Abstract
Background
The development of the technique has improved the success rate of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for in-stent chronic total occlusion (IS-CTO). However, long-term outcomes remain unclear. The present study sought to investigate long-term outcomes of PCI for IS-CTO.
Methods
A total of 474 IS-CTO patients were enrolled at two cardiac centers from 2015 to 2018 retrospectively. These patients were allocated into either successful or failed IS-CTO PCI groups. The primary endpoint (major adverse cardiac events [MACE]) consisted of recurrent angina pectoris (RAP), target-vessel myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure, cardiac death, or ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization (TVR) at follow-up. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to investigate the association between treatment appropriateness and clinical outcomes.
Results
A total of 367 patients were successfully treated with IS-CTO PCI while 107 patients had failed recanalization. After a median follow-up of 30 months (interquartile range: 17–42 months), no significant difference was observed between the two groups for the following parameters: cardiac death (successful PCI vs. failed PCI: 0.9% vs. 2.7%; adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 1.442; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.21–9.887; P = 0.709), RAP (successful PCI vs. failed PCI: 40.8% vs. 40.0%; adjusted HR: 1.025; 95% CI: 0.683–1.538; P = 0.905), heart failure (successful PCI vs. failed PCI: 6.1% vs. 2.7%; adjusted HR: 0.281; 95% CI: 0.065–1.206; P = 0.088), target-vessel related MI (successful PCI vs. failed PCI: 1.5% vs. 2.7%; adjusted HR: 1.150; 95% CI: 0.221–5.995; P = 0.868), MACE (successful PCI vs. failed PCI: 44.2% vs. 45.3%; adjusted HR: 1.052; 95% CI: 0.717–1.543; P = 0.797). More patients were free of angina in the successful IS-CTO PCI group compared with failed PCI in the first (80.4% vs. 60%, P < 0.01) and second years (73.3% vs. 60.0%, P = 0.02) following up. Successful IS-CTO PCI had a lower incidence of MACE in the first and second years (20.2% vs. 40.0%, P < 0.01; 27.9% vs. 41.3%, P = 0.023) compared with failed PCI. After a median follow-up of 30 months, the reocclusion rate was 28.5% and TVR was 26.1% in the successful IS-CTO PCI group. Receiving >18 months of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) was an independent predictor of decreased risk of TVR (HR: 2.682; 95% CI: 1.295–5.578; P = 0.008) or MACE (without TVR) (HR: 1.898; 95% CI: 1.036–3.479; P = 0.038) in successful IS-CTO PCI.
Conclusions
After a median follow-up of 30 months, the successful IS-CTO PCI group had MACE similar to that of the failed PCI group. However, the successful IS-CTO PCI group had improved angina symptoms and were free from requiring coronary artery bypass grafting in the first or second years. To decrease MACE, DAPT was found to be essential and recommended for at least 18 months for IS-CTO PCI.
Keywords: In-stent chronic total occlusion, Percutaneous coronary intervention, Predictive factor, Prognosis
Introduction
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for in-stent chronic total occlusion (IS-CTO) accounts for 5% to 25% of all CTOs and is the most difficult and challenging subset of lesions treated using PCI. Due to the development of new equipment and the techniques, IS-CTO PCI has achieved high technical and procedural rates of success (86%).[1] Although clinicians should be pleased with the apparent technological success, such achievements must be translated into long-term patient well-being. Little literature has so far been published on the subject.
As is well known, PCI for non-occlusive in-stent restenosis (ISR) yields worse outcomes than PCI in de novo lesions, even in the era of drug-eluting stents (DES).[2–4] The pre-existed artificial stent structure makes IS-CTO lesion's long-term outcome more pessimistic than de novo CTO reasonably. IS-CTO has been identified as an independent predictor of target-vessel revascularization (TVR).[5] Until now, few reports have been published of clinical long-term outcomes for IS-CTO PCI. It is the aim of the present study to examine the long-term outcomes and predictors of adverse events in PCI for IS-CTO. The results should assist clinicians in taking the most appropriate clinical decisions and improve the long-term outcomes of this challenging patient population.
Methods
Ethical approval
The study complied with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Ethics Committees of two participating centers (Fuwai Hospital and Beijing Anzhen Hospital). All eligible patients provided informed consent for this study before undergoing coronary angiography.
Patient population
The CTO database was retrospectively queried and 474 cases who had undergone PCI for IS-CTO in two participating centers (Chinese Academy of Medical Science National Center for Cardiovascular Disease Fuwai Hospital and Beijing Anzhen Hospital) consecutively from January 2015 to December 2018 were selected. The IS-CTO PCI procedure was based on current PCI recommendations.[6,7] Cases were divided into successful and failed IS-CTO PCI groups, of which detailed clinical and procedural data were collected. Patients had been questioned about their symptoms, angina status (Canadian Cardiovascular Society [CCS] grading of angina pectoris [AP]), and dyspnea class (New York Heart Association functional classification). Follow-up was performed by telephone interviews, a review of hospital records, or in outpatient visits. Information about each patient in the failed PCI and successful PCI groups included which medications had been used, such as antiplatelet, β-blockers, statin lipid-lowering therapy, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), or nitrates. Baseline, procedural, and hospitalization data were recorded for further analysis. The institutional review boards of each of the two participating hospitals approved the study.
Definitions
A CTO was defined as an occluded coronary lesion with thrombosis in the myocardial infarction (MI)-related artery with antegrade blood flow grade thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) 0 and an estimated duration of >3 months. Occlusions located within a previously implanted stent or up to 5 mm from the edge of the stent was defined as IS-CTO.[1]
Technical success in PCI for CTO was defined as successful CTO revascularization with <30% residual stenosis and restoration of antegrade thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow grade 3 in the CTO segment. Procedural success was defined as technical success without any in-hospital adverse events (all-cause death, Q-wave MI, stroke, recurrent angina requiring TVR with PCI, or coronary artery bypass grafting [CABG]). Major procedural complications included: procedure-related death, stroke, periprocedural type 4a MI, major bleeding (bleeding requiring transfusion, vasopressors, surgery, or percutaneous intervention), or coronary perforation with cardiac tamponade requiring intervention (pericardiocentesis, coiling, covered stent implantation, or surgery).
Long-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) was defined as longer than 18 months on DAPT. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at follow-up were defined as recurrent angina pectoris (RAP) (CCS grading), target-vessel MI, heart failure, cardiac death, or ischemia-driven TVR.
AP was defined as typical symptoms with a corresponding change in electrocardiogram or stress test. Symptoms were graded as I to IV using the CCS classification — class I: angina with strenuous exertion; class II: angina with moderate exertion; class III: angina with mild exertion; class IV: angina with any level of physical exertion.
Statistical analysis
Continuous variables are reported as mean ± standard deviation and compared using a Student's t test. Categorical variables are expressed as frequency (percentage) and were tested using a Chi-square test. Event-free survival was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier plots and compared with log-rank tests. Covariates that were significant by univariate analysis or those that were clinically relevant were included in multivariate models. Variable selection was performed by fitting a penalized Cox regression model. The results of this analysis are presented as hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS version 25 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA).
Results
Baseline clinical characteristics
A total of 474 patients were recruited to the study, of which 395 (82.8%) were male. Of the total, 313 (65.6%) had a history of hypertension, 409 (86.3%) had a history of dyslipidemia, 303 (63.9%) were current smokers, and 279 (59%) had a previous MI. A total of 367 patients were successfully treated with PCI and ISO-CTO PCI failed in 107 patients. There were no significant differences between the successful and failed IS-CTO PCI groups with respect to age, the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors, renal function, ejection fraction, previous MI, previous CABG history, procedural complications, or indications for CTO PCI [Table 1]. Both the successful and failed groups received standard medical therapy (MT).
Table 1.
Baseline characteristics of the overall population of PCI.
| Characteristics | Overall (N = 474) | Successful PCI (n = 367) | Failed PCI (n = 107) | Statistical values | P |
| Age (years) | 61.00 ± 10.50 | 60.85 ± 9.97 | 60.72 ± 12.09 | 2.968∗ | 0.910 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 26.40 ± 4.10 | 26.23 ± 4.26 | 27.00 ± 3.51 | 1.024∗ | 0.089 |
| Male | 395 (82.8) | 298 (81.2) | 97 (90.7) | 5.333† | 0.021 |
| EF (%) | 58.30 ± 8.30 | 58.54 ± 8.29 | 57.96 ± 8.50 | 0.577∗ | 0.533 |
| LVEDd (mm) | 50.20 ± 6.20 | 50.05 ± 46.11 | 50.72 ± 6.36 | 0.252∗ | 0.329 |
| TC (mmol/L) | 3.95 ± 1.20 | 4.00 ± 1.21 | 3.75 ± 1.02 | 3.774∗ | 0.045 |
| LDL-C (mmol/L) | 2.18 ± 1.00 | 2.22 ± 1.06 | 2.02 ± 0.92 | 3.103∗ | 0.065 |
| Lipoprotein a (mg/L) | 351.28 ± 336.90 | 361.78 ± 337.53 | 315.58 ± 333.97 | 0.146∗ | 0.228 |
| During of first PCI (years) | 5.70 ± 3.80 | 5.74 ± 3.75 | 5.37 ± 3.46 | 0.694∗ | 0.366 |
| eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) | 0.789† | 0.853 | |||
| eGFR >90 mL/min/1.73 m2 | 367 (76.9) | 281 (65.6) | 81 (76.4) | ||
| eGFR (60–90) mL/min/1.73 m2 | 96 (20.1) | 73 (19.9) | 23 (21.7) | ||
| eGFR (30–60) mL/min/1.73 m2 | 13 (2.7) | 11 (3.0) | 2 (1.9) | ||
| eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 | 1 (0.2) | 1 (0.3) | 0 (0) | ||
| Hypertension | 313 (65.6) | 240 (65.6) | 73 (68.9) | 0.399† | 0.527 |
| Dyslipidemia | 409 (86.3) | 317 (86.4) | 92 (86.0) | 0.011† | 0.917 |
| Diabetes | 162 (34.0) | 122 (33.3) | 40 (37.7) | 0.707† | 0.401 |
| Current smoking | 303 (63.9) | 232 (63.2) | 71 (66.4) | 0.354† | 0.552 |
| Previous MI | 279 (59.0) | 210 (57.4) | 69 (64.5) | 1.730† | 0.188 |
| Previous CABG | 11 (2.3) | 9 (2.5) | 2 (1.9) | 0.118† | 0.731 |
| Prior attempt | 31 (6.6) | 19 (5.2) | 12 (11.2) | 4.905† | 0.027 |
| Dual injection | 28 (5.9) | 22 (6.0) | 6 (5.6) | 0.270† | 0.870 |
| CTO site | |||||
| LAD | 166 (35.2) | 142 (39.0) | 24 (22.4) | 9.961† | 0.002 |
| LCX | 82 (17.4) | 69 (19.0) | 13 (12.1) | 2.664† | 0.103 |
| RCA | 207 (43.9) | 142 (39.0) | 65 (60.7) | 15.861† | 0.000 |
| Branch vessel CTO | 19 (3.5) | 18 (4.9) | 1 (0.9) | 5.333† | 0.000 |
| Occlusion length (mm) | 24.10 ± 20.10 | 17.81 ± 13.27 | 45.54 ± 26.44 | 84.338∗ | 0.000 |
| Prox-cap ambiguity/blunt | 409 (86.3) | 312 (85.0) | 97 (90.7) | 2.228† | 0.136 |
| Prox bifurcation | 46 (9.6) | 18 (4.9) | 28 (26.2) | 42.746† | 0.000 |
| Ostial CTO | 48 (10.1) | 13 (3.5) | 35 (32.7) | 77.445† | 0.000 |
| Good interventional collaterals | 116 (24.5) | 90 (24.5) | 26 (24.3) | 0.002† | 0.962 |
| Proximal bending | 73 (15.4) | 16 (4.4) | 57 (53.3) | 152.118† | 0.000 |
| Moderate or severe tortuosity | 120 (25.3) | 29 (7.9) | 91 (85.0) | 260.770† | 0.000 |
| Underexpansion | 120 (25.3) | 26 (7.1) | 94 (87.9) | 285.825† | 0.000 |
| Poor distal target | 49 (10.3) | 16 (4.4) | 33 (30.8) | 62.680† | 0.000 |
| Success | 367 (77.4) | ||||
| Failure | 107 (22.6) | ||||
| Successful crossing technique | |||||
| Antegrade wire escalation | 455 (96.0) | 354 (96.5) | 101 (99.4) | 0.918† | 0.338 |
| Retrograde wire escalation | 19 (4.0) | 13 (3.5) | 6 (5.6) | 0.918† | 0.338 |
| Use of crossboss | 9 (1.9) | 9 (2.4) | 0 (0.0) | Fisher | 0.219 |
| Use of intravascular ultrasound | 27 (5.7) | 25 (6.8) | 2 (1.9) | 2.904† | 0.088 |
| Type of treatment | |||||
| POBA | 50 (13.6) | ||||
| DEB | 125 (34) | ||||
| DES | 219 (59.7) | ||||
| Contrast volume (mL) | 199.80 ± 72.60 | 202.71 ± 72.15 | 189.91 ± 73.77 | 0.179∗ | 0.111 |
| Total procedural time (min) | 63.40 ± 50.60 | 65.84 ± 51.40 | 55.13 ± 47.08 | 0.188∗ | 0.056 |
| Major procedural complications | |||||
| Side branch loss | 19 (4.0) | 18 (4.9) | 1 (0.9) | 2.440† | 0.118 |
| Low flow | 30 (6.3) | 29 (7.9) | 1 (0.9) | 5.636† | 0.018 |
| Perforation | 4 (0.8) | 2 (0.5) | 2 (1.9) | 0.514† | 0.473 |
| Dissection | 5 (1.0) | 4 (1.1) | 1 (0.9) | 0.000† | 1.000 |
Values are mean ± standard deviation, or n (%).∗F values. †x2 values. PCI: Percutaneous coronary intervention; BMI: Body mass index; LVEDd: Left ventricular end-diastolic diameter; MI: Myocardial infarction; CABG: Coronary artery bypass graft surgery; CTO: Chronic total occlusion; LAD: Left anterior descending coronary artery; LCX: Left circumflex coronary artery; RCA: Right coronary artery; POBA: plain old balloon angioplasty; DEB: Drug-eluting balloon; DES: Drug-eluting stent; EF: Ejection fraction; TC: Total cholesterol.
Baseline angiographic characteristics
The majority of IS-CTOs were located in the right coronary artery (RCA, 43.9%), the left anterior descending artery (LAD, 35.2%), or the left circumflex artery (17.4%). The failed IS-CTO group had a greater number of IS-CTOs in the RCA (P = 0.000) and fewer in the LAD (P = 0.002) than the successful group. No difference was observed in the left ventricular end-diastolic diameter or left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) between the two groups (P > 0.05). The failed PCI group exhibited a longer occlusion length than the successful IS-CTO PCI group (45.54 ± 26.44 vs. 17.81 ± 13.27; P < 0.001), a larger rate of ostial CTO (32.7% vs. 3.5%; P = 0.000), proximal bifurcation (26.2% vs. 4.9%; P < 0.001), moderate or severe tortuosity (85% vs. 7.9%; P < 0.001), proximal bending (53.3% vs. 4.4%; P < 0.001), under expansion (87.9% vs. 7.1%; P < 0.001), poor distal target (30.8% vs. 4.4%; P < 0.001), and higher J scores (2.56 ± 0.71 vs. 2.15 ± 0.88, P < 0.001). No difference was observed in syntax score between the two groups (P = 0.221) [Table 1].
Procedural characteristics
The overall procedural success rate was 77.4%. In all successful IS-CTO PCI procedures, a true-to-true crossing of the occlusion was conducted and in no case did subintimal crushing of the previous stent occur. The most frequent successful crossing strategy (96.0%) was antegrade wire escalation. The retrograde approach is used rarely in IS-CTO patients (4.0%). Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) was relatively infrequently utilized, principally due to its expense and time inefficiency [Table 1].
The incidence of major procedural complications was 12.1%. No deaths, strokes, stent thrombosis, or emergent TVR occurred during hospitalization. Four perforations, 19 cases of side branch loss, 30 of low/no flow, and five of dissection were observed in the successful IS-CTO PCI group. One of four patients with tamponade received pericardiocentesis. No differences were observed between the successful and failed IS-CTO PCI groups regarding side branch loss, perforation, or dissection [Table 1].
Clinical outcomes on follow-up
Follow-up data were available for 411 (86.7%) patients. Median follow-up was 30 months (interquartile range: 17–42 months). In the failed group (n = 92), ten patients received a CABG, due to the patients’ wishes and their unacceptable symptoms of AP, and seven underwent a second PCI within 1 month that was subsequently successful, who were transferred to the successful IS-CTO PCI group (n = 326). In all, 75 cases were assigned to the failed PCI group. They all received standard MT with a prescription for aspirin, clopidogrel/ticagrelor, ACEI, beta-blockers, and statins. There was no difference in MT between the two groups (P > 0.05) [Table 2].
Table 2.
Medication at 30-month follow-up of failed IS-CTO PCI vs. successful IS-CTO PCI groups.
| Medication | Failed PCI (n = 75) | Successful PCI (n = 326) | Statistical values | P value |
| Aspirin (%) | 74 (98.7) | 323 (99.1) | 0.000∗ | 1.000 |
| ADP receptor inhibitor (%) | 10 (13.3) | 75 (23.0) | 0.025∗ | 0.874 |
| ACE-inhibitor or ARB (%) | 52 (70.3) | 225 (69.7) | 0.234∗ | 0.890 |
| Beta-blocker (%) | 63 (84.0) | 296 (82.5) | 3.318∗ | 0.069 |
| Calcium antagonist (%) | 20 (26.7) | 97 (30.1) | 0.839∗ | 0.657 |
| Statin (%) | 75 (100.0) | 324 (99.4) | Fisher | 1.000 |
| Nitrate (%) | 72 (96.0) | 322 (98.8) | 1.356∗ | 0.244 |
x2 values. IS-CTO: In-stent chronic total occlusion; PCI: Percutaneous coronary intervention; ADP: Adenosine diphosphate; ACE: Angiotensin-converting enzyme; ARB: Angiotensin receptor blocker.
Kaplan-Meier analysis of MACE-free survival curves of the failed and successful IS-CTO PCI groups is displayed in Figure 1. The plots crossed at 36 months with an HR value of 1.052 (95% CI: 0.717–1.543; P = 0.797).
Figure 1.

Long-term MACE. Kaplan-Meier curves for MACE; hazard ratios and P values are derived from Cox proportional hazard methods. CI: Confidence interval; HR: Hazard ratio; MACE: Major adverse cardiac events; PCI: Percutaneous coronary intervention.
Clinical outcomes on follow-up are displayed in Table 3. No significant differences were observed in the following parameters between the two groups: cardiac death (failed vs. successful PCI: 2.7% vs. 0.9%; adjusted HR: 1.442; 95% CI: 0.21–9.887; P = 0.709), RAP (failed vs. successful PCI: 40% vs. 40.8%; HR: 1.025; 95% CI: 0.683–1.538; P = 0.905), heart failure (failed vs. successful PCI: 2.7% vs. 6.1%; HR: 0.281; 95% CI: 0.065–1.206; P = 0.088), target-vessel related MI (failed vs. successful PCI: 2.7% vs. 1.5%; HR: 1.150; 95% CI: 0.221–5.995; P = 0.868), and MACE (failed vs. successful PCI: 45.3% vs. 44.2%; HR: 1.052; 95% CI: 0.717–1.543; P = 0.797). In the IS-CTO PCI group, reocclusion occurred in 28.5% of cases and TVR in 26.1%. Over the following 30 months, 12 cases in the successful PCI group received CABG due to restenosis/reocclusion. The incidence of MACE in the failed PCI (n = 75), successful IS-CTO PCI (n = 326), and CABG (n = 22) groups was 45.3%, 44.2%, and 13.6%, respectively.
Table 3.
Clinical outcomes of patients with in-stent chronic total occlusion on follow-up n (%).
| Clinical outcomes | Failed PCI (n = 75) | Successful PCI (n = 326) | Adjusted HR (95% CI) | P |
| Major adverse cardiac events | 34 (45.3) | 144 (44.2) | 1.052 (0.717–1.530) | 0.797 |
| Angina | 30 (40.0) | 133 (40.8) | 1.025 (0.683–1.538) | 0.905 |
| Re-infarction | 2 (2.7) | 5 (1.5) | 1.150 (0.221–5.995) | 0.868 |
| Heart failure | 2 (2.7) | 20 (6.1) | 0.281 (0.065–1.206) | 0.088 |
| Cardiac mortality | 2 (2.7) | 3 (0.9) | 1.442 (0.21–9.887) | 0.709 |
| Restenosis/re-occlusion | 93 (28.5) | |||
| TVR | 85 (26.1) |
Major adverse cardiac events adjusted covariates: age, BMI, sex, prior MI, CABG, LVEF, eGFR, dyslipidemia, diabetes, hypertension, smaller vessel diameter, long-term DAPT, CTO site. Angina adjusted covariates: age, dyslipidemia, diabetes, hypertension, long-term DAPT. Re-infarction adjusted covariates: age, dyslipidemia, diabetes, hypertension, long-term DAPT. Heart failure adjusted covariates: age, sex, hypertension, prior MI, LVEF, LVEDd, eGFR, CTO site. Cardiac mortality adjusted covariates: age, sex, prior MI, CABG, LVEF, eGFR, CTO site, long-term DAPT. Values are n (%). PCI: Percutaneous coronary intervention; HR: Hazard ratio; CI: Confidence interval; TVR: Target-vessel revascularization; BMI: Body mass index; MI: Myocardial infarction; CABG: Coronary artery bypass graft surgery; LVEF: Left ventricular ejection fraction; DAPT: Dual antiplatelet therapy; CTO: Chronic total occlusion; LVEDd: Left ventricular end-diastolic diameter.
Multivariate predictors of restenosis/reocclusion are displayed in Table 4 on follow-up. Long-term DAPT therapy was an independent predictor of decreased restenosis/reocclusion (HR: 2.682; 95% CI: 1.295–5.578; P = 0.008). Small vessels (HR: 0.588; 95% CI: 0.348–0.995; P = 0.048), being female (HR: 0.506; 95% CI: 0.309–0.829; P = 0.007), and a higher body mass index (BMI) (HR: 1.053; 95% CI: 1.007–1.102; P = 0.025) were independent predictors of restenosis/reocclusion. Long-term DAPT remained independently associated with decreasing MACE (not driven by TVR) (HR: 1.898; 95% CI: 1.036–3.479; P = 0.038). Prior CABG was independently associated with MACE (not driven by TVR) (HR: 0.204; 95% CI: 0.062–0.673; P = 0.009). Figure 2 presents the adjusted 3-year survival curves from TVR. Patients prescribed long-term DAPT had a >2-fold decreased risk of TVR with no major bleeding events throughout follow-up.
Table 4.
Multivariable Cox proportional analysis for predictors of restenosis/re-occlusion on follow-up.
| Model | Adjusted HR | 95% CI | P value |
| Female | 0.506 | 0.309–0.829 | 0.007 |
| BMI | 1.053 | 1.007–1.102 | 0.025 |
| Smaller vessel diameter | 0.588 | 0.348–0.995 | 0.048 |
| Long-term DAPT | 2.682 | 1.295–5.578 | 0.008 |
Hazard ratios and P values were calculated from Cox proportional hazard methods. Adjusted covariates: age, prior MI, LVEF, eGFR, dyslipidemia, diabetes. HR: Hazard ratio; CI: Confidence interval; BMI: Body mass index; DAPT: Dual antiplatelet therapy; LVEF: Left ventricular ejection fraction; MI: Myocardial infarction.
Figure 2.

Long-term outcome of IS-CTO PCI. Kaplan-Meier curves for TVR, for patients with and without long-term DAPT; hazard ratios and P values are derived from Cox proportional hazard methods. CI: Confidence interval; DAPT: Dual antiplatelet therapy; HR: Hazard ratio; IS-CTO: In-stent chronic total occlusion; PCI: Percutaneous coronary intervention; TVR: Target-vessel revascularization.
Discussion
The principal findings of the present study were as follows. (1) The long-term outcomes of successful IS-CTO PCI showed a surprisingly high incidence of MACE (44.2%) and traceable restenosis and reocclusion (28.5%) after a median follow-up of 30 months. (2) Angina and MACE in the successful IS-CTO PCI group occurred significantly less frequently than in the failed PCI group in the first and second years. Over the first and second years, successful IS-CTO PCI improved symptoms of angina and reduced the need for coronary artery bypass grafting. (3) More than 18 months of DAPT decreased MACE in IS-CTO PCI.
IS-CTOs constitute 5% to 25% of all PCIs for CTO[8–11] and so are frequently observed during PCI procedures. Although IS-CTO is apparently different from de novo CTO due to the artificial implanted stent structure, clinicians rarely treat them differently. The long-term outcomes of IS-CTO are as yet unknown, and so this is the focus of the present study.
After a median follow-up of 30 months, the successful IS-CTO PCI group had a surprisingly high rate of MACE (44.2%) and traceable restenosis and reocclusion (28.5%). Azzalini et al[5] reported that over a 15-month follow-up period, MACE were observed in 20.8% vs. 13.9%; P = 0.07 in the IS-CTO group compared with the de novo group and driven by TVR (16.7% vs. 9.4%; P = 0.03), where IS-CTO was found to be an independent predictor of MACE. Indeed, we found a similar incidence of MACE after 15 months [Figure 1]. Traceable restenosis and reocclusion occurred in 28.5%, without considering asymptomatic ISR or reocclusion, suggesting that almost one-third of the benefit of IS-CTO PCI had disappeared by month 30.
Kaplan-Meier curve analysis, as shown in Figure 1, demonstrated that the MACE-free survival curves in the two groups apparently separated during the first year following treatment. Significantly, more patients with MACE were in the failed PCI group. But after nearly 1-year, MACE in the successful IS-CTO group increased rapidly. By the 36th month, the two curves crossed, after which the MACE in the successful IS-CTO PCI group increased even more rapidly than the failed PCI group. After a median follow-up of 30 months, no difference in cardiac death was observed (0.9% vs. 2.7%; P = 0.709) between the successful and failed IS-CTO PCI groups. de la Torre Hernandez et al[12] also reported that after a median follow-up of 20 months, cardiac death in failed vs. successful groups was 8.3% and 3%, respectively (P = 0.09). They observed no difference between the successful and failed IS-CTO PCI groups for long-term mortality, in support of the findings in the present study.
In the successful IS-CTO group in the present study, the recanalization of the IS-CTO instantly mitigated ischemia, relieving the symptoms of angina. As time passed, more patients presented symptoms of angina. After a median follow-up of 30 months, no differences in reports of angina between the failed and successful IS-CTO groups were found (40% vs. 40.8%; HR: 1.025; 95% CI: 0.683–1.538; P = 0.905). The current guidelines for myocardial revascularization recommend that treatment for CTO should be considered depending on symptoms or objective evidence of myocardial viability/ischemia in the territory of the occluded artery.[13] Improvement in symptoms is considered the principal benefit of CTO PCI. The present study found no difference in heart failure (2.7% vs. 6.1%; P = 0.088) or target-vessel MI (2.7% vs. 1.5%; P = 0.868) between the failed and successful IS-CTO PCI groups.
The benefits of CTO PCI are controversial. A number of observational, uncontrolled studies have suggested that successful CTO PCI can improve angina, dyspnea, depression, capacity for exercise, and risk of arrhythmias. The OPEN-CTO trial reported that a great improvement in the Seattle Angina Questionnaire subscales was observed in successful vs. unsuccessful procedures (P < 0.001). An Italian multi-center registry reported that of 1777 patients with CTOs, 1-year follow-up examinations indicated that PCI (43.7%), MT (46.5%), or surgery (9.8%) were performed, with rates of cardiac death of 1.4% vs. 4.7% and 6.3% P < 0.001, and MACE was 2.6% vs. 8.2% and 6.9%; P < 0.001, respectively, significantly lower in the PCI group than for MT or CABG.[14]
Conversely, long-term outcomes for CTO in randomized controlled trials are suboptimal. The EXPLORE trial failed to find any differences in LVEF between the two groups and demonstrated that there were more patients free from angina in the CTO-PCI arm after 1 year (94% vs. 87%, P = 0.03).[15] The DECISION-CTO trial demonstrated no difference in the primary composite endpoint of MACE after 3 years (all-cause mortality, MI, stroke, repeat revascularization) between PCI and MT groups, suggesting that MT was not inferior to PCI as an initial strategy (NCT01078051).
In conclusion, the studies described above showed, in the short-term, that PCI is effective in relieving the symptoms of CTO, but over the long-term, especially after 30 months, all indices revert to their original trend, consistent with the findings in the present study. The decision of approach to IS-CTO should include the evaluation of symptoms, ischemic burden, and myocardial viability. In asymptomatic CTO patients with no available viability data, MT is strongly recommended, while PCI or CABG are preferred for symptomatic patients or asymptomatic patients with proven viability issues.
In the present study, CABG exhibited a low incidence of MACE, 13.6%. CABG should be considered as an initial treatment option for IS-CTO patients with significant concomitant LM disease, multivessel disease, more complex coronary artery disease, or a high SYNTAX score. CABG may reduce the risk of TVR and provide complete arterial revascularization.
The present study also demonstrated that in the IS-CTO PCI group, TVR was 26.1%. It can be reasonably inferred that a patient's biological factors that caused the first in-stent occlusion may be triggered once again where a fresh stent is implanted in the same lesion. These factors may include abnormal local morphology inflammatory reaction, adverse reactions to stent polymers, antiplatelet drug resistance, under expansion/malposition, or the presence of other immune diseases, etc. The high risk of TVR was also correlated with lower utilization of IVUS or OCT. A meta-analysis of randomized trials indicated that after a mean of 15 months, routine IVUS-guided PCI could reduce the risk of MACE (6.5% vs. 10.3%; odds ratio: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.46–0.77; P < 0.0001), principally because of a reduction in the risk of TVR (4.1% vs. 6.6%; odds ratio: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.43–0.84; P = 0.003).[16]
The practical challenges of how to achieve a balanced platelet inhibition and reduce the incidence of bleeding or other adverse events have been discussed.[17] Campo et al[18] reported that patients undergoing a PCI procedure for ISR may benefit from long-term administration of aspirin plus clopidogrel. Additionally, the present study indicated that the administration of >18 months of DAPT could independently decrease MACE (driven by TVR and not driven by TVR). Our adjusted analysis indicated that >18 months of DAPT was an independent predictor of decreased TVR (HR: 2.682; 95% CI: 1.295–5.578; P = 0.008), small vessels were an independent predictor of restenosis/reocclusion (HR: 0.588; 95% CI: 0.348–0.995; P = 0.048), in addition to being female (HR: 0.506; 95% CI: 0.309–0.829; P = 0.007), and having a higher BMI (HR: 1.053; 95% CI: 1.007–1.102; P = 0.025). Additionally, >18 months of DAPT was found to decrease the risk of MACE for IS-CTO PCI. Rathore and Kaul[18] reported that small vessel (<3 mm) coronary artery disease is common and was identified as an independent predictor of restenosis following PCI. The present study also indicated that prior CABG was an independent predictor of MACE (not driven by TVR) on follow-up. Azzalini et al[5] reported that previous CABG was an independent risk factor of MACE on follow-up for IS-CTO PCI. A number of novel findings were achieved in the present study.
Study limitations
The following were limitations of the present study. (1) This was a retrospective observational study rather than a randomized clinical trial. (2) The number of patients included was relatively small compared with other de novo CTO studies. (3) Operator-related bias could have affected the assessment of angiographic parameters due to the absence of quantitative analysis to some degree. (4) IVUS was not utilized in many cases due to cost and efficiency, not optimal for the outcome of IS-CTO PCI.
Conclusions
After a median follow-up of 30 months, a similar number of MACE were observed in the successful IS-CTO PCI group compared with the failed PCI group. However, successful IS-CTO PCI improved symptoms of angina and reduced coronary artery bypass grafting during the first and second years. To decrease MACE, DAPT was essential and recommended for at least 18 months for IS-CTO PCI patients.
Conflicts of interest
None.
Footnotes
How to cite this article: Gong ML, Mao Y, Liu JH. Long-term outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for in-stent chronic total occlusion. Chin Med J 2021;134:302–308. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000001289
References
- 1.Christopoulos G, Karmpaliotis D, Alaswad K, Lombardi WL, Grantham JA, Rangan BV, et al. The efficacy of “hybrid” percutaneous coronary intervention in chronic total occlusions caused by in-stent restenosis: insights from a US multicenter registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2014; 84:646–651. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mehilli J, Byrne RA, Tiroch K, Pinieck S, Schulz S, Kufner S, et al. Randomized trial of paclitaxel- versus sirolimus-eluting stents for treatment of coronary restenosis in sirolimus-eluting stents: the ISAR-DESIRE 2 (intracoronary stenting and angiographic results: drug eluting stents for in-stent restenosis 2) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 55:2710–2716. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Song HG, Park DW, Kim YH, Ahn JM, Kim WJ, Lee JY, et al. Randomized trial of optimal treatment strategies for in-stent restenosis after drug-eluting stent implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 59:1093–1100. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.11.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Zheng JF, Guo TT, Tian Y, Wang Y, Hu XY, Chang Y, et al. Clinical characteristics of early and late drug-eluting stent in-stent restenosis and mid-term prognosis after repeated percutaneous coronary intervention. Chin Med J 2020; 133:2674–2681. doi: 10.1097/cm9.0000000000001135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Azzalini L, Dautov R, Ojeda S, Benincasa S, Bellini B, Giannini F, et al. Procedural and long-term outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for in-stent chronic total occlusion. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2017; 10:892–902. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.01.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, Bailey SR, Bittl JA, Cercek B, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. Circulation 2011; 124:e574–651. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31823ba622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wijns W, Kolh P, Danchin N, Di mario C, Falk V, Folliguet T, et al. Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology; the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery; European Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J 2010; 31:2501–2555. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq277.20802248 [Google Scholar]
- 8.Abbas AE, Brewington SD, Dixon SR, Boura J, Grines CL, O’Neill WW. Success, safety, and mechanisms of failure of percutaneous coronary intervention for occlusive non-drug-eluting in-stent restenosis versus native artery total occlusion. Am J Cardiol 2005; 95:1462–1466. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.01.098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.William MW, Simon JJW, Colm GH, Julian William S, Jonathan H, James S, et al. A novel approach to the management of occlusive in-stent restenosis (ISR). EuroIntervention 2014; 9:1285–1293. doi: 10.4244/EIJV9I11A218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Werner GS, Moehlis H, Tischer K. Management of total restenotic occlusions. EuroIntervention 2009; 5: Suppl D: D79–D83. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Abdel-Karim A-RR, Lombardi WB, Banerjee S, Brilakis ES. Contemporary outcomes of percutaneous intervention in chronic total coronary occlusions due to in-stent restenosis. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 2011; 12:170–176. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2010.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.de la Torre Hernandez JM, Rumoroso JR, Subinas A, Gonzalo N, Ojeda S, Pan M, et al. Percutaneous intervention in chronic total coronary occlusions caused by in-stent restenosis: procedural results and long-term clinical outcomes in the TORO (Spanish registry of chronic TOtal occlusion secondary to an occlusive in-stent RestenOsis) multicentre registry. EuroIntervention 2017; 13:e219–e226. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-16-00764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, Alfonso F, Banning AP, Benedetto U, et al. 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Kardiol Pol 2018; 76:1585–1664. doi: 10.5603/kp.2018.0228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Tomasello SD, Boukhris M, Giubilato S, Marzà F, Garbo R, Contegiacomo G, et al. Management strategies in patients affected by chronic total occlusions: results from the Italian Registry of Chronic Total Occlusions. Eur Heart J 2015; 36:3189–3198. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Elias J, van Dongen IM, Ramunddal T, Laanmets P, Eriksen E, Meuwissen M, et al. Long-term impact of chronic total occlusion recanalisation in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Heart 2018; 104:1432–1438. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2017-312698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Elgendy IY, Mahmoud AN, Elgendy AY, Bavry AA. Outcomes with intravascular ultrasound-guided stent implantation: a meta-analysis of randomized trials in the era of drug-eluting stents. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2016; 9:e003700.doi: 10.1161/circinterventions.116.003700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Han YL. De-escalation of anti-platelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a narrative review. Chin Med J 2019; 132:197–210. doi: 10.1097/cm9.0000000000000047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Campo G, Tebaldi M, Vranckx P, Biscaglia S, Tumscitz C, Ferrari R, et al. Short- versus long-term duration of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients treated for in-stent restenosis: a PRODIGY trial substudy (Prolonging Dual Antiplatelet Treatment After Grading Stent-Induced Intimal Hyperplasia). J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 63:506–512. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.09.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
