Abstract
Iatrogenic dissection of coronary arteries while performing catheter engagement, in general is not uncommon. However, we encountered a relatively rare case of iatrogenic right coronary cusp dissection.Here we report an iatrogenic coronary artery dissection after diagnostic angiography in a 54-year-oldwoman presented with exertional dyspnea and chest discomfort. In our case delayed progression of sub-intimal hematoma and subsequent compression of RCA ostium an SA node branch was the cause of SA node dysfunction and subsequent junctional rhythm and atrial fibrillation.
To conclude it should be said that in catastrophic cases of iatrogenic coronary ostia dissection and ensuing aortic cusp involvement, stenting of entry point at coronary ostia is a logical decision with good result.
Keywords: Coronary Angiography, Iatrogenic, Coronary Artery, Dissection
Introduction
In recent years, trans-radial artery approach has become popular among cardiologists for both diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This is mostly due to its superiority to traditional femoral approach, which provides less discomfort for the patient and the ability to walk immediately after procedure, less bleeding, shorter hospital stay and even the possibility of performing the procedure in out-patient settings.1
Iatrogenic coronary artery dissection following the angiography of coronary arteries is a rare condition with high mortality rate if not diagnosed and treated early.2 It is reported that its incidence is as low as 0.02%. However, it should be mentioned that the rate of iatrogenic coronary artery dissection after PCI is almost twenty times higher compared to its incidence after coronary angiography.3
There are several factors contributing to development of iatrogenic coronary artery dissection including: mal alignment of diagnostic or guiding catheter with coronary ostia, the structure of the guiding wire, coronary arteries’ anatomy and the operator factors (experience and technical skill).1
In this report we present a case of catheter-induced (iatrogenic) right coronary sinus and ascending aortic dissection following diagnostic angiography.
Case Presentation
A 54-year-old woman with diabetes was referred to the cardiology clinic with dyspnea and chest discomfort on moderate exertion. ECG and Physical examination was normal. Transthoracic echocardiogram showed normal ejection fraction, grade 1 diastolic dysfunction, no significant valvular dysfunction and no pathology in other chamber and pericardium. Because of the moderate pretest probability of coronary artery disease (CAD), exercise treadmill test (ETT) was done which was positive for CAD. The patient was scheduled for coronary angiography via right radial artery.
After the first dye injection in the right coronary artery (RCA), a radiopaque area was seen in the right coronary sinus that expanded to the ascending aorta, and patient experienced chest pain, suggesting catheter-induced (iatrogenic) right coronary sinus and ascending aortic dissection (Figure 1).
Figure 1.
Angiography of Right Coronary Artery
Right coronary artery also showed no coronary disease and the patient had stable condition. A few minutes later patient’s chest pain decreased and ECG did not show any sign of ischemia. Bed side echocardiography (TTE) was then performed to evaluate for a dissection flap. By TTE, no abnormality was noted. Computed tomography (CT) also demonstrated no evidence of aortic dissection and sub intimal hematoma.
Since the patient’s condition was stable, it was decided to perform watch and wait strategy and therefore she was treated non-surgically, with aggressive blood pressure control.
After 8 hours the patient experienced mild chest discomfort. ECG showed junctional rhythm with no ischemic change (Figure 2). Six hours later her blood pressure decreased and atrial fibrillation was observed in ECG (Figure 3).
Figure 2.
Eight hours after initial treatment: ECG showing junctional rhythm with no ischemic change
Figure 3.
Fourteen hours after initial treatment: Atrial Fibrilation occurred
Echocardiography was repeated and showed normal EF. No pericardial effusion but there was a mass compressing RCA ostium.
We decided to repeat the coronary angiography. Angiography was performed via right femoral artery. LM, LAD and LCX was normal. Right coronary injection showed severe narrowing and slit like RCA ostium .SA node artery was absent (Figure 4).
Figure 4.
Reapeated Coronary Angiography
DES stent 3*28 was deployed from RCA-ostium to proximal RCA. Subsequent injection showed no further contrast staining of the aortic wall. The flow in the RCA was normalized (Figure 5).
Figure 5.
Final Coronary Angiography
Two hours after PCI of RCA, ECG was normal sinus rhythm and the patient had no chest pain. Follow-up echocardiography revealed normal left ventricular function and a normal aortic root.
Discussion
Catheter induced aortic dissection has a reported incidence of only 0.02%.4 Coronary artery dissection may result in complete occlusion of the true vessel lumen by compression from the false lumen.5 It represents a potentially lethal complication. Both surgery and PCI of the coronary ostia to seal the entry site have been reported as treatment options.4
There are several mechanisms responsible for this complication. It appears that catheter trauma first produces coronary artery dissection which can then progress retrogradely through the subintima into the aortic root. Vigorous hand injection of contrast medium, subintimal passage of the guidewire, and improper manipulation of the catheter have been proposed as possible mechanisms of iatrogenic coronary dissection.6
In our case we observed that we thought that catheter mal alignment resulted in coronary ostial dissection and further injection of the dye into the subintimal space was the cause of the retrograde progression of the dissection. Forceful contrast injections should be avoided since it promotes propagation of flap dissection. Susceptibility to the development of intimal tears and progression of a hematoma may be related to underlying structural weakness of the media.4 The predisposing factors include hypertension, congenital unicuspid and bicuspid aortic valves, Marfan syndrome, cystic media necrosis and extensive atherosclerosis.4,7 In one original study, the incidence of proximal RCA dissection increased with selection of a Kimny®, Amplatz or EBU guiding catheter, atherosclerotic plaque lesions in the proximal RCA, angulation (> 90°) of the proximal RCA and various degrees of calcification of the proximal RCA.1
If the vessel flow is compromised the most important point is rapid restoration of vessel patency. In previous reports, surgery, PCI and conservative management have all been successful.8-10 CABG is best suited for left main (LM) artery lesions, multi-vessel disease 11. PCI is an alternative treatment for this condition. In an original study9 and a case report,12 bail-out stenting for treating catheter-induced LM dissection was technically feasible and showed good short- and long-term results. In a case series by Leontyev and colleagues13 with dissections generally progressing into the aorta, surgical management was performed in all cases. By contrast, in a recently published series by Nunez and colleagues,14 the patients were treated conservatively, being followed up by close monitoring with imaging. They concluded conservative strategy and stenting of coronary ostia when dissected is a logical approach with good short- and long-term prognosis.
In 2002, Dunning et al published a series of 9 patients with coronary dissection extending to the aorta (incidence, 0.02%) and proposed a classification in 3 grades: type 1, dissection limited to the sinuses of Valsalva; type 2, dissection of the ascending aorta outside of the sinuses < 4 cm; and type 3, dissection ≥ 4 cm. These authors proposed that stent implantation was sufficient in the limited forms, but those with type 3 required surgery.4
Conclusion
In catastrophic cases of iatrogenic coronary ostia dissection and ensuing aortic cusp involvement, stenting of entry point at coronary ostia is a logical decision with good result.
References
- 1.Chai H-T, Yang C-H, Wu C-J, Hang C-L, Hsieh Y-K, Fang C-Y. et al. Utilization of a double-wire technique to treat long extended spiral dissection of the right coronary artery. International heart journal. 2005;46:35–44. doi: 10.1536/ihj.46.35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Prakash R, Starovoytov A, Heydari M, Mancini GJ, Saw J. Catheter-induced iatrogenic coronary artery dissection in patients with spontaneous coronary artery dissection. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2016;9:1851–1853. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.06.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Amano H, Kadota K, Kuwayama A, Miura K, Ohya M, Shimada T. et al. Long-term outcomes of iatrogenic coronary artery dissection during cardiac catheterization. European Heart Journal. 2018;39:ehy563–P4560. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy563.P4560. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Dunning DW, Kahn JK, Hawkins ET, O’Neill WW. Iatrogenic coronary artery dissections extending into and involving the aortic root. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 2000;51:387–393. doi: 10.1002/1522-726x(200012)51:4<387::aid-ccd3>3.0.co;2-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Zampieri P, Aggio S, Roncon L, Rinuncini M, Canova C, Zanazzi G. et al. Follow up after spontaneous coronary artery dissection: a report of five cases. Heart. 1996;75:206–209. doi: 10.1136/hrt.75.2.206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Yip H-K, Wu C-J, Yeh K-H, Hang C-L, Fang C-Y, Hsieh KY-K. et al. Unusual complication of retrograde dissection to the coronary sinus of valsalva during percutaneous revascularization: a single-center experience and literature review. Chest. 2001;119:493–501. doi: 10.1378/chest.119.2.493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gur M, Yilmaz R, Demirbag R, Kunt AS. Large atherosclerotic plaque related severe right coronary artery dissection during coronary angiography. The international journal of cardiovascular imaging. 2006;22:321–325. doi: 10.1007/s10554-005-9036-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Connors J, Thanavaro S, Shaw R, Sandza J, Ludbrook P, Krone R. Urgent myocardial revascularization for dissection of the left main coronary artery: a complication of coronary angiography. The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. 1982;84:349–352. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lee SW, Hong MK, Kim YH, Park JH, Rhee KS, Lee CW. et al. Bail-out stenting for left main coronary artery dissection during catheter-based procedure: Acute and long-term results. Clinical cardiology. 2004;27:393–395. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960270705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Cappelletti A, Margonato A, Rosano G, Mailhac A, Veglia F, Colombo A. et al. Short-and long-term evolution of unstented nonocclusive coronary dissection after coronary angioplasty. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 1999;34:1484–1488. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00395-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Vale PR, Baron DW. Coronary artery stenting for spontaneous coronary artery dissection: a case report and review of the literature. Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis. 1998;45:280–286. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0304(199811)45:3<280::aid-ccd14>3.0.co;2-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Akgul F, Batyraliev T, Besnili F, Karben Z. Emergency stenting of unprotected left main coronary artery after acute catheter-induced occlusive dissection. Texas Heart Institute Journal. 2006;33:515. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Leontyev S, Borger MA, Legare J-F, Merk D, Hahn J, Seeburger J. et al. Iatrogenic type A aortic dissection during cardiac procedures: early and late outcome in 48 patients. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 2011;41:641–646. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezr070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Núñez-Gil IJ, Bautista D, Cerrato E, Salinas P, Varbella F, Omedè P. et al. Incidence, management, and immediate-and long-term outcomes after iatrogenic aortic dissection during diagnostic or interventional coronary procedures. Circulation. 2015;131:2114–2119. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.015334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]





