Skip to main content
iScience logoLink to iScience
. 2020 Dec 31;24(2):102024. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.102024

Mechanistic origin and unlocking of negative capacitance in perovskites solar cells

Mohd Taukeer Khan 1,2, Peng Huang 1, Abdullah Almohammedi 2, Samrana Kazim 1,3, Shahzada Ahmad 1,3,4,
PMCID: PMC7820557  PMID: 33521597

Summary

We have unlocked the mechanistic behavior of negative capacitance in perovskite solar cells (PSCs) by analyzing impedance spectra at variable photovoltage and applied bias, temperature-dependent capacitance versus frequency (C-f) spectra, and current-voltage (J-V) characteristics. We noted that p-i-n type PSCs having PEDOT:PSS or PTAA as hole transport layer display negative capacitance feature at low and intermediate frequencies. The activation energies (Ea) for the observance of negative capacitance were found to be in a similar order of magnitude required for the ionic migration. Moreover, the kinetic relaxation time (τkin) estimated to be in the same order of magnitude required to activate the halide ion migration. Our investigation suggests that the primary reason for the appearance of negative capacitance in PSCs with a p-i-n configuration is associated with the migration of halide ions and vacancies in the perovskite layers.

Subject areas: Energy Resources, Energy Systems, Energy Materials, Devices

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name fx1.jpg

Highlights

  • Negative capacitance in p-i-n device was unraveled from immittance spectroscopy

  • Under external bias, halide ions/vacancies migrate toward HTL/perovskites interface

  • Charge carriers discharge in trap states leading to the negative capacitance

  • In p-i-n devices PTAA-based HTL display improved charge transport compared with PEDOT:PSS


Energy Resources; Energy Systems; Energy Materials; Devices

Introduction

Despite the exceptional power conversion efficiency shown by perovskites solar cells (PSCs), they suffer from several eccentric behaviors such as dynamic J-V hysteresis (Snaith et al., 2014), giant low-frequency capacitance (Zarazua et al., 2016a, 2016b), inductive loop or negative capacitance, (Ebadi et al., 2014), and the origins of these phenomena are still not fully understood. The negative capacitance is an ambiguous feature observed in the PSCs, which harms device performance in terms of reduced open-circuit voltage (Voc) and fill factor, thus yielding a reduced power conversion efficiency (Fabregat-Santiago et al., 2017). The observance of the inductive loop or negative capacitance at low and medium frequencies was explained via both bulk and interfacial effects, including ion migration and accumulation at the interface of perovskites/charge extraction layers (Guillen et al., 2014; Dualeh et al., 2014; Miyano et al., 2015), trapping/detrapping of charge carriers at interfacial trap states, frequency-induced changes in resistance (Klotz, 2019), and electrochemical reaction (Zohar et al., 2016). Additionally, the negative capacitance was also explicated through interfacial phenomenon where the charge injection from perovskite to charge-selective layer is mediated through interfacial states (Guerrero et al., 2016; Bisquert et al., 2016). Under open-circuit conditions or due to photovoltage, the interfacial states become depopulated leading to negative capacitance.

The capacitance refers to the charge held by an arrangement for an applied voltage; accordingly, negative capacitance corresponds to the drop in stored charges, on the applied voltage increases. Recently, Ebadi et al. reported that negative capacitance is not related to the classical capacitive effect and rather corresponds to slow transients in the injection current (Ebadi et al., 2014). Alvarez et al. found that the negative capacitance and inverted J-V hysteresis in PSC's features stemmed from the same origin, i.e., large kinetic relaxation times because of an increased recombination value (Alvarez et al., 2020). The correlation for the ionic-to-electronic current amplification for the observance of low-frequency photoinduced capacitance was established (Choi et al., 2020), while the origin of the negative capacitance through the formation of an inversion layer at interface leading to bending of energy band under illumination or open-circuit condition is also reported (Feng et al., 2018). The surface polarization model, which describes the anomalous J-V hysteresis was also employed to expound the negative capacitance in PSCs. In this model, the negative capacitance was assigned to the assumption of large charge accumulation at the interface of the perovskites/electron transport layer (ETL), which delays surface voltage, and subsequent detection of negative capacitance (Alvarez et al., 2020, and Ghahremanirad et al., 2017).

Inductive loop or negative capacitance is not limited to a specific device configuration and reported for both types of devices (n-i-p or p-i-n) (Ebadi et al., 2014; Guerrero et al., 2016), with or without charge-selective contacts (Choi et al., 2020; Feng et al., 2018 and Ghahremanirad et al., 2017); moreover, it was also noted in MAPbBr3 single crystal (Kovalenko et al., 2017). Thus, inductive loop and negative capacitance in PSCs are unrelated to the grain-boundary defects or interfacial phenomenon; rather they are intrinsic properties of perovskite material itself. Arguably, negative capacitance observed in PSCs is becoming one of the firmest features to interpret. So far, most of the studies on negative capacitance in PSCs are rather speculative and lack a systematic approach to elucidate its origin. Although these studies provide significant information about negative capacitance, the adequate hypothesis for its origin has not yet been explained.

In this report, we have decipher the origin of negative capacitance by investigating the bias and illumination dependence impedance spectra, temperature-dependent capacitance versus frequency (C-f) spectra, and current-voltage (J-V) characteristics. For this study, we have employed two different p-type materials including poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) polystyrene sulfonate (PEDOT:PSS) and poly[bis(4-phenyl) (2,4,6-trimethylphenyl)amine (PTAA) in inverted configuration, viz., ITO/PEDOT:PSS/PVSK/PC61BM/BCP/Ag (device A) and ITO/PTAA/PVSK/PC61BM/BCP/Ag (device B) (Figure 1). The perovskite composition was kept similar. It was found that negative capacitance appears under the applied bias condition or above a critical temperature in both devices. Our investigation suggests that the origin of negative capacitance is related to the migration of halide vacancies due to their low activation energies.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Schematic diagram

p-i-n devices with PEDOT:PSS and PTAA as hole transport materials (device A and B).

Results

Observance of the inductive loop in impedance spectra

The impedance spectra (IS) of fabricated devices were measured at short circuit conditions and in the presence of applied bias under dark and variable illumination intensity (Figure 2). The diameter of the Nyquist plot decreases when the light illumination intensity increases. Impedance spectra under dark at short circuit conditions display a single arc, whereas under illumination, an additional arc appears. With the increase in illumination intensity the diameter of the left semicircle (high frequency) decreases, whereas the diameter increases for the right arc (low frequency). The high-frequency semicircle described the charge transfer and recombination through perovskite/charge-selective contacts, whereas the low-frequency arc was attributed to charge carrier (e-h) recombination, dielectric relaxation, and ionic migration in the perovskite layer. In the presence of applied bias, the low-frequency arc in both devices collapsed below the real impedance axis, drawing an inductive loop.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Impedance plot

(A–D) Impedance spectra at short circuit condition (A and B) and at different applied bias (C and D) for type A and type B devices. Here “D” stands for dark and L1, L2, L3, L4, and L5 represent the illumination intensities of 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, and 0.5 sun, respectively.

To analyze the IS, different equivalent circuits (EC) were used. We noted that at short circuit condition and in the presence of external field, the IS fits using EC shown in Figures S1A and S1B, respectively, and the fitting parameters are represented in Tables S1 and S2 for device A and device B, respectively. Here, RS is the series resistance attributed to contacts and was in the range of 7–12 Ω, indicating intimate device contacts. The first capacitance, Cbulk, represents the geometrical or bulk capacitance of perovskite layer, which with R1 accounts for the arc at high frequencies (Zohar et al., 2016; Khan et al., 2019a, 2019b). This bulk capacitance (Cbulk) was extracted to be of the order of 10−8 F, and a small increment under illumination was noted, possibly due to photogeneration of charge carriers. The value of resistance R1 decreases with illumination or under applied bias due to an increase in the charge carrier density. The second capacitance, Cacc, labels the ionic migration and accumulation at the perovskite/ETL interface under short circuit condition and in the presence of external fields, respectively. The Cacc with R2 (related to recombination resistance) accounts for the low-frequency arc (Choi et al., 2020; Anaya et al., 2017; Khan et al., 2020, 2019). Ionic capacitance values in type A and type B devices under short circuit condition and dark were extracted to be 8.76 × 10−7 and 3.92 × 10−8 F, respectively; this value increased by an order of magnitude under light illumination. Under external bias, the accumulation of capacitance further increases by an order of magnitude with respective values of 1.67× 10−5 F and 1.99 × 10−4 F. This implies that under external bias or illumination, the ionic accumulation at the interface is higher compared with the short circuit and dark condition. The interfacial charge transfer resistance R2 defines arc radius of the inductive loop. It decreases in the presence of external fields and under illumination. According to the surface polarization model, the inductance becomes prominent for larger values of the kinetic relaxation constant τkin = L/RL (L is the inductance and RL is the resistance parallel to L); the loop becomes bigger and crosses the axis entering negative values (Ghahremanirad et al., 2017). The kinetic relaxation time for the device A and device B was calculated to be 0.57 s and 2.67 × 10−2 s, respectively, which is of the same order of magnitude required for the diffusion of halide vacancies (Wang et al., 2019). Arguably, the diffusion of halide vacancy is one of the primary causes for the appearance of low-frequency inductive loop in inverted PSCs.

Observation of negative capacitance

Mostly, inductance is related to the magnetic field, which is not the case here (neither magnetic field was applied nor any magnetic material was employed). Typically, inductive loop and negative capacitance are noted in the same device; therefore, inductance is considered the effect of reciprocal of negative capacitance. To investigate the origin of the inductive loop in impedance spectra, we made temperature dependence capacitance versus frequency (C-f) measurements (Figure 3). The C-f spectra show three distinct regions in agreement with the previous report (Khenkin et al., 2019). The high-frequency capacitance corresponds to the series resistance of contact electrodes; the capacitance in the intermediate frequency range is related to the dielectric relaxation in the perovskite layer and is determined by the geometrical capacitance per unit area. The low-frequency capacitance in type A and B devices first increases exponentially and subsequently drops rapidly to below zero with a negative value of capacitance. Moreover, with an increase in temperature the onset of drop frequency increases in both devices (A and B) and shifts to intermediates frequency. The rise of low-frequency capacitance corresponds to charge accumulation at perovskites/HTL interface and the drop in capacitance to negative value at lower frequency corresponds to the discharge of interfacial accumulated charge to the defect states due to ionic migration. With an increase in temperature, ions start to migrate faster and leave behind the trap states. The shift (increase) in drop frequency with temperature is attributed to faster (decrease) recombination (τ=1f)of charge carriers in defect states created by ionic migration.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Capacitance versus frequency curves

Capacitance versus frequency spectra as a function of temperature of (A)device A and (B) device B.

Discussion

Evidence of halide vacancy migration

The kinetic relaxation time derived for device A and device B are in the similar order required for the diffusion of halide vacancies. To further unravel the evidence for the ionic migration in the perovskite layers, the activation energy (Ea) was calculated from the Arrhenius plot of peak frequencies (fpeak) (extracted from fdCdf versus f plot and versus 1,000/T) (Figure 4). The activation energies for A and B devices were calculated to be 0.39 and 0.18 eV, respectively. The activation energies are in the range of the activation barrier for migrating I ions (0.08–0.58 eV) and lower than the activation energies required for migrating MA+ ions (0.46–0.84 eV) and Pb2+ ions (0.80–2.31 eV) (Azpiroz et al., 2015; Eames et al., 2015; Haruyama et al., 2015). Owing to the low activation energy, most mobile ions in perovskites are suggested to be the I ions, which can migrate easily across the perovskite layer under external bias or with the temperature rise in PSCs, and change the local stoichiometry of the entire layer, which in turn can influence the charge transport and its characteristic resistance. The activation energy depends on several factors, e.g., migration path (grain or bulk), grain boundaries, crystallinity, and defects. The different activation energy in two configurations might be due to the variation in perovskites structure and interfacial properties of perovskites with PTAA and PEDOT:PSS. The hydrophobic surface of PTAA is favorable for the growth of compact, pin-hole-free with larger grain perovskite layers (Shao and Loi, 2020). Alternatively, hydrophilic surface of PEDOT:PSS produces smaller grains and deep traps compared with PTAA. The large-sized grains in perovskite layers over PTAA provide a network for ionic migration compared with perovskites grown atop of PEDOT:PSS. We speculate that this phenomenon is responsible for the lower ionic activation barrier in PTAA as compared with PEDOT:PSS.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Derivative of capacitance versus frequency plots

(A–D) (-f × dC/df) versus frequency at different temperatures for (A) device A and (B) B device. Arrhenius plot of peak frequency (fpeak) versus 1000/T for (C) A and (D) B devices.

The migration rate of halide ions was evaluated through the equation k=(kBT)eEaRT, where KB is the Boltzmann constant, T is the temperature, ħ = h/2π is the Planck constant, R is the ideal gas constant, and Ea is the activation energy. The halide migration rate was in the order of ∼1013 s−1 at room temperature. The low activation energy led to the migration of iodide ions toward ETL with a migration rate of 1013 s−1 at room temperature. The I ions migration leaves behind iodide vacancy (VI+) and lattice distortion due to unbalanced charge. Under the influence of external bias, these defects and iodide vacancy (VI+) migrate toward the hole transport layer (HTL) and accumulate at HTL/perovskites interface (Figure 5A) with a concentration of Cm. The accumulated vacancies create shallow traps at HTL/perovskite interface, electrons from the conduction band can discharge in these defects, and charge carrier density at the interface decreases to (p0-Cm), where p0 is the charge carrier density in the bulk of films. Thus, with an increase in external bias, the net interfacial charge decreases, resulting in the observation of negative capacitance:C=dQdV. Our findings suggest that migration of halide ions and accumulation of halide vacancies at perovskite/HTL interface are the key reason for the appearance of negative capacitance in PSCs.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Schematic showing ion migration and accumulation

(A) Schematic illustration of the migration of iodide ions and vacancies migration in a perovskites layer under the external bias. The applied voltage causes diffusion of halide defects toward HTL, and compensate the iodide interstitial (Ii) and accumulate at HTL/perovskites interface and (B) the accumulated halide vacancies create shallow traps, where electrons recombine and reduce the interfacial charge density.

Furthermore, the negative capacitance in device B starts appearing at a lower temperature as compared with device A (Figure 3); this is because the activation energy in device B is about half that of device A. Thus, the migration of halide vacancies in device B was easy when compared with that in device A; consequently, negative capacitance in device B appears at lower temperature than of device A.

At short circuit condition, these defects follow a random migration path and distribute uniformly over the perovskite layer. At an applied bias, halide vacancies migrate toward the interface of HTL/perovskites and accumulate, thus affecting the interfacial space charge region due to the Fermi level equilibration (Khenkin et al., 2019). Moreover, these defects are also thermally activated; with an increase in temperature they accumulate at the interface, affecting the interfacial space charge region. To elucidate the effect of the accumulation of iodide vacancies on interfacial space charge, we measured the temperature-dependent dark J-V characteristics for A and B devices (Figures 6A and 6B).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Current density profile

(A–D) Experimental (symbols) and calculated (solid lines) J-V characteristics of (A) type A and (B) type B devices. Variation of current density as a function of temperature for (C) type A (at 0.5 V) and (D) type B (at 0.7 V) devices.

The J-V characteristics can be divided into two regions (i) lower field and (ii) higher field. At low applied bias, J-V characteristics follow Ohm's law, and electrical conductivity at room temperature was evaluated to be 7.68 × 10−9 and 4.27 × 10−8 S/cm for A and B devices, respectively. The higher conductivity in device B has an origin due to surface properties of PTAA, which favors compact, pin-hole-free devices and large grains of perovskites compared with PEDOT:PSS (Shao and Loi, 2020). This is in accordance with the device performance (Figure S2) owing to improved carrier transport (Khadka et al., 2017). The high-field region was fitted with space charge-limited current equation for distributing exponential traps (Blom et al., 1996; Khan et al., 2018; Kao and Hwang, 1981):

J=q1lμeffNeff(2l+1l+1)l+1(ll+1εHeff)lVl+1d2l+1

where q is the total charge, Neff is the effective density of states, ε is the permittivity of perovskite layer, d is the thickness of perovskite layer, and Heff is the sum of the shallow density of traps at the edge of the valence band and conduction band. μeff is the effective carrier mobility given by (Kao and Hwang, 1981):

μeff=μeμpεvσ[B(α/βvan,α/βvap)]3[B(3α/2βvan,3α/2βvap)]2

where μp and μe hole and electron mobilities, respectively; B(m, n) is the β function; σ is the capture cross-section; v is thermal velocity; and the product vσ is charge carrier capture rate constant or recombination rate constant. The fitting parameters used for A (B) device are: Heff = 1.3 × 1016 cm−3 (2.90 × 1016 cm−3), Neff = 6.0 × 1017 cm−3 (6.0 × 1017 cm−3), μeff = 4 × 10−4 cm2V−1s−1 (5.5 × 10−4 cm2V−1s−1). The effective carrier mobility in device B was noted to be slightly higher than of device A, a feature that is aligned with larger grain size in device B. The free carrier concentration in perovskite layers was estimated to be 1.25 × 1014 cm−3 and 5.59 × 1014 cm−3 for A and B devices, respectively.

Figures 6C and 6D illustrate the variation in the current density at the constant voltage at variable temperatures. We noted (Figures 6C and 6D) that the rate of current density increase below the critical temperature is low and is almost constant above the critical temperature. This implies that when the temperature reaches a critical temperature, the halide defect starts migrating toward HTL/perovskites interface, and the accumulation of these halide vacancies at interface rises, subsequently increasing accumulation of capacitance (Figures 3A and 3B). Moreover, Minns et al. reported a similar temperature (280 K) for migrating iodide defects in MAPbI3 via interstitial sites, which is comparable to this work (>250 K) (Minns et al., 2017). Furthermore, we performed Mott-Schottky analysis to derive information about the HTL/perovskites interface (Figure S3). We noted that depletion capacitance is not visible in both devices, suggesting that at room temperature the contribution of capacitance due to accumulation of halide vacancies dominates depletion capacitance in type devices A and B (Futscher et al., 2018). We speculate that when the devices acquire critical temperature, iodide vacancies activate and migrate toward HTL, creating additional trap states (Figure 5). Trap density (ntrap) increase above critical temperature can be established from the plot of the variation of trap density versus temperature (Figure S4). It can be deduced from the figures that the rate of trap density concerning temperature starts increasing above the critical temperature, suggesting the increase in trap density beyond critical temperature. In case where the temperature of devices cross the critical temperature, the migration of iodide vacancies is activated, increasing trap density at HTL/perovskites interface (Figure 5B). The charge carriers discharged in these defect states resulted in no further increase in current (Figures 6C and 6D). Due to the recombination of charge carriers in iodide recombination centers, the interfacial charge carrier density decreases, which leads to the appearance of negative capacitance.

An alternative explanation for the appearance of negative capacitance can be assigned to the decrease in the interfacial barrier. When the concentration of iodide vacancies (positive charge) at the interface reaches the threshold, the interfacial electric field increases, reducing the barrier height, which results in more charge carrier transfer from perovskites to HTL either via tunneling or injection as a result of the increase in device current in this temperature range (Figures 6C and 6D). Subsequently, interfacial charge carrier density decreases because of negative capacitance (Chen et al., 2016). The origin of negative capacitance remains the same, i.e., the migration of halide vacancies in perovskite layer and accumulation at HTL/perovskites interface.

Conclusion

To summarize, we have unraveled that under applied bias accumulation of capacitance increases, suggesting accumulation of iodide vacancies at HTL/perovskite interface. We assign the origin of negative capacitance in perovskites solar cells to the migration of halide vacancies. The inductive loop observed on the applied external bias is required to migrate the iodine vacancies. We noted a similar kinetic relaxation time for the diffusion of iodine vacancies and the activation energies, while the activation temperature is also in the same order required for migrating iodine vacancies. Above the activation temperature, trap density increases and the value of current becomes constant, signaling the creation of additional traps due to iodine vacancies and recombination of charge carriers in these trap states. Our findings suggest that under the activation conditions, the halide defects migrate toward hole transport layers and accumulate at the interface of perovskite; charge carriers recombine in these trap states decreasing carrier density, which in turn allows the appearance of negative capacitance.

Limitations of the study

We noted the appearance of negative capacitance in lead halide perovskites solar cells and it was ascribed to the migration of halide ions/vacancies. The different activation energies in the two types of devices suggest that the role of hole-selective layers/perovskites interface in the observation of negative capacitance requires further investigations.

Resource availability

Lead contact

Further requests for resources and materials should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the Lead Contact, Shahzada Ahmad (shahzada.ahmad@bcmaterials.net).

Materials availability

This study did not yield any new unique reagents.

Data and code availability

This study did not produce datasets/code.

Methods

All methods can be found in the accompanying Transparent methods supplemental file.

Acknowledgments

This work has received funding from the European Union H2020 Programme under the European Research Council Consolidator grant [MOLEMAT, 726360].

Author contributions

M.T.K performed the experiments, analyzed the data, and prepared the initial draft, P.H. fabricated the devices, A.A provided assistance to M.T.K., S.K. performed the analysis of the data, and S.A. supervised and directed the research. All authors contributed to the draft and prepared the final version.

Declaration of interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Published: February 19, 2021

Footnotes

Supplemental information can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2020.102024.

Supplemental information

Document S1. Transparent methods, Figures S1–S4, and Tables S1 and S2
mmc1.pdf (270.5KB, pdf)

References

  1. Alvarez A.O., Arcas R., Aranda C.A., Bethencourt L., Mas-Marza E., Fabregat-Santiago F. Negative capacitance and inverted hysteresis: matching features in perovskite solar cells. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2020;11:8417–8423. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c02331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anaya M., Zhang W., Hames B.C., Li Y., Fabregat-Santiago F., Calvo M.E., Snaith H.J., Miguez H., Mora-Sero I. Electron injection and scaffold effects in perovskite solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. C. 2017;5:634–644. doi: 10.1039/c6tc04639h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Azpiroz J.M., Mosconi E., Bisquert J., De Angelis F. Defect migration in methylammonium lead iodide and its role in perovskite solar cell operation. Energy Environ. Sci. 2015;8:2118–2127. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bisquert J., Garcia-Belmonte G., Pitarch A., Bolink H.J. Negative capacitance caused by electron injection through interfacial states in organic light-emitting diodes. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2016;422:184–191. [Google Scholar]
  5. Blom P.W.M., De Jong M.J.M., Vleggaar J.J.M. Electron and hole transport in poly(p-phenylene vinylene) devices. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1996;68:3308–3310. [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen S., Wen X., Sheng R., Huang S., Deng X., Green M.A., Ho-Baillie A. Mobile ion induced slow carrier dynamics in organic–inorganic perovskite CH3NH3PbBr3. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2016;8:5351. doi: 10.1021/acsami.5b12376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Choi W., Song S.W., Han S.G., Cho K. The origin of photoinduced capacitance in perovskite solar cells: beyond ionic-to-electronic current amplification. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2020;6:2000030. [Google Scholar]
  8. Dualeh A., Tetreault N., Teuscher J., Gao P., Nazeeruddin M.K., Graetzel M. Impedance spectroscopic analysis of lead iodide perovskite-sensitized solid-state solar cells. ACS Nano. 2014;8:362–373. doi: 10.1021/nn404323g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Eames C., Frost J.M., Barnes P.R., O’Regan B.C., Walsh A., Islam M.S. Ionic transport in hybrid lead iodide perovskite solar cells. Nat. Commun. 2015;6:7497. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8497. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ebadi F., Taghavinia N., Mohammadpour R., Hagfeldt A., Tress W. Origin of apparent light-enhanced and negative capacitance in perovskite solar cells. Nat. Commun. 2014;10:1574. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09079-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fabregat-Santiago F., Kulbak M., Zohar A., Valles-Pelarda M., Hodes G., Cahen D., Mora-Sero I. Deleterious effect of negative capacitance on the performance of halide perovskite solar cells. ACS Energy Lett. 2017;2:2007–2013. [Google Scholar]
  12. Feng Y., Bian J., Wang M., Wang S., Zhang C., Dong Q., Zhang B., Shi Y. Interfacial negative capacitance in planar perovskite solar cells: an interpretation based on band theory. Mater. Res. Bull. 2018;107:74–79. [Google Scholar]
  13. Futscher M.H., Lee J.M., Mcgovern L., Muscarella L.A., Wang T., Haider M.I., Ehrler B. Quantification of ion migration in CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite solar cells by transient capacitance measurements. Mater. Horiz. 2018;6:1497–1503. [Google Scholar]
  14. Ghahremanirad E., Bou A., Olyaee S., Bisquert J. Inductive loop in the impedance response of perovskite solar cells explained by surface polarization model. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2017;8:1402–1406. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b00415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Guerrero A., Garcia-Belmonte G., Mora-Sero I., Bisquert J., Kang Y.S., Jacobsson T.J., Correa-Baena J.-P., Hagfeldt A. Properties of contact and bulk impedances in hybrid lead halide perovskite solar cells including inductive loop elements. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2016;120:8023–8032. [Google Scholar]
  16. Guillen E., Ramos F.J., Anta J.A., Ahmad S. Elucidating transport-recombination mechanisms in perovskite solar cells by small-perturbation techniques. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2014;118:22913–22922. [Google Scholar]
  17. Haruyama J., Sodeyama K., Han L., Tateyama Y. First-principles study of ion diffusion in perovskite solar cell sensitizers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015;137:10048–10051. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b03615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kao K.C., Hwang W. Pergamon Press; 1981. Electrical Transport in Solids. [Google Scholar]
  19. Khadka D.B., Shirai Y., Yanagida M., Ryan J.W., Miyano K. Exploring the effects of interfacial carrier transport layers on device performance and optoelectronic properties of planar perovskite solar cells. J. Mater. Chem. C. 2017;5:8819–8827. [Google Scholar]
  20. Khan M.T., Agarawal V., Almohammedi A., Gupta V. Effect of traps on the charge transport in semiconducting polymer PCDTBT. Solid State Electron. 2018;145:49–53. [Google Scholar]
  21. Khan M.T., Almohammedi A.R.D., Kazim S., Ahmad S. Electrical methods to elucidate charge transport in hybrid perovskites thin films and devices. Chem. Rec. 2020;20:452–465. doi: 10.1002/tcr.201900055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Khan M.T., Salado M., Almohammedi A., Kazim S., Ahmad S. Elucidating the impact of charge selective contact in halide perovskite through impedance spectroscopy. Adv. Mater. Interfaces. 2019;6:1901193. [Google Scholar]
  23. Khenkin M.V., Anoop K.M., Katz E.A., Visoly-Fisher I. Bias-dependent degradation of various solar cells: lessons for stability of perovskite photovoltaics. Energy Environ. Sci. 2019;12:550–558. [Google Scholar]
  24. Klotz D. Negative capacitance or inductive loop? – a general assessment of a common low frequency impedance feature. Electrochem. Commun. 2019;98:58–62. [Google Scholar]
  25. Kovalenko A., Pospisil J., Zmeskal O., Krajcovic J., Weiter M. Ionic origin of a negative capacitance in lead halide perovskites. Phys. Status Solidi RRL. 2017;11:1600418. [Google Scholar]
  26. Minns J.L., Zajdel P., Chernyshov D., Van Beek W., Green M.A. Structure and interstitial iodide migration in hybrid perovskite methylammonium lead iodide. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:15152. doi: 10.1038/ncomms15152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Miyano K., Yanagida M., Tripathi N., Shirai Y. Simple characterization of electronic processes in perovskite photovoltaic cells. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015;106:093903. [Google Scholar]
  28. Shao S., Loi M.A. The role of the interfaces in perovskite solar cells. Adv. Mater. Interfaces. 2020;7:1901469. [Google Scholar]
  29. Snaith H.J., Abate A., Ball J.M., Eperon G.E., Leijtens T., Noel N.K., Stranks S.D., Wang J.T.-W., Wojciechowski K., Zhang W. Anomalous hysteresis in perovskite solar Cells. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2014;5:1511–1515. doi: 10.1021/jz500113x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Wang H., Guerrero A., Bou A., Al-Mayouf A.M., Bisquert J. Kinetic and material properties of interfaces governing slow response and long timescale phenomena in perovskite solar cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 2019;12:2054. [Google Scholar]
  31. Zarazua I., Bisquert J., Garcia-Belmonte G.J. Light-Induced space-charge accumulation zone as photovoltaic mechanism in perovskite solar cells. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2016;7:525–528. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b02810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Zarazua I., Han G., Boix P.P., Mhaisalkar S., Fabregat-Santiago F., Mora-Sero I., Bisquert J., Garcia-Belmonte G. Surface recombination and collection efficiency in perovskite solar cells from impedance analysis. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2016;7:5105–5113. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b02193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Zohar A., Kedem N., Levine I., Zohar D., Vilan A., Ehre D., Hodes G., Cahen D. Impedance spectroscopic indication for solid state electrochemical reaction in (CH3NH3)PbI3 films. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2016;7:191–197. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b02618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Document S1. Transparent methods, Figures S1–S4, and Tables S1 and S2
mmc1.pdf (270.5KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

This study did not produce datasets/code.


Articles from iScience are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES