Abstract
Human herpesvirus 6A (HHV-6A) is a common virus that has important immunomodulatory effects. Dendritic cells (DC) are key players in innate and adaptive immunity and are implicated in the pathogenesis of many human diseases, including infections. (1) Background: Previous studies have demonstrated suppressive effects of HHV-6A on key DC functions. (2) Methods: human monocyte derived dendritic cells were inoculated with HHV-6A and viral replication, cell viability, and release of high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) protein from DC and of the cytokines IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, TNF and IFN-γ after co-culture with allogenic CD4+ T cells were assessed. (3) Results: Nonproductive infection of HHV-6A in DC leads to titer-dependent cell death and the release of HMGB1 protein, and a Th2 polarization. (4) Conclusion: These immune responses aimed to clear the infection may also imply risks for inflammatory pathologies associated with HHV-6A such as multiple sclerosis.
Keywords: human herpesvirus 6A, HMGB1, dendritic cells
1. Introduction
Human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6) [1] is a ubiquitous virus that most individuals have been exposed to at the age of two years [2,3]. It is a member of the β-herpesvirus genus of the Herpesviridae family and as such can establish lifelong latent infections in the host. Since 2014, HHV-6 isolates are classified into two distinct virus species, HHV-6A and 6B [4]. Therefore, earlier studies often have not distinguished between these two viral species. In addition, as the viruses display a high degree of homology it has been difficult to discriminate between HHV-6A and 6B with diagnostic tests. HHV-6B is the causative agent of exanthema subitum [5], but no disease has been causally linked to HHV-6A. However, an accumulating body of data suggests an association between HHV-6A infection and multiple sclerosis (MS) [6,7,8,9], a multifactorial disease characterized by an over-active immune system and/or misdirected immune reaction.
High mobility group box 1 (HMBG)-1 is a highly conserved alarmin, or damage-associated molecular pattern molecules (DAMPs), with antiviral effects [10] located in the nucleus and is passively released upon cell death. It has several redox isoforms that regulate its pro-inflammatory activity in various conditions, both at sterile states and during infections [11]. For infectious states, HMGB1 is elevated during respiratory infections such as during Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) bronchiolitis [12] and is released by herpes simplex virus (HSV)-2 infected epithelial cells upon cell death [13]. Furthermore, HMGB-1 release has been seen to aggravate Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS) [14], a syndrome with confirmed involvement of HHV-6A/6B [15,16]. Thus, there is a possibility that HHV-6A may trigger HMGB-1 release. The aim of the present study has been to investigate this possibility, and the data suggest that replication independent exposure of human dendritic cells (DC) to HHV-6A indeed induces titer-dependent cell death, HMGB-1 release and skewing the CD4+ T cell population towards a T helper (Th) 2-profile upon co-culture with allogenic T cells.
2. Results
2.1. DC Do Not Support HHV-6A Viral Replication
To assess if DC can support HHV-6A replication, 104 DC were inoculated with HHV-6A at 1944 to 19 tissue culture infective dose (TCID50), or with UV-treated virus (194 TCID50), used as negative control for infection. As positive controls for infection 104 HSB-2 cells, which are known to support HHV-6A replication, were inoculated in parallel with 194 TCID50 HHV-6A. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (Q-PCR) analysis of the HHV-6A DNA levels in cells and supernatants of DC cultures for up to 14 days after infection suggests that HHV-6A persists but does not replicate in DC at all titers tested (Figure 1A,B). This notion was further supported with data on UV-treated HHV-6A that gave a similarly flat growth curve. In contrast, for the HSB-2 cultures accumulation of viral DNA was seen over time in the supernatants (p < 0.001), suggesting that the virus inoculum was infectious. Intracellular increase of HHV-6A DNA was also seen, but as the HSB-2 cells continued to expand after inoculation the virus growth curve appears to be flat, given the unit HHV-6A DNA/cell. A cellular receptor for HHV-6A is CD46 [17], a molecule known to be expressed by all nucleated cells including DC. Therefore, DC are likely susceptible for viral entry and indeed in a previous report HHV-6A proteins were detected in moderate amounts in DC after inoculation and showed a similar staining pattern as did DC inoculated with UV-inactivated HHV-6A [18]. In contrast, HSB-2 inoculated with the same HHV-6A supernatants showed strong staining. These notions in combination with the data in the current report suggest that HHV-6A can enter but not replicate in human monocyte-derived DC.
2.2. Exposure of HHV-6A by DC Induces Virus Titer-Dependent Cell Death, HMGB1 Release and Th2 Skewing
To investigate how HHV-6A exposure of human DC affects cell viability, 104 DC were inoculated with 1944 to 1.9 TCID50 of HHV-6A, or with mock as negative control. Trypan blue staining and analysis using Bürken-chambers revealed that HHV-6A induces cell death in a virus titer-dependent manner (p < 0.001, p < 0.01, p < 0.05 or p > 0.05 compared to mock for 1944, 194, 19 or 1.9 TCID50, respectively) (Figure 2A). The data suggest that cell death seen for HHV-6A inoculated DC is independent on virus replication as DC inoculated with UV-treated HHV-6A at 194 TCID50 died to the same extent, as did DC inoculated with non-UV-treated HHV-6A, also at 194 TCID50 (p > 0.05 compared to mock).
To investigate if the DC cell death seen may induce an inflammatory response, HMGB1 release was determined in supernatants from cultures of 104 DC inoculated with HHV-6A at 194 TCID50, or treated with mock, using ELISA targeting HMGB1. Increased concentrations of HMGB1 were seen in supernatants of HHV-6A inoculated DC, compared to in supernatants of mock treated DC (p < 0.05) and suggests that exposure of the virus indeed induces HMGB1 release (Figure 2B).
To investigate if HHV-6A exposure may affect the Th profile, supernatants of cultures of 104 DC were inoculated with HHV-6A at 194 TCID50 for three days, or with mock, and co-cultured with allogenic CD4+ T cells. The co-cultures were harvested after four days and subjected to cytometric bead arrays (CBA) targeting IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10 and IFN-γ. While the expression of cytokines in the Th1 group (IL-2 and IFN-γ) did not differ between co-cultures of CD4+ T cells and DC treated with mock or HHV-6A, cytokines of the Th2 group (IL-4, IL-6 and IL-10) were significantly elevated in the co-cultures of CD4+ T cells and DC exposed to HHV-6A.
3. Discussion
DC are key immune cells that play important roles in capturing foreign antigens that enter the body, including viruses, and initiate specific immune responses against pathogens by presenting antigens to naïve T cells. However, DC can also be targets for viral infections, and with their antigen capturing capacity may be exposed to large amounts of virions. HHV-6A and 6B are very successful viruses that most people have been exposed to, as seen with a high seroprevalence in the human population [9] and have developed various specific viral immune-escape mechanisms that can hamper the ability of DC to activate T cells [19,20].
MS is recognized as an inflammatory disease [21] supported by large genetic studies that have linked several immune genes to the incidence of MS [22,23]. In addition, several environmental factors with well-established impacts on immunity have been associated to MS. These include vitamin D [24], which is important for T cell activation, and smoking, which has effects on both humoral and cell-mediated immunity [25]. As a central factor in innate immunity driving pro-inflammatory responses that can mediate autoimmunity, HMGB1 may be an important driver in MS [26]. Indeed, previous publications report data on HMGB1 expression in MS lesions [27] and elevated serum levels of HMGB1 in treatment of naïve MS patients, compared to those receiving disease-modifying treatment [28]. Even though an accumulating body of data suggests an association between HHV-6A infection and MS [6,7,8,9] the mechanism of action remains unclear. The data in the current study show that DC die upon exposure in a viral load dependent manner and release HMGB1, but this release is independent on virus replication.
Thus, it is possible that HMGB1 release upon cell death induced by HHV-6A infection and/or reactivation may act as a driver in inflammation in MS, but more studies are needed to further investigate this notion, and to test whether this can happen in vivo. In addition, if HHV-6A exposure leads to passive release of HMGB1 simply due to cell death or whether the virus has impacts on HMGB1 expression remains to be investigated.
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Isolation of Peripheral Blood Monocytes and Generation of DC
Buffy coats were bought from the Blood Transfusion Clinic at the Karolinska University Hospital, and monocytes were isolated from the buffy coats using commercial kits (RosetteSep Human Monocyte Enrichment Cocktail solution, Stemcell, Grenoble, France) and density gradient centrifugation on lymphoprep (Fresenius Kabi Norge AS, Oslo, Norway). To generate DC, the purified monocytes were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium containing GlutaMAX (Invitrogen Gibco, Paisly, UK) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (HyClone,, Logan, UT, USA), 100 µg/mL streptomycin and 100 U/mL penicillin (Invitrogen Gibco), 250 ng/ml of recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) (R&D systems or PeproTech, London, UK) and 6.5 ng/ml of recombinant human IL-4 (R&D systems). RPMI 1640 is described above, but without GM-CSF and IL-4 is referred to as complete RPMI, whereas RPMI 1640 with no supplementary agents is referred to as incomplete RPMI. On day 3 of culture, half of the medium was replaced with fresh complete RPMI containing IL-4 and GM-CSF. On day 6 or 7 the cells were harvested and washed with incomplete RPMI medium. The cell population used for the experiments described below typically contained >70% CD14− CD1a+ live cells, assessed by flow cytometry (data not shown).
4.2. HHV-6A Propagation and Inoculation
HHV-6A strain GS [1] was propagated in HSB-2 cells. When the cytopathic effect (CPE) was >50%, the cell culture was cleared by two rounds of centrifugation for 10 min at 300 g and the supernatant was collected and stored in aliquots at −80 °C. The 50% tissue culture infective dose (TCID50) was determined by ocular inspection for cytopathic effect as previously described [29] according to the Reed and Muench method. 104 DC were incubated with mock (supernatant from uninfected HSB-2 cells) or HHV-6A at 1944, 194, 19.4 TCID50 for 3 h before they were washed with incomplete RPMI medium and cultured in complete RPMI supplemented with GM-CSF and IL-4 at 5% CO2 and 37°C. 104 HSB-2 cells were inoculated in parallel with 194 TCID50 as positive controls for infection. DC were also incubated with HHV-6A supernatant that had been inactivated by UV irradiation for 20 min. This treatment completely eliminated the replication capacity as evident by TCID50 assays with HSB-2 cells as targets but as previously shown, uptake of UV-inactivated HHV-6A can be detected by confocal microscopy [18], suggesting that this treatment does not lead to breakdown of viral proteins. Assessment of DC viability was determined using Trypan blue staining and manual counting in Bürken chamber.
4.3. Assessment of HHV-6A Replication in DC
Viral replication was followed at 3 hours post-infection (hpi) and at 1, 3, 6, 10 and 14 days post-infection (dpi) in cells and supernatants by assessing viral DNA accumulation using Q-PCR (7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System, Applied Biosystems, Warrington, UK) of the immediate-early gene as previously described [30]. DNA was extracted from cells or supernatants using a commercial kit according to the manufacturer’s protocol (MagMAX-96 Viral RNA Isolation Kit, Applied Biosystems).
4.4. Assessment of HMGB1 Release
To assess if DC exposed to HHV-6A can release HMGB1, cell-free supernatants from cultures of 104 DC inoculated with 194 TCID50 of HHV-6A and incubated for three days were collected and subjected to HMGB1 enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) according to the instructions of the manufacturer (IBL International, Hamburg, Germany).
4.5. Co-Culture of DC and Allogenic T Cells and Cytokine Measurements
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were isolated from buffy coats bought from the Blood Transfusion Clinic at the Karolinska University Hospital using density gradient centrifugation on lymphoprep (Fresenius Kabi Norge AS). CD3+ and CD4+ T cells were further isolated from these PBMC using magnetic micro bead kits (Miltenyi Biotech GmbH, Germany), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Cell numbers were determined using a phase contrast microscope (Nikon) and Trypan blue (Gibco) staining. 3 × 104 live DC and 105 allogenic T cells per well were incubated for 96 hours at 5% CO2 and at 37 °C. Subsequently, supernatants from the co-cultures were harvested and subjected to cytometric bead arrays (CBA) (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) targeting the cytokines IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, IFN-γ and TNF and analyzed with a Gallios flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA), and data were analyzed using the software FCAP (Soft Flow Inc., St. Louise Park, MN, USA).
4.6. Statistics
The data were analyzed in the GraphPad Prism v.5 software (GraphPad, La Jolla, CA, USA) using Student’s t-test with two-tailed p-values and 95% confidence interval and Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, Washington, USA) using Single Factor ANOVA with α 0.05.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable as the identity of the donors of PBMC were unknown.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.
Conflicts of Interest
The author declares no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Salahuddin S.Z., Ablashi D.V., Markham P.D., Josephs S.F., Sturzenegger S., Kaplan M., Halligan G., Biberfeld P., Wong-Staal F., Kramarsky B. Isolation of a new virus, HBLV, in patients with lymphoproliferative disorders. Science. 1986;234:596–601. doi: 10.1126/science.2876520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Okuno T., Takahashi K., Balachandra K., Shiraki K., Yamanishi K., Takahashi M., Baba K. Seroepidemiology of human herpesvirus 6 infection in normal children and adults. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1989;27:651–653. doi: 10.1128/JCM.27.4.651-653.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Zerr D.M., Meier A.S., Selke S.S., Frenkel L.M., Huang M.L., Wald A., Rhoads M.P., Nguy L., Bornemann R., Morrow R.A., et al. A population-based study of primary human herpesvirus 6 infection. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005;352:768–776. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa042207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ablashi D., Agut H., Alvarez-Lafuente R., Clark D.A., Dewhurst S., DiLuca D., Flamand L., Frenkel N., Gallo R., Gompels U.A., et al. Classification of HHV-6A and HHV-6B as distinct viruses. Arch. Virol. 2014;159:863–870. doi: 10.1007/s00705-013-1902-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Yamanishi K., Okuno T., Shiraki K., Takahashi M., Kondo T., Asano Y., Kurata T. Identification of human herpesvirus-6 as a causal agent for exanthem subitum. Lancet. 1988;1:1065–1067. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(88)91893-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Soldan S.S., Leist T.P., Juhng K.N., McFarland H.F., Jacobson S. Increased lymphoproliferative response to human herpesvirus type 6A variant in multiple sclerosis patients. Ann. Neurol. 2000;47:306–313. doi: 10.1002/1531-8249(200003)47:3<306::AID-ANA5>3.0.CO;2-A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Akhyani N., Berti R., Brennan M.B., Soldan S.S., Eaton J.M., McFarland H.F., Jacobson S. Tissue distribution and variant characterization of human herpesvirus (HHV)-6: Increased prevalence of HHV-6A in patients with multiple sclerosis. J. Infect. Dis. 2000;182:1321–1325. doi: 10.1086/315893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Virtanen J.O., Färkkilä M., Multanen J., Uotila L., Jääskeläinen A.J., Vaheri A., Koskiniemi M. Evidence for human herpesvirus 6 variant A antibodies in multiple sclerosis: Diagnostic and therapeutic implications. J. Neurovirol. 2007;13:347–352. doi: 10.1080/13550280701381332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Engdahl E., Gustafsson R., Huang J., Biström M., Lima Bomfim I., Stridh P., Khademi M., Brenner N., Butt J., Michel A., et al. Increased Serological Response Against Human Herpesvirus 6A Is Associated with Risk for Multiple Sclerosis. Front. Immunol. 2019;10:2715. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Jung J.H., Park J.H., Jee M.H., Keum S.J., Cho M.S., Yoon S.K., Jang S.K. Hepatitis C virus infection is blocked by HMGB1 released from virus-infected cells. J. Virol. 2011;85:9359–9368. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00682-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Yang H., Wang H., Andersson U. Targeting Inflammation Driven by HMGB1. Front. Immunol. 2020;11:484. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Simpson J., Loh Z., Ullah M.A., Lynch J.P., Werder R.B., Collinson N., Zhang V., Dondelinger Y., Bertrand M.J.M., Everard M.L., et al. Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection Promotes Necroptosis and HMGB1 Release by Airway Epithelial Cells. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2020;201:1358–1371. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201906-1149OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Borde C., Barnay-Verdier S., Gaillard C., Hocini H., Maréchal V., Gozlan J. Stepwise release of biologically active HMGB1 during HSV-2 infection. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e16145. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hashizume H., Fujiyama T., Kanebayashi J., Kito Y., Hata M., Yagi H. Skin recruitment of monomyeloid precursors involves human herpesvirus-6 reactivation in drug allergy. Allergy. 2013;68:681–689. doi: 10.1111/all.12138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Fujino Y., Nakajima M., Inoue H., Kusuhara T., Yamada T. Human herpesvirus 6 encephalitis associated with hypersensitivity syndrome. Ann. Neurol. 2002;51:771–774. doi: 10.1002/ana.10194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Descamps V., Ranger-Rogez S. DRESS syndrome. Joint Bone Spine. 2014;81:15–21. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2013.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Santoro F., Kennedy P.E., Locatelli G., Malnati M.S., Berger E.A., Lusso P. CD46 is a cellular receptor for human herpesvirus 6. Cell. 1999;99:817–827. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81678-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gustafsson R.K., Engdahl E.E., Hammarfjord O., Adikari S.B., Lourda M., Klingström J., Svensson M., Fogdell-Hahn A. Human Herpesvirus 6A Partially Suppresses Functional Properties of DC without Viral Replication. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e58122. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Gustafsson R., Svensson M., Fogdell-Hahn A. Modulatory effects on dendritic cells by human herpesvirus 6. Front. Microbiol. 2015;6:388. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Jaworska J., Gravel A., Flamand L. Divergent susceptibilities of human herpesvirus 6 variants to type I interferons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2010;107:8369–8374. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0909951107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Hafler D.A., Slavik J.M., Anderson D.E., O’Connor K.C., De Jager P., Baecher-Allan C. Multiple sclerosis. Immunol. Rev. 2005;204:208–231. doi: 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2005.00240.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Beecham A.H., Patsopoulos N.A., Xifara D.K., Davis M.F., Kemppinen A., Cotsapas C., Shah T.S., Spencer C., Booth D., Goris A., et al. Analysis of immune-related loci identifies 48 new susceptibility variants for multiple sclerosis. Nat. Genet. 2013;45:1353–1360. doi: 10.1038/ng.2770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sawcer S., Hellenthal G., Pirinen M., Spencer C.C., Patsopoulos N.A., Moutsianas L., Dilthey A., Su Z., Freeman C., Hunt S.E., et al. Genetic risk and a primary role for cell-mediated immune mechanisms in multiple sclerosis. Nature. 2011;476:214–219. doi: 10.1038/nature10251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Murdaca G., Tonacci A., Negrini S., Greco M., Borro M., Puppo F., Gangemi S. Emerging role of vitamin D in autoimmune diseases: An update on evidence and therapeutic implications. Autoimmun. Rev. 2019;18:102350. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2019.102350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hedström A.K., Olsson T., Alfredsson L. The Role of Environment and Lifestyle in Determining the Risk of Multiple Sclerosis. Curr. Top. Behav. Neurosci. 2015;26:87–104. doi: 10.1007/7854_2015_372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Paudel Y.N., Angelopoulou E., Bhuvan K.C., Piperi C., Othman I. High mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) protein in Multiple Sclerosis (MS): Mechanisms and therapeutic potential. Life Sci. 2019;238:116924. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2019.116924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Andersson A., Covacu R., Sunnemark D., Danilov A.I., Dal Bianco A., Khademi M., Wallström E., Lobell A., Brundin L., Lassmann H., et al. Pivotal advance: HMGB1 expression in active lesions of human and experimental multiple sclerosis. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2008;84:1248–1255. doi: 10.1189/jlb.1207844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Sternberg Z., Sternberg D., Chichelli T., Drake A., Patel N., Kolb C., Chadha K., Yu J., Hojnacki D. High-mobility group box 1 in multiple sclerosis. Immunol. Res. 2016;64:385–391. doi: 10.1007/s12026-015-8673-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Gustafsson R.K., Engdahl E.E., Fogdell-Hahn A. Development and validation of a Q-PCR based TCID50 method for human herpesvirus 6. Virol. J. 2012;9:311. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-9-311. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Nitsche A., Müller C.W., Radonic A., Landt O., Ellerbrok H., Pauli G., Siegert W. Human herpesvirus 6A DNA Is detected frequently in plasma but rarely in peripheral blood leukocytes of patients after bone marrow transplantation. J. Infect. Dis. 2001;183:130–133. doi: 10.1086/317651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.