Abstract
Peritoneal dialysis (PD) possesses multiple advantages for end stage renal disease. However, long-term PD triggers peritoneal fibrosis (PF). From the nationwide analysis of diabetic PD patients (n = 19,828), we identified the incidence of PD failure was significantly lower in diabetic patients treated with dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) inhibitors. Experimental study further showed high concentration of glucose remarkably enhanced DPP4 to promote epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in the mesothelial cells. In chlorhexidine gluconate (CG)-induced PF model of rats, DPP4 expression was enriched at thickening peritoneum. Moreover, as to CG-induced PF model, DPP4 deficiency (F344/DuCrlCrlj strain), sitagliptin and exendin-4 treatments significantly inhibited DPP4 to reverse the EMT process, angiogenesis, oxidative stress, and inflammation, resulting in the protection from PF, preservation of peritoneum and the corresponding functional integrity. Furthermore, DPP4 activity was significantly correlated with peritoneal dysfunction. Taken together, DPP4 caused peritoneal dysfunction/PF, whereas inhibition of DPP4 protected the PD patients against PD failure.
Subject terms: Mechanisms of disease, Peritoneal dialysis, End-stage renal disease, Translational research
Li et al. show that dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) promotes peritoneal fibrosis whereas the inhibition of DPP4 protects the patients from failure of peritoneal dialysis. This study provides mechanistic insights into the effects of DPP4 on peritoneal fibrosis and the translational potential of these effects.
Introduction
The incidence and prevalence rates of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) keep on increasing and have been emerged as a global health burden1. Studies have further demonstrated the overall mortality rate of ESRD patients is unacceptably high with an estimation of up to 15–30% per year2. Among the ESRD patients, renal transplantation has been reported to possess the better long-term survival outcome as compared to that of peritoneal dialysis (PD) or conventional hemodialysis (HD) patients. However, not every ESRD patient has the chance or as a candidate for receiving renal transplantation3. Available data have reported that PD is currently utilized by ~270,000 ESRD patients worldwide, representing ~12% of the total dialysis population1,4,5. Compared with conventional HD patients, PD patients have a higher survival rate during the first 2 years of dialysis treatment and a better quality of life6. However, 20% of PD patients are finally turned to receive conventional HD (defined as PD failure) because of loss of functional integrity of peritoneal ultrafiltration affected by several unfavorable factors7,8. In fact, the success of PD is mainly dependent on the structural and functional integrity of the peritoneal membrane9. The peritoneal membrane, a rather simple histological ultrastructure, contains a superficial epithelial-like cell layer (i.e., the mesothelium) attached to a basement membrane. Beneath the basement membrane is a submesothelial layer which consists of the connective tissue, fibroblasts, and blood vessels10,11.
During PD, the peritoneal membrane acts as an endogenous dialyzing membrane by the permeability of peritoneal capillaries. Across this membrane, waste products diffuse into the dialysate that is usually glucose-containing fluid with solute transport capacity. Commercialized PD solutions are composed of acidic pH, high-glucose concentration, and high osmolality, resulting in generation of glucose degradation products (i.e., a by-product during standard sterilization), and in further jeopardizing the peritoneal architectural integrity12. In this chemically gradient situation, the excess body fluid is removed by osmosis13. Nevertheless, the phenomena of angiogenesis, vascular degeneration, and peritoneal fibrosis (PF), i.e., so-called peritoneal ultrastructural and functional damages, frequently induced by long-term exposure to PD solution, are closely associated with increased solute transport and decreased ultrafiltration capacity in ~50% of all PD patients14–16.
Dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP4) is a 110-kDa type II integral membrane glycoprotein with serine peptidase activity to degrade incretins such as glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), and is widely expressed on the surface of various cell types, endothelial cells, kidney epithelial cells, immune cells, and mesothelial cells17–21. There are two kinds of incretin-based therapies for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, i.e., DPP4 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist22. The DPP4 inhibitor has been recommended as one of the most preferable option among oral hypoglycemic agents23. Of particular importance is that DPP4 inhibitor has been proved to exert cytoprotective effects, such as anti-inflammatory24,25, antifibrotic26, and antiapoptotic effects27. Thus, DPP4 inhibitor has pleiotropic effects beyond hypoglycemic effect. Basic research has recently demonstrated that an interaction between DPP4 and integrin β1 would initially elicit the endothelial cells into endothelial–mesenchymal transition (EndMT) (i.e., a morphological and functional changes) and finally into fibrosis through activating Smad-3 pathway in kidney injury28. On the other hand, inhibition of DPP4 activity possesses antifibrotic effects and provides renoprotection29.
Interestingly, our previous study demonstrated that DPP4 enzyme deficiency protected kidney against acute ischemia-reperfusion injury25. In addition, the other report showed the prevention of DPP4 inhibitor in PF of mice, but it did not explore DPP4 expression or activity during PF30. So far, it has still lacked a direct evidence to address the pathogenic roles and molecular mechanisms of DPP4 involving in peritoneal pathogenesis. Furthermore, the effective protection of DPP4 inhibitors in clinical PD patients is unclear. Therefore, we first analyzed a 17-year observational data from Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database to explore whether DPP4 inhibitor could inhibit chronic PD-induced peritoneal fibrosis and further reduce the rate of PD failure. Since the roles of DPP4 in the peritoneal pathogenesis have been not yet clearly established, we subsequently examined the cellular and molecular mechanisms of DPP4 on peritoneal fibrosis and the role of incretin-based therapies on protecting the peritoneum against fibrosis by using in vitro and peritoneal-fibrosis animal model.
Results
DPP4 inhibitors reduced the incidence of PD transition to HD
First, we examined the nationwide registered data and studied the incidence of PD transition to HD (i.e., defined as PD failure) among ESRD patients who had regularly received different kinds of DPP4 inhibitor for controlling type 2 diabetes. Table 1 shows the prevalence of user of DPP4 inhibitor was about 10% of patients with ESRD, with a similar prevalence of utilizing this medication among patients in PD, HD, and RT (Table 1). Of note, the rate of conversion of PD to HD was significantly lower in diabetic patients than in those without receiving DPP4 inhibitors (Table 2).
Table 1.
Users of DPP4i | Nonusers of DPP4i | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
N | % | N | % | |
All cases of ESRD (N = 174686) | 16,048 | 9.2 | 158,638 | 90.8 |
PD (N = 19828) | 2150 | 10.8 | 17,678 | 89.2 |
HD (N = 171266) | 15,634 | 9.1 | 155,632 | 90.9 |
RT (N = 6787) | 771 | 11.4 | 6016 | 88.6 |
DPP4i dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, ESRD end-stage renal disease, PD peritoneal dialysis, HD hemodialysis, RT renal transplantation, N number, % percentage.
Table 2.
Users of DPP4i (N = 541) | Nonusers of DPP4i (N = 6449) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
PD transition to HD | N | % | N | % | P-value |
Yes | 177 | 32.7 | 3393 | 52.6 | <0.0001 |
No | 364 | 67.3 | 3056 | 47.4 |
DPP4i dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, ESRD end-stage renal disease, PD peritoneal dialysis, HD hemodialysis, RT renal transplantation, N number, % percentage.
Among all types of antidiabetic drugs listed in Table 3, those diabetic ESRD patients receiving PD and DPP4 inhibitor had the lowest rate of PD transition to HD (Table 3). On the contrary, about one-half of ESRD patients who were administered with other antidiabetic drugs suffered from PD catheter failure at the end of study, implying DPP4 inhibitor offered a better protective effect against peritoneal sclerosis or fibrosis compared to other non-DPP4 inhibitors antidiabetic drugs (Tables 2 and 3).
Table 3.
Number and percentage of antidiabetic drugs used in ESRD on PD (N = 6990) | Rate of PD transition to HD (N = 3570) | Comparison to DPP4 inhibitor | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Antidiabetic drugs | N | % | N | % | P-value |
Insulin | 1813 | 25.9 | 916 | 50.5 | <0.0001 |
Sulfonylurea (SFU) | 938 | 13.4 | 475 | 50.6 | <0.0001 |
Meglitinide (GLN) | 825 | 11.8 | 397 | 48.1 | <0.0001 |
TZD | 434 | 6.2 | 220 | 50.7 | <0.0001 |
AGI | 332 | 4.8 | 166 | 50.0 | <0.0001 |
DPP4 inhibitor | 541 | 7.7 | 177 | 32.7 | – |
PD peritoneal dialysis, HD emodialysis, ESRD end-stage renal disease, N number, % percentage.
Sulfonylureas: Gliclazide, Glimepiride, Glyburide, etc.; Meglitinides: Nateglinide, Repaglinide; Thiazolidinediones (TZD): Pioglitazone, Rosiglitazone; Alpha-glucosidases inhibitor (AGI): Acarbose; Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) inhibitors: Linagliptin, Saxagliptin, Sitagliptin, Alogliptin, Vildagliptin.
Glucose exposure upregulated DPP4, promoted EMT process, and enhanced inflammation, respectively, via activation of SMAD3 and NFκB pathway in mesothelial cells
Previous reports have demonstrated that the majoring of ESRD patients’ peritoneal fibrosis was caused by the long-term exposure of PD solution, resulted in a histopathological phenomenon of mesothelial cells underwent epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) process31,32. Accordingly, to further explore the role of DPP4 and potential mechanism in peritoneal fibrosis, we investigated the molecular changes of mesothelial cells on a stepwise increment of glucose exposure.
Consistent with previous reports31,32, our results demonstrated that as glucose concentration increased, the morphology of mesothelial cells transformed from cobble stone shapes to fibroblast-liked structure in a glucose concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 1a). The western blot result showed that the protein level of DPP4 was significantly progressively increased with stepwise increased glucose concentration, whereas protein expression of GLP-1 exhibited an opposite pattern of DPP4 in the similar situation (Fig. 1b). In addition, glucose exposure activated p-SMAD3 (Fig. 1b), which in turn, upregulated the snail level, followed by increasing the mesenchymal markers (i.e., type I collagen, fibronectin, α-SMA, vimentin, Twist) but decreasing the epithelial marker (Zonula occludens-1, ZO-1). All of these findings shared glucose-dependent trends (Fig. 1c, Supplementary Fig. 1).
Furthermore, glucose exposure also enhanced NFκB pathway and generated oxidative stresses (NOX-1 and NOX-2) (Fig. 1d). In contrast, glucose exposure suppressed the enzymes of clearing oxidative stress such as SOD1 and NQO1 (i.e., antioxidant enzyme) (Fig. 1d). Our finding reveals high concentration of glucose exposure, a major component of PD solution, triggered DPP4 induction, underwent EMT process, and generated inflammation and oxidative stress.
Sitagliptin and exendin-4 treatments suppressed glucose-induced DPP4 expression, EMT processing, inflammation, and oxidative stress in mesothelial cells
In the incretin-based therapies, both sitagliptin (DPP4 inhibitor) and exendin-4 (GLP-1 receptor agonist) are widely used to treat DM with glucose-lowering and anti-inflammatory effects22,33. Sitagliptin is a tight binding DPP4 inhibitor; exendin-4 is an analog of GLP-1 originally found from the venom of Gila monster with a long half-life, which was also a peptide agonist of the GLP receptor. To evaluate the protective effects of incretin-based therapies against glucose-induced cellular damage, we performed glucose exposure of mesothelial cells with sitagliptin or exendin-4 treatment. Interestingly, both sitagliptin and exendin-4 significantly reversed glucose-induced mesothelial cells into fibroblast-liked morphologies (Figs. 2a, 3a). During EMT process, the changes of cellular morphology correspond with reorganization of filamentous actin (F-actin). Glucose exposure promoted phalloidin-labeled F-actin to form actin stress fibers in the mesothelial cells, but sitagliptin and exendin-4 suppressed the formation of actin stress fibers (Supplementary Fig. 3). Also, sitagliptin and exendin-4 treatments further inhibited the protein expressions of DPP4, soluble DPP4 activity, p-SMAD3, and snail in glucose-exposure situation (Figs. 2b, e, 3b, e, Supplementary Fig. 2a-b).
Furthermore, sitagliptin treatment significantly restored the protein level of GLP-1 during glucose exposure (Fig. 2b), whereas exendin-4 treatment did not exhibit this effect as Sitagliptin (Fig. 3b). On the other hand, the glucose-upregulated protein expressions of mesenchymal markers (type I collagen, fibronectin, vimentin, and α-SMA) were significantly diminished by sitagliptin and exendin-4 treatments (Figs. 2c, f, 3c, f). Consistent with sitagliptin, DPP4 knockdown inhibited the glucose-inducing DPP4 elevation, TGFβ/SMAD3 pathway, and downstream signaling (Supplementary Fig. 4).
On the other hand, sitagliptin and exendin-4 suppressed glucose-induced protein expression of NFκB and NOX-1, and augmented the protein expressions of SOD1 and NQO1 (Figs. 2d,g, 3d, g), indicating sitagliptin and exendin-4 treatments protected mesothelial cells against glucose-induced cellular damage.
DPP4 deficiency, sitagliptin, and exendin-4 comparably protected peritoneum against CG-induced PF in rats
To clarify DPP4 role involving in PF in vivo, we next established an experimental model of PF induced by chlorhexidine gluconate (CG) for 21 days in wild-type (i.e., Fischer 344) and DPP4 deficient rats. In sham-control (SC) group, the normal mesothelium was shown as a simple slim layer with positively stained WT-1 attached to connective tissue outside which was obviously detected by immunofluorescent staining (Fig. 4a). On the other hand, submesothelial region thickened and the formation of PF along with DPP4 upregulation in the proliferated peritoneal membrane was clearly identified in CG-treated animals (Fig. 4a, Supplementary Fig. 5).
We further performed H&E staining and Masson trichrome staining to evaluate the morphological feature and severity of fibrosis in the peritoneal membranes, respectively (Fig. 4b, c). Compared to the SC group of F344 animals, the thickness length and area of PF were significantly increased up to 4-fold values in CG-treated F344 rats (p < 0.001). In this way, the thickness of PF was substantially reduced (i.e., at least 50%) in DPP4 deficient rats as compared with those of F344 wild-type counterparts in the same condition of CG treatment (Fig. 4c, d, f), suggesting genetic DPP4 deficiency protected peritoneum against CG-induced PF in rodents. In addition, CG-induced peritoneal thickening (i.e., up to 50%) was significantly suppressed in wild-type rats with than without sitagliptin and exendin-4 treatments, once again, indicating an essential role of sitagliptin and exendin-4 treatments on ameliorating the CG-induced PF (Fig. 4b, c, e, g).
DPP4 deficiency, sitagliptin, and exendin-4 reversed CG-induced EMT process via Smad-3 signaling pathway
To clarify whether DPP4 participating in EMT process in vivo, we further examined the peritoneal expression of type I collagen, a mesenchymal marker, by immunohistochemical analysis. As expected, microscopic findings demonstrated that the thickness of positively stained type I collagen was significantly increased in PF-F344 group as compared with SC group of wild-type rats, and that was significantly reduced in PF-DPP4 deficient rats (Fig. 5a, b). Meanwhile, the protein level of DPP4 in the peritoneal membrane was significantly enhanced to 4-folds in PF-F344 group as compared with SC-F344 group that was decreased in PF-DPP4 deficient rats again (Fig. 5d).
In situation of peritoneal fibrosis, TGF-β/SMAD3 signaling axis has been recognized to mediate EMT process34,35. The results of the present study also displayed the significant upregulations of type I collagen, TGF-β, SMAD3, and Twist in PF-344 group (Fig. 5d, Supplementary Fig. 1). On the other hand, DPP4 deficiency significantly not only suppressed CG-induced protein expression of DPP4 but also downregulated the mesenchymal marker (i.e., type I collagen) and TGF-β/SMAD3 signaling axis (Fig. 5d, f), suggesting DPP4 deficiency alleviated CG-induced PF mainly via reversing EMT process mediated SMAD3 signaling pathway. Similarly, both sitagliptin and exendin-4 significantly inhibited CG-induced the thickness of type I collagen, DPP4 upregulation, and EMT process in peritoneum (Fig. 5a, c, e, g).
DPP4 deficiency, sitagliptin, and exendin-4 ameliorated CG-induced angiogenesis and inflammation by suppressing NF-κB/MyD88 signaling
Angiogenesis and inflammation, two most common complications in PD patients, contribute to progressively peritoneal remodeling and the event of ultrafiltration failure36,37. The immunofluorescent stain exhibited that vessel number was significantly increased in PF-F344 group than in SC-F344 group, and that was reversed in PF-DPP4 deficient group (Fig. 6a, b), suggesting DPP4 deficiency suppressed CG-induced peritoneal angiogenesis. Furthermore, the number of CD45+ cells, an indicator of inflammatory leukocytes infiltrated in peritoneum, was significantly increased in PF-F344 animals than in SC-F344 group, whereas this parameter was reduced in PF-DPP4 deficient group compared with PF-344 group (Fig. 6d, e).
It is well known that the transcription factor NF-κB activation through MyD88 signaling serves as a critical mediator of inflammatory response38,39. Consistent with the leukocyte infiltration in CG-induced PF condition, the protein levels of phosphorylated (p)-NF-κB and MyD88 were significantly higher in the peritoneum of PF-344 group than in SC-F344 group. In addition, NOX-1, an indicator of oxidative stress, was also upregulated in the peritoneum of PF-F344 animals (Fig. 6g, i). However, DPP4 deficiency significantly inhibited the levels of p-NF-κB, MyD88, and NOX-1, implying DPP4 deficiency blocked the NF-κB/MyD88 signaling activation, inflammation, and the generation of oxidative stress (Fig. 6g, i).
Moreover, both sitagliptin and exendin-4 treatments significantly diminished CG-induced angiogenesis and leukocytes infiltration in peritoneum (Fig. 6a, c, d, f). On the other hand, sitagliptin and exendin-4 significantly downregulated the NF-κB/MyD88 signaling activation which further reduced the inflammation and oxidative stress (Fig. 6h, j).
DPP4 deficiency, sitagliptin, and exendin-4 reduced the functional impairments of peritoneal membrane with peritoneal fibrosis in rats
To assess the functional change of the peritoneal membrane, the peritoneal equilibrium test (PET), i.e., a semiquantitative assessment of peritoneal membrane transport function, was performed on day 21. The PET in the present study was based on the previous report40 in which the solute transport rates are calculated by the rates of their equilibration between the dialysate and peritoneal capillary blood.
The results of our study demonstrated that the absorption rate of glucose from the dialysate (D/D0) and the transport rate of blood creatine from the serum (D/S) were significantly higher in CG-treated rats (i.e., PF-F344) than in the F344 rats treated with the saline alone (Fig. 7a, c). The peritoneal membrane in PF-F344 group possessed an increased permeability that caused a significantly rapid loss of the osmotic gradient between dialysate and capillary. This finding implicated that the CG exposure damaged not only the peritoneal delicate ultrastructure but also its functional integrity in PF-F344 animals, as well as remarkably increased DPP4 activities in serum and peritoneal fluids (Fig. 7e, g). On the other hand, the DPP4 deficiency acted as an important contributor for improving the peritoneal membrane function in CG-treated DPP4 deficient rats (Fig. 7a, c, e, g).
As the condition of DPP4 deficiency, sitagliptin or exendin-4 treatment significantly attenuated DPP4 activity, peritoneal injury, and functional impairment in PF-F344 animals (Fig. 7b, d, f, h).
We further analyzed the correlation between DPP4 activity and peritoneal function in wild-type rats (i.e., F344). The result revealed that DPP4 activity in serum was significantly positively correlated with the glucose absorption (D/D0) and the transport rate of creatine, indicating DPP4 activity in circulation was closely linked to the functional impairments of the peritoneal membrane (Fig. 7i). Finally, we found that the DPP4 activity in peritoneal fluid had more significant correlation with the peritoneal membrane dysfunction (Fig. 7j). Taken together, both sitagliptin and exendin-4 treatments could significantly attenuate peritoneal injury and dysfunction that were closely related to DPP4 activation.
Discussion
So far, the mechanism of peritoneal injury caused by long-term PD and the corresponding potential therapeutic modality are not yet clearly established. One of the essential findings in the present study was that we identified the DPP4 played a key role in peritoneal fibrosis and dysfunction through promoting EMT, inflammation, and angiogenesis. Furthermore, sitagliptin and exendin-4 treatments markedly inhibited DPP4 levels, resulting in ameliorating peritoneal fibrosis and functional impairment. In particular, finding from nationwide registered data showed DPP4 inhibitors significantly prevent PD failure in ESRD patients, highlighting the great therapeutic benefits of DPP4 inhibitors to PD patients.
The fundamental finding of PD solution-induced peritoneal injury and fibrosis is that the distinctively histopathological change of the mesothelial cells undergoes EMT process31,32. In EMT process, mesothelial cells undergo trans-differentiation and convert the epithelial to mesenchymal phenotype, which is characterized as loss of cellular adherent and junction, acquisition of fibroblastic morphology and ability, proliferation of α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA)-positive myofibroblasts, accumulation of collagen and increase of the thickness in submesothelial compact zone15,41. In addition, TGF-β delivers pro-EMT signals and further induces Smad2/3 activation, followed by stimulating snail to transcript mesenchymal molecules and promoting the formation of EMT42,43. An essential finding in the present study was that the high concentration of glucose triggered EMT process with fibrotic phenotype via activating p-SMAD3 which in turn further stimulated snail, followed by increasing the mesenchymal markers (i.e., collagen-I, fibronectin, α-SMA, vimentin) and decreasing the epithelial marker (i.e., ZO-1) in mesothelial cells. Moreover, DPP4 deficiency or DPP4 inhibitors repressed TGF-β levels (Fig. 3d–g). Interestingly, TGF-β also triggered an increase of DPP4 levels followed by regulating downstream signaling (Supplementary Fig. 6), suggesting that DPP4 and TGFβ exhibited the crosstalk regulation. In this way, our findings were consistent with the findings of previous studies15,41–43.
Another essential finding in the present study was that high concertation of glucose remarkably upregulated DPP4 level in mesothelial cells, resulting in initiating the propagation of the EMT process, inflammation, and generation of oxidative stress. Of important finding was that these molecular-cellular perturbations were markedly suppressed by incretin-based therapies (i.e., sitagliptin and extendin-4). Accordingly, our findings strengthened the findings of previous studies15,41–43.
Previous study has demonstrated that an increase in the number of blood vessels in the peritoneal tissues of PD patients was commonly observed and more pronounced in those of PD patients with peritoneal membrane ultrafiltration failure44. Consistent with the previous study44, our study demonstrated a progressive increase in submesothelial thickening (i.e., through EMT process), in number of blood vessels and in a unique vasculopathy after CG-treated F344 PF.
On the other hand, DPP4 possesses soluble and membrane-bound DPP4 form, which share the main domains including the catalytic site and protease to degrade a broad range of substrates with many biological actions. Except to DPP4 enzymatic pathway, membrane-bound DPP4 possesses the cytoplasmic, transmembrane and flexible domains, that can interact with extracellular matrix components and further regulate intracellular signal transduction. In normoglycemic conditions, Panchapakesan and Pollock (2014) reveal the membrane-bound DPP4 rarely or does not interact with the cation-independent mannose 6-phosphate receptor (CIM6PR), but this interaction increases in hyperglycemic conditions causing to the activation of TGF-β pathway and renal fibrosis45. Moreover, Zeisberg and Zeisberg demonstrate the interaction between DPP4 and integrin β1 would initially elicit the endothelial cells into endothelial–mesenchymal transition and finally into fibrosis through activating Smad-3 pathway in kidney injury46. This nonenzymatic regulation of DPP4 influences the cellular signal transduction, which could be explained how to influence TGF-β/Smad-3 pathway in this study47. Since DPP4 exhibits several pleiotropic effects not only by enzymatic but also by nonenzymatic pathways, DPP4 has been found to play an essential role in a variety of disease entities and states, such as inflammation, cancer, diabetes, hepatic, and renal fibrosis48–50. In type 2 diabetes, plasma DPP4 activity is increased for glycemic deregulation51. In addition, DPP4 activities in serum level and peritoneal fluids were revealed to be remarkably increased in CG-treated F344 PF. In this way, our finding corroborated with the finding of previous study51.
A principal finding in the present study was that in CG-treated DPP4 deficiency rats, the DPP4 activity was extremely diminished, and that in turn substantially attenuated EMT, angiogenesis, inflammatory reaction, and generation of oxidative stress, resulting in protecting the peritoneal structure and function. Another principal finding in the present study was that a strong correlation between DPP4 activities in serum or in peritoneal fluids and functional impairment of peritoneal membrane, implying DPP4 activity would be a unique biomarker for predicting the PD outcome. The crucial finding in the present study was that the incretin-based therapies (i.e., sitagliptin and extendin-4) offered an identical effect as DPP4 deficiency in CG-treated F344 animals on ameliorating the inflammation, angiogenesis, EMT process, and generation of oxidative stress, and protecting the peritoneum against CG-treated injury. The most important finding in the present study was that our nationwide registered data of diabetic ESRD patients showed the incidence of PD failure was significantly lower in with than without receiving DPP4 inhibitors. Since DPP4 inhibitors have been recommended in treating hyperglycemia in diabetes patients on PD for several favorable characteristics52, it is important to clarify whether DPP4 was involved in peritoneal fibrosis. Among all collected types of antidiabetic drugs, diabetic ESRD patients with DPP4 inhibitors treatment had the lowest incidence of PD failure, highlighting that the utilization of DPP4 inhibitors should be strongly considered as a priority of our daily clinical practice for protecting the PD and extending its lifespan. We believe our study provided solid data to establish the role of DPP4 in the pathogenesis of peritoneal fibrosis and explain the beneficial effects of DPP4 inhibitors fundamentally.
GLP-1 is an incretin and possesses hypoglycemic ability in a glucose-dependent manner by enhancing insulin53. In circulation, endogenous GLP-1 is rapidly cleaved by soluble DPP4, which is suggesting that the regulation between DPP4 and GLP-1 may involve in the important physiological or pathological roles21. Based on this concept, two kinds of incretin-based therapies, including DPP4 inhibitors and GLP-1 agonist, have been developed for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. In this study, we found the increase of DPP4 accompanied with the decrease of active GLP-1, but the decrease of active GLP-1 levels did not reach statistical significance during CG-inducing fibrosis in rats (Supplementary Fig. 7a-b). In addition, peritoneal impairments were significantly associated with DPP4 activities (Fig. 7) but not with active GLP-1 levels (Supplementary Fig. 7c), suggesting DPP4 plays a critical role than GLP-1 in the status of peritoneal injury.
In conclusion, our results of cell level and animal model studies, and clinical observational findings showed that DPP4 enzyme played a key contributor to the peritoneal fibrosis and functional impairment, whereas DPP4 inhibitors safeguarded PD from dysfunction and failure.
Methods
Study population and primary outcome of PD transition to HD
The clinical part in the present study was analyzed from Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database, which contained complete healthcare information of 23.74 million Taiwanese collected by Taiwan National Health Insurance program and has been considered as a reliable database for population analysis54.
We conducted the retrospective population-based cohort study (1997–2013). A total of 174,686 ESRD patients with type 2 diabetes and age between 18 and 80 years were identified from one million general populations after excluding those who have history of malignancy and liver cirrhosis, age of younger than 18 years, and follow-up period <1 year. The ESRD patients were further divided into three groups, including 19,828 patients with PD, 171,266 with HD, and 6787 with RT. We further defined the study and comparison groups according to user and nonuser of DPP4 inhibitors. Comparison group was selected in a 1 to 10 ratio by matching study group with age, gender, socioeconomic status, and relevant medications. The users of DPP4 inhibitor were defined as diabetic patients with DPP4 inhibitor prescribed for sugar control for more than three months (n = 16,048). On the contrary, those diabetic subjects with oral antidiabetic agents other than DPP4 inhibitor or use of DPP4 inhibitor for less than 3 months were defined as the nonusers of DPP4 inhibitor (n = 158,638).
We compared the incidence of PD transition to HD between users and nonusers of DPP4 inhibitors. Those ESRD patients who changed dialysis modality from PD to HD for any reason, e.g., PD catheter infection or fibrosis and peritonitis, were identified as PD failure with a need for PD transition to HD. The diagnoses were verified with ICD-9-CM codes and procedure charge/codes. The study design was approved by the Ethics Institutional Review Board of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (No. 201702246B1)
The distribution of antidiabetic drugs administered for patients with ESRD on different renal replacement therapies
In order to further study the rate of PD transition to HD among different type of antidiabetic drugs, detailed information of prescription was retrieved based on Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification system (WHO ATC codes). Information regarding glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists was not listed because of long-term follow-up data is unavailable in Taiwan, i.e., these agents only appeared on the Taiwan market after 2013. Distribution of antidiabetic drugs prescribed for the diabetic patients with ESRD on PD was investigated initially, and then the rate of PD transition to HD in subgroups of different antidiabetic drugs was followed up till the end of 2013.
Mesothelial cell culture
Mesothelial cells, Met-5A cells (65302), were purchased from Bioresource Collection and Research Center (BCRC) in Taiwan. The BCRC cell bank is a nonprofit organization supported by the Taiwan government and has a strict quality control system, including sterility, mycoplasma contamination tests, and STR profiling analysis for each banked cell line. Met-5A cells were maintained in the M199 culture medium supplemented with penicillin (100 U/ml), streptomycin (100 μg/ml), and 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) in 37 °C incubator at a humidified atmosphere of 95% air and 5% CO2. To determine the impact of high-glucose concentration (G8270, Sigma) on the molecular-cellular signaling, Met-5A cells were incubated with serum-free medium for 24 h for arrest and synchronization of the cell growth. After this time period, Met-5A cells were treated with serum-free medium containing various concentrations of glucose for 120 h. To evaluate therapeutic benefit, Met-5A cells were treated with or without sitagliptin (PHR1857, Sigma) or exendin-4 (Byetta, AstraZeneca) under glucose induction. In addition, TGF-β1 treatment was utilized as a positive control of EMT, 2 ng/ml TGF-β1 recombinant protein (240-B, R&D Systems) for 120 h, and cell morphology observed by microcopy at 200×.
Western blotting
These experimental protocols were based on our previous study55. The 50 μg protein extracts were loaded and separated by SDS-PAGE. The SDS-PAGE gel was next transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (GE, UK), followed by blocking overnight. The membranes were incubated with optimal primary antibodies and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies. Immunoreactive bands were identified by enhanced chemiluminescence (WBKLS0500, Millipore) and exposed to Biomax L film (Kodak) or detected by UVP BioSpectrum Imaging System (BioSpectrum 810). The semiquantitative signals were finally analyzed by Labwork software (UVP, Waltham) or ImageJ. All the antibody information and conditions were listed in Supplementary Table 1.
Animal model and animal grouping
This animal procedure was approved by the Institute of Animal Care and Use Committee at Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (Affidavit of Approval of Animal Use Protocol No. 2017111301) and performed according to the guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals. The pathogen-free, adult male, 8–10 weeks of age, wild-type Fischer 344 (F344) rats, and DPP4 deficient rats (DPP4D, i.e., F344/DuCrlCrlj strain rats with a missense mutation (Gly633Arg) in DPP4 gene leading to DPP4 deficiency and lack DPP4 activity) were provided from Charles River Technology (BioLASCO Taiwan Co., Ltd) and utilized as study animals.
These animals were housed with 23–24 °C controlled temperature and 12/12 h light/dark cycles in animal center of our hospital, which was an animal facility approved by Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care International (AAALAC; Frederick, MD, USA).
The PF was established by daily intraperitoneal injection of 0.1% chlorhexidine gluconate (CG) in saline at a dose of 10 ml/kg body weight into the peritoneal cavity for 21 consecutive days. This experimental model of PF was based on the previous study56 with some modification. Sham-control group of animals were injected with an equal amount of 0.9% saline. On day 2 after CG-induced PF, 600 mg/kg sitagliptin (i.e., a DPP4 inhibitor, Januvia®, MSD) was orally administrated into each wild-type F344 rat daily for 20 days. On the other hand, the 10 μg/kg exedin-4 (GLP-1 receptor agonist, Byetta, AstraZeneca) was intra-peritoneally injected for rat daily for 20 days after CG injection for 1 day. At day 21 after CG-induced PF, all rats were euthanatized by CO2 inhalation, and the parietal peritoneum were harvested away from the injection points for further analysis.
Animals were categorized into six groups (n = 6 each group): (1) sham control F344 (SC-F344); (2) SC of DPP4 deficiency rats (SC-DPP4D); (3) PF-induced F344 rats (PF-F344); (4) PF-induced DPP4 deficiency rats (PF-DPP4D); (5) PF-induced F344 rats with daily 600 mg/kg sitagliptin (PF-F344 + Sita) for 20 days; and (6) PF-induced F344 rats with intraperitoneal injection of 10 μg/kg exedin-4 (PF-F344 + Exe4)/day for 20 consecutive days.
Histological study of fibrosis area and immunofluorescent staining
These experimental protocols were based on our previous report57. Rehydrated paraffin sections were treated with 3% H2O2 for 30 min and then incubated with blocking by 5% BSA in PBS for 30 min at room temperature, followed by incubation with primary and secondary antibodies. Masson’s trichrome staining (TRM-2, ScyTek) was used to study fibrosis in peritoneal membrane specimens. The 4-μm-thick serial sections of specimens were performed by Cryostat (Leica CM3050S). The integrated area (μm2) of peritoneal fibrosis in each section was analyzed by Image Tool 3 software (University of Texas). In each section, three randomly selected HPFs (100×) were detected and averaged for each animal to determine the fibrotic length or area (cellSens Standard, Olympus). All the antibody information and conditions were listed in supplementary Table 1.
Assessment of DPP4 enzyme activity
DPP4 activity (MAK088, Sigma) in circulation and in peritoneal fluids was assessed and calculated by using standard methods according to manufacturers’ instructions.
Peritoneal equilibrium test
A peritoneal equilibrium test was conducted based on previous study and performed on day 2158. Prior to animals to be euthanized, the rats in each group were instilled with PD solution (DIANEAL PD-2 Peritoneal Dialysis Solution 4.25% Dextrose, 5B9896, Baxter) at 100 ml/kg body weight. At the end of time point, we collected the dialysate samples through midline incision via insertion of a dialysis catheter. The peritoneal permeability of glucose D/D0 [the ratio of time after initiation (D) to 0-h (D0) glucose concentration of the dialysate] was calculated and determined as the peritoneal absorption of glucose from the dialysate. The creatinine ratio was calculated as dialysate (D)-to-serum (S) ratio (D/S urea) of blood urea nitrogen.
Statistical analysis and reproducibility
Quantitative data were expressed as mean ± SD. To analyze the differences of mean among groups, ANOVA analysis was adequately performed, followed by Turkey’s multiple comparison test. In addition, student t-test was assessed between two groups. Transition rate of PD to HD was evaluated with Chi-Square test. Correlation estimate was analyzed by Pearson correlation coefficients. PASW Statistics 18 SPSS18 (IBM) software and GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software v.8.0) were utilized. A probability value <0.05 with two-tailed statistical test was considered as statistically significant. Sample sizes and number of replicates were described in figure legends.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. Chi-Hsiang Chu for the assistance of statistical analysis and Dr. Wan-Ting Huang for the assistance of histopathology analysis. We also thank the Health Information and Epidemiology Laboratory of the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (Chia-Yi Branch) for the assistance in data analysis. This study was supported by research funding from Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University (Grant number: CMRPG8H1231).
Author contributions
C.C.Y. and Y.C.L. initiated the project, designed the study, and performed experiments. H.K.Y. organized this project process. P.H.S. and Y.H.Y. collected the nationwide data, interpreted, and analyzed clinical observation. H.K.Y., Y.C.L., and J.Y.C. analyzed data, wrote, and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Data availability
All relevant data underlying the graphs and charts were presented in Supplementary Data 1. The uncropped blots were shown in figures are provided in Supplementary Fig. 8.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors jointly supervised this work: Hon-Kan Yip, Chih‐Chao Yang.
Contributor Information
Hon-Kan Yip, Email: han.gung@msa.hinet.net.
Chih‐Chao Yang, Email: papaofison@gmail.com.
Supplementary information
Supplementary information is available for this paper at 10.1038/s42003-021-01652-x.
References
- 1.Saran R, et al. US Renal Data System 2017 annual data report: epidemiology of kidney disease in the United States. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2018;71:A7. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.01.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Tonelli M, et al. Chronic kidney disease and mortality risk: a systematic review. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2006;17:2034–2047. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2005101085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kaballo MA, et al. A comparative analysis of survival of patients on dialysis and after kidney transplantation. Clin. Kidney J. 2018;11:389–393. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfx117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Jain AK, Blake P, Cordy P, Garg AX. Global trends in rates of peritoneal dialysis. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2012;23:533–544. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2011060607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Li PK, et al. Changes in the worldwide epidemiology of peritoneal dialysis. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2017;13:90–103. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2016.181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lukowsky LR, et al. Comparing mortality of peritoneal and hemodialysis patients in the first 2 years of dialysis therapy: a marginal structural model analysis. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2013;8:619–628. doi: 10.2215/CJN.04810512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Teitelbaum I. Ultrafiltration failure in peritoneal dialysis: a pathophysiologic approach. Blood Purif. 2015;39:70–73. doi: 10.1159/000368972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Chiarelli G, et al. Vascular access planning in peritoneal dialysis patients. Perit. Dial. Int. 2008;28:585–590. doi: 10.1177/089686080802800606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Yung S, Chan TM. Pathophysiological changes to the peritoneal membrane during PD-related peritonitis: the role of mesothelial cells. Mediators Inflamm. 2012;2012:484167. doi: 10.1155/2012/484167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Di Paolo N, Sacchi G. Atlas of peritoneal histology. Perit. Dial. Int. 2000;20:S5–96. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Mutsaers SE. The mesothelial cell. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2004;36:9–16. doi: 10.1016/S1357-2725(03)00242-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Morgan LW, et al. Glucose degradation products (GDP) retard remesothelialization independently of D-glucose concentration. Kidney Int. 2003;64:1854–1866. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00265.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bai, Z. G. et al. Bicarbonate versus lactate solutions for acute peritoneal dialysis. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. CD007034 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 14.Margetts PJ, Churchill DN. Acquired ultrafiltration dysfunction in peritoneal dialysis patients. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2002;13:2787–2794. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V13112787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Williams JD, et al. Morphologic changes in the peritoneal membrane of patients with renal disease. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2002;13:470–479. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V132470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Khanna, R., Krediet, R. T., Devuyst, O., van Westrhenen, R. & Topley, N. in Nolph and Gokal’s Textbook of Peritoneal Dialysis, 3rd edn (eds Khanna, R. & Krediet, R. T.) 757–780 (Springer, New York, 2009).
- 17.Hopsu-Havu VK, Glenner GG. A new dipeptide naphthylamidase hydrolyzing glycyl-prolyl-β-naphthylamide. Histochemistry Cell Biol. 1966;7:197–201. doi: 10.1007/BF00577838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Mentlein R. Dipeptidyl-peptidase IV (CD26)-role in the inactivation of regulatory peptides. Regulatory Pept. 1999;85:9–24. doi: 10.1016/S0167-0115(99)00089-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Yu DM, et al. The dipeptidyl peptidase IV family in cancer and cell biology. FEBS J. 2010;277:1126–1144. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.07526.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kajiyama H, et al. Possible involvement of SDF-1alpha/CXCR4-DPPIV axis in TGF-beta1-induced enhancement of migratory potential in human peritoneal mesothelial cells. Cell Tissue Res. 2007;330:221–229. doi: 10.1007/s00441-007-0455-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Drucker DJ, Nauck MA. The incretin system: glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes. Lancet. 2006;368:1696–1705. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69705-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Tran KL, et al. Overview of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists for the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes. Am. Health Drug Benefits. 2017;10:178–188. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ishii H, Hayashino Y, Akai Y, Yabuta M, Tsujii S. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors as preferable oral hypoglycemic agents in terms of treatment satisfaction: Results from a multicenter, 12-week, open label, randomized controlled study in Japan (PREFERENCE 4 study) J. Diabetes Investig. 2018;9:137–145. doi: 10.1111/jdi.12659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Shinjo T, et al. DPP-IV inhibitor anagliptin exerts anti-inflammatory effects on macrophages, adipocytes, and mouse livers by suppressing NF-kappaB activation. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2015;309:E214–E223. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00553.2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Chen YT, et al. DPP-4 enzyme deficiency protects kidney from acute ischemia-reperfusion injury: role for remote intermittent bowel ischemia-reperfusion preconditioning. Oncotarget. 2017;8:54821–54837. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.18962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Forst T, Michelson G, Diessel S, Jahnke J, Kapitza C. Microvascular effects of the inhibition of dipeptidylpeptidase IV by linagliptin in nondiabetic hypertensive patients. J. Hypertens. 2016;34:345–350. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Marques C, et al. Sitagliptin prevents inflammation and apoptotic cell death in the kidney of type 2 diabetic animals. Mediators Inflamm. 2014;2014:538737. doi: 10.1155/2014/538737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Shi S, et al. Interactions of DPP-4 and integrin beta1 influences endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Kidney Int. 2015;88:479–489. doi: 10.1038/ki.2015.103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Takagaki Y, Koya D, Kanasaki K. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibition and renoprotection: the role of antifibrotic effects. Curr. Opin. Nephrol. Hypertens. 2017;26:56–66. doi: 10.1097/MNH.0000000000000291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Nagai T, et al. Linagliptin ameliorates methylglyoxal-induced peritoneal fibrosis in mice. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0160993. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Margetts PJ, Bonniaud P. Basic mechanisms and clinical implications of peritoneal fibrosis. Perit. Dial. Int. 2003;23:530–541. doi: 10.1177/089686080302300604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Aguilera A, Yanez-Mo M, Selgas R, Sanchez-Madrid F, Lopez-Cabrera M. Epithelial to mesenchymal transition as a triggering factor of peritoneal membrane fibrosis and angiogenesis in peritoneal dialysis patients. Curr. Opin. Investig. Drugs. 2005;6:262–268. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lee YS, Jun HS. Anti-inflammatory effects of GLP-1-based therapies beyond glucose control. Mediators Inflamm. 2016;2016:3094642. doi: 10.1155/2016/3094642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Duan WJ, Yu X, Huang XR, Yu JW, Lan HY. Opposing roles for Smad2 and Smad3 in peritoneal fibrosis in vivo and in vitro. Am. J. Pathol. 2014;184:2275–2284. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2014.04.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Margetts PJ, Oh KH, Kolb M. Transforming growth factor-beta: importance in long-term peritoneal membrane changes. Perit. Dial. Int. 2005;25:S15–S17. doi: 10.1177/089686080502503S04. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Shi J, Yu M, Sheng M. Angiogenesis and inflammation in peritoneal dialysis: the role of adipocytes. Kidney Blood Press Res. 2017;42:209–219. doi: 10.1159/000476017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Zhou Q, Bajo MA, Del Peso G, Yu X, Selgas R. Preventing peritoneal membrane fibrosis in peritoneal dialysis patients. Kidney Int. 2016;90:515–524. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2016.03.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Liu, T., Zhang, L., Joo, D. & Sun, S. C. NF-kappaB signaling in inflammation. Signal. Transduct. Target. Ther.2, 17023 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 39.Sung PH, et al. Melatonin attenuated brain death tissue extract-induced cardiac damage by suppressing DAMP signaling. Oncotarget. 2018;9:3531–3548. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.23180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Khanna R. Peritoneal inflammation and high transport status. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2006;1:167–169. doi: 10.2215/CJN.00130106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Padwal M, Margetts PJ. Experimental systems to study the origin of the myofibroblast in peritoneal fibrosis. Kidney Res. Clin. Pr. 2016;35:133–141. doi: 10.1016/j.krcp.2016.07.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Strippoli R, et al. Molecular mechanisms underlying peritoneal EMT and fibrosis. Stem Cells Int. 2016;2016:3543678. doi: 10.1155/2016/3543678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Liu Y, et al. Transition of mesothelial cell to fibroblast in peritoneal dialysis: EMT, stem cell or bystander? Perit. Dial. Int. 2015;35:14–25. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2014.00188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Stachowska-Pietka J, Poleszczuk J, Flessner MF, Lindholm B, Waniewski J. Alterations of peritoneal transport characteristics in dialysis patients with ultrafiltration failure: tissue and capillary components. Nephrol. Dial. Transpl. 2019;34:864–870. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfy313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Panchapakesan U, Pollock CA. DPP-4 inhibitors-renoprotection in diabetic nephropathy? Diabetes. 2014;63:1829–1830. doi: 10.2337/db14-0366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Zeisberg M, Zeisberg EM. Evidence for antifibrotic incretin-independent effects of the DPP-4 inhibitor linagliptin. Kidney Int. 2015;88:429–431. doi: 10.1038/ki.2015.175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Gupta S, Sen U. More than just an enzyme: dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) and its association with diabetic kidney remodelling. Pharm. Res. 2019;147:104391. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2019.104391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Rohrborn D, Wronkowitz N, Eckel J. DPP4 in diabetes. Front. Immunol. 2015;6:386. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Wang XM, et al. The pro-fibrotic role of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 in carbon tetrachloride-induced experimental liver injury. Immunol. Cell Biol. 2017;95:443–453. doi: 10.1038/icb.2016.116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Kanasaki K. The role of renal dipeptidyl peptidase-4 in kidney disease: renal effects of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors with a focus on linagliptin. Clin. Sci. 2018;132:489–507. doi: 10.1042/CS20180031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Sarkar J, Nargis T, Tantia O, Ghosh S, Chakrabarti P. Increased plasma dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) activity is an obesity-independent parameter for glycemic deregulation in type 2 diabetes patients. Front. Endocrinol. 2019;10:505. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.American Diabetes, A. 9. Pharmacologic approaches to glycemic treatment: standards of medical care in diabetes-2020. Diabetes Care. 2020;43:S98–S110. doi: 10.2337/dc20-S009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Drucker DJ. The biology of incretin hormones. Cell Metab. 2006;3:153–165. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2006.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Sung PH, et al. Cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events are associated with nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2018;476:865–874. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Chen KH, et al. Human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived mesenchymal stem cell therapy effectively reduced brain infarct volume and preserved neurological function in rat after acute intracranial hemorrhage. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2019;11:6232–6248. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Wang L, et al. Inhibition of EGF receptor blocks the development and progression of peritoneal fibrosis. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2016;27:2631–2644. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2015030299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Yang CC, et al. The therapeutic impact of entresto on protecting against cardiorenal syndrome-associated renal damage in rats on high protein diet. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2019;116:108954. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2019.108954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Ueno T, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells ameliorate experimental peritoneal fibrosis by suppressing inflammation and inhibiting TGF-beta1 signaling. Kidney Int. 2013;84:297–307. doi: 10.1038/ki.2013.81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data underlying the graphs and charts were presented in Supplementary Data 1. The uncropped blots were shown in figures are provided in Supplementary Fig. 8.