Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jan 28.
Published in final edited form as: J Mol Biochem. 2020 Dec 30;9(1):74–79.

Validation of the Stress in Children (SiC) Questionnaire in a Sample of Greek Pupils

Chrysoula Emmanouil 1,*, Flora Bacopoulou 2,*, Dimitrios Vlachakis 3,4, George P Chrousos 1,2, Christina Darviri 1
PMCID: PMC7842352  NIHMSID: NIHMS1661776  PMID: 33520745

Abstract

Aim:

The purpose of this study was to validate a Greek version of the Stress in Children (SiC) Questionnaire and assess its psychometric qualities in a Greek pediatric sample.

Materials and Methods:

Healthy children aged 8–12 years, attending schools of various areas of Attica, the largest region in Greece, were eligible to participate in the study. Data were collected from May 2016 until June 2017, anonymously, though three self-reported questionnaires, a simple demographic questionnaire, the SiC Questionnaire and the State and Trait Anxiety in Children Questionnaire.

Results:

Questionnaires were completed by 100 pupils (54 boys, 46 girls) aged (mean ± SD) 10.6 ± 1.26 years. A three-factor structure (“Distress”, “Presence of well-being”, and “Presence of social support”) accounted for 41.33% of variance. Reliability Cronbach’s alpha of “Distress”, “Presence of well-being” and “Presence of social support” factors was equal to 0.75, 0.75 and 0.61, respectively. Regarding concurrent validity, positive correlations were found between “Distress” and both trait anxiety (rho=0.59, p<0.0001) and state anxiety (rho=0.61, p<0.0001). Correlations were also found between “Presence of Wellbeing” and age (rho=−0.24, p=0.019), state (rho=−0.36, p=0.006) and trait anxiety (rho=−0.45, p<0.0001).

Conclusions:

The Greek version of SiC Questionnaire demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties (content validity, internal reliability) that support its use in Greek children.

Introduction

Stress is a state in which homeostasis is disturbed by a stressor i.e. a real or perceived threat (Chrousos & Gold 1992). Increased vulnerability to stressors is observed during periods of continuous growth and great brain plasticity such as the prenatal period, infancy, childhood and adolescence. Extreme activation of the stress system during these critical periods of life has been related to adverse endocrine and metabolic sequel as well as negative effects on brain development and behavior (Charmandari et al. 2012, Pervanidou & Chrousos 2011).

A well-known study measuring the impact of stress on child health is the World Health Organization survey on Health Behaviour of School-aged Children (King et al. 1996).Widely used instruments measuring childhood and adolescent internalizing and externalizing disorders are the Achenbach’s Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL), which is a caregiver report measure, and the Achenbach’s Youth Self-Report (YSR), which is an adolescent (11–18 years) report measure (Achenbach 2001). The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Children (STAIC) is another self-report valid instrument of 40 items, measuring anxiety in children, which has been translated into the Greek language (Psychountaki et al. 2003, Spielberger & Edwards 1973).

Childhood is a period of increased vulnerability to stressors, therefore brief, self-reported and easily scored screening measures of stress are of particular value in young children. The Stress in Children (SiC) is a short, easily administered, self-reported questionnaire, constructed to assess stress in younger children up to the age of 12 years (Osika et al. 2007). Since SiC has not been validated in Greece, the purpose of this study was to validate a Greek version of the SiC Questionnaire and to assess its psychometric qualities in a Greek sample of healthy pupils of 3rd to 6th grade of elementary school.

Materials & Methods

Linguistic validation

Permission to validate the SiC Questionnaire in Greek was obtained by its authors (Osika et al. 2007). Translation was performed by two independent native bilingual Greek translators with the use of the forward/backward translation method. The translated version was initially administered to five persons in order to identify any unclear sections and to define the final Greek version.

Participants

The study was conducted in various areas of Attica, the largest and main urban region of Greece, from May 2016 until June 2017. Healthy children aged 8–12 years attending the 3rd to 6th grade of two private and one public elementary schools of of Pallini, Aigaleo and Glyfada, respectively, were asked to participate in the study.

The study protocol was approved by the scientific and ethics committee of the Postgraduate Course “Stress Management and Health Promotion”, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens. Children’s parents were thoroughly informed about the purpose of the research and provided written consent prior to their children’s participation.

Questionnaires

Data were collected from participating children in an anonymous manner through three self-reported questionnaires, a simple demographic questionnaire, the SiC Questionnaire and the State and Trait Anxiety in Children Questionnaire.

The demographic questionnaire included questions regarding children’s age, gender, family status (two or single parent family), presence of siblings and the type of attending school (public or private).

The SiC Questionnaire comprises of 21 questions that address physical and emotional aspects of stress. Questions are answered using a 4-point Likert-type scale (from 1=never to 4=very often), while 13 of them are positively worded, to minimize potential biased responses (Osika et al. 2007).

The State and Trait Anxiety in Children Questionnaire, is a “how-I-feel” questionnaire that includes two scales of 20 items with each question answered with the use of a 3-point Likert-type scale. The State-Anxiety scale considers children’s feelings at a particular moment in time, with half of the items assessing the presence of anxiety, and the other half the absence of anxiety. The Trait-Anxiety scale evaluates how children feel generally (usually) with all its items assessing the presence of anxiety (Psychountaki et al. 2003, Spielberger & Edwards 1973).

During questionnaire completion, no clarity issues arose. Children were informed to leave blank any questions in case they didn’t wish to answer.

Results

From a total of 110 questionnaires, 10 were excluded because of incomplete answers. Questionnaires from 100 children (54 boys, 46 girls) aged 8 to 12 years (mean ± SD, 10.6 ± 1.26 years) were finally included in the analysis.

Analysis indicated absence of very high correlation of variables as the determinant was 0.001 (≥0.00001). The Barlett’s test of Sphericity was statistically significant (χ2=615.886, p<0.0001), showing satisfactory correlation among variables. Sample adequacy was confirmed by a Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin test value of 0.713 (>0.5). Similarly, sample adequacy for each variable individually was confirmed by Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin test value >0.5 for each variable.

The three factors eigenvalues of ≥1, combined accounted for 41.33% of the variance. The scree plot indicated that three factors should be retained (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Scree plot of the factors’ eigenvalues regarding the SiC Questionnaire.

The items of factor 1, labelled as “Distress”, refer to the physical, emotional and behavioral aspects of psychological stress. Items of factor 2, labelled as “Presence of well-being”, refer to the child’s general feeling of life satisfaction. The items of factor 3, labeled as “Presence of social support”, refer to the expression of feelings and presence of supportive social environment. The final results of factor analysis are displayed in Table 1. The subscales’ basic descriptive measures are presented in Table 2. The subscales’ correlations are shown in Table 3.

Table 1.

Results of Principal Component analysis.

Number Questions Factor 1 Distress Factor 2 Presence of Wellbeing Factor 3 Presence of Social Support
Item 2 I get headaches 0.704
Item 4 I feel calm and happy −0.436
Item 5 I get stomach pains 0.462
Item 6 I feel lonely 0.569
Item 7 I get sad 0.705
Item 12 Things work out as I have planned −0.417
Item 13 I feel happy −0.520
Item 15 Sometimes I do not reach the goal I have planned for 0.418
Item 18 Sometimes I can’t manage with the things I have to do 0.479
Item 1 I get angry −0.464
Item 3 I like going to school 0.871
Item 8 I like to be at school 0.867
Item 10 I fall asleep easily at night 0.476
Item 11 I feel calm 0.446
Item 21 It is easy to concentrate during lessons at school 0.507
Item 14 When I am happy I show it 0.667
Item 17 When I am sad I show it 0.591
Item 19 When I have a hard time there is an adult to talk to 0.736
Item 20 If anyone teases me I will react 0.531
Eigenvalues 3.16 2.9 2.62
%Variance 15.05 13.81 12.47
Cronbach’s alpha 0.75 0.75 0.61

Table 2.

SiC Questionnaire three factors’ descriptive measures.

Factor Number of items Mean SD Min Max
Distress 9 16.7 4.03 9 30
Presence of Well-being 6 16.8 3.7 8 24
Presence of Social Support 4 12 2.6 5 16

Table 3.

Correlations of SiC Questionnaire’s three factors.

Distress Presence of Well-being Presence of Social Support
Distress 1 - -
Presence of Well-being −0.49* 1 -
Presence of Social Support −0.26* 0.24* 1

Higher levels of distress were associated with lack of social support and absence of well-being. On the contrary, well-being was significantly related to the presence of social support and lower levels of distress. Regarding concurrent validity, a significant positive correlation was found between “Distress” and both trait anxiety (rho=0.59, p<0.0001) and state anxiety (rho=0.61, p<0.0001). Significant correlations were also found between “Presence of Wellbeing” and age (rho=−0.24, p=0.019), state (rho=−0.36, p=0.006) and trait anxiety (rho=−0.45, p<0.0001). Finally, “Distress” and “Presence of Social Support” were significantly higher in girls (p=0.049 and p=0.03, respectively), while “Presence of Wellbeing” was significantly higher in children without siblings (p=0.026). No other significant associations were noted.

Discussion

During the past decades, special emphasis has been attributed to the relationship of psychological distress with the physical and psychological health of children. (Charmandari et al. 2003, Chrousos & Gold 1992, Nicolaides et al. 2015, Stavrou et al. 2017).

Results support the reliability and validity of the Greek version of the SiC Questionnaire, used in this study. The adaptation was performed with the use of common component analysis of data collected from 100 pupils residing in urban regions. The three-component structure, also used elsewhere (Osika et al. 2007), in the present study accounted for 41.33% of the tool’s variance. Most questions’ loadings onto the factors were satisfactory, including four negative loadings which had to be reversed during score calculation. Two questions of the original questionnaire (“The other kids tease me” and “When I have a hard time it helps being with my friends”) were excluded due to low loading onto the three factors. This result could be justified by both the relatively small study population and some social-cultural factors, e.g. different structure of interpersonal relationships. The internal reliability of the three factors was satisfactory too.

This tool was designed to assess the degree and symptoms of perceived distress, or lower levels of well-being and main aspects of coping and social support (Osika et al. 2007). Social skills were associated with greater well-being and lower degree of perceived stress. The lower perception of stress that accompanies enhanced social skills mediates the relationship of social skills with depression and life satisfaction (Segrin et al. 2007). According to our results, “Distress”, “Presence of Well-being” and “Presence of Social support” were major parameters of perceived stress and therefore could be used in predicting the development of psychological and somatic symptoms in children.

The associations between female gender and elevated levels of distress as well as between “Distress” and state-anxiety are consistent with the results of previous studies (Pervanidou et al. 2013, Psychountaki et al. 2003) demonstrating higher levels of state-anxiety in girls. Sex differences in both neuroendocrine and behavioral stress responses do exist (Novais et al. 2017). Neuropsychiatric disorders are more prevalent in women than men (WHO 2012). Depression in particular, is twice more prevalent in females than in males. According to some researchers, this sex difference does not manifest in childhood, but emerges during puberty (Wade et al. 2002). However, a recent study from the U.S. demonstrated that this sex-related difference in depression has its origins in childhood and becomes significant in adolescence (Breslau et al. 2017). Social anxiety disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder are also more likely to develop in women during adolescence (Asher et al. 2017, Garza & Jovanovic 2017). Gender differences in the prevalence of stress-related psychiatric disorders seem to be mediated by differences in the function and regulation of the stress response system between men and women. Several clinical studies have identified gender differences in the stress response and at the same time many preclinical studies have revealed cellular and molecular sex differences in the stress response system (Bangasser & Valentino 2014). Furthermore, our finding of higher levels of social support among girls is consistent with previous studies suggesting that women compared to men, are more likely to use emotion-focused coping strategies and talk about their feelings (Tamres et al. 2002, Taylor et al. 2000).

Our study has some limitations. Although the study sample comprised of children in Attica, the most populated region in Greece, results can-not be generalized in the whole Greek pediatric population. Nevertheless, our results allow recommendation of this tool for use in future studies in the Greek territory. The lack of test-retest performance is another limitation of this study. Finally, there has been no prior study using SiC as a psychometric instrument in Greece, to allow better control of the validity criterion.

In conclusion, the Greek version of the SiC Questionnaire used in the present study, demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties (content validity, internal reliability) that support its use as a valid screening measure for childhood stress. This easily administered tool could be used in future studies of childhood stress in Greece.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the participating children and families for their contribution.

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Achenbach TM & Rescorla LA 2001. Manual for the ASEBA School-Age Forms & Profiles. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families [Google Scholar]
  2. Asher M, Asnaani A & Aderka IM 2017. Gender differences in social anxiety disorder: A review. Clin Psychol Rev 56 1–12 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bangasser DA & Valentino RJ 2014. Sex differences in stress-related psychiatric disorders: neurobiological perspectives. Front Neuroendocrinol 35 303–319 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Breslau J, Gilman SE, Stein BD, Ruder T, Gmelin T & Miller E 2017. Sex differences in recent first-onset depression in an epidemiological sample of adolescents. Transl Psychiatry 7 e1139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Charmandari E, Achermann JC, Carel JC, Soder O & Chrousos GP 2012. Stress response and child health. Sci Signal 5 mr1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Charmandari E, Kino T, Souvatzoglou E & Chrousos GP 2003. Pediatric stress: hormonal mediators and human development. Horm Res 59 161–179 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chrousos GP & Gold PW 1992. The concepts of stress and stress system disorders. Overview of physical and behavioral homeostasis. JAMA 267 1244–1252 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Garza K & Jovanovic T 2017. Impact of Gender on Child and Adolescent PTSD. Curr Psychiatry Rep 19 87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. King A, Wold B, Tudor-Smith C & Harel Y 1996. The health of youth. A cross-national survey. WHO Reg Publ Eur Ser 69 1–222 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Nicolaides NC, Kyratzi E, Lamprokostopoulou A, Chrousos GP & Charmandari E 2015. Stress, the stress system and the role of glucocorticoids. Neuroimmunomodulation 22 6–19 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Novais A, Monteiro S, Roque S, Correia-Neves M & Sousa N 2017. How age, sex and genotype shape the stress response. Neurobiol Stress 6 44–56 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Osika W, Friberg P & Wahrborg P 2007. A new short self-rating questionnaire to assess stress in children. Int J Behav Med 14 108–117 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Pervanidou P, Bastaki D, Chouliaras G, Papanikolaou K, Laios E, Kanaka-Gantenbein C & Chrousos GP 2013. Circadian cortisol profiles, anxiety and depressive symptomatology, and body mass index in a clinical population of obese children. Stress 16 34–43 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Pervanidou P & Chrousos GP 2011. Stress and obesity/metabolic syndrome in childhood and adolescence. Int J Pediatr Obes 6 Suppl 1 21–28 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Psychountaki M, Zervas Y, Karteroliotis K & Spielberger C 2003. Reliability and Validity of the Greek Version of the STAIC. Eur J Psychol Assess 19 124–130 [Google Scholar]
  16. Segrin C, Hanzal A, Donnerstein C, Taylor M & Domschke TJ 2007. Social skills, psychological well-being, and the mediating role of perceived stress. Anxiety Stress Coping 20 321–329 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Spielberger CD & Edwards CD 1973. STAIC Preliminary Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Children (“How I Feel Questionnaire”) Consulting Psychologists Press [Google Scholar]
  18. Stavrou S, Nicolaides NC, Critselis E, Darviri C, Charmandari E & Chrousos GP 2017. Paediatric stress: from neuroendocrinology to contemporary disorders. Eur J Clin Invest 47 262–269 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Tamres LK, Janicki D & Helgeson VS 2002. Sex Differences in Coping Behavior: A Meta-Analytic Review and an Examination of Relative Coping. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 6 2–30 [Google Scholar]
  20. Taylor SE, Klein LC, Lewis BP, Gruenewald TL, Gurung RA & Updegraff JA 2000. Biobehavioral responses to stress in females: tend-and-befriend, not fight-or-flight. Psychol Rev 107 411–429 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Wade TJ, Cairney J & Pevalin DJ 2002. Emergence of gender differences in depression during adolescence: national panel results from three countries. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 41 190–198 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. WHO 2012. Depression: A Global Crisis [18/2/2018]. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/mental_health/management/depression/wfmh_paper_depression_wmhd_2012

RESOURCES