Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2021 Jan 22;16(1):e0245614. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245614

A novel antibody for the detection of alternatively spliced secreted KLOTHO isoform in human plasma

Shreyas Jadhav 1, Sudipta Tripathi 1, Anil Chandrekar 1, Sushrut S Waikar 2, Li-Li Hsiao 1,*
Editor: Ping-Hsun Wu3
PMCID: PMC7822350  PMID: 33481901

Abstract

αKlotho is primarily known to express as a transmembrane protein. Proteolytic cleavage results in shedding of the extracellular domain which enters systemic circulation. A truncated form of αKlotho resulting from alternative splicing of the αKLOTHO transcript exists and is believed to be secreted, thereby also entering systemic circulation. Existing ELISA methods fail to distinguish between the two circulating isoforms resulting in inconsistencies in assessing circulating αKlotho levels. We have exploited a unique 15aa peptide sequence present in the alternatively spliced secreted isoform to generate an antibody and show that it is able to specifically detect only the secreted Klotho isoform in human plasma. This finding will facilitate in distinguishing the levels of different circulating Klotho isoforms in health and disease and enhance their potential to serve as a biomarker for CKD and other conditions.

Introduction

Since its serendipitous discovery as an aging related gene, αKLOTHO has gained significant attention owing to its potential role in aging, Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and cardiovascular diseases [16]. It was initially reported to only express in the distal tubular epithelial cells of the kidney [7, 8]. The complex aging-like phenotype observed in Kl-/- mice established its role as an aging regulator which in-part has led to continued interest in this gene [1, 9]. Indeed, several studies have reported the protective role of Klotho in reversal of disease mechanisms [10]. It has since been shown to be expressed in human artery and cardiac myocytes [6]. A subsequent study showed that Klotho is expressed ubiquitously including relatively lower expression observed in the parathyroid gland, placenta, prostate and small intestine [11]. The accumulating evidence suggests its role in playing a protective role in several organ systems.

Klotho is a single-pass transmembrane protein which acts as a co-receptor for FGF23 by forming a complex with FGFR1 [12]. This signalling in the distal tubular epithelial cells is what helps maintain normal phosphate levels [13, 14]. Klotho has also been reported to play a protective role in vascular calcification [5, 6]. Recent report has identified a role for Klotho in cardiac fibrosis by modulating the TGFB and Wnt pathways [15]. It was also included as a factor in gene therapy that showed an improvement of aging-related disease outcomes, including chronic kidney disease [16].

The Klotho protein comprises two repeats of 440 aa in the extracellular region termed KL1 and KL2 domains. Proteolytic cleavage of the transmembrane Klotho results in shedding of the extracellular domain which is known to enter systemic circulation [17]. This circulating isoform called soluble Klotho (sKL) potentially acts as a humoral factor and likely functions independently of FGF23 [18]. This isoform has been successfully detected in blood and cerebrospinal fluid [19]. Multiple studies have reported the existence of another isoform of Klotho resulting from alternative splicing of the αKLOTHO transcript which is believed to be secreted thereby also entering systemic circulation [7, 20]. It comprises of the KL1 domain and a unique 15aa sequence at the c-terminus [21]. Based on the fact that this isoform also enters circulation, it is likely to impact signalling pathways independent of the transmembrane and sKL isoform. Also, there is a potential to detect this isoform in blood and other body fluids. Given its significance in modulating several disease mechanisms, the circulating isoforms present a unique potential to serve as markers of health and disease.

Currently available methods to detect the circulating isoforms are unable to differentiate between sKL and secKL as they utilize antibodies that would detect all isoforms containing the KL1 domain [22]. This has hindered the assessment of circulating Klotho levels, reliably. Our goal for this study is to develop a new methodology to detect secKL, which could add value to currently available tools in detecting circulating KL. It may also potentially serve as a biomarker for disease detection.

Materials and methods

ELISA procedures

For direct ELISA, 96-well microtiter plates (44-2404-21, Nunc) were coated with 1μg/ml either recombinant secreted KL (secKL), protein, aa 34–549 (ab84072, abcam) or recombinant soluble KL (sKL) protein, 34–981 (5334-KL-025, R&D systems) in 100 μl carbonate-bicarbonate buffer pH9.5 (C3041-50CAP, Sigma -Aldrich) and incubated overnight at 4°C. Wells were then blocked in 100 μl blocking buffer (1% BSA in 1X PBS containing 0.1% v/v Tween20) for 1 hour at RT. HRP conjugated secKL Ab diluted in 100 μl Antibody dilution buffer (1% BSA in 1X PBS containing 0.05% v/v Tween20) was added to each well and incubated at RT for 1 Hour. Between each step plates were washed four times in washing buffer (1X PBS, 0.1% v/v Tween 20. The reaction was visualized by adding 100 μl chromogen TMB and substrate (555214, BD Biosciences) and incubated for a maximum of 30 minutes for color development and the reaction was stopped by adding 100 μl STOP solution (Invitrogen). Absorbance was measured at 450 nm using a plate reader.

For indirect ELISA similar protocol was followed except that after primary Ab (secKL) incubation, HRP labelled isotype specific IgG (A01856, GenScript) was added.

For sandwich ELISA, plates were coated with 2μg/ml secKL Ab in carbonate-bicarbonate buffer and incubated overnight at 4°C. Wells were washed in washing buffer and blocked. Samples were diluted 1:4 in dilution buffer (1% BSA in 1X PBS containing 0.05% v/v Tween20) and added to corresponding wells (100 μl/well). The plate was then incubated at RT for one hour. Following washings, detection antibody from IDK kit (KR 1700, Immun Diagnostik, Germany) was added at the recommended dilution and incubated at RT for one hour. The plate was then processed as above.

secKL Ab generation

Following peptide sequence was provided to GenScript (GenScript USA Inc. 860 Centennial Ave. Piscataway, NJ 08854) for antibody generation: SQLTKPISSLTKPYH

GenScript synthesized the peptide, immunized rabbits and provided purified polyclonal secKL antibodies.

HRP labelling

HRP labelling was performed using the Lightning-HRP Conjugation Kit (701–0000, Novus Biologicals) following the manufacturers protocol.

Reagents

Recombinant beta-Klotho protein (5889-KB-050, R&D systems), Recombinant Human TGF-beta 1 protein (240-B-002, R&D systems), Recombinant Human IL-6 protein (7270-IL-010/CF, R&D systems), Recombinant Human IL-6 protein (3718-FB-010, R&D systems).

Statistics

Statistical analyses were performed using the GraphPad Prism version 8.0 software. Each result is a representative of three experimental replicates. Error bars are +/- standard deviation unless indicated otherwise. We applied 2-tailed Student′s t test, as specified in the legends. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Novel secKL Ab can detect recombinant secKL (rsecKL) protein

We first tested the ability of the novel secKL antibody to detect secKL protein in a direct ELISA setting. The different ELISA modalities are shown in S1 Fig. 96-well ELISA plates were coated with recombinant secKL (rsecKL) protein at 2μg/ml in carbonate buffer. HRP-labelled polyclonal secKL Ab was used as the detection antibody. As shown in Fig 1A, the antibody was able to detect the coated rsecKL protein over a broad dilution range ranging from 1:1,000 to 1:400,000. This clearly demonstrates that the novel secKL Ab is able to detect rsecKL protein. We further chose to test the antibody in an indirect ELISA setting (S1 Fig). The plates were similarly coated with rsecKL protein at 2μg/ml. secKL antibody was used at a concentration of 1μg/ml and an HRP-labelled isotype matched IgG was used to detect the signal. Again, as shown in Fig 1B, this combination was also able to detect the rsecKL protein over a broad dilution range of the secondary Ab (1:1,000 to 1:100,000). Together this clearly shows that the antibody can detect rsecKL protein in an ELISA assay.

Fig 1. High specificity of secKL antibody for secKL protein.

Fig 1

(A) secKL Ab detects rsecKL protein in a direct ELISA setting over a high dilution range: 1:1000, 1:5000, 1:7000, 1:10000, 1:25000, 1:50000, 1:100000, 1:200000, 1:400000 (B) secKL Ab detects rsecKL protein in an indirect ELISA setting via HRP labelled secondary Ab (IgG dilutions: 1:1000, 1:5000, 1:10000, 1:15000, 1:20000, 1:25000, 1:30000, 1:40000, 1:50000, 1:100000) (C) secKL Ab can detect rsecKL but not rsKL protein in a direct ELISA setting at a higher dilution range (Ab dilutions: 1:1000, 1:5000, 1:7000, 1:10000, 1:15000, 1:25000, 1:50000) (D) secKL Ab can detect rsecKL but not rsKL protein in a direct ELISA setting at a lower dilution range (Ab dilutions: 1:100, 1:200, 1:400, 1:500, 1:600, 1:700, 1:800, 1:900, 1:1000) (E) Labelled detection antibody from IBL kit can detect both, rsKL and rsecKL proteins in a direct ELISA setting (Ab dilutions: 1:50, 1:100, 1:200, 1:400, 1:500, 1:700, 1:900, 1:1000) (F) secKL Ab can specifically detect rsecKL protein (6ng/ml) in the presence of indicated spiked-in non-specific proteins (3ng/ml).

Novel secKL Ab shows specificity for secKL protein

Next, we tested whether this novel antibody can specifically detect secKL protein. We used our direct ELISA system to determine the specificity. Plates were coated with either rsecKL protein or recombinant soluble Klotho (rsKL) protein at 2μg/ml. Detection was carried out with the HRP-labelled secKL antibody. While the antibody was able to detect rsecKL protein over a broad dilution range (1:1,000 to 1:100,000) as shown in Fig 1C, the rsKL protein remained undetected at all dilutions tested. Similarly, we also used a lower dilution range (1:100 to 1:1000) to determine whether we could detect the rsKL. As Fig 1D shows, the secKL antibody successfully detected rsecKL protein but failed to detect rsKL. We next tested the most commonly used commercially available ELISA kit from IBL (#27998, Immuno-biological Laboratories, Japan), for its ability to detect the two circulating Klotho isoforms. ELISA plates were coated with either rsecKL or rsKL protein and the HRP-labelled detection antibody from the kit was used for detection. As seen in Fig 1E, the antibody from the kit was able to detect both rsKL and rsecKL proteins at a dilution range from 1:100 to 1:1,000. We also determined the specificity of the Klotho detection antibody from an additional commercially available ELISA kit from IDK, following the manufacturers protocol. As seen in S2 Fig, this antibody also detects both, rsecKL and rsKL proteins. We further tested the specificity of the secKL antibody in a sandwich ELISA setting (S1 Fig). Specifically, plates were coated with the novel secKL antibody at 2μg/ml and rsecKL protein was added to the wells at 6ng/ml. Additionally, wells were spiked with the indicated non-specific recombinant protein (Fig 1F) at 3ng/ml and detection antibody from the IDK kit was used at the recommended dilution to detect the signal. As seen in Fig 1F, spiking-in with the indicated non-specific recombinant proteins, especially rsKL and recombinant beta KL, did not alter the detection of rsecKL by the novel Ab. These results clearly demonstrate that the secKL antibody is able to specifically bind rsecKL and not rsKL or rbetaKL. Also, antibodies from commercially available kits are unable to differentiate between the various circulating Klotho isoforms. This likely explains the confounding results seen for Klotho plasma levels in normal Vs disease states when detected using commercial kits [23].

Novel secKL Ab can detect secKL protein in healthy and diseased human plasma samples

Given that the novel secKL antibody can selectively and specifically detect the rsecKL protein, we proceeded to test whether this Ab could also detect secKL protein in human plasma samples. We first determined the ability of the novel secKL antibody to detect secKL protein from either human plasma or urine samples in a sandwich ELISA setting using the secKL Ab as the capture Ab and labelled Ab from IDK kit as the detection Ab. The antibody detected secKL protein from normal human plasma but not urine (S3 Fig). We also performed a dilution series for human plasma and as shown in S4 Fig, the antibody is able to detect secKL protein over series of dilutions in a linear range. Finally, we proceeded to test human normal Vs CKD plasma samples in our ELISA setting with the novel secKL antibody as the capture antibody. Kidney function parameters for the samples are listed in S1 Table. The standard curve is as shown in Fig 2A. We successfully detected secKL protein in human plasma from normal and CKD samples. The levels of secKL protein were highly decreased in CKD plasma samples compared to normal (Fig 2B), the data is consistent with known reports showing that Klotho expression level is decreased in patients with CKD. This clearly indicates that the novel antibody can detect secKL protein from human plasma samples and is able to determine the differential levels of secKL protein from normal Vs CKD human plasma samples.

Fig 2. secKL protein levels are reduced in human plasma from CKD samples.

Fig 2

(A) standard curve with secKL protein concentrations of 6000pg/ml, 3000pg/ml, 1500pg/ml, 750pg/ml, 375pg/ml, 187.5pg/ml, 93.75pg/ml (B) secKL protein levels in human plasma samples from normal (n = 5) Vs CKD (n = 4) (p< 0.003), confirmed that CKD is a state of Klotho deficiency. Two-tailed Student’s t test applied (error bars, +/- standard error of mean).

Discussion

For decades there has been a lack of robust and credible detection methods for circulating Klotho. The existence of various isoforms and the extensive sequence similarity between them has further confounded the development of reliable detection methods. Given the significance of Klotho in health and disease and that it is present in systemic circulation, it is critical to develop detection methods that not only reliably detect but also distinguish between the known isoforms. We have successfully developed an antibody and a detection method that specifically and selectively detects only the secreted Klotho isoform. Furthermore, the ability to detect secKL levels in human plasma samples and demonstrate the differential levels in normal Vs CKD samples shows immense potential for the novel antibody to present as a credible and reliable tool for the detection of circulating secKL protein. Generating a monoclonal antibody against the unique 15aa sequence will provide an antibody pair and further help in fine tuning the assay. Expanding the detection to a broader sample pool to further demonstrate the applicability of the antibody will reveal its true potential as a reliable biomarker.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the only study that shows the detection of secKL, specifically. There exists a mouse secKL antibody, K113, generated against the unique sequence but it has not been shown to detect secKL in blood or other body fluids [24]. Although mRNA levels for the full-length Vs secKl transcripts can be assessed to determine the relative expression levels of the two isoforms in normal Vs disease states, it does not always recapitulate protein expression levels. Also, given their distinct mechanisms of origin, there is a possibility that the sKL and secKL isoforms may not be present at the same level in circulation at any given point in time. As demonstrated in this study, the two most commonly used ELISA kits for Klotho detection do not distinguish between the two isoforms. They certainly appear to have a higher affinity for sKL in comparison to secKL. This might potentially skew the results thus obtained. In-line with this theory, a recent study aimed at determining the performance of assays to detect circulating Klotho reported some interesting findings. It showed that the immunoprecipitation-immunoblot (IP-IB) assay performed better at reliably detecting sKL levels over commercial ELISA assays [23]. Therefore, there is a need for better antibodies that will specifically detect the sKL isoform. As demonstrated in our study, currently available ELISA kits detect both sKL and secKL isoforms. This is likely because both these Klotho isoforms contain the KL1 domain and the antibodies from the commercial kits likely rely on the presence of the KL1 domain. The presence of multiple circulating isoforms and the inability of the antibody to specifically detect only one of these will continue to generate ambiguous results. Given that the secKL isoform is the only isoform with the unique 15aa sequence and the fact that it is potentially generated via a mechanism that is distinct from the other circulating isoforms, it might prove to be a more reliable readout in health Vs disease states. Also, the currently available methods are able to detect circulating Klotho from urine samples as well. Our Ab unambiguously detects secKL from plasma samples but did not detect any secKL protein from urine samples. We reason there could be at least two scenarios at play; 1) it might be that secKL protein is not shed in the urine of healthy subjects (the urine sample tested was from healthy subject) or 2) the amount of secKL shed in the urine is extremely low and therefore beyond the detection range of the Ab. Going forward, it will be ideal and more informative to develop the ability to assess the levels of these multiple circulating isoforms and determine whether there is any pattern in their expression in normal Vs disease states.

The lack of specificity for the various circulating isoforms by existing detection methodologies is perhaps the reason why they cannot reproducibly detect circulating Klotho. Our novel antibody nevertheless demonstrates the potential to develop a reliable detection method for the alternatively spliced secreted Klotho isoform. If we are able to detect the levels of these circulating isoforms distinctly, it might help to shed light on the yet unknown potential of this intriguing molecule. Perhaps secKL could prove to be a more reliable indicator of disease states and offer an opportunity for early intervention.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. A schematic depicting various types of ELISA modalities used.

In the direct and indirect ELISA assay, secKL protein was coated on the well and either labelled secKL Ab (direct) or a labelled secondary Ab (indirect), in combination with the secKL Ab, was used to detect the signal. In the sandwich assay, secKL Ab was coated on the well and served as a capture Ab and labelled Ab from the IDK Kit was used as the detection Ab.

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Labelled detection Ab from IDK kit detects rsKL, rsecKL and recombinant βKL proteins with different affinities.

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Novel secKL Ab detects secKL protein from human plasma and not urine samples.

(A) standard curve with secKL protein concentrations of 6000pg/ml, 3000pg/ml, 1500pg/ml, 750pg/ml, 375pg/ml, 187.5pg/ml, 93.75pg/ml (B) seckL protein concentrations in human plasma and urine samples at indicated dilutions. While there is linear correlation in the plasma measurement, no protein detection observed in the urine, indicating that the Ab is able to detect differential expression in different specimens.

(TIF)

S4 Fig. secKL protein detection by novel secKL Ab in normal human plasma samples at indicated serial plasma dilutions shows a lineal correlation.

(TIF)

S1 Table. Kidney function parameters for plasma samples.

(DOCX)

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting information files.

Funding Statement

The authors received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Kuro-o M, Matsumura Y, Aizawa H, Kawaguchi H, Suga T, Utsugi T, et al. Mutation of the mouse klotho gene leads to a syndrome resembling ageing. Nature. 1997;390(6655):45–51. 10.1038/36285 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kurosu H, Yamamoto M, Clark JD, Pastor JV, Nandi A, Gurnani P, et al. Suppression of aging in mice by the hormone Klotho. Science. 2005;309(5742):1829–33. 10.1126/science.1112766 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Masuda H, Chikuda H, Suga T, Kawaguchi H, Kuro-o M. Regulation of multiple ageing-like phenotypes by inducible klotho gene expression in klotho mutant mice. Mech Ageing Dev. 2005;126(12):1274–83. 10.1016/j.mad.2005.07.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hu MC, Kuro-o M, Moe OW. Klotho and kidney disease. J Nephrol. 2010;23 Suppl 16:S136–44. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hu MC, Shi M, Zhang J, Quinones H, Griffith C, Kuro-o M, et al. Klotho deficiency causes vascular calcification in chronic kidney disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;22(1):124–36. 10.1681/ASN.2009121311 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lim K, Lu TS, Molostvov G, Lee C, Lam FT, Zehnder D, et al. Vascular Klotho deficiency potentiates the development of human artery calcification and mediates resistance to fibroblast growth factor 23. Circulation. 2012;125(18):2243–55. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.053405 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Matsumura Y, Aizawa H, Shiraki-Iida T, Nagai R, Kuro-o M, Nabeshima Y. Identification of the human klotho gene and its two transcripts encoding membrane and secreted klotho protein. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1998;242(3):626–30. 10.1006/bbrc.1997.8019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kato Y, Arakawa E, Kinoshita S, Shirai A, Furuya A, Yamano K, et al. Establishment of the anti-Klotho monoclonal antibodies and detection of Klotho protein in kidneys. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000;267(2):597–602. 10.1006/bbrc.1999.2009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Shiraki-Iida T, Iida A, Nabeshima Y, Anazawa H, Nishikawa S, Noda M, et al. Improvement of multiple pathophysiological phenotypes of klotho (kl/kl) mice by adenovirus-mediated expression of the klotho gene. J Gene Med. 2000;2(4):233–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kuro OM. The Klotho proteins in health and disease. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2019;15(1):27–44. 10.1038/s41581-018-0078-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lim K, Groen A, Molostvov G, Lu T, Lilley KS, Snead D, et al. alpha-Klotho Expression in Human Tissues. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100(10):E1308–18. 10.1210/jc.2015-1800 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kurosu H, Ogawa Y, Miyoshi M, Yamamoto M, Nandi A, Rosenblatt KP, et al. Regulation of fibroblast growth factor-23 signaling by klotho. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(10):6120–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Negri AL. The klotho gene: a gene predominantly expressed in the kidney is a fundamental regulator of aging and calcium/phosphorus metabolism. J Nephrol. 2005;18(6):654–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hu MC, Shiizaki K, Kuro-o M, Moe OW. Fibroblast growth factor 23 and Klotho: physiology and pathophysiology of an endocrine network of mineral metabolism. Annu Rev Physiol. 2013;75:503–33. 10.1146/annurev-physiol-030212-183727 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Liu Q, Zhu LJ, Waaga-Gasser AM, Ding Y, Cao M, Jadhav SJ, et al. The axis of local cardiac endogenous Klotho-TGF-beta1-Wnt signaling mediates cardiac fibrosis in human. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2019;136:113–24. 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2019.09.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Davidsohn N, Pezone M, Vernet A, Graveline A, Oliver D, Slomovic S, et al. A single combination gene therapy treats multiple age-related diseases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019;116(47):23505–11. 10.1073/pnas.1910073116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chen CD, Podvin S, Gillespie E, Leeman SE, Abraham CR. Insulin stimulates the cleavage and release of the extracellular domain of Klotho by ADAM10 and ADAM17. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(50):19796–801. 10.1073/pnas.0709805104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hu MC, Shi M, Zhang J, Pastor J, Nakatani T, Lanske B, et al. Klotho: a novel phosphaturic substance acting as an autocrine enzyme in the renal proximal tubule. FASEB J. 2010;24(9):3438–50. 10.1096/fj.10-154765 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Imura A, Iwano A, Tohyama O, Tsuji Y, Nozaki K, Hashimoto N, et al. Secreted Klotho protein in sera and CSF: implication for post-translational cleavage in release of Klotho protein from cell membrane. FEBS Lett. 2004;565(1–3):143–7. 10.1016/j.febslet.2004.03.090 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mencke R, Harms G, Moser J, van Meurs M, Diepstra A, Leuvenink HG, et al. Human alternative Klotho mRNA is a nonsense-mediated mRNA decay target inefficiently spliced in renal disease. JCI Insight. 2017;2(20). 10.1172/jci.insight.94375 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Di Bona D, Accardi G, Virruso C, Candore G, Caruso C. Association of Klotho polymorphisms with healthy aging: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Rejuvenation Res. 2014;17(2):212–6. 10.1089/rej.2013.1523 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Yamazaki Y, Imura A, Urakawa I, Shimada T, Murakami J, Aono Y, et al. Establishment of sandwich ELISA for soluble alpha-Klotho measurement: Age-dependent change of soluble alpha-Klotho levels in healthy subjects. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2010;398(3):513–8. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.06.110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Neyra JA, Moe OW, Pastor J, Gianella F, Sidhu SS, Sarnak MJ, et al. Performance of soluble Klotho assays in clinical samples of kidney disease. Clin Kidney J. 2020;13(2):235–44. 10.1093/ckj/sfz085 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Masso A, Sanchez A, Gimenez-Llort L, Lizcano JM, Canete M, Garcia B, et al. Secreted and Transmembrane alphaKlotho Isoforms Have Different Spatio-Temporal Profiles in the Brain during Aging and Alzheimer’s Disease Progression. PLoS One. 2015;10(11):e0143623 10.1371/journal.pone.0143623 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Ping-Hsun Wu

21 Oct 2020

PONE-D-20-19356

A novel antibody for the detection of alternatively spliced secreted Klotho isoform in human plasma

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Shreyas Jadhav,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Dec 05 2020 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Ping-Hsun Wu, M.D.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. In the Methods section, please provide the location of the GenScript company that synthesized the peptides for antibody generation.

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

Re-plot the figures with consistent scales were advised, including Fig 1A, 1B, 1C, 1D, 1E, 1F, and 2A. The numbers of experimental replicates were recommended to demonstrate in the method section. Please revise as the reviewers' suggestions.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The manuscript by Jadhav et al demonstrated the development and validation of a monoclonal antibody specifically recognize alternatively spliced secreted Klotho (secKL) in human plasma. The authors performed direct, indirect, and sandwich ELISA strategies to confirm the antibody recognized only the secKL but not the soluble Klotho (sKL), which is generated by proteolytic cleavage of transmembrane form of Klotho. The secKL contains a unique 15AA sequence at the C-terminal. Therefore, the authors showed that the successful generation of the 15AA-specific monoclonal antibody that could be used to specifically target secKL in human plasma samples.

Overall, the experimental design and results of this study is straightforward. The reviewer have some comments for the authors to consider:

1. The X-axis labeling in Fig 1A and 1B is likely mislabeled if the authors intend to show Log10 value of the Ab dilution factors. Also, the scale of the Y-axis for Fig 1A, 1B, 1C, 1D, 1E, and 1F are different. Some figures used Log10 OD450nm and some used OD450nm. It is suggested to re-plot the figures with consistent scales.

2. Similarly, the X-axis of Fig 2A is not correct.

3. In Fig 2B, the authors showed the serum secKL levels. What is the levels total KL (secKL+sKL) in these samples based on commercial KL kit? and what is percentage of secKL among total circulating KL?

4. It is not clear why the error bars are not shown in all Figures. How many experimental replicates were performed to generate the representative results? It is recommended to describe the information in figures legend or M&M section.

Reviewer #2: This is a clinically relevant paper that is likely to have translational relevance. Reliable antibodies that detect the secreted Klotho isoform in human plasma are required to assess it'a potential as a biomarker of age-related disease. Please rearrange the paper so that the figure legends go to the end rather in the middle of the results section. Statisatical analyses comparing the curves for figure 1C,D,E should be undertaken.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2021 Jan 22;16(1):e0245614. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245614.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


1 Dec 2020

Dear Dr. Ping-Hsun Wu,

Thank you for your letter dated October 21, 2020 with comments. We greatly appreciate and agree with yours and the reviewers’ suggestions, and we have aimed to address all the comments in this letter and incorporated all suggestions and points into the paper. The changes have been highlighted in the revised manuscript for ease of reference.

We hope that you will find favor in all the information provided. We would like to express our gratitude for your consideration of our manuscript and we look forward to hearing from you.

Thank you very much for your time and consideration.

Yours sincerely,

Li-Li Hsiao, MD, PhD, FACP

Director, Asian Renal Clinic

Director, Global Kidney Health Innovation Center

Co-Program Director, Harvard Summer Research Program in Kidney Medicine

Brigham and Women’s Hospital

Harvard Medical School

BLI Room 443, 221 Longwood Ave.

Boston, MA. 02115

617-525-7366 (o)

Phone: (617) 525-7366

Fax: (617) 525-7386

E-mail: lhsiao@bwh.harvard.edu

Point-by-point response to the editor’s and reviewers’ comments

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

We thank the editor’s for pointing out our misstep. We have modified the manuscript following the recommended guidelines.

2. In the Methods section, please provide the location of the GenScript company that synthesized the peptides for antibody generation.

Per editor’s suggestion, we have updated this information in the “Materials and Methods” section Line 73-74, page 5

“Following peptide sequence was provided to GenScript (GenScript USA Inc. 860 Centennial Ave. Piscataway, NJ 08854) for antibody generation: SQLTKPISSLTKPYH”

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

Re-plot the figures with consistent scales were advised, including Fig 1A, 1B, 1C, 1D, 1E, 1F, and 2A. The numbers of experimental replicates were recommended to demonstrate in the method section. Please revise as the reviewers' suggestions.

We thank you for your comments. We have re-plotted all graphs to maintain consistency in terms of the scales. In addition, each result shown in this manuscript is a representative of three replicates. This information has also been updated in the “Materials and Methods”, Line 85-87, page 5.

“Each result is a representative of three experimental replicates. Error bars are +/- standard deviation unless indicated otherwise.”

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The manuscript by Jadhav et al demonstrated the development and validation of a monoclonal antibody specifically recognize alternatively spliced secreted Klotho (secKL) in human plasma. The authors performed direct, indirect, and sandwich ELISA strategies to confirm the antibody recognized only the secKL but not the soluble Klotho (sKL), which is generated by proteolytic cleavage of transmembrane form of Klotho. The secKL contains a unique 15AA sequence at the C-terminal. Therefore, the authors showed that the successful generation of the 15AA-specific monoclonal antibody that could be used to specifically target secKL in human plasma samples.

Overall, the experimental design and results of this study is straightforward. The reviewer have some comments for the authors to consider:

1. The X-axis labeling in Fig 1A and 1B is likely mislabeled if the authors intend to show Log10 value of the Ab dilution factors. Also, the scale of the Y-axis for Fig 1A, 1B, 1C, 1D, 1E, and 1F are different. Some figures used Log10 OD450nm and some used OD450nm. It is suggested to re-plot the figures with consistent scales.

We thank the reviewer for their wonderful comments. We have re-plotted all the graphs to reflect consistency in the scales.

The x-axis for Fig 1A and 1B has been updated to reflect the antibody concentrations. The scales for the Y-axis for Fig 1A,1B,1C, 1D, 1E and 1F have been re-plotted and are now consistent. All graphs now show OD450 nm on the Y-axes.

2. Similarly, the X-axis of Fig 2A is not correct.

We thank you again for your suggestion. We have re-plotted the graph for Fig 2A with OD 450nm on the Y-axis and standard concentrations on the X-axis.

3. In Fig 2B, the authors showed the serum secKL levels. What is the levels total KL (secKL+sKL) in these samples based on commercial KL kit? and what is percentage of secKL among total circulating KL?

We thank the reviewer for this insightful comment. Our ultimate goal is to be able to detect both, secKL and sKL proteins and determine their differential levels in normal Vs disease states thereby attributing their contribution to either the normal or the disease state. In order to be able to reliably do this, we first need to determine the affinities for secKL Vs sKL proteins of the commercial antibody. At this point we do not have a clear understanding of whether the antibody has a preference for either isoform and whether the two isoforms compete with each other to bind to the antibody. Lacking this information, we cannot clearly determine, in the total circulating KL that the commercial antibody detects, what fraction each isoform represents. If the two isoforms were to be competing for the antibody (which is as yet unknown), it will further cloud the contribution from each isoform and therefore might mislead the final values, especially given the fact that their levels are altered in the disease state.

4. It is not clear why the error bars are not shown in all Figures. How many experimental replicates were performed to generate the representative results? It is recommended to describe the information in figures legend or M&M section.

We thank the reviewer you for their comments.

We have re-plotted the graphs to include error bars (+/- standard deviation). In addition, each result shown in this manuscript is a representative of three replicates. This information has also been updated in the “Materials and Methods” section, Line 85-87, page 5.

“Each result is a representative of three experimental replicates. Error bars are +/- standard deviation unless indicated otherwise.”

Reviewer #2: This is a clinically relevant paper that is likely to have translational relevance. Reliable antibodies that detect the secreted Klotho isoform in human plasma are required to assess it's potential as a biomarker of age-related disease. Please rearrange the paper so that the figure legends go to the end rather in the middle of the results section. Statistical analyses comparing the curves for figure 1C,D,E should be undertaken.

We thank the reviewer for their kind words on the “translational relevance” of this paper.

We apologize for the inconvenience. We have formatted the manuscript per the journal’s recommended guidelines, which suggests inserting the figure legend in the text right after the first mention of the figure.

Fig 1C, 1D and 1E represent the specificity of the secKL antibody towards the secKL protein and the lack of specificity for the commercial antibody in terms of detecting both secKL and sKL proteins. While the secKL antibody is clearly able to detect the secKL protein over a wide range of dilution series, it is unable to detect the sKL protein over a similar dilution series under identical experimental conditions. This is clearly observed by the near zero OD values for the sKL protein, clearly indicating that the secKL antibody is unable to detect the sKL protein. On the contrary, the commercial antibody is able to detect both secKL and sKL proteins as seen by the non-zero OD values for both.

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to reviewers.pdf

Decision Letter 1

Ping-Hsun Wu

5 Jan 2021

A novel antibody for the detection of alternatively spliced secreted Klotho isoform in human plasma

PONE-D-20-19356R1

Dear Professor Li-Li Hsiao,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Ping-Hsun Wu, M.D. PhD.

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

All comments and suggestions were advised. The manuscript is accepted for publication.

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The authors have addressed my comments appropriately. One more suggestion is to move the supplementary figures to the main figures as this might increase readability.

Reviewer #2: The authors have addressed my concerns. The paper is correctly formatted. They have replotted the graphs including error bars. with corrected labelling of axis.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Acceptance letter

Ping-Hsun Wu

11 Jan 2021

PONE-D-20-19356R1

A novel antibody for the detection of alternatively spliced secreted KLOTHO isoform in human plasma

Dear Dr. Hsiao:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Ping-Hsun Wu

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. A schematic depicting various types of ELISA modalities used.

    In the direct and indirect ELISA assay, secKL protein was coated on the well and either labelled secKL Ab (direct) or a labelled secondary Ab (indirect), in combination with the secKL Ab, was used to detect the signal. In the sandwich assay, secKL Ab was coated on the well and served as a capture Ab and labelled Ab from the IDK Kit was used as the detection Ab.

    (TIF)

    S2 Fig. Labelled detection Ab from IDK kit detects rsKL, rsecKL and recombinant βKL proteins with different affinities.

    (TIF)

    S3 Fig. Novel secKL Ab detects secKL protein from human plasma and not urine samples.

    (A) standard curve with secKL protein concentrations of 6000pg/ml, 3000pg/ml, 1500pg/ml, 750pg/ml, 375pg/ml, 187.5pg/ml, 93.75pg/ml (B) seckL protein concentrations in human plasma and urine samples at indicated dilutions. While there is linear correlation in the plasma measurement, no protein detection observed in the urine, indicating that the Ab is able to detect differential expression in different specimens.

    (TIF)

    S4 Fig. secKL protein detection by novel secKL Ab in normal human plasma samples at indicated serial plasma dilutions shows a lineal correlation.

    (TIF)

    S1 Table. Kidney function parameters for plasma samples.

    (DOCX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to reviewers.pdf

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES