In their Comment (September, 2020), Vimla Kumari and colleagues1 analyse the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in four tertiary teaching hospitals in western India. The authors report that, compared with before the pandemic, the demographics of pregnant women delivering in their facilities has changed (ie, there are more educated and nulliparous women), and there is an increased number of in-hospital maternal deaths, and an increased number of late pregnancy fetal losses. During the lockdown period there was a 43·2% reduction in hospital admissions when compared with the control period (ie, 10 weeks before lockdown; 6209 vs 3527), and a 66·4% reduction in referred obstetric emergencies compared with the same calendar period in the previous year (905 vs 304).1
These results are interesting, as the increase in maternal deaths combined with the observed reduction in the number of emergency referrals during lockdown compared with before lockdown suggest that, not only are fewer women seeking care, the local maternity health system is also failing to seek care for these women. This observation continues to illustrate the indirect effects of COVID-19 on maternal and perinatal health, which we had previously warned about,2 and that there is an urgent need to comprehensively report all important obstetric and neonatal outcomes to highlight both predictable and understandable outcomes (eg, an increase in the incidence of stillbirth3) and unexpected patterns of outcomes (eg, the contradictory global evidence about preterm birth rates3, 4, 5). Lower preterm birth rates during the COVID-19 pandemic compared with before the pandemic would not be explained by reduced care-seeking behaviour, but could reflect countervailing reductions in maternal activity (high amounts of which could potentially be associated with an increased risk of preterm birth), changes in clinical decision making that might reduce iatrogenic prematurity, or both. Do Kumari and colleagues1 have information about changes in the number of preterm births during lockdown to help present a more complete picture?
Acknowledgments
We declare no competing interests.
References
- 1.Kumari V, Mehta K, Choudhary R. COVID-19 outbreak and decreased hospitalisation of pregnant women in labour. Lancet Glob Health. 2020;8:e1116–e1117. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30319-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.von Dadelszen P, Khalil A, Wolfe I, Kametas NA, O'Brien P, Magee LA. “Women and children last”- effects of the covid-19 pandemic on reproductive, perinatal, and paediatric health. BMJ. 2020;369 doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Khalil A, von Dadelszen P, Draycott T, Ugwumadu A, O'Brien P, Magee L. Change in the incidence of stillbirth and preterm delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA. 2020;324:705–706. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.12746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hedermann G, Hedley PL, Baekvad-Hansen M. Danish premature birth rates during the COVID-19 lockdown. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2020 doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2020-319990. published online Aug 9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.KC A, Gurung R, Kinney MV. Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic response on intrapartum care, stillbirth, and neonatal mortality outcomes in Nepal: a prospective observational study. Lancet Glob Health. 2020;8:e1273–e1281. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30345-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]