Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2021 Jan 26;16(1):e0246047. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246047

Association of recurrent common infections and subclinical cardiovascular disease in Mexican women

Priscilla Espinosa-Tamez 1, Martin Lajous 1,2, Carlos Cantú-Brito 3,4, Ruy Lopez-Ridaura 1, Adriana Monge 1,4, Elsa Yunes 1, Beatriz L Rodríguez 5, Luis Espinosa 4, José Sifuentes-Osornio 6, Andres Catzin-Kuhlmann 4,6,*
Editor: Jose Gutierrez7
PMCID: PMC7837493  PMID: 33497395

Abstract

Background

Acute and agent-specific chronic infections have been associated with increased cardiovascular risk, however data on the burden of common recurrent infections on cardiovascular disease is limited. We hypothesized women with greater exposure to uncomplicated common infectious events had an increased risk of subclinical cardiovascular disease (sCVD).

Methods

In a cross-sectional study, we assessed the relation of recurrent infections and carotid artery intima-media thickness (IMT) in 1946 disease-free women from the Mexican Teachers’ Cohort. Through 2012–2016, participants answered structured questions on respiratory, urinary and vaginal infections during the previous year and their IMT was measured using ultrasound by standardized neurologists. We defined sCVD as mean right and left IMT ≥0.8 mm or the presence of atheromatous plaque. Multivariable linear and logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the association of infectious events with IMT and sCVD adjusting for age, sociodemographic, and cardiovascular risk factors.

Results

Among participants (50±5 years) 13% reported no infections, 20% one infection and 67% three or more episodes. Overall prevalence of sCVD was 12%(n = 240). Adjusted models for logistic regression showed that women with 2 or more infections had 91% higher odds of sCVD (OR 1.91; 95%CI 1.16, 3.13) compared to women without infections (p-trend:0.015). Sub-analyses by type of infection resulted not significant. Linear regression analysis did not show a significant association between mean IMT and recurrent infections.

Conclusions

Recurrent infectious events in young adult women are associated with greater sCVD, which supports the hypothesis of low-grade chronic inflammation in the pathophysiology of cardiovascular disease.

Introduction

Inflammation is associated with atherosclerosis, which increases the risk of cardiovascular events [1]. Factors and mechanisms involved in inflammation and infection are also involved in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease: macrophages are found in atherosclerotic plaques and inflammatory markers like high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP) levels can predict coronary events [2]. Infections have been determined to increase the risk of cardiovascular diseases, including acute myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke and atherosclerosis [35].

Several studies have assessed the relation between agent-specific infections and cardiovascular disease [2, 69]. Chlamydia pneumoniae and Herpes simplex virus type 1 have been associated with coronary heart disease risk, especially in subjects with increased levels of CRP [2]. Respiratory [10], cytomegalovirus [11], tuberculosis [12], and influenza infections [1315], have been associated with acute and long-term risk of myocardial infarction [16]. Higher risk of ischemic stroke [10, 17, 18] has been found in patients with tuberculosis [19], influenza [20], respiratory [10], cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus simplex [21, 22] infections.

Infections cause atherosclerosis by direct (infecting vascular cells and triggering immune response), or indirect mechanisms (circulating inflammatory factors) [6]. Several agent-specific infections have been found to cause atherosclerosis through both mechanisms, including cytomegalovirus [2325], herpes simplex virus [2628], influenza [29], Epstein-Barr virus [30], hepatitis virus [31, 32], human immunodeficiency virus [33] and human papillomavirus [34].

However, low-grade chronic inflammation, which would be expected to exist in individuals with persistent or recurrent infections, could also be involved in a greater predisposition for atherosclerotic disease. “Infectious burden”, the combined and aggregated activity of several infections was found to be significantly associated with maximum carotid plaque thickness [3538]. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations, as well as documented urinary tract infections and self-reported periodontitis were also related to an increased risk of atherosclerosis defined by intima-media thickness, even without other vascular risk factors [39].

The “pathogen burden” theory proposes that the element that should be considered relevant in the progression of atherosclerosis is the total number of infectious pathogens in the lifetime of an individual [40, 41]. It has been shown that infections of different organ systems are associated with increased cardiovascular risk, which suggests that chronic inflammation itself could have a generic role, rather than the specific infection site [4, 42]. Despite the evidence of both acute and agent-specific chronic infections’ association with increased cardiovascular risk, data on the burden of common recurrent infections and cardiovascular disease is extremely scarce and in the Mexican population it is nonexistent. Therefore, we hypothesized women with greater exposure to uncomplicated common infectious events had an increased risk of sCVD, which is defined by the presence of atherosclerosis of carotid arteries by high-resolution ultrasound imaging.

Material and methods

Study population

The Mexican Teachers’ Cohort (MTC) is a large prospective cohort study of 115,314 female teachers aged 25 years and older, followed since 2006 and 2008 across 12 Mexican states. At baseline, the participants responded to a self-administrated questionnaire on demographic, reproductive, lifestyle, diet, and health status characteristics [43]. Between 2012 and 2016, 3,613 study participants aged 40 years and older and living within a 50 km radius from clinical sites in three states (Chiapas, Yucatán, and Nuevo León) were invited to participate in a cardiovascular disease ancillary study. There were 2,390 women who volunteered (65.6%).

In this cross-sectional study, we excluded teachers that had a history of myocardial infarction or cerebrovascular disease (n = 17), those who reported implausible amounts of infections during the previous year (≥60 site specific infections, n = 4), women without carotid IMT measurements (n = 272), and those who did not answer the infections section of the questionnaire (n = 151). Thus, our final analyses included 1,946 women. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the National Institute of Public Health, and at the Escuela de Medicina, Tecnologico de Monterrey. All participants provided informed consent.

Assessment of infections

During the clinical evaluations, participants responded to: “How many respiratory infections (sore throat, cold, flu, sinusitis) have you suffered during the previous year?”, “How many urinary infections (burning when urinating, bladder pain, urgency to urinate) that required antibiotic treatment…”, and “How many vaginal infections (vaginal burning, itching, abnormal discharge)…”. Participants wrote down a number for each of these three questions. Since no standard validated questionnaire existed for the evaluation of common recurrent infections, we designed and reviewed this questionnaire with practicing physicians of different specialties. Due to the nature of the clinical subcohort, and the difficulties to access the population previous to the clinical evaluations, a pre-test was not carried out.

Carotid artery intima-media thickness measurement

Carotid arteries were examined with a lineal array transducer operating at a frequency of 10 MHz using SonoSite MicroMaxx ultrasound scanning and an Asus laptop with M’AthStd Software (Intelligence in Medical Technologies). Reproducibility of the IMT measurement was evaluated in Chiapas and Yucatán. Reproducibility was r = 0.89 (95% CI: 0.85, 0.93) for Chiapas and r = 0.92 (95% CI: 0.85, 0.93) for Yucatán [44]. Examination included visualization of external, internal, and common carotid arteries with patients in a supine position with their head rotated 20° to 30°. IMT was measured along a 10 mm length starting 5 mm below the far wall end of the common carotid artery where the carotid bifurcation was clearly visible. We obtained the mean IMT for the 10 mm segment of each common carotid arteries to calculate the overall mean. Using the measurement from the adventitia-media interface up to the intima-lumen interface, plaque was defined according to the Mannheim consensus: focal structures of at least 0.5 mm encroachment into the lumen, 50% greater thickness compared to the surrounding IMT, or a thickness greater than 1.5 mm [45]. IMT was measured by standardized neurologists, and sCVD was defined as mean right and left IMT ≥0.8 mm or plaque appearance.

Covariates

Since 2008 when the baseline questionnaire was recovered, teachers answered follow-up questionnaires in 2011, and during clinical evaluations complementary ones. These assessed socioeconomic status, age at diagnosis and treatment of chronic diseases, menopausal status, physical activity, smoking, and alcohol consumption.

During the clinical evaluations in 2012–2016, teachers fasted for at least 8 hours; this was corroborated with the participants by clinical personnel. The physical examination included anthropometric measurements (weight, height, waist and hip circumferences), blood pressure, carotid ultrasound and ankle-brachial index determination. Previously standardized clinical technicians placed blood pressure cuffs on the 4 extremities, and blood pressure measurements were performed automatically (VaSera VS-1000; Fukuda Denshi). Standardized personnel performed weight and height measurements with the use of an electronic digital scale (Tanita Corp, Arlington Heights, Illinois, USA) to the nearest 0.1 kg and a wall stadiometer (Seca Corp; Hamburg, Germany) to the nearest millimeter. Blood samples were obtained after 8-hour fasting by venipuncture by trained nurses and were processed within 30 minutes. Glucose, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL) were assayed using standard methods.

Socioeconomic status was established as tertiles depending on the amount of seven household assets: computer, vacuum cleaner, microwave oven, cell phone, phone, car, and internet. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters, and obesity was defined as a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2. Diabetes, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia were either self-reported in 2008 and 2011 questionnaires (diagnosis or treatment) or diagnosed at clinical evaluation as follows. Diabetes: fasting glucose >125 mg/dL; hypertension: systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mm Hg; and hypercholesterolemia: total cholesterol ≥ 240 mg/dl or LDL cholesterol ≥ 160 mg/dl. Uncontrolled diabetes was defined at the clinical evaluation as fasting glucose ≥200 mg/dL.

Statistical analysis

For carotid IMT continuous analysis measurements were log-transformed, and back-transformed for interpretation. Respiratory, urinary tract, vaginal and total infections were categorized as “0”, “1” and “2 or more” infectious episodes in the previous year.

Multivariable linear and logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the association of infectious events with IMT and sCVD, respectively, comparing the higher infectious events category to the “0 infections” category for each type of infection and for total infectious events. Multivariable models were obtained adjusting for covariates: Model 1 adjusted for age and, to account for geographical distribution of participants, for evaluation site; Model 2 (“environmental factors”) added socioeconomic status, education level, smoking status, and alcohol consumption; and Model 3 (“comorbidities”) added diabetes, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, menopausal status, and body mass index for adjustment. Logistic regression estimates and confidence intervals are described in the format: (odds ratio [OR]; 95% confidence interval [CI]). Linear trend (p-trend) was estimated including the median value of infections of each category of total infectious events as a continuous variable in the models. Since we only evaluated preestablished complementary comparisons, no correction for multiple comparisons was performed. Stratified analyses were conducted to evaluate effect modification using median BMI (28.5 kg/m2) and median age (49 years) of the study population. This was evaluated by including cross-product terms of the median value of infections of each category of total infectious events as a continuous variable and categories of age and BMI (p-interaction).

Since there is no standard classification for exposure to infectious events, we performed sensitivity analyses with different categorizations of total infectious events: (1) with total infections categorized as: “0”, “1”, “2” and “3 or more”; and (2) total infections categorized considering a hypothetical yearly distribution as follows: “0”, “1 event during the year”, “1 infection per semester” (reported as 2), “More than one per semester” (≥3 and <12 events), and “1 event per month or more” (≥12 reported).

We also performed a sensitivity analysis (3) with subclinical cardiovascular disease defined as right or left IMT ≥0.8 mm or plaque.

Statistical analyses were performed using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).

Results

The mean age ±SD of the 1946 women included was 50 ±5 years. Among participants, 22% reported no respiratory infections during the previous year, 30.1% one infection and 47.9% two or more. Regarding urinary and vaginal infections, the distributions were 64.9%, 20.7%, and 14.4%; and 64.3%, 18.7%, and 17% of participants, respectively. Considering total infections (respiratory, urinary, and vaginal combined) 12.7% reported none, 20% one, and 67.3% two or more. Age-adjusted sociodemographic and cardiovascular risk factors of the population are shown in Table 1, according to the number of total infections in the previous year.

Table 1. Characteristics of 1946 women from the Mexican Teachers’ Cohort (MTC) by categories of total infectious events during the last year, age adjusted.

Categories of total infectious events
0 1 2 or more
n = 246 (%a) n = 390 (%a) n = 1310 (%a)
Age (SD), yb 50.9(5.4) 50.6(5.1) 49.2(5.1)
Educational Level
    • Highschool or less 63 (24.7) 114 (29.7) 382 (29.2)
    • Undergraduate 134 (55.6) 206 (53.8) 718 (54.4)
    • Graduate 49 (19.7) 70 (16.4) 210 (16.4)
Socioeconomic Status
    • Tertile 1 73 (31.2) 103 (28.5) 464 (34.8)
    • Tertile 2 41 (16.7) 55 (14.5) 231 (17.4)
    • Tertile 3 132 (52.1) 232 (57) 615 (47.8)
Smoking
    • Nonsmokers 194 (80.2) 305 (79.3) 1036 (78.7)
    • Ex-smokers 27 (10.5) 55 (13.3) 177 (13.8)
    • Current smokers 24 (8.9) 29 (7.2) 90 (6.9)
Alcohol intake (SD), servings/week 0.6(1.1) 0.5(1.8) 0.5(0.9)
BMI (SD), kg/m2 c 29.3(5.7) 29.5(5.4) 29.4(5.5)
Obese 93 (36.7) 148 (37) 501 (38.7)
Diabetes 24 (9) 26 (6.4) 92 (7.2)
Uncontrolled diabetes (fasting glucose>200) 6 (2.4) 5 (1.3) 29 (2.3)
Hypertension 28 (10.5) 47 (11.5) 185 (14.5)
Hypercholesterolemia 95 (35.8) 115 (29.1) 418 (32.5)
Menopausal Status
    • Premenopausal 95 (45.2) 141 (41.7) 591 (42.3)
    • Postmenopausal 132 (46.9) 201 (45.5) 545 (44.9)
    • Unknown 19 (7.9) 48 (12.8) 174 (12.8)

a Values in parenthesis are percentages unless otherwise specified. Percentages were age-standardized to the age distribution of the study population.

SD = standard deviation.

b Value is not age adjusted.

c Three participants had a missing BMI because they did not have complete weight or height information.

Higher educational level was related to a lower number of infections during the previous year. Women in the highest category of total infectious events were more likely to have hypertension (Table 1), greater IMT measurements and sCVD (Table 2). Among participants (n = 1,946) the overall prevalence of sCVD was 12.3% (n = 240).

Table 2. Carotid findings in 1946 women from the MTC by categories of total infectious events during the last year, age adjusted.

Categories of total infectious events
0 1 2 or more
n = 246 n = 390 n = 1310
Right Mean IMT(SD), mm 0.672(0.116) 0.670(0.098) 0.680(0.110)
Left Mean IMT(SD), mm 0.686(0.094) 0.697(0.108) 0.701(0.115)
Mean IMT(SD), mm 0.679(0.091) 0.683(0.088) 0.691(0.099)
Plaque, % 1.5 2.9 3.0
SCVD, % 8.8 11.3 13.5

Values were age-standardized to the age distribution of the study population.

SD = standard deviation.

Although not statistically significant, a trend could be appreciated in the relation between amount of respiratory, urinary, and total infections during the previous year and IMT (contrary to the case of vaginal infections) (Table 3). Regression analyses showed a significant association between total infections and sCVD, strengthened after adjusting for potential confounders. Women with the highest amount (2 or more) of total infections had 91% greater odds of sCVD (1.91; 95% CI 1.16,3.13; p-trend: 0.015), compared to women with no infections. A tendency could be appreciated between the amount of respiratory (1.19; 95% CI 0.82, 1.71; p-trend: 0.251) as well as urinary infections (1.29; 95% CI 0.86, 1.94; p-trend: 0.144) and sCVD, although not statistically significant (but not with vaginal infections) (Table 4).

Table 3. Adjusted differences, in percentage points (95% confidence intervals), in mean carotid IMT in 1946 women of the MTC according to categories of infectious events.

  0 1 2 or more p-trend
Total infections
            N 246 390 1310
    Model 1 Reference 0.38 (-1.63,2.42) 1.04 (-0.70,2.81) 0.177
    Model 2 Reference 0.34 (-1.67,2.39) 1.03 (-0.71,2.81) 0.173
    Model 3 a Reference 0.40 (-1.55,2.38) 1.04 (-0.65,2.75) 0.170
Infections 0 1 2 or more
Respiratory
            N 428 586 932
    Model 1 Reference 0.10 (-1.46,1.69) 0.32 (-1.13,1.79) 0.646
    Model 2 Reference 0.08 (-1.49,1.68) 0.29 (-1.16,1.76) 0.767
    Model 3 a Reference 0.13 (-1.39,1.67) 0.24 (-1.16,1.66) 0.736
Urinary
            N 1263 403 280
    Model 1 Reference 0.42 (-1.00,1.85) 1.31 (-0.34,2.98) 0.123
    Model 2 Reference 0.42 (-1.00,1.86) 1.39 (-0.27,3.07) 0.105
    Model 3 a Reference 0.36 (-1.01,1.75) 1.04 (-0.56,2.67) 0.201
Vaginal
            N 1252 364 330
    Model 1 Reference -0.11 (-1.58,1.39) -0.42 (-1.96,1.16) 0.614
    Model 2 Reference -0.13 (-1.61,1.38) -0.34 (-1.89,1.24) 0.669
    Model 3 a Reference 0.08 (-1.35,1.54) -0.40 (-1.90,1.12) 0.668

Notes

Model 1: Adjusted for age and site

Model 2: Model 1 adjusted for socioeconomic status, education level, smoking, and alcohol intake

Model 3: Model 2 adjusted for diabetes, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, BMI, and menopausal status

a Three participants were excluded from Model 3 because they had a missing BMI

Table 4. Adjusted OR (95% CI) for sCVD in 1946 women of the MTC according to categories of infectious events.

  0 1 2 or more p-trend
Total infections
            N 246 390 1310
    Model 1 Reference 1.40 (0.82,2.40) 1.72 (1.07,2.76) 0.021
    Model 2 Reference 1.41 (0.82,2.42) 1.72 (1.07,2.77) 0.023
    Model 3 a Reference 1.60 (0.91,2.80) 1.91 (1.16,3.13) 0.015
Infections 0 1 2 or more
Respiratory
            N 428 586 932
    Model 1 Reference 0.85 (0.58,1.26) 1.10 (0.78,1.56) 0.413
    Model 2 Reference 0.85 (0.58,1.27) 1.10 (0.77,1.56) 0.431
    Model 3 a Reference 0.91 (0.61,1.37) 1.19 (0.82,1.71) 0.251
Urinary
            n 1263 403 280
    Model 1 Reference 1.28 (0.91,1.79) 1.36 (0.92,2.02) 0.067
    Model 2 Reference 1.27 (0.91,1.78) 1.38 (0.93,2.04) 0.064
    Model 3 a Reference 1.23 (0.87,1.75) 1.29 (0.86,1.94) 0.144
Vaginal
            n 1252 364 330
    Model 1 Reference 1.22 (0.85,1.74) 0.96 (0.64,1.45) 0.855
    Model 2 Reference 1.22 (0.85,1.74) 0.95 (0.63,1.44) 0.889
    Model 3 a Reference 1.26 (0.87,1.83) 0.91 (0.59,1.40) 0.989

Notes

Model 1: Adjusted for age and site.

Model 2: Model 1 adjusted for socioeconomic status, education level, smoking, and alcohol intake.

Model 3: Model 2 adjusted for diabetes, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, BMI, and menopausal status.

a Three participants were excluded from Model 3 because they had a missing BMI.

Stratified linear regression analyses showed that women aged ≥49 (study population median age) had a greater mean carotid IMT as they reported more infections during the last year (p-trend: 0.004). This was not observed among women aged <49 or stratified by median BMI (S1 Table). In the stratified logistic regression, women aged ≥49 and those with BMI ≥28.5 showed higher OR of sCVD as number of infections increased, but this was only statistically significant in women aged ≥49. Women aged <49 or with BMI <28.5 did not show a clear tendency (S2 Table).

Sensitivity analyses with different categorizations of total infectious events also showed significant associations between total infections and sCVD. Women with more than 3 infectious events during the previous year had greater odds of sCVD (OR 1.94; 95% CI 1.16, 3.23; p-trend: 0.027) than women with no infections. Those with an average of one infection per month, i.e. 12 or more events, showed much higher odds of sCVD (OR 3.02; 95% CI 1.23, 7.40; p-trend: 0.018). Linear regression analyses were non-significant, and a less strict definition of sCVD was not associated with total infectious events (S3S7 Tables).

Discussion

Our study shows an (to the best of our knowledge previously unreported) association between the amount of common non-serious infections (respiratory, urinary, or vaginal) among working women and high-resolution ultrasound-diagnosed atherosclerosis of the carotid arteries. We have observed that young adult women with more frequent infections (2 or more per year) had 91% greater odds of sCVD compared to those with none of those infections during their previous year of life.

Although some studies have assessed the relation between pathogen-specific infections and coronary heart disease risk [3, 4], studies about the association of self-reported more common, and often neglected, recurrent organ system-specific infections and cardiovascular disease were nonexistent. Therefore, we considered a questionnaire to be the best tool to assess our exposure, based on the fact that the epidemiology of common recurrent infections is extremely difficult to study since the vast majority of events tend to resolve spontaneously and patients often do not seek formal medical care at all.

Moreover, as in many other countries, Mexico does not have a universal electronic medical record that could allow the evaluation of the incidence of infectious events throughout participants’ lifespan. Since the Mexican Teachers’ Cohort is a multiethnic group scattered across the country in rural as well as urban areas, they may also have different types of access to both public and private health care that we may not be aware of.

Respiratory, urinary, and vaginal infections are common recurrent infections because they are the most frequent among adult women, and their symptoms could be identified and recalled by the participants [4648]. Urinary tract infections were defined as events that required antibiotic treatment to help subjects distinguish between urinary and vaginal infections, since the latter frequently have a fungal etiology. Although respiratory infections may be mistaken with allergic manifestations, the latter are usually subacute or chronic, and seasonal; therefore, adults are familiar with their allergic symptoms and are able to distinguish between both diagnoses.

In contrast, gastrointestinal infections were excluded from the questionnaire since episodes of diarrhea (and abdominal pain) are highly frequent manifestations of common noninfectious diseases such as irritable bowel syndrome and lactose intolerance. Symptoms of these diseases could be hard to differentiate between infectious and non-infectious causes. For example, in everyday medical practice patients often erroneously attribute chronic or episodic diarrhea to bacterial o parasitic causes, demanding antibiotic therapy even despite negative microbiological laboratory results. Nevertheless, further research is needed to define the possible role of gastrointestinal infections in sCVD.

A strength of our study is the outcome assessment. Carotid IMT and carotid plaques have proven to be predictors of myocardial infarction and stroke and are used as a screening tool to asses cardiovascular risk [49]. Carotid arteries were examined by standardized neurologists blinded to the exposure using a state-of-the-art protocol. The high reproducibility of the IMT assessment was also established in two of the sites.

The amount of all infectious events during the previous year was directly associated with sCVD in this cross-sectional study, while site-specific infections were not. Respiratory and urinary infections, mainly viral and bacterial respectively, usually trigger a systemic inflammatory response [50, 51]. Specific viral and bacterial infectious agents, such as cytomegalovirus [2325], influenza virus [29], Epstein-Barr virus [30] and Chlamydia pneumoniae [2], have been found to cause atherosclerosis through indirect mechanisms, such as increased circulating inflammatory factors, or increase acute and long-term risk of myocardial infarction and stroke. Although not statistically significant, we found a positive trend in the relation between both respiratory and urinary tract infections and sCVD, which is consistent with the proposed mechanism of chronic systemic inflammation. We believe this association could be not statistically significant due to insufficient sample size.

In contrast, vaginal infections did not show a trend or association with number of infections in the previous year. This could be explained because vaginal infections are predominantly fungal and superficial, generating local inflammatory responses that most likely do not translate in increased circulating inflammatory factors, one of the main proposed mechanisms of the effect of chronic infections in cardiovascular disease [52, 53].

Total infectious events during the previous year were associated with subclinical cardiovascular disease, association that was stronger among participants that reported an average of one infection per month. This is consistent with findings that aggregated activity of several infections is associated with atherosclerosis [3538], even without other vascular risk factors [39]. Having found a relation with total infections and not with site-specific infections supports the hypothesis of the mayor role of low-grade chronic systemic (as opposed to local) inflammation in cardiovascular disease. As proposed by the pathogen burden theory, the total exposure to infections and chronic inflammation itself could have a role in the progression of atherosclerosis and increased cardiovascular risk rather than specific-site infections [4, 4042].

Several studies have found that obesity induces production of pro-inflammatory molecules, promoting a low-level chronic inflammatory state [5457], whose relation with aging has also been documented [58, 59]. To assess this potential interaction, we conducted stratified analyses using these factors. Although no statistically significant interaction was found, association seemed to be stronger among women with higher BMI (≥28.4 kg/m2) and age (≥49 years).

Somehow surprisingly, the prevalence of diabetes among the group that reported no infectious events during the previous year was higher. However, this difference almost disappeared when comparing only women with uncontrolled diabetes. An increasing gradient of poor metabolic control, the main immunocompromising factor in this population, can be observed as women reported more infections [60].

Our main explanatory line for the association we are establishing is chronic low-grade systemic inflammation, for which there are a series of biomarkers whose levels are known to be predictors of coronary events, the most widespread being high sensitivity CRP [2]. Acute infections are certainly capable of generating systemic inflammatory responses, but these could and should be transient, with biomarkers returning to normal levels in otherwise healthy subjects between events [16].

A potential limitation of our study is that no validated questionnaire exists to assess our particular exposure. Ours was designed by experienced clinicians considering culture and popular language, and one-year recall since this period is short enough to remember and long enough to be representative of adulthood exposure. The cross-sectional design of our study could also be questioned, nevertheless we registered the number of infections experienced during the previous year, while the measurement of the outcome was performed during clinical evaluation and therefore after the exposure. Another possible caveat could be that we did not review clinical records, however, as previously stated, people with these types of infections do not usually seek medical attention and therefore this information can only be collected asking participants to recall the previous year's infectious clinical pictures, a period that can be easily remembered. Finally, since we did not assess reported overall health, we were not able to adjust for this factor.

Although we do not have a previous measurement of IMT to compare with the one obtained during our clinical evaluation, we strengthened the assessment of our outcome through three different strategies. Firstly, we excluded participants who had a history of myocardial infarction or cerebrovascular disease. Secondly, we accurately measured early cardiovascular disease signs, such as IMT, by neurologists using standardized methods who were blinded to the exposure. Lastly, recruited participants were blinded to their outcome at the moment of answering the questionnaire registering the exposure.

Further research is needed to analyze this issue. If this kind of infectious burden is proven to be a risk factor for sCVD, public health policies could be directed to create awareness for prevention, timely diagnosis, and treatment of infections to avoid long term complications derived from sCVD.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Adjusted differences in carotid IMT stratified by age and BMI.

Adjusted differences, in percentage points (95%CI), in mean carotid IMT in 1943a women of the Mexican Teachers’ Cohort (MTC) according to categories of total infectious events, stratified by age and BMI medians, using Model 3.

(PDF)

S2 Table. Adjusted OR for subclinical cardiovascular disease (sCVD) stratified by age and BMI.

Adjusted OR (95%CI) for sCVD in 1943 a women of the MTC according to categories of total infectious events, stratified by age and BMI median, using Model 3.

(PDF)

S3 Table. Adjusted differences in carotid IMT according to infectious events.

Adjusted differences, in percentage points (95%CI), in mean carotid IMT in 1946 women of the MTC according to balanced categories of infectious events.

(PDF)

S4 Table. Adjusted OR for sCVD according to infectious events.

Adjusted OR (95%CI) for sCVD in 1946 women of the MTC according to balanced categories of infectious events.

(PDF)

S5 Table. Adjusted differences in carotid IMT according to extreme categories of infectious events.

Adjusted differences, in percentage points (95%CI), in mean carotid IMT in 1946 women of the MTC according to more extreme categories of infectious events.

(PDF)

S6 Table. Adjusted OR for sCVD according to extreme categories of infectious events.

Adjusted OR (95%CI) for sCVD in 1946 women of the MTC according to more extreme categories of infectious events.

(PDF)

S7 Table. Adjusted OR for sCVD defined as right or left IMT ≥0.8 mm.

Adjusted OR (95% CI) for sCVD in 1946 women of the MTC according to categories of total infectious events, with subclinical cardiovascular disease defined as right or left IMT ≥0.8 mm or plaque.

(PDF)

S1 File. Infectious diseases questionnaire.

Questionnaire applied during clinical evaluations in original language (Spanish) and English.

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

We thank all study participants for their time and continued support of the Mexican Teachers’ Cohort. We thank the leadership at the office for Regulation at Carrera Magisterial (now Servicio Profesional Docente) in Mexico’s Ministry of Education as well as state coordinators in Chiapas, Yucatán, and Nuevo León for their support in contacting Mexican Teachers’ Cohort participants and assisting with operations during the clinical visits. We would like to acknowledge the commitment to the study by Instituto de Seguridad y Servicios Sociales de los Trabajadores del Estado’s Prevention and Health Protection area within the Medical Sub-Directorate by providing technical and logistical support in data collection and hosting clinical visits in their facilities in Chiapas and Yucatán. For clinical data collection in Nuevo León, we thank Tecnologico de Monterrey’s Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud and Instituto de Seguridad y Servicios Sociales de los Trabajadores del Estado de Nuevo León for hosting our research team.

Data Availability

Data cannot be shared publicly since, to ensure our participants privacy, their data is only stored in a secure server inside the Mexico’s National Institute of Public Health (INSP). Data are available from the Mexican Teachers’ Cohort Data Access (http://www.esmaestras.org/investigadores/docs/Politicas_Acceso_Uso_Autoria.pdf, contact via: ccientifico.esm@insp.mx) for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by an unrestricted investigator-initiated grant from AstraZeneca (ISSNPCV0022); https://www.astrazeneca.com/country-sites/mexico.html and by the National Council of Science and Technology’s Fund for Health Research and Social Security (CONACYT-SALUD 161786); https://www.conacyt.gob.mx/index.php/el-conacyt/desarrollo-cientifico/redes-tematicas-conacyt/directorio-de-redes-tematicas-conacyt/category/salud. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Frostegård J. Immunity, atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease. BMC Med [Internet]. 2013. May 1 [cited 2020 Dec 9];11(1):117 Available from: http://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1741-7015-11-117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Roivainen M, Viik-Kajander M, Palosuo T, Toivanen P, Leinonen M, Saikku P, et al. Infections, inflammation, and the risk of coronary heart disease. Circulation. 2000; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Grau AJ, Urbanek C, Palm F. Common infections and the risk of stroke. Nature Reviews Neurology. 2010. 10.1038/nrneurol.2010.163 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Smeeth L, Thomas SL, Hall AJ, Hubbard R, Farrington P, Vallance P. Risk of Myocardial Infarction and Stroke after Acute Infection or Vaccination. N Engl J Med. 2004; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mattila KJ, Valtonen V V., Nieminen MS, Asikainen S. Role of infection as a risk factor for atherosclerosis, myocardial infarction, and stroke. Clin Infect Dis [Internet]. 1998. [cited 2020 Dec 9];26(3):719–34. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9524851/ 10.1086/514570 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hemmat N, Ebadi A, Badalzadeh R, Memar MY, Baghi HB. Viral infection and atherosclerosis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis [Internet]. 2018. December 1 [cited 2020 Dec 9];37(12):2225–33. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30187247/ 10.1007/s10096-018-3370-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rosenfeld ME, Campbell LA. Pathogens and atherosclerosis: Update on the potential contribution of multiple infectious organisms to the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Thromb Haemost [Internet]. 2011. November [cited 2020 Dec 9];106(5):858–67. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22012133/ 10.1160/TH11-06-0392 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ji YN, An L, Zhan P, Chen XH. Cytomegalovirus infection and coronary heart disease risk: A meta-analysis. Mol Biol Rep [Internet]. 2012. June [cited 2020 Dec 9];39(6):6537–46. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22311014/ 10.1007/s11033-012-1482-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wang H, Peng G, Bai J, He B, Huang K, Hu X, et al. Cytomegalovirus infection and relative risk of cardiovascular disease (ischemic heart disease, stroke, and cardiovascular death): A meta-analysis of prospective studies up to 2016. J Am Heart Assoc [Internet]. 2017. July 1 [cited 2020 Dec 9];6(7). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28684641/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ohland J, Warren-Gash C, Blackburn R, Mølbak K, Valentiner-Branth P, Nielsen J, et al. Acute myocardial infarctions and stroke triggered by laboratory-confirmed respiratory infections in Denmark, 2010 to 2016. Eurosurveillance [Internet]. 2020. April 30 [cited 2020 Dec 9];25(17). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32372757/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Nikitskaya E, Lebedeva A, Ivanova O, Maryukhnich E, Shpektor A, Grivel JC, et al. Cytomegalovirus-Productive Infection Is Associated With Acute Coronary Syndrome. J Am Heart Assoc [Internet]. 2016. August 1 [cited 2020 Dec 9];5(8). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27543799/ 10.1161/JAHA.116.003759 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Huaman MA, Ticona E, Miranda G, Kryscio RJ, Mugruza R, Aranda E, et al. The Relationship between Latent Tuberculosis Infection and Acute Myocardial Infarction. Clin Infect Dis [Internet]. 2018. March 5 [cited 2020 Dec 9];66(6):886–92. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29069328/ 10.1093/cid/cix910 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Barnes M, Heywood AE, Mahimbo A, Rahman B, Newall AT, MaCintyre CR. Acute myocardial infarction and influenza: A meta-analysis of case-control studies. Heart [Internet]. 2015. November 1 [cited 2020 Dec 9];101(21):1738–47. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26310262/ 10.1136/heartjnl-2015-307691 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Warren-Gash C, Smeeth L, Hayward AC. Influenza as a trigger for acute myocardial infarction or death from cardiovascular disease: a systematic review. Lancet Infect Dis [Internet]. 2009. October [cited 2020 Dec 9];9(10):601–10. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19778762/ 10.1016/S1473-3099(09)70233-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Mohammad MA, Tham J, Koul S, Rylance R, Bergh C, Erlinge D, et al. Association of acute myocardial infarction with influenza: A nationwide observational study. PLoS One [Internet]. 2020. August 1 [cited 2020 Dec 9];15(8 August). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32760080/ 10.1371/journal.pone.0236866 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Musher DM, Abers MS, Corrales-Medina VF. Acute Infection and Myocardial Infarction. N Engl J Med [Internet]. 2019. January 10 [cited 2020 Dec 9];380(2):171–6. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30625066/ 10.1056/NEJMra1808137 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Elkind MSV, Ramakrishnan P, Moon YP, Boden-Albala B, Liu KM, Spitalnik SL, et al. Infectious burden and risk of stroke: The northern manhattan study. Arch Neurol [Internet]. 2010. January [cited 2020 Dec 9];67(1):33–8. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19901154/ 10.1001/archneurol.2009.271 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Elkind MSV, Boehme AK, Smith CJ, Meisel A, Buckwalter MS. Infection as a Stroke Risk Factor and Determinant of Outcome after Stroke. Stroke [Internet]. 2020. [cited 2020 Dec 9];51(10):3156–68. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32897811/ 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.030429 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sheu JJ, Chiou HY, Kang JH, Chen YH, Lin HC. Tuberculosis and the risk of ischemic stroke: A 3-year follow-up study. Stroke [Internet]. 2010. February [cited 2020 Dec 9];41(2):244–9. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20035070/ 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.567735 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Boehme AK, Luna J, Kulick ER, Kamel H, Elkind MSV. Influenza-like illness as a trigger for ischemic stroke. Ann Clin Transl Neurol [Internet]. 2018. April 1 [cited 2020 Dec 9];5(4):456–63. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29687022/ 10.1002/acn3.545 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Forbes HJ, Williamson E, Benjamin L, Breuer J, Brown MM, Langan SM, et al. Association of herpesviruses and stroke: Systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One [Internet]. 2018. November 1 [cited 2020 Dec 9];13(11). Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30462656/ 10.1371/journal.pone.0206163 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Nagel MA, Gilden D. The Relationship Between Herpes Zoster and Stroke. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep [Internet]. 2015. [cited 2020 Dec 9];15(4):16 Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC5489066/?report = abstract 10.1007/s11910-015-0534-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Nieto FJ, Adam E, Sorlie P, Farzadegan H, Melnick JL, Comstock GW, et al. Cohort study of cytomegalovirus infection as a risk factor for carotid intimal-medial thickening, a measure of subclinical atherosclerosis. Circulation [Internet]. 1996. [cited 2020 Dec 9];94(5):922–7. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8790026/ 10.1161/01.cir.94.5.922 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Horváth R, Černý J, Benedík J, Hökl J, Jelínková I, Benedík J. The possible role of human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) in the origin of atherosclerosis. J Clin Virol [Internet]. 2000. February [cited 2020 Dec 9];16(1):17–24. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10680737/ 10.1016/s1386-6532(99)00064-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hsich E, Zhou YF, Paigen B, Johnson TM, Burnett MS, Epstein SE. Cytomegalovirus infection increases development of atherosclerosis in Apolipoprotein-E knockout mice. Atherosclerosis [Internet]. 2001. May [cited 2020 Dec 9];156(1):23–8. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11368993/ 10.1016/s0021-9150(00)00608-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Wu YP, Sun DD, Wang Y, Liu W, Yang J. Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 and Type 2 Infection Increases Atherosclerosis Risk: Evidence Based on a Meta-Analysis. Biomed Res Int [Internet]. 2016. [cited 2020 Dec 9];2016 Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27195284/ 10.1155/2016/2630865 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Shi Y, Tokunaga O. Herpesvirus (HSV-1, EBV and CMV) infections in atherosclerotic compared with non-atherosclerotic aortic tissue. Pathol Int [Internet]. 2002. [cited 2020 Dec 9];52(1):31–9. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11940204/ 10.1046/j.1440-1827.2002.01312.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Espinola-Klein C, Rupprecht HJ, Blankenberg S, Bickel C, Kopp H, Rippin G, et al. Are morphological or functional changes in the carotid artery wall associated with Chlamydia pneumoniae, Helicobacter pylori, cytomegalovirus, or herpes simplex virus infection? Stroke [Internet]. 2000. [cited 2020 Dec 9];31(9):2127–33. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10978041/ 10.1161/01.str.31.9.2127 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Auer J, Leitinger M, Berent R, Prammer W, Weber T, Lassnig E, et al. Influenza A and B IgG seropositivity and coronary atherosclerosis assessed by angiography. Hear Dis [Internet]. 2002. November [cited 2020 Dec 9];4(6):349–54. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12441011/ 10.1097/00132580-200211000-00003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ibrahim AI, Obeid MT, Jouma MJ, Moasis GA, Al-Richane WL, Kindermann I, et al. Detection of herpes simplex virus, cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr virus DNA in atherosclerotic plaques and in unaffected bypass grafts. J Clin Virol [Internet]. 2005. January [cited 2020 Dec 9];32(1):29–32. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15572003/ 10.1016/j.jcv.2004.06.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Blankson JN, Finzi D, Pierson TC, Sabundayo BP, Chadwick K, Margolick JB, et al. The possible role of hepatitis A virus in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. J Infect Dis [Internet]. 2000. [cited 2020 Dec 9];182(6):1583–7. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11069227/ 10.1086/317613 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Petta S, Torres D, Fazio G, Cammà C, Cabibi D, Di Marco V, et al. Carotid atherosclerosis and chronic hepatitis C: A prospective study of risk associations. Hepatology [Internet]. 2012. May [cited 2020 Dec 9];55(5):1317–23. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22135089/ 10.1002/hep.25508 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kearns A, Gordon J, Burdo TH, Qin X. HIV-1–Associated Atherosclerosis: Unraveling the Missing Link. J Am Coll Cardiol [Internet]. 2017. June 27 [cited 2020 Dec 9];69(25):3084–98. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28641798/ 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.05.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lawson JS, Glenn WK, Tran DD, Ngan CC, Duflou JA, Whitaker NJ. Identification of Human Papilloma Viruses in Atheromatous Coronary Artery Disease. Front Cardiovasc Med [Internet]. 2015. May 20 [cited 2020 Dec 9];2 Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26664889/ 10.3389/fcvm.2015.00017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Elkind MSV, Luna JM, Moon YP, Boden-Albala B, Liu KM, Spitalnik S, et al. Infectious Burden and Carotid Plaque Thickness: The Northern Manhattan Study. Stroke. 2010; 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.571299 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Sessa R. Infectious burden and atherosclerosis: A clinical issue. World J Clin Cases [Internet]. 2014. [cited 2020 Dec 9];2(7):240 Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25032197/ 10.12998/wjcc.v2.i7.240 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Tufano A, Di Capua M, Coppola A, Conca P, Cimino E, Cerbone AM, et al. The infectious burden in atherothrombosis. Semin Thromb Hemost [Internet]. 2012. [cited 2020 Dec 9];38(5):515–23. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22660918/ 10.1055/s-0032-1315759 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Prasad A, Zhu J, Halcox JPJ, Waclawiw MA, Epstein SE, Quyyumi AA. Predisposition to atherosclerosis by infections: Role of endothelial dysfunction. Circulation [Internet]. 2002. July 9 [cited 2020 Dec 9];106(2):184–90. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12105156/ 10.1161/01.cir.0000021125.83697.21 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kiechl S, Egger G, Mayr M, Wiedermann CJ, Bonora E, Oberhollenzer F, et al. Chronic infections and the risk of carotid atherosclerosis: Prospective results from a large population study. Circulation. 2001; 10.1161/01.cir.103.8.1064 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Pedicino D, Giglio AF, Galiffa VA, Cialdella P, Trotta F, Graziani F, et al. Infections, immunity and atherosclerosis: Pathogenic mechanisms and unsolved questions. International Journal of Cardiology. 2013. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.05.098 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Zhu J, Quyyumi AA, Norman JE, Csako G, Waclawiw MA, Shearer GM, et al. Effects of total pathogen burden on coronary artery disease risk and C-reactive protein levels. Am J Cardiol [Internet]. 2000. January 15 [cited 2020 Dec 9];85(2):140–6. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10955367/ 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00653-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Smeeth L, Casas JP, Hingorani AD. The role of infection in cardiovascular disease: More support but many questions remain. European Heart Journal. 2007; 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm073 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Lajous M, Ortiz-Panozo E, Monge A, Santoyo-Vistrain R, García-Anaya A, Yunes-Díaz E, et al. Cohort Profile: The Mexican Teachers’ Cohort (MTC). Int J Epidemiol. 2017; 10.1093/ije/dyv123 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Monge A, Harris WS, Ortiz-Panozo E, Yunes E, Cantu-Brito C, Catzin-Kuhlmann A, et al. Whole Blood ω-3 Fatty Acids Are Inversely Associated with Carotid Intima-Media Thickness in Indigenous Mexican Women. J Nutr. 2016; 10.3945/jn.115.227264 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Touboul PJ, Hennerici MG, Meairs S, Adams H, Amarenco P, Bornstein N, et al. Mannheim carotid intima-media thickness and plaque consensus (2004-2006-2011). Cerebrovascular Diseases. 2012. 10.1159/000343145 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Guglietta A. Recurrent urinary tract infections in women: Risk factors, etiology, pathogenesis and prophylaxis. Vol. 12, Future Microbiology. Future Medicine Ltd.; 2017. p. 239–46. 10.2217/fmb-2016-0145 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Passioti M, Maggina P, Megremis S, Papadopoulos NG. The common cold: Potential for future prevention or cure topical collection on rhinosinusitis. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2014. February;14(2). 10.1007/s11882-013-0413-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Mills BB. Vaginitis: Beyond the Basics. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2017. June 1;44(2):159–77. 10.1016/j.ogc.2017.02.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Inaba Y, Chen JA, Bergmann SR. Carotid plaque, compared with carotid intima-media thickness, more accurately predicts coronary artery disease events: A meta-analysis. Atherosclerosis [Internet]. 2012. January [cited 2019 May 21];220(1):128–33. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21764060 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2011.06.044 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Abraham SN, Miao Y. The nature of immune responses to urinary tract infections. Nat Rev Immunol [Internet]. 2015. October [cited 2019 May 26];15(10):655–63. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26388331 10.1038/nri3887 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Newton AH, Cardani A, Braciale TJ. The host immune response in respiratory virus infection: balancing virus clearance and immunopathology. Semin Immunopathol [Internet]. 2016. [cited 2019 May 26];38(4):471–82. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26965109 10.1007/s00281-016-0558-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Fidel PL Jr. Distinct protective host defenses against oral and vaginal candidiasis. Med Mycol. 2002; [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Cassone A, De Bernardis F, Santoni G. Anticandidal immunity and vaginitis: novel opportunities for immune intervention. Infect Immun [Internet]. 2007. October [cited 2019 May 26];75(10):4675–86. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17562759 10.1128/IAI.00083-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Bea JW, Funk J, Hetherington‐Rauth M, Wertheim BC, Mosquiera L, Thuraisingam R, et al. Anthropometry Versus Imaging for Prediction of Inflammation Among Hispanic Girls. Obesity [Internet]. 2018. October [cited 2019 May 21];26(10):1594–602. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30277029 10.1002/oby.22265 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Pavela G, Kim Y, Salvy S-J. Additive effects of obesity and loneliness on C-reactive protein. Jackson SE, editor. PLoS One [Internet]. 2018. November 15 [cited 2019 May 21];13(11):e0206092 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30439985 10.1371/journal.pone.0206092 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Visser M, Bouter LM, McQuillan GM, Wener MH, Harris TB. Elevated C-reactive protein levels in overweight and obese adults. JAMA [Internet]. 1999. December 8 [cited 2019 May 21];282(22):2131–5. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10591334 10.1001/jama.282.22.2131 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Ferrante AW. Obesity-induced inflammation: a metabolic dialogue in the language of inflammation. J Intern Med [Internet]. 2007. October [cited 2019 May 21];262(4):408–14. Available from: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2007.01852.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Franceschi C, Garagnani P, Parini P, Giuliani C, Santoro A. Inflammaging: a new immune–metabolic viewpoint for age-related diseases. Nat Rev Endocrinol [Internet]. 2018. October 25 [cited 2019 May 21];14(10):576–90. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30046148 10.1038/s41574-018-0059-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Franceschi C, Campisi J. Chronic Inflammation (Inflammaging) and Its Potential Contribution to Age-Associated Diseases. Journals Gerontol Ser A Biol Sci Med Sci [Internet]. 2014. June 1 [cited 2019 May 21];69(Suppl 1):S4–9. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24833586 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Sewify M, Nair S, Warsame S, Murad M, Alhubail A, Behbehani K, et al. Prevalence of Urinary Tract Infection and Antimicrobial Susceptibility among Diabetic Patients with Controlled and Uncontrolled Glycemia in Kuwait. J Diabetes Res [Internet]. 2016. [cited 2019 Oct 25];2016:6573215 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26844231 10.1155/2016/6573215 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 Table. Adjusted differences in carotid IMT stratified by age and BMI.

Adjusted differences, in percentage points (95%CI), in mean carotid IMT in 1943a women of the Mexican Teachers’ Cohort (MTC) according to categories of total infectious events, stratified by age and BMI medians, using Model 3.

(PDF)

S2 Table. Adjusted OR for subclinical cardiovascular disease (sCVD) stratified by age and BMI.

Adjusted OR (95%CI) for sCVD in 1943 a women of the MTC according to categories of total infectious events, stratified by age and BMI median, using Model 3.

(PDF)

S3 Table. Adjusted differences in carotid IMT according to infectious events.

Adjusted differences, in percentage points (95%CI), in mean carotid IMT in 1946 women of the MTC according to balanced categories of infectious events.

(PDF)

S4 Table. Adjusted OR for sCVD according to infectious events.

Adjusted OR (95%CI) for sCVD in 1946 women of the MTC according to balanced categories of infectious events.

(PDF)

S5 Table. Adjusted differences in carotid IMT according to extreme categories of infectious events.

Adjusted differences, in percentage points (95%CI), in mean carotid IMT in 1946 women of the MTC according to more extreme categories of infectious events.

(PDF)

S6 Table. Adjusted OR for sCVD according to extreme categories of infectious events.

Adjusted OR (95%CI) for sCVD in 1946 women of the MTC according to more extreme categories of infectious events.

(PDF)

S7 Table. Adjusted OR for sCVD defined as right or left IMT ≥0.8 mm.

Adjusted OR (95% CI) for sCVD in 1946 women of the MTC according to categories of total infectious events, with subclinical cardiovascular disease defined as right or left IMT ≥0.8 mm or plaque.

(PDF)

S1 File. Infectious diseases questionnaire.

Questionnaire applied during clinical evaluations in original language (Spanish) and English.

(PDF)

Data Availability Statement

Data cannot be shared publicly since, to ensure our participants privacy, their data is only stored in a secure server inside the Mexico’s National Institute of Public Health (INSP). Data are available from the Mexican Teachers’ Cohort Data Access (http://www.esmaestras.org/investigadores/docs/Politicas_Acceso_Uso_Autoria.pdf, contact via: ccientifico.esm@insp.mx) for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data.


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES