Abstract
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the causative agent of COVID-19, so understanding its biology and infection mechanisms is critical to facing this major medical challenge. SARS-CoV-2 is known to use its spike glycoprotein to interact with the cell surface as a first step in the infection process. As for other coronaviruses, it is likely that SARS-CoV-2 next undergoes endocytosis, but whether or not this is required for infectivity and the precise endocytic mechanism used are unknown. Using purified spike glycoprotein and lentivirus pseudotyped with spike glycoprotein, a common model of SARS-CoV-2 infectivity, we now demonstrate that after engagement with the plasma membrane, SARS-CoV-2 undergoes rapid, clathrin-mediated endocytosis. This suggests that transfer of viral RNA to the cell cytosol occurs from the lumen of the endosomal system. Importantly, we further demonstrate that knockdown of clathrin heavy chain, which blocks clathrin-mediated endocytosis, reduces viral infectivity. These discoveries reveal that SARS-CoV-2 uses clathrin-mediated endocytosis to gain access into cells and suggests that this process is a key aspect of virus infectivity.
Keywords: clathrin, COVID-19, dynamin, endocytosis, infection, SARS-CoV-2, virus entry
Abbreviations: ACE2, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2; CHC, clathrin heavy chain; CQ, chloroquine; MERS-CoV, Middle-East respiratory syndrome coronavirus; SARS-CoV, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus; SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; Tf, transferrin; TfR, Tf receptor
The internal membrane system represents a major evolutionary advance associated with the emergence of the eukaryotic cell. Its dynamics are integral to basic cellular function and underlie much of the novel capability of the cell, including the almost infinite range of physiological responsiveness required for the complexity of eukaryotic organisms. Unfortunately, viruses subvert this complexity to gain access into cells and to propagate in a manner that allows them to limit immune surveillance. Antiviral strategies targeting the earliest steps of infection, such as cellular entry, are appealing, as interference through a common early step can provide robust efficacy. Thus, understanding the mechanisms of viral cellular entry is crucial.
Since the beginning of the 21st century, 3 coronaviruses have crossed the species barrier to cause deadly types of pneumonia in humans: Middle-East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) (1), severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) (2, 3), and SARS-CoV-2 (4, 5), the causative agent of COVID-19. All originated in bats, but zoonotic transmission involved intermediate hosts; dromedary camels (MERS-CoV), civets (SARS-CoV), and unknown (SARS-CoV-2). The presence of numerous coronaviruses in bats suggests that zoonotic transmission to humans will continue (6), and new pandemic potential viruses continue to emerge (7).
SARS-CoV-2 is a single-stranded RNA virus in which a lipid membrane surrounds the RNA and nucleocapsid proteins. Other viral structural proteins associate with the viral membrane including the spike protein, a transmembrane glycoprotein that forms homotrimers (6). The spike glycoprotein is composed of S1 and S2 subdomains (8). The S1 subdomain encodes the receptor binding domain and is responsible for binding to host cells, whereas the S2 subdomain encodes the transmembrane portion of the spike protein and is responsible for fusion of the viral membrane with cellular membranes. The receptor for the spike glycoprotein is angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) (9, 10, 11, 12) although recent studies indicate that neuropilin-1 is also a host factor for SARS-CoV-2 and facilitates infectivity (13, 14, 15). ACE2 is a transmembrane metallopeptidase localized primarily on the plasma membrane of many cell types with abundant expression in lung alveolar epithelial cells (16). The receptor binding domain of the spike protein binds ACE2 with low nM affinity, allowing the virus to stably associate with the plasma membrane (12). Cleavage of the spike glycoprotein between the S1 and S2 domains, mediated by the type II transmembrane serine protease TMPRSS2 (9), and perhaps by furin, activates the S2 subdomain. The S2 subdomain then mediates the fusion of the viral membrane and the cellular membrane in a process that is a molecular mimic of SNARE-mediated fusion of cellular membranes (12, 16, 17). This creates a pore allowing the RNA and RNA-associated nucleocapsid proteins within the lumen of the virus to gain access to the cellular cytosol, triggering infection.
For SARS-CoV-2, it remains unknown where the fusion of the viral and cellular membranes occurs. One possibility is that fusion occurs at the cell plasma membrane (18). In such a scenario, the virus does not directly enter the cell, but the viral RNA that drives infection enters the cytosol through a fusion pore in the plasma membrane. Alternatively, SARS-CoV-2 may undergo endocytosis with the entire viral particle rapidly entering the cell. In this scenario, the viral membrane would fuse with the luminal face of the endosomal membrane, allowing for RNA transfer to the cytosol. In fact, it appears that most human coronaviruses are engulfed/endocytosed before they infect the cell with their genetic material. This includes human (H)CoV-229E (19, 20) HCoV-OC43 (21), HCoV-NL63 (22, 23), HCoV-HKU1 (24), MERS-CoV (25, 26), and SARS-CoV (27, 28). And yet, the endocytic mechanisms used by these coronaviruses remain unclear as they have been shown to use (1) clathrin-dependent, (2) caveolae-dependent/clathrin-independent, and (3) caveolae- and clathrin-independent pathways. In fact, the virus most similar to SARS-CoV-2 is SARS-CoV, and there are conflicting results regarding its endocytic entry; one study indicating that the virus uses clathrin-mediated endocytosis (26) and a second stating the opposite that viral entry before infectivity uses a clathrin-independent process (27). Here we demonstrate rapid, clathrin-mediated endocytosis of SARS-CoV-2 and provide evidence that this process is critical for infectivity.
Experimental procedures
Cell lines
HEK-293T and A549 cell lines were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (CRL-1573, CCL-185). The adherent Vero-SF-ACF cell line is from the American Type Culture Collection (CCL-81.5) (29). The HEK-293T-ACE2 stable cell line was a gift from Dr Jesse D. Bloom (30).
Cell culture
All cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) high-glucose (GE Healthcare cat# SH30081.01) containing 10% bovine calf serum (GE Healthcare cat# SH30072.03), 2-mM L-glutamate (Wisent cat# 609065), 100 IU penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin (Wisent cat# 450201). Cell lines were checked monthly for Mycoplasma contamination using the Mycoplasma detection kit (biotool cat# B39038).
Immunoblot
Cells were collected in Hepes lysis buffer (20-mM Hepes, 150-mM sodium chloride, 1% Triton X-100, pH 7.4) supplemented with protease inhibitors. Cells in the lysis buffer were gently rocked for 30 min (4 °C). Lysates were spun at 238,700g for 15 min at 4 °C and equal protein aliquots of the supernatants were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblot. Lysates were run on large 5 to 16% gradient polyacrylamide gels and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. Proteins on the blots were visualized by Ponceau staining. Blots were then blocked with 5% milk, and antibodies were incubated O/N at 4 °C with 5% bovine serum albumin in tris-buffered saline with 0.1% Tween 20. The peroxidase conjugated secondary antibody was incubated in a 1:5000 dilution in tris-buffered saline with 0.1% Tween 20 with 5% milk for 1 h at room temperature (RT) followed by washes.
Antibodies
SARS-CoV-2 spike protein antibody is from GeneTex (GTX632604). ACE2 antibody is from GeneTex (GTX01160). 6x-His Tag antibody is from Thermo Fisher Scientific (MA1-21315-D550). GAPDH antibody is from OriGene (TA802519). HSC70 antibody is from Enzo (ADI-SPA-815-F). Clathrin heavy chain (CHC) antibody is from Cell Signaling Technology (4796S). Conjugated transferrin (Tf) antibody is from Thermo Fisher Scientific (T23366). Alexa Fluor 488, 568, and 647 conjugated secondary antibodies are from Invitrogen.
Confocal microscopy
Cells grown on poly-L-lysine–coated coverslips were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min and then washed 3 times with PBS. Cells were then permeabilized in 0.2% Triton X-100 in PBS and blocked with 5% bovine serum albumin in PBS for 1 h. The coverslips were incubated in a wet chamber with diluted antibody in a blocking buffer overnight at 4 °C. The following day, cells were washed 3 times and incubated with corresponding Alexa Fluorophore diluted in the blocking buffer for 1 h at RT. Cells were again washed 3 times with a blocking buffer and once with PBS. Nuclei were stained using 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (1 μg/ml diluted in a blocking buffer) for 10 min. Finally, coverslips were mounted on a slide using mounting media (DAKO, Cat# S3023). Imaging was performed using a Leica TCS SP8 confocal microscope, Zeiss LSM-880 confocal microscope, and Opera Phoenix High-Content Screening microscope.
Endocytosis assay using purified spike protein
Cells were incubated at 37 °C with serum-free media (DMEM) for 3 h to enhance ACE2 receptor expression. Before the addition of spike protein, cells were cooled to 4 °C by being placed on ice. Spike protein was added to each well (3 μg per 200 μl of media) and incubated on ice for 30 min (to allow ligand attachment to the cell surface). Subsequently, cells were incubated at 37 °C (to allow internalization) for indicated time points (Tf was also added in some experiments in the same manner). Before fixation, cells were acid washed (washing off extracellular spike protein) or PBS washed for 1 min and rinsed with acid or PBS. Cells were then washed 3 times with PBS followed by fixation for 10 min at 4 °C.
siRNA-mediated knockdown of CHC
Various cell types at 60% confluency were transfected with siRNA targeted against CHC (Dharmacon; SMARTpool: ON-TARGETplus; L-004001–01–0010) or control siRNA (Dharmacon; ON-TARGETplus CONTROL) using the jetPRIME reagent. On day 3, cells were processed for immunoblot to investigate the effect of siRNA, and in parallel, cells were infected with pseudovirus or used for spike endocytosis assays.
Purified SARS-Cov-2 spike and pseudovirus production
Purified SARS-CoV-2 spike protein prefusion-stabilized ectodomain (C-term His tag, with furin cleavage site removed, trimerization stabilized) was produced by LakePharma (#46328). Lentivirus pseudotyped with SARS-CoV-2 spike protein was supplied by Creative Diagnostics (catalog number COV-PS02).
Treatments with chemical inhibitors
Cells were washed five times with serum-free media (DMEM) to remove any traces of serum. Furthermore, cells were incubated with Dynasore (80 μM; Abcam, Ab120192) or Pitstop 2 (15 μM; Abcam, ab120687) in serum-free media for 30 or 20 min, respectively. DMSO was used as a control for Dynasore and Pitstop 2 negative control (Abcam, ab120688). After incubation, drug-containing media was replaced with spike protein (3 μg per 200 μl of media) and further incubated for 5 min to allow internalization. Finally, cells were processed for immunofluorescence labeling.
Pseudovirus SARS-Cov-2 infection
Cells were transfected with control siRNA or siRNA targeted against CHC (Dharmacon) using jetPRIME. Cells were split on day 2, and 10,000 cells were seeded in each well (96-well plate; CellCarrier-96 Ultra Microplates, PerkinElmer). At 12 to 14 h after cell seeding, cells were incubated with concentrated pseudovirus SARS-Cov-2 for 12 h. After this incubation, pseudovirus containing media was replaced with regular DMEM media and incubated further for 48 h. Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min and stained with DAPI.
Quantification
Purified spike protein and Tf (internalized or on the plasma membrane): ImageJ was used to measure the fluorescence intensity. The DAPI channel was used to count the number of cells per image. This was performed by calculating the maxima using the “Find Maxima” function. The threshold was set at 150. This automated the way in which to count the cells. Then, spike protein or Tf fluorescence corresponding to the cell count was calculated using the “measure” function. Pearson Correlation Coefficient: Using ImageJ Coloc2 plugin, colocalization was calculated after background subtraction. The colocalization was calculated for 144 × 144 μm. Fluorescence was then divided by cell count to calculate the fluorescence per cell in each condition. Infection of cells using pseudovirus SARS-Cov-2: GFP-expressing cells in CellCarrier-96 Ultra Microplate were imaged using Opera Phenix HCS (40× objective). The total number of GFP expressing cells in each condition was normalized to the total number of cells in the respective wells.
Statistics
Graphs were prepared using GraphPad Prism 6 software. For all data, comparisons were made using Student's t test or one-way ANOVA. All data are shown as the mean ± SEM with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant.
Results
SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein is rapidly endocytosed in an ACE2-dependent manner
The spike glycoprotein is critical for binding ACE2 and allowing for SARS-CoV-2 infectivity (6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 16, 17). WT HEK-293T cells or HEK-293T cells stably expressing ACE2 (30) were incubated for 30 min on ice with purified spike protein containing a His6 tag. After a PBS wash, spike protein binds to the plasma membrane of cells expressing ACE2 but not to the control HEK-293T cells (Fig. 1, A and B). In contrast, Tf, which binds to the Tf receptor (TfR), is detected on the surface of the cells independent of their ACE2 status (Fig. 1, A and B). After a brief acid wash, both spike protein and Tf are stripped from the surface of cells (Fig. 1, C and D). Thus, HEK-293T cells lacking or expressing ACE2 are a functional model system for examining potential SARS-CoV-2 endocytosis.
We first tested for endocytosis using purified spike glycoprotein. Although a reductionist approach, it is unlikely that receptor binding and initial membrane trafficking depends on whether or not the spike protein is on a viral particle. For example, epidermal growth factor and insulin both undergo similar cell surface binding and clathrin-mediated endocytosis whether they are purified proteins or attached to magnetic beads (31). We thus added purified spike protein to HEK-293T cells, WT or expressing ACE2. After 30 min on ice, the cells were transferred to 37 °C for an additional 30 min. After this treatment, cells were washed briefly with acid to strip off any surface-bound spike protein. Spike protein was internalized into the cells (as revealed by its resistance to acid wash) in an ACE2-dependent manner (Fig. 2, A and B). In contrast, Tf was internalized independent of ACE2 (Fig. 2, A and B).
We next examined the time course of internalization. Spike protein is internalized into cells rapidly and is detected in cells within 5 min (Fig. 3, A and B), a hallmark of endocytosis. The amount of spike protein in cells continues to increase for up to 30 min (Fig. 3, A and B). Thus, SARS-CoV-2 spike protein enters cells via endocytosis.
SARS-CoV-2 spike protein is internalized by clathrin-mediated endocytosis
There are conflicting reports about endocytosis of coronaviruses in general and SARS-CoV specifically (27, 28). The endocytic mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 have yet to be examined. Clathrin-mediated endocytosis is a major mechanism for cellular internalization. We thus used HEK-293T cells stably expressing ACE2 to examine the internalization of SARS-CoV-2 in the presence of two drugs that are known to block clathrin-mediated endocytosis, Dynasore and Pitstop 2 (32, 33). Dynasore blocks the GTPase dynamin that drives the fission of clathrin-coated pits from the plasma membrane and it disrupts internalization of the TfR and low-density lipoprotein receptor, among other clathrin-dependent targets (32). Pitstop 2 prevents CHC from interacting with adaptor proteins required for clathrin-coated pit formation and blocks the uptake of TfR and epidermal growth factor receptor (33). Both drugs reduce the endocytosis of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, strongly suggesting it is internalized by clathrin-mediated endocytosis (Fig. 4, A and B). Both Dynasore and Pitstop 2 have been criticized for having off-target effects (34, 35). However, at the concentrations and cell systems used here, while both drugs block the uptake of Tf, there is no influence of either drug on the uptake of dextran, which is internalized in a clathrin-independent manner (Fig. S1, A and B).
To best demonstrate a role for clathrin in spike protein uptake, we took a loss-of-function approach to inhibit clathrin-mediated endocytosis by knockdown of CHC with a previously defined siRNA pool (36, 37). Transfection of HEK-293T-ACE2 cells with the CHC siRNA led to an ∼70% decrease in CHC levels when compared with cells transfected with a control siRNA (Fig. 5A). Importantly, CHC knockdown led to a significant reduction of spike protein endocytosis (Fig. 5, B and C). Thus, the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein undergoes rapid internalization via clathrin-mediated endocytosis.
SARS-CoV-2 spike protein undergoes rapid endocytosis in cell lines expressing endogenous levels of ACE2
We next sought to examine endocytosis of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in cells expressing endogenous levels of the cellular receptor ACE2. We first tested VERO cells, a monkey kidney epithelial cell that is robustly infected by SARS-CoV-2 (9). VERO cells have high levels of ACE2 expression that exceeds even that of HEK-293T cells with overexpression of ACE2 (Fig 6A). SARS-CoV-2 spike protein added to VERO cells undergoes rapid endocytosis with the protein appearing in the cells as early as 5 min (Fig 6B), as determined using a spike protein antibody that recognizes the His6-tagged spike protein (Fig. S2). The amount of internalized protein increases slightly over the next 25 min, with the protein appearing as distinct punctae in the cells (Fig. 6B). These punctae colocalize in part with Rab5, a marker of early endosomes, indicating that a portion of the spike glycoprotein is delivered to early endosomes (Fig. S3, A and B). Knockdown of CHC in VERO cells (Fig. 7A) reduces spike glycoprotein internalization (Fig. 7, B and C), further supporting entry via clathrin-mediated endocytosis. We also tested for SARS-CoV-2 endocytosis in A549 cells that are widely used as a type II pulmonary epithelial cell model, and which are moderately infectible by the virus (9). A549 cells have ACE2 expression levels similar to the ACE2-expressing HEK-293T cell (Fig. 6A). These cells endocytose purified spike protein with the protein detectable in the cells at 5 min, and with increasing amounts of internalized protein up to 30 min (Fig. S4). As for the VERO cells, endocytosed spike protein appears as distinct punctae (Fig. S4). Thus, endocytosis of SARS-CoV-2 occurs in multiple cell types and is clathrin dependent.
After endocytosis, SARS-CoV-2 spike protein has a distinct trafficking itinerary from Tf
Tf bound to the TfR is an established cargo of the recycling endosomal pathway. The Tf–TfR complex enters cells via clathrin-mediated endocytosis and rapidly transports to early endosomes. From there, the complex recycles directly back to the plasma membrane, a fast recycling route, or is transported to Rab11-positive recycling endosomes before returning to the cell surface, the slow recycling pathway (38). When spike protein and Tf are coincubated with HEK-293T cells stably expressing ACE2, both proteins are rapidly internalized and accumulate over 30 min (Fig. 8). However, there is little or no colocalization of the two cargo proteins once internalized (Fig. 8), indicating that they have different trafficking itineraries.
Lentivirus pseudotyped with SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein requires clathrin for infectability
We next sought to examine the role of clathrin-mediated endocytosis in viral infectivity. Viruses pseudotyped with the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein are a commonly used tool to examine the ability of SARS-CoV-2 to infect cells. Such pseudotyped viruses involve transfection of HEK-293T cells with a viral packaging construct, a viral transfer vector encoding luciferase or GFP, and a plasmid encoding the spike protein, and are based on murine leukemia virus (12), VSV (39), or lentivirus (30) among others. These pseudoviruses avoid the need for biocontainment 3 facilities. We have used a lentiviral system in which VSV-G was replaced with the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein (30). We first incubated the virus with HEK-293T cells, WT, or overexpressing ACE2, and infection was monitored by GFP expression. At 12 h of incubation, HEK-293T-ACE2 cells were infected, whereas little to no infection was seen with WT HEK-293T cells (Fig. 9A). We next repeated the experiment using HEK-293T-ACE2 cells transfected with a control siRNA or an siRNA driving knockdown of CHC (Fig. 5A). Importantly, CHC knockdown led to an ∼65% decrease in viral infectivity (Fig. 9, B and C). Taken together, our data indicate that SARS-CoV-2 uses its spike glycoprotein to engage ACE2, driving clathrin-mediated endocytosis of the virus/receptor complex, and that this process is required for viral infectivity.
Discussion
Strategic entry mechanisms used by viruses to infect mammalian host cells are unique and highly variable across different viral families (40). Among the various routes used, the majority of viruses use endosomal pathways to efficiently deliver virion components into the cytoplasm for productive infection (41). Although the most commonly used endosomal pathway is clathrin-mediated endocytosis (used, e.g., by Semliki forest virus and Adenoviruses 2 and 5), other forms of endocytosis are used (40, 41, 42). These include caveolae-mediated endocytosis (e.g., Simian virus 40), lipid raft–mediated endocytic pathways (e.g., Avian sarcoma leukosis virus), and macropinocytosis (e.g., poxviruses) (40, 41, 42).
Endosomal entry mechanisms provide many advantages to the viruses by allowing them to efficiently spread while evading host immune surveillance. Most importantly, gaining access to the endocytic system helps viruses to prevent exposure of the viral capsid proteins to the host immune system at the level of plasma membrane. In addition, strategic use of endosomal pathway also ensures entry into cells with active membrane transport system as opposed to cells with no such means (e.g., erythrocytes), which would prevent active propagation of the virus (40). Furthermore, the acidic milieu of endosomes helps the incoming viruses to elicit penetration into the host cytosol (40, 42). Finally, it has been recently demonstrated that egress of SARS-CoV-2 from cells uses a lysosomal pathway, further demonstrating the importance of the endosomal/lysosomal system to the virus life cycle (43).
The most closely related virus to SARS-CoV-2 is SARS-CoV. For SARS-CoV, endocytic entry has been suggested as the first step in infectivity with two mechanisms proposed, one clathrin-mediated endocytosis (27) with a second study indicating a clathrin-independent process (28). Here we used purified spike protein and lentivirus pseudotyped with SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein to measure endocytosis and infectivity in HEK-293T cells expressing ACE2 and cell lines with endogenous ACE2 expression. We demonstrate that drugs, which are known inhibitors of clathrin-mediated endocytosis, block spike protein endocytosis and we further demonstrate that knockdown of CHC blocks both spike protein endocytosis and pseudovirus infectibility. We thus propose a viral infectivity model involving 3 key steps: (1) the virus uses its spike glycoprotein to bind to the plasma membrane of cells expressing ACE2. Notably, a recent paper questions that ACE2 is the cellular receptor for SARS-CoV-2 based on the observation that immunohistochemical analysis fails to detect ACE2 in cells and tissues that are infectible with virus (44). Our data do not support this observation; (2) the ACE2/virus complex undergoes rapid endocytosis with delivery to the lumen of the endosome; (3) fusion of the viral membrane with the lumen of the endosomal membrane allows viral RNA to enter the cytosol for infection. After entry, the viral particles appear in a pathway that is unique from the TfR. Because the TfR defines a recycling pathway, we propose the viral capsid proteins get targeted to late endosomes/lysosomes for degradation, even as the viral RNA is driving formation of new virus that egresses from lysosomes (43).
The discovery that clathrin-mediated endocytosis is an early step in viral infectivity will allow for a new emphasis on drug targets. Chloroquine (CQ) and hydroxychloroquine are widely used malaria drugs that have yielded mixed results for the treatment of COVID-19 (45). CQ is known for its efficacy in blocking the clathrin-mediated endocytosis of nanoparticles (46). CQ reduces the expression of the phosphatidylinositol-binding CHC assembly protein (46), and depletion of phosphatidylinositol-binding CHC assembly protein is known to block clathrin-mediated endocytosis (47). Hydroxychloroquine and CQ are in the class of aminoquinolines, which are hemozoin inhibitors, and were identified with other Food and Drug Administration–approved hemozoin inhibitors, including amodiaquine dihydrochloride dihydrate, amodiaquine hydrochloride, and mefloquine, in a screen testing for reduction of SARS-CoV-2 infectivity (48). Chlorpromazine, which is widely used to treat psychiatric disorders, blocks cellular entry of SARS-CoV and is known to disrupt clathrin-mediated endocytosis (27). This may explain why psychiatric patients treated with chlorpromazine have a lower incidence of COVID-19 (49). Thus, although vaccine development is clearly the lead mechanism to slow the pandemic, drugs that disrupt virus infectivity are likely to have a corollary role. Regardless of clinical implications, given the prevalence and severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection, and the likelihood that other viruses with pandemic implications will emerge, it behooves the scientific community to learn about all aspects of SARS-CoV-2 infectivity, including basic functions such as its precise mechanism of cellular entry. This study, which provides a clear demonstration that clathrin-mediated endocytosis is used by SARS-CoV-2 to enter cells, thus provides an important new piece of information on SARS-CoV-2 biology.
Data availability
All data are contained within the manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article.
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge the Neuro Microscopy Imaging Centre and Advanced BioImaging Facility at McGill University. We thank Dr Jesse D. Bloom (University of Washington, Seattle) for HEK-293T-ACE2 stable cell line and Dr Amine A. Kamen (Department of Bioengineering, McGill University) for Vero ATCC CCL 81.5 cell line.
Author contributions
A. B. conducted spike protein endocytosis, all knockdown experiments and imaging; R. K. conducted spike protein endocytosis in A549/VERO cells and lentivirus based endocytosis experiments and imaging; V. F. conducted immunoblotting and aided with the knockdown experiments; P. S. M. concieved the original idea and supervised the study.
Funding and additional information
This work was supported by a grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council to P. S. M. A. B. is supported by a studentship from the Parkinson Society of Canada. R. K. is supported by a studentship from ALS Canada. V. F. was supported by a fellowship from the Fonds de recherche du Quebec–Sante. P. S. M. is a James McGill Professor and a Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada.
Biographies
Armin Bayati is a PhD student at McGill University, in Integrated Program in Neuroscience under the supervision of Dr Peter McPherson. Armin is interested in the endocytic pathways taken by pathogens such as prions, aggregated proteins, and viruses, which is why he was interested to investigate SARS-CoV-2. Following the COVID-19 project, Armin’s research will be focusing on Parkinson’s disease, specifically on the endocytosis and trafficking of alpha-synuclein protofibrils. Once established, Armin will then explore the mechanisms underlying formation of cytoplasmic aggregates by alpha-synuclein fibrils. Armin's research could lead to significant advancement in our understanding of Parkinson's disease pathophysiology and the developing of treatments for the disease.
Rahul Kumar is a graduate student in the lab of Dr Peter McPherson at McGill University. His research is focused on understanding regulation of small GTPases in membrane trafficking. Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, Dr McPherson’s lab turned their attention to study entry mechanism of SARS-Cov-2 using their long-standing expertise in cell biology of neurological diseases, which led to the discovery of clathrin-mediated endocytosis of SARS-Cov-2 as a first step in viral infection. With the completion of this project, Kumar is now focused on his thesis work—understanding the regulation of Rab GTPases by DENN domain containing proteins, guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) for Rabs. As many DENN domain proteins have mutations linked to human diseases, it is exciting time to characterize many of the uncharacterized members of DENN domain family and study their underlying molecular mechanisms.
Edited by Phyllis Hanson
Footnotes
This article contains supporting information.
Supporting information
References
- 1.Zaki A.M., van Boheemen S., Bestebroer T.M., Osterhaus A.D., Fouchier R.A. Isolation of a novel coronavirus from a man with pneumonia in Saudi Arabia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012;367:1814–1820. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1211721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Drosten C., Günther S., Preiser W., van der Werf S., Brodt H.R., Becker S., Rabenau H., Panning M., Kolesnikova L., Fouchier R.A., Berger A., Burguière A.M., Cinatl J., Eickmann M., Escriou N. Identification of a novel coronavirus in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med. 2003;348:1967–1976. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa030747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ksiazek T.G., Erdman D., Goldsmith C.S., Zaki S.R., Peret T., Emery S., Tong S., Urbani C., Comer J.A., Lim W., Rollin P.E., Dowell S.F., Ling A.E., Humphrey C.D., Shieh W.J. A novel coronavirus associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med. 2003;348:1953–1966. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa030781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Huang C., Wang Y., Li X., Ren L., Zhao J., Hu Y., Zhang L., Fan G., Xu J., Gu X. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020;395:497–506. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Zhu N., Zhang D., Wang W., Li X., Yang B., Song J., Zhao X., Huang B., Shi W., Lu R. A Novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;382:727–733. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Tortorici M.A., Veesler D. Structural insights into coronavirus entry. Adv. Virus Res. 2019;105:93–116. doi: 10.1016/bs.aivir.2019.08.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sun H., Xiao Y., Liu J., Wang D., Li F., Wang C., Li C., Zhu J., Song J., Sun H., Jiang Z., Liu L., Zhang X., Wei K., Hou D. Prevalent Eurasian avian-like H1N1 swine influenza virus with 2009 pandemic viral genes facilitating human infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2020;117:17204–17210. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1921186117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wrapp D., Wang N., Corbett K.S., Goldsmith J.A., Hsieh C.L., Abiona O., Graham B.S., McLellan J.S. Cryo-EM structure of the 2019-nCoV spike in the prefusion conformation. Science. 2020;367:1260–1263. doi: 10.1126/science.abb2507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hoffmann M., Kleine-Weber H., Schroeder S., Krüger N., Herrler T., Erichsen S., Schiergens T.S., Herrler G., Wu N.H., Nitsche A., Müller M.A., Drosten C., Pöhlmann S. SARS-CoV-2 cell entry depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and is blocked by a clinically proven protease inhibitor. Cell. 2020;181:271–280. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Letko M., Marzi A., Munster V. Functional assessment of cell entry and receptor usage for SARS-CoV-2 and other lineage B betacoronaviruses. Nat. Microbiol. 2020;5:562–569. doi: 10.1038/s41564-020-0688-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zhou P., Yang X.L., Wang X.G., Hu B., Zhang L., Zhang W., Si H.R., Zhu Y., Li B., Huang C.L., Chen H.D., Chen J., Luo Y., Guo H., Jiang R.D. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature. 2020;579:270–273. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2012-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Walls A.C., Xiong X., Park Y.J., Tortorici M.A., Snijder J., Quispe J., Cameroni E., Gopal R., Dai M., Lanzavecchia A., Zambon M., Rey F.A., Corti D., Veesler D. Unexpected receptor functional mimicry elucidates activation of coronavirus fusion. Cell. 2019;176:1026–1039. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.12.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Daly J.L., Simonetti B., Klein K., Chen K.E., Williamson M.K., Antón-Plágaro C., Shoemark D.K., Simón-Gracia L., Bauer M., Hollandi R., Greber U.F., Horvath P., Sessions R.B., Helenius A., Hiscox J.A. Neuropilin-1 is a host factor for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Science. 2020;370:861–865. doi: 10.1126/science.abd3072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Cantuti-Castelvetri L., Ojha R., Pedro L.D., Djannatian M., Franz J., Kuivanen S., van der Meer F., Kallio K., Kaya T., Anastasina M., Smura T., Levanov L., Szirovicza L., Tobi A., Kallio-Kokko H. Neuropilin-1 facilitates SARS-CoV-2 cell entry and infectivity. Science. 2020;370:856–860. doi: 10.1126/science.abd2985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Davies J., Randeva H.S., Chatha K., Hall M., Spandidos D.A., Karteris E., Kyrou I. Neuropilin-1 as a new potential SARS-CoV-2 infection mediator implicated in the neurologic features and central nervous system involvement of COVID-19. Mol. Med. Rep. 2020;22:4221–4226. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2020.11510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hamming I., Timens W., Bulthuis M.L., Lely A.T., Navis G., van Goor H. Tissue distribution of ACE2 protein, the functional receptor for SARS coronavirus. A first step in understanding SARS pathogenesis. J. Pathol. 2004;203:631–637. doi: 10.1002/path.1570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Weber T., Zemelman B.V., McNew J.A., Westermann B., Gmachl M., Parlati F., Söllner T.H., Rothman J.E. SNAREpins: Minimal machinery for membrane fusion. Cell. 1998;92:759–772. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81404-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Tang T., Bidon M., Jaimes J.A., Whittaker G.R., Daniel S. Coronavirus membrane fusion mechanism offers a potential target for antiviral development. Antivir. Res. 2020;178 doi: 10.1016/j.antiviral.2020.104792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Yeager C.L., Ashmun R.A., Williams R.K., Cardellicho C.B., Shapiro L.H., Look A.T., Homes K.V. Human aminopeptidase N is a receptor for human coronavirus 229E. Nature. 1992;357:420–422. doi: 10.1038/357420a0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Nomura R., Kiyota A., Suzaki E., Kataoka K., Ohe Y., Miyamoto K., Senda T., Fujimoto T. Human coronavirus 229E binds to CD13 in rafts and enters the cell through caveolae. J. Virol. 2004;78:8701–8708. doi: 10.1128/JVI.78.16.8701-8708.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Owczarek K., Szczepanski A., Milewska A., Baster Z., Rajfur Z., Sarna M., Pyrc K. Early events during human coronavirus OC43 entry to the cell. Sci. Rep. 2018;8 doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-25640-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hofmann H., Pyrc K., Van Der Hoek L., Geier M., Berkhout B., Pöhlmann S. Human coronavirus NL63 employs the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus receptor for cellular entry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2005;102:7988–7993. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0409465102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Milewska A., Nowak P., Owczarek K., Szczepanski A., Zarebski M., Hoang A., Berniak K., Wojarski J., Zeglen S., Baster Z., Rajfur Z., Pyrc K. Entry of human coronavirus NL63 into the cell. J. Virol. 2018;92 doi: 10.1128/JVI.01933-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hulswit R.J.G., Lang Y., Bakkers M.J.G., Li W., Li Z., Schouten A., Ophorst B., van Kuppeveld F.J.M., Boons G.J., Bosch B.J., Huizinga E.G., de groot R.J. Human coronaviruses OC43 and HKU1 bind to 9-O-acetylated sialic acids via a conserved receptor-binding site in spike protein domain A. Pro.c Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2019;116:2681–2690. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1809667116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Burkard C., Verheije M.H., Wicht O., van Kasteren S.I., van Kuppeveld F.J., Haagmans B.L., Pelkmans L., Rottier P.J., Bosch B.J., de Haan C.A. Coronavirus cell entry occurs through the endo-/lysosomal pathway in a proteolysis-dependent manner. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10 doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lu G., Hu Y., Wang Q., Qi J., Gao F., Li Y., Zhang Y., Zhang W., Yuan Y., Bao J., Zhang B., Shi Y., Yan J., Gao G.F. Molecular basis of binding between novel human coronavirus MERS-CoV and its receptor CD26. Nature. 2013;500:227–231. doi: 10.1038/nature12328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Inoue Y., Tanaka N., Tanaka Y., Inoue S., Morita K., Zhuang M., Hattori T., Sugamara T. Clathrin-dependent entry of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus into target cells expressing ACE2 with the cytoplasmic Tail Deleted. J. Virol. 2007;81:8722–8729. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00253-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wang H., Yang P., Liu K., Guo Z., Zhang Y., Zhang G., Jiang C. SARS coronavirus entry into host cells through a novel clathrin- and caveolae-independent endocytic pathway. Cell Res. 2008;18:290–301. doi: 10.1038/cr.2008.15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kiesslich S., Losa J.P.V.-C., Gelinas J.-F., Kamen A.A. Serum-free production of rVSV-ZEBOV in Vero cells: Microcarrier bioreactor versus scale-X hydron fixed bed. J. Biotech. 2020;310:32–39. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2020.01.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Crawford H.D.K., Eguia R., Dingens A.S., Loes A.N., Malone K.D., Wolf C.R., Chu H.Y., Tortorici M.A., Veesler D., Murphy M., Pettie D., King N.P., Balazs A.B., Bloom J.D. Protocol and reagents for pseudotyping lentiviral particles with SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein for neutralization assays. Viruses. 2020;12 doi: 10.3390/v12050513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Li H.-S., Stolz D.B., Romero G. Characterization of endocytic vesicles using magnetic microbeads coated with signaling ligands. Traffic. 2005;6:324–334. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2005.00274.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Marcia E., Ehrlich M., Massol R., Boucrot E., Brunner C., Kirchhausen T. Dynasore, a cell-permeable inhibitor of dynamin. Dev. Cell. 2006;10:839–850. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2006.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.von Kleist L., Stahlschmidt W., Bulut H., Gromova K., Puchkov D., Robertson M.J., MacGregor K.A., Tomilin N., Pechstein A., Chau N., Chircop M., Sakoff J., von Kries J.P., Saenger W., Kräusslich H.G. Role of the clathrin terminal domain in regulating coated pit dynamics revealed by small molecule inhibition. Cell. 2011;146:471–484. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.06.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Park R.J., Shen H., Liu L., Liu X., Ferguson S.M., De Camilli P. Dynamin triple knockout cells reveal off target effects of commonly used dynamin inhibitors. J. Cell Sci. 2013;126:5305–5312. doi: 10.1242/jcs.138578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Lemmon S.K., Traub L.M. Getting in touch with the clathrin terminal domain. Traffic. 2012;13:511–519. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2011.01321.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Galvez T., Teruel M.N., Do Heo W., Jones J.T., Kim M., Liou J., Myers J.W., Meyer T. siRNA screen of the human signaling proteome identifies the PtdIns(3,4,5)P3-mTOR signaling pathway as a primary regulator of transferrin uptake. Gen. Biol. 2007;8 doi: 10.1186/gb-2007-8-7-r142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kim M.L., Sorg I., Arrieumerlou C. Endocytosis-independent function of clathrin heavy chain in the control of basal NF-kB activation. PLoS One. 2011;6 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Stoorvogel W., Strous G.J., Ciechanover A., Schwartz A.L. Trafficking of the transferrin receptor. Targeted Diagn. Ther. 1991;4:267–304. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kang Y.-L., Chou Y.-Y., Rothlauf P.W., Liu Z., Piccinotti Z., Soh T.K., Cureton D., Case J.B., Chen R.E., Diamond M.S., Whelan S.P.J., Kirchhausen T. Inhibition of PIKfyve kinase prevents infection 1 by EBOV and SARS2 CoV-2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2020;117:20803–20813. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2007837117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Pelkmans L., Helenius A. Insider information: What viruses tell us about endocytosis. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2003;15:414–422. doi: 10.1016/s0955-0674(03)00081-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Yamauchi Y., Helenius A. Virus entry at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 2013;126:1289–1295. doi: 10.1242/jcs.119685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Marsh M., Helenius A. Virus entry: Open sesame. Cell. 2006;124:729–740. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Ghosh S., Dellibovi-Ragheb T.A., Kerviel A., Pak E., Qui Q., Fisher M., Takvorian P.M., Bleck C., Hsu V.W., Fehr A.R., Perlman S., Achar S.R., Straus M.R., Whittaker G.R., deHaan A.A.M. β-Coronaviruses use lysosomes for egress instead of the biosynthetic secretory pathway. Cell. 2020;183:1520–1535. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.10.039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Hikmet F., Méar L., Edvinsson A., Micke P., Uhlén M., Lindskog C. The protein expression profile of ACE2 in human tissues. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2020;16 doi: 10.15252/msb.20209610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Gao J., Tian Z., Yang X. Breakthrough: Chloroquine phosphate has shown apparent efficacy in treatment of COVID-19 associated pneumonia in clinical studies. Biosci. Trends. 2020;16:72–73. doi: 10.5582/bst.2020.01047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Hu T.Y., Frieman M., Wolfram J. Insights from nanomedicine into chloriquine efficacy against COVID-19. Nat. Nanotech. 2020;15:247–249. doi: 10.1038/s41565-020-0674-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Miller S.E., Mathiasen S., Bright N.A., Pierre F., Kelly B.T., Kladt N., Schauss A., Merrifield C.J., Stamou D., Höning S., Owen D.J. CALM regulates clathrin-coated vesicle size and maturation by directly sensing and driving membrane curvature. Dev. Cell. 2015;33:163–175. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2015.03.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Weston S., Coleman C.M., Haupt R., Logue J., Matthews K., Li Y., Reyes H.M., Weiss S.R., Frieman M.B. Broad anti-coronavirus activity of Food and Drug Administration-approved drugs against SARS-CoV-2 in vitro and SARS-CoV in vivo. J. Virol. 2020;94 doi: 10.1128/JVI.01218-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Plaze M., Attali D., Petit A.C., Blatzer M., Simon-Loriere E., Vinckier F., Cachia A., Chrétien F., Gaillard R. Repurposing chlorpromazine to treat COVID-19: The recovery study. Encephale. 2020;46:169–172. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2020.05.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data are contained within the manuscript.