Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jan 23.
Published in final edited form as: J Clin Psychiatry. 2019 Feb 12;80(2):18m12317. doi: 10.4088/JCP.18m12317

Psychiatric Disorders and Crime in the US Population: Results From the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions Wave III

Kelly E Moore 1, Lindsay MS Oberleitner 1, Howard V Zonana 1, Alec W Buchanan 1, Brian P Pittman 1, Terril L Verplaetse 1, Gustavo A Angarita 1, Walter Roberts 1, Sherry A McKee 1
PMCID: PMC7826201  NIHMSID: NIHMS1661576  PMID: 30758921

Abstract

Objective:

Current knowledge regarding the intersection of psychiatric disorders and crime in the U.S. is limited to psychiatric, forensic, and youth samples. This study presents nationally representative data on the relationship of DSM-5 psychiatric disorders, comorbid substance and mental health disorders, and multimorbidity (number of disorders) with criminal behavior and justice involvement among non-institutionalized U.S. adults.

Methods:

Data were drawn from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions Wave III (NESARC-III; 2012–2013; n=36,309). Logistic regressions were used to examine the association of specific disorders (e.g., mood, anxiety, eating, posttraumatic stress, substance), comorbid substance and mental health disorders, and multimorbidity with lifetime criminal behavior, incarceration experience, and past 12 month general, alcohol-related, and drug-related legal problems.

Results:

28.5% of participants reported a history of criminal behavior, 11.4% reported a history of incarceration, 1.8% reported current general legal problems, 0.8% reported current alcohol-related legal problems, and 2.7% reported current drug-related legal problems. The presence of any disorder was associated with 4 to 5 times increased risk of crime outcomes. Drug use disorders were associated with the highest risk of lifetime crime (OR=6.8, 95% CI=6.1–7.6), incarceration (OR=4.7; 95% CI=4.1–5.3), and current legal problems (OR=3.3; 95% CI=2.6–4.2). Multimorbidity and comorbid substance and mental health disorders were associated with additional risk. Controlling for antisocial personality disorder did not change the findings.

Conclusion:

Community adults with substance use disorders, comorbid substance and mental health disorders, and increasing multimorbidity are most at risk of crime and justice involvement, highlighting the importance of community-based addiction treatment.

Keywords: psychiatric disorders, crime, justice system involvement, substance use

INTRODUCTION

The issue of mental illness and crime often attracts national attention and brings to question whether people with psychiatric disorders are more likely to engage in criminal behavior. Ample research supports the association of psychiatric disorders with crime and justice system involvement1,2, however, the majority of this research is drawn from forensic populations37, psychiatric populations8,9, youth10,11, or people with serious mental illness (e.g., schizophrenia)12,13. While population-based studies have examined the association of psychiatric disorders with antisocial personality14,15 and violence16,17, there have been few studies focused more broadly on crime and justice system involvement in the general population18. Research on the current intersection of psychiatric disorders and crime among non-institutionalized U.S. adults is needed to inform treatment efforts within community mental health and criminal justice systems, and guide U.S. policy.

Among forensic and psychiatric samples, people with substance use disorders (SUDs),19,20 psychotic disorders (e.g., schizophrenia)13,21, and mood disorders4,8,9,22,23 demonstrate higher rates of criminal behavior and justice system involvement compared to people without these disorders. More recently, trauma-related disorders have been identified as a risk factor for crime1 with studies among veterans24 and offenders7,25 showing that a posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) diagnosis increases risk for incarceration and arrests. Studies among youth suggest an added risk of multiple psychiatric disorders (i.e., multimorbidity) on crime11, and comorbid substance and mental health disorders are associated with greater risk of crime outcomes among forensic4,5 and psychiatric2628 populations.

Research on the association of psychiatric disorders and crime in community-based samples is limited. Studies in Sweden and New Zealand have shown that people with major psychiatric disorders (e.g., schizophrenia/psychosis, affective disorders) have increased risk of justice system involvement18,29; however, there have been no studies to our knowledge examining these relationships in the U.S. Moreover, less is known about the association of a variety of psychiatric disorders (e.g., anxiety, eating) with crime outcomes, despite the shared emotional/behavioral dysregulation observed across disorders1,30.

The present study drew from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions Wave III (NESARC-III), the only nationally representative sample including Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5 (DSM-5) data as well as crime and justice system involvement among adults. This report examines the relationship between specific psychiatric disorders and criminal behavior (engaging in crime) and justice involvement (incarceration, current general, alcohol-, and drug-related legal problems). We examined each disorder category (i.e., mood, anxiety, eating, posttraumatic stress, schizophrenia/psychosis, substance), disorders within each category, and multimorbidity (number of disorders) as predictors. We also distinguish between mental health [mood, anxiety, eating, trauma, schizophrenia/psychosis] and SUDs to examine aspects of comorbidity (i.e., SUD only, mental health disorder only, comorbid substance and mental health disorder). To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the association of psychiatric disorders, comorbidity, and multimorbidity with crime and justice system involvement among the general U.S. population.

METHOD

Study Design and Participants

Data were drawn from the NESARC-III, a survey conducted by the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) from April 2012 to June 201331. The original dataset is available from NIAAA (https://www.niaaa.nih.gov/research/nesarc-iii). The sample consisted of 36,309 non-institutionalized U.S. adult men and women whose addresses were randomly selected from the 2010 census via probability sampling of counties in 50 states. Subjects provided written informed consent after receiving a description of the study. Trained NIAAA interviewers conducted an in-person computer-assisted interview (Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule-5; AUDADIS-5), a reliable and valid measure of DSM-5 criteria32. The response rate was 72% for households, 84% for individuals, and 60.1% overall, which is comparable to other national surveys33,34. Data were weighted to adjust for nonresponse and were nationally representative with regard to age, sex, and race/ethnicity. Original data collection and secondary analysis of data were approved by the institutional review board.

Measures

DSM-5 Diagnoses.

Lifetime and current (past 12-month) presence vs. absence of DSM-5 diagnoses available in the NESARC-III were categorized as follows: mood disorder (major depression, persistent depression, bipolar I), anxiety disorder (generalized anxiety, social anxiety, specific phobia, panic, agoraphobia), eating disorder (anorexia nervosa, bulimia, binge eating), PTSD, schizophrenia/psychosis, and substance use disorder (SUD; includes alcohol use disorder [AUD] and drug use disorder [DUD; marijuana, cocaine, opiates, heroin, sedatives, stimulants, hallucinogens, inhalants/solvents, club drugs, other drugs]). AUDADIS-5 scoring was used for all disorders except for schizophrenia/psychosis which, in the NESARC-III, was queried by asking: “Did a doctor or other health professional tell you that you had schizophrenia or a psychotic illness or episode in the last 12 months,” “Did this happen before 12 months ago?

Multimorbidity and Comorbidity.

Multimorbidity was assessed by counting lifetime and current diagnoses. We created two four-level variables (i.e., lifetime, current): 0 disorders, 1 disorder, 2 disorders, and 3 or more disorders. Two four-level variables were created for lifetime and current comorbid disorders: 0 disorders, SUDs only, mental health disorders only, and comorbid substance and mental health disorders. All levels of these variables were compared to the reference category of 0 disorders.

Outcomes.

We assessed two primary lifetime crime outcomes (n = 36,309). The lifetime presence vs. absence of criminal behavior was assessed using questions that pertained to illegal behavior from the NESARC-III antisocial personality module. If participants endorsed (since age 15) ever using an alias, scamming someone, engaging in reckless behavior that could hurt someone (e.g., driving while intoxicated), destroying property, setting fires, stealing, shoplifting, mugging, breaking into a house/car, forging checks, making money illegally, using a credit card without permission, forcing someone to have sex, starting fights, physically hurting someone/family on purpose, hitting and causing a serious injury, threatening/harassing, using weapons in a fight, hurting animals on purpose, or “something you could have been arrested for regardless of whether caught or not,” they were coded as having endorsed adult criminal behavior. The presence vs. absence of lifetime incarceration was assessed with the question, “Since you were 18, were you ever in jail, prison, or a correctional facility?” In addition to these two outcomes, among people who reported having been incarcerated (n = 4,130), the number of days incarcerated was assessed by asking: “About how long altogether were you in jail or a correctional facility since you were 18?” Responses were recorded in number of days.

We assessed three current crime outcomes: general, alcohol-related, and drug-related legal problems. General legal problems were assessed by asking, “Did you have serious trouble with the police or law [in the past 12 months]?” If participants endorsed ever having used alcohol, they were asked, “Did you ever get arrested, held at a police station, or have other legal problems because of drinking? Did this happen in the last 12 months? Participants who never drank were not asked this question, resulting in a sample of 31,189. If participants endorsed ever having used illegal drugs, they were asked, “In the last 12 months, did you more than once get arrested, held at a police station or have any other legal problems because of your medicine or drug use?” Participants who never used drugs in the past 12 months were not asked this question, resulting in a sample of 5,107. Of note, alcohol- and drug-related legal problems variables are not considered mutually exclusive from other variables, but are more focused on substance-related legal involvement. All items had possible response of yes, no, or unknown; unknown responses were recoded as missing.

Covariates.

Analyses were adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics used in prior analyses of the NESARC (i.e., gender, age, race/ethnicity, educational attainment, marital status, personal income, urbanicity, and region35,36,14,37) and all other categories of psychiatric disorders (other than the disorder evaluated as the predictor).

Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed using PROC SURVEYLOGISTIC in SAS, version 9.4 (Cary, NC). This procedure allows for incorporating the stratification, clustering (i.e., primary sampling unit (PSU)), and unequal weighting of the sampling design. Chi square analyses compared sample descriptives across crime outcomes. Logistic regressions examined associations between lifetime psychiatric disorders, lifetime comorbid substance and mental health disorders, and lifetime multimorbidity with lifetime criminal behavior and incarceration; and current psychiatric disorders, current comorbid substance and mental health disorders, and current multimorbidity with current general, alcohol-related, and drug-related legal problems, controlling for sociodemographics and psychiatric comorbidity (Tables 3 and 4). Adjusted odds ratios (AOR) are presented. Supplemental analyses present unadjusted odds ratios (Supplementary Tables 1 and 5) and analyses controlling for antisocial personality disorder (ASPD; i.e., due to the potential influence of ASPD on crime outcomes) in addition to sociodemographics and psychiatric disorders (Supplementary Tables 4 and 8). We also explored the effect of gender on outcomes by examining whether associations across our primary analysis differed by gender, and present results stratified by gender in Supplementary Tables 2, 3, 6, and 7. An analysis of variance (ANOVA) comparing mean lifetime days incarcerated by the presence vs. absence of psychiatric disorders was examined, controlling for sociodemographic characteristics. All tests were two-tailed and the significance level was p<.00137.

Table 3.

Association of Lifetime Psychiatric Disorders with Lifetime Crime Outcomes Adjusted for Sociodemographic Characteristics and Other Disorders (n = 36,309)

Lifetime Crime Lifetime Incarceration
Lifetime Diagnosis %a AORd [95% CI] %a AOR [95% CI]
No Diagnosis 14.11 Ref ---- 5.14 Ref ----
Any Diagnosis 43.50 4.34* [4.06–4.62] 18.01 4.11* [3.71–4.56]
Any Mood Disorder 43.65 1.61* [1.50–1.73] 16.08 1.21 [1.08–1.35]
 Major Depression 40.85 1.41* [1.32–1.52] 14.35 1.10 [0.98–1.23]
 Persistent Depressive Disorder 50.07 1.60* [1.39–1.85] 18.52 1.11 [0.92–1.34]
 Bipolar I 69.12 2.20* [1.72–2.81] 31.46 1.48 [1.13–1.94]
Any Anxiety Disorder 44.31 1.46* [1.36–1.57] 16.90 1.29* [1.15–1.45]
 Generalized Anxiety 49.65 1.47* [1.32–1.64] 18.72 1.23 [1.07–1.42]
 Social Anxiety 52.24 1.63* [1.41–1.88] 21.96 1.35 [1.11–1.65]
 Specific Phobia 42.18 1.37* [1.20–1.56] 15.54 1.17 [0.99–1.39]
 Panic 48.50 1.21 [1.05–1.40] 19.61 1.20 [0.97–1.48]
 Agoraphobia 53.86 1.39 [1.15–1.67] 23.07 1.30 [0.96–1.78]
Eating Disordersb 50.41 1.39 [1.05–1.83] 14.42 1.16 [0.81–1.66]
 Posttraumatic Stress 57.27 2.09* [1.82–2.39] 22.77 1.50* [1.27–1.77]
 Schizophrenia/Psychosis 46.45 1.44 [1.13–1.83] 24.22 1.42 [1.05–1.92]
Any Substance Use Disorder 55.52 4.30* [3.99–4.64] 24.59 4.17* [3.76–4.63]
 Alcohol Use Disorder 54.91 3.77* [3.49–4.07] 24.03 3.54* [3.19–3.93]
 Any Drug Use Disorder 75.80 6.81* [6.12–7.58] 38.07 4.65* [4.08–5.30]
# of Diagnosesc
 1 31.67 2.62* [2.43–2.83] 12.91 2.72* [2.39–3.09]
 2 45.65 4.90* [4.47–5.37] 18.75 4.44* [3.89–5.05]
 3+ 62.97 10.60* [9.61–11.70] 26.55 7.55* [6.67–8.54]
Comorbid Substance Use and Mental Healthc
 SUD Only 47.44 4.36* [3.97–4.79] 22.95 4.63* [4.07–5.27]
 Mental Health Only 24.29 2.11* [1.94–2.29] 7.50 1.82* [1.56–2.12]
 Both 63.58 9.51* [8.75–10.34] 26.23 6.72* [5.94–7.59]

Note.

*

p0<.001.

a

Unweighted percentages.

b

Combined prevalence of anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and binge eating disorder.

c

These models only controlled for sociodemographic characteristics. Reference category for these analyses is “no diagnoses” (n = 18,548).

d

Odds ratios are adjusted for gender, age, race/ethnicity, educational attainment, marital status, personal income, urbanicity, and region in addition to other psychiatric disorders. Abbreviations: AOR=Adjusted Odds Ratio.

Table 4.

Lifetime Days Incarcerated by Lifetime Psychiatric Diagnoses Adjusted for Sociodemographic Characteristics and Other Disorders (n = 4,076)

Lifetime Diagnosis N M SE Fb p
Any Diagnosis 3144 124.09 23.45 4.94 0.028
No Diagnosis 932 62.91 28.51
Any Mood Disorder Diagnosis 1363 193.46 59.36 0.69 0.407
No Mood Disorder 2713 167.58 52.92
 Major Depression 1045 190.19 64.09 0.10 0.753
 No Major Depression 3031 179.18 53.25
 Persistent Depressive Disorder 367 171.38 72.96 0.08 0.774
 No Persistent Depressive Disorder 3709 185.70 54.29
 Bipolar I 233 238.86 71.64 1.40 0.239
 No Bipolar I 3843 168.32 56.12
Any Anxiety Disorder 1001 169.13 53.18 0.55 0.462
No Anxiety Disorder 3075 191.91 59.06
 Generalized Anxiety 499 156.90 60.98 0.59 0.443
 No Generalized Anxiety 3577 190.58 56.36
 Social Anxiety 273 138.64 66.88 1.41 0.237
 No Social Anxiety 3803 191.91 54.51
 Specific Phobia 350 169.17 67.59 0.07 0.789
 No Specific Phobia 3726 183.54 55.69
 Panic 352 179.61 65.35 0.00 0.968
 No Panic 3724 181.84 56.68
 Agoraphobia 158 192.56 93.29 0.02 0.886
 No Agoraphobia 3918 179.94 55.60
Eating Disordersa 88 173.69 74.58 0.03 0.856
No Eating Disorders 3988 187.36 55.58
Posttraumatic Stress 524 207.04 65.70 1.47 0.228
No Posttraumatic Stress 3552 154.00 49.82
Schizophrenia/Psychosis 213 260.96 88.77 3.51 0.064
No Schizophrenia/Psychosis 3863 100.09 40.64
Any Substance Use Disorder 2645 227.81 54.15 16.93 <0.001
No Substance Use Disorder 1431 133.23 56.33
 Alcohol Use Disorder 2365 219.24 56.01 4.43 0.038
 No Alcohol Use Disorder 1711 164.24 54.82
 Any Drug Use Disorder 1332 284.54 52.00 17.09 <0.001
 No Drug Use Disorder 2744 134.51 58.72

Note.

a

Combined prevalence of anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and binge eating disorder.

b

Analysis of covariance models are adjusted for gender, age, race/ethnicity, educational attainment, marital status, personal income, urbanicity, region, and other psychiatric diagnoses

RESULTS

Unweighted prevalence estimates of sociodemographic characteristics by lifetime crime outcomes are reported in Table 1, and by current crime outcomes in Table 2. Regarding lifetime crime, 28.5% of U.S. adults reported engaging in criminal behavior (since age 15) and 11.4% reported a history of incarceration as an adult. Adults who were male, younger, Native American, unmarried/separated, or had ASPD were more likely to report criminal behavior and incarceration. Adults in higher income brackets and who were more educated reported similar rates of criminal behavior to those in lower income brackets, but were less likely to be incarcerated. Regarding current crime, 1.8% of U.S. adults reported general legal problems; out of people who drank alcohol, 0.8% reported past-year alcohol-related legal problems, and out of people who used drugs, 2.7% reported past-year drug-related legal problems. Adults who were male, younger, unmarried, had lower education and income, or had ASPD were more likely to report current legal problems.

Table 1.

Lifetime Crime Outcomes by Sociodemographic Characteristics (n = 36,309)

Lifetime Crime p Lifetime Incarceration p
%a %a
Total 28.5 11.4
Gender
 Women 21.57 <.001 5.96 <.001
 Men 37.40 18.49
Age (years)
 18–29 31.90 <.001 9.52 <.001
 30–44 31.11 13.66
 45–64 29.40 13.35
 65+ 17.16 6.20
Race-ethnicity
 White 31.46 <.001 11.12 <.001
 Black 29.52 14.72
 Native American 46.94 25.30
 Asian/Pac. Islander 13.89 2.73
 Hispanic 21.62 9.91
Education
 < High School 25.11 <.001 16.44 <.001
 High School 28.91 14.09
 Some college 29.17 8.89
Marital Status
 Married/cohabitating 25.69 <.001 9.11 <.001
 Widowed/ Separated/Divorced 29.46 13.86
 Never Married 32.21 13.04
Income
 $0–19,999 28.14 .203 13.28 <.001
 $20,000–$34,999 28.17 11.25
 $35,000–$69,999 29.38 9.57
 $70,000 or more 28.84 7.09
Urbanicity
 Rural 29.25 .147 11.69 .497
 Urban 28.33 11.38
Region
 Northeast 27.57 .001 7.46 <.001
 Midwest 29.25 12.19
 South 27.62 12.02
 West 29.75 12.14
Antisocial PD
 No 25.44 <.001 9.89 <.001
 Yes 94.37 44.79

Note.

a

Unweighted percentages.

Table 2.

Current Crime Outcomes by Sociodemographic Characteristics (n = 36,309)

Current Legal Problemsa
(n = 36,309)
p Current Alcohol-related Legal Problems
(n = 35,772)
p Current Drug-related Legal Problems
(n = 36,121)
p
%b %b %b
Total 1.8 0.8 2.7
Gender
 Women 1.14 <.001 0.33 <.001 1.79 <.001
 Men 2.66 1.33 3.44
Age (years)
 18–29 3.67 <.001 1.51 <.001 3.49 .018
 30–44 1.97 0.81 2.43
 45–64 1.14 0.60 2.21
 65+ 0.33 0.04 0.76
Race-ethnicity
 White 1.50 <.001 0.65 <.001 2.27 .155
 Black 2.43 0.80 3.61
 Native American 3.52 1.36 2.50
 Asian/Pac. Islander 0.67 0.22 1.57
 Hispanic 2.13 1.22 2.83
Education
 < High School 3.32 <.001 1.36 <.001 4.40 <.001
 High School 2.11 1.06 3.35
 Some college 1.27 0.53 1.91
Marital Status
 Married/cohabitating 1.04 <.001 0.34 <.001 1.89 .001
 Widowed/ Separated/Divorced 1.63 0.77 1.92
 Never Married 3.24 1.54 3.61
Income
 $0–19,999 2.62 <.001 1.08 <.001 3.54 <.001
 $20,000–$34,999 1.61 0.66 2.63
 $35,000–$69,999 0.79 0.50 0.81
 $70,000 or more 0.62 0.37 .00
Urbanicity
 Rural 1.60 .188 0.51 .015 1.33 .020
 Urban 1.85 0.83 2.89
Region
 Northeast 1.35 .001 0.50 .071 1.18 .034
 Midwest 2.21 0.85 3.32
 South 1.66 0.76 2.91
 West 1.97 0.92 2.72
Antisocial PD
 No 1.51 <.001 0.65 <.001 2.26 <.001
 Yes 8.25 3.49 5.57

Note.

a

Refers to the past 12 months.

b

Unweighted percentages.

About half (48.9%) of adults reported lifetime psychiatric disorders and 33.4% reported current psychiatric disorders. For lifetime disorders, 24.1% had 1 disorder, 11.4% had 2, and 13.4% had 3 or more. For current disorders, 19.9% had 1 disorder, 17.2% had 2, and 6.4% had 3 or more. Among people with 3 or more lifetime disorders, the most prevalent disorders were AUD (71.0%), major depression (65.7%), and DUD (46.6%). Among people with 3 or more current disorders, the most prevalent disorders were major depression (59.6%), AUD (48.1%) and generalized anxiety (43.9%). In their lifetime, 15.0% of adults had a SUD only, 18.8% had a mental health disorder only, and 15.07% had a comorbid substance and mental health disorder. In the past year, 9.9% of adults had SUDs only, 17.4% had a mental health disorder only, and 6.1% had comorbid substance and mental health disorders.

Lifetime psychiatric disorders were associated with increased risk for lifetime criminal behavior (see Table 3). Drug use disorders (DUDs) were associated with the greatest absolute risk of any disorder (75.8% of those with DUDs reported criminal behavior), followed by AUD. Among other disorders, the odds of criminal behavior were greatest for PTSD, social anxiety disorder, and bipolar I. Multimorbidity and comorbidity were associated with increased risk; 47% of those with SUDs only reported criminal behavior, compared to 24% of those with mental health disorders only and 64% of those with comorbid substance and mental health disorders.

Lifetime psychiatric disorders were associated with increased risk for incarceration (see Table 3). DUD was associated with the greatest absolute risk of incarceration, followed by AUD. Among other disorders, PTSD, followed by any anxiety disorder, was associated with the greatest risk of incarceration. Risk of incarceration over the lifetime increased as more lifetime disorders were present. Adults with comorbid substance and mental health disorders had the greatest risk of incarceration (26%) compared to those with SUDs only (23%) and mental health disorders only (8%). Analyses comparing the length of time incarcerated by the presence vs. absence of psychiatric disorders show that adults with SUDs and in particular DUDs were incarcerated more days in their lifetime compared to adults without these disorders (see Table 4).

Any current psychiatric disorder was associated with increased risk of current legal problems (see Table 5). The presence of a SUD was associated with the greatest absolute risk of current legal problems, and within this category, AUDs and DUDs were associated with equal risk. Among other disorders, mood disorders were associated with the greatest risk of current legal problems, followed by major depressive disorder. Risk of current legal problems increased with multimorbidity and comorbidity; 5% of adults with SUDs only and 2% of adults with mental health disorders only reported current legal problems, compared to 8% of adults with comorbid substance and mental health disorders.

Table 5.

Association of Current Psychiatric Disorders with Current Crime Outcomes Adjusted for Sociodemographic Characteristics and Other Disorders (n = 36,309)

Currenta Legal Problems Current Alcohol-related Legal Problems Current Drug-related Legal Problems
Current Diagnosis %b AORe [95% CI] %b AOR [95% CI] %b AOR [95% CI]
No Diagnosis 0.78 Ref ---- 0.13 Ref ---- 0.83 Ref ----
Any Diagnosis 3.85 3.94* [3.24–4.79] 2.26 12.22* [6.40–23.34] 3.59 3.73 [1.84–7.57]
Any Mood Disorder 4.04 1.78* [1.40–2.27] 1.55 0.98 [0.63–1.54] 3.75 1.51 [0.94–2.41]
 Major Depression 3.76 1.68* [1.31–2.16] 1.21 0.82 [0.46–1.48] 3.64 1.40 [0.80–2.48]
 Persistent Depressive Disorder 4.39 1.54 [1.08–2.21] 2.07 1.35 [0.68–2.67] 3.21 1.40 [0.59–3.37]
 Bipolar I 5.58 1.50 [0.87–2.60] 2.93 1.30 [0.58–2.92] 4.13 1.18 [0.55–2.55]
Any Anxiety Disorder 3.30 1.37 [1.02–1.85] 1.09 0.66 [0.44–0.97] 3.14 0.91 [0.53–1.58]
 Generalized Anxiety 4.30 1.79 [1.27–2.54] 1.13 0.75 [0.39–1.44] 3.11 0.96 [0.51–1.82]
 Social Anxiety 3.78 0.96 [0.62–1.49] 1.27 0.60 [0.27–1.36] 4.98 1.60 [0.82–3.12]
 Specific Phobia 2.51 1.07 [0.74–1.57] 0.94 0.43 [0.24–0.78] 2.49 0.75 [0.36–1.58]
 Panic 4.71 1.08 [0.72–1.60] 1.54 1.00 [0.52–1.94] 4.55 1.28 [0.58–2.80]
 Agoraphobia 4.01 0.90 [0.52–1.58] 1.77 0.97 [0.40–2.34] 5.52 2.09 [0.84–5.21]
Eating Disordersc 1.55 0.41 [.16–1.08] 1.01 1.03 [0.29–3.69] 2.06 0.92 [0.20–4.17]
Posttraumatic Stress 4.89 1.29 [0.92–1.82] 1.86 1.05 [0.64–1.72] 5.05 1.82 [1.12–2.96]
Schizophrenia/Psychosis 8.31 2.18 [1.14–4.19] 2.80 1.22 [0.43–3.48] 4.17 1.12 [0.33–3.75]
Any Substance Use Disorder 6.06 3.53* [2.83–4.40] 3.89 22.92* [12.07–43.53] 4.22 2.88 [1.62–5.11]
 Alcohol Use Disorder 5.96 3.22* [2.58–4.02] 4.17 18.55* [10.27–33.51] 3.60 0.99 [0.68–1.45]
 Any Drug Use Disorder 10.36 3.27* [2.57–4.17] 5.71 5.04* [3.34–7.62] 5.99 3.14* [1.98–4.99]
# of Diagnosesd
 1 2.73 2.77* [2.20–3.49] 1.94 10.79* [5.60–20.77] 2.39 2.68 [1.21–5.92]
 2 4.32 4.84* [3.63–6.46] 2.13 12.55* [5.74–27.44] 3.65 3.35 [1.55–7.26]
 3+ 6.80 6.71* [5.14–8.76] 3.38 16.74* [8.48–33.05] 5.29 5.70* [2.64–12.32]
Comorbid Substance Use and Mental Healthd
 SUD Only 5.04 4.16* [3.20–5.39] 4.16 20.80* [10.62–40.74] 3.80 3.62 [1.74–7.52]
 Mental Health Only 1.82 2.32* [1.76–3.06] 0.07 0.20 [0.05–0.77] 1.24 2.03 [0.70–5.84]
 Both 7.73 7.03* [5.46–9.04] 3.45 14.77* [7.16–30.45] 4.73 4.74* [2.15–10.45]

Note.

*

p<.001.

a

Current refers to the past 12 months.

b

Unweighted percentages.

c

Combined prevalence of anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and binge eating disorder.

d

These models only controlled for sociodemographic characteristics. Reference category for these analyses is “no diagnoses” (n = 18,548).

e

Odds ratios are adjusted for gender, age, race/ethnicity, educational attainment, marital status, personal income, urbanicity, and region in addition to other psychiatric disorders. Abbreviations: AOR=Adjusted Odds Ratio.

Any current psychiatric disorder was associated with increased risk of alcohol-related legal problems; however, among specific disorders, only SUDs were associated with increased risk. Within the category of SUDs, adults with AUDs experienced the greatest risk of alcohol-related legal problems. Unlike other crime outcomes, more adults with SUDs only (4.2%) reported alcohol-related legal problems compared to adults with comorbid substance and mental health disorders (3.5%). The only disorder associated with risk of current drug-related legal problems was DUD. Similar to other crime outcomes, the risk of current drug-related legal problems increased as more current disorders were present. Additionally, 5% of adults with comorbid substance and mental health disorders reported current drug-related legal problems, compared to 4% of adults with SUDs only and 1% of adults with mental health disorders only.

Primary analyses stratified by gender are shown in Supplementary Tables 2, 3, 6, and 7; interaction analyses showed that within the comorbid substance and mental health variable (i.e., no disorders, SUDs only, mental health disorders only, comorbid substance and mental health disorders), men with SUDs only had lower risk of criminal behavior compared to women (OR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.58–0.81, p < .001). Additionally, men with SUDs (OR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.59–0.82, p < .001), AUDs (OR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.66–0.89, p < .001), DUDs (OR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.58–0.87, p < .001), and comorbid substance and mental health disorders (OR = 0.55; 95% CI = 0.45–0.69, p < .001) had lower risk of incarceration than women. There were no significant gender differences in other crime outcomes. As is shown in Supplementary Tables 4 and 8, including ASPD as a covariate slightly decreased effect sizes but did not change the pattern of findings.

DISCUSSION

This study evaluated the risk of crime outcomes (i.e., criminal behavior, incarceration, general and substance-related legal problems) associated with specific psychiatric disorders, comorbid substance and mental health disorders, and multimorbidity in the most recent representative U.S. sample.

A considerable portion of the U.S. population reported engaging in criminal behavior (28.5%) and having been incarcerated (11.4%) as an adult. Given that NESARC-III data captures any incarceration, including brief jail detention, this rate is greater than prior research predicting 6.6% of the U.S. population will go to state or federal prison in their lifetime38. The U.S. has the highest rate of incarceration in the world, with 1% of its total population currently incarcerated39. The presence of any psychiatric disorder (controlling for sociodemographics and ASPD) was associated with 4 to 5 times the likelihood of crime outcomes. Multimorbidity, as well as comorbid substance and mental health disorders, were associated with higher risk of crime, consistent with research showing poor health and social outcomes associated with increasing multimorbidity40,41. Importantly, these findings do not suggest that all people with psychiatric disorders commit crime. The majority of adults with a psychiatric disorder (57%) denied engaging in criminal behavior; however, this contrasts with 86% of adults without psychiatric disorders who denied criminal behavior.

Adults most at risk of current substance- and non-substance related crime had multiple psychiatric disorders, SUDs (particularly DUDs), or comorbid substance and mental health disorders, which is consistent with international studies examining psychiatric disorders and violent crime29. Over a third of adults with DUDs reported having been incarcerated. These findings parallel research showing that veterans and offenders with substance use/comorbid substance and mental health disorders have the highest risk for future crime19,4244. There are numerous pathways from substance use to crime, including possession of drugs, engagement in crime to financially support addiction, risky behavior while intoxicated, and being in environments wherein crime is common45. Community-based treatment of SUDs is necessary to reduce crime and justice-system involvement. Unfortunately, among U.S. adults in need of substance use treatment, only 11% receive treatment46. Once people with SUDs become involved in the justice system, they are unlikely to receive evidence-based treatment47 and have heightened rates of recidivism43.

Though smaller in magnitude compared to SUDs, several other mental health disorders had significant associations with crime outcomes. Bipolar I and PTSD were associated with the strongest risk of lifetime crime and, in the case of PTSD, incarceration. The link between bipolar I and crime is well-documented48, and may reflect engagement in reckless behavior during mania22. Indeed, mania symptoms are commonly diagnosed (up to 50%) among inmates49. In addition, research has uncovered a heightened prevalence of risky, impulsive (including antisocial) behavior among people with PTSD50. Theories suggest that hypervigilance paired with aggression, or suspiciousness and subsequent distancing from prosocial individuals and communities among people with PTSD may be an explanatory mechanism25, though these theories have yet to be tested empirically. Alternatively, psychiatric disorders share common risk factors that may increase the propensity for illicit behaviors, such as emotion dysregulation51. As noted by Skeem and colleagues3, there are many factors associated with psychiatric disorders that contribute to crime in addition to uncontrolled symptoms, such as low socioeconomic status. Though controlling for such factors helps account for their contribution to crime risk, the association between mental illness and crime is complex and prospective data is needed to draw conclusions about mechanisms explaining this relationship.

Supplemental analysis of gender differences highlighted that women with SUDs and comorbid substance and mental health disorders had greater risk of incarceration than men, which is consistent with a national study of psychiatric disorders and crime in Sweden18. Research has suggested that the well-documented “gender-gap” in crime (i.e., men report more crime and violence than women) is smaller among those with psychiatric disorders, especially bipolar, psychosis, or phobias52. It may be that women with SUDs have more severe/impairing psychiatric symptoms that prompt arrest compared to men. More research is needed to clarify the mechanisms explaining such gender differences.

Though this study presents current data on the intersection of psychiatric disorders and crime in a nationally representative sample, there are limitations. Crime outcomes are self-reported and there may be an unknown amount of underreporting or biased recall, though self-reported crime is adequately correlated with official records5355. We were limited to the available questions in the NESARC-III; there were no questions assessing types of justice involvement (e.g., charges, convictions), or severity of crime (e.g., misdemeanor vs. felony). Questions about drug-related and alcohol-related legal problems differed slightly; participants were scored affirmatively for alcohol-related legal problems if they endorsed any legal issues, whereas only those with more than one legal issue were scored affirmatively on drug-related legal problems. Though we analyzed lifetime diagnoses with lifetime outcomes, and current diagnoses with current outcomes, the time of diagnosis may not have overlapped with when the crime was committed. Temporal precedence could not be established using NESARC-III. Finally, NESARC-III did not contain a comprehensive list of DSM-5 diagnoses, and schizophrenia/psychosis may have been under-represented, as it was assessed via self-report (which could explain our lack of findings for this diagnosis).

In conclusion, in a nationally representative sample, criminal behavior and incarceration are prevalent and SUDs, comorbid substance and mental health disorders, and multimorbidity are most strongly associated with criminal behavior and justice system involvement. Our findings about disorders associated with crime risk parallels research on disorders that increase risk for recidivism among forensic populations23. Thus, high-risk individuals (i.e., SUDs, PTSD, comorbid disorders) who are likely to become involved in the justice system are also more likely to stay in this system. With regard to clinical implications, improved access to community-based treatment, including diversion from the justice system to mental health or substance use treatment, may reduce crime and incarceration56,57. At-risk individuals, including those with SUDs, PTSD, bipolar I, or comorbidity, should be screened for criminal behavior in community-based systems to identify and target behaviors that lead to arrest. Psychiatric symptoms and other criminogenic factors should be treated to prevent continued criminal justice involvement.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Tables

Clinical Points.

  • There are currently no national estimates of the relationship between DSM-5 psychiatric disorders and crime outcomes among U.S. adults.

  • People with substance use disorders, PTSD, bipolar, or comorbid substance and mental health disorders should be screened for criminal behavior to identify and target issues that lead to justice system involvement.

  • Increased access to community-based substance use and mental health treatment may reduce crime and incarceration in the U.S.

Funding Sources:

This work was funded in part by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA; T32DA019426-12; KEM), and the State of Connecticut, Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services (DMHAS). The National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions-III (NESARC-III) was sponsored by the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA), with supplemental support from NIDA. Support is acknowledged from the intramural program, NIAAA, NIH. Role of Funders and Sponsors: Sponsors and funders of the NESARC-III, and specific funders of this study, had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. This publication does not express the views of DMHAS, the State of Connecticut, NIDA, or NIAAA.

Footnotes

Potential conflicts of interest: None.

REFERENCES

  • 1.McCormick S, Peterson-Badali M, Skilling T. Mental health and justice system involvement: A conceptual analysis of the literature. Psychol Public Policy, Law Public Policy Law. 2015;21(2):213–225. doi: 10.1037/law0000033. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Andrews DA, Bonta J. Rehabilitating Criminal Justice Policy and Practice. Psychol Public Policy, Law. 2010;16(1):39–55. doi: 10.1037/a0018362. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Skeem JL, Manchak S, Peterson JK. Correctional policy for offenders with mental illness: Creating a new paradigm for recidivism reduction. Law Hum Behav. 2011;35(2):110–126. doi: 10.1007/s10979-010-9223-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Balyakina E, Mann C, Ellison M, et al. Risk of future offense among probationers with co-occurring substance use and mental health disorders. Community Ment Health J. 2014;50(3):288–295. doi: 10.1007/s10597-013-9624-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Constantine RJ, Petrila J, Andel R, et al. Arrest trajectories of adult offenders with a serious mental illness. Psychol Public Policy, Law. 2010;16(4):319–339. doi: 10.1037/a0020852. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Martin MS, Dorken SK, Wamboldt AD, Wootten SE. Stopping the revolving door: A meta-analysis on the effectiveness of interventions for criminally involved individuals with major mental disorders. Law Hum Behav. 2012;36(1):1–12. doi: 10.1037/h0093963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Proctor SL, Alvarez de la Campa GJ, Medina-Reyes L, Hoffmann NG. Clinical and demographic correlates of the type and frequency of criminal behavior among jail inmates with a substance use disorder. Am J Crim Justice. 2017;42(4):746–758. doi: 10.1007/s12103-016-9381-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Modestin J, Wuermle O. Criminality in men with major mental disorder with and without comorbid substance abuse. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2005;59(1):25–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Soyka M, Zingg C. Association for methodology and documentation in psychiatry profiles predict later risk for criminal behavior and violent crimes in former inpatients with affective disorder. J Forensic Sci. 2010;55(3):655–659. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01354.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ferguson KM, Bender K, Thompson SJ, Xie B, Pollio D. Exploration of arrest activity among homeless young adults in four U.S. Cities. Soc Work Res. 2012;36(3):233–238. doi: 10.1093/swr/svs023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Coker Kendall L.; Smith Phillip H., Westphal Alexander, Howard V. Zonana SAM. Crime and psychiatric disorders among youth in the US population: An analysis of National Comorbidity Survey- Adolescent Supplement. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2014;53(8):888–898. doi: 10.1038/jid.2014.371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tiihonen J, Isohanni M, Räsänen P, Koiranen M, Moring J. Specific major mental disorders and criminality: A 26-year prospective study of the 1966 Northern Finland birth cohort. Am J Psychiatry. 1997;154(6):840–845. doi: 10.1176/ajp.154.6.840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wallace C, Mullen PE, Burgess P. Criminal offending in schizophrenia over a 25-year period marked by deinstitutionalization and increasing prevalence of comorbid substance use disorders. Am J Psychiatry. 2004;161(4):716–727. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.4.716. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Goldstein RB; Chou P; Saha TD; Smith SM; Jung J; Zhang H; Pickering RP; Ruan J; Huang B; Grant B The epidemiology of antisocial behavioral syndromes in adulthood: Results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions-III. J Clin Psychiatry. 2016;51(1):87–100. doi: 10.1037/a0038432.Latino. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sareen J, Stein MB, Cox BJ, Hassard ST. Understanding comorbidity of anxiety disorders with antisocial behavior: Findings from two large community surveys. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2004;192(3):178–186. doi: 10.1097/01.nmd.0000116460.25110.9f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Pulay AJ, Dawson D a, Hasin DS, et al. Violent behavior and DSM-IV psychiatric disorders: results from the national epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions. J Clin Psychiatry. 2008;69(1):12–22. doi: 10.4088/JCP.v69n0103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Harford TC, Chen CM, Kerridge BT, Grant BF. Self- and other-directed forms of violence and their relationship with lifetime DSM-5 psychiatric disorders: Results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol Related Conditions-III (NESARC-III). Psychiatry Res. 2017;262(December 2016):384–392. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.09.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hodgins S Mental disorder, intellectual deficiency, and crime: Evidence from a birth cohort. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1992;49:476–483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Skjærvø I, Skurtveit S, Clausen T, Bukten A. Substance use pattern, self-control and social network are associated with crime in a substance-using population. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2016;245–252. doi: 10.1111/dar.12406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Comiskey CM, Stapleton R, Kelly PA. Ongoing cocaine and benzodiazepine use: Effects on acquisitive crime committal rates amongst opiate users in treatment. Drugs Educ Prev Policy. 2012;19(5):406–414. doi: 10.3109/09687637.2012.668977. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Morgan VA, Morgan F, Valuri G, Ferrante A, Castle D, Jablensky A. A whole-of-population study of the prevalence and patterns of criminal offending in people with schizophrenia and other mental illness. Psychol Med. 2013;43(9):1869–1880. doi: 10.1017/S0033291712002887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Graz C, Etschel E, Schoech H, Soyka M. Criminal behaviour and violent crimes in former inpatients with affective disorder. J Affect Disord. 2009;117(1–2):98–103. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Baillargeon J, Binswanger IA, Penn JV., Williams BA, Murray OJ. Psychiatric disorders and repeat incarcerations: The revolving prison door. Am J Psychiatry. 2009;166(1):103–109. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08030416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Elbogen EB, Johnson SC, Newton VM, et al. Criminal justice involvement, trauma, and negative affect in Iraq and Afghanistan war era veterans. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2012;80(6):1097–1102. doi: 10.1037/a0029967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sadeh N, McNiel DE. Posttraumatic stress disorder increases risk of criminal recidivism among justice-involved persons with mental disorders. Crim Justice Behav. 2015;42(6):573–586. doi: 10.1177/0093854814556880. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Fazel S, Lichtenstein P, Grann M, Goodwin GM, Långström N. Bipolar disorder and violent crime. 2010;67(9):931–938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ogloff JRP, Talevski D, Lemphers A, Wood M, Simmons M. Co-occurring mental illness, substance use disorders, and antisocial personality disorder among clients of forensic mental health services. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2015;38(1):16–23. doi: 10.1037/prj0000088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Robertson AG, Swanson JW, Frisman LK, Lin H, Swartz MS. Patterns of justice involvement among adults with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: Key risk factors. Psychiatr Serv. 2014;65(7):931–938. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201300044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Arsenault L; Moffitt TE; Caspi A; Taylor PJ; Silva P Mental disorders and violence in a total birth cohort. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2000;57(5):494. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.57.5.494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hofmann SG, Sawyer AT, Fang A, Asnaani A. Emotion dysregulation model of mood and anxiety disorders. Depress Anxiety. 2012;29(5):409–416. doi: 10.1002/da.21888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Grant BF, Amsbary M, Chu A, Sigman R, Al. E. Source and accuracy statement: National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions-III (NESARC-III). Rockville, MD Natl Inst Alcohol Abus Alcohol. 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hasin DS, Greenstein E, Aivadyan C, et al. The Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule-5 (AUDADIS-5): Procedural validity of substance use disorders modules through clinical re-appraisal in a general population sample. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015;148(123):40–46. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.12.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Galea S, Tracy M. Participation rates in epidemiologic studies. Ann Epidemiol. 2007;17(9):643–653. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2007.03.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Blackwell DL, Lucas JW, Clarke TC. Summary health statistics for U.S. adults: National health interview survey, 2012. Vital Health Stat 10. 2014;10(260):1–171. doi:24819891. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Fearn NE, Vaughn MG, Nelson EJ, Salas-Wright CP, DeLisi M, Qian Z. Trends and correlates of substance use disorders among probationers and parolees in the United States 2002–2014. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016;167:128–139. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.08.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Chou SP, Goldstein RB, Smith SM, et al. The epidemiology of DSM-5 nicotine sse disorder: Results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions-III. J Clin Psychiatry. 2016;77(10):1404–1412. doi: 10.4088/JCP.15m10114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Grant BF, Goldstein RB, Saha TD, et al. Epidemiology of DSM-5 alcohol use disorder. JAMA Psychiatry. 2015;72(8):757. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.0584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Bonczar TP. Prevalence of Imprisonment in the U.S. Population, 1974–2001. Bur Justice Stat Spec Rep. 2003;2001(August):1–12. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Blumstein A Bringing Down the U.S. Prison Population. Prison J. 2011;91. doi: 10.1177/0032885511415218. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Angst J, Sellaro R, Merikangas KR. Multimorbidity of psychiatric disorders as an indicator of clinical severity. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2002;252(4):147–154. doi: 10.1007/s00406-002-0357-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Gamma A, Angst J. Concurrent psychiatric comorbidity and multimorbidity in a community study: gender differences and quality of life. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2001;251 Suppl:II43–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Weaver CM, Trafton JA, Kimerling R, Timko C, Moos R. Prevalence and nature of criminal offending in a national sample of veterans in VA substance use treatment prior to the operation enduring freedom/operation Iraqi freedom conflicts. Psychol Serv. 2013;10(1):54–65. doi: 10.1037/a0030504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Håkansson A, Berglund M. Risk factors for criminal recidivism - a prospective follow-up study in prisoners with substance abuse. BMC Psychiatry. 2012;12:111. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-12-111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Sutherland R, Sindicich N, Barrett E, et al. Motivations, substance use and other correlates amongst property and violent offenders who regularly inject drugs. Addict Behav. 2015;45(2015):207–213. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.01.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Newcomb MD, Galaif ER, Vargas Carmona J. The drug-crime nexus in a community sample of adults. Psychol Addict Behav. 2001;15(3):185–193. doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.15.3.185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Park-Lee E, Lipari RN, Hedden SL, Kroutil LA, Porter JD. Receipt of services for substance use and mental health issues among adults: Results from the 2016 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. NSDUH Data Review. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Wakeman SE, Rich JD. Addiction treatment within u.s. correctional facilities: Bridging the gap between current practice and evidence-based care. 2015. doi: 10.1080/10550887.2015.1059217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Swann AC, Lijffijt M, Lane SD, Kjome KL, Steinberg JL, Moeller FG. Criminal conviction, impulsivity, and course of illness in bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord. 2011;13(2):173–181. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2011.00900.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.James DJ, Glaze LE. Mental health problems of prison and jail inmates. Bur Justice Stat Spec Rep. 2005:12. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Weiss NH, Tull MT, Viana AG, Anestis MD, Gratz KL. Impulsive behaviors as an emotion regulation strategy: Examining associations between PTSD, emotion dysregulation, and impulsive behaviors among substance dependent inpatients. J Anxiety Disord. 2012;26(3):453–458. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2012.01.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Baumeister RF, Lobbestael J. Emotions and antisocial behavior. J Forensic Psychiatry Psychol. 2011;22(5):635–649. doi: 10.1080/14789949.2011.617535. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Stueve A, Link BG. Gender differences in the relationship between mental illness and violence: Evidence from a community-based epidemiological study in Israel. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1998;33:61–67. doi: 10.1007/s001270050211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Pollock W, Menard S, Elliott DS, Huizinga DH. It’s official: Predictors of self-reported vs. officially recorded arrests. J Crim Justice. 2015;43:69–79. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Maxfield MG, Weiler BL, Widom CS. Comparing self-reports and official records of arrests. J Quant Criminol. 2000;16(1):87–110. doi: 10.1023/A:1007577512038. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Babinski LM, Hartsough CS, Lambert NM. A comparison of self-report of criminal involvement and official arrest records. Aggress Behav. 2001;27(1):44–54. doi: 10.1002/1098-2337(20010101/31)27. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Anestis JC, Carbonell JL. Stopping the Revolving Door: Effectiveness of mental health court in reducing recidivism by mentally ill offenders. Psychiatr Serv. 2014;65(9):1105–1112. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201300305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Garnick DW, Horgan CM, Acevedo A, et al. Criminal justice outcomes after engagement in outpatient substance abuse treatment. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2014;46(3):295–305. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2013.10.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Tables

RESOURCES