Abstract
A synthesis of the reported antifungal agent (+)-hippolide J is presented. The rapid assembly of the natural product was enabled through implementation of an enantioselective isomerization/[2 + 2]-cycloaddition sequence. Due to the simplicity of the route, >100 mg of the natural product were prepared in a single pass. Anitfungal assays of hippolide J, however, confirmed that it showed no activity against several fungal strains, contrary to the isolation report.
Graphical Abstract

(+)-Hippolide J (1) (Figure 1) is a complex natural product that was isolated from the marine sponge Hippospongia lachne.1 Its structure and preliminary biological activity were reported in 2016, describing its antifungal activity against invasive fungal pathogens. Given the limited number of drugs available to treat invasive fungal infections, the emerging problem of antifungal drug resistance, and the increasing number of patients at risk for these infections,2 (+)-hippolide J (1) has emerged as an encouraging avenue to explore. Interestingly, while the molecule was isolated as a racemate, the enantiomers were separated and both were found to have a similar biological profile. Finally, preliminary toxicity evaluation of (−)- and (+)-hippolide J (1) showed little activity against human cancer cell lines, thus confirming it as a promising lead compound. From a chemical standpoint, stereocontrolled assembly of the pentasubstituted cyclobutane ring of (+)-hippolide J (1) represents a challenge that would require improvement upon state-of-the-art in cyclobutane synthesis. Due to the limited availability of (+)-hippolide J (1), the desire to pursue biological investigation, and the intriguing structure, we elected to develop a scalable synthesis.
Figure 1.

Structures of (+)-hippolide J (1).
Our lab has taken an interest in [2 + 2] cycloadditions of alkenes with electron deficient allenes.3–6 Along these lines, we have reported catalytic and enantioselective cycloadditions of allenoates with unactivated alkenes.3 In connection with these efforts, we investigated related cycloadditions of allenic ketones (6) (Scheme 1), which led to the development of an enantioselective isomerization7/stereoselective [2 + 2]-cycloaddition8 process (4 to 6 to 8) for the synthesis of bicyclo[4.2.0]octanes 8.9 The scope of this method was evaluated and was found to be broad due to, in part, the straightforward synthesis of the alkyne precursors to the allene (4) from lithium acetylides (2) and epoxy alkenes (3).9 The utility of the method was demonstrated in the synthesis of ent-[3]-ladderanol9 and, in a more recent study, in the synthesis of (−)-cajanusine.10
Scheme 1.

Enantioselective Isomerization/[2 + 2]-Cycloaddition Sequence for Bicyclo[4.2.0]octane
Based on the aforementioned reaction methodology, a retrosynthesis of 1 was devised that would allow rapid synthesis of the cyclobutane containing core structure (10) from 11 by establishing three of the four stereogenic centers in a single operation (Scheme 2). Due to the pathway of [2 + 2]-cycloaddition, which would lead to positioning of the butenolide moiety on the concave face of the bicyclo[4.2.0]-octane, epimerization would be necessary (10 to 9). Finally, elaboration of the enone subunit of 9 to the allylic alcohol motif of 1 could be affected by stereocontrolled conjugate reduction and cross-coupling reactions.
Scheme 2.

Initial Retrosynthesis of (+)-Hippolide J (1)
Our studies commenced with synthesis of the allenic ketone necessary for stereoselective [2 + 2]-cycloaddition (Scheme 3). The requisite homopropargylic alcohols were prepared through addition of a lithium (trimethylsilyl)acetylide to epoxide 12 (derived from commercially available farnesylacetone in three steps; see Supporting Information (SI)). Cross-coupling with lactone 14 led to formation of 15. Attempted oxidation under various conditions led to inseparable mixtures of the alkynyl ketone 11 and racemic allenic ketone 16. The facile isomerization is likely due to the increased acidity of the hydrogens alpha to the ketone as a result of the electron-withdrawing butenolide unit.
Scheme 3.

Challenges with Initial Route
Due to the aforementioned challenges encountered with early stage incorporation of the butenolide unit, a revised approach was investigated that would incorporate the motif at a later stage. It was envisioned that a protected hydroxyl methylene unit could serve as a versatile precursor for butenolide synthesis and the required alkynyl ketone would be less prone to premature isomerization.
The second-generation approach commenced with preparation of alkynyl ketone 17 (undesired isomerization was not observed), from farnesylacetone in five steps on multigram scale (see SI). Enantioselective isomerization and stereoselective [2 + 2]-cycloaddition proceeded smoothly to generate cyclobutane 18 in excellent diastereoselectivity and enantioselectivity (Scheme 4). This reaction is noteworthy because it was easily performed on gram scale and it established three contiguous stereogenic centers with control of enantioselectivity and diastereoselectivity.
Scheme 4.

Synthesis of (+)-Hippolide J (1)
1,4-Reduction of 18 and in situ generation of vinyl triflate 19 allowed for cross-coupling with trifluoroborate 20 to be investigated (Scheme 4). Initial attempts to carry out this reaction under Pd-catalysis were unsuccessful, as low yield and significant proto-detriflation were observed.11 To address this challenge, we elected to explore an emerging set of transformations that employ photocatalysis in conjunction with Ni-catalyzed cross-coupling. Under these conditions, 21 was formed in good yield with minimal formation of byproducts.12
Deprotection and oxidation generated the corresponding aldehyde 22 (Scheme 4).13 Epimerization of the stereogenic center was accomplished with DBU to deliver 23. This reaction is driven by release of steric pressure of the aldehyde from the concave face of the bicycle. Benzoin condensation with formaldehyde promoted by precatalyst 24 led to formation of α-hydroxy ketone 25.14 Finally, sequential treatment with the Bestmann ketene (26)15 and DDQ led to the formation of (+)-hippolide J (1).16 Due to the simplicity of the route, synthesis of 135 mg of (+)-hippolide J (1) was easily achieved in a single pass.
With a scalable synthesis developed, attention was turned to biological evaluation of (+)-hippolide J (1) against human fungal pathogens (Table 1). However, under the same conditions (CLSI methodology)17 the authors of the isolation report described, (+)-hippolide J showed no activity at 8–256-fold above the reported MIC for Candida albicans, Candida glabrata, Aspergillus fumigatus, and Cryptococcus neoformans using both reference strains and clinical isolates. Importantly, we tested the same isolate of Candida albicans (SC5314) as tested in the initial report.18 The source of the discrepancy is not known at this time.19
Table 1.
Biological Testing of (+)-Hippolide J (1)
| MIC50 (μg/mL) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Species | Strain | natural (+)-1 | natural (−)-1 | synthetic (+)-1 |
| C. albicans | SC5314 | 0.125a | 0.125a | >32 |
| Y0109 | 4a | 2a | – | |
| C. glabrata | ATCC2001 | – | – | >32 |
| 4720 | – | – | >32 | |
| 537 | 0.125a | 0.25a | – | |
| C. neoformans | H99 | – | – | >32 |
| DUMC | – | – | >32 | |
| 101.24 | ||||
| 32609 | 0.5a | 0.25a | – | |
| A. fumigatus | CEA10 | – | – | >32 |
| AF293 | – | – | >32 | |
| 07544 | 4a | 2a | – | |
From ref 1.
Through the implementation of an enantioselective isomerization/chirality transfer process, the synthesis of (+)-hippolide J was achieved. The synthesis also serves to highlight an emerging set of transformation in metallo-photoredox catalysis. Finally, the biological evaluation of synthetic (+)-hippolide J revealed that the molecule was inactive against all tested fungal strains.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Indiana University (M.K.B. and R.G.) and the NIH (R01GM110131 and R35GM131755 to M.K.B. and F32AI1-45160 to S.R.B.) for financial support. This project was partially funded by the Indiana University Vice Provost for Research through the Research Equipment Fund and the NSF (CHE1726633). We thank Dr. David Andes (Wisconsin) and Dr. John Perfect (Duke) for providing clinical isolates of C. glabrata and C. neoformans, respectively. We also thank Marhiah Montoya (Iowa) for performing initial antifungal testing.
Footnotes
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
Supporting Information
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.orglett.0c02979.
Experimental procedures and analytical data for all compounds (PDF)
FAIR data, including the primary NMR FID files, for compounds 1, 12, 13, 15, 17, 18, 19, 21, 23, 25, SI-6, SI-8, SI-9, SI-10, SI-11 (ZIP)
Contributor Information
Renyu Guo, Indiana University, Department of Chemistry, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, United States.
M. Kevin Brown, Indiana University, Department of Chemistry, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, United States.
REFERENCES
- (1).Jiao W-H; Hong L-L; Sun J-B; Piao S-J; Chen G-D; Deng H; Wang S-P; Yang F; Lin H-W Eur. J. Org. Chem 2017, 2017, 3421. [Google Scholar]
- (2).(a) Perfect JR Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2017, 16, 603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) McCarthy MW; Kontoyiannis DP; Cornely OA; Perfect JR; Walsh TJ J. Infect. Dis 2017, 216 (S3), S474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (3).(a) Lee-Ruff E; Mladenova G Chem. Rev 2003, 103, 1449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Namyslo JC; Kaufmann DE Chem. Rev 2003, 103, 1485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Hoffmann N Chem. Rev 2008, 108, 1052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Bach T; Hehn JP Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2011, 50, 1000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Yoon TP ACS Catal. 2013, 3, 895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Poplata S; Tröster A; Zou Y-Q; Bach T Chem. Rev 2016, 116, 9748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (4).(a) Xu Y; Conner ML; Brown MK Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2015, 54, 11918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Poplata S; Tröster A; Zou Y-Q; Bach T Chem. Rev 2016, 116, 9748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Wang N; Lu P Org. Chem. Front 2018, 5, 254. [Google Scholar]
- (5).(a) Conner ML; Xu Y; Brown MK J. Am. Chem. Soc 2015, 137, 3482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Xu Y; Hong YJ; Tantillo DJ; Brown MK Org. Lett 2017, 19, 3703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Wiest JM; Conner ML; Brown MK Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2018, 57, 4647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Wiest JM; Conner ML; Brown MK J. Am. Chem. Soc 2018, 140, 15943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Conner ML; Wiest JM; Brown MK Tetrahedron 2019, 75, 3265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (6).For selected exceptions, see:; (a) Ishihara K; Nakano K J. Am. Chem. Soc 2007, 129, 8930–8931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Poplata S; Bach TJ J. Am. Chem. Soc 2018, 140, 3228–3231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (7).(a) Liu H; Leow D; Huang K-W; Tan C-HJ Am. Chem. Soc 2009, 131, 7212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Inokuma T; Furukawa M; Uno T; Suzuki Y; Yoshida K; Yano Y; Matsuzaki YK; Takemoto KY Chem. - Eur. J 2011, 17, 10470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (8).Zhao J-F; Loh T-P Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2009, 48, 7232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (9).Line NJ; Witherspoon BP; Hancock EN; Brown MK J. Am. Chem. Soc 2017, 139, 14392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (10).Guo R; Witherspoon BP; Brown MK J. Am. Chem. Soc 2020, 142, 5002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (11).(a) Molander GA; Canturk B Org. Lett 2008, 10, 2135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Molander GA; Wisniewski SR J. Am. Chem. Soc 2012, 134, 16856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (12).(a) Karakaya I; Primer DN; Molander GA Org. Lett 2015, 17, 3294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Karimi-Nami R; Tellis JC; Molander GA Org. Lett 2016, 18, 2572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (13).Hoover JM; Stahl SS J. Am. Chem. Soc 2011, 133, 16901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (14).Kuhl N; Glorius F Chem. Commun 2011, 47, 573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (15).(a) Bestmann HJ; Sandmeier D Chem. Ber 1980, 113, 274. [Google Scholar]; (b) Stork G; West F; Lee HY; Isaacs RCA; Manabe SJ Am. Chem. Soc 1996, 118, 10660. [Google Scholar]
- (16).The absolute configuration was determined by comparison of optical rotation data from the isolation report (1).
- (17).(a) Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts; Approved standard, 4th ed, CLSI document M27, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA: 2017. [Google Scholar]; (b) CLSI. Reference Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal Susceptablity Testing of Filamentous Fungi. CSLI Standard M38 (Clinical and Labratory Standards Institute, 2017). [Google Scholar]
- (18).We have been unable to contact the corresponding author from the isolation report despite repeated attempts.
- (19).For a related scenario in which a natural product (hippolachnin A) failed to show antifungal activity, contrary to the isolation report, see: (Isolation); (a) Piao S-J; Song Y-L; Jiao W-H; Yang F; Liu X-F; Chen W-S; Han B-N; Lin H-W Org. Lett 2013, 15, 3526 (Biological evaluation) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Timmerman JC; Wood JL Org. Lett 2018, 20, 3788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Winter N; Rupcic Z; Stadler M; Trauner DJ Antibiot. 2019, 72, 375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
