Abstract
The programmability of DNA/RNA-based molecular circuits provides numerous opportunities in the field of synthetic biology. However, the stability of nucleic acids remains a major concern when performing complex computations in biological environments. Our solution to this problem is L-(deoxy)ribose nucleic acids (L-DNA/RNA), which are mirror images (i.e. enantiomers) of natural D-nucleotides. L-oligonucleotides have the same physical and chemical properties as their natural counterparts, yet they are completely invisible to the stereospecific environment of biology. We recently reported a novel strand-displacement methodology for transferring sequence information between oligonucleotide enantiomers (which are incapable of base pairing with each other), enabling bio-orthogonal L-DNA/RNA circuits to be easily interfaced with living systems. In this perspective, we summarize these so-called “heterochiral” circuits, provide a viewpoint on their potential applications in synthetic biology, and discuss key problems that must be solved before achieving the ultimate goal of engineering complex and reliable functionality.
The advent of DNA nanotechnology, whereby Watson–Crick (WC) base pairing is used to generate complex static and dynamic systems, promises to have a profound impact on the field of synthetic biology.1,2 In particular, DNA/RNA-based molecular circuits, whose operation is based on strand-displacement, provide a straightforward approach for designing synthetic systems capable of autonomous decision-making and complex logic functions.3,4 Importantly, DNA/RNA-based circuits can be easily interfaced with living organisms via WC base pairing to the endogenous biopolymer, making them a highly attractive platform for engaging and/or manipulating biological processes in a programable and controlled manner. For example, the ability of DNA/RNA-based circuits to detect specific combinations of nucleic acid biomarkers (e.g. mRNAs and microRNAs) provides the basis for a number of exciting diagnostic technologies and provides a starting point for the development of “smart therapeutics” that only become activated within diseased environments.5–7 Furthermore, the marriage of strand-displacement circuits with gene knock-in and knock-out tools, such as RNA interference (RNAi) and CRISPR-Cas9, provide a promising approach for precise, conditional control of gene expression.8,9
Despite their potential, if DNA/RNA-based circuits are to be routinely employed for complex tasks in live cells, two key limitations must be overcome: (1) rapid nuclease degradation and (2) unintended interactions with bio-macromolecules, both of which adversely affect the performance of the device. The most common approach for stabilizing circuit components is the use of chemically modified nucleotides, including 2′-O-methyl ribonucleotides,9,10 locked nucleic acids (LNAs),11,12 and/or phosphorothioate (PS) linkages. Although these modifications can dramatically increase the intracellular stability of nucleic acids 13, they also alter the thermodynamic properties of circuit components in an unpredictable manner. Indeed, DNA strand-displacement reactions involving chemically modified nucleic acids are poorly characterized, making the design of corresponding circuits extremely challenging. Moreover, modified nucleotides can be toxic and tend to have adverse effects on cell viability. Due to these issues, modification-independent approaches for stabilizing DNA circuit components have also been explored, including the ligation of vulnerable free DNA ends and the use of nuclease-resistant structural elements, such as hairpins and nanostructures.2,14,15 However, these methods have found only limited success. Importantly, none of the above approaches address potential off-target interactions of DNA/RNA-based circuits with abundant cellular nucleic acids, which can lead to leak (i.e. the undesired triggering of strand displacement reactions) and/or sequestration of circuit components, thereby eroding performance. Thus, there remains a need for novel approaches to construct biocompatible DNA/RNA-based circuitry.
A promising, yet rarely considered alternative to the use of modified nucleotides is a simple inversion of stereochemistry, i.e. the use of L-(deoxy)ribose-based nucleic acids (L-DNA/RNA). L-oligonucleotides are mirror images (or enantiomers) of native D-oligonucleotides and are completely resistant to nuclease degradation, nontoxic, and nonimmunogenic.16–20 Importantly, as enantiomers, D- and L-DNA/RNA have identical physical properties in terms of solubility, hybridization kinetics, and duplex thermal stability.16,17 Thus, well-established principles for designing D-DNA/RNA-based circuits can be directly applied to L-DNA/RNA without further optimization. In this way, L-oligonucleotides can be considered the ideal nucleic acid analogue. Furthermore, L-oligonucleotides avoid off-target interactions with cellular nucleic acids because oligonucleotides of opposite chirality (D versus L) are incapable of forming contiguous Watson–Crick (WC) base pairs with each other.21–23 Unfortunately, this property also represents the key limitation of L-DNA/RNA because it precludes their direct interfacing with endogenous nucleic acids.
We recently reported a novel methodology for sequence-specifically interfacing D- and L-oligonucleotides, enabling (for the first time) development of DNA/RNA-based circuitry having fully-interfaced D- and L-oligonucleotide components (referred to as “heterochiral” circuitry).24 Our approach takes advantage of peptide nucleic acids (PNA), which unlike native DNA and RNA, has no inherent chirality (Figure 1a). As a result, PNA hybridizes to DNA and RNA irrespective of chirality.21 On the basis of this property, we conceived two novel toehold-mediated strand-displacement reactions that exploit DNA/PNA heteroduplexes in order to interface the two enantiomers of DNA. In reaction A (Figure 1b), a DNA toehold domain (t*) can hybridize to an input (D/L-IN) of the same chirality (via t/t* domains), which eventually leads to the displacement of the incumbent PNA strand. By transforming an input signal of defined chirality into an achiral output signal, this reaction effectively decoupled the sequence information from the stereochemical information in the polymer. Accordingly, we refer to these DNA/PNA heteroduplexes (D/L-A1) as “racemization” gates. The achiral PNA strand can serve as an input for downstream circuit components of either chirality. In contrast, Reaction B (Figure 1c) places the toehold domain (t*) on the PNA itself, allowing the strand-displacement reactions to be initiated by an input strand of either chirality. For example, a D-input strand (D-IN) can be used to displace an incumbent L-DNA strand from a L-DNA/PNA heteroduplex (L-A2). We refer to this DNA/PNA heteroduplex (L-A2) as an “inversion” gate because it effectively inverts the stereochemistry of the input from D to L in a sequence specific manner. Although we explain both reactions in the context of DNA, they are also compatible with input and output stands made of RNA.
We believe these rather simple reactions now provide the foundation for interfacing L-DNA/RNA-based circuits with endogenous D-nucleic acids within living cells and organisms. Given the bio-orthogonal nature of L-oligonucleotides, we expect that L-DNA/RNA-based circuits will have dramatically improved intracellular performance, reliability, and utility compared to traditional approaches, opening the door to a number of exciting applications. For example, logic-driven L-DNA/RNA-based circuits could be programmed to generate optical and/or chemical “outputs” in response to specific combinations (or patterns) of nucleic acid “inputs” within living cells, providing opportunities for “intelligent” disease diagnosis and treatment. As a proof-of-principle, we recently developed a fluorescent L-RNA-based biosensor for the detection of microRNAs inputs, which we used to demonstrate, for the first time, sequence-specific interfacing of oligonucleotide enantiomers in living cells (Figure 1d).25 Furthermore, by utilizing chemical outputs, such as antisense oligonucleotides or enzyme inhibitors, L-DNA/RNA circuits could be used to regulate gene expression and modulate protein activity in response to both endogenous or exogenous nucleic acid input signals. It is worth noting that metal ions and/or small molecule metabolites could also be interfaced with L-DNA/RNA circuits by simply replacing inversions gates with mirror-image aptamers (i.e. Spiegelmers) or (deoxy)ribozymes that have been engineered to release L-DNA/RNA output strands in response to their target analyte.26 Lastly, beyond L-DNA/RNA circuits, one can imagine the exciting possibility of using heterochiral methods to create self-replicating systems and/or synthetic cells having both D-DNA and L-DNA genomes. In addition to possible applications in synthetic biology, such systems may provide fundamental insights into the origin of biological homochirality.
Although L-oligonucleotides and heterochiral strand-displacement address a number of concerns regarding the use of nucleic acid-based circuits as synthetic biology tools, numerous challenges must be overcome before achieving the ultimate goal of engineering complex and reliable functionality for synthetic biology applications. First, the thermodynamic and kinetic properties of heterochiral-strand displacement reactions must be thoroughly characterized in order to enable precise engineering of related L-DNA-based circuits. Such studies should also address potential limitations of PNA, including poor water solubility that places limits on its length and sequence.27 Second, we must develop a better understanding of the intracellular behavior of L-oligonucleotide including their bio-distribution, trafficking, and toxicity. For example, intracellular environments are highly heterogeneous and the distribution of biomolecules is restrictive in both time and space, making it difficult to localize circuit components to the cellular compartment where they will function. For this reason, L-DNA/RNA-based heterochiral circuits that functions well in the test tube may not be effective in cells. Additionally, intracellular delivery of nucleic acids (regardless of stereochemistry) is extremely challenging, and in the case of L-oligonucleotides, relatively unexplored. Nevertheless, several groups have demonstrated that L-oligonucleotides can be efficiently delivered into cells using traditional approaches, such as cationic liposomes (e.g. Lipofectamine) and cholesterol conjugates.25,28 Because these challenges parallel those faced by therapeutic oligonucleotides, more effective solutions may already be emerging from that field.29 For example, GalNAc (N-acetylgalactosamine) conjugates30 and cell-penetrating peptides31, both of which promote efficient cellular uptake and endosomal escape of D-oligonucleotide-based drugs, may also prove effective for the delivery of L-oligonucleotide-based circuit components. It is worth noting that the superior biostability of L-oligonucleotides may facilitate the development of completely novel delivery technologies. Finally, it is not currently possible to synthesize and/or replicate L-oligonucleotides using the cellular machinery. While this challenge may seem insurmountable, several recent studies suggest that a solution may be closer than expected. For example, Sczepanski et al reported an RNA enzyme (or ribozyme) that catalyzes the ligation and polymerization of RNA of the opposite chirality.32 In particular, the D-RNA version of this “cross-chiral” ribozyme was shown to catalyze the ligation of two or more L-RNAs. More recently, the ligation of L-DNA using a protein ligase comprised of D-amino acids was also demonstrated.33 Furthermore, two research groups independently synthesized the D-amino acid version of DNA polymerase IV (D-Dpo4) and demonstrated mirror-image transcription and PCR amplification of L-RNA and L-DNA, respectively, using synthetic L-DNA templates.34–36 Such enzymes may one day enable intracellular assembly of complex L-DNA/RNA-based circuits from readily deliverable nucleoside building blocks. Given recent advances in polymerase engineering 37, these studies raise the exciting possibility of creating novel polymerases capable of directly synthesizing L-DNA and/or L-RNA using a D-DNA template, which may ultimately allow L-oligonucleotides to be genetically encoded. Given the progress that has already been made, it seems very likely that these challenges will be overcome, advancing L-oligonucleotides to the forefront of synthetic biology tools for manipulating and controlling biological information.
Summary Points.
Heterochiral circuits enable sequence-specific interfacing between the otherwise orthogonal enantiomers of DNA/RNA (D versus L).
Because mirror image L-DNA/RNA are orthogonal to the stereospecific environment of biology, heterochiral circuits constructed from L-DNA/RNA overcome the primary barriers to engineering complex and reliable functionality for applications in synthetic biology.
Despite the advantages of L-oligonucleotides, a number of challenges must be overcome before L-DNA/RNA-based circuits can take their place at the forefront of synthetic biology.
Acknowledgements
J.T.S. is a CPRIT Scholar of Cancer Research supported by the Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (RR150038). This work was also supported by the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering of the National Institutes of Health (R21EB027855), and the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health (R35GM124974). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Footnotes
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
References
- (1).Jones MR; Seeman NC; Mirkin CA Programmable materials and the nature of the DNA bond. Science 2015, 347, 840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (2).Chen Y-J; Groves B; Muscat RA; Seelig G DNA nanotechnology from the test tube to the cell. Nat. Nanotechnol 2015, 10, 748–760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (3).Simmel FC; Yurke B; Singh HR Principles and applications of nucleic acid strand displacement reactions. Chem. Rev 2019, 119, 6326–6369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (4).Zhang DY; Seelig G Dynamic DNA nanotechnology using strand-displacement reactions. Nat. Chem 2011, 3, 103–113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (5).Hemphill J; Deiters A DNA computation in mammalian cells: MicroRNA logic operations. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2013, 135, 10512–10518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (6).Lopez R; Wang R; Seelig G A molecular multi-gene classifier for disease diagnostics. Nat. Chem 2018, 10, 746–754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (7).Jung C; Ellington AD Diagnostic applications of nucleic acid circuits. Acc. Chem. Res 2014, 47, 1825–835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (8).Siu K-H; Chen W Riboregulated toehold-gated gRNA for programmable CRISPR–Cas9 function. Nat. Chem. Biol 2019, 15, 217–220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (9).Groves B; Chen Y-J; Zurla C; Pochekailov S; Kirschman JL; Santangelo PJ; Seelig G Computing in mammalian cells with nucleic acid strand exchange. Nat. Nanotechnol 2016, 11, 287–294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (10).Molenaar C; Marras SA; Slats JCM; Truffert JC; Lemaître M; Raap AK; Dirks RW; Tanke HJ Linear 2′ O-Methyl RNA probes for the visualization of RNA in living cells. Nucleic Acids Res 2001, 29, e89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (11).Olson X; Kotani S; Yurke B; Graugnard E; Hughes WL Kinetics of DNA Strand Displacement Systems with Locked Nucleic Acids. J. Phys. Chem. B 2017, 121, 2594–2602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (12).Wu C; Cansiz S; Zhang L; Teng IT; Qiu L; Li J; Liu Y; Zhou C; Hu R; Zhang T; Cui C; Cui L; Tan W A nonenzymatic hairpin DNA cascade reaction provides high signal gain of mRNA imaging inside live cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2015, 137, 4900–4903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (13).Khvorova A; Watts JK The chemical evolution of oligonucleotide therapies of clinical utility. Nat. Biotechnol 2017, 35, 238–248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (14).Fern J; Schulman R Design and characterization of DNA strand-displacement circuits in serum-supplemented cell medium. ACS Syn. Biol 2017, 6, 1774–1783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (15).Conway JW; McLaughlin CK; Castor KJ; Sleiman H DNA nanostructure serum stability: greater than the sum of its parts. Chem. Commun 2013, 49, 1172–1174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (16).Ashley GW Modeling, synthesis, and hybridization properties of (L)-ribonucleic acid. J. Am. Chem. Soc 1992, 114, 9732–9736. [Google Scholar]
- (17).Urata H; Ogura E; Shinohara K; Ueda Y; Akagi M Synthesis and properties of mirror-image DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 1992, 20, 3325–3332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (18).Wlotzka B; Leva S; Eschgfaller B; Burmeister J; Kleinjung F; Kaduk C; Muhn P; Hess-Stumpp H; Klussmann S In vivo properties of an anti-GnRH spiegelmer: an example of an oligonucleotide-based therapeutic substance class. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 8898–8902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (19).Vater A; Klussmann S Turning mirror-image oligonucleotides into drugs: the evolution of Spiegelmer therapeutics. Drug Discov. Today 2015, 20, 147–155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (20).Hauser NC; Martinez R; Jacob A; Rupp S; Hoheisel JD; Matysiak S Utilising the left-helical conformation of L-DNA for analysing different marker types on a single universal microarray platform. Nucleic Acids Res 2006, 34, 5101–5111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (21).Hoehlig K; Bethge L; Klussmann S Stereospecificity of oligonucleotide interactions revisited: no evidence for heterochiral hybridization and ribozyme/DNAzyme activity. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0115328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (22).Szabat M; Gudanis D; Kotkowiak W; Gdaniec Z; Kierzek R; Pasternak A Thermodynamic features of structural motifs formed by β-L-RNA. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0149478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (23).Garbesi A; Capobianco ML; Colonna FP; Tondelli L; Arcamone F; Manzini G; Hilbers CW; Aelen JME; Blommers MJJ L-DNAs as potential antimessenger oligonucleotides: a reassessment. Nucleic Acids Res 1993, 21, 4159–4165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (24).Kabza AM; Young BE; Sczepanski JT Heterochiral DNA strand-displacement circuits. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2017, 139, 17715–17718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (25).Zhong W; Sczepanski JT A mirror image fluorogenic aptamer sensor for live-cell imaging of microRNAs. ACS Sens 2019, 4, 566–570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (26).Young BE; Kundu N; Sczepanski JT Mirror-image oligonucleotides: History and emerging applications. Chem. Eur. J 2019, 25, 7981–7990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (27).Sahu B; Sacui I; Rapireddy S; Zanotti KJ; Bahal R; Armitage BA; Ly DH Synthesis and characterization of conformationally preorganized, (R)-diethylene glycol-containing γ-peptide nucleic acids with superior hybridization properties and water solubility. J. Org. Chem 2011, 76, 5614–5627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (28).Cui L; Peng R; Fu T; Zhang X; Wu C; Chen H; Liang H; Yang CJ; Tan W Biostable L-DNAzyme for sensing of metal ions in biological systems. Anal. Chem 2016, 88, 1850–1855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (29).Benizri S; Gissot A; Martin A; Vialet B; Grinstaff MW; Barthélémy P Bioconjugated oligonucleotides: recent developments and therapeutic applications. Bioconjug. Chem 2019, 30, 366–383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (30).Nair JK; Willoughby JLS; Chan A; Charisse K; Alam MR; Wang Q; Hoekstra M; Kandasamy P; Kel’in AV; Milstein S; Taneja N; O’Shea J; Shaikh S; Zhang L; van der Sluis RJ; Jung ME; Akinc A; Hutabarat R; Kuchimanchi S; Fitzgerald K; Zimmermann T; van Berkel TJC; Maier MA; Rajeev KG; Manoharan M Multivalent n-acetylgalactosamine-conjugated siRNA localizes in hepatocytes and elicits robust rRNA-mediated gene silencing. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2014, 136, 16958–16961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (31).Bechara C; Sagan S Cell-penetrating peptides: 20 years later, where do we stand? FEBS Lett 2013, 587, 1693–1702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (32).Sczepanski JT; Joyce GF A cross-chiral RNA polymerase ribozyme. Nature 2014, 515, 440–442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (33).Weidmann J; Schnölzer M; Dawson PE; Hoheisel JD Copying life: synthesis of an enzymatically active mirror-image DNA-ligase made of D-amino acids. Cell Chem. Biol 2019, 26, 645–651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (34).Pech A; Achenbach J; Jahnz M; Schulzchen S; Jarosch F; Bordusa F; Klussmann S A thermostable D-polymerase for mirror-image PCR. Nucleic Acids Res 2017, 45, 3997–4005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (35).Jiang W; Zhang B; Fan C; Wang M; Wang J; Deng Q; Liu X; Chen J; Zheng J; Liu L; Zhu TF Mirror-image polymerase chain reaction. Cell Discov 2017, 3, 17037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (36).Wang M; Jiang W; Liu X; Wang J; Zhang B; Fan C; Liu L; Pena-Alcantara G; Ling J-J; Chen J; Zhu TF Mirror-Image Gene Transcription and Reverse Transcription. Chem 2019, 5, 848–857. [Google Scholar]
- (37).Houlihan G; Arangundy-Franklin S; Holliger P Exploring the Chemistry of Genetic Information Storage and Propagation through Polymerase Engineering. Acc. Chem. Res 2017, 50, 1079–1087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]