the various variables were evaluated by one-way analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA) followed by post-hoc test (Tukey’s HSD test) for multiple comparisons. A difference was considered significant if the p-value was < 0.05.

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the Iran University of Medical Sciences for financial support. The results of the present study have been derived from a Ph.D. thesis on Reproductive Biology by Hossein Nikniaz [grant Number: 33674].

Abbreviations

ECM

Extracellular matrix

SEM

Scanning electron microscope

NMRI

Naval Medical Research Institute

PEG

Polyethylene glycol

SDS

Sodium dodecyl sulfate

SLE

Sodium lauryl ester sulfate

GAGs

Glycosaminoglycans

FSH

Follicle-stimulating hormone

PBS

Phosphate-buffered saline

OD

Optical density

DPBS

Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline

GC

Granulosa cell

BSA

Bovine serum albumin

Authors’ contributions

HN, ZZ and SBJ conceived and designed the experiments. HN, ZZ, SBJ and MG performed the experiments. HN, ZZ, SBJ, MN, NF contributed materials. HN, ZZ, RA and MG analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. HN, ZZ, MN and SBJ guided the experiments and writing. All authors read, reviewed and approved the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency.

Availability of data and materials

The data are available with reasonable request from the corresponding author.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The present study was approved by the Ethics Committee on Animal Research, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (ir.iums.fmd.rec.1398.031). A written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Zahra Zandieh, Email: zandie.dvm@gmail.com, Email: zandieh.z@iums.ac.ir.

Seyed Behnamedin Jameie, Email: behjame@gmail.com, Email: Jameie.sb@iums.ac.ir.

References

  • 1.Shea LD, Woodruff TK, Shikanov A. Bioengineering the ovarian follicle microenvironment. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2014;16:29–52. doi: 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071813-105131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Amorim CA, Shikanov A. The artificial ovary: current status and future perspectives. Future Oncol. 2016;12(20):2323–2332. doi: 10.2217/fon-2016-0202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Haddadi M, Muhammadnejad S, Sadeghi-Fazel F, Zandieh Z, Rahimi G, Sadighi S, et al. Systematic review of available guidelines on fertility preservation of young patients with breast cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(3):1057–1062. doi: 10.7314/APJCP.2015.16.3.1057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Paulini F, Vilela JMV, Chiti MC, Donnez J, Jadoul P, Dolmans MM, et al. Survival and growth of human preantral follicles after cryopreservation of ovarian tissue, follicle isolation and short-term xenografting. Reprod BioMed Online. 2016;33(3):425–432. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2016.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chiti MC, Dolmans MM, Hobeika M, Cernogoraz A, Donnez J, Amorim CA. A modified and tailored human follicle isolation procedure improves follicle recovery and survival. J Ovarian Res. 2017;10(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s13048-017-0366-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chiti MC, Dolmans MM, Orellana R, Soares M, Paulini F, Donnez J, et al. Influence of follicle stage on artificial ovary outcome using fibrin as a matrix. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(2):427–435. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Dolmans MM, Martinez-Madrid B, Gadisseux E, Guiot Y, Yuan WY, Torre A, et al. Short-term transplantation of isolated human ovarian follicles and cortical tissue into nude mice. Reproduction. 2007;134(2):253–262. doi: 10.1530/REP-07-0131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chiti MC, Dolmans MM, Mortiaux L, Zhuge F, Ouni E, Shahri PAK, et al. A novel fibrin-based artificial ovary prototype resembling human ovarian tissue in terms of architecture and rigidity. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018;35(1):41–48. doi: 10.1007/s10815-017-1091-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Laronda MM, Jakus AE, Whelan KA, Wertheim JA, Shah RN, Woodruff TK. Initiation of puberty in mice following decellularized ovary transplant. Biomaterials. 2015;50(1):20–29. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.01.051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Alshaikh AB, et al. Decellularization of the mouse ovary: comparison of different scaffold generation protocols for future ovarian bioengineering. J Ovarian Res. 2019;12:58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 11.Gilpin A, Yang Y. Decellularization strategies for regenerative medicine: from processing techniques to applications. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:9831534. doi: 10.1155/2017/9831534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Liu WY, Lin SG, Zhuo RY, Xie YY, Pan W, Lin XF, et al. Xenogeneic Decellularized scaffold: a novel platform for ovary regeneration. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2017;23(2):61–71. doi: 10.1089/ten.tec.2016.0410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hassanpour A, Talaei-Khozani T, Kargar-Abarghouei E, Razban V, Vojdani Z. Decellularized human ovarian scaffold based on a sodium lauryl ester sulfate (SLES)-treated protocol, as a natural three-dimensional scaffold for construction of bioengineered ovaries. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2018;9(1):252. doi: 10.1186/s13287-018-0971-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Eivazkhani F, Abtahi NS, Tavana S, Mirzaeian L, Abedi F, Ebrahimi B, et al. Evaluating two ovarian decellularization methods in three species. Mater Sci Eng C. 2019;102:670–682. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2019.04.092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Syed O, Walters NJ, Day RM, Kim HW, Knowles JC. Evaluation of decellularization protocols for production of tubular small intestine submucosa scaffolds for use in oesophageal tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 2014;10(12):5043–5054. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.08.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Vavken P, Joshi S, Murray MM. TRITON-X is most effective among three decellularization agents for ACL tissue engineering. J Orthop Res. 2009;27(12):1612–1618. doi: 10.1002/jor.20932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Coronado RE, Somaraki-Cormier M, Natesan S, Christy RJ, Ong JL, Halff GA. Decellularization and solubilization of porcine liver for use as a substrate for porcine hepatocyte culture: method optimization and comparison. Cell Transplant. 2017;26(12):1840–1854. doi: 10.1177/0963689717742157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Huet C, Pisselet C, Mandon-Pepin B, Monget P, Monniaux D. Extracellular matrix regulates ovine granulosa cell survival, proliferation and steroidogenesis: relationships between cell shape and function. J Endocrinol. 2001;169(2):347–360. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.1690347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Carrier A. Investigating the role of extracellular matrix proteins in ovarian Folliculogenesis and ovarian Cancer. 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kreeger PK, Deck JW, Woodruff TK, Shea LD. The in vitro regulation of ovarian follicle development using alginate-extracellular matrix gels. Biomaterials. 2006;27(5):714–723. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.06.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Berkholtz CB, Shea LD, Woodruff TK. Extracellular matrix functions in follicle maturation. Semin Reprod Med. 2006;24(4):262–269. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-948555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Destefani AC, Sirtoli GM, Nogueira BV. Advances in the knowledge about kidney decellularization and repopulation. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2017;5:34. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2017.00034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Woodruff TK, Shea LD. The role of the extracellular matrix in ovarian follicle development. Reprod Sci. 2007;14(8 Suppl):6–10. doi: 10.1177/1933719107309818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bussenot I, Ferre G, Azoulay-Barjonet C, Murgo C, Vieitez G, Parinaud J. Culture of human preovulatory granulosa cells: effect of extracellular matrix on steroidogenesis. Biol Cell. 1993;77(2):181–186. doi: 10.1016/S0248-4900(05)80186-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Giri TK, Thakur D, Alexander A. Ajazuddin, Badwaik H, Tripathi DK. Alginate based hydrogel as a potential biopolymeric carrier for drug delivery and cell delivery systems: present status and applications. Curr Drug Deliv. 2012;9(6):539–555. doi: 10.2174/156720112803529800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chiti C, Viswanath A, Vanacker J, Germain L, White L, Dolmans M, et al. Hydrogel from bovine decellularized ovarian extracellular matrix supports mouse follicle survival in vitro. Front Bioeng Biotechnol Conference Abstract. 2016.
  • 27.Hassani F, Ebrahimi B, Moini A, Ghiaseddin A, Bazrafkan M, Hassanzadeh G, et al. Chitosan hydrogel supports integrity of ovarian follicles during in vitro culture: a preliminary of a novel biomaterial for three dimensional culture of ovarian follicles. Cell J (Yakhteh) 2020;21(4):479. doi: 10.22074/cellj.2020.6393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data are available with reasonable request from the corresponding author.


Articles from BMC Biotechnology are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES