Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2020 Dec 21;12(12):e12205. doi: 10.7759/cureus.12205

Global Scientific Outputs of Microsurgery Publications: A Bibliometric Approach About Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow

Serkan Guler 1, Ramadan Ozmanevra 2,, Sercan Çapkin 1
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC7817138  PMID: 33489614

Abstract

Introduction

Although there have been important developments in microsurgery in recent years, there is no current and comprehensive bibliometric study in the literature. In this study, we aimed to present a summary of the articles published on microsurgery between 1980 and 2019 with bibliometric analysis.

Methods

Articles published on microsurgery between 1980 and 2019 were withdrawn from the Web of Science database and analyzed by bibliometric methods. Citation analysis was performed to identify effective journals and articles. Keyword cluster and trends analyses were performed for a detailed analysis of the researched topics. Relationships between the article numbers of the countries and gross domestic product (GDP) and human development index (HDI) values were investigated using Spearman’s correlation coefficient. A linear regression analysis was used to estimate the number of articles to be published in the future.

Results

A total of 3,537 publications related to microsurgery were found. Bibliometric analyses were performed in 2,063 articles (58.3%) of these publications. The most active countries in publishing were the United States (504), Germany (286), and Italy (154), respectively. A statistically significant correlation was found between the article numbers and the GDP and HDI sizes of the countries (r = 0.758, p <0.001, r = 0.659, p <0.001).

Conclusion

The economic size and development levels of the countries were an important factor in academic productivity in microsurgery. Undeveloped countries should be encouraged by performing multidisciplinary studies in this regard.

Keywords: bibliometric analysis, microsurgery, citation analysis, web of science

Introduction

Microsurgery is a term used to describe the surgical techniques that require surgical microscopy and the necessary special instrumentation (microscopes, microstrums, and micro-sutures) to perform sensitive operations on small structures in our body [1]. It specializes in many clinical disciplines including microsurgical orthopedics, otorhinolaryngology, ophthalmology, neurosurgery, plastic surgery, transplantation surgery, oncology, gynecology, and urology [2]. There are highly efficient microsurgery applications in orthopedic surgery [3].

A bibliometric analysis involves analyzing scientific publications, such as published articles, books, congress abstracts, etc., using statistical methods. Although the number of scientific publications is increasing every day, access to medical literature is becoming easier. Therefore, it is difficult to search the literature for researchers who want to perform a new study on a subject. There is an increase in bibliometric studies in the field of health, in parallel with the significant increase in the number of publications in recent years. Researchers can easily access the summary information of thousands, sometimes tens of thousands, of articles published in a research area on a particular subject, through bibliometric studies. In addition, the most influential articles, active universities, authors, countries, and international collaborations can be determined in a short time. Important bibliometric studies have been conducted in many different disciplines in the field of health. Recently, some studies have been conducted in the field of anesthesia, neurosurgery, rhinoplasty, and general surgery [4-10].

Although there have been important developments in microsurgery in recent years, there is no current and comprehensive bibliometric study in the literature.

In this study, we aimed to present a summary of the articles published on microsurgery between 1980 and 2019 with bibliometric analysis. In addition, we aimed to reveal the most cited effective publications, active journals, countries, institutions, and authors; identify international collaborations; and discuss keyword analysis and trending research topics. We also aimed to determine the development of publications over the years and the factors affecting the productivity of the publication with correlation and regression analysis.

Materials and methods

The literature review was performed using the Web of Science (WoS; Clarivate Analytics, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) database (access date: May 10, 2020). All articles published on microsurgery were searched. All the publications with the keywords “microsurgery/micro surgery/micro-surgery” in the title and published between 1980 and 2019 were pulled from the WoS database and analyzed by bibliometric methods. The codes for repeatability were as follows: Title: (“micro-surgery”) OR Title: (“micro surgery”) OR Title: (microsurgery) and Document Types: (Article) Timespan = 1980-2019. Indexes = SCI-Expanded, SSCI, A & HCI, CPCI-S, CPCI-SSH, BKCI-S, BKCI-SSH, ESCI). Bibliometric network visualizations were performed using the VOSviewer (Version 1.6.15; Centre for Science and Technology Studies, The Netherlands) package program [11].

Statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) (Version 22.0, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY) package programming. The normality of data distribution was tested using the Shapiro-Wilk test. The correlation between the number of articles produced by countries and gross domestic product (GDP) (data obtained from the World Bank Group website) [12] and human development index (HDI) (data from the United Nations Development Program Human Development Report 2019) [13] was determined using Spearman’s correlation coefficient in accordance with the data distribution. Linear regression analysis was used to estimate the number of articles to be published in the future. A p-value of <0.05 was considered significant.

Results

As a result of the literature review, 3,537 publications were found. A total of 2,063 (58.32%) of these publications were articles, 441 (12.46%) were proceedings papers, 430 (12.15%) were meeting abstracts, 315 (8.90%) were editorial materials, 186 (5.25%) were letters, and 151 (4.26%) were reviews. The rest were other types of publications: note (46), book chapter (31), correction (12), discussion (8), news item (8), book review (7), biographical item (4), reprint (4), book (3), and correction addition (1). In our study, 2,063 articles were analyzed bibliometrically in the article category. A total of 1,759 (85.2%) of the articles were published in English, and the rest were published in other languages (German: 139, French: 95, Russian: 37, Spanish: 14, Japanese: 6, Italian: 3, Korean: 3, Czech: 2, Portuguese: 2, Dutch: 1, Greek: 1, and Turkish: 1). A total of 2,063 articles had 37,577 citations (without self-citations: 33,493), the average number of citations was 18.21, and the h-index was 86.

Research areas

More than half of the published articles related to microsurgery were in the field of surgery (1075; 52.1%). Most of the articles published were in the areas of otorhinolaryngology (254), clinical neurology (221), gastroenterology hepatology (147), medicine general internal (87), obstetrics-gynecology (84), ophthalmology (74), dentistry oral surgery medicine (69), medicine research experimental (67), oncology (59), radiology nuclear medicine medical imaging (57), neurosciences (43), urology nephrology (43), orthopedics (42), and optics (35). Some of the articles were labeled in more than one field.

Development of publications

The distribution of articles by year is presented in Figure 1. The number of publications for the next five years predicted by regression analysis is also shown in Figure 1 with 95% confidence intervals. The estimated number of publications was 124 (102-145) for 2020 and 130 (99-161) for 2024.

Figure 1. Distribution of the number of articles on microsurgery by year.

Figure 1

Footnote: The orange color shows an estimate of the number of articles to be published in the coming years.

Trend topics

A total of 2,628 different keywords were used in 2,063 articles. Approximately 76 keywords used in at least eight different articles from these keywords are listed in Table 1. The network visualization map obtained according to the citation analysis of the articles containing the keywords is shown in Figure 2.

Table 1. The first 76 trend keywords on microsurgery.

The first 76 trend keywords on microsurgery

Keyword O Keyword O Keyword O Keyword O
microsurgery 311 laser microsurgery 19 aneurysm 13 glottic carcinoma 9
transanal endoscopic microsurgery 208 glottic cancer 18 carcinoma 13 glottis 9
rectal cancer 82 stereotactic radiosurgery 18 early glottic cancer 13 head and neck cancer 9
transoral laser microsurgery 74 cancer 17 organ preservation 13 meningioma 9
local excision 47 free flap 17 rectal neoplasms 13 reconstruction 9
tem(s) 47 squamous cell carcinoma 17 education 12 simulation 9
vestibular schwannoma 39 training 17 neurosurgery 12 clinical outcome 8
surgery 34 co2 laser 16 rectum 12 clipping 8
endoscopy 30 laryngeal cancer 16 transanal 12 endoscope 8
quality of life 29 outcome 16 transsphenoidal surgery 12 functional outcome 8
rectal adenoma 27 complications 15 rectal carcinoma 11 hearing preservation 8
endodontic microsurgery 26 early rectal cancer 15 survival 11 laparoscopy 8
minimally invasive surgery 26 endoscopic surgery 15 anastomosis 10 local control 8
larynx 25 laser 15 arteriovenous malformation 10 minimally invasive 8
acoustic neuroma 24 radiotherapy 15 facial nerve 10 pituitary adenoma 8
rectal tumor(s) 23 adenoma 14 laryngeal carcinoma 10 radiation therapy 8
radiosurgery 22 gamma knife 14 prognostic factors 10 rectal polyp 8
recurrence 20 laser surgery 14 reconstructive surgery 10 total mesorectal excision 8
carbon dioxide laser 19 local recurrence 14 transanal excision 10 voice 8

Figure 2. Network visualization map for citation analysis of keywords on microsurgery.

Figure 2

Footnote: The number of citations taken by keyword increases from blue to red (blue-green-yellow-red). The size of the circles indicates that the keyword is used frequently. The thickness of the lines indicates the strength of the relationship.

Active authors

Authors who published the most articles on microsurgery were Steiner W (28), De Graaf EJR (24), Campisi C (20), Boccardo F (18), Morino M (17), Arezzo A (15), Allaix ME (14), Doornebosch PG (14), Hinni ML (14), and Lezoche E (14).

Active organization

The 16 organizations and organizations-enhanced that published the most articles on microsurgery are presented in Table 2.

Table 2. Active organization and organizations-enhanced on microsurgery.

Organizations RC Organizations-Enhanced RC
University Gottingen 34 Assistance Publique Hopitaux Paris (APHP) 42
University Genoa 30 University of California System 39
Mayo Clinic 24 University of Gottingen 39
Ijsselland Hospital 22 Harvard University 35
Harvard University 21 Mayo Clinic 33
Johns Hopkins University 21 University of Genoa 33
University Penn 21 University of Texas System 27
Leiden University 17 Johns Hopkins University 24
Stanford University 17 University of Pennsylvania 23
University Calif Irvine 17 Ijsselland Hospital 22
University Roma La Sapienza 16 Sapienza University Rome 22
University Turin 16 University of Munich 22
Yonsei University 16 University of London 21
Louisiana State University 14 Erasmus University Rotterdam 20
University Milan 14 Pennsylvania Commonwealth System of Higher Education (PCSHE) 20
University Toronto 14 University of Erlangen Nuremberg 19

Active journals

A total of 636 journals with 2,063 articles were published. Among these journals, 74 published at least six articles on this subject. The first 74 journals that produced the most publications are presented in Table 3. The table lists the total number of citations and the average number of citations per article.

Table 3. Active journals on microsurgery.

Journals RC C AC Journals RC C AC
Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery 84 330 3.9 Frontiers in Oncology 10 30 3.0
Microsurgery 78 1392 17.8 Helvetica Chirurgica Acta 10 2 0.2
Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques 57 2107 37.0 Otology & Neurotology 9 73 8.1
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 43 1281 29.8 Klinische Monatsblatter Fur Augenheilkunde 9 29 3.2
Neurosurgery 35 1884 53.8 International Surgery 9 26 2.9
Laryngoscope 34 965 28.4 American Journal of Surgery 8 365 45.6
Journal of Endodontics 34 880 25.9 Journal of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery 8 107 13.4
Colorectal Disease 34 802 23.6 Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume 8 105 13.1
Head and Neck-Journal for the Sciences and Specialties of the Head and Neck 34 799 23.5 Clinical Otolaryngology 8 93 11.6
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 30 423 14.1 Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques 8 66 8.3
Annals of Plastic Surgery 30 273 9.1 International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery 8 55 6.9
Acta Neurochirurgica 27 776 28.7 Acta Oto-Laryngologica 8 49 6.1
Journal of Neurosurgery 26 1909 73.4 Therapeutische Umschau 8 2 0.3
Diseases of The Colon & Rectum 25 1682 67.3 Surgical Neurology 7 417 59.6
Handchirurgie Mikrochirurgie Plastische Chirurgie 19 78 4.1 Surgical Endoscopy-Ultrasound and Interventional Techniques 7 319 45.6
International Journal of Colorectal Disease 16 413 25.8 Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 7 155 22.1
Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 16 346 21.6 Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 7 150 21.4
Clinics in Plastic Surgery 16 159 9.9 International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery 7 110 15.7
HNO 16 97 6.1 Journal of Biomedical Optics 7 91 13.0
Vestnik Oftalmologii 15 12 0.8 Lasers in Surgery and Medicine 7 84 12.0
British Journal of Surgery 14 854 61.0 Chirurg 7 79 11.3
World Neurosurgery 14 55 3.9 Lymphology 7 62 8.9
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 14 38 2.7 British Journal of Plastic Surgery 7 42 6.0
Fertility and Sterility 13 457 35.2 Annales De Chirurgie Plastique Esthetique 7 16 2.3
Techniques in Coloproctology 13 91 7.0 Khirurgiya 7 1 0.1
Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies 13 89 6.8 Vestnik Khirurgii İmeni II Grekova 7 0 0.0
Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology 12 299 24.9 World Journal of Surgery 6 161 26.8
Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques 12 56 4.7 Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica 6 115 19.2
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery-Global Open 12 23 1.9 Neurosurgical Focus 6 90 15.0
Neurochirurgie 11 86 7.8 Hepato-Gastroenterology 6 65 10.8
Laryngo-Rhino-Otologie 11 51 4.6 Chinese Medical Journal 6 51 8.5
Journal Francais D Ophtalmologie 11 19 1.7 Plos One 6 45 7.5
Biomedical Optics Express 10 219 21.9 Medicine 6 16 2.7
Journal of Voice 10 177 17.7 Neurological Surgery 6 13 2.2
Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery 10 157 15.7 Acta Chirurgica Belgica 6 9 1.5
Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery 10 121 12.1 Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery 6 4 0.7
Journal of Laryngology and Otology 10 49 4.9 Sciences Et Techniques De L Animal De Laboratoire 6 0 0.0

Active countries

A total of 2,063 articles were published, with a total of 85 country addresses. Active countries producing more than 20 publications are the United States (US) (504), Germany (286), Germany (52), Italy (154), United Kingdom (UK) (145), France (139), China (113), Japan (81), Switzerland (69), Canada (65), Spain (60), Netherlands (58), South Korea (52), Belgium (43), Australia (41), Austria (37), Taiwan (34), Brazil (31), Turkey (28), Israel (24), Russia (21), and Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (37). The network map showing at least five publications from these countries and showing international cooperation among the 34 countries are illustrated in Figure 3.

Figure 3. Network visualization map for the international collaboration of worldwide countries on microsurgery.

Figure 3

Footnote: The size of the circle shows the large number of publications, the colors indicate the cluster of collaboration, and the thickness of the lines indicates the strength of the collaboration.

Correlation analysis

A statistically significant correlation was found between the number of articles published by countries on microsurgery and the GDP and HDI sizes of countries (r = 0.758, p <0.001, r = 0.659, p <0.001). Scatter plots of correlations are presented in Figure 4.

Figure 4. Scatter plot between the number of articles produced by country on microsurgery and log (GDP) and HDI values.

Figure 4

Footnote: GDP: gross domestic product, HDI: human development index

Co-citation analysis

In the references section of 2,063 articles, 29,387 publications were referred. Among these were eight publications that received more than 50 citations. These most cited publications were Buess (1984) (number of citations: C; 114), Winde (1996) (C: 86), Middleton (2005) (C: 68), Heintz (1998) (C: 60), Moore (2008) (C: 56), Lee (2003) (C: 53), Mellgren (2000) (C: 52), and Buess (1992) (C: 51) [14-21].

Citation analysis

When the analyzed articles were evaluated according to the total number of citations and the average number of citations per year, the most cited study was Anderson et al.’s study titled “Selective photothermolysis - precise microsurgery by selective absorption of pulsed radiation” published in Science in 1983 [22]. The remaining most cited articles were performed by Sylla et al. [23], Haughey et al. [24], Hutson et al. [25], and Bach et al. [26], respectively. The articles were ranked according to the average number of citations per year, and the first five articles are presented in Table 4 [22-26]. The total citation numbers of the articles are also provided in the table.

Table 4. The five most cited manuscripts on microsurgery.

No Article Author Journal PY TC AC
1 Selective photothermolysis - precise microsurgery by selective absorption of pulsed radiation Anderson, RR. et al. [22] Science 1983 1952 51.37
2 Notes transanal rectal cancer resection using transanal endoscopic microsurgery and laparoscopic assistance Sylla, P. et al. [23] Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques 2010 312 28.36
3 Transoral laser microsurgery as primary treatment for advanced-stage oropharyngeal cancer: a united states multicenter study Haughey, Bruce H. et al. [24] Head and Neck-Journal for the Sciences and Specialties of the Head and Neck 2011 209 20.9
4 Forces for morphogenesis investigated with laser microsurgery and quantitative modeling Hutson, MS. et al. [25] Science 2003 344 19.11
5 A predictive model for local recurrence after transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer Bach, SP. et al. [26] British Journal of Surgery 2009 213 17.75

Discussion

According to our comprehensive statistical analysis findings with 2,063 articles, a significant increase was observed in the number of articles on microsurgery especially after 2005. The number of articles published ranged from 21 to 60 per year between 1980 and 2009. The number of articles exceeded 60 in 2010 and reached 122 in 2019. When the regression analysis results were evaluated, we observed that the number of articles published will continue to increase.

When the results of the keyword analysis were evaluated, the top 10 topics related to microsurgery investigated were transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM), rectal cancer/adenoma, transoral laser microsurgery, local excision, vestibular schwannoma, endoscopy, quality of life, endodontic microsurgery, minimally invasive surgery, and larynx. According to the results of cluster analysis, four major primary clusters were formed based on the topics used in similar articles: microsurgery, transanal endoscopic microsurgery/rectal cancer/local excision, transoral laser microsurgery/quality of life, and vestibular schwannoma/acoustic neuroma. The literature on microsurgery developed four main clusters, with a total of eight different clusters.

According to the results of trend analysis to determine the current research topics, issues related to transanal endoscopic microsurgery, rectal carcinoma/tumors, laser microsurgery, endoscopy, transsphenoidal surgery, gamma knife, and pituitary adenoma were initially studied; in the following years, acoustic neuroma, stereotactic radiosurgery, radiotherapy, arteriovenous malformation, local excision, minimally invasive, transanal, rectal neoplasms, rectal polyp, laparoscopy, facial nerve, hearing preservation, neurosurgery, anastomosis, vestibular schwannoma, reconstructive surgery, meningioma, aneurysm, clipping, larynx, survival, carcinoma, local recur, carcinoma, carbon dioxide laser, squamous cell carcinoma, early glottic cancer, and organ preservation were studied. In recent years, subjects such as transoral laser microsurgery, quality of life, training, education, free flap, simulation, endodontic microsurgery, recurrence, CO2 laser, head and neck cancer, outcome, glottis cancer, voice, glottis, and local control have been explored. The keywords used in more cited articles were acoustic neuroma, stereotactic radiosurgery, hearing preservation, transsphenoidal surgery, pituitary adenoma, minimally invasive, transanal, rectal carcinoma, gamma knife, radiosurgery, radiotherapy, laser, adenoma, and local excision.

The most active journals producing more than 30 publications were the Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery, Microsurgery, Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Neurosurgery, Laryngoscope, Journal of Endodontics, Colorectal Disease, and Head and Neck-Journal for the Sciences and Specialties of the Head and Neck. Researchers who want to publish manuscripts on this subject can consider these journals. When the journals were evaluated according to the number of citations per article, Journal of Neurosurgery, Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, British Journal of Surgery, Surgical Neurology, Neurosurgery, American Journal of Surgery, Surgical Endoscopy-Ultrasound and Interventional Techniques, Surgical Endoscopy, and Other Interventional Techniques journals came to the fore as the more cited journals. Researchers who want their articles to be cited more can first consider these journals.

When the publication distributions of the world countries were analyzed, we found that developed countries produce the most publications in microsurgery (US, Germany, Italy, UK, France, Japan, Switzerland, Canada, Spain, Netherlands, South Korea, Belgium, Australia, Austria, Taiwan, and Israel) or developing countries with large economies (China, Brazil, Turkey, and Russia). When the relation graph plotted for the correlations was evaluated, countries with HDI 0.88 and above provided remarkable article contributions. Countries with a log (GDP) value of more than 5.6 (about 400,000 GDP) contributed significantly to the attention. Some studies conducted in the literature reported that the economic size or development levels of the countries had a significant effect on academic publication productivity [4-5]. Some cutting points were discussed in our study. When co-authoring cooperation of countries was evaluated, we found that geographical regional neighborhood is an important factor in cooperation.

When the analyzed articles were evaluated according to the total number of citations and the average number of citations per year, the most cited study was Anderson et al.’s study titled “Selective photothermolysis - precise microsurgery by selective absorption of pulsed radiation” published in Science in 1983 [22]. The remaining most cited articles were presented in Table 4 [23-26]. Buess (1984), Winde (1996), Middleton (2005), Heintz (1998), Moore (2008), Lee (2003), Mellgren (2000), and Buess (1992) were cited in all the articles analyzed according to the co-citation analysis findings [14-21]. Researchers interested in this subject should read these studies, which are determined primarily by attribution and co-citation analysis.

In our study, comprehensive bibliometric analyses, such as keyword analysis, citation analysis for articles and journals, international collaborations, and correlation analyses, were performed for the first time in this study. Our study is the most comprehensive research in the literature in which the most articles are analyzed on this subject.

This study has some limitations. It only reviewed the articles published in the WoS database. The PubMed and Scopus databases were not included for analysis. In the bibliometric studies where many articles were analyzed, if multiple databases are used, the same articles (there maybe thousands) in different databases can be included in the analysis twice. This will negatively affect the reliability of the results.

Conclusions

As a result of our study on microsurgery, which has an increase in the number of articles every day in the literature, summary information of 2,063 articles published between 1980 and 2019 was presented. The most active publishing countries were the US, Germany, and Italy. There was a significant correlation between article numbers and countries’ GDP and HDI sizes. The top three journals to publish articles were the Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery, Microsurgery, and Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques. The most active institution was University Gottingen.

The researchers will be able to get ideas for new studies on this subject by evaluating the development of the topics studied by year, the trending topics, and the topics that received more citations. Hence, this study will be a useful guide for clinicians and scientists on the global outcomes of studies on microsurgery.

The content published in Cureus is the result of clinical experience and/or research by independent individuals or organizations. Cureus is not responsible for the scientific accuracy or reliability of data or conclusions published herein. All content published within Cureus is intended only for educational, research and reference purposes. Additionally, articles published within Cureus should not be deemed a suitable substitute for the advice of a qualified health care professional. Do not disregard or avoid professional medical advice due to content published within Cureus.

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Human Ethics

Consent was obtained by all participants in this study

Animal Ethics

Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue.

References

  • 1.The history of microsurgery. Mavrogenis AF, Markatos K, Saranteas T, et al. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2019;29:247–254. doi: 10.1007/s00590-019-02378-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.History of microsurgery—from the beginning until the end of the 1970s. Tamai S. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8441345/ Microsurgery. 1993;14:6–13. doi: 10.1002/micr.1920140105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.The reconstructive microsurgery ladder in orthopaedics. Tintle SM, Levin LS. Injury. 2013;44:376–385. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.A bibliometric analysis of the field of anesthesia during 2009-2018: a bibliometric analysis of anesthesia. Doğan G, Karaca O. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2020;70:140–152. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2020.04.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.A bibliometric analysis of publications on spinal cord injury during 1980-2018. Kiraz M, Demir E. World Neurosurg. 2020;136:504–513. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.01.064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Development of rhinoplasty: yesterday and today. Muslu Ü, Demir E. http://www.discoveryjournals.org/medicalscience/current_issue/v23/n97/A6.pdf Med Sci. 2019;23:294–301. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.The effect of religious beliefs on the publication productivity of countries in circumcision: a comprehensive bibliometric view. Doğan G. J Relig Health. 2020;59:1126–1136. doi: 10.1007/s10943-020-00985-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.The development of necrotizing enterocolitis publications: a holistic evolution of global literature with bibliometric analysis. Doğan G, İpek H. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2019;30:293–303. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-3400514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.The evolution of celiac disease publications: a holistic approach with bibliometric analysis. Demir E, Comba A. Ir J Med Sci. 2020;189:267–276. doi: 10.1007/s11845-019-02080-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bibliometric analysis of publications on house dust mites during 1980-2018. Demir E, Akmeşe ÖF, Erbay H, Taylan-Özkan A, Mumcuoğlu KY. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) 2020;48:374–383. doi: 10.1016/j.aller.2020.01.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Scientometrics. 2010;84:523–538. doi: 10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.World Bank. International Comparison Program database. [May;2020 ];World Bank. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.CD
  • 13.United Nations Development Programme. Human Development Report. [May;2020 ];http://hdr.undp.org/en/2019-report/download Human Development Report. 2019
  • 14.A system for a transanal endoscopic rectum operation [Article in German] Buess G, Hutterer F, Theiss J, Bobel M, Isselhard W, Pichlmaier H. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6510078/ Chirurg. 1984;55:677–680. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Surgical cure for early rectal carcinomas (T1) Winde G, Nottberg H, Keller R, Schmid KW, Bünte H. Dis Colon Rectum. 1996;39:969–976. doi: 10.1007/BF02054683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: a systematic review. Middleton PF, Sutherland LM, Maddern GJ. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15711865/ Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48:270–284. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0804-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Comparison of results after transanal endoscopic microsurgery and radical resection for T1 carcinoma of the rectum. Heintz A, Mörschel M, Junginger T. Surg Endosc. 1998;12:1145–1148. doi: 10.1007/s004649900802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is more effective than traditional transanal excision for resection of rectal masses. Moore JS, Cataldo PA, Osler T, Hyman NH. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51:1026–1031. doi: 10.1007/s10350-008-9337-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Transanal endoscopic microsurgery and radical surgery for T1 and T2 rectal cancer. Lee W, Lee D, Choi S, Chun H. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:1283–1287. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-8814-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Is local excision adequate therapy for early rectal cancer? Mellgren A, Sirivongs P, Rothenberger DA, Madoff RD, García-Aguilar J. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43:1064–1071. doi: 10.1007/BF02236551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Technique and results of transanal endoscopic microsurgery in early rectal cancer. Buess G, Mentges B, Manncke K, Starlinger M, Becker HD. Am J Surg. 1992;163:63–70. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(92)90254-o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Selective photothermolysis: precise microsurgery by selective absorption of pulsed radiation. Anderson RR, Parrish JA. Science. 1983;220:524–527. doi: 10.1126/science.6836297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.NOTES transanal rectal cancer resection using transanal endoscopic microsurgery and laparoscopic assistance. Sylla P, Rattner DW, Delgado S, Lacy AM. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:1205–1210. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-0965-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Transoral laser microsurgery as primary treatment for advanced‐stage oropharyngeal cancer: a United States multicenter study. Haughey BH, Hinni ML, Salassa JR, et al. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21284056/ Head Neck. 2011;33:1683–1694. doi: 10.1002/hed.21669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Forces for morphogenesis investigated with laser microsurgery and quantitative modeling. Hutson MS, Tokutake Y, Chang MS, Bloor JW, Venakides S, Kiehart DP, Edwards GS. Science. 2003;300:145–149. doi: 10.1126/science.1079552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.A predictive model for local recurrence after transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer. Bach SP, Hill J, Monson JRT, et al. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19224520/ Br J Surg. 2009;96:280–290. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES