Skip to main content
NPJ Parkinson's Disease logoLink to NPJ Parkinson's Disease
. 2021 Jan 21;7:11. doi: 10.1038/s41531-020-00154-7

Astrogliosis and sexually dimorphic neurodegeneration and microgliosis in the olfactory bulb in Parkinson’s disease

Alicia Flores-Cuadrado 1, Daniel Saiz-Sanchez 1, Alicia Mohedano-Moriano 2, Elena Lamas-Cenjor 1, Victor Leon-Olmo 1, Alino Martinez-Marcos 1, Isabel Ubeda-Bañon 1,
PMCID: PMC7820595  PMID: 33479244

Abstract

Hyposmia is prodromal, and male sex is a risk marker for an enhanced likelihood ratio of Parkinson’s disease. The literature regarding olfactory bulb volume reduction is controversial, although the olfactory bulb has been largely reported as an early and preferential site for α-synucleinopathy. These pathological deposits have been correlated with neural loss in Nissl-stained material. However, microgliosis has rarely been studied, and astrogliosis has been virtually neglected. In the present report, α-synucleinopathy (α-synuclein), neurodegeneration (Neu-N), astrogliosis (GFAP), and microgliosis (Iba-1) were quantified, using specific markers and stereological methods. Disease, sex, age, disease duration, and post-mortem interval were considered variables for statistical analysis. No volumetric changes have been identified regarding disease or sex. α-Synucleinopathy was present throughout the OB, mainly concentrated on anterior olfactory nucleus. Neurodegeneration (reduction in Neu-N-positive cells) was statistically significant in the diseased group. Astrogliosis (increased GFAP labeling) and microgliosis (increased Iba-1 labeling) were significantly enhanced in the Parkinson’s disease group. When analyzed per sex, neurodegeneration and microgliosis differences are only present in men. These data constitute the demonstration of sex differences in neurodegeneration using specific neural markers, enhanced astrogliosis and increased microgliosis, also linked to male sex, in the human olfactory bulb in Parkinson’s disease.

Subject terms: Parkinson's disease, Parkinson's disease

Introduction

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is the second most prevalent neurodegenerative disorder characterized by an associated proteinopathy (α-synucleinopathy), long prodromal period, unknown etiology1, and multifactorial pathogenesis2. According to the last Movement Disorder Society research criteria, masculine sex and olfactory loss are markers with a positive likelihood ratio notably increased risk factors for PD3. Accumulating evidence supports the neuroprotective role of estrogens in PD, given the rise of a more benign phenotype in women4,5. Hyposmia has also been largely reported as a prodromal deficit in PD6 with no apparent sexually olfactory sensory differences7. Interestingly, α-synuclein (α-syn) aggregates (Lewy bodies and neurites) have been described in the olfactory bulb (OB) at early neuropathological stages of the disease8,9. In fact, these deposits are particularly conspicuous in the OB1013. A previous study in our laboratory showed that Lewy bodies and Lewy neurites were present in mitral cells and the inner plexiform layer and they were particularly abundant in the anterior olfactory nucleus. However, α-syn was scarce in olfactory cortices and it rarely co-localized with tyrosine hydroxylase12. It has recently been published that the α-syn are also localized in non-neuronal cells as glial and astroglial cells in the anterior olfactory nucleus14. Potential sexual dimorphic differences have only been occasionally addressed in the human OB15, showing that the number of neurons in females was 49.3% higher than males. Also, microglial cells in females proved 38.7% greater than males.

Studies using deformation-based morphometry and partial least squares have demonstrated subtle gray matter changes in regions where atrophy is related to motor and non-motor features16, which would be consistent with the Braak hypothesis of accumulative and predictable α-synucleinopathy in prion-like staging throughout given neural connections17. In the OB, literature on volumetric changes is controversial18,19, with studies showing significant2023 or non-significant2426 volume reduction in PD. A meta-analysis concluded that the volume was significantly reduced in PD patients vs. controls, and among diseased brains, the left bulb was significantly smaller27.

Morphometric and stereological studies using Nissl-stained post-mortem human tissue have demonstrated significant cell loss in the OB and tract, particularly in the anterior olfactory nucleus, showing correlation with disease progression and Lewy pathology28. No significant volumetric changes have been described, but an increase in dopaminergic cells has been described29,30 and it is significantly higher in males31,32. Increased microgliosis has also been reported in neurodegenerative proteinopathies, including PD with dementia, compared to age-matched controls33.

The available literature is controversial regarding volumetric changes and potential interhemispheric or sexual differences. Previous reports describing neural loss have exclusively used Nissl-stained material, and glial markers have only sporadically been used. Therefore, unbiased stereological methods and specific markers were used to rigorously measure OB volume and to quantify α-syn, the number of neurons (Fox-3, Rbfox3, or Hexaribonucleotide Binding Protein-3, Neu-N), and astroglial (glial fibrillary acidic protein, GFAP) and microglial (ionized calcium binding adaptor molecule 1, Iba-1) cells in groups of diseased and non-diseased individuals. Apart from disease, potential sexually dimorphic changes have also been considered as a variable for analysis.

Results

Olfactory bulb volume

Using starting sections of every OB (Fig. 1a), the total volume of the different individuals was estimated by the Cavalieri method. Data regarding estimated area, corrected volume for overprojection, coefficient of error (Gundersen, m = 1), section thickness, number of sections analyzed, interval between sections, grid size, number of sections, and number of elements counted are presented in Table 1. Since the data were distributed normally, an unpaired two-tailed t-test was applied. This did not reveal differences between PD and non-Parkinson’s disease (NPD) cases (t22 = 0.1108; p = 0.9128) (Fig. 1b). Two-way ANOVA did not show intersexual differences either (interaction: F (1, 20) = 0.3996, p = 0.5345; sex: F (1, 20) = 1.172, p = 0.2918; disease: F (1, 20) = 0.004056, p = 0.9499) (Fig. 1c).

Fig. 1. Olfactory bulb volume.

Fig. 1

Mosaic reconstruction of Nissl-stained images of horizontal sections of the human olfactory bulb. Calibration bar, 1000 µm (a). Graphs illustrating the volume data in Parkinson’s disease (PD) and non-Parkinson’s disease (NPD) groups (b) and including the sex of individuals (c).

Table 1.

Estimated olfactory bulb volume.

Cases DxAP Estimated area (µm²) Volume corrected for overprojection (µm³) Coefficient of error (Gundersen), m = 1 Section cut thickness (µm) Section evaluation interval Grid size (µm) Sections Count
1 PD 224,250,000 53,034,400,000 0.012 50 5 250 7 3588
2 PD 187,438,000 44,768,700,000 0.012 50 5 250 6 2999
3 PD 210,875,000 50,518,800,000 0.011 50 5 250 8 3374
4 PD 229,500,000 54,968,800,000 0.007 50 5 250 7 3672
5 PD 138,375,000 33,246,900,000 0.010 50 5 250 7 2214
6 PD 131,750,000 31,187,500,000 0.015 50 5 250 5 2108
7 PD 175,000,000 41,571,900,000 0.014 50 5 250 5 2800
8 PD 157,000,000 37,537,500,000 0.010 50 5 250 6 2512
9 PD 124,312,000 29,475,000,000 0.016 50 5 250 5 1989
11 PD 160,438,000 38,250,000,000 0.015 50 5 250 5 2567
13 PD 81,500,000 18,750,000,000 0.028 50 5 250 3 1304
14 PD 170,562,000 40,415,600,000 0.014 50 5 250 5 2729
15 PD 112,812,000 26,590,600,000 0.020 50 5 250 5 1805
16 PD 257,875,000 61,578,100,000 0.013 50 5 250 6 4126
18 NPD 243,750,000 58,831,200,000 0.008 50 5 250 8 3900
19 NPD 130,688,000 31,103,100,000 0.014 50 5 250 5 2091
20 NPD 105,125,000 24,756,300,000 0.023 50 5 250 4 1682
21 NPD 223,688,000 53,815,600,000 0.013 50 5 250 8 3579
22 NPD 215,375,000 51,653,100,000 0.009 50 5 250 9 3446
23 NPD 185,438,000 44,434,400,000 0.008 50 5 250 8 2967
24 NPD 225,812,000 53,646,900,000 0.010 50 5 250 7 3613
25 NPD 123,188,000 29,128,100,000 0.013 50 5 250 5 1971
26 NPD 147,875,000 35,446,900,000 0.009 50 5 250 6 2366
27 NPD 103,375,000 24,293,800,000 0.017 50 5 250 4 1654

α-Synucleinopathy

The distribution of α-syn was stereologically analyzed by two different approaches: optical fractionator and area fraction fractionator. Data regarding elements counted, number of sections, number of sampling sites, coefficient of error (Gundersen, m = 1), counting frame area, sampling grade area, estimated population, volume, density, and area fraction are available in Tables 2 and 3. α-Syn aggregates and fibers were not observed in NPD (Fig. 2a, b), whereas those were present throughout the OB, mainly concentrated on anterior olfactory nucleus (dark staining) of the 11 PD cases used in this study (Fig. 2c–f). Density, which was obtained after dividing the estimated population (optical fractionator probe) by the volume, was similar in both males and females, being 154,100 ± 66,617 and 161,151 ± 41,570 α-syn aggregates/mm3, respectively (unpaired two-tailed t-test, t9 = 0.2048, p = 0.8423) (Fig. 2g). The area fraction of α-syn (area fraction fractionator probe), which measured the percentage of area occupied by aggregates and fibers, was also analogous between males (35.38 ± 10.74%) and females (39.80 ± 3.978%) (Mann–Whitney U = 11, p = 0.5281) (Fig. 2h).

Table 2.

Estimated olfactory bulb α-synuclein number and density.

Cases DxAP Total markers counted Number of sections Number of sampling sites Coefficient of error (Gundersen), m = 1 Counting frame area (XY) (µm²) Sampling grid area (XY) (µm²) Estimated population using mean section thickness Measured volume (mm³) Density (cell/mm3)
5 PD 499 6 236 0.05 900 250,000 829,533.44 14.39 57,666.56
7 PD 481 4 70 0.05 900 1,000,000 3,193,458.75 17.73 180,129.32
8 PD 499 5 62 0.05 900 1,000,000 3,342,852.25 15.70 212,874.43
9 PD 413 5 61 0.05 900 1,000,000 2,718,442.00 15.70 173,182.26
10 PD 1744 3 196 0.03 900 250,000 2,938,421.25 11.86 247,775.67
11 PD 395 4 77 0.06 900 1,000,000 2,598,875.75 19.65 132,230.04
12 PD 203 7 51 0.07 900 1,000,000 1,333,214.38 11.52 115,769.61
14 PD 460 6 93 0.05 900 1,000,000 3,032,370.50 22.55 134,480.95
15 PD 296 5 75 0.06 900 1,000,000 1,948,283.75 18.15 107,339.32
16 PD 508 3 73 0.07 900 250,000 854,206.94 4.29 198,906.27
17 PD 648 3 108 0.05 900 250,000 1,088,870.25 6.40 170,003.69

Table 3.

Estimated olfactory bulb α-synuclein area fraction.

Cases DxAP Marker count Total markers counted Number of sections Number of sampling sites Grid spacing (µm) Coefficient of error (Gundersen), m = 1 Counting frame area (XY) (µm²) Sampling grid area (XY) (µm²) Area fraction (%)
5 PD 465 2891 6 79 15 0.038 10,000 250,000 16.08
7 PD 1331 3007 4 78 15 0.035 10,000 1,000,000 44.26
8 PD 1163 2740 5 67 15 0.021 10,000 1,000,000 42.45
9 PD 996 2807 5 72 15 0.019 10,000 1,000,000 35.48
10 PD 727 2031 3 51 15 0.031 10,000 250,000 35.80
11 PD 1407 3430 4 86 15 0.035 10,000 1,000,000 41.02
12 PD 934 1926 7 51 15 0.025 10,000 1,000,000 48.49
14 PD 1258 3064 6 95 15 0.026 10,000 1,000,000 41.06
15 PD 1326 3707 5 92 15 0.040 10,000 1,000,000 35.77
16 PD 254 721 3 18 15 0.041 10,000 250,000 35.23
17 PD 424 1190 3 32 15 0.027 10,000 250,000 35.63

Fig. 2. α-Synucleinopathy.

Fig. 2

Mosaic reconstruction and high-power details of α-synuclein-stained images of horizontal section of the human olfactory bulb in non-Parkinson’s disease (a, b) and Parkinson’s disease (cf). Details of α-synuclein aggregates and fibers (d) in layers (e) and in anterior olfactory nucleus (f). Graphs (Mean ± SD) showing the quantification of α-synuclein’s density (aggregates/mm3) (g) and the area fraction percentage (h). Calibration bars, a and c 1000 µm; b, e, f 125 µm; d 50 µm.

Neurodegeneration

Neu-N labeling in the NPD (Fig. 3a, b) and PD (Fig. 3c, d) groups was analyzed using an optical fractionator probe. Data regarding elements counted, number of sections, number of sampling sites, coefficient of error (Gundersen, m = 1), counting frame area, sampling grade area, estimated population, volume, and density are available in Table 4. Statistical analysis revealed a significant neural loss in PD compared to NPD cases (unpaired two-tailed t-test, t21 = 3.617, p = 0.0016) (Fig. 3e). Two-way ANOVA including neurodegeneration and sex (between and within) demonstrated that degeneration was only significant in males (interaction: F (1, 19) = 0.1145, p = 0.7388; sex: F (1, 19) = 0.2889, p = 0.5965; disease: F (1, 19) = 11.21, p = 0.0034). Given that the disease factor was significant, to identify this difference, the analysis of each sex was separately carried out, which showed differences only in males (male: unpaired two-tailed t-test, t11 = 2.794, p = 0.0175; female: unpaired two-tailed t-test, t8 = 2.017, p = 0.0784) (Fig. 3f).

Fig. 3. Neurodegeneration.

Fig. 3

Mosaic reconstruction of Neu-N-immunoreacted images of horizontal sections of the human olfactory bulb in non-Parkinson’s disease (a) and a Parkinson’s disease case (c) and the corresponding high-power details (b, d). Calibration bars, a, c 1000 µm; b, d 100 µm. Graphs (Mean ± SD) illustrating the density of Neu-N-positive cells in the Parkinson’s disease (PD) and non-Parkinson’s disease (NPD) groups (e) and including the sex of individuals (f).

Table 4.

Estimated olfactory bulb neuron number and density.

Cases DxAP Total markers counted Number of sections Number of sampling sites Coefficient of error (Gundersen), m = 1 Counting frame area (XY) (µm²) Sampling grid area (XY) (µm²) Estimated population using mean section thickness Measured volume (mm3) Density (cell/mm3)
1 PD 493 5 114 0.05 900 1,000,000 3,325,011.11 29.23 113,724.97
2 PD 334 4 111 0.06 900 640,000 1,436,942.22 17.36 82,790.34
3 PD 477 5 132 0.05 900 1,000,000 3,263,984.62 32.05 101,832.13
4 PD 394 5 131 0.05 900 1,000,000 2,756,540.74 32.21 85,565.67
5 PD 944 2 159 0.06 900 90,000 584,336 3.45 169,378.65
7 PD 226 5 84 0.08 900 1,000,000 1,582,000 21.15 74,796.23
8 PD 212 5 61 0.07 900 1,000,000 1,457,303.70 15.79 92,261.27
9 PD 246 5 67 0.07 900 1,000,000 1,648,200 17.21 95,743.75
10 PD 166 3 49 0.09 900 640,000 714,168.89 8.61 82,946.54
11 PD 473 4 132 0.07 900 640,000 2,085,404.44 20.06 103,930.89
13 PD 330 2 165 0.10 900 90,000 204,380 4.18 48,931.73
14 PD 477 4 122 0.05 900 640,000 2,071,381.33 18.77 110,347.14
15 PD 174 5 69 0.08 900 1,000,000 1,178,044.44 16.07 73,324.40
16 PD 380 4 140 0.06 900 640,000 1,700,598.52 21.60 78,716.11
18 NPD 292 3 67 0.07 900 640,000 1,306,083.56 10.04 130,098.37
19 NPD 269 5 51 0.07 900 1,000,000 1,877,022.22 12.93 145,193.83
20 NPD 134 3 54 0.09 900 640,000 598,731.85 8.06 74,252.84
21 NPD 405 5 101 0.05 900 1,000,000 2,845,500 24.23 117,437.06
22 NPD 553 7 120 0.05 900 1,000,000 3,813,651.85 29.07 131,207.08
23 NPD 250 3 60 0.07 900 640,000 1,110,518.52 10.10 109,899.01
24 NPD 499 6 107 0.05 900 1,000,000 3,509,633.33 27.18 129,132.71
25 NPD 194 5 41 0.08 900 1,000,000 1,354,407.41 9.80 138,138.73
26 NPD 421 3 123 0.07 900 90,000 258,353.67 2.55 101,168.37
28 NPD 358 6 106 0.07 900 1,000,000 2,507,325.93 25.12 99,803.60

To confirm whether neurodegeneration was correlated to α-synucleinopathy, linear regression and Pearson test were carried out. The results did not show that the density of Neu-N (cells/mm3) was decreased as density of α-syn (aggregates/mm3) increased (Pearson r = −0.2418, p = 0.5639) (Supplementary Fig. 1a).

Astrogliosis

Analysis of GFAP labeling in both sexes and in NPD (Fig. 4a, b, e, g) and PD cases (Fig. 4c, d, f, h) using the area fraction method demonstrated a significant increase in diseased compared to non-diseased brains (unpaired two-tailed t-test, t25 = 2.394, p = 0.0245) (Fig. 4i). When analyzed per sex, a non-significant trend toward astrogliosis in PD was observed (two-way ANOVA: interaction: F (1, 23) = 0.06800, p = 0.7966; sex: F (1, 23) = 0.9359, p = 0.3434; disease: F (1, 23) = 4.545, p = 0.0439). Given that the disease factor was significant, to identify this difference, the analysis of each sex was separately carried out, which did not show differences in either sex (male: unpaired two-tailed t-test, t14 = 1.731, p = 0.1054; female: unpaired two-tailed t-test, t9 = 1.474, p = 0.1745) (Fig. 4j). The correlation of α-syn with GFAP was analyzed by linear regression and Pearson test using area fraction values (Pearson r = −0.4484, p = 0.1937). No correlation was detected (Supplementary Fig. 1b).

Fig. 4. Astrogliosis.

Fig. 4

Mosaic reconstruction of GFAP-immunolabeled images of horizontal sections of the human olfactory bulb in non-Parkinson’s disease (a) and a Parkinson’s disease case (c) and the corresponding high-magnification (b, d). Images of GFAP-immunoreacted horizontal sections of the human olfactory bulb in non-Parkinson’s disease (e, g) and a Parkinson’s disease case (f, h) in both sexes. M: males (e, f); F: females (g, h). Calibration bars, a, c 1000 µm; bh 125 µm. Graphs (Mean ± SD) represent the percentage of the area fraction of GFAP in the Parkinson’s disease (PD) and non-Parkinson’s disease (NPD) groups (i) and including the sex of individuals (j).

Microgliosis

Iba-1 labeling in NPD (Fig. 5a, b, e, g) and PD cases of both sexes was analyzed (Fig. 5c, d, f, h). Area fraction quantification showed a significant increase in the percentage of PD patients compared to NPD patients (Mann–Whitney U = 37.50, p = 0.0370) (Fig. 5i). Analysis per sex showed that this difference was even greater in males, but it does not exist in females (two-way ANOVA: interaction: F (1, 21) = 3.530, p = 0.0742; sex: F (1, 21) = 0.3932, p = 0.5374; disease: F (1, 21) = 3.759, p = 0.0661) (Fig. 5j). Regarding to the involvement the α-syn with microgliosis, linear regression and Pearson test were carried out. The area fraction of Iba-1 was not correlated to area fraction of α-syn (Pearson r = −0.2275, p = 0.5560) (Supplementary Fig. 1c).

Fig. 5. Microgliosis.

Fig. 5

Mosaic reconstruction of Iba-1-immunolabeled images of horizontal sections of the human olfactory bulb in non-Parkinson’s disease (a) and a Parkinson’s disease case (c) and the corresponding high-magnification (b, d). Images of Iba-1 immunoreactive horizontal sections of the human olfactory bulb in non-Parkinson’s disease (e, g) and a Parkinson’s disease case (f, h) in both sexes. M: males (e, f); F: females (g, h). Calibration bars, a, c 1000 µm; bh 125 µm. Graphs (Mean ± SD) represent the percentage of the area fraction of Iba-1 in the Parkinson’s disease (PD) and non-Parkinson’s disease (NPD) groups (i) and including the sex of individuals (j).

Further correlations

Apart from age and sex, post-mortem human OBs are highly heterogeneous due to other factors such as interindividual differences, disease duration, and post-mortem interval. To analyze this variability, all markers (density of α-syn, density of Neu-N, area fraction of Iba-1, and area fraction of GFAP) were compared to disease duration and post-mortem interval. No significant correlations were found (Supplementary Figs. 2 and 3).

Discussion

Demographically, the data presented in this report demonstrate that the group of PD-diagnosed individuals was significantly older than the NPD group. However, when estimated per sex, this age difference was only detected in the female group (Fig. 6). The data presented in this report demonstrate no volumetric changes between PD and NPD cases, either between sex (Fig. 1). α-syn quantification did not show differences between males and females, and the labeling was concentrated on anterior olfactory nucleus (Fig. 2). Neurodegeneration, considered a reduction in Neu-N-positive cells, was demonstrated in the diseased group and was also significant in men (Fig. 3). However, astrogliosis, demonstrated by the increased area fraction of GFAP labeling, was significant in the PD group compared with the NPD group, but this difference was not significant when analyzed per sex (Fig. 4). Finally, microgliosis, assumed by augmented labeling of Iba-1, was significantly found in the PD group. When studied per sex, this difference was only found in men (Fig. 5). Since the PD and NPD groups of men were age matched, this microgliosis can be attributed to a sex effect. To the best of our knowledge, microgliosis linked to masculine sex was previously unreported.

Fig. 6. Age and sex.

Fig. 6

Graphs illustrating age (a) and age and sex (b) in Parkinson’s disease (PD) and non-Parkinson’s disease (NPD) groups.

There are sex differences in the symptomatology, pathophysiology, susceptibility, medication use, levodopa bioavailability, among others in PD34,35. Focusing on symptomatology, pathophysiology, and susceptibility, these differences could be due to exogenous and endogenous estrogens34,36. As a result, the incidence in men is greater than women (approximately 3:2 ratio)37. In fact, most women develop PD after menopause, confirmed by a positive correlation between age of PD onset and duration of fertile life34,35. Despite promising results about the estrogen neuroprotective effects in neurotoxic animal models36,3840, these might be not corroborated in the human disease. According to literature, a number of clinical studies had been performed to characterize the correlation between estrogens exposure and PD risk; however, the role of estrogens remains controversial due to disparity findings34,36. Estrogens have been associated to different roles: mediators in oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and protecting the nigrostriatal dopaminergic pathway34. The role of estrogens in this pathway has been studied using both gonadally intact and ovariectomized animals, showing that estrogens increase the nigral dopaminergic synthesis and the release of dopamine from nigral axon terminals within the striatum36. In humans, estrogens could affect clinical symptomatology, to improve41 or worsen42 motor symptoms. Therefore, it has been suggested other several variables as age, estrogen dose and formula, and timing and length of doses period36. In addition, it has been described other factors, as dysmorphological changes in the basal ganglia, younger women have a higher baseline number of dopaminergic cells in substantia nigra and also, sex chromosomes could be involved in the dopamine system.

As mentioned above, symptomatology is affected by sex. Regarding motor symptoms, women present tremor as initial symptoms of PD and worse UPDRS instability score in comparison with men35. According to non-motor symptoms, women have higher prevalence and severity of the sleep/fatigue, mood/apathy, and pain symptoms, whereas men have more urinary symptoms. Meanwhile, hyposmia, which has also been largely reported as a prodromal deficit in PD6, does not show apparent sexually olfactory sensory differences7.

Previous reports on OB volumetric changes in PD have been controversial18. Some magnetic resonance studies report volume reduction with the disease2023, whereas others do not observe changes2426. A recent meta-analysis concludes a volume reduction in PD, and among them, further significant reduction in the left OB27. Our present data using stereology match previous observations30 and do not report significant volume reduction regarding disease and sex (Fig. 1).

α-Synucleinopathy was localized throughout the OB, mainly converging on the different subdivisions of the anterior olfactory nucleus of the 11 PD cases used in this study, as previously described different reports8,12,14. The explanation that the densest labeling in the olfactory system was present in the anterior olfactory nucleus cannot be exclusively clarified from OB afferent connections, but it might be due to its multiple centripetal, centrifugal, commissural, associational, and non-olfactory connections43. Although our results of α-syn did not show differences between males and females (Fig. 2), it has been reported that once again the estrogens may be protective in PD preventing Lewy body formation, destabilizing the fibrillization and the aggregation of α-syn44.

Regarding neurodegeneration, early studies have reported neuronal loss (using Nissl-stained material) in the anterior olfactory nucleus28 correlating with pathology. Our current data, using specific neural markers, in agreement with the previous literature, also describe that this occurs in men (Fig. 3). However, the positive correlation was not found between the density of α-syn and the density of Neu-N, that means, the density of Neu-N (cells/mm3) was significantly decreased as density of α-syn (aggregates/mm3) increased (Supplementary Fig. 1a).

Astrocytes are critical for brain function, including homeostasis, neuronal metabolism, and blood–brain barrier maintenance, and have been involved in the inflammatory response (astrogliosis) associated with PD45. α-Syn is predominantly expressed in neurons, but it also aggregates in astrocytes, disrupting their function46. Early reports on astroglial marker (GFAP) using western blot with human brain homogenates indicated GFAP low levels in the substantia nigra correlated inversely with α-syn accumulation in patients with PD47. To the best of our knowledge, our current data are a rigorous stereological quantification of astrogliosis in the human OB in PD (Fig. 4). Our results could be correlated to a recent report by Stevenson and colleagues14 describing intracellular α-syn inclusions in astrocytes.

Microglia, under physiological conditions, display immune and phagocytic capacity, whereas they are activated in pathological circumstances such as neurodegeneration and can migrate, engulf debris, sense pathological markers, and secrete pro- and anti-inflammatory compounds48,49. The use of the term “inflammation” to describe the complex and heterogeneous interactions carried out by microglia in PD is too simplistic, and perhaps “immune dysregulation” would be a better definition50. The potential role of microglia in disease progression, particularly the interaction with dopaminergic neurons, may explain the specificity of the pathology in given brain regions such as the substantia nigra. Dopaminergic neural signals to microglia include α-syn and substance P51, both of which, apart from dopaminergic neurons, are particularly abundant in the OB12. In fact, increased microgliosis has been reported in the human OB of demented PD patients33, which is in agreement with our findings (Fig. 5). In addition, microglia contain intracellular α-syn inclusion (7.78%), as occurs in astrocytes14. Regarding the sex effect of microgliosis, it has been proposed in neurodegeneration models that inflammation endangers neuronal survival, but estrogens reduce microglial inflammation, which could protect neurons in female brains34,52,53. This would help to explain our current results show the sex dimorphic microglial response in the human brain in PD (Fig. 5).

Collectively, the current data suggest that in regions that are involved in α-synucleinopathy early and preferentially, such as the OB, neurodegeneration, and microgliosis (linked to masculine sex) and astrogliosis occur simultaneously. Evidence suggests that activated glial cells facilitate clearance of pathological proteins, but recent studies suggest that astroglia and microglia promote spreading of proteinopathies and facilitate disease progression54. Therefore, the OB constitutes a fundamental “hub” from this connectomic perspective in which proteomic analysis would be essential to identify biomarker proteins5557.

Methods

Human samples

In the present study, tissue from N = 28 individuals (with or without PD diagnosis; PD = 17 and NPD = 11, respectively) was used (Table 5). The average brain weight of PD cases (1224 ± 127.6 g) was not significantly different from that of the NPD group (1172 ± 158.5 g) (unpaired two-tailed t-test, t26 = 0.9470, p = 0.3524). Samples and data from donors included in this study were provided by the IDIBAPS, BIOBANC-MUR, BTCIEN, and BPA, integrated in the Spanish National Biobanks Network, and they were processed following standard operating procedures with the appropriate approval of the Ethical and Scientific Committees. These biobanks protocols involved written informed consent of donors. All experiments carried out in this work were authorized by the Ethical Committee of Clinical Research of the Ciudad Real University Hospital (SAF2016-75768-R).

Table 5.

Demographic and clinicopathological features of the individuals with or without Parkinson’s disease diagnosis.

Cases DxAP Sex Age (years) PMD (hh:mm) Brain weight (g) Stage Disease duration (years) Original fixation Cause of death Iba-1 Neu-N Cavalieri GFAP α-Syn
1 PD M 73 1:00 1450 Braak 6 1,5 Fd Cardiorespiratory arrest X X X X
2 PD F 82 2:00 1300 Braak 5 22 Fd Cardiorespiratory arrest (immediate), intestinal ischemia (secondary) X X X X
3 PD M 82 5:00 m.d. Braak 6 8 Fd m.d. X X X X
4 PD M 65 m.d. 1305 Braak 6 9 Fd m.d. X X X X
5 PD M 80 m.d. 1231 Braak 5 m.d. Fd m.d. X X X X X
6 PD F 87 2:00 1100 Braak 6 10 Fr Cardiorespiratory arrest X X X
7 PD F 81 12:20 1105 Braak 6 13 Fr Urinary sepsis X X X X X
8 PD F 84 4:30 1050 Braak 4 22 Fr Acute myocardial infarction X X X X X
9 PD F 81 6:30 1010 Braak 4 12 Fr Hepatic carcinoma X X X X X
10 PD M 85 12:15 1355 Braak 5 12 Fr Bronchoaspiration X X X X
11 PD F 87 7:00 1140 Braak 6 20 Fr Bronchoaspiration X X X X X
12 PD M 74 8:00 1305 Braak 5 19 Fr Pneumonia X X X
13 PD M 87 15:15 m.d. Braak 5 m.d. Fr m.d. X X X X
14 PD M 78 5:15 1210 Braak 5 m.d. Fr Bronchoaspiration X X X X X
15 PD F 75 3:45 m.d. Braak 5 m.d. Fr m.d. X X X X X
16 PD M 72 6:00 1160 Braak 6 15 Fr Advanced cognitive impairment + renal insufficiency X X X X X
17 PD M 62 13:30 1355 Braak 5 12 Fr Cardiorespiratory arrest X
18 NPD F 62 2:00 1050 Fr Cardiorespiratory arrest (immediate), Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (secondary) X X X X
19 NPD M 58 6:00 1500 Fr Acute myocardial infarction (immediate), ischemic heart disease (secondary) X X X X
20 NPD F 59 2:00 1200 Fr Severe acute pancreatitis (immediate), Cardiorespiratory arrest (secondary) X X X X
21 NPD M 53 5:00 1300 Fr Cardiorespiratory arrest (immediate), rectal carcinoma (secondary) X X X X
22 NPD M 78 4:00 1100 Fr Respiratory insufficiency (immediate), lung cancer (secondary) X X X X
23 NPD F 81 5:00 1100 Fd Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome X X X X
24 NPD M 75 4:00 1250 Fd Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome X X X X
25 NPD F 58 944 Fd X X X X
26 NPD M 80 10:00 1310 Fr Piriformis sinus carcinoma X X X X
27 NPD M 69 10:15 1110 Fr Pneumonia X X X
28 NPD M 73 6:10 1030 Fr Bronchoaspiration X X X

DxAP neuropathological diagnosis, PMD post-mortem duration, PD Parkinson’s disease, NPD non-Parkinson’s disease, M male, F female, m.d. missing data, Fd formaldehyde, Fr frozen no-fix.

Age and sex

Since aging could be potentially relevant in subsequent analyses, ages between the NPD (mean 67.82 ± 10.15 years) and PD (mean 78.73 ± 7.45 years) groups were compared. Data of individuals were normally distributed, and the unpaired two-tailed t-test revealed a significantly older age for PD compared to NPD cases (t26 = 3.223; p = 0.0034) (Fig. 6a). Two-way ANOVA including age and sex (between and within) demonstrated that only women with PD (mean 82.43 ± 4.16) years) were significantly older than NPD females (mean 65 ± 10.80 years) [interaction: F (1, 24) = 2.739, p = 0.1110; sex: F (1,24) = 0.1084, p = 0.7449; disease: F (1, 24) = 12.68, p = 0.0016) (Fig. 6b)].

Histologic procedures

Tissues were received either frozen or immersed in formaldehyde (Table 5). As previously described in our laboratory12, to standardize the conditions of the samples received, all of them were immersed in fresh phosphate-buffered 4% paraformaldehyde for 45 days. Afterward, bulbs were kept in a phosphate-buffered solution of 2% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) for 48 h and 10% glycerol and for 48 h in a phosphate-buffered solution of 2% DMSO and 20% glycerol for cryoprotection. It is important to note that the fixation and thawing processes may have affected the thickness of the samples, but this effect was stereologically standardized thereafter for all cases (see below). Using a freezing sliding microtome, horizontal sections (50 µm) were obtained. Five series of sections were collected; one was mounted and counterstained with toluidine blue, and the remaining sections were kept in a phosphate-buffered solution of 20% glycerol and 30% ethylene glycol at −20 °C for future processing: α-syn, Neu-N, Iba-1, GFAP immunohistochemistry’s.

Immunohistochemistry

Immunohistochemistry protocol was provided by neuropathologists from Spanish Biobanks and it is routinely used in our laboratory. Tissue was boiled under pressure for 2 min and 30 s in citrate buffer and after that, sections were immersed in formic acid for 3 min and rinsed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4) to unmask antigenicity. This double unmasking procedure is used since samples were kept in paraformaldehyde during long periods of time at Biobanks. Endogenous peroxidase activity was inhibited by a 30-min bath in 1% H2O2 in PBS. Sections were incubated overnight in primary antibody (Table 6), subsequently incubated for 2 h in secondary antibody (biotinylated horse anti-mouse or anti-rabbit IgG (H+L) Vector Laboratories, 1:200 in blocking buffer) and finally incubated in avidin–biotin complex (ABC standard, Vector, containing 0.3% TX-100) and reacted using 0.025% 3,3ʹ-diaminobenzidine and 0.1% H2O2. Sections were mounted, dried, dehydrated, and coverslipped with DPX (Sigma-Aldrich).

Table 6.

Antibodies used in the present study.

Antigen Manufacturer Cat no. Species Dilution BB Incubation
Iba-1 Wako 019–19741 Rabbit polyclonal antibody 1:2000 PBS + 0.1% TX-100 4 °C overnight
GFAP DAKO Z0334 Rabbit polyclonal antibody 1:10,000 PBS + 0.1% TX-100 + 10% Normal horse serum 4 °C overnight
Neu-n Abcam Ab104225 Rabbit polyclonal antibody 1:500 PBS + 0.3% TX-100 Room temperature overnight
α-Syn NovocastraTM Leica Biosystems NCL-L- α-syn Mouse monoclonal antibody 1:20 PBS + 0.3% TX-100 4 °C 48 h

The antibody NCL-L-α-syn (previously called KM51) has been widely used for Parkinson’s disease post-mortem diagnosis at Biobanks58,59 and also was reported as one of the best antibodies against human α-syn60,61.

Stereological quantification

Stereological quantification was performed using Stereo Investigator software (MBF Bioscience coupled to a Zeiss Axio Imager M2 microscope). The OB volume was calculated using the Cavalieri estimator. Boundaries of sections of the OB, excluding the olfactory peduncle, were outlined using a low magnification objective (Plan-Neofluar 1x/0.025, Ref. 420300-9900-000) (Table 1). Two different stereological approaches were carried out to quantify α-syn: optical fractionator (estimation of the total number of aggregates) and area fraction fractionator probes (percentage of area fraction occupied by aggregates and fibers) (Tables 2 and 3). Optical fractionator is an unbiased probe which is not influenced by the size, shape, spatial orientation, or spatial distribution of the cells under study. The first step was to draw the boundaries of 11 PD cases (n = 51) and a total 1102 sites were analyzed. The parameters used were 30 × 30 µm counting frame size, 2 µm guard zone, 18 µm height dissector, and 500 × 500 or 1000 × 1000 µm of sampling grid size depending on the sections analyzed per case (3 or 4–6, respectively). The counting frame is composed of red lines (rejection lines) and green lines (acceptance region). Therefore, the counting rule was that α-syn aggregate was counted if it lies entirely within the counting frame or if it touches the green line without touching the red line. To clarify how the height dissector is obtained, several random measurements of the thickness of each section are taken, and an average is established. This value is maintained throughout the quantification and it is calculated for each case. The guard zones prevent possible artifacts that the tissue may have suffered in the upper and lower surfaces during fixation, cutting, or immunohistochemistry. These guard zones reduce the available section thickness that can be used for counting.

Area fraction fractionator was also used due to the heterogeneity of α-syn aggregates size and fibers. This test allows to estimate percentage of area of α-syn also in neuropile. A random two-dimensional virtual square was superimposed on the region; and an array of points was in each sampling box. One marker is used on points for one type of staining (α-syn), while another marker is used for the rest of the tissue (neuropile). The number of points over α-syn was divided by the total number of points (reference) to get an estimate of the area.

The density of Neu-N-positive cells was calculated using an optical fractionator probe (Plan Apochromat, 63x/1.4, oil lens, Ref. 420782–9900). Boundaries of PD (n = 58) and NPD (n = 46) cases were traced, and a total of 2366 sites were analyzed. The parameters used were 30 × 30 µm counting frame size, 1 µm guard zone, 15 µm height dissector, and 300 × 300, 800 × 800, or 1000 × 1000 µm of sampling grid size depending on the sections analyzed per case (2, 3–4, or 5–6, respectively) (Table 4).

To quantify the intricate labeling of Iba-1 and GFAP markers and based on the steps of stereological area fraction fractionator method described above, an Image J analysis of the area fraction method was performed. This probe included random region-of-interest selection, photography, and ImageJ analysis. Following an unbiased protocol, first, a millimetric transparent grid was randomly overlapped in the slide and crossed matched to the tissue identified simulating the previously mentioned array of points (Supplementary Fig. 4a); second, to maintain randomness for image capture, odd and even numbers were randomly assigned to each human case (Supplementary Fig. 4b). In odd-numbered cases, the images were taken from the first cross-matching of the tissue following this cross-matching sequence for the first line: 3-5-7 (Supplementary Fig. 4c). In even-numbered cases, the images were captured in the second cross-matching following this sequence: 4-6-8 (Supplementary Fig. 4d). Images were captured (Iba-1, n = 887 and GFAP, n = 554) using a Nikon Eclipse 80i microscope (Plan Apo 20x/0.75, Ref. MRD00205). Third, images were processed with an ImageJ protocol62 further implemented in a macro. Briefly, images were converted to 8-bit grayscale, and the histogram was obtained. The histogram mode is the most representative value of the image, in all cases it is the neuropile (background). Then, the histogram mode was multiplied by 0.6 (Iba-1 labeling) or 0.7–0.85 (GFAP labeling) to obtain the threshold for considering specific cell labeling from background or Nissl-counterstain and to measure the area fraction. The area fraction is an average percent of each picture labeled for each case.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was carried out using GraphPad Prism® software (v6.01; La Jolla, CA). Normality and outliers were analyzed by the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test and Grubb’s method (α = 0.05), respectively. Statistical comparisons were performed using the two-tailed t-test, the Mann–Whitney U test, two-way ANOVA (Tukey post-hoc test). Linear regressions, Spearman and Pearson tests were applied to analyze the correlations. The variables and factors in this study were: age, sex, disease, volume, α-synucleinopathy (α-syn), neurodegeneration (Neu-N), microglial (Iba-1) and astroglial (GFAP) inflammation, disease duration, and post-mortem interval. Data are represented as the mean ± SD, and the differences were regarded as statistically significant at *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01.

Supplementary information

Supplementary figures (485.6KB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to IDIBAPS, BIOBANC-MUR, BTCIEN, and BPA, integrated in the Spanish Biobank Network, for the samples and patient data. This study was sponsored by the UCLM/ERDF (2020-GRIN-29145 to NPND), the Spanish Ministries of Economy and Competitiveness/ERDF (grant no. SAF2016-75768-R), and Science and Innovation (grant no. PID2019-108659RB-I00) to A.M.M. and the Autonomous Government of Castilla-La Mancha/ERDF (grant no. SBPLY/17/180501/000430) to A.M.M. and D.S.S. We acknowledge American Journal Experts for the English edition of this manuscript.

Author contributions

(1) Research project: A. Conception, A.F.C., I.U.B., A.M.M. B. Organization, A.F.C., D.S.S., A.M.M., I.U.B., E.L.C., V.L.O. C. Execution, A.F.C., E.L.C., V.L.O., A.M.M., I.U.B. (2) Statistical analysis: A. Design, A.F.C., I.U.B., D.S.S. B. Execution, A.F.C., E.L.C., V.L.O., A.M.M. C. Review and critique, I.U.B., D.S.S., A.M.M. (3) Manuscript preparation: A. Writing of the first draft, A.F.C., D.S.S., A.M.M., I.U.B. B. Review and critique, A.F.C., A.M.M., I.U.B., A.M.M., E.L.C., V.L.O.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41531-020-00154-7.

References

  • 1.Poewe W, et al. Parkinson disease. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers. 2017;3:17013. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Johnson ME, Stecher B, Labrie V, Brundin L, Brundin P. Triggers, facilitators, and aggravators: redefining Parkinson’s disease pathogenesis. Trends Neurosci. 2019;42:4–13. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2018.09.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Heinzel S, et al. Update of the MDS research criteria for prodromal Parkinsonas disease. Mov. Disord. 2019;34:1464–1470. doi: 10.1002/mds.27802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Picillo M, et al. The relevance of gender in Parkinson’s disease: a review. J. Neurol. 2017;264:1583–1607. doi: 10.1007/s00415-016-8384-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Meoni S, Macerollo A, Moro E. Sex differences in movement disorders. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2020;16:84–96. doi: 10.1038/s41582-019-0294-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Doty RL. Olfactory dysfunction in Parkinson disease. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2012;8:329–339. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2012.80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jalali MM, Roudbary SA, Gerami H, Soleimani R, Ebrahimi SM. Olfactory identification among various subtypes of Parkinson disease. Eur. Neurol. 2019;81:167–173. doi: 10.1159/000501551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Braak H, et al. Staging of brain pathology related to sporadic Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol. Aging. 2003;24:197–211. doi: 10.1016/S0197-4580(02)00065-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Del Tredici K, Rub U, De Vos RA, Bohl JR, Braak H. Where does parkinson disease pathology begin in the brain? J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 2002;61:413–426. doi: 10.1093/jnen/61.5.413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Attems J, Walker L, Jellinger KA. Olfactory bulb involvement in neurodegenerative diseases. Acta Neuropathol. 2014;127:459–475. doi: 10.1007/s00401-014-1261-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sengoku R, et al. Incidence and extent of Lewy body-related alpha-synucleinopathy in aging human olfactory bulb. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 2008;67:1072–1083. doi: 10.1097/NEN.0b013e31818b4126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ubeda-Banon I, et al. Alpha-Synucleinopathy in the human olfactory system in Parkinson’s disease: involvement of calcium-binding protein- and substance P-positive cells. Acta Neuropathol. 2010;119:723–735. doi: 10.1007/s00401-010-0687-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ubeda-Banon I, et al. The human olfactory system in two proteinopathies: Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases. Transl. Neurodegener. 2020;9:22. doi: 10.1186/s40035-020-00200-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Stevenson TJ, et al. Alpha-synuclein inclusions are abundant in non-neuronal cells in the anterior olfactory nucleus of the Parkinson’s disease olfactory bulb. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:6682. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-63412-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Oliveira-Pinto AV, et al. Sexual dimorphism in the human olfactory bulb: females have more neurons and glial cells than males. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e111733. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zeighami Y, et al. A clinical-anatomical signature of Parkinson’s disease identified with partial least squares and magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroimage. 2019;190:69–78. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.12.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Braak, H. & Del Tredici, K. Potential pathways of abnormal tau and alpha-synuclein dissemination in sporadic Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol.8, 10.1101/cshperspect.a023630 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 18.Hummel T, Witt M, Reichmann H, Welge-Luessen A, Haehner A. Immunohistochemical, volumetric, and functional neuroimaging studies in patients with idiopathic Parkinson’s disease. J. Neurol. Sci. 2010;289:119–122. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2009.08.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Held P, et al. MRI detection of olfactory bulb and tract. J. Neuroradiol. 2000;27:112–118. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Brodoehl S, et al. Decreased olfactory bulb volume in idiopathic Parkinson’s disease detected by 3.0-tesla magnetic resonance imaging. Mov. Disord. 2012;27:1019–1025. doi: 10.1002/mds.25087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Chen S, et al. Imaging of olfactory bulb and gray matter volumes in brain areas associated with olfactory function in patients with Parkinson’s disease and multiple system atrophy. Eur. J. Radiol. 2014;83:564–570. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.11.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Tanik N, Serin HI, Celikbilek A, Inan LE, Gundogdu F. Associations of olfactory bulb and depth of olfactory sulcus with basal ganglia and hippocampus in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Neurosci. Lett. 2016;620:111–114. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2016.03.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wang J, et al. Association of olfactory bulb volume and olfactory sulcus depth with olfactory function in patients with Parkinson disease. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2011;32:677–681. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Paschen L, et al. The olfactory bulb volume in patients with idiopathic Parkinson’s disease. Eur. J. Neurol. 2015;22:1068–1073. doi: 10.1111/ene.12709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Mueller A, et al. Olfactory bulb volumes in patients with idiopathic Parkinson’s disease a pilot study. J. Neural Transm. (Vienna) 2005;112:1363–1370. doi: 10.1007/s00702-005-0280-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Altinayar S, et al. Olfactory disfunction and its relation olfactory bulb volume in Parkinson’s disease. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharm. Sci. 2014;18:3659–3664. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Li J, et al. Changes in olfactory bulb volume in Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0149286. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Pearce RK, Hawkes CH, Daniel SE. The anterior olfactory nucleus in Parkinson’s disease. Mov. Disord. 1995;10:283–287. doi: 10.1002/mds.870100309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Huisman E, Uylings HB, Hoogland PV. A 100% increase of dopaminergic cells in the olfactory bulb may explain hyposmia in Parkinson’s disease. Mov. Disord. 2004;19:687–692. doi: 10.1002/mds.10713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mundinano IC, et al. Increased dopaminergic cells and protein aggregates in the olfactory bulb of patients with neurodegenerative disorders. Acta Neuropathol. 2011;122:61–74. doi: 10.1007/s00401-011-0830-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Huisman E, Uylings HB, Hoogland PV. Gender-related changes in increase of dopaminergic neurons in the olfactory bulb of Parkinson’s disease patients. Mov. Disord. 2008;23:1407–1413. doi: 10.1002/mds.22009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Alizadeh R, et al. Gender and age related changes in number of dopaminergic neurons in adult human olfactory bulb. J. Chem. Neuroanat. 2015;69:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jchemneu.2015.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kohl Z, et al. Distinct pattern of microgliosis in the olfactory bulb of neurodegenerative proteinopathies. Neural Plast. 2017;2017:3851262. doi: 10.1155/2017/3851262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Smith KM, Dahodwala N. Sex differences in Parkinson’s disease and other movement disorders. Exp. Neurol. 2014;259:44–56. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2014.03.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Jurado-Coronel JC, et al. Sex differences in Parkinson’s disease: features on clinical symptoms, treatment outcome, sexual hormones and genetics. Front. Neuroendocrinol. 2018;50:18–30. doi: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2017.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Shulman LM. Is there a connection between estrogen and Parkinson’s disease? Parkinsonism Relat. Disord. 2002;8:289–295. doi: 10.1016/S1353-8020(02)00014-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kalia LV, Lang AE. Parkinson’s disease. Lancet. 2015;386:896–912. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61393-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Morale MC, et al. Estrogen, neuroinflammation and neuroprotection in Parkinson’s disease: glia dictates resistance versus vulnerability to neurodegeneration. Neuroscience. 2006;138:869–878. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.07.060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Morissette M, Al Sweidi S, Callier S, Di Paolo T. Estrogen and SERM neuroprotection in animal models of Parkinson’s disease. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2008;290:60–69. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2008.04.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Disshon KA, Dluzen DE. Estrogen as a neuromodulator of MPTP-induced neurotoxicity: effects upon striatal dopamine release. Brain Res. 1997;764:9–16. doi: 10.1016/S0006-8993(97)00418-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Saunders-Pullman R, et al. The effect of estrogen replacement on early Parkinson’s disease. Neurology. 1999;52:1417–1421. doi: 10.1212/WNL.52.7.1417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Koller WC, Barr A, Biary N. Estrogen treatment of dyskinetic disorders. Neurology. 1982;32:547–549. doi: 10.1212/WNL.32.5.547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ubeda-Banon I, Saiz-Sanchez D, de la Rosa-Prieto C, Martinez-Marcos A. Alpha-Synuclein in the olfactory system in Parkinson’s disease: role of neural connections on spreading pathology. Brain Struct. Funct. 2014;219:1513–1526. doi: 10.1007/s00429-013-0651-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Hirohata M, Ono K, Morinaga A, Ikeda T, Yamada M. Anti-aggregation and fibril-destabilizing effects of sex hormones on alpha-synuclein fibrils in vitro. Exp. Neurol. 2009;217:434–439. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2009.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Booth HDE, Hirst WD, Wade-Martins R. The role of astrocyte dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease pathogenesis. Trends Neurosci. 2017;40:358–370. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2017.04.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Sorrentino ZA, Giasson BI, Chakrabarty P. Alpha-Synuclein and astrocytes: tracing the pathways from homeostasis to neurodegeneration in Lewy body disease. Acta Neuropathol. 2019;138:1–21. doi: 10.1007/s00401-019-01977-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Tong J, et al. Low levels of astroglial markers in Parkinson’s disease: relationship to alpha-synuclein accumulation. Neurobiol. Dis. 2015;82:243–253. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2015.06.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ho MS. Microglia in Parkinson’s Disease. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2019;1175:335–353. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-9913-8_13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Hickman S, Izzy S, Sen P, Morsett L, El Khoury J. Microglia in neurodegeneration. Nat. Neurosci. 2018;21:1359–1369. doi: 10.1038/s41593-018-0242-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Gopinath A, Collins A, Khoshbouei H, Streit W. Microglia and other myeloid cells in CNS health and disease. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2020;375:154–160. doi: 10.1124/jpet.120.265058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Lazdon E, Stolero N, Frenkel D. Microglia and Parkinson’s disease: footprints to pathology. J. Neural Transm. (Vienna) 2020;127:149–158. doi: 10.1007/s00702-020-02154-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Villa A, Vegeto E, Poletti A, Maggi A. Estrogens, neuroinflammation, and neurodegeneration. Endocr. Rev. 2016;37:372–402. doi: 10.1210/er.2016-1007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.May M. Sex on the brain: unraveling the differences between women and men in neurodegenerative disease. Nat. Med. 2016;22:1370–1372. doi: 10.1038/nm1216-1370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Peng C, Trojanowski JQ, Lee VM. Protein transmission in neurodegenerative disease. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2020;16:199–212. doi: 10.1038/s41582-020-0333-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Dammalli M, et al. Proteomic analysis of the human olfactory bulb. OMICS. 2017;21:440–453. doi: 10.1089/omi.2017.0084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Fernandez-Irigoyen J, Corrales FJ, Santamaria E. Proteomic atlas of the human olfactory bulb. J. Proteom. 2012;75:4005–4016. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2012.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Lachen-Montes M, et al. Unveiling the olfactory proteostatic disarrangement in Parkinson’s disease by proteome-wide profiling. Neurobiol. Aging. 2019;73:123–134. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2018.09.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Gelpi E, et al. Multiple organ involvement by alpha-synuclein pathology in Lewy body disorders. Mov. Disord. 2014;29:1010–1018. doi: 10.1002/mds.25776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Sanchez-Ferro A, et al. In vivo gastric detection of alpha-synuclein inclusions in Parkinson’s disease. Mov. Disord. 2015;30:517–524. doi: 10.1002/mds.25988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Croisier E, et al. Comparative study of commercially available anti-alpha-synuclein antibodies. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 2006;32:351–356. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2990.2006.00722.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Flores-Cuadrado A, Ubeda-Banon I, Saiz-Sanchez D, de la Rosa-Prieto C, Martinez-Marcos A. Hippocampal alpha-synuclein and interneurons in Parkinson’s disease: data from human and mouse models. Mov. Disord. 2016;31:979–988. doi: 10.1002/mds.26586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Flores-Cuadrado A, Ubeda-Banon I, Saiz-Sanchez D, de la Rosa-Prieto C, Martinez-Marcos A. alpha-Synuclein staging in the amygdala of a Parkinson’s disease model: cell types involved. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2015;41:137–146. doi: 10.1111/ejn.12763. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary figures (485.6KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from NPJ Parkinson's Disease are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES