Abstract
Background
Little is known on how context-specific sedentary behaviors (SB) affect adiposity. This study aimed to investigate compositional associations between context-specific SB and adiposity and estimate the differences in adiposity associated with replacing school and out-of-school SB with physical activity (PA).
Methods
This study included 336 children and adolescents. Time spent in SB and PA was estimated using multi-day 24-hour raw accelerometer data. SB and PA were specified for school and out-of-school times. Fat mass percentage (FM%) and fat mass index (FMI) were used as adiposity indicators. A compositional isotemporal substitution model was used to estimate differences in adiposity associated with one-to-one reallocations of time from context-specific SB to PA.
Results
Participants spent approximately two thirds of their school and out-of-school time being sedentary. Relative to the remaining 24-h movement behaviors, significant associations between out-of-school SB and adiposity were found in both boys (βilr1 = 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.03–1.22 for FM%; βilr1 = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.03–1.49 for FMI) and girls (βilr1 = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.25–0.98 for FM%; βilr1 = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.28–1.32 for FMI). Replacing 30 min/day of out-of-school SB with out-of-school light PA decreased FM% by 10.1% (95% CI = 3.3–17.9) and FMI by 14% (95% CI = 2.7–24) in girls. No significant associations were found for school SB.
Conclusions
A reduction of out-of-school SB in favor of light PA should be advocated as an appropriate target for interventions and strategies to prevent childhood obesity.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12199-021-00932-6.
Keywords: Accelerometry, Compositional data analysis, Schools, Time-use epidemiology
Introduction
Sedentary behavior (SB) is described as any waking behavior where energy expenditure is equal to or less than 1.5 metabolic equivalents while a person is sitting, reclining, or lying [1]. SB is considered a predominant part of the 24-h cycle [2] with a high potential to affect health [3, 4]. Excessive SB is highly prevalent among school-aged children and adolescents [5]. The large amount of time spent in SB leads to a dysregulation in the energy balance, which is one of the key contributors to childhood obesity [6].
Numerous studies have investigated the relationship between total SB and adiposity in past decades but their conclusions have been inconsistent [7]. The occurrence of a few unexpected findings [8, 9] suggests a need for an extended investigation. The context in which SB occurs may contribute to an explanation of this inconsistency [10]. Children and adolescents spend a large proportion of their waking hours at school and most of their school time corresponds to SB [11–14]. However, the amount of time they spend in SB during school time might not be the main driver of childhood obesity because it is highly organized with a lack of opportunity to exercise free choice in movement behaviors. In contrast, out-of-school time corresponds more with the attitudes of children and adolescents and their family background [15] and could be the potential source of obesogenic movement behaviors.
Although previously published studies have shown that both school and out-of-school SB are independently associated with adiposity indicators [11, 16, 17], these studies examined SB in isolation without including the remaining movement behaviors within the 24-h cycle (i.e., physical activity [PA] and sleep). It is known that all movement behaviors interact with each other [2, 18], and therefore, the change in adiposity status associated with a change in SB is partly due to a compensatory change in one or all remaining movement behaviors [19]. For this reason, the relationship between SB and adiposity should be examined in accordance with a 24-h time-use paradigm that integrates all daily movement behaviors [2]. This, however, requires the use of appropriate statistical methods such as compositional data analysis (CoDA), which allows one to analyze associations between SB and adiposity relative to other movement behaviors [19, 20]. Moreover, the employment of isotemporal substitution modeling [21] provides an opportunity to design more effective intervention strategies that focus on reducing sedentary time by estimating the theoretical difference in adiposity resulting from replacing SB with one or all remaining movement behaviors within the day.
To our knowledge, a study based on 24-h movement behaviors to examine the associations between context-specific SB and adiposity data has not been published. The present study sought to fill this gap by (1) investigating compositional associations between context-specific SB and adiposity and (2) estimating the differences in adiposity associated with replacing school and out-of-school SB with PA in the 24-h movement behavior composition.
Methods
Participants
This observational cross-sectional study included children and adolescents aged 8 to 18 years who were recruited from urban and rural schools across the Czech Republic. The study’s sampling and design details have been reported elsewhere [18, 22]. Briefly, seven primary and four secondary schools in which students are engaged in the mandated amount of physical education lessons (i.e., 90 min a week) participated in this study. The main inclusion criteria were participant age and good health condition. A total of 907 children agreed to participate in the study on a voluntary basis. Of these, 45 participants were excluded due to illness, and another 146 were excluded because they either provided incomplete data or because the accelerometer malfunctioned. Another 380 participants were excluded from the study because they did not meet the specific criteria for accelerometer wear time. Hence, the final sample comprised 336 participants. Detailed characteristics of the study sample are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1.
Descriptive characteristics of the study sample
| Boys (n = 128) |
Girls (n = 208) |
p valuec | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meana | varb | Meana | varb | ||
| Age (years) | 14.4 | 2.4 | 13.8 | 2.6 | 0.033 |
| Height (cm) | 167.0 | 14.4 | 158.3 | 11.9 | < 0.001 |
| Weight (kg) | 58.6 | 17.5 | 51.4 | 13.1 | < 0.001 |
| Fat mass (%) | 15.5 | 7.6 | 23.7 | 8.0 | < 0.001 |
| Fat mass index (kg/m2) | 3.4 | 2.4 | 5.0 | 2.5 | < 0.001 |
| Weight status (% of n)d | |||||
| Underweight | 2.3 | 1.0 | 0.341 | ||
| Normal weight | 74.2 | 76.4 | 0.649 | ||
| Overweight | 14.8 | 18.3 | 0.407 | ||
| Obese | 8.7 | 4.3 | 0.099 | ||
| 24-h movement behaviors (min/day)d | |||||
| Sleep (min/day) | 479.1 | 15.0 | 486.3 | 13.7 | 0.989 |
| SB school (min/day) | 229.4 | 19.1 | 215.2 | 19.6 | 0.236 |
| SB out-of-school (min/day) | 427.5 | 17.9 | 394.9 | 17.1 | 0.056 |
| LPA school (min/day) | 89.4 | 13.9 | 90.5 | 13.6 | 0.634 |
| LPA out-of-school (min/day) | 142.0 | 14.7 | 159.9 | 13.9 | 0.011 |
| MPA school (min/day) | 23.5 | 13.9 | 26.3 | 15.8 | 0.005 |
| MPA out-of-school (min/day) | 44.4 | 13.5 | 62.4 | 13.7 | < 0.001 |
| VPA school (min/day) | 2.4 | 28.8 | 1.6 | 34.7 | < 0.001 |
| VPA out-of-school (min/day) | 2.3 | 63.2 | 2.9 | 57.9 | 0.153 |
LPA light physical activity, MPA moderate physical activity, SB sedentary behaviors, VPA vigorous physical activity
aGeometric mean for time-use components; arithmetic mean for non-compositional continuous variables; percentages for categorical variables
bThe part of total variance related to a given time-use component; standard deviation for other variables
cDifferences between sexes were tested using the t-test for independent samples and the chi-squared test for categorical variables
dBased on the BMI z-score
Device-measured 24-h movement behaviors
SB, PA, and sleep were measured using the wrist-worn ActiGraph accelerometer GT9X Link or wGT3X-BT (ActiGraph Corp., Pensacola, FL, USA) which are comparable if count-based metrics are used [23]. Participants were given an accelerometer at their schools and asked to wear it for seven consecutive days, except when bathing and swimming. The devices were initialized to collect data at 100 Hz, and data were downloaded using the ActiLife software version 6.13.3 (ActiGraph Corp., Pensacola, FL, USA).
Raw accelerometer data were saved as GT3X files and reintegrated to 5-s periods. Non-wear time was captured with the Choi algorithm [24] to minimize misclassification of wear time as non-wear time during the sleep time period [25] and removed for further analysis. Vector magnitude activity counts per 5 s were used to estimate SB (< 306 counts), light physical activity (LPA; 306–817 counts), moderate physical activity (MPA; 818–1968 counts), and vigorous physical activity (VPA; ≥ 1969 counts) [26]. Participants’ log diaries were used to specify school (time between the start and the end of school) and out-of-school movement behaviors (all remaining time). Sleep duration was derived using the Cole-Kripke algorithm [27] which provides high accuracy of sleep estimation against polysomnography in the pediatric population [28].
Time spent in SB, LPA, MPA, VPA, and sleep were summed and then normalized to 24 h (i.e., 1440 min). We applied the wear time requirement of ≥ 1200 min of a total wear time with ≥ 720 min of awake time, ≥ 320 min of sleep time, and 220–440 min of school time to constitute a valid measurement. In order to cover the whole period of 1 week, participants with a valid set of 7 days and nights and with valid school and out-of-school segments for all the five school days included in the measurement period were included in the final analysis.
Adiposity indicators
Adiposity was assessed on the school premises during school hours using the multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance (InBody 720, InBody Co., Seoul, South Korea; 1–1000 kHz). Fat mass percentage (FM%) and fat mass index (FMI) were used as indicators of adiposity. The multi-frequency bioimpedance analysis method has been previously validated against dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for assessing adiposity in pediatric population [29]. Participants were instructed in advance to avoid any vigorous exercise for at least a day before the examination and to maintain proper hydration.
Covariates
The several covariates were selected to control for potential cofounding factors. We selected a set of potential confounding factors a priori based on the literature [30] and based on the preliminary analysis. Data on participants’ active transport from school (defined as any mode of non-motorized transportation on most days of the school week) and unhealthy diet (defined as a low frequency in consumption of fruits and vegetable) were self-reported. Maternal overweight and obesity (self-reported body mass index ≥ 25 kg/m2) and education level were reported by parents. Missing values (2–6%) were imputed using the k-nearest neighbor imputation algorithm [31].
Statistical analyses
IBM SPSS Statistics version 23 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) was used to determine the descriptive analyses and to verify the data for further analysis. A CoDA was conducted with R Statistical Software, version 4.0.2 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) using the robCompositions package. The analysis was performed separately for boys and girls to take into account sexual dimorphism in adiposity [30].
The descriptive statistics of the compositional variables are presented as a robust center (i.e., vector of compositional means) and variation matrix (i.e., dispersion of compositional data). We used the 9-part 24-h movement behavior composition which takes into account school and out-of-school behaviors (i.e., SB, LPA, MPA, and VPA) and sleep. The variables of movement behaviors were expressed as isometric log-ratio coordinates and the first pivot coordinate (ilr1), which includes all relative information about the one part given the remaining parts of 24-h composition, was used in the analysis [32]. The order of movement behavior variables was rearranged in every given analysis to be able to analyze each part of the 24-h composition using the first pivot coordinate system [20]. A few zero values in school VPA (seven cases) were replaced using the Bayesian-multiplicative method [33].
Differences between sexes were tested using the independent t-test for scale variables and with the chi-square test for categorical variables. The compositional regression analysis adjusted for covariates, age, region, and season of data collection were used to examine associations between components of the 24-h movement behaviors and adiposity. The robust estimators were used to suppress the influence of outlying observations [34] that occurred in school and out-of-school VPA. Dependent variables were transformed using a natural logarithm before analysis to achieve the absolute scale and a normal distribution. The sample size of both sex categories was sufficient to detect at least a medium effect size (f2 ≤ 0.15) in the population and to ensure a statistical power of ≥ 80% and an alpha error of 0.05 for regression models with 13 explanatory variables [35].
The compositional isotemporal substitution model [21] was used to estimate relative differences in adiposity indicators associated with one-to-one reallocations from time spent in SB to PA of different intensities within school and out-of-school time. Estimated differences in adiposity indicators were considered significant when 95% confidence intervals (CIs) did not cover zero.
Results
The descriptive characteristics of the included participants did not differ from those who were excluded (Table S1). The characteristics of the study participants included in the final sample are shown in Table 1. Boys had significantly lower FM% and FMI, by 8.2% points and 1.6 kg/m2 (p < 0.001 for both), respectively, compared with girls. In both age categories, participants spent 64–69% of their school and out-of-school time in SB. Relative to the remaining 24-h movement behaviors, boys spent less time in school MPA, by 2.8 min/day (p = 0.005), and more time in school VPA, by 0.8 min/day (p < 0.001), than girls. Boys also spent less time in out-of-school LPA and out-of-school MPA, by 17.9 min/day (p = 0.011) and 18 min/day (p < 0.001), respectively.
Table 2 displays the results of the compositional regression analysis between all 24-h movement behaviors and adiposity indicators. Significant associations were found between out-of-school SB (relative to the remaining 24-h movement behaviors) and FM% for both boys (βilr1 = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.03 to 1.22) and girls (βilr1 = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.25 to 0.98). Similar associations were found for FMI for boys (βilr1 = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.03 to 1.49) and for girls (βilr1 = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.28 to 1.32). Relative to the remaining 24-h movement behaviors, out-of-school LPA was significantly associated with FM% (βilr1 = − 0.43, 95% CI = −0.86 to −0.01) in girls. No significant associations between movement behaviors during school and adiposity indicators were found.
Table 2.
Robust compositional regression analysis of associations between 24-h movement behaviors and adiposity indicators
| Boys (n = 128) | Girls (n = 208) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fat massa (%) | Fat mass indexa (kg/m2) | Fat massa (%) | Fat mass indexa (kg/m2) | |||||||||
| βilr1b | (95% CI) | p value | βilr1b | (95% CI) | p value | βilr1b | (95% CI) | p value | βilr1b | (95% CI) | p value | |
| Sleep (min/day) | −0.67 | (−1.62, 0.27) | 0.159 | −0.65 | (−1.92, 0.63) | 0.318 | −0.46 | (−0.96, 0.05) | 0.075 | −0.71 | (−1.45, 0.03) | 0.058 |
| SB school (min/day) | −0.32 | (− 1.09, 0.45) | 0.411 | −0.51 | (−1.49, 0.46) | 0.297 | −0.20 | (−0.58, 0.18) | 0.302 | −0.20 | (−0.76, 0.35) | 0.473 |
| SB out-of-school (min/day) | 0.63 | (0.03, 1.22) | 0.040 | 0.76 | (0.03, 1.49) | 0.040 | 0.62 | (0.25, 0.98) | 0.001 | 0.80 | (0.28, 1.32) | 0.003 |
| LPA school (min/day) | 0.18 | (−0.54, 0.90) | 0.615 | 0.17 | (−0.68, 1.02) | 0.691 | 0.38 | (−0.06, 0.81) | 0.086 | 0.52 | (−0.09, 1.12) | 0.094 |
| LPA out-of-school (min/day) | 0.11 | (−0.50, 0.71) | 0.732 | 0.20 | (−0.50, 0.90) | 0.569 | −0.43 | (−0.86, − 0.01) | 0.047 | −0.56 | (−1.21, 0.08) | 0.086 |
| MPA school (min/day) | 0.23 | (−0.19, 0.65) | 0.284 | 0.30 | (−0.19, 0.78) | 0.230 | −0.08 | (−0.41, 0.25) | 0.636 | −0.07 | (−0.54, 0.39) | 0.765 |
| MPA out-of-school (min/day) | −0.02 | (−0.56, 0.52) | 0.940 | −0.14 | (−0.73, 0.45) | 0.640 | 0.20 | (−0.19, 0.59) | 0.305 | 0.25 | (−0.33, 0.83) | 0.388 |
| VPA school (min/day) | −0.05 | (−0.16, 0.05) | 0.298 | −0.07 | (−0.19, 0.06) | 0.281 | 0.04 | (−0.02, 0.09) | 0.200 | 0.05 | (−0.03, 0.13) | 0.219 |
| VPA out-of-school (min/day) | −0.08 | (−0.21, 0.06) | 0.254 | −0.06 | (−0.22, 0.09) | 0.430 | −0.07 | (−0.15, 0.01) | 0.077 | −0.07 | (−0.18, 0.04) | 0.190 |
CI confidence interval, ilr1 isometric log-ratio (first coordinate), LPA light physical activity, MPA moderate physical activity, SB sedentary behaviors, VPA vigorous physical activity
aVariable was transformed using natural logarithm before analysis
bRegression coefficient for fully-adjusted model
Independent variables are expressed as the first pivot coordinate which represents the relative contribution of one behavior relative to remaining behaviors within a 24-hour cycle. Results were derived from nine regression models corresponding to the pivot coordinate representations of specific time-use components
Estimated relative differences in adiposity indicators associated with simulated reallocations of time from school and out-of-school SB to PA of different intensities are presented in Tables 3 and 4. In girls, substituting 30 min/day of out-of-school SB to out-of-school LPA was associated with lower FM% and FMI by 10.1% (95% CI = 3.3 to 17.9) and 14% (95% CI = 2.7 to 24.0), respectively. Estimated differences in adiposity were not exactly symmetrical because higher FM% by 13.5% (95% CI = 3.3 to 24.7) and FMI by 18% (95% CI = 2.3 to 36.1) were associated with a 30-min reallocation from LPA to SB within out-of-school time. No significant change in adiposity indicators was found for boys (Fig. 1) and for time reallocations between context-specific SB and MPA and VPA (Figures S1 and S2).
Table 3.
Estimated relative difference in adiposity associated with replacing context-specific sedentary behaviors with physical activity among boys (n = 128)
| LPA 30 min/day reallocation |
MPA 10 min/day reallocation |
VPA 2 min/day reallocation |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage change | (95% CI) | Percentage change | (95% CI) | Percentage change | (95% CI) | |
| Fat mass (%) | ||||||
| SB to PA (school time) | 9.6 | (−13.3, 38.6) | 9.4 | (−4.5, 25.4) | −2.8 | (−8.6, 3.4) |
| PA to SB (school time) | −10.1 | (−33.6, 21.6) | −12.4 | (−29.3, 8.5) | 9.9 | (−8.8, 32.3) |
| SB to PA (out-of-school time) | −2.4 | (−14.0, 10.8) | −1.8 | (−11.1, 8.5) | −4.6 | (−11.8, 3.1) |
| PA to SB (out-of-school time) | 1.7 | (−12.5, 18.2) | 1.9 | (−10.1, 15.5) | 15.4 | (−9.5, 47.1) |
| Fat mas index (kg/m2) | ||||||
| SB to PA (school time) | 12.2 | (−15.0, 48.1) | 12.8 | (−3.7, 32.1) | −3.5 | (−10.4, 4.1) |
| PA to SB (school time) | −11.8 | (−38.3, 26.1) | −16.1 | (−34.4, 7.5) | 12.5 | (−10.2, 41.0) |
| SB to PA (out-of-school time) | −1.6 | (−14.9, 13.8) | −4.3 | (−14.1, 6.7) | −3.9 | (−12.5, 5.5) |
| PA to SB (out-of-school time) | 0.4 | (−15.5, 19.2) | 5.1 | (−8.3, 20.5) | 12.7 | (−15.8, 50.7) |
CI confidence interval, LPA light physical activity, MPA moderate physical activity, PA physical activity, SB sedentary behaviors, VPA vigorous physical activity
Table 4.
Estimated relative difference in adiposity associated with replacing context-specific sedentary behaviors with physical activity among girls (n = 208)
| LPA 30 min/day reallocation |
MPA 10 min/day reallocation |
VPA 2 min/day reallocation |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage change | (95% CI) | Percentage change | (95% CI) | Percentage change | (95% CI) | |
| Fat mass (%) | ||||||
| SB to PA (school time) | 13.9 | (−0.4, 30.3) | − 1.5 | (−10.9, 8.9) | 3.8 | (−1.4, 7.7) |
| PA to SB (school time) | −15.5 | (−29.1, 0.8) | 2.8 | (−11.4, 19.2) | −9.7a | (−22.7, 5.4) |
| SB to PA (out-of-school time) | −10.1 | (−17.9, −3.3) | 1.4 | (−4.1, 7.1) | −3.7 | (−7.3, 0.1) |
| PA to SB (out-of-school time) | 13.5 | (3.3, 24.7) | −1.9 | (−8.0, 4.7) | 8.5 | (−0.5, 18.3) |
| Fat mas index (kg/m2) | ||||||
| SB to PA (school time) | 18.3 | (−1.5, 42.2) | −1.2 | (−14.2, 13.7) | 4.1 | (−2.1, 10.7) |
| PA to SB (school time) | −19.9 | (−37.1, 2.1) | 2.3 | (−16.9, 25.9) | −12.8a | (−29.7, 8.3) |
| SB to PA (out-of-school time) | −14.0 | (−24.0, −2.7) | 1.6 | (−6.3, 10.2) | −4.0 | (−9.1, 1.4) |
| PA to SB (out-of-school time) | 18.0 | (2.3, 36.1) | −2.3 | (−11.1, 7.5) | 9.0 | (−3.7, 23.4) |
CI confidence interval, LPA light physical activity, MPA moderate physical activity, PA physical activity, SB sedentary behaviors, VPA vigorous physical activity
aEstimate is based on 1.5 min/day reallocation because the model was unable to estimate differences due to the low compositional mean of school VPA
Fig. 1.
Relative difference in fat mass percentage associated with replacing school (left) and out-of-school (right) SB with LPA in boys (top) and girls (bottom). Positive values on x-axis present time replacement from context-specific SB to LPA, and negative values time replacement from context-specific LPA to SB
Discussion
The findings of the present study provide novel insights into the compositional associations of context-specific SB with adiposity and the changes in adiposity associated with replacing SB with PA. We found that boys and girls spent approximately two thirds of their school and out-of-school time being sedentary. The greater amount of time spent in out-of-school SB was associated with FM% and FMI in both sexes. Replacing out-of-school SB with out-of-school LPA results in favorable changes in adiposity among girls. No significant associations were found for school SB.
In line with previous studies [11–14, 36, 37], our participants spent a predominant proportion of school and out-of-school time being sedentary. Thus, these context-specific settings present an opportunity for interventions targeting obesity prevention by replacing SB with PA [38, 39]. Our analysis, however, did not reveal any significant differences in adiposity associated with replacing school SB with school PA of different intensities. A plausible explanation behind this finding may be that school movement behaviors have low intrapersonal variability [12] and may not differ between individuals with normal and excess adiposity. Another explanation is that we did not take into account patterns of SB. A recent study found significant compositional associations between time spent in middle sedentary bouts (i.e., bouts of 10–29 min) and adiposity in children of a school-going age, whilst no associations were found for total SB [40]. SB patterns should therefore be considered when examining associations between SB and adiposity.
We had no empirical data on SB patterns during school time, so we could only hypothesize that most of the time our participants spent in school SB was accumulated by a few periods of prolonged SB (i.e., during lessons). Prolonged uninterrupted SB is associated with several adverse health outcomes including excess adiposity [40–42]. Consequently, breaking up prolonged sitting with short bouts of PA could make a significant contribution to obesity prevention. This assumption is supported by a recent CoDA-based study in which favorable adiposity status was associated with time reallocation from middle sedentary bouts to moderate-to-vigorous PA [40]. Moreover, clinical trials also reporting that incorporating brief bouts of PA into school time may attenuate increases in adiposity [43].
Out-of-school time also presents numerous opportunities to prevent excess adiposity by reducing SB in favor of PA. Although a plethora of studies show that a favorable adiposity status is associated with at least MPA as part of active transportation to and from school [44] and organized sport and PA [45], the present study did not find such associations for both out-of-school MPA and VPA. These different results could be due to the fact that the independent variables used in the present study included relative information about all the parts of 24-h movement behaviors composition (i.e., the first pivot coordinate), whilst previously published studies were not based on 24-h movement behavior data and/or had not used adequate statistical methods for time-use data. For example, omitting sleep from the analysis may yield biased estimates of the association of out-of-school PA with adiposity. Sleep represents a predominant part of 24-h movement behavior composition and has been found to be independently associated with childhood obesity [46]. Moreover, inadequate sleep is associated with less healthy awake time, especially with higher levels of prolonged SB [18]. Future studies should consider a 24-h time-use paradigm and use appropriate statistical methods.
The novel finding of this study is that adiposity could be improved by increasing out-of-school LPA at the expense of time spent in out-of-school SB. This finding corresponds with previous CoDA-based studies showing the favorable difference in adiposity [47] and body mass index z-score [11] for time reallocations between total SB and LPA. Moreover, the recent study showed that LPA moderates associations between sitting and adiposity indicators among adolescents [48]. Although LPA requires a low consumption of energy, it has the potential of improving health outcomes. The main reason for this is that LPA represents the dominant part of out-of-school time composition and includes various mixes of daily living activities, which may interrupt prolonged SB. The experimental study by Bailey and Locke [49] supports this assumption by showing that interrupting SB with frequent sporadic bouts of LPA leads to enhanced cardiometabolic health in the adult population. However, the potential of LPA for the prevention of excess adiposity in the pediatric population is largely unexplored and undocumented. Future studies are warranted to gain a better understanding of the role of LPA in the prevention of childhood obesity.
The compositional isotemporal substitution model used in the present study found significant differences in adiposity only in girls. Similar to our findings, previously published studies [47, 50] confirmed sex-specific differences in adiposity associated with time reallocations between SB and LPA. This finding can be partly explained by differences in out-of-school activity. In the present study, boys spent significantly less time in out-of-school LPA and out-of-school MPA than girls. Additionally, differences in overweight and obesity prevalence between sex categories indicate differences in variability of adiposity between boys and girls, which may also have caused the sex-specific results of the analysis.
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to use CoDA to examine associations between context-specific SB and adiposity indicators. The strength of the study is the availability of raw multi-day 24-h movement data which allowed SB adjustment for PA and sleep duration. There are also some limitations to this study. First, the design of study was cross-sectional with limited ability to draw causality in the associations between 24-h movement behaviors and adiposity. Second, an isotemporal substitution model provides only theoretical estimates of changes in adiposity. Our findings should be, therefore, interpreted with caution and need to be contrasted in experimental designs. Third, although the regression analysis was adjusted for several confounders, there are still several potential endogenous and exogenous factors that have not been considered. Last, although the sample size is comparable with previous studies [11, 50, 51], it allowed us to detect at least a medium effect size in the population.
Conclusion
The present study is the first to use CoDA when examining associations between context-specific SB and adiposity status in school-aged children and adolescents. We revealed positive (unfavorable) associations between out-of-school SB and adiposity. Based on compositional isotemporal substituting modeling, the present study suggests that adiposity status could be improved by replacing out-of-school SB with out-of-school LPA. No significant associations were found for school SB. This study, therefore, highlights the need for assessing the context-specific SB and to amplify the benefits of LPA in the prevention of excess adiposity. Findings from the present study provide further evidence for public health policy and practices and may help to design more effective strategies to prevent childhood obesity.
Supplementary Information
Additional file 1: Figure S1. Relative difference in fat mass percentage associated with replacing school (left) and out-of-school (right) SB with MPA in boys (top) and girls (bottom). Positive values on the x-axis present time replacement from context-specific SB to MPA, and negative values time replacement from context-specific MPA to SB.
Additional file 2: Figure S2. Relative difference in fat mass percentage associated with replacing school (left) and out-of-school (right) SB with VPA in boys (top) and girls (bottom). Positive values on x-axis present time replacement from context-specific SB to VPA, and negative values time replacement from context-specific VPA to SB. Note: The isotemporal substitution model was unable to estimate difference for reallocation between school SB and VPA due to low compositional mean for school VPA among girls.
Additional file 3: Table S1. Descriptive characteristics of included and excluded participants.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to all the participants who were involved in this study.
Authors’ contributions
AG and JD came up with the concept and design of the study and prepared final dataset. NŠ and KH carried out statistical analysis and provided editing assistance for tables and content. AG and JD contributed to the interpretation of data and wrote the manuscript. LR and LJ coordinated and supervised data collection. The authors revised the manuscript drafts for important intellectual content and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was funded by the research grant of Czech Science Foundation (18-09188S). Funding organization had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Availability of data and materials
The dataset analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Physical Culture, Palacký University Olomouc (reference number: 19/2017). The study was conducted in accordance with the Ethical principles of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. Parents or guardians provided a written consent for the participation of their children in the study.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Tremblay MS, Aubert S, Barnes JD, Saunders TJ, Carson V, Latimer-Cheung AE, Chastin SFM, Altenburg TM, Chinapaw MJM, Participants STCP. Sedentary Behavior Research Network (SBRN) - Terminology Consensus Project process and outcome. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017;14(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0525-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Pedisic Z, Dumuid D, Olds T. Integrating sleep, sedentary behaviour, and physical activity research in the emerging field of time-use epidemiology: definitions, concepts, statistical methods, theoretical framework, and future directions. Kinesiology. 2017;49(2).
- 3.Carson V, Hunter S, Kuzik N, Gray CE, Poitras VJ, Chaput JP, Saunders TJ, Katzmarzyk PT, Okely AD, Connor Gorber S, et al. Systematic review of sedentary behaviour and health indicators in school-aged children and youth: an update. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016;41(6 Suppl 3):S240–S265. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2015-0630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Rodriguez-Ayllon M, Cadenas-Sánchez C, Estévez-López F, Muñoz NE, Mora-Gonzalez J, Migueles JH, Molina-García P, Henriksson H, Mena-Molina A, Martínez-Vizcaíno V, et al. Role of physical activity and sedentary behavior in the mental health of preschoolers, children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2019;49(9):1383–1410. doi: 10.1007/s40279-019-01099-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Aubert S, Barnes JD, Abdeta C, Abi Nader P, Adeniyi AF, Aguilar-Farias N, Andrade Tenesaca DS, Bhawra J, Brazo-Sayavera J, Cardon G, et al. Global matrix 3.0 physical activity report card grades for children and youth: results and analysis from 49 countries. J Phys Act Health. 2018;15(S2):S251–Ss73. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2018-0472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Han JC, Lawlor DA, Kimm SYS. Childhood obesity. Lancet. 2010;375(9727):1737–1748. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60171-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Biddle SJ, García Bengoechea E, Wiesner G. Sedentary behaviour and adiposity in youth: a systematic review of reviews and analysis of causality. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017;14(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0497-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Cliff DP, Hesketh KD, Vella SA, Hinkley T, Tsiros MD, Ridgers ND, Carver A, Veitch J, Parrish AM, Hardy LL, et al. Objectively measured sedentary behaviour and health and development in children and adolescents: systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2016;17(4):330–344. doi: 10.1111/obr.12371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Tanaka C, Reilly JJ, Huang WY. Longitudinal changes in objectively measured sedentary behaviour and their relationship with adiposity in children and adolescents: systematic review and evidence appraisal. Obes Rev. 2014;15(10):791–803. doi: 10.1111/obr.12195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sallis JF, Owen N. Health behavior: Theory, research, and practice. 5. Hoboken: Jossey-Bass/Wiley; 2015. Ecological models of health behavior; pp. 43–64. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Fairclough SJ, Dumuid D, Mackintosh KA, Stone G, Dagger R, Stratton G, Davies I, Boddy LM. Adiposity, fitness, health-related quality of life and the reallocation of time between children’s school day activity behaviours: a compositional data analysis. Prev Med Rep. 2018;11:254–261. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.07.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hubbard K, Economos CD, Bakun P, Boulos R, Chui K, Mueller MP, Smith K, Sacheck J. Disparities in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity among girls and overweight and obese schoolchildren during school- and out-of-school time. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016;13(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12966-016-0358-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Nettlefold L, McKay HA, Warburton DER, McGuire KA, Bredin SSD, Naylor PJ. The challenge of low physical activity during the school day: at recess, lunch and in physical education. Br J Sports Med. 2011;45(10):813–819. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2009.068072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Egan CA, Webster CA, Beets MW, Weaver RG, Russ L, Michael D, Nesbitt D, Orendorff KL. Sedentary time and behavior during school: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Health Educ. 2019;50(5):283–290. doi: 10.1080/19325037.2019.1642814. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Rhodes RE, Guerrero MD, Vanderloo LM, Barbeau K, Birken CS, Chaput J-P, Faulkner G, Janssen I, Madigan S, Mâsse LC, et al. Development of a consensus statement on the role of the family in the physical activity, sedentary, and sleep behaviours of children and youth. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020;17(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-00973-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ashdown-Franks G, Vancampfort D, Firth J, Veronese N, Jackson SE, Smith L, Stubbs B, Koyanagi A. Leisure-time sedentary behavior and obesity among 116,762 adolescents aged 12-15 years from 41 low- and middle-income countries. Obesity. 2019;27(5):830–836. doi: 10.1002/oby.22424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Shakir RN, Coates AM, Olds T, Rowlands A, Tsiros MD. Not all sedentary behaviour is equal: Children’s adiposity and sedentary behaviour volumes, patterns and types. Obes Res Clin Pract. 2018;12(6):506–512. doi: 10.1016/j.orcp.2018.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gába A, Dygrýn J, Štefelová N, Rubín L, Hron K, Jakubec L, Pedišić Ž. How do short sleepers use extra waking hours? A compositional analysis of 24-h time-use patterns among children and adolescents. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020;17(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-01004-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Dumuid D, Pedišić Ž, Palarea-Albaladejo J, Martín-Fernández JA, Hron K, Olds T. Compositional data analysis in time-use epidemiology: what, why, how. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(7):2220. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Dumuid D, Stanford TE, Martin-Fernández J-A, Pedišić Ž, Maher CA, Lewis LK, Hron K, Katzmarzyk PT, Chaput J-P, Fogelholm M, et al. Compositional data analysis for physical activity, sedentary time and sleep research. Stat Methods Med Res. 2018;27(12):3726–3738. doi: 10.1177/0962280217710835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Dumuid D, Pedišić Ž, Stanford TE, Martín-Fernández J-A, Hron K, Maher CA, Lewis LK, Olds T. The compositional isotemporal substitution model: a method for estimating changes in a health outcome for reallocation of time between sleep, physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Stat Methods Med Res. 2018;28(3):846–857. doi: 10.1177/0962280217737805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Jakubec L, Gába A, Dygrýn J, Rubín L, Šimůnek A, Sigmund E. Is adherence to the 24-h movement guidelines associated with a reduced risk of adiposity among children and adolescents? BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):1119. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09213-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Clevenger KA, Pfeiffer KA, Montoye AHK. Cross-generational comparability of raw and count-based metrics from ActiGraph GT9X and wGT3X-BT accelerometers during free-living in youth. Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci. 2020;24(3):194–204. doi: 10.1080/1091367X.2020.1773827. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Choi L, Liu Z, Matthews CE, Buchowski MS. Validation of accelerometer wear and nonwear time classification algorithm. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43(2):357–364. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181ed61a3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Knaier R, Höchsmann C, Infanger D, Hinrichs T, Schmidt-Trucksäss A. Validation of automatic wear-time detection algorithms in a free-living setting of wrist-worn and hip-worn ActiGraph GT3X+ BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):244. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6568-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Chandler JL, Brazendale K, Beets MW, Mealing BA. Classification of physical activity intensities using a wrist-worn accelerometer in 8-12-year-old children. Pediatr Obes. 2016;11(2):120–127. doi: 10.1111/ijpo.12033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Cole RJ, Kripke DF, Gruen W, Mullaney DJ, Gillin JC. Automatic sleep/wake identification from wrist activity. Sleep. 1992;15(5):461–469. doi: 10.1093/sleep/15.5.461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Quante M, Kaplan ER, Cailler M, Rueschman M, Wang R, Weng J, Taveras EM, Redline S. Actigraphy-based sleep estimation in adolescents and adults: a comparison with polysomnography using two scoring algorithms. Nat Sci Sleep. 2018;10:13–20. doi: 10.2147/NSS.S151085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lim JS, Hwang JS, Lee JA, Kim DH, Park KD, Jeong JS, Cheon GJ. Cross-calibration of multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis with eight-point tactile electrodes and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for assessment of body composition in healthy children aged 6-18 years. Pediatr Int. 2009;51(2):263–268. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-200X.2008.02698.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Katzmarzyk PT, Shen W, Baxter-Jones A, Bell JD, Butte NF, Demerath EW, Gilsanz V, Goran MI, Hirschler V, Hu HH, et al. Adiposity in children and adolescents: correlates and clinical consequences of fat stored in specific body depots. Pediatr Obes. 2012;7(5):e42–e61. doi: 10.1111/j.2047-6310.2012.00073.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kowarik A, Templ M. Imputation with the R Package VIM. J Stat Softw. 2016;74(7):1–16. doi: 10.18637/jss.v074.i07. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Pawlowsky-Glahn V, Egozcue JJ, Tolosana-Delgado R. Modeling and analysis of compositional data. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley; 2015. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Martín-Fernández J-A, Hron K, Templ M, Filzmoser P, Palarea-Albaladejo J. Bayesian-multiplicative treatment of count zeros in compositional data sets. Stat Modelling. 2014;15(2):134–158. doi: 10.1177/1471082X14535524. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Štefelová N, Dygrýn J, Hron K, Gába A, Rubín L, Palarea-Albaladejo J. Robust compositional analysis of physical activity and sedentary behaviour data. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(10):2248. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15102248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Cohen J. A power primer. Psychol Bull. 1992;112(1):155–159. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Arundell L, Fletcher E, Salmon J, Veitch J, Hinkley T. A systematic review of the prevalence of sedentary behavior during the after-school period among children aged 5-18 years. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016;13(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12966-016-0419-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Atkin AJ, Gorely T, Biddle SJH, Marshall SJ, Cameron N. Critical hours: physical activity and sedentary behavior of adolescents after school. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2008;20(4):446. doi: 10.1123/pes.20.4.446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hegarty LM, Mair JL, Kirby K, Murtagh E, Murphy MH. School-based interventions to reduce sedentary behaviour in children: a systematic review. AIMS Public Health. 2016;3(3):520–541. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2016.3.520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Beets MW, Beighle A, Erwin HE, Huberty JL. After-school program impact on physical activity and fitness: a meta-analysis. Am J Prev Med. 2009;36(6):527–537. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.01.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Gába A, Pedišić Ž, Štefelová N, Dygrýn J, Hron K, Dumuid D, Tremblay M. Sedentary behavior patterns and adiposity in children: a study based on compositional data analysis. BMC Pediatr. 2020;20(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s12887-020-02036-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Colley RC, Garriguet D, Janssen I, Wong SL, Saunders TJ, Carson V, Tremblay MS. The association between accelerometer-measured patterns of sedentary time and health risk in children and youth: results from the Canadian Health Measures Survey. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(1):200. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Carson V, Stone M, Faulkner G. Patterns of sedentary behavior and weight status among children. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2014;26(1):95–102. doi: 10.1123/pes.2013-0061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Donnelly JE, Greene JL, Gibson CA, Smith BK, Washburn RA, Sullivan DK, DuBose K, Mayo MS, Schmelzle KH, Ryan JJ, et al. Physical Activity Across the Curriculum (PAAC): a randomized controlled trial to promote physical activity and diminish overweight and obesity in elementary school children. Prev Med. 2009;49(4):336–341. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.07.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Sarmiento OL, Lemoine P, Gonzalez SA, Broyles ST, Denstel KD, Larouche R, Onywera V, Barreira TV, Chaput JP, Fogelholm M, et al. Relationships between active school transport and adiposity indicators in school-age children from low-, middle- and high-income countries. Int J Obes. 2015;5(2):S107–SS14. doi: 10.1038/ijosup.2015.27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Cairney J, Veldhuizen S. Organized sport and physical activity participation and body mass index in children and youth: a longitudinal study. Prev Med Rep. 2017;6:336–338. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2017.04.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Morrissey B, Taveras E, Allender S, Strugnell C. Sleep and obesity among children: a systematic review of multiple sleep dimensions. Pediatr Obes. 2020;15(4):e12619. doi: 10.1111/ijpo.12619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Dumuid D, Stanford TE, Pedišić Ž, Maher C, Lewis LK, Martín-Fernández J-A, Katzmarzyk PT, Chaput J-P, Fogelholm M, Standage M, et al. Adiposity and the isotemporal substitution of physical activity, sedentary time and sleep among school-aged children: a compositional data analysis approach. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):311. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5207-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Contardo Ayala AM, Salmon J, Dunstan DW, Arundell L, Timperio A. Does light-intensity physical activity moderate the relationship between sitting time and adiposity markers in adolescents? J Sport Health Sci. 2020: [Published Ahead of Print]. 10.1016/j.jshs.2020.04.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 49.Bailey DP, Locke CD. Breaking up prolonged sitting with light-intensity walking improves postprandial glycemia, but breaking up sitting with standing does not. J Sci Med Sport. 2015;18(3):294–298. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2014.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Jones MA, Skidmore PM, Stoner L, Harrex H, Saeedi P, Black K, Barone GB. Associations of accelerometer-measured sedentary time, sedentary bouts, and physical activity with adiposity and fitness in children. J Sport Sci. 2020;38(1):114–120. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2019.1685842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Talarico R, Janssen I. Compositional associations of time spent in sleep, sedentary behavior and physical activity with obesity measures in children. Int J Obes. 2018;42(8):1508–1514. doi: 10.1038/s41366-018-0053-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Additional file 1: Figure S1. Relative difference in fat mass percentage associated with replacing school (left) and out-of-school (right) SB with MPA in boys (top) and girls (bottom). Positive values on the x-axis present time replacement from context-specific SB to MPA, and negative values time replacement from context-specific MPA to SB.
Additional file 2: Figure S2. Relative difference in fat mass percentage associated with replacing school (left) and out-of-school (right) SB with VPA in boys (top) and girls (bottom). Positive values on x-axis present time replacement from context-specific SB to VPA, and negative values time replacement from context-specific VPA to SB. Note: The isotemporal substitution model was unable to estimate difference for reallocation between school SB and VPA due to low compositional mean for school VPA among girls.
Additional file 3: Table S1. Descriptive characteristics of included and excluded participants.
Data Availability Statement
The dataset analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.