Abstract
Background
Parental involvement in mobile health (mHealth) to consult with medical professionals appears to be prevalent in China with the rapid development of the internet. More parents with busy jobs have chosen to use mHealth. During the ongoing COVID-19 outbreak, mHealth can assist with health promotion, directions for medication use, and disease diagnosis via online chat and video consultation without contacting others. To our knowledge, no studies have been performed to explore the role of mHealth in parents’ attitudes toward child health care at home during the COVID-19 outbreak.
Objective
This study aims to identify the associated factors of willingness to adopt mHealth among Chinese parents during the COVID-19 outbreak and to explore the correlation between the frequency of adopting mHealth and parents’ attitudes toward child health care at home.
Methods
Chinese parents were asked to complete an online survey from January 25 to February 15, 2020. The questionnaire comprised of two parts with a total of 16 items, including parents’ demographic variables and attitudes toward child health care at home. By multivariate logistic regression, we explored factors associated with parents’ willingness to adopt mHealth during the COVID-19 outbreak. Pearson chi-square tests were used to reveal the correlation between the frequency of adopting mHealth and parents’ attitudes toward child health care at home.
Results
A total of 254 parents enrolled, and 202 (79.5%) parents were willing to adopt mHealth during the COVID-19 outbreak. Parents’ age (26-35 years: adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 8.114, 95% CI 1.471-44.764), parents’ interest in the COVID-19 pandemic (moderate: AOR 8.753, 95% CI 2.009-38.127; high: AOR 22.194, 95% CI 5.509-89.411), the source that recommended mHealth (medical health providers: AOR 4.257, 95% CI 1.439-12.596), the presence of chronic disease in their children (yes: AOR 20.844, 95% CI 4.600-94.443), parents’ duration of daily internet use (4-6 hours: AOR 6.487, 95% CI 1.870-22.495; >6 hours: AOR 8.766, 95% CI 1.883-40.804), and adoption of mHealth before the COVID-19 outbreak (yes: AOR 3.413, 95% CI 1.234-9.444) were significantly correlated with the parents’ willingness to adopt mHealth during the COVID-19 outbreak. The frequency of mHealth use among parents was correlated with their behaviors in regard to handwashing (χ26=18.967, P=.004), mask wearing (χ26=45.364, P<.001), frequency of leaving the home (χ26=16.767, P=.01), room disinfection and ventilation (χ26=19.515, P=.003), temperature checking (χ26=17.47, P=.007), and mental health care of children (χ26=63.810, P<.001) during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Conclusions
We found various objective factors that were associated with parents’ willingness to adopt mHealth during the COVID-19 outbreak. Overall, parents’ willingness to adopt mHealth was high. The frequency of mHealth use among parents was correlated with their attitudes toward child health care at home. The option of mHealth to patients at home during the COVID-19 outbreak would be beneficial for education and improvement in self-management of child health care at home.
Keywords: mHealth, parents, child health at home, COVID-19
Introduction
Background
COVID-19 has caused an ongoing pandemic and is an important public health concern. The major transmission modes of COVID-19 are airborne droplets from coughing or sneezing and direct contact with contaminated surfaces such as doorknobs, dishes, and handrails [1]. Particular circumstances including tracheal incubation or opening suction in a hospital, staying in confined spaces with infected people, and fomites attaching to ventilation systems can result in mass infection [1].
Infants and children are a typically vulnerable population due to immaturity of the respiratory tract and hypoimmunity [2]. According to an analysis of 2143 pediatric cases in China, the median age of children who are infected is 7 years [3]. The majority of severe pediatric cases arose from exposure to infected family members, and few were infected in a hospital or as a result of travel [4]. To effectively prevent and control the COVID-19 outbreak among Chinese children, the National Health Commission issued guidelines termed “Epidemiological characteristics and prevention and control measures of Corona Virus Disease 2019 in children,” which clearly state that children are required to be isolated at home under the parents’ supervision [5]. In addition, experts also suggest that parents do not take children to the hospital to avoid cross infection [6]. To prevent large scale gatherings, all regional governments of China shut down schools and colleges, and decreased the run time of public transportation. Residents dwelling in high-risk areas are forbidden to go out except to acquire daily necessities and to visit the hospital [6].
In China, more than 1.3 billion people access the internet via their mobile phones, which has become an indispensable part of daily life [7]. The application of mobile health (mHealth) is widely recommended for Chinese parents to replace visiting a hospital during the COVID-19 outbreak. mHealth is defined as the use of wireless electronic devices to transmit various contents and medical services among patients and caregivers. Besides routine use, Chinese people could use mHealth during the COVID-19 pandemic through mobile phone apps [8,9], the hospital website, and doctors’ official social media accounts on WeChat or Alipay to get primary diagnoses between common cold or flu and pneumonia, achieve self-monitoring, access online lectures about COVID-19 prevention, and purchase essential medicine from online diagnosis. Specific individuals could also acquire urgent care in emergency situations by using mHealth to contact specialists or hospitals designed for delivery, patients with chronic disease, or terminal cancer. mHealth is viewed as an easily accessible, cost-efficient approach to enhancing adherence to medication, expanding access to medical care, and increasing the number of medical consultations [10]. Overall, mHealth has proven to be a great success for the management of chronic disease [11], remote monitoring of weight control [12], improvement of child vaccine coverage, and neonatal care among young mothers [13].
Objectives
Though robust evidence highlights the potential benefits of mHealth, individual willingness to adopt mHealth is a decisive factor. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to explore factors associated with willingness to adopt mHealth among Chinese parents during the COVID-19 outbreak for better promotion of mHealth in China and to investigate the correlation between frequency of adopting mHealth during the COVID-19 outbreak in 1 month and parents’ attitudes toward child health at home.
Methods
Definition of Variables
The willingness to adopt mHealth among Chinese parents was measured with a yes or no question.
mHealth in China is defined as the dissemination of medical information, consultation about disease diagnosis and treatment, postoperative care management, mental health care, and making medical appointments via mobile phone apps or social media [14].
Participant Recruitment
This cross-sectional study was conducted between January 25, 2020, and February 15, 2020. Data were collected using structured questionnaires based on a literature review. A total of 12 participants were recruited to test the original questionnaire and provide feedback, ensuring the questionnaire was understandable. Regarding the COVID-19 pandemic, only an online version of this questionnaire was used for distributing the survey. The online questionnaire link was forwarded to social media groups, such as breastfeeding groups and parental involvement in kindergarten or primary school online groups, and posted on pediatric researchers’ social media webpages, where health education about children is given, to maximize recruitment of respondents. If parents were interested in our study, they could visit our questionnaire through a link, and a description of this study was shown on the first page of the online questionnaire. Parents could only access the questionnaire by clicking “agree” after reading the consent information on the first page, and the submission was accepted when all items were completed.
Parents who met any of the following criteria were excluded: completed the questionnaire in less than 120 seconds, their child was older than 14 years, the parent has not lived with their child during the COVID-19 pandemic, one or both parents have a confirmed case of COVID-19, parent has no internet access, more than one questionnaire was submitted from the same Internet Protocol address, and the questionnaire had missing items. Two researchers, who were master’s degree students, selected the valid questionnaires in accordance with the exclusion criteria. This study was approved by the Ethics Committees of Xiangya Nursing School, Central South University. In total, 18 questionnaires were considered substandard and excluded, and 254 Chinese parents participated in the online survey with an effective rate of 93.38% (254/272).
Measurement of Variables
Following a literature review by our research team, consisting of one professor and five graduate students, a structured questionnaire was designed for this study. The 23-item questionnaire was comprised of two parts: (1) parents’ demographic variables including gender, age, education level, family annual income, occupation, age of the child, residence, attention to the pandemic of COVID-19, how they heard about mHealth, presence of chronic disease in their child, their use of mHealth before the COVID-19 outbreak, confirmed or suspected case of COVID-19 in their community, and duration of daily internet use, and (2) parents attitudes toward child health at home in regard to diet, exercise, personal hygiene, sleep quality, and mental care. In total, 30 parents were involved in the pilot study to modify the statements in the questionnaire. Subsequently, “worries about privacy disclosure” and “the frequency of nutrition supplement intake among children” were deleted. Most parents reported that their name or phone number is hidden when using mHealth, and other confounding factors such as residence, family income, and education level were related to the intake of nutritional supplements.
Statistical Analysis
Each questionnaire was screened by two separate researchers and inputted into SPSS.V.22 (IBM Corp) for analysis. Means and SDs were used to describe the continuous variables with normal distribution. Numbers and percentages were used to represent categorical variables. The associated factors of willingness to adopt mHealth among Chinese parents during the COVID-19 outbreak were analyzed by binary and multivariate logistic regression. To eliminate the effects of confounding variables on the results, only variables with a P value <.20 following bivariate logistic regression analyses were entered into the logistic regression. Correlation chi-square tests were used to determine the correlation between the frequency of adopting mHealth during the COVID-19 outbreak in 1 month and parents’ attitudes toward child health at home. Corrected P values <.05 were considered statistically significant.
Results
Sociodemographic Characteristics
In total, 254 parents were recruited, and 172 (67.7%) were female. The age ranged from 26 to 35 years. Overall, 175 (68.9%) parents had a bachelor’s degree or above. Almost half of the parents’ family annual income reached more than US $7700. There were 179 (70.5%) parents who had jobs working in information technology, medicine, service, or other industries, and others were self-employed or jobless. In total, 165 (64.9%) parents were living in urban areas during the COVID-19 outbreak. All details about the parents’ sociodemographic characteristics are presented in Table 1.
Table 1.
Demographics of parents (N=254).
| Variables | Willingness to adopt mHealtha | ||
| No, n (%) | Yes, n (%) | ||
| Gender | |||
| Male | 20 (24.4) | 62 (75.6) | |
| Female | 32 (18.6) | 140 (81.4) | |
| Age (years) | |||
| 18-25 | 6 (37.5) | 10 (62.5) | |
| 26-35 | 37 (18.7) | 161 (81.3) | |
| ≥36 | 9 (22.5) | 31 (77.5) | |
| Education level | |||
| Middle school or below | 12 (20) | 48 (80) | |
| High school | 6 (31.6) | 13 (68.4) | |
| University or college | 29 (20.1) | 115 (79.9) | |
| Master’s degree or above | 5 (16.1) | 26 (83.9) | |
| Family annual income (US $) | |||
| <1600 | 10 (18.5) | 44 (81.5) | |
| 1600-7700 | 15 (20.3) | 59 (79.7) | |
| 7700-16,000 | 14 (29.2) | 34 (70.8) | |
| >16,000 | 13 (16.7) | 65 (83.3) | |
| Occupation | |||
| Medical care | 4 (14.3) | 24 (85.7) | |
| ITb | 2 (14.3) | 12 (85.7) | |
| Service | 14 (18.2) | 63 (81.8) | |
| Other | 19 (31.7) | 41 (68.3) | |
| Self-employed | 6 (12.5) | 42 (87.5) | |
| Jobless | 7 (5.5) | 20 (74.1) | |
| Age of the child (years)c | |||
| <3 | 33 (18.8) | 143 (81.3) | |
| 3-6 | 16 (23.9) | 51 (76.1) | |
| 7-14 | 3 (27.3) | 8 (72.7) | |
| Residence | |||
| Urban | 21 (23.6) | 68 (76.4) | |
| Rural | 31 (18.8) | 134 (81.2) | |
| Attention to the COVID-19 pandemic | |||
| Low | 13 (59.1) | 9 (40.9) | |
| Moderate | 14 (26.4) | 39 (73.6) | |
| High | 25 (14) | 154 (86) | |
| The recommendation about mHealth received from | |||
| Media (phone message, internet, TV program) | 19 (32.3) | 40 (67.8) | |
| Community or people you are familiar with | 19 (25.7) | 55 (74.3) | |
| Medical health providers | 14 (11.6) | 107 (88.4) | |
| Presence of chronic disease in children | |||
| Yes | 3 (3.8) | 75 (96.2) | |
| No | 49 (27.8) | 127 (72.2) | |
| Adoption of mHealth before the COVID-19 outbreak | |||
| Yes | 7 (9.9) | 64 (90.1) | |
| No | 45 (24.6) | 138 (75.4) | |
| Confirmed or suspected case was found in your community | |||
| Yes | 9 (16.4) | 46 (83.6) | |
| No | 43 (21.6) | 156 (78.4) | |
| Duration of daily internet use (hours) | |||
| <2 | 12 (54.5) | 10 (45.5) | |
| 2-4 | 19 (32.8) | 39 (67.2) | |
| 4-6 | 16 (12.9) | 108 (87.1) | |
| >6 | 5 (10) | 45 (90) | |
amHealth: mobile health.
bIT: information technology.
cRespondents with more than one child were asked to provide the age of their youngest child.
Willingness to Adopt mHealth
The majority of the 254 parents (n=202, 79.5%) reported that they were willing to adopt mHealth during the COVID-19 outbreak (Table 1). The proportion of parents with a high or moderate interest in the COVID-19 pandemic who were willing to adopt mHealth was higher than those with low interest (39/53, 73.6% and 154/179, 86% vs 9/22, 40.9%, respectively). Willingness to adopt mHealth was highest among parents of children with chronic diseases (75/78, 96.2%). Willingness to adopt mHealth increased with parents’ duration of daily internet use.
Factors Associated With Willingness to Adopt mHealth
Results from the bivariate analyses demonstrated that age, interest in the pandemic, the source that recommended mHealth, the presence of a chronic disease in children, duration of daily internet use, and use of mHealth before the COVID-19 outbreak were associated with willingness to adopt mHealth during the pandemic. The multivariate logistics regression model indicated that the parents’ age (26-35 years: adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 8.114, 95% CI 1.471-44.764), parents’ interest in the COVID-19 pandemic (moderate: AOR 8.753, 95% CI 2.009-38.127; high: AOR 22.194, 95% CI 5.509-89.411), the source that recommended mHealth (medical health providers: AOR 4.257, 95% CI 1.439-12.596), presence of chronic disease in children (yes: AOR 20.844, 95% CI 4.600-94.443), parents’ duration of daily internet use (4-6 hours: AOR 6.487, 95% CI 1.870-22.495; >6 hours: AOR 8.766, 95% CI 1.883-40.804), and adoption of mHealth before the COVID-19 outbreak (yes: AOR 3.413, 95% CI 1.234-9.444) were significantly correlated with the parents’ willingness to adopt mHealth during the COVID-19 outbreak (Table 2).
Table 2.
Multivariate analyses of factors associated with willingness to adopt mHealth among Chinese parents (N=254).
| Variable | Willingness to adopt mHealtha, n (%) | Crude ORb (95% CI) | Adjusted OR (95% CI) | P value | ||
| No | Yes | |||||
| Age (years) | ||||||
| 18-25 | 6 (37.5) | 10 (62.5) | 1 | 1 | N/Ac | |
| 26-35 | 37 (18.7) | 161 (81.3) | 11.591 (1.805-74.448) | 8.114 (1.471-44.764) | .02 | |
| ≥36 | 9 (22.5) | 31 (77.5) | 12.513 (1.362-114.971) | 5.794 (0.841-39.913) | .07 | |
| Attention to the COVID-19 pandemic | ||||||
| Low | 13 (59.1) | 9 (40.9) | 1 | 1 | N/A | |
| Moderate | 14 (26.4) | 39 (73.6) | 13.113 (2.119-84.124) | 8.753 (2.009-38.127) | .004 | |
| High | 25 (14) | 154 (86) | 31.889 (6.395-159.020) | 22.194 (5.509-89.411) | <.001 | |
| The recommendation about mHealth received from | ||||||
| Media (phone message, internet, TV program) | 19 (24.4) | 59 (75.6) | 1 | 1 | N/A | |
| Medical health providers | 14 (14.3) | 84 (85.7) | 4.710 (1.382-16.049) | 4.257 (1.439-12.596) | .009 | |
| Presence of chronic disease in children | ||||||
| No | 3 (3.8) | 75 (96.2) | 1 | 1 | N/A | |
| Yes | 49 (27.8) | 127 (72.2) | 30.571 (5.552-168.331) | 20.844 (4.600-94.443) | <.001 | |
| Duration of daily internet use (hours) | ||||||
| <2 | 12 (54.5) | 10 (45.5) | 1 | 1 | N/A | |
| 4-6 | 16 (12.9) | 108 (87.1) | 6.860 (1.591-29.575) | 6.487 (1.870-22.495) | .003 | |
| >6 | 5 (10) | 45 (90) | 6.794 (1.141-40.455) | 8.766 (1.883-40.804) | .006 | |
| Use of mHealth before the COVID-19 outbreak | ||||||
| No | 45 (24.6) | 138 (75.4) | 1 | 1 | N/A | |
| Yes | 7 (9.9) | 64 (90.1) | 3.759 (1.185-11.928) | 3.413 (1.234-9.444) | .02 | |
amHealth: mobile health.
bOR: odds ratio.
cN/A: not applicable.
The odds of being willing to adopt mHealth were 8.1 times greater in parents aged from 26 to 35 years than parents aged from 18 to 25 years (P=.02). The odds of being willing to adopt mHealth were 8.6 times greater in respondents with moderate interest in the pandemic than respondents with low interest (P=.004). Meanwhile, the odds of being willing to adopt mHealth were 22.2 times greater in participants with high interest in the pandemic than respondents with low interest in the pandemic (P<.001). The odds of being willing to adopt mHealth were 4.3 times greater in parents who were recommended to use mHealth by a medical health provider than parents who received the recommendation from the media (P=.009). The odds of being willing to adopt mHealth were 21 times greater in parents of children with chronic diseases than parents of children without chronic diseases (P<.001). The odds of being willing to adopt mHealth were 6.5 times greater in respondents with 4-6 hours of daily internet use than respondents with 2 hours of daily internet use (P=.003). Moreover, the odds of being willing to adopt mHealth were 8.8 times greater in participants with >6 hours of daily internet use than respondents with 2 hours of daily internet use (P=.006). Furthermore, odds of being willing to adopt mHealth were 3.4 times greater in parents who had ever adopted mHealth than those who had not (P=.02).
Correlation Between Frequency of Using mHealth During the COVID-19 Outbreak in 1 Month and Parents’ Attitudes Toward Child Health at Home
Table 3 presents the results of the correlation between frequency of using mHealth during the COVID-19 outbreak in 1 month and parents’ attitudes toward child health at home. Frequency of using mHealth during the COVID-19 outbreak in 1 month was associated with parents’ attitudes toward ventilation and daily disinfection of their child’s room (P=.003) and guidance for the child on washing hands properly every time (P=.004). Specific actions to prevent children from contracting COVID-19, such as instructing them to wear medical masks appropriately (P<.001) and reducing the frequency of children leaving the home (P=.01), were correlated with the frequency of using mHealth during the COVID-19 outbreak in 1 month. In addition, the frequency of using mHealth during the COVID-19 outbreak in 1 month was significantly correlated with parents’ attitudes toward checking children’s temperature regularly (P=.007) and ensuring mental health care at home (P<.001).
Table 3.
Correlation between parents’ attitudes toward child health at home and the frequency of adopting mHealth in 1 month (N=254).
| Item | Frequency of mHealtha service use, n (%) | Chi-square (df) | P value | ||||
| 0 | 1–2 | 3–4 | >4 | ||||
| Reduce the frequency of children leaving the home | 16.767 (6) | .01 | |||||
| Never/seldom | 10 (26.6) | 7 (23.5) | 8 (16.7) | 9 (19) | |||
| Sometimes | 31 (21.5) | 4 (21.6) | 17(33.3) | 17 (22.4) | |||
| Often/always | 38 (51.9) | 40 (54.9) | 41(50) | 32 (58.6) | |||
| Ventilation and daily disinfection of child’s room | 19.515 (6) | .003 | |||||
| Never/seldom | 13(16.5) | 4 (7.8) | 2 (3) | 10 (17.2) | |||
| Sometimes | 3 (3.8) | 9 (17.6) | 6 (9.1) | 11 (19) | |||
| Often/always | 63 (79.7) | 38 (74.5) | 58 (87.9) | 37 (63.8) | |||
| Guidance for the child on washing hands properly every time | 18.967 (6) | .004 | |||||
| Never/seldom | 22 (27.8) | 9 (17.6) | 11 (16.7) | 6 (10.3) | |||
| Sometimes | 24 (30.4) | 14 (27.5) | 25 (37.9) | 9 (15.5) | |||
| Often/always | 33 (41.8) | 28 (54.9) | 30 (45.5) | 43 (74.1) | |||
| Instructing children to wear medical masks appropriately | 45.364 (6) | <.001 | |||||
| Never/seldom | 11 (13.9) | 13 (25.5) | 13 (19.7) | 3 (5.2) | |||
| Sometimes | 45 (57) | 27 (52.9) | 28 (42.4) | 11 (19) | |||
| Often/always | 23(29.1) | 11 (21.6) | 25 (25.2) | 44 (75.9) | |||
| Cooking nutritional meals | 4.174 (6) | .65 | |||||
| Never/seldom | 20 (25.3) | 16 (31.4) | 16 (24.2) | 15 (25.9) | |||
| Sometimes | 28 (31.1) | 18 (35.3) | 32 (48.5) | 22 (37.9) | |||
| Often/always | 31 (27.1) | 17 (33.3) | 18 (27.3) | 21 (36.2) | |||
| Improving child’s sleep quality | 6.996 (6) | .32 | |||||
| Never/seldom | 19 (24.1) | 13 (25.5) | 17 (25.8) | 20 (34.5) | |||
| Sometimes | 27 (34.2) | 21 (43.1) | 23 (34.8) | 25 (43.1) | |||
| Often/always | 33 (27.4) | 16 (31.4) | 26 (39.4) | 13 (22.4) | |||
| Encouraging child to exercise at home | 6.188 (6) | .40 | |||||
| Never/seldom | 11 (13.9) | 10 (19.6) | 10 (15.2) | 6 (10.3) | |||
| Sometimes | 17 (21.5) | 12 (23.5) | 23 (34.8) | 14 (24.1) | |||
| Often/always | 51 (64.6) | 29 (56.9) | 33 (50) | 38 (65.5) | |||
| Relieving child’s negative emotions at home | 63.810 (6) | <.001 | |||||
| Never/seldom | 41 (51.9) | 20 (39.2) | 8 (12.1) | 6 (10.3) | |||
| Sometimes | 33 (41.8) | 30 (58.8) | 32 (48.5) | 34 (58.6) | |||
| Often/always | 5 (6.3) | 1 (2) | 26 (39.4) | 18 (31) | |||
| Checking child’s temperature regularly | 17.847 (6) | .007 | |||||
| Never/seldom | 32 (40.5) | 10 (19.6) | 15 (22.7) | 8 (13.8) | |||
| Sometimes | 20 (25.3) | 10 (19.6) | 16 (24.2) | 17 (29.3) | |||
| Often/always | 27 (34.2) | 31 (60.8) | 35 (53) | 33 (56.9) | |||
| Update knowledge about COVID-19 prevention | 5.041 (6) | .53 | |||||
| Never/seldom | 21 (26.6) | 12 (23.5) | 11 (16.7) | 11 (19) | |||
| Sometimes | 17 (21.5) | 11 (21.6) | 22 (33.3) | 13(22.4) | |||
| Often/always | 41 (51.9) | 28 (54.9) | 33 (50) | 34 (58.6) | |||
amHealth: mobile health.
Discussion
Principal Findings
Our primary finding was that the parents’ age and interest in the COVID-19 pandemic, the source that recommended mHealth, the presence of a chronic disease in their children, duration of daily internet use among parents, and adoption of mHealth service before the COVID-19 outbreak were significantly correlated with parents’ willingness to adopt mHealth during the COVID-19 outbreak. In addition, the frequency of mHealth use for parents was correlated with their attitudes toward handwashing, mask wearing, frequency of going out, room disinfection and ventilation, temperature checking, and care of children’s mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The findings show that, overall, parents’ willingness to adopt mHealth during the COVID-19 pandemic was high (202/254, 79.5%), which is supported by another study that reported willingness to adopt mHealth at 80% [15]. However, another study conducted in China reported that just 66.1% (725/1097) of participants were willing to participate in mHealth programs for patients with chronic diseases [7]. James and Harville [16] showed an almost identical result (n=881, 67%). One possible explanation is that the proportion of participants who were willing to engage with various components of mHealth technology varied from 59% to 81% [17].
Our study reveals several factors influencing parents’ willingness to adopt mHealth, including age, interest in the COVID-19 pandemic, the source that recommended mHealth, the presence of a chronic disease in their children, duration of daily internet use, and adoption of mHealth before the COVID-19 outbreak. Age was shown to be significantly related to the parents’ willingness to adopt mHealth in our study, which is in line with previous published studies on mHealth acceptance factors, where age was an important factor among both patients and medical professionals [18-20]. Importantly, age has specific moderating effects on the adoption of mHealth [18]. However, age in our study did not play as significant a role as in other studies [20], and one possible explanation for this may be the varied age group included [21].
We found that the odds of willing to adopt mHealth were greater in parents with higher levels of attention to the COVID‑19 pandemic than those with lower attention, which is consistent with previous studies on the adoption of eHealth services during the COVID-19 pandemic [22,23]. Previous studies have confirmed a direct relationship between perception risk and technology adoption [24,25]. The outbreak of COVID-19 is regarded as a facilitating factor for the adoption and acceptance of technology [26]. Many measures were taken to accelerate the adoption of mHealth, including practical guidance for individual practices to quickly adopt mHealth in response to COVID-19 [22,27]. Moreover, the range of providers who could deliver care through mHealth was broadened, and rules around patient eligibility and audiovisual equipment requirements were relaxed specifically to address COVID-19 [22,28].
This study demonstrates that the source of referral is associated with parents’ willingness to participate in mHealth programs, specifically the odds were greater in patients who were recommended mHealth by medical professionals (98/254, 85.7%), which is consistent with previous findings that reported about one-third of patients would likely be able to contact their doctors using an electronic device [20]. On the contrary, another study found that the source of referral for mHealth was through various media sources such as email. One possible reason is that all the users included were children with a median age of 6 years [29].
This study indicates that duration of daily internet use is associated with a willingness to adopt mHealth among parents, which is in line with a previous study that reported time spent on the internet is greatly associated with the level of eHealth literacy [30,31]. However, time spent on the internet was reported to be a nonsignificant factor in other studies; therefore, the small sample size and methodological differences may have played an important role in it [32,33].
Overall, our study found that the odds of willing to adopt mHealth was greater in parents of children with chronic diseases (>90%). This finding is consistent with a previous study that found the most patients who are chronically ill (>80%) would be willing to participate in mHealth programs in transitional countries [15]. Prior findings indicated that sharing personal health information and receiving support through social networking can benefit adolescents with a chronic illness [34-36]. The positive association is likely due to the patient’s improved awareness of the importance of mobile phones for care of chronic health conditions [37-40].
Previous use of mHealth was found to be greatly associated with the participants’ willingness to adopt mHealth in this trial. This finding is consistent with a previous study where respondents who had used WeChat before were more willing to adopt mHealth as a result of their greater familiarity and confidence in new technology [7]. One potential reason is that prior use experiences influence various beliefs and, consequently, willingness to use technology in a consumer context [41].
The frequency of mHealth use for parents was associated with their attitudes toward handwashing, mask wearing, frequency of going out, room disinfection and ventilation, temperature checking, and care of children’s mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. A previous published study demonstrated the effectiveness of hand hygiene, mask wearing, and social distancing for the prevention of COVID-19 as well as other respiratory infectious diseases [42]. Interestingly, mask wearing and handwashing among children were found to be influenced by frequency of leaving the house, mother’s educational background, and father’s occupation [43]. Furthermore, mental health status was found to be a big issue during the crisis for children who were isolated and quarantined [44]. An increase in sedentary behavior was observed due to the pandemic, and students were found to be more depressed and anxious during this time [45]. Thus, psychological crisis interventions targeted to different pediatric age groups could be conducted to minimize the psychological trauma and subsequent psychosocial problems caused by the COVID-19 pandemic [46]. mHealth is an ideal tool for the control of communicable diseases. Social distancing has a significant role in cutting the transmission of the virus and decreasing the chance of face-to-face contact. Especially during the COVID-19 outbreak, mHealth could provide some recommendations about health management for people quarantined at home.
Limitations
First, the sample size was insufficient. A study with a larger sample is recommended to further improve the representativeness of the study results. Second, social desirability bias and recall bias may have arose from self-reporting. Confounding or unknown factors omitted from the survey may also have caused residual confounding, and instrumental variable analysis should be used to control these confounding factors. Third, a cause-effect relationship could not be established due to the inherent nature of the cross-sectional study design.
Conclusion
The COVID-19 pandemic has enormously changed health care systems worldwide, and internet-based medical care is likely to play a major role during the COVID-19 pandemic to increase widespread access to effective care and overcome the challenges and restrictions imposed by the outbreak [47]. We found various objective factors associated with parents’ willingness to adopt mHealth during the COVID-19 outbreak, and the frequency of mHealth use among parents was correlated with their attitudes toward child health at home. Furthermore, our study provides new insight into how parents cope with pandemic-related mental health problems in children. These findings provide valuable information for mHealth service providers and policy makers to develop policy and strategies for the successful implementation and acceleration of this technology’s adoption.
Acknowledgments
This study is funded by a research grant from Hunan Women Theory and Practice Research Project (19YB11).
Abbreviations
- AOR
adjusted odds ratio
- mHealth
mobile health
Footnotes
Authors' Contributions: Each author made a significant contribution to this study. SY, YH, LZ, and JD conceived and designed the study and collected the data. SY and YC performed the data analysis and drafted the manuscript. LZ instructed the process of study, reviewed the study design, and interpreted the study findings. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript. Each author certified that they had participated sufficiently in this study to believe in its overall validity and to take public responsibility for appropriate portions of its content.
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
References
- 1.Sankar J, Dhochak N, Kabra SK, Lodha R. COVID-19 in children: clinical approach and management. Indian J Pediatr. 2020 Jun;87(6):433–442. doi: 10.1007/s12098-020-03292-1. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/32338347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kelvin AA, Halperin S. COVID-19 in children: the link in the transmission chain. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Jun;20(6):633–634. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30236-X. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/32220651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lu X, Zhang L, Du H, Zhang J, Li YY, Qu J, Zhang W, Wang Y, Bao S, Li Y, Wu C, Liu H, Liu D, Shao J, Peng X, Yang Y, Liu Z, Xiang Y, Zhang F, Silva RM, Pinkerton KE, Shen K, Xiao H, Xu S, Wong GWK, Chinese Pediatric Novel Coronavirus Study Team SARS-CoV-2 infection in children. N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 23;382(17):1663–1665. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2005073. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/32187458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.To T, Viegi G, Cruz A, Taborda-Barata L, Asher I, Behera D, Bennoor K, Boulet L, Bousquet J, Camargos P, Conceiçao C, Gonzalez Diaz S, El-Sony A, Erhola M, Gaga M, Halpin D, Harding L, Maghlakelidze T, Masjedi MR, Mohammad Y, Nunes E, Pigearias B, Sooronbaev T, Stelmach R, Tsiligianni I, Tuyet Lan LT, Valiulis A, Wang C, Williams S, Yorgancioglu A. A global respiratory perspective on the COVID-19 pandemic: commentary and action proposals. Eur Respir J. 2020 Jul;56(1) doi: 10.1183/13993003.01704-2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.She J, Liu L, Liu W. COVID-19 epidemic: disease characteristics in children. J Med Virol. 2020 Jul;92(7):747–754. doi: 10.1002/jmv.25807. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/32232980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Diagnosis and treatment protocol for novel coronavirus pneumonia (trial version 7) Chin Med J (Engl) 2020 May 05;133(9):1087–1095. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000819. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/32358325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Dai M, Xu J, Lin J, Wang Z, Huang W, Huang J. Willingness to use mobile health in glaucoma patients. Telemed J E Health. 2017 Oct;23(10):822–827. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2016.0254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Olson CA, McSwain SD, Curfman AL, Chuo J. The current pediatric telehealth landscape. Pediatrics. 2018 Mar;141(3) doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-2334. http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=29487164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Shigekawa E, Fix M, Corbett G, Roby DH, Coffman J. The current state of telehealth evidence: a rapid review. Health Aff (Millwood) 2018 Dec;37(12):1975–1982. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Qian W, Lam TT, Lam HHW, Li C, Cheung YT. Telehealth interventions for improving self-management in patients with hemophilia: scoping review of clinical studies. J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jul 10;21(7):e12340. doi: 10.2196/12340. https://www.jmir.org/2019/7/e12340/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Cajita MI, Hodgson NA, Budhathoki C, Han H. Intention to use mHealth in older adults with heart failure. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2017;32(6):E1–E7. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000401. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/28248747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.James DCS, Harville C. Smartphone usage, social media engagement, and willingness to participate in mHealth weight management research among African American women. Health Educ Behav. 2018 Jun;45(3):315–322. doi: 10.1177/1090198117714020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ruton H, Musabyimana A, Gaju E, Berhe A, Grépin KA, Ngenzi J, Nzabonimana E, Law MR. The impact of an mHealth monitoring system on health care utilization by mothers and children: an evaluation using routine health information in Rwanda. Health Policy Plan. 2018 Oct 01;33(8):920–927. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czy066. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/30169638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Liu S, Yang L, Zhang C, Xiang Y, Liu Z, Hu S, Zhang B. Online mental health services in China during the COVID-19 outbreak. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Apr;7(4):e17–e18. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30077-8. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/32085841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Piette JD, Mendoza-Avelares MO, Milton EC, Lange I, Fajardo R. Access to mobile communication technology and willingness to participate in automated telemedicine calls among chronically ill patients in Honduras. Telemed J E Health. 2010 Dec;16(10):1030–41. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2010.0074. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/21062234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.James DCS, Harville C. eHealth literacy, online help-seeking behavior, and willingness to participate in mHealth chronic disease research among African Americans, Florida, 2014-2015. Prev Chronic Dis. 2016 Nov 17;13:E156. doi: 10.5888/pcd13.160210. https://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2016/16_0210.htm. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Abelson JS, Symer M, Peters A, Charlson M, Yeo H. Mobile health apps and recovery after surgery: what are patients willing to do? Am J Surg. 2017 Oct;214(4):616–622. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Zhao Y, Ni Q, Zhou R. What factors influence the mobile health service adoption? A meta-analysis and the moderating role of age. Int J Inf Manage. 2018 Dec;43(12):342–350. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.08.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Chib A, van Velthoven MH, Car J. mHealth adoption in low-resource environments: a review of the use of mobile healthcare in developing countries. J Health Commun. 2015;20(1):4–34. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2013.864735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Illiger K, Hupka M, von Jan U, Wichelhaus D, Albrecht U. Mobile technologies: expectancy, usage, and acceptance of clinical staff and patients at a university medical center. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2014 Oct 21;2(4):e42. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.3799. https://mhealth.jmir.org/2014/4/e42/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Garavand A, Samadbeik M, Nadri H, Rahimi B, Asadi H. Effective factors in adoption of mobile health applications between medical sciences students using the UTAUT model. Methods Inf Med. 2019 Nov;58(4-05):131–139. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1701607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Scott BK, Miller GT, Fonda SJ, Yeaw RE, Gaudaen JC, Pavliscsak HH, Quinn MT, Pamplin JC. Advanced digital health technologies for COVID-19 and future emergencies. Telemed J E Health. 2020 Oct;26(10):1226–1233. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2020.0140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hollander JE, Carr BG. Virtually perfect? Telemedicine for Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2020 Apr 30;382(18):1679–1681. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2003539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Quaosar GMAA, Hoque MR, Bao Y. Investigating factors affecting elderly's intention to use m-Health services: an empirical study. Telemed J E Health. 2018 Apr;24(4):309–314. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2017.0111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Phichitchaisopa N, Naenna T. Factors affecting the adoption of healthcare information technology. EXCLI J. 2013;12:413–36. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/26417235. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ting DSW, Carin L, Dzau V, Wong TY. Digital technology and COVID-19. Nat Med. 2020 Apr;26(4):459–461. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0824-5. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/32284618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Mann DM, Chen J, Chunara R, Testa PA, Nov O. COVID-19 transforms health care through telemedicine: evidence from the field. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Jul 01;27(7):1132–1135. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa072. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/32324855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Kichloo A, Albosta M, Dettloff K, Wani F, El-Amir Z, Singh J, Aljadah M, Chakinala RC, Kanugula AK, Solanki S, Chugh S. Telemedicine, the current COVID-19 pandemic and the future: a narrative review and perspectives moving forward in the USA. Fam Med Community Health. 2020 Aug;8(3) doi: 10.1136/fmch-2020-000530. https://fmch.bmj.com/lookup/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=32816942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Fiks AG, Fleisher L, Berrigan L, Sykes E, Mayne SL, Gruver R, Halkyard K, Jew OS, FitzGerald P, Winston F, McMahon P. Usability, acceptability, and impact of a pediatric teledermatology mobile health application. Telemed J E Health. 2018 Mar;24(3):236–245. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2017.0075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Mitsutake S, Shibata A, Ishii K, Oka K. Association of eHealth literacy with colorectal cancer knowledge and screening practice among internet users in Japan. J Med Internet Res. 2012 Nov 13;14(6):e153. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1927. https://www.jmir.org/2012/6/e153/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.van der Vaart R, van Deursen AJ, Drossaert CH, Taal E, van Dijk JA, van de Laar MA. Does the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS) measure what it intends to measure? Validation of a Dutch version of the eHEALS in two adult populations. J Med Internet Res. 2011 Nov 09;13(4):e86. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1840. https://www.jmir.org/2011/4/e86/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Tubaishat A, Habiballah L. eHealth literacy among undergraduate nursing students. Nurse Educ Today. 2016 Jul;42:47–52. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Robb M, Shellenbarger T. Influential factors and perceptions of eHealth literacy among undergraduate college students. On-Line J Nurs Inform. 2014 Oct;18(3) doi: 10.2196/18155. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Hether HJ, Murphy ST, Valente TW. It's better to give than to receive: the role of social support, trust, and participation on health-related social networking sites. J Health Commun. 2014 Dec;19(12):1424–39. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2014.894596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Nicholas DB, Fellner KD, Frank M, Small M, Hetherington R, Slater R, Daneman D. Evaluation of an online education and support intervention for adolescents with diabetes. Soc Work Health Care. 2012;51(9):815–27. doi: 10.1080/00981389.2012.699507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Vaala S, Lee J, Hood K, Mulvaney S. Sharing and helping: predictors of adolescents' willingness to share diabetes personal health information with peers. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Feb 01;25(2):135–141. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocx051. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/28575462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Shibuta T, Waki K, Tomizawa N, Igarashi A, Yamamoto-Mitani N, Yamaguchi S, Fujita H, Kimura S, Fujiu K, Waki H, Izumida Y, Sasako T, Kobayashi M, Suzuki R, Yamauchi T, Kadowaki T, Ohe K. Willingness of patients with diabetes to use an ICT-based self-management tool: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2017;5(1):e000322. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2016-000322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Mathieson K, Leafman JS, Horton MB. Access to digital communication technology and perceptions of telemedicine for patient education among American Indian patients with diabetes. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2017;28(4):1522–1536. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2017.0131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Nijland N, van Gemert-Pijnen JEWC, Kelders SM, Brandenburg BJ, Seydel ER. Factors influencing the use of a Web-based application for supporting the self-care of patients with type 2 diabetes: a longitudinal study. J Med Internet Res. 2011 Sep 30;13(3):e71. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1603. https://www.jmir.org/2011/3/e71/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Jemere AT, Yeneneh YE, Tilahun B, Fritz F, Alemu S, Kebede M. Access to mobile phone and willingness to receive mHealth services among patients with diabetes in Northwest Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 24;9(1):e021766. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021766. https://bmjopen.bmj.com/lookup/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=30679284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Ajzen I, Fishbein M. The influence of attitudes on behavior. In: Albarracín D, Johnson BT, Zanna MP, editors. The Handbook of Attitudes. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 2005. pp. 173–221. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Chiu N, Chi H, Tai Y, Peng C, Tseng C, Chen C, Tan BF, Lin C. Impact of wearing masks, hand hygiene, and social distancing on influenza, enterovirus, and all-cause pneumonia during the coronavirus pandemic: retrospective national epidemiological surveillance study. J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 20;22(8):e21257. doi: 10.2196/21257. https://www.jmir.org/2020/8/e21257/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Chen X, Ran L, Liu Q, Hu Q, Du X, Tan X. Hand hygiene, mask-wearing behaviors and its associated factors during the COVID-19 epidemic: a cross-sectional study among primary school students in Wuhan, China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 22;17(8) doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082893. https://www.mdpi.com/resolver?pii=ijerph17082893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Liu JJ, Bao Y, Huang X, Shi J, Lu L. Mental health considerations for children quarantined because of COVID-19. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020 May;4(5):347–349. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(20)30096-1. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/32224303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Huckins JF, daSilva AW, Wang W, Hedlund E, Rogers C, Nepal SK, Wu J, Obuchi M, Murphy EI, Meyer ML, Wagner DD, Holtzheimer PE, Campbell AT. Mental health and behavior of college students during the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic: longitudinal smartphone and ecological momentary assessment study. J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 17;22(6):e20185. doi: 10.2196/20185. https://www.jmir.org/2020/6/e20185/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Ye J. Pediatric mental and behavioral health in the period of quarantine and social distancing With COVID-19. JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2020 Jul 28;3(2):e19867. doi: 10.2196/19867. https://pediatrics.jmir.org/2020/2/e19867/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Badawy SM, Radovic A. Digital approaches to remote pediatric health care delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic: existing evidence and a call for further research. JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2020 Jun 25;3(1):e20049. doi: 10.2196/20049. https://pediatrics.jmir.org/2020/1/e20049/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]