Skip to main content
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute logoLink to JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
editorial
. 2020 Apr 28;112(12):1181–1182. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaa055

Trastuzumab: Weighing the Benefits and the Risks

Anne H Blaes MD, MS, 1,, Chau Dang MD 2
PMCID: PMC7824039  PMID: 32343773

Within this issue of the Journal, Rushton and colleagues (1) report the outcomes of premature discontinuation of trastuzumab on breast cancer outcomes in 5547 women with early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer treated with the adjuvant trastuzumab. Using administrative claims data in Ontario, Canada, for women treated for HER2-positive breast cancer 2007-2016, they assessed the impact of full trastuzumab treatment (17-18 cycles) on cancer outcomes as compared with early discontinuation ([1] discontinuation for cardiac events [CEs], [2] no CEs but <16 cycles of trastuzumab, and [3] no CEs, <16 cycles of trastuzumab but >30 days since last trastuzumab) (2). The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) was statistically significantly lower for those women who did not receive full treatment regardless of the cause of premature discontinuation (94.1% vs 80%, 81.4%, 82.4%). Overall survival (OS) was also inferior in those with premature discontinuation of trastuzumab regardless of cause (95.0% vs 84.4%, 82.8%, 83.7%). It appears from this analysis that using trastuzumab for durations less than 17-18 cycles results in inferior cancer outcomes.

Although the use of trastuzumab in the (neo)adjuvant setting for HER2-positive breast cancer improves both OS and DFS, several different clinical trials have been conducted in an effort to investigate the optimal duration of this treatment. Initially, 12 months of trastuzumab was chosen rather arbitrarily. In the adjuvant setting, chemotherapy with trastuzumab was demonstrated to improve OS in the combined analysis of the North Central Cancer Treatment Group N9831 and the National Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-31 clinical trials (3). OS improved by 40%, with DFS improving by 37% at a median follow-up of 8.4 years. Based on these studies, 1 month of trastuzumab (17-18 cycles) became the standard of care. In the HERA study of more than 5000 women, there was no improvement in DFS with 2 years of trastuzumab (69% in both the 1- and 2-year arms) or OS (79% and 80%) (4). The incidence of cardiac toxicity was lower in those treated with 1 year of trastuzumab.

More recent studies have evaluated whether an even shorter duration of trastuzumab can have the same outcomes (Table 1). In the PHARE study of 3380 women randomized to 6 vs 12 months of trastuzumab, noninferiority of 6 vs 12 months based on prespecified criteria could not be claimed (hazard ratio = 1.08, 95% confidence interval = 0.93 to 1.25). There were more CEs in the 12-month group, however (5.7% vs 1.9%, P < .0001) (5). The Hellenic Oncology Research Group also assessed the impact of 6 vs 12 months of trastuzumab in 481 patients with early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer. The 3-year DFS was 95.7% and 93.3% in favor of the 12-month treatment group (hazard ratio = 1.57, P  = .137). There was no difference in OS and cardiac toxicity (6). Three other more recent studies demonstrate conflicting results. SHORT-HER (Multicentric randomized phase 3 trial of 2 different adjuvant chemo regimens plus 3 vs 12 months of trastuzumab in HER2+ breast cancer patients) and Synergism or Long Duration (SOLD) evaluated the use of 9 weeks compared with 12 months of trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy (differing chemotherapy regimens for SHORT-HER, same for SOLD). Noninferiority could not be achieved. In SHORT-HER, the 5-year DFS was 85% in the 9-week arm and 88% in the 12-month arm, not achieving prespecified criteria (7,8). In the PERESPHONE trial of 2045 early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer patients, 4-year DFS was 89.4% in the 6-month arm compared with 89.8% in the 12-month arm (P  = .011). Cardiac events were higher in the 12-month arm of trastuzumab (3% vs 8%, P  < .0001) (9). Based on these results, shortened trastuzumab courses may be an option for those at high risk for cardiac dysfunction.

Table 1.

Prospective trials evaluating adjuvant trastuzumab duration and associated breast cancer outcomes*

Trial Reference No. Treatment arms DFS OS Cardiac events
HERA Cameron et al., 2017 (4) 5102 Obs vs T 1y vs T 2y 63% vs 69% vs 69% (at 10 y) 73% vs 79% vs 80% 0% vs 4.4% vs 7.3%
NSABP B31/NCCTG 9831 Perez et al., 2014 (3) 3177 Obs vs T 1 y 62.2% vs 73.7% (at 10 y) 75.2% vs 84.0% 3 vs 9 CV deaths
SOLD Joensuu et al., 2018 (8) 2100 9 wk vs 1 y T 88% vs 90.5% (at 5 y) Not reported 21 vs 36 cases
PHARE Pivot et al, 2019 (5) 3384 0.5 vs 1 y T 78% vs 80% (at 7.5 y) 81% vs 82% Equivalent
HORG Mavroudis et al., 2015 (6) 481 0.5 vs 1 y T 93% vs 96% (at 3 y) Equivalent Equivalent
 PERSEPHONE Earl et al., 2018 (9) 2045 0.6 vs 1 y T 89.4% vs 89.8% (at 4 y) Not reported yet 3% vs 8%
 SHORT-HER Conte et al., 2018 (7) 1254 9 wk vs 1 y T 85% vs 88% (at 5 y) 95.0% vs 95.2% 4.3% vs 13.1%
*

CV= cardiovascular events; DFS = disease-free survival; OS = overall survival; T = trastuzumab.

With the current studies available, 12 months of adjuvant trastuzumab should be continued as the standard of care for women with HER2-positive breast cancer receiving chemotherapy plus trastuzumab alone. Currently, more and more patients with HER2-positive breast cancer are being treated in the neoadjuvant setting, and with dual HER2-blocking agents (blocking both HER2 and HER3) using trastuzumab plus pertuzumab though. In the United States, for patients with tumors greater than 2 cm, dual HER2 blockade has become the standard of care based on the results for the NEOSPHERE and TRYPHAENA trials (10,11). Following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for HER2-positive tumors, individuals may receive trastuzumab alone, trastuzumab plus pertuzumab as in the APHINITY trial (12), or adjuvant trastuzumab emtansine for 14 cycles as per the KATHERINE study (13). It is clear from the KATHERINE study that adjuvant trastuzumab emtansine is superior to trastuzumab alone for those with residual disease from neoadjuvant chemotherapy. It is suggestive that doublet therapy (trastuzumab plus pertuzumab) is superior to trastuzumab alone in the adjuvant setting. It is unclear, however, how premature discontinuation of trastuzumab affects outcomes in individuals who received neoadjuvant trastuzumab plus pertuzumab or how premature discontinuation of trastuzumab affects those who achieved a complete pathologic response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in which they may do extremely well regardless. For example, in triple-negative breast cancer, additional therapy following a complete pathologic response does not improve outcomes (14). It is also not clear how HER2 heterogeneity plays into these results (15). Stratifying by molecular subtypes of HER2-positive tumors or estrogen status may help outline who benefits from trastuzumab or a drug conjugate. Other studies, particularly for low-risk HER2-positive breast cancers, suggest that overall patients do extremely well with little HER2-based therapies (16).

Today, it seems clear that 12 months of trastuzumab remains the standard of care. Further efforts should be made to risk-stratify patients, on genomic profile, HER2 heterogeneity, and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, determining who is at highest risk of recurrence, because these individuals may benefit from dual HER2 blockade or consideration of trastuzumab emtansine in the adjuvant setting. These individuals also should not have a shortened course of trastuzumab. Similar risk stratification from a cardiac perspective should be performed in all patients. Six months of trastuzumab may be reasonable to consider for those at high risk for cardiac dysfunction and a low biologic risk of recurrence. Finally, shorter courses of trastuzumab may be reasonable to consider, particularly in low- to middle-income countries where the resources are more limited.

Notes

Disclosures: No disclosures.

Acknowledgment: We thank Dr Douglas Yee for reviewing the manuscript.

References

  • 1. Rushton M, Lima I, Tuna M, et al. Impact of stopping trastuzumab in early breast cancer: a population-based study in Ontario, Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2020;112(12):djaa054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Gradishar WJ, Anderson BO, Balassanian R, et al. NCCN guidelines insights: breast cancer, version 1.2017. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2017;15(4):433–451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Perez EA, Romond EH, Suman VJ, et al. Trastuzumab plus adjuvant chemotherapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer: planned joint analysis of overall survival from NSABP B-31 and NCCTG N9831. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(33):3744–3752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Cameron D, Piccart-Gebhart MJ, Gelber RD, et al. 11 years' follow-up of trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive early breast cancer: final analysis of the HERceptin Adjuvant (HERA) trial. Lancet. 2017;389(10075):1195–1205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Pivot X, Romieu G, Debled M, et al. 6 months versus 12 months of adjuvant trastuzumab in early breast cancer (PHARE): final analysis of a multicentre, open-label, phase 3 randomised trial. Lancet. 2019;393(10191):2591–2598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Mavroudis D, Saloustros E, Malamos N, et al. Six versus 12 months of adjuvant trastuzumab in combination with dose-dense chemotherapy for women with HER2-positive breast cancer: a multicenter randomized study by the Hellenic Oncology Research Group (HORG). Ann Oncol. 2015;26(7):1333–1340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Conte P, Frassoldati A, Bisagni G, et al. Nine weeks versus 1 year adjuvant trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy: final results of the phase III randomized Short-HER studydouble dagger. Ann Oncol. 2018;29(12):2328–2333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Joensuu H, Fraser J, Wildiers H, et al. Effect of adjuvant trastuzumab for a duration of 9 weeks vs 1 year with concomitant chemotherapy for early human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer: The SOLD Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4(9):1199–1206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Earl HM, Hiller L, Vallier AL, et al. PERSEPHONE Steering Committee and Trial Investigators. 6 versus 12 months of adjuvant trastuzumab in patients with HER2 positive early breast cancer: randomised phase 3 non-inferiority trial with definitive 4 year disease-free survival results. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(15_suppl):506. [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Schneeweiss A, Chia S, Hickish T, et al. Pertuzumab plus trastuzumab in combination with standard neoadjuvant anthracycline-containing and anthracycline-free chemotherapy regimens in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer: a randomized phase II cardiac safety study (TRYPHAENA). Ann Oncol. 2013;24(9):2278–2284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Gianni L, Pienkowski T, Im Y-H, et al. 5-year analysis of neoadjuvant pertuzumab and trastuzumab in patients with locally advanced, inflammatory, or early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer (NeoSphere): a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(6):791–800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. von Minckwitz G, Procter M, de Azambuja E, et al. Adjuvant pertuzumab and trastuzumab in early HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(2):122–131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. von Minckwitz G, Huang C-S, Mano MS, et al. Trastuzumab emtansine for residual invasive HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(7):617–628. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Spring LM, Fell G, Arfe A, et al. Pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and impact on breast cancer recurrence and survival: a comprehensive meta-analysis. Clin Cancer Res. 2020. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-3492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Carey LA, Berry DA, Cirrincione CT, et al. Molecular heterogeneity and response to neoadjuvant human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 targeting in CALGB 40601, a randomized phase III trial of paclitaxel plus trastuzumab with or without lapatinib. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(6):542–549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Tolaney SM, Barry WT, Dang CT, et al. Adjuvant paclitaxel and trastuzumab for node-negative, HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(2):134–141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES