Skip to main content
Journal of Experimental Botany logoLink to Journal of Experimental Botany
. 2020 Jul 25;72(1):137–152. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eraa343

Overexpression of the chloroplastic 2-oxoglutarate/malate transporter disturbs carbon and nitrogen homeostasis in rice

Shirin Zamani-Nour 1,#, Hsiang-Chun Lin 2,#, Berkley J Walker 1, Tabea Mettler-Altmann 1, Roxana Khoshravesh 3, Shanta Karki 4, Efren Bagunu 2, Tammy L Sage 3, W Paul Quick 2,5, Andreas P M Weber 1,
Editor: Christine Raines6
PMCID: PMC7816853  PMID: 32710115

Solute transport across the chloroplast envelope is controlled by metabolite concentration gradients and transporter abundance. Overexpression of an envelope dicarboxylate transporter causes a pronounced metabolic phenotype, indicating that transporter abundance directly affects metabolism.

Keywords: Carbon and nitrogen assimilation, C4 rice, gas exchange, glutamate/malate transporter, oxaloacetate/malate transporter, photosynthesis

Abstract

The chloroplastic 2-oxaloacetate (OAA)/malate transporter (OMT1 or DiT1) takes part in the malate valve that protects chloroplasts from excessive redox poise through export of malate and import of OAA. Together with the glutamate/malate transporter (DCT1 or DiT2), it connects carbon with nitrogen assimilation, by providing 2-oxoglutarate for the GS/GOGAT (glutamine synthetase/glutamate synthase) reaction and exporting glutamate to the cytoplasm. OMT1 further plays a prominent role in C4 photosynthesis: OAA resulting from phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylation is imported into the chloroplast, reduced to malate by plastidic NADP-malate dehydrogenase, and then exported for transport to bundle sheath cells. Both transport steps are catalyzed by OMT1, at the rate of net carbon assimilation. To engineer C4 photosynthesis into C3 crops, OMT1 must be expressed in high amounts on top of core C4 metabolic enzymes. We report here high-level expression of ZmOMT1 from maize in rice (Oryza sativa ssp. indica IR64). Increased activity of the transporter in transgenic rice was confirmed by reconstitution of transporter activity into proteoliposomes. Unexpectedly, overexpression of ZmOMT1 in rice negatively affected growth, CO2 assimilation rate, total free amino acid content, tricarboxylic acid cycle metabolites, as well as sucrose and starch contents. Accumulation of high amounts of aspartate and the impaired growth phenotype of OMT1 rice lines could be suppressed by simultaneous overexpression of ZmDiT2. Implications for engineering C4 rice are discussed.

Introduction

Population growth, climate change, and lack of arable land are causing greater dependence on crop yield improvement. However, crop demand is already outpacing the yield gains achieved by conventional breeding and, hence, stepwise changes in crop yield are needed (Kromdijk and Long, 2016). Rice (Oryza sativa L.) is a C3 grass and one of the top three staple crops in the world. Its highest consumption is in Asia (Muthayya et al., 2014) where 60% of the world population exists (Bai et al., 2018), with the highest and lowest rates of poverty and income, respectively (FAO, 2017). Therefore, boosting rice yield and performance is an important goal for improving the quality of life for a large share of the global population. Engineering the C3 crop rice to perform C4 photosynthesis would greatly improve rice productivity by up to 50% per year (Wang et al., 2016), through maximizing the conversion of the captured solar energy into chemical energy and biomass (Hibberd et al., 2008).

C3 photosynthesis performs both initial carbon fixation and Calvin–Benson cycle reactions in the mesophyll. In C4 photosynthesis, initial carbon fixation and the Calvin–Benson cycle are carried out separately in the mesophyll and one or more layers of sheath cells (bundle and/or mestome sheath) surrounding the vascular tissue, respectively. This spatial separation concentrates CO2 around the enzyme Rubisco, thereby reducing Rubisco oxygenase activity and the subsequent loss of energy and previously fixed CO2 during photorespiration (Sage et al., 2012). Suppressing the energy and CO2 loss from photorespiration leads to greater plant biomass, and nitrogen- and water-use efficiency (Ghannoum et al., 2011). C4 photosynthesis also represents an adaptation for coping with stressful conditions, such as drought, high temperature, and light intensity (Edwards et al., 2010).

Chloroplasts with their double-envelope membrane and internal compartments play a critical role in carbon fixation and photosynthesis. Since biological membranes form barriers for the diffusion of hydrophilic metabolites, membrane transporters are required for the selective flux of polar molecules and metabolites across the chloroplast membrane (Haferkamp and Linka, 2012). One of the transporters that resides in the plastid inner envelope membrane is known as oxaloacetate (OAA)/malate transporter 1 (OMT1) or dicarboxylate transporter 1 (DiT1). The gene is expressed ubiquitously in roots, stems, leaves, florescences, and siliques of mature Arabidopsis plants (Taniguchi et al., 2002), and the protein is an OAA/malate antiporter with 12 α-helical transmembrane domains. OMT1/DIT1 functions to transport substrates according to the electrochemical gradient generated by solutes inside and outside the chloroplast membrane (Weber et al., 1995). This transporter, in concert with malate dehydrogenase (MDH; plastidic and cytosolic isoforms), forms the malate shunt that plays a key role in exporting excess reducing compounds from the chloroplast, to protect PSII, and to balance stromal redox potential (Selinski and Scheibe, 2019).

Redox balancing through the OMT1/DiT1-mediated malate valve is expected to be more beneficial when photorespiratory rates are increased, since higher relative rates of photorespiration increase the ATP/NAPDH demand of central metabolism, resulting in an excess of reduced NADPH in the plastid (Kramer and Evans, 2011; Walker et al., 2014). The malate valve can serve to oxidize the over-reduced NADPH pool to regenerate oxidized NADP+ carriers that are needed to maintain electron transport. The NADH generated in the cytosol from the malate valve activity is consumed in other reactions such as nitrate reduction. The resulting nitrite is imported into chloroplasts where it is further reduced to ammonia that is subsequently assimilated into glutamate by the GS/GOGAT (glutamine synthase/glutamate synthase) pathway (Tobin and Yamaya, 2001; Selinski and Scheibe, 2019). Glutamate itself is a building block for the biosynthesis of many amino acids (Forde and Lea, 2007). OMT1, jointly with the DiT2/DCT1 transporter (a glutamate/malate transporter), therefore connects carbon and nitrogen metabolism while equilibrating the ATP/NADPH ratio in chloroplast stroma (Taniguchi et al., 2002; Kinoshita et al., 2011; Taniguchi and Miyake, 2012). The strong, visibly perturbed phenotypes of omt1 mutants in Arabidopsis (Kinoshita et al., 2011) and in tobacco (Schneidereit et al., 2006) confirm its crucial role in carbon and nitrogen assimilation pathways as well as in plant growth and development.

OMT1 also plays an important role in C4 photosynthesis. The transporter imports OAA that is formed by cytosolic phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPC) into mesophyll cell chloroplasts where it is reduced to malate by NADP-MDH. OMT1 also facilitates the export of malate to the cytosol. These transport steps occur at the same rate as CO2 assimilation and thus, for engineering C4 photosynthesis into C3 crops such as rice, high expression and activity of OMT1 are required. In this study, as part of the effort to engineer C4 rice, we introduced the ZmOMT1 gene from C4 maize into C3 rice to achieve sufficiently highly transport capacity for OAA and malate across the chloroplast envelope. Additionally, since C4 photosynthesis requires a complex array of biochemical and anatomical components, we investigate whether ZmOMT1 expression triggers anatomical features found in C4 plants, which could further aid continued C4 engineering efforts.

Materials and methods

Rice transformation and growth conditions

To express maize ZmOMT1 in rice mesophyll cells, we transferred the pSC110:ZmOMT1:AcV5 construct into Oryza sativa spp. indica cultivar IR64 (Mackill and Khush, 2018). The construct contains the full-length cDNA of the ZmOMT1 gene (GRMZM2G383088) from maize (Zea mays var. B73) with a C-terminal AcV5 epitope tag, driven by the maize B73 mesophyll-specific ZmPEPC promoter (GRMZM2G083841; base pairs –1212 to +1) from the pSC110 vector (Supplementary Fig. 1A at JXB online). The forward and reverse primers given in Supplementary Table S1) were used to clone the coding sequence via the pENTR vector into the pSC110 expression vector utilizing the Gateway cloning system (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The pSC110 vector was generated as previously described (Osborn et al., 2017). The AcV5 epitope tag was placed downstream of the ZmOMT1 coding sequence (CDS) for later detection of expressed protein using commercially available AcV5 antibody. The final construct was transferred into freshly harvested immature embryos 8–12 d after anthesis using an Agrobacterium-mediated transformation protocol as described in Yin et al. (2019). After 1 week of co-cultivation and following 5 d on non-selective medium, emerging resistant calli were selected with 30 mg l–1 hygromycin B. The transgenic plants generated from hygromycin-resistant calli were transferred to Yoshida hydroponic solution (Yoshida et al., 1972) for 2 weeks and then transplanted into 0.5 liter pots filled with soil. Plants were grown in a greenhouse at the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI, Los Baños, Philippines: 14°9'53.58''S 121°15'32.19''E). The average day/night temperatures were 35±3 °C and 28±3 °C, respectively. The average and maximum light intensities were 825 µmol photons m−2 s−1 and 2000 µmol photons m−2 s−1, respectively. Seeds of transgenic plants were germinated in distilled water for 1 week and transplanted into soil in 100 ml Rootrainers (http://rootrainers.co.uk/). After 2 weeks, plants were transplanted to 7 liter soil pots. Plants were grown at Heinrich-Heine University (HHU) Düsseldorf, Germany under semi-controlled greenhouse conditions (16 h day/8 h night and 25 °C). Assessment of leaf gas exchange, as well as metabolite, C:N ratio, total free amino acids, and transporter activity measurements were performed at HHU.

PCR screening

Homozygous transgenic lines were screened by performing genomic PCR using the KAPA 3G plant PCR kit (Kapa Biosystem, USA). Leaves were harvested 7 d after transplanting plants into soil; scraped leaves were directly used as the template for PCR amplification of ZmOMT1 in a 10 µl total volume employing the gene-specific primers given in Supplementary Table S1. PCR conditions were: 95 °C for 5 min, 32 cycles of 95 °C for 20 s, 60 °C for 15 s, and 72 °C for 30 s; and 72 °C for 1 min using the plasmid DNA as a positive control and non-transgenic rice leaf tissue or water as negative controls.

Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR)

qRT-PCR was performed to quantify OsOMT1 and ZmOMT1 transcript expression levels in 8-week-old plants. Leaf RNA was extracted using a QIAGEN RNeasy Mini Kit from three biological replicates. Then one-step cDNA synthesis using LunaScript™ RT SuperMix Kit (NEB Biolabs, USA) was followed by total 20 µl volume master mix preparation (Luna® Universal qPCR Master Mix NEB Biolabs, USA). PCRs were performed in a 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System (Invitrogen, USA), and guided using the primer pairs given in Supplementary Table S1. The PCR conditions were: 95 °C for 60 s, 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s, and 60 °C for 30 s, followed by the measurement of the melting curve after 40 cycles for primer specificity. The primer efficiency was calculated as described by Udvardi et al. (2008) using different dilutions of cDNA together with a highly stable housekeeping gene from rice, OseEF-1a (Os03g0177500) (Jain et al., 2006). The mean normalized expression (MNE) for calculation of average CT was used as described by Simon (2003).

Reverse transcription PCR (RT–PCR)

To detect the ZmOMT1 and ZmDiT2 mRNA expression in OMT1/DiT2 double cross lines, RT-PCR analysis was performed in 8-week-old plants. Leaf RNA was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, USA) and treated with DNase (Promega, USA). Using 1 µg of RNA, cDNA was synthesized by a first-stand cDNA synthesis kit (Roche Diagnostics, Switzerland), normalized to 100 ng µl−1, and used for PCR analysis in a 10 µl reaction with gene-specific primers (see Supplementary Table S1). OseEF-1a was used as a positive and quality control. The PCR conditions were: pre-denaturation for 3 min, 95 °C; 40 cycles of the polymerization reaction consisting of a denaturation step for 20 s at 95 °C, for 30 s at 55 °C, and an extension step for 45 s 72 °C; and a final extension step for 3 min at 72 °C.

Leaf chlorophyll content and plant growth analysis

The upper fully expanded leaves at mid-tillering stage (50–60 d old) were used to determine leaf chlorophyll content using a SPAD chlorophyll meter (Konica Minolta, Japan). The plant height and tiller number were measured at the booting stage from soil level to the base of the flag leaf on the main tiller.

Western blot and immunodetection of recombinant protein (ZmOMT1)

The presence of the AcV5-tagged ZmOMT1 protein in leaf membrane extracts of ZmOMT1 was checked by fractionating the isolated protein on a 12% SDS–PAGE gel, followed by western blot analysis. Primary mouse anti-AcV5 tag 1:2000 (Abcam plc, UK) and peroxidase-conjugated secondary [goat anti-mouse IgG (H+L) horseradish peroxidase (HRP), 1:2500, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Germany] antibodies were used for the detection of the AcV5 tag. The stained protein on nitrocellulose membranes was visualized by a LAS-4000 Mini luminescence image analyzer (GE Healthcare, Germany) using the ECL Western Blotting Detection Reagents (GE Healthcare, Germany).

DNA blot analysis

Genomic DNA was extracted from the mature leaves using the potassium acetate method as described by Guillemaut and Maréchal-Drouard (1992). A total of 16 µg of genomic DNA was digested with HindIII restriction endonuclease (NEB Biolabs, USA), separated by electrophoresis on a 0.8% agarose gel, then transferred onto Hybond N+ membrane (GE Healthcare, UK). Blots were hybridized with a digoxigenin (DIG)-labeled ZmPEPC promoter-specific probe synthesized using the primers given in Supplementary Table S1 and the PCR DIG Probe Synthesis Kit (Roche Diagnostics, Switzerland). The signals were detected by CDP-Star (Roche Diagnostics, Switzerland) following the manufacturer’s instructions.

Immunolocalization

The seventh leaf at the mid-tillering stage was fixed and prepared for immunolocalization analysis as described in Lin et al. (2016). The fixed leaf sections were probed with the anti-AcV5 mouse monoclonal antibody (Abcam plc, UK) diluted 1:25 in blocking solution. Alexa Fluor 488 (fluorescent dye) goat anti-mouse IgG (Invitrogen, USA) secondary antibody was used for detection, and sections were examined on a BX61 using the Disk Scanning Unit attachment microscope (Olympus, Japan) with fluorescence functions.

Total leaf membrane protein isolation

For protein extraction, the fully expanded third leaves at the mid-tillering stage were homogenized to a fine powder using a nitrogen-cooled mortar and pestle. Total leaf membrane protein was isolated from the powder using an extraction buffer consisting of 250 mM Tris (HCl, pH 8.5), 25 mM EDTA, 30% (w/v) sucrose, 5 mM DTT, and appropriate protease inhibitors. Two subsequent centrifugation steps at 10 000 g (10 min) and 100 000 g (45 min) were then performed, using a benchtop centrifuge and ultracentrifuge, respectively. Ultimately, the isolated membrane was resuspended in 50 mM HEPES (KOH, pH 7.5), 5 mM EDTA, 2 mM DTT, together with protease inhibitors (Furbank et al., 2001; Roell et al., 2017). Finally, the protein concentration was measured utilizing the Pierce BCA Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Germany) following the manufacturer’s instructions.

Reconstitution of total leaf membrane into liposomes

In vitro analysis of transporter activity was carried out using a freeze–thaw–sonication reconstitution procedure in concert with forward exchange of the substrate (Palmieri et al., 1995). Following reconstitution, the proteoliposomes were pre-loaded with unlabeled malic acid to a final concentration of 30 mM (pH 7.5). Reconstituted proteins were separated from the non-reconstituted ones utilizing the size-based column chromatography technique [Sephadex G-25M columns (PD-10 column, GE Healthcare, USA)] (for the detailed procedure, see Roell et al., 2017).

[14C]Malate uptake measurement

Uptake of radiolabeled substrates in counterexchange with non-labeled substrates was carried out at six different time points (2, 4, 8, 16, 32, and 64 min). The reaction was started by adding 950 µl of proteoliposomes into 50 µl of [14C]malate diluted in transport medium (7 mM malic acid, pH 7.5), and stopped at each of the above-mentioned time points by loading 150 µl of the reaction mixture to an anion exchange resin column (acetate form, 100–200 mesh, Dowex AG1-X8 Resin, Bio-Rad, USA). The resin column was previously equilibrated five times using 150 mM sodium acetate (pH 7.5). Unincorporated [14C]malate was replaced by acetate in the resin column and the incorporated label was washed through a scintillation vial containing 10 ml of Rotiszint® eco plus scintillation cocktail (Carl Roth, Germany). Finally, the uptake of radiolabeled substrate was measured as counts per minute (CPM) by scintillation counting. To correct for background and false positives, the entire experiment was repeated using proteoliposomes without pre-loading of the substrate of interest (for the detailed procedure, see Roell et al., 2017). The uptake data were further assessed relative to both internal standards and total protein content (mg) in each sample. Related graphs were made using the one-phase association equation in GraphPad Prism 6 (http://www.graphpad.com/prism/prism.htm).

Photosynthetic CO2 assimilation, light response, and dark respiration rates

Leaf photosynthetic CO2 assimilation and dark respiration rates during the tillering were measured on the middle portion of fully expanded leaves (two leaves per plant, three plants per line) in the standard leaf chamber of a portable photosynthesis system (LI-6400XT, LI-COR Biosciences, USA) between 08.00 h and 13.00 h at a constant airflow rate of 400 µmol s−1, leaf temperature of 30 °C, and a leaf to air vapor pressure deficit of between 1.0 kPa and 1.5 kPa. Leaves were acclimated in the chamber for 30 min before measurements. The response curves of the net rate of CO2 assimilation (A, µmol CO2 m−2 s−1) to changing intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci, µmol CO2 mol−1) were acquired by decreasing Ca (CO2 concentration in the cuvette) from 2000 µmol CO2 mol−1 to 20 µmol CO2 mol−1 at a photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) of 2000 µmol photons m−2 s−1. The 2 % oxygen entering the cuvette was set by mixing nitrogen and oxygen in the CO2 free airstream through two mass flow controllers (model GFC17, Aalborg Mass Flow Systems, USA) at a flow rate of 1.5 ml min−1. Maximum Rubisco activity (Vcmax) and maximum electron transport activity (J max) were determined using the PsFit Model (Farquhar et al., 1980; Bernacchi et al., 2001, 2003). The light–response curves were measured by increasing the PPFD from 20 µmol photons m−2 s−1 to 2000 µmol photons m−2 s−1 at a Ca of 400 µmol CO2 mol−1. The carboxylation efficiency (CE; µmol CO2 m−2 s−1 µmol CO2 mol−1), CO2 compensation point (Γ, µmol CO2 m−2 s−1), and quantum yield (ф, mol CO2 mol−1 photons) were calculated as described by Lin et al. (2016). The dark respiration rate (Rd, µmol CO2 m−2 s−1) was measured on leaves in darkness following an acclimation at a PPFD of 1000 µmol photons m−2 s−1 for 10 min at a Ca of 400 µmol CO2 mol−1, and calculated for 1100–1200 s in the dark.

Leaf gas exchange and photosynthetic measurement in tandem with the metabolite analysis

To normalize metabolite pool sizes by photosynthetic flux, two sets of rice plants of different ages (set one, 30–35 d old; and set two, 50–55 d old) were analyzed. To measure A and collect the samples for metabolite analysis under steady-state conditions, a custom gas exchange chamber was interfaced with a LI-COR 6400XT portable photosynthesis system (Supplementary Fig. S1B) encasing the leaf to be measured within a low gas-permeable sausage casing (5 cm diameter Nalophan, Kalle GmbH, Germany) to allow for rapid freeze-quenching of the sample. The chamber was constructed using two stainless-steel pipe sections fitted with Swagelok connections to the LI-COR sample line, one of which was capped on the end with a welded end cap. Prior to each measurement, an ~20 cm section of sausage casing was positioned between the pipe sections and sealed to the outside of the pipe sections using a small amount of silicone vacuum grease. The proximal end of a leaf blade was then sandwiched between two halves of a silicone stopper and inserted into the open pipe section with the adaxial side up. Actinic light was delivered via an LED ring light (Model R300, F&N Lighting, USA) which allowed constant, homogenous illumination of the leaf surface. Metabolic activity was rapidly quenched by freeze clamping the leaves with a liquid nitrogen-cooled copper disk attached to an aluminum handle. Fully expanded leaves of different tillers from five biological replicates were measured in the LICOR 6400XT that was attached to the sausage chamber. Flow through in the custom chamber was maintained at 700 μmol s−1, light intensity at 500 μmol photons m−2 s−1, and CO2 concentration was set to 200, 400, or 1000 µmol CO2 mol−1. Leaf surface area was determined by taking a photograph and analyzing in ImageJ v1.51m9 (Schneider et al., 2012). Leaf temperature was not controlled but ranged between 25 °C and 27 °C as determined from energy balance calculations. Leaves were sealed within the chamber until steady-state net CO2 fixation rates were reached and gas exchange measurements were logged. Next, the liquid nitrogen-cooled piston was inserted rapidly through the ring light onto the leaf and onto a plastic anvil, and then transferred rapidly to an aluminum foil pouch and into liquid nitrogen. To avoid potential diurnal artifacts, all measurements (genotypes and CO2 treatments) were randomized and performed only during the peak photosynthetic activity of the rice plants between 09.00 h and to 15.00 h.

Metabolite analysis (GC/MS)

The GC/MS-based metabolite measurements were performed as described by Fiehn (2007), using ribitol as an internal standard. Leaf samples were collected by rapid freeze-quenching from the custom gas exchange chamber describe above. Freeze-quenched tissue was ground into a fine powder in liquid nitrogen using a mortar and pestle. Extracted metabolites were injected into a gas chromatograph (Agilent 7890B GC System, Agilent Technologies, USA) that was in line with a mass spectrometer (Agilent 7200 Accurate-Mass Q-TOF GC/MS, Agilent Technologies, USA). Metabolite peaks were evaluated using Mass Hunter Software (Agilent Technologies, UAS). The relative amount of each metabolite was calculated from the peak area, considering both the initial fresh weight used for extraction and the internal standard.

Total free amino acid (FAA) content

FAA contents were measured using the ninhydrin colorimetric method as described by Smith and Agiza (1951), with minor changes. Briefly, FAA contents of 10 µl of metabolite extract were measured using the ninhydrin colorimetric method as described by Smith and Agiza (1951), with minor changes. A 10 µl aliquot of metabolite extract together with 40 µl of a methanol:water mixture (2.5:1 ratio) were added to 50 µl of 1 M citrate (NaOH, pH 5.2) and 100 µl of 1% (w/v) ninhydrin (prepared in methanol:H2O, 2.5:1 ratio), and then heated to 95 °C for 20 min. The solution was then transferred to a microwell plate after a short centrifugation of 10 s at 10 000 rpm. The total amino acid content was then measured in a Synergy HT plate reader (BioTek, Germany) at a wavelength of 550 nm. Data were adjusted based on the l-leucine standard curve and related dilution factor.

Starch and sucrose contents

The youngest fully expanded leaf during the tillering stage was harvested at 10.00 h, frozen immediately, and ground in liquid nitrogen using a mortar and pestle. A 50 mg aliquot of homogenized leaf powder was then extracted in 500 µl of ice-cold 0.7 M perchloric acid and centrifuged at 21 100 g for 10 min at 4 °C to separate the soluble and insoluble fractions. The insoluble fraction containing the starch was further washed five times with 1 ml of 80% (v/v) ethanol. After centrifugation, the supernatant was discarded, the pellet was air-dried and resuspended in 500 µl of water, then gelatinized by boiling for 4 h and hydrolyzed overnight at 37 °C with 0.5 U of amyloglucosidase and 5 U of α-amylase. The starch content was measured as described in Smith and Zeeman (2006). The soluble fraction containing sucrose was neutralized to pH 6 with neutralization buffer (2 M KOH, 0.4 M MES, 0.4 M KCl). After centrifugation at 21 100 g for 10 min at 4 °C, the supernatant was assayed for sucrose content by enzymatic determination as described by Smith and Zeeman (2006).

Carbon:nitrogen (C:N) ratio measurement

The ratio of carbon to nitrogen as well as δ 13C were analyzed based on leaf dry weight (mg) of 30-day-old and 50-day-old transgenic plants using the ISOTOPE cube elemental analyzer connected to an Isoprime 100 isotope ratio mass spectrometer (Elementar, Germany). The δ 13C ratio is expressed as parts per thousand (‰) using the international standard of the Vienna Pee Dee Belemnite (VPDB).

Transmission electron microscopy

Rice seeds were germinated in Petri dishes in distilled water for 4 d and then placed on a floating net in distilled water in a 19 liter bin in greenhouses at the University of Toronto. Seedlings were fertilized with 1/3 strength hydroponic media at day three after transfer and then with full-strength media every 4 d (Makino and Osmond, 1991). Plants were sampled from 09.30 h to 11.00 h when day length was >11.5 h and light intensity in the unshaded greenhouse regularly exceeded 1400 μmol photons m−2 s−1. The middle section of the most recently fully expanded leaf was dissected into 2 mm pieces, prepared in Araldite 502 epoxy resin, and sectioned for TEM as described by Khoshravesh et al. (2017). Sections were imaged with a Phillips 201 transmission electron microscope equipped with an Advantage HR camera system (Advanced Microscopy Techniques, USA).

Generation of rice lines overexpressing both ZmOMT1 and ZmDiT2

To generate transgenic rice plants co-expressing ZmOMT1 and ZmDiT2, homozygous ZmOMT1 single transgenic T2 lines (OMT1-79, OMT1-80, and OMT1-45) were crossed with homozygous ZmDiT2 single transgenic T2 lines (DiT2-27, DiT2-39, and DiT2-44) (Supplementary Fig. S2A). The F1 progeny were selfed to produce segregating F2 populations. The pSC110:ZmDiT2:AcV5 construct used for generating DiT2 lines contained the coding sequence of ZmDiT2 (GRMZM2G40933) from Zea mays of the B73 variety and included an AcV5 epitope tag at the C-terminal end of the coding sequence. ZmDiT2 was cloned using the primers shown in Supplementary Table S1. Homozygous ZmDiT2 lines were selected by PCR analysis, and protein accumulation was determined on western blots (Supplementary Fig. S2B).

Results

Three independent single transgene insertion lines accumulate ZmOMT1 protein in mesophyll cells

A total of 198 T0 plants were generated, of which 87 were positive for ZmOMT1 as determined by PCR analysis of genomic DNA, and 40 of which carried a single copy of the ZmOMT1 transgene as determined by DNA gel blot analysis. Three single insertion lines (OMT1-79, OMT1-80, and OMT1-87; Supplementary Fig. S3) were advanced to succeeding generations to obtain homozygous lines. Homozygous plants in either the T3 or T4 generation were used for all subsequent experiments. To compare steady-state transcript levels of native rice OsOMT1 and the introduced ZmOMT1, qRT-PCR was performed. Expression of the native OsOMT1 was not affected by expression of ZmOMT1 in any of the three overexpressing lines, with transcript levels observed similar to those in wild-type rice (Fig. 1A ). ZmOMT1 transcripts accumulated in all three lines, with the highest levels in OMT1-79 and the lowest in OMT1-80 (Fig. 1A). To test whether the high amounts of ZmOMT1 mRNA in the transgenic lines were accompanied by increased transporter protein abundance, the amounts of ZmOMT1 protein in extracted total membrane leaf protein were examined via western blot, taking advantage of the C-terminal AcV5 tag. The ZmOMT1 protein was clearly detectable in all three lines (OMT1-79, OMT1-80, and OMT1-87) by immunoblotting (Fig. 1B). As with the transcript levels, OMT1-79 and OMT1-87 lines accumulated more ZmOMT1 protein than the OMT1-80 line. We further examined the spatial localization of ZmOMT1 in the transgenic lines by immunolocalization. Figure 1C shows that the ZmOMT1 protein accumulated primarily in chloroplasts of mesophyll cells. Collectively, these data show that the ZmPEPC promoter drives expression of ZmOMT1 predominantly in mesophyll cells of rice leaf tissues and that the protein can be detected in the chloroplasts of those cells.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Transcript accumulation of OsOMT1 and ZmOMT1 genes detected by qRT-PCR analysis on leaf blades of transgenic rice OMT1 lines (OMT1-79, OMT1-80, and OMT1-87). Wild-type plants (WT) served as a control. Data represent the mean normalized expression ±SEM of three and two biological and technical replicates, respectively (A). Assessment of expressed ZmOMT1 protein in transgenic lines (OMT1-79, OMT1-80, and OMT1-87) together with WT rice as a control via western blot using 12% SDS–PAGE and two-step antibody immunodetection with 5 s exposure time. The calculated molecular mass of OMT1-AcV5 is ~60 kDa; however, 40 kDa is the size shown on the blot. Samples were loaded based on equal leaf area of 0.396 cm2 (B). Immunolocalization of ZmOMT1-AcV5 protein in leaves of WT, OMT1-79, OMT1-80, and OMT1-87 plants in which the green signal is easiest to see in line OMT1-79 where the levels are highest. Anti-AcV5 tag primary antibody diluted 1:25 plus Alexa Fluor 488 (fluorescent dye) goat anti-mouse IgG secondary antibody diluted 1:200 was used to probe for the AcV5 tag (shown in green color). Chlorophylls are shown as a red autofluorescence. The cell wall was co-stained with calcofluor white and is shown in blue. Magnification: ×200. Scale bar: 5 µm (C).

OMT1 membrane transporter activity is significantly increased in transgenic rice lines

To test whether expression of the ZmOMT1 transgene led to increased OMT1 transporter activity in transgenic lines, we measured malate counterexchange activity in liposomes reconstituted with membrane proteins isolated from the wild type and overexpressing lines (Fig. 2A). We detected significantly higher malate–malate counterexchange activity in liposomes reconstituted with membrane proteins from overexpression lines as compared with those reconstituted with membrane proteins isolated from the wild type. These data clearly indicate that the recombinantly introduced ZmOMT1 transporter protein is active in rice (Fig. 2B).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Illustration of proteoliposome uptake assay after reconstitution of total leaf membrane protein from transgenic lines and wild-type controls. Uptake of [14C]malate (from outside into the inside of liposome) was measured with 30 mM or without (w/o) pre-loading of unlabeled malate inside the proteoliposome. Transport was initiated by adding [14C]malate to a final concentration of 0.3 mM (A). Uptake of malate into liposomes reconstituted with total crude membrane protein isolated from three different transgenic OMT1 lines, overexpressing ZmOMT1 (OMT1-79, OMT1-80, and OMT1-87), preloaded with either 30 mM malate (closed squares) or without preloading (closed circles) respectively. Liposomes reconstituted with total crude membrane protein isolated from WT plants, preloaded with either 30 mM malate (open squares) or without preloading (open circles) respectively served as controls. Values represent the arithmetic means ± SEM, n = 3 (B).

Slower growth and leaf lesion phenotypes of OMT1 lines

The transgenic plants with the highest ZmOMT1 protein levels (OMT1-79 and OMT1-87) displayed perturbed phenotypes at the whole-plant level. The OMT1-79 and OMT1-87 lines were shorter (Fig. 3A; Table 1) than the wild type and displayed lesions in mature leaves in IRRI (Fig. 3B). An ELISA test for detection of infection caused by tungro virus was negative (data not shown), indicating that the lesions were not caused by tungro virus infection. The OMT1-80 line that accumulates lower levels of ZmOMT1 (Fig. 1) had more and longer tillers compared with the wild type (Fig. 3A; Table 1) and did not have a lesion-mimic phenotype (Fig. 3B). Despite the different lesion-mimic phenotypes, chlorophyll content was similar in the youngest fully expanded leaves of all three transgenic lines and the wild type (Table 1). These results suggest that high levels of ZmOMT1 expression in rice inhibit plant growth and induce a lesion-mimic phenotype in mature leaves, without altering chlorophyll content in young leaves. The symptom is due to the accumulation of the substrates transported by OMT1 and shows the clear phenotypes in more mature leaves.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Representative pictures of wild-type, OMT1-79, OMT1-80, and OMT1-87 lines grown under ambient conditions; 70 d post-germination. Scale bar: 15 cm (A). Representative pictures of the youngest fully expanded leaves (Day 0) and the same leaves after 4 d (Day 4) of wild-type, OMT1-79, OMT1-80, and OMT1-87 plants. The middle portions of the youngest fully expanded leaves were taken when their next leaf needles started to emerge (Day 0) and the same positions from the same leaves were taken after 4 d (Day 4). Scale bar: 1 mm (B).

Table 1.

Leaf chlorophyll content, plant height, and tiller number of wild-type and OMT1 lines

Chl (SPAD value) Tiller number Plant height (cm)
Wild type 42.1±0.7ns 9±0.5 ab 56.4±1.1 a
OMT1-79 42.4±1.4ns 8±2 b 42.3±0.4 c
OMT1-80 41.3±1ns 12±1 a 60±1.5 a
OMT1-87 42.2±0.8ns 6.8±0.9 b 47.8±2.9 b

Chlorophyll SPAD values are the average ±SEM of three leaves from four plants at mid-tillering stage using the upper fully expanded leaves. Tiller number and plant height are the average ±SEM of four individual T3 plants; 70 d post-germination. Different letters within groups indicate that values are statistically different P≤0.05, Tukey’s multiple comparison test. ns indicates non-significant, P>0.05.

Photorespiratory-deficient phenotypes of ZmOMT1 transgenic lines

To examine the effect of overexpressing ZmOMT1 on photosynthesis in response to changing light conditions, the CO2 assimilation rate (A) in response to PPFD was measured at ambient CO2 conditions (400 µmol CO2 mol−1). The transgenic lines with highest ZmOMT1 expression (OMT1-79 and OMT1-87) had slightly lower CO2 assimilation rates than the wild type, whereas OMT1-80 had a similar rate (Fig. 4A). At 2000 µmol photon m−2 s−1, photosynthesis in the OMT-80 line and wild type was already saturated, but this was not the case for OMT-79 and OMT-87 lines. The ZmOMT1-overexpressing lines had similar quantum efficiency (QE) from the initial slope of light response curves (PPFD <100 µmol photons m−2 s−1) to the wild type (Table 2), suggesting that overexpressing ZmOMT1 protein does not affect the efficiency of using light energy to fix CO2 in rice plants. The dark respiration rates were twice as high in OMT1-79 and OMT1-87 lines compared with OMT1-80 and the wild type (Table 2), suggesting that the carbon balance is possibly altered in OMT1-79 and OMT1-87 compared with the wild type. Moreover, the CO2 assimilation rate (A) in response to intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci) under non-photorespiratory (2% O2) versus photorespiratory (21% O2) conditions was measured under saturating light intensity of 2000 µmol photons m−2 s−1. At 21% O2, lower photosynthetic rates were observed in OMT1-79 and OMT1-87 lines compared with the wild type and the OMT1-80 line (Fig. 4B). OMT1-79 and OMT1-87 lines also had lower CEs and OMT1-79 had higher CO2 compensation points (Γ) (Table 2). Under low photorespiratory conditions (2% O2), the wild type, OMT1-80, and OMT1-87 had similar photosynthetic rates at ~40 µmol CO2 m2 s−1, and similar Γ (Fig. 4C). Above a Ci of 400 µmol CO2 mol−1, the assimilation rate was lower in OMT1-79 and OMT1-87 lines. The maximum rate of Rubisco carboxylation (Vcmax) and the maximum rate of electron transport (Jmax) were reduced in OMT1-79 and OMT1-87 lines under high photorespiratory conditions (Supplementary Table S2). Together, these results indicate that the transgenic lines are Rubisco limited under high photorespiratory conditions (21% O2) and that when ZmOMT1 is expressed, ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate (RuBP) regeneration is limited at high CO2 concentrations. Together, these data indicate that ZmOMT1 overexpression leads to higher rates of photorespiration, a suggestion supported by the observation that transgenic lines have a higher Γ than the wild type at 21% but not at 2% O2.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Rate of CO2 assimilation (A) in response to photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD). Light–response curve measurements were carried out under 400 µmol CO2 mol−1 and leaf temperature of 30 °C. Values represent the mean ±SEM of two leaves of four individual T4 plants of OMT1 lines (OMT1-79, OMT1-80, and OMT1-87) and wild-type rice (WT) (A). Rate of CO2 assimilation in response to intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci) at 21% (B) and 2% O2 (C). The measurements were carried out under a light intensity of 2000 µmol photons m−2 s−1 at a leaf temperature of 30 °C. Values represent the mean ±SEM of two leaves of four individual T4 plants of OMT1 lines (OMT1-79, black square; OMT1-80, white square; and OMT1-87, black circle) and WT rice, white circle.

Table 2.

Comparison of photosynthesis parameters.

QE (µmol CO2 m−2 s−1 µmol photons mol−1) R  d (µmol CO2 m−2 s−1) Γ (µmol CO2 m−2 s−1) CE (µmol CO2 m−2 s−1 µmol CO2 mol−1) Γ (µmol CO2 m−2 s−1) CE (µmol CO2 m−2 s−1 µmol CO2 mol−1)
21% O2 2% O2
Wild type 0.05±0.003ns 0.42±0.26 a 54.86±5.23 b 0.12±0.01 a 13.72±1.93 ns 0.23±0.013 a
OMT1-79 0.043±0.003ns 0.93±0.20 ab 64.55±3.47 b 0.08±0.01 bc 17.89±4.76 ns 0.12±0.02 b
OMT1-80 0.047±0.002ns 0.41±0.21 a 53.81±3.17 b 0.11±0.01 ab 22.63±0.8 ns 0.22±0.2 a
OMT1-87 0.037±0.011ns 1.06±0.12 b 67.9±7.23 a 0.07±0.02 c 12.55±6.54 ns 0.17±0.05 ab

Measurements of quantum efficiency (QE) were made at 400 µmol CO2 mol−1 and a leaf temperature of 30 °C. Values represent the mean ±SEM of two leaves from four individual T4 generation plants. Measurements of dark respiration rate (Rd) were made on leaves dark adapted for 1100 s. Values represent the mean ±SEM of measurements made every 10 s for 100 s from two leaves of four individual T4 generation plants. Measurements of CO2 compensation point (Γ) and carboxylation efficiency (CE) were made at a photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) of 2000 µmol photons m−2 s−1 and a leaf temperature of 30 °C at either 21% or 2% O2. Values represent the mean ±SEM of two leaves of four individual T4 generation plants. Different letters within groups indicate that values are statistically different P≤0.05, Tukey’s multiple comparison test. ns indicates non-significant, P>0.05.

Chloroplast ultrastructure is perturbed in OMT1 transgenic lines

The macroscopic and physiological phenotypes of OMT1 lines were accompanied by ultrastructural changes in mesophyll cell chloroplasts. In contrast to wild-type plants, mesophyll cell chloroplasts of the OMT1 lines developed a peripheral reticulum (PR; Fig. 5) which is an internal network of tubules and vesicles continuous with the chloroplast inner envelope (Rosado-Alberio et al., 1968; Laetsch, 1974). Plastoglobules (PGs), not observed in wild-type plants, were also present in chloroplasts of the overexpressing lines. PGs are lipid microcompartments posited to function in lipid metabolism, redox and photosynthetic regulation, and thylakoid repair and disposal during chloroplast biogenesis and stress (Rottet et al., 2015; van Wijk and Kessler, 2017).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Transmission electron micrographs illustrating chloroplasts without peripheral reticulum in the wild type (A) and with peripheral reticulum (black arrows) in OMT1 transgenic lines OMT1-79 (B), OMT1-80 (C), and OMT1-87 (D). White arrows mark plastoglobules; C, chloroplast; Scale bar=500 nm.

CO2 assimilation rate and leaf metabolite profiles of transgenic lines

The photosynthetic rate of the older ZmOMT1 transgenic plants (50–55 d old) measured in our custom-built gas exchange cuvette (Supplementary Fig. S1B) was affected more than that of younger plants (30–35 d old) (Fig. 6A and B). In younger plants, there was no significant difference in photosynthetic rate between the wild type and any of the ZmOMT1 transgenic plants. However, in older plants, the photosynthetic rate was significantly lower in ZmOMT1 transgenic lines under ambient CO2 concentration (400 ppm) in each of the transgenic lines (Fig. 6B). The photosynthetic rate was partially restored under high CO2 concentration (1000 ppm) for older plants and only one line had a significantly lower photosynthetic rate as compared with the wild type under 200 ppm CO2 (Fig. 6B).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Impact of three CO2 concentrations (200, 400, and 1000 µmol CO2 mol−1) on the rate of CO2 assimilation (A) measured inside a custom gas exchange cuvette of two different plants sets [OMT1 lines (OMT1-79, OMT1-80, and OMT1-87) and the wild type (WT)]; younger, 30–35 d old (A) and older, 50–55 d old (B). For both experiments, the youngest, fully expanded leaf was chosen for each treatment. Values represent the mean ±SEM, n=4–5. Significant differences from the WT are indicated by *P≤0.05 and **P≤0.01, Tukey’s multiple comparison test.

Metabolite profiles of ZmOMT1 lines and wild-type rice reveal altered steady-state pools of TCA intermediates and aspartate

The metabolic state of 30- to 35-day-old ZmOMT1 transgenic rice lines and the wild type under different CO2 conditions was examined using GC-MS analysis. Large differences were observed among the measured metabolites of the mitochondrial tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle between the transgenic lines and the wild type. Malic acid, fumaric acid, iso-citric acid, succinic acid, and 2-oxoglutarate were significantly lower in all ZmOMT1 transgenic rice lines than in the wild type under different CO2 concentrations (Fig. 7A). Among photorespiratory intermediates, only glyceric acid displayed a lower amount in OMT1 lines. Others, such as glycolic acid, glycine, and serine, were similar to the wild type or tended to be higher, in some cases significantly (Fig. 7B). Of the substrates transported by OMT1 and DiT2, aspartic acid was significantly increased in the overexpression lines (Fig. 7C). Malic acid and 2-oxoglutarate, as previously mentioned, were significantly lower and glutamic acid remained unchanged for all three OMT1 transgenic rice lines in comparison with the wild type under different CO2 concentrations (Fig. 7A, C). We further calculated the aspartate/malate ratio for all transgenic rice lines and compared them with the wild type. As shown in Fig. 7D, the aspartate to malate ratio was significantly higher in transgenic ZmOMT1 lines relative to the wild type under different CO2 concentrations.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7.

Relative amount of metabolites involved in the citric acid cycle (A), in photorespiration (B), in the key substrates of OMT1 and DiT2 membrane transporters (C), and the aspartate/malate ratio (D) of OMT1 lines (OMT1-79, OMT1-80 and OMT1-87) and wild-type (WT) rice leaves under different CO2 concentrations [µmol CO2 mol−1] (200, black; 400, white; and 1000, dashed pattern). Values represent the mean ±SEM, n=5; significant differences from the WT are indicated by *P≤0.05, Student’s t-test.

Total free amino acids, carbon:nitrogen ratios, and carbohydrate contents are decreased in leaves of ZmOMT1 lines

The absolute FAA contents of ZmOMT1 lines and wild-type rice were determined to assess the effect of altered plastidial dicarboxylate transport capacity on amino acid metabolism. Amounts were lower in older plants of ZmOMT1 lines (50–55 d old) under all CO2 concentrations but were significantly decreased under ambient CO2 (400 ppm) compared with wild-type rice (Fig. 8A). As plants aged, the C:N ratio also decreased significantly in ZmOMT1 transgenic lines, but the δ 13C value did not differ between the wild type and transgenic lines (Fig. 8B). Sucrose and starch amounts were significantly reduced in the OMT1 lines compared with wild-type plants (Fig. 8C).

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8.

Absolute amounts of total free amino acid (FAA) content (A), and the C:N ratio and δ 13C value (B) of OMT1 lines (OMT1-79, OMT1-80, and OMT1-87) and wild-type (WT) rice. (A) Samples collected under different CO2 concentrations [µmol CO2 mol−1] (200, black; 400, white; and 1000, dashed pattern). Values represent the mean ±SEM, n=5. (B) Samples collected from 30- and 50-day-old OMT1 lines and WT rice. Values represent the mean ±SEM, n=3. Significant differences from the WT are indicated by *P≤0.05, **P≤0.01, and ***P≤0. 001, Tukey’s multiple comparison test

Simultaneous expression of ZmOMT1 and ZmDiT2 in transgenic rice lines restored the wild-type growth phenotype

We hypothesized that the phenotypes observed in rice lines overexpressing ZmOMT1 might be caused by an imbalance between the transport capacities for malate, OAA, and 2-oxoglutarate (transported by OMT1), and glutamate and aspartate (transported by DiT2). If this assumption was true, then the phenotypes of ZmOMT1 single transgenic lines should be rescued by simultaneous overexpression of ZmDiT2. We hence generated double transgenic lines in which both ZmOMT1 and ZmDiT2 were expressed (Supplementary Figs S5, S6). Notably, double transgenic lines displayed similar physiological phenotypes as wild-type plants when grown under ambient conditions (Fig. 9). Leaf chlorophyll content, number of tillers, and plant height were comparable with those of the wild type in two of three independent ZmOMT1/ZmDiT2 double overexpressing plants.

Fig. 9.

Fig. 9.

Growth phenotype of the wild type and of double overexpressor lines OMT1-79/DiT2-44, OMT1-80/DiT2-39, and OMT1-45/DiT2-27. All plants were grown under ambient conditions; pictures were taken 90 d post-germination. Scale bar: 10 cm.

Discussion

C4 plants require a higher transport capacity for OAA and malate across the chloroplast envelope of leaf mesophyll cells because OAA generated by the PEPC reaction in the cytoplasm is further converted to malate by plastidial NADP-MDH. Malate is then exported from mesophyll chloroplasts and transported to the carbon-concentrating sheath cells. In this study, as part of the effort to engineer C4 rice, transgenic rice lines were generated that overexpress the gene encoding the chloroplast envelope OAA/malate/2-oxoglutarate antiporter OMT1 from maize, ZmOMT1.

A striking feature of chloroplasts in the ZmOMT1-overexpressing lines was the development of the PR. This peripheral matrix of tubules and vesicles is continuous with the inner envelope which is the site where metabolite exchange occurs (Pottosin and Shabala, 2016). Although PR has been reported to be present in mesophyll and bundle sheath cells of other C3 grasses such as wheat (Szczepanik and Sowinski, 2014), this cellular feature has not been observed in other Oryza species or cultivars (Sage and Sage, 2009; Giuliani et al., 2013). The PR is also present in mesophyll and sheath cells of C4 species of grasses and eudicots, although, in comparison with C3 grasses, the PR in C4 species is much more abundant (Laetsch, 1968, 1969; Rosado-Alberio et al., 1968; Szczepanik and Sowinski, 2014). Chloroplast envelope proliferation in association with overexpression of envelope proteins has been previously reported (Breuers et al., 2012), supporting the idea that the ZmOMT1 transporter is accumulating to high amounts in the inner envelope of mesophyll chloroplasts. Given that the presence of the PR is posited to be correlated with high rates of metabolite exchange (Hilliard and West, 1971; Gracen et al., 1972a, b; Laetsch, 1974), the PR phenotype in ZmOMT1 transgenic lines is consistent with the altered metabolic profiles observed.

In general, OAA transported by OMT1 enters the chloroplast and is subsequently converted either to malate by NADP-MDH or to aspartate by plastidial aspartate aminotransferase. Whereas malate can be transported back to the cytosol by OMT1, export of aspartate out of chloroplasts requires the activity of DiT2. Enhanced accumulation of aspartate in the transgenic lines (Fig. 7D) indicates that this metabolite cannot be further metabolized in chloroplasts and thus that metabolite flux between chloroplasts and mitochondria is blocked. This outcome could explain the lower amounts of intermediate metabolites in the TCA cycle of mitochondria (the energy machinery) (Fig. 7A) among which a few are common substrates of the OMT1 transporter (Fig. 7A, C). All these intermediates are pivotal for effective function of plant metabolic pathways. For instance, malate, a primary substrate of OMT1, participates as an intermediate in many vital mechanisms in the cytosol and vacuole (redox homeostasis, pH levels, and carbon storage) (Fernie and Martinoia, 2009). Loss-of-function mutations in OMT1 in the C3 plants Arabidopsis (Kinoshita et al., 2011) and tobacco (Schneidereit et al., 2006) caused an increase in levels of 2-oxoglutarate and malate and a decrease in levels of aspartate, the opposite trend to that seen in ZmOMT1-overexpressing rice plants. Surprisingly, any disruption to OMT1 activity (either an increase or a decrease) leads to lower photosynthetic rates than the wild type, suggesting that OMT1 transporter activity must be precisely regulated to maintain optimal photosynthetic performance. The reduced photosynthetic rates in ZmOMT1 transgenic rice plants reveal possible relationships between photosynthesis, photorespiration, and cellular redox status. Differences in photosynthesis were significant in the plants measured in the Philippines and in older plants grown in Düsseldorf, Germany (Figs 4A, 6B). This decrease in photosynthesis is only partially explained by increases in Rd (Table 2). Interestingly, this decrease in photosynthesis could be rescued by minimizing photorespiration under some measurement and growth conditions, but not others. Specifically, the photosynthetic rates of ZmOMT1 transgenic lines were not rescued by elevated CO2 or reduced O2 when measured under growth conditions in the Philippines (Fig. 4B, C), but were rescued in the plants grown in Düsseldorf, Germany when measured under elevated CO2 (Fig. 6). One major difference in these measurements was the light intensity used (2000 μmol m−2 s−1 for the ACi curves versus 500 μmol m−2 s−1 for the metabolite assays), meaning that phenotypic rescue may only occur under subsaturating light intensities. As photorespiratory rates increase, the increased demand for ATP relative to NAD(P)H pushes the redox status of the NADP+/NADPH pools to be more reduced unless processes either decrease plastidic NADPH (malate valve) or increase ATP production (cyclic electron flux around PSI). The oxidation of NADPH, which could be increased with increased export of malate, must be finely balanced with metabolic demand so as not to directly compete with NADPH pools needed to supply the Calvin–Benson cycle or photorespiration. Under subsaturating light, there are numerous lines of evidence suggesting that the malate valve regulates this balance, particularly under photorespiratory conditions (Kramer and Evans, 2011; Walker et al., 2014; Shameer et al., 2019). In particular, this event leads to the reduced provision of carbon skeletons for nitrogen assimilation and to a significant reduction of the leaf C:N ratio (Fig. 8B) together with the reduction of FAA in the older OMT1 transgenic lines under 400 ppm CO2 concentration (Fig. 8A). Principally, both carbohydrate and amino acid biosynthesis are relying on each other (Nunes-Nesi et al., 2010). Correspondingly, in all three OMT1 transgenic lines, both sucrose and starch contents were decreased significantly compared with wild-type rice (Fig. 8C). It is known that a part of the photoassimilated carbon during the day will be partitioned and stored as starch to be used later during the night as a source of energy supply for sink tissues as well as fatty acid and amino acid biogenesis (Stitt and Zeeman, 2012). On the other hand, sucrose biosynthesis is occurring during the day (from the triose-phosphate pathway) and the night (from various enzymatic reactions involved in starch degradation) (Kunz et al., 2014). Therefore, the metabolism of starch and sucrose tightly depend on each other, and both are orchestrated by the amount of the fixed carbon during photosynthesis. Taken together, apparently too high or too low amounts of OMT1 protein affect the coordination of the C and N assimilation pathways.

Concluding model

Our results present evidence on the crucial roles of the OMT1 transporter in rice plants. We suggest a hypothetical model (Fig. 10) in which aspartate accumulates in chloroplasts of single OMT1 transgenic lines in comparison with wild-type rice (Fig. 7D). We propose that the accumulated aspartate impairs the flux between the inside and outside of the chloroplast, causing the growth and photosynthetic deficiency phenotypes in single OMT1 transgenic lines. Our assumption is supported by the finding that providing an exit pathway for aspartate by introducing an additional plastidial transporter (ZmDiT2) suppresses the phenotype of OMT1 overexpression (Fig. 10). These double overexpressor OMT1/DiT2 lines grew similarly to the wild type, and plant height along with numbers of tillers were recovered (Table 3). Our results indicate that coordinated expression of OMT1 and DiT2 is needed for engineering C4 rice plants.

Fig. 10.

Fig. 10.

Schematic of the metabolic scenarios in single OMT1 and double OMT1/DiT2 transgenic C3 rice plants. We hypothesize that in single OMT1 overexpressing lines, OAA imported by OMT1 is converted to Asp, which is trapped inside the chloroplasts due to higher OMT1 than DiT2 activity. Overexpression of DiT1 in OMT1 lines rescues the phenotype by providing sufficient capacity for Asp export from chloroplasts.

Table 3.

Leaf chlorophyll content, plant height, and tiller number of the wild type and OMT1/DiT2 double overexpressed lines

Chl (SPAD value) Tiller number Plant height (cm)
Wild type 43.8±1.1 a 17.3±1.6ns 99.3±3.8 ab
OMT1-79/DiT2-44 39.9±1.6 ab 24.7±6.4ns 97.7±1.8 a
OMT1-80/DiT2-39 40.9±1.6 ab 13±0.7ns 96.7±3.1 ab
OMT1-45/DiT2-27 36.6±1.5 b 18±3.3ns 87.7±4.7 b

Chlorophyll SPAD values are the average ±SEM of three leaves from three plants at mid-tillering stage using the upper fully expanded leaves. Tiller number and plant height are the average ±SEM of three individual F2 plants at 90 d post-germination. Different letters within groups indicate that values are statistically different P≤0.05, Tukey’s multiple comparison test. ns indicates non-significant, P>0.05.

Supplementary data

The following supplementary data are available at JXB online.

Fig. S1. Schematic of the pSC110:ZmOMT1:AcV5 construct.

Fig. S2. Representative pictures of wild-type, DiT2-44, DiT2-39 and DiT2-27 lines grown under ambient conditions; 80 d post-germination.

Fig. S3. DNA blots showing that the OMT1 lines (OMT1-79, OMT1-80, and OMT1-87) carry a single copy of the ZmOMT1 CDS and are homozygous at the T3 generation.

Fig. S4. Relative amount of some individual amino acids in OMT1 lines (OMT1-79, OMT1-80, and OMT1-87) and wild-type (WT) plants under different CO2 concentrations (200, 400, and 1000 ppm).

Fig. S5. Western blot analysis of ZmOMT1 and ZmDiT2 protein expression in rice cross lines of OMT1/DiT2 (1, 2, 3, and 4).

Fig. S6. RT-PCR of ZmOMT1 and ZmDiT2 mRNA expression in OMT1/DiT2 double transgenic lines together with the wild type (WT).

Table S1. Primers used in this study.

Table S2.  V  cmax and Jmax based on A/Ci data at 21% or 2% O2 using the PsFit Model.

eraa343_suppl_Supplementary_Figures_Tables

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation C4-Rice project. The CEPLAS Plant Metabolism and Metabolomics laboratory, is funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) under Germany´s Excellence Strategy – EXC-2048/1 – project ID 390686111. We acknowledge the excellent technical assistance of E. Klemp, K. Weber, and M. Graf for GC-MS measurements. We would like to thank Professor Jane Langdale (University of Oxford) for her C4 rice team leadership and valuable comments on the draft manuscript. We wish to thank the IRRI C4 rice center for their help with plant transformation, husbandry, and physiological measurements. We also wish to thank Sarah Covshoff for providing the constructs of OMT1 and DiT2.

References

  1. Bai  Z, Wang J, Wang M, Gao M, Sun J. 2018. Accuracy assessment of multi-source gridded population distribution datasets in China. Sustainability 10, 1363. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bernacchi  CJ, Pimentel C, Long SP. 2003. In vivo temperature response functions of parameters required to model RuBP-limited photosynthesis. Plant, Cell & Environment 26, 1419–1430. [Google Scholar]
  3. Bernacchi  CJ, Singsaas EL, Pimentel C, Portis AR Jr, Long SP. 2001. Improved temperature response functions for models of Rubisco-limited photosynthesis. Plant, Cell & Environment 24, 253–259. [Google Scholar]
  4. Breuers  FKH, Bräutigam A, Geimer S, Welzel UY, Stefano G, Renna L, Brandizzi F, Weber APM. 2012. Dynamic remodeling of the plastid envelope membranes—a tool for chloroplast envelope in vivo localizations. Frontiers in Plant Science 3, 1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Edwards  EJ, Osborne CP, Strömberg CA, et al.  2010. The origins of C4 grasslands: integrating evolutionary and ecosystem science. Science 328, 587–591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. FAO.  2017. The future of food and agriculture—trends and challenges. Rome: FAO; www.fao.org/3/a-i6583e.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  7. Farquhar  GD, von Caemmerer S, Berry JA. 1980. A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species. Planta 149, 78–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fernie  AR, Martinoia E. 2009. Malate. Jack of all trades or master of a few? Phytochemistry 70, 828–832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fiehn  O 2007. Validated high quality automated metabolome analysis of Arabidopsis thaliana leaf disks. In: Nikolau BJ, Wurtele ES, eds. Concepts in plant metabolomics. New York: Springer, 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  10. Forde  BG, Lea PJ. 2007. Glutamate in plants: metabolism, regulation, and signalling. Journal of Experimental Botany 58, 2339–2358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Furbank  RT, Scofield GN, Hirose T, Wang X-D, Patrick JW, Offler CE. 2001. Cellular localisation and function of a sucrose transporter OsSUT1 developing rice grains. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 28, 1187–1196. [Google Scholar]
  12. Ghannoum  O, Evans JR, Von Caemmerer S. 2011. Nitrogen and water use efficiency of C4 plants. In: Raghavendra AS, Sage RF, eds. C4 photosynthesis and related CO2 concentrating mechanisms. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer, 129–146. [Google Scholar]
  13. Giuliani  R, Koteyeva N, Voznesenskaya E, Evans MA, Cousins AB, Edwards GE. 2013. Coordination of leaf photosynthesis, transpiration, and structural traits in rice and wild relatives (genus Oryza). Plant Physiology 162, 1632–1651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gracen  VE  Jr, Hilliard JH, Brown RH, West SH. 1972a Peripheral reticulum in chloroplasts of plants differing in CO2 fixation pathways and photorespiration. Planta 107, 189–204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gracen  VE, Hilliard JH, West SH. 1972b Presence of peripheral reticulum in chloroplasts of Calvin cycle cells. Journal of Ultrastructure Research 38, 262–264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Guillemaut  P, Maréchal-Drouard L. 1992. Isolation of plant DNA: a fast, inexpensive, and reliable method. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 10, 60–65. [Google Scholar]
  17. Haferkamp  I, Linka N. 2012. Functional expression and characterization of membrane transport proteins. Plant Biology 14, 675–690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hibberd  JM, Sheehy JE, Langdale JA. 2008. Using C4 photosynthesis to increase the yield of rice—rationale and feasibility. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 11, 228–231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hilliard  JH, West SH. 1971. The association of chloroplast peripheral reticulum with low photorespiration rates in a photorespiring plant species. Planta 99, 352–356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Jain  M, Nijhawan A, Tyagi AK, Khurana JP. 2006. Validation of housekeeping genes as internal control for studying gene expression in rice by quantitative real-time PCR. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 345, 646–651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Khoshravesh  R, Lundsgaard-Nielsen V, Sultmanis S, Sage TL. 2017. Light microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, and immunohistochemistry protocols for studying photorespiration. Methods in Molecular Biology 1653, 243–270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kinoshita  H, Nagasaki J, Yoshikawa N, Yamamoto A, Takito S, Kawasaki M, Sugiyama T, Miyake H, Weber APM, Taniguchi M. 2011. The chloroplastic 2-oxoglutarate/malate transporter has dual function as the malate valve and in carbon/nitrogen metabolism. The Plant Journal 65, 15–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kramer  DM, Evans JR. 2011. The importance of energy balance in improving photosynthetic productivity. Plant Physiology 155, 70–78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kromdijk  J, Long SP. 2016. One crop breeding cycle from starvation? How engineering crop photosynthesis for rising CO2 and temperature could be one important route to alleviation. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 283, 20152578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kunz  HH, Zamani-Nour S, Häusler RE, Ludewig K, Schroeder JI, Malinova I, Fettke J, Flügge UI, Gierth M. 2014. Loss of cytosolic phosphoglucose isomerase affects carbohydrate metabolism in leaves and is essential for fertility of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 166, 753–765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Laetsch  WM 1968. Chloroplast specialization in dicotyledons possessing the C4-dicarboxylic acid pathway of photosynthetic CO2 fixation. American Journal of Botany 55, 875–883. [Google Scholar]
  27. Laetsch  WM 1969. Relationship between chloroplast structure and photosynthetic carbon fixation pathways. Science Progress Oxford 57, 323–351. [Google Scholar]
  28. Laetsch  WM 1974. The C4 syndrome: a structural analysis. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 25, 27–52. [Google Scholar]
  29. Lin  H, Karki S, Coe RA, et al.  2016. Targeted knockdown of GDCH in rice leads to a photorespiratory-deficient phenotype useful as a building block for C4 rice. Plant & Cell Physiology 57, 919–932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Mackill  DJ, Khush GS. 2018. IR64: a high-quality and high-yielding mega variety. Rice 11, 18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Makino  A, Osmond B. 1991. Effects of nitrogen nutrition on nitrogen partitioning between chloroplasts and mitochondria in pea and wheat. Plant Physiology 96, 355–362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Muthayya  S, Sugimoto JD, Montgomery S, Maberly GF. 2014. An overview of global rice production, supply, trade, and consumption. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1324, 7–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Nunes-Nesi  A, Fernie AR, Stitt M. 2010. Metabolic and signaling aspects underpinning the regulation of plant carbon nitrogen interactions. Molecular Plant 3, 973–996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Osborn  HL, Alonso-Cantabrana H, Sharwood RE, Covshoff S, Evans JR, Furbank RT, von Caemmerer S. 2017. Effects of reduced carbonic anhydrase activity on CO2 assimilation rates in Setaria viridis: a transgenic analysis. Journal of Experimental Botany 68, 299–310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Palmieri  F, Indiveri C, Bisaccia F, Iacobazzi V. 1995. Mitochondrial metabolite carrier proteins: purification, reconstitution, and transport studies. Methods in Enzymology 260, 349–369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Pottosin  I, Shabala S. 2016. Transport across chloroplast membranes: optimizing photosynthesis for adverse environmental conditions. Molecular Plant 9, 356–370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Roell  MS, Kuhnert F, Zamani-Nour S, Weber APM. 2017. In vitro analysis of metabolite transport proteins. Methods in Molecular Biology 1653, 83–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Rosado-Alberio  J, Weier TE, Stocking CR. 1968. Continuity of the chloroplast membrane systems in Zea mays L. Plant Physiology 43, 1325–1331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Rottet  S, Besagni C, Kessler F. 2015. The role of plastoglobules in thylakoid lipid remodeling during plant development. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1847, 889–899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Sage  RF, Sage TL, Kocacinar F. 2012. Photorespiration and the evolution of C4 photosynthesis. Annual Review of Plant Biology 63, 19–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Sage  TL, Sage RF. 2009. The functional anatomy of rice leaves: implications for refixation of photorespiratory CO2 and efforts to engineer C4 photosynthesis into rice. Plant & Cell Physiology 50, 756–772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Schneider  CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. 2012. NIH image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nature Methods 9, 671–675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Schneidereit  J, Häusler RE, Fiene G, Kaiser WM, Weber AP. 2006. Antisense repression reveals a crucial role of the plastidic 2-oxoglutarate/malate translocator DiT1 at the interface between carbon and nitrogen metabolism. The Plant Journal 45, 206–224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Selinski  J, Scheibe R. 2019. Malate valves: old shuttles with new perspectives. Plant Biology 21Suppl 1, 21–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Shameer  S, Ratcliffe RG, Sweetlove LJ. 2019. Leaf energy balance requires mitochondrial respiration and export of chloroplast NADPH in the light. Plant Physiology 180, 1947–1961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Simon  P 2003. Q-Gene: processing quantitative real-time RT–PCR data. Bioinformatics 19, 1439–1440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Smith  AM, Agiza AH. 1951. The determination of amino-acids colorimetrically by the ninhydrin reaction. The Analyst 76, 623–627. [Google Scholar]
  48. Smith  AM, Zeeman SC. 2006. Quantification of starch in plant tissues. Nature Protocols 1, 1342–1345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Stitt  M, Zeeman SC. 2012. Starch turnover: pathways, regulation and role in growth. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 15, 282–292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Szczepanik  J, Sowinski P. 2014. The occurrence of chloroplast peripheral reticulum in grasses: a matter of phylogeny or a matter of function? Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 36, 1133–1142. [Google Scholar]
  51. Taniguchi  M, Miyake H. 2012. Redox-shuttling between chloroplast and cytosol: integration of intra-chloroplast and extra-chloroplast metabolism. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 15, 252–260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Taniguchi  M, Taniguchi Y, Kawasaki M, Takeda S, Kato T, Sato S, Tabata S, Miyake H, Sugiyama T. 2002. Identifying and characterizing plastidic 2-oxoglutarate/malate and dicarboxylate transporters in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant & Cell Physiology 43, 706–717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Tobin  AK, Yamaya T. 2001. Cellular compartmentation of ammonium assimilation in rice and barley. Journal of Experimental Botany 52, 591–604. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Udvardi  MK, Czechowski T, Scheible WR. 2008. Eleven golden rules of quantitative RT-PCR. The Plant Cell 20, 1736–1737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. van Wijk  KJ, Kessler F. 2017. Plastoglobuli: plastid microcompartments with integrated functions in metabolism, plastid developmental transitions, and environmental adaptation. Annual Review of Plant Biology 68, 253–289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Walker  BJ, Strand DD, Kramer DM, Cousins AB. 2014. The response of cyclic electron flow around photosystem I to changes in photorespiration and nitrate assimilation. Plant Physiology 165, 453–462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Wang  P, Vlad D, Langdale JA. 2016. Finding the genes to build C4 rice. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 31, 44–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Weber  A, Menzlaff E, Arbinger B, Gutensohn M, Eckerskorn C, Flügge UI. 1995. The 2-oxoglutarate/malate translocator of chloroplast envelope membranes: molecular cloning of a transporter containing a 12-helix motif and expression of the functional protein in yeast cells. Biochemistry 34, 2621–2627. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Yin  X, Anand A, Quick WP, Bandyopadhyay A. 2019. Editing a stomatal developmental gene in rice with CRISPR/Cpf1. Methods in Molecular Biology 1917, 257–268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Yoshida  S, Forno DA, Cock JH, Gomez KA. 1972. Routine procedure for growing rice plants in culture solution. In: Yoshida S, Forno DA, Cock JH, eds. Laboratory manual for physiological studies of rice. Los Baños, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute, 61–66. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

eraa343_suppl_Supplementary_Figures_Tables

Articles from Journal of Experimental Botany are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES