Thoughts on the popularity of ICSI

Abstract

Purpose

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) is the most widely utilized assisted reproductive technique (ART) worldwide. In this feature, we review the early assisted fertilization attempts that eventually led to the development of ICSI, and discuss its current utilization in cases of male and non-male factor infertility.

Methods

We researched the literature related to the development, indications, and current use of ICSI, such as sperm structural abnormalities, male genetic indications, surgically retrieved sperm, high sperm chromatin fragmentation, oocyte dysmorphism, and preimplantation genetic testing (PGT). We also describe the potential future applications of ICSI.

Results

This review summarizes the early micromanipulation techniques that led to the inception of ICSI. We also explore its current indications, including non-male factor infertility, where its use is more controversial. Finally, we consider the benefits of future advancements in reproductive biology that may incorporate ICSI, such as in vitro spermatogenesis, neogametogenesis, and heritable genome editing.

Conclusion

The versatility, consistency, and reliability of ICSI have made it the most prevalently utilized ART procedure worldwide.

Introduction

The topic of infertility has been explored across a wide range of fields- medicine, social science, religion, and philosophy. Infertility has led to the appearance of what is known today as assisted reproductive technology (ART), with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) becoming the most widely used insemination method worldwide. Indeed, ICSI is used today in 66.5% [1] of fertility centers. The reliability of ICSI to achieve fertilization in cases of severe male factor infertility has led to the dramatic expansion of its use; it is now commonly utilized for low oocyte maturity, with cryopreserved oocytes, in conjunction with preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) and for patients of advanced maternal age (AMA) [1].

In 2003, the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) reported a total of 112,988 annual ART cycles in the United States, which steadily grew to 248,086 cycles by 2017 [2]. Along with this growth, patients are opting for additional ART procedures to enhance their chances of having a successful pregnancy, including oocyte cryopreservation to postpone conception, and PGT to assess the genetic profile of embryos and increase the likelihood of implantation [2]. As the overall incidence rate of cancer patients in young adults (age 15–39) in the United States is increasing by 0.9% each year [3], many patients are also choosing oocyte cryopreservation to preserve their fertility. All these factors have contributed to the growing popularity of ICSI. Yet despite its popularity, whether ICSI is actually more beneficial than standard in vitro insemination has been the subject of debate.

How did ICSI manage to be the most widely used ART in the twenty-first century? In this manuscript, we describe the early micromanipulation techniques that led to the development of ICSI and its eventual widespread. In addition to describing its rise in popularity and expanding indications, we will discuss the potential future applications we envision for this versatile insemination method (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Indications of ICSI

Early micromanipulation

The evidence that in vitro fertilization (IVF) was a viable option to infertile couples emerged in 1978, when the first live birth was achieved in a woman with bilateral tubal occlusion [4, 5]. This was the first birth by natural cycle IVF, i.e. it was achieved without the use of ovarian superovulation [6]. The use of unstimulated cycles, which yielded a 6% pregnancy rate, was used by all clinicians until 1982, when a study on human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) was linked to an increased number of oocytes, reaching an average of 2.1–2.6 oocytes per retrieval and a clinical pregnancy rate of 30% [7].

Different attempts were made to improve pregnancy rates such as the transfer of the male gametes directly into the fallopian tubes, known as gamete intrafallopian transfer (GIFT). With this procedure, the oocytes retrieved laparoscopically were transferred in the fallopian tube together with spermatozoa [8]. This technique soon became obsolete because it was not indicated for women with tubal occlusion or male patients with compromised semen parameters. A variant of this technique was later introduced, zygote intrafallopian transfer (ZIFT), where the oocyte was fertilized in vitro and subsequently transferred to the fallopian tube, which was able to overcome these prior limitations. But very quickly, this method was found to be invasive, ineffective, and costly because of the need of 2 laparoscopic procedures; one for oocyte retrieval and one for zygote transfer [9]. This was particularly evident once the less invasive transvaginal aspiration of oocytes became the standard. However, among these patients, sudden unexpected fertilization failure started to emerge. This was later attributed to compromised semen parameters.

The routine utilization of conventional IVF was able to treat couples with tubal infertility, and soon was adapted to treat couples whose male partners had abnormal kinetic or morphologic characteristics of the spermatozoa, preventing the spermatozoa from penetrating the glycoprotein layer surrounding the oocyte with often failure to fertilize [10, 11]. The adoption of microdroplet insemination was proposed [12], entailing small drops of medium covered by oil loaded with pooled oocytes and high sperm concentration, but the results in fertilization rate were still poor and unpredictable. Different efforts to improve fertilization outcomes were made and the first attempts were focused on the manipulation of the zona pellucida (ZP), since it was initially hypothesized that the thick layer of glycoproteins would impede the penetration of the spermatozoon into the oocyte [13].

Therefore, an early experiment was done to completely remove the ZP in an attempt to facilitate the fusion of the male gamete with the oolemma but this resulted in high incidence of polyspermy. This approach was compromised by impaired embryo developmental dynamics [14] due to the loss of the ZP as a scaffold for the developing conceptuses. To overcome this obstacle, subsequent techniques aimed at thinning the ZP by the use of trypsin or pronase were investigated [15]. Despite the presence of sperm penetration in patients with previous total failure of fertilization, the aggressive enzymatic action resulted in embryos unable to cleave [15, 16]. Gordon and Talansky reported a procedure called zona drilling (ZD) in which an actual hole in the ZP was created by the action of acidified Tyrode’s medium delivered through a thin glass pipette to allow spermatozoa to bypass the ZP and interact directly with the oolemma. Although the fertilization rate improved to 32%, a high rate of oocytes damage was observed due to the acidic medium employed. Additionally, there was also an increase in the polyspermy rate since more spermatozoa were able to simultaneously enter the perivitelline space through the breach in the zona [13, 17].

Around the same time, Cohen et al. used mechanical means to produce a virtual opening in the ZP [10]. This approach was called partial zona dissection (PZD). Once the ZP was breached by a microneedle controlled by a micromanipulator, the oocytes were then conventionally inseminated. With this approach, the fertilization rate improved to 45% in some cases, but fertilization rates were still sporadic for patients with male factors due to severe asthenozoospermia. Also with this technique, polyspermy as high as 48% plagued clinical outcome [18].

In order to achieve fertilization while minimizing the polyspermy side effect, a later procedure known as subzonal insemination (SUZI) was advanced, where few spermatozoa were inserted in the perivitelline space with a micropipette [19]. This method was beneficial even when sperm concentration and motility were both compromised yielding more consistent results in comparison to ZD and PZD. Indeed, well-developed embryos were obtained, even in couples with a history of poor fertilization results. This was demonstrated in a study that involved 114 patients in which SUZI and IVF were performed simultaneously on sibling oocytes. The fertilization rate with SUZI was 39% versus the 6% obtained with IVF [20]. In another study on 43 couples (44 cycles) with fertilization failure after standard in vitro insemination, the fertilization rate and the cleavage improved after subzonal insemination, reaching 30.9% and 80%, respectively [21].

The early gamete manipulation techniques were proven successful in couples with mild male factor infertility, when only the parameters of the spermatozoa were impaired but purposeless in cases of gamete dysfunction [13]. Indeed, it was very important to select spermatozoa with normal morphology and intact acrosomes [22, 23].

In the late 1980s, different attempts were carried out by injecting the spermatozoon directly into the oocyte. The sea urchin [24, 25] and the Chinese hamster [26, 27] were the first species used to attempt these new procedures. Early on, a pregnancy was obtained in the rabbit [28] followed by a birth in the bovine species [29]. In 1987, this technique was applied in human oocytes as a proof-of-concept [30]. In a small series aimed at achieving pregnancy, it was shown that most oocytes injected were damaged, and the few that were fertilized were somewhat hindered in their ability to develop, resulting in failed implantation [31]. In spite of these initial disappointing results, and with a further refinement of tools and equipment, this procedure evolved in a new technique, intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI; Fig. 2) [23]. This novel approach proved itself as the best way to treat male factor couples [32–34].

Fig. 2.

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) procedure. (a) The injection (right) and holding (left) pipettes are placed into micromanipulation tool holders on an inverted microscope and positioned using hydraulic joysticks. The ICSI dish is placed on the microscope stage. (b) The injecting pipette enters from the 3 o’clock portion of the oocyte and deposits the spermatozoon at the 9 o’clock portion of the ooplasm

Male factors indications of ICSI

Ejaculated specimen

Semen parameter abnormalities

ICSI is the gold standard technique to treat male factor infertility. It was developed to enable the male gamete to bypass natural barriers surrounding the oocyte, such as cumulus cells, the zona pellucida, and the oolemma. It is because of its direct approach that ICSI is the most effective method to treat couples presenting with oligo-, astheno-, and teratozoospermia or a combination of all the above [33].

In cases of oligozoospermia, adequate fertilization rate, implantation rate, and clinical outcomes were observed when selecting apparently normal spermatozoa for ICSI [35]. In cryptozoospermia, previously considered azoospermia, spermatozoa cannot be observed in an ejaculated semen sample unless an initial centrifugation is carried out, followed by an extensive semen analysis. In those circumstances, ICSI is the only infertility treatment suggested for these men [36].

Cases of complete asthenozoospermia, where only immotile spermatozoa are retrieved, have an estimated frequency of 1 in 5000 men [37]. Completely immotile spermatozoa can be either viable or non-viable, and this distinction is not straightforward, requiring the addition of pentoxifylline, which has been linked to higher fertilization rates, allowing the identification of sperm cells with kinetic activity [38]. Other improvements of the sperm sample such as the use of theophylline and the sperm tail flexibility test (STFT) have been proposed, but are less effective than pentoxifylline [39–42].

Evaluation of sperm membrane integrity using the hypo-osmotic swelling test (HOST) has also been proposed. This test consists of adding spermatozoa to a hypo-osmotic solution and assessing the presence of swelling, which indicates an intact membrane and confirms spermatozoa viability [43]. HOST has been proposed to differentiate viable from non-viable spermatozoa in cases of necrozoospermia, a catabolic and degenerative condition that results in cell death and which is very often associated with asthenozoospermia. This allows a better selection of the spermatozoon to be injected with ICSI [44, 45].

On the other hand, the assessment of spermatozoa morphology is more complex and prone to inter-observer grading variability. Sperm morphology according to Kruger’s criteria has little to no prognostic value in ICSI outcome [46]. On the other hand, the identification under light microscopy of spermatozoa with normal shape of the head and detectable acrosomal structure, has allowed for good quality blastocyst development, even in samples with no normal form [46].

Structural abnormalities

Globozoospermia

Globozoospermia is a subtype of teratozoospermia characterized by round-headed spermatozoa with absent acrosomes, abnormal nuclear membranes, and midpiece defects [47]. In patients with partial globozoospermia, where some normally shaped heads are present, the selection of normal sperm cells for ICSI injection is appropriate. In complete cases, however, the utilization of assisted oocyte activation (AOA) can also achieve fertilization as in the case of 34 globozoospermic patients [48]. This disorder has been linked to genetic defects related to cytoskeleton organization, endoplasmic and Golgi network and acrosome formation [49]. In particular, recessive deletions and point mutations of three genes, dpy-19-like 2 (DPY19L2), spermatogenesis associated 16 (SPATA16) and protein interacting with C Kinase (PICK 1) result in globozoospermia phenotype. DPY19L2 is involved in sperm head elongation and development of the acrosome, SPATA16 is responsible for acrosome biogenesis, and PICK 1 plays a role in vesicular transport mechanism and acrosome biogenesis [50]. In addition, a homozygous mutation of aurora kinase C (AURKC), a gene involved in chromosomal segregation and cytokinesis, has been identified in large-headed spermatozoa [51]. ICSI, often supported by assisted gamete treatment or not, is the only viable option to obtain fertilization in globozoospermic patients [52].

Primary ciliary dyskinesia

Primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) is an autosomal recessive condition that is caused by a defect in the ultrastructure of motile cilia or flagella. The axoneme is the internal cytoskeleton of the flagellum or cilium, and is composed of a central pair of microtubule doublets, surrounded by 9 outer microtubule doublets, carrying the dynein arms. The sliding force of motility is provided by outer and inner dynein arms. A mutation can occur in any one of these structures, leading to abnormal beating of the flagella and often absent sperm motility [53, 54].

Kartagener syndrome is an autosomal recessive disease characterized by situs inversus and accounts for around 50% of PCD cases. Kartagener syndrome has been attributed to different gene defects affecting the dynein arms or microtubules structures, leading to structural abnormalities of cilia and flagella, disrupting their mechanism of action. A case report on a Kartagener syndrome patient where pentoxifylline was added resulted in the birth of a healthy infant after ICSI [55]. Other dynein arm defects have been reported, being associated with gene mutations affecting the axonemal dynein intermediate chain DNAI1, and the dynein heavy chain gene DNAH5 as well as other similar genes [56].

Collectively, the different types of sperm flagella abnormalities were previously known as dysplasia of the fibrous sheath (DFS). One of the first case reports of a live birth was in 1996; it describes a young man with a combination of DFS and dynein deficiency where ICSI performed with immotile spermatozoa led to a viable pregnancy and delivery [57]. Later on, a number of reports confirmed that ICSI was the only treatment option for most PCD patients, with its ability to overcome impaired motility and bypass the processes of natural fertilization [58–62].

In all of these forms of dyskinesia of the sperm flagellum, incubating sperm with pentoxifylline can seldom lead to motile spermatozoa [63] and should be attempted prior to injecting immotile spermatozoa.

Genetic indications

Klinefelter syndrome

Infertile men, particularly azoospermic men, are prone to higher chromosomal abnormalities, with an incidence of 12.6% [64], and with Klinefelter syndrome (47, XXY) being the most prevalent. Approximately 15% to 20% of Klinefelter syndrome (KS) patients are mosaics and present with two cell lines: 46XY/47XXY. Men with mosaic KS are reported to be more androgenized than non-mosaic KS, with lower estradiol and LH level in non-mosaic men [65].

KS is characterized by hypergonadotropic hypogonadism and intrinsic testicular failure, which in non-mosaic form, results in non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA). These men have spermatogonia at birth, but testicular function progressively deteriorates with onset of puberty, and is associated with a depletion of testicular germ cells [66]. However, even in the adult men’s testes, small, patchy distribution of spermatogenesis may still be present, and spermatozoa can be retrieved by testicular sperm extraction (TESE or microTESE). From the literature, we can argue that less than 10% of KS patients have sperm in their ejaculate while more than 90% will have to undergo TESE [67, 68]. When combined with ICSI, TESE can lead to a rate of pregnancy close to 50% (218 biochemical pregnancies over 410 ICSI cycles) and a live birth rate of 43% in KS [69].

As the first microTESE on KS patient was performed in 1996 [70], and the first pregnancy using TESE/ICSI in KS was reported in 1997 [71], until today there are still debates on whether to cryopreserve germ cells prior to reaching puberty and no clear clinical practice guidelines have been established yet [72]. Indeed, in a recent survey, 78% of practitioners agreed that testicular biopsy ought to be offered if no sperm is found in ejaculate, and more than 70% of endocrinologists, pediatric endocrinologists, and urologists promoted sperm freezing for KS patient between age 14–16 years [73].

Yq microdeletions

Y chromosome microdeletions are a condition associated with severe male factors infertility, and is seen in up to 18% of men with non-obstructive azoo- or oligozoospermia [74]. Different loci on the Y chromosome have been identified, and most of these genes have been located in a specific region known as the azoospermic factor (AZF) region, and found to have regional alterations (AZFa, AZFb, and AZFc). The most frequent microdeletion has been found to be AZFc (53–56%), followed by AZFa (4.7%) and AZFb (4.1%) [75, 76]. Furthermore, the chance of sperm retrieval for these patients based upon the specific region of Yq deleted differs. As a matter of fact, microdeletions of AZFa or AZFb regions are associated with no sperm retrieval except in rarer situations by TESE, while most men with AZFc microdeletions have sperm in the ejaculate, or can be retrieved from the epididymis and/or testis, and eventually be used with ICSI [77].

Furthermore, in the AZFa region, the USP9Y gene, an ubiquitin-specific peptidase 9 Y-linked gene, and the DDX3Y gene, which functions in RNA metabolism and translational regulation, have been identified. The partial or complete deletion of USP9Y causes severe oligozoospermia but spermatogenesis still occurs [78–80]. On the other hand, DDX3Y gene mutations or deletion is related to complete azoospermia, and spermatogenesis does not occur [79].

Through ART, and particularly with TESE/ICSI, men with Yq microdeletions and severe oligozoospermia or azoospermia have been able to reproduce. One study concluded that fertilization rates and clinical pregnancy rates were not significantly different from men with NOA with no Y chromosome microdeletions [81]. Moreover, evaluation of children of men with Yq microdeletions, born through ICSI, demonstrated that the inheritance of this defect has no effect on their psychological and physical development, except for a similar deletion in baby boys [82] and sometimes a different spermatogenetic profile in fathers and sons may ensue [83].

Genomic abnormalities

Sperm chromatin fragmentation

It has been recently recognized that an elevated sperm chromatin fragmentation (SCF) affects couples seeking procreation and can be one of the reasons to cause recurrent implantation failure and/or pregnancy loss [84, 85]. As mentioned, ICSI aims to select spermatozoa with adequate morphokinetic profile (normal morphology and motility) in order to inseminate oocytes, which may indicate that they are the spermatozoa with highest genetic integrity [86]. Directly compared to conventional in vitro insemination, ICSI yields a superior pregnancy rate in couples known to have high SCF [87]. Indeed, an algorithm of reproductive treatment is devised to use ICSI upfront to treat patients known to have high SCF, in an attempt to minimize futile ART cycles [88]. However, when clinical outcomes were compared between couples with high SCF and normal SCF, even ICSI outcome was affected by the extent of DNA damage in the ejaculated male gamete [89]. Specifically, ICSI results are negatively impacted by the high incidence of double-stranded DNA breakage resulting in delayed embryo development and poor embryo implantation due to high rate of embryo aneuploidy [90], while ICSI seems less affected by single-stranded DNA breakage [90]. In order to ameliorate the detrimental effect of such DNA insult, treatment can be attempted with the administration of Coenzyme Q10 which improves sperm parameters and apparently has an effect on the proportion of spermatozoa with an intact genome [91].

A more sophisticated alternative sperm selection method was proposed, aiming to select ejaculated spermatozoa with the highest genomic integrity and competence, such as testicular sperm extraction. By using microfluidic techniques together with ICSI, a higher rate of euploid conceptuses was achieved even in patients who had not been able to obtain suitable embryos to transfer in their historical cycles [92].

Absence of oocyte activation sperm cytosolic factor

ICSI has been able to greatly alleviate male factor infertility, but some rare cases of post-ICSI fertilization failure still occur at about 1–3%. In about 40–70% of unfertilized oocytes post-ICSI, the culprit has been attributed to a specific oocyte activating factor deficiency in the spermatozoa [93]. Evidence suggests that oocyte activation is triggered by a sperm factor, phospholipase C zeta (PLCζ) that, once in the ooplasm, activates a cascade of reactions leading to the release of Ca²⁺ in an oscillatory mode [94].

For these problematic cases of failed oocyte activation, assisted oocyte activation (AOA) can be carried out by exposing the oocytes, post-ICSI, to a chemical agent such as calcium ionophore or strontium chloride, or an electrical pulse [95, 96]. Treatment with one of these agents increases the Ca²⁺ permeability at the cell membrane, allowing an influx of extracellular Ca²⁺ into the ooplasma and thereby inducing Ca²⁺ release from intracellular calcium stores.

One pioneering study on AOA reported 17 couples with previously failed fertilization following ICSI. For these patients’ subsequent ICSI cycles, AOA was carried out by injecting the spermatozoon with medium containing a high concentration of CaCl₂, followed by exposing the oocyte to calcium ionophore. As a result, couples with this peculiar defect were able to achieve an overall fertilization rate of over 70% [97].

Despite positive results, it is important to identify a sperm-related oocyte activation deficiency (OAD), or a sperm-related fertilization deficiency, before carrying out AOA to avoid unnecessary interventions. The demonstration of OAD is usually confirmed in couples with a history of fertilization failure with ICSI and a positive mouse oocyte activation test (MOAT), which measures the oocyte activating capacity of spermatozoa. If a MOAT test indicates a deficiency of the sperm oocyte-activating ability, then theoretically good results with AOA can be expected [98]. In a study carried out on 114 couples with history of poor or complete ICSI fertilization failure, male partners were initially screened using direct PLCζ assessment by immunofluorescence to determine whether poor fertilization was attributed to an oocyte- or sperm-related OAD [52]. If the PLCζ assay was negative, indicating an oocyte-related cause for fertilization failure, couples were treated in a subsequent ICSI cycle with a modulated stimulation protocol. Couples with a positive PLCζ assay, however, were further assessed with the MOAT to confirm sperm-related OAD. A deletion on the PLCZ1 gene in some of these men was also detected by DNA sequencing, confirming the absence of PLCζ. Deletions on PICK1, SPATA16, and DPY19L indicated an absence of the spermatozoa subacrosomal perinuclear theca, as observed in globozoospermic men. These couples underwent subsequent ICSI cycles with assisted gamete treatment (AGT), during which the spermatozoa and oocytes were briefly exposed to calcium ionophore. In both cases of oocyte- and sperm-related OAD, couples’ subsequent ICSI cycles yielded significantly higher fertilization and clinical pregnancy rates [52].

Infectious agents in semen

HIV/Hep C discordant couples

Assisted reproductive techniques may also benefit serodiscordant couples in which the male partner is infected by blood borne viruses such as HIV or Hepatitis C by preventing horizontal transmission. Conversely for seropositive females, intrauterine insemination (IUI) can be considered if other indications of female factor infertility are absent, and ICSI would be offered to avoid unexpected fertilization failure following potential IUI failure [99].

In seropositive males however, prerequisite highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), extensive sperm decontamination and ICSI are utilized in order to minimize horizontal and vertical virus transmission [100]. In fact, spermatozoa lack an HIV receptor and therefore the male gametes themselves are not infected as the virus is only present in seminal plasma [101]. Even though sperm processing by density gradient can yield viral-free samples safe for insemination and a seronegative offspring has been born from IUI using decontaminated spermatozoa from seropositive male [102], patients treated with HAART may present with impaired semen parameters including volume, concentration, progressive motility and compromised morphology [103]. In addition to an already impaired semen sample, proper sperm processing is required to remove excess viral particles, resulting in loss of additional sperm cells, leaving ICSI as the preferable insemination option to ensure successful treatment outcome [99, 104, 105]. To date, all infants born from ICSI with seropositive male parents tested seronegative [106].

Ejaculatory dysfunction

Retrograde ejaculation

Ejaculation is a complex process involving the sympathetic nerve fibers. The latter triggers the 2 phases of ejaculation: emission and expulsion. Failure of closure of the bladder neck during the expulsion phase results in reflux of semen into the bladder and is known as retrograde ejaculation (RE). Moreover, the spermatozoa recovered following urination are usually compromised by a non-physiological environment and appear non-motile. Performing IUI or conventional insemination would be unadvisable in such cases due to the impaired sperm kinetics and the possible exposure to toxic contaminants [107], but is still possible in specific cases with good concentration and motility and when adequate alkalization of urine is done by oral or intravenous administration of sodium bicarbonate [108].

In an early study by Nikolettos et al., the outcome of ICSI treatment in 16 couples with men presenting with RE reported 51.2% fertilization rate [109]. ICSI was able to generate live births using fresh spermatozoa retrieved from post-ejaculatory urine despite extremely low motility [110, 111]. Moreover, sperm retrieval directly from the bladder, known as the Hotchkiss procedure has been attempted. The use of cryopreserved spermatozoa retrieved from the bladder has yielded 62.6% ICSI fertilization, 37.5% clinical pregnancy rate and 28% live birth rate [112].

Electroejaculation

Men with neurologic impairment in their sympathetic outflow, as in demyelinating neuropathies (multiple sclerosis), traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI), or diabetes, often present with abnormalities or absence of ejaculation. Another common cause is psychogenic anejaculation (PAE). Medically assisted ejaculation methods for the treatment of these conditions are being used, such as penile vibratory stimulation (PVS), and electroejaculation (EEJ) by inserting a probe transrectally and sending an electric signal to stimulate ejaculation [113].

In an early study by Hovav et al., sperm retrieved by EEJ was assessed and shown to have decreased motility and normal or decreased concentration, thus demonstrating that EEJ can work and is a less invasive treatment option than surgical sperm retrieval [114]. Sperm retrieval by PVS or EEJ combined with intravaginal insemination or intrauterine insemination (IUI) should be offered to couples with abnormal ejaculatory processes as the first line of treatment. In the case of suboptimal motility or previously failed IUI with EEJ, ICSI should be used to maximize chances of fertilization and a successful pregnancy [115].

Moreover, studies on different methods of fertilization reported similar or even higher rates of pregnancy and delivery in EEJ/ICSI cycles when compared to EEJ/IUI cycles [116, 117]. To note that it is also possible to cryopreserve the spermatozoa retrieved from EEJ, with results as good as those with freshly obtained spermatozoa. With the use of frozen-thawed samples, the frequency of transrectal EEJ procedures can be thus reduced [118].

Presence of other cells and reactive oxygen species

Semen samples can contain cells other than spermatozoa, such as round cells (RC), and white blood cells (WBC),which can be accountable for reactive oxygen species (ROS) production. Presence of round cells in the ejaculate has been erroneously considered leukocytospermia. The origin of seminal RCs is not necessarily correlated to bacteriological growth. In this scenario, RCs are mostly immature germ cells with sloughed Sertoli cell remnants and indicate a damage on germinal epithelium usually caused by ailment and disrupted physiology.

Presence of seminal RCs correlates to a compromised sperm concentration, but more importantly, the sperm DNA fragmentation is also elevated when RCs are seen [119]. This results in an apparent impairment of fertilization and pregnancy rates with IVF but not with ICSI, even though a decreased blastocyst development has been observed in the ICSI group [120].

A male genital tract infection can occur in up to 15% of male infertility cases, and etiology has been attributed to genital tract infection affecting the urethra, epididymis and/or testis [121]. In this scenario, the presence of WBCs has been identified, and usually indicates the potential presence of bacteria in semen. However, leukocytospermia does not necessarily imply immunologic infertility caused by antisperm antibodies [122]. Indeed, the presence of white blood cells in male genital tract can cause elevation of (ROS), directly or indirectly, and may result in poor sperm motility and increase sperm DNA damage [123]. Therefore, leukocytospermia may cause male infertility by attenuating sperm kinetics and impairing male genomic integrity. Common treatment of leukocytospermia includes antibiotics therapy and antioxidant therapy [124]. Patients who underwent antibiotic treatment have shown recovered semen parameters, resolution of leukocytospermia, and increased pregnancy rate [125]. However, seminal leukocytes may not be used as a predictor for ART treatment outcome, as patients with or without WBCs in their semen were comparable, whether treated by standard IVF or ICSI [126, 127].

The dogma on leukocytospermia has been challenged in a recent paper using ploidy markers, protamine assays, and Sertoli cell cytoplasm markers. It was determined that leukocytes made up at most 26.7% of the round cells in the samples of all men assessed [119]. The authors were able to conclude that the etiology of round cells is actually the presence of nuclei of immature germ cells encased in Sertoli cell cytoplasm sloughed from the germinal epithelium due to an insult in the genital tract. These samples also exclusively had negative bacterial cultures. This in part explains why samples presenting with seminal RCs are associated with a compromised sperm concentration and normal morphology. ICSI is the ideal treatment method in these cases not only because it can take care of a semen sample with acutely compromised semen parameters, but also with an increase in SCF due to exposure to ROS generated from these ancillary cells. The selection of spermatozoa for ICSI through a viscous medium also prevents eventual bacterial and viral contamination, even if initially present in the ejaculated specimen.

Antisperm antibody

Antisperm antibodies (ASA) are immunoglobins directed against sperm antigen, which are positive in 5–15% of infertile men and 1–2% of fertile men [128–131]. ASA is usually IgG isotype when found in blood or lymph node, and in the form of IgA when in seminal secretions [132]. To date, the IgG-mixed anti-globulin reaction (IgG-MAR) test is the most widely used test for ASA detection, with positive results ranging from 2.6% to 12.9% depending on the threshold chosen for positivity [133].

The presence of ASA in either male or female partners is considered a type of immunological infertility. Since human semen is made up of spermatozoa, non-sperm cells, seminal vesicles and small molecules, the female genital tract may be sensitized and thus trigger local or systemic immunological responses. The immunological rejection of semen in the female genital tract is also known as failure of natural tolerance, and may lead to sperm elimination [134]. Within the female reproductive tract, ASA may hinder pre/post-fertilization processes at different levels including sperm agglutination, reduced sperm motility, impaired capacitation and acrosome reaction, inability to bind and penetrate ZP, failed sperm-oocyte fusion, and eventual unsuccessful embryo implantation. In those cases, standard IVF which relies on natural binding between the spermatozoon and oocyte is not an ideal treatment method and has been shown to yield reduced fertilization, pregnancy and live birth rates [135]. Most of the ASA is found to be on the head of the spermatozoa, thus preventing the acrosomal reaction and ability of the sperm head to penetrate into the oocyte [136, 137]. By directly injecting the sperm in the ooplasm, ICSI bypasses this obstacle.

In men with positive seminal ASA, semen parameters may be negatively affected including a reduction in total sperm count, concentration, motility, and viability [138]. However, sperm genomic integrity is not affected by ASA and therefore genomically healthy spermatozoa are still achievable [139], although proper sperm process using chymotrypsin-galactose may improve treatment outcome of conventional IVF by shedding antibodies bound to the spermatozoa [140]. ICSI, however, can easily bypass pre-fertilization biological hindrances caused by ASA. In fact, ICSI has shown to be an effective technique that yields comparable clinical outcomes as those cases with negative ASA, and the presence of ASA does not show any negative impact to ICSI outcomes [141, 142].

Surgically retrieved spermatozoa

Epididymal

As aforementioned, ICSI requires only a single spermatozoon to fertilize an oocyte in spite of impaired kinetics, dysmorphism and maturational stage of the male gametes. Therefore, ICSI is regarded as the only method of insemination for men with azoospermia that require surgical intervention to retrieve spermatozoa. While azoospermia is observed in 1% of all men and 10–15% in males seeking fertility treatment [143], epididymal sperm retrieval is an efficient method to obtain a sufficient number of male gametes in men with obstructive azoospermia (OA) and a normal hormonal profile [144].

Obstruction of the male genital tract can present at different levels. Ejaculatory duct obstruction (EDO) occurs in the distal level and can be corrected by transurethral resection of the ejaculatory duct (TURED). In 50–70% of cases, spermatozoa are found in the ejaculate after the TURED procedure, but in 20% of cases, complications such as urine reflux, hematuria, urinary tract infection, or hematuria can occur [145]. Indeed, sperm retrieval techniques such as percutaneous and microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration (PESA and MESA, respectively) can be used as alternatives to resection. .

Epididymal sperm retrieval can also benefit patients who have obstruction at the deferens vasa level. The etiology of vasal obstruction can be either congenital or acquired. Congenital obstruction may occur unilaterally or bilaterally (CUAVD or CBAVD, respectively). The genetic cause of CBAVD is mostly linked to a cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) mutation, and the symptoms account for 25% of the OA population [146]. CBAVD is present in 1% of infertile men and in up to 6% of men with OA [147]. Surgical sperm retrieval for OA patients using ICSI has a success rate of 96–100% regardless of the etiology of OA [144]. However, epididymal sperm retrieval is only meaningful or effective in OA patients with conserved spermatogenesis. Acquired vasal obstruction can be attributed to vasectomy and failed vasectomy-reversal including vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy [148] as well as other iatrogenic causes [144].

While obstructive azoospermia (OA) on the ductal system is accountable for 40% of azoospermia cases [149], the most common cause of OA is vasectomy as a method of elective sterilization. Approximately 500,000 vasectomies are performed in the United States annually [150, 151]. ICSI is the sole and trusted method to utilize epididymal spermatozoa in ART.

Testicular

Testicular sperm extraction (TESE) offers a direct path to obtain male gametes directly from testes, and it can be utilized for OA patients as well, as it covers all the indications of the use of epididymal sperm. In order to obtain male gametes for males afflicted by non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA), surgical sperm retrieval directly from the germinal epithelium is required to gather these precious gametes. NOA can be further divided into 3 categories: hypospermatogenesis, maturational arrest and germ cell aplasia. As previously stated, ICSI bypasses the natural barriers between male and female gametes, and indeed, testicular spermatozoa can only be utilized in conjunction with ICSI due to the low maturity of male gametes [152].

High sperm chromatin fragmentation

While surgical sperm extraction is mostly performed on azoospermic men, utilization of those relatively immature gametes may benefit couples who present with elevated sperm chromatin fragmentation (SCF). High SCF may result in poor fertilization and recurrent pregnancy loss and can occur in men with normal or even optimal semen parameters [153]. In a recent study., a progressively decreasing level of SCF was observed when spermatozoa are retrieved from proximal levels of the male genital tract. Even though testicular spermatozoa have the lowest level of SCF due to lower exposure of oxidative stress, epididymal spermatozoa outperform the more immature gametes from germinal epithelium in clinical cases as they offer a balance between gametal maturity and SCF [154]. Conclusively, surgical sperm retrieval in conjunction with ICSI is a preferred approach to efficiently treat couples plagued by high SCF.

Post mortem sperm retrieval

Although the application may be legally, ethically and morally challenging, postmortem sperm retrieval (PSR) by methods such as testicular and epididymal resection, testicular biopsy and vasal aspiration can be offered to obtain and preserve the still viable gametes from a man who has been pronounced brain dead [155]. Needless to say, viable gametes can be extremely rare when the PSR is not conducted immediately. Therefore, in order to grant fertilization using these extremely precious specimens, ICSI is the preferred method of insemination.

Non-male factor indications of ICSI

Oocyte dysmorphism

Zona pellucida abnormalities

Following standard in vitro insemination, it has been evidenced that abnormalities of the zona pellucida (ZP) may affect fertilization, embryo development and clinical outcomes [156]. Lack of a ZP protein, ZP dysmorphism (thinned, thickened, irregularly shaped ZP), and/or complete absence of the ZP are alterations that have been demonstrated [157].

All mammalian ZPs consist of 3 sulfated glycoproteins, ZP1, ZP2, and ZP3, with human oocytes containing an additional ZP4. In humans, the protein that acts as the primary sperm ligand and acrosome reaction-inducer during fertilization remains controversial [158, 159]. However, one generally accepted mechanism is that the spermatozoon binds to ZP3 protein, also known as the sperm-recognition protein, after which it undergoes the acrosome reaction and binds to ZP2 protein, to penetrate the ZP [157]. Oocyte maturation defects and consequent female infertility have been linked to variants in ZP1 and ZP3 proteins [160, 161]. Moreover, a study was conducted to assess abnormal ZP phenotype and total fertilization failure following standard in vitro insemination in 2 unrelated infertile women, with a family history of consanguinity. They were found to have no ZP2 proteins, resulting in only the presence of a thin zona layer,. Despite a thin ZP, the lack of ZP2 protein was linked to defective sperm binding and penetration, as well as fertilization failure. This demonstrates that a ZP2 protein pathogenic variant also causes in vitro fertilization failure, and it is only after direct injection of sperm into the ooplasm that fertilization and pregnancy occur [162].

Another common abnormality is an alteration in the structural integrity of the ZP, which results in a frail structure that breaks easily with manipulation. Studies have reported higher than expected rates of fertilization failure using standard in vitro insemination [163]. This has actively stimulated the development of different assisted fertilization techniques aimed at bypassing the ZP and resulting in the development of ICSI. Indeed, a clinical trial demonstrated improved fertilization and pregnancy rates following ICSI in 92 patients with fertilization failure in their first IVF cycle, 28 of which had abnormal ZP morphology [164]. Also, by using modified laser assisted ICSI to inject these oocytes, the zona was thinned, and sperm was injected through the thinned area. This approach, which combines less invasive ICSI with assisted hatching, improves oocyte survival [165]. Later, a study on 212 ICSI cycles, where patients were randomly divided between laser assisted ICSI and conventional ICSI, demonstrated higher fertilization and pregnancy rates with laser assisted ICSI [166].

While ICSI has resolved the issue of overcoming the zona layer, it requires the removal of cumulus cells, which has evidenced the emergence of other defects of these oocyte coats. Indeed, during the denudation procedure in preparation for ICSI, the ZP can be occasionally damaged, leading to zona-free oocytes. In this regard, a retrospective comparison was done between 135 zona-free oocytes (oocytes where Paws damaged and subsequently removed) and 216 zona-intact oocytes. The results showed that the zona-free oocytes were successfully fertilized following ICSI, and there was no significant difference in cleavage, blastocyst formation, or survival rate between the zona-free and zona-intact oocytes [167]. A study on zona-free embryo culture concluded that although beneficial, the presence of the zona does not seem to be indispensable to all stages of oocyte and embryo development in vivo [168]. Indeed, follicle development, oocyte maturation, fertilization, and embryo development in vivo still occur in zona-free mammalian oocytes. Under laboratory conditions, the zona seems to be a passive, artificially hardened layer that from fertilization to the blastocyst stage envelopes the embryo [168]. Studies with domestic animals demonstrated that zona-free zygotes can be cultured in isolated systems (as individual droplets), without compromising blastocyst formation rates and quality [169, 170]. Zona-free culture may become a viable option for zona-free oocytes in humans.

These clinical evidences confirm that ICSI can successfully fertilize oocytes with damaged or absent ZP, giving a chance to patients with low egg yield and structurally compromised oocytes to have a normal fertilization followed by normal blastocyst development with fair chances of pregnancy.

Oolemma/ooplasmic abnormalities

It is commonly accepted that a morphologically healthy oocyte is one that is at metaphase II (MII), with a moderately granular, vacuole-free cytoplasm, a thin perivitelline space, and a non-fragmented round polar body [156]. In addition to the zona pellucida, a second obstacle that spermatozoa are faced with is the oolemma. In order to penetrate the oolemma, the sperm has to be fully capacitated and contain an acrosome with functional post acrosomal segments. While the presence of an oolemma receptor has been disputed for a long time, recently, a protein identified as IZUMO has been described. IZUMO 1 is a ligand found on the spermatozoa membrane that binds with JUNO, a folate receptor anchored on the egg oolemma [171]. Following fertilization, JUNO is rapidly shed from the egg membrane, contributing to the block of polyspermia at the oolemma level [172]. In this instance, ICSI presents itself as the only technique to bypass this hurdle.

On the other hand, oocyte dysmorphism can be characterized by an abnormal cytoplasm (granular, or dark), cytoplasmic inclusions (vacuoles, smooth endoplasmic reticulum, or refractile bodies), abnormal perivitelline space, abnormal polar body (giant, duplicated, fragmented) or non-spherical shapes [173]. Several studies have tried to investigate the ability of dysmorphic oocytes to fertilize. One pioneer study showed that when abnormal oocytes were conventionally inseminated no fertilization occurred, whereas the use of ICSI improved fertilization and clinical outcomes [174, 175]. These aberrations in the morphology of oocytes have little or no consequences on the fertilization and cleavage rate post-ICSI.

Abnormal morphological features are multifactorial; they can be due to the superovulation protocol, the nature of the gonadotropic drugs used (natural or synthetic), or the hormonal environment generated by these drugs. Different studies linked causative agents to each defect seen [173, 176, 177]. Furthermore, a meta-analysis on the effect of oocyte morphological characteristics in relation to clinical outcome concluded that, based on the data from eligible studies, MII oocytes with a large polar body, large perivitelline space, refractile bodies, or vacuoles were associated with an impaired fertilization rate with standard in vitro insemination. However, there was no significant effect on the embryo quality [178].

On the other hand, in the setting of ICSI, it is possible to evaluate the morphology of the oocyte immediately after removal of the cumulus-oocyte complex (COC), whereas standard in vitro insemination is limited at the evaluation of the COC. It is only the following day, after the inseminating spermatozoa have dispersed the cumulus cells from the surface of the oocytes, that a detailed morphology can be done, at which point the oocyte has already been fertilized or not. A study was conducted to assess the effect of centrally located cytoplasm granulation (CLCG) on ICSI outcome in terms of embryo cleavage, ongoing pregnancy, and live birth rate. These oocytes with CLCG were retrieved from women with a high pesticide exposure. The higher the density of the CLCG, the lower the pregnancy rate. This was presumably due to a dysregulated intra-ovarian microenvironment that, during oocyte maturation, affects oocyte morphology with consequent impairment of clinical outcome. The author opted to use ICSI to be able to “read” the oocytes’ cytoplasm and overcome the CLCG, granting fertilization [179]. Similarly, other studies confirm ICSI as the preferential tool to inseminate oocytes that require detailed evaluation of their morphological features [180–183].

Fertility preservation

Elective oocyte cryopreservation

Although both embryo and sperm cryopreservation has been well-established, it is only relatively recently that oocyte cryopreservation has emerged as an additional fertility preservation option for women. Oocyte cryopreservation in combination with ART provides several advantages for women anticipating age-related fertility decline, elective cryopreservation when a designated partner has not been identified, or cancer patients prior to gonadotoxic cancer treatment.

The first pregnancy from frozen-thawed oocytes was reported in 1986 [184] and since then, cryopreservation of oocytes has cemented its position in assisted reproduction. Standard in vitro insemination was useful in this anecdotal case achieving 83% fertilization, and a cleavage rate of 60%. With standard in vitro insemination as the obvious method of insemination at that time, all the frozen-thawed oocytes in the early 1990s were inseminated by this method. Successful fertilization and embryo development were obtained worldwide. However, unpredictability of egg survival and most importantly scant fertilization limited the use of this procedure. It was the report of the first Italian experience with slow freezing in combination with ICSI that produced the first live birth after intracytoplasmic sperm injection of a cryopreserved oocyte in 1997 [185]. With the utilization of ICSI, different studies and clinical trials were conducted to compare the treatment outcomes of standard in vitro insemination and ICSI on thawed-frozen oocytes [186] and early on, it was found that ICSI was able to rectify fertilization issues caused by a hardened ZP [186–188].

Due to its consistency in granting promising fertilization outcomes in the past two decades, ICSI has been the tool used to inseminate these oocytes and for experiments on cryopreservation,. Indeed, studies on oocyte cryopreservation were done in Italy, where there was a legally imposed limit of 3 inseminated oocytes per cycle. In one study, the author randomly divided the cycles into 2 groups: 120 autologous IVF cycles using vitrified oocytes and 251 cycles using freshly retrieved oocytes [189]. They concluded that in terms of fertilization and embryo development rates, there was no difference in ICSI performance between fresh or frozen oocytes. At the same time, a similar study also showed no difference in one group of freshly inseminated oocytes by ICSI compared to another group of cryopreserved oocytes [190]. With the emergence of supernumerary oocytes and to avoid discarding the remaining oocytes, oocyte banking has now become a routine practice and insemination of the survived oocytes post warming procedure is done by ICSI.

Moreover, in studies conducted to compare 2 methods of cryopreservation, slow-freezing versus vitrification, the ability of the cryopreserved oocytes to fertilize after thawing was evaluated only by ICSI [191–193]. Fertilization outcomes and pregnancy rates of previously cryopreserved oocytes were evaluated using ICSI as the method of insemination in many more studies [194–199].

Recently, an evidence-based counseling tool was created to guide physicians and women desiring elective oocyte cryopreservation; it estimates the number of oocytes to freeze and predicts the likelihood of having one, two or three live birth(s) based on the patient’s age and the results of ICSI cycles in their patient population [200].

Medically-indicated oocyte cryopreservation

Fertility preservation prior to gonadotoxic cancer therapy is becoming highly promoted in most oncology centers to preserve the reproductive potential in cancer survivors. Also, the survival rate for cancer patients has dramatically improved in the last two decades, pressing the need for cryostorage of these precious gametes. Oocyte cryopreservation has been preferred over embryo cryopreservation, particularly in single women refusing sperm donation and when embryo freezing is avoided for ethical or religious issues, or prohibited by law [201].

One of the first oocyte cryopreservation cycles for a cancer patient before her treatment was reported in 2007. By using ICSI the cycle yielded a successful live birth through a gestational carrier [202]. In a retrospective study on 357 women who had their oocytes cryopreserved after being diagnosed with cancer, 11 women returned for assisted reproduction. Their oocytes were fertilized by ICSI and 4 pregnancies and live births were reported [203]. Additionally, in a single center observational study, women with different types of cancer underwent oocyte retrieval cycles for cryopreservation prior to their treatment. After fertilization by ICSI, the pregnancy rate was 36.4% and delivery rate was 18.2%, demonstrating that oocyte cryopreservation combined with fertilization by ICSI is a good opportunity for fertilization preservation [204]. Finally, even if cancer patients were described as having a poorer response to ovarian stimulation [205], it was demonstrated that all the delivered babies were healthy and at term [206]. The hope of having a family after a cancer diagnosis can contribute to better acceptance of the oncologic treatment.

Low oocyte maturity

In earlier years, standard in vitro insemination was the only available method to treat couples with a history of low fertilization, or complete fertilization failure. These poor outcomes were largely attributed to the number of follicles, oocytes retrieved, and proportion of mature oocytes [207]. In an ART protocol, the aim is to harvest healthy mature oocytes in order to increase chances for a successful pregnancy. Although oocyte maturity can be assessed with difficulty and only by skillful individuals in the presence of the cumulus cells [208], oocyte nuclear maturity is only properly assessable after the removal of the cumulus cells and can be identified by the extrusion of the first polar body (PB) in the perivitelline space, indicating a successful completion of meiosis I and arrest at the metaphase II (MII) stage. Failure to yield an optimal maturation rate entails that some oocytes remain at either the germinal vesicle (GV) or metaphase I (MI) stages [37]. Thus, the proportion of MII oocytes retrieved can be affected by follicle size, ovarian stimulation protocols, or the surgeon’s ability to retrieve the smallest antral follicle [209]. An assessment of couples with low fertilization found that standard in vitro insemination was not beneficial in achieving higher fertilization rates in subsequent cycles [210].

The introduction of ICSI, however, was able to provide an effective alternative for couples with recurrent poor fertilization. A study on 38 couples with a history of low fertilization (<25%) compared IVF and ICSI outcomes on sibling oocytes and confirmed that while IVF treatment could not provide any improvement, ICSI was able to achieve a significantly higher fertilization rate [211]. The utilization of ICSI in these cases is helpful in order to assess the actual number of mature oocytes prior to injection, and therefore provide time for further in vitro maturation of the remainder GV and MI oocytes. Even with ICSI, however, the proportion of mature oocytes of the entire retrieved cohort influences successful outcome. Indeed, a recent study evaluating oocyte maturity allocated 7672 ICSI cycles according to their oocyte nuclear maturity ratios. The minimal maturation cohort, characterized by the highest proportion of MI and GV oocytes, displayed significantly lower normal 2PN fertilization, implantation, and clinical pregnancy rates, indicating an association of the low number of mature oocyte within the cohort with oocyte readiness to be fertilized [209]. The utilization of ICSI would allow for a more detailed information on the response of a patient to a specific superovulation protocol.

Although nuclear maturity can be morphologically validated by the extrusion of the first polar body, evaluating for the presence of a spindle has proven to be linked to more promising outcomes. In a recent study, polarized light microscopy was used to appraise oocyte maturity by looking at the presence or absence of a spindle, in addition to the polar body [212]. The authors considered that incomplete maturity is often seen in cases where there is a polar body, but no spindle. By removing the cumulus cells in the setting of ICSI, they could confirm complete maturity and allow them to adjust the timing of injection. Results showed that, of the examined oocytes retrieved from poor/slow responding patients with low oocyte yield, 32.6% did not display MII spindles. However, by adjusting the timing of ICSI insemination by lengthening the in vitro culture of the oocytes, successful fertilization, embryo development, and live births were observed [212]. Therefore, the ability of ICSI to enhance fertilization chances by direct spermatozoon injection makes it the most appropriate treatment in cases with low oocyte maturity. Moreover, the utilization of ICSI has allowed investigation into the contribution of ooplasm maturity on ART outcome. In a retrospective analysis, the duration of time interaction between oocyte and cumulus cells was lengthened, allowing the ooplasm to reach a proper maturity granting successful fertilization even with ICSI [213].

In vitro maturation

In vitro maturation (IVM) was originally developed as a variant to traditional in vitro fertilization (IVF) and was addressed to women with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS), prone to ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), or other factors preventing them from undergoing a typical ovarian superovulation [214]. In IVM procedures, oocytes are retrieved from small and intermediate sized follicles when the largest of the cohort has not yet surpassed 13 mm in diameter. These cumulus-enclosed oocytes are then matured in vitro prior to insemination by small dosage gonadotropin, with or without hCG [215, 216].

Current literature on IVM in humans focuses mainly on its effectiveness or related culture conditions [217–219], with few studies comparing different insemination protocols. One such study included 8 PCOS patients treated in 8 IVM cycles where sibling oocytes were equally inseminated by IVF or ICSI. No significant differences in fertilization, blastocyst development, or clinical pregnancy rates between the two insemination methods were found [214]. Another assessment, however, found that 138 in vitro-matured oocytes fertilized by IVF yielded significantly lower fertilization than 151 oocytes fertilized by ICSI, although cleavage rates remained unaffected [220].

While the debate of using one insemination method versus another has not yet been settled due to the somewhat inconsistent fertilization of IVF in IVM cases, ICSI is widely considered to be the preferred procedure as it provides higher chances of yielding successful fertilization [221].

An assessment of 324 in vitro-matured GV oocytes and 341 MI oocytes found that, while IVF and ICSI yielded comparable normal fertilization rates in the GV and MI-derived oocytes, the occurrence of multiple pronuclei formation in the MI-derived oocytes was significantly more frequent when standard IVF was used [222]. These findings suggest that some in vitro-matured oocytes are more prone to allow polyspermy and therefore exhibit signs of abnormal zona behavior. Indeed, electron microscope assessment has evidenced that oocytes in culture media are at different stages of maturation, with specific morphokinetic characteristics [216]. Ultrastructural changes and altered properties of the ZP have been observed in in vitro-matured oocytes, and cumulus cells surrounding the abnormal oocytes have been shown to possess high apoptotic potential, which potentially leads to higher oocytes degeneration rates [216]. Moreover, a recent morphokinetic analysis of in vitro-matured oocytes using time-lapse microscopy found that early key developmental events, such as polar body extrusion and pronuclear fading, were significantly delayed following fertilization [223].

We also cannot exclude a potential negative effect of high hormone levels on in vitro-matured oocytes. In a retrospective analysis of 703 patients undergoing IVF, high serum FSH was found to be associated with brown ZP of oocytes, as well as impaired fertilization, embryo quality, and pregnancy outcomes [224]. Another study revealed that culturing oocytes in high doses of gonadotropins compromised their mitochondrial membrane potential, and resulted in the downregulation of genes involved in spindle formation and cell cycle control [225]. Regarding the use of protein supplements in IVM culture medium, an evaluation of bovine oocytes found that the addition of BSA-V, fetal calf serum, or polyvinyl alcohol during IVM hindered oocyte nuclear maturation and yielded a significantly lower number of morulae and blastocysts [226]. However, embryonic development rates were restored when BSA-V was replaced with purified BSA, indicating that the effect of FSH on oocyte nuclear maturation may be influenced by substrates present in the IVM medium.

As demonstrated by these studies, the success of IVM is dependent on the ability to overcome lags in nuclear and cytoplasmic maturation. Therefore, insemination at the precise time of maturation is crucial to provide optimal chances of fertilization. This can only be achieved by individual sperm penetration unconstrained by the zona characteristics, thus validating the use of ICSI for IVM.

Recurrent polyspermy

Standard in vitro insemination was designed to treat couples unable to achieve a pregnancy by natural means. However, this procedure, was often associated with multiple sperm penetration resulting in abnormal fertilization. Genetic analysis of embryos derived from multi-sperm fertilization has shown the spermatozoon to be the gamete responsible for carrying the centrosome. Functioning as a scaffold for the mitotic spindle and located near the nucleus, the centrosome in the zygote controls the first mitotic division. This underlines the importance of only a single spermatozoon with the oocyte for subsequent normal zygote development [227].

An early study found that 12.2% of fertilized oocytes obtained from 67 IVF cycles stimulated with human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) were polyspermic but cleaved into normal appearing 2- and 3-cell embryos. They argued that corona-cumulus-removal at 15–18 h post standard in vitro insemination, instead of 40 h, is therefore essential determining the occurrence of polyspermy and avoiding the potential transfer of a diploid conceptus. [228]. Similarly, another study found 10% of oocytes to be polyspermic after standard in vitro insemination, but by adjusting the insemination time according to oocyte maturity and by decreasing the concentration of spermatozoa, the polyspermy rate decreased [229]. Higher rates of polyspermy have also been linked to high estradiol levels prior to hCG administration [230].

Most 3PN zygotes after standard in vitro insemination are of dispermic origin, with two centrosomes. The development of ICSI, however, led to the observation of a new pattern of abnormal fertilization: digynic 3PN zygotes consisting of 3PN and a single polar body (PB), with only centrosome. Due to partially-removed cumulus cells or a fragmented PB, digynic 3PN zygotes were overlooked in standard in vitro insemination [231].

Additionally, 3PN zygotes resulting from ICSI are largely due to failure of the oocyte to complete the second meiotic division after sperm injection, resulting in a third pronucleus from an unextruded PB [232]. Experiments comparing 3PN IVF zygotes (oocytes fertilized by standard in vitro insemination) and 3PN ICSI zygotes showed that karyotypes of 3PN ICSI embryos were closer to euploid than 3PN IVF embryos, indicating that the number of centrosomes in a 3PN zygote affects the integrity of the karyotype [233, 234]. The use of ICSI is able to eliminate dispermic triploidy even if it does not prevent oocyte-induced 3PN formation. .

Nevertheless, the incidence of digynic 3PN zygotes after ICSI is only 3.3% and their occurrence is related to superovulation protocol response of a particular patient to a specific gonadotropin regimen, higher estrogen level on day of hCG administration, or number of oocytes retrieved [233–235]. The appearance of 3PN embryos after ICSI is not, however, associated with lower pregnancy rates [236], although a high incidence rate of 3PN zygotes after ICSI is a negative predictor of fertilization and implantation rates for the remaining normally fertilized oocytes [235, 237].

Adjusting superovulation protocols or other risk factors may better control the risk of 3PN zygotes, but because ICSI outcome is highly reliant on oocyte quality, 3PN zygotes in ICSI cycles may signal an occult oocyte factor that could reflect oocyte competence [238], and require further investigation and appropriate treatment. ICSI is, thus, an ideal treatment for patient affected by recurrent polyspermy with standard in vitro insemination as it prevents multiple sperm fertilization and can help determine the cause of 3PN zygotes.

Other

Rescue ICSI

Early attempts of re-inseminating oocytes that had failed standard in vitro fertilization involved re-inseminating them in vitro or by partial zona pellucida dissection (PZD), and proved that in spite of enhanced fertilization, it generated an increase in polyspermia rate [239]. The concept of rescue ICSI surfaced in 1993, when in 23 patients, 115 MII one-day-old oocytes failed to fertilize with standard in vitro insemination were re-inseminated by ICSI. The fertilization and cleavage rate were 38% and 82% respectively following this attempted ICSI [240]. Another study compared oocytes that after standard in vitro insemination had a fertilization rate of 64.3% to those that failed and were re-inseminated by ICSI, reaching a comparable fertilization rate of 60.2% [241].

By directly injecting a single spermatozoon, the initial implementation of rescue ICSI was to avoid polyspermy and bypass a thick, as well as dysfunctional, ZP which lacked appropriate sperm glycoprotein receptors that may have led to the fertilization failure in the first place. Rescue ICSI proved superior and more reliable than prior endeavors with multiple sperm re-insemination and PZD [242]. Nonetheless, the success of fertilization by rescue ICSI is offset by a slim pregnancy rate. This might be due to a difference in the maturity of the oocytes at the time of rescue ICSI [243].

Furthermore, the low implantation rate after intrauterine replacement of embryos generated by rescue ICSI may be related to a higher rate of aneuploidy explained in an earlier study [244] as being linked to oocyte abnormalities due to a prolonged incubation.

A proof-of-concept to enhance rescue ICSI efficacy, by preventing oocyte aging, was carried out by inseminating oocytes determined to have failed standard in vitro insemination only 9 h after oocytes retrieval. While the fertilization rate was significantly higher with rescue ICSI (90.2%), the pregnancy rate was significantly compromised (30%) [245]. Interestingly, this experiment of early rescue ICSI insemination was repeated more recently by shortening the time of ICSI even more, at 6 h post retrieval. This was carried out only in oocytes that the authors described as having a putatively abnormal pellucida. Although fertilization rate appeared higher, pregnancy rate again was hindered. Both these studies have a major flaw due to the initial assessment of fertilization which is defined by the absence of extrusion of the second polar body. That, together with the absence of any genetic evaluation, may overlook multiple sperm penetration [163].

Unexplained infertility

The diagnosis of unexplained infertility in a couple unable to reproduce is made after excluding common causes of infertility including male factors, ovulatory disorders, tubal damage, uterine or peritoneal abnormalities [246]. Many algorithms for the management of unexplained infertility have been proposed, and they vary mainly based on duration of infertility and parental age. One common point is that the approach to unexplained infertility is from conservative to more invasive interventions [247]. Overall, the two most applied treatments in patients with unexplained infertility are IUI and IVF (either standard in vitro insemination or ICSI). While IUI represents a simple inexpensive approach, it does not allow an understanding of stealth reasons for the inability of the couple to reproduce. Therefore, when IUI fail, the utilization of ART seems reasonable to investigate issues related to fertilization and embryo development.

Studies assessing the efficacy of IVF, and mainly ICSI, in patients with unexplained infertility are scarce. One study selecting couples with unexplained infertility and that failed IUI and were subsequently treated by ART, both by IVF and ICSI, concluded that there was no difference in fertilization rate and embryo developmental quality between standard in vitro insemination and ICSI; however there was no total fertilization failure in ICSI-inseminated oocytes [248]. In that case, for patients with unexplained infertility and failed IUI, the results would be more favorable if ICSI is used over standard in vitro insemination, to avoid a total fertilization failure with the latter technique. The same conclusion was reached in a prospective randomized trial on 60 women with unexplained infertility undergoing either standard in vitro insemination or ICSI, with a rate of fertilization failure of 6.7% in standard in vitro insemination and no case of failed fertilization reported in ICSI [249]. Even if the authors do not recommend the routine use of ICSI for these patients, the ability of this insemination method to prevent fertilization failure and increase the number of embryos carried a potential psychological benefit for the couple [207]. On the other hand, a multicentered randomized controlled trial comparing standard in vitro insemination and ICSI in cases of non-male factor infertility reported no advantage for ICSI in terms of clinical outcomes, having obtained higher implantation and pregnancy rates with standard in vitro insemination when compared with ICSI [250].

Additional comparative studies on the outcomes between ICSI and standard in vitro insemination in patients with unexplained infertility have demonstrated higher fertilization rates with ICSI [251–254]. In one of the prospective cohort trials, rescue ICSI on oocytes that had failed to fertilize by standard in vitro insemination was also able to fertilize 10.9% of these oocytes [251]. The use of ICSI has also been recommended for couples with unexplained infertility where the female partner yielded a limited number of oocytes (less than 6 oocytes retrieved per cycle) [252].

Finally, a retrospective review of ICSI cycles, including 407 cases with unexplained infertility and 651 cases with male factor infertility, revealed that ICSI achieved comparable clinical pregnancy and live birth rates independent of the diagnosis [255]. ICSI is widely considered the preferred method to level consistent fertilization and prevent failure.

Future applications

Because of the versatility of ICSI, its large popularity, and ability of the technique, it is feasible to consider that this insemination procedure will be applied in new, upcoming technology that will fulfill the goal of neogametogenesis and the alleviation of genomic defects. A list of the more realistic forthcoming techniques has been listed in Table 1.

Table 1.

Future applications

Goal	Technique	Utilization
Neogametogenesis	In vitro gametogenesis	ICSI is used to inject round spermatids and spermatozoa created in vitro.
	Somatic cell haploidization	ICSI insemination is the preferred method of insemination for artificial oocytes due to better fertilization and post-fertilization development [256–258].
	Stem cell differentiation	ICSI provides a means to overcome gamete fusing issues arising from immature spermatid-like cells and round spermatids created through stem cell differentiation [259].
Heritable gene defect	Heritable genome editing	ICSI would be required to deliver mRNA [260] and for the coinjection of spermatozoa with CRISPR-Cas 9 [261] to edit target genes.
	Mitochondrial replacement therapy	Due to the requirement of heavy oocyte manipulation, precise timing of insemination, and ability to transfer pronuclei, spindles, and polar bodies, ICSI would be the only option for this experimental treatment.

Conclusion

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection has become an indispensable procedure in every ART center, and its implementation has given rise to as much controversy as it has awe (Fig. 3). Indeed, every aspect of this microinvasive technique has been investigated, from different approaches of handling human oocytes and timing of ICSI, to current male factor indications and emerging non-male factor indications, to possible future roles in hereditary genome editing and neogametogenesis. As in many areas of practical laboratory ARTs, for ICSI there is no one clear and uniform utilization protocol being used worldwide. It seems clear that a male factor indication for ICSI utilization is unwavering while debate continues regarding non-male factor indications. Some ART procedures, such as following oocyte cryopreservation, remain as a popular indication ICSI utilization with preferences are mostly related to individual laboratory practice patterns. As such they portray ICSI as some sort of evolution of the in vitro fertilization process itself. In conclusion, we are left to wonder whether it is more important to identify the real indications of ICSI, or to accept ICSI as a technique offering more consistent and versatile outcomes we have come to expect from our embryology laboratories.

Fig. 3.

According to the most recent ICMART report, ICSI utilization was 66.5% worldwide in 2011 [1]. At Weill Cornell, our ICSI utilization has steadily increased from 1993 to 2019, with ICSI now utilized in over 95% of ART cycles done at the center