Abstract
Women and girls with spina bifida have specific health care concerns. It is essential that they, and their health care providers have access to information to help them make healthy choices throughout their lifespan. This article aims to address key aspects of health pertinent to girls and women with spina bifida and outlines the SB Women’s Health Guidelines for the Care of People with Spina Bifida. Further research into this area is needed.
Keywords: Myelomeningocele, spina bifida, pregnancy, women’s health, birth, contraception, menopause, neural tube defects
1. Introduction
Women and girls with spina bifida have specific needs and concerns, especially in the context of puberty, sexuality, pregnancy and childbirth, and menopause. Throughout their lifetime, every woman and girl’s body undergoes multiple changes which are further impacted by spina bifida.
Girls with spina bifida may go through puberty early, and will need information and support during this process. Women with spina bifida may have unique health concerns regarding their reproductive health, such as structural anomalies of the reproductive tract (for example, a bicornuate uterus may be found on exam or ultrasound). Changes to the hips and spine may require special attention to positioning during pelvic examinations and birth. More information is still needed regarding sexual response in women with spina bifida. Many factors may affect a woman’s ability to position herself during sexual activity, including level of mobility, respiratory function, history of osteoporosis and fracture risk [1].
Many with physical disabilities, including those with spina bifida, choose to become pregnant [2, 3]. However this comes with specific concerns, such as preterm birth and changes in a woman’s bowel, bladder and mobility. Choices surrounding birth may be complex in some individuals. Understanding how pregnancy will affect one’s current state of health and quality of life is critical to the ongoing health of a woman with Spina Bifida.
Since menopause can cause vasomotor symptoms and changes in vaginal and bladder health, women may benefit from both lifestyle and medical management [4]. Health screening programs such as pap smears and mammograms are important for all individuals. This guideline aims to address many of the main health concerns specific to women with spina bifida, and acknowledges that since the original publication there may have been further advances in this field [5].
2. Guideline goals and outcomes
The goals of the Women’s Health Guidelines were both practical and aspirational.
2.1. Primary
Provide accurate information to women with spina bifida about its impact on pregnancy and the impact of pregnancy on them.
2.2. Secondary
Help women with spina bifida maximize sexual functioning.
2.3. Tertiary
Understand menopause management options for women with spina bifida
3. Methods
The methodology for these guidelines has been published by Dicianno et al. [6]. The development of this guideline utilized an international expert team and systematic review of the literature. Clinical questions developed through this process are shown in Table 1. In scenarios where the evidence was limited, recommendations were based on the consensus of expert opinion. The source of the final version of these guidelines is the Spina Bifida Association Guidelines for the Care of People with Spina Bifida 2018 [7].
Table 1.
Age group | Clinical questions |
---|---|
6–12 years 11 months |
|
13–17 years 11 months |
|
18 years |
|
Table 2, continued | ||
---|---|---|
Age group | Guidelines | Evidence |
18 years Part B: Antenatal care |
|
|
18 years Part C: Care surrounding Birth |
|
Clinical consensus |
Table 2, continued | ||
---|---|---|
Age group | Guidelines | Evidence |
18 years Part C: Care surrounding Birth |
|
|
18 years Part D: Breastfeeding |
|
[26]Clinical consensus |
Menopause |
|
Table 2, continued | ||
Age group | Guidelines | Evidence |
Menopause |
|
4. Results
The Women’s Health Guidelines for the Care of People with Spina Bifida are shown in Table 2. Girls with spina bifida are more likely to go through puberty early [1], and will need information and support during this process. Contraception counselling may require the assessment of special circumstances, such as latex allergy, medication usage, and decreased bone mineral density, and thus individuals may benefit from consulting a gynecologist [8, 9, 10, 11]. Health maintenance programs such as pap smears and mammograms should be encouraged and facilitated. Sexual function may be impacted by decreased pelvic sensation and challenges with orgasm. A sexologist may be helpful for some individuals [12].
Table 2.
Age group | Guidelines | Evidence |
---|---|---|
6–12 years11 months |
|
[1] |
13–17 years11 months |
|
[5, 8, 27, 28] |
18 yearsPart A: gynecological health |
|
[1, 5, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31] Clinical consensus |
18 years Part B: Antenatal care |
|
Clinical consensus |
Women with spina bifida may benefit from consultation with an obstetrician experienced with high-risk pregnancies to discuss the increased risk of having a baby with a neural tube defect [13], as well as an increased risk of preterm birth [14, 15]. Women should be strongly encouraged to supplement with 4 mg of folic acid starting at least 1 month prior to conception, and ideally 3 months prior to conception to decrease the risk of their baby having an open neural tube defect [13]. Pregnancy care should be individualized depending on the way each woman is affected by spina bifida. Changes in pulmonary function, mobility, pain, falls [15, 16, 17], bowel and bladder function [17, 18, 19], seizures [1], shunt function [20] and kidney function [21, 22, 23], may impact women differently during pregnancy. Although many may be good candidates for vaginal birth, a cesarean birth may be optimal for some individuals, a decision that should be made with input from an interdisciplinary team when warranted [15, 19, 23, 24, 25].
There is no specific information on breastfeeding in women with spina bifida, however those who choose to breastfeed should be encouraged to do so after reviewing their medications [26] and may wish the support of a lactation consultant. There is no specific information about management of vasomotor symptoms during menopause in women with spina bifida, however consultation with an expert in menopausal management will help take into consideration the severity of symptoms, bone mineral density, risk of deep vein thrombosis and other symptoms such as depression [4]. There is no specific data on thromboprophylaxis in women with spina bifida, however decision-making should be made on a case-by case basis for those with limited mobility or who use wheelchairs.
5. Discussion
This guideline was developed to help those who provide women’s health services to individuals with spina bifida. Due to the diverse ways spina bifida affects each person, the concerns surrounding healthy sexual function, pregnancy, and menopausal symptoms management will be quite individualized. While performing this review, it became evident that there are limited data and multiple research gaps in the field of health of women with spina bifida. Recommendations in these areas were made based on the current small body of evidence, expert opinion, and when appropriate, extrapolating from similar groups. Screening for sexually transmitted infections, cervical cancer and breast cancer should be in concordance with local guidelines; however, it is important to recognize that women with physical disabilities face a number of systemic barriers when trying to access healthcare, resulting in decreased rates of screening.
The creation of this guideline highlighted clinically important research gaps and the need for further study. There is no information available on the effect of pregnancy on future continence or other key indicators of urogenital health in women with spina bifida. Preterm birth is an important outcome due to its significant impact on a child’s health. There appears to be an increased risk of preterm birth in women with spina bifida, however more data is needed to better understand the incidence and risk factors for preterm birth in those with spina bifida. Likewise, the incidence of other important maternal outcomes including gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, and postpartum complications are unknown. There is no specific literature on breastfeeding in the context of spina bifida. Maximizing sexual functioning and management of menopausal symptoms, specifically for women with spina bifida, also requires further research. It is hoped that increased awareness of the seemingly complex overlap between women’s health and spina bifida will result in increased research into this field, improving women’s ability to make informed decisions about their health, and ultimately improved quality of life.
Acknowledgments
This edition of the Journal of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine includes manuscripts based on the most recent “Guidelines For the Care of People with Spina Bifida,” developed by the Spina Bifida Association. Thank you to the Spina Bifida Association for allowing the guidelines to be published in this forum and making them Open Access.
The Spina Bifida Association has already embarked on a systematic process for reviewing and updating the guidelines. Future guidelines updates will be made available as they are completed.
Executive Committee
-
•
Timothy J. Brei, MD. Spina Bifida Association Medical Director; Developmental Pediatrician, Professor, Seattle Children’s Hospital.
-
•
Sara Strewe, MPA, Spina Bifida Association President & Chief Executive Officer.
-
•
Patricia Beierwaites, DPN, CPNP, Guideline Steering Committee Co-Chair; Assistant Professor, Nursing, Minnesota State University, Mankato.
-
•
Brad E. Dicianno, MD, Guideline Steering Committee Co-Chair; Associate Medical Director and Chair of Spina Bifida Association’s Professional Advisory Council; Associate Professor, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine.
-
•
Nienke Dosa MD, MPH, Guideline Steering Committee Co-Chair; Upstate Foundation Professor of Child Health Policy; SUNY Upstate Medical University.
-
•
Lisa Raman, RN, MScANP, Med, former Spina Bifida Association Director, Patient and Clinical Services.
-
•
Jerome B. Chelliah, MD, MPH, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.
Additional acknowledgements
-
•
Julie Bolen, PhD, MPH, Lead Health Scientist, Rare Disorders Health Outcomes Team, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
-
•
Adrienne Heron, PhD Behavioral Scientist, Intervention Research Team, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
-
•
Judy Thibadeau, RN, MN. Spina Bifida Association Director, Research and Services; former Health Scientist, National Spina Bifida Program, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Funding
The development of these Guidelines was supported in part by Cooperative Agreement UO1DD001077, funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official view of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or the Department of Health and Human Services.
Conflict of interest
Anne Berndl has received funding for a project entitled “Spinal Cord Injury and Urogenital Health” from the Ontario Neurotrauma foundation. Ashely Waddington has received research funding from Bayer and Consulting Fees from Bayer and Merck. Margaret Nosek has no conflicts of interest to report.
References
- [1]. Jackson AB, Mott PK. Reproductive health care for women with spina bifida. Scientific World Journal. 2007. Nov 26; 7: 1875–83. doi: 10.1100/tsw.2007.304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2]. Mitra M, Parish SL, Clements KM, Cui X, Diop H. Pregnancy outcomes among women with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Am J Prev Med. 2015. Mar; 48(3): 300–8. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.09.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3]. Signore C, Spong CY, Krotoski D, Shinowara NL, Blackwell SC. Pregnancy in women with physical disabilities. Obstet Gynecol. 2011. Apr; 117(4): 935–47. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182118d59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4]. Reid R, Abramson BL, Blake J, Desindes S, Dodin S, Johnston S, et al. Managing menopause. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014. Sep 1; 36(9): 830–3. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30487-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5]. Loret de Mola JR, Carpenter SE. Management of genital prolapse in neonates and young women. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1996. Apr; 51(4): 253–60. doi: 10.1097/00006254-199604000-00022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6]. Dicianno BE, Beierwaltes P, Dosa N, Raman L, Chelliah J, Struwe S, et al. Scientific methodology of the development of the guidelines for the care of people with spina bifida: an initiative of the spina bifida association. Disabil Health J. 2019. Jun 18; S1936-6574(19): 30106–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7]. Spina Bifida Association Guidelines for the care of people with spina bifida. [Internet]. 2018. Available from: https://www.spinabifidaassociation.org/guidelines/.
- [8]. Black A, Guilbert E, Costescu D, Dunn S, Fisher W, Kives S, et al. Canadian contraception consensus (part 2 of 4). J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015. Nov; 37(11): 1033–9. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30054-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9]. Black A, Guilbert E, Costescu D, Dunn S, Fisher W, Kives S, et al. Canadian contraception consensus (part 3 of 4): chapter 8 – progestin-only contraception. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2016. Mar; 38(3): 279–300. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2015.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10]. Canadian Contraception Consensus Chapter 5 Barrier Methods. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada. 2015. Nov; 37(11): S12–24. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)39376-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11]. Black A, Guilbert E, Costescu D, Dunn S, Fisher W, Kives S, et al. No. 329-canadian contraception consensus part 4 of 4 chapter 9: combined hormonal contraception. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2017. Apr 1; 39(4): 229–268.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2016.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12]. von Linstow ME, Biering-Słrensen I, Liebach A, Lind M, Seitzberg A, Hansen RB, et al. Spina bifida and sexuality. J Rehabil Med. 2014. Oct; 46(9): 891–7. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13]. Wilson RD, Wilson RD, Audibert F, Brock J-A, Carroll J, Cartier L, et al. Pre-conception folic acid and multivitamin supplementation for the primary and secondary prevention of neural tube defects and other folic acid-sensitive congenital anomalies. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015. Jun; 37(6): 534–52. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(15)30230-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14]. Sterling L, Keunen J, Wigdor E, Sermer M, Maxwell C. Pregnancy outcomes in women with spinal cord lesions. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013. Jan; 35(1): 39–43. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)31046-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15]. Blasi I, Ferrari A, Comitini G, Vinci V, Abrate M, La Sala GB. Myelomeningocele and pregnancy: a case report and review of the literature. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012. Jul; 25(7): 1176–8. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2011.599459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16]. Iezzoni LI, Wint AJ, Smeltzer SC, Ecker JL. Effects of disability on pregnancy experiences among women with impaired mobility. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015. Feb; 94(2): 133–40. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17]. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Committee Opinion: Number 275, September 2002. Obstetric management of patients with spinal cord injuries. Obstet Gynecol. 2002. Sep; 100(3): 625–7. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(02)02261-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18]. Richmond D, Zaharievski I, Bond A. Management of pregnancy in mothers with spina bifida. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1987. Aug 1; 25(4): 341–5. doi: 10.1016/0028-2243(87)90146-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19]. Thomas JC, Adams MC. Female sexual function and pregnancy after genitourinary reconstruction. J Urol. 2009. Dec; 182(6): 2578–84. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.08.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20]. Wang X, Wang H, Fan Y, Hu Z, Guan Q, Zhang Q, et al. Management of acute hydrocephalus due to pregnancy with ventriculoperitoneal shunt. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013. Nov 1; 288(5): 1179–82. doi: 10.1007/s00404-013-2858-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21]. Blom K, Odutayo A, Bramham K, Hladunewich MA. Pregnancy and glomerular disease: a systematic review of the literature with management guidelines. CJASN. 2017. Nov 7; 12(11): 1862–72. doi: 10.2215/CJN.00130117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22]. Filler G, Gharib M, Casier S, Lödige P, Ehrich JHH, Dave S. Prevention of chronic kidney disease in spina bifida. Int Urol Nephrol. 2012. Jun; 44(3): 817–27. doi: 10.1007/s11255-010-9894-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23]. Hensle TW, Bingham JB, Reiley EA, Cleary-Goldman JE, Malone FD, Robinson JN. The urological care and outcome of pregnancy after urinary tract reconstruction. BJU Int. 2004. Mar; 93(4): 588–90. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2003.04665.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24]. Wisoff JH, Kratzert KJ, Handwerker SM, Young BK, Epstein F. Pregnancy in patients with cerebrospinal fluid shunts: report of a series and review of the literature. Neurosurgery. 1991. Dec; 29(6): 827–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25]. Kuczkowski KM. Labor analgesia for the parturient with spinal cord injury: what does an obstetrician need to know? Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2006. Feb 22; 274(2): 108. doi: 10.1007/s00404-006-0126-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26]. Veiby G, Bjørk M, Engelsen BA, Gilhus NE. Epilepsy and recommendations for breastfeeding. Seizure. 2015. May; 28: 57–65. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2015.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27]. Black A, Yang Q, Wen SW, Lalonde AB, Guilbert E, Fisher W. Contraceptive use among Canadian women of reproductive age: results of a national survey. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2009. Jul; 31(7): 627–40. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)34242-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28]. World Health Organisation. WHO guidelines for screening and treatment of precancerous lesions for cervical cancer prevention [Internet]. 2013. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/94830/9789241548694_eng.pdf?sequence=1. [PubMed]
- [29]. Sramkova T, Skrivanova K, Dolan I, Zamecnik L, Sramkova K, Kriz J, et al. Women’s sex life after spinal cord injury. Sex Med. 2017. Dec; 5(4): e255–9. doi: 10.1016/j.esxm.2017.07.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30]. American Academy of Pediatrics. HPV Vaccine Implementation Guidance Updated February 2017 [Internet]. Available from: https://www.aap.org/en-us/Documents/immunization_hpvimplementationguidance.pdf.
- [31]. World Health Organization. WHO position paper on mammography screening. [Internet]. 2014. [cited 2020 May 28]. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/137339/1/9789241507936_eng.pdf?ua=1. [PubMed]
- [32]. Centers for Disease Control. Recommendations for the use of folic acid to reduce the number of cases of spina bifida and other neural tube defects. MMWR Recomm Rep. 1992. Sep 11; 41(RR-14): 1–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33]. Greenwood CJ, Stainton MC. Back pain/discomfort in pregnancy: invisible and forgotten. J Perinat Educ. 2001; 10(1): 1–12. doi: 10.1624/105812401X88002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34]. Slootjes H, McKinstry C, Kenny A. Maternal role transition: why new mothers need occupational therapists. Aust Occup Ther J. 2016. Apr; 63(2): 130–3. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35]. Britnell SJ, Cole JV, Isherwood L, Sran MM, Britnell N, Burgi S, et al. Postural health in women: the role of physiotherapy. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2005. May; 27(5): 493–510. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30535-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36]. Trottier M, Erebara A, Bozzo P. Treating constipation during pregnancy. Can Fam Physician. 2012. Aug; 58(8): 836–8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [37]. Magee LA, Pels A, Helewa M, Rey E, von Dadelszen P, Canadian Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy (HDP) Working Group. Diagnosis, evaluation, and management of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2014. Apr; 4(2): 105–45. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(15)30588-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [38]. Arata M, Grover S, Dunne K, Bryan D. Pregnancy outcome and complications in women with spina bifida. J Reprod Med. 2000. Sep; 45(9): 743–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [39]. Whitaker RH, Hunt GM. Incidence and distribution of renal anomalies in patients with neural tube defects. Eur Urol. 1987; 13(5): 322–3. doi: 10.1159/000472810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [40]. Natarajan V, Kapur D, Sharma S, Singh G. Pregnancy in patients with spina bifida and urinary diversion. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2002. Nov 1; 13(6): 383–5. doi: 10.1007/s001920200085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [41]. Tidmarsh MD, May AE. Epidural anaesthesia and neural tube defects. Int J Obstet Anesth. 1998. Apr; 7(2): 111–4. doi: 10.1016/S0959-289X(98)90007-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [42]. Vaagenes P, Fjaerestad I. Epidural block during labour in a patient with spina bifida cystica. Anaesthesia. 1981. Mar; 36(3): 299–301. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1981.tb10205.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [43]. Royal College of Obstetricains and Gynecologists. Reducing the Risk of Venous Thromboembolism during Pregnancy and the Puerperium Green-top Guideline No. 37a [Internet]. 2015. Available from: https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/gtg-37a.pdf.
- [44]. Practice Bulletin Number 179: Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Screening in Average-Risk Women Ovid [Internet]. [cited 2020 May 28]. Available from: https://oce-ovid-com.myaccess.library.utoronto.ca/article/00006250-201707000-00050/HTML. [DOI] [PubMed]
- [45]. Oeffinger KC, Fontham ETH, Etzioni R, Herzig A, Michaelson JS, Shih Y-CT, et al. Breast cancer screening for women at average risk: 2015 guideline update from the american cancer society. JAMA. 2015. Oct 20; 314(15): 1599–614. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.12783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [46]. Renaud M-C, Le T, Le T, Bentley J, Farrell S, Fortier MP, et al. Epidemiology and investigations for suspected endometrial cancer. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013. Apr 1; 35(4): 380–1. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30970-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]