Skip to main content
PMC home page
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2021 Jan 21;32(1):12. doi: 10.1007/s10856-020-06485-4

The influence of animal species, gender and tissue on the structural, biophysical, biochemical and biological properties of collagen sponges

Anna Sorushanova 1,2, Ioannis Skoufos 3, Athina Tzora 3, Anne Maria Mullen 4, Dimitrios I Zeugolis 1,2,5,✉
PMCID: PMC7819930  PMID: 33475864

Abstract

Although collagen type I is extensively used in biomedicine, no study to-date has assessed how the properties of the produced scaffolds are affected as a function of species, gender and tissue from which the collagen was extracted. Herein, we extracted and characterised collagen from porcine and bovine, male and female and skin and tendon tissues and we subsequently fabricated and assessed the structural, biophysical, biochemical and biological properties of collagen sponges. All collagen preparations were of similar purity and free-amine content (p > 0.05). In general, the porcine groups yielded more collagen; had higher (p < 0.05) denaturation temperature and resistance to enzymatic degradation; and lower (p < 0.05) swelling ratio and compression stress and modulus than the bovine groups of the same gender and tissue. All collagen preparations supported growth of human dermal fibroblasts and exhibited similar biological response to human THP-1 monocytes. These results further illustrate the need for standardisation of collagen preparations for the development of reproducible collagen-based devices.

graphic file with name 10856_2020_6485_Figa_HTML.jpg

Open in a new tab

Assessment of the physicochemical and biological properties of collagen sponges as a function of animal species (bovine versus porcine), gender (male versus female) and tissue (skin versus tendon).

Introduction

The term collagen encompasses a large family of proteins with 29 subtypes [1]. Among them, collagen type I is the most abundant in mammalian tissues (e.g. 85–90% in skin [2], 65–80% in tendon [3]). This prevalence in tissues coupled with numerous inherent properties (e.g. cell recognition signals, physiological biodegradability, low antigenicity) makes it the material of choice for biomedical applications [4]. Further, advancements in scaffold fabrication and functionalisation technologies allow the development of three-dimensional implantable devices with clinical indication-specific properties and capacity to deliver a broad range of cells and bioactive molecules in a controlled and localised fashion [5, 6].

Despite the significant advancements in the field, collagen remains an animal by-product and, as such, variability is frequently encountered between different collagen preparations, as a function of species, tissue and extraction method [7, 8], which subsequently influence the properties and performance of the produced scaffolds [9–11]. For example, the properties of extruded collagen fibres have been shown to be species (bovine Achilles tendon versus rat tail tendon) and extraction method (acid versus pepsin) dependent [12]. Yet again, no study to-date has assessed whether the properties of collagen scaffolds depend on the species, gender and tissue from which the collagen is extracted.

In this study, collagen sponges were fabricated and their properties were correlated to the origin of collagen (porcine versus bovine, male versus female and skin versus tendon tissues). Porcine and bovine skin and tendon tissues were selected, as the vast majority of collagen used in biomedicine is extracted from these species and tissues [13]. Pepsin extraction was used, as it results in high yield (cleavage of even mature cross-links) and with reduced immunogenicity and antigenicity (removal of antigenic p-determinant located at the non-helical ends) collagen preparations [14, 15]. Male and female tissues were selected, as recent data have shown gender-dependant disease and injury disposition and differences in, for example, mechanical, structural and compositional properties of tendon [16–21] and skin [22–26].

Materials and methods

Materials

Porcine and bovine, male and female and skin and tendon tissues were collected from a local abattoir and transferred to the laboratory on ice. The following abbreviations are used throughout this manuscript: PMS: Porcine male skin, PMT: Porcine male tendon, PFS: Porcine female skin, PFT: Porcine female tendon, BMS: Bovine male skin, BMT: Bovine male tendon, BFS: Bovine female skin, BFT: Bovine female tendon. SilverQuest™ kit was purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (UK). Quant-iT™ PicoGreen® dsDNA Reagent was purchased from Invitrogen (Bio Sciences Ltd., Ireland). Human adult dermal fibroblasts and human derived leukaemic monocytes (THP-1) were purchased from ATCC (UK). All chemicals, cell culture media and reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Ireland), unless otherwise stated.

Collagen extraction and yield analysis

Collagen type I was extracted using the acetic acid/pepsin protocol from porcine and bovine, male and female and skin and tendon tissues [12, 14]. Briefly, porcine and bovine tissues (200 g) were cut into small pieces (1 × 1 × 1 cm3) using a scalpel and the weight was recorded. Tissue pieces were washed three times for 2 h each in salt solutions (3.7 mM Na2HPO4, 0.35 mM KH2PO4, 51 mM NaCl). Tissue pieces were then suspended in 0.5 M acetic acid for 48 h under stirring at 4 °C. During the process, swollen tissue pieces were sieved, blended and re-suspended in the acetic acid solution. 2 g of pepsin (1 g pepsin per 100 g tissue) was added to the acetic acid solution at room temperature for 1 h and then the solution was transferred at 4 °C for 48 h under stirring. The collagen solution was then filtered through a sieve with pore diameter of 250 µm. 0.9 M NaCl was added to the filtered solution, stirred manually every 2 h for 8 h and then left static overnight. The next day, precipitated collagen was collected from the top of the solution and re-suspended in 1 M acetic acid overnight at 4 °C. The solution was then centrifuged at 8000 rpm for 20 min at 4 °C and the supernatant was collected and subjected to a second salt-precipitation and re-suspended in minimum required volume of 1 M acetic acid to produce a concentrated collagen solution. Once fully suspended, the collagen solution was dialysed four times (the first 3 times every 2 h and the last time overnight) against 1 mM acetic acid at 4 °C. The final collagen solutions, at concentration of 5 mg/ml, were stored at 4 °C until use. Yield was calculated as % of original weight (200 gr).

Collagen purity

Sodium dodecyl sulphate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) was performed to assess the purity of the extracted collagen [27]. Briefly, collagen samples were freeze-dried and then dissolved in 0.5 M acetic acid at concentration of 0.1 mg/ml. Collagen samples were neutralised by the addition of 1 N NaOH. Collagen samples (40 µl) were transferred to Eppendorf tubes and 10 µl of the sample buffer (×5) and 34 µl distilled water were added. Bovine (calf hide) collagen type I (Symatese, Biomateriaux, France) was used as a standard at a concentration of 0.1 mg/ml. Samples and standard were heated at 95 °C for 5 min and then loaded onto 3% stacking and 5% separation gels. Gels were run (50 V for ~30 min for the stacking gel and 120 V for ~60 min for the separation gel) using Mini-Protean 3 system (Bio-Rad Laboratories, UK). Gels were stained using SilverQuest™ kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, UK) following the manufacturer’s instructions.

Fabrication of collagen sponges

To fabricate collagen sponges, collagen solutions at 5 mg/ml were pipetted into well plates, frozen at −80 °C overnight and freeze-dried (Freezone 4.5 L, Labconco, USA) for 24 h. 24 well plates were used to fabricate sponges for stability analysis with 2 ml of collagen per well and 48 well plates were used to fabricate sponges for biological analysis with 250 µl per well.

Structural characterisation

The structure of produced collagen type I sponges was visualised using scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Hitachi S-4700, Japan). Adhesive carbon tabs were used on top of SEM specimen stubs. Collagen sponges were cut horizontally and stuck onto carbon tabs. Collagen sponges were gold-coated prior to SEM imaging at 25 mA current for 5 min. Pore diameter was measured using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, USA).

Quantification of free amines

Free-amine groups were determined using the ninhydrin assay [28]. Briefly, 3 mg of freeze-dried samples were added in 1 ml ninhydrin buffer and incubated at 100 °C for 10 min. After the samples were cooled down at room temperature, 50% of isopropanol was added and the absorbance was measured at 570 nm. Free-amine groups were quantified by interpolating values from a linear standard curve of known concentrations of glycine.

Enzymatic stability analysis

Enzymatic degradation of collagen sponges was assessed using collagenase type I assay [29]. Briefly, 5 mg of freeze-dried samples were added in 1 ml of collagenase solution. The samples were incubated for 3, 6, 9, 12 and 24 h at 37 °C. The supernatants were then collected, freeze-dried overnight and weighed.

Thermal stability and swelling analyses

Denaturation temperature of the collagen sponges was analysed using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC-60, Shimadzu, Japan) [30]. The collagen sponges were hydrated overnight at room temperature in 0.01 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The sponges were then removed from the PBS and quickly blotted on a filter paper. The sponges were then hermetically sealed in aluminium pans. Heating was carried out at a raising temperature rate of 10 °C/min within temperature range of 20–70 °C. An empty aluminium pan was used as reference. The endothermic transition was recorded as a typical peak and denaturation temperature was defined as the temperature of maximum power absorption during denaturation (peak temperature).

For swelling determination, collagen sponges were incubated in PBS overnight and the next day were quickly blotted using filter paper. Swelling ratio was calculated using the following equation: Swelling (%) = [(Ww − Wd)/(Wd)] × 100, where Ww and Wd refer to the average wet weight and dry weight of the sponges, respectively.

Mechanical stability analysis

Compression test was carried out using an electromechanical testing machine (Z2.5, Zwick, Germany). The collagen sponges were tested in the dry state, as wet sponges were collapsing. Compression stress and modulus values were calculated as follows: compressive stress was defined as the force at 70% compression divided by the original cross-sectional area and modulus was defined as the slope of the stress-strain (deformation) curve at the elastic deformation region (Young’s modulus).

Dermal fibroblast culture and analysis

Human adult dermal fibroblasts were used between passages 3 and 5. Collagen sponges were sterilised prior to seeding with UV for 2 h. The cells were seeded onto collagen sponges at a density of 30,000 cells per cm2 in 48 well plates. The cells were cultured for 3, 5 and 7 days in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium, supplemented with 1% penicillin streptomycin and 10% foetal bovine serum at 37 °C and 5% CO2. Media were changed every 2 days. Cell proliferation was assessed using PicoGreen® dsDNA assay kit after 3, 5 and 7 days in culture, according to manufacturer’s protocol. Metabolic activity was assessed using the alamarBlue® assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific, UK) after 3, 5 and 7 days in culture, according to manufacturer’s protocol. Cell viability was assessed with calcein AM (Thermo Fisher Scientific, UK) and ethidium homodimer I (Thermo Fisher Scientific, UK) staining after 3, 5 and 7 days in culture, according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The cells were visualised under Andor Revolution Spinning Disk Confocal Microscope (Olympus IX81, Japan). Nuclei were stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI), whilst cytoskeleton was stained with rhodamine phalloidin based on established protocols. Briefly, media were removed and sponges were washed three times with Hank’s Balanced Salt Solution prior to staining. Cells were fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde, permeabilised with 0.2% Triton X-100 and then stained with DAPI and rhodamine. The sponges were imaged using Andor Revolution Spinning Disk Confocal Microscope (Olympus IX81, Japan). Cell morphometric analysis was conducted with ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, USA). The total area and aspect ratio (the ratio of the major axis divided by the minor axis of each nuclei based on a fitted ellipse) of the nuclei were assessed. For cell viability and morphometric analysis, for each experimental group, cells on three sponges were analysed by taking five images per sponge (15 images in total were analysed per experimental group).

Monocyte culture and analysis

Human derived leukaemic monocyte cells (THP-1) were seeded onto TCP and collagen sponges at a density of 50,000 cells per cm2 in 48 well plates. Collagen sponges were sterilised prior to seeding with UV for 2 h. Mature macrophage-like state was induced by treating them with phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) at concentration of 100 ng/ml for 24 h, at 37 °C and 5% CO2. The differentiation media was removed and replaced by activation media and the cells were incubated for 48 h, at 37 °C and 5% CO2. Activated control was induced with 100 ng/ml of lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Cell metabolic activity, proliferation and viability was assessed at day 1 and day 2, as described above (Section “Dermal fibroblast culture and analysis”).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS (version 20.0, IBM SPSS Statistics, IBM Corporation, USA). All values are expressed as mean values ± standard deviation (SD). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for multiple comparisons was employed, after confirming the following assumptions: (a) the distribution from which each of the samples was derived was normal; (b) and the variances of the population of the samples were equal to one another. Nonparametric statistics were used when either one or both of the above assumptions were violated and consequently Kruskal–Wallis test for multiple comparisons was carried out. Statistical significance was accepted at p < 0.05.

Results

Collagen purity and yield

SDS-PAGE revealed that all collagen preparations exhibited typical collagen type I electrophoretic mobility and purity (Fig. 1A). The porcine groups yielded more collagen than the bovine groups of the same gender and tissue (Fig. 1B).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

A SDS-PAGE revealed that all collagen preparations were of similar purity. STD: 0.1 mg/ml bovine (calf hide) collagen type I (Symatese, Biomateriaux, France). B More collagen was extracted from the porcine than the bovine groups of the same gender and tissue

Structural analysis

SEM and complementary porosity analysis (Fig. 2) revealed that the bovine groups showed a significantly higher (p < 0.005) pore diameter than the porcine groups of the same gender and tissue. No correlation was observed between male and female and skin and tendon tissues across the different species with respect to porosity.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Open in a new tab

SEM and supplementary porosity analysis revealed that the bovine groups exhibited significantly higher (p < 0.005) pore diameter than the porcine groups of the same gender and tissue. N = 20

Free amine and resistance to enzymatic degradation analyses

Ninhydrin assay (Fig. 3A) revealed no significant differences (p > 0.05) in free-amine content as a function of species, gender and tissue. After 24 h, bovine MT, FS and FT exhibited significantly lower (p < 0.01) resistance to enzymatic degradation than their porcine counterparts (Fig. 3B).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Open in a new tab

A Species, gender and tissue did not significantly (p > 0.05) affect free-amine content. N = 3. B Bovine MT, FS and FT exhibited significantly lower (p < 0.01) resistance to collagenase degradation than their porcine counterparts after 24 h of enzyme incubation. N = 3. Symbol “*” indicates statistically significant difference

Thermal stability, swelling and mechanical properties analyses

DSC analysis (Table 1) revealed that sponges produced from porcine collagen exhibited significantly higher (p < 0.001) denaturation temperature than the bovine collagen sponges of the same gender and tissue, whilst sponges produced from bovine collagen had significantly higher (p < 0.001) PBS absorption capacity (Table 1) than porcine collagen sponges of the same gender and tissue. Compression test (Table 1) revealed that sponges produced from porcine collagen exhibited significantly lower (p < 0.001) compressive stress and modulus than bovine collagen sponges of the same gender and tissue. Between both species and genders, tendon derived scaffolds exhibited significantly higher (p < 0.001) compressive stress and modulus than the skin-derived scaffolds.

Table 1.

Sponges produced from porcine collagen exhibited significantly higher (p < 0.001) denaturation temperature and significantly lower (p < 0.001) swelling ratio, compressive stress and modulus than bovine collagen sponges of the same gender and tissue

Group Peak temperature
 ± SD (°C)		 Swelling
 ± SD (%)		 Compressive stress at 70% deformation
 ± SD (KPa)		 Compressive modulus (Young’s modulus)
 ± SD (KPa)
PMS 55.43 ± 1.24 1603 ± 439 0.75 ± 0.24 0.63 ± 0.29
PMT 54.99 ± 1.08 498 ± 171 1.09 ± 0.13 1.31 ± 0.19
PFS 53.70 ± 1.36 520 ± 109 0.93 ± 0.62 1.07 ± 0.85
PFT 53.08 ± 1.28 771 ± 226 1.56 ± 0.18 2.29 ± 0.30
BMS 51.03 ± 0.46 1977 ± 463 1.27 ± 0.19 1.78 ± 0.20
BMT 47.65 ± 1.22 7546 ± 1736 2.27 ± 0.49 2.84 ± 0.59
BFS 50.55 ± 1.14 2502 ± 529 1.03 ± 0.21 1.29 ± 0.27
BFT 49.63 ± 1.06 12,031 ± 1900 3.18 ± 0.66 4.67 ± 1.61
Open in a new tab

Tendon derived scaffolds exhibited significantly higher (p < 0.001) compressive stress and modulus than skin-derived scaffolds, independently of the species and gender

Denaturation temperature: N = 5; Swelling: N = 6; Mechanical properties: N = 10

Dermal fibroblast biological analysis

Cytoskeleton and nuclei staining (Fig. 4) demonstrated that both porcine and bovine collagen sponges supported cellular growth, independently of the tissue and gender. Quantitative morphometric analysis (Supplementary Fig. S1) revealed no apparent differences (p > 0.05) in nuclei area and elongation, as a function of species, gender and tissue. Cell viability (Supplementary Fig. S2) and DNA concentration (Fig. 5A) were not affected as a function of species, gender and tissue, whilst PMS and PFS exhibited the lowest (p < 0.001) metabolic (Fig. 5B) activity at day 7; there were no significant differences (p > 0.05) in metabolic activity (Fig. 5B) between the other groups.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Open in a new tab

Cellular staining (red: cytoskeleton and blue: nuclei) of human dermal fibroblasts at day 3, 5 and 7 demonstrated that all sponges supported cellular growth independently of species, gender and tissue. N = 3

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Open in a new tab

A DNA concentration of human dermal fibroblasts at day 3, 5 and 7 was not significantly (p > 0.05) affected as a function of species, gender and tissue. B By day 7, human dermal fibroblasts grown of PMS and PFS exhibited the lowest (p < 0.001) metabolic activity, whilst no significant differences (p > 0.05) were observed between the other groups. N = 3. Symbol “*” indicates statistically significant difference from all other groups

Monocyte biological analysis

Qualitative cell morphology analysis via cytoskeleton and nuclei staining (Fig. 6) revealed that most of the THP-1 cells adopted a rounded morphology and formed cell aggregates (five or more cells) independently of time point, species, gender and tissue. Although some cells grown on TCP and LPS adopted an elongated cell morphology, most cells exhibited a rounded morphology and also formed aggregates (five or more cells) at both time points.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Open in a new tab

Cellular staining (red: cytoskeleton and blue: nuclei) of THP-1 cells at day 1 and 2 revealed that most cells adopted a rounded morphology and formed aggregates on all samples (five or more cells; yellow arrows), including TCP and LPS controls. Some cells on TCP and LPS also exhibited an elongated morphology (white arrows). N = 3

At day 2, the PMS exhibited the lowest cell viability (p < 0.001), whilst no significant differences were observed between the other groups (p > 0.05) (Fig. 7A and Supplementary Fig. S3). Cells on TCP and cells treated with LPS had the highest DNA concentration (p < 0.001) and, at day 2, the PMS, BFS and BFT sponges had significantly higher DNA concentration than the other collagen groups (p < 0.001) (Fig. 7B). No significant differences were observed in metabolic activity between all groups (p > 0.05) (Fig. 7C).

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Open in a new tab

A At day 2, among the collagen groups, the PMS sponges exhibited the lowest (p < 0.001) THP-1 viability. B Add both times point, TCP and LPS has the highest DNA concentration and at day 2, among the collagen groups, the BFT sponges had the highest (p < 0.001) THP-1 DNA concentration. C No significant differences (p > 0.05) were observed between all groups in THP-1 metabolic activity. N = 3. Symbol “*” indicates statistically significant difference from all groups; Symbol “#” indicates statistically significant difference from all groups; Symbol “‡” indicates statistically significant difference from collagen groups

Discussion

Collagen is the most abundant protein family in vertebrates. Among the 29 collagen subtypes, collagens type I, type II and type III are more frequently encountered and together comprising around 80–90% of the total body collagen [4]. This abundance, along with various properties (e.g. tissue-specific structure and mechanical properties, physiological biodegradability, low antigenicity, cell recognition signals) make collagens the materials of choice for various biomedical applications, including skin [31], bone [32], tendon [33] and cartilage [34] repair and regeneration. Although collagen type I can be extracted from various animals and tissues, type I collagens extracted from skin or tendon of close herd porcine or bovine animals represent the lion’s share. Considering though that collagen is a biological material, differences in amino acid composition as a function of species, age, gender and tissue may affect the properties of the resultant scaffolds. Although collagen extracted from different species and tissues has been shown to produce scaffolds with different properties [7, 12, 35], no study has compared the properties of collagen-based scaffolds as a function of species, gender and tissue. Thus, herein, we assessed the properties of extracted collagen and subsequently produced collagen sponges, as a function of species (porcine and bovine), tissue (skin and tendon) and gender (male and female).

All collagen preparations were produced following a pepsin digestion and a filtration, double salt precipitation, centrifugation and dialysis protocol, which has been shown to increase yield and purity, respectively [12]. In fact, the produced collagen solutions were as pure as the commercially available standard that was used in this study. With respect to yield, the porcine tendons yielded more collagen than the bovine tendons, which can be attributed to the lower level of activity of the porcine tendons (pigs are slaughtered at 100–120 Kg weight, whilst calves are slaughtered at 460–640 Kg) and thus lower cross-linking density and higher solubility [36, 37]. With respect to skin yield, one would have expected more collagen to be extracted from bovine skin as opposed to porcine skin. To substantiate this, we should consider that domesticated pigs evolved from the wild boar and adapted a thick and tightly interwoven collagen network. Indeed, the collagen fibres within the skin of the pig are arranged in two directions, creating an interwoven dense network of small fibres and fibre bundles. The fibres and fibre bundles cross each other and merge from one bundle to the next, with smaller fibres interweaving in between and in different orientations. This compact, higher-order network is also interwoven with elastic fibres [38, 39]. Bovine skin, on the other hand, is thinner in comparison to the porcine skin. The collagen fibres in the bovine skin align in a non-uniform order and it is thought that fibres align parallel to the cows’ spinal column to allow for the skin movement while grazing and walking [40]. However, in our case, the porcine skin groups yielded more collagen than the bovine skin groups, possibly attributed to the age of the animals (pigs are slaughtered at month 5.0–5.5, whilst calves are slaughtered between month 14 and 24). As the animal ages, more mature cross-links are formed that renders collagen solubility [41–44].

Various factors (e.g. freeze-drying parameters, concertation of solution, cross-linking time/density) have been shown to affect pore size and porosity of freeze-dried materials [45–48]. Considering that all freeze-drying parameters and the collagen concentration were kept constant for all collagen preparations, the observed differences may be attributed to the random nature of the process that results in materials with heterogeneous pore structure and with large variations in average pore size throughout the material [49], as opposed to the inherent properties of the collagen preparations. In any case, the produced collagen sponges were highly porous, which is beneficial for cell adhesion, proliferation, migration and differentiation [50–52].

Although no significant differences were observed in free-amine content, as a function of species, gender and tissue, in general, sponges produced from porcine collagen exhibited significantly higher resistance to enzymatic degradation and denaturation temperature and significantly lower swelling ratio than bovine collagen sponges of the same gender and tissue. All these suggest a higher in cross-linking density material, which is surprisingly, considering that the porcine tissues yielded the highest amount of collagen, which indicates lower cross-linking density. As all these properties were assessed with freeze-dried sponges, we believe that these differences may be due to freeze-drying-induced intermolecular cross-linking that provided better organisation and stabilisation of the helices through maintenance of the distances between neighbouring molecules and prevention of incorporation of excess water that disrupts hydrogen and electrostatic bond formation between molecules [53–57]. This has been more profound with the porcine collagen preparations possibly due to the lower extend of cross-linking, as the animals were of younger age.

Mechanical properties wise, porcine collagen sponges exhibited significantly lower compression stress and modulus than bovine collagen sponges of the same gender and tissue and tendon derived scaffolds exhibited significantly higher compression stress and modulus than skin-derived scaffolds, independently of the species and gender. Both these observations may be attributed to the ‘memory’ of collagen from the tissue that has been extracted. Bovine (older animals) extracted collagen sponges had higher mechanical properties than porcine (younger animals) extracted collagen sponges and tendon extracted collagen sponges had higher mechanical properties than skin extracted collagen sponges, as previous studies have shown age-related increases in mechanical properties as a function of increased cross-linking density [58] and increased mechanical properties as a function of weight-bearing tasks [59], respectively. The higher in mechanical properties collagen sponges derived from tendon tissues in comparison to collagen sponges derived from skin tissues can also be attributed to the architecture of the collagen fibres in the respective tissues, which, in turn, is responsible for the tissue-specific biomechanical properties. In skin, collagen fibres are more loosely packed and are interwoven with elastin fibres, whilst in tendons collagen fibres are more closely packed along the longitudinal axis of the tissue, as has been revealed by polarised, transmission electron and second harmonic generation microscopy [60–63].

With respect to biological analysis, in general, all collagen sponges supported human dermal fibroblast attachment, proliferation and growth. The only deviation was observed in (reduced) metabolic activity of human dermal fibroblasts grown on PMS and PFS sponges. It is worth noting though that these sponges had the lowest modulus values and it has been well described in the literature the influence of substrate rigidity on dermal fibroblast growth and function [64–66]. THP-1 morphology analysis revealed that most cells adopted a rounded morphology and formed aggregates, whilst some cells on TCP and LPS groups exhibited an elongated morphology. Rounded cell morphology is associated with M1 pro-inflammatory response, elongated morphology is indicative of M2 anti-inflammatory response phenotype and cell aggregates suggest foreign body response [67–69]. The BFT sponges formed the least aggregates and had the highest DNA concentration; this may be due to the fact that these scaffolds had also the highest modulus values, which may be explained considering that previous studies have associated macrophage response to substrate rigidity [70, 71]. Whether though such slight increase in rigidity is capable of inducing macrophage response has yet to be verified and should be investigated further.

With respect to the influence of gender on the properties of the produced scaffolds, some differences were observed. For example, collagen sponges from porcine female tendon and skin had significantly higher mechanical properties than collagen sponges from porcine male tendon and skin. However, collagen sponges from bovine female tendon had significantly higher mechanical properties than collagen sponges from bovine male tendon and the reverse was the case for skin-derived collagen. Although gender-dependant differences have been documented in the literature for mechanical, structural and compositional properties of tendon [16–21] and skin [22–26], a more detailed investigation (e.g. analysing the properties of the original tissue and the derived scaffolds) is required to safely conclude on the influence of the gender on the properties of the scaffold.

Conclusions

Collagen type I is the most abundant extracellular matrix protein in vertebrates. This abundance makes collagen the material of choice for scaffold fabrication. Herein we illustrated that although purity, free-amine content and biological (human dermal fibroblast and THP-1 monocyte cultures) response were not affected as a function of species (porcine versus bovine), gender (female versus male) and tissue (skin versus tendon) from which the collagen was extracted, yield, denaturation temperature, resistance to enzymatic degradation, swelling ratio and biomechanical properties were certainly species and tissue dependent. To safely conclude on the influence of gender, more detailed studies are required. Collectively, these data suggest that all these parameters should be considered in the development of a collagen-based implantable device.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information (3.6MB, docx)

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by: Teagasc Walsh Fellowship (Grant No. 2014045); Teagasc/Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine FIRM/RSF/CoFoRD 2011 Call (Grant No. 11/F/043); Science Foundation Ireland, Career Development Award (Grant No. 15/CDA/3629); and Science Foundation Ireland/European Regional Development Fund (Grant No. 13/RC/2073). This work has also received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme, grant agreement No. 866126.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

The online version of this article (10.1007/s10856-020-06485-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

References

  • 1.Parenteau-Bareil R, Gauvin R, Berthod F. Collagen-based biomaterials for tissue engineering applications. Materials. 2010;3:1863. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Smith LT, Holbrook KA, Madri JA. Collagen types I, III, and V in human embryonic and fetal skin. Am J Anat. 1986;175:507–21. doi: 10.1002/aja.1001750409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kannus P. Structure of the tendon connective tissue. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2000;10:312–20. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0838.2000.010006312.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Sorushanova A, Delgado LM, Wu Z, Shologu N, Kshirsagar A, Raghunath R, et al. The collagen suprafamily: from biosynthesis to advanced biomaterial development. Adv Mater. 2018;31:e1801651. doi: 10.1002/adma.201801651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Chowdhury SR, Mh Busra MF, Lokanathan Y, Ng MH, Law JX, Cletus UC, et al. Collagen type I: a versatile biomaterial. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018;1077:389–414. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-0947-2_21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Dong C, Lv Y. Application of collagen scaffold in tissue engineering: recent advances and new perspectives. Polymers. 2016;8:E42. doi: 10.3390/polym8020042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lin Y, Liu D. Comparison of physical–chemical properties of type I collagen from different species. Food Chem. 2006;99:244–51. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2005.06.053. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cozza N, Bonani W, Motta A, Migliaresi C. Evaluation of alternative sources of collagen fractions from Loligo vulgaris squid mantle. Int J Biol Macromol. 2016;87:504–13. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.03.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bohm S, Strauss C, Stoiber S, Kasper C, Charwat V. Impact of source and manufacturing of collagen matrices on fibroblast cell growth and platelet aggregation. Materials. 2017;10:1086. doi: 10.3390/ma10091086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Widdowson JP, Picton AJ, Vince V, Wright CJ, Mearns-Spragg A. In vivo comparison of jellyfish and bovine collagen sponges as prototype medical devices. J Biomed Mater Res B. 2017;106:1524–33. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.33959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ghodbane SA, Dunn MG. Physical and mechanical properties of cross-linked type I collagen scaffolds derived from bovine, porcine, and ovine tendons. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2016;104:2685–92. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.35813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Zeugolis DI, Paul RG, Attenburrow G. Factors influencing the properties of reconstituted collagen fibers prior to self-assembly: animal species and collagen extraction method. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2008;86:892–904. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.31694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Browne S, Zeugolis DI, Pandit A. Collagen: finding a solution for the source. Tissue Eng Part A. 2013;19:1491–4. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2012.0721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Delgado LM, Shologu N, Fuller K, Zeugolis DI. Acetic acid and pepsin result in high yield, high purity and low macrophage response collagen for biomedical applications. Biomed Mater. 2017;12:065009. doi: 10.1088/1748-605x/aa838d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lynn A, Yannas I, Bonfield W. Antigenicity and immunogenicity of collagen. J Biomed Mater Res B. 2004;71:343–54. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.30096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lepley A, Joseph M, Daigle N, Digiacomo J, Galer J, Rock E, et al. Sex differences in mechanical properties of the Achilles tendon: longitudinal response to repetitive loading exercise. J Strength Cond Res. 2018;32:3070–9. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sarver D, Kharaz Y, Sugg K, Gumucio J, Comerford E, Mendias C. Sex differences in tendon structure and function. J Orthop Res. 2017;35:2117–26. doi: 10.1002/jor.23516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Silbernagel K, Brorsson A, Olsson N, Eriksson B, Karlsson J, Nilsson-Helander K. Sex differences in outcome after an acute Achilles tendon rupture. Orthop J Sports Med. 2015;3:2325967115586768. doi: 10.1177/2325967115586768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bonilla K, Pardes A, Freedman B, Soslowsky L. Supraspinatus tendons have different mechanical properties across sex. J Biomech Eng. 2019;141. 10.1115/1.4041321 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 20.Hicks K, Onambele-Pearson G, Winwood K, Morse C. Gender differences in fascicular lengthening during eccentric contractions: the role of the patella tendon stiffness. Acta Physiol. 2013;209:235–44. doi: 10.1111/apha.12159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Little D, Thompson J, Dubois L, Ruch D, Moseley M, Guilak F. Proteomic differences between male and female anterior cruciate ligament and patellar tendon. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e96526. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Blom L, Klingberg A, Laflamme L, Wallis L, Hasselberg M. Gender differences in burns: a study from emergency centres in the Western Cape, South Africa. Burns. 2016;42:1600–8. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2016.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Skroza N, Tolino E, Mambrin A, Zuber S, Balduzzi V, Marchesiello A, et al. Adult acne versus adolescent acne: a retrospective study of 1,167 patients. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2018;11:21–5. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lundin M, Chawa S, Sachdev A, Bhanusali D, Seiffert-Sinha K, Sinha A. Gender differences in alopecia areata. J Drugs Dermatol. 2014;13:409–13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Holm E, Esmann S, Jemec G. Does visible atopic dermatitis affect quality of life more in women than in men? Gend Med. 2004;1:125–30. doi: 10.1016/s1550-8579(04)80017-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Phuong C, Maibach H. Gender differences in skin In: Farage M, Miller K, Maibach H, editors. Textbook of Aging Skin. Berlin: Springer; 2017. p. 1729–55.
  • 27.Capella-Monsonís H, Coentro JQ, Graceffa V, Wu Z, Zeugolis DI. An experimental toolbox for characterization of mammalian collagen type I in biological specimens. Nat Protoc. 2018;13:507–29. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2017.117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Delgado LM, Fuller K, Zeugolis DI. Collagen cross-linking: biophysical, biochemical, and biological response analysis. Tissue Eng Part A. 2017;23:1064–77. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2016.0415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Helling AL, Tsekoura EK, Biggs M, Bayon Y, Pandit A, Zeugolis DI. In vitro enzymatic degradation of tissue grafts and collagen biomaterials by matrix metalloproteinases: improving the collagenase assay. ACS Biomat Sc Eng. 2017;3:1922–32. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.5b00563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zeugolis DI, Raghunath M. The physiological relevance of wet versus dry differential scanning calorimetry for biomaterial evaluation: a technical note. Polym Int. 2010;59:1403–7. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Davison-Kotler E, Marshall W, García-Gareta E. Sources of collagen for biomaterials in skin wound healing. Bioengineering. 2019;6:E56. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering6030056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zhang D, Wu X, Chen J, Lin K. The development of collagen based composite scaffolds for bone regeneration. Bioact Mater. 2017;3:129–38. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2017.08.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kew S, Gwynne J, Enea D, Abu-Rub M, Pandit A, Zeugolis D, et al. Regeneration and repair of tendon and ligament tissue using collagen fibre biomaterials. Acta Biomater. 2011;7:3237–47. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Irawan V, Sung T, Higuchi A, Ikoma T. Collagen scaffolds in cartilage tissue engineering and relevant approaches for future development. Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2018;15:673–97. doi: 10.1007/s13770-018-0135-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Angele P, Abke J, Kujat R, Faltermeier H, Schumann D, Nerlich M, et al. Influence of different collagen species on physico-chemical properties of crosslinked collagen matrices. Biomaterials. 2004;25:2831–41. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.09.066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Makris E, Responte D, Paschos N, Hu J, Athanasiou K. Developing functional musculoskeletal tissues through hypoxia and lysyl oxidase-induced collagen cross-linking. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:E4832–E41. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1414271111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kaku M, Rosales Rocabado J, Kitami M, Ida T, Akiba Y, Yamauchi M, et al. Mechanical loading stimulates expression of collagen cross-linking associated enzymes in periodontal ligament. J Cell Physiol. 2016;231:926–33. doi: 10.1002/jcp.25184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Moyo D, Gomes M, Erlwanger KH. Comparison of the histology of the skin of the windsnyer, kolbroek and large white pigs. J S Afr Vet Assoc. 2018;89:e1–e10. doi: 10.4102/jsava.v89i0.1569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Meyer W, Neurand K, Radke B. Collagen fibre arrangement in the skin of the pig. J Anat. 1982;134:139–48. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Osaki S. Distribution map of collagen fiber orientation in a whole calf skin. Anat Rec. 1999;254(1):147–52. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0185(19990101)254:1&#x0003c;147::AID-AR18&#x0003e;3.0.CO;2-I. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Snedeker J, Gautieri A. The role of collagen crosslinks in ageing and diabetes—The good, the bad, and the ugly. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2014;4:303–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Schnider S, Kohn R. Effects of age and diabetes mellitus on the solubility and nonenzymatic glucosylation of human skin collagen. J Clin Investig. 1981;67:1630–5. doi: 10.1172/JCI110198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Miyahara T, Murai A, Tanaka T, Shiozawa S, Kameyama M. Age-related differences in human skin collagen: solubility in solvent, susceptibility to pepsin digestion, and the spectrum of the solubilized polymeric collagen molecules. J Gerontol. 1982;37:651–5. doi: 10.1093/geronj/37.6.651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Svensson R, Heinemeier K, Couppé C, Kjaer M, Magnusson S. Effect of aging and exercise on the tendon. J Appl Physiol. 1985;121:1237–46. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00328.2016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Yang L, Tanabe K, Miura T, Yoshinari M, Takemoto S, Shintani S, et al. Influence of lyophilization factors and gelatin concentration on pore structures of atelocollagen/gelatin sponge biomaterial. Dent Mater J. 2017;36:429–37. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2016-242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Haparanta A, Koivurinta J, Hamalainen E, Kellomaki M. The effect of cross-linking time on a porous freeze-dried collagen scaffold using 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide as a cross-linker. J Appl Biomater Biomech. 2008;6:89–94. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Zhang Y, Wang C, Jiang W, Zuo W, Han G. Influence of stage cooling method on pore architecture of biomimetic alginate scaffolds. Sci Rep. 2017;7:16150. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-16024-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Schoof H, Apel J, Heschel I, Rau G. Control of pore structure and size in freeze-dried collagen sponges. J Biomed Mater Res. 2001;58:352–7. doi: 10.1002/jbm.1028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.O’Brien F, Harley B, Yannas I, Gibson L. Influence of freezing rate on pore structure in freeze-dried collagen-GAG scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2004;25:1077–86. doi: 10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00630-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Murphy CM, Haugh MG, O’Brien FJ. The effect of mean pore size on cell attachment, proliferation and migration in collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2010;31:461–6. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.09.063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.O’Brien FJ, Harley BA, Yannas IV, Gibson LJ. The effect of pore size on cell adhesion in collagen-GAG scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2005;26:433–41. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.02.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Pina S, Ribeiro VP, Marques CF, Maia FR, Silva TH, Reis RL, et al. Scaffolding strategies for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine applications. Materials. 2019;12:1824. doi: 10.3390/ma12111824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Chen R, Ho H, Sheu M. Characterization of collagen matrices crosslinked using microbial transglutaminase. Biomaterials. 2005;26:4229–35. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.11.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Mentink C, Hendriks M, Levels A, Wolffenbuttel B. Glucose-mediated cross-linking of collagen in rat tendon and skin. Clin Chim Acta. 2002;321:69–76. doi: 10.1016/s0009-8981(02)00097-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Wang M, Pins G, Silver F. Collagen fibres with improved strength for the repair of soft tissue injuries. Biomaterials. 1994;15:507–12. doi: 10.1016/0142-9612(94)90016-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Wissink M, Beernink R, Pieper J, Poot A, Engbers G, Beugeling T, et al. Immobilization of heparin to EDC/NHS-crosslinked collagen. Characterization and in vitro evaluation. Biomaterials. 2001;22:151–63. doi: 10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00164-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Rault I, Frei V, Herbage D, Abdul-Malak N, Huc A. Evaluation of different chemical methods for cros-linking collagen gel, films and sponges. J Mater Sci: Mater Med. 1996;7:215–21. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Avery N, Bailey A. Enzymic and non-enzymic cross-linking mechanisms in relation to turnover of collagen: relevance to aging and exercise. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2005;15:231–40. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2005.00464.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Waugh CM, Blazevich AJ, Fath F, Korff T. Age-related changes in mechanical properties of the Achilles tendon. J Anat. 2012;220:144–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2011.01461.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Franchi M, Trire A, Quaranta M, Orsini E, Ottani V. Collagen structure of tendon relates to function. TheScientificWorldJournal. 2007;7:404–20. doi: 10.1100/tsw.2007.92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Benjamin M, Kaiser E, Milz S. Structure-function relationships in tendons: a review. J Anat. 2008;212:211–28. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2008.00864.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Ribeiro J, dos Anjos E, Mello M, de Campos Vidal B. Skin collagen fiber molecular order: a pattern of distributional fiber orientation as assessed by optical anisotropy and image analysis. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e54724. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Zeugolis D, Khew S, Yew E, Ekaputra A, Tong Y, Yung L, et al. Electro-spinning of pure collagen nano-fibres—Just an expensive way to make gelatin? Biomaterials. 2008;29:2293–305. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Hopp I, Michelmore A, Smith L, Robinson D, Bachhuka A, Mierczynska A, et al. The influence of substrate stiffness gradients on primary human dermal fibroblasts. Biomaterials. 2013;34:5070–7. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.03.075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Achterberg V, Buscemi L, Diekmann H, Smith-Clerc J, Schwengler H, Meister J, et al. The nano-scale mechanical properties of the extracellular matrix regulate dermal fibroblast function. J Invest Dermatol. 2014;134:1862–72. doi: 10.1038/jid.2014.90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Smithmyer M, Sawicki L, Kloxin A. Hydrogel scaffolds as in vitro models to study fibroblast activation in wound healing and disease. Biomater Sci. 2014;2:634–50. doi: 10.1039/c3bm60319a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Yahyouche A, Zhidao X, Czernuszka JT, Clover AJ. Macrophage-mediated degradation of crosslinked collagen scaffolds. Acta Biomater. 2011;7:278–86. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.McWhorter FY, Wang T, Nguyen P, Chung T, Liu WF. Modulation of macrophage phenotype by cell shape. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:17253–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1308887110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.McWhorter FY, Davis CT, Liu WF. Physical and mechanical regulation of macrophage phenotype and function. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2015;72:1303–16. doi: 10.1007/s00018-014-1796-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Patel N, Bole M, Chen C, Hardin C, Kho A, Mih J, et al. Cell elasticity determines macrophage function. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e41024. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Blakney A, Swartzlander M, Bryant S. The effects of substrate stiffness on the in vitro activation of macrophages and in vivo host response to poly(ethylene glycol)-based hydrogels. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2012;100:1375–86. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.34104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information (3.6MB, docx)

Articles from Journal of Materials Science. Materials in Medicine are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES