Abstract
Lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-binding protein (LBP) is an acute-phase reactant that mediates innate immune responses triggered by LPS. Recent studies indicated a positive correlation of circulating LBP level with chronic low-grade inflammation, a condition present in many non-communicable diseases. We determined the association of serum LBP concentration with allergic sensitization in a general pediatric population. Serum LBP was measured in a sample of children (n = 356; mean age = 9.6 ± 0.2 years) in this population-based cross-sectional study. Skin prick tests (SPTs) were performed to assess allergic sensitization to 22 common inhalant and food allergens. One hundred and seven children (30.1%) were nonsensitized, 160 (44.9%) were monosensitized, and 89 (25.0%) were polysensitized. Children who were mono- or polysensitized had a significantly higher median serum LBP level (25.5 ng/mL, inter-quartile range [IQR] 20.3–30.7) than those who were nonsensitized (20.3 ng/mL, IQR = 14.81–25.8, P < 0.0001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis with adjustment for confounders indicated that serum LBP level was positively associated with allergic sensitization overall (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.041; 95% CI 1.007–1.076, P = 0.016), with sensitization to food allergens in particular (aOR 1.080, 95% CI 1.029–1.133, P = 0.002), but not with sensitization to aeroallergens (aOR 1.010, 95% CI 0.982–1.040, P = 0.467). LBP level was not associated with allergic diseases after adjustment. We suggest the possibility of sensitization to food allergens may be related to gut-derived low-grade inflammation, and large sized longitudinal investigations are needed to elucidate the relationship.
Subject terms: Biomarkers, Medical research
Introduction
Sensitization by administration of a low level of lipopolysaccharides (LPS) from Gram-negative bacteria and a relevant allergen leads to TH2-type inflammation that is mediated by Toll-like receptor-4 (TLR-4)1. In contrast, intake of a high LPS level induces a TH1 response1,2, which corresponds well with the hygiene theory3. LPS is generally present at levels insufficient to stimulate macrophages in the absence of the accessory molecule, known as lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP). Thus, LBP is a useful biomarker for activation of innate immune responses to microbial products4 and is widely used as a marker of LPS.
LBP is a 65-kDa soluble acute-phase protein mainly produced by hepatocytes5, intestinal epithelial cells6, and visceral adipocytes7. Recent studies demonstrated that serum LBP level correlates positively with obesity8, metabolic syndrome9, type 2 diabetes10,11, and atherosclerosis12,13. Thus, LBP may be used as a surrogate marker of “systemic chronic low-grade inflammation”, a condition present in many non-communicable diseases14.
Allergic diseases are also closely associated with systemic inflammation15–18, and childhood allergic sensitization is considered a prerequisite for the development of allergies19,20. Despite the possible links between systemic inflammation and allergic sensitization, few studies have investigated whether systemic low-grade inflammation accompanies childhood allergic sensitization21. Furthermore, no studies have determined whether LBP is associated with allergic sensitization and/or allergic diseases in humans.
We aimed to determine the association of serum LBP level with allergic sensitization and self-reported allergic diseases and to explore the possible mechanisms underlying this association.
Results
The clinical characteristics of the 356 enrolled children are shown in Supplementary Table 1. A total of 160 children (44.9%) were monosensitized, 89 (25.0%) were polysensitized, and 107 (30.1%) were non-sensitized. There were 233 children (65.4%) sensitized to an aeroallergen such as house dust mites, 45 (12.6%) sensitized to plant food allergens, and 22 (6.2%) sensitized to class I food allergens; shrimp, port, mussel, egg, cod, and milk (Fig. E1).
Allergic sensitization and LBP
Analysis of serum LBP in the different groups indicated a greater median level in sensitized than nonsensitized children (25.5 ng/mL [IQR: 20.3–30.7] vs. 20.3 [IQR: 14.8–25.8], P < 0.001), but no significant difference in mono-sensitized and poly-sensitized children (P = 0.308, Fig. 1). LBP level was also positively associated with a higher risk of allergic sensitization (OR 1.052, 95% CI 1.020–1.085, P = 0.001), and this relationship remained significant after adjustment for confounders (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.041, 95% CI 1.007–1.076, P = 0.016, Table 1). Children with an LBP level in the highest quartile had a significantly increased risk of allergic sensitization relative to those in the lowest quartile (aOR 3.599, 95% CI 1.576–8.222, P = 0.002, Table 1).
Table 1.
LBP | Asthma | Allergic rhinitis | Atopic dermatitis | Allergic sensitization | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR (95% CI) | P value | OR (95% CI) | P value | OR (95% CI) | P value | OR (95% CI) | P value | |
Continuous variable | ||||||||
Crude | 1.013 (0.963–1.065) | 0.615 | 1.027 (1.003–1.052) | 0.028 | 0.971 (0.943–1.000) | 0.049 | 1.052 (1.020–1.085) | 0.001 |
Adjusted† | 0.985 (0.922–1.052) | 0.644 | 1.012 (0.982- 1.043) | 0.438 | 0.984 (0.952–1.017) | 0.350 | 1.037 (1.003–10.72) | 0.033 |
Adjusted‡ | 0.974 (0.913–1.040) | 0.435 | 1.012 (0.983–1.043) | 0.416 | 0.993 (0.962–1.026) | 0.691 | 1.040 (1.005–1.075) | 0.023 |
Adjusted§ | 0.996 (0.931–1.066) | 0.916 | 1.015 (0.985–1.045) | 0.334 | 0.991 (0.959–1.024) | 0.599 | 1.041 (1.007–1.076) | 0.016 |
Categorical variable | ||||||||
1 Q† | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | ||||
2 Q | 1.307 (0.173–9.845) | 0.795 | 1.021 (0.466–2.238) | 0.959 | 0.480 (0.199–1.155) | 0.101 | 1.391 (0.665–2.910) | 0.381 |
3 Q | 1.749 (0.239–12.819) | 0.582 | 1.715 (0.786–3.742) | 0.176 | 0.556 (0.236–1.311) | 0.180 | 2.744 (1.217–6.185) | 0.015 |
4 Q | 1.432 (0.191–10.760) | 0.727 | 1.974 (0.917–4.246) | 0.082 | 0.855 (0.384–1.906) | 0.702 | 3.599 (1.576–8.222) | 0.002 |
Allergic sensitization indicates one or more positive reactions (wheal diameter > 3 mm) to any allergen in the SPT.
CI confidence interval, OR odds ratio, LBP lipopolysaccharide-binding protein.
*Analyses are based on the 356 subjects using data on allergic sensitization (19 with asthma, 167 with allergic rhinitis, 80 with atopic dermatitis, and 249 with allergic sensitization).
OR was calculated using generalized linear regression with the logitfunction.
†Multivariate logistic regression adjusted for sex, age, body mass index z-score, parental asthma, allergic rhinitis, and atopic dermatitis, and household income (model I).
‡Multivariate logistic regression adjusted for sex, age, body mass index z-score, parental asthma, allergic rhinitis, and atopic dermatitis, and type of residency (model II).
§Multivariate logistic regression adjusted for sex, age, body mass index z-score, parental asthma, allergic rhinitis, and atopic dermatitis, and floor of residency (model III).
Children with self-reported allergic rhinitis and atopic dermatitis had a significantly higher median serum LBP level than controls (P = 0.028 and P = 0.049, respectively); however, this relationship did not remain significant after adjustment for sex, age, BMI z-score, parental allergic diseases, and household income (Model I), type of residency (Model II), or floor of residency (Model III) (Table 1). Children with asthma and controls had comparable LBP levels. There were no significant correlations of serum LBP level with levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 or hemoglobin, or with counts of white blood cells, neutrophils, or total eosinophils (Suppl Table 2).
Types of allergens and LBP
We also determined the relationship of sensitization to each type of allergen with LBP level (Table 2). Children with polysensitization had a significantly higher median serum LBP level than those with non-sensitization (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.055–1.147, P < 0.001); this relationship remained significant after adjustment for confounders (aOR 1.110, 95% CI 1.059–1.164, P < 0.001). Of note, elevated LBP level was not associated with sensitization to aeroallergens including house dust mite (aOR 1.010, 95% CI 0.982–1.040, P = 0.467). However, LBP level was significantly associated with sensitization to any food allergen (aOR 1.080, 95% CI 1.029–1.133, P = 0.002), as well as sensitization to plant food allergens (aOR 1.256, P = 0.001) and sensitization to type I food allergens (aOR 1.128, P = 0.043).
Table 2.
Dependent variable (allergen) | Lipopolysaccharide-binding protein | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OR (95% CI) | P value | aOR (95% CI)* | P value | aOR (95% CI)† | P value | |
Non-sensitization‡ | Ref | Ref | Ref | |||
Mono-sensitization | 1.019 (0.985 to 1.055) | 0.274 | 1.015 (0.979 to 1.052) | 0.419 | 1.020 (0.986 to 1.056) | 1.000 |
Poly-sensitization | 1.100 (1.055 to 1.147) | < 0.001 | 1.110 (1.059 to 1.164) | < 0.001 | 1.105 (1.056 to 1.156) | 0.002 |
Allergens | ||||||
Any inhalant allergens | 1.017 (0.990 to 1.045) | 0.227 | 1.010 (0.982 to 1.040) | 0.467 | 1.017 (0.989 to 1.046) | 1.000 |
Any food allergens | 1.363 (1.156 to 1.607) | < 0.001 | 1.080 (1.029 to 1.133) | < 0.001 | 1.326 (1.206 to 1.457) | < 0.001 |
Allergic sensitization indicates one or more positive reactions (wheal diameter > 3 mm) to any allergen in the SPT.
OR odds ratio, aOR adjusted odds ratio, LBP lipopolysaccharide-binding protein.
*Multivariate logistic regression adjusted for sex (male), age, body mass index z-score, and household income.
†Multivariate logistic regression adjusted for sex (male), age, body mass index z-score, and household income. The Holm method was used to counteract the problem of multiple comparisons. ‡The P value for the association between LBP level and sensitization (non-, mono, and poly-sensitization) was from multinomial regression.
We also analyzed the relationship of sensitization to individual allergens with LBP level (Fig. 2). Analysis of sensitization to plant allergens indicated that LBP level had significant associations with sensitization to kiwi (aOR 1.014, P = 0.018), orange (aOR 1.005, P = 0.039), celery (aOR 1.064, P < 0.001), peanut (aOR 1.054, 95% CI 1.135–1.223, P = 0.001), walnut (aOR 1.043, 95% CI 1.126–1.216, P = 0.003), and wheat (aOR 1.04, 95% CI 1.151–1.274, P = 0.007). LBP level was also significantly associated with sensitization to shrimp (aOR 1.034, 95% CI 1.115–1.204, P = 0.005), mussel (aOR 1.013, 95% CI 1.099–1.194, P = 0.024), and egg (aOR 1.011, P = 0.027). Partial correlation analyses between LBP levels and wheal diameter for each allergen in the skin prick test after adjustment for sex and age are shown in Suppl Table 3: Japanese hop, apple, peach, kiwi, orange, tomato, celery, peanut, walnut, wheat, egg, milk, mussel, and shrimp showed a significant positive correlation with LBP level.
Discussion
The major finding of the current study is that the presence and severity of food allergic sensitization is positively associated with serum LBP level. This may suggest that LBP is associated with the active gut-derived inflammatory process that contributes to allergic sensitization. Of note, sensitization to celery, peanuts, nuts, and seafood were significantly associated with increased LBP level. This indicates that LBP may play a role in the development of sensitization to food allergens, and that serum LBP level may be useful as a surrogate biomarker for gut-inflammation. Sensitization to fruits may have had a relatively weak association with LBP level because their allergenic components are readily dissolved by gastric acid. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to report a positive association between LBP (i.e., a surrogate marker for gut-inflammation) and food allergic sensitization in human subjects.
It can be difficult to accurately measure serum LPS level. Only one previous study directly measured LPS and LBP levels in humans, and the results indicated that LBP and LPS levels were strongly correlated with each other10. Other studies have determined that serum LBP level can function as a biomarker for inflammation of the gut4,9,22–24 and the lung25. Our findings suggest that increased LBP level are associated with food allergic sensitization which is in agreement with these studies.
This significant association of serum LBP concentration with food allergic sensitization suggests that there may be mechanistic relationships. One possibility is that different allergens bind to LPS with different affinities26,27. When the LPS component of an allergen enters the systemic circulation, it can bind with LBP28, leading to CD14 binding to effector cells29 and activation of these cells30,31. This immune reaction may ultimately lead to innate immune disturbances, a systemic low-grade inflammatory reaction, and allergic sensitization14,21. Furthermore, LBP markedly enhances the sensitivity of TLR-expressing cells to lipoproteins32, thus promoting the antigen-presenting process. Although house dust mites33 and pollen34 contain LPS, food allergens do not. Hence, based on our findings, it is unclear whether a food allergen itself is the initiating factor of LBP-related chronic low-grade inflammation. Another mechanism is that LBP, which can function as a lipid transfer protein10,27 due to its hydrophobic binding sites for lipid ligands27, may bind directly to allergen lipids27. This could lead to immunomodulation by ligands of LBP and lipids on the surface of allergens, and a TH2-enhanced process that predisposes subjects to allergic sensitization due to an interaction of the innate immune system with invariant natural killer T cells27. This distinct function of LBP may explain our finding of a connection between chronic low-grade gut inflammation and food allergic sensitization. It is unclear whether the increased LBP produced by human cells following gut-inflammation in response to LPS is responsible for food allergic sensitization, or whether ingestion of food allergens directly cause gut inflammation by changing the gut microenvironment and thereby increasing LBP levels. When subjects predisposed to allergic diseases experience contact with allergens, this may cause upstream alterations in the respiratory system, skin, and/or gut microbiota, and these changes could promote changes in permeability, or cause microbial translocation and systemic low-grade LPS-related inflammation, a precondition for allergic sensitization17. In contrast, there are previous studies suggesting that LPS activity may modulate mucosal tolerance by inducing allergen-specific IgG1 production and distinct effector CDD4 + T cells with a mixed regulatory/Th1 phenotype35. Regardless of the mechanism, chronic low-grade gut inflammation due to dysregulation of microbiota may lead to increased levels of LPS and LBP, and this can markedly enhance the sensitivity of TLR-expressing cells to lipoproteins, thus promoting the antigen-presenting process and inducing food allergic inflammation in the gut.
High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) is significantly associated with allergic sensitization. However, because we found that LBP level is associated with food allergic sensitization, but not aeroallergen sensitization, we speculate that LBP may be upregulated by gut low-grade inflammation, but not by systemic low-grade inflammation. In addition, our finding that LBP was not associated with allergic diseases may explain why gut inflammation occurs in children with dysregulation of immune responses related to food allergy, rather than in those with symptomatic or asymptomatic allergic diseases21.
The main strength of the current study is its population-based design. Furthermore, our data were from comprehensive and standardized objective assessments conducted by skilled and experienced research pediatricians at each school. Nevertheless, our study also has a few limitations. The cross-sectional design prevented us from inferring causal relationships between LBP level and food allergic sensitization. Allergen-specific IgE tests would be a much more reliable test marker to strictly demonstrate atopic immune responses. Much to our regret, we were not able to perform serum allergen-specific IgE tests due to the limited amount of blood sample from each subject. Moreover, because only a small number of the children had asthma, it may be inappropriate to conclude that LBP is not significantly associated with allergic diseases. Furthermore, an alternative explanation might reverse the cause-effect relation and assert that allergic sensitization leads to alterations in the respiratory system, skin, and/or gut microbiota. Another limitation is that there may be potential bias due to unrevealed factors that may influence serum LBP levels and interfere with the association between LBP levels and skin prick tests. In addition, since this was a survey against general school children, allergic conditions relied on self-reports and diagnoses of food allergy or asthma were not confirmed using spirometry or oral food challenge tests. Although the questionnaires we used were structured and validated36, the current study lacks confirmed diagnosis utilizing objective diagnosing tools.
Conclusion
We demonstrated serum LBP level is associated with allergic sensitization, especially to sensitization to food allergens, in children from a general pediatric population. These results suggest that low-grade gut inflammation due to LBP-associated disturbance of innate immunity may be a key phenotype of food allergic sensitization. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm the role of LBP-associated dysfunction of innate immunity in allergic sensitization and allergic diseases.
Methods
Study design
This study was conducted as a part of a health screening program conducted on school children of Seongnam, Korea. Detailed information was provided elsewhere37. Children from 3 kindergartens and 6 elementary schools in Seongnam, South Korea during June and July 2015 were enrolled. In this survey, the structured questionnaires were distributed to the parents of participants for investigation of demographic characteristics and allergic conditions. Subjects who showed apparent infection signs and/or symptoms such as fever, cough, rhinorrhea, phlegm, vomiting, and/or diarrhea prior or at the time of enrollment were excluded. Among the remaining children, 51 children refused blood sampling and 11 refused skin testing at the study site. An additional 146 children were excluded because there were unsatisfactory amount of samples available. Thus, 356 children aged 5–15 years (mean 9.6 years, 95% CI 9.4–9.8 years) were assessed in the final analysis.
Exposures and outcomes
Parents answered a modified Korean version of the ISAAC questionnaire to determine the presence of signs and/or symptoms and the diagnosis of allergic diseases36,38,39. We also examined clinical factors that could affect serum LBP level in the study population using a structured questionnaire. Allergic diseases were defined as the presence of relevant symptoms within the last 12 months37. Trained nurses recorded anthropometric measurements in all children. The BMI z-score was based on age- and sex-standardized measures of adiposity in children from World Health Organization (WHO) growth standards37.
LBP
The serum concentration of LBP was measured using a commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit (Duoset, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and with all measurements in duplicate. Serum samples were diluted 1000-fold before this assay. No significant cross-reactivity or interference with LBP was observed. A450 values with a calibration line obtained with an LBP standard preparation were recorded using an Infinite 2000 Pro Multimode Plate Reader (Tecan, Vienna, VA, USA).
Skin prick test (SPT)
We conducted SPTs to assess allergic sensitization to 6 common aeroallergens (2 dust mites [Dermatophagoides (D.) farinae and D. pteronyssinus]; 3 tree pollens [birch, oak, and elm] and Japanese hop;10plant foods (apple, peach, kiwi, orange, tomato, strawberry, celery, peanut, walnut, and wheat); and 6 type I food allergens (egg, milk, cod, pork, mussel, and shrimp) using extract and control solutions from Lofarma (Milan, Italy)37. A subject was considered “sensitized” if there were one or more positive reactions (wheal diameter > 3 mm) to an allergen.
All children were categorized as being nonsensitized, monosensitized (positive SPT for a single antigen or multiple cross-reactive antigens without other positive tests), or polysensitized (positive SPTs for antigens in different classes)40.
Additional laboratory tests
Blood samples were used to measure total eosinophil count (TEC), and serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) level. TEC was measured using an automated analyzer (Phadia AB, Uppsala, Sweden) and serum 25[OH]D level using a LIASON chemiluminescence immunoassay analyzer (DiaSorin, Stillwater, Minnesota). The participants were categorized into two groups according to TEC (< 4% or ≥ 4%), and 3 groups according to serum 25(OH)D level (< 20.0 ng/mL, deficient; 20.0–29.9 ng/mL, insufficient;or ≥ 30.0 ng/mL, sufficient)41.
Ethics statement
This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the CHA Bundang Medical Center (IRB No. 2015-05-075), which abides by the Helsinki Declaration on ethical principles for medical research. Written informed consent was obtained from parents or guardians and consent/assent from the children.
Statistical analysis
The normality of the distribution of LBP level was tested using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, and results are presented as medians (interquartile ranges [IQRs]). The significance of differences between continuous variables was assessed using the Mann–Whitney U test, Student’s t-test, or ANOVA, as appropriate. Categorical variables are presented as absolute numbers and proportions. The significance of differences in proportions was assessed using the Chi-square test. Pearson’s or Spearman’s correlation analysis was used to determine the association between serum LBP level and various clinical measures. The Holm method was used to counteract the problem of multiple comparisons. We analyzed the partial correlation of LBP with factors obtained by the structured questionnaire among the subdirectory data comprising questionnaire responses. Variables were included in the model if their P values were less than 0.1 or if they were a priori confounders (sex, age, and BMI z-score) in the multivariable analysis. The partial correlation analysis indicated that household income, breastfeeding, floor of residency, and type of residency had significant correlations with LBP (P < 0.1for all; Supple Table 4).To identify factors independently and significantly correlated with allergic diseases and allergic sensitization, a generalized linear regression analysis with the logit function was conducted. The outcomes (i.e., self-reported allergic diseases and allergic sensitization) were determined after adjustment for sex, age, BMI z-score, parental asthma, allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis, household income, breastfeeding, floor of residency, and type of residency in each model. All statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics ver. 25.0 (IBM Co., Armonk, NY, USA). All statistical tests were two-sided, and a P value below 0.05 was considered significant.
Supplementary Information
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by the Seongnam Atopy Preventive Project for Children's Happiness.
Author contributions
H.M.J., K.S.L., and M.Y.H. designed the research. H.M.J., K.S.L., and M.Y.H. performed the research. H.M.J., K.S.L., and M.Y.H. collected the data. Y.H.S., D.K.Y., E.K.H., S.W.L., J.H.K., K.S.L., M.S., H.M.J., and M.Y.H. analyzed and interpreted the data. Y.H.S., S.W.L., and M.Y.H. performed the statistical analysis. E.K.H. and Y.H.S. mainly prepared the manuscript andand D.K.Y., S.W.L., J.H.K., K.S.L., M.S., H.M.J., and M.Y.H. were also involved in drafting the manuscript. All authors critically reviewed the manuscript for importantintellectual contents and approved the final manuscript. Youn Ho Shin and Man Yong Han contributed equally as corresponding authors to this work.
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Youn Ho Shin, Email: epirubicin13@gmail.com.
Man Yong Han, Email: drmesh@gmail.com.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-020-79241-x.
References
- 1.Eisenbarth SC, Piggott DA, Huleatt JW, Visintin I, Herrick CA, Bottomly K. Lipopolysaccharide-enhanced, toll-like receptor 4-dependent T helper cell type 2 responses to inhaled antigen. J. Exp. Med. 2002;196(12):1645–1651. doi: 10.1084/jem.20021340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Herrick CA, Bottomly K. To respond or not to respond: T cells in allergic asthma. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2003;3(5):405–412. doi: 10.1038/nri1084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Liu AH. Hygiene theory and allergy and asthma prevention. Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol. 2007;21(Suppl 3):2–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2007.00878.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gonzalez-Quintela A, Alonso M, Campos J, Vizcaino L, Loidi L, Gude F. Determinants of serum concentrations of lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP) in the adult population: the role of obesity. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(1):e54600. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wan Y, Freeswick PD, Khemlani LS, Kispert PH, Wang SC, Su GL, et al. Role of lipopolysaccharide (LPS), interleukin-1, interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor, and dexamethasone in regulation of LPS-binding protein expression in normal hepatocytes and hepatocytes from LPS-treated rats. Infect. Immun. 1995;63(7):2435–2442. doi: 10.1128/IAI.63.7.2435-2442.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Su GL, Freeswick PD, Geller DA, Wang Q, Shapiro RA, Wan YH, et al. Molecular cloning, characterization, and tissue distribution of rat lipopolysaccharide binding protein. Evidence for extrahepatic expression. J. Immunol. 1994;153(2):743–752. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Moreno-Navarrete JM, Escote X, Ortega F, Serino M, Campbell M, Michalski MC, et al. A role for adipocyte-derived lipopolysaccharide-binding protein in inflammation- and obesity-associated adipose tissue dysfunction. Diabetologia. 2013;56(11):2524–2537. doi: 10.1007/s00125-013-3015-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kim KE, Cho YS, Baek KS, Li L, Baek KH, Kim JH, et al. Lipopolysaccharide-binding protein plasma levels as a biomarker of obesity-related insulin resistance in adolescents. Korean J. Pediatr. 2016;59(5):231–238. doi: 10.3345/kjp.2016.59.5.231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Liu X, Lu L, Yao P, Ma Y, Wang F, Jin Q, et al. Lipopolysaccharide binding protein, obesity status and incidence of metabolic syndrome: A prospective study among middle-aged and older Chinese. Diabetologia. 2014;57(9):1834–1841. doi: 10.1007/s00125-014-3288-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Moreno-Navarrete JM, Ortega F, Serino M, Luche E, Waget A, Pardo G, et al. Circulating lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP) as a marker of obesity-related insulin resistance. Int. J. Obes. 2012;36(11):1442–1449. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2011.256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Tilves CM, Zmuda JM, Kuipers AL, Nestlerode CS, Evans RW, Bunker CH, et al. Association of lipopolysaccharide-binding protein with aging-related adiposity change and prediabetes among African ancestry men. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(3):385–391. doi: 10.2337/dc15-1777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Serrano M, Moreno-Navarrete JM, Puig J, Moreno M, Guerra E, Ortega F, et al. Serum lipopolysaccharide-binding protein as a marker of atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis. 2013;230(2):223–227. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2013.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sakura T, Morioka T, Shioi A, Kakutani Y, Miki Y, Yamazaki Y, et al. Lipopolysaccharide-binding protein is associated with arterial stiffness in patients with type 2 diabetes: A cross-sectional study. Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2017;16(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12933-017-0545-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Prescott SL. Early-life environmental determinants of allergic diseases and the wider pandemic of inflammatory noncommunicable diseases. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2013;131(1):23–30. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.11.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ohtsuka T. Different effect of oral cyclosporine therapy and oral antihistamine therapy on serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein level and thymus and activation-regulated chemokine level in atopic dermatitis in older children and adulthood. Int. J. Dermatol. 2015;54(6):648–655. doi: 10.1111/ijd.12374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Shimoda T, Obase Y, Kishikawa R, Iwanaga T. Serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein can be an airway inflammation predictor in bronchial asthma. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2015;36(2):e23–e28. doi: 10.2500/aap.2015.36.3816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Chawes BL. Low-grade disease activity in early life precedes childhood asthma and allergy. Dan. Med. J. 2016;63:8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Vekaria AS, Brunner PM, Aleisa AI, Bonomo L, Lebwohl MG, Israel A, et al. Moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis patients show increases in serum C-reactive protein levels, correlating with skin disease activity. F1000Res. 2017;6:1712. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.12422.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Stemeseder T, Klinglmayr E, Moser S, Lueftenegger L, Lang R, Himly M, et al. Cross-sectional study on allergic sensitization of Austrian adolescents using molecule-based IgE profiling. Allergy. 2017;72(5):754–763. doi: 10.1111/all.13071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lee E, Hong SJ. Phenotypes of allergic diseases in children and their application in clinical situations. Korean J. Pediatr. 2019;62(9):325–333. doi: 10.3345/kjp.2018.07395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Chawes BL, Stokholm J, Schoos AM, Fink NR, Brix S, Bisgaard H. Allergic sensitization at school age is a systemic low-grade inflammatory disorder. Allergy. 2017;72(7):1073–1080. doi: 10.1111/all.13108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ruiz AG, Casafont F, Crespo J, Cayon A, Mayorga M, Estebanez A, et al. Lipopolysaccharide-binding protein plasma levels and liver TNF-alpha gene expression in obese patients: Evidence for the potential role of endotoxin in the pathogenesis of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Obes. Surg. 2007;17(10):1374–1380. doi: 10.1007/s11695-007-9243-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sun L, Yu Z, Ye X, Zou S, Li H, Yu D, et al. A marker of endotoxemia is associated with obesity and related metabolic disorders in apparently healthy Chinese. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(9):1925–1932. doi: 10.2337/dc10-0340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kheirandish-Gozal L, Peris E, Wang Y, Tamae Kakazu M, Khalyfa A, Carreras A, et al. Lipopolysaccharide-binding protein plasma levels in children: Effects of obstructive sleep apnea and obesity. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2014;99(2):656–663. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-3327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Strohmeier GR, Walsh JH, Klings ES, Farber HW, Cruikshank WW, Center DM, et al. Lipopolysaccharide binding protein potentiates airway reactivity in a murine model of allergic asthma. J. Immunol. 2001;166(3):2063–2070. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.166.3.2063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Bonura A, Quaratino S, Gervasi F, Melis MR, Di Sano C, Colombo P. Innate and adaptive immune responses to the major Parietaria allergen Par j 1 in healthy subjects. Immunobiology. 2013;218(7):995–1004. doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2012.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Bublin M, Eiwegger T, Breiteneder H. Do lipids influence the allergic sensitization process? J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2014;134(3):521–529. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.04.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Tobias PS, Soldau K, Ulevitch RJ. Identification of a lipid A binding site in the acute phase reactant lipopolysaccharide binding protein. J. Biol. Chem. 1989;264(18):10867–10871. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)81700-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hailman E, Lichenstein HS, Wurfel MM, Miller DS, Johnson DA, Kelley M, et al. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-binding protein accelerates the binding of LPS to CD14. J. Exp. Med. 1994;179(1):269–277. doi: 10.1084/jem.179.1.269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Cho YS, Challa S, Clancy L, Chan FK. Lipopolysaccharide-induced expression of TRAIL promotes dendritic cell differentiation. Immunology. 2010;130(4):504–515. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2010.03266.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Liu SH, Lin CH, Hung SK, Chou JH, Chi CW, Fu SL. Fisetin inhibits lipopolysaccharide-induced macrophage activation and dendritic cell maturation. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010;58(20):10831–10839. doi: 10.1021/jf1017093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Ranoa DR, Kelley SL, Tapping RI. Human lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP) and CD14 independently deliver triacylated lipoproteins to Toll-like receptor 1 (TLR1) and TLR2 and enhance formation of the ternary signaling complex. J. Biol. Chem. 2013;288(14):9729–9741. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.453266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Berger M, de Boer JD, Bresser P, van der Poll T, Lutter R, Sterk PJ, et al. Lipopolysaccharide amplifies eosinophilic inflammation after segmental challenge with house dust mite in asthmatics. Allergy. 2015;70(3):257–264. doi: 10.1111/all.12544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Mittag D, Varese N, Scholzen A, Mansell A, Barker G, Rice G, et al. TLR ligands of ryegrass pollen microbial contaminants enhance Th1 and Th2 responses and decrease induction of Foxp3(hi) regulatory T cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 2013;43(3):723–733. doi: 10.1002/eji.201242747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Gerhold K, Avagyan A, Reichert E, Blumchen K, Wahn U, Hamelmann E. Lipopolysaccharides modulate allergen-specific immune regulation in a murine model of mucosal tolerance induction. Int. Arch. Allergy Immunol. 2008;147(1):25–34. doi: 10.1159/000128583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Choi SW, Ju YS, Kim DS, Kim JY, Kwon HJ, Kang DH, et al. reliability and validity of the Korean version of ISAAC questionnaire.
- 37.Lee SJ, Ha EK, Jee HM, Lee KS, Lee SW, Kim MA, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of urticaria with a focus on chronic urticaria in children. Allergy Asthma Immunol. Res. 2017;9(3):212–219. doi: 10.4168/aair.2017.9.3.212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Ha J, Lee SW, Yon DK. Ten-Year trends and prevalence of asthma, allergic rhinitis, and atopic dermatitis among the Korean population, 2008–2017. Clin. Exp. Pediatr. 2020;63(7):278–283. doi: 10.3345/cep.2019.01291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ahn K, Kim J, Hahm MI, Lee SY, Kim WK, Chae Y, et al. Prevalence of immediate-type food allergy in Korean schoolchildren: A population-based study. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2012;33(6):481–487. doi: 10.2500/aap.2012.33.3598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Baek JH, Shin YH, Chung IH, Kim HJ, Yoo EG, Yoon JW, et al. The link between serum vitamin D level, sensitization to food allergens, and the severity of atopic dermatitis in infancy. J. Pediatr. 2014;165(4):849–854. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.06.058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Shin YH, Shin HJ, Lee YJ. Vitamin D status and childhood health. Korean J. Pediatr. 2013;56(10):417–423. doi: 10.3345/kjp.2013.56.10.417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.