Skip to main content
Scars, Burns & Healing logoLink to Scars, Burns & Healing
. 2021 Jan 22;7:2059513120986687. doi: 10.1177/2059513120986687

Plump endothelial cells integrated into pre-existing venules contribute to the formation of ‘mother’ and ‘daughter’ vessels in pyogenic granuloma: possible role of galectin-1, -3 and -8

Enrique Arciniegas 1,, Luz Marina Carrillo 1,2, Héctor Rojas 3, Jacinto Pineda 4, Richard Ramírez 2, Oscar Reyes 2, Marina Chopite 2, Albani Rocheta 2
PMCID: PMC7841855  PMID: 33796337

Abstract

Introduction:

Pyogenic granuloma (PG) is a reactive inflammatory vascular lesion of the skin and mucous membranes, characterised by the presence of enlarged venules and seamed and seamless capillaries with plump endothelial cells (EC), and numerous macrophages. EC activation upregulates the synthesis of galectins and induces their translocation to the EC surface promoting angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis, particularly galectin-1 (Gal-1), Gal-3 and Gal-8. However, the presence and distribution of Gal-1, -3 and -8, as well as their implications in the pathogenesis of PG, has not been considered.

Materials and methods:

Eight biopsies from patients diagnosed with PG were selected. The presence of PECAM-1/CD31, IL-1β, VEGF-C, VEGFR-2, VEGFR-3, integrin β1, CD44, fibronectin and Gal-1, -3 and -8 was assessed by immunofluorescence staining using confocal laser scanning microscopy.

Results and Discussion:

Immunostaining revealed that these molecules were present in the enlarged venules with plump ECs, in some macrophages and other immune cells. We propose that macrophages release VEGF-A and VEGF-C inducing VEGFR-2/VEGFR-3 expression and activation, leading macrophages to transdifferentiate into plump ECs that might integrate into pre-existing venules, contributing to the formation of enlarged venules with transluminal bridges and capillaries. EC activation, induced by certain cytokines, has been shown to stimulate galectin expression and changes in the cellular localisation through association and activation of specific EC surface glycoproteins. Therefore, it is plausible that Gal-1, -3 and -8, acting in a concerted manner, could be mediating the transdifferentiation of macrophages into plump ECs and facilitating their migration and incorporation into the new vessels.

Lay Summary

In this study, immunostaining of pyogenic granuloma (PG) tissue sections showed immunoreactivity for PECAM-1/CD31, IL-1β, VEGF-C, VEGFR-2 and VEGFR-3, and galectin-1, -3 and -8 in enlarged venules with plump endothelial cells (EC), as well as in some macrophages and other immune cells. Interestingly, enlarged and thin-walled transient vessels lined by PECAM-1/CD31 and VEGFR-2 immunopositive ECs that form from pre-existing normal venules in response to VEGF-A (called ‘mother’ vessels [MV]) and that undergo intraluminal bridging evolving into various types of capillaries (called ‘daughter’ vessels [DV]) have been observed in benign and malignant tumours, in physiological and pathological angiogenesis as well as in vascular malformations, suggesting an important role for VEGF-A and VEGFR-2 in such a process. However, it is not only the mechanisms by which the MVs evolve in different types of DVs that remains to be elucidated, but also whether the cells that form intraluminal bridges proceed from locally activated ECs or whether they are derived from bone marrow precursors or from resident macrophages.

Given that the formation of homodimers by Gal-1 and Gal-8 and pentamers by Gal-3 to generate gal–glycan lattices at the cell surface and in the extracellular space has been shown, it is possible that in PG tissue Gal-1, -3 and -8, through their binding partners, form a supramolecular structure at the surface of ECs and plump ECs, macrophages and in the extracellular space that might be mediating the transdifferentiation of macrophages into plump ECs and facilitating the migration and incorporation of these cells into the pre-existing venules, thus contributing to the formation of MVs and DVs.

Keywords: Pyogenic granuloma, plump endothelial cell, macrophage, venules, galectins, gal–glycan lattice

Introduction

Pyogenic granuloma (PG), also referred to as lobular capillary haemangioma, is a reactive inflammatory vascular lesion of the skin and mucous membranes that can equally affect both sexes and occurs at all ages. There is controversy concerning its nature. Some authors consider PG as a benign vascular tumour, while others define it as a reactive inflammatory lesion.15 PG is histologically characterised by the presence of enlarged venules with plump endothelial cells (ECs) or immature ECs, seamed and seamless capillaries arranged in a lobular pattern in the dermis, and numerous macrophages, which are frequently associated with angiogenesis.1,36 With respect to the presence of plump ECs and seamed and seamless capillaries, previous studies have shown an increased expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and bFGF limited to plump ECs with no lumen formation, many of them expressing PECAM-1/CD31.79 The same studies point to macrophages as the major source of synthesis and secretion of both angiogenic factors79 and that vascular growth observed would be associated with the activation of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-3 (VEGFR-3/Flt4).79 Equally well established is the important role during the early phase of inflammation and wound healing of activated macrophages as an important source of pro-inflammatory cytokines and growth factors such as IL-1β, IL-1α, IL-6. IL-12, TNFα, VEGF-A, VEGF-C and bFGF,9,10 and that overexpression of VEGF-C, the main ligand for VEGFR-3, would be involved in the recruitment, accumulation and transdifferentiation of macrophages into endothelial-like cells during inflammation.11,12 Other studies have suggested an important contribution of macrophage as endothelial progenitor during the lymphangiogenesis process.1318 Although the plump ECs have been identified in PG, only its presence and localisation have been examined, while its progenitor and possible contribution to the formation of enlarged venules and capillaries have received little attention.

It has further been reported that the activation of ECs by inflammatory cytokines and growth factors secreted by different immune cell types, including macrophages, contributes in the pathogenesis of many skin diseases frequently associated with the enlargement and formation of new capillaries from the pre-existing vasculature (angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis) and that the major regulator of the angiogenesis cascade and wound repair released during inflammation is the VEGF-A, whose functions are mediated by two receptors tyrosine kinases, VEGFR-1 (Flt-1) and VEGFR-2 (Flk-1),19,20 while in inflammatory lymphangiogenesis VEGF-C is the main ligand that activates VEGFR-3 (Flt-4).8,2126

Equally, previous reports have suggested that EC activation upregulates the synthesis of galectins and induces their translocation to the EC surface promoting angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis via association and activation of specific EC surface glycoproteins, particularly galectin-1 (Gal-1), Gal-3 and Gal-8.2734

Gal-1 is a prototypic member of the galectin family with a conserved carbohydrate recognition domain (CRD) that has affinity for multiple N-acetyllactosamine (LacNAc) disaccharides (Gal-GlNAc) present in N- and O-linked glycans.3538 By association of their monomers, it can form homodimers through its C-terminal domain on the cell surface and in the extracellular space, which results in the formation of molecular complexes.3538 This lectin participates in signalling pathways, regulating a variety of important biological responses including cell growth, proliferation, cell–cell and cell–matrix adhesion, cell differentiation, motility and cell death, and plays a critical role in the initiation and resolution of the inflammatory response, angiogenesis, fibrosis, and tumour development.3538 Gal-3 is a chimera type galectin that is composed of a C-terminal domain that binds to specific N- and O-glycan ligands, and an N-terminal domain which facilitates its multidimerisation and generation of galectin–glycan (gal–glycan) lattices on the cell membrane and in the extracellular space controlling several cellular processes through specific signalling pathways; those processes include cell–cell adhesion, cell–matrix adhesion, proliferation, growth, differentiation, migration, inflammation, immune response, apoptosis, angiogenesis and tumour development.3945 It is predominantly localised in the cytoplasm but can also be detected in the nucleus, intracellular and extracellular sides of the cell membrane, and found in the extracellular space.2832,43,45 Gal-8 is a tandem-repeat-type galectin that has two CRDs joined by a linker peptide. It appears to be one of the most prominent galectins detected in ECs.28,30,33 It plays an important role in the control of EC migration, capillary tube formation and in vivo angiogenesis33,4650 and tumour growth.51 In addition, Gal-8 modulates lymphangiogenesis induced by VEGF-C in vivo and in vitro.28,30,33 Nevertheless, to the best of our knowledge, the presence and distribution of Gal-1, -3 and -8, as well as their implications in the pathogenesis of PG, has not been considered.

In view of the above considerations, the aim of this study was to examine not only the presence and localisation of the plump ECs in PG, but also establish its origin and contribution to the formation of enlarged venules and new capillaries.

Given that in human skin some galectins play a crucial role in diverse cutaneous disorders,38,43,5254 we sought to determine whether Gal-1, -3 and -8 were present in PG. We also examined whether these galectins could generate gal–glycan lattices able to regulate the behaviour of the plump ECs through the interactions with platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 (PECAM-1/CD31), VEGFR-2, VEGFR-3, CD44, integrin β1 and fibronectin (FN). All of them were considered as targets for these galectins as they contain N- and/or O-linked glycans in the extracellular domains.

Materials and methods

Skin biopsies

Eight biopsies from patients clinically and histopathologically (haematoxylin and eosin [H&E] staining) diagnosed with PG were retrieved from the files of the Section of Dermatopathology at the ASIB. Data regarding gender, age and site of lesion appear listed in Table 1. For the identification of collagen bundles, some histological sections were stained following Masson’s trichrome protocol. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the SAIB and performed according to the Declaration of Helsinki.

Table 1.

Patients diagnosed with PG included in the study.

Patient Age (years) Gender Site
1 48 M Upper lip
2 50 M Lower lip
3 25 M Thorax
4 37 F Finger
5 21 M Upper lip
6 46 F Finger
7 57 M Finger
8 24 F Nose

F, female; M, male; PG, pyogenic granuloma.

Indirect immunofluorescence staining of tissue sections

For immunohistochemistry purposes, paraffin-embedded skin tissue blocks were cut into sections each with a thickness of 4 µm. Paraffin sections were then set onto silanised slides (DakoCytomation, Denmark), dewaxed in xylene, dehydrated through graded alcohol series (from 100 to 70%), then rehydrated in distilled water and equilibrated in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for 10 min. Before incubation with the primary antibodies, sections were blocked for 1 h in a humid chamber with PBS containing 2% BSA and 0.1% Tween 20, in order to prevent non-specific staining. Sections were then incubated with the primary antibodies diluted in PBS, 2% BSA, 0.1% Tween 20 (Table 2) overnight at 4 °C followed by incubation with anti-rabbit IgG Cruz Fluor 594 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Dallas, TX, USA) or anti-mouse IgG Cruz Fluor 488 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) diluted with PBS containing 2% BSA and 0.1% Tween20 for 30 min in a humid chamber in the dark. Cell nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (4’,6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole) (Molecular Thermo-Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA) for 15 min in the dark. Finally, the sections were washed in PBS and coverslipped with mounting medium (IMMU-MOUNT, Shandon, Pittsburgh, PA, USA). All images were captured using a 1X81 Olympus inverted microscope with the Fluo View Confocal Laser Scanning configuration (CLSM) (Olympus America) equipped with software program FV10.ASW version 02.01.01.04 (Olympus Corporation). Image J software (NHI, Washington, DC, USA) was used for the processing of contrast and brightness.

Table 2.

Antibodies.

Primary antibody Host Producer
PECAM-1/CD31 Mouse
monoclonal
Santa Cruz
Biotechnology, Inc., Dallas, TX, USA
IL-1β Mouse
monoclonal
Santa Cruz
Biotechnology, Inc., Dallas, TX, USA
VEGFC Mouse
monoclonal
Santa Cruz
Biotechnology, Inc., Dallas, TX, USA
VEGFR-2 Mouse
monoclonal
Santa Cruz
Biotechnology, Inc., Dallas, TX, USA
VEGFR-3 Mouse
monoclonal
Santa Cruz
Biotechnology, Inc., Dallas, TX, USA
Integrin β1 Mouse
monoclonal
Santa Cruz
Biotechnology, Inc., Dallas, TX, USA
CD44 Mouse
monoclonal
Santa Cruz
Biotechnology, Inc., Dallas, TX, USA
Fibronectin Mouse
monoclonal
Santa Cruz
Biotechnology Inc. Dallas, TX, USA
Galectin-1 Mouse
monoclonal
Santa Cruz
Biotechnology, Inc., Dallas, TX, USA
Galectin-3 Mouse monoclonal Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Dallas, TX, USA
Galectin-8 Mouse
monoclonal
Santa Cruz
Biotechnology, Inc., Dallas, TX, USA

Results

Histopathological analysis of the PG tissues by Masson’s trichrome staining showed the presence of enlarged, thin-walled venules with some plump ECs in the dermis, some of these cells forming intraluminal bridges that divide the lumen into small channels and capillaries (Figure 1). Staining also revealed the presence of numerous capillaries lined by some plump ECs localised close to the enlarged venules, as well as the presence of some vascular structures known as glomeruloid bodies, numerous macrophages and other immune cells (Figure 1). They were all embedded in a collagen matrix (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Masson trichrome staining from two biopsies of PG tissues. Biopsy 1, lesion located on upper lip. Biopsy 2, lesion located on thorax. Note the presence of enlarged venules with some plump ECs (V, arrowheads), small channels (asterisks), capillaries (C) and macrophages (arrows). They were all embedded in a collagen matrix. Yellow dotted line shows glomeruloid body. Enlargements show macrophages. Scale bars: 20 µm; 10 µm. EC, endothelial cell; PG, pyogenic granuloma.

In vivo PECAM-1/CD31 immunostaining

Platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 (PECAM-1/CD31) is a transmembrane glycoprotein with proinflammatory and proangiogenic activities that is highly expressed on the surface of ECs and lower levels on platelets and immune cells including monocytes, macrophages, and T and B cells.5559 It contains seven N-linked glycans and interacts with VEGFR-2, VEGFR-3 and integrins.60 For these reasons, we examined the presence and distribution of this glycoprotein on the ECs of vessels of PG tissues. Immunolabelling analysed by CLSM showed that PECAM-1 was present in the enlarged venules with plump ECs, small channels and capillaries (Figure 2a). Interestingly, a strong PECAM-1 immunoreactivity was appreciable in the plump ECs that were close to and incorporated into the enlarged venules, forming intraluminal bridges, as well as in some plump ECs of small channels and capillaries that were mostly situated close to enlarged venules. Likewise, PECAM-1 immunoreactivity was present in some macrophages and other immune cells (Figure 2a).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Immunostaining of PECAM-1/CD31, IL-1β, VEGF-C, VEGFR-2, VEGFR-3, Gal-1 and Gal-3 in the dermis reticular of one biopsy of PG tissue (lower lip). Serial sections were stained for PECAM-1/CD31 (a), IL-1β (b), VEGF-C (c), VEGFR-2 (d), VEGFR-3 (e), Gal-1 (f) and Gal-3 (g). Enlargements show the corresponding immunoreactivities in the venules (V), small channels (asterisks), capillaries (C), plump ECs (arrowheads), macrophages (arrows) and immune cells (stars). Blue, DAPI. Scale bars: 30 µm; 15 µm. EC, endothelial cell; PG, pyogenic granuloma.

In vivo IL-1β and VEGF-C immunostaining

Because IL-1β promotes the EC activation during inflammation and angiogenesis by increasing expression of adhesion molecules on the surface of ECs6163 and it regulates the expression of VEGF-C,64 we examined the presence and distribution of IL-1β and VEGF-C in the dermis of the PG tissues selected. Examination of the dermis revealed IL-1β and VEGF-C immunoreactivities localised in the enlarged venules with plump ECs and small channels and capillaries, as well as in some macrophages and other immune cells (Figure 2b and c).

In vivo VEGFR-2 and VEGFR-3 immunostaining

Considering that VEGF-C is a secreted glycoprotein that has an affinity for VEGFR-2 and VEGFR-323,64 and that both tyrosine kinase receptors contain N-linked glycans,65,66 we also examined the presence and distribution of VEGFR-2 and VEGFR-3 in the dermis of PG tissues. Immunostaining showed that both receptors were localised in the enlarged venules with plump ECs, small channels and capillaries, as well as in some macrophages and other immune cells (Figure 2d and e). Like PECAM-1, strong VEGFR-2 and VEGFR-3 immunoreactivity was detected in the plump ECs that were close to and incorporated into the enlarged venules, as well as in the plump ECs that were forming transluminal bridges, small channels and capillaries, and some macrophages and other immune cells (Figure 2d and e).

In vivo Gal-1, Gal-3 and Gal-8 immunostaining

To determine whether these galectins were present in the dermis of PG, tissue sections were also examined by immunofluorescence staining. Immunolocalisation revealed that Gal-1, -3 and -8 were present in the enlarged venules with plump ECs and small channels and capillaries, as well as in some macrophages and other immune cells (Figures 2f, 2g, 3a and 4a–c). Notably, an intensive cytoplasmic and cell membrane immunoreactivity for Gal-1, -3 and -8 was detected in the plump ECs that were close to and incorporated into the enlarged venules, as well as in the plump ECs, forming intraluminal bridges, small channels and capillaries, and some macrophages and immune cells (Figures 2f. 2g, 3a and 4a–c). In addition, a moderate immunoreactivity for these galectins was detected in fibrils and thin bundles of collagen and some elongated fibroblasts (Figure 4a–c). No immunoreactivity was detected when the primary antibodies were omitted or replaced with PBS (not shown).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Immunolocalisation of Gal-8, CD44, integrin β1 and FN in the reticular dermis of the same biopsy. Serial sections were stained for Gal-8 (a), CD44 (b), integrin β1 (c) and FN (d). Enlargements show the corresponding immunoreactivities in the venules (V), small channels (asterisks), capillaries (C), plump ECs (arrowheads), macrophages (arrows) and immune cells (stars). Blue, DAPI. Scale bars: 30 µm; 15 µm. EC, endothelial cell; FN, fibronectin; PG, pyogenic granuloma.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

A series of representative CLSM fluorescence images of Gal-1, -3 and -8 in one biopsy of the PG (finger). Sections were stained for Gal-1 (a), Gal-3 (b) and Gal-8 (c). Enlargements show the corresponding immunoreactivities in the venules (V), small channels (asterisks), capillaries (C), plump ECs (arrowheads), macrophages (arrows) and immune cells (stars). Blue, DAPI. Scale bars: 20 µm; 10 µm. EC, endothelial cell; PG, pyogenic granuloma.

In vivo CD44 immunostaining

Since CD44 is a glycosylated cell-surface receptor that has an N-terminal that contains N- and O-linked glycans6769 and can interact with Gal-8 contributing to the resolution of inflammation,70 we also examined the presence and distribution of CD44 in the dermis of PG tissues selected. CD44 was observed in the enlarged venules with plump ECs, small channels and capillaries as well as in some macrophages and other immune cells and some fibroblasts and fibrils and collagen bands (Figure 3b).

In vivo integrin β1 immunostaining

Because integrin β1 contains N-linked glycans71,73 and is considered as binding partner for Gal-1,35,73 Gal-3,47,7476 and Gal-8,47,49,77,78 we investigated the presence and distribution of integrin β1 in the dermis of PG tissues. Immunostaining showed that this subunit was localised in the enlarged venules with plump ECs, small channels and capillaries (Figures 3c and 4a–c), as well as in some macrophages, immune cells, fibroblasts and collagen bands (Figure 3c).

In vivo FN immunostaining

We next examined the presence and distribution of FN, a glycoprotein that contains N-linked glycans79 and associates with Gal-1,35 Gal-376 and Gal-8.47,80 Examination of the dermis revealed that FN was localised in the enlarged venules with plump ECs, small channels and capillaries (Figure 3d). Moderate immunoreactivity was also observed in some fibroblasts and thin bundles of collagen and in the extracellular space (Figure 3d).

Discussion

In the present study, immunostaining of PG tissue sections showed immunoreactivity for PECAM-1/CD31, IL-1β, VEGF-C, VEGFR-2 and VEGFR-3 in enlarged venules with plump ECs, including those cells that were forming transluminal bridges and dividing the lumen into small channels and capillaries, as well as in some macrophages and other immune cells. It is important to stress that this immunoreactivity increased in the plump ECs. Remarkably, studies conducted by Caramelo’s group in PG had revealed the presence of EC precursors or plump ECs without lumen formation that displayed increased expression of VEGF and immunoreactivity for PECAM-1/CD31, suggesting that early VEGF expression might act as angiogenic mediator and that the presence of local inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β and TNFα in PG would explain the induction of VEGF in these cells.6 Other studies in PG report the presence of aggregates of capillaries and venules lined by ECs and plump ECs positive to CD31, CD34, CD105; ICAM-1 and VCAM-1.15,81 Of particular interest, studies in PG have also shown VEGF and bFGF upregulation, considering the macrophages as the major source of synthesis and secretion of both angiogenic factors.2,4,7 It is noteworthy that the angiogenesis observed in PG has been associated to the activation of Flt4/VEGFR3 and the nitric oxide signalling pathway.8 Likewise, overexpression of VEGF-C has been shown to induce enlargement of veins and venules positive for PECAM-1/VEGFR-2 in skin and mucous membranes.9 Interestingly, enlarged and thin-walled transient vessels lined by PECAM-1/CD31 and VEGFR-2 immunopositive ECs that form from pre-existing normal venules in response to VEGF-A (called ‘mother’ vessels [MV]) and that undergo intraluminal bridging evolving into various types of capillaries (called ‘daughter’ vessels [DV]), have been observed in benign and malignant tumours, in physiological and pathological angiogenesis as well as in vascular malformations, suggesting an important role for VEGF-A and VEGFR-2 in such a process.8185 However, it is not only the mechanisms by which the MVs evolve in different types of DVs that remains to be elucidated, but also whether the cells that form intraluminal bridges proceed from locally activated ECs or whether they are derived from bone marrow precursors or from resident macrophages.83,84 Of relevance, studies in vitro and in vivo have shown that overexpression of VEGF induces macrophages to transdifferentiate into EC progenitors or endothelial-like cells characterised by expression of VE-cadherin, CD31, CD105 and eNOS, which are able to incorporate in the newly formed vessels.11,12 In this context, other studies report that lymphatic EC progenitors derived from macrophages integrate into lymphatic endothelium. The same studies propose that the VEGF-C/VEGFR-3 signalling pathway could play a critical role in the early phase of transdifferentiation of macrophages and that the progenitors of the lymphatic ECs may originate from macrophages derived from bone marrow cells or resident macrophages that have been activated in situ.1318 In line with these reports, contribution of lymphatic EC progenitors to lymphangiogenesis in human renal transplants has been shown, suggesting that these EC progenitors derive from macrophages expressing VEGFR-3 and incorporate into the newly growing lymphatic vessel.18,86

Based on the above evidence and our observations, it is tempting to hypothesise that in response to inflammatory stimuli, for example upregulation of IL-1β, macrophage release VEGF-A and VEGF-C inducing VEGFR-2/VEGFR-3 expression, and that VEGF-C upregulation would provoke an increase in the activation of VEGFR-2 and VEGFR-3, generating an autocrine loop that would lead macrophages to transdifferentiate into plump ECs characterised by the expression of PECAM-1/CD31, VEGFR-2 and VEGFR-3. These plump ECs which might integrate into pre-existing venules contributing to the formation of enlarged venules with transluminal bridges (MVs) and capillaries (DVs) (Figure 5).

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Macrophage transdifferentiate into plump endothelial cells that integrate into pre-existing venules contributing to the formation of enlarged venules with transluminal bridges (mother vessels) and capillaries (daughter vessels).

Immunostaining also revealed that Gal-1, -3 and -8 were present in the ECs and plump ECs of the MVs and DVs, in some macrophages and other type of immune cells. Consistent with this, several in vitro and in vivo studies have shown that ECs synthesise Gal-1, -3 and -8 and that EC activation, induced by certain cytokines that are released from inflammatory and ECs at the sites of inflammation, stimulates galectin expression and induces changes in the cellular localisation through association and activation of specific EC surface glycoproteins.28,30,33,34 Similarly, studies on galectins and angiogenesis have suggested that Gal-1 can be synthesised or taken by activated ECs to promote angiogenesis in an autocrine or paracrine manner3438 and that Gal-3 modulates angiogenesis mediated by VEGF and bFGF.3945 Thus, the presence of Gal-1, -3 and -8, possibly stimulated by EC activation that has been induced by IL-1β,VEGF-A and VEGF-C, could be contributing to the generation of MVs and DVs with plump ECs in PG tissues.

Regarding the presence of Gal-1, -3 and -8 in some macrophages, it is well known that Gal-1 and Gal-3 are abundantly expressed and secreted by human monocytes and macrophages regulating its phenotype and functioning during acute and chronic inflammation16,29,33,39,45 and that Gal-3 modulates the production of some cytokines such as IL-1β and IL-5 in macrophages and increases the migration of monocytes and macrophages in the presence of FN, suggesting that Gal-3 can act as chemoattractant for monocytes, macrophages and ECs.45,87 Therefore, it is plausible that Gal-1, -3 and -8, acting in a concerted manner, could be mediating the transdifferentiation of macrophages into plump ECs and, in turn, facilitating the migration and incorporation of these cells into the new vessels, i.e. into MVs and DVs. Interestingly, previous studies have indicated that Gal-8, together with Gal-1 and Gal-3, modulates the invasive and migratory capacities of malignant cells.88,89

With respect to the immunolocalisation of Gal-1, -3 and -8 in the cell membrane of the ECs and plump ECs as well as in some macrophages, several in vitro and in vivo studies have shown that EC activation, in addition to upregulating the synthesis of Gal-1, -3 and -8, also induces changes in its cellular localisation and distribution through its interaction with the N- and/or O-glycans residues of glycosylated molecules that are present on the surface of ECs or in the extracellular space, modulating the cell–cell and cell–matrix interactions through specific signalling pathways. In keeping with these observations, Gal-1 and Gal-3 interact with the N-linked glycans of VEGFR-2, while Gal-8 interacts with the N-glycans of VEGFR-2 and VGFR-3, preventing the internalisation of both tyrosine kinase receptors and modulating their signalling pathways.33,78,8789 Likewise, Gal-1, -3 and -8 have been reported to be able to interact with the N- and/or O-linked glycans of the cell surface glycoproteins CD44 and integrin β1 and with the extracellular matrix components collagen and FN, regulating cell attachment, spreading and migration.48,70 Importantly, many of the aforementioned molecules are recognised as binding partners of Gal-1, -3 and -8.

Given that Gal-1, -3 and -8, VEGFR-2, VEGFR-3, CD44, integrin β1 and PECAM-1/CD31 were immunolocalised in the reticular dermis, and that the formation of homodimers by Gal-1 and Gal-8 and pentamers by Gal-3 to generate gal–glycan lattices at the cell surface and in the extracellular space has been shown, it is possible that in PG tissue, Gal-1, -3 and -8, through their binding partners, form a supramolecular structure at the surface of ECs and plump ECs, macrophages and in the extracellular space that might be mediating the transdifferentiation of macrophages into plump ECs and facilitating the migration and incorporation of these cells into the pre-existing venules, thus contributing to the formation of MVs and DVs.

Footnotes

Declaration of conflicting interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding: The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

ORCID iD: Enrique Arciniegas Inline graphic https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6371-1561

References

  • 1. Requena L, Sangueza OE. Cutaneous vascular proliferations. Part II. Hyperplasias and benign neoplasms. J Am Acad Dermatol 1997; 37(6): 887–920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Yuan KY, Wing L-Y, Lin MT. Pathogenetic roles of angiogenic factors in pyogenic granulornas in pregnancy are modulated by female sex hormones. J Periodontol 2002; 73(7): 701–708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Lin RL, Janniger CK. Pyogenic granuloma. Cutis 2004; 74(4): 229–233. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Kawachi NA. Comparative histopathological and immunohistochemically study of capillary hemangioma, pyogenic granuloma and cavernous hemangioma in the oral region: with special reference to vascular proliferation factors. Int J Oral Med Sci 2011; 9: 241–251. [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Wollina U, Langner D, França K, et al. Pyogenic granuloma – a common benign vascular tumor with variable clinical presentation: new findings and treatment options. Maced J Med Sci 2017; 5(4): 423–426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Bragado R, Bello E, Requena L, et al. Increased expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in pyogenic granulomas. Acta Derm Venereol 1999; 79(6): 422–425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Yuan KY, Wing L-Y, Lin MT. The detection and comparison of angiogenesis - associated factors in pyogenic granuloma by immunohistochemistry. J Periodontol 2000; 71(5): 701–709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Godfraind C, Calicchio ML, Kozakewich H. Pyogenic granuloma, an impaired wound healing process, linked to vascular growth driven by FLT4 and the nitric oxide pathway. Modern Pathology 2013; 26(2): 247–255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Saaristo A, Veikkola T, Enholm B, et al. Adenoviral VEGF-C overexpression induces blood vessel enlargement, tortuosity, and leakiness but no sprouting angiogenesis in the skin or mucous membranes. FASEB J 2002; 16(2): 1041–1049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Curiefen C, Wiegand S, Streitein W. VEGFA stimulates lymphangiogenesis and hemangiogenesis in inflammatory neovascularization via macrophage recruitment. J Clin Invest 2004; 11379: 1040–1050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Rehman J, Li J, Orschell CM, et al. Peripheral blood endothelial progenitor cells are derived from monocyte/macrophage and secrete angiogenic factors. Circulation 2003; 107:1164–1169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Yan D, Wang X, Li D, et al. Macrophages overexpressing VEGF, transdifferentiate into endothelial-like cells in vitro and in vivo. Biotechnol Lett 2011; 33(9): 1751–1758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Kerjaschki D. Crucial role of macrophages in lymphangiogenesis. J Clin Invest 2005; 115(9): 2316–2319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Ran S, Montgomery KE. Macrophage-mediated lymphangiogenesis: the emerging role macrophages as lymphatic endothelial progenitors. Cancers 2012; 4: 618–657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Hall K, Volk-Draper LD, Flister MJ, et al. New model of macrophage acquisition of the lymphatic endothelial phenotype. PLoS ONE 2012; 7(3): e31794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Novak ML, Koh TJ. Phenotypic transitions of macrophages orchestrate tissue repair. Am J Pathol 2013;183(5):1352–1363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Corliss B, Azimi M, Muuson J, et al. Macrophages: An inflammatory link between angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis. Microcirculation 2016; 23(2): 95–121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Kazenwadel J, Harvey NL. Lymphatic endothelial progenitor cells: origins and roles in lymphangiogenesis. Curr Opin Immunol 2018; 53: 81–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Varricchi G, Granata F, Loffredo S, et al. Angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis in inflammatory skin disorders. J Am Acad Dermatol 2015; 73: 144–153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Witmer AN, van Blijswijk BC, Dai J, et al. VEGFR-3 in adult angiogenesis. J Pathol 2001; 195(4): 490–497. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Tammela T, Zarkada G, Wallgard E, et al. Blocking VEGFR-3 suppresses angiogenic sprouting and vascular network formation. Nature 2008; 454(7204); 656–660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Huggenberger R, Detmar M. The cutaneous vascular system in chronic skin inflammation. J Invest Dermatol Symp Proc 2011; 15(1): 24–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Nilsson F, Bahram F, Li X, et al. VEGF receptor -2/-3 heterodimers detected in situ by proximity ligation on angiogenic sprouts. EMBO J 2010; 29(8): 1377–1388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Card CM, Yu SS, Swartz MA. Emerging roles of lymphatic endothelium regulating adaptive immunity. J Clin Invest 2014; 124(3): 943–952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Davydova N, Harris NC, Roufail S, et al. Differential receptor binding and regulatory mechanisms for the lymphangiogenic growth factors. J Biol Chem 2016; 291(53): 27265–27278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Wang ChA, Tsai S-I. The non-canonical role of vascular endothelial growth factor-C axis in cancer progression. Exp Biol Med 2015; 240(6): 718–724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Rubinstein N, Llaregui JM, Toscano MA, et al. The role of galectins in the initiation, amplification and resolution of the inflammatory response. Tissue Antigens 2004; 64(1): 1–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Thijssen VL, Hulsmans S, Griffioen AW. The galectin profile of the endothelium: Altered expression and localization in activated and tumor endothelial cells. Am J Pathol 2008; 172(2): 545–553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Liu F-T, Rabinovich GA. Galectins: Regulators of acute and chronic inflammation. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2010; 1183: 158–182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Thijssen VL, Rabinovich GA, Griffioen AW. Vascular galectins: regulators of tumor progression and targets for cancer therapy. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 2013; 24: 547–558. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Compagno D, Jaworski FM, Gentilini L, et al. Galectins: Major signaling modulators inside and outside the cell. Curr Mol Med 2014; 14(5): 1–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Baum L. Galectins and immune responses-just how do they do those things they do? Annu Rev Immunol 2016; 34: 243–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Elola MT, Ferragut F, Méndez-Huergo SP, et al. Galectins: multitask signaling molecules linking fibroblast, endothelial and immune cell programs in the tumor microenvironment. Cell Immunol 2018; 333: 34–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Baum LG, Seilhamer JJ, Pang M, et al. Synthesis of an endogenous lectin, galectin-1, by human endothelial cells is up-regulated by endothelial cell activation. Glycoconj J 1995; 12: 63–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Camby I, Le Mercier M, Lefranc F, et al. Galectin-1: A small protein with major functions. Glycobiology 2006; 16(11): 137R–157R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Thijssen VL, Barkan B, Shoji H, et al. Tumor cells secrete galectin-1 to enhance endothelial cell activity. Cancer Res 2010; 70(15): 6216–6224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Sundblad V, Morosi L, Geffner J, et al. Galectin-1: A jack-of-all-trades in the resolution of acute and chronic inflammation. J Immunol 2017; 199: 3721–3730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Pasmatzi E, Papadionysiou1 C, Monastirli A, et al. Galectin-1 in dermatology: Current knowledge and perspectives. Acta Dermatovenerol Alp Pannonica Adriat 2019; 28: 27–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Liu FT, Hsu DK, RI Zuberi, et al. Expression and function of galectin-3, a beta-galactoside-binding lectin, in human monocytes and macrophages. Am J Pathol 1995; 147(4): 1016–1028. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Nangia-Makker P, Honjo Y, Sarvis R, et al. Galectin-3 induces endothelial cell morphogenesis and angiogenesis. Am J Pathol 2000; 156(3): 899–909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Henderson N, Sethi T. The regulation of inflammation by galectin-3. Immunol Rev 2009; 230(1): 160–171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Ochieng J, Furtak V, Lukyanov P. Extracellular functions of galectin-3. Glycoconjugate J 2004; 19: 527–535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Larsen L, Chen HH, Saegusa J, et al. Galectin-3 and the skin. J Dermatol Sci 2011; 64(2): 85–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Gittens BR, Bodkin JV, Nourshargh, et al. Galectin-3: A positive regulator of leukocyte recruitment in the inflamed microcirculation. J Immunol 2017; 198(11): 4458–4469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. McLeod K, Walker JT, Hamilton DW. Galectin-3 regulation of wound healing and fibrotic processes: Insights for chronic skin wound therapeutics. J Cell Commun Signal 2018; 12(1): 281–287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Levy Y, Arbel-Goren R, Hadari YR, et al. Galectin–8 functions as a matricellular modulator of cell adhesion. J Biol Chem 2001; 276(33): 31285–31295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Zick Y, Eisenstein M, Goren RA, et al. Role of galectin-8 as a modulator of cell adhesion and cell growth. Glycoconj J 2004; 19(7–9): 517–526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Delgado V, Nugnes LG, Colombo LL, et al. Modulation of endothelial cell migration and angiogenesis: a novel function for the “tandem-repeat” lectin galectin-8. FASEB J 2011; 25: 242–254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Troncoso MF, Ferragut F, Bacigalupo ML, et al. Galectin-8: a matricellular lectin with key roles in angiogenesis. Glycobiology 2014; 24(10): 907–914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Cattaneo V, Tribulatti MV, Carabelli L, et al. Galectin-8 elicits pro-inflammatory activities in the endothelium. Glycobiology 2014; 24(10): 966–973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Vinik Y, Shatz-Azoulay H, Zick Y. Molecular mechanisms underlying the role of galectin-8 as a regulator of cancer growth and metastasis. Trends in Glycoscience Glycotechnology 2018; 30(172): SE119–SE128. [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Wun-L, Liu F-T. The expression and function of galectins in skin physiology and pathology. Exp Dermatol 2018; 27: 217–226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Jiang Z, Tan G, Shi Z, et al. Galectin-3 expression in benign and malignant skin diseases with epidermal hyperplasia. Am J Dermatopathol 2017; 39(10): 738–741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Arciniegas E, Carrillo LM, Rojas H, et al. Galectin-1 and galectin-3 and their potential binding partners in the dermal thickening of keloid tissues. Am J Dermatopathol 2019; 41(3): 193–204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Albelda SM, Muller WA, Buck CA, et al. . Molecular and cellular properties of PECAM-1 (endoCAM/CD31): A novel (vascular) cell-cell adhesion molecule. J Cell Biol 1991; 114(5): 1059–1068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. DeLisser HM, Christofidou-Solomidou M, Strieter RM, et al. Involvement of endothelial PECAM-1/CD31 in angiogenesis. Am J Pathol 1997; 151(3): 671–677. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Privalsky JR, Paddock CM, Florey O, et al. Relative contribution of PECAM-1 adhesion and signaling to the maintenance of vascular integrity. J Cell Sci 2011; 124(9): 1477–1485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Kitazume S, Imamaki R, Ogawa K, et al. Sweet role of platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule in understanding angiogenesis. Glycobiology 2014; 24(12): 1260–1264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Paddock C, Zhou D, Lertkiatmongkol P, et al. Structural basis for PECAM-1 homophilic binding. Blood 2016; 127(8): 1052–1061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Park S, DiMaio TA, Scheef EA, et al. PECAM-1 regulates proangiogenic properties of endothelial cells through modulation of cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2010; 299(6): C1468–C1484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Romero LI, Zhang DN, Herron GS, et al. Interleukin-1 induces major phenotypic changes in human skin microvascular endothelial cells. Cell Physiol 1997; 173(1): 84–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Dinarello CA. Proinflammatory cytokines. Chest 2000; 118: 503–508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Angeli V, Randolph GJ. Inflammation, lymphatic function, and dendritic Cell migration. Lymphat Res Biol 2006; 4(4): 217–228 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Gerhardt H, Golding M, Fruttiger M, et al. VEGF guides angiogenic sprouting utilizing endothelial tip cell filopodia. J Cell Biol 2003; 161(6): 1163–1177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Leppänen VM, Prota AE, Jeltsch M, et al. Structural determinants of growth factor binding and specificity by VEGF receptor 2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010; 107(6): 2425–2430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Leppänen VM, Tvorogov D, Kisko K, et al. Structural and mechanistc insights into VEGF receptor 3 ligand binding and activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013; 110(32): 12960–12965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Ponta H, Sherman L, Herrlich PA. CD44: From adhesion molecules to signalling regulators. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2003; 4(1): 33–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Johnson P, Ruffell B. CD44 and its role in inflammation and inflammatory diseases. Inflamm Allergy Drug Targets 2009; 8(3): 208–220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Orian-Rousseau V, Sleeman J. CD44 is a multidomain signaling platform that integrates extracellular cues with growth factor and cytokine signals. Adv Cancer Res 2014; 123: 231–254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Sebban LE, Ronen D, Levartovsky D, et al. The involvement of CD44 and its novel ligand galectin-8 in apoptotic regulation of autoimmune inflammation. J Immunol 2007; 179: 1225–1235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Chammas R, Veiga SS, Travasso LR, et al. Functionally distinct roles for glycosylation of alpha and beta integrin chains in cell-matrix interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1993; 90(5): 1795–1799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Nakagawa H, Zheng M, Hakomori SL, et al. Detailed oligosaccharide structures of human integrin alpha 5 beta 1 analyzed by a three-dimensional mapping technique Eur J Biochem 1996; 237(1): 76–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Moiseeva EP, Williams B, Goodall AH, et al. Galectin-1 interacts with beta-1 subunit of integrin. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2003; 310(3): 1010–1016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Saravanan CH, Liu F-T, Gipson I, et al. Galectin-3 promotes lamellipodia formation in epithelial cells by interacting with complex N-glycans on alpha3beta1 integrin. J Cell Sci 2009; 122(20): 3684–3693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Fukushi JI, Makagiansar IT, Stallcup WB. NG2 Proteoglycan promotes endothelial cell motility and angiogenesis via engagement of galectin-3 and alpha3beta1 integrin. Mol Biol Cell 2004; 15(8): 3580–3590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Fortuna-Costa A, Gomes MA, Kozlowski EO, et al. Extracellular galectin-3 in tumor progression and metastasis. Front Oncol 2014; 4: 138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Hadari YR, Arbel-Goren R, Levy Y, et al. Galectin-8 binding to integrins inhibits cell adhesion and induces apoptosis. J Cell Sci 2000; 113: 2385–2397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Carcamo C, Pardo E, Oyanadel C, et al. Galectin-8 binds specific beta1 integrins and induces polarized spreading highlighted by asymmetric lamellipodia in Jurkat T cells. Exp Cell Res 2006; 312: 374–386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Pankov R, Yamada KM. Fibronectin at a glance. J Cell Sci 2002; 115: 3861–3863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Levy Y, Arbel-Goren R, Hadari YR, et al. Galectin-8 functions as a matricellular modulator of cell adhesion. J Biol Chem 2001; 276(33): 31285–31295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Pettersson A, Nagy JA, Brown LF, et al. Heterogeneity of the angiogenic response induced in different normal adult tissues by vascular permeability factor/Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor. Lab Invest 2000; 80(1): 99–115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Nagy JA, Chang SH, Shih SC, et al. Heterogeneity of the tumor vasculature. Semin Thromb Hemost 2010; 36(3): 321–331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Nagy JA, Dvorak HF. Heterogeneity of the tumor vasculature: the need for new tumor blood vessel type-specific targets. Clin Exp Metastasis 2012; 29(7): 657–662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Bousseau S, Vergori L, Soleti R, et al. Glycosylation as new pharmacological strategies for diseases associated with excessive angiogenesis. Pharmacol. Ther 2018: 191: 92–122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Dvorak HF. Tumors: wounds that do not heal—a historical perspective with a focus on the fundamental roles of increased vascular permeability and clotting. Semin Thromb Hemost 2019; 45(6): 576–592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Kerjaschki D, Huttary N, Raab I, et al. Lymphatic endothelial progenitor cells contribute to the novo lymphangiogenesis in human renal transplants. Nature Med 2006; 12(2): 230–234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Markowska AI, Jefferies KC, Panjwai N. Galectin-3 protein modulates cell surface expression and activation of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 in human endothelial cells. J Biol Chem 2011; 286(34): 29913–29921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. D’Haene N, Sauvage S, Maris C, et al. VEGFR1 and VEGFR2 involvement in extracellular galectin-1- and galectin-3-induced angiogenesis. PLoS One 2013; 8(6): e67029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Camby I, Belot N, Rorive S, et al. Galectins are differentially expressed in supratentorial pilocytic astrocytomas, astrocytomas, anaplastic astrocytomas and glioblastomas, and significantly modulate tumor astrocyte migration. Brain Pathol 2001; 11(1): 12–26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

How to cite this article

  1. Arciniegas E, Carrillo LM, Rojas H, Pineda J, Ramírez R, Reyes O, Chopite M, Rocheta A. Plump endothelial cells integrated into pre-existing venules contribute to the formation of ‘mother’ and ‘daughter’ vessels in pyogenic granuloma: possible role of galectin-1, -3 and -8. Scars, Burns & Healing, Volume 6, 2020. DOI: 10.1177/2059513118986687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Scars, Burns & Healing are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES