Abstract
Oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma is one of the most prevalent head and neck cancers. During tumor progression, elastin fragments are released in the tumor microenvironment. Among them, we previously identified a nonapeptide, AG-9, that stimulates melanoma progression in vivo in a mouse melanoma model. In the present paper, we studied AG-9 effect on tongue squamous cell carcinoma invasive properties. We demonstrated that AG-9 stimulates cell invasion in vitro in a modified Boyen chamber model. It increases MMP-2 secretion, analyzed by zymography and MT1-MMP expression, studied by Western blot. The stimulatory effect was mediated through Ribosomal Protein SA (RPSA) receptor binding as demonstrated by SiRNA experiments. The green tea-derived polyphenol, (−)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG), was previously shown to bind RPSA. Molecular docking experiments were performed to compare the preferred areas of interaction of AG-9 and EGCG with RPSA and suggested overlapping areas. This was confirmed by competition assays. EGCG abolished AG-9-induced invasion, MMP-2 secretion, and MT1-MMP expression.
Keywords: elastin, ribosomal protein SA, tongue carcinoma, MMP-2, EGCG
1. Introduction
Head and neck tumors are a heterogeneous group of cancers occurring in the mouth, nose, pharynx, larynx, salivary glands, and sinuses. Approximately 90% of those cancers are squamous cell carcinomas [1]. They are typically characterized by a peak of incidence in the elderly and a strong correlation with chronic exposure to risk factors such as smoking and alcohol abuse [2]. Among head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC), cancers of the oral cavity and pharynx display an increasing incidence since 1999, despite a decrease in tobacco use [2,3]. Many subsites have shown a rise in the number of cases, especially the anterior tongue [2]. Indeed, its incidence raised +1.8% per year on average between 2007 and 2016, particularly among young adults and especially in females [3,4,5,6,7]. Thus, in 2007, the prevalence in the US was 4422 cases, rising to 6155 cases in 2016 [3]. Despite advances in diagnosis and management of oral cancer in recent decades, the long term prognosis of patients with advanced-stage squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue is generally poor, with 5-year survival rates around 50% [8].
Elastic fibers are components of all mammalian connective tissues. Elastin, the major protein component of elastic fibers, has unique elastomeric properties which provide reversible deformability crucial for arterial vessels, lungs, and skin [9]. Elastic fibers are also stable components of tongue, providing the elasticity necessary to mechanical resistance during mastication [10].
During tumor progression, tumor and stromal cells secrete a wide variety of proteolytic enzymes including matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA), a disintegrin and metalloproteinases (ADAMs), a disintegrin-like and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin type 1 motif (ADAMTS), and cathepsins that are activated to degrade extracellular matrix (ECM) components and to favor tumor growth and cell dissemination. ECM-degrading enzymes also liberate active fragments from matrix components called matrikines [11]. Proteolytic degradation of elastin results in the liberation of bioactive elastin peptides, termed elastokines [12]. Elastases that degrade elastin belong to the classes of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), aspartic proteases, serine proteases, and cysteine proteases [13]. Elastokines containing the GxxPG motif such as VGVAPG (VG-6) promote tumor progression by stimulating cell invasion through the activation of proteolytic cascades, especially MMP-2 and uPA [14,15]. They also promote angiogenesis by stimulating the migration of endothelial cells through MMP-14 increase [16]. We have also demonstrated that an elastin nonapeptide of consensus sequence xGxPGxGxG, AGVPGLGVG (AG-9), favors the migration and invasion of tumor cells through MMP-2 and uPA increases [17,18]. These effects are mediated through the RPSA (ribosomal protein SA) receptor [19].
The 37/67-kDa laminin receptor was reported to bind elastin by Mecham et al. in 1989 [20]. The 37/67-kDa laminin receptor, RPSA, also referred as 67LR, LAMBR, LAMR1, lamR, LRP/LR, 37LRP, LBP, LBP/p40, NEM/1CHD4, SA, ICAS, and p40 is ubiquitously expressed. It allows cell adhesion to the basement membrane. The 37-, 53-, and 67 kDa forms are the major forms reported but additional high-molecular-weight (HMW) forms of 32, 37, 45, 53, 55, 67, 80, and >110 kDa were also reported. The conversion of the 37 kDa form to higher molecular weight species remains unclear [21]. RPSA not only localized on the cell surface but also in the nucleus, in association with nucleolar pre-40S ribosomes, small nucleolar ribonucleoproteins (snoRNPs), chromatin, histones, and in the cytosol as a ribosomal component or as actin and cytoskeletal stress fibers partner. It was reported to mediate cell proliferation, adhesion, differentiation, invasion, and angiogenesis. RPSA prevents cell apoptotic escape, allowing tumor progression [22].
The green tea-derived polyphenol, (−)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG), is a small molecule with anti-cancer effects [23,24,25]. It inhibits the invasion of human oral cancer cells, decreases the production of MMPs and urokinase-plasminogen activator [26,27], prevents epithelial-mesenchymal transition [28], suppresses cell proliferation, promotes apoptosis and autophagy [29], and inhibits tumor growth [28]. Li et al. demonstrated that the inhibitory effect on cell proliferation, apoptosis, migration, and invasion of tongue squamous cell carcinoma was mediated through the hippo-TAZ signaling pathway [30]. EGCG inhibitory effect is mediated through RPSA receptor. RPSA antibodies block EGCG anti-cancer activity but do not trigger the same effects, indicating that the polyphenol may act agonistically or allosterically [21]. EGCG was reported to exert its anti-cancer activity through the 10 amino acid sequence of RPSA, IPCNNKGAHS [31].
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Peptide Synthesis
AG-9 was purchased from Proteogenix® (Schiltigheim, France). It was obtained by solid-phase synthesis using a FMOC (N-(9-fluorenyl) methoxy-carbonyl) derivative procedure. It was then purified by reverse phase high performance liquid chromatography using a C18 column, eluted by a gradient of acetonitrile in trifluoroacetic acid and lyophilized. Its purity (>98%) was assessed by HPLC and mass spectroscopy.
2.2. Cell Culture
Human tongue squamous cell carcinoma CAL 27 (ATCC® CRL-2095™) were purchased from ATCC. Cells were grown in DMEM (Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium) with 4.5 g/L glucose supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) at 37 °C in a humid atmosphere with 5% CO2 in air. At 70–90% confluency, cells were subcultured according to ATCC protocol.
2.3. Cytotoxicity Assay
A total of 50,000 CAL 27 cells were seeded in 96-well plates in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS. After cell adhesion, culture medium was removed and replaced by FBS-free medium. Cells were incubated for 24 h with or without effectors. Cells were then fixed with 1.1% glutaraldehyde for 15 min and stained with crystal violet for another 15 min. Dye was eluted with a 10% acetic acid solution. Absorbance was read at 560 nm using a Biochrom Asys UVM 340 microplate reader (Biochrom, Yvelines, France).
2.4. Proliferation Assay
A total of 2000 CAL 27 cells were seeded in 96-well plates in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS. After cell adhesion, medium was removed and cells were cultivated in DMEM supplemented with 2.5% FBS with or without AG-9 for 24, 48, 72, or 96 h. Cells were then fixed with 1.1% glutaraldehyde for 15 min and stained with crystal violet for another 15 min. Dye was eluted with a 10% acetic acid solution. Absorbance was read at 560 nm using a Biochrom Asys UVM 340 microplate reader (Biochrom, Yvelines, France).
2.5. In Vitro Invasion Assays
Invasion was assessed in modified Boyden chambers (tissue culture treated, 6.5 mm diameter, 8 µm pore, Greiner-One, Courtaboeuf, France). Further, 5 × 104 cells were suspended in DMEM containing 10% FBS and seeded onto membranes coated with Matrigel® (10 µg/well). After cell adhesion, culture medium was removed from the upper compartment and replaced by DMEM containing 0.2% BSA ± effectors. DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and 2% BSA was used as a chemoattractant. After a 72 h incubation period, cells were fixed with methanol and stained with crystal violet for 15 min. Cells remaining on the upper face of the membranes were scrapped. Crystal violet was eluted using 10% acetic acid and absorbance was read at 560 nm using a Biochrom Asys UVM 340 microplate reader (Biochrom, Yvelines, France).
2.6. Zymography Analyses
2.6.1. Cell Incubation with Effectors
At subconfluence, cells were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline to remove residual FBS and incubated for 48 h in DMEM, with or without effectors. Conditioned media were harvested and centrifuged at 10,000× g for 10 min at 4 °C.
2.6.2. Gelatin Zymography
To study MMP-2 secretion by CAL 27 cells, conditioned media, diluted in 2× non-reducing Laemmli buffer, were electrophoresed in a 10% polyacrylamide SDS gel containing 0.1% (w/v) gelatin. The gels were washed twice for 30 min at room temperature in a 2.5% (v/v) Triton X-100 solution to remove SDS, then incubated at 37 °C for 24 h in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.6), 200 mM NaCl, 5 mM CaCl2, stained for 30 min with 0.1% (w/v) Coomassie blue (G 250) in 45% (v/v) methanol/10% (v/v) acetic acid and destained in the same solution without dye.
2.6.3. Gelatin-Plasminogen Zymography
To study uPA secretion, CAL 27-conditioned media were electrophoresed in SDS-poly-acrylamide gels containing 1 mg/mL gelatin and 10 μg/mL plasminogen. The gels were washed twice for 30 min at room temperature in a 2.5% (v/v) Triton X-100 solution to remove SDS, then incubated at 37 °C for 24 h in 100 mM glycine, 10 mM EDTA (pH 8.3), stained for 30 min with 0.1% (w/v) Coomassie blue (G 250) in 45% (v/v) methanol/10% (v/v) acetic acid and destained in the same solution without dye.
2.7. Western-Blot Analyses
Samples were reduced by 10 mM of dithiothreitol and subjected to SDS-PAGE (0.1% SDS, 10% polyacrylamide gel) (50 µg total protein per lane), then transferred onto Immobilon-P membranes (Millipore, St Quentin-en-Yvelines, France). Membranes were blocked by incubation with 5% non-fat dry milk, 0.1% Tween-20 in 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.5 (TBS-T) for 2 h at room temperature. They were incubated overnight with the first antibody (anti-RPSA polyclonal antibody, Abcam Ab99484, diluted 1/3000; anti-MT1-MMP Ab38971 diluted 1/3000; anti-actin polyclonal antibody, Sigma Aldrich Biotechnology A2066, diluted 1/2000) and then for 1 h with the 1/10,000 diluted peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody (GE Healthcare, NA931V) at room temperature. Immune complexes were visualized using the ECL prime chemiluminescence detection kit (GE Healthcare, Orsay, France).
2.8. Immunocytochemistry
Cells were seeded on glass slides and incubated in 10% serum-containing medium for 16 h. Cells were incubated with an anti-RPSA antibody (Abcam, 137388) diluted 1/400 in culture medium supplemented with 1% BSA for 1 h on ice, washed and incubated for 30 min with the Alexa-488-conjugated secondary antibodies diluted 1/1000 in culture medium with 1% BSA, and then fixed for 10 min with 4% paraformaldehyde at room temperature. Immunofluorescence-labeled cell preparations were studied using a Zeiss LSM 710® NLO confocal laser scanning microscope (Carl ZEISS SAS, Marly-le-Roi, France) with the 63x oil-immersion objective (ON 1.4) coupled with CHAMELEON femtosecond Titanium-Sapphire Laser (Coherent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Alexa 488 was excited by 488 nm line of Argon. Emitted signals were collected with 493–560 nm bandpass filter. Image acquisitions were performed with ZEN Software (Carl ZEISS SAS, Marly-le-Roi, France) and all acquisition settings were constant between specimens.
2.9. RNA Isolation and Real-Time PCR Analysis
Total RNA was isolated from cells using a RNeasy Plus Mini kit (Qiagen, Courtaboeuf, France) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. The amount and integrity of isolated RNA were analyzed using the Bioanalyzer RNA 6000 nano assay (Agilent Technologies, Les Ulis, France) as recommended by the manufacturer. Total RNA was reverse transcribed using the first strand cDNA synthesis kit (Thermo Scientific, Illkirch, France) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Real-time PCR analysis was conducted in 20 μL reaction mixture, using Thermo Scientific Maxima SYBR Green qPCR Master Mix, following the manufacturer’s instructions. Relative expression of different gene transcripts was calculated by the ΔΔCt method. The Ct of the gene of interest was normalized to the Ct of the normalizer (EEF1A1). Fold changes (arbitrary units) were determined as 2−ΔΔCt.
RT-qPCR primers were designed according to sequence of RPSA (NM_002295). The forward primer for RPSA was 5’-CCA-TTG-AAA-ACC-CTG-CTG-AT-3’ and the reverse primer was 5’- CTG-CCT-GGA-TCT-GGT-TAG-TGA-3’ with a 144 bp product. The forward primer for EEF1a1 was 5′-CTG-GAG-CCA-AGT-GCT-AAC-ATG-CC-3′ and the reverse primer was 5′-CCG-GGT-TTG-AGA-ACA-CCA-GTC-3′ with a 221 bp product. All primers were synthesized by Eurofins (Les Ulis, France).
2.10. SiRNA Transfection
SiRNA were transfected as previously described [19]. SiRNA specific to human RPSA and negative control siRNA (non-targeting pool), which do not target any gene, were purchased from Qiagen. The siRNA targets different regions of the RPSA mRNA: 1st siRNA target sequence (5′-AGG-CTC-TTA-AGC-AGC-ATG-GAA-3′), 2nd siRNA target sequence (5′-TAC-CTG-GGA-TTG-CAT-ATC-AAA-3′), 3rd siRNA target sequence (5′-TTG-CAT-ATC-AAA-GCA-TAA-TAA-3′), and 4th siRNA target sequence (5′-TCG-ACA-TGA-GTT-GTA-CTT-CTA-3′). Expression of RPSA mRNA and protein was confirmed by real-time PCR and Western blot.
2.11. Docking Experiments
Dockings of the AG-9 peptide and EGCG onto RPSA (RCSB Protein Data Bank 3BCH) were performed using Autodock software (version 4.2) [32]. We performed preliminary docking experiments to determine the relevant set of docking parameters. The software was used with a fixed RPSA and flexible AG-9 and EGCG ligands. Since RPSA is a large molecule, we performed several independent dockings targeting subvolumes of the protein; we considered 80 overlapping boxes with a volume of 31.5 Å × 31.5 Å × 31.5 Å. The spacing parameter used to compute the 3D maps in each box was set to 0.25 Å. The selected search method was the Lamarckian genetic algorithm, and for each docking experiment, 50 solutions per box were generated with the default parameters of Autodock except for the population size (200), number of energy evaluations (2.5 × 106), and maximum number of generations (270,000), which were derived from the preliminary study. The identification of the contacts between RPSA and the poses of each ligand was carried out by the evaluation of the intermolecular atomic distances. Contacts were counted for distances lower than the 5 Å threshold. Molecular models were graphed with VMD software, which is available online.
2.12. Statistical Analysis
Results were expressed as means +/− standard deviation. Statistical significance between groups was assessed using unpaired Student’s t test.
3. Results
3.1. CAL 27 Cells Express RPSA Receptor
Elastin was reported to interact with invasive cancer cells through RPSA [33]. Previous experiments from our laboratory identified RPSA as AG-9 receptor on HT-1080 human fibrosarcoma cell surface [19], and on MIA PaCa-2 cell pancreatic adenocarcinoma cells [34]. We first checked for RPSA expression in CAL 27 cells, compared to MIA PaCa-2 cells. By qPCR and Western blot analyses, we proved that RPSA was expressed by CAL 27 at the mRNA and protein level (Figure 1A,B respectively). By immuno-histochemistry, we confirmed that RPSA was present at the cell surface of CAL 27 cells.
3.2. AG-9 Increases CAL 27 Invasion through Matrigel®, MMP-2 Secretion, and MT1-MMP Expression
Soluble kappa-elastin peptides were shown to regulate MT1-MMP and MMP-2 [14]. Both MMPs are largely involved in cell invasion. Recently, we reported that AG-9 peptide stimulates tumor cell invasion at lower concentrations than the well characterized VG-6 peptide [18]. CAL 27 invasion was studied in vitro in the presence of soluble kappa-elastin peptides or AG-9 peptide using the transwell invasion assay. After 72 h of incubation, kappa-elastin peptides and AG-9 peptide increased cell invasion by +22 and +25%, respectively (Figure 2A). The increase was independent of cell proliferation since the peptides did not significantly modified cell proliferation as demonstrated using the crystal violet assay (Figure 2B). MMP-2 secretion was studied by zymography. After 24 h of incubation, kappa-elastin peptides and AG-9 peptide increased MMP-2 cell secretion by +39 and +139%, respectively (Figure 2C). Kappa-elastin peptides and AG-9 peptide also induced MT1-MMP expression, studied by Western blot (Figure 2D).
3.3. AG-9 Proinvasive Effects Are Mediated through RPSA Receptor
CAL 27 cells were tranfected with control (non-targeting) or RPSA siRNA. RPSA gene expression was measured by qPCR 48 h after transfection. RPSA gene expression was decreased by 62% after RPSA siRNA transfection compared to control (Figure 3A). RPSA protein expression was evaluated 72 h after transfection by Western blot. RPSA was decreased by 36% (Figure 3B). We performed invasion assays, zymography, and Western blot experiments. Even partial RPSA invalidation abolished the AG-9-induced effects on MMP-2 secretion (Figure 3C) and MT1-MMP expression (Figure 3D). The results confirm the involvement of RPSA receptor in AG-9-mediated effects.
3.4. In Silico Study of AG-9 and EGCG Binding on RPSA
EGCG was previously reported to bind RPSA [18,22,35]. EGCG may prevent AG-9 fixation on RPSA and represent a molecule of choice to limit AG-9 pro-tumoral effects on oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma. Clustering the 50 best results for each ligand, we first identified the preferred areas of interaction (PAI) with EGCG and then with AG-9 and found overlapping areas (Figure 4A,B). The comparison of the associated distribution profile of the free energy of binding demonstrated lower free energy of binding for EGCG onto RPSA than for AG-9 onto RPSA, corresponding to a stronger binding of the polyphenol onto the receptor (Figure 4C,D). The localization of the lowest free energy of binding pose of each ligand highlighted a colocalization onto RPSA (Figure 4E,F). Finally, the analysis of the RPSA residues making contact with the ligands evidenced common interactions with R117, 120RL121, and the region 140VNLP143 (Figure 3G).
3.5. In Vitro EGCG Cytotoxicity on CAL 27 Cells
The aim of this part was to determine EGCG maximal concentration that could be used to counteract AG-9 stimulation without affecting cell viability. For this purpose, CAL 27 cells were incubated for 24 h with increasing amount of EGCG and cell viability was measured (Figure 5). Cell viability was 97.4% for 10 µM EGCG. Comparable results were obtained by Weisburgh et al. [36]. The same authors reported that cell viability of normal oral fibroblasts was also around 95% at this concentration.
We thus decided to use this concentration in the following experiments to try to block AG-9-stimulatory effects without affecting cell viability.
3.6. EGCG Prevents AG-9 Stimulatory Effect on CAL 27 Migration, Invasion, MMP-2 Secretion, and MT1-MMP Expression
Incubation with 10µM EGCG slightly decreased CAL 27 migration (−11%; Figure 6A) and significantly decreased cell invasion (−23%; Figure 6B) and it abolished AG-9 stimulatory effect (Figure 6). It also slightly decreased MMP-2 secretion and MT1-MMP expression (Figure 6C,D). This is in accordance with previously published papers [37]. Incubation with EGCG also prevented AG-9 stimulatory effect on cell migration (Figure 6A), invasion (Figure 6B), as well as on MMP-2 secretion (Figure 6C) and MT1-MMP expression (Figure 6D).
4. Discussion
Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is the most common malignant epithelial neoplasm affecting the oral cavity. The treatment of choice for OSCC is surgical resection. Adjuvant radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy is offered when there is a high risk of recurrence and after taking into consideration multiple factors, including patient’s age and comorbidities, pathologic staging, margin status, the extent of nodal involvement, and other histopathologic characteristics of the primary tumor [38]. Despite the advances of therapeutic approaches, percentages of morbidity and mortality of OSCC have not improved significantly during the last 30 years. Developing new therapeutic approaches is thus challenging.
Cancer development leads to ECM degradation by tumor and stromal cells. Fragments with biological activities are released during this process, named matrikines. Elastin is the major component of elastic fibers. Its cleavage by elastase-proteinases such as metalloproteinases or leucocyte elastase is known to unmask cryptic sites within the macromolecule and to release matrikines, called elastin derived peptides (EDPs) or elastokines. These EDPs exert a wide range of biological activities. They influence cell survival, differentiation [39], proliferation, chemotaxis [18,40], migration [18,41], tumor progression [15,17,19,42], angiogenesis [16], atherogenesis, and aneurysm formation. Among all the EDPs described in the literature, two major consensus sequence were reported: the xGxxPG consensus sequence including the VGVAPG, VAPG, VGVPG, VGAPG, (VGVAPG)n, and PGAIPG peptides and the xGxPGxGxG consensus sequence with the AGVPGLGVG, AGVPGFGVG, GLGVGVAPG, and GFGVGAGVP peptides. In vivo study showed that AG-9 peptide promotes melanoma progression even more than the well described VG-6 peptide. These results were confirmed by in vitro studies in proliferation assays, migration assays, adhesion assays, proteinase secretion studies, and pseudotube formation assays to investigate angiogenesis [18,34].
In the present paper, we report for the first time EDP-effect on oral tongue SCC. CAL 27 is one of the most frequently used cell lines in the field of OSCC studying [43]. Soluble elastin peptides were obtained by partial hydrolysis of elastin in 1 M KOH in 80 per cent aqueous ethanol (kappa-elastin). Additionally, 50 mM kappa-elastin increases CAL 27 invasion through transwell previously coated with Matrigel® which mimicks basement membrane. AG-9 also significantly increased CAL 27 invasion, as previously reported for MIA PaCa-2 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells [34]. EDP were previously reported to increase MMP secretion, especially MMP-2 [44,45]. These results were confirmed by zymography analysis of conditioned media from CAL 27. AG-9 increased MMP-2 secretion, as reported for MIA PaCa-2 cells; this effect was biphasic, with an optimal effect obtained for 1.10−7 M AG-9. Moreover, AG-9 increases MT1-MMP expression. MT1-MMP is able to degrade extracellular matrix by itself or to activate proMMP-2 at the cell surface.
The pro-tumor biological effects of AG-9 was previously reported to involve a lactose-insensitive receptor, the ribosomal protein SA (RPSA) [19]. The 37/67-kDa laminin receptor was reported to bind elastin by Mecham et al. in 1989 [20]. It allows cell adhesion to basement membrane. RPSA does not only localize on the cell surface but also in the nucleus, in association with nucleolar pre-40S ribosomes, small nucleolar ribonucleoproteins (snoRNPs), chromatin, histones, and in the cytosol as a ribosomal component or as actin and cytoskeletal stress fibers partner. It was reported to mediate cell proliferation, adhesion, differentiation, invasion, and angiogenesis. RPSA also prevents cell apoptotic escape, allowing tumor progression [22].
The green tea-derived polyphenol (−)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG), was reported to affect cell behavior through RPSA binding [31]. We performed molecular docking experiments to determine its potential preferred areas of interaction with RPSA and especially the area with the lowest energy of binding that means the highest probability of binding. We did the same for the AG-9 peptide. The preferred area of interaction with the lowest energy for EGCG and AG-9 was broadly overlapping. We then formulated the hypothesis that EGCG could counteract the effects induced by the peptide AG-9. To test this hypothesis, we performed the invasion experiments in presence or absence of EGCG. We first observed that EGCG alone at 10 µM was able to decrease CAL 27 invasion. This was previously reported by Chang et al. with a concentration of 25 µM EGCG [37]. EGCG was also able to inhibit SCC-4, SCC-9, and SCC-15 cell [28,29,30]. other oral SCC and nasopharyngeal carcinoma cell invasion [46,47]. In addition, 10 µM EGCG also inhibits MMP-2 secretion as previously described for CAL 27 cells [37], nasopharyngeal carcinoma [47], and buccal mucosa cancer cells [26]. This was also observed in other oral SCC. Further, 10 µM EGCG prevents AG-9 induced invasion, MMP-2 secretion, and MT1-MMP expression. As suggested by molecular docking experiments, this may be due to steric hindrance or conformation modification as the PAIs of lowest binding energy of both molecules are very close. Binding energy of EGCG for RPSA are lower than those found with AG-9, suggesting that RPSA affinity for EGCG may be greater than for AG-9.
5. Conclusions
During cancer progression, tumor cells induce the expression of MMPs, such as MT1-MMP and MMP-2, which degrade ECM macromolecules like elastin and release EDPs, such as AG-9, that in turns stimulate MMP secretion, leading to an auto-amplification loop. EGCG prevents AG-9 stimulation and represents a molecule of choice to limit cancer progression in elastin-rich tissues.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the HPC-Regional Center ROMEO, the Multiscale Molecular Modeling Platform (P3M) and the PICT-IBiSA Platform of the University of Reims Champagne-Ardenne (France) for providing time and support.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, S.B., B.B. and S.B.-P.; Formal analysis, S.B., B.B. and S.B.-P.; Investigation, C.B., S.B., A.D.-D., R.C., B.B. and S.B.-P.; Project administration, B.B. and S.B.-P.; Supervision, B.B. and S.B.-P.; Validation, S.B., B.B. and S.B.-P.; Visualization, S.B. and S.B.-P.; Writing—original draft, S.B., B.B. and S.B.-P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (UMR 7369), the University of Reims Champagne-Ardenne.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Data is contained within the article.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Chi A.C., Day T.A., Neville B.W. Oral cavity and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma-an update. CA. Cancer J. Clin. 2015 doi: 10.3322/caac.21293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kim Y.J., Kim J.H. Increasing incidence and improving survival of oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma. Sci. Rep. 2020 doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-64748-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ellington T.D., Henley S.J., Senkomago V., O’Neil M.E., Wilson R.J., Singh S., Thomas C.C., Wu M., Richardson L.C. Trends in Incidence of Cancers of the Oral Cavity and Pharynx—United States 2007–2016. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2020 doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6915a1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Paderno A., Morello R., Piazza C. Tongue carcinoma in young adults: A review of the literature. Acta Otorhinolaryngol. Ital. 2018;38:175–180. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-1932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lenze N.R., Farquhar D.R., Dorismond C., Sheth S., Zevallos J.P., Blumberg J., Lumley C., Patel S., Hackman T., Weissler M.C., et al. Age and risk of recurrence in oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma: Systematic review. Head Neck. 2020;42:3755–3768. doi: 10.1002/hed.26464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mukdad L., Heineman T.E., Alonso J., Badran K.W., Kuan E.C., St. John M.A. Oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma survival as stratified by age and sex: A surveillance, epidemiology, and end results analysis. Laryngoscope. 2019;129 doi: 10.1002/lary.27720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Tota J.E., Anderson W.F., Coffey C., Califano J., Cozen W., Ferris R.L., St. John M., Cohen E.E.W., Chaturvedi A.K. Rising incidence of oral tongue cancer among white men and women in the United States, 1973–2012. Oral Oncol. 2017 doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2017.02.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gonzalez M., Riera A. Tongue Cancer. [(accessed on 30 December 2020)]; Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK562324/
- 9.Wagenseil J.E., Mecham R.P. Vascular extracellular matrix and arterial mechanics. Physiol. Rev. 2009;89:957–989. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00041.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Marettova E., Maretta M. Distribution of elastic fibers in the cat tongue. Rev. Med. Vet. (Toulouse). 2012;163:577–580. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Maquart F.X., Pasco S., Ramont L., Hornebeck W., Monboisse J.C. An introduction to matrikines: Extracellular matrix-derived peptides which regulate cell activity - Implication in tumor invasion. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2004;49:199–202. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2003.06.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Duca L., Floquet N., Alix A.J.P., Haye B., Debelle L. Elastin as a matrikine. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2004;49:235–244. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2003.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Heinz A. Elastases and elastokines: Elastin degradation and its significance in health and disease. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2020;55:252–273. doi: 10.1080/10409238.2020.1768208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Brassart B., Randoux A., Hornebeck W., Emonard H. Regulation of matrix metalloproteinase-2 (gelatinase A, MMP-2), membrane-type matrix metalloproteinase-1 (MT1-MMP) and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-2 (TIMP-2) expression by elastin-derived peptides in human HT-1080 fibrosarcoma cell line. Clin. Exp. Metastasis. 1998;16:489–500. doi: 10.1023/A:1006550503612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Huet E., Brassart B., Cauchard J.-H., Debelle L., Birembaut P., Wallach J., Emonard H., Polette M., Hornebeck W. Cumulative influence of elastin peptides and plasminogen on matrix metalloproteinase activation and type I collagen invasion by HT-1080 fibrosarcoma cells. Clin. Exp. Metastasis. 2002;19 doi: 10.1023/A:1014547324918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Robinet A., Fahem A., Cauchard J.-H., Huet E., Vincent L., Lorimier S., Antonicelli F., Soria C., Crepin M., Hornebeck W., et al. Elastin-derived peptides enhance angiogenesis by promoting endothelial cell migration and tubulogenesis through upregulation of MT1-MMP. J. Cell Sci. 2005;118:343–356. doi: 10.1242/jcs.01613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Donet M., Brassart-Pasco S., Salesse S., Maquart F.-X., Brassart B. Elastin peptides regulate HT-1080 fibrosarcoma cell migration and invasion through an Hsp90-dependent mechanism. Br. J. Cancer. 2014;111 doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Da Silva J., Lameiras P., Beljebbar A., Berquand A., Villemin M., Ramont L., Dukic S., Nuzillard J.-M., Molinari M., Gautier M., et al. Structural characterization and in vivo pro-tumor properties of a highly conserved matrikine. Oncotarget. 2018;9 doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.24894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Brassart B., Da Silva J., Donet M., Seurat E., Hague F., Terryn C., Velard F., Michel J., Ouadid-Ahidouch H., Monboisse J.C., et al. Tumour cell blebbing and extracellular vesicle shedding: Key role of matrikines and ribosomal protein SA. Br. J. Cancer. 2019;120:453–465. doi: 10.1038/s41416-019-0382-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mecham R.P., Hinek A., Griffin G.L., Senior R.M., Liotta L.A. The elastin receptor shows structural and functional similarities to the 67-kDa tumor cell laminin receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 1989;264:16652–16657. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Digiacomo V., Meruelo D. Looking into laminin receptor: Critical discussion regarding the non-integrin 37/67-kDa laminin receptor/RPSA protein. Biol. Rev. 2016;91:288–310. doi: 10.1111/brv.12170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Vania L., Morris G., Otgaar T.C., Bignoux M.J., Bernert M., Burns J., Gabathuse A., Singh E., Ferreira E., Weiss S.F.T. Patented therapeutic approaches targeting LRP/LR for cancer treatment. Expert Opin Ther Pat. 2019;29:987–1009. doi: 10.1080/13543776.2019.1693543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Gan R.Y., Li H.B., Sui Z.Q., Corke H. Absorption, metabolism, anti-cancer effect and molecular targets of epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG): An updated review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2018;58:924–941. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2016.1231168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Almatrood S.A., Almatroudi A., Khan A.A., Alhumaydh F.A., Alsahl M.A., Rahmani A.H. Potential therapeutic targets of epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG), the most abundant catechin in green tea, and its role in the therapy of various types of cancer. Molecules. 2020;25:3146. doi: 10.3390/molecules25143146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Aggarwal V., Tuli H.S., Tania M., Srivastava S., Ritzer E.E., Pandey A., Aggarwal D., Barwal T.S., Jain A., Kaur G., et al. Molecular mechanisms of action of epigallocatechin gallate in cancer: Recent trends and advancement. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2020:32461153. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2020.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ho Y.C., Yang S.F., Peng C.Y., Chou M.Y., Chang Y.C. Epigallocatechin-3-gallate inhibits the invasion of human oral cancer cells and decreases the productions of matrix metalloproteinases and urokinase-plasminogen activator. J. Oral Pathol. Med. 2007 doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.2007.00588.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Chiang W.C., Wong Y.K., Lin S.C., Chang K.W., Liu C.J. Increase of MMP-13 expression in multi-stage oral carcinogenesis and epigallocatechin-3-gallate suppress MMP-13 expression. Oral Dis. 2006 doi: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2005.01151.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Chen P.N., Chu S.C., Kuo W.H., Chou M.Y., Lin J.K., Hsieh Y.S. Epigallocatechin-3 gallate inhibits invasion, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, and tumor growth in oral cancer cells. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011 doi: 10.1021/jf1049408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Irimie A.I., Braicu C., Zanoaga O., Pileczki V., Gherman C., Berindan-Neagoe I., Campian R.S. Epigallocatechin-3-gallate suppresses cell proliferation and promotes apoptosis and autophagy in oral cancer SSC-4 cells. Onco. Targets. Ther. 2015 doi: 10.2147/OTT.S78358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Li A., Gu K., Wang Q., Chen X., Fu X., Wang Y., Wen Y. Epigallocatechin-3-gallate affects the proliferation, apoptosis, migration and invasion of tongue squamous cell carcinoma through the Hippo-TAZ signaling pathway. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2018 doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2018.3818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Fujimura Y., Sumida M., Sugihara K., Tsukamoto S., Yamada K., Tachibana H. Green tea polyphenol EGCG sensing motif on the 67-kDa laminin receptor. PLoS ONE. 2012 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Morris G.M., Huey R., Lindstrom W., Sanner M.F., Belew R.K., Goodsell D.S., Olson A.J. AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility. J. Comput. Chem. 2009;30:2785–2791. doi: 10.1002/jcc.21256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Fülöp T., Larbi A. Putative role of 67 kDa elastin-laminin receptor in tumor invasion. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2002 doi: 10.1016/S1044-579X(02)00025-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Lefebvre T., Rybarczyk P., Bretaudeau C., Vanlaeys A., Cousin R., Brassart-Pasco S., Chatelain D., Dhennin-Duthille I., Ouadid-Ahidouch H., Brassart B., et al. TRPM7/RPSA Complex Regulates Pancreatic Cancer Cell Migration. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020 doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.00549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Tachibana H., Koga K., Fujimura Y., Yamada K. A receptor for green tea polyphenol EGCG. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2004 doi: 10.1038/nsmb743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Weisburg J.H., Weissman D.B., Sedaghat T., Babich H. In vitro cytotoxicity of epigallocatechin gallate and tea extracts to cancerous and normal cells from the human oral cavity. Basic Clin. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2004 doi: 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2004.pto_950407.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Chang C.M., Chang P.Y., Tu M.G., Lu C.C., Kuo S.C., Amagaya S., Lee C.Y., Jao H.Y., Chen M.Y., Yang J.S. Epigallocatechin gallate sensitizes CAL-27 human oral squamous cell carcinoma cells to the anti-metastatic effects of gefitinib (Iressa) via synergistic suppression of epidermal growth factor receptor and matrix metalloproteinase-2. Oncol. Rep. 2012 doi: 10.3892/or.2012.1991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Zanoni D.K., Montero P.H., Migliacci J.C., Shah J.P., Wong R.J., Ganly I., Patel S.G. Survival outcomes after treatment of cancer of the oral cavity (1985–2015) Oral Oncol. 2019 doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.02.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Betre H., Ong S.R., Guilak F., Chilkoti A., Fermor B., Setton L.A. Chondrocytic differentiation of human adipose-derived adult stem cells in elastin-like polypeptide. Biomaterials. 2006;27:91–99. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.05.071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Long M.M., King V.J., Prasad K.U., Freeman B.A., Urry D.W. Elastin repeat peptides as chemoattractants for bovine aortic endothelial cells. J. Cell. Physiol. 1989;140:512–518. doi: 10.1002/jcp.1041400316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Senior R.M., Griffin G.L., Mecham R.P. Chemotactic activity of elastin-derived peptides. J. Clin. Invest. 1980;66:859–862. doi: 10.1172/JCI109926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Toupance S., Brassart B., Rabenoelina F., Ghoneim C., Vallar L., Polette M., Debelle L., Birembaut P. Elastin-derived peptides increase invasive capacities of lung cancer cells by post-transcriptional regulation of MMP-2 and uPA. Clin. Exp. Metastasis. 2012;29 doi: 10.1007/s10585-012-9467-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Jiang L., Ji N., Zhou Y., Li J., Liu X., Wang Z., Chen Q., Zeng X. CAL 27 is an oral adenosquamous carcinoma cell line. Oral Oncol. 2009 doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2009.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Ntayi C., Labrousse A.L., Debret R., Birembaut P., Bellon G., Antonicelli F., Hornebeck W., Bernard P. Elastin-Derived Peptides Upregulate Matrix Metalloproteinase-2-ediated Melanoma Cell Invasion Through Elastin-Binding Protein. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2004 doi: 10.1046/j.0022-202X.2004.22228.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Szychowski K.A., Wójtowicz A.K., Gmiński J. Impact of Elastin-Derived Peptide VGVAPG on Matrix Metalloprotease-2 and -9 and the Tissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinase-1, -2, -3 and -4 mRNA Expression in Mouse Cortical Glial Cells In Vitro. Neurotox. Res. 2019 doi: 10.1007/s12640-018-9935-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Fang C.Y., Wu C.C., Hsu H.Y., Chuang H.Y., Huang S.Y., Tsai C.H., Chang Y., Tsao G.S.W., Chen C.L., Chen J.Y. EGCG inhibits proliferation, invasiveness and tumor growth by up-regulation of adhesion molecules, suppression of gelatinases activity, and induction of apoptosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015;16:2530–2558. doi: 10.3390/ijms16022530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Ho H.C., Huang C.C., Lu Y.T., Yeh C.M., Ho Y.T., Yang S.F., Hsin C.H., Lin C.W. Epigallocatechin-3-gallate inhibits migration of human nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells by repressing MMP-2 expression. J. Cell. Physiol. 2019 doi: 10.1002/jcp.28696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data is contained within the article.