Abstract
Introduction
The majority of cervical wounds are linked to aggressions and attempted autolysis by knives or firearms.
Case presentation
the story is about a 35 -year-old man admitted to the emergency room for a penetrating cervical wound following an accidental fall in the workplace. The extremely long iron bar (concrete)has penetrated its neck on the right side.upon admission, the patient was conscious,hemodynamically and respiratory stable without sensory-motor deficit.
Surgical exploration is urgently decided under general anesthesia, from wich the foreign body is successfully removed.A follow -up examination at 4 months was without particularity.
Discussion
Penetrating neck injuries caused by objects such as rods or iron bars pose a significantly high risk of serious neurological damage.
Penetrating neck injuries can be life-threatening and functional.the extent of the lesions must be assessed precisely before removing the foreign body.
Conclusion
we report an exceptional case of a penetrating neck wound caused by a concrete iron bar.treatment should always be multidisciplinary and giving priority to vital structures and function.
Keywords: Injury, Penetrating injuries, Neck, Iron bar
Highlights
-
•
The majority of cervical wounds are linked to aggressions and attempted autolysis by knives or firearms.
-
•
The management of trauma to the penetrating neck has gone from compulsory exploration of the neck to selective management.
-
•
The care is multidisciplinary because it calls upon several stakeholders to know: the surgeon of head and neck, vascular surgeon and anesthesiologist and only an early appropriate treatment can reduce the sequel.
1. Introduction
The neck is an extremely complex anatomical region wich contains blood vessels, the aerodigestive tract, the cervical vertebrae and the spinal cord.
The penetration of this region by a foreign body can lead to fatal injuries. mortality rates from penetrating cervical trauma are estimated at 3% to 6% [1].
Advances in diagnostic imaging technology have moved management of penetrating neck lesions from mandatory exploration to selective management [2,3].
Hemodynamic stability and the presence of intracranial lesions remain crucial factors in assessing the patient's stability and prognosis.
Here, we present a penetrating cervical trauma caused by a concrete bar.the bar had entered above the SCM muscle at the upper edge of the outgoing thyroid cartilage next to the homolateral ear lobule.the metallic foreign body was successfully removed without complications.this case report in line with the SCARE Criteria [4].
2. Case report
The story is of a 35-year-old man admitted to the emergency room for a penetrating cervical wound following an accidental fall in the workplace (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1.
Penetrating concrete bar on the right side.
The extremely long iron rod (concrete) had penetrated his neck on the right side.on arrival at the emergency room, the patient was conscious,hemodynamically and respiratory stable, without sensory-motor deficit.
Surgical exploration is urgently decided under general anesthesia, the patient is positioned per the foreign body location, the simple exploration through the current bar, would be enough to remove it thoroughly with irrigation by sterile saline.(Fig. 2, Fig. 3).
Fig. 2.
The exploration found the SCM muscle intact with a protected vascular groove.
Fig. 3.
Immediate post-operative appearance and at first week.
During the surgical procedure,a vascular surgeon is called upon to help if necessary. Formost,a surgeon on ENT Head and Neck Surgery (otorhinolaryngology) with adequate skill level and 9 years of experience.
The patient had received a combined course of Amoxicillin and clavulanic acid after removal of the foreign body during 7 days after surgery and the anti-tetanus serum. A follow -up examination in Hospital via patient interview and physical examination at the first and the fourth months was without particularity.(Fig. 4).
Fig. 4.
The appearance of the wound 1 month post-operative.
3. Discussion
The cervical region is divided into three anatomical areas of wich zone II is the widest and most exposed zone.it extends from the cricoid cartilage to the corner of the mandible and includes the common carotid aeteries, internal and external jugular veins, various cranial nerves,larynx, hypopharynx and cervical esophagus [5].
Recently, the management of trauma to the penetrating neck has gone from compulsory exploration of the neck to selective management.
This is largely due to advances in diagnostic imaging technology, as well as the consideration that exploration of the neck can lead to unnecessary complications [6,11].
The case presentation of the patient and the foreign body did not necessitate carrying out the radiological exploration.
The rate of major vascular lesions due to penetrating cervical trauma can reach up to 50% in zone II.in particular, an injury to the carotid sheath can lead to fatal haemorrhaging [7].
Angiography is considered the standard method for examining suspected vascular lesions [8].
However, the interpretation of angiographic images by computed tomography (CTA) may be limited by metallic fragments retained in the neck [9,10].in our case CTA imaging could not completely exclude vascular lesions due to an artifact caused by metallic foreign body [11].
4. Conclusion
Cervical trauma remains a worrying surgical emergency. These pathologies are more common in young adult male in connection with the activities with high traumatic risk that he exercises.
The care is multidisciplinary because it calls upon several stakeholders to know: the ENT doctor, psychiatrist and anesthesiologist and only an early appropriate treatment can reduce the sequel.
Declaration of competing interest
The authors state that they do not have competing interests.
Sources of funding
We have any financial sources for our research.
Ethical approval and consent to participate
The study committee of the university hospital center approves the favorable opinion to publish this work.
Consent to publication
The consent to publish this information was obtained from study participants. We confirm that written proof of consent to publish study participants are available when requested and at any time.
Author's contributions
Dr. AB analysed and performed the literature research, Pr. AL, Pr. FE and Pr. RG, performed the examination and performed the scientific validation of the manuscript. Asmae Bazzout was the major contributors to the writing of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the manuscript.
Registration of research studies
Name of the registry:
Unique Identifying number or registration ID:
Hyperlink to your specific registration (must be publicly accessible and will be checked).
Guarantor
Dr.Asmae Bazzout.
Availability of data and material
The datasets in this article are available in the repository of the ENT database, Chu Mohamed VI Oujda, upon request, from the corresponding author.
References
- 1.Burgess C.A., Dale O.T., Almeyda R. An evidence-based review of the assessment and management of penetrating neck trauma. Clin. Otolaryngol. 2012;37:44–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2011.02422.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Teixeira F., Menegozzo C.A., Netto S.D. Safety in selective surgical exploration in penetrating neck trauma. World J. Emerg. Surg. 2016;11:32. doi: 10.1186/s13017-016-0091-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Prichayudh S., Choadrachata-anun J., Sriussadaporn S. Selective management of penetrating neck injuries using “no zone” approach. Injury. 2015;49:1720–1725. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.06.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Agha R.A., Franchi T., Sohrabi C., Mathew G., for the SCARE Group The SCARE 2020 guideline: updating consensus surgical CAse REport (SCARE) guidelines. Int. J. Surg. 2020;84 doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.10.034. (article in press) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.reportPenetrating Cervical Wound Following a Wild Boar Attack: Report of Case S. Tritar, R. Mani, S. Ayachi, H. Khochtali, Service de stomatologie et chirurgie maxillo-faciale. CHU Sahloul. Sousse.
- 6.Inaba K., Branco B.C., Menaker J. Evaluation of multidetector computed tomography for penetrating neck injury: a prospective multicenter study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;72:576–583. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31824badf7. discussion 583-4; quiz 803-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bladergroen M., Brockman R., Luna G. A twelve-year survey of cervicothoracic vascular injuries. Am. J. Surg. 1989;157:483–486. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(89)90640-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Osborn T.M., Bell R.B., Qaisi W. Computed tomographic angiography as an aid to clinical decision making in the selective management of penetrating injuries to the neck: a reduction in the need for operative exploration. J. Trauma. 2008;64:1466–1471. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181271b32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Inaba K., Munera F., McKenney M. Prospective evaluation of screening multislice helical computed tomographic angiography in the initial evaluation of penetrating neck injuries. J. Trauma. 2006;61:144–149. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000222711.01410.bc. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Munera F., Soto J.A., Palacio D.M. Penetrating neck injuries: helical CT angiography for initial evaluation. Radiology. 2002;224:366–372. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2242010973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wang D., Zhao Y., Cha B., Fang P., Liu Y. Penetrating neck trauma with common carotid artery injury caused by a percussive drill: a case report. Medicine (Baltim.) 2019 May;98(22) doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets in this article are available in the repository of the ENT database, Chu Mohamed VI Oujda, upon request, from the corresponding author.