Skip to main content
Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology logoLink to Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology
. 2020 Dec 14;27(1):79–84. doi: 10.5152/dir.2020.20143

Managing occluded stents in biliary obstruction using radiofrequency ablation combined with 125I-strand brachytherapy

Yuan Yao 1,*, Dechao Jiao 1,*, Qinyu Lei 1, Zongming Li 1, Yanli Wang 1, Xinwei Han 1
PMCID: PMC7837722  PMID: 33331281

Abstract

PURPOSE

We aimed to assess the effectiveness of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (PRFA) combined with iodine-125 (125I) seed strand brachytherapy (125I-BT) for treatment of occluded biliary stents.

METHODS

From November 2015 to September 2017, 13 consecutive patients with occluded biliary metal stents, implanted for malignant obstruction, underwent PRFA combined with 125I-BT to reopen the bile duct. Data included clinical and technical success, stent patency, complications, and overall survival.

RESULTS

The clinical and technical success rates were both 100%. One month after treatment, the total serum bilirubin level had decreased significantly (p < 0.001). Early complications of cholangitis or hemobilia were experienced by one patient each. Three patients (23.1%) had late complications, including two cases of cholangitis and one case of cholecystitis. During the mean follow-up of 233±82.9 days (range, 88–365 days), the stent patency time was 239±26.5 days (95% CI, 187–291 days), and the 6-month stent patency rate was 68.4%. Five patents died; the mean survival time was 298±30.1 days (95% CI, 239–358 days). The 6-month survival rate was 83%.

CONCLUSION

PRFA therapy combined with 125I-BT is feasible and safe for patients with occluded metal stents placed for malignant biliary obstruction. Nevertheless, randomized controlled trails are needed to confirm the effectiveness of this new approach.


Self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) placement is an effective treatment for malignant biliary obstruction (1). However, stent restenosis occurs within 6 months in over 50% of patients, due to tumor ingrowth, overgrowth, epithelial hyperplasia, and biliary sludge formation (2, 3). There are no clear recommendations regarding how to re-open SEMS occlusions. Recently, some studies reported the safety and efficacy of a Habib EndoHPB percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (PRFA) catheter for re-opening occluded SEMSs, with a median stent patency time of 102–234 days (49).

We previously showed that intraluminal brachytherapy (ILBT) with low dose rate (LDR) iodine-125 (125I) seed strands is effective for treatment of malignant biliary obstruction, prolonging stent patency (10, 11). To the best of our knowledge, there are no reports regarding the use of PRFA and ILBT synchronously to re-open SEMS occlusions. This study assessed the feasibility and effectiveness of PRFA combined with 125I seed strand brachytherapy (125I-BT) for the treatment of malignant biliary occlusion after stenting.

Methods

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of our hospital (2019-KY-383). All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Patient characteristics

From November 2015 to September 2017, 13 patients with occluded SEMS obstruction underwent PRFA combined with 125I-BT for recanalization of the bile duct. The selected patients met the following eligibility criteria: previous non-coated biliary stent placement; final malignant pathology; refusal to undergo surgery or absence of indications for surgery; and no previous PRFA or ILBT treatment. Exclusion criteria were: tumor volume >70% total liver volume; ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance >2; Child-Pugh C status; severe coagulation dysfunction or refractory ascites; or refusal to participate in the study. All patients underwent enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT, Siemens) before treatments (Table 1; Fig. 1).

Table 1.

Characteristics and outcomes of the 13 patients included in the study

Gender Age, y Diagnosis TNM SBT, μmol/L OT, min Complication SR (d) FU, d Outcome
Preop Postop Early Late
1 Male 56 CC T2N2M0 153.6 52.1 32 NA NA NA 207 Alive
2 Male 51 PC T2N0M0 121.7 43.6 45 NA NA NA 165 Death
3 Female 66 CC T3N1M1 98.3 33.3 24 NA NA TI (155) 306 Alive
4 Male 70 CC T3N2M1 210.5 57.3 42 Hemobilia NA TI (176) 200 Death
5 Female 47 PC T2N0M0 178.2 49.9 57 NA NA NA 198 Alive
6 Female 68 PC T2N0M0 166.6 69.2 34 NA NA TI (242) 282 Alive
7 Female 49 CC T3N2M1 251.5 79.6 26 NA Cholecystitis NA 189 Death
8 Male 45 GC T2N1M1 131.2 45.4 29 No No TI (50) 88 Alive
9 Female 74 PC T3N2M1 145.4 88.2 67 Cholangitis Cholangitis TI (100) 131 Death
10 Male 55 CC T3N1M1 208.9 55.6 37 NA NA TI (259) 289 Alive
11 Male 70 GC T3N1M0 222.1 43.7 62 NA NA NA 277 Alive
12 Female 66 PC T2N1M1 302.1 66.2 44 NA NA NA 339 Alive
13 Male 48 PC T3N1M0 105.2 60.9 51 NA Cholecystitis TI (308) 365 Death

STB, serum total bilirubin; y, years; TNM, tumor, node, metastasis stage; OT, operative time; SR, stent reocclusion; d, days; FU, follow-up; CC, cholangiocarcinoma; NA, not available; PC, pancreatic cancer; TI, tumor ingrowth; GC, gallbladder cancer.

Figure 1. a–c.

Figure 1. a–c

Axial CT images (a, b) reveal biliary dilatation and tumor ingrowth (arrow) within the metal biliary stent. Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (c) shows the occluded biliary stent (arrows).

Device

An intraductal radiofrequency ablation (RFA) catheter (Habib EndoHPB, EMcision Limited) was connected to a compatible radiofrequency generator (1500X RITA, Fremont). The length depended on the length of the stricture, with overlap of treated areas of approximately 1 cm. LDR-125I seeds (model type 6711 with a half-life of 59.6 days) were made by the Chinese Atomic Energy Science Institution of China. Each seed was 0.8×4.5 mm (radioactivity 25.9 MBq) and emitted 35.5 keV gamma rays. The device included a 3 F catheter (Cook Inc.), with tip parts reduced by the heat shrinkable method 2 cm distal to the catheter tip, to prevent seed displacement into the duodenum. The number of 125I seeds used equaled the stent length in mm divided by 4.5. The 125I seeds were arranged one-by-one within the catheter. There was a hole 1 cm from the tip, for rapid guidewire exchange.

Procedure 1: Intraductal RFA

All procedures were performed under local anesthesia (2% lidocaine) and dezocine (Dezocine Injection, Yangzijiang pharmaceutical co. LTD) by intravenous injection. First, percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography was performed to confirm the location of the biliary SEMS (Micro-Tech) obstruction, under digital subtraction angiography. Second, an Amplatz Super Stiff Guidewire (Boston Scientific) was placed across the metal stent occlusion zone. According to the stricture length, sequential PRFA was applied to treat the entire stricture, with an overlap of treated areas of approximately 1 cm (10 W × 120 s). Balloon ductoplasty (8×60 mm Boston Scientific balloon catheter) was performed by moving the guidewire back and forth within the stent to remove ablated tissue and debris from the occluded SEMS (Fig. 2a).

Figure 2. a–c.

Figure 2. a–c

Percutaneous intraductal radiofrequency (10 W × 120 s) was done within the occluded stent (a). Intraluminal BT with low-dose-rate 125I strand (b, arrow). Cholangiography (c) confirmed the stent patency after combination therapy at 1 month.

Procedure 2: ILBT with 125I strand

An 8 F sheath (Cook Inc.) was inserted across the metal stent, and another 0.035-inch guidewire (Glidewire, Terumo) was inserted into the sheath to establish double guidewire approaches. After withdrawing the sheath, the 125I strand was inserted across one guidewire using the rapid exchange technique (the guidewire was inserted from the tip hole to another hole 1 cm from the catheter tip). An 8.5 F drainage catheter (Cook Inc.) was inserted along another guidewire across the occluded SEMS to the duodenum (Fig. 2b, 2c). The 8.5 F drainage catheter and the 125I seed strand were fixed to nearby skin, together.

Evaluation and follow-up

The primary endpoints of the study were technical success, clinical success, and stent patency. Secondary endpoints were complications (early and late) and patient survival. Technical success was defined as completion of both procedures (PRFA and ILBT) and good contrast flow through the stent at the 1-month follow-up. Clinical success was considered a substantial decrease in bilirubin (>75%), relative to the pretreatment value, within 1 month. Stent patency was defined as no recurrence of biliary occlusion with increased serum bilirubin (twice the normal level), and biliary dilatation on CT, MRI, or ultrasound (Fig. 3). Early and late complications occurred within or after 30 days of the procedure, respectively (12).

Figure 3. a, b.

Figure 3. a, b

Axial pretreatment CT image (a) shows tumor ingrowth within the metal biliary stent. Axial posttreatment CT image (b) shows the stent patency after combination therapy at 1 month, and the low-density area around the stent represents tumor necrosis (arrow).

Single-photon emission CT (SPECT)/CT (Siemens) was performed to evaluate the dose distribution of radioactive seeds within 3 days of 125I strand implantation. All patients were followed up every 2 weeks for the first month, and thereafter as per the oncology follow-up protocol. If SEMS reocclusion was suspected, patients underwent repeat PTCD or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). To provide a precise description of the dose and to compare with related studies, 5 mm from the source axis was set as the dose reference point, from which the dose was calculated by a computerized treatment plan system (TPS, Cancer Physiotherapy Center of Peking University).

Statistical analysis

The data are expressed as the median (range) or mean ± standard deviation, and were analyzed using SPSS 11.0 software. The paired-sample t-test was applied to compare the serum bilirubin pre-PRFA (baseline) with the post-PRFA/ILBT treatment at 1 month. Values of p < 0.05 were defined as statistically significant.

Results

The study included 13 patients (seven men) with mean age 59.6±11.4 years (range, 45–74 years). Primary diagnoses were gallbladder cancer (n=2), cholangiocarcinoma (n=5), and pancreatic cancer (n=6). Eight patients underwent gemcitabine plus cisplatin chemotherapy, while 5 patients did not undergo any radiotherapy and chemotherapy before stent occlusion. All final malignant pathologies were diagnosed by forceps biopsy via the PTCD approach (n=9) or the ERCP approach (n=4). Seed activity was 25.9 Mbq, with no 125I seeds lost as confirmed by fluoroscopy and SPECT/CT. The estimated radiation dose at the reference point was 27.2±3.3 Gy.

PRFA and ILBT were synchronously completed successfully in all patients, for a technical success rate of 100%. Cholangiograms, MRI, or CT obtained within 1 month after stent placement showed adequate biliary drainage, with decompression of the biliary ducts. Serum bilirubin 1 month after the treatment (57.3±15.4 μmol/L, range 33.3–88.2 μmol/L) was significantly less than at baseline (176.6±60.2 μmol/L, range 98.3–302.1 μmol/L; p < 0.001). The drainage catheters and 125I strands were removed from all the patients.

Patient 4 had early complications (bilirubinemia), due to portal vein branch injury, as confirmed by percutaneous cholangiography. After adjusting the position of the drainage tube hole, the bilirubinemia resolved within 3 days. Patient 9 had cholangitis (fever and abdominal pain). These symptoms resolved within 7 days after antibiotics and acid suppression treatment. There were three patients (23.1%) with late complications: cholecystitis in Patients 7 and 13, and cholangitis in Patient 9. All these patients received systemic medication, and their symptoms resolved.

During the mean follow-up of 233±82.9 days (range, 88–365), seven patients (Patients 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 10, and 13) developed stent occlusion caused by tumor ingrowth (detected at days 155, 176, 242, 50, 100, 259, and 308, respectively). Five patients (Patients 3, 4, 8, 9, and 13) underwent plastic stent placement using ERCP. Two patients (Patients 6 and 10) underwent secondary PTCD and biliary SEMS deployment. The mean stent patency time was 239±26.5 days (95% CI, 187–291 days), and the 6- and 9-month patency rates were 68% and 41%, respectively.

Four patients (Patients 2, 4, 9, 13) died of multiple organ failure, and one patient (Patient 7) died of pulmonary embolism. The mean survival time was 298±30.1 days (95% CI, 239–358 days). The 6- and 9-month survival rates were 83% and 65%.

Discussion

Stenting has been the recommended palliative treatment for patients with unresectable malignant biliary obstruction. However, stents (especially non-coated SEMS) tend to occlude because of tumor ingrowth, overgrowth, epithelial hyperplasia, and sludge deposition within 3–6 months (2). Even after the development of advanced technologies such as coated stents, endobiliary photodynamic therapy, locally active endoscopic methods, and ILBT with iridium-192 (192Ir) (1315), the duration of the metal biliary stent has remained unsatisfactory. Placement of a second SEMS (coated or non-coated) or drainage catheter within the occluded SEMS, via PTCD or ERCP, are considered better options.

RFA generates heat causing immediate tissue necrosis. It has been the preferred minimally invasive method to treat solid tumors. In recent years, endobiliary RFA (using the Habib EndoHPB radiofrequency ablation catheter) has been used in the bile duct to control local tumor and to reduce the stent obstruction rate (16). Mukund et al. (4) was the first to report endobiliary RFA to clear tumor ingrowth within the SEMS, conducted in two patients. They suggested that this new method was safe and promising, with patency sustained for 6–7 months. Pai et al. (5) reported a prospective study using a bipolar radiofrequency catheter to clear blocked SEMSs in 9 patients, with a median stent patency of 102.5 days. Subsequently, other investigators have reported techniques using PTCD or ERCP to reopen occluded SEMSs, although retrospective designs limited the statistical power of these results (69).

It has been demonstrated that the duration of SEMS patency can be prolonged by ILBT using high-dose-rate 192Ir. However, the device is not available in most hospitals in China. Furthermore, the technique predisposes patients to bile duct infection because of repeated instrumentation (17). 125I-BT was invented by a Chinese investigator, and has been extensively applied for vascular thrombi and non-vascular cavity BT, with promising results (1824). Liu et al. (19) reported a preliminary study to test the feasibility and effectiveness of ILBT using 125I seed strands in 11 patients; the median stent patency time was 129 days. Zhu et al. (21) demonstrated that the 6-month patency rate of the SEMS was substantially longer than that of the control (7.4 vs. 2.5 months) when using the new biliary intraluminal irradiation stent loaded with 125I seeds. Jiao et al. (10) performed a randomized, single-blind controlled study to evaluate the efficacy of SEMS with 125I-BT in malignant biliary obstruction, and found that the median stent patency time in the BT group (368 days) was longer than that of the non-BT control group (220 days). All these studies showed that tumor growth can be inhibited by 125I-BT, and thus prolong stent patency.

In the present study, the Endo RFA was operated under bipolar mode, meaning that both electrodes did not work simultaneously when in contact with the SEMS. Therefore, tumor ingrowth within the stent can be ablated without destroying tumor tissue outside the stent.

We believe that ILBT can be combined with endobiliary RFA. Theoretically, endobiliary RFA destroys the tumor within the stent, and continuous 125I-BT inhibits tumor ingrowth and granulation hyperplasia. Thus, the two treatments are complementary. The present initial study established the safety and efficacy of combined endobiliary RFA and ILBT. The 100% technical and clinical success rates, and the reasonable early complication rate (15.4%) showed that this combination therapy did not decrease clinical success or increase complications, as was seen in other studies (Tables 2 and 3). The mean stent patency time was 239 days (95% CI, 187–291 days) and the 6-month stent patency rate was 68.4%, both rather promising. In the future, randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm the effectiveness of combined endobiliary RFA and ILBT.

Table 2.

Recent studies of endobiliary radiofrequency ablation for re-opening the occluded SEMS a,b

Author Year Study Pt, n Pre-RFA (Diameter, mm) Post-RFA (Diameter, mm) Success E Cx c Patency, d Survival
Mukund (4) 2012 CR 2 NA NA 100% NA 6 & 7 mo NA
Pai (5) 2013 R 9 1.6 8 100% NA 102.5 d (50–321 d) 3 patients died within 122 d (20–488 d)
Duan (6) 2015 R 14 NA NA 100% 4 cholangitis 234 d (187–544 d) 6-mo & 12-mo, 100% & 64.3%
Kadayifci (7) 2016 R 50 NA NA RFA: 56% NA 90 d 56%, 119.5 d vs. 24%, 65.3 d d NA
Xia (8) 2017 R 43 1 8 100% NA 107 d (12–80 d) 80.5 d (30–243 d)
Betgeri (9) 2017 R 8 NA NA 100% 1 intra-stent H 4 ± 2.1 mo (2–7 mo) NA

SEMS, self-expandable metallic stent; RFA, radiofrequency ablation; Pt, patients; E Cx, early complication; d, days; CR, case report; NA, not available; R, retrospective; H, hemorrhage.

a

The approach was PTCD in all studies, except for ERCP in Kadayifci et al. (7);

b

In all studies, RFA power and time was 10W and 120 s, respectively;

c

There was no information on late complications in any study;

d

In RFA and control groups, respectively.

Table 3.

Recent studies of ILBT for malignant biliary obstruction with low-dose-rate 125I seeds a, b

Author Year Study Pt, n Complications Seed activity Patency Survival
Early Late
Liu (19) 2009 RS 11 18.2% (AST and BR) 18.2% (GOO) NA 129 d Median, 150 d
Guo (20) 2010 CR 1 Nil Nil NA NA 30 mo
Zhu (21) 2012 RCT 23 IS, nil; ctrl, 27.2% IS, 8.3%; ctrl, 45.5% 26.4 Mbq IS, 7.4 mo; ctrl, 2.5 mo IS, 7.4 mo; ctrl, 2.5 mo
Chen (22) 2012 RS 34 23.5% (BR, cholangitis) NA 25.9 Mbq ILBT, 10.2 mo; ctrl, 7.2 mo ILBT, 10 mo; ctrl, 8 mo
Yang (23) 2016 PS 18 55.6% NA 25.9 Mbq 10.6 mo Mean, 11.91 mo
Jiao (10) 2017 PS 61 BT, 35.5%; ctrl, 14.8% BT, 70.1%; ctrl, 76.7% 33.67 Mbq BT, 368 d; ctrl, 220 d BT, 355 d; ctrl, 209 d
Hasimu (24) 2017 PS 55 ILBT, 14.3%; ctrl, 18.5% NA 33.3 Mbq ILBT, 191 d; ctr,l 88 d ILBT, d; ctrl, 139 d

ILBT; intraluminal brachytherapy; RS, retrospective study; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; BR, bilirubinemia; GOO, gastric outlet obstruction; NA, not available; d, days; CR, case report; mo, months; RCT, randomized controlled trial; IS, irradiation stent; ctrl, control; PS, prospective study.

a

The approach was PTCD in all studies, except for ERCP in Liu et al. (19) and Guo et al. (20);

b

the technical and clinical success rates were 100% in all studies.

To improve this combination therapy for treating an occluded biliary stent, the following three technical aspects must be noted. First, a puncture approach from under the diaphragm to the bile duct branch should be coronally flat (avoiding the oblique upward side), to enable easy manipulation later, and to decrease patient discomfort after subsequent placement of the 8.5 F biliary drainage catheter and 125I seed strand. Second, the 125I strand length should be longer than the occluded portion of the SEMS, to inhibit tumor ingrowth more effectively. Third, the dual guidewire technology using an 8 F long sheath can quickly complete the drainage catheter and 125I strand implantation, greatly shortening procedural time.

Regarding dosimetry, in this study the estimated radiation dose at the reference point was only 27.2 Gy over 1 month, as calculated by the treatment planning system. This was less than the 52.3 Gy reported in our previous study, using single 125I strands (10). The difference is due to the short half-life of the 125I strand within the SEMS. Considering the rapid attenuation of 125I-BT, this study was designed to remove the 125I strand at 1 month. Whether the result would improve with simultaneous double 125I strand BT or replacement after 1 month will be addressed in our next study.

The study had several limitations. First, there was no control group, which potentially confounded the results. Second, patient selection bias may have affected the statistical analysis. Third, it was difficult to evaluate tumor response, which possibly influenced objective evaluation of tumor inhibition by PRFA and 125I-BT.

In conclusion, PRFA combined with 125I-BT is feasible and effective for patients with an occluded SEMS in malignant biliary obstruction. However, randomized controlled trails are needed to confirm the effectiveness of this new approach.

Main points

  • Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation combined with 125I seed strand brachytherapy is feasible and effective for patients with an occluded self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) in malignant biliary obstruction.

  • A puncture approach from under the diaphragm to the bile duct branch should be coronally flat (avoiding the oblique upward side).

  • The 125I strand length should be longer than the occluded portion of the SEMS, to inhibit tumor ingrowth more effectively.

  • The dual guidewire technology using an 8 F long sheath can quickly complete the drainage catheter and 125I strand implantation, greatly shortening procedural time.

  • Theoretically, endobiliary RFA destroys the tumor within the stent, and continuous 125I-BT inhibits tumor ingrowth and granulation hyperplasia.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest disclosure

The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Financial Disclosure

This study was supported by Henan Medical Science and Technology Public Relations Program (grant number SB201902014) and the Key Scientific Research Project of Henan Higher Education Institutions (grant number 20A310024).

References

  • 1.Kessler J, Lee A, Frankel P, Dagis A, Park JJ, Lin J. Outcomes of salvage percutaneous biliary drainage after occlusion of endoscopic stents. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017;28:594–601. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2016.12.1208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hu Z, Patel N, Butani D. External biliary conduit for occlusion of an endobiliary stent in malignant biliary obstruction: a nonsurgical solution. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016;27:770–773. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2015.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jiao D, Huang K, Zhu M, et al. Placement of a newly designed Y-configured bilateral self-expanding metallic stent for hilar biliary obstruction: A Pilot Study. Dig Dis Sci. 2017;62:253–263. doi: 10.1007/s10620-016-4284-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mukund A, Arora A, Rajesh S, Bothra P, Patidar Y. Endobiliary radiofrequency ablation for reopening of occluded biliary stents: a promising technique. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013;24:142–144. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2012.09.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Pai M, Valek V, Tomas A, et al. Percutaneous intraductal radiofrequency ablation for clearance of occluded metal stent in malignant biliary obstruction: feasibility and early results. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2014;37:235–240. doi: 10.1007/s00270-013-0688-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Duan XH, Wang YL, Han XW, et al. Intraductal radiofrequency ablation followed by locoregional tumor treatments for treating occluded biliary stents in non-resectable malignant biliary obstruction: a single-institution experience. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0134857. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kadayifci A, Atar M, Forcione DG, Casey BW, Kelsey PB, Brugge WR. Radiofrequency ablation for the management of occluded biliary metal stents. Endoscopy. 2016;48:1096–1101. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-115938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Xia N, Gong J, Lu J, Chen ZJ, Zhang LY, Wang ZM. Percutaneous intraductal radiofrequency ablation for treatment of biliary stent occlusion: A preliminary result. World J Gastroenterol. 2017;23:1851–1856. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i10.1851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Betgeri S, Rajesh S, Arora A, Panda D, Bhadoria AS, Mukund A. Percutaneous endobiliary RFA combined with balloon-sweep for re-opening occluded metallic biliary stents. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2017;26:124–127. doi: 10.1080/13645706.2016.1235052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jiao D, Wu G, Ren J, Han X. Study of self-expandable metallic stent placement intraluminal (125) I seed strands brachytherapy of malignant biliary obstruction. Surg Endosc. 2017;31:4996–5005. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5481-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Dechao J, Han X, Yanli W, Zhen L. Y-configured metallic stent combined with (125) I seed strands cavity brachytherapy for a patient with type IV Klatskin tumor. J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2016;8:356–360. doi: 10.5114/jcb.2016.61704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sacks D, McClenny TE, Cardella JF, Lewis CA. Society of Interventional Radiology clinical practice guidelines. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003;14:S199–202. doi: 10.1097/01.RVI.0000094584.83406.3e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Minaga K, Kitano M, Imai H, et al. Evaluation of anti-migration properties of biliary covered self-expandable metal stents. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22:6917–6924. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i30.6917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mattiucci GC, Autorino R, Tringali A, et al. A Phase I study of high-dose-rate intraluminal brachytherapy as palliative treatment in extrahepatic biliary tract cancer. Brachytherapy. 2015;14:401–404. doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2014.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Moole H, Tathireddy H, Dharmapuri S, et al. Success of photodynamic therapy in palliating patients with nonresectable cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2017;23:1278–1288. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i7.1278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Li TF, Huang GH, Li Z, et al. Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography and intraductal radiofrequency ablation combined with biliary stent placement for malignant biliary obstruction. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2015;26:715–721. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2015.01.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bruha R, Petrtyl J, Kubecova M, et al. Intraluminal brachytherapy and self-expandable stents in nonresectable biliary malignancies--the question of long-term palliation. Hepatogastroenterology. 2001;48:631–637. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zhang ZH, Liu QX, Zhang W, et al. Combined endovascular brachytherapy, sorafenib, and transarterial chemobolization therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma patients with portal vein tumor thrombus. World J Gastroenterol. 2017;23:7735–7745. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i43.7735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Liu Y, Lu Z, Zou DW, et al. Intraluminal implantation of radioactive stents for treatment of primary carcinomas of the peripancreatic-head region: a pilot study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:1067–1073. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.08.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Guo Y, Chen J, Liu Y, Hu YH, Li ZS. Iodine-125 biliary stent for palliative treatment of locally advanced gallbladder cancer. Endoscopy. 2010;42(Suppl 2):E259–260. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1255862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zhu HD, Guo JH, Zhu GY, et al. A novel biliary stent loaded with (125) I seeds in patients with malignant biliary obstruction: preliminary results versus a conventional biliary stent. J Hepatol. 2012;56:1104–1111. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2011.12.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Chen Y, Wang XL, Yan ZP, et al. The use of (1)(2)(5)I seed strands for intraluminal brachytherapy of malignant obstructive jaundice. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2012;27:317–323. doi: 10.1089/cbr.2011.0999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Yang M, Yan Z, Luo J, et al. A pilot study of intraluminal brachytherapy using (125) I seed strand for locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with obstructive jaundice. Brachytherapy. 2016;15:859–864. doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2016.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hasimu A, Gu JP, Ji WZ, Zhang HX, Zhu DW, Ren WX. Comparative study of percutaneous transhepatic biliary stent placement with or without iodine-125 seeds for treating patients with malignant biliary obstruction. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017;28:583–593. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2016.11.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology are provided here courtesy of Turkish Society of Radiology

RESOURCES