Skip to main content
International Journal of Fertility & Sterility logoLink to International Journal of Fertility & Sterility
. 2021 Jan 27;15(1):26–33. doi: 10.22074/IJFS.2020.134688

Genetic Determinants of Premature Menopause in A Mashhad Population Cohort

Mohammad Reza Mirinezhad 1, Narges Khosroabadi 2, Maliheh Rahpeyma 1, Reza Khayami 1,3, Seyyed Reza Hashemi 1,3, Hamideh Ghazizadeh 3,4,5, Gordon A Ferns 6, Alireza Pasdar 1,7,*, Majid Ghayour-Mobarhan 4,5,*, Tayebeh Hamzehloei 1,*
PMCID: PMC7838752  PMID: 33497044

Abstract

Background:

Premature menopause is characterized by amenorrhea before age of 40 years, markedly raised serum luteinizing hormone (LH) level, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) level and reduced serum level of estradiol. Genome-wide analysis suggested several loci associated with premature menopause. Here, we aimed to analyze association of variants at the MCM8, FNDC4, PRRC2A, TLK1, ZNF346 and TMEM150B gene loci with premature menopause.

Materials and Methods:

In this cross-sectional study, a total of 117 women with premature menopause were compared to 183 healthy women. Anthropometric indices were measured in all participants: height, weight, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC) and wrist circumference. Eight single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the indicated genes (rs16991615, rs244715, rs451417, rs1046089, rs7246479, rs4806660, rs10183486 and rs2303369) were identified from the literature. Genotyping was performed using tetra-ARMS polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and ASO-PCR methods.

Results:

T allele of the rs16991615, rs1046089, rs7246479 and rs10183486, C allele of rs244715, rs451417 and rs4806660 as well as TT genotype of rs2303369 were associated with an increased risk of premature menopause, likely causing susceptibility to primary ovarian insufficiency (POI) in comparison with C allele. We also found an association between the rs16991615 SNP with premature menopause. Frequency of the minor allele in cases was increased for all SNPs in comparison with controls. All minor alleles, except for rs2303369, showed a statistically significant increased odds ratio (OR). However, after Bonferroni correction for multiple testing, none of the P values were remained significant.

Conclusion:

The selected polymorphisms in MCM8, FNDC4, PRRC2A, TLK1, ZNF346 and TMEM150B genes may potentially affect susceptibility to premature menopause, although replication of the results in larger cohort could clarify this.

Keywords: Association Studies, Genetic Polymorphisms, Haplotype, Premature Menopause

Introduction

Premature menopause or primary ovarian insufficiency (POI) is the occurrence of menopause before age of 40 years (1). This condition is characterized by amenorrhea, increased luteinizing hormone (LH) level, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) level and reduced level of estradiol. POI may be idiopathic or associated with autoimmune and genetic abnormalities (2). Other than that, factors such as infections, chemo and radiotherapy, surgery and adverse effects of drugs could also be contributory (3, 4). POI may lead to increase of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular diseases, depression, type 2 diabetes and increased risk of bone fracture (5-8).

Genetic factors appear to be responsible for approximately 50% of the variations in the onset of menarche and menopause (9). Several studies have found different genetic loci associated with age at natural menopause (ANM) (10-14). DNA repair genes such as EXO1, HELQ, UIMC1, FAM175A, FANCI, TLK1, POLG and PRIM1 along with genes like IL11, NLRP11 and PRRC2A which are involved in immune function, are located at these loci (14).

Mutations in some of these genes have been indicated to be involved in POI. For example, Tenenbaum-Rakover et al. (15) found two new homozygous mutations in the MCM8 gene, a frameshift (c.1469-1470insTA) and a splice site mutation (c.1954-1G>A). These mutations were shown to increase the risk of chromosomal breakage after mitomycin C exposure. The authors also found that MCM8 plays a pivotal role in gonadal development. Desai et al. (16) also found that mutations in MCM8 and MCM9 could be a significant risk factor for POI. Besides, several other studies have replicated findings obtained from rs16991615 polymorphism, located in MCM8, as a significant single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) associated with ANM in different populations (17, 18). Llácer et al. (19) showed that IL11- rs11668344 and PRRC2Ars1046089 are associated with poor ovarian response indicating that women carrying these polymorphisms have decreased oocyte production in response to controlled ovarian hyper stimulation. On this basis, we selected eight different SNPs in the genes more commonly associated with POI. They have not previously been studied in the Iranian population. We aimed to determine whether these SNPs are involved in the development of premature menopause and to find their association with anthropometric characteristics in a population sample from Mashhad city in Iran.

Materials and Methods

Studying participants and anthropometric indices

In this cross-sectional study, a total of 117 women who were originally enrolled in the Mashhad stroke and heart atherosclerotic disorder (MASHAD) study were recruited and compared to 183 healthy women. "MASHAD study" is a 10-years cohort study of a total of 9704 individuals aged 35-65 years, from an urban population in eastern part of Iran. They were selected using a stratified cluster random sampling design. The healthy group was chosen from women without history of menopause before the age of 40 years to match with the cases group in terms of age. The cases were also selected from this study cohort based on their history of premature menopause. A complete history was taken for all subjects, including any surgical procedures, acute or chronic diseases, chemotherapy or radiation therapy, smoking habit, medications as well as the results of periodic examinations. Women who were not willing to enroll in the present study, were excluded. We included all eligible and available volunteer women who met the study criteria. To clarify this, 9704 people participated in "MASHAD study" project. 5838 of the cases were women. 2747 women reached menopause by the time of starting study. Furthermore, 895 women were removed from the project (due to hysterectomy, oophorectomy and other secondary causes). Out of the 1852 remaining women, 117 (all the cases existed in the population) cases were below the age of 40 years at their menopause. They were selected according to the POI definition, including: i. Women going through menopause before the age of 40 years, ii. 12 months of consecutive menstrual cessation or iii. Elevated serum FSH levels >40 IU/L (repeated at four-week intervals) (1). Other inclusion criteria were provided as follows: women with POI, women younger than 40 years old, women without history of diseases affecting menstruation, women without any genetically confirmed diseases or syndromes that early menopause was part of their manifestations, women without any previous surgeries affecting menstruation (oophorectomy, hysterectomy) and women who were not using any drugs affecting menstruation. Hence, 117 women were considered eligible to be enrolled in the present study. Anthropometric indices such as height, weight, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC) and wrist circumference were measured in all participants. Informed consent was obtained from all participants. The approval number from the constituted review board, the Ethics Committee of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences is IR.MUMS.MEDICAL.REC.1398.658.

Genotyping

DNA extraction and quality control

Total genomic DNA was extracted from 200 µl blood or buffy coat using a DNA extraction kit (Parstous, Iran). After DNA extraction, the samples were loaded and run on agarose gel (Parstous, Iran). Quantification of the DNA samples was evaluated by Nanodrop 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) at wave length of 280 and 260 nm.

Tetra-ARMS polymerase chain reaction

Tetra-ARMS polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was carried out in 15 µl reaction volume containing 1 µl of each primer (0.6 pM of each primer), 7.5 µl master mix (Parstous, Iran), 2 µl genomic DNA and 1.5 µl water. Primers were designed using Primer 1 software. TetraARMS PCR was conducted with an initial denaturation step at 95°C for 5 minutes, followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 seconds, annealing at 58°C for 30 seconds and extension at 72°C for 40 seconds. Final extension step was performed at 72°C for 5 minutes. The sequences of all primers are summarized in Table S1 (See Supplementary Online Information at www.ijfs.ir). Sanger sequencing was performed to confirm the results.

Allele-specific oligonucleotide polymerase chain reaction

Allele-specific oligonucleotide PCR (ASO-PCR) was performed in a 15 µl reaction volume containing 1 µl of each primer (4 µM), 7.5 µl master mix (Parstous, Iran), 2 µl genomic DNA and 1.5 µl water. Primers were designed using Primer 3 software. PCR was carried out with the following condition: one cycle of initial denaturation at 95°C for 7 minutes, followed by 35 cycles including 95°C for 30 seconds, annealing for 30 seconds, 72°C for 30 seconds, followed by one cycle of 7 minutes for the final extension. The sequences of all primers are summarized in Table S1 (See Supplementary Online Information at www.ijfs.ir). The sample data are presented in Figure 1.

Fig.1.

Fig.1

The RS4806660 Gel electrophoresis. Tetra- ARMS polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products were loaded and run on 2% agarose gel.

Statistical analysis

All experiments were performed in triplicate and reported values were displayed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). All data were analyzed using Microsoft Excel and SPSS version 24 (SPSS Inc., USA). t test statistical analysis was applied for comparing mean differences between two independent groups, and One-way ANOVA test was used to compare mean differences between more than two groups. Chi-square test was performed to analyze the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Binary logistic regression test was used to calculate the odds ratio (OR) and confidence interval (CI) based on genotype data. Univariate and multivariate analysis were applied for the polymorphisms. Significance level is shown with *P<0.05, ** P<0.01 and ***P<0.001. Where applicable, Bonferroni correction was used to correct for multiple testing.

Results

Study of population characteristics

The mean age was 55.21 ± 5.56 years for the cases and 54.62 ± 2.89 years for the controls (P=0.411). A significant difference was observed between the average heights, waist circumference, weight, waist/height ratio and waist/hip ratio (WHR) of both groups. The controls were significantly heavier (70.96 ± 10.80 Kg) than the cases (67.11 ± 12.03 Kg, P<0.001). In contrast, the waist/height ratio was higher in the patients (63.55 ± 8.41) compared to the healthy subjects (60.30 ± 6.84, P=0.001). WHR was also greater in patients (0.93 ± 0.08) than controls (0.89 ± 0.07, P=0.001). The data are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1.

Demographic features and characteristics of the study population


Indices Case Control P value

Age (Y) 55.21 ± 5.56 54.62 ± 2.89 0.411
Height (m) 1.53 ± 0.06 1.56 ± 0.06 0.001
Waist circumference (cm) 96.96 ± 12.19 93.70 ± 10.44 0.020
Weight (kg) 67.11 ± 12.03 70.96 ± 10.80 <0.001
Hip circumference (cm) 104.71 ± 9.85 105.57 ± 8.78 0.430
Waist/height ratio 63.55 ± 8.41 60.30 ± 6.84 0.001
Waist/hip ratio 0.93 ± 0.08 0.89 ± 0.07 0.001
Mid upper circumference (cm) 30.69 ± 4.47 31.02 ± 4.61 0.550
Body mass index (kg/m2) 28.78 ± 5.06 29.34 ± 4.22 0.300

Data are presented as mean ± SD.

Association of the single nucleotide polymorphisms and premature menopause

A total of eight SNPs were investigated in this study: rs16991615, rs244715, rs451417, rs1046089, rs7246479, rs4806660, rs10183486 and rs2303369. The genotype and allele frequencies of these SNPs are shown in Table 2. All SNPs conformed to the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. We found that the T allele of rs16991615, rs1046089, rs7246479 and rs10183486 as well as the C allele of rs244715, rs451417 and rs4806660 were associated with increased risk of premature menopause, in addition to the TT genotype of rs2303369 which may increase the susceptibility to POI in comparison with C allele careers. Besides, using a recessive model, genotypes of all SNPs were associated with an elevated risk of the disease (Table 3). Our results also suggested that CT genotype of rs7246479 was associated with increased susceptibility to premature menopause in comparison with CC genotype (OR=1.92, 95% CI=1.16-3.18, P=0.01). Furthermore, dominant model showed that genotype frequency of CC+TC was associated with increased risk of premature menopause for rs244715 (OR=1.70, 95% CI=1.06-2.72, P=0.027) in comparison with TT, while the T allele careers of rs1046089 (OR=1.71, 95% CI=1.05-2.79, P=0.03) and rs7246479 (OR=2.13, 95% CI=1.30-3.47, P=0.002) showed a greater association with risk for POI in comparison with CC. The additive model also indicated that TT genotype of rs16991615, rs1046089, rs10183486 and rs2303369, as well as CC genotype of rs451417 and rs4806660, were associated with increased risk of premature menopause, more than 100%. We acknowledge that although in the initial analysis some of these SNPs seemed to be associated with premature menopause, after correction for multiple testing none of them remained significant, as explained in Table 4.

Table 2.

Genotype distribution and allele frequencies of the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs)


SNP Genotype frequency HWE
Case (117) Alleles Control (183) Alleles P value
AA Aa aa A a AA Aa aa A a

rs16991615 (G>A) 44 39 29 0.57 0.43 96 79 18 0.66 0.33 0.95
rs244715 (A>G) 59 46 12 0.70 0.3 116 61 6 0.80 0.20 0.83
rs451417 (A>C) 48 36 33 0.56 0.43 87 76 20 0.68 0.32 0.85
rs1046089 (G>A) 37 59 21 0.56 0.44 81 89 13 0.69 0.31 0.22
rs7246479 (G/T) 36 67 14 0.60 0.4 89 86 8 0.72 0.28 0.07
rs4806660 (T>C) 50 53 14 0.65 0.34 94 82 7 0.74 0.26 0.10
rs10183486 (C>T) 47 55 15 0.64 0.36 93 81 9 0.73 0.27 0.25
rs2303369 (C>T) 42 54 21 0.59 0.41 77 90 16 0.67 0.33 0.35

Table 3.

OR based on different models


SNP Additive model (aa vs. Aa) P value Dominant model ( aa+Aa vs. AA) P value
OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI)

rs16991615 (G>A) 3.26 (1.61-6.58) 0.001 1.52 (0.95- 2.45) 0.078
rs244715 (A>G) 2.65 (0.92-7.59) 0.069 1.70 (1.06-2.72) 0.027
rs451417 (A>C) 3.48 (1.76-6.89) <0.001 1.30 (0.81-2.08) 0.269
rs1046089 (G>A) 2.43 (1.13-5.24) 0.023 1.71 (1.05-2.79) 0.03
rs7246479 (G/T) 2.24 (0.89-5.66) 0.087 2.13 (1.30-3.47) 0.002
rs4806660 (T>C) 3.09 (1.17-8.16) 0.023 1.41 (0.88-2.25) 0.145
rs10183486 (C>T) 2.45 (1.00-6.00) 0.050 1.53 (0.96-2.46) 0.070
rs2303369 (C>T) 2.18 (1.05-4.55) 0.040 1.29 (0.80-2.09) 0.290
Allelic model (a vs. A) Homozygote contrast (aa vs. AA)
rs16991615 (G>A) 1.79 (1.27-2.53) 0.001 3.51 (1.76-6.99) 0.001
rs244715 (A>G) 1.71 (1.17- 2.50) 0.005 3.93 (1.40-11.00) 0.009
rs451417 (A>C) 1.66 (1.18-2.33) 0.003 2.99 (1.54-5.77) 0.001
rs1046089 (G>A) 1.65 (1.17-2.32) 0.004 3.53 (1.59-7.81) 0.002
rs7246479 (G/T) 1.76 (1.25-2.50) 0.001 4.32 (1.67-11.19) 0.003
rs4806660 (T>C) 1.48 (1.042-2.12) 0.028 3.76(1.42-9.91) 0.007
rs10183486 (C>T) 1.53 (1.08-2.18) 0.020 3.29 (1.34-8.09) 0.010
rs2303369 (C>T) 1.39 (0.99-1.95) 0.060 2.40 (1.13-5.10) 0.020
Heterozygote contrast (Aa vs. AA) Recessive model ( aa vs. Aa+AA)
rs16991615 (G>A) 1.07 (0.63-1.81) 0.781 3.39 (1.78-6.46) 0.001
rs244715 (A>G) 1.48 (0.90-2.43) 0.119 3.37 (1.22-9.24) 0.018
rs451417 (A>C) 0.85 (0.50-1.45) 0.573 3.20 (1.73-5.92) 0.001
rs1046089 (G>A) 1.45 (0.87-2.41) 0.152 2.86 (1.37-5.96) 0.005
rs7246479 (G/T) 1.92 (1.16-3.18) 0.010 2.97 (1.20-7.32) 0.018
rs4806660 (T>C) 1.21 (0.74-1.97) 0.433 3.41 (1.33- 8.74) 0.010
rs10183486 (C>T) 1.34 (0.82-2.19) 0.240 2.84 (1.20- 6.73) 0.020
rs2303369 (C>T) 1.1(0.66-1.82) 0.710 2.28 (1.13-4.58) 0.020

SNP; Single nucleotide polymorphism, OR; Odds ratio, and CI; Confidence interval.

Table 4.

Association between the SNPs and demographic characteristics


Polymorphism Height (m) Waist circumference (cm) Weight (kg) Hip circumference (cm) Waist/ height ratio Waist/hip ratio Mid upper circumference (cm) BMI (kg/m2)

rs16991615
AA (n=134) Mean 1.54604 95.5396 69.8507 105.3455 61.8738 0.9069 30.7632 29.2723
SD 0.059774 11.59249 11.74 9.636 7.79393 0.07493 4.06007 4.89012
Aa+aa (n=166) Mean 1.54366 94.4811 69.1659 105.1543 61.2964 0.8992 30.9902 29.0056
SD 0.058927 10.96122 11.19606 8.85304 7.52282 0.07828 4.93033 4.29641
P value* 0.730 0.420 0.608 0.859 0.517 0.386 0.670 0.617
rs244715
AA (n=172) Mean 1.54413 94.932 68.443 104.625 61.5679 0.9077 30.4241 28.722
SD 0.058418 11.08496 10.86428 8.78544 7.605 0.07768 2.99326 4.37843
Aa+aa (n=128) Mean 1.54556 94.9913 70.881 106.0802 61.5399 0.8958 31.5143 29.6764
SD 0.060525 11.49888 12.06058 9.70565 7.71405 0.07526 6.01161 4.77505
P value 0.838 0.964 0.069 0.178 0.975 0.186 0.042 0.075
rs451417
AA (n=135) Mean 1.5443 95.0711 68.9215 105.0119 61.6286 0.9056 30.6828 28.8994
SD 0.061006 11.20656 10.88902 8.65259 7.47528 0.07947 3.80482 4.27702
Aa+aa (n=165) Mean 1.54509 94.8626 69.9313 105.4294 61.496 0.9002 31.058 29.3128
SD 0.057888 11.30614 11.87232 9.64887 7.7933 0.0746 5.09652 4.79884
P value 0.908 0.874 0.449 0.697 0.882 0.549 0.481 0.438
rs1046089
AA (n=108) Mean 1.53991 94.9944 69.0157 105.1648 61.7733 0.9031 30.5252 29.1215
SD 0.055895 10.98759 11.2755 8.80033 7.57492 0.0696 3.06539 4.63562
Aa+aa (n=192) Mean 1.54747 94.9358 69.7342 105.2832 61.4326 0.9024 31.0937 29.1279
SD 0.061005 11.41384 11.53757 9.43923 7.69138 0.08073 5.20816 4.53979
P value 0.290 0.966 0.603 0.915 0.712 0.938 0.303 0.991
rs7246479
AA (n=125) Mean 1.53992 95.5864 70.3928 105.2984 62.132 0.9078 30.722 29.6871
SD 0.060728 10.95757 11.09858 9.25444 7.25764 0.06692 3.85928 4.40168
Aa+aa (n=175) Mean 1.54821 94.5023 68.8098 105.1983 61.1399 0.899 31.0064 28.7198
SD 0.058037 11.45425 11.64944 9.18376 7.89665 0.08315 4.99693 4.65319
P value 0.234 0.412 0.239 0.926 0.269 0.329 0.597 0.071
rs4806660
AA (n=144) Mean 1.54222 96.3625 67.6604 104.7625 62.5597 0.92 30.5895 28.4628
SD 0.056426 11.34757 11.4973 8.87954 7.68153 0.07821 3.12603 4.67753
Aa+aa (n=156) Mean 1.54708 93.6429 71.1695 105.687 60.6176 0.8864 31.1673 29.7452
SD 0.061813 11.0187 11.13753 9.4933 7.50157 0.07191 5.5638 4.38612
P value 0.480 0.037 0.008 0.387 0.028 <0.001 0.276 0.015
rs10183486
AA (n=140) Mean 1.55436 96.3093 71.2586 106.7629 62.054 0.9025 31.3266 29.491
SD 0.061752 10.84882 11.72958 9.3348 7.45174 0.07029 4.26855 4.52896
Aa+aa (n=160) Mean 1.5362 93.7589 67.8924 103.8911 61.1148 0.9028 30.5 28.8017
SD 0.055702 11.48176 10.95238 8.8882 7.79695 0.0823 4.77225 4.59034
P value 0.008 0.050 0.011 0.007 0.290 0.975 0.119 0.194
rs2303369
AA (n=119) Mean 1.54345 96.8336 67.5714 104.9563 62.8264 0.9232 30.7568 28.3835
SD 0.054779 11.18619 11.66716 8.84538 7.69302 0.08058 2.98854 4.79756
Aa+aa (n=181) Mean 1.54559 93.7095 70.7385 105.4291 60.7116 0.889 30.9753 29.6188
SD 0.062135 11.1368 11.12204 9.44499 7.50472 0.07112 5.35162 4.35084
P value 0.760 0.019 0.019 0.665 0.019 <0.001 0.687 0.022

; Due to multiplecomparison, Bonferroni correction has been applied and the level of significance is set to <0.006 and SNP; Single-nucleotide polymorphism.

Table 5.

Univariate multivariate analysis of the polymorphisms between case and control groups


SNP Univariateanalysis Multivariateanalysis

rs16991615 0.312 0.162
rs244715 0.008 0.019
rs451417 0.270 0.589
rs1046089 0.208 0.095
rs7246479 0.286 0.600
rs4806660 0.005 0.024
rs10183486 0.072 0.096
rs2303369 0.008 0.028
Age (Y) 0.163
Height (m) 0.310
Waist circumference (cm) 0.439
Weight (kg) 0.830
Hip circumference (cm) 0.938
Waist: height ratio 0.550
Waist:hip ratio 0.348
Mid upper circumference (cm) 0.332
Body mass index (kg/m2) 0.463

Univariate and multivariate linear regression were used to indicate the polymorphisms correlations. * ; Due to multiple comparison, Bonferroni correction was applied and the level of significance was set to <0.003.

Association of the single nucleotide polymorphisms with demographic characteristics

We found no significant association between rs16991615, rs451417 and rs1046089 polymorphisms and demographic characteristics of the patients. Additionally, only the rs244715 showed an association with Mid-Upper Arm Circumference (MUAC) in which the dominant homozygous genotype had lower MUAC (P=0.042). WC and weight did not seem to be associated with rs4806660, rs10183486 and rs2303369 (P=0.05). In all of these three SNPs, the dominant homozygous genotype had a greater WC. On the other hand, people with the dominant homozygous genotype of rs10183486 were heavier, while the same genotype for rs2303369 and rs4806660 had lower weight. Hip circumference only showed association with rs10183486, as dominant homozygous genotype. Furthermore, waist/height and waist/hip ratios were significantly higher for the dominant homozygous genotype of rs4806660 and rs2303369. Finally, women having TT and CC genotypes for the rs4806660 and rs2303369, respectively, had significantly higher BMI. The association of these SNPs and demographic characteristics are summarized in Table 4. However, after correcting for multiple testing using Bonferroni correction, they were not remained significant. Moreover, univariate regression analysis (model 1) was used to analyze the association between genetic variants and risk of POI. While, multivariate regression analysis (model 2) was adjusted for sex, age, smoking status, BMI, WC, waist/hip, waist/height.

Discussion

We evaluated association of eight different SNPs including rs16991615, rs244715, rs451417, rs1046089, rs7246479, rs4806660, rs10183486 and rs2303369 with premature menopause. All of these SNPs except for rs244715, rs7246479 and rs4806660 were previously identified in GWAS. These SNPs are mapped to different loci in the genome. rs16991615 and rs451417 are mapped to MCM8 while rs2303369, rs1046089, rs10183486 and rs244715 are mapped to FNDC4, PRRC2A, TLK1 and ZNF346, respectively. Besides, rs7246479 and rs4806660 are both mapped to TMEM150B.

Several studies have established the role of genetic variations in premature menopause. One of the loci is located on chromosome 19 containing MCM8, which encodes a mini-chromosome maintenance protein called DNA replication licensing factor MCM8. MCM8 plays role in DNA repair (16). Moreover, this protein has an important role in gametogenesis as MCM8 knockedout mice showed sterility and arrested primary follicles in males and females, respectively (20). Additionally, MCM8 expression was increased during the follicular phase of menstrual cycle in humans (21). Mutations in this gene have been linked to ovarian failure as well as chromosomal instability (15, 22). Recently, novel mutations of this gene were also identified to associate with POI (23, 24). Large scale studies were previously conducted and they found that rs16991615 was associated with ANM in American populations with Hispanic, African and Indian descent, in addition to European women (17). This SNP was discovered to ramp up the risk of premature menopause (25). Bae et al. (26) and Day et al. (27) studies revealed association of rs16991615 with age at menopause at a genome-wide significance. The rs16991615 association with age at menopause was also replicated in the Iranian population (28). We identified that a minor allele of rs16991615 and TT genotype is not associated with increased risk of POI in our population. Similar to our results, Setti et al. (29) found no significant association between rs16991615 and poor ovarian response in Brazilian women. Moreover, other studies including Desai et al. (16) could not find any association between rs16991615 and POI. Recently, the minor allele of rs16991615 has been demonstrated to increase age-adjusted inverse anti-mullerian hormone (AMH), suggesting that factors affecting age at premature menopause could have a role in AMH regulation in ovarian reserves (30). For other SNPs including rs451417, we found that CC genotype was associated with an increased risk of POI by more than two-fold in comparison with careers of T allele.

We also investigated association of premature menopause with the rs244715, located in the ZNF346 gene. ZNF346 encodes a double-stranded RNA binding protein and takes part in apoptosis regulation (31). We confirmed that the minor allele of rs244715 could have an association with increased risk of the disease and MUAC; however, the study on Brazilian women failed to find any association between rs244715 and poor ovarian response (29).

Furthermore, Perry et al. (32) and Stolk et al. (14) found an association between rs1046089, located in the PRRC2A gene that encodes the HLA-B associated transcript, with age at menopause. Variations in this gene have been linked to different phenotypes, including BMI and height. Consistent with this, we noticed that the TT genotype of rs1046089 compared to C allele careers could be linked with increased risk of POI by more than 150%. However, Llácer et al. (19) found an increased risk of poor ovarian response in patients with CT and CC genotype, in comparison with TT genotype.

The rs7246479 and rs4806660 are located on chromosome 19 in the TMEM150B gene, which gives rise to transmembrane protein 150B, a member of TMEM150/Damage-Regulated Autophagy Modulator (DRAM) family. DRAM proteins play a role in apoptosis and autophagy (33). We found that women carrying GG genotype of rs7246479 were younger and had a lower rate of POI. Moreover, this SNP is also associated with age at menopause in the Chinese population (13). Furthermore, Setti et al. (29) found that rs4806660 has a protective effect against poor ovarian response. They further identified that the minor allele of rs4806660 was associated with enhanced controlled ovarian stimulation. However, the association was not statistically significant. Nonetheless, we demonstrated that C allele in the recessive model could associate with an increased risk of POI.

Another SNP associated with early menopause is rs2303369. The gene containing this variant encodes a protein called FNDC4. FNDC4 belong to the fibronectin type III domain family of proteins. FNDC4 binds to macrophages and monocytes. Administration of this could have therapeutic applications in inflammatory diseases (34). FNDC4 can also activate Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway (35). Although Laisk-Podar et al. (36) established the association of rs2303369 with early follicular FSH, they could not find any association between rs2303369 and mean ovarian volume. On the other hand, we found that TT genotype of rs2303369 was associated with a significantly increased risk of POI in comparison with the major allele careers.

rs10183486 in the Tousled-like kinase 1 (TLK1) gene, encoding a serine/threonine kinase, is suggested to be involved in chromatin assembly, DNA repair and ovarian aging (37). Overexpression of TLK1 in mouse embryonic stem cells has resulted in developmental arrest and apoptosis, as well as a decrease in pluripotency factors (38). We found that the minor allele of rs10183486 in comparison with the C allele and TT genotype in comparison with C allele careers (CT+CC) were associated with increased susceptibility to POI which is in concordance with the findings of Stolk et al. (14) study, reported an association between rs10183486 SNP and age at menopause.

Limitations of the current study include use of a population derived from a single region of Iran, hence it may not be possible to extrapolate our findings more widely. Secondly, we were unable to completely verify premature menopause by biochemical testing. Thirdly, the sample size of this study was quite small, which may affect the power of this study. Hence, there is a need to conduct further studies in different ethnicities with large sample sizes and to consider more comprehensive criteria for assessing the correlation between variants and premature menopause.

Conclusion

The rs16991615, rs244715, rs451417, rs1046089, rs7246479, rs4806660, rs10183486 and rs2303369 polymorphisms may potentially influence premature menopause. Although ethnic differences may result in diverse outcomes in association studies, more commonly recognized loci related to age at menopause could be subjected to replication in different populations. This could warrant further investigations with larger sample sizes to get a more comprehensive understanding of variations in different geographic regions.

Supplementary PDF

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a grant from the Vice Chancellor for Research at Mashhad University of Medical Sciences and this was a part of the Ph.D. student dissertation (no. 971084). The authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.

Authors’ Contributions

M.R.M., N.Kh., G.A.F., A.P., M.Gh.-M., T.H.; Participated in study design, data collection and evaluation, drafting and statistical analysis. M.R.M., R.Kh., S.R.H.; Performed blood sample and demographic data collection to this component of the study. H.Gh., M.R.; Conducted molecular experiments and RT-qPCR analysis. All authors performed editing and approved the final version of this manuscript for submission.

References

  • 1.Mishra GD, Chung HF, Cano A, Chedraui P, Goulis DG, Lopes P, et al. EMAS position statement: Predictors of premature and early natural menopause. Maturitas. 2019;123:82–88. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2019.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.De Vos M, Devroey P, Fauser BC. Primary ovarian insufficiency. Lancet. 2010;376(9744):911–921. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60355-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Calvet GA, Grinsztejn BG, Quintana Mde S, Derrico M, Jalil EM, Cytryn A, et al. Predictors of early menopause in HIV-infected women: a prospective cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(6):765–765. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.12.040. e1-765e13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Okeke TC, Anyaehie UB, Ezenyeaku CC. Premature menopause. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2013;3(1):90–95. doi: 10.4103/2141-9248.109458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Anagnostis P, Christou K, Artzouchaltzi AM, Gkekas NK, Kosmidou N, Siolos P, et al. Early menopause and premature ovarian insufficiency are associated with increased risk of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Endocrinol. 2019;180(1):41–50. doi: 10.1530/EJE-18-0602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Anagnostis P, Siolos P, Gkekas NK, Kosmidou N, Artzouchaltzi AM, Christou K, et al. Association between age at menopause and fracture risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endocrine. 2019;63(2):213–224. doi: 10.1007/s12020-018-1746-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Georgakis MK, Thomopoulos TP, Diamantaras AA, Kalogirou EI, Skalkidou A, Daskalopoulou SS, et al. Association of age at menopause and duration of reproductive period with depression after menopause: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry. 2016;73(2):139–149. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.2653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Muka T, Oliver-Williams C, Kunutsor S, Laven JS, Fauser BCJM, Chowdhury R, et al. Association of age at onset of menopause and time since onset of menopause with cardiovascular outcomes, intermediate vascular traits, and all-cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Cardiol. 2016;1(7):767–776. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2016.2415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Perry JRB, Hsu YH, Chasman DI, Johnson AD, Elks C, Albrecht E, et al. DNA mismatch repair gene MSH6 implicated in determining age at natural menopause. Hum Mol Genet. 2014;23(9):2490–2497. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddt620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.He C, Kraft P, Chasman DI, Buring JE, Chen C, Hankinson SE, et al. A large-scale candidate gene association study of age at menarche and age at natural menopause. Hum Genet. 2010;128(5):515–527. doi: 10.1007/s00439-010-0878-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Day FR, Ruth KS, Thompson DJ, Lunetta KL, Pervjakova N, Chasman DI, et al. Large-scale genomic analyses link reproductive aging to hypothalamic signaling, breast cancer susceptibility and BRCA1-mediated DNA repair. Nat Genet. 2015;47(11):1294–1303. doi: 10.1038/ng.3412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Chen CT, Liu CT, Chen GK, Andrews JS, Arnold AM, Dreyfus J, et al. Meta-analysis of loci associated with age at natural menopause in African-American women. Hum Mol Genet. 2014;23(12):3327–3342. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddu041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Shen C, Delahanty RJ, Gao YT, Lu W, Xiang YB, Zheng Y, et al. Evaluating GWAS-identified SNPs for age at natural menopause among chinese women. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e58766–e58766. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Stolk L, Perry JR, Chasman DI, He C, Mangino M, Sulem P, et al. Meta-analyses identify 13 loci associated with age at menopause and highlight DNA repair and immune pathways. Nat Genet. 2012;44(3):260–268. doi: 10.1038/ng.1051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Tenenbaum-Rakover Y, Weinberg-Shukron A, Renbaum P, Lobel O, Eideh H, Gulsuner S, et al. Minichromosome maintenance complex component 8 (MCM8) gene mutations result in primary gonadal failure. J Med Genet. 2015;52(6):391–399. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2014-102921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Desai S, Wood-Trageser M, Matic J, Chipkin J, Jiang H, Bachelot A, et al. MCM8 and MCM9 Nucleotide Variants in Women With Primary Ovarian Insufficiency. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017;102(2):576–582. doi: 10.1210/jc.2016-2565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Carty CL, Spencer KL, Setiawan VW, Fernandez-Rhodes L, Malinowski J, Buyske S, et al. Replication of genetic loci for ages at menarche and menopause in the multi-ethnic Population Architecture using Genomics and Epidemiology (PAGE) study. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(6):1695–1706. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Coignet MV, Zirpoli GR, Roberts MR, Khoury T, Bandera EV, Zhu Q, et al. Genetic variations, reproductive aging, and breast cancer risk in African American and European American women: The Women's Circle of Health Study. PLoS One. 2017;12(10):e0187205–e0187205. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Llácer J, Ortiz JA, Turienzo A, Luque L, Lledó B, Bernabeu R. Polymorphisms in inmune pathway genes (IL11 and PRRC2A) are associated with poor ovarian response. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(3):S376–S376. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lutzmann M, Grey C, Traver S, Ganier O, Maya-Mendoza A, Ranisavljevic N, et al. MCM8- and MCM9-deficient mice reveal gametogenesis defects and genome instability due to impaired homologous recombination. Mol Cell. 2012;47(4):523–534. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.05.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Dondik Y, Lei Z, Gaskins J, Pagidas K. Minichromosome maintenance complex component 8 and 9 gene expression in the menstrual cycle and unexplained primary ovarian insufficiency. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019;36(1):57–64. doi: 10.1007/s10815-018-1325-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.AlAsiri S, Basit S, Wood-Trageser MA, Yatsenko SA, Jeffries EP, Surti U, et al. Exome sequencing reveals MCM8 mutation underlies ovarian failure and chromosomal instability. J Clin Invest. 2015;125(1):258–262. doi: 10.1172/JCI78473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Heddar A, Beckers D, Fouquet B, Roland D, Misrahi M. A Novel phenotype combining primary ovarian insufficiency growth retardation and pilomatricomas with MCM8 mutation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2020;105(6):dgaa155–dgaa155. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zhang YX, He WB, Xiao WJ, Meng LL, Tan C, Du J, et al. Novel loss-of-function mutation in MCM8 causes premature ovarian insufficiency. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2020;8(4):e1165–e1165. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.1165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Chen CT, Fernández-Rhodes L, Brzyski RG, Carlson CS, Chen Z, Heiss G, et al. Replication of loci influencing ages at menarche and menopause in Hispanic women: the Women's Health Initiative SHARe Study. Hum Mol Genet. 2012;21(6):1419–1432. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddr570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Bae H, Lunetta KL, Murabito JM, Andersen SL, Schupf N, Perls T, et al. Genetic associations with age of menopause in familial longevity. Menopause. 2019;26(10):1204–1212. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000001367. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Day FR, Ruth KS, Thompson DJ, Lunetta KL, Pervjakova N, Chasman DI, et al. Large-scale genomic analyses link reproductive aging to hypothalamic signaling, breast cancer susceptibility and BRCA1-mediated DNA repair. Nat Genet. 2015;47(11):1294–1303. doi: 10.1038/ng.3412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Rahmani M, Earp MA, Ramezani Tehrani F, Ataee M, Wu J, Treml M, et al. Shared genetic factors for age at natural menopause in Iranian and European women. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(7):1987–1994. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Setti AS, Cortezzi SS, Figueira Rde C, Martinhago CD, Braga DP, Iaconelli A Jr, et al. A chromosome 19 locus positively influences the number of retrieved oocytes during stimulated cycles in Brazilian womn. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012;e29(5):443–449. doi: 10.1007/s10815-012-9735-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ruth KS, Soares ALG, Borges MC, Eliassen AH, Hankinson SE, Jones ME, et al. Genome-wide association study of anti-Müllerian hormone levels in pre-menopausal women of late reproductive age and relationship with genetic determinants of reproductive lifespan. Hum Mol Genet. 2019;28(8):1392–1401. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddz015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Wu T, Lin Y, Xie Z. MicroRNA-1247 inhibits cell proliferation by directly targeting ZNF346 in childhood neuroblastoma. Biol Res. 2018;51(1):13–13. doi: 10.1186/s40659-018-0162-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Perry JR, Corre T, Esko T, Chasman DI, Fischer K, Franceschini N, et al. A genome-wide association study of early menopause and the combined impact of identified variants. Hum Mol Genet. 2013;22(7):1465–1472. doi: 10.1093/hmg/dds551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Mrschtik M, Ryan KM. Another DRAM involved in autophagy and cell death. Autophagy. 2016;12(3):603–605. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2015.1137412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bosma M, Gerling M, Pasto J, Georgiadi A, Graham E, Shilkova O, et al. FNDC4 acts as an anti-inflammatory factor on macrophages and improves colitis in mice. Nat commun. 2016;7:11314–11314. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Li J, Wang Y, Wang Y, Yan Y, Tong H, Li S. Fibronectin type III domain containing four promotes differentiation of C2C12 through the Wnt/β- catenin signaling pathway. FASEB J. 2020;34(6):7759–7772. doi: 10.1096/fj.201902860RRR. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Laisk-Podar T, Kaart T, Peters M, Salumets A. Genetic variants associated with female reproductive ageing--potential markers for assessing ovarian function and ovarian stimulation outcome. Reprod Biomed Online. 2015;31(2):199–209. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Homer MV, Charo LM, Natarajan L, Haunschild C, Chung K, Mao JJ, et al. Genetic variants of age at menopause are not related to timing of ovarian failure in breast cancer survivors. Menopause. 2017;24(6):663–668. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000000817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Lee J, Kim MS, Park SH, Jang YK. Tousled-like kinase 1 is a negative regulator of core transcription factors in murine embryonic stem cells. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):334–334. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-18628-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from International Journal of Fertility & Sterility are provided here courtesy of Royan Institute

RESOURCES