Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2021 Jan 29;52(4):362–370. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2021.01.004

Immunoinformatics Approach for the Identification and Characterization of T Cell and B Cell Epitopes towards the Peptide-Based Vaccine against SARS-CoV-2

Chiranjib Chakraborty a,b,, Ashish Ranjan Sharma b, Manojit Bhattacharya c, Garima Sharma d, Sang-Soo Lee b,
PMCID: PMC7846223  PMID: 33546870

Abstract

Presently, immunoinformatics is playing a significant role in epitope identification and vaccine designing for various critical diseases. Using immunoinformatics, several scientists are trying to identify and characterize T cell and B cell epitopes as well as design peptide-based vaccine against SARS-CoV-2. In this review article, we have tried to discuss the importance in adaptive immunity and its significance for designing the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Moreover, we have attempted to illustrate several significant key points for utilizing immunoinformatics for vaccine designing, such as the criteria for selection and identification of epitopes, T cell epitope, and B cell epitope prediction and different emerging tools/databases for immunoinformatics. In the current scenario, a few immunoinformatics studies have been performed for various infectious pathogens and related diseases. Thus, we have also summarized and included these current immunoinformatics studies in this review article. Finally, we have discussed about the probable T cell and B cell epitopes and their identification and characterization for vaccine designing against SARS-CoV-2.

Key Words: Immunoinformatics, T cell epitopes, B cell epitopes, Vaccine design, SARS-CoV-2

Introduction

The use of modern technologies in the field of biological sciences is generating an enormous amount of data and making a significant impact on different branches of life sciences. This large amount of data is creating new opportunities for the researcher, especially in the field of bioinformatics (1). Recently, EMBL‐EBI has reported that a vast amount of biological data is stored into servers, and it is doubling every year (1,2). The bioinformatics researchers are currently utilizing and analyzing large amounts of biological data to generate the various probable working model for every field of science. Therefore, simultaneously, there has been a massive growth in the field of bioinformatics, and research are analyzing the data from different domains of biological science.

Similarly, an enormous amount of experimental data is also being generated in the field of immunological research. Therefore, bioinformatics applications of analyzing the considerable amount of experimental data related to immunology research might provide new possibilities around diagnostics and vaccines. Bioinformatics can generate various kinds of software and servers for analyzing the immunological data, and at the same time, these software and servers are capable of understanding the properties of the immune system. So, the rapid growth of bioinformatics has been noted in the field of immunology, and this has led to the formation of a new branch of bioinformatics called computation immunology. However, computation immunology is now termed as “Immunoinformatics” (3). These days, it is an essential element in the field of immunological research and is providing a platform for processing and understanding the different immunological events.

Immunoinformatics helps in the identification of B cell and T cell epitopes. The potential of different B and T cell epitopes were identified and characterized using various immunoinformatics tools utilizing viruses and bacteria from time to time. Ahmad B, et al. identified and characterized potential B and T cell epitopes from ebolavirus glycoprotein (4). Possible B and T cell epitopes from Leishmania secretory proteins were identified and characterized by Khatoon N, et al (5). Narula A, et al. also identified and characterized potential B and T cell epitopes from chikungunya for multi-epitopic vaccine development (6). Usually, immunoinformatic identified and characterized B and T cell epitopes are used for multi-epitopic vaccine development.

The immunoinformatics helps in vaccine development, and this has been termed as reverse vaccinology (7). This process has speeded up the design of a multi-epitope vaccine development using different antigenic constructs. The discovery of many unknown antigens has shown a successful way to vaccine development though immunoinformatics. The process of reverse vaccinology using immunoinformatic tools can usually decipher different antigenic functions. Moreover, to understand the biology of the pathogen and mutagenic antigens, immunoinformatic tools are a boon in the world of vaccine development. Therefore, this next-generation methodology could address the challenges faced while handling pathogens with mutagenic antigens. It can provide a solution against these pathogens through the development of the multi-epitope vaccine utilizing either a mutagenic antigen or the normal antigen (8,9).

COVID-19 has created a health emergency throughout the globe. This disease has created a pandemic situation in several countries throughout the world, and deaths associated with its complications are increasing day by day (10., 11., 12.). Scientists are rigorously trying to search for new therapeutics and vaccines against COVID-19. However, with continuing efforts, only a limited number of therapeutics have been are mapped, such as remdesivir, tocilizumab, lvermectin, and dexamethasone (11,13., 14., 15.). To combat COVID-19, a vaccine is the only desired way, and every country is focused on the development of some potent vaccine against it. Sooner or later, the world will get a new vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 (16,17). Immunoinformatics has been used by several groups of research to map antigens of SARS-CoV-2 (Figure 1 ). Lately, many immunoinformatics studies have been performed to determine the epitopes by using already identified B and T cells epitope database.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

A schematic diagram to illustrate identification and characterization of T cell and B cell epitopes towards the peptide-based vaccine designing against SARS-CoV-2

In this article, we have discussed the adaptive immunity and its importance for SARS-CoV-2 vaccine design. Also, an emphasis has been given to the topics like the epitopes selection criteria, identification of epitopes, B cell epitope prediction, T cell epitope prediction, different emerging tools, and databases for immunoinformatics. Here, immunoinformatics related studies for different pathogenic diseases have also been illustrated. Finally, we have discussed the B cell and T cell epitopes identification and characterization for vaccine designing against SARS-CoV-2.

Adaptive Immunity and its Importance for SARS‐-CoV‐2 Vaccine Design

The adaptive immunity or adaptive immune system is also referred to as acquired immunity. Acquired immunity has two components: i) the cellular immune response through the T lymphocytes or T cells, and ii) the humoral response of antibody produces through the B lymphocytes or B cells. An antigen is a small portion of a protein that can elicit an immune reaction and is often termed as an epitope. These epitopes can be recognized by the consequent B cell receptor (BCR) or T cell receptor (TCR) present on B or T cells. B cell epitopes are composed of contiguous amino acids and linear amino acids. Conversely, T cell epitopes are noted as small linear peptides that are cleaved from antigenic proteins (18,19). There are two major subsets of the T cell population, which can be differentiated through the presence of any of two glycoproteins on their surface, i.e., CD4 or CD8 (13).

CD4+ T cells act as T helper cells (Th cell), and this group of cells can recognize the peptides exhibited by MHC class II molecules (major histocompatibility complex). T helper cells could produce cytokines (18,19). Similarly, CD8+ T cells act as T cytotoxic cells (Tc cell), and this group of cells can recognize the peptides exhibited by MHC class I molecules. T cytotoxic cells have cytolytic activity and cause apoptosis of virally infected cells (18,19).

Like all viral infections, the adaptive immune response may play an important role during the infection of SARS-CoV-2. The T lymphocytes can provide an inflammatory response and produce different kinds of cytokines against SARS-CoV-2. On the other hand, B lymphocytes can produce specific antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 and can help to neutralize the virus.

We all know that the IgG (immunoglobulins G) is vital for immune memory and long-term immunity. Similarly, IgM (immunoglobulins M) can provide the first line of defense during viral infections. Thus, these two are essential components against SARS-CoV-2 and can only be generated through vaccination or adaptive immune system (20).

Epitopes Selection for Immunoinformatics Study and its Infusing Factors

Epitopes selection is one of the critical steps for immunoinformatics study. During epitope selection, we should select epitopes that are multi-specific and broad-based (21). Multi-specific epitopes may be identified from the multiple proteins originating from a single pathogen. Similarly, broad-based epitopes are a range of epitopes that are derived from a single protein. While selecting significant epitopes, different factors might affect the selection procedure and should be considered for assessing the various abilities of epitopes. The factors include the attachment capacity of an epitope with a suitable MHC molecule (an important factor for selection), the capability of an epitope for cellular presentation, and the T cell repertoire should be able to distinguish the MHC-epitope complexes (22,23).

Immunoinformatics and Identification of Epitopes

The identification of suitable epitopes is the most notable step for multi-epitope vaccine designing. In silico study requires to evaluate the sequences of amino acid from a pathogen and to find out the specific motif. It should have a high binding affinity, particularly to MHC molecules (24,25).

T cell Epitope Prediction Though Immunoinformatics

For immunoinformatics based T cell epitope prediction, several immunoinformatics-based algorithms were developed (26., 27., 28.). Immunoinformatics based T cell epitope prediction includes two methods, which can be either direct or indirect. The direct method of T cell epitope prediction is based on any of the three types of patterns, which includes, i) epitope motif pattern, ii) amphipathic based pattern, and iii) mix epitopic pattern (23,29). There is a disadvantage of the direct method of T cell epitope prediction as it is the low accuracy.

It has been noted that indirect methods were predicted using MHC binders in comparison to T cell epitopes. However, the prediction of MHC class I binders is easy to compare than the MHC class II binders. Due to the presence of binding grooves in the MHC class II molecules, the prediction is more complicated. The indirect method of T cell epitope prediction is based on different methods such as quantitative matrices-based methods, neural networks-based methods, motif profiles-based methods, motif pattern-based methods, MHC-peptide threading-based method, support vector machines based methods, free energy scoring functions based methods and 3D-QSAR studies (23,30,31). Some web-based computational system tools for T cell epitope prediction are easy to accessible like MULTIPRED (32), TEPITOPEpan (33), Pickpocket (34).

Prediction of B cell Epitopes Through Immunoinformatics

It has been noted that BCR present on the B-cell can recognize B cell epitopes. The B cell epitopes are the antigenic regions that are present on the surface of any pathogen. This recognition of the antigen can activate B-cell for the generation of specific antibodies against the recognized antigen. Hence, it is necessary that we should consider B cell epitopes when we design successful vaccines against any pathogen. However, there are two groups of B cell epitopes, which are discontinuous epitopes and continuous or linear epitopes. It has been estimated that more than 85% of the B cell epitopes are continuous in sequence (35). During linear B cell epitope prediction, researchers consider some of the properties of amino acids, such as secondary structure, amino acid charge, exposed surface area, and hydrophilicity (23,31).

Some continuous B cell epitopes prediction tools or servers are available for the immunoinformatics research are BCPRed, FBCPred (36), and COBEpro (37).

Emerging Immunoinformatics Tools Used for Vaccine Designing

Several immunoinformatics tools are being used for the identification of the probable epitopes for vaccine development (Table 1 ). Some examples include Vaxign and VaxiJen. Vaxign helps in the vaccine target prediction as well as the analysis (38), while VaxiJen helps in the prediction of antigens (39). Some of these immunoinformatics tools can search the protein sequences and identify the MHC binding motifs for the epitopes. The identified epitopes (from B cell and T cells) are used to develop the probable epitope-based vaccine. This vaccine can be used among different human populations, even if the genetic variability among these populations has been observed (23,40).

Table 1.

Different immunoinformatics and related tools/ web server/ database and their web address

Sl. no Web server/Tool/Database description Name Web address Reference
1 Prediction of linear B cell epitopes LBtope http://crdd.osdd.net/raghava/lbtope/ (57)
2 Prediction of antibody specific B cell epitopes IgPred http://crdd.osdd.net/raghava/igpred/ (58)
3 Artificial neural network-based B cell epitope prediction server Abcpred https://webs.iiitd.edu.in/raghava/abcpred/ (59)
4 Prediction of linear B cell epitopes, using physico-chemical properties Bcepred https://webs.iiitd.edu.in/raghava/bcepred/ (60)
5 Sequential B-cell Epitope Predictor BepiPred http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/BepiPred/ (61)
6 Residue-level epitope mapping of antigens based on peptide microarray data. ArrayPitope http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/ArrayPitope/ (62)
7 Prediction of discontinuous B cell epitopes from protein three dimensional structures. DiscoTope http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/DiscoTope/ (63)
8 Database of experimentally characterized immune epitopes Immune Epitope Database (IEDB) https://www.iedb.org/ (64)
9 Integrated knowledge resource specialized in the antibodies, T cell receptors, major histocompatibility complex IMGT http://www.imgt.org/ (65)
10 Prediction of protective antigens and subunit vaccines. VaxiJen http://www.ddg-pharmfac.net/vaxijen/VaxiJen/VaxiJen.html (39)
11 Prediction of Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte epitopes CTLPred http://crdd.osdd.net/raghava/ctlpred/index.html (66)
12 Prediction of MHC class-II binding regions in an antigen sequence ProPred https://webs.iiitd.edu.in/raghava/propred/ (67)
13 Identifying the MHC class-I binding regions in antigens ProPred-I https://webs.iiitd.edu.in/raghava/propred1/ (68)
14 Structural database and viewing tools, MHC/peptide/TCR combinations PDB https://www.rcsb.org/ (69)
15 Secondary structure prediction of the vaccine PSIPRED http://bioinf.cs.ucl.ac.uk/psipred/ (70)
16 Allergenicity prediction of protein AllerTOP https://www.ddg-pharmfac.net/AllerTOP/ (71)
17 Reverse translation and codon optimization JCat http://www.jcat.de/ (72)
18 Analyze immunogenicity and immune response properties in mesoscopic level C-ImmSim http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/C-ImmSim-10.1 (73)
19 In silico cloning of vaccine WebDSV http://www.molbiotools.com/WebDSV/ (74)
20 Solubility prediction of protein Protein-Sol https://protein-sol.manchester.ac.uk/ (75)
21 Predict and design toxic/non-toxic peptides ToxinPred http://crdd.osdd.net/raghava/toxinpred/ (76)

Emerging Immunoinformatics Databases Used for Vaccine Designing

Currently, several available databases can provide an extensive range of immunological information in diverse areas of immunology. Different immunoinformatics data originated from the immunological studies are stored in the databases (Table 1). Some immunoinformatics databases are Bcipep, SYFPEITHI, and several others. Bcipep is a repertoire that consists of a data source about B cell epitopes (41). YFPEITHI is databank for MHC peptide motifs and MHC ligands (42). All these types of databases are continually helping the advancement of immunoinformatics (23,40).

Immunoinformatics Related Studies to Understand Different Infectious Diseases and its Pathogen

Immunoinformatics based studies have been performed to understand different diseases (Table 2 ). These studies have strengthened the immunoinformatics knowledge about the disease pathogenesis of the pathogenic organism. Studies have also provided evidence to understand the immune system dynamics, as well as provided information for in silico based vaccine designing. To understand the complex pathogenic process of different pathogenic diseases, computational methods and models were generated for different pathogens such as viral pathogens, bacterial pathogens, parasitic pathogens as well as fungal pathogens. Mirza MU, et al. performed the immunoinformatics analysis along with MD (molecular dynamics) simulations to understand and analyze the different antigenic epitopes of the Zika virus (43). Khan M, et al. have applied an immunoinformatic approach to develop the B and T cell multi-epitope subunit vaccine for Helicobacter pylori (44).

Table 2.

Different immunoinformatics studies to understand diverse infectious diseases and its pathogen

Sl. no Researcher group Country of origin Human pathogen Target protein Remarks Reference
1 Chaudhuri D, et al. 2020 India Hepatitis B virus, and Hepatitis C virus Viral protease, core, and membrane protein Identified T cell, B cell epitopes and designing a common peptide-based vaccine (77)
2 Saha CK, et al. 2017 Bangladesh Hendra virus, Nipah virus. Viral fusion protein, attachment glycoprotein and matrix protein Development of common Band T cell epitope-based peptide vaccine candidate (78)
3 Rahman U, et al. 2019 Pakistan, China Alkhurmahemorrhagic fever virus Envelope glycoprotein Identification of potential Band T cell epitopes and development of peptide based vaccine model (79)
4 Dash R, et al. 2017 Malaysia, Bangladesh Ebola virus Viral glycoprotein B and T cell based epitope-based peptide vaccine (80)
5 Anwar S, et al. 2020 Canada, USA, Bangladesh Chikungunya virus Envelope glycoprotein Prediction of potential common B cell and T cell epitopes (81)
6 Verma S, et al. 2018 India Salmonella typhi bacteria
Chaperone protein DnaK Identification of promising immunogenic B and T cell epitopes. (82)
7 Unni PA, et al. 2019 India Mycoplasma pneumonia bacteria Membrane associated proteins and cyt adherence proteins Prediction of best T cell and B cell epitopes (83)
8 Zahroh H, et al. 2016 Indonesia Meningitis-inducing Bacteria (Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae Type band Neisseria meningitides)
Protein of polysaccharide capsule T cell epitopes based peptide constructs for vaccine (84)
9 Shahsavandi S, et al. 2015 Iran Influenza virus Hemokinin-1 (HK-1) peptide Identification of conserver T cell epitopes for chimeric vaccine development (85)
10 Adhikari UK, et al. 2018 Australia, Bangladesh Oropouche virus Viral membrane polyprotein Prediction of common T cell and B cell epitopes for epitope-based peptide vaccine design (86)

Similarly, Urrutia-Baca VH, et al. have tried to develop an oral vaccine against H. pylori using novel peptides through immunoinformatics (45). Pandey RK, et al. have designed a multi-epitope-based subunit vaccine against the malarial pathogen (genus Plasmodium) using immunoinformatics (46). Rujirawat T, et al. used immunoinformatics and other approaches to understand the oomycete genome of Pythium insidiosum (47). Several other examples are available in this direction and provide the utility of immunoinformatics in disease pathogenesis.

8. T Cell and B Cell Epitopes Identification and Characterization for Vaccine Designing Against SARS‐CoV‐2

The outbreak of the SARS-CoV-2 occurred in China. This disease subsequently spread throughout the world and created a pandemic situation (10). Scientists are desperately trying to develop a vaccine against SARS-CoV-2. Presently, several researchers are using immunoinformatics approaches for the T cell and B cell epitopes identification and characterization as well as vaccine development against SARS-CoV-2. Different in silico studies have been performed in recent times to determine the epitopes of SARS-CoV-2. A list of epitopes that have been detected using T and B cells are listed in Table 3 .

Table 3.

Different immunoinformatics studies related to T cell and B cell epitopes identification and characterization for vaccine designing against SARS-CoV-2

Sl. no Researcher group Country of origin Identified SARS-CoV-2 protein Remarks Reference
1 Sarkar B, et al. 2020 Bangladesh Surface glycoprotein, Nucleocapsid phosphoprotein Prediction of common epitopes and antigenicity of B cell and T cell. (48)
2 Kalita P, et al. 2020 India Membrane glycoprotein, Surface spike glycoprotein, Nucleocapsid protein Multi-epitopic (B cell and T cell) peptide identification and antigenicity prediction. (49)
3 Grifoni A, et al. 2020 USA ORF3a protein, ORF1ab protein, Surface glycoprotein, Nucleocapsid phosphoprotein, Membrane glycoprotein Prediction of common epitopes of B cell and T cell. (50)
4 Bhattacharya M, et al. 2020 India, South Korea Spike protein Common epitopes identification of B cell and T cell, antigenicity prediction of T cell (51)
5 Baruah and Bose, 2020 India Surface glycoprotein Prediction of common epitopes and antigenicity of B cell and T cell (52)
6 Ahmed SF, et al. 2020 China Nucleocapsid phosphoprotein, Surface glycoprotein Prediction of common epitopes of B cell and T cell (53)
7 Kumar S, et al. 2020 India Spike protein Epitope identification and antigenicity prediction of T cell (54)
8 Panda PK, et al. 2020 Sweden, India, Denmark Spike protein and Mpro Identification of B cell and T cell epitopes (55)
9 Bhattacharya M, et al. 2020 South Korea, India Spike protein In silico cloning and validation of peptide vaccine candidate (56)

Recently, Sarkar B, et al. performed epitope-based subunit vaccine development against the SARS-CoV-2 using the immunoinformatics approaches and reverse vaccinology. The research group also performed in silico codon adaptation and MD simulation in this study (48). Kalita P, et al. have also tried to develop a subunit vaccine against SARS-CoV-2. They proposed a multi-peptide-based subunit vaccine through computational biology. The researchers are utilizing T-cell and B-cell epitopes database to identified T-cell and B-cell epitopes, which are then joined through a peptide linker to form a multi-epitopic peptide vaccine (49). Grifoni A, et al. have used immunoinformatics tools and techniques to design a multi-epitopic vaccine. They have predicted common epitopes from the B cells and T cells, and these potential epitopes may be useful to develop human immune responses. In this study, they have used a server titled IEDB server for designing the vaccine. Simultaneously, they have performed the sequence homology to understand the sequence similarity of SARS-CoV-2 with other CoVs (50). In another important study, Bhattacharya M, et al. developed an immunoinformatics based SARS-CoV-2 vaccine using spike protein. They have chosen 13 MHC- I and 3 MHC‐II epitopes. These peptides were linked with an (EAAAK)3 linker to develop the multi-epitopic based peptide vaccine for COVID-19. The peptide vaccine was finally docked with the Toll like receptor (TLR) to understand its feasibility to develop adaptive immunity. This rapid immunoinformatics study can be a useful vaccine developmental approach for future researchers (51). Alike, Baruah and Bose have identified the T cell and B cell epitopes for the development vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 though immunoinformatics. In this study, surface glycoprotein was used for the epitopic identification of the COVID-19 vaccine. The study predicted common B cell and T cell epitopes, and their antigenicity was analyzed. They have identified 3 sequential and 5 discontinuous B cell epitopes. The study also characterized the B cell and T cell epitopes and found the existence of salt bridge anchors and continuous hydrogen bonds. Finally, the authors concluded that the vaccine candidate might generate constant humoral immunity in the host (52). Ahmed SF, et al. performed immunoinformatics analysis to developed vaccines against SARS-CoV-2. The study used surface glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 and predicted the common epitopes of B cell and T cell. Here, researchers have mapped the residues of the discontinuous epitopes and linear epitopes of B cells. All these B cell and T cell epitopes sets were found to induce sufficient immune response against SARS-CoV-2 (53). Another study performed by Kumar S, et al. through immunoinformatics using SARS-CoV-2 showed the antigenic variation of S glycoprotein. The study has predicted Cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) epitopes using NetCTL and mIEDB resources. This study also predicted the glycosylation pattern of S glycoprotein (54). Panda PK, et al. performed an extensive study using immunoinformatics to identify the epitopes from spike protein and Mpro. They utilized VixiJen server and found that both the spike proteins (structural protein) and Mpro (nonstructural protein) are antigenic in nature and possess antigenicity. They have identified several T cell and B cell epitopes. From B cell epitopes, they have found both the discontinuous epitopes and linear epitopes (55). In another research by (56) molecular cloning of the identified vaccine construct was reported. The study evaluated various safety measures and the effectiveness of their proposed epitopic vaccine candidate. Even the response of the adaptive immune system was assessed in terms of binding with TLR proteins. Researchers also performed the MD simulation and other characterization to understand the stability, physicochemical and biochemical properties of the vaccine candidate.

Conclusion

In the current scenario, there is an urgent need for the generation of more immunological data related to COVID-19 infection. Immunoinformatics can help to generate immunological data associated with COVID-19 at a faster pace. It has been observed that most of the studies that are performed for COVID-19 using immunoinformatics are focused on B and T cells epitopes identification and characterization. Basically, B cells and T cells are two significant components that can elicit an immune system to fight against all pathogens, including viruses. For the body's defense mechanism, activation of these two cell types plays a crucial role. Moreover, the activation of adaptive immunity is a prerequisite for the development of body defense after vaccination. All literatures reviewed for the immunoinformatics on epitope identifications will help to develop a significant vaccine against SARS-CoV-2. Soon, we can expect to utilize these rapidly generated databases for developing effective peptide vaccine against COVID-19 and help to protect the diverse human population.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

Not applicable

Informed consent and patient details

Not required.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Hallym University Research Fund and by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2020R1C1C1008694 & NRF-2020R1I1A3074575).

Footnotes

Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.arcmed.2021.01.004.

Appendix A. Supplementary materials

Supplementary Data S1

Supplementary Raw Research Data. This is open data under the CC BY license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

mmc1.xml (217B, xml)

References

  • 1.Oliveira AL. Biotechnology, Big Data and Artificial Intelligence. Biotechnol J. 2019;14 doi: 10.1002/biot.201800613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cook CE, Bergman MT, Cochrane G. The European Bioinformatics Institute in 2017: data coordination and integration. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(D1) doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx1154. D21-D9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Tong JC, Ren EC. Immunoinformatics: current trends and future directions. Drug Discov Today. 2009;14:684–689. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2009.04.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ahmad B, Ashfaq UA, Rahman MU. Conserved B and T cell epitopes prediction of ebola virus glycoprotein for vaccine development: An immuno-informatics approach. Microb Pathog. 2019;132:243–253. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2019.05.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Khatoon N, Pandey RK, Prajapati VK. Exploring Leishmania secretory proteins to design B and T cell multi-epitope subunit vaccine using immunoinformatics approach. Sci Rep. 2017;7:8285. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-08842-w. doi.org/ [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Narula A, Pandey RK, Khatoon N. Excavating chikungunya genome to design B and T cell multi-epitope subunit vaccine using comprehensive immunoinformatics approach to control chikungunya infection. Infect Genet Evol. 2018;61:4–15. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2018.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kazi A, Chuah C, Majeed ABA. Current progress of immunoinformatics approach harnessed for cellular- and antibody-dependent vaccine design. Pathog Glob Health. 2018;112:123–131. doi: 10.1080/20477724.2018.1446773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Vivona S, Gardy JL, Ramachandran S. Computer-aided biotechnology: from immuno-informatics to reverse vaccinology. Trends Biotechnol. 2008;26:190–200. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2007.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sette A, Rappuoli R. Reverse vaccinology: developing vaccines in the era of genomics. Immunity. 2010;33:530–541. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2010.09.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chakraborty C, Sharma AR, Bhattacharya M. The 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic: A zoonotic prospective. Asian Pac J Trop Dis. 2020;13(6) doi: 10.4103/1995-7645.281613. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Saha A, Sharma AR, Bhattacharya M. Probable Molecular Mechanism of Remdesivir for the Treatment of COVID-19: Need to Know More. Arch Med Res. 2020;51:585–586. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2020.05.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Chakraborty C, Sharma AR, Sharma G. SARS-CoV-2 causing pneumonia-associated respiratory disorder (COVID-19): diagnostic and proposed therapeutic options. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2020;24:4016–4026. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202004_20871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Saha A, Sharma AR, Bhattacharya M. Tocilizumab: A Therapeutic Option for the Treatment of Cytokine Storm Syndrome in COVID-19. Arch Med Res. 2020;51:595–597. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2020.05.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Gupta D, Sahoo AK, Singh A. Ivermectin: potential candidate for the treatment of COVID 19. Braz J Infect Dis. 2020;24:369–371. doi: 10.1016/j.bjid.2020.06.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ledford H. Coronavirus breakthrough: dexamethasone is first drug shown to save lives. Nature. 2020;582:469. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-01824-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Fadda M, Albanese E, Suggs LS. When a COVID-19 vaccine is ready, will we all be ready for it? Int J Public Health. 2020;65:711–712. doi: 10.1007/s00038-020-01404-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Saha RP, Sharma AR, Singh MK. Repurposing Drugs, Ongoing Vaccine, and New Therapeutic Development Initiatives against COVID-19. Front Pharmacol. 2020;11(1258) doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.01258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Korber B, LaBute M, Yusim K. Immunoinformatics comes of age. PLoS Comput Biol. 2006;2:e71. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0020071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tomar N, De RK. Immunoinformatics: an integrated scenario. Immunology. 2010;131:153–168. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2010.03330.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.di Mauro G, Cristina S, Concetta R. SARS-CoV-2 infection: Response of human immune system and possible implications for the rapid test and treatment. Int Immunopharmacol. 2020;84 doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2020.106519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.De Groot AS, Moise L, McMurry JA. Epitope-Based Immunome-Derived Vaccines: A Strategy for Improved Design and Safety. Clinical Applications of Immunomics. 2009;2:39–69. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-79208-8_3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Chen W, Anton LC, Bennink JR. Dissecting the multifactorial causes of immunodominance in class I-restricted T cell responses to viruses. Immunity. 2000;12:83–93. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(00)80161-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kardani K, Bolhassani A, Namvar A. An overview of in silico vaccine design against different pathogens and cancer. Expert Rev. Vaccines. 2020;19:699–726. doi: 10.1080/14760584.2020.1794832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Sette A, Newman M, Livingston B. Optimizing vaccine design for cellular processing, MHC binding and TCR recognition. Tissue antigens. 2002;59:443–451. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-0039.2002.590601.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Raoufi E, Hemmati M, Eftekhari S. Epitope Prediction by Novel Immunoinformatics Approach: A State-of-the-art Review. Int J Pept Res Ther. 2020;26:1155–1163. doi: 10.1007/s10989-019-09918-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Flower DR. Towards in silico prediction of immunogenic epitopes. Trends Immunol. 2003;24:667–674. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2003.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Goldberg AL, Cascio P, Saric T. The importance of the proteasome and subsequent proteolytic steps in the generation of antigenic peptides. Mol Immunol. 2002;39:147–164. doi: 10.1016/s0161-5890(02)00098-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Patronov A, Doytchinova I. T-cell epitope vaccine design by immunoinformatics. Open Biol. 2013;3 doi: 10.1098/rsob.120139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sanchez-Trincado JL, Gomez-Perosanz M, Reche PA. Fundamentals and Methods for T- and B-Cell Epitope Prediction. J Immunol Res. 2017;2017 doi: 10.1155/2017/2680160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Desai DV, Kulkarni-Kale U. T-cell epitope prediction methods: an overview. Methods Mol Biol. 2014;1184:333–364. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-1115-8_19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Backert L, Kohlbacher O. Immunoinformatics and epitope prediction in the age of genomic medicine. Genome Med. 2015;7:119. doi: 10.1186/s13073-015-0245-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zhang GL, Khan AM, Srinivasan KN. MULTIPRED: a computational system for prediction of promiscuous HLA binding peptides. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33 doi: 10.1093/nar/gki452. (Web Server issue):W172–W179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Zhang L, Chen Y, Wong HS. TEPITOPEpan: extending TEPITOPE for peptide binding prediction covering over 700 HLA-DR molecules. PloS one. 2012;7:e30483. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Zhang H, Lund O, Nielsen M. The PickPocket method for predicting binding specificities for receptors based on receptor pocket similarities: application to MHC-peptide binding. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1293–1299. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kringelum JV, Nielsen M, Padkjaer SB. Structural analysis of B-cell epitopes in antibody:protein complexes. Mol Immunol. 2013;53:24–34. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2012.06.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.El-Manzalawy Y, Dobbs D, Honavar V. Predicting flexible length linear B-cell epitopes. Comput Syst Bioinformatics Conf. 2008;7:121–132. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Sweredoski MJ, Baldi P. COBEpro: a novel system for predicting continuous B-cell epitopes. Protein Eng Des Sel. 2009;22:113–120. doi: 10.1093/protein/gzn075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Xiang Z, He Y. Genome-wide prediction of vaccine targets for human herpes simplex viruses using Vaxign reverse vaccinology. BMC Bioinformatics. 2013;14(Suppl 4):S2. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-S4-S2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Doytchinova IA, Flower DR. VaxiJen: a server for prediction of protective antigens, tumour antigens and subunit vaccines. BMC Bioinformatics. 2007;8:4. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-8-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Oli AN, Obialor WO, Ifeanyichukwu MO. Immunoinformatics and Vaccine Development: An Overview. Immunotargets Ther. 2020;9:13–30. doi: 10.2147/ITT.S241064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Saha S, Bhasin M, Raghava GP. Bcipep: a database of B-cell epitopes. BMC genomics. 2005;6:79. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-6-79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Schuler MM, Nastke MD, Stevanovikc S. SYFPEITHI: database for searching and T-cell epitope prediction. Methods Mol Biol. 2007;409:75–93. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-118-9_5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Mirza MU, Rafique S, Ali A. Towards peptide vaccines against Zika virus: Immunoinformatics combined with molecular dynamics simulations to predict antigenic epitopes of Zika viral proteins. Sci Rep. 2016;6:37313. doi: 10.1038/srep37313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Khan M, Khan S, Ali A. Immunoinformatics approaches to explore Helicobacter Pylori proteome (Virulence Factors) to design B and T cell multi-epitope subunit vaccine. Sci Rep. 2019;9:13321. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49354-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Urrutia-Baca VH, Gomez-Flores R, De La, Garza-Ramos MA. Immunoinformatics Approach to Design a Novel Epitope-Based Oral Vaccine Against Helicobacter pylori. J Comput Biol. 2019;26:1177–1190. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2019.0062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Pandey RK, Bhatt TK, Prajapati VK. Novel Immunoinformatics Approaches to Design Multi-epitope Subunit Vaccine for Malaria by Investigating. Anopheles Salivary Protein. Sci Rep. 2018;8:1125. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-19456-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Rujirawat T, Patumcharoenpol P, Lohnoo T. Probing the Phylogenomics and Putative Pathogenicity Genes of Pythium insidiosum by. Oomycete Genome Analyses. Sci Rep. 2018;8:4135. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-22540-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Sarkar B, Ullah MA, Johora FT. Immunoinformatics-guided designing of epitope-based subunit vaccines against the SARS Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) Immunobiology. 2020;225 doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2020.151955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Kalita P, Padhi AK, Zhang KYJ. Design of a peptide-based subunit vaccine against novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. Microb Pathog. 2020;145 doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2020.104236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Grifoni A, Sidney J, Zhang Y. A Sequence Homology and Bioinformatic Approach Can Predict Candidate Targets for Immune Responses to SARS-CoV-2. Cell Host Microbe. 2020;27 doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2020.03.002. 671–680 e2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Bhattacharya M, Sharma AR, Patra P. Development of epitope-based peptide vaccine against novel coronavirus 2019 (SARS-COV-2): Immunoinformatics approach. J Med Virol. 2020;92:618–631. doi: 10.1002/jmv.25736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Baruah V, Bose S. Immunoinformatics-aided identification of T cell and B cell epitopes in the surface glycoprotein of 2019-nCoV. J Med Virol. 2020;92:495–500. doi: 10.1002/jmv.25698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Ahmed SF, Quadeer AA, McKay MR. Preliminary Identification of Potential Vaccine Targets for the COVID-19 Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) Based on SARS-CoV Immunological Studies. Viruses. 2020;12:254. doi: 10.3390/v12030254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Kumar S, Maurya VK, Prasad AK. Structural, glycosylation and antigenic variation between 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) and SARS coronavirus (SARS-CoV) Virusdisease. 2020;31:13–21. doi: 10.1007/s13337-020-00571-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Panda PK, Murugan NA, Patel P. Structure-based drug designing and immunoinformatics approach for SARS-CoV-2. Sci Adv. 2020;6:eabb8097. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abb8097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Bhattacharya M, Sharma AR, Patra P. A SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidate: In-silico cloning and validation. Inform Med Unlocked. 2020;20 doi: 10.1016/j.imu.2020.100394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Singh H, Ansari HR, Raghava GP. Improved method for linear B-cell epitope prediction using antigen's primary sequence. PloS one. 2013;8:e62216. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Gupta S, Ansari HR, Gautam A. Identification of B-cell epitopes in an antigen for inducing specific class of antibodies. Biol direct. 2013;8:27. doi: 10.1186/1745-6150-8-27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Saha S, Raghava GP. Prediction of continuous B-cell epitopes in an antigen using recurrent neural network. Proteins. 2006;65:40–48. doi: 10.1002/prot.21078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.SSaR G.P.S. Prediction of Continuous B-Cell Epitopes in Antigenic Sequences Using Physico-chemical Properties. ICARIS Springer. 2004:197–204. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-30220-9_16. doi.org/ [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Jespersen MC, Peters B, Nielsen M. BepiPred-2.0: improving sequence-based B-cell epitope prediction using conformational epitopes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45(W1) doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx346. W24–W29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Hansen LB, Buus S, Schafer-Nielsen C. Identification and mapping of linear antibody epitopes in human serum albumin using high-density Peptide arrays. PloS One. 2013;8:e68902. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Kringelum JV, Lundegaard C, Lund O. Reliable B cell epitope predictions: impacts of method development and improved benchmarking. PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8 doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Vita R, Overton JA, Greenbaum JA. The immune epitope database (IEDB) 3.0. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43 doi: 10.1093/nar/gku938. (Database issue):D405–D412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Lefranc MP, Giudicelli V, Ginestoux C. IMGT, the international ImMunoGeneTics information system. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn838. (Database issue):D1006–D1012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Bhasin M, Raghava GP. Prediction of CTL epitopes using QM, SVM and ANN techniques. Vaccine. 2004;22:3195–3204. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2004.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Singh H, Raghava GP. ProPred: prediction of HLA-DR binding sites. Bioinformatics. 2001;17:1236–1237. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.12.1236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Singh H, Raghava GP. ProPred1: prediction of promiscuous MHC Class-I binding sites. Bioinformatics. 2003;19:1009–1014. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28:235–242. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.1.235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Jones DT. Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices. J Mol Biol. 1999;292:195–202. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.3091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Dimitrov I, Bangov I, Flower DR. AllerTOP v.2–a server for in silico prediction of allergens. J Mol Model. 2014;20:2278. doi: 10.1007/s00894-014-2278-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Grote A, Hiller K, Scheer M. JCat: a novel tool to adapt codon usage of a target gene to its potential expression host. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:W526–W531. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki376. (Web Server issue) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Rapin N, Lund O, Bernaschi M. Computational immunology meets bioinformatics: the use of prediction tools for molecular binding in the simulation of the immune system. PloS One. 2010;5:e9862. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Bevilacqua V, Menolascina F, Aurora D. Springer book; 2010. A Novel Tool for Assisted In-silico Cloning and Sequence Editing in Molecular Biology. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Hebditch M, Carballo-Amador MA, Charonis S. Protein-Sol: a web tool for predicting protein solubility from sequence. Bioinformatics. 2017;33:3098–3100. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Gupta S, Kapoor P, Chaudhary K. In silico approach for predicting toxicity of peptides and proteins. PloS One. 2013;8:e73957. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Chaudhuri D, Datta J, Majumder S. In silico designing of peptide based vaccine for Hepatitis viruses using reverse vaccinology approach. Infect Genet Evol. 2020;84 doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2020.104388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Saha CK, Mahbub Hasan M, Saddam Hossain M. In silico identification and characterization of common epitope-based peptide vaccine for Nipah and Hendra viruses. Asian Pac J Trop Med. 2017;10:529–538. doi: 10.1016/j.apjtm.2017.06.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Ul-Rahman A, Shabbir MAB. In silico analysis for development of epitopes-based peptide vaccine against Alkhurma hemorrhagic fever virus. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2019;38:3110–3122. doi: 10.1080/07391102.2019.1651673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Dash R, Das R, Junaid M. In silico-based vaccine design against Ebola virus glycoprotein. Adv Appl Bioinform Chem. 2017;10:11–28. doi: 10.2147/AABC.S115859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Anwar S, Mourosi JT, Khan MF. Prediction of Epitope-Based Peptide Vaccine Against the Chikungunya Virus by Immuno-informatics Approach. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2020;21:325–340. doi: 10.2174/1389201020666191112161743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Verma S, Sugadev R, Kumar A. Multi-epitope DnaK peptide vaccine against Salmonella Typhi: An in silico approach. Vaccine. 2018;36:4014–4022. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.05.106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Unni PA, Ali A, Rout M. Designing of an epitope-based peptide vaccine against walking pneumonia: an immunoinformatics approach. Mol Biol Rep. 2019;46:511–527. doi: 10.1007/s11033-018-4505-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Zahroh H, Ma'rup A, Tambunan US. Immunoinformatics Approach in Designing Epitope-based Vaccine Against Meningitis-inducing Bacteria (Streptococcus pneumoniae, Neisseria meningitidis, and Haemophilus influenzae Type b) Drug Target Insights. 2016;10:19–29. doi: 10.4137/DTI.S38458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Shahsavandi S, Ebrahimi MM, Sadeghi K. Design of a heterosubtypic epitope-based peptide vaccine fused with hemokinin-1 against influenza viruses. Virol Sin. 2015;30:200–207. doi: 10.1007/s12250-014-3504-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Adhikari UK, Tayebi M, Rahman MM. Immunoinformatics Approach for Epitope-Based Peptide Vaccine Design and Active Site Prediction against Polyprotein of Emerging Oropouche Virus. J Immunol Res. 2018;2018 doi: 10.1155/2018/6718083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Data S1

Supplementary Raw Research Data. This is open data under the CC BY license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

mmc1.xml (217B, xml)

Articles from Archives of Medical Research are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES