Abstract
Background
Strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) is an important fruit crop worldwide. It was particularly sensitive to drought stress because of their fibrous and shallow root systems. Mutant rty of Arabidopsis thaliana ROOTY (RTY) results in increased endogenous auxin levels, more roots, and shoot growth. It is still unclear whether the rty gene improves stress tolerance in strawberry.
Results
rty gene was isolated from Arabidopsis thaliana and placed under the control of the cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S promoter in the pBI121-rty binary vector carrying the selectable marker of neomycin phosphotransferase II (NPT II). Seven transgenic lines were confirmed by PCR and western blot analysis. Accumulations of IAA and ABA were significantly increased in the transgenic plants. The endogenous IAA contents were 46.5 ng g− 1 and 66.0 ng g− 1in control and transgenic plants respectively. The endogenous ABA contents in the control plant were 236.3 ng g− 1 and in transgenic plants were 543.8 ng g− 1. The production of adventitious roots and trichomes were enhanced in the transgenic plants. Furthermore, transcript levels of the genes including IAA and ABA biosynthetic, and stress-responsive genes, were higher in the transgenic plants than in the control plants under drought conditions. Water use efficiency and a reduced water loss rate were enhanced in the transgenic strawberry plants. Additionally, peroxidase and catalase activities were significantly higher in the transgenic plants than in the control plants. The experiment results revealed a novel function for rty related to ABA and drought responses.
Conclusions
The rty gene improved hormone-mediated drought tolerance in transgenic strawberry. The heterologous expression of rty in strawberry improved drought tolerance by promoting auxin and ABA accumulation. These phytohormones together brought about various physiological changes that improved drought tolerance via increased root production, trichome density, and stomatal closure. Our results suggested that a transgenic approach can be used to overcome the inherent trade-off between plant growth and drought tolerance by enhancing water use efficiency and reducing water loss rate under water shortage conditions.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12870-021-02839-4.
Keywords: ABA, Arabidopsis thaliana, Drought stress, Heterologous expression, Stomatal closure, Strawberry
Background
Plant hormones regulate myriad aspects of plant growth and development. Auxins are plant growth hormones that cause rapid increases in plant cell wall extensibility, alter ion flux at the plasma membrane, and cause specific changes in gene expression [1]. Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) is a classic plant auxin that regulates embryogenesis, tropic growth, leaf formation, stem elongation, fruit development, and root formation [2–5].
A mutational analysis of Arabidopsis thaliana revealed the importance of auxins in plant growth and development. The aberrant lateral root formation1 (alf1), superroot1 (sur1), and ROOTY mutant (rty) accumulate increased levels of endogenous auxins, which lead to the development of an increased number of roots [6–9]. These observations are consistent with the results of previous studies that established that auxins promote lateral root development [6–8, 10, 11]. In A. thaliana, the rooty (rty) mutation was shown to be allelic to both superroot1 (sur1) and the ethylene-response mutant hookless3 (hls3) [6–8, 12]. rty encodes an aminotransferase or a C-S lyase that catalyzes IAA biosynthesis and may influence auxin transport and increase levels of both free and conjugated IAA [7–9]. The gene expression of rty may clarify its direct or indirect regulation of auxin concentrations and elucidate the effects of this locus on plant growth and development, including the formation of adventitious and lateral roots, as well as the controlled expansion of the shoot [8].
The aminotransferase encoded by rty is also responsive to abscisic acid (ABA), which exhibits increased levels due to crosstalk between the auxin and ABA biosynthesis and metabolism pathways [9]. ABA and IAA functionally interact in roots as regulators of growth, development, and tropisms [9, 12–15].
ABA is a classic stress-associated plant hormone that improves tolerance to abiotic stresses [16]. Drought stress is among the most destructive abiotic stresses in the agricultural industry. Plants often experience seasonal water stress due to variable rainfall [17]. ABA is an important modulator of the drought stress response in plants due to its effects on guard cell development, stomatal aperture closure, and the expression of specific genes associated with drought tolerance [18–21]. The physiological response of plants to drought directly affects growth, productivity, and survival under water shortage conditions [22–24]. Despite the importance of auxin and ABA in the plant’s response to drought stress, little is known of how the rty-encoded aminotransferase influences ABA accumulation, improves drought tolerance, or how variation in ABA accumulation may contribute to environmental adaptation.
Strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.), which is a flavorful and popular fruit crop, is an important source of various minerals and vitamins in the world [25, 26]. The strawberry genome carries eight sets of chromosomes (2n = 8x = 56), which are derived from four diploid ancestors [27]. Because of the superior fruit quality of this hybrid subspecies, it was rapidly distributed around the wide [28]. Cultivated strawberry has grown to be one of the most important fruit crop plants worldwide, with a total annual production of over 8 million tons [29]. Due to their fibrous and shallow root systems, strawberry plants are particularly sensitive to drought stress. It is challenging to cultivate strawberries in drought-prone regions.
In this study, we analyzed the effect of rty on adventitious root development in strawberry. Our data revealed a novel function for rty related to ABA and drought responses, indicating that this gene has roles beyond the regulation of plant growth and development. The heterologous expression of rty enhances plant tolerance to drought stress via the ABA-mediated regulation of stomatal closure in strawberry. These results have potential significance for the cultivation of strawberries in drought-prone regions.
Results
Constitutive heterologous expression of rty increases the ABA and IAA contents
In A. thaliana, rty is a critical regulator of endogenous auxin concentration, with consequences for normal growth and development [6–8]. The RTY gene is located at 8.89 cM between marker SM114 (8.79 cM) and SGCSNP71 (8.94 cM) on chromosome 2 (Fig. 1a). To determine the regulatory effect of rty on adventitious root development in strawberry, rty was introduced into strawberry via Agrobacterium tumefaciens (Fig. 1b). Putatively transformed shoots were identified by screening the culture (Fig. 1c). Seven transgenic lines were confirmed by PCR and western blot analysis (Fig. 1e, f, Additional files 2, 3, 4). The transgenic strawberry plants exhibited strong growth, including broad leaves (Fig. 1d), an increased number of roots (Fig. 2b, c), and leaf trichomes (Fig. 5b, d), but showed reduced tiller number (Fig. 1d, g) compared to the control plants.
The rty gene encodes either a transaminase or a C-S lyase involved in IAA biosynthesis [7–9]. rty appears to be critical for regulating IAA concentrations [6, 7, 9]. Thus, we expected the heterologous expression of rty in strawberry to result in IAA accumulation. Therefore, we assayed the endogenous IAA contents on days 0 and 4 in control and rty transgenic plants cultured on MS medium with no exogenous growth regulators. The concentrations of IAA in the control plants were 46.5 ng g− 1 on day 0 and 72.7 ng g− 1 on day 4, but in transgenic plants were 66.0 and 155.3 ng g− 1 respectively. Additionally, the IAA concentrations in the transgenic plants significantly increased between the two analyzed time-points, whereas the IAA concentration in the control plants only slightly increased (Fig. 1h). Thus, quantification of IAA concentrations revealed that heterologous expression of rty significantly enhanced the accumulation of IAA in the transgenic plants on days 0 and 4.
To clarify whether rty increased ABA levels due to crosstalk between the auxin and ABA biosynthesis and metabolism pathways [9], we next tested the endogenous ABA concentrations. The concentrations of ABA in the control plants were 236.3 ng g− 1 on day 0 and 421.7 ng g− 1 on day 4, but in transgenic plants were 543.8 and 963.4 ng g− 1, respectively. The ABA levels exhibited a similar trend as IAA, with endogenous ABA concentrations being significantly higher in the transgenic plants than in the control plants (Fig. 1i). These data indicate that the heterologous expression of rty in the transgenic strawberry plants stimulated the accumulation of large amounts of IAA and ABA.
High endogenous auxin contents lead to early root development
Endogenous IAA regulates auxin-dependent developmental processes in plants, including adventitious root formation [6–8]. To assess the effects of the increased IAA concentration in the transgenic strawberry plants on root development, we examined the histology of the roots of control and transgenic plants on MS medium with no exogenous growth regulators. The roots exhibited a developmental pattern common among woody perennials. The meristematic tissues, including the exodermis, cortex, and stele, remained undifferentiated on the first day. There were no differences on day 0. Differences in root development between the control and transgenic plants were apparent on day 4. Specifically, in the transgenic plants at this stage, the arched nature of the xylem poles was lost, the periderm formed from the outer layers of the pericycle, and the outer cell layers containing the exodermis, cortex, and endodermis began to break down and rupture, but these phenomena were only observed on day 5 in control plants.
In the control plants on day 4, the primary xylem, primary phloem, and endodermis began to differentiate, and the vascular cambium formed and gave rise to secondary xylem and phloem tissues. Whereas the roots of the transgenic plants were intact on day 5, in control plants, the periderm had formed and the exodermis, cortex, and endodermis had ruptured by this time point (Fig. 2a). On day 9, most transgenic plants had 3–5 roots, whereas the control plants had 1–3 roots (Fig. 2b, c). These results suggest that the high IAA concentrations of the transgenic plants induced early root development and increased the number of roots.
Heterologous expression of rty confers drought tolerance to strawberry
ABA accumulation in plants is expected to induce many drought-resistance mechanisms [21, 30, 31]. To clarify how the increased accumulation of ABA in the transgenic plants enhanced drought tolerance, we compared the effects of a drought treatment on the control and transgenic plants. Specifically, we grew the control and transgenic plants for 2 months in pots and then induced drought conditions by withholding water for 2 weeks. The plants were then rewatered and their growth was monitored for 1 week. The 14-day drought treatment resulted in curled and severely wilted leaves in the control plants, with many leaves withering and falling off the plants. By contrast, the leaves of the transgenic plants were less affected by the exposure to drought stress, with only a few leaves were curled, wilted, or withered (Fig. 3a). Additionally, 80% of the transgenic plants and 2% of the control plants survived the 14-day drought treatment (Fig. 3b). These results suggest that the enhanced drought tolerance of the transgenic plants was likely mediated by an ABA-dependent pathway.
Simultaneously, we measured the soil relative water content during drought stress. Whereas the relative soil water content was 100% in the control and transgenic plants on 0 d (i.e., the day of saturation with water), it was decreased from 19% on day 6 to 5.3% on day 14 in control, but decreased from 20% on day 6 to 6.6% on day14 in transgenic plants (Additional file 5). These data showed that the soil of transgenic plants was wetter by reducing transpiration.
To further characterize the drought tolerance of the transgenic plants, 30-day- old control and transgenic plants on subculture medium were treated with various PEG concentrations (0, 10, 20, and 30%) to simulate drought conditions. After 2 days of treatment with 0% PEG, the transgenic plants displayed no obvious differences from the untransformed control plants. However, after 2 days of treatment, leaves of the control plants began to roll and wilt in response to the 10% PEG treatment, with the rolling and wilting increasing in severity as the concentration of PEG increased to 30%. These symptoms were most severe for the 30% PEG treatment. By contrast, the leaves of the transgenic plants only began to roll and wilt in response to the 20% PEG treatment. The transgenic plants displayed less rolling and wilting than the control plants, even under 30% PEG conditions (Fig. 3c).
The ability of the control and transgenic plants treated with PEG to scavenge reactive oxygen species (ROS) was assessed by examining the activities of two key antioxidant enzymes (POD and CAT), which are known ROS scavengers. CAT activity was considerably higher in the transgenic plants than in the control plants. Additionally, the PEG treatment significantly enhanced the POD activity of the transgenic plants, ultimately resulting in significantly higher POD activity in the transgenic than control plants (Fig. 3d, e).
To explore the molecular mechanisms underlying the increased drought tolerance of the transgenic plants heterologously expressing rty, we analyzed the expression of stress-responsive genes during the PEG treatment using an RT-qPCR analysis. Specifically, we analyzed the expression of the following drought-responsive genes, involved in ABA biosynthesis, catabolism, transport, and signaling: NCED3 (nine cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase 3) [32], ABI1 (ABA insensitive 1) [33], RD29A (responsive to dehydration 29) [34], DREB2A (dehydration responsive element-binding protein 2A) [35], and PP2C (type-2C protein phosphatase) [36]. The expression of RD29A (a stress-responsive marker), and DREB2A (a regulator of many water stress-inducible genes) during PEG treatment was upregulated to a greater extent in the transgenic plants than in the control plants (Additional file 6). The stress-responsive genes were likewise more responsive to drought stress in the transgenic plants than in the control plants, suggesting that stress signals are somehow amplified in rty, triggering a stronger drought response (Additional file 6). These results suggest that heterologous expression of rty in strawberry may decrease ROS accumulation by enhancing antioxidant enzyme activities.
The water loss rate is lower in the transgenic plants than in the wild-type plants
To investigate the effects of heterologous expression of rty on the physiological status of strawberry plants, we analyzed the water loss rate, water use efficiency, and electrolyte leakage of the transgenic and control plants. The water loss rate of leaves of one-month-old plants at same position excised from three transgenic plants was lower than that of leaves from the control plants (Fig. 4a). The water use efficiency of leaves from two-month-old transgenic plants grown in pots in the greenhouse was higher than that of the control plants (Fig. 4b). Moreover, the electrolyte leakage from fresh leaves was lower in transgenic plants than in the control plants (Fig. 4c), likely due to the transgenic plants having less cell membrane damage. The differences in the water loss rate, electrolyte leakage, and water use efficiency between the control and transgenic plants may contribute to the improved drought tolerance of the transgenic plants heterologously expressing rty.
Transgenic plants heterologously expressing rty have increased ABA-induced stomatal closure
Previous research indicates that ABA is an important inducer of stomatal closure, preventing water loss and thereby contributing to drought tolerance [18, 37]. We thus compared the stomatal aperture sizes of transgenic and control plants following ABA treatment. Scanning electron microscopy revealed that the percentage of closed stomata was almost two-fold higher in the transgenic plants than in the control plants (Fig. 5a, c). There were no significant differences in the average number of stomata between the control and transgenic plants. Thus, the observed reduced water loss rate and increased water use efficiency of the transgenic plants compared to the control plants were likely not due to differences in the number of stomata but to variability in stomatal closure (Fig. 5c).
To assess whether ABA induced stomatal closure differently in the transgenic plants, we compared the effects of exogenous ABA addition with that of mock. The average width of transgenic plant stomatal apertures was significantly smaller than that of the control plants for untreated (CK), mock-treated, or 20-μM ABA-treated plants. However, the width of stomatal apertures was more severely reduced for plants subjected to the 20-μM ABA treatment (Fig. 5e, Additional file 7). Thus, the transgenic plants heterologously expressing rty exhibited increased ABA-induced stomatal closure.
Trichomes affect the optical properties of the leaf surface and may protect plants from stress damage and reduced water loss through decreasing the rate of transpiration [38–40]. In the current study, we revealed that the density and number of epidermal trichomes on the abaxial side of leaves were higher in the transgenic plants than in the control plants. The abaxial surface per unit area of transgenic and control leaves were an average of 50 and 30 epidermal trichomes per unit area, respectively (Fig. 5b, d). The greater abundance of epidermal trichomes on the transgenic leaves may have aided in the increase in drought tolerance through reducing water loss and decreasing the rate of transpiration. These results suggest that the increase in drought tolerance is due to an increased number of epidermal trichomes and increased endogenous ABA concentrations, leading to smaller stomates.
Expression of auxin biosynthetic and signaling genes is upregulated in transgenic plants
To determine the molecular mechanisms underlying the phenotypic differences between the control and transgenic plants, we compared the IAA contents of the control and transgenic plants during drought treatment. The concentrations of IAA in the control plants were 31.8 ng g− 1 on day 0, 36.5 ng g− 1 on day 4, and 36.7 ng g− 1 on day 8, but in transgenic plants were 43.0, 46.2, and 40.1 ng g− 1, respectively. The IAA content was always higher in the transgenic plants than in the control plants during drought treatment (Fig. 6). However, these results indicated that the IAA content in the transgenic and control plants did not increase during drought treatment.
To clarify the mechanism underlying the IAA content difference between the control and transgenic plants, we examined the expression levels of IAA biosynthetic and signaling genes, including PIN1, AAO1, ARF7, MIX2, YUC1, YUC3, and GA3ox. RT-qPCR analysis indicated that drought treatment upregulated the expression of the IAA biosynthetic and signaling genes in the transgenic plants.
These results suggest that the heterologous expression of rty in transgenic plants induced the expression of IAA biosynthetic and signaling genes, which in turn increased IAA accumulation. Furthermore, the increased ABA levels during drought treatment (Fig. 6) likely influence the observed production of additional roots (Fig. 2b, c) and trichomes (Fig. 5b, d) in the transgenic plants.
Expression of stress-inducible genes and ABA biosynthetic genes is upregulated in the transgenic plants
Under drought conditions, ABA concentrations increase to a specific threshold by midday, inducing ion efflux and inhibiting sugar uptake by guard cells, after which the stomatal apertures decrease in size for the rest of the day [41]. To elucidate the role of ABA during stress responses, we compared the ABA contents of the two-month-old control and transgenic plants following a drought treatment. The concentrations of ABA in the control were 334.0 ng g− 1 on day 0, 1017.2 ng g− 1 on day 4, and 2635.3 ng g− 1 on day 8, but in transgenic plants were 939.3, 1083.7, and 3471.3 ng g− 1, respectively. The ABA concentration was significantly higher at 8 days after initiating the drought treatment in both the control and transgenic plants, but was 1.3-fold higher in the transgenic plants (Fig. 7).
To determine the molecular mechanisms underlying this difference in ABA contents between the control and transgenic plants, we examined the expression of genes involved in ABA biosynthesis, catabolism, transport, and signaling, as well as drought-responsive genes, including the following: NCED3 [32], ABI1 [33], RD29A [34], DREB2A [35], and PP2C [36]. Water deficit stress promotes ABA biosynthesis via the upregulated expression of NCED3 [42]. RT-qPCR analysis indicated that the NCED3 transcript levels were significantly higher at 8 days after starting the drought treatment, with the increase being more pronounced in transgenic plants, implying that this gene was actively expressed. Additionally, the expression levels of the ABA-inducible marker genes (RD29A and DREB2A), ABA biosynthetic genes (ABI1, ABA8, and PYL9), a stomatal closure-responsive gene (PP2C), and MYB44 were higher in the transgenic plants than in the control plants during the drought treatment (Fig. 7). High PP2C and MYB44 transcript levels may induce stomatal closure [36].
Thus, the heterologous expression of rty in strawberry plants considerably increased ABA accumulation. The expression of stress-inducible genes and ABA biosynthetic genes may then trigger stomatal closure via an ABA-dependent pathway, which may contribute to the observed drought tolerance of the transgenic plants.
Discussion
The rty gene improves hormone-mediated drought tolerance in plants (Fig. 8). In plants, rty promotes IAA and ABA accumulation [12, 14, 15]. The transcript levels of IAA biosynthetic genes, including AAO1, YUC1, and YUC3, increase auxin accumulation [43]. The auxin induces transcripts of related response genes including PIN1 and ARF7, and the products of excess roots and increases the density of leaf trichomes, which keep moisture retention [44, 45]. The transcript levels of ABA biosynthetic genes including ABI1 and ABA8, improve ABA accumulation [33, 46]. The ABA induces transcripts of related response genes including PYL9 and PP2C, and promotes stomatal closure in the plants, which increase the water use efficiency and decreased the water loss rate [47, 48]. Plant photosynthesis, respiration, and transpiration are all affected by the rty gene. These changes contributed to the increased tolerance of the plants to drought stress [49–53]. In this study, we demonstrated that the heterologous expression of rty in strawberry improved drought tolerance by promoting auxin and ABA accumulation. These phytohormones together brought about various physiological changes that improved drought tolerance, such as increased root production, trichome density, and stomatal closure.
Heterologous expression of rty increases the drought tolerance of transgenic strawberry plants
Transgenic strawberry plants heterologously expressing rty exhibited a strong growth potential (Fig. 1d), and produced more roots (Fig. 2b, c) and leaf trichomes (Fig. 5b, d), but fewer tillers (Fig. 1g), than the control plants. Measurement of IAA concentrations revealed that the heterologous expression of rty significantly increased the IAA levels in transgenic strawberry plants (Fig. 1h). The high IAA contents of the transgenic strawberry plants resulted in earlier root development and increased numbers of roots. These dominant effects were consistent with the general functions of rty in A. thaliana. Moreover, rty expression appears to be critical for regulating IAA concentrations in A. thaliana. A recessive rty mutation also yields high endogenous IAA concentrations. The most extreme phenotypic effects of rty expression are the proliferation of adventitious roots, lateral roots, and the restriction of shoot development. These phenotypes are most likely caused by increases in auxin concentrations [6–8, 10, 12]. Thus, rty plays a critical role in regulating endogenous auxin concentrations to facilitate normal growth and development.
In the current study, we revealed a hitherto unknown function of rty related to drought tolerance, revealing that heterologous expression of this mutant gene increases ABA concentrations in response to drought stress. Thus, rty helps regulate plant growth and development as well as responses to abiotic stress conditions. Specifically, the heterologous expression of rty significantly increased the ABA content of the transgenic plants (Fig. 1i). The transgenic plants had a lower water loss rate, exhibited less electrolyte leakage, and had higher water use efficiency than the untransformed controls (Fig. 4). The observed accumulation of ABA in the transgenic plants in response to drought treatment suggested that the increased drought tolerance of the transgenic plants was mediated by an ABA-dependent pathway.
Previous reports have indicated that ABA is important for stomatal closure, which limits water loss and enhances drought tolerance [18, 54]. Because ABA helps regulate stomatal closure [55], we speculate that rty expression maintains narrower stomatal apertures in plants exposed to drought stress, which reduces water loss through transpiration. We determined that the heterologous expression of rty in strawberry likely increases the sensitivity of the transgenic plants to ABA and improves their tolerance to drought stress.
rty expression promotes drought stress responses via ABA-regulated stomatal closure
Plant drought responses involve a complex process regulated by multiple molecular and cellular pathways. The expression levels of some genes are upregulated or downregulated by exposure to abiotic stresses, and the heterologous expression of these genes can increase the tolerance of transgenic plants to drought or salt stress [56–59]. Consistent with this, our results indicated that the eheterologous expression of rty has critical effects on strawberry drought responses. Specifically, heterologous expression of rty increased the tolerance of the transgenic strawberry plants to drought stress. Moreover, the transgenic plants produced more leaf trichomes and had a higher percentage of closed stomata and smaller stomatal apertures compared to the control plants (Fig. 5, Additional file 7). When plants are subjected to drought stress, some physiological factors (e.g., electrolyte leakage and POD and CAT activities) may be quickly activated to enable these plants to survive under extreme environmental conditions [60–63]. Thus, physiological indices related to plant osmotic stress caused by drought may be useful measures for quickly and accurately assessing plant resistance to abiotic stress. Electrolyte leakage, which reflects the degree of cell membrane damage [60], was higher in the leaves of control plants than in those of the transgenic plants (Fig. 4). The results suggested that heterologous expression of rty may strengthen the plant cell membrane integrity in response to drought stress. Furthermore, POD and CAT are vital antioxidant enzymes that protect plants from abiotic stress damage [64, 65]. In this study, we established that CAT and POD were more active in the transgenic plants than in the control plants (Fig. 3d, e). This information may be useful for clarifying the mechanism underlying the increased drought tolerance of the transgenic plants.
In A. thaliana, many positive and negative regulators have been identified and characterized as key components of ABA biosynthesis and drought signaling [18, 66]. Biotic stresses upregulate the expression of several ABA biosynthetic genes [67–72]. Water stress-induced ABA accumulation is preceded by significant increases in Phaseolus vulgaris CED1 transcript and protein levels in the leaves and roots [42, 73, 74]. In A. thaliana, of the five NCED genes involved in ABA biosynthesis, the expression of only AtNCED3 is strongly induced by dehydration, although a minor increase in the expression of the other NCED genes has also been reported [42, 74, 75]. Additionally, AtNCED3 overexpression in transgenic A. thaliana plants increased the ABA content and desiccation tolerance [42]. Similarly, in the current study, some ABA biosynthetic and abiotic stress-responsive genes, including RD29A, DREB2A, NCED3, ABI1, ABA8, PYL9, and PP2C [67–71, 76–78], were more highly expressed in the transgenic plants than in the control plants under drought conditions (Figs. 6, 7). These results imply that the increased tolerance of the transgenic plants to drought stress may be influenced by the upregulated expression of these genes in response to drought conditions. Further study will focus on the how rty interacts with these ABA biosynthetic pathways and with stress-induced signal transduction during the plant’s response to drought stress. In addition to providing a foundation for future studies of drought stress tolerance, the results presented here may be used to develop genetically modified strawberry varieties with improved drought tolerance.
Conclusion
In this study, rty gene was isolated from Arabidopsis thaliana and placed under the control of the cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S promoter in the pBI121-rty binary vector carrying the selectable marker of neomycin phosphotransferase II (NPT II). Transgenic strawberry plants were confirmed by PCR and western blot analysis. The transgenic strawberry plants induced IAA accumulation and increased the production of adventitious roots as well as trichomes on the abaxial leaf surface. Also, the ABA accumulation increased stomatal closure in the transgenic strawberry plants. This enhanced water use efficiency, reduced water loss rate, and improved more drought tolerant. A novel function was revealed for rty related to ABA and drought responses. Transgenic approaches can be used to overcome the inherent trade-off between plant growth and drought tolerance by enhancing water use efficiency and reducing water loss rate under water shortage conditions. This study provides the basis for future genetic modifications of strawberry to improve drought tolerance.
Methods
Vector construction for heterologous expression of rty
A previous study [8] and BLAST analysis (GenBank accession: AY050987) suggested that rty encodes an aminotransferase or a C-S lyase that catalyzes IAA biosynthesis. To functionally characterize rty in strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa), we created an overexpression construct by PCR-based cloning. A cDNA fragment from an A. thaliana mutant (Stock Number CS8156 from Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center) containing the entire rty coding region was amplified as previously described [69]. The PCR products and the pBI121 vector were digested with Sma I and Sac I endonucleases, and the digested PCR and vector products were then ligated with T4 DNA ligase (Promega Corporation, Madison, USA). rty gene was isolated from Arabidopsis thaliana and placed under the control of the cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S promoter in the pBI121-rty binary vector carrying the selectable marker of neomycin phosphotransferase II.
Heterologous expression of rty in strawberry plants
A strawberry cultivar ‘Honeoye’ (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) were used as the experiment materials. The strawberry cultivar ‘Honeoye’ was developed at Cornell University by plant breeders at the New York State Agricultural Experiment Station and released in 1979. ‘Honeoye’ was introduced to China as commercial cultivar in 1983. The pBI121-rty binary vector was transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101 using a freeze-thaw procedure [79]. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of ‘Honeoye’ strawberry was carried out according to the protocol of Jin and Wang [80]. The leaf disc method was used to transform strawberry. The leaves of sterile seedlings subcultured for 25–30 days were cut into 3–5 mm2 leaf discs. Agrobacterium tumefaciens LBA4404 carrying the target gene was cultured in liquid LB medium containing 100 mg L− 1 kanamycin at 28 °C for 16 h. The leaf discs were placed in this culture for 5 min, transferred to regeneration MS medium (Murashige and Skoog, 1962) containing 6-BA 3.0 mg L− 1 and 2, 4 - D 0.1 mg L− 1, cultured in darkness for 1 d; and then transferred to regeneration medium containing 400 mg L− 1 cephalosporin and 5 mg L− 1 kanamycin, at 25 ± 1 °C, a light cycle of 16 h, and a light intensity of 30 μmol m− 1 s− 1. After 30 days of culture on subculture medium (MS + 6-BA 0.2 mg L− 1 + IBA 0.1 mg L− 1), the shoots of 3 ~ 5 cm in height had formed and these were rooted on root medium (1/2 MS + IBA 0.2 mg L− 1). Kanamycin-resistant plants were further confirmed by a PCR-based assay using NPTII and rty genespecific primers (Table 1). Western blot analysis was used to verify that the target protein was produced in the transgenic plants, which were then used for subsequent analyses [86]. Untransformed strawberry was used as the control for analysis of drought stress.
Table 1.
Gene | Accession | Primer Sequence (5′ → 3′) a | Protein | Ortholog gene in Arabidopsis | Function | Reference (s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
rty | AY050987 |
F: AAGCTTATGAGC GAAGAACAACCACACGC R: GAGCTCTTACAT TTCGAGATTATTATCACTC |
tyrosine aminotransferase | AT2G20610 | Regulation of cell growth by extracellular stimulus, glucosinolate biosynthetic process, adventitious root development, indoleacetic acid biosynthetic process | [6] |
NPTII | AAL92039 |
F: CCGGTATAAAGGGACCACCT R: ATGTTGCTGTCTCCCAGGTC |
neomycin phosphotransferase II | – | Neomycin phosphotransferase II as selectable markers in transformed plant screening | [81] |
Actin | XM_004306544 |
F: GGCCGTTCTCTCTCTGTATGC R: TTCTGGGCACCTGAATCTC |
Actin | – | Actin | [29] |
FvRD29A | XM_011472069 |
F: AGAGGCACGCCACGAATA R: GCCAGTTTGGTCCTTGCT |
Cold regulated protein | AT5G52310 | Responded to abscisic acid, cold, desiccation, mannitol, osmotic stress, reactive oxygen species, salt stress, water deprivation, and wounding | [34] |
FvNCED3 | XM_004300619 |
F: TCACCACAAGAGATTCCTTTCT R: ATGGCTGTGAGTAGGTTGGA |
Encodes 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase | AT3G14440 | Regulated in response to drought and salinity | [32] |
FvDREB2A | XM_004307642 |
F: TGCTGCGAGTCTACTACGATGTCT R: TGATCCATAGGAACCTCGCTTT |
Encodes a transcription factor binds to DRE/CRT cis elements | AT5G05410 | Regulates expression of many water stress–inducible genes. | [35] |
FvABA8 | XM_004300635 |
F: ATGGAACTACTCAGCCTCAACT R: ATGGCGAGCGGAAATGAG |
Encodes a protein with ABA 8′-hydroxylase | AT4G19230 | Involved in ABA catabolism. | [46] |
FvABI1 | XM_011469096 |
F: GCATGGCTAAAGCTAGTAACAGAC R: GCTCCTCCAGTGTTATCTTCTTGT |
Protein phosphatase 2C family protein | AT4G26080 | Involved in abscisic acid (ABA) signal transduction | [33] |
FvPYL9 | XM_004306638 |
F: GGGAGTCTTAGGGAAGTGAATG R: GGATGGACGGTGATAATAGAAGAG |
Encodes regulatory components of ABA receptor | AT1G01360 | Interacts with and regulates the type 2C protein phosphatases (PP2Cs). | [78] |
FvPP2C | XM_004291463 |
F: ACGAAATATGCCGAGAAGCGAAAG R: TTGGCGGAAATCGTTAGGCTCAT |
Encodes a member of the group A protein phosphatase 2C | At1g07430 | Negative regulation of abscisic acid-activated signaling pathway. | [36] |
FvAAO1 | XM_004296223 |
F: TCAACCGCTGCTCCATCACG R: GTCGGTCAGTGGTGTTTTGGGC |
Encodes aldehyde oxidase 1 | AT5G20960 | Involved abscisic acid biosynthetic process, auxin biosynthetic process. | [76] |
FvPIN1 | XM_004303589 |
F: CAAAGCCGCAAAGATAGAGCC R: TGGGATGCCCTGACCTGAT |
Encodes an auxin efflux carrier involved in shoot and root development | AT1G73590 | Involved in the maintenance of embryonic auxin gradients | [82] |
FvARF7 | XM_004287612 |
F:ACAATCACTGGCATTAGCGAGC R: GAGGTGGGCAGATGTAGAAAGG |
Encodes an auxin-regulated transcriptional activator | AT5G20730 | Involved in auxin-activated signaling pathway, lateral root development, lateral root formation. | [83] |
FvMAX2 | XM_011468656 |
F:ACTGTGGCGATTTGACGGAT R: CCACAACAAAGAAGCCAGCGT |
F-box leucine-rich repeat family of proteins | AT2G42620 | Responses to abiotic stress conditions. | [84] |
FvYUC1 | JF898837 |
F: CAAATGGTTGGAAAGGTGAGC R: CGAGGACATTGAGCGGTGTTGGA |
Encodes a member of the YUC family | AT4G32540 | Involved in auxin biosynthetic process. | [72] |
FvYUC3 | JX417080 |
F: ATTTCCCAACCTACCCAACC R: AGTCTTGACGAGCCAAAGTC |
Encodes a member of the YUC family | AT1G04610 | Involved in auxin biosynthetic process, oxidation-reduction process, response to ethylene. | [72] |
FvGA3ox | XM_004302902 |
F: CCTGTAAGAATCTCCGAAGCC R: CGTGTAGTGAGTTGAAGTCTGC |
gibberellin 3-beta-dioxygenase activity, | AT1G15550 | Involved in later steps of the gibberellic acid biosynthetic pathway. | [85] |
aF forward primer, R reverse primer. Underlined characters indicate the restriction enzyme cutting site
The root and leaf tissues of the control and transgenic plants cultured on subculture medium MS + 6-BA 0.2 mg L− 1 + IBA 0.1 mg L− 1 were placed in liquid nitrogen and ground in a mortar. Immediately after evaporation of the liquid nitrogen, 2 mL of extraction buffer containing 50 mmol L− 1 Tris, 50 mmol L− 1 EDTA, 100 mmol L− 1 KCL, 2 mmol L− 1 dithiothreitol (DTT), 2 mmol L− 1 PMSF, and 10% (w/v) glycerine (pH 7.5), was added. Samples were extracted for 2 h at 0 °C and then centrifuged at 12,000×g for 15 min at 4 °C. The concentration of protein in the supernatant was determined using the Bradford assay. All samples were stored at − 70 °C. After SDS-PAGE separation, the resolved proteins were electroblotted to a PVDF membrane. Electroblotted membranes were subjected to western blot analysis using anti-rty serum (Beijing Protein Innovation Co., Ltd., China). To increase the serum specificity, the Atrty protein secondary structure, tertiary structure, hydrophobicity, antigenicity, and specificity were analyzed. Recombinantly expressed rty protein (1–131 aa) was used as the immunogen to generate antibody (Additional file 1). Membranes were then treated with alkaline phosphatase-labelled protein and goat anti-rabbit antibody (Jinqiao, Co., Ltd., Beijing, China), and then dyed with BeyoECL Plus kit (Beyotime Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China).
Quantitative analysis of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) and abscisic acid (ABA)
Three independent transgenic lines 3, 6, and 8 were examined for all physiology and molecular assays (Fig. 1e). The data from transgenic plants in this study are the average of these three independent lines. Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) and abscisic acid (ABA) content in tissues of the control and transgenic plants were assessed by high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry according to the method of Pan et al. [87]. One-month-old control and transgenic plants were inoculated on subculture medium for 4 days with no exogenous growth regulators. The first day after inoculating on subculture medium was defined as day 0. Basic shoot segments (~ 0.4 cm) of control and transgenic plants were sampled on days 0 and 4. Around 50 mg of fresh samples was frozen in liquid nitrogen, ground to powder, and transferred to 2-mL screw-cap tubes. Metabolites were immediately extracted from the powdered tissue by adding 500 μl extraction solvent (2-propanol: H2O: concentrated HCl, 2:1:0.002, v/v/v), to each tube on a shaker at a speed of 100 rpm for 30 min at 4 °C after the addition of stable isotopes, which were used for isotope dilution-based quantification. Samples were re-extracted by adding 1 mL dichloromethane and spun at a speed of 100 rpm for 30 min at 4 °C. Samples were then centrifuged at 4 °C in an Avanti J-26XP centrifuge at 13,000×g for 5 min (Beckman Coulter, USA). Two phases formed during centrifugation, with a layer of plant debris between the layers. An aliquot of ~ 900 μL from the lower phase was transferred to a screw-cap vial using a Pasteur pipette and concentrated using a nitrogen evaporator. Solids were redissolved in 0.1 mL methanol and centrifuged at 13,000×g for 5 min at 4 °C. An aliquot of 50 μl of the resulting supernatant was injected into an Agilent 1260 Infinity series HPLC system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) for chromatographic separation before detection by tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) using an AB SCIEX QTRAP 5500 LC/MS/MS System (AB SCIEX Deutschland GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany).
Histological observations
Histological observations of root development were conducted. One-month-old control and transgenic plants were cultured on subculture medium (MS + 6-BA 0.2 mg L− 1 + IBA 0.1 mg L− 1) for 0–9 days. About 0.2 cm basic shoot segments of control and transgenic plants were sampled every day. The samples were fixed in formaldehyde-acetic acid fixative solution (50% ethanol-formalin-acetic acid =18:1:1) for 48 h. The next method was performed as previously described [88].
Drought treatment
The transgenic and control plants were subjected to a drought tolerance test. Pots (16 × 16 cm) with the same volume of nutrient soil (peat soil: field soil: vermiculite at 1: 1: 1) per pot. After saturation with 0.8 L of water, the 30-day-old control and transgenic plants cultured on root medium were planted in pots (one plant per pot). Two month later, these plants were subjected to drought stress by withholding water for 14 days after saturation with 0.8 L of water. About seventy-eight pots of control and transgenic plants were analyzed per treatment, respectively. The pot positions were often changed to minimize the effects of environmental variability in the greenhouse. Leaves were sampled every 2 days during the drought stress treatment. Three pots were sampled. For the drought treatment, the relative water content was measured every 2 days using a Soil Temperature/Moisture Meter L99-TWS-1(Shanghai Danding International Trade Co., Ltd). Before the drought treatment, the mixed vermiculite and soil was saturated with 0.8 L water. The soil water content before drought was set to 100%, while the relative soil water content after the 14-day drought treatment was ∼6%. Additionally, plants were rewatered after the 14-day drought treatment and the survival rate was calculated 7 days later.
Simulated drought stress with PEG 8000
Polyethylene glycol (PEG)-infused medium was prepared as described by Verslues et al [89]. Because PEG cannot be dissolved in agar before pouring medium, PEG-infused medium was prepared by pouring a liquid medium containing PEG on top of the solidified agar. An aliquot of 5 mmol L− 1 MES was added to stabilize the pH of the medium (to pH 5.7) and to avoid having to adjust the pH after adding PEG. An appropriate volume of ½ MS containing 15 g L− 1 agar and 5 mmol L− 1 MES was prepared for the agar medium. While the agar medium was still hot, an equal volume of agar medium was divided into the glass flasks, autoclaved, and then frozen. An appropriate volume of ½ MS liquid medium containing 5 mmol L− 1 MES (to pH 5.7) was then prepared. Solid PEG 8000 (Sigma Catalog number P-2139) was weighed out at 10, 20, 30% (w/v) into the liquid medium after autoclaving, while it was still hot. The PEG- infused liquid medium was filter sterilized with a 0.45 μm filter. The 0.04 L volume of PEG- liquid medium was pipetted on top of the glass flasks containing solidified agar. The 0.06 L volume of liquid medium was pipetted on top of the glass flasks containing solidified agar, as the 0 treatment. The agar was added to the PEG liquid medium at a ratio of 2:3. The glass flasks were allowed to equilibrate for 24 h at room temperature. Before use, the PEG liquid medium was poured off, careful not to dislodge the agar which may no longer be tightly adhered to the bottom of the glass flasks. Thirty-day-old control and transgenic plants heterologously expressing rty on subculture medium were transferred to glass flasks containing 0% (CK), 10, 20, and 30% PEG-infused medium at 21 °C in a temperature-controlled growth room with a 16-h light/8-h dark photoperiod. Forty-eight hours later, the treated plants were observed, photographed, sampled, and subjected to RT-qPCR and antioxidant enzyme activity analyses.
Gas exchange measurements and water loss
Photosynthetic parameters were measured as described by Zhao et al. [31]. Three independent the control and transgenic plants were analyzed and the experiment was replicated. Gas exchange measurements were taken with the LI-6400 (LI-6400, Li-Cor, USA). Every three mature and fully expanded leaves from three transgenic plants and wild type with good growth status and proper position were randomly sampled. The measurements were taken on two hourly basis from 8:00 to 16:00 in the clear day of April 24–25, 2017. Water Use Efficiency (WUE) was calculated the ratio net photosynthetic rate divided by transpiration rate [90]. To assess the water loss, leaves of one-month-old plants from the same position were weighed with an electronic scale, and then placed in a glass culture dish on a layer of filter paper and weighed every hour.
Measurement of antioxidant enzyme activities
To measure antioxidant enzyme activities, fresh leaves (0.2 g) from the control and transgenic plants were cut into small pieces and ground with a mortar and pestle on ice, in a solution comprising 1 mL 0.05 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.8), 3 g polyvinylpyrrolidone, and 0.1 g quartz sand. The mortar was washed twice with 2 mL phosphate buffer (pH 7.8). The resulting solution was poured into a 10-mL centrifuge tube for a final volume of 7 mL with phosphate buffer (pH 7.8). The tube was centrifuged at 2500×g for 20 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was collected, topped up to 10 mL with phosphate buffer (pH 7.8), and used as the enzyme solution for the subsequent analysis of antioxidant enzyme activities. Specifically, catalase (CAT) activity was assayed at 240 nm. The sample was assayed again 1 min later. The peroxidase (POD) activity in a 0.5-mL aliquot of the enzyme solution was determined at 470 nm. The sample was assayed again 1 min later. The CAT and POD activities were calculated as described by Zhao et al [31].
Analysis of stomatal closure and plant trichomes by scanning electron microscopy
A hole puncher (0.5 cm diameter) was used to collect leaf discs from two-month-old control and transgenic plants at 8 h, 10 h, 12 h, 14 h, 16 h, and 18 h. The collected samples were immediately fixed for 24 h in fixing solution (90 mL of 50% [v/v] ethanol, 5 mL glacial acetic acid, 5 mL formaldehyde) (using a vacuum pump to remove the gas attached to the tissue surface). The leaf discs were dehydrated with 70, 80, 90, 95, and 100% ethanol for 15–20 min, respectively, and then dried with CO2 and coated on film. The stomatal and plant trichomes were observed and photographed with a Hitachi S-4800 scanning electron microscopy system. Three biological replicates were performed.
For ABA-induced stomatal closure, leaf discs were obtained with a hole puncher (0.5 cm diameter) from four different two-month-old plants at 12:00 and were then incubated in stomatal opening solution (50 mmol L− 1 KCl, 10 mmol L− 1 CaCl2, and 10 mmol L− 1 MES (pH 6.15)) for 2 h in a growth chamber with a light intensity of 130 mmol m− 2 s− 1 at 22 °C. Aliquots of 20 μmol L− 1 ABA (dissolved in absolute ethanol) or mock (the same volume of absolute ethanol) were added to the opening solution, and the leaf discs were incubated for an additional 2 h. Then, all samples were immediately fixed, dehydrated, dried, and coated. Three images of CK (not treated with stomatal opening solution and ABA), ABA-treated, or mock-treated leaf discs were obtained using scanning electron microscopy. The stomatal apertures (widths and lengths) of 60 stomata were measured per leaf disc. The mean stomatal apertures were determined based on measurements from four leaf discs.
Measurement of electrolyte leakage
To examine electrolyte leakage, fresh leaves (0.2 g) from control and transgenic plants (one-month-old plants cultured on subculture medium) were cut into smaller pieces and placed in a glass tube containing 10 mL deionized water. The samples were mixed on a gyratory shaker (at about 150 rpm) for 6 h at room temperature. After the initial conductivity (Ci) was measured with a DDS-307A conductivity meter (Leici), the samples were boiled for 20 min to release the electrolytes into the solution. After the samples were cooled to room temperature, the conductivity of the dead tissue (Cmax) was measured. Relative electrolyte leakage was calculated as (Ci/Cmax) × 100%.
Reverse transcription quantitative PCR analysis
The expression levels of specific genes in the control and transgenic plants were analyzed using a reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) assay. Total RNA and cDNA were prepared as previously described [91]. RT-qPCR primer sequences are provided in Table 1. Two independent biological replicates and three technical replicates were performed. The resulting data were analyzed according to the 2−ΔΔCt method as outlined by Livak and Schmittgen [92]. The expression levels of specific genes were normalized against the Actin expression level.
Supplementary Information
Acknowledgments
We are thankful to professor Hui Zhang and Dr. Zhen Xue from Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences for their assistance with the experiment.
Authors’ contributions
WJ designed research; ML, YY, SY, HW, JD, HZ, JL, and CZ performed research; WJ, ML, YY, SY, YZ, AR, and GW analyzed data; WJ, AR, and ML wrote the paper. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
This study was supported by National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2019YFD1000800), the Beijing Innovation of Science and Technology (No. KJCX20200205, KJCX202000602), and the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (No. 679303). The funding body has no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis and interpretation of data, and in writing the manuscript.
Availability of data and materials
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the published article and its supplementary data files (Figs. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 and Additional files 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7). The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author Wanmei Jin.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Jones AM, Im KH, Savka MA, Wu MJ, DeWitt NG, Shillito R, Binns AN. Auxin-dependent cell expansion mediated by overexpressed auxin-binding protein 1. Science. 1998;282(5391):1114–1117. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5391.1114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Calderon Villalobos LI, Lee S, De Oliveira C, Ivetac A, Brandt W, Armitage L, Sheard LB, Tan X, Parry G, Mao H, et al. A combinatorial TIR1/AFB-aux/IAA co-receptor system for differential sensing of auxin. Nat Chem Biol. 2012;8(5):477–485. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Charlton W. Lateral root initiation. Plant roots, the hidden half. 1996;24:149–73.
- 4.Davies PJ. “Plant hormones, physiology, biochemistry and molecular biology,”. Netherlands: Springer Science & Business Media; 2013.
- 5.Laskowski MJ, Williams ME, Nusbaum HC, Sussex IM. Formation of lateral root meristems is a two-stage process. Development. 1995;121(10):3303–3310. doi: 10.1242/dev.121.10.3303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Boerjan W, Cervera MT, Delarue M, Beeckman T, Dewitte W, Bellini C, Caboche M, Van Onckelen H, Van Montagu M, Inze D. Superroot, a recessive mutation in Arabidopsis, confers auxin overproduction. Plant Cell. 1995;7(9):1405–1419. doi: 10.1105/tpc.7.9.1405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Brumos J, Bobay BG, Clark CA, Alonso JM, Stepanova AN. Structure-function analysis of interallelic complementation in ROOTY transheterozygotes. Plant Physiol. 2020;183:1110–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 8.King JJ, Stimart DP, Fisher RH, Bleecker AB. A mutation altering Auxin homeostasis and plant morphology in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 1995;7(12):2023–2037. doi: 10.2307/3870148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rock CD, Sun X. Crosstalk between ABA and auxin signaling pathways in roots of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. Planta. 2005;222(1):98–106. doi: 10.1007/s00425-005-1521-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Celenza JL, Jr, Grisafi PL, Fink GR. A pathway for lateral root formation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genes Dev. 1995;9(17):2131–2142. doi: 10.1101/gad.9.17.2131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Buezo J, Esteban R, Cornejo A, Lopez-Gomez P, Marino D, Chamizo-Ampudia A, Gil MJ, Martinez-Merino V, Moran JF. IAOx induces the SUR phenotype and differential signalling from IAA under different types of nitrogen nutrition in Medicago truncatula roots. Plant Sci. 2019;287:110176. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2019.110176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kong W, Li Y, Zhang M, Jin F, Li J. A novel Arabidopsis microRNA promotes IAA biosynthesis via the indole-3-acetaldoxime pathway by suppressing superroot1. Plant Cell Physiol. 2015;56(4):715–726. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcu216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Blazquez MA, Nelson DC, Weijers D. Evolution of plant hormone response pathways. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2020;71:327–353. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050718-100309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Perez-Alonso MM, Ortiz-Garcia P, Moya-Cuevas J, Lehmann T, Sanchez-Parra B, Bjork RG, Karim S, Amirjani MR, Aronsson H, Wilkinson MD, et al. J Exp Bot. 2020. 10.1093/jxb/eraa1485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 15.Zhang Y, Li Y, Hassan MJ, Li Z, Peng Y. Indole-3-acetic acid improves drought tolerance of white clover via activating auxin, abscisic acid and jasmonic acid related genes and inhibiting senescence genes. BMC Plant Biol. 2020;20(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12870-020-02354-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Schroeder JI, Kwak JM, Allen GJ. Guard cell abscisic acid signalling and engineering drought hardiness in plants. Nature. 2001;410(6826):327–330. doi: 10.1038/35066500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Raza A, Razzaq A, Mehmood SS, Zou X, Zhang X, Lv Y, Xu J. Impact of Climate Change on Crops Adaptation and Strategies to Tackle Its Outcome: A Review. Plants (Basel, Switzerland). 2019;8(2). 10.3390/plants8020034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 18.Hauser F, Waadtl R, Schroeder JI. Evolution of Abscisic acid synthesis and Signaling mechanisms. Curr Biol. 2011;21(9):R346–R355. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.03.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kim TH, Bohmer M, Hu HH, Nishimura N, Schroeder JI. Guard Cell Signal Transduction Network: Advances in Understanding Abscisic Acid, CO2, and Ca2+ Signaling. Ann Rev Plant Biol. 2010;61:561–591. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Luan S. Signalling drought in guard cells. Plant Cell Environ. 2002;25(2):229–237. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2002.00758.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Zhu JK. Salt and drought stress signal transduction in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2002;53:247–273. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.53.091401.143329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Cheng WH, Endo A, Zhou L, Penney J, Chen HC, Arroyo A, Leon P, Nambara E, Asami T, Seo M, et al. A unique short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase in Arabidopsis glucose signaling and abscisic acid biosynthesis and functions. Plant Cell. 2002;14(11):2723–2743. doi: 10.1105/tpc.006494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Finkelstein RR, Gampala SS, Rock CD. Abscisic acid signaling in seeds and seedlings. Plant Cell. 2002;14(Suppl):S15–S45. doi: 10.1105/tpc.010441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kalladan R, Lasky JR, Chang TZ, Sharma S, Juenger TE, Verslues PE. Natural variation identifies genes affecting drought-induced abscisic acid accumulation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(43):11536–11541. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1705884114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Graham J, McNicol RJ, McNicol JW. A comparison of methods for the estimation of genetic diversity in strawberry cultivars. Theor Appl Genet. 1996;93(3):402–406. doi: 10.1007/BF00223182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kher R, Baba JA, Bakshi P. Influence of planting time and mulching material on growth and fruit yield of strawberry cv. Chandler. Indian J Hortic. 2010;67(4):441–444. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Shulaev V, Sargent DJ, Crowhurst RN, Mockler TC, Folkerts O, Delcher AL, Jaiswal P, Mockaitis K, Liston A, Mane SP, et al. The genome of woodland strawberry (Fragaria vesca) Nat Genet. 2011;43(2):109–116. doi: 10.1038/ng.740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Shoemaker JS. Small-fruit culture. LWW. 1995;79:410. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Wang H, Zhang H, Yang Y, Li MF, Zhang YT, Liu J, Dong J, Li J, Butelli E, Xue Z, et al. The control of red colour by a family of MYB transcription factors in octoploid strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa) fruits. Plant Biotechnol J. 2020;18:1169–1184. doi: 10.1111/pbi.13282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Xiong LM, Wang RG, Mao GH, Koczan JM. Identification of drought tolerance determinants by genetic analysis of root response to drought stress and abscisic acid. Plant Physiol. 2006;142(3):1065–1074. doi: 10.1104/pp.106.084632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Zhao Y, Chan Z, Xing L, Liu X, Hou YJ, Chinnusamy V, Wang P, Duan C, Zhu JK. The unique mode of action of a divergent member of the ABA-receptor protein family in ABA and stress signaling. Cell Res. 2013;23(12):1380–1395. doi: 10.1038/cr.2013.149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kalladan R, Lasky JR, Sharma S. Natural variation in 9-Cis-Epoxycartenoid Dioxygenase 3 and ABA accumulation. Plant Physiol. 2019;179(4):1620–1631. doi: 10.1104/pp.18.01185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ludwikow A, Kierzek D, Gallois P, Zeef L, Sadowski J. Gene expression profiling of ozone-treated Arabidopsis abi1td insertional mutant: protein phosphatase 2C ABI1 modulates biosynthesis ratio of ABA and ethylene. Planta. 2009;230(5):1003–1017. doi: 10.1007/s00425-009-1001-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Xiong L, Ishitani M, Zhu JK. Interaction of osmotic stress, temperature, and abscisic acid in the regulation of gene expression in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 1999;119(1):205–212. doi: 10.1104/pp.119.1.205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Liu Q, Kasuga M, Sakuma Y, Abe H, Miura S, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K. Two transcription factors, DREB1 and DREB2, with an EREBP/AP2 DNA binding domain separate two cellular signal transduction pathways in drought- and low-temperature-responsive gene expression, respectively, in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 1998;10(8):1391–1406. doi: 10.1105/tpc.10.8.1391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Lim CW, Kim JH, Baek W, Kim BS, Lee SC. Functional roles of the protein phosphatase 2C, AtAIP1, in abscisic acid signaling and sugar tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Sci. 2012;187:83–88. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2012.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Qi X, Torii KU. Hormonal and environmental signals guiding stomatal development. BMC Biol. 2018;16(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12915-018-0488-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Matias-Hernandez L, Jiang W, Yang K, Tang K, Brodelius PE, Pelaz S. AaMYB1 and its orthologue AtMYB61 affect terpene metabolism and trichome development in Artemisia annua and Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2017;90(3):520–534. doi: 10.1111/tpj.13509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ning P, Wang J, Zhou Y, Gao L, Wang J, Gong C. Adaptional evolution of trichome in Caragana korshinskii to natural drought stress on the loess plateau, China. Ecol Evol. 2016;6(11):3786–3795. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Traw MB, Bergelson J. Interactive effects of jasmonic acid, salicylic acid, and gibberellin on induction of trichomes in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2003;133(3):1367–1375. doi: 10.1104/pp.103.027086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Daszkowska-Golec A, Szarejko I. Open or close the gate - stomata action under the control of phytohormones in drought stress conditions. Front Plant Sci. 2013;4:138. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Iuchi S, Kobayashi M, Taji T, Naramoto M, Seki M, Kato T, Tabata S, Kakubari Y, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K. Regulation of drought tolerance by gene manipulation of 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase, a key enzyme in abscisic acid biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2001;27(4):325–333. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.01096.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Zhang X, Adamowski M, Marhava P, Tan S, Zhang Y, Rodriguez L, Zwiewka M, Pukysova V, Sanchez AS, Raxwal VK, et al. Arabidopsis Flippases cooperate with ARF GTPase exchange factors to regulate the trafficking and polarity of PIN Auxin transporters. Plant Cell. 2020;32(5):1644–1664. doi: 10.1105/tpc.19.00869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Doyle SM, Rigal A, Grones P, Karady M, Barange DK, Majda M, Parizkova B, Karampelias M, Zwiewka M, Pencik A, et al. A role for the auxin precursor anthranilic acid in root gravitropism via regulation of PIN-FORMED protein polarity and relocalisation in Arabidopsis. New Phytol. 2019;223(3):1420–1432. doi: 10.1111/nph.15877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Yamauchi T, Tanaka A, Inahashi H, Nishizawa NK, Tsutsumi N, Inukai Y, Nakazono M. Fine control of aerenchyma and lateral root development through AUX/IAA- and ARF-dependent auxin signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019;116(41):20770–20775. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1907181116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Millar AA, Jacobsen JV, Ross JJ, Helliwell CA, Poole AT, Scofield G, Reid JB, Gubler F. Seed dormancy and ABA metabolism in Arabidopsis and barley: the role of ABA 8′-hydroxylase. Plant J. 2006;45(6):942–954. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02659.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Khandal H, Gupta SK, Dwivedi V, Mandal D, Sharma NK, Vishwakarma NK, Pal L, Choudhary M, Francis A, Malakar P, et al. Root-specific expression of chickpea cytokinin oxidase/dehydrogenase 6 leads to enhanced root growth, drought tolerance and yield without compromising nodulation. Plant Biotechnol J. 2020. 10.1111/pbi.13378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 48.Visentin I, Pagliarani C, Deva E, Caracci A, Tureckova V, Novak O, Lovisolo C, Schubert A, Cardinale F. A novel strigolactone-miR156 module controls stomatal behaviour during drought recovery. Plant Cell Environ. 2020. 10.1111/pce.13758. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 49.De Roo L, Salomon RL, Steppe K. Woody tissue photosynthesis reduces stem CO2 efflux by half and remains unaffected by drought stress in young Populus tremula trees. Plant Cell Environ. 2019. 10.1111/pce.13711. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 50.Jarvis AJ, Mansfield TA, Davies WJ. Stomatal behaviour, photosynthesis and transpiration under rising CO2. Plant Cell Environ. 1999;22(6):639–648. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3040.1999.00407.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Misson L, Limousin JM, Rodriguez R, Letts MG. Leaf physiological responses to extreme droughts in Mediterranean Quercus ilex forest. Plant Cell Environ. 2010;33(11):1898–1910. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02193.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Rascher U, BOBICH EG, LIN GH, WALTER A, Morris T, Naumann M, Nichol CJ, Pierce D, Bil K, Kudeyarov V, et al. Functional diversity of photosynthesis during drought in a model tropical rainforest – the contributions of leaf area, photosynthetic electron transport and stomatal conductance to reduction in net ecosystem carbon exchange. Plant Cell Environ. 2004;27(10):1239–1256. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2004.01231.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Tuzet A, Perrier A, Leuning R. A coupled model of stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and transpiration. Plant Cell Environ. 2003;26(7):1097–1116. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2003.01035.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Li CL, Wang M, Ma XY, Zhang W. NRGA1, a putative mitochondrial pyruvate carrier, mediates ABA regulation of guard cell ion channels and drought stress responses in Arabidopsis. Mol Plant. 2014;7(10):1508–1521. doi: 10.1093/mp/ssu061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Rowland L, da Costa ACL, Oliveira AAR, Oliveira RS, Bittencourt PL, Costa PB, Giles AL, Sosa AI, Coughlin I, Godlee JL, et al. Drought stress and tree size determine stem CO2 efflux in a tropical forest. New Phytol. 2018;218(4):1393–1405. doi: 10.1111/nph.15024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Li Q, Wang G, Guan C, Yang D, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Ji J, Jin C, An T. Overexpression of LcSABP, an Orthologous Gene for Salicylic Acid Binding Protein 2, Enhances Drought Stress Tolerance in Transgenic Tobacco. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10. 10.3389/fpls.2019.00200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 57.Liu C, Xu Y, Feng Y, Long D, Cao B, Xiang Z, Zhao A. Ectopic Expression of Mulberry G-Proteins Alters Drought and Salt Stress Tolerance in Tobacco. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;20(1):89–101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 58.Tang Y, Bao X, Zhi Y, Wu Q, Guo Y, Yin X, Zeng L, Li J, Zhang J, He W, et al. Overexpression of a MYB family gene, OsMYB6, Increases Drought and Salinity Stress Tolerance in Transgenic Rice. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10:168. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Wang Q, Ni J, Shah F, Liu W, Wang D, Yao Y, Hu H, Huang S, Hou J, Fu S, et al. Overexpression of the Stress-Inducible SsMAX2 Promotes Drought and Salt Resistance via the Regulation of Redox Homeostasis in Arabidopsis. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(4). 10.3390/ijms20040837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 60.James D, Borphukan B, Fartyal D, Ram B, Singh J, Manna M, Sheri V, Panditi V, Yadav R, Achary VMM, et al. Concurrent Overexpression of OsGS1;1 and OsGS2 Genes in Transgenic Rice (Oryza sativa L.): Impact on Tolerance to Abiotic Stresses. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:786. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Tang Y, Liu K, Zhang J, Li X, Xu K, Zhang Y, Qi J, Yu D, Wang J, Li C. JcDREB2, a physic nut AP2/ERF gene, Alters Plant Growth and Salinity Stress Responses in Transgenic Rice. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:306. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Torun H. Time-course analysis of salicylic acid effects on ROS regulation and antioxidant defense in roots of hulled and hulless barley under combined stress of drought, heat and salinity. Physiol Plant. 2019;165(2):169–182. doi: 10.1111/ppl.12798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Wei Q, Luo Q, Wang R, Zhang F, He Y, Zhang Y, Qiu D, Li K, Chang J, Yang G, et al. A wheat R2R3-type MYB transcription factor TaODORANT1 positively regulates drought and salt stress responses in transgenic tobacco plants. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:1374. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.del Río LA. CF, López-Huertas E. & Palma JM.: Plant superoxide dismutases: function under abiotic stress conditions. . Antioxidants and Antioxidant Enzymes in Higher Plants Springer, Cham 2018.
- 65.Sofo A, Scopa A, Nuzzaci M, Vitti A. Ascorbate peroxidase and catalase activities and their genetic regulation in plants subjected to drought and salinity stresses. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16(6):13561–13578. doi: 10.3390/ijms160613561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. Gene networks involved in drought stress response and tolerance. J Exp Bot. 2007;58(2):221–227. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erl164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Delker C, Poschl Y, Raschke A, Ullrich K, Ettingshausen S, Hauptmann V, Grosse I, Quint M. Natural variation of transcriptional auxin response networks in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell. 2010;22(7):2184–2200. doi: 10.1105/tpc.110.073957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Frigerio M, Alabadi D, Perez-Gomez J, Garcia-Carcel L, Phillips AL, Hedden P, Blazquez MA. Transcriptional regulation of gibberellin metabolism genes by auxin signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2006;142(2):553–563. doi: 10.1104/pp.106.084871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Li G, Zhu C, Gan L, Ng D, Xia K. GA(3) enhances root responsiveness to exogenous IAA by modulating auxin transport and signalling in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Rep. 2015;34(3):483–494. doi: 10.1007/s00299-014-1728-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Omelyanchuk NA, Kovrizhnykh VV, Oshchepkova EA, Pasternak T, Palme K, Mironova VV. A detailed expression map of the PIN1 auxin transporter in Arabidopsis thaliana root. BMC Plant Biol. 2016;16(Suppl 1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12870-015-0685-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Shen H, Zhu L, Bu QY, Huq E. MAX2 affects multiple hormones to promote photomorphogenesis. Mol Plant. 2012;5(3):750–762. doi: 10.1093/mp/sss029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Zhao Y, Christensen SK, Fankhauser C, Cashman JR, Cohen JD, Weigel D, Chory J. A role for flavin monooxygenase-like enzymes in auxin biosynthesis. Science. 2001;291(5502):306–309. doi: 10.1126/science.291.5502.306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Qin X, Zeevaart JA. The 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid cleavage reaction is the key regulatory step of abscisic acid biosynthesis in water-stressed bean. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96(26):15354–15361. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.26.15354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Thompson AJ, Jackson AC, Symonds RC, Mulholland BJ, Dadswell AR, Blake PS, Burbidge A, Taylor IB. Ectopic expression of a tomato 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase gene causes over-production of abscisic acid. Plant J. 2000;23(3):363–374. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2000.00789.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Qin X, Zeevaart JA. Overexpression of a 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase gene in Nicotiana plumbaginifolia increases abscisic acid and phaseic acid levels and enhances drought tolerance. Plant Physiol. 2002;128(2):544–551. doi: 10.1104/pp.010663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Seo M, Akaba S, Oritani T, Delarue M, Bellini C, Caboche M, Koshiba T. Higher activity of an aldehyde oxidase in the auxin-overproducing superroot1 mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol. 1998;116(2):687–693. doi: 10.1104/pp.116.2.687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Xing L, Zhao Y, Gao J, Xiang C, Zhu JK. The ABA receptor PYL9 together with PYL8 plays an important role in regulating lateral root growth. Sci Rep. 2016;6:27177. doi: 10.1038/srep27177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Zhao Y, Chan Z, Gao J, Xing L, Cao M, Yu C, Hu Y, You J, Shi H, Zhu Y, et al. ABA receptor PYL9 promotes drought resistance and leaf senescence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113(7):1949–1954. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1522840113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Jyothishwaran G, Kotresha D, Selvaraj T, Srideshikan SM, Rajvanshi PK, Jayabaskaran C. A modified freeze-thaw method for efficient transformation of agrobacterium tumefaciens. Curr Sci. 2007;93(6):770–772. [Google Scholar]
- 80.Jin WM, Wang H. Construction of plant expression vector pCAMBIA2301-del-ros and genetic transformation of strawberry. J Agric Biotechnol. 2014;22(3):389–396. [Google Scholar]
- 81.Chen P-Y, Wang C-K, Soong S-C, To K-Y. Complete sequence of the binary vector pBI121 and its application in cloning T-DNA insertion from transgenic plants. Mol Breed. 2003;11(4):287–293. doi: 10.1023/A:1023475710642. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Geldner N, Friml J, Stierhof YD, Jurgens G, Palme K. Auxin transport inhibitors block PIN1 cycling and vesicle trafficking. Nature. 2001;413(6854):425–428. doi: 10.1038/35096571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Okushima Y, Fukaki H, Onoda M, Theologis A, Tasaka M. ARF7 and ARF19 regulate lateral root formation via direct activation of LBD/ASL genes in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2007;19(1):118–130. doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.047761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Bu Q, Lv T, Shen H, Luong P, Wang J, Wang Z, Huang Z, Xiao L, Engineer C, Kim TH, et al. Regulation of drought tolerance by the F-box protein MAX2 in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2014;164(1):424–439. doi: 10.1104/pp.113.226837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Lee SA, Jang S, Yoon EK, Heo JO, Chang KS, Choi JW, Dhar S, Kim G, Choe JE, Heo JB, et al. Interplay between ABA and GA modulates the timing of asymmetric cell divisions in the Arabidopsis root ground tissue. Mol Plant. 2016;9(6):870–884. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2016.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Li MF, Li XF, Han Zh H, Shu HR, Li T. Molecular analysis of two Chinese pear (Pyrus bretschneideri Rehd.) spontaneous self-compatible mutants, Yan Zhuang and Jin Zhui. Plant Biol (Stuttg) 2009;11(5):774–783. doi: 10.1111/j.1438-8677.2008.00180.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Pan X, Welti R, Wang X. Quantitative analysis of major plant hormones in crude plant extracts by high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Nat Protoc. 2010;5(6):986–992. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2010.37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Wang H, Li MF, Yang Y, Dong J, Jin WM. Histological and endogenous plant growth regulators changes associated with adventitious shoot regeneration from in vitro leaf explants of strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa cv. ‘Honeoye’) Plant Cell Tiss Org. 2015;123(3):479–488. doi: 10.1007/s11240-015-0851-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Verslues PE, Agarwal M, Katiyar-Agarwal S, Zhu J, Zhu JK. Methods and concepts in quantifying resistance to drought, salt and freezing, abiotic stresses that affect plant water status. Plant J. 2006;45(4):523–539. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02593.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Calatayud V, Cervero J, Calvo E, Garcia-Breijo FJ, Reig-Arminana J, Sanz MJ. Responses of evergreen and deciduous Quercus species to enhanced ozone levels. Environ Pollut. 2011;159(1):55–63. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2010.09.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Li MF, Wang H, Yang Y, Jin WM. Capsella rubella TGA4, a bZIP transcription factor, causes delayed flowering in Arabidopsis thaliana. Arch Biol Sci. 2016;68(1):187–195. doi: 10.2298/ABS150414141L. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(−Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 2001;25(4):402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the published article and its supplementary data files (Figs. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 and Additional files 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7). The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author Wanmei Jin.